2-8-25 The Weekend Hour 2: Trump’s Anti-DEI Executive Order Yet NFL Keeps Pursuing DEI

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Too night. Michael Brown joins me here, the former FEMA
director talk show host Michael Brown. Brownie, no, Brownie, You're
doing a heck of a job. The Weekend with Michael
Brown broadcasting life from Denver, Colorado. It's the Weekend with
Michael Brown. And thanks for tuning in, because I certainly
do appreciate it. If you want to send me a
text message, it's very easy on your text app whatever
you use, the numbers three three one zero three three

(00:22):
three one zero three, just starts your message with one
of two words, Mike or Michael. Tell me anything, ask
me anything. And while you're at it, be sure and
follow me on social media. The most active place to
follow me is over on X and that's at Michael
Brown USA. So go follow me right now X at
Michael Brown USA. So part of this paradigm shift that

(00:43):
we're going through is I want you to tell me
the number is like eighty percent. Eighty percent of Americans
believe that men, whether biological males or transgender males, should
not be participating competing against females biological females in sports

(01:05):
organized sports, you know, amateur sports, professional sports, whatever. They
just don't think that biological or transgender males ought to be,
you know, competing against women. Eighty percent of Americans agree
with that. Almost every poll gets somewhere between seventy eight
and eighty two percent. Yet, somehow, the fact that Donald

(01:27):
Trump signed an executive order which was you know, if
you saw the video of him signing that executive order
with all of those female athletes in the East room
with him, it was very well choreographed and unlike the
old fart that used to be the president, he didn't

(01:48):
sniff anybody's hair. He didn't you know, reach down and
touch them in appropriately. He brought them all down together
around him while he signed the executive order. And I
thought it was a great day for someone that finally
stood up and is going to protect women from men

(02:08):
in sports. Title nine never went away, and I never
understood what I did understand because I think they're afraid
of the transgender lobby. I really do believe that the
National Organization of Women. Now, I think all of these
women organizations, you know, we're all you know, remember the

(02:31):
Me Too movement? Believe the women where were all of
them all this time? While all of these women, whether
they were teenagers or in college or in professional sports,
were getting beat up by biological males. And let's be honest,
you you can go. If you're a male and you
want to be a you know, you want to be
a I always get this confused. You want to be

(02:53):
a trans female. You want to be a trans woman,
so you're transitioning to a female. That's how I keep
it in my head. You don't change your chromosome structure.
And then the International Olympic Committee and others come out
with these rules that say, well, you know, as long
as your testosterone levels are below a certain limit, well

(03:16):
then you can compete with women. And I'm thinking to myself, well,
what does that have to do with anything, because the
bone structure, the physical structure of a male is inherently
different from the physical structure of a female. And I
don't care. I truly do not care how confused you

(03:38):
are as a child, if you're a child, or that matter,
really don't care. If you're an adult either. I think
you ought to get psychological counseling. I think you ought
to get psychiatric counseling. And then if you're an adult
and you want to if you're a male and you
want to be a trans woman and you want your
penis cut off, well, you know what, you're over the
age of eighteen to make that decision. Go make that decision,

(04:02):
but I ain't doing it. And if you want to,
and that's the choice you make, okay, But don't then
think that that turns you into a woman, because your
chromosomes stay the same, you just don't have a certain
appendage anymore. The life of me. We have allowed this

(04:22):
to get way out of control. And the fact that
nobody in support of women, the usual suspects would come
out and say anything, pretty despicable in my opinion. So
this is all under the umbrella of civil rights. Title

(04:43):
nine was designed to protect the civil rights of women
when it comes to sports. Mark Moriol, who's the president
of the National Urban League, put together a panel civil
rights leaders last month to attack Trump for this executive order.
And the executive order was on ending illegal discrimination and

(05:04):
restoring merit based opportunity. That was the that's the so
called anti DEI order, separate apart from the Title nine order. Well,
the president of the Urban League said that what Trump
was doing was an effort, an effort to reverse the
gains of the last seventy years. He said this that diversity, equity,

(05:27):
and inclusion are aligned with American values. Now, to any
critic claiming that DEI represents some sort of preference program
that divides Americans, he said, no, that's not true. We
say absolutely not, that's true. And then he went on
to argue that the organizations gathered at his little confab

(05:50):
would crusade to protect DEI and the notion that everyone
has an equal opportunity. That's the so called civil rights establishment.
And that was more than just a claim that they're
going to be the resistance. It reflected opposition to a

