Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Somebody who has the ear of the president on a
slip up to him and whisper in his ear. You
don't have the stoves to send any of these illegals
to the Vatican.
Speaker 2 (00:20):
You mean you mean.
Speaker 3 (00:22):
Treating like passive aggressive to getting to do it. Any
of you Catholics? What do you think of that the
Vatican has at what he's referring to is the Vatican
has a statue, right, I was reading it last night
about anyone you know, Vatican has as its own nation state. Uh,
(00:49):
obviously they have agreements with the Italians for you know,
police services. I mean, the Swiss guards don't really do
a lot, so they got these agree with the Italians,
I'm sorry, the Italians to provide you know, police services
and stuff.
Speaker 2 (01:08):
Security.
Speaker 3 (01:11):
The Vatican statues criminalize anyone entering the Vatican grounds the
country without authorization. Now obviously it's open to tourists and stuff.
So you know, you'd have to figure out, you know,
a fact situation that would fit the statute. But it
comes with a really hefty find. Like I remember it
(01:33):
was like I don't worry whether it was in lira
or euros or what, but it was like thirty thousand something.
You know, maybe it's thirty thousand euros or something, and
a certain amount of time in jail, you know, a
incarceration period of you know, I don't know, two to
five years or something. Again, just pulling some numbers out
of my butt. I was more fast numb by the
(01:54):
fact that they have a statute that says that, and
then here's the Pope at the same time saying that, well,
we're doing is immoral and illegal. Mister Pope, sit down,
shut up. That's what I would say. Do you know
what's going on? The annual World Economic Forum conferences are
(02:18):
being held in DeVos, and nobody's there.
Speaker 2 (02:23):
Now, some of the usual.
Speaker 3 (02:24):
Suspects are there, but in one news story that I
dug into yesterday, DeVos is almost like they described it
as almost like a ghost town. Nobody's there. Most of
the CEOs that normally attend. I don't think that Bezos
is there. I don't think that Google Facebook, Tim Cook,
(02:49):
I don't think any of the biggies that were at
the inauguration or at DeVos. Oh, John Kerry is still
there though. We'll get to John Kerry in a minute.
Speaker 4 (03:00):
So why.
Speaker 2 (03:05):
Well, I want you to listen to this is just
freaking hilarious.
Speaker 3 (03:10):
So there's there's a they're holding, you know, the they're
holding one of their panel discussions, and they're talking about
Trump and how bad Trump is. Yeah, it's feel easy
to talk bad about somebody when they're not around.
Speaker 5 (03:27):
Trump has done something no person in the world has
ever done before. A dead man, A dead politician has risen.
Speaker 2 (03:38):
A dead politician has risen.
Speaker 5 (03:41):
Wow, somebody who the year were four years ago at
the US he's buried dead politically known to me, He's
now returned. This is the greatest comeback in political history
a politician.
Speaker 4 (03:56):
And then therefore he thinks he can do anything.
Speaker 6 (03:59):
We need to also factor and not only who's one,
which is.
Speaker 3 (04:03):
Don't don't just don't gloss over the fact that you know,
now that he's one, he thinks he can do anything.
Speaker 4 (04:08):
And therefore he thinks he can do anything.
Speaker 3 (04:11):
Now the camera switches. New speaker steps up, or doesn't
step up, but they take the camera to a new speaker,
turn his microphone on.
Speaker 2 (04:20):
Listen to what he has to say.
Speaker 6 (04:21):
We need to also factor and not only who's one,
which is Trump, but who's lost, which is to say us.
Speaker 2 (04:31):
We you know, so is it I can't see for
all the glaring lights.
Speaker 3 (04:37):
Is there anybody out there in the audience, anybody listening
to us?
Speaker 2 (04:40):
Anybody there? Hello? Is this microphone on?
Speaker 4 (04:44):
Huh?
Speaker 2 (04:45):
Is this is a microphone?
Speaker 7 (04:47):
On? Uh?
Speaker 4 (04:50):
Trump won?
Speaker 2 (04:51):
We lost?
Speaker 6 (04:53):
We need to also factor and not only who's one,
which is Trump, but who's loss, which is to say US,
And I guess I would add throw into that to
the epitome of the US. Who is losing? Here is
Europe that the European Union and by and largest member
states have misread the direction where events were going.
Speaker 2 (05:17):
The causes.
Speaker 3 (05:18):
I don't know that the European states have, Like I
don't think that the UK or France or Germany misunderstood
where this country was going. Now that the EU states,
the EU countries, I hate colling states. The EU countries
are different than the bureaucratic Beanie Weeni's that run the
(05:40):
EU in Brussels. They're truly globalists. So for this guy
to conflate the two, I think is a little misunderstanding
even among themselves, which is again because the DeVos people,
they don't care about Germany or France or the UK,
or Switzerland or Portugal or any of the other countries.
(06:01):
They care about the EU because that's where they drive
their power, is.
Speaker 8 (06:05):
That it is interested in climate, human rights, some others,
as well as the methods of diplomacy that it prefers.
Speaker 2 (06:16):
Oh, the method of diplomacy that you prefer, you need
to suppose just telling you the you know, the straight
out truth.
Speaker 8 (06:22):
Are simply being gradually kind of marginalized as something new,
not necessarily something better, but something new moves into the center.
Speaker 2 (06:34):
So you're waking up.
Speaker 3 (06:39):
So also the World Economic Forum, they also have the
Church of the Climate Activists, the Church of the Climate Alarmists.
They're there too, because they're still preaching to the faithful
remnants of the cult of all the globalists that are
still there. Well, today's punctificating buffoon come in the form
(07:00):
of former climaz are and former presidential candidate and former
US senator and uh well, John Heinz Kerry, who, like
the Pope of the global cult al Gore, came perilously
close to attaining the presidents of the United States. But
now it's forced to admit that he doesn't really have
(07:22):
any position, he doesn't really have any authority, he doesn't
really have any influence at all. He's just a common.
Speaker 2 (07:27):
Man who flew to Davis. He was very uncommon private
jet by the way.
Speaker 3 (07:32):
He's just out there pursuing his green dreams. You know,
do you dream in Kellor dragon? Do you dream in color?
Speaker 2 (07:42):
Sometimes?
Speaker 7 (07:42):
Not?
Speaker 3 (07:43):
Only do I think I do more often than not,
but it's not always green. But I don't dream about windmills.
I just attack with mills.
Speaker 9 (07:54):
You know.
