Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Michael. Law abiding criminals don't exist. And yes, Michael Bennett
is Gomer Pile. Watch the RFK Come, Who's gumber Pile?
Michael Bennett?
Speaker 2 (00:15):
Oh, oh my gosh, that was so funny. Yesterday, So
the RFK Junior hearing started and I wanted to dip
into them. As I looked up to tell Dragon this,
dip into it. It was just as Michael Bennett was starting,
and it was the the The guy is a blubbering idiot.
(00:40):
But isn't it appropriate? Have you thought about just how
appropriate it is for Colorado that our senior United States
senator is a blithering idiot like Michael Bennett.
Speaker 1 (00:51):
And our junior US senator is Howdie Dooty, that's all. Yeah,
And then look at the governor.
Speaker 2 (01:00):
All he cares about is Taylor Swift, his animal rights
hugging loving husband. What's his name, I've given his name.
Bring the wolves into Colorado? No wonder, no wonder, this
is a state into client.
Speaker 1 (01:14):
You almost figured out he loves trains and he loves trains.
That's right, he loves trains. Oh, good grief.
Speaker 2 (01:22):
But they just like the person I want to talk
about now, they have no clue how stupid they are,
and they have no clue sometimes the stupid things that
they say, and I'm always just it frustrates me that
more Americans don't hear the stupidity of what they say,
(01:45):
particularly in light of the election last November. When you
think about where we were last November and the four
years preceding that, and how little was done, but what
was done was so damaging to the country, not just
domestically but internationally, and in the what now ten days
(02:10):
ten today's the tenth day into the well nine and
a half days into the tenth day of this administration
of Trump two point zero. He's done more in those
ten days to reverse what the damage was done by
the Biden administration than I ever thought possible. But compare
(02:33):
the two individuals. They're only what four years apart in age,
they might as well be forty years apart in age
or four hundred, because one's a dinosaur and one's like
a like a ADHD brain adult rug raft that's just
hyped up on sugar all the time, hyped up on dieke,
(02:54):
cocone and cheeseburgers, Oh and French fries too, which, by
the way, Bobby Kin Junior.
Speaker 1 (03:00):
Yesterday made a great statement about.
Speaker 2 (03:02):
I can't believe these people think that I'm out there
trying to get rid of you know, McDonald's, you know,
quarter pounders and French fries and diet coach. When I
got a boss that that's his favorite meal, I'll see
if I can find that and then play for it's hilarious.
But if you stop and compare the two and then
listen to what some of the journalists say, particularly about immigration,
(03:23):
you'll realize that either there's a portion of the country
that is really just so stupid that they have no
clue what's going on, or they're so blinded by their
ideology that they don't care what's going on. Let's talk
about Al Jazeera for a moment. You don't get much
further left than Al Jazeera. Well, they have a journalist
(03:44):
by the name of Julia Galliano.
Speaker 1 (03:48):
I don't have pronounced last name g A L I
A n O Golliano.
Speaker 2 (03:54):
She in this In this interview, she does unwitting, unknowingly
total cognitive dissonance, admits that no country can adequately deal
with the negative consequences of mass immigration. While she's trying
to defend Mexico's resistance to accepting the illegal aliens that
(04:21):
are being mass deported by Donald Trump.
Speaker 1 (04:25):
She reports from.
Speaker 2 (04:27):
Cuba, absolutely hilarious. She's reporting from Cuba under its authoritarian
and obviously anti American communist regime. She contends that Mexico
is unable to cope with the economic and societal impact
that influx of deportees are going to have on that country.
(04:54):
I'll let you listen heer in just a minute. I
want to I want to tell you what she says. First,
Mexico cannot. I'm not sure any country can, but Mexico
cannot cope with, like, you know, a sudden influx of
millions of people. I mean, as much as Mexican President
Scheinbaum wants to embrace them, to use her word, when
(05:15):
they come back, and make them feel welcome.
Speaker 1 (05:17):
This is on.
Speaker 2 (05:18):
A podcast called The Take. It's hosted by Al Jazeera.
By the way, it all sounds very nice when you're
listening to it, but the reality of that is just
completely unsustainable. Now she goes on, and I want to
analyze what she says, but just think about that. It
(05:40):
all sounds very nice when you're listening to it, but
the reality of that is just completely unsustainable. Well, isn't
that true for us too?
Speaker 1 (05:53):
Now?
Speaker 2 (05:53):
What was she doing? This is where the cognitive dissonance
sets in her remarks to be seen or heard. I
guess heard the right word. She wanted her remarks to
be heard as a criticism of Trump's mass deportation policies
and their impact on Mexico, but she unintentionally echoed the
(06:16):
very argument behind Trump's massive immigration crackdown. Let's go back,
because I think again, let's not forget where we were.
It's going to be real easy to forget where we were.
Under Joe Biden, millions of illegal aliens were allowed to
(06:36):
come into this country because they had the stupid temporary
Protective Status program, which was abused by everybody. You had
the federal immigration parole program, and you had a complete
utter lack of border enforcement. So the influx of illegal
aliens placed an unprecedented strain on federal, state, and local rea.
(07:01):
And then we had the It also fueled and we
witnessed it right here in Colorado, a spike in violent
gang related crime, which of course you know they told us,
police told us, is just it's our imagination. And at
one point Mike Kaufman Essentially, the Republican was even denying
that turn their rod was even present.
Speaker 1 (07:22):
And now we have.
Speaker 2 (07:23):
Oh they're having they're they're having big parties in the
warehouse and they get raided by Dea and Ice. Oh,
it's just a figment of your imagination. Think about Remember
I told you the story about the the teacher in
the War of Public Schools who has classrooms that have
(07:47):
no English speaking students at all. Now, this teacher is
trying to teach mathematics to kids that don't understand any English.
He told me that he can speak, you know, like
kind of like me, those strasquattro sinco, and that's about it.
(08:11):
And so he relies on kids in the class that
know a few English words so that they can translate,
because the War of Public Schools doesn't put any translators
in the class. Now, think about that. So those classes
mean that your student that is an American citizen that
speaks English is being deprived of this person who's probably
(08:36):
an excellent math teacher. His abilities are being totally wasted
on those students. And if those are additional students in
a War of Public Schools, they have to hire additional teachers,
which means, of course, if you have to hire additional
If you, let's just say a war of public schools
has to hire five additional teachers, well that means scientifically,
(08:58):
you have to hire fifteen additional administrators. So don't ever
try to explain to or convince me that there's not
a strain on resources in this country and in this
state and in our neighborhoods because of all these illegal aliens.