(06:10):
long cresting sea change in racial politics in this country.
Let's go back to nineteen sixty three. In nineteen sixty three,
that same urban league that is now opposed to eliminating DEI,
that was one of the groups that participated in Doctor
Kings March in Washington. And that's where King envisioned a

(06:33):
nation where his children would be judged not by the
color of their skin, but by the content of their character.
And it was during that same period in nineteen sixty
three that non white Americans faced these absolute, in almost indestructible,
legal and cultural barriers to a full participation in America's

(06:59):
civic life. You had school segregation, you had rampant discrimination
both in employment and in housing opportunities. There was serious
racial discrimination. But being honest with ourselves, a lot has
changed since the nineteen sixties. So this order by Trump

(07:23):
was issued to counter a new form of discrimination. And
I believe that's what DEI is. It's a new form
of discrimination, and that's and what's happening. So if you
go think about the historical arc, the arc of history
here in nineteen sixty three, non white Americans really did
face legal barriers, cultural barriers, and they were limited in

(07:49):
fully participating in American life, and to do so, they
almost had to segregate themselves into their own communities to
do so. So you had thriving businesses in the in
the black cultural center of Tulsa, Oklahoma, or in Harlem
in New York or any other large city. You had
all of these little black communities, and what were they

(08:10):
trying to do. They were just trying to make lives
for themselves, and they were successful at doing so. But
then there was an awakening, and I think that awakening
starting with doctor King's speech about he envisioned a country
where his children would be judged not by the color
of their skin, but by the content of their character.
That started us on this arc of history that we

(08:32):
were going to become a color blind society. And I
really think, going back to my belief that that's where
most Americans are in terms of their view of other
human beings, I think that's where we are today. Are
there still biggots, of course they're still bigots. Are there
still racists, of course they're still racists. But you know,
I think some of the worst racists are these black

(08:53):
people like Mark like excuse me, like Mark Moriole at
the Urban League, who are trying to infuse DEI into
every aspect of our culture because they don't want a
color blind society. Because of this arc of history continues
the march that it's on. We are a color blind

(09:16):
society and we have, although I don't think we'll ever
be perfect, because we'll always have bigoted individuals of all colors.
You know, white people aren't the only bigoted people in
the world, so are people of different races and different ethnicities.
Bigots exist everywhere, but the vast majority of people no

(09:37):
longer think that way. But DEI is a new form
of racism. Think about that. Let me explain what's really
going on deep under the fight over DEI. I'll be
right back. Hey, welcome back to the Weekend with Michael Brown.

(10:02):
Glad to have you with me. Be sure and go
over to if you're on social media, follow me on X.
It's at Michael Brown USA. Go give me a follow
right now at Michael Brown USA on X. Be sure
and subscribe to the podcast on your podcast app, search
for the Situation with Michael Brown. And once you find
the Situation with Michael Brown, hit subscribe and that will

(10:22):
give you all five days of the weekday program that
we do out of Denver. Plus you'll get the weekend
program too, so you'll get all six days of Michael Brown.
So over the past decade, the Urban League has actually
adopted the very types of discriminatorial racial practices that were
once condemned by the early civil rights leaders. For example,

(10:44):
a few years ago, the Urban League helped administer a
ten million dollar grant program. Now be frightened tell you
what the grant program did. This is a great example
of my explanation of how NGO's non government organizations are
a money laundering scheme. So the grant came from the
federal government and it goes to the Urban League. So

(11:07):
you know that members of Congress, particularly those that represented
urban areas, and particularly black members of Congress, are those
you know, those white liberals that wanted to be senial. Oh,
we're doing something, you know, for the black community. So
they they take ten million of your tax dollars and
they give it to the Urban League, and the Urban
League takes it to fund a program that excluded applicants

(11:34):
based on their race. It was limited to five hundred
black owned businesses. Well, that's the very opposite of what
doctor King talked about. And the Urban League also defended
a venture capital firm that ran a black women only
grant program that was founded to be in violation of

(11:58):
the Civil Rights Act. Why because it excluded Americans based
on immutable characteristics. You not only had to be black,
you had to be a black female in order to
participate in this venture capital firm. Well, that's clearly discriminatory.
And those kinds of discriminatory programs have now in this

(12:21):
arc of history from nineteen sixty three forward, have now
become pervasive in our society, education, healthcare, hiring, practices. There's
a Catholic health system called SSM Health. They developed a
scoring system, a scoring system that they used to award

(12:42):
doses of Regeneron, which was an antibody treatment for COVID nineteen,
based on racial demographics. If you identified as non wide
or Hispanic, you were awarded seven additional points on a
twenty point scale to determine whether or not you got
the treatment. I don't care what your skin color is.