Speaker 3 (07:56):
John Kerry has spent probably twenty years as one one
of the most highly sought featured speakers at these stupid
WEF confabs. No, he's no relegated to doing a panel
discussion about how climate change is going to kill everybody.
Speaker 2 (08:18):
Anyway.
Speaker 3 (08:19):
Listen to these clips in which Kerry implies that only
the members of the Congregants of the Church of the
Climate Activists actually have functioning brains, which is, when you
think about it, a really classic cult indoctrination tactic, and
that carbon caption, now, of all things, is going to
(08:41):
save us from a from dying in some sort of
fiery inferno. Come now, twenty fifty. I know it used
to be nineteen seventy, and there was nineteen eighty, and
then it was you know, nineteen ninety, and then two thousand,
News two twenty and it was two twenty five. Well
now it's twenty fifty. Man, these people just.
Speaker 7 (09:00):
Thank you for those great contents and for your participation.
So I am appearing for the first time in years
at the.
Speaker 3 (09:09):
I'm sorry, I'm sorry to interrupt the center bizarre, I'm
sorry to interrupt missus Hines. Uh, mister Hines. But his
panel three people, Carrie and two others. Yeah, DeVos. This
is the Trump effect. This is absolutely the Trump effect.
(09:33):
I guess the globalists decided that maybe instead of going
to DeVos, maybe we have to stay home and figure
out how we're going to deal with the freaking United
States of America.
Speaker 7 (09:43):
Thank you for those great contents and for your participation.
So I am appearing for the first time in years
at the at the annual meeting here and Davos, and
not as an official speaking from my government, but as
a private citizen and a private sector individual who has
(10:07):
worked with the President and with others for many years
on this notion of what could be achieved by focusing
on the Congo basin. Sadly, I think all of you
know this and feel it. We're behind in this great battle,
and it is a great battle, because the stakes could
(10:28):
not be higher, and we see every day somewhere in
the world the impacts of the final crisis growing. On
the other hand, on the other side of that, we
have a remarkable opportunity if we will just act like
the intelligent human beings who were given brains and have
the ability to.
Speaker 4 (10:50):
Improvise, to be.
Speaker 7 (10:52):
Creative, to be entrepreneurs, and to make things happen.
Speaker 3 (10:56):
Oh, the rest of you, pleads, Unfortunately, you were born
without a brain, he said. On the other end, on
the other side of that, we have a remarkable opportunity
if we will just act like the intelligent human beings
who were given brains and have the ability to improvise,
to be creative, to be entrepreneurs.
Speaker 2 (11:17):
And to make things happen. No, but he's not done.
Speaker 7 (11:22):
The great challenge that we face is that the world
is still stuck.
Speaker 4 (11:28):
More than it should be at this point.
Speaker 7 (11:30):
On the burning of fossil fuel, Yeah, dragon and I
are burning is on right now, trying to stay warm.
Speaker 3 (11:39):
Yep, there's no wind out there today. Oh, there's some sun,
so maybe there's maybe your solar panels are working today.
Speaker 7 (11:48):
I don't know now that fossil fuel burning can produce
emissions that can be captured. We win, But we don't
know yet whether that could happen at a rate that
could be brought to scale and at a price that
enables it to be brought to scale and therefore proceed
(12:09):
as we have previously.
Speaker 4 (12:10):
That's the challenge for all of us.
Speaker 7 (12:12):
Dubai presented the world with a new choice where almost
two hundred nations came together and issued a new mission.
Definition after Paris and Glasgow and Shamashaikh and now after Dubai,
and that new mission was that we must, because of
(12:36):
what it is doing, we must transition away from fossil fuel.
Even fossil field producing countries signed on to this understanding
of the new mission we pulled out of it, and
that we would do so in a way that allowed
us to meet our goal of net zero twenty fifty.
Speaker 4 (12:57):
That we would accelerate in this deck rather than of
building something.
Speaker 7 (13:01):
As exciting as this kind of product.
Speaker 2 (13:03):
Oh so exciting, It is so exciting. That's it. Dragon.
Speaker 3 (13:07):
Do you have the ability because ironically I didn't plan
it this way. But ironically Trump is in DC delivering
a speech to the attendees at Davos. He was just
talking about free speech, and now he's talking about how
he's excited for the World Cup. Can we hear what
Trump's say?
Speaker 4 (13:23):
Everybody for being with you.
Speaker 10 (13:25):
I would have been there myself, except the inauguration was
two days ago. I thought it might be a little
bit quick to make it the first stop. But we'll
get there one day. We hope to get there. But
I do appreciate I heard. The audience is fantastic, and
many of my friends are in the audience, and I
will be taking questions now from some very distinguished people.
Speaker 4 (13:45):
Thank you all very much, and.
Speaker 2 (13:50):
We've got an audience applauds as they hate it.
Speaker 9 (13:53):
Thank you very much, mister President, for that very powerful speech.
And I think you could hear the applause all the
way from Doubles to the White House.
Speaker 4 (14:04):
But next year it will.
Speaker 9 (14:05):
Be even better because then you can get that clause
heir in Doubles. So we wish you welcome to our
village next year.
Speaker 4 (14:11):
We hope to see you. Thank you very much.
Speaker 9 (14:14):
So we also know, mister President, that you open up
for interaction here. We have a great pannel with some
of the most distinguished business people in the world. Let
me start with someone that you know really well, that
I think is almost the neighbor of you in Malarao
in Florida, mister Steve Schwartzman, Chairman, CEO and co founder
(14:41):
Blackstone Group.
Speaker 4 (14:42):
So Steve floors yours.
Speaker 2 (14:47):
Well, mister President.
Speaker 11 (14:50):
I'm sure the Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia will be
really glad you gave this speech today. You've had the
busiest four days that anybody can imagine, and congratulations for that.
(15:12):
And my question is about some of the things I've
observed here at Davos. It's a terrific forum. I've met
lots of people as usual, I think I've been there
thirty years, and a lot of the European business people
(15:34):
I have expressed enormous frustration with the regulatory regime in
the EU and they attribute slower growth rates here because
of the numerous factors, but especially because of regulations. And
(15:57):
you've taken a completely different approach in this area. And
if you could explain the theory of what you're doing,
how are you going to do it, and what you
expect the outcome to be, I'd appreciate it.
