1-22-25 - 8am - National Cathedral Bishop and Suing the Census

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
If you come to this country legally, you should be
able to go to our schools. You should be entitled
to some of the programs that I don't think should
be there, but they're there. If you do not come
to this country legally, you should not be entitled to
use any of the taxpayer's money for anything, including schools,
including social security, in including anything. He has a beautiful day.

Speaker 2 (00:27):
Well, dragon, I can't believe that you let that xenophobic, racist,
horrible individual who has no mercy whatsoever on our airwaves.

Speaker 3 (00:37):
What is wrong with you?

Speaker 4 (00:38):
I said it before, I'll say it again. I don't
leave them, I just play them.

Speaker 3 (00:45):
I want to do the dan.

Speaker 2 (00:48):
You guys just throw me completely off, sometimes including you
back there. How's the temp it's cold well so here,
speaking of you know the infrastructure. When I came in
it was already so apparently it's been bad enough that
other programs have left the temperature turned cranked off.

Speaker 4 (01:10):
I know it was negative four when I got here
this morning. I pumped it up.

Speaker 2 (01:13):
Oh it was down the negative four yea. Oh, So
someone's trying to really bug me. I see you, I
see you super show, I see you capitalists. I know
what you're doing so anyway, it was cranked up to
four to maximum. Yeah, but it really wasn't quite warm
here yet. But then it started warming and then, as
I told you earlier, suddenly it just suddenly is like

(01:34):
the air conditioning came on and it got really cold.
And so now here we are a little over two
hours into the program and it's just now getting where
it's like just comfortable.

Speaker 3 (01:44):
Fairly comfortable. Yeah, lucky you.

Speaker 2 (01:46):
Yeah, and you're still back there with your I mean,
in your John Fetterman outfit exactly.

Speaker 3 (01:51):
Yeah.

Speaker 2 (01:53):
By the way, can I just say this about your
Fetterment outfit versus his Federament outfit?

Speaker 3 (01:59):
Okay, And I really hate to say this.

Speaker 2 (02:03):
I hope you take it the right way, but you
really do look a lot better in the Federment.

Speaker 3 (02:10):
Out Yeah, for sure.

Speaker 2 (02:13):
He just it's just it accentuates all the problems he has,
whereas you it kind of like fits.

Speaker 3 (02:24):
Thank you. Yeah, I appreciate it.

Speaker 2 (02:25):
Yeah. Well, you people are just horrible individuals. Uh. Thirty
three seventy four, Michael, regarding the lefty bishop you think
she is. Although I know it's tradition for the service
to be held in that church, it's time that changed,

(02:46):
they would have been better off attending a service held
by the Troit Detroit pastor Lorenzo Sewell, who gave one
of the inauguration prayers on Monday. His words were joyous
and uplifting. Oh you think so?

Speaker 3 (03:01):
All right?

Speaker 2 (03:02):
Hang on, Let's first go to what you refer to
as the lefty bishop.

Speaker 5 (03:10):
Let me make one final please, mister President, millions have
put their trust in you, and as you told the
nation yesterday, you have felt the providential hand of a
loving God. In the name of our God, I ask
you to have mercy upon the people in our country.

(03:34):
And we're scared now.

Speaker 2 (03:36):
This particular video Dragon, just to give you a hint,
This particular video is from the Guardian, and they have
the camera on Trump, Millenia, Dvance, and Usha, and they're
all four looking at her with utter.

Speaker 3 (03:56):
Disdain.

Speaker 2 (03:59):
I mean, Vance, who is normally just this exuberant, embulent, wonderful, smiling,
happy individual, is giving her a true you can just
go to hell, lady. Look and Vance has his his
forehead is wrinkled, his eyebrows are up and he's looking
at her like really, and Milenia, the daggers are coming

(04:25):
out and Trump is sitting there as if if this
wasn't church, I just get up and.

Speaker 3 (04:34):
Walk out there are I miss this?

Speaker 2 (04:40):
I'm sorry, and just as I started it back up.
Vance turns to his left and looks at his wife
as if.

Speaker 3 (04:50):
Can you believe this crap? Can you believe what we're
listening to?

Speaker 5 (04:53):
A lesbian and transgender children in Democratic Republican and independent families,
some who fear for their lives, and the people, the
people who pick our crops and clean our office buildings,
who labor in poultry farms and meat packing plants, who

(05:15):
wash the dishes after we eat in restaurants, and work
the night shifts in hospitals.

Speaker 3 (05:19):
States.