She goes on to say, she bizarrely claims this, a
lot of these people have lived in this country for decades,
(09:21):
they have lives there, they have families, they're good standing citizens.
In fact, no US citizens are being deported to Mexico.
So don't tell me they're good standing citizens. They might good,
they might be really honorable individuals, but they came here illegally.
(09:45):
They didn't come here the legal way. They violated federal
law to come here illegally and then are working illegally,
and by the way, shame and you companies that hire
them too. In fact, no US citizens, again are being
deported to Mexico.
Speaker 1 (10:04):
Only those who unlawfully.
Speaker 2 (10:06):
Reside in this country. Then she goes on to acknowledge
that a lot of the mass migration into this country
is driven by economics. Well, does make a rocket science
to understand that individuals risking that stupid journey to find
higher paying jobs. Now, I've previously talked about that this
(10:29):
mass immigration depresses American wages because most of the illegal
aliens are being paid less than native born workers despite
making more than they would in their home countries.
Speaker 1 (10:44):
Take a listen.
Speaker 3 (10:45):
Mexico cannot cope. Not sure any country can, but Mexico can't.
Speaker 1 (10:51):
Mexico can't cope. But actually no country.
Speaker 3 (10:54):
Canticle cannot cope. Not sure any country can, but Mexico
can't cope with like a sudden flucks of millions of people.
Speaker 1 (11:01):
I mean, as much as she wants to.
Speaker 3 (11:03):
Embrace them, to use her word when they come back,
and make them feel welcome, it all sounds very nice
when you're listening to it, but the reality of that
is is just completely unsustainable.
Speaker 1 (11:12):
It's unsustainable.
Speaker 2 (11:15):
And of course the video shows just you know, hundreds
of not thousands, of people, you know, behind barricades, all
lined up because they you know, it's kind of like
they've all run up to the fence and now they
can't get through the fence. It's animal house is the
Marching Band and animal House all over again, and they're stuck.
And now she suddenly feels sorry for them, and she
(11:40):
feels sorry for Mexico because Mexico can't handle it, but
they expected us.
Speaker 1 (11:46):
To handle it. This is now. I know this is Al.
Speaker 2 (11:51):
Jazeera, but this could have easily been CNN or MSNBC
or any of the networks, or the New York Times
for the Denver Post.
Speaker 3 (12:02):
A lot of these people have lived in the US
for decades. They have lives there, they have families, they're
good standing citizens, so they're not in a position to
just be deported and say like, oh, okay, well I'm
just going to come back here and take a job
making a fraction of what I used to make.
Speaker 1 (12:17):
And I find that one pretty fascinating.
Speaker 2 (12:23):
You made it all the way here, you went through
the dairyen gap, you did whatever you needed to do
to get from the Middle East or Central or South
America or Asia, and you made your way here. And
yet she claims, but they can't just go back. And
my question simply is why not. If if you had
(12:47):
the audacity, the tenacity, the resilience, the resourcefulness to make
your way here, then once we deport you to Mexico
or wherever the hell we take you to. I frank,
they don't give a rat sass wherever we take them to.
(13:08):
That same resourcefulness, that same resilience, that same determination and
tenacity to get here can get you back. But you
don't want to. And I know you don't want to
because you come from a crab whole country. Well, your
crab whole country is not my responsibility. In fact, you
(13:34):
talk about foreign aid, Well, the president of Kenya was.
Speaker 1 (13:41):
I don't know.
Speaker 2 (13:41):
He's giving a speech somewhere, and he was someone was
upset because Trump had cut off foreign aid.
Speaker 1 (13:51):
Listen to what he had to say.
Speaker 4 (13:53):
Oh, I don't know. Trump has removed money. He said,
he's not giving us any more money.
Speaker 1 (14:03):
Why are you crying.
Speaker 5 (14:03):
It's not your government, it's not your country.
Speaker 2 (14:06):
Why are you crying, it's not your country, it's not
your money.
Speaker 5 (14:15):
He has, he has, He has no reason to to
give you anything.
Speaker 4 (14:21):
I mean, you don't pay taxes in America.
Speaker 6 (14:26):
He's appealing to his people, shout hey, this is a
wake up call for you to say, Okay, what are.
Speaker 1 (14:34):
We going to do to help ourselves?
Speaker 2 (14:36):
This is an opportunity for you to say, by the way,
it's the former president. This is an opportunity for you
to say, Okay, so what are we going to do
to improve our country?
Speaker 6 (14:49):
This is a wake up call for you to say, Okay,
what are we going to do.
Speaker 1 (14:52):
To help ourselves? Instead of crying.
Speaker 5 (14:56):
To you, lizen, what are we going to do? Are
you to find that I'm not going to Demaine?
Speaker 1 (15:01):
What are we going to do?
Speaker 5 (15:03):
Yeah, to support ourselves because nobody is going.
Speaker 4 (15:08):
To continue holding out a hand there to give you.
It is time for us to use our resources for
the right things. We are the ones who are using
them for the wrong things.
Speaker 1 (15:19):
Wow, I love that guy. You love that guy.
Speaker 2 (15:23):
I've never heard of him before, but he says some
fantastic things.
Speaker 1 (15:27):
I think it's glorious.
Speaker 2 (15:29):
So here you have Al Jazeera crying about oh, these
poor people who made it all the way here from
Guatemala or Bolivia or Yemen, or communists China, wherever the
hell they came from, or even just Mexico, but they
can't go back because they live in craphole countries. And
here's the former president of ken.
Speaker 4 (15:50):
People the other day crying, Oh, I don't know. Trump
has removed money he said, he's not giving us any
more money.
Speaker 1 (16:02):
Why are you crying?
Speaker 4 (16:03):
It's not your government, is not your country.
Speaker 6 (16:12):
He has he has no he has no reason to
give you anything. I mean, you.
Speaker 4 (16:19):
Don't pay taxes in America.
Speaker 1 (16:22):
He's appealing to his people. Should he one?
Speaker 6 (16:27):
This is a wake up call for you to say, Okay,
what are we going to do to help ourselves?
Speaker 1 (16:32):
Instead of crying.
Speaker 6 (16:35):
To to you, Liza, what are we going to do?
Speaker 5 (16:38):
Im are your persition, I'm not gonna Jamin, what are
we going to do? Yeah, to support ourselves because nobody
is going to continue holding out a hand there to
give you.
