Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:01):
Mike Elon Musk may have as burgers, but I think
the ultra lefty press are a bunch of ass burgers.
That's right, fun with bows.
Speaker 2 (00:19):
Please raise your right hand and repeat after me. I,
Donald John Trump, do solemnly swear I.
Speaker 3 (00:26):
Donald John Trump, who solemnly.
Speaker 1 (00:28):
Swear that I will faithfully execute.
Speaker 2 (00:31):
That I will faithfully execute the office of President of
the United States, the office of President of the United States,
and will, to the best of my ability, and will,
to the best of my ability, reserve, protect, and defend
to zero, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States,
the Constitution of the United States.
Speaker 3 (00:51):
So help me, God, So help me God.
Speaker 2 (00:53):
Congratulations mister p.
Speaker 4 (00:57):
And so he's allauguate yesterday. Now I want to go
back to the lack of protests and what that means.
But I also want to address something that's driving me nuts.
Chief Justice John Roberts. I don't know.
Speaker 3 (01:12):
Did he need to go to the bathroom real badly?
What was the deal?
Speaker 4 (01:17):
So the Chief Justice is supposed to stand up, you know, address,
you know, come and take the oath of office, and
then he's supposed to pause to give the family time
to gather around. Brett Kavanaugh did it with I mean,
(01:38):
everybody does it. Kavanaugh did it with JD.
Speaker 3 (01:40):
Vance.
Speaker 4 (01:42):
You know, mister Vice president elect, please stand and take
the old of office. And then you know, you see
the some of the corps bring in the Vance's children
so that they can be in the photo. Well, Roberts said,
(02:02):
Chief Justice Roberts doesn't give Trump the chance. It's just like,
stand up here, come on, take the olth let's go.
I got I got things to do. I got lunch waiting.
It's cold, you know, I had a date. I got
things to do. And here's poor Mlanie. She's got these
two bibles, two family bibles. She's trying to get into
the picture. You see Don Junior, and you see all
(02:23):
the others trying to line up so they can be
in the photo. Poor Baron, who's you know, like twenty
feet tall. He gets in behind his dad and behind
his mom, so he's at least in photo simply because
of his size. And then Mlanie is trying to put
the bibles over here so he can put his hand
on the bible. Now, the only thing the Constitution does
not require, and all you conspiracy not stop it, because
(02:48):
because the Chief Justice started the oath, mister President, you know,
raise your right hand. So he raises his right hand.
Speaker 3 (02:54):
He starts the oath.
Speaker 4 (02:56):
You know Mlanie is not there. By the way, wasn't
she hot yesterday? Hats are back, baby, hats are back.
So he never has a chance to put his I mean,
she keeps trying to get it. It's it's almost funny
to watch she try to nudges him, like, I think
my job was to put these bibles over here.
Speaker 3 (03:16):
But the oath is done and.
Speaker 4 (03:19):
The family still gathering when they start playing hal to
the Chief, Halder the Chief. But if you somehow think
there was if you think there was something nefarious about it,
there wasn't. The Chief Justice was just like, okay, so
I'm do the oath. Let's do the oath. And he
wasn't even he wasn't even taking into consideration. Oh let's wait.
(03:39):
My job is to administer the oath. So I do
it and I'm done. I just laughed because there were
so many people yesterday, because remember I read text messages
all the time. I don't just read them during this program.
And many people were like, there's something I know. It's
(04:00):
a conspiracy. I know it. They must have they secretly
he was. Somebody actually texted me and said he was
secretly sworn in the day before and that was just
for show.
Speaker 3 (04:16):
Oh my god, people stop it.
Speaker 4 (04:20):
When it's time to put on your tenfoil hat, I'll
tell you to put on your tenfoil hat.
Speaker 3 (04:24):
But not.
Speaker 4 (04:24):
And then so let's go back to the lack of
protests and what's happened to the Democrats And just so
you know where we're going, where they're going to go
into the executive orders and I'm gonna I'm gonna lift
you up and then I'm gonna dump you down. So
because again I can't, I cannot, I refuse to come
(04:47):
onto this program and just mimic what you want to hear.
I want you to hear what I want you to hear.
