Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Really, Mike, you get two weeks at the undisclosed location,
sitting on your butt drinking diet coke by a fire
for two weeks, and we were lucky enough to get
two days.
Speaker 2 (00:15):
I don't want to hear any complaints about.
Speaker 1 (00:19):
iHeart, because you got two weeks where we had to
listen to that drivel.
Speaker 3 (00:30):
Dragon. He seems a little upset, Okay, I know, does
he think? First of all, many of you, even on
the text line, I noticed many of you are telling
Dragon and me, welcome back from vacation.
Speaker 4 (00:51):
We were here last week. We were here last week,
just for a couple of days, but we were.
Speaker 3 (00:55):
We were here, We were I've been on theres Thursday,
Friday and side and now again.
Speaker 2 (01:01):
Today, and nobody cares about Saturday since I'm not there.
Speaker 3 (01:05):
And by the way, it wasn't two weeks.
Speaker 2 (01:08):
We used the week and a half.
Speaker 3 (01:10):
Yeah. Week and a half. Yeah, week and a half. Yeah.
But you know what, you know what I read into
that talk back he really loves us and he really
misses us.
Speaker 2 (01:20):
I figured he just wasn't paying attention to begin with.
Speaker 3 (01:24):
Which is pretty powerful the course for our listeners.
Speaker 2 (01:26):
Yep, huh and producer right.
Speaker 3 (01:34):
So it's can I tell him about Can I tell
him about your photographs? Sure?
Speaker 4 (01:39):
Yeah, just for funsies. I've been trying to punch in
those numbers from what I did yesterday.
Speaker 2 (01:44):
Yeah, I'm not even halfway through the day, and it's ridiculous.
Speaker 3 (01:50):
So Dragon's doing this new Well, you you tell him
what you're doing, because I don't fully I understand. I
guess in a nutshell, you're counting calories now, right.
Speaker 4 (01:59):
For the longest time, I'm four and a half years plus,
I have been very exercise focused and I've been seeing
fantastic results and I've loved it so far.
Speaker 2 (02:09):
But I wanted to.
Speaker 4 (02:09):
Go a step further, and I finally focused more so
on my nutrition. So I've been counting every single calorie,
counting every single gram of fat, every gram of carb,
all the proteins, all that kind of good stuff. And
I've been tracking it and posting it online because that's
how I keep myself accountable with my workout. So I
forgot I could do it with my nutrition as well.
So I spent the last twelve weeks following a beach
(02:33):
body program known as body Beast, which is a weightlifting
program which I do enjoy I enjoy weightlifting so much
more than cardio or yoga. So I've been following that
program and Sunday yesterday was my last day on that program,
so I figured I would just take a cheat day
and just eat nutrition wise, whatever the hell I wanted.
Speaker 3 (02:56):
You're about to hear a perfect description.
Speaker 5 (02:59):
Of this is why I was a fat ass for
as long as I was, Andach you had even made
mention on Friday when we were talking about that. I
still consider myself a fat ass, and yes, I have
been and I probably continue to will be because I
have been a fat ass longer than I have been
a skinny guy.
Speaker 4 (03:19):
I am a skinny guy now and I am am
skinnier than I have been in a long since, well
my entire adult life. Uh So I did take some
before and after photos. They are not safe for work,
but everything is covered. I don't feel comfortable posting those online,
and missus radbards Is flat out told me no, I can't.
Speaker 3 (03:39):
And I would tell you the same thing. It's not appropriate.
Speaker 4 (03:41):
So, uh, chances of anybody out there really seeing those
is slim to none. But like I said, yes, so
I showed Michael those this morning. I did preface that
the tay, you know, we're friends. You don't have to
see this.
Speaker 2 (03:53):
This is kind.
Speaker 3 (03:55):
Of choked on. Were friends, but anyway.
Speaker 4 (03:59):
So I showed him the photos. He was very impressed.
The rundown of the numbers are.
Speaker 3 (04:05):
Yeah.
Speaker 4 (04:05):
I lost fifteen pounds in the twelve week program doing
weightlifting and monitoring my nutrition. I lost several inches off
the belly and waste gained a quarter half an inch
on my biceps, which is great, fantastic.
Speaker 2 (04:18):
A love that kind of stuff.
Speaker 4 (04:19):
But yeah, yesterday I went hogwild with any food that
I wanted. I went out and got Dunkin Donuts, got
two of the sour cream donuts, and also on my
way home, I stopped at Good Times, got a couple
of breakfast bacon breakfast readers from there, did slam down
a couple of tubes of Eminem's minis, several glasses of eggnog.
(04:42):
Even ordered a pizza for the Broncos game that showed up.
Speaker 3 (04:46):
Well, a pizza, However, it was not a pizza. It
was pizza dough with crap on top of it.
Speaker 2 (04:52):
Said, you know, chicken bacon pizza. Fine, it was delicious.
Speaker 3 (04:56):
Chicken bacon alfredo pizza.
Speaker 4 (04:57):
Yeah, delicious missus Redbeard eight.
Speaker 2 (05:01):
The other half.
Speaker 4 (05:01):
It was delicious, It was enjoyable, except the fact that
it showed up at half hour late and lukewarm. Let's
see what else, several crumble cookies.
Speaker 2 (05:14):
I didn't get to the ice cream though.
Speaker 4 (05:15):
I was gonna try and have ice cream later in
the evening after the Broncos game, but I was just
far too full and just yeah, just for funzies, I
was putting all that information in that calculator app that
I've been using for the calories.
Speaker 2 (05:29):
I'm not even to.
Speaker 4 (05:30):
The pizza yet, and I'm well over five thousand calories
and well over two hundred and fifty grams of fat.
Then my normal goal is under twenty five hundred calories
and under eighty grams of fat.
Speaker 2 (05:42):
So so yeah, yesterday was.
Speaker 3 (05:45):
I mean, I just can't believe you just don't feel
like feces right now?
Speaker 6 (05:48):
Me too.
Speaker 2 (05:49):
I am sure a couple of TwixT bars too. I
put in some oh my god, oh lord.
Speaker 3 (05:54):
So let me say this about the photos. So he's
described me, you know, he I can tell he really
does want me to see the photos, and honestly, I
really do want to see the photos.
Speaker 4 (06:06):
I am proud of day one to where I am now,
but I'm also very proud of as to what I
did for these past twelve years with program, because, like
I said, I've never really fully taken this much intricacies
details of the focus on the nutrition, right.