Speaker 4 (16:51):
It is time for us to use our resources for
the right things. We are the ones who are using
them for the wrong things.
Speaker 1 (16:58):
Versus Al Jazeera, who says who cannot cope.
Speaker 3 (17:04):
I'm not sure any country can, but Mexico can't cope
with like a sudden influx of millions of people. I mean,
as much as she wants to embrace them, to use
her word and when they come back and make them
feel welcome, it all sounds very nice when you're listening
to it, but the reality of that is is just
completely unsustainable.
Speaker 1 (17:20):
It's just unsustainable.
Speaker 7 (17:22):
Grow up, the way from Al Jazeera completely missed it.
There are millions of people heading back to Mexico now
who could pick their avocados.
Speaker 2 (17:42):
The hearing yesterday from Bobby Kennedy Junior h I found
fascinating because the Democrats didn't have anything. It was clear
that the Democrats and at least Republicans were mostly decent
(18:03):
to him. James Langford and a couple of others were,
I mean, legitimate questions if you are. Look, let's face it,
Bobby Kennedy Jr. Is a pro abortion, liberal, left wing Democrat,
but he's right about the lack of trust in science today.
(18:28):
And we can thank doctor Fauci and the CDC and
the n I H and the n I A I
A I D H everything that they did during COVID
which just destroyed our trust in medicine and science. But nonetheless,
I think he will be confirmed. It may be a
(18:48):
tie again. I don't know how many. You know, two
or three Republicans may defect.
Speaker 1 (18:53):
JD.
Speaker 2 (18:53):
Vans will move in and as President of the Senate
Vice President he will he'll he'll break the tie vote
and Bobby Kennedy Junior will be confirmed. It'll be a
shame if he's not. It's a great example of how
we can disagree on some issues and agree on other issues.
(19:14):
And his closing argument, I forget, I forget, it doesn't
many difference. Which senator ask him, but the question was essentially,
your only goal is to kind of eradicate chronic disease,
and he gave a pretty good answer about how chronic
(19:34):
disease leads to all of these other consequences, including the
fact that, for example, Medicare and Medicaid are costing some
sixty billion dollars a year, and that and that's the
that's the and it has the largest annual increase in
the federal budget. And until we start reducing and eliminating
(19:58):
chronic disease, that those numbers are going to continue, and
Americans will continue to become more and more unhealthy. That
swerved into a conversation which is absolutely right about that
you got to get rid of the underlying cause. But
then he casually mentioned that the other problem is that
because somebody he mentioned that we had more COVID deaths
(20:23):
than any other country, and I forget what the ratio was,
but it was astonishing, and I thought, huh. But then
he solved my uh. He went on to say, and
the reason we had more COVID deaths than anybody else
(20:43):
was because every single one of those deaths had like
three point five co morbidities. They had three and a
half underlying chronic diseases. So if you're already that unhealthy,
something like COVID comes along, which shouldn't be that big
of a deal, turns out to be a big deal
(21:04):
because we're chronically unhealthy. Well, I say all of that
because in already on the morning shows today, CNN is
out all upset and questioning Democrats, are you doing enough
to obstruct Trump's nominees?
Speaker 3 (21:25):
Huh?
Speaker 1 (21:26):
Listen to this.
Speaker 8 (21:28):
There are reports this morning that there were calls from
US governors to the minority leader now in the Senate,
Chuck Schumer, saying, look, you've got to work Democrats to
slow down some of these nominations, especially with some of
the actions that the White House is trying to take.
There was the now rescinded memo praising federal money. But
as a Democrat, do you think you're doing enough in
(21:49):
these hearings to raise questions and maybe sway the potential
outcomes of these nominations?
Speaker 2 (21:58):
Are you doing enough to obstruct Trump's nominees. He's asking
Dick Durbin, We're.
Speaker 9 (22:06):
Doing everything that we can illegally and procedurally do in
the United States Senate. We're taking this very seriously. For example,
the Secretary of Defense, every minute that could be applied
to asking questions and making making background checks was done,
and I support that the same thing is true when
(22:27):
it comes to the head of the FBI. Then we're
not cutting corners who are not trying to find some
way to end this quickly. If we're taking our time
and doing it responsibly.
Speaker 2 (22:37):
In other words, we're going to do everything we can
procedurally through parliamentary procedures. We're gonna do everything we can
to obstruct these nominees. They they're already engaged in a
form maybe not technically law fair, but now they're gained
in legislative fair. They're going to do everything they cangislatively.
Speaker 1 (23:01):
Through all the Senate.
Speaker 2 (23:02):
You know rules that are really some are archaic, but
they're very complicated rules. Why do you think that Trump's
going to slow down and not do some of the things.
If you look at what Trump's done, He's put some
acting people into some of these positions who are obviously
(23:23):
you know, you can, you can put someone in as
the acting Secretary of the Department of Justice, for example. Well,
that individual is already doing things that Pam Bondi would
be doing. So they're not they're not slowing down. Trump's
attacked on the deep state or the administrative state. Trump
(23:44):
has appointed an acting US Attorney for the District of Columbia.
That individual is already starting and ordering that all of
the information, the memos, the files, everything that we're done
on the J sixers that were done on the Trump
on the J six and the document's case that he's
ordering all of those documents in all of those offices
(24:07):
to be preserved, and he's starting the investigation. He's not
waiting for the permanent US Attorney, he's not waiting for
the Attorney General to be appointed. He's doing what the
commander in chief On's done, which is to say that
Democrats just stop it, just stop it and start moving
(24:30):
these nominees through. Now, I don't mind have a hearing,
have a hearing and then vote on it. Move it
to the floor, and let the Senate vote on it.
You know, once you have let's be real honest about this.
Once you've had the hearing, and the members of the committee,
(24:52):
whatever the appropriate committee of jurisdiction is, once they've asked
their questions. Because every senator listens to that, every senator hears.