Speaker 5 (05:21):
They may not be citizens or have the proper documentation,
but the vast majority of immigrants are not criminals. They
pay taxes and our good neighbors. They are faithful members
of our churches and mosques, synagogues, guidara and temples. I

(05:45):
ask you to have mercy, mister President, on those in
our communities whose children fear that their parents will be
taken away, and that you help those who are fleeing
war zones and persecution in their own lands.

Speaker 2 (05:57):
I'm sorry, but the other thing that bugs me about film.
This is the presidential prayer service. This is where the
country is as a nation, and I agree, maybe it's
time to move out of the national cathedral. We've got
Saint Matthew's in d C.

Speaker 6 (06:15):
There is.

Speaker 2 (06:17):
I can't think of the name of it. I think
it's non denominational. But there are a couple of other
cathedrals in d C. Maybe it's time to move. Maybe
it's time to tell the episcopalians that you know what, hey,
we're out of here. This is supposed to be a
service where you pray for the safety and that God
give his wisdom to the president. That's the purpose of this,

(06:39):
not to lecture the commander in chief about having mercy.
You know, if you want to have mercy, let's talk
about having mercy for everyone who suffers in the world,
not just these that you've picked out because you're a lefty.

Speaker 5 (06:52):
Racist to find compassion and welcome here. How God teaches
us that we are to be merciful to the stranger,
for we will all want strangers in this land. May

(07:14):
God grant us the strength and courage to honor the
dignity of every human being, to speak the truth to
one another in love and walcomely with each other and
our God for the good of all people, good of
all people in this nation.

Speaker 2 (07:34):
You, I think, and I sincerely believe this. I sincerely
believe that Trump does have compassion for the people in
this country. And because this is his nation and he
is our president. And this woman is this this woman

(07:56):
is completely out of bounds. But somebody said, why can't
we have instead of her? Why couldn't we have had
Reverend Sewell provide the prayer for the president. You know,
I just love this.

Speaker 7 (08:15):
I love it that you gave our forty fifth and
now our forty seventh president a millimeter miracle. We are
grateful that you are the one that have called him
for such a time as this, that America would begin
to dream again.

Speaker 8 (08:36):
We pray that we would.

Speaker 7 (08:38):
Fulfill the true meaning of our creed, that we hold
these truths to be self evidence that all men are
created equally. We pray that you use our president that
we will live in a nation well we will not
be judged by the color of our skin, but by

(08:59):
the concert of our character. Heavenly Father, in the name
of Jesus, we are so grateful today. Now you will
use our forty seventh President, so.

Speaker 8 (09:12):
We would sing with new meaning, my country.

Speaker 7 (09:16):
Tizathe sweet land of liberty, of the i seen.

Speaker 8 (09:22):
Land when my fathers die, Land of the pilgrim's pride.
From every mountainside, let freedom ring. And because America is
called to be a great nation, we believe that you
will make this come true.

Speaker 3 (09:39):
So let freedom ring.

Speaker 8 (09:41):
From the prodigious hilltops up New Hampshire. Let freedom ring
from the mighty mountains of New York. Let freedom ring
from the heightening Deleghatties up Pennsylvania. Let freedom ring from
the snowcapped rockies Colorado. Let freedom ring from the curvacious

(10:04):
hilltops of California. But God, we're asking you not only that.
Let freedom ring.

Speaker 3 (10:11):
From stone Mountain Georgia.

Speaker 8 (10:13):
Let freedom ring from the mountain of Tennessee.

Speaker 3 (10:17):
Let freedom ring.

Speaker 8 (10:19):
From every hill and every mole hill in Mississippi, from
every state, every city, every village, and every hamlets.

Speaker 7 (10:28):
And when we let freedom ring, we will be able to.

Speaker 8 (10:31):
Speed up that day. All of your children, black men
and white men, Protestant and Catholic, jew and gentile, we'll
be able to sing in the meaning of.

Speaker 7 (10:43):
That old Negro spiritual free.

Speaker 8 (10:46):
Elast, free, elast Thank you God Almighty.

Speaker 7 (10:51):
We are free a last. If you believe what the
spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty. Come on,
put your hands together.

Speaker 8 (10:59):
Hey, you have your great God right glorry.

Speaker 2 (11:07):
What I hadn't noticed when I played that yesterday were
the smiles on the faces of the people behind Trump.
Baron Cracks a little tiny smile. Sonjay, what's his name?
The head of Google, He's got a giant smile. Bezos

(11:34):
is smiling, Musk is watching intently. Everybody is now. Vance's dances. Oh,
he's got his head down, you know. In Vance's head
he's praying. Hallelujah, hallelujah. This is how God intends us
to live. God intends us to live in happiness, enjoy.