Speaker 10 (16:18):
Well, thank you very much and congratulations Steve. You're a
friend of mine, but on a great career. You have
had an amazing career and continues. I just want to
congratulate you. Very inspirational to a lot of people. I
want to talk about the EU because you mentioned specifically that.
I've also had a lot of friends and leaders of countries.
(16:38):
I've gotten to know them all my first term and
a little bit during this period of four years.
Speaker 2 (16:44):
And know them well, like them a lot.
Speaker 10 (16:46):
But they're very frustrated because of the time everything seems
to take to get approved environmental impact statements for things
that you shouldn't even have to do that, and many
many other ways that it takes.
Speaker 2 (17:00):
I'm not gonna like hearing that at all. They're not
gonna like it at all. Do you think he'll go
next year? I really question. I'll be right back.
Speaker 4 (17:22):
We had a huge twin farm plan to be built
just south.
Speaker 3 (17:25):
Of Idaho National Laboratories.
Speaker 2 (17:28):
Donald Trump put the cabash on that.
Speaker 5 (17:30):
Everybody around here is just happy as a clam.
Speaker 4 (17:37):
Yeah.
Speaker 2 (17:37):
I don't even care what he said. I just want
to listen to him laugh.
Speaker 3 (17:44):
So, as I said, I'm still digging into all the
pardons and I'll continue doing so. I just had a
text from a family member, who is it true that
Trump is refusing any sort of federal resources of any
kind for gay people? And I thought, what, So I
(18:08):
just did a quick Google search of is Trump denying
federal resources for gay citizens or gay people? I forget
which word I used, and of course the and I
did it on Google because I knew that would return
all of the you know, biased sources and you know
the A. C. L U Out magazine Blade, I mean,
(18:29):
all all of the left leaning and in particular all
the left leaning gay sites all have stories about how
Trump is eliminating all federal resources for gay people, which
is just not true. It's based upon their interpretation of
his elimination of DEI and somehow that's going to take
away protections for gay people.
Speaker 2 (18:49):
Really, we'll talk about that tomorrow. I just found that.
Speaker 3 (18:54):
I always find it interesting when I get that kind
of question from a family member, because I know instantly
they've read something. And I asked for a link, and
I get a link back from Out magazine.
Speaker 2 (19:10):
So I said, well, consider the source and listen tomorrow.
But anyway, so.
Speaker 3 (19:15):
I'm gonna keep digging into the whole pardon thing. But
Trump has now pardoned the founder of Silk Road, Ross Ulbrick.
We talked about that briefly yesterday, and I think that's
arguably a lot bigger deal for the country in the
grand scheme of things. Go back to December of twenty
(19:37):
twenty three, Angela mccardial, the chair of the Libertarian Party,
flew to down Tomorrow Lago to meet with Trump. Trump
wanted to know how to win over Libertarian voters. That's
a constituency that he thought he could help that would
help him reclaim the presidency. This is all according to
an interview that she did, and she had an Her
(20:00):
answer was free Ross Lbrick. Who is this guy? He's
a pioneer in bitcoin. He was sentenced to life in
prison in twenty fifteen, ten years ago, life in prison
for creating silk Road.
Speaker 2 (20:22):
What silk Road, It's the or.
Speaker 3 (20:25):
It was the world's largest online drug marketplace, and he
was regarded as a hero, a libertarian hero, because he
built an illegal market outside of the government's reach where
people could buy their drugs. According to the interview, Trump said,
(20:50):
I love freeing people. So five months after that trip
that she made Tomorrowlgo, she hosted Trump at the Libertarian
party's national convention, where he announced on stage that if
elected the presidency, he would release mister Olbrick. Well Tuesday,
(21:11):
he made good on that promise. He called mister Olbric's mother,
Lynn Olbrich, to personally tell her that he had granted
a full pardon to her son, who is now forty
years old. Over and then he made a post over
on truth Social and Trump said that the decision was
in honor of her and the libertarian movement movement, which
(21:35):
supported me so strongly. Now, his pardon was not, I
don't think an obvious agenda item from mister Trump, because,
unlike the nearly sixteen hundred people who got pardons or
commutations this week for their involvement in Jay six, Olbrich
had little direct connection to the president. But the moved
(21:59):
law been in the works after more than a decade
of activism by mister Olbrich's supporters, including a bunch of
cryptocurrency investors, libertary politicians, and especially Missus Olbrick, who was
a vocal proponent for a Sun's release. It's a big deal.
(22:21):
The New York Times has a story out about how
he was persuaded to do this, and you might think, well,
why would you do it into a guy who was
doing something that was maybe in the eyes of some
illegal but he did it.
Speaker 2 (22:40):
Well, let me just give you the history.
Speaker 3 (22:41):
In twenty eleven, he turned Silk Road into one of
the most popular sights on the so called dark web.
It facilitated more than one point five million transactions. It
generated more than two hundred million dollars in revenue from
the sale of heroin, them fatamine, cocaine, and other drugs.
(23:03):
Users transacted anonymously using bitcoin, which was do you think
back to twenty fifteen, It was just really kind of
getting started and you could actually post Amazon style product ratings.
So he In twenty thirteen, he was arrested at a
library in San Francisco and charged with running Silk Road.
(23:27):
In the trial, the prosecutors argued that he had solicited
the murders of people he considered threats to his business,
though he was never tried or charged for any murder
or murder for higher charges, and there was no indication
that any killings had ever even taken place. Now, six
(23:48):
deaths were attributed to drugs that were bought on the website,
so a federal judge in the Southern District of New York,
the same jurisdiction that Trump was subject to by living
in New York, called Olbrich the king pin of a
(24:09):
worldwide digital drug trafficking enterprise whose actions were quote terribly
destructive to our social fabric. So he got a life
sentence for drug distribution, money laundering, other charges. But legal
experts said that's too harsh, And of course the Bertarians
were outraged about it because they opposed severe drug penalties,
(24:31):
and crypto enthusiasts were upset because this was showing how
crypto could be used anonymously. So while he was in prison,
he played up his connection to bitcoin, and October twenty eighteen,
he sent a letter to his mother celebrating the tenth
anniversary of the founding of bitcoin and liking himself to
(24:55):
a proud pair of the technology. Social media went crazy
about him too. Now, behind the scenes, his mother worked
to popularize the slogan free Ross, and that became a
rallying cry at crypto conferences all over the country. She
networked with Republican politicians, bar right influencers, hoping to eventually
(25:15):
get into.
Speaker 2 (25:16):
Trump's inner circle.