So you're gonna you're gonna hear it. So in in
blue states, Democrats have repudiated their party's own position on
(05:08):
you know, things like gender affirming care, you know, like
cutting little boys testicles and penises off, uh men, and
women's sports, the electric vehicle mandates, open borders. You know,
you have to give Biden credit. He had already moved
to expand energy production, not because he believes in it.
Speaker 3 (05:29):
He still is on.
Speaker 4 (05:30):
The side of the Marxist but he knew that he
had a political problem and that high energy prices are
an existential threat to Democrat control. Duh, doesn't they much
figure that. Even old pudd and bring can figure that
one out.
Speaker 3 (05:47):
But the more.
Speaker 4 (05:49):
Democrats oppose every day this coalition of Americans that Trump
has managed to put together, Oh my gosh, if you
want to think about the coalition that he's put together,
you listen to those you had. You had the Archbishop
(06:09):
of New York. Uh, you had Dolan, you had Franklin Graham,
you had that black minister from Detroit. You had Rabbi
Ari Berman, and then you had you had another minister.
You had like five or six I think you had
three invocations, maybe two invocations and four benedictions, but you
(06:33):
have you.
Speaker 3 (06:34):
Had like four, five or six prayers.
Speaker 4 (06:36):
I've got to find I've got to find the black
minister from Detroit, because, oh my gosh, he gave me chills.
If you've never been to a black church, you got
to go to a black church. Holy Moly, or I
should say, amen, you really got to go to a
black church. That group of ministers in many way represents
(06:59):
because in each of their flocks, they have a diverse
group of people. You take a typical Black church, they're
not all liberal and they're not all conservative, and they
come from all economic backgrounds. A Black church is an
amazing uh demographic to look at, and they're all there
(07:23):
for one thing. They're all there because they're Christian. You
take many people look upon Judaism and Jews as being
this monolith, and it is not a monolith the life
of meest they don't understand why Jews vote Democrat, but
many Jews do vote Democrat. But Biden has put Biden
(07:45):
Trump has put together a coalition that is, yes, it's big,
it's big business like Republicans have kind of traditionally been.
But it is also it's say, it's the Reagan coalition,
Reagan Democrats, except now they're Trump Democrats.
Speaker 3 (08:09):
So the more that.
Speaker 4 (08:13):
He is going to do what he's going to do Trump,
the more the Democrats are going to realize how isolated,
what a political hole they have dug for themselves with
these Marxist, outrageous policies. And then what they say about Trump,
particularly in this second term, and I would say most
(08:36):
particularly in this second campaign. All of those lies, the
disinformation that the kind they accuse accused him and the
Russians are spreading in which they sought to censor. It's
now clear they really didn't believe their own disinformation.
Speaker 3 (08:54):
They didn't.
Speaker 4 (08:55):
They don't believe this stuff. Their motive was simply power.
So they accused Trump, and you know, he's a fascist.
The very fine people hoax is already back with the
with the salute of the of Elon Musk throwing his
arm into the air. And it's not just Trump. For decades,
(09:20):
the left has accused the right of being fascist. They
made similar accusations against Nixon, Reagan, George W.
Speaker 3 (09:28):
Bush. While the moderate Democrats, the old old school of
post war liberals.
Speaker 4 (09:35):
They never used that kind of language. Democrats were projecting.
Democrats are really good at projecting. What they accuse Republicans
of doing, they actually do themselves. They're actually the authoritarians,
they're the narcissists. They're the ones that believe that what
(10:00):
they think is best for you is the right thing
to do. So they tell all of these lies. And
the problem for the Democrats is that it will compound itself.
As Trump continues to put blue state governors like Gavin
Newsom on the defensive over things like mismanagement not just
(10:22):
of the fires, but of everything that's wrong in California
right now. And as I like to do on my
Michael Brown Minutes for over own freedom, the things that
are good that are stupid.
Speaker 3 (10:36):
In Colorado, you know.
Speaker 4 (10:41):
I heard some blurb. I didn't pay attention to it.
You know, Colorado Parks and Wildlife is is. There's already
a push to rescind the introduction of the wolves into
the state. The program cost overruns are huge. We were
told that these wolves had enough natural prey that they
(11:02):
wouldn't become predators for cattle, sheep, dogs, or anything else. Indeed,
that is what they have. They have become. The programs
of Democrats invariably proved to be utter failures. So they've
got a lot of work to do in creating some
sort of an agenda, and they will fail in doing that.