(11:57):
And I know that happiness enjoy doesn't always exist in
our lives, but it should in our hearts. We are
a great nation, but being a great nation does not
mean while we shout for freedom from the mountaintops, let
freedom ring, we at the same time know that we.

Speaker 3 (12:20):
Are unique in the world.

Speaker 2 (12:23):
We're truly unique in the world in terms of the
nations that have existed since the since man set was
put on this planet. Because we live in a country
that is designed. We're not perfect, I know that, but
is designed by its very foundations for man to live

(12:45):
in liberty and freedom. Now that means that we have
to protect ourselves from those who would denegrate, desecrate, and
destroy that freedom. And I would put in that category
those who live in craphole countries who, rather than ask

(13:12):
us for their help to change their country, instead just
simply want to take the easy way out and come
to this country and live off the backs of the
hard working Americans that every single day do whatever they can.

Speaker 3 (13:29):
In their little world.

Speaker 2 (13:31):
We all have this little world in which we toil
and work and raise families and do whatever we can
to live up to this creed that Reverend Sewell talks about,
trying to judge people by the content of their character
and not the color of their skin, by expanding and

(13:54):
not limiting freedom, by doing all of those things that
God wants. God wants is to live in liberty. He
wants us to live in freedom. And we are that beacon.
But a beacon is not a beacon that says, come here.
A beacon is a begon that says, look what you

(14:14):
can do, Look how you can live. And I know
that many live in dictatorships, and many live in countries
where that is virtually impossible. But that is not an
excuse to violate our laws and come to this country
and then expect us to take care of you. And

(14:36):
by us, I mean the United States. If you and
I do mean you, and you and you, If every
one of you individually want to go contribute and take
some of your hard earned money to support someone who
has come here illegally, that is your choice, and I

(14:58):
respect that choice. I may disagree with it, but I
respect it. But don't forcibly take my money out of
my paycheck and make me support something that I do
not believe in, particularly when what they're doing is a
violation of our laws. Let freedom ring from all these mountaintops,

(15:26):
from the Mole Hills and Mississippi to the snow capped
mountains of Colorado. We might learn a little bit about that.
Right here in our own state, we facilitate you think
about this. We are facilitating child trafficking, child sex trafficking,

(15:49):
human trafficking, human sex trafficking. We are facilitating the killing.

Speaker 3 (15:55):
And the murder of hundreds of thousands.

Speaker 2 (15:58):
Of Americans by allowing showing this invasion into the country.
And Trump has stood up and drawn a line in
the sand and said no more, We're not going to
do it. And he is showing mercy. He is showing
mercy by saying we're going to take the worst of
the worst. Now, there is a political and a practical

(16:22):
reason for that, because you don't want to start by
saying to the family that just got here, that's just
trying to you know, do whatever they can, you have
to go back. Instead, we're going to start with the
ones that are causing the most problems and work our
way up. And I say it's political because you've got

(16:45):
to show first that you're going to do this, and
you're going to do it with a group of people
to which if you object, if you object to the
deportation of transnational gangs or the cartels, if you object
to that, then I really question your commitment to this country,

(17:08):
your commitment to liberty and freedom. It helps show those
who are the true believers versus those who are the
useful idiots. Hey just go talk to Jaris over at

(17:39):
the retirement planning center of the Rockies.

Speaker 3 (17:42):
Jeriff.

Speaker 2 (17:42):
So, I was at dinner last night and this came up,
something about the Windfall Elimination Provision and Government Pension Offset
bill that's going to change social Security for a lot
of people.

Speaker 3 (17:54):
What's that about.

Speaker 6 (17:55):
Yeah, good morning, Michael. For sure, I'd love to address that.
On January fifth of this year, something happened that honestly
I never thought would happen, but they eliminated the Windfall
Elimination Provision otherwise known as WEBB and the Government Pension
Offset GPO provisions and Social Security. The Social Security Fairness

(18:17):
Act is what it's called NIT, was put into place
January fifth. What it does is it eliminates the reductions
that workers who fall under those provisions would otherwise be
subject to under Social Security. So for example, public sector workers, teachers,
police officers, a lot of healthcare workers, anybody who has
a job that provides them a pension where they didn't

(18:40):
pay into Social Security, those provisions in the past would
reduce their Social Security benefit. As of the passage of
this bill, those reductions are now gone. And what I'm
surprised about is it's not getting a ton of air
time and a lot of attention out there, but this
could make a big difference in the monthly the monthly
benefits of a lot of these workers going to get.