Speaker 3 (25:19):
Now, after he lost the election in twenty twenty Trump
considered freeing Olbert. At least one lobbyist was paid over
twenty thousand dollars to try to help secure his release,
but Trump left office and didn't take any action. Then
she starts her push again, and then you had mccardeal
go down, contacted by Richard Grennell, who had asked for
(25:42):
advice about the pardon. Then late last year, Trump and
his staff also met with representatives of Bitcoin magazine, who
pushed for his release. By then Trump laure vowed to
free him. Then he doubled down that pledge at a
conference in Ashville organized by Bitclaim magazine. And now he's
(26:05):
fulfilled it. Freedom, Free at last, Free at last. Now,
many people may say, but wait a minute. This guy
had a website on the dark web in which people
started using the website to buy.
Speaker 2 (26:22):
And sell drugs. Is he responsible for that.
Speaker 3 (26:28):
Anymore than we want to hold people responsible for what
they say on X or Facebook. If you open a
platform and ostensibly arguably on the dark web, because you're
trying to get away from the jurisdiction of any government,
(26:49):
I'm impressed by it. Now do I condone the use
of illicit illegal drugs that have the ability to kill you. No,
But anybody who has the wherewithal to put together that
kind of website where you could buy and sell anything
(27:10):
doesn't have to be drugs. I want to buy a
I don't know. I want to buy a specialty microphone
of some sort. I could have probably found it there,
Probably could have found a lot of stuff there, including
illegal drugs. But should he be held accountable for what
(27:32):
took place on the website? Because under section two thirty
you give immunity to people who have platforms, and you're
immune from liability for what takes place on the platform.
Speaker 2 (27:48):
That's federal law.
Speaker 3 (27:50):
So if you create a platform, and you're smart enough
to do it so that it's outside the jurisdiction of
the government, and then some people, not everybody, but some
people use it for, you know, illegal purposes, are you
to be held liable for that? You see, that gets
awfully close to the idea that you manufacture a gun
(28:11):
and someone uses it illegally, which guns can be used
in illegal ways, right, just as drugs can be used
in illegal ways. Should the manufacturer be held liable or
should the person who facilitates the sale be held liable?
I think it's a question that this particular pardon is
(28:35):
going to cause us to really.
Speaker 7 (28:36):
Focus on Uncle Joe gave out a hell of a
lot of pardons.
Speaker 6 (28:40):
How come we didn't partners dogs for assaulting secret service agents?
Speaker 4 (28:45):
Oh? Just curious?
Speaker 3 (28:46):
Good one good one commander And what was the other's
dog's name?
Speaker 4 (28:51):
Major?
Speaker 2 (28:52):
What major?
Speaker 3 (28:54):
Major?
Speaker 2 (28:54):
Major command? Yeah, what happened to them? I think they
really still have those dogs. They probably do now, Yeah,
I don't know. I think they were sent away for
a while, sent away for re education something like that.
Speaker 3 (29:12):
And know what communists does send them away for re education.
We talked about birthright citizenship and Kirk sent me, by
the way, thanks for sending me a stuff from Professor Eastman.
Speaker 2 (29:22):
I'd read it.
Speaker 3 (29:24):
And by the way, Professor Eastman and I are probably
on exactly the same page when it counts to birthright citizenship.
So one of the top national priorities is to end
birthright citizenship, and I'm all in favor of that. I
am thoroughly convinced that the eighteen ninety eight Supreme Court
(29:45):
decision was wrongfully decided. I don't think that the interpretation
about subject to the jurisdiction thereof is correct. I don't
think that there was never any intention at all that
it interpreted the way that people are currently doing it. Well,
so that's one of our top priorities. You know, Sneak
(30:08):
over the border, come in as a tourist or student,
drop a baby, and presto. You know, somehow your lips
are suddenly affixed to the social welfare system and that
turns out to be an intergenerational thing. Well, the New
York Times is really upset that Trump will try to
put an end to that insanity. But interestingly, the Times
(30:28):
propagandists distract from their own message with some unusual language.
So doctor Braddock tweeted this out posted this yesterday, quite
the shift from the usual birthing people, fetus and clumps
of sales terminology, and e cites this article from The
(30:49):
New York Times. Undocumented women ask will my unborn child
be a citizen? And the subject is President trump executive
order seeking to end birthright citizenship. Is already facing lawsuits,
but that has been little comfort to women who expect
to give birth after the order goes into effect. Now,
(31:13):
I just find the use of the term woman and
women interesting because, you know, the prominent elitist like associate
justice Ttanji Brown Jackson should be Jackson.
Speaker 2 (31:26):
Brown cannot define the term woman.
Speaker 3 (31:32):
It is used here to mean adult human female, But
then you got terms like chess feeder or person who menstruates.
Those are the preferred terminology in the New Speak dictionary.
So the term unborn child, unborn child, undocumented women ask,
(31:55):
will my unborn child be a citizen? I'm really confused because,
according to the left's theory, the concept of an unborn
child is an oxymoron. If a child's not been born, well,
it's not a child. It's just simply a non human
(32:15):
clump of sales, right, That's all we keep being told,
And to think otherwise would be to acknowledge that abortion
is something not any less than just cold blood and murder.
So the lesson here for those who want to avoid
straying into thought crimes is that contact matters. A woman
(32:35):
could be a woman if she is also an illegal
alien put upon by Donald Trump. An unborn child can
be an unborn child if that will help the woman
onto the welfare state and onto the roles of the
Democrat voters. So you see, even the New Speak dictionary
(32:57):
has were that. Well, only depending upon the context, can
you really ascertain the meaning of the word now. Quite honestly,
I had when I was reading New York Times. I
saw the story, I glanced through it, and the whole
(33:17):
headline went right past me until it appeared again on
my Twitter, on my ex feet because he's right, quite
the shift from the usual birthing people, fetus and clumps
of sales terminology that those on the left always want
to use. And suddenly it's oh, is my unborn child
going to be a citizen? Well, is it really an
(33:40):
unborn child or is it just a.
Speaker 2 (33:42):
Clump of cell?
Speaker 3 (33:43):
I mean, what is it. See when you're talking about immigration, oh,
it's a child. When you're talking about abortion, well it's
just a clump of cells. Get it, got it.
Somebody who has the ear of the president on a
slip up to him and whisper in his ear. You
don't have the stoves to send any of these illegals
to the Vatican.
Speaker 2 (00:20):
You mean you mean.