(11:24):
But instead what they will do is they are And
I find this fascinating. It took less than an hour
at the inauguration ceremony for a group to demand an
impeachment and.
Speaker 3 (11:40):
Removal of Donald Trump from office.
Speaker 4 (11:44):
John Bonifaz, the President of Free Speech for people announced
a demand to remove the president for offenses that he
has already committed upon taking the oath. What I guess
just taking the oath was some sort of offense, an
impeachable offense. There's a website I hate to give it
(12:05):
to you, but it's pretty funny impeach Trump again. It
promotes their initiatives, and they're already suggesting that Trump could
be impeached for a litany of offenses, including using racist, xenophobic rhetoric. Really,
that's an impeachable offense that see again, it's a projection
(12:25):
of what they really are, uh, spreading dangerous disinformation and
appointing billionaire campaign contribute contributors such as Elon Musk, which
by the way, doesn't violate any criminal law and suggests
an utter lack of understanding of the US Constitution and
(12:46):
of the unified executive But no want to They wanted
to impeach him over that. Maybe that's really the reason
why the fake Ramaswami stepped aside to run for the
governor governorship of Ohio because he was like, oh my gosh,
nose is is set to die, so you can go
to and preach impeach Trump campaign dot org and read
(13:08):
for yourself exactly what they're up to.
Speaker 3 (13:12):
The anger at.
Speaker 4 (13:13):
Trump's first election just transformed into a series of you know,
these all these stupid investigations, Russian influence, all of that.
All of that's gone. It's utterly and completely gone. But
what this is a grift. This is a total grift,
the partisan frenzy that originally raised hundreds of millions of
(13:35):
dollars for all these left leaning adversary groups. By the way,
the minute I said left leaning advasy groups, it made it.
It reminded me of a point that I wanted to make.
I know, I'm bouncing all over. Just told me suit
too much talk about I was just little, you know,
I wanted to shoot my TVs yesterday because I was.
(13:56):
I was home alone yesterday, which is always dangerous. So
I had every TV in the house on so no
matter what I was doing, I wouldn't miss a thing,
and I could flip around and watch different channels and everything.
But they showed a photo of the Al Paso crossing
and they had cops and riot gear. One of the
(14:18):
cops that his shield upside down. The word police was
upside down. It was hilarious looking but it was amazing
to look at a group of riot cops, I assume
CBP cops stopping all traffic across the bridge.
Speaker 3 (14:36):
It was amazing.
Speaker 4 (14:38):
And then they immediately turned to people in Mexico trying
to turn on their CBP one apps, getting a message
that says this app is no longer available and if
you had an appointment, it's being canceled and there will
be no more appointments made your sol And I thought
it was glorious, except then they wanted you to look
(15:01):
at the people crying because now they had gotten to
the border and they couldn't cross, And I thought, well,
sucks to be you. And then I thought about this,
and this is why when I said the left leaning
advacy groups, it reminded me of this point. I do
not feel sorry for those people, because all of those
(15:24):
left leaning advocacy groups can also be called NGOs.
Speaker 3 (15:30):
So all the.
Speaker 4 (15:31):
NGOs that have offices field people all the way from
the Darien Gap, maybe even in Guatemalda, Venezuela, Honduras, who
knows where, all over the world to help them get started,
and then all the way on the track through Mexico
and then on the border itself.
Speaker 3 (15:50):
You couldn't have told them.
Speaker 4 (15:52):
You couldn't have said, hey, wait a minute, maybe you
ought to stop, Maybe I ought to stop where you are
for right now, because you're not going to get across
and your appointments have been canceled.
Speaker 3 (16:07):
They could have told them that, but they didn't. And
you know why, they are going to be a little different.
Speaker 4 (16:13):
Yeah that's right. Come Monday, things will be slightly different.
But dragon you know why they did not tell them
that because they wanted this. They wanted to see the
throngs at the border so they could get the photos
of all of the illegal or supposed or attempted illegal aliens,
all of the so called migrants, so that you could
see the tears in their eyes, so that you would
(16:36):
feel sorry for them. Guess what, I have no feeling
sorry for me in me whatsoever. And by the way,
NGO's shame on you for encouraging them to continue the
trick when you knew that things were going to change.