In fact, every senator here is even more than what
every senator has, all of the information that the members
of that committee have, including any classified information. So they've
(25:13):
got all the background checks, they've got the transcripts, they've
sat in their offices, they've listened to the hearings, unless
they're in other hearings, but they've had staff listening to them,
so they have all the information upon which to make
their determination. So what are we really talking about? Because
we know that all Democrats, with maybe the exception of
John Fetterman on a few, are probably going to vote
against all of the nominations. The real issue is on
(25:37):
the stupid Republican side, where we have stupid, dumbass Republicans
who are for whatever reason, Oh, I'm not really sure
I can vote for Pete Haiggs's I'm not really sure
I can vote for you know, Tolsey Gabert or cash Hotel. Really,
if you're in a red state or a state that
voted overwhelming overwhelmingly for Donald Trump. You might want to
(26:00):
rethink your position. Now, if you're a Susan Collins from Maine,
where Trump actually lost the state, well then you've got
a little more political leeway. But nonetheless you're supposed to
be a Republican. Why can't Republicans just say, hey, this
guy got elected with a vast majority of the electoral
College and winning the popular vote. So maybe my job
(26:23):
is to Yeah, I'll listen to I'll ask questions, but
my ultimate job is to vote for that nominee. There's
something really inherently mentally wrong with the Republican Party.
Speaker 1 (26:38):
I don't get it.
Speaker 2 (26:41):
Meanwhile, the Democrats and the Cabal, they're still around, but
they have tried and failed to push their very first
hoax against Donald Trump. Just one week after he assumed
office again, one day after the Office of Management Budget
issued a memo this is a big controversial memo that
(27:03):
temporarily halted federal loans, grants, and assistance programs authorized under
presidential executive orders. An unconnected federal Medicaid payments portal suffered
an outage, but, according to the Cabal, being fed by
(27:24):
obviously hysterical claims from Democrats, on Capitol Hill. The memo
from OMB resulted in the closure of access to federal
Medicaid funding for state governments. Now, despite the claim, there
is absolutely zero evidence that the memo and the portal
access issue were even remotely connected. The Office of Management
(27:46):
and Budget did not temporarily freeze portal funding and in
no way impacted any Medicaid payments or any Medicaid allocations.
In fact, the Trump administration memo explicitly states this, Have
you heard this quote? Any program that provides direct benefits
to Americans is explicitly excluded from the pause and exempted
(28:09):
from this review process period.
Speaker 1 (28:11):
Close quote.
Speaker 2 (28:15):
Do they care about the fact? I know, Michael, you're
being master of the obvious today. Maybe so, But I
want to make certain that you understand that this bull
crap that you're hearing from the media is aught. The
first hoax of the of the new term. Oh, they
resided the memo because they got caught. They shut down
(28:35):
the portal. No, it was an outage, and even regards
the cause of the outage Medicaid and Medicaid assistance payments.
In fact, let me read you the sentence again. Any
program that provides direct benefits to Americans is explicitly excluded
from this pause and exempted from this review process. They
(29:00):
just lie. But you know the sad part is too
many stupid Americans believe it.
Speaker 7 (29:07):
Michael, This Al Jazeera lady is a perfect portrait of
cognitive disiness. She has no idea that she completely exposed
her own position to be utterly faulty.
Speaker 1 (29:20):
She had no clue. She just stepped in it.
Speaker 7 (29:23):
And she's just walling around in it, and she had
no idea.
Speaker 2 (29:30):
During the confirmation hearing yesterday for Bobby Kennedy Jr. Elizabeth
Warren really stepped into it.
Speaker 1 (29:38):
Now.
Speaker 2 (29:38):
I looked it up yesterday, but I didn't make it.
I don't know why I didn't make a copy of it.
But if you go to OpenSecrets dot org and you
look up members of the committee that you look up
Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders, Dick Durbin and some of the others,
you'll see and including Michael benn and the others, that
they have taken hundreds of thousands of dollars in campaign
contributions from Pfizer. Uh Maderna, I don't remember the Big Pharma.
(30:07):
They're taking all this money from Big Pharma. It's amazing
how much money they've taken. So Elizabeth Warren asked Bobby Kennedy, this,
will you now, just I want you to picture this
in your head. Here's a woman who has taken money
from now she hasn't.
Speaker 1 (30:29):
Look. The other thing I.
Speaker 2 (30:30):
Checked on Elizabeth Warren yesterday was whether or not she
had done any insider trading.
Speaker 1 (30:34):
She doesn't.
Speaker 2 (30:35):
Her financial at least according to her financial statements. Most
of their money comes from her husband's job as professor
at Harvard and her salary, and from book deals and
from speeches, pretty standard stuff for politicians. I couldn't find
anything about her trading. In fact, I couldn't find any
stock trades at all. But here's the question she asked
(30:56):
Bobby Kennedy yesterday.
Speaker 1 (30:58):
Quote, will you.
Speaker 2 (30:59):
Commit that when you leave this job, you will not
accept compensation from a drug company, a medical device company,
a hospital system, or a health insurer for at least
four years, including as a lobbyist or a board member.
That Kennedy was fascinated by the question, So this shows
(31:23):
just how smart he is. He asked the senator to
repeat the last part of the question. Now, remember the
last part of the question was that you will not
accept compensation from a drug company, a medical device company,
a hospital system, or a health insurer for at least
four years, including as a lobbyist or a board member.
So Kennedy's listening to this, and of course Kennedy is
(31:44):
the one who assued some of these people. Kennedy is
the one who has fought some of these people. So
he said, would you please report repeat the last part
of the question. She restates the question this way. Quote
You're not going to take money from drug companies in
any way, shape or form. Question mark close quote. Kennedy
(32:09):
laughed and said, who me, Oh, yeah, I'm happy to
commit to that, to which Warren replies, good, that's what
I figured talking about cognitive disson As you mentioned, she
does not get what he just did to her. In fact,
(32:33):
I don't think anybody got what he just did to her.
Who me as if to say, you're not referring to yourself, right,
because you take the money now while you're still making
laws that affect them now. He's been a longtime critic
(32:54):
of Big Farmer, of companies that produce food additives, of
any organization that he said he sees as undermining American
health and he's always bitched about regulatory capturing government. You know,
public officials task with regulating the food at industry transitioning
to those jobs working for the companies they were supposed
(33:14):
to be monitoring. What was the guy Scott whatever was
that went to work for Pfizer. Shimn me, Christmas.
Speaker 10 (33:27):
Will you commit that when you leave this job he
will not accept compensation from a drug company, a medical
device company, a hospital system, or a health insurer for
at least four years, including as a lobbyist or a
board member.
Speaker 7 (33:42):
Can you just repeat the last part of the question
with the CANA Commission, you're not
Speaker 10 (33:45):
Going to take money from drug companies in any way
Michael. Law abiding criminals don't exist. And yes, Michael Bennett
is Gomer Pile. Watch the RFK Come, Who's gumber Pile?