(13:06):
I don't care what your sex is. I don't care
what your ethnicity is or your religion. I don't care
what your sexual preference is. Imagine going into a hospital
and you need a treatment, and the determining factor on
whether or not you're going to get a particular treatment
is racist. Doctor King would be looking at this stuff going, oh, well,

(13:28):
we'll wait a minute. Uh did you hear what I
said that day? Did you hear what I said about
them during the march on Washington? So all this news
around the anti DEI executive order has been focused on
stupid stuff like different government agencies or shutting down websites

(13:50):
or firing their diversity officers, or closing down all sorts
of racial affinity groups. Federal workers and then most corporative,
I should say, a lot of corporate America. I think
we're sick of it. I think they were quite frankly,
I think they were afraid of DEI. You know why,
because if you were the CEO of any size company

(14:10):
and you had to have a DEI program because a
state or of federal, you know whatever you might be
involved with federal state government mandated that you knew you
were discriminating. You knew that you weren't hiring the best qualified,
you were hiring someone based upon whatever DEI mandated, So
you were violating the civil rights laws. Give you an example, SIDEXO,

(14:37):
the food and facilities management conglomerate. It's kind of like
a Cisco SIDEXO. She told investors that her company was
going to intensify their initiatives on diversity, equity and inclusion.
Last month, Delta Airlines said it was going to rethink
it's DEI programs, But then on an investor, no, we're

(15:01):
not going to do that. The CEO of Delta Airlines said,
we're actually steadfast in our commitments because we think that
it's critical to our business. How on the hell is
it critical to your business? And it's easy. It's easy
to mock this because when you board a Delta AIRLINESES flight,
do you want the pilot to be a DEI higher
or do you want the pilot to be the most qualified.

(15:24):
I want the pilot to be the most qualified. I
don't care what the color of the skin is of
the pilot. I don't care whether the pilot's mail or
a female. I don't care whether the pilot's you know,
gay or lesbian. I want the pilot to be qualified.
I want the pilot to be able to take off,
get me from point A, and land safely at point
B on time, by the way, but who knows when

(15:47):
that's going to happen. So this executive order, I think,
is a step in the right direction, but it's not
going to solve the problem in its entirety because it's
going to have to be followed up by investigations, enforcement, legislation,
and we're going to have to take this off ramp
that really started with the George Floyd riots. You think

(16:09):
back to where did this DEI come from? Go back
and start thinking about the George Floyd riots. Think about
how Democrats at that point are all in on racial discrimination.
The fact that it's going to take other things to
change leads me to one area that I think is fascinating,

(16:31):
and that's the National Football League. Oh tomorrow Sunday is
the Super Bowl. Wall Street Journal has a headline America
is abandoning DEI, the NFL remains all in, and the
subhead is everyone from the federal government to Fortune five

(16:52):
hundred companies is dialing back their diversity efforts. But America's
most popular sport is standing its ground. Fascinating story because
of all places where you think the diversity, equity inclusion
would not even be anywhere in the playbook, man, it's

(17:13):
right at the top of the list. Now, think about
the NFL, and I want you to think about, how
do you make it to the NFL. Do you make
it because you're white? You make it because you're black,
you make it because you're Asian? No, you make it
because you're the most qualified. You get drafted because you're

(17:35):
the most qualified. You see, Trump understands where the American
people are, regardless of their race. We want a color
neutral society and that's where we're headed, except for stupid
Democrats to keep one to draw us back in time,
back into the dark ages, dumb Democrats. It's the weekend

(17:55):
of Michael Brown. Text the word Michael Michael to three
three one zero three. I'll be right back tonight. Michael
Brown joins me here, the former FEMA director of talk
show host Michael Brown. Brownie, no, Brownie, You're doing a
heck of a job the weekend with Michael Brown. Hey,
so wee came with Michael Brown. Glad to have you

(18:16):
with me. I appreciate you tuning in. You want to
send me a text message, It's real easy to do.
The number on your message app is three three one
zero three, three three one zero three. Starts your message
with the word Mike or Michael. Tell me anything, ask
me anything. And while you're on your phone, go over
and follow me on X. My name over on on
Twitter is at Michael Brown USA, at Michael Brown USA.