Speaker 3 (06:24):
And so I I was listening to him rationalized what
I'm about to see, while I'm just like, oh, just
shut up and get me the camera and the phone.
Just let me see the pictures. And so he hands
them to me, and I'm actually shocked. I'm shocked because well,
I'm seeing Dragon pretty much naked.
Speaker 2 (06:44):
Everything's covered that should be covered.
Speaker 3 (06:47):
But still is more than you. It's more than guys
just want to.
Speaker 2 (06:49):
Really see true of another guy.
Speaker 3 (06:51):
Yeah, right, But I'm amazed by it because here's how
I would describe it for those of you to paint
the picture. You know, you have the different body shapes.
You got the pear shaped and you got the round shaped,
you got all of that. Dragon has gone from what
I would consider it to be what looks like just
(07:14):
a kind of an over kind of an overweight person,
not even fat, just a little overweight, thick, yeah, to slim,
I mean truly slim, like the outline is concave instead
of convex. It's really fascinating and I I just wanted
to take some time on air because I know you
(07:36):
guys kind of are fascinated by this, this journey that
he's been on. And I saw the photos today and
I was shocked. I was actually shocked. It's congratulations, Buck, Joe.
Thank you. Yeah, very very very well done.
Speaker 4 (07:51):
New Day one starts today. So back on nutrition, and
I've got my chicken and rice in the fridge, and
as much as I want to eat it today, i'm.
Speaker 2 (08:03):
Still full from yesterday. I'm not sure I can.
Speaker 3 (08:07):
Yes, And I decided, without getting too graphic, at some point,
all of that's going to want to go elsewhere.
Speaker 4 (08:11):
It will escape, will escape, it come back the way
it came or out the way it's supposed to do.
Speaker 2 (08:16):
It will make a violence.
Speaker 3 (08:17):
It will make a violent exit somewhere. So anyways, we've
been talking about. Today is January six, so it's been
nearly what well, it has been now been four years
since the pipe bombs. We haven't talked about the pipe bombs,
remember those They were discovered near the Republican and the
(08:38):
Democrat National Committee headquarters on January sixth, twenty twenty one.
They were planted on the eve of the riots, and
the bombs were strategically positioned to maximize disruption and to
create fear. If those bombs had it, let's set aside
(09:03):
January sixth, and let's just say that these two bombs
had gone off at those locations on just any ordinary day,
because of their strategic positioning and the size of the bombs,
everything about them, we would be talking about terrorism, literally
(09:25):
talking about terrorism. But their discovery just mere hours before
the certification of the electoral votes, think about what that did.
It diverted law enforcement resources obviously, I mean, hey, we
got pipe bombs. Guys gus in the bomb squad, Well,
(09:46):
we're busy right now. We have a riot going on
with the US Capital. Well we're sorry, we've got bombs.
And it heightened the chaos that was already going on
that day. Now you think about just radio chatter. So
the Capitol police is talking about, hey, we got a
mob that's now kind of getting out of control. Now,
(10:10):
whether the I'm not making a judgment here, I'm just
making a statement to paint a picture. Imagine the Capitol police,
unbeknownst to them about any sort of agents provocateur on
the radio chatting, you know, about going back to their
you know, command post, back to their command structure, about
(10:33):
we need additional resources. At the same time that US
Capitol Police that are in charge of the area where
the DNC and the r n C buildings are located
are also talking about, Hey, we've got bomb We've we've
located bombs, and we need the bomb squad and we
need extra people here. So it's utter chaos. Yet here
(10:59):
we are. The investigation into those two bombs has produced
what tell me, what you've heard about the bombs?
Speaker 2 (11:12):
Nothing?
Speaker 3 (11:13):
No suspects, nothing, no arrests, nothing, no answers, nothing, not
a thing.
Speaker 4 (11:20):
I'm starting to a question whether or not the fact
that they're even real if we have no information about
it whatsoever. On one of the probably most filmed areas
of the country, I'm sure there's cameras every block.
Speaker 2 (11:33):
I don't work there, I don't know that.
Speaker 4 (11:35):
I haven't ever been there, but I would like to
think that that would be the most protected place in
the country, if not the world.
Speaker 3 (11:43):
Well, generally speaking, that area is I would say that
there are degrees of protectiveness that are greater than other
areas within that circle. So for example, the capital is
going to be a little more protected than say the
DNC and the RNC, but nonetheless they're in that cone
of protections. To speak, the National Capital Region is called
(12:07):
the NCR, so within the National Capital Region of the
DNC and the RNC. But to Dragon's point, I would say,
it doesn't make any difference whether they were real or not,
because that whether they were ever intended to actually explode
or not, is not the point that I want to
make here, And the point is the chaos. So you
(12:28):
have bombs, let me use air quotes here, So you
have bombs that are planted strategically located at the DNC
and the RNC to create what additional chaos? Not chaos,
additional chaos? Got it? Yet? No suspects, no arrests, no answers. Now,
(12:57):
you cannot dismiss that investigating paralysis as just simply bureaucratic
inefficiency or you know, we just don't have the technology.
What a bunch of bull crap. Instead, it appears increasingly
appears that the FBI concluded early on that somehow the
(13:18):
perpetrator was one of their own, either a federal asset
or an informant, a confidential informant, ave CI, whatever it
might have been. But it was a federal asset, one
of their own.
Speaker 4 (13:31):
It's Monday morning, I'm barely paying attention to begin with,
and I've got this sugar hangover or would you would
you mind saying that again? Are you saying that the
person or persons that have placed those bombs were.
Speaker 3 (13:48):
FBI hang on hang type? Because I believe it appears
that the FBI has concluded that it was as one
of their own, either some sort of federal asset whatever
that might be a contractor an employee or an informant
(14:11):
or someone that was I mean when I say contractor
I'm kind of laughing to myself because I'm thinking, like
who issued the contract and what were the terms of
the contract. But it was it was some form of
federal asset. Now, what's the evidence to support that? Well,
I think one can. You can deduce from the fact
(14:31):
that the FBI was reluctant to act decisively on actually
identified devices and there was GEO fence data aligning with
the suspect's movements because remember we now have video, We
actually have video of the suspect. Actually needn say suspect
(14:51):
of the individual planting the bombs at both locations. Sheel
Atkinson has done some incredible rep reporting about the videos
and the placement of those bombs. I may get to
some of reporting in a minute. So there's evidence. So
the evidence that supports my theory that we know they
(15:15):
were federal assets or informants includes their reluctance to act decisively,
because when does the FBI not act decisively if they
have video reports or chatter on their communication lines that
(15:39):
we have bombs. That's I mean, you think about how
local law enforcement reacts to reports of a suspicious package.