Michael Bennett?
Speaker 2 (00:15):
Oh, oh my gosh, that was so funny. Yesterday, So
the RFK Junior hearing started and I wanted to dip
into them. As I looked up to tell Dragon this,
dip into it. It was just as Michael Bennett was starting,
and it was the the The guy is a blubbering idiot.
(00:40):
But isn't it appropriate? Have you thought about just how
appropriate it is for Colorado that our senior United States
senator is a blithering idiot like Michael Bennett.
Speaker 1 (00:51):
And our junior US senator is Howdie Dooty, that's all. Yeah,
And then look at the governor.
Speaker 2 (01:00):
All he cares about is Taylor Swift, his animal rights
hugging loving husband. What's his name, I've given his name.
Bring the wolves into Colorado? No wonder, no wonder, this
is a state into client.
Speaker 1 (01:14):
You almost figured out he loves trains and he loves trains.
That's right, he loves trains. Oh, good grief.
Speaker 2 (01:22):
But they just like the person I want to talk
about now, they have no clue how stupid they are,
and they have no clue sometimes the stupid things that
they say, and I'm always just it frustrates me that
more Americans don't hear the stupidity of what they say,
(01:45):
particularly in light of the election last November. When you
think about where we were last November and the four
years preceding that, and how little was done, but what
was done was so damaging to the country, not just
domestically but internationally, and in the what now ten days
(02:10):
ten today's the tenth day into the well nine and
a half days into the tenth day of this administration
of Trump two point zero. He's done more in those
ten days to reverse what the damage was done by
the Biden administration than I ever thought possible. But compare
(02:33):
the two individuals. They're only what four years apart in age,
they might as well be forty years apart in age
or four hundred, because one's a dinosaur and one's like
a like a ADHD brain adult rug raft that's just
hyped up on sugar all the time, hyped up on dieke,
(02:54):
cocone and cheeseburgers, Oh and French fries too, which, by
the way, Bobby Kin Junior.
Speaker 1 (03:00):
Yesterday made a great statement about.
Speaker 2 (03:02):
I can't believe these people think that I'm out there
trying to get rid of you know, McDonald's, you know,
quarter pounders and French fries and diet coach. When I
got a boss that that's his favorite meal, I'll see
if I can find that and then play for it's hilarious.
But if you stop and compare the two and then
listen to what some of the journalists say, particularly about immigration,
(03:23):
you'll realize that either there's a portion of the country
that is really just so stupid that they have no
clue what's going on, or they're so blinded by their
ideology that they don't care what's going on. Let's talk
about Al Jazeera for a moment. You don't get much
further left than Al Jazeera. Well, they have a journalist
(03:44):
by the name of Julia Galliano.
Speaker 1 (03:48):
I don't have pronounced last name g A L I
A n O Golliano.
Speaker 2 (03:54):
She in this In this interview, she does unwitting, unknowingly
total cognitive dissonance, admits that no country can adequately deal
with the negative consequences of mass immigration. While she's trying
to defend Mexico's resistance to accepting the illegal aliens that
(04:21):
are being mass deported by Donald Trump.
Speaker 1 (04:25):
She reports from.
Speaker 2 (04:27):
Cuba, absolutely hilarious. She's reporting from Cuba under its authoritarian
and obviously anti American communist regime. She contends that Mexico
is unable to cope with the economic and societal impact
that influx of deportees are going to have on that country.
(04:54):
I'll let you listen heer in just a minute. I
want to I want to tell you what she says. First,
Mexico cannot. I'm not sure any country can, but Mexico
cannot cope with, like, you know, a sudden influx of
millions of people. I mean, as much as Mexican President
Scheinbaum wants to embrace them, to use her word, when
(05:15):
they come back, and make them feel welcome.
Speaker 1 (05:17):
This is on.
Speaker 2 (05:18):
A podcast called The Take. It's hosted by Al Jazeera.
By the way, it all sounds very nice when you're
listening to it, but the reality of that is just
completely unsustainable. Now she goes on, and I want to
analyze what she says, but just think about that. It
(05:40):
all sounds very nice when you're listening to it, but
the reality of that is just completely unsustainable. Well, isn't
that true for us too?
Speaker 1 (05:53):
Now?
Speaker 2 (05:53):
What was she doing? This is where the cognitive dissonance
sets in her remarks to be seen or heard. I
guess heard the right word. She wanted her remarks to
be heard as a criticism of Trump's mass deportation policies
and their impact on Mexico, but she unintentionally echoed the
(06:16):
very argument behind Trump's massive immigration crackdown. Let's go back,
because I think again, let's not forget where we were.
It's going to be real easy to forget where we were.
Under Joe Biden, millions of illegal aliens were allowed to
(06:36):
come into this country because they had the stupid temporary
Protective Status program, which was abused by everybody. You had
the federal immigration parole program, and you had a complete
utter lack of border enforcement. So the influx of illegal
aliens placed an unprecedented strain on federal, state, and local rea.
(07:01):
And then we had the It also fueled and we
witnessed it right here in Colorado, a spike in violent
gang related crime, which of course you know they told us,
police told us, is just it's our imagination. And at
one point Mike Kaufman Essentially, the Republican was even denying
that turn their rod was even present.
Speaker 1 (07:22):
And now we have.
Speaker 2 (07:23):
Oh they're having they're they're having big parties in the
warehouse and they get raided by Dea and Ice. Oh,
it's just a figment of your imagination. Think about Remember
I told you the story about the the teacher in
the War of Public Schools who has classrooms that have
(07:47):
no English speaking students at all. Now, this teacher is
trying to teach mathematics to kids that don't understand any English.
He told me that he can speak, you know, like
kind of like me, those strasquattro sinco, and that's about it.
(08:11):
And so he relies on kids in the class that
know a few English words so that they can translate,
because the War of Public Schools doesn't put any translators
in the class. Now, think about that. So those classes
mean that your student that is an American citizen that
speaks English is being deprived of this person who's probably
(08:36):
an excellent math teacher. His abilities are being totally wasted
on those students. And if those are additional students in
a War of Public Schools, they have to hire additional teachers,
which means, of course, if you have to hire additional
If you, let's just say a war of public schools
has to hire five additional teachers, well that means scientifically,
(08:58):
you have to hire fifteen additional administrators. So don't ever
try to explain to or convince me that there's not
a strain on resources in this country and in this
state and in our neighborhoods because of all these illegal aliens.
