2-24-25 - 9am - We Need More DOGE and UK Encryption

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
When I was working for the county in the early
months of COVID, I was required to keep an Excel
spreadsheet of what my tasks.

Speaker 2 (00:06):
Were every hour.

Speaker 1 (00:10):
Well, as a lawyer, if you're you know, well, whether
you're a mailable time by the hour or you're working
on a contingency case, you still keep track of all
your time.

Speaker 3 (00:23):
Uh.

Speaker 1 (00:24):
You used to drive me nuts the very first firm
I worked in a phone call regardless of whether you
know he happened to turn on television last night and oh,
what's his name in the firm? Uh? Who's the actor
in the top gun movies?

Speaker 2 (00:47):
Cruise?

Speaker 1 (00:47):
Yeah, Tom Cruise. So Tom Cruise one of his one
of his earlier movies. Uh, based on Oh who rights Total?

Speaker 2 (00:57):
I hadn't thought it's a great story.

Speaker 1 (01:01):
I can't think of the damn lawyer that writes the
books about these law firm mysteries. Anyway, The Firm is
one of the books, and it was on there and
I was laughing about it because they were one way
the crews got to the firm who was money laundering
on behalf of the mob was overcharging all of their clients,

(01:26):
including the mob. And it reminded me one of the
first places I worked had this policy. Drove me nuts
that a phone call, whether it was one minute, five minutes,
or actually twenty five or actually a quarter hour, you
always build a quarter hour for any phone call. And

(01:48):
their theory was you had to think about what you
were going to say on the phone call, you had
to make notes of the phone call, you had to
you know, keep track of whatever you were doing. So
we just build there was and they disclosed it to
the client. Any phone calls and I think they were
trying to discourage phone calls too, would result in a

(02:09):
quarter minute or quarter hour charge. See got charged fifteen
minutes for a phone call. Drove me nuts. Oftentimes I
just wouldn't put the phone calls down and I would
just keep on doing what I was doing. There is
dosee going on all over the country, and it's something

(02:30):
that I'd like to see picked up and more people. Do.
You see liberals, progressives, Marxist they confiscate the wealth that
you and I create, and then they wasted in disgusting ways,
not only at the federal level, but state and local
levels too. Those has inspired some independent people around the

(02:51):
country to start doing their own investigation on government spending,
particularly at the local level. We could certainly use some
doze attempts in Colorado, and I know you could use
it in your state too, even conservatives, even red states,
could use it. The story starts out like this, tens
of thousands of dollars a taxpayer money we're given to

(03:13):
a Seattle foundation that supports bondage program and I can't
it the exact wording is another word for masturbation, you know,
jumping jacks, but I can't say that on air. So
a Seattle foundation that supports bondage programming and masturbation clubs

(03:36):
where members can share masturbation and mutual touch in an
open group setting. Well, is it really masturbation if you're
doing it, you know, in a group setting. I thought
it was kind I always love it was something you
did in private. But what do I know? What? What

(03:57):
are you looking at me for?

Speaker 2 (03:59):
I'm trying to think that as long as there's no
insertion into an orifice, then it is mutual masturbation.

Speaker 1 (04:13):
Okay, yeah, I guess you're right, sometimes referred to as
a circle sort of activity, right, yeah, okay, yeah, okay,
all right, Well maybe we could actually start one of
these dragon no no, hang on, don't just fall no,
not actually do it, but just collect the money for
one oh yeah, sure, and then we could just fill

(04:34):
out a form for the nonprofit that gives us the
money that says yes. On Monday, February twenty fourth, at
nine to twelve am, we had one of our meetings
and we had a group. How many people you and
I see out there today? I mean there's probably across
the hall in the newsroom here a couple of people
out there. You know. We had ten.

Speaker 2 (04:56):
People, almost a dozen.

Speaker 1 (04:57):
Almost a dozen we had that's how we would phrase it,
almost a dozen. So send us our money, volunteers calling
themselves Washington Doge revealed that Washington's Arts Commission, of course,
because who doesn't think masturbation when you think about art,
gave the funds to the Pan Euros Foundation, an organization

(05:22):
that celebrates and cultivates consent and sexuality through the arts
and education for all. If you want Democrats to give
you other people's money, then you ought to be like
sexually oriented, gaze straight by, confused, unknown, whatever, just as

(05:45):
long as it involves sex. Tax forms revealed that this
organization got more than sixty thousand dollars in government grants
so that people could go pleasure themselves, just.

Speaker 2 (05:56):
Like the Georgia O'Keeffe thing. Key, yeah, the art you
would talk about it. It's art things Georgia O'Keeffe. Now
you don't know the Georgia O'Keeffe art.

Speaker 1 (06:08):
I know Georgia O'Keefe. Am I missing a piece of
art that I'm not aware of? That?

Speaker 2 (06:12):
She was very famous for painting depictions of flowers.

Speaker 1 (06:16):
That look yes, yes, yeah, yes, so yeah, yeah yeah.