Speaker 3 (17:07):
Hey, Michael, just a little reminder.
Speaker 1 (17:10):
Don't forget Donald Trump was impeached after he was not
president anymore.
Speaker 3 (17:17):
Yeah, but it went nowhere too. You know.
Speaker 4 (17:21):
It's like when people say say to me, can I
be sued for something. Yes, you can be sued for anything.
All it takes is you know somebody to go online
and find the proper form, fill it out, walk down
to the courthouse, pay the filing fee, and you've been sued.
Whether doesn't even make any difference of the statue limitations
(17:43):
has passed. You can be sued. You then have to
assert the statue limitations to get the lawsuit dismissed.
Speaker 3 (17:52):
The question is am I liable? Am I liable for
what I'm doing?
Speaker 1 (17:57):
Not?
Speaker 3 (17:57):
Can I be sued for what I'm doing?
Speaker 4 (18:00):
It?
Speaker 3 (18:01):
It drives me nuts.
Speaker 4 (18:10):
The there's been I guess the way I would describe
it an unprecedented course of course change for America, and
that course change is I think represented in the UH
(18:37):
in the executive actions that the President has signed and
which show that.
Speaker 3 (18:46):
He means business.
Speaker 4 (18:48):
However, because we already have lawsuits appearing, we already have
an impeachment effort underway, which I think will fail. But
nonetheless it's a rift and as well the lawsuits. You know,
it's a way to raise money, it's a way to
you know, kind of excite that radical wing of the
party base that I think most Democrats probably look at
(19:11):
and think, ah, you know what, I think deep down,
not very pretty deep, but you got to get maybe
down into his bowels. But I think even Chuck Schumer
recognizes that the Biden administration overreached and that the radical
wing of the Democrat Party overreached. Now Chuck may even
(19:35):
like where they were going, but he doesn't like how
they got there. And I think Chuck Schumer also is
at least smart enough of a politician to recognize that, oh,
we're not where the same We're not the same place
where the American people are. We we've tried to use
these illegal aliens as as some sort of a straw
(19:59):
man for people to look at and go, oh, we
feel so sorry for them, and we, you know, we
just want to care for them and take care of
them because we feel sorry for them. I don't think
there are enough people in the country that feel that
way anymore. And I think by allowing so many in
who have been criminals, gang members, or who have lived
(20:19):
off the taxpayers, that they recognize that, oh, this is
probably backfired. So where are we What happened yesterday that
really signals a change. Well, let's go through the executive
orders in no particular order, but I think they all
(20:43):
have significance. Guaranteeing this again, I'll try to remember what
number I'm on. Guaranteeing the state's protection against invasion. All
that does is simply reaffirms the federal government's commitment, their
constitutional requirement to protect states from foreign invasions. Now you
(21:05):
could litigate that all day long about is it a
foreign invasion and what constitutes a foreign invasion. Well, I
would say whether the numbers twelve, fifteen or thirty million
people who are not citizens of this country coming into
the country illegally, I would argue if that's a foreign invasion,
(21:25):
and we see that it has been costly to us
just in terms of the economy. Have there been some
benefits you can't help butni there been some benefits that
also been huge economic costs to taxpayers, to wages, to
any number of things, and there's been a criminal cost
to it. So just reaffirming the constitutional obligation the federal
(21:49):
government to protect the fifty states against invasion is one
of the ones that I think is going to have
a long term effect.
Speaker 3 (22:00):
Uh.
Speaker 4 (22:01):
Again, no particular order, but the second one, restoring names
that honor American greatness and in that one, he directed
the federal departments and agencies that have federal properties to
honor historically significant American figures. This is the Mount McKinley.
This is going back from you from McKinley to Denali.
(22:22):
Now let's go back to McKinley. And that I think
is part of just wait a minute, It's like, what
do we change Mount Evans to Mount Blue Sky or
something something. Yeah, it's still Mount Evans to me. It
will always be Mount Evans.
Speaker 3 (22:40):
It will always be mile High too. It will always
be mile High. I don't care.
Speaker 4 (22:44):
You know, at someday it's going to be blankety blank
blank blank blank blank whatever. At mile High. They can't
get rid of it anymore. You can get rid of
you know. It's like Gulf of Mexican, Gulf of Mexico.