She goes on to say, she bizarrely claims this, a
lot of these people have lived in this country for decades,
(09:21):
they have lives there, they have families, they're good standing citizens.
In fact, no US citizens are being deported to Mexico.
So don't tell me they're good standing citizens. They might good,
they might be really honorable individuals, but they came here illegally.
(09:45):
They didn't come here the legal way. They violated federal
law to come here illegally and then are working illegally,
and by the way, shame and you companies that hire
them too. In fact, no US citizens, again are being
deported to Mexico.
Speaker 1 (10:04):
Only those who unlawfully.
Speaker 2 (10:06):
Reside in this country. Then she goes on to acknowledge
that a lot of the mass migration into this country
is driven by economics. Well, does make a rocket science
to understand that individuals risking that stupid journey to find
higher paying jobs. Now, I've previously talked about that this
(10:29):
mass immigration depresses American wages because most of the illegal
aliens are being paid less than native born workers despite
making more than they would in their home countries.
Speaker 1 (10:44):
Take a listen.
Speaker 3 (10:45):
Mexico cannot cope. Not sure any country can, but Mexico can't.
Speaker 1 (10:51):
Mexico can't cope. But actually no country.
Speaker 3 (10:54):
Canticle cannot cope. Not sure any country can, but Mexico
can't cope with like a sudden flucks of millions of people.
Speaker 1 (11:01):
I mean, as much as she wants to.
Speaker 3 (11:03):
Embrace them, to use her word when they come back,
and make them feel welcome, it all sounds very nice
when you're listening to it, but the reality of that
is is just completely unsustainable.
Speaker 1 (11:12):
It's unsustainable.
Speaker 2 (11:15):
And of course the video shows just you know, hundreds
of not thousands, of people, you know, behind barricades, all
lined up because they you know, it's kind of like
they've all run up to the fence and now they
can't get through the fence. It's animal house is the
Marching Band and animal House all over again, and they're stuck.
And now she suddenly feels sorry for them, and she
(11:40):
feels sorry for Mexico because Mexico can't handle it, but
they expected us.
Speaker 1 (11:46):
To handle it. This is now. I know this is Al.
Speaker 2 (11:51):
Jazeera, but this could have easily been CNN or MSNBC
or any of the networks, or the New York Times
for the Denver Post.
Speaker 3 (12:02):
A lot of these people have lived in the US
for decades. They have lives there, they have families, they're
good standing citizens, so they're not in a position to
just be deported and say like, oh, okay, well I'm
just going to come back here and take a job
making a fraction of what I used to make.
Speaker 1 (12:17):
And I find that one pretty fascinating.
Speaker 2 (12:23):
You made it all the way here, you went through
the dairyen gap, you did whatever you needed to do
to get from the Middle East or Central or South
America or Asia, and you made your way here. And
yet she claims, but they can't just go back. And
my question simply is why not. If if you had
(12:47):
the audacity, the tenacity, the resilience, the resourcefulness to make
your way here, then once we deport you to Mexico
or wherever the hell we take you to. I frank,
they don't give a rat sass wherever we take them to.
(13:08):
That same resourcefulness, that same resilience, that same determination and
tenacity to get here can get you back. But you
don't want to. And I know you don't want to
because you come from a crab whole country. Well, your
crab whole country is not my responsibility. In fact, you
(13:34):
talk about foreign aid, Well, the president of Kenya was.
Speaker 1 (13:41):
I don't know.
Speaker 2 (13:41):
He's giving a speech somewhere, and he was someone was
upset because Trump had cut off foreign aid.
Speaker 1 (13:51):
Listen to what he had to say.
Speaker 4 (13:53):
Oh, I don't know. Trump has removed money. He said,
he's not giving us any more money.
Speaker 1 (14:03):
Why are you crying.
Speaker 5 (14:03):
It's not your government, it's not your country.
Speaker 2 (14:06):
Why are you crying, it's not your country, it's not
your money.
Speaker 5 (14:15):
He has, he has, He has no reason to to
give you anything.
Speaker 4 (14:21):
I mean, you don't pay taxes in America.
Speaker 6 (14:26):
He's appealing to his people, shout hey, this is a
wake up call for you to say, Okay, what are.
Speaker 1 (14:34):
We going to do to help ourselves?
Speaker 2 (14:36):
This is an opportunity for you to say, by the way,
it's the former president. This is an opportunity for you
to say, Okay, so what are we going to do
to improve our country?
Speaker 6 (14:49):
This is a wake up call for you to say, Okay,
what are we going to do.
Speaker 1 (14:52):
To help ourselves? Instead of crying.
Speaker 5 (14:56):
To you, lizen, what are we going to do? Are
you to find that I'm not going to Demaine?
Speaker 1 (15:01):
What are we going to do?
Speaker 5 (15:03):
Yeah, to support ourselves because nobody is going.
Speaker 4 (15:08):
To continue holding out a hand there to give you.
It is time for us to use our resources for
the right things. We are the ones who are using
them for the wrong things.
Speaker 1 (15:19):
Wow, I love that guy. You love that guy.
Speaker 2 (15:23):
I've never heard of him before, but he says some
fantastic things.
Speaker 1 (15:27):
I think it's glorious.
Speaker 2 (15:29):
So here you have Al Jazeera crying about oh, these
poor people who made it all the way here from
Guatemala or Bolivia or Yemen, or communists China, wherever the
hell they came from, or even just Mexico, but they
can't go back because they live in craphole countries. And
here's the former president of ken.
Speaker 4 (15:50):
People the other day crying, Oh, I don't know. Trump
has removed money he said, he's not giving us any
more money.
Speaker 1 (16:02):
Why are you crying?
Speaker 4 (16:03):
It's not your government, is not your country.
Speaker 6 (16:12):
He has he has no he has no reason to
give you anything. I mean, you.
Speaker 4 (16:19):
Don't pay taxes in America.
Speaker 1 (16:22):
He's appealing to his people. Should he one?
Speaker 6 (16:27):
This is a wake up call for you to say, Okay,
what are we going to do to help ourselves?
Speaker 1 (16:32):
Instead of crying.
Speaker 6 (16:35):
To to you, Liza, what are we going to do?
Speaker 5 (16:38):
Im are your persition, I'm not gonna Jamin, what are
we going to do? Yeah, to support ourselves because nobody
is going to continue holding out a hand there to
give you.
Speaker 4 (16:51):
It is time for us to use our resources for
the right things. We are the ones who are using
them for the wrong things.