Oh my gosh, they get so excited, they're peeing their pants.
They get to bring out all the toys, all the equipment,
they get to put on you maybe even bring out
(15:59):
the bombs squad. Everybody shows up and you cording off everything.
You create a safe zone. They shut down highways, they
shut down neighborhoods, they you know, they they they what
do you call it? They shut down, They shut down
the schools, They do all sorts of things. Here somebody
(16:20):
called it a bomb. Yeah, you know, you know. There
was also geofence data aligning with the person identified Shince
identified the person seen in the video their movements. And
then you have the refusal, the FBI's refusal to release
(16:42):
their complete investigative records despite repeated Congressional inquiries to avoid
embarrassment and protect the political narrative of January sixth, that
of some sort so called existential threat from Trump support,
which is total bs. What the FBI do? It quietly
(17:05):
curtailed its investigation, They stonewalled Congress, They did a selective
release of information, and then glaring investigative o missions. All
of that added together points to a calculated effort to
obstruct the truth, to not let you know. Now, from
(17:27):
the very outset, the FBI demonstrated an inexplicable reluctance to
act decisively. Security camera footage showed the suspects handling a
phone while planting the bombs. A geofence warrant yielded data
on hundreds of devices in the area. Yet the FBI
(17:47):
alleged that some of the cell data was oh conveniently corrupted,
a claim that's denied by the cell carriers themselves.
Speaker 7 (17:59):
What about those tradictions, hey, dragon, Occasionally you have to
take a break from your diet, from your dietary routine
and splurge. Otherwise you're just going to balance out and
stay there without the break, You're not going to lose more.
Speaker 4 (18:15):
I completely agree to. That's why I'm also changing the program,
the weightlifting program. I'm using a different trainer, different series,
different movements, all that kind of stuff. So I completely agree.
But I don't think you should go as far as
I did yesterday.
Speaker 3 (18:32):
I don't want to get too graphic, but I told
Dragging during the break, I'm so fascinated that he hasn't
had diary, like just hasn't had the runs for the
past twenty four or at least starting this morning, Like
I haven't seen you jump up and run out to
go to the I mean, I'm fully prepared just to
do next event my own and just run the program
best I can.
Speaker 4 (18:51):
Arguably, I was super structured on what I ate, everything
I ate, and how much I ate and what time
I ate it throughout the past twelve weeks, so I've
trained my body to just go with the flow and
everything and everything comes out when it's supposed to. But
what I did yesterday was just inhuman I am very
(19:14):
shocked that all I have right now is a sugar
headache and I feel bloated.
Speaker 3 (19:19):
Yeah, but the poor little worker bees inside your body.
We're just hit with this gigantic flash flood, an earthquake,
a tornado, a hurricane, you know, a volcano. You're gonna
have a volcano eruption eventually, but you haven't had it yet.
Speaker 4 (19:33):
So yeah, well over five thousand, and I haven't even
gotten to the pizza yet. There's a well over five
thousand calories, well over seven hundred carbs, under a hundred protein.
Speaker 3 (19:42):
It's just I just cannot believe you wasted a pizza
on a chicken alfredo on top of a pizza dough.
Speaker 4 (19:50):
No, it's fine, it was delicious. I liked it, except
for the fact that it was cold and showed up
a half an hour late.
Speaker 3 (19:56):
What does your dad have to said about what that
kind of pizza?
Speaker 4 (19:58):
Oh, he absolutely hates it too, New York Born. And yeah,
I just say, that's not pizza. That's sauce and chicken
on bread on bread.
Speaker 3 (20:05):
It's exactly right. So back to back to this thing
that I believe that the FBI knows exactly where those
bombs came from. Think about the continent. Let me go
back to the just some of the Let let's go through.
(20:27):
Let's go through a timeline. So from the moment that
the bombs are reported, the FBI just doesn't act decisively.
There is security camera footage that shows this person handling
a phone while at the same time planning the bombs.
(20:48):
So they issue a geofence warrant. It's a search warrant.
So they go to all the cell companies and they
want all of the cell your data, you know, in
a particular area, particular time, so that they can start
narrowing it down to suspects. Okay, we can eliminate this person,
because this is a person that you know, was, you
know is a full time employee of the of the DNC.
(21:14):
But then they claim that the cellular data was corrupted,
but the carriers themselves vently deny that. And then the
contradictions between FBI statements and available facts. That's the first
thing that raises at least questions, serious questions about the
(21:35):
integrity of their own investigation. Now, let's get to March
of twenty twenty one. You know, we've got January sixth,
Let's go to March or twenty twenty one. The FBI
had identified devices and ad tech identifiers that aligned with
the suspect's movements, but somehow the investigation was stagnant. This
(21:59):
apparent any prioritization of their leads raises questions about whether
external pressures, like maybe political considerations or an effort to
protect Oh, I don't know their own credibility, those kinds
of things at least influenced the decision to curtail, if
(22:21):
not outright stop any further action. Now, surveillance of persons
of interest was ordered, But do we know the outcomes
of those of that surveillance? No, we do not. Even
basic forensic avenues failed DNA and fingerprint analysis of the
(22:41):
bombs nothing no DNA, no fingerprint analysis. Well I shouldn't
say no, I should say no DNA, but fingerprints but
no results of the analysis. You mean the FBI has
unknown thing finger prints. Now, while those setbacks could happen
(23:04):
in any investigation, tack onto it. The FBI's complete and
total lack of transparency. Well does that do? That fuels suspicion?
Then you get the next step. Congressional scrutiny and congressional
investigation starts to intensify, and when Congress starts to really
(23:27):
push for answers, the FBI adopts a strategy of delay
and obfuscation. There were dozens, if not hundreds of requests
from oversight committees for detailed records and for at least
some explanation, and guess what Congress got zilch nothing. It
(23:48):
was only after Congress released its report late this past
year that the FBI, perhaps sensing I don't know incoming
reform under Cash pttel Is the new FBI director, that
they began to selectively release updates. Now the timing by
(24:10):
just okay, we're going to kind of dribble this out.
That smacks of damage control, not transparency. Why wouldn't you
just release everything, particularly as an outgoing administration if you
know the FBI directors has announced that he's going to
lead before the inauguration, We have a new FBI director nominated.