In so far as i'm I really don't give a
rats asked whether it's Gulf of America or Golf of Mexico.
(23:04):
But I've grown up and at my age, I'm not
likely to change the Gulf of America. And it doesn't
really have that much of a significance to me. I
couldn't even tell you the history of why it's called
the Gulf of Mexico. Quite frankly, I don't care some
of these things that are on American soil. However, I do.
Speaker 3 (23:23):
Another one.
Speaker 4 (23:23):
I think I'm in the third one now, designating the cartels,
and not just the Mexican cartels, but all the cartels
and other organizations as foreign terrorist organizations. And as many
people gloss over this, specially designated global terrorists, now they
(23:45):
just simply clarifies that certain cartels and organizations are terrorist entities,
so that we have additional law enforcement enhancements that we
can use against them. And I think that's long overdue
because what he quoted during that impromptu press conference last night,
(24:06):
he quoted, you know, they like to claim that, you know,
the cartails have killed, you know, an average of one
hundred thousand Americans every year.
Speaker 3 (24:13):
Well I think that number. I agree with him.
Speaker 4 (24:15):
I think that number is low. It probably is two
hundred and fifty thousand, three hundred thousand, maybe even more.
Americans die every year because of directly related foreign terrorist organizations,
the cartels, their activities on American soil. So designating them
as such is I think proper, and it will change
(24:37):
law enforcement, it'll change their whole, their their whole approach
to enforcement. Think about in Denver. Just think about in Denver,
if you're refusing to go after the cartels, or you're
harboring fugitives, or you're ignoring the cartels, like oh, trend
(24:59):
or no, we don't really have a problem with trendo
rogwa in Colorado. Really, Aurora, If I were you, I'd
lock the doors Denver. If I were you, i'd luck
If I lived in Denver, I'd be locking the doors too.
I think that was let me start doing a little
hash marks here. That was number four. Now that was
(25:24):
number three. I think the student now will do the
fourth one. Four reforming the federal hiring process and restoring
merit to government service. Now, all that does is that
prioritizes merit based hiring within the federal agencies. Now there
(25:45):
already is merit based hiring. But that is a way
to which will get me into the next one. That's
a way to add on to number five, which is
ending radical and wasteful government DEI programs and DEI preferencing
so that eliminates diversity, equity inclusion programs that are deemed
(26:06):
non essential.
Speaker 3 (26:09):
Now I looked at that one not that close. See,
but I skimmed.
Speaker 4 (26:12):
Through that one a little more. That one, to me,
doesn't go quite as far as it needs to. It
needs to just blanket eliminate all DEI programs and all
DEI preferences in hiring. And then you go back to
the previous one about reforming the high federal hiring process
(26:33):
and restoring merit to government service. I think you put
those two together and just say that, you know, promotions
and hiring are based on merit, and therefore you get
the best qualified people that if you've got to hire
a civil servant, they win based on whatever their score is,
(26:56):
and you hire based on the highest score, irrespective of
what anything else is, their sexual preference, their stupid gender identity,
which should not play a role at all anymore. You
get rid of all of that. So that's four and
five kind of together. Number six, defending women from gender
ideology extremism and restoring biological truth to the federal government.
(27:22):
That means that policies have to be based policies that
are that are based on biological distinctions between sexes and
federal programs. No, this whole idea that you've you've got
to accommodate all these different genders. No, we have male
and female, just male and female. The seventh one establishing
(27:50):
implementing the President's Department of Government Efficiency. Now, this one's
interesting because the language says it creates a new department
aimed at improving efficiency and reducing wasting government operations. Now,
if it actually creates a new department, that requires congressional action.
(28:15):
If he wants to established an office within the Executive
Office of the President, and there's rumors out there that
El Musk already has an EOP email address, it's usually
like Michael Brown at white House dot EOP dot gov,
(28:36):
which is the Executive Office of the President. He can
establish any office in the Executive Office that he wants
to and give him space in the new or the
old Executive Office building, and then give them a presidential memo,
the presidential directive that here is here are your objectives.
Speaker 3 (28:53):
So I think that one was.