(18:38):
So speaking to DEI, Britain's far left labor government has
actually admitted that DEI policies in their National Health Service,
which is their socialized medicine system, actually has an anti
white bias. Now they you know, well, well, the Brits
do have a long forgotten history, I would say being

(19:02):
anti slavery. The British Labor Party is just completely off
the deep end they are. If you think that the squad,
if you think Alexander A Cassia Cortes and Jaia Paul
what's her name? And Ianna Pressley, if you think all
of the radicals and the Democrat Party are Marxist, you

(19:27):
ought to look at Britain's far left labor government. It's
really out of control. Their health secretary some Yahoo bad
West Streaming acknowledge that some diversity measures within the National
Health Service have been counterproductive. So Streeting pointed the instances
where actions taken by the National Health Service in the

(19:50):
name of diversity, equity inclusion just happened to get misdirected.
He gave an example a case where National Health Service
staffer shared a job advertisement online, describing part of the
role as involving quote, anti whiteness. Now, when you put

(20:15):
it in a job application and part of your role involves,
you know, anti whiteness, it doesn't get much plainer than that.
But the Health Minister question what way, how might that
be perceived by the public, particularly people in the public
that are experiencing significant health inequalities linked to their social

(20:37):
economic status. Why would the Health Secretary be concerned about
or believe that people in the general public in the
United Kingdom be experiencing significant health inequalities that are linked
to their social economic status, because that's exactly how socialized
medicine works. And I'm not surprised in the lead that

(21:00):
the left wing Labor Party in the United Kingdom would
look upon DEI as being you know, anti whiteness, and well, yeah,
we're kind of okay with that. The Health Secretary was
indirectly referring doctor Florence Disbertha. That's an East London psychologist
who last year circulated an advertisement for a trainee position

(21:23):
emphasizing quote anti whiteness, anti racist praxies. Well, you know,
the National Health Service has for quite a while now,
even under you know, Tory government, not just the Labor government,
but the Tory government, so both Liberals and Conservatives, has
faced serious criticism over issues of alleged anti white cinema.

(21:47):
Back in twenty twenty one, the Tavistalk Comportman National Health
Service Foundation Trust that's a leading purveyor and pusher of
child gender transition surgeries and child gender transition. You know,
I want to say healthcare, but I don't think it's healthcare.
They hosted a seminar and the seminar was to address quote,

(22:12):
whiteness a problem for our time. HM, whiteness is a problem.
I think that your recognition or trying to claim that
whiteness is a problem is the problem because a lot
of the world's moving on from this, particularly where the

(22:34):
you know, the one country forgets South Africa for a moment,
but the one country that is always deemed to be
so racist and horrible the United States of America. Can
you imagine, which is kind of easy to do people
in this country claiming that. And then the National Health Service,
their emergency services, faced a lot of controversy when it

(22:57):
was reported that they were going to priority ties asylum
seekers and illegal aliens over Native Britons. Now, when you
specifically state that when it comes to healthcare delivery, you
got two people in the er. Now, the natural thing
to do when you got two people in the er

(23:18):
is to triya age them. You're gonna you're gonna triage them,
and you're gonna look at, Okay, who's most likely to live,
all right? And but who's most likely live and who
needs the most immediate healthcare, who needs the most immediate
and significant interventions to preserve their life. Or now you

(23:40):
start looking at who's probably not gonna live regardless of
all you do, you triage them. Now, imagine that one
of the conditions or one of the elements by which
you triage two equal patients in an emergency room. Oh uh, well,

(24:00):
this one's black. Well, this one's white. Oh well, this
one I think is a migrant, is an asylum seeker,
is an illegal alien? Oh well, this one overhears a
Native bread. Well, just take the gurney that the Native
Bread's on, kind of move them over into the closet somewhere.
There's there's a janitorial closet down the hallway. Just go
hide them in there for a minute while we take

(24:22):
care of this illegal alien. Now, I do think you
had a triage emergency room patients based on medical conditions.
I don't see how in the hell you can say
that a native breat versus an illegal alien. That anyway,

(24:42):
that's a triage element that you ought to consider when
you're when you're going to deliver emergency healthcare in an er.
And then the National Health Service got criticized because they
decided to lower the entry standards for foreign nurses in
order to get them into the system because they were

(25:02):
having a nursing short a nursing shortage. Again, I ask
you serious question. You're in an er or you've already
made it into it from the er into a into
a hospital. Bit nurse comes in, do you really care

(25:23):
whether that nurse is foreign born or native born or
do What you really care about is did that nurse
meet the qualifications to be a nurse to be taken
care of me in this hospital. That's what I care about.
But maybe I'm weird, maybe I'm just you know, maybe
I'm just not woke enough, but I really don't care.