Speaker 3 (00:22):
Treating like passive aggressive to getting to do it. Any
of you Catholics? What do you think of that the
Vatican has at what he's referring to is the Vatican
has a statue, right, I was reading it last night
about anyone you know, Vatican has as its own nation state. Uh,
(00:49):
obviously they have agreements with the Italians for you know,
police services. I mean, the Swiss guards don't really do
a lot, so they got these agree with the Italians,
I'm sorry, the Italians to provide you know, police services
and stuff.
Speaker 2 (01:08):
Security.
Speaker 3 (01:11):
The Vatican statues criminalize anyone entering the Vatican grounds the
country without authorization. Now obviously it's open to tourists and stuff.
So you know, you'd have to figure out, you know,
a fact situation that would fit the statute. But it
comes with a really hefty find. Like I remember it
(01:33):
was like I don't worry whether it was in lira
or euros or what, but it was like thirty thousand something.
You know, maybe it's thirty thousand euros or something, and
a certain amount of time in jail, you know, a
incarceration period of you know, I don't know, two to
five years or something. Again, just pulling some numbers out
of my butt. I was more fast numb by the
(01:54):
fact that they have a statute that says that, and
then here's the Pope at the same time saying that, well,
we're doing is immoral and illegal. Mister Pope, sit down,
shut up. That's what I would say. Do you know
what's going on? The annual World Economic Forum conferences are
(02:18):
being held in DeVos, and nobody's there.
Speaker 2 (02:23):
Now, some of the usual.
Speaker 3 (02:24):
Suspects are there, but in one news story that I
dug into yesterday, DeVos is almost like they described it
as almost like a ghost town. Nobody's there. Most of
the CEOs that normally attend. I don't think that Bezos
is there. I don't think that Google Facebook, Tim Cook,
(02:49):
I don't think any of the biggies that were at
the inauguration or at DeVos. Oh, John Kerry is still
there though. We'll get to John Kerry in a minute.
Speaker 4 (03:00):
So why.
Speaker 2 (03:05):
Well, I want you to listen to this is just
freaking hilarious.
Speaker 3 (03:10):
So there's there's a they're holding, you know, the they're
holding one of their panel discussions, and they're talking about
Trump and how bad Trump is. Yeah, it's feel easy
to talk bad about somebody when they're not around.
Speaker 5 (03:27):
Trump has done something no person in the world has
ever done before. A dead man, A dead politician has risen.
Speaker 2 (03:38):
A dead politician has risen.
Speaker 5 (03:41):
Wow, somebody who the year were four years ago at
the US he's buried dead politically known to me, He's
now returned. This is the greatest comeback in political history
a politician.
Speaker 4 (03:56):
And then therefore he thinks he can do anything.
Speaker 6 (03:59):
We need to also factor and not only who's one,
which is.
Speaker 3 (04:03):
Don't don't just don't gloss over the fact that you know,
now that he's one, he thinks he can do anything.
Speaker 4 (04:08):
And therefore he thinks he can do anything.
Speaker 3 (04:11):
Now the camera switches. New speaker steps up, or doesn't
step up, but they take the camera to a new speaker,
turn his microphone on.
Speaker 2 (04:20):
Listen to what he has to say.
Speaker 6 (04:21):
We need to also factor and not only who's one,
which is Trump, but who's lost, which is to say us.
Speaker 2 (04:31):
We you know, so is it I can't see for
all the glaring lights.
Speaker 3 (04:37):
Is there anybody out there in the audience, anybody listening
to us?
Speaker 2 (04:40):
Anybody there? Hello? Is this microphone on?
Speaker 4 (04:44):
Huh?
Speaker 2 (04:45):
Is this is a microphone?
Speaker 7 (04:47):
On? Uh?
Speaker 4 (04:50):
Trump won?
Speaker 2 (04:51):
We lost?
Speaker 6 (04:53):
We need to also factor and not only who's one,
which is Trump, but who's loss, which is to say US,
And I guess I would add throw into that to
the epitome of the US. Who is losing? Here is
Europe that the European Union and by and largest member
states have misread the direction where events were going.
Speaker 2 (05:17):
The causes.
Speaker 3 (05:18):
I don't know that the European states have, Like I
don't think that the UK or France or Germany misunderstood
where this country was going. Now that the EU states,
the EU countries, I hate colling states. The EU countries
are different than the bureaucratic Beanie Weeni's that run the
(05:40):
EU in Brussels. They're truly globalists. So for this guy
to conflate the two, I think is a little misunderstanding
even among themselves, which is again because the DeVos people,
they don't care about Germany or France or the UK,
or Switzerland or Portugal or any of the other countries.
(06:01):
They care about the EU because that's where they drive
their power, is.
Speaker 8 (06:05):
That it is interested in climate, human rights, some others,
as well as the methods of diplomacy that it prefers.
Speaker 2 (06:16):
Oh, the method of diplomacy that you prefer, you need
to suppose just telling you the you know, the straight
out truth.
Speaker 8 (06:22):
Are simply being gradually kind of marginalized as something new,
not necessarily something better, but something new moves into the center.
Speaker 2 (06:34):
So you're waking up.
Speaker 3 (06:39):
So also the World Economic Forum, they also have the
Church of the Climate Activists, the Church of the Climate Alarmists.
They're there too, because they're still preaching to the faithful
remnants of the cult of all the globalists that are
still there. Well, today's punctificating buffoon come in the form
(07:00):
of former climaz are and former presidential candidate and former
US senator and uh well, John Heinz Kerry, who, like
the Pope of the global cult al Gore, came perilously
close to attaining the presidents of the United States. But
now it's forced to admit that he doesn't really have
(07:22):
any position, he doesn't really have any authority, he doesn't
really have any influence at all. He's just a common.
Speaker 2 (07:27):
Man who flew to Davis. He was very uncommon private
jet by the way.
Speaker 3 (07:32):
He's just out there pursuing his green dreams. You know,
do you dream in Kellor dragon? Do you dream in color?
Speaker 2 (07:42):
Sometimes?
Speaker 7 (07:42):
Not?
Speaker 3 (07:43):
Only do I think I do more often than not,
but it's not always green. But I don't dream about windmills.
I just attack with mills.
Speaker 9 (07:54):
You know.
Speaker 3 (07:56):
John Kerry has spent probably twenty years as one one
of the most highly sought featured speakers at these stupid
WEF confabs. No, he's no relegated to doing a panel
discussion about how climate change is going to kill everybody.