Speaker 2 (06:20):
It makes sense, you know, art and pleasuring oneself pistols
and flowers.

Speaker 1 (06:26):
Yeah, really, okay, all right, I guess this will become
America if we lose the cultural war to these Marxists.
One of the ongoing programs that was listed on this
organization's calendar. Remember this is the pan Eros Foundation. Is

(06:48):
rain City Jacks, a traditional you know what off club.
So I would say hats off to the Washington DOGE group.
Washington DOGE volunteers, inspired by President Donald Trump and x
CEO Elon Musk Department of Government Efficiency, have discovered over
one point five billion dollars. Oh wait a minute, I

(07:11):
said Colorado was in the hole one point six billion.
Do you suppose if somebody out there organize a Colorado
Doze group. They could probably fill that hole. Just let
me move on here. We could probably fill that budget
hole by just finding out of control spending. They discovered

(07:33):
over one point five billion in state government waste in Washington,
as Washington faces a twelve to sixteen billion dollar budget
deficit because of out of control spending. Now, I don't
suppose we'd all get a cool chainsaw like Elon Musk did,
but that doesn't mean that we can't, you know, kind
of help to get the voted obscenity that is liberal

(07:55):
progressive government and another or I should say, a major
justification for progressively eroding with the goal of eradicating Western civilization,
which is what's going on, is that it apparently inflicts
oppression on black people. Now, fortunately, there's a way members

(08:15):
of the put upon race can heal themselves from the
hurt of white culture, namely by tying each other up
and abusing each other for the perverse sexual gratification that
apparently brings some people. And this appears, as best I
can tell, to be on the level. It comes from
a particular website where this person searches out these kinds

(08:39):
of stories she writes. For centuries, black people's sexuality has
been policed, shamed, and forcibly controlled through colonialism, religion, and
systemic oppression. The impact of this repression has resulted in
generational trauma, deep seated wounds passed down through families and
communities that dictate how we perceive our bodies, relationships, and desires. However,

(09:04):
within the practice of BDSM see can I name all
of those bondage, discipline, sado masochism, what's m or the
smm SM the same thing BDSM, there exists an opportunity
for radical reclamation, healing, and self liberation. By decolonizing kink,

(09:27):
Black individuals can use BDSM as a pathway to reclaim agency,
embrace pleasure, and disrupt the narratives that have long sought
to control black sexuality. You know, I think with progressives
the issue is really never the issue. The issue is
always depravity as an end to itself. I talked about

(09:51):
this on Saturday, but I wanted to share it with you.
I don't think there's anything that's more wholesome, constructive, and
good than mother right, and you think about it throughout
the centuries in reverent depictions of for example, the virgin Mary.
But naturally, these progressives seek to destroy motherhood, hammering away

(10:13):
with feminism in their anti sacrament abortion, that which they hate,
progressives ultimately attempt to erase. So it was only a
matter of time until someone like Governor Tony Evers, a
Democrat from Wisconsin, step forward to delete the word mother
from the New Speak Dictionary modern and he reports Wisconsin

(10:38):
is now floating legislation that we would replace the word
mother with the term inseminated person in state documents. Evers,
the government's self introduced the amendment as part of a
budget recommendation for the twenty twenty five to twenty seven
fiscal period in a bill submitted to Wisconsin Sentence Joint
Committee on Finance. Now you know we're no no. I

(11:03):
locked its calendar. Mother's Day's coming up, so don't forget
to send your mom a card on inseminated person Day.
The amendment also quote suggests replacing the term biological father
with natural parent, husband with spouse, and male with person.
The words wife, woman, and female would also be erased

(11:27):
and completely eliminated from all Wisconsin government documents. I thought
that women had the freedom to scream, you know, my body,
my choice, so long as they weren't referring you to
say you know sars Kov two shots. This is pure
social engineering, and it's social engineering through language, and it

(11:50):
reveals modern progressives roots in postmodernism because the academics who
can cut this bull crap and they're lavishly taxed or
funded labs, hold that objective reality is irrelevant if it
exists at all. All that matters is the subjective reality

(12:11):
that they can then force to meet their specification through
the control of language. It bumfuzzles me that we allow
this to go on. And most people, I think, whether
in polite society or any other society, don't want to
talk about this. I do language matters inseminated persons. Seriously,

(12:38):
you want to eliminate the term mother, motherhood, anything regarding mother,
and it's an inseminated person. Now part of me thinks, okay,
because I don't think that a transwoman can be inseminated
in the uh, in the true word, in the true

(13:03):
meany of the word ineminate introduce semen into a woman
or a female animal by natural or artificial means. That's
the dictionary definition of insemination. So an inseminated person if
they really do adopt this in Wisconsin, can technically only

(13:24):
mean a woman because you cannot inseminate a man. And
don't give me what I know what you're thinking, but
that's not insemination because the purpose of insemination is to
what is to inciminate an embryo, an egg, so that
you can create an embryo and eventually have a baby.
And then a trans woman simply can I'll do that,
So my body, my choice. Where are the feminists? Where