(25:48):
I think back to the it's probably been almost ten
years now since I was last hospitalized, and I was
in the hospital long enough that I went through, you know,
a hole series of nurses, and I remember, I think
back on that now, and I recall there were some
nurses that I thought were pretty good, and there were

(26:10):
some nurses that I was like, oh, dear God, don't
let this nurse come near me again. I'm not really
sure she knows what she's doing. And then I finally
got this nurse that came in at the end of
near the end of well, actually she made it near
the end of my hospital stay. She walked in, she
looked at my chart, she looked at me, checked a

(26:31):
few things. She said, why are you still here? And
I said, because they just, you know, they just don't
think I had to leave yet. And her basic I mean,
she was wonderful, and I started talking to her. Oh,
she was a naturalized citizen. She was from South Korea.
She had immigrated to this country after the Korean War,

(26:52):
and I talked to her about where she went to
nursing school. I say all of that because I had
found a nurse that I thought was genuinely interested in
my health, was generally interested in getting me out of
that hospital bed as quickly as possible by looking at
my chart, realigning certain treatments that I was receiving. By

(27:15):
the way, she come from the cardiology department, because well,
they were having a staffing shortage, and so she had
gone to this other level to take care of where
I was. And I thought, wow, or I think now wow,
never really crossed my mind that I was interested about,
you know, our background and where she came from. Because
she was showing an interest in me, I was interested

(27:36):
in her. I didn't care that she was South Korean
or that she was a naturalized citizen. If I have
to go to the hospital now, and particularly if I
live in the UK, I really wonder because what the
UK did, maybe you miss when I said it. They
lowered the entry standards so that less qualified foreign nurses

(28:02):
could come in and fill their staffing shortages. Huh. Well,
I'm not sure that those are the nurses that I
want taking care of me. It was revealed that within
the National Health Service that thirty five diversity roles salaries
exceeding ninety nine five hundred US dollars have been advertised

(28:27):
since July of last year under the Labor government. Because
they're so desperate for nurses, they'll take less qualified nurses
in order just to fill a staffing shortage. Huh. I
don't think socialized medicine is going to work, and I
think DEI exacerbates the problem. It's the Weekend with Michael Brown.

(28:50):
You want to subscribe to the podcast. It's really easy
to do on your podcast app. Search for the Situation
with Michael Brown. The Situation with Michael Brown. Once you
find that program, you hit subscrib That will give you
all if you like what we do on the weekend,
that'll give you all five days of the weekday program
plus Saturday. I'll be right back, hey, So begin with

(29:13):
Michael Brown. Glad to have you with me. I appreciate
you tuning in. Be sure and get over to X.
Follow me on X. We have fun over on X
formerly known as Twitter. It's at Michael Brown USA. Go
give me a follow right now. So, I get asked
a lot about birthright citizenship, and we've covered it on
the weekday program, and we covered it fairly extensive on
the weekend program. But the America First Legal Foundation has

(29:36):
filed what are called a Meekas briefs to support Trump's
executive order to end birthright citizenship. And there are legal
scholars at the Wall Zoo that will tell you that
the Supreme Court is unlikely to overturn precedent. But I
think the precedent upon which birthright citizenship is based is

(30:02):
a complete misreading of the Fourteenth Amendment and the purpose
of the Fourteenth Amendment soil, and an amikas brief is
means an amikus brief means that you're not a party
to the particular case amikus look means you're a friend

(30:22):
of the court. You're filing these on behalf of the parties,
although you're not a part of the litigation. As a
friend of the court, you want the court to be
aware of some additional legal arguments, either in favor or
against whatever the issue is this before the court. So
these are amikas briefs, and they were filed on behalf
of the chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, Jim Jordan,