Speaker 1 (16:58):
Versus Al Jazeera, who says who cannot cope.
Speaker 3 (17:04):
I'm not sure any country can, but Mexico can't cope
with like a sudden influx of millions of people. I mean,
as much as she wants to embrace them, to use
her word and when they come back and make them
feel welcome, it all sounds very nice when you're listening
to it, but the reality of that is is just
completely unsustainable.
Speaker 1 (17:20):
It's just unsustainable.
Speaker 7 (17:22):
Grow up, the way from Al Jazeera completely missed it.
There are millions of people heading back to Mexico now
who could pick their avocados.
Speaker 2 (17:42):
The hearing yesterday from Bobby Kennedy Junior h I found
fascinating because the Democrats didn't have anything. It was clear
that the Democrats and at least Republicans were mostly decent
(18:03):
to him. James Langford and a couple of others were,
I mean, legitimate questions if you are. Look, let's face it,
Bobby Kennedy Jr. Is a pro abortion, liberal, left wing Democrat,
but he's right about the lack of trust in science today.
(18:28):
And we can thank doctor Fauci and the CDC and
the n I H and the n I A I
A I D H everything that they did during COVID
which just destroyed our trust in medicine and science. But nonetheless,
I think he will be confirmed. It may be a
(18:48):
tie again. I don't know how many. You know, two
or three Republicans may defect.
Speaker 1 (18:53):
JD.
Speaker 2 (18:53):
Vans will move in and as President of the Senate
Vice President he will he'll he'll break the tie vote
and Bobby Kennedy Junior will be confirmed. It'll be a
shame if he's not. It's a great example of how
we can disagree on some issues and agree on other issues.
(19:14):
And his closing argument, I forget, I forget, it doesn't
many difference. Which senator ask him, but the question was essentially,
your only goal is to kind of eradicate chronic disease,
and he gave a pretty good answer about how chronic
(19:34):
disease leads to all of these other consequences, including the
fact that, for example, Medicare and Medicaid are costing some
sixty billion dollars a year, and that and that's the
that's the and it has the largest annual increase in
the federal budget. And until we start reducing and eliminating
(19:58):
chronic disease, that those numbers are going to continue, and
Americans will continue to become more and more unhealthy. That
swerved into a conversation which is absolutely right about that
you got to get rid of the underlying cause. But
then he casually mentioned that the other problem is that
because somebody he mentioned that we had more COVID deaths
(20:23):
than any other country, and I forget what the ratio was,
but it was astonishing, and I thought, huh. But then
he solved my uh. He went on to say, and
the reason we had more COVID deaths than anybody else
(20:43):
was because every single one of those deaths had like
three point five co morbidities. They had three and a
half underlying chronic diseases. So if you're already that unhealthy,
something like COVID comes along, which shouldn't be that big
of a deal, turns out to be a big deal
(21:04):
because we're chronically unhealthy. Well, I say all of that
because in already on the morning shows today, CNN is
out all upset and questioning Democrats, are you doing enough
to obstruct Trump's nominees?
Speaker 3 (21:25):
Huh?
Speaker 1 (21:26):
Listen to this.
Speaker 8 (21:28):
There are reports this morning that there were calls from
US governors to the minority leader now in the Senate,
Chuck Schumer, saying, look, you've got to work Democrats to
slow down some of these nominations, especially with some of
the actions that the White House is trying to take.
There was the now rescinded memo praising federal money. But
as a Democrat, do you think you're doing enough in
(21:49):
these hearings to raise questions and maybe sway the potential
outcomes of these nominations?
Speaker 2 (21:58):
Are you doing enough to obstruct Trump's nominees. He's asking
Dick Durbin, We're.
Speaker 9 (22:06):
Doing everything that we can illegally and procedurally do in
the United States Senate. We're taking this very seriously. For example,
the Secretary of Defense, every minute that could be applied
to asking questions and making making background checks was done,
and I support that the same thing is true when
(22:27):
it comes to the head of the FBI. Then we're
not cutting corners who are not trying to find some
way to end this quickly. If we're taking our time
and doing it responsibly.
Speaker 2 (22:37):
In other words, we're going to do everything we can
procedurally through parliamentary procedures. We're gonna do everything we can
to obstruct these nominees. They they're already engaged in a
form maybe not technically law fair, but now they're gained
in legislative fair. They're going to do everything they cangislatively.
Speaker 1 (23:01):
Through all the Senate.
Speaker 2 (23:02):
You know rules that are really some are archaic, but
they're very complicated rules. Why do you think that Trump's
going to slow down and not do some of the things.
If you look at what Trump's done, He's put some
acting people into some of these positions who are obviously
(23:23):
you know, you can, you can put someone in as
the acting Secretary of the Department of Justice, for example. Well,
that individual is already doing things that Pam Bondi would
be doing. So they're not they're not slowing down. Trump's
attacked on the deep state or the administrative state. Trump
(23:44):
has appointed an acting US Attorney for the District of Columbia.
That individual is already starting and ordering that all of
the information, the memos, the files, everything that we're done
on the J sixers that were done on the Trump
on the J six and the document's case that he's
ordering all of those documents in all of those offices
(24:07):
to be preserved, and he's starting the investigation. He's not
waiting for the permanent US Attorney, he's not waiting for
the Attorney General to be appointed. He's doing what the
commander in chief On's done, which is to say that
Democrats just stop it, just stop it and start moving
(24:30):
these nominees through. Now, I don't mind have a hearing,
have a hearing and then vote on it. Move it
to the floor, and let the Senate vote on it.
You know, once you have let's be real honest about this.
Once you've had the hearing, and the members of the committee,
(24:52):
whatever the appropriate committee of jurisdiction is, once they've asked
their questions. Because every senator listens to that, every senator hears.
In fact, every senator here is even more than what
every senator has, all of the information that the members
of that committee have, including any classified information. So they've
(25:13):
got all the background checks, they've got the transcripts, they've
sat in their offices, they've listened to the hearings, unless
they're in other hearings, but they've had staff listening to them,
so they have all the information upon which to make
their determination. So what are we really talking about? Because
we know that all Democrats, with maybe the exception of
John Fetterman on a few, are probably going to vote
against all of the nominations. The real issue is on
(25:37):
the stupid Republican side, where we have stupid, dumbass Republicans
who are for whatever reason, Oh, I'm not really sure
I can vote for Pete Haiggs's I'm not really sure
I can vote for you know, Tolsey Gabert or cash Hotel. Really,
if you're in a red state or a state that
voted overwhelming overwhelmingly for Donald Trump. You might want to
(26:00):
rethink your position. Now, if you're a Susan Collins from Maine,
where Trump actually lost the state, well then you've got
a little more political leeway. But nonetheless you're supposed to
be a Republican. Why can't Republicans just say, hey, this
guy got elected with a vast majority of the electoral
College and winning the popular vote. So maybe my job
(26:23):
is to Yeah, I'll listen to I'll ask questions, but
my ultimate job is to vote for that nominee. There's
something really inherently mentally wrong with the Republican Party.