Speaker 2 (08:18):
Anyway.
Speaker 3 (08:19):
Listen to these clips in which Kerry implies that only
the members of the Congregants of the Church of the
Climate Activists actually have functioning brains, which is, when you
think about it, a really classic cult indoctrination tactic, and
that carbon caption, now, of all things, is going to
(08:41):
save us from a from dying in some sort of
fiery inferno. Come now, twenty fifty. I know it used
to be nineteen seventy, and there was nineteen eighty, and
then it was you know, nineteen ninety, and then two thousand,
News two twenty and it was two twenty five. Well
now it's twenty fifty. Man, these people just.
Speaker 7 (09:00):
Thank you for those great contents and for your participation.
So I am appearing for the first time in years
at the.
Speaker 3 (09:09):
I'm sorry, I'm sorry to interrupt the center bizarre, I'm
sorry to interrupt missus Hines. Uh, mister Hines. But his
panel three people, Carrie and two others. Yeah, DeVos. This
is the Trump effect. This is absolutely the Trump effect.
(09:33):
I guess the globalists decided that maybe instead of going
to DeVos, maybe we have to stay home and figure
out how we're going to deal with the freaking United
States of America.
Speaker 7 (09:43):
Thank you for those great contents and for your participation.
So I am appearing for the first time in years
at the at the annual meeting here and Davos, and
not as an official speaking from my government, but as
a private citizen and a private sector individual who has
(10:07):
worked with the President and with others for many years
on this notion of what could be achieved by focusing
on the Congo basin. Sadly, I think all of you
know this and feel it. We're behind in this great battle,
and it is a great battle, because the stakes could
(10:28):
not be higher, and we see every day somewhere in
the world the impacts of the final crisis growing. On
the other hand, on the other side of that, we
have a remarkable opportunity if we will just act like
the intelligent human beings who were given brains and have
the ability to.
Speaker 4 (10:50):
Improvise, to be.
Speaker 7 (10:52):
Creative, to be entrepreneurs, and to make things happen.
Speaker 3 (10:56):
Oh, the rest of you, pleads, Unfortunately, you were born
without a brain, he said. On the other end, on
the other side of that, we have a remarkable opportunity
if we will just act like the intelligent human beings
who were given brains and have the ability to improvise,
to be creative, to be entrepreneurs.
Speaker 2 (11:17):
And to make things happen. No, but he's not done.
Speaker 7 (11:22):
The great challenge that we face is that the world
is still stuck.
Speaker 4 (11:28):
More than it should be at this point.
Speaker 7 (11:30):
On the burning of fossil fuel, Yeah, dragon and I
are burning is on right now, trying to stay warm.
Speaker 3 (11:39):
Yep, there's no wind out there today. Oh, there's some sun,
so maybe there's maybe your solar panels are working today.
Speaker 7 (11:48):
I don't know now that fossil fuel burning can produce
emissions that can be captured. We win, But we don't
know yet whether that could happen at a rate that
could be brought to scale and at a price that
enables it to be brought to scale and therefore proceed
(12:09):
as we have previously.
Speaker 4 (12:10):
That's the challenge for all of us.
Speaker 7 (12:12):
Dubai presented the world with a new choice where almost
two hundred nations came together and issued a new mission.
Definition after Paris and Glasgow and Shamashaikh and now after Dubai,
and that new mission was that we must, because of
(12:36):
what it is doing, we must transition away from fossil fuel.
Even fossil field producing countries signed on to this understanding
of the new mission we pulled out of it, and
that we would do so in a way that allowed
us to meet our goal of net zero twenty fifty.
Speaker 4 (12:57):
That we would accelerate in this deck rather than of
building something.
Speaker 7 (13:01):
As exciting as this kind of product.
Speaker 2 (13:03):
Oh so exciting, It is so exciting. That's it. Dragon.
Speaker 3 (13:07):
Do you have the ability because ironically I didn't plan
it this way. But ironically Trump is in DC delivering
a speech to the attendees at Davos. He was just
talking about free speech, and now he's talking about how
he's excited for the World Cup. Can we hear what
Trump's say?
Speaker 4 (13:23):
Everybody for being with you.
Speaker 10 (13:25):
I would have been there myself, except the inauguration was
two days ago. I thought it might be a little
bit quick to make it the first stop. But we'll
get there one day. We hope to get there. But
I do appreciate I heard. The audience is fantastic, and
many of my friends are in the audience, and I
will be taking questions now from some very distinguished people.
Speaker 4 (13:45):
Thank you all very much, and.
Speaker 2 (13:50):
We've got an audience applauds as they hate it.
Speaker 9 (13:53):
Thank you very much, mister President, for that very powerful speech.
And I think you could hear the applause all the
way from Doubles to the White House.
Speaker 4 (14:04):
But next year it will.
Speaker 9 (14:05):
Be even better because then you can get that clause
heir in Doubles. So we wish you welcome to our
village next year.
Speaker 4 (14:11):
We hope to see you. Thank you very much.
Speaker 9 (14:14):
So we also know, mister President, that you open up
for interaction here. We have a great pannel with some
of the most distinguished business people in the world. Let
me start with someone that you know really well, that
I think is almost the neighbor of you in Malarao
in Florida, mister Steve Schwartzman, Chairman, CEO and co founder
(14:41):
Blackstone Group.
Speaker 4 (14:42):
So Steve floors yours.
Speaker 2 (14:47):
Well, mister President.
Speaker 11 (14:50):
I'm sure the Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia will be
really glad you gave this speech today. You've had the
busiest four days that anybody can imagine, and congratulations for that.
(15:12):
And my question is about some of the things I've
observed here at Davos. It's a terrific forum. I've met
lots of people as usual, I think I've been there
thirty years, and a lot of the European business people
(15:34):
I have expressed enormous frustration with the regulatory regime in
the EU and they attribute slower growth rates here because
of the numerous factors, but especially because of regulations. And
(15:57):
you've taken a completely different approach in this area. And
if you could explain the theory of what you're doing,
how are you going to do it, and what you
expect the outcome to be, I'd appreciate it.
Speaker 10 (16:18):
Well, thank you very much and congratulations Steve. You're a
friend of mine, but on a great career. You have
had an amazing career and continues. I just want to
congratulate you. Very inspirational to a lot of people. I
want to talk about the EU because you mentioned specifically that.
I've also had a lot of friends and leaders of countries.