Speaker 4 (28:55):
Broadly overworded or overly broadly overworded, but it I get
what they're trying. That's that's the established establishment of DOGE.
I just have a lawyer's problem with creating a new
department because he can't create a new department that takes
Congress at number nine, protecting the United States from foreign
(29:17):
terrorists and other national security and public safety threats. So
that's basically saying to DHS, and by saying to DHS,
saying to Immigrations and Customs Enforcement that you need to
enhance whatever measures you have in place or adopt new
measures that anybody that's deemed to be a security threat,
(29:40):
you keep them out of the country. You don't give
them a tourist visa, you don't allow them in the country.
If you find that you're here, you expel them, to
deport them. Whatever. So guess that ninth one perfect, and
we'll finish the others after the.
Speaker 3 (29:53):
Break, Hey, Michael.
Speaker 5 (29:55):
On January eighth of this year, Joe Biden was interviewed
by USA Today and he actually said he hopes that
this pardon didn't set a precedent for future presidents to
quote abuse unquote pardon powers. Democrats have no standing in
(30:16):
Trump's pardon of pardons of fifteen hundred rioters.
Speaker 4 (30:23):
No, they don't, but they're already on the cables this
morning talking about it. And there's just too much to discuss.
I may or may not get to that today, but
let's go back to these executive orders, see where it was. I, oh,
(30:54):
number ten, unleashing Alaska's extraordinary resource buttential. Let's just put
that one aside for a moment because I want to
get to that in depth in the next hour.
Speaker 3 (31:07):
Eleven.
Speaker 4 (31:07):
Protecting the American people against invasion. That one is different
than talking about protecting the States. This one's protecting the
American people, and that is strengthening border security measures to
prevent unauthorized entry into the United States. Think those will
be challenged, but I think under the Immigration and Naturalization
(31:29):
Act and the Supreme Court decisions, immigration policy is left
to the federal government. The Immigration and Naturalization Act gives
broad discretion to the President to enforce immigration laws as
he sees fit within the confines of whatever the law is.
But he can expand and decrease and you know, strengthen
(31:51):
and weaken, you know, whatever he needs to do based
on whatever he thinks the exigence circumstances are. And so
I think those will ultimately be upheld. And I certainly
don't think he'll be able to get any or objectors
will be able to get any injunctions prohibiting from starting
that enforcement. Oh, they'll try, and that in of itself
(32:14):
will take some time. But I think an emergency, you know,
a temporary restraining order that would stop him immediately from
doing something while the request for the injunction proceeds. I
think they're going to be hard pressed to get. But
you know, we'll see. The twelfth one the Organization for
Economic Cooperation and Development, the OECD Global Tax Deal. That
(32:39):
is well, I think we all have just pulled out
to it. The word reevaluate is in there, and it
says reevaluates our participation in international tax agreements to make
certain they align with national interests. Okay, well, should just
withdrawn from it, but I get it. And restructures at
the next one, number thirteen structures the National Security Council
(33:02):
for improved coordination on security matters. That's entirely internal. He
can do that, and good for him. Go after it.
Number fourteen Reevaluating and realigning foreign aid. That's just simply
a directive to the State Department, anybody else, usaid, all
of them to assess and adjust foreign aid allocations to
(33:25):
just better serve our strategic interests. So some people might
get some more, some people might get some less, some
people might might get some at all. So again just
setting the tone, we're gonna look at everything, and these
pretty much do look at everything. Number fifteen. The fifteenth
one temporary withdrawal of all areas on the Ader Continental
(33:49):
Shelf from offshore wind leasing and review of the federal
government's leasing and permitting practices for wind projects, so that
one essentially pauses offshore in energy projects pending a review
of the environmental and the economic impacts. That's where he
made the joke about, you know, some people are interested
(34:09):
in the whales, and we're going to try to save
the whales. And he gave some number. Whether it's true
or not, I don't know about. You know, four were
killed in the past ten years, and fourteen had been
killed in the past, you know, four minutes or something.
Sixteen declaring a national emergency that is for all departments
and agency to recognize challenges in energy supply and implements
(34:33):
measures to address the energy supply problem.
Speaker 3 (34:38):
We have in this country. And they're a bunch
Speaker 4 (34:42):
Of other but we got days to go through the
as the news, we'll start going through them too.