(24:35):
We have US attorneys that are already resigning. Graves, the
US attorney for the District of Columbia that's prosecuting the
j six defendants, He's announced he's leaving I think like
next week, So all of those cases are being pushed
off onto career people, and the US Attorney's going to
(24:56):
vamoose out of town. So why not just say, oh, hey,
you know what, it's a new day. Here's everything. When
has the FBI had done this before? Consider the Cointail
pro program of the nineteen sixties and the nineteen seventies.
(25:17):
That's the program where the FBI infiltrated and surveilled all
these different civil rights organizations under the guise of protecting
national security. Now, when that program became exposed, those operations
revealed not just misconduct, but institutional willingness to protect its
(25:37):
own interest at the expense of the public trust. Now,
let's just not pick on democrats, let's pick on Republicans.
The around the Iran Contra scandal the nineteen eighties, that
underscores how government agencies can manipulate investigations to safeguard broader
(25:58):
agendas because a lot of key actors were shielded to
prevent destabilizing revelations. Now, think about those two Cointail Patrol
Cointail Prow and around Contra. The parallels to January sixth
are pretty striking. Both involved calculated actions to suppress information
(26:24):
and to steer your perception. It goes without saying that
they have I think successfully framed January sixth as an insurrection,
an existential threat to democracy, and it was all perpetuated, perpetuated,
(26:45):
perpetrated by Trump supporters, Maga. It was all mega driven.
And that narrative alone has justified unprecedented lawfare against conservatives.
We've got thousands of arrests, hundreds of convictions. Acknowledging that
the pipe bomber might have been a federal asset. What
(27:08):
would that do to the narrative? That would shatter the narrative?
And you know how you've seen it's coldest crap outside,
so you've seen ice. Have you ever seen ice start
to crack on a pond or a lake or even
on a puddle, and how it just shatters and goes everywhere. Well,
(27:31):
if they were to release the information that they have,
that would shatter this narrative because it would go to
everything that occurred on Capitol Hill. It would go to
to my belief about agents provocateur. It would go to
the idea that, oh, the Capitol police were told to
(27:53):
let them in the building, why else would they stand
aside open the doors for them while others, you know,
actually engaged in some violence with the protesters. So when
you prioritize some leads then you leave others out completely,
(28:14):
like the geofence data and the surveillance footage. You don't
even explore that they selectively shared fragments of information with
the oversight committees. And what does that do well? That
means the staff on the oversight committees have to keep
digging further and further so that US installs the inquiries
and that avoids accountability. Those are deliberate choices, and those
(28:43):
deliberate choices, in my opinion, illustrate a deliberate strategy to
control the narrative rather than to conduct a criminal investigation.
Let me give you three examples. The congressional stonewall. Number one,
when the FBI fails to provide complete responses to multiple
(29:05):
oversight requests, shielding critical details from public view. That's one
of those cracks that never happens because they don't let
it get out. The data discrepancy's number two. All these
claims of corrupted geo fence data is contradicted by the
cellar providers themselves, suggests that they were more interested in
(29:28):
excuses than solutions. No have you. You know one thing
that I did yesterday, I tried to find a SoundBite
of anybody being questioned about the difference between Hey, you know,
Verizon and AT and T and T Mobile have all
said no, no, We've got the data right here. We've
got the data on our servers. It's all completely good.
(29:50):
It's not corrupted, So we're not We don't know what
you're talking about when you say that all the geo
FENS data is corruptive. It's right here and we gave
it to you. Huh, why wouldn't you want to tell
the truth about the data. And then the last one
we'll get to is the delayed transparencies, because now it's
(30:11):
starting to dribble out.
Speaker 6 (30:13):
Why Now, Hey, Michael, let's talk about something other than
January six It's been four years, nothing happened.
Speaker 1 (30:20):
Whatever.
Speaker 6 (30:21):
Let's talk about how there is a mass exodus from
Colorado and you Haul reported more usage of their vehicles
to use that exodus.
Speaker 3 (30:39):
Okay, Well, you can get a radio program and then
you can talk about that on whatever hour you want
to talk about it. And I'm sure that people will
bitch and moan about, well, you're talking about the U
Haul story about people leaving Colorado on January sixth, When
January sixth is today January sixth, and has significant implications,
(31:05):
not what happened on January sixth, twenty twenty one, but
what happens since then. And I find that talk back
interesting because people bitch and moment I say, look, when
January twentieth gets here, you're going to have these great
expectations of change, and I'm trying to tap that down
(31:27):
a little bit and tell you, look, you need to
expect some change, but it's going to take a while
to reverse what we've gotten ourselves into because of the Democrats.
And yet you want to ignore that the FBI, a
corrupt organization, probably used its own assets to plan those bombs,
and you don't want to know about that and understand
(31:48):
my rationale for that, Well, then go, you know, go
over listen to Colorado Morning News for a while and
listen to their bull crap about whatever they're doing on
and listen to their Broncos. Yeah, the Broncos win. Go
listen about the broncosmen don't don't act. Well, now, I'm
(32:10):
not gonna say that. I'm not gonna say that. Here
here are the implications if if the FBI curtailed its
investigation to protect a federal asset to protect one of
their own. The implications of that are staggering. That would
that would cast the doubt. In fact, I would argue
(32:31):
that that is the proof that if cash Ptail gets
uh confirmed as the next director of the FBI, he
needs to figuratively blow up the place. Because the FBI,
which has the ability to take away your freedom, is
an absolutely corrupt organization. Now that does not mean that
(32:55):
the special Agent in charge of the FBI, say in Phoenix,
is corrupt, but it means his organization is, and it
means that that corruption. If what I'm telling you today
is vindicated and is proven to be true, there's no
(33:19):
legitimate law enforcement in the country. Why would you trust
to beat coopt Because this is an attack on the
credibility of law enforcement in the entire country. And if
this is true, this makes us a third world country.
And you want to talk about U Haul's moving out
of Colorado, I think this is much more important. This
(33:44):
story would also vindicate critics like me of the deep state.
These federal institutions have become tools of the elite, and
they're designed to crush dissent, to enforce the Democrats, the
Marxist ideological conformity. And it would expose January sixth narrative
(34:06):
for what it truly is. It's a political cudgel wielded
to marginalize you and bolster the Marxist at all levels.
Right here in Colorado or whatever state you live in,
Cash Patel can bring this to a reckoning and all
(34:26):
my if you want to watch turmoil, get ready for
the turmoil.
Really, Mike, you get two weeks at the undisclosed location,
sitting on your butt drinking diet coke by a fire
for two weeks, and we were lucky enough to get
two days.