(16:38):
I've gotten to know them all my first term and
a little bit during this period of four years.
Speaker 2 (16:44):
And know them well, like them a lot.
Speaker 10 (16:46):
But they're very frustrated because of the time everything seems
to take to get approved environmental impact statements for things
that you shouldn't even have to do that, and many
many other ways that it takes.
Speaker 2 (17:00):
I'm not gonna like hearing that at all. They're not
gonna like it at all. Do you think he'll go
next year? I really question. I'll be right back.
Speaker 4 (17:22):
We had a huge twin farm plan to be built
just south.
Speaker 3 (17:25):
Of Idaho National Laboratories.
Speaker 2 (17:28):
Donald Trump put the cabash on that.
Speaker 5 (17:30):
Everybody around here is just happy as a clam.
Speaker 4 (17:37):
Yeah.
Speaker 2 (17:37):
I don't even care what he said. I just want
to listen to him laugh.
Speaker 3 (17:44):
So, as I said, I'm still digging into all the
pardons and I'll continue doing so. I just had a
text from a family member, who is it true that
Trump is refusing any sort of federal resources of any
kind for gay people? And I thought, what, So I
(18:08):
just did a quick Google search of is Trump denying
federal resources for gay citizens or gay people? I forget
which word I used, and of course the and I
did it on Google because I knew that would return
all of the you know, biased sources and you know
the A. C. L U Out magazine Blade, I mean,
(18:29):
all all of the left leaning and in particular all
the left leaning gay sites all have stories about how
Trump is eliminating all federal resources for gay people, which
is just not true. It's based upon their interpretation of
his elimination of DEI and somehow that's going to take
away protections for gay people.
Speaker 2 (18:49):
Really, we'll talk about that tomorrow. I just found that.
Speaker 3 (18:54):
I always find it interesting when I get that kind
of question from a family member, because I know instantly
they've read something. And I asked for a link, and
I get a link back from Out magazine.
Speaker 2 (19:10):
So I said, well, consider the source and listen tomorrow.
But anyway, so.
Speaker 3 (19:15):
I'm gonna keep digging into the whole pardon thing. But
Trump has now pardoned the founder of Silk Road, Ross Ulbrick.
We talked about that briefly yesterday, and I think that's
arguably a lot bigger deal for the country in the
grand scheme of things. Go back to December of twenty
(19:37):
twenty three, Angela mccardial, the chair of the Libertarian Party,
flew to down Tomorrow Lago to meet with Trump. Trump
wanted to know how to win over Libertarian voters. That's
a constituency that he thought he could help that would
help him reclaim the presidency. This is all according to
an interview that she did, and she had an Her
(20:00):
answer was free Ross Lbrick. Who is this guy? He's
a pioneer in bitcoin. He was sentenced to life in
prison in twenty fifteen, ten years ago, life in prison
for creating silk Road.
Speaker 2 (20:22):
What silk Road, It's the or.
Speaker 3 (20:25):
It was the world's largest online drug marketplace, and he
was regarded as a hero, a libertarian hero, because he
built an illegal market outside of the government's reach where
people could buy their drugs. According to the interview, Trump said,
(20:50):
I love freeing people. So five months after that trip
that she made Tomorrowlgo, she hosted Trump at the Libertarian
party's national convention, where he announced on stage that if
elected the presidency, he would release mister Olbrick. Well Tuesday,
(21:11):
he made good on that promise. He called mister Olbric's mother,
Lynn Olbrich, to personally tell her that he had granted
a full pardon to her son, who is now forty
years old. Over and then he made a post over
on truth Social and Trump said that the decision was
in honor of her and the libertarian movement movement, which
(21:35):
supported me so strongly. Now, his pardon was not, I
don't think an obvious agenda item from mister Trump, because,
unlike the nearly sixteen hundred people who got pardons or
commutations this week for their involvement in Jay six, Olbrich
had little direct connection to the president. But the moved
(21:59):
law been in the works after more than a decade
of activism by mister Olbrich's supporters, including a bunch of
cryptocurrency investors, libertary politicians, and especially Missus Olbrick, who was
a vocal proponent for a Sun's release. It's a big deal.
(22:21):
The New York Times has a story out about how
he was persuaded to do this, and you might think, well,
why would you do it into a guy who was
doing something that was maybe in the eyes of some
illegal but he did it.
Speaker 2 (22:40):
Well, let me just give you the history.
Speaker 3 (22:41):
In twenty eleven, he turned Silk Road into one of
the most popular sights on the so called dark web.
It facilitated more than one point five million transactions. It
generated more than two hundred million dollars in revenue from
the sale of heroin, them fatamine, cocaine, and other drugs.
(23:03):
Users transacted anonymously using bitcoin, which was do you think
back to twenty fifteen, It was just really kind of
getting started and you could actually post Amazon style product ratings.
So he In twenty thirteen, he was arrested at a
library in San Francisco and charged with running Silk Road.
(23:27):
In the trial, the prosecutors argued that he had solicited
the murders of people he considered threats to his business,
though he was never tried or charged for any murder
or murder for higher charges, and there was no indication
that any killings had ever even taken place. Now, six
(23:48):
deaths were attributed to drugs that were bought on the website,
so a federal judge in the Southern District of New York,
the same jurisdiction that Trump was subject to by living
in New York, called Olbrich the king pin of a
(24:09):
worldwide digital drug trafficking enterprise whose actions were quote terribly
destructive to our social fabric. So he got a life
sentence for drug distribution, money laundering, other charges. But legal
experts said that's too harsh, And of course the Bertarians
were outraged about it because they opposed severe drug penalties,
(24:31):
and crypto enthusiasts were upset because this was showing how
crypto could be used anonymously. So while he was in prison,
he played up his connection to bitcoin, and October twenty eighteen,
he sent a letter to his mother celebrating the tenth
anniversary of the founding of bitcoin and liking himself to
(24:55):
a proud pair of the technology. Social media went crazy
about him too. Now, behind the scenes, his mother worked
to popularize the slogan free Ross, and that became a
rallying cry at crypto conferences all over the country. She
networked with Republican politicians, bar right influencers, hoping to eventually
(25:15):
get into.
Speaker 2 (25:16):
Trump's inner circle.