(30:44):
the Republican from Ohio, and seventeen other committee members too,
And they're all in opposition to an effort by these
Democrat states attorneys generals again to secure an injunction against
the presidential executive if again, just as a footnote, if

(31:06):
you don't think that state elections are important, here are
eighteen eighteen attorneys general that are trying to keep Trump
from through executive order determining that you do not have
a right to become a US citizen simply because you
were born here. They contend these the American First Legal

(31:28):
Foundation contends that the Fourteenth Amendment, when properly interpreted, excludes
citizenship for children that are born to illegal migrants, illegal aliens.
They just happen to be in the United States. In
their brief, they say this specifically, the historical record confirms
that the fourteenth Amendment does not confer citizenship on the

(31:49):
children of aliens unlawfully present in the United States. Because
of this, an alien who seeks political rights as a
member of this nation cannot can rite rightfully obtain them
only upon terms and conditions specified by Congress. And they
cited nineteen seventeen US Supreme Court case that says that,

(32:10):
And then they go on to say, but Congress has
never granted citizenship to the children of aliens who are
unlawfully present. Thus, the other branches are forbidden from conferring
such citizenship on their own, a limitation that this executive
order ensures is followed within the executive branch. So they

(32:35):
obviously argue that the Court should deny the motion for
a preliminary injunction. Now, what does Trump's executive order do.
It asserts that citizenship should not be automatically granted to
those born in US soil if their parents are in
this country unlawfully or are just here temporarily what you

(32:56):
would call temporarily present. And of course that's being contested
by these Democrat controlled states in federal court, and it
will eventually reach the US Supreme Court. But let's go
back to when the fourteenth Amendment was adopted. When the
fourteenth Amendment was adopted, it was to ensure that those

(33:16):
individuals who were formerly slaves were guaranteed all the rights
and privileges that American citizens have. And it was expressly
stated that those people who were born here or who
were brought here are citizens of the United States who
were slaves, and then they added the phrase and subject

(33:39):
to the jurisdiction thereof, And that's been misinterpreted to mean that, well,
if you're in the United States. You know, I had
an email from a listener of the Weekday program that
wanted to know, why is it that if someone is
here illegally they have a First Amendment right, or a
Second Amendment right, or a Fourth Amendment right. And that's because, well,
they're in the United States, just as just as if

(34:03):
I go to Spain or Italy or the United Kingdom,
I'm subject to their laws. So some people like to
argue that I'm subject to the jurisdiction thereof, that I'm
subject to the jurisdiction of the laws of the United
Kingdom or Spain or Britain or wherever, or Italy. But
that's not what subject to the jurisdiction thereof means in

(34:23):
terms of the fourteenth Amendment, because when they debated it,
when Congress debated it, they talked about how they did
not mean that people who just happened to be here,
that the children born to them would be citizens. And
they gave they gave examples like, you're an ambassador to

(34:45):
the United States, Well you or you're here as a tourist,
you might be subject to the jurisdiction thereof because well,
if you're an ambassador and you you might be exempt
from a speeding ticket or parking ticket if you're in
New York. You know, you're here for a United Nations meeting.

(35:05):
But if if you, as an ambassador, go out and
just decide to kill, you know, to murder me when
I walk outside this building and they catch you, you're
going to be subject to murder charges. You can claim
diplomatic immunity all you want. And then it becomes an
international you know, fiasco about are they going to extradite

(35:26):
you or let you leave or not leave. Now they're
probably going to keep you here and try you for murder.
And the and the members of Congress at that time said, ministers, ambassadors,
people are here. You know, they're not here as permanent residents.
Their children don't automatically become citizens. And there's a US

(35:50):
Supreme Court case that deals with this also, but I
think the case was wrongly decided. And the Chief Justice
of the Supreme Court in that case, in dickta And
in a dissent, wrote that this is never what that
was meant by birthright citizenship. But here's the problem. The
problem is it's much like a government program. Once something

(36:15):
becomes interpreted one way, it becomes difficult for lower courts,
not for the Supreme Court, because the Supreme Court has
no problem overturning precedent because if they think that something
is wrong, they'll change it. The clearest example of that
Brown v. Board of Education that said separate but equal

(36:37):
is discrimination. Before that, as long as you had a
black school, it was like a white school. That was okay.
But in Brown v. Board of Education, they overruled that
and said no, that's wrong. And I think the Supreme
Court will ruled this is wrong too. It's the weekend
with Michael Brown hang type, I'll be right back.