Speaker 2 (00:15):
I don't want to hear any complaints about.
Speaker 1 (00:19):
iHeart, because you got two weeks where we had to
listen to that drivel.
Speaker 3 (00:30):
Dragon. He seems a little upset, Okay, I know, does
he think? First of all, many of you, even on
the text line, I noticed many of you are telling
Dragon and me, welcome back from vacation.
Speaker 4 (00:51):
We were here last week. We were here last week,
just for a couple of days, but we were.
Speaker 3 (00:55):
We were here, We were I've been on theres Thursday,
Friday and side and now again.
Speaker 2 (01:01):
Today, and nobody cares about Saturday since I'm not there.
Speaker 3 (01:05):
And by the way, it wasn't two weeks.
Speaker 2 (01:08):
We used the week and a half.
Speaker 3 (01:10):
Yeah. Week and a half. Yeah, week and a half. Yeah.
But you know what, you know what I read into
that talk back he really loves us and he really
misses us.
Speaker 2 (01:20):
I figured he just wasn't paying attention to begin with.
Speaker 3 (01:24):
Which is pretty powerful the course for our listeners.
Speaker 2 (01:26):
Yep, huh and producer right.
Speaker 3 (01:34):
So it's can I tell him about Can I tell
him about your photographs? Sure?
Speaker 4 (01:39):
Yeah, just for funsies. I've been trying to punch in
those numbers from what I did yesterday.
Speaker 2 (01:44):
Yeah, I'm not even halfway through the day, and it's ridiculous.
Speaker 3 (01:50):
So Dragon's doing this new Well, you you tell him
what you're doing, because I don't fully I understand. I
guess in a nutshell, you're counting calories now, right.
Speaker 4 (01:59):
For the longest time, I'm four and a half years plus,
I have been very exercise focused and I've been seeing
fantastic results and I've loved it so far.
Speaker 2 (02:09):
But I wanted to.
Speaker 4 (02:09):
Go a step further, and I finally focused more so
on my nutrition. So I've been counting every single calorie,
counting every single gram of fat, every gram of carb,
all the proteins, all that kind of good stuff. And
I've been tracking it and posting it online because that's
how I keep myself accountable with my workout. So I
forgot I could do it with my nutrition as well.
So I spent the last twelve weeks following a beach
(02:33):
body program known as body Beast, which is a weightlifting
program which I do enjoy I enjoy weightlifting so much
more than cardio or yoga. So I've been following that
program and Sunday yesterday was my last day on that program,
so I figured I would just take a cheat day
and just eat nutrition wise, whatever the hell I wanted.
Speaker 3 (02:56):
You're about to hear a perfect description.
Speaker 5 (02:59):
Of this is why I was a fat ass for
as long as I was, Andach you had even made
mention on Friday when we were talking about that. I
still consider myself a fat ass, and yes, I have
been and I probably continue to will be because I
have been a fat ass longer than I have been
a skinny guy.
Speaker 4 (03:19):
I am a skinny guy now and I am am
skinnier than I have been in a long since, well
my entire adult life. Uh So I did take some
before and after photos. They are not safe for work,
but everything is covered. I don't feel comfortable posting those online,
and missus radbards Is flat out told me no, I can't.
Speaker 3 (03:39):
And I would tell you the same thing. It's not appropriate.
Speaker 4 (03:41):
So, uh, chances of anybody out there really seeing those
is slim to none. But like I said, yes, so
I showed Michael those this morning. I did preface that
the tay, you know, we're friends. You don't have to
see this.
Speaker 2 (03:53):
This is kind.
Speaker 3 (03:55):
Of choked on. Were friends, but anyway.
Speaker 4 (03:59):
So I showed him the photos. He was very impressed.
The rundown of the numbers are.
Speaker 3 (04:05):
Yeah.
Speaker 4 (04:05):
I lost fifteen pounds in the twelve week program doing
weightlifting and monitoring my nutrition. I lost several inches off
the belly and waste gained a quarter half an inch
on my biceps, which is great, fantastic.
Speaker 2 (04:18):
A love that kind of stuff.
Speaker 4 (04:19):
But yeah, yesterday I went hogwild with any food that
I wanted. I went out and got Dunkin Donuts, got
two of the sour cream donuts, and also on my
way home, I stopped at Good Times, got a couple
of breakfast bacon breakfast readers from there, did slam down
a couple of tubes of Eminem's minis, several glasses of eggnog.
(04:42):
Even ordered a pizza for the Broncos game that showed up.
Speaker 3 (04:46):
Well, a pizza, However, it was not a pizza. It
was pizza dough with crap on top of it.
Speaker 2 (04:52):
Said, you know, chicken bacon pizza. Fine, it was delicious.
Speaker 3 (04:56):
Chicken bacon alfredo pizza.
Speaker 4 (04:57):
Yeah, delicious missus Redbeard eight.
Speaker 2 (05:01):
The other half.
Speaker 4 (05:01):
It was delicious, It was enjoyable, except the fact that
it showed up at half hour late and lukewarm. Let's
see what else, several crumble cookies.
Speaker 2 (05:14):
I didn't get to the ice cream though.
Speaker 4 (05:15):
I was gonna try and have ice cream later in
the evening after the Broncos game, but I was just
far too full and just yeah, just for funzies, I
was putting all that information in that calculator app that
I've been using for the calories.
Speaker 2 (05:29):
I'm not even to.
Speaker 4 (05:30):
The pizza yet, and I'm well over five thousand calories
and well over two hundred and fifty grams of fat.
Then my normal goal is under twenty five hundred calories
and under eighty grams of fat.
Speaker 2 (05:42):
So so yeah, yesterday was.
Speaker 3 (05:45):
I mean, I just can't believe you just don't feel
like feces right now?
Speaker 6 (05:48):
Me too.
Speaker 2 (05:49):
I am sure a couple of TwixT bars too. I
put in some oh my god, oh lord.
Speaker 3 (05:54):
So let me say this about the photos. So he's
described me, you know, he I can tell he really
does want me to see the photos, and honestly, I
really do want to see the photos.
Speaker 4 (06:06):
I am proud of day one to where I am now,
but I'm also very proud of as to what I
did for these past twelve years with program, because, like
I said, I've never really fully taken this much intricacies
details of the focus on the nutrition, right.
Speaker 3 (06:24):
And so I I was listening to him rationalized what
I'm about to see, while I'm just like, oh, just
shut up and get me the camera and the phone.