Speaker 1 (26:38):
I don't get it.
Speaker 2 (26:41):
Meanwhile, the Democrats and the Cabal, they're still around, but
they have tried and failed to push their very first
hoax against Donald Trump. Just one week after he assumed
office again, one day after the Office of Management Budget
issued a memo this is a big controversial memo that
(27:03):
temporarily halted federal loans, grants, and assistance programs authorized under
presidential executive orders. An unconnected federal Medicaid payments portal suffered
an outage, but, according to the Cabal, being fed by
(27:24):
obviously hysterical claims from Democrats, on Capitol Hill. The memo
from OMB resulted in the closure of access to federal
Medicaid funding for state governments. Now, despite the claim, there
is absolutely zero evidence that the memo and the portal
access issue were even remotely connected. The Office of Management
(27:46):
and Budget did not temporarily freeze portal funding and in
no way impacted any Medicaid payments or any Medicaid allocations.
In fact, the Trump administration memo explicitly states this, Have
you heard this quote? Any program that provides direct benefits
to Americans is explicitly excluded from the pause and exempted
(28:09):
from this review process period.
Speaker 1 (28:11):
Close quote.
Speaker 2 (28:15):
Do they care about the fact? I know, Michael, you're
being master of the obvious today. Maybe so, But I
want to make certain that you understand that this bull
crap that you're hearing from the media is aught. The
first hoax of the of the new term. Oh, they
resided the memo because they got caught. They shut down
(28:35):
the portal. No, it was an outage, and even regards
the cause of the outage Medicaid and Medicaid assistance payments.
In fact, let me read you the sentence again. Any
program that provides direct benefits to Americans is explicitly excluded
from this pause and exempted from this review process. They
(29:00):
just lie. But you know the sad part is too
many stupid Americans believe it.
Speaker 7 (29:07):
Michael, This Al Jazeera lady is a perfect portrait of
cognitive disiness. She has no idea that she completely exposed
her own position to be utterly faulty.
Speaker 1 (29:20):
She had no clue. She just stepped in it.
Speaker 7 (29:23):
And she's just walling around in it, and she had
no idea.
Speaker 2 (29:30):
During the confirmation hearing yesterday for Bobby Kennedy Jr. Elizabeth
Warren really stepped into it.
Speaker 1 (29:38):
Now.
Speaker 2 (29:38):
I looked it up yesterday, but I didn't make it.
I don't know why I didn't make a copy of it.
But if you go to OpenSecrets dot org and you
look up members of the committee that you look up
Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders, Dick Durbin and some of the others,
you'll see and including Michael benn and the others, that
they have taken hundreds of thousands of dollars in campaign
contributions from Pfizer. Uh Maderna, I don't remember the Big Pharma.
(30:07):
They're taking all this money from Big Pharma. It's amazing
how much money they've taken. So Elizabeth Warren asked Bobby Kennedy, this,
will you now, just I want you to picture this
in your head. Here's a woman who has taken money
from now she hasn't.
Speaker 1 (30:29):
Look. The other thing I.
Speaker 2 (30:30):
Checked on Elizabeth Warren yesterday was whether or not she
had done any insider trading.
Speaker 1 (30:34):
She doesn't.
Speaker 2 (30:35):
Her financial at least according to her financial statements. Most
of their money comes from her husband's job as professor
at Harvard and her salary, and from book deals and
from speeches, pretty standard stuff for politicians. I couldn't find
anything about her trading. In fact, I couldn't find any
stock trades at all. But here's the question she asked
(30:56):
Bobby Kennedy yesterday.
Speaker 1 (30:58):
Quote, will you.
Speaker 2 (30:59):
Commit that when you leave this job, you will not
accept compensation from a drug company, a medical device company,
a hospital system, or a health insurer for at least
four years, including as a lobbyist or a board member.
That Kennedy was fascinated by the question, So this shows
(31:23):
just how smart he is. He asked the senator to
repeat the last part of the question. Now, remember the
last part of the question was that you will not
accept compensation from a drug company, a medical device company,
a hospital system, or a health insurer for at least
four years, including as a lobbyist or a board member.
So Kennedy's listening to this, and of course Kennedy is
(31:44):
the one who assued some of these people. Kennedy is
the one who has fought some of these people. So
he said, would you please report repeat the last part
of the question. She restates the question this way. Quote
You're not going to take money from drug companies in
any way, shape or form. Question mark close quote. Kennedy
(32:09):
laughed and said, who me, Oh, yeah, I'm happy to
commit to that, to which Warren replies, good, that's what
I figured talking about cognitive disson As you mentioned, she
does not get what he just did to her. In fact,
(32:33):
I don't think anybody got what he just did to her.
Who me as if to say, you're not referring to yourself, right,
because you take the money now while you're still making
laws that affect them now. He's been a longtime critic
(32:54):
of Big Farmer, of companies that produce food additives, of
any organization that he said he sees as undermining American
health and he's always bitched about regulatory capturing government. You know,
public officials task with regulating the food at industry transitioning
to those jobs working for the companies they were supposed
(33:14):
to be monitoring. What was the guy Scott whatever was
that went to work for Pfizer. Shimn me, Christmas.
Speaker 10 (33:27):
Will you commit that when you leave this job he
will not accept compensation from a drug company, a medical
device company, a hospital system, or a health insurer for
at least four years, including as a lobbyist or a
board member.
Speaker 7 (33:42):
Can you just repeat the last part of the question
with the CANA Commission, you're not
Speaker 10 (33:45):
Going to take money from drug companies in any way
Popular Podcasts
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.
The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show
The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show. Clay Travis and Buck Sexton tackle the biggest stories in news, politics and current events with intelligence and humor. From the border crisis, to the madness of cancel culture and far-left missteps, Clay and Buck guide listeners through the latest headlines and hot topics with fun and entertaining conversations and opinions.