(19:01):
As far as as far as when it's going to
happen and how it's going to happen, that's still up
in the air. This is our government we're talking about here, exactly.
Move with the speed of light. But what they said
is they're going to They're they're figuring it out out
implementation right now, and when when everything is set and
figured out, they're going to make it retroactive back to January. First. Theoretically,

(19:22):
workers won't have to do anything. They're going to automatically
apply the increases retroactively back to January, and off we go.

Speaker 2 (19:29):
With a teacher in Colorado paying into PARA does not
pay into Social Security direct. So I mean, for example,
I'll use my wife as an example. So she gets
a very minimal amount of Social Security based on you know,
a certain number quarter she worked when she took a
leave of absence from teaching.

Speaker 6 (19:51):
Yeah, So so what will happen is the reduction that
she's getting, and the reduction for for pair workers for example,
for most workers, is going to be around five or
six hundred a month on their own benefit. Yeah, that's
going to be that's you know, that's if they had
the maximum reduction that's going to be added back into
their Social Security check, and they're going to get it.
I'll tell you this though, Michael. The big benefit is

(20:14):
going to be with that government pension offset, which not
to get too far into the weeds, but that applies
to survivor or spousal benefits, and that's a that can
be a much much larger reduction. It's a it's a
two thirds reduction of whatever your social Security is. So
if your wife would otherwise have gotten a two or
three or four thousand dollars, maybe she's got a two

(20:35):
or three or four thousand dollars pension, and that reduces
her service her spousal benefit off your benefit by a
couple thousand. That's going to increase that. I mean, the
elimination of that one alone is going to make a
big difference, especially for those who have.

Speaker 3 (20:48):
Death.

Speaker 2 (20:48):
She would get the full survivor benefits respect of our parrot.

Speaker 6 (20:54):
Yeah, she'd get the full survivor be and she can
also get a full spousal benefit, you know, if and
when she claims the spouse the benefit off you while
you guys are alive. Yeah, So it can make a
big difference, right, away for a lot of people.

Speaker 2 (21:07):
Yeah, my friend asked me about this last night, and
then it popped up that this was the question that
if they want me to ask you, And I'm like, well, yeah,
this is pretty perton because I don't know a thing
about it.

Speaker 6 (21:18):
Yeah, this is huge news. And like I said, it's
not going a ton of airtime these days, partly because
it only applies to a small subset of those who
are receiving Social Security. But for those people, it's going
to be it's a game changer. You know. Think of
what someone could do with an extra five hundred or
one thousand or two thousand dollars a month for the
rest of their lives. Right, you could go go buy
some long term care insurance if that's something putting off,

(21:40):
or pay down debt or heavens, you know, keep up
with inflation.

Speaker 2 (21:44):
Then I have, you know, me always trying to look
at two or three steps.

Speaker 3 (21:50):
Down the road. What does that do? Though?

Speaker 2 (21:52):
Then in terms of the Social Security Fund, which we
know is pretty much mikrupt anyway, what does it do
to that?

Speaker 6 (22:00):
It'll accelerate it for sure. Yeah, okay, but you know,
you know this is a problem Congress has been facing forever,
and I you know, I'm hopeful that and we could
get into this conversation then other day. But there's a
lot of things that can be done to fix social
security if if the members of Congress would just sit
down and sharpen their pencils and get after it, if.

Speaker 2 (22:19):
They would just quit, if they would just quit talking
about or claiming that, you know, somebody wants to do
away with your social security because that just gets everybody
wound up and scared, and and then everybody's you know,
calling Congress then and everybody freezes, nobody does anything.

Speaker 3 (22:34):
If we would just start with them.

Speaker 6 (22:36):
Yeah, as you say, there's some very realistic proposals out
there that have that have had the math done, and
they could eliminate that with just a couple of simple
changes and yeah, problem solved. That nobody's got the guts
to actually face that.