Just let me see the pictures. And so he hands
them to me, and I'm actually shocked. I'm shocked because well,
I'm seeing Dragon pretty much naked.
Speaker 2 (06:44):
Everything's covered that should be covered.
Speaker 3 (06:47):
But still is more than you. It's more than guys
just want to.
Speaker 2 (06:49):
Really see true of another guy.
Speaker 3 (06:51):
Yeah, right, But I'm amazed by it because here's how
I would describe it for those of you to paint
the picture. You know, you have the different body shapes.
You got the pear shaped and you got the round shaped,
you got all of that. Dragon has gone from what
I would consider it to be what looks like just
(07:14):
a kind of an over kind of an overweight person,
not even fat, just a little overweight, thick, yeah, to slim,
I mean truly slim, like the outline is concave instead
of convex. It's really fascinating and I I just wanted
to take some time on air because I know you
(07:36):
guys kind of are fascinated by this, this journey that
he's been on. And I saw the photos today and
I was shocked. I was actually shocked. It's congratulations, Buck, Joe.
Thank you. Yeah, very very very well done.
Speaker 4 (07:51):
New Day one starts today. So back on nutrition, and
I've got my chicken and rice in the fridge, and
as much as I want to eat it today, i'm.
Speaker 2 (08:03):
Still full from yesterday. I'm not sure I can.
Speaker 3 (08:07):
Yes, And I decided, without getting too graphic, at some point,
all of that's going to want to go elsewhere.
Speaker 4 (08:11):
It will escape, will escape, it come back the way
it came or out the way it's supposed to do.
Speaker 2 (08:16):
It will make a violence.
Speaker 3 (08:17):
It will make a violent exit somewhere. So anyways, we've
been talking about. Today is January six, so it's been
nearly what well, it has been now been four years
since the pipe bombs. We haven't talked about the pipe bombs,
remember those They were discovered near the Republican and the
(08:38):
Democrat National Committee headquarters on January sixth, twenty twenty one.
They were planted on the eve of the riots, and
the bombs were strategically positioned to maximize disruption and to
create fear. If those bombs had it, let's set aside
(09:03):
January sixth, and let's just say that these two bombs
had gone off at those locations on just any ordinary day,
because of their strategic positioning and the size of the bombs,
everything about them, we would be talking about terrorism, literally
(09:25):
talking about terrorism. But their discovery just mere hours before
the certification of the electoral votes, think about what that did.
It diverted law enforcement resources obviously, I mean, hey, we
got pipe bombs. Guys gus in the bomb squad, Well,
(09:46):
we're busy right now. We have a riot going on
with the US Capital. Well we're sorry, we've got bombs.
And it heightened the chaos that was already going on
that day. Now you think about just radio chatter. So
the Capitol police is talking about, hey, we got a
mob that's now kind of getting out of control. Now,
(10:10):
whether the I'm not making a judgment here, I'm just
making a statement to paint a picture. Imagine the Capitol police,
unbeknownst to them about any sort of agents provocateur on
the radio chatting, you know, about going back to their
you know, command post, back to their command structure, about
(10:33):
we need additional resources. At the same time that US
Capitol Police that are in charge of the area where
the DNC and the r n C buildings are located
are also talking about, Hey, we've got bomb We've we've
located bombs, and we need the bomb squad and we
need extra people here. So it's utter chaos. Yet here
(10:59):
we are. The investigation into those two bombs has produced
what tell me, what you've heard about the bombs?
Speaker 2 (11:12):
Nothing?
Speaker 3 (11:13):
No suspects, nothing, no arrests, nothing, no answers, nothing, not
a thing.
Speaker 4 (11:20):
I'm starting to a question whether or not the fact
that they're even real if we have no information about
it whatsoever. On one of the probably most filmed areas
of the country, I'm sure there's cameras every block.
Speaker 2 (11:33):
I don't work there, I don't know that.
Speaker 4 (11:35):
I haven't ever been there, but I would like to
think that that would be the most protected place in
the country, if not the world.
Speaker 3 (11:43):
Well, generally speaking, that area is I would say that
there are degrees of protectiveness that are greater than other
areas within that circle. So for example, the capital is
going to be a little more protected than say the
DNC and the RNC, but nonetheless they're in that cone
of protections. To speak, the National Capital Region is called
(12:07):
the NCR, so within the National Capital Region of the
DNC and the RNC. But to Dragon's point, I would say,
it doesn't make any difference whether they were real or not,
because that whether they were ever intended to actually explode
or not, is not the point that I want to
make here, And the point is the chaos. So you
(12:28):
have bombs, let me use air quotes here, So you
have bombs that are planted strategically located at the DNC
and the RNC to create what additional chaos? Not chaos,
additional chaos? Got it? Yet? No suspects, no arrests, no answers. Now,
(12:57):
you cannot dismiss that investigating paralysis as just simply bureaucratic
inefficiency or you know, we just don't have the technology.
What a bunch of bull crap. Instead, it appears increasingly
appears that the FBI concluded early on that somehow the
(13:18):
perpetrator was one of their own, either a federal asset
or an informant, a confidential informant, ave CI, whatever it
might have been. But it was a federal asset, one
of their own.
Speaker 4 (13:31):
It's Monday morning, I'm barely paying attention to begin with,
and I've got this sugar hangover or would you would
you mind saying that again? Are you saying that the
person or persons that have placed those bombs were.
Speaker 3 (13:48):
FBI hang on hang type? Because I believe it appears
that the FBI has concluded that it was as one
of their own, either some sort of federal asset whatever
that might be a contractor an employee or an informant
(14:11):
or someone that was I mean when I say contractor
I'm kind of laughing to myself because I'm thinking, like
who issued the contract and what were the terms of
the contract. But it was it was some form of
federal asset. Now, what's the evidence to support that? Well,
I think one can. You can deduce from the fact
(14:31):
that the FBI was reluctant to act decisively on actually
identified devices and there was GEO fence data aligning with
the suspect's movements because remember we now have video, We
actually have video of the suspect. Actually needn say suspect
(14:51):
of the individual planting the bombs at both locations. Sheel
Atkinson has done some incredible rep reporting about the videos
and the placement of those bombs. I may get to
some of reporting in a minute. So there's evidence. So
the evidence that supports my theory that we know they
(15:15):
were federal assets or informants includes their reluctance to act decisively,
because when does the FBI not act decisively if they
have video reports or chatter on their communication lines that
(15:39):
we have bombs. That's I mean, you think about how
local law enforcement reacts to reports of a suspicious package.