Speaker 3 (25:19):
Now, after he lost the election in twenty twenty Trump
considered freeing Olbert. At least one lobbyist was paid over
twenty thousand dollars to try to help secure his release,
but Trump left office and didn't take any action. Then
she starts her push again, and then you had mccardeal
go down, contacted by Richard Grennell, who had asked for
(25:42):
advice about the pardon. Then late last year, Trump and
his staff also met with representatives of Bitcoin magazine, who
pushed for his release. By then Trump laure vowed to
free him. Then he doubled down that pledge at a
conference in Ashville organized by Bitclaim magazine. And now he's
(26:05):
fulfilled it. Freedom, Free at last, Free at last. Now,
many people may say, but wait a minute. This guy
had a website on the dark web in which people
started using the website to buy.
Speaker 2 (26:22):
And sell drugs. Is he responsible for that.
Speaker 3 (26:28):
Anymore than we want to hold people responsible for what
they say on X or Facebook. If you open a
platform and ostensibly arguably on the dark web, because you're
trying to get away from the jurisdiction of any government,
(26:49):
I'm impressed by it. Now do I condone the use
of illicit illegal drugs that have the ability to kill you. No,
But anybody who has the wherewithal to put together that
kind of website where you could buy and sell anything
(27:10):
doesn't have to be drugs. I want to buy a
I don't know. I want to buy a specialty microphone
of some sort. I could have probably found it there,
Probably could have found a lot of stuff there, including
illegal drugs. But should he be held accountable for what
(27:32):
took place on the website? Because under section two thirty
you give immunity to people who have platforms, and you're
immune from liability for what takes place on the platform.
Speaker 2 (27:48):
That's federal law.
Speaker 3 (27:50):
So if you create a platform, and you're smart enough
to do it so that it's outside the jurisdiction of
the government, and then some people, not everybody, but some
people use it for, you know, illegal purposes, are you
to be held liable for that? You see, that gets
awfully close to the idea that you manufacture a gun
(28:11):
and someone uses it illegally, which guns can be used
in illegal ways, right, just as drugs can be used
in illegal ways. Should the manufacturer be held liable or
should the person who facilitates the sale be held liable?
I think it's a question that this particular pardon is
(28:35):
going to cause us to really.
Speaker 7 (28:36):
Focus on Uncle Joe gave out a hell of a
lot of pardons.
Speaker 6 (28:40):
How come we didn't partners dogs for assaulting secret service agents?
Speaker 4 (28:45):
Oh? Just curious?
Speaker 3 (28:46):
Good one good one commander And what was the other's
dog's name?
Speaker 4 (28:51):
Major?
Speaker 2 (28:52):
What major?
Speaker 3 (28:54):
Major?
Speaker 2 (28:54):
Major command? Yeah, what happened to them? I think they
really still have those dogs. They probably do now, Yeah,
I don't know. I think they were sent away for
a while, sent away for re education something like that.
Speaker 3 (29:12):
And know what communists does send them away for re education.
We talked about birthright citizenship and Kirk sent me, by
the way, thanks for sending me a stuff from Professor Eastman.
Speaker 2 (29:22):
I'd read it.
Speaker 3 (29:24):
And by the way, Professor Eastman and I are probably
on exactly the same page when it counts to birthright citizenship.
So one of the top national priorities is to end
birthright citizenship, and I'm all in favor of that. I
am thoroughly convinced that the eighteen ninety eight Supreme Court
(29:45):
decision was wrongfully decided. I don't think that the interpretation
about subject to the jurisdiction thereof is correct. I don't
think that there was never any intention at all that
it interpreted the way that people are currently doing it. Well,
so that's one of our top priorities. You know, Sneak
(30:08):
over the border, come in as a tourist or student,
drop a baby, and presto. You know, somehow your lips
are suddenly affixed to the social welfare system and that
turns out to be an intergenerational thing. Well, the New
York Times is really upset that Trump will try to
put an end to that insanity. But interestingly, the Times
(30:28):
propagandists distract from their own message with some unusual language.
So doctor Braddock tweeted this out posted this yesterday, quite
the shift from the usual birthing people, fetus and clumps
of sales terminology, and e cites this article from The
(30:49):
New York Times. Undocumented women ask will my unborn child
be a citizen? And the subject is President trump executive
order seeking to end birthright citizenship. Is already facing lawsuits,
but that has been little comfort to women who expect
to give birth after the order goes into effect. Now,
(31:13):
I just find the use of the term woman and
women interesting because, you know, the prominent elitist like associate
justice Ttanji Brown Jackson should be Jackson.
Speaker 2 (31:26):
Brown cannot define the term woman.
Speaker 3 (31:32):
It is used here to mean adult human female, But
then you got terms like chess feeder or person who menstruates.
Those are the preferred terminology in the New Speak dictionary.
So the term unborn child, unborn child, undocumented women ask,
(31:55):
will my unborn child be a citizen? I'm really confused because,
according to the left's theory, the concept of an unborn
child is an oxymoron. If a child's not been born, well,
it's not a child. It's just simply a non human
(32:15):
clump of sales, right, That's all we keep being told,
And to think otherwise would be to acknowledge that abortion
is something not any less than just cold blood and murder.
So the lesson here for those who want to avoid
straying into thought crimes is that contact matters. A woman
(32:35):
could be a woman if she is also an illegal
alien put upon by Donald Trump. An unborn child can
be an unborn child if that will help the woman
onto the welfare state and onto the roles of the
Democrat voters. So you see, even the New Speak dictionary
(32:57):
has were that. Well, only depending upon the context, can
you really ascertain the meaning of the word now. Quite honestly,
I had when I was reading New York Times. I
saw the story, I glanced through it, and the whole
(33:17):
headline went right past me until it appeared again on
my Twitter, on my ex feet because he's right, quite
the shift from the usual birthing people, fetus and clumps
of sales terminology that those on the left always want
to use. And suddenly it's oh, is my unborn child
going to be a citizen? Well, is it really an
(33:40):
unborn child or is it just a.
Speaker 2 (33:42):
Clump of cell?
Speaker 3 (33:43):
I mean, what is it. See when you're talking about immigration, oh,
it's a child. When you're talking about abortion, well it's
just a clump of cells. Get it, got it.
Popular Podcasts
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
NFL Daily with Gregg Rosenthal
Gregg Rosenthal and a rotating crew of elite NFL Media co-hosts, including Patrick Claybon, Colleen Wolfe, Steve Wyche, Nick Shook and Jourdan Rodrigue of The Athletic get you caught up daily on all the NFL news and analysis you need to be smarter and funnier than your friends.