Speaker 2 (22:51):
Yeah, it drives me nuts. Well that's that's good news.
I'm glad you shared it with me. So this is
the kind of stuff you find out from the retirement
planning set of the Rockies. So again, you know, regardless
of your age, regardless of your income, if you want
to sit down with these with these guys just give
them a phone call, tell them that I sent you.
See if you like them as much as I do,
you kind of you know, talkie. They'll talk to you

(23:13):
about what you're wanting to do. You can ask them
about how they do things. You can find all of
that out with just a simple, no obligation phone call.
So pick up the phone. You call it the retirement
Planning some of the rockies today, and you tell them
Michael Brown sent you. It's ninety seven zero six six
three thirty two eleven. Ninety seven zero six sixty three
thirty two eleven or go online rpcenter dot com. Well, Dragon,

(23:37):
I'm I'm I'm retired. After that, after that one where yeah,
I'm done, I'm done. So the attorney generals of Louisiana, Ohio,
West Virginia, and Kansas have sued the Census Bureau Why
whether trying to prevent the inclusion of illegal aliens in

(23:57):
the population count that we then used for assigning congressional
seats and electoral votes.

Speaker 3 (24:05):
He was filed in federal court in.

Speaker 2 (24:07):
Louisiana just Sunday, and the main contention in the lawsuit
is that the Biden administration's decision to count illegal aliens
in the twenty twenty census for purposes of apportionment resulted
in a loss of congressional representation and electoral votes for

(24:30):
Ohio and West Virginia. Now, the allegations in the suit
claimed that because of this new method, Texas gained a
congressional seat and California retained a seat that might have
otherwise lost.

Speaker 3 (24:44):
So they've pretty much covered all the bases.

Speaker 2 (24:47):
Some states lost seats, some states kept seats they shouldn't
have kept, some gained seats that probably they should not
have gained, and even California got one that it kept
one that it probably should not have kept. And their
argument is pretty simple, that Louisiana and Kansas are at
risk of losing seats and votes in the twenty thirty

(25:11):
reapportionment if this practice continues in twenty eighteen is continued,
but back in twenty eighteen, the Census Bureau developed the
residence rule for the twenty twenty census that required foreign
nationals that are in the US to be counted in

(25:32):
the state of their usual residence. I mean, the rule
actually says that, I mean, what a stupid, non legal
term to put in the rule in your usual residence.
I'm usually here, well, I'm usually there, well, you know,
sometimes in I'm in New Mexico, so maybe that's my
usual place. According to the lawsuit, both Biden's Commerce Secretary

(25:57):
Gina Romando by by Sweetheart, and Census Bureau director Robert
Santos Bye Bye, mister Santos included illegal aliens in the
apportionment in the apportionment data for congressional seats and electoral votes,
and they argue that that approach infringes upon here we
go again, the Fourteenth Amendment, Article two, Section one of

(26:20):
the Constitution. Why because it improperly redistributes political power to
the states with large illegal alien populations, which actually it does.
The lawsuit says that the actual enumeration obligation, which is
the language in the Constitution, has always been understood to
include only US citizens and those that are lawful permanent residents,

(26:45):
and the lawsuit asserts that those without the right to vote,
primarily illegals, should not be counted in state apportionment. Then
I happen to agree. If I mean, you think about
everybody talks about how much Trump has done in just

(27:05):
the past, you know what forty eight hours, I would
say yes, it's truly amazing. He's shown his vitality, his
ability to work long hours, his energizer bunny energy. But
there's still more to do. There's still a lot to do,

(27:26):
and I think this is one of them. But as
a subset of just this problem of counting illegal aliens,
you still have the problem of and I hope they'll
address this at some point. And Colorado, you know, they
always talk about Colorado being the real gold standard for
mail in Ballance, that's the gold standard for the ability

(27:50):
to cheat. Just mail balance out, just add infinite. You know,
college students move, they don't do a change of address.
They don't care, they don't even think that. They probably
even know.

Speaker 3 (28:02):
What mail is.

Speaker 2 (28:04):
You know, old people die, family members don't think, oh
I should you know, tell them that person to day
you know they're no longer alive and they're not going
to be voting. It's you know, oh grandma just died.
I better call the election board right away. It's just
not something that people automatically think about. So in addition
to fixing this apportionment problem of counting illegal aliens in

(28:29):
the country, at the same time that they're challenging that,
we ought to. Congress ought to while we have majorities
in both houses. I don't know whether they can get
a pastor now, but we'll at least start trying to
get a national conversation going about requiring citizenship to vote.
I know that seems like, well, Michael, isn't that required, Yes,

(28:53):
But if you're not required to prove your citizenship, if
you're not required to show an ID when you register,
if you're not required to show that you are either
a naturalized citizen or you're a permanent resident, or that
you are a natural born citizen, whatever your circumstances may be,

(29:15):
and that you actually live in and reside in the
precinct where you're going to vote, in the state where
you're going to vote. I mean, what good does it
do about whether we're counting people who are here or
illegally or not. It's just that all of these problems
have tentacles that go out and while Trump is doing

(29:36):
an amazing job of starting the discussion and starting action
on many of these problems, there's still others that have
yet to be addressed, and I think this is one
of them. And so while the lawsuits pending Congress at
the same time, ought to an I simply because we

(29:56):
can't get states to do it.