Oh my gosh, they get so excited, they're peeing their pants.
They get to bring out all the toys, all the equipment,
they get to put on you maybe even bring out
(15:59):
the bombs squad. Everybody shows up and you cording off everything.
You create a safe zone. They shut down highways, they
shut down neighborhoods, they you know, they they they what
do you call it? They shut down, They shut down
the schools, They do all sorts of things. Here somebody
(16:20):
called it a bomb. Yeah, you know, you know. There
was also geofence data aligning with the person identified Shince
identified the person seen in the video their movements. And
then you have the refusal, the FBI's refusal to release
(16:42):
their complete investigative records despite repeated Congressional inquiries to avoid
embarrassment and protect the political narrative of January sixth, that
of some sort so called existential threat from Trump support,
which is total bs. What the FBI do? It quietly
(17:05):
curtailed its investigation, They stonewalled Congress, They did a selective
release of information, and then glaring investigative o missions. All
of that added together points to a calculated effort to
obstruct the truth, to not let you know. Now, from
(17:27):
the very outset, the FBI demonstrated an inexplicable reluctance to
act decisively. Security camera footage showed the suspects handling a
phone while planting the bombs. A geofence warrant yielded data
on hundreds of devices in the area. Yet the FBI
(17:47):
alleged that some of the cell data was oh conveniently corrupted,
a claim that's denied by the cell carriers themselves.
Speaker 7 (17:59):
What about those tradictions, hey, dragon, Occasionally you have to
take a break from your diet, from your dietary routine
and splurge. Otherwise you're just going to balance out and
stay there without the break, You're not going to lose more.
Speaker 4 (18:15):
I completely agree to. That's why I'm also changing the program,
the weightlifting program. I'm using a different trainer, different series,
different movements, all that kind of stuff. So I completely agree.
But I don't think you should go as far as
I did yesterday.
Speaker 3 (18:32):
I don't want to get too graphic, but I told
Dragging during the break, I'm so fascinated that he hasn't
had diary, like just hasn't had the runs for the
past twenty four or at least starting this morning, Like
I haven't seen you jump up and run out to
go to the I mean, I'm fully prepared just to
do next event my own and just run the program
best I can.
Speaker 4 (18:51):
Arguably, I was super structured on what I ate, everything
I ate, and how much I ate and what time
I ate it throughout the past twelve weeks, so I've
trained my body to just go with the flow and
everything and everything comes out when it's supposed to. But
what I did yesterday was just inhuman I am very
(19:14):
shocked that all I have right now is a sugar
headache and I feel bloated.
Speaker 3 (19:19):
Yeah, but the poor little worker bees inside your body.
We're just hit with this gigantic flash flood, an earthquake,
a tornado, a hurricane, you know, a volcano. You're gonna
have a volcano eruption eventually, but you haven't had it yet.
Speaker 4 (19:33):
So yeah, well over five thousand, and I haven't even
gotten to the pizza yet. There's a well over five
thousand calories, well over seven hundred carbs, under a hundred protein.
Speaker 3 (19:42):
It's just I just cannot believe you wasted a pizza
on a chicken alfredo on top of a pizza dough.
Speaker 4 (19:50):
No, it's fine, it was delicious. I liked it, except
for the fact that it was cold and showed up
a half an hour late.
Speaker 3 (19:56):
What does your dad have to said about what that
kind of pizza?
Speaker 4 (19:58):
Oh, he absolutely hates it too, New York Born. And yeah,
I just say, that's not pizza. That's sauce and chicken
on bread on bread.
Speaker 3 (20:05):
It's exactly right. So back to back to this thing
that I believe that the FBI knows exactly where those
bombs came from. Think about the continent. Let me go
back to the just some of the Let let's go through.
(20:27):
Let's go through a timeline. So from the moment that
the bombs are reported, the FBI just doesn't act decisively.
There is security camera footage that shows this person handling
a phone while at the same time planning the bombs.
(20:48):
So they issue a geofence warrant. It's a search warrant.
So they go to all the cell companies and they
want all of the cell your data, you know, in
a particular area, particular time, so that they can start
narrowing it down to suspects. Okay, we can eliminate this person,
because this is a person that you know, was, you
know is a full time employee of the of the DNC.
(21:14):
But then they claim that the cellular data was corrupted,
but the carriers themselves vently deny that. And then the
contradictions between FBI statements and available facts. That's the first
thing that raises at least questions, serious questions about the
(21:35):
integrity of their own investigation. Now, let's get to March
of twenty twenty one. You know, we've got January sixth,
Let's go to March or twenty twenty one. The FBI
had identified devices and ad tech identifiers that aligned with
the suspect's movements, but somehow the investigation was stagnant. This
(21:59):
apparent any prioritization of their leads raises questions about whether
external pressures, like maybe political considerations or an effort to
protect Oh, I don't know their own credibility, those kinds
of things at least influenced the decision to curtail, if
(22:21):
not outright stop any further action. Now, surveillance of persons
of interest was ordered, But do we know the outcomes
of those of that surveillance? No, we do not. Even
basic forensic avenues failed DNA and fingerprint analysis of the
(22:41):
bombs nothing no DNA, no fingerprint analysis. Well I shouldn't
say no, I should say no DNA, but fingerprints but
no results of the analysis. You mean the FBI has
unknown thing finger prints. Now, while those setbacks could happen
(23:04):
in any investigation, tack onto it. The FBI's complete and
total lack of transparency. Well does that do? That fuels suspicion?
Then you get the next step. Congressional scrutiny and congressional
investigation starts to intensify, and when Congress starts to really
(23:27):
push for answers, the FBI adopts a strategy of delay
and obfuscation. There were dozens, if not hundreds of requests
from oversight committees for detailed records and for at least
some explanation, and guess what Congress got zilch nothing. It
(23:48):
was only after Congress released its report late this past
year that the FBI, perhaps sensing I don't know incoming
reform under Cash pttel Is the new FBI director, that
they began to selectively release updates. Now the timing by
(24:10):
just okay, we're going to kind of dribble this out.
That smacks of damage control, not transparency. Why wouldn't you
just release everything, particularly as an outgoing administration if you
know the FBI directors has announced that he's going to
lead before the inauguration, We have a new FBI director nominated.