Speaker 3 (29:59):
And I know this.

Speaker 2 (30:00):
It goes against everything I stand for in terms of federalism,
that the federal government ought to establish some standards. Look, states,
you can set your own rules, but the rules ought
to include at least this, you know, voter id proof
of citizenship depending on the outcome of this lawsuit, that

(30:21):
you are here in the country legally and that you
are in a legal resident alien, whatever it might be,
but some standard in order to vote and to determine
your congressional representation.

Speaker 3 (30:37):
Is it safe to come back?

Speaker 6 (30:39):
You?

Speaker 4 (30:39):
Are you done? Playing the audio of the air quotes
Bishop My god, the cringe of this generation is painful. Yeah,
but that bishop had gray hair, so she's not really
of the younger generation.

Speaker 2 (30:57):
I have a confession to make, and I'm not even careful.
Before I heard what she said, I had heard that
she had said some you know, outrageous things. So I
went searching for it. And I, you know, this was
last night, and I'm searching for for some audio of her,

(31:19):
and I find a YouTube and dragon when I first
looked at her, I know this is horrible for me
to say this, but I thought, Oh, just looking at you,
I can imagine I can just imagine.

Speaker 3 (31:33):
What you said.

Speaker 2 (31:35):
And I know that's judgmental, and I know that that
might even be stereotyping, but you go look at her.
We've talked about the Trump effect. It continues. New Delhi,
the Indian government, do not feather, has pledged to help

(31:57):
identify and deport somewhere around.

Speaker 3 (32:01):
Eighteen thousand of.

Speaker 2 (32:03):
Its citizens that are in this country illegally. The US
has pinpointed these individuals for removal, and India has committed
to verify and then expel like their deportation. They come
predominantly from Punjab and Gujarard states in western India, some

(32:25):
of the poorest, and Trump, who's made cracking down on
illegant immigration obviously a cornerstone of his agendas. All we
talked about a lot for two days now. As in
this movie, obviously the bolished birthright citizenship, is using tariffs

(32:45):
as part of his leverage to get New Delhi to
agree to do this.

Speaker 3 (32:51):
So every time you.

Speaker 2 (32:52):
Hear about how bad tariffs are, remember Trump is always negotia.
Trump is truly transactional, and he's always trying to gain
the upper hand in whatever you know, you may think
that when he talks about tariffs, he's really you know,
whether he's talking to Canada or Mexico or India. Now,

(33:16):
there is a subset of his argument that really is
about tariffs, about you know, fixing a trade balance or
you know, getting more jobs back into this country, or
punishing our enemies. But there's also a piece where he's
truly negotiating. Hey, listen, I'm thinking about imposing twenty five

(33:39):
percent tariff in India. Oh, well, we don't want that.
What can we do? How can we avoid that? Well,
we've identified eighteen thousand illegal aliens that are of Indian
descent that are in this country that came from these provinces,
and we would like for you to help us identify
them and help us expedite the remove them back to
your country. Okay, and you won't impose a town. Yeah,

(34:00):
we'll reach an agreement.

Speaker 3 (34:04):
Now.

Speaker 2 (34:05):
India is also hoping to get something out of it,
such as student visas the H one B program, because
last none. Actually now it would be a year before
Laska's We're down twenty twenty three. Indians received nearly seventy
five percent of the H one B visas of re issue.

Speaker 3 (34:24):
Now.

Speaker 2 (34:24):
H one B visas theoretically target skilled immigrants, although there
are a lot of skeptics. They are questioning why any
country would actively lobby to get rid of their best
and brightest, elite human capital if that's what those people
really are. And I think what I support H one
B visas, but I do think there's an abuse of

(34:46):
H one B visus and we ought to tighten them up.
And if and remember it applies many people think that
H one B visas apply solely to technology, It applies
to almost anything. If there is something that we need
that's the best and the brightest, and we don't have
the best and the brightest here, we can we can
issue an H one B visa and bring those people

(35:08):
to work in this country. I don't have a problem
with that. It's the abusive that are problem with. Trump
effect is affecting some other people too.

Speaker 3 (35:20):
That's next