(24:35):
We have US attorneys that are already resigning. Graves, the
US attorney for the District of Columbia that's prosecuting the
j six defendants, He's announced he's leaving I think like
next week, So all of those cases are being pushed
off onto career people, and the US Attorney's going to
(24:56):
vamoose out of town. So why not just say, oh, hey,
you know what, it's a new day. Here's everything. When
has the FBI had done this before? Consider the Cointail
pro program of the nineteen sixties and the nineteen seventies.
(25:17):
That's the program where the FBI infiltrated and surveilled all
these different civil rights organizations under the guise of protecting
national security. Now, when that program became exposed, those operations
revealed not just misconduct, but institutional willingness to protect its
(25:37):
own interest at the expense of the public trust. Now,
let's just not pick on democrats, let's pick on Republicans.
The around the Iran Contra scandal the nineteen eighties, that
underscores how government agencies can manipulate investigations to safeguard broader
(25:58):
agendas because a lot of key actors were shielded to
prevent destabilizing revelations. Now, think about those two Cointail Patrol
Cointail Prow and around Contra. The parallels to January sixth
are pretty striking. Both involved calculated actions to suppress information
(26:24):
and to steer your perception. It goes without saying that
they have I think successfully framed January sixth as an insurrection,
an existential threat to democracy, and it was all perpetuated, perpetuated,
(26:45):
perpetrated by Trump supporters, Maga. It was all mega driven.
And that narrative alone has justified unprecedented lawfare against conservatives.
We've got thousands of arrests, hundreds of convictions. Acknowledging that
the pipe bomber might have been a federal asset. What
(27:08):
would that do to the narrative? That would shatter the narrative?
And you know how you've seen it's coldest crap outside,
so you've seen ice. Have you ever seen ice start
to crack on a pond or a lake or even
on a puddle, and how it just shatters and goes everywhere. Well,
(27:31):
if they were to release the information that they have,
that would shatter this narrative because it would go to
everything that occurred on Capitol Hill. It would go to
to my belief about agents provocateur. It would go to
the idea that, oh, the Capitol police were told to
(27:53):
let them in the building, why else would they stand
aside open the doors for them while others, you know,
actually engaged in some violence with the protesters. So when
you prioritize some leads then you leave others out completely,
(28:14):
like the geofence data and the surveillance footage. You don't
even explore that they selectively shared fragments of information with
the oversight committees. And what does that do well? That
means the staff on the oversight committees have to keep
digging further and further so that US installs the inquiries
and that avoids accountability. Those are deliberate choices, and those
(28:43):
deliberate choices, in my opinion, illustrate a deliberate strategy to
control the narrative rather than to conduct a criminal investigation.
Let me give you three examples. The congressional stonewall. Number one,
when the FBI fails to provide complete responses to multiple
(29:05):
oversight requests, shielding critical details from public view. That's one
of those cracks that never happens because they don't let
it get out. The data discrepancy's number two. All these
claims of corrupted geo fence data is contradicted by the
cellar providers themselves, suggests that they were more interested in
(29:28):
excuses than solutions. No have you. You know one thing
that I did yesterday, I tried to find a SoundBite
of anybody being questioned about the difference between Hey, you know,
Verizon and AT and T and T Mobile have all
said no, no, We've got the data right here. We've
got the data on our servers. It's all completely good.
(29:50):
It's not corrupted, So we're not We don't know what
you're talking about when you say that all the geo
FENS data is corruptive. It's right here and we gave
it to you. Huh, why wouldn't you want to tell
the truth about the data. And then the last one
we'll get to is the delayed transparencies, because now it's
(30:11):
starting to dribble out.
Speaker 6 (30:13):
Why Now, Hey, Michael, let's talk about something other than
January six It's been four years, nothing happened.
Speaker 1 (30:20):
Whatever.
Speaker 6 (30:21):
Let's talk about how there is a mass exodus from
Colorado and you Haul reported more usage of their vehicles
to use that exodus.
Speaker 3 (30:39):
Okay, Well, you can get a radio program and then
you can talk about that on whatever hour you want
to talk about it. And I'm sure that people will
bitch and moan about, well, you're talking about the U
Haul story about people leaving Colorado on January sixth, When
January sixth is today January sixth, and has significant implications,
(31:05):
not what happened on January sixth, twenty twenty one, but
what happens since then. And I find that talk back
interesting because people bitch and moment I say, look, when
January twentieth gets here, you're going to have these great
expectations of change, and I'm trying to tap that down
(31:27):
a little bit and tell you, look, you need to
expect some change, but it's going to take a while
to reverse what we've gotten ourselves into because of the Democrats.
And yet you want to ignore that the FBI, a
corrupt organization, probably used its own assets to plan those bombs,
and you don't want to know about that and understand
(31:48):
my rationale for that, Well, then go, you know, go
over listen to Colorado Morning News for a while and
listen to their bull crap about whatever they're doing on
and listen to their Broncos. Yeah, the Broncos win. Go
listen about the broncosmen don't don't act. Well, now, I'm
(32:10):
not gonna say that. I'm not gonna say that. Here
here are the implications if if the FBI curtailed its
investigation to protect a federal asset to protect one of
their own. The implications of that are staggering. That would
that would cast the doubt. In fact, I would argue
(32:31):
that that is the proof that if cash Ptail gets
uh confirmed as the next director of the FBI, he
needs to figuratively blow up the place. Because the FBI,
which has the ability to take away your freedom, is
an absolutely corrupt organization. Now that does not mean that
(32:55):
the special Agent in charge of the FBI, say in Phoenix,
is corrupt, but it means his organization is, and it
means that that corruption. If what I'm telling you today
is vindicated and is proven to be true, there's no
(33:19):
legitimate law enforcement in the country. Why would you trust
to beat coopt Because this is an attack on the
credibility of law enforcement in the entire country. And if
this is true, this makes us a third world country.
And you want to talk about U Haul's moving out
of Colorado, I think this is much more important. This
(33:44):
story would also vindicate critics like me of the deep state.
These federal institutions have become tools of the elite, and
they're designed to crush dissent, to enforce the Democrats, the
Marxist ideological conformity. And it would expose January sixth narrative
(34:06):
for what it truly is. It's a political cudgel wielded
to marginalize you and bolster the Marxist at all levels.
Right here in Colorado or whatever state you live in,
Cash Patel can bring this to a reckoning and all
(34:26):
my if you want to watch turmoil, get ready for
the turmoil.
Popular Podcasts
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Special Summer Offer: Exclusively on Apple Podcasts, try our Dateline Premium subscription completely free for one month! With Dateline Premium, you get every episode ad-free plus exclusive bonus content.
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.