(13:48):
are the women? Because this kind of social engineering is
a bunch of bull crap. Barack Obama, as you know,
is I keep trying to remind everybody want to defend,
fundamentally transform this country so he can make it more
like say, Western Europe. And this objective was really most
aggressively pursued during what I've always referred to as his

(14:12):
third term. That was the term of Joe Biden. An
undefended border, you got unenforced immigration laws, you got lavish
financial incidents that drew massive numbers of aliens into this
country from the Third World, and as intended, some places
in America become less like America and more exactly like

(14:32):
the foreign land that these democrats would find easier to
rule if they could go rule those countries. This comes
to us from Pennsylvania Vice President of the Borough of
the Melbourne Council, m D Neural Hassan now not MD
as a doctor. M D is short for Muhammad Mohammad

(14:53):
Neural Hassan, council member Mohammad Monsieur Ali, and former council
member Muhammad off kool Is. We're each charged with sixteen
counts of election fraud for falsifying voter registrations. The three Democrats,
all of Bangladesh origin, used an online voter registration portal.
Do you could to see anything going wrong with that

(15:15):
to artificially inflate voter rolls because they wanted to win
borough council seats during a twenty twenty one local primary election.
So it's not just the big cities that get fundamentally transformed.
Because Melbourne is a really small locality in Pennsylvania, a
population of just over one thousand people. Two thirds of
those thousands, so approximately six hundred plus people are South Asian.

(15:41):
Sixty three percent of the population in Melbourne are foreign born.
It's in fact a foreign colony within the state, within
the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. So you can probably expect things
to be done there the way they are in those
foreign countries that really came from where the sanctity of
so called representative god government, a republican form of government

(16:02):
has taken well, not seriously at all. In in Hamtramck, Michigan,
Muslim politician have been accused of holding secret meetings to
auction absentee ballance to candidates in order to ensure their victory.
The population that amtrak is largely Muslim fifty percent foreign
born forty two percent. You see, limited immigration eventually results

(16:27):
in assimilation. And that's why Democrats prefer effectively unlimited immigration
as they had under Biden. They don't have it anymore
because today we find out that, oh guess what, they
have now dropped the number of people coming into this
country eighty percent decline the coyotes that bring people into

(16:51):
this country. I'll give you the details next, an eighty
percent decline in business since January twenty.

Speaker 3 (17:17):
Mike or Michael.

Speaker 4 (17:18):
In order to keep in compliance with SCC regulations, feel
free to use any of the following whipping, the pounding,
the ramming, the stinking them, jerking, the even feel free
to ask if you need some more you're welcome.

Speaker 1 (17:37):
I think there's probably enough.

Speaker 2 (17:38):
What do you think, Dragon, I think we're safe there.

Speaker 1 (17:40):
Yeah, I think we're safe there. I wasn't quite certain
whether you had done the bleeping or he had done
the bleeping, but either way, I was a little nervous.
It's just a little, a tiny bit nervous. So we've
talked a little bit about the United Kingdom. I'm going
to save this other story for tomorrow. Of course we

(18:05):
don't hear much about this, but they've had mass protests
against everything from Israel's war with the moss to fossil fuels.
You name it, they protest it. In the United Kingdom,
newspaper editorialists denounced the government in strong terms every single day.

(18:25):
And the UK draws upon hundreds of years of demands
for free speech from intellectual giants John Milton, John Stuart Mill,
George Orwell, Thomas Paine, all of the great people have
always talked to us and written about free speech. But
it appears to me that and again this goes is
also part of the equation that Trump has to deal with.

(18:50):
You have to look at a country's domestic affairs, not
just there, in order to understand their military posture. In
order to understand their military, you have to understand their
domestic politics. If you look at the United Kingdom right now,
it appears to be descending into tyranny. Two years ago,

(19:13):
Britain's parliament passed what was called or what is called,
the Public Order Act and Online Safety Act. Now, those
two pieces of legislation passed by parliament cracked down on
protests and online content, but then they did not pass

(19:34):
the Higher Education Freedom of Speech Act in the very
same year, which was twenty twenty three. Then last summer,
Kier Starmer, the Labor government Prime minister, appears to have
deliberately spread this information about the high profile killings of
those three little girls because he needed to justify the

(19:56):
censorship and the repression of anti mass migration protesters and
the rioters that were coming with it. I find it
really hard to judge the actions of Britain's government as
an outsider, and some people raise I think maybe maybe

(20:16):
legitimate concerns about a relationship between misinformation online and real
world violence, because no amount of violence justifies the violent
riots that overtook Britain last summer, when more than fifteen
hundred people were arrested for arson bluting violence that was
directed at mosques and hotels, all of which were housing

(20:38):
asylum seekers. I'm opposed to these asylum seekers, but I
do not in any way condone violence against or destruction
of public or private property in protest of them being there.
I understand why, but I don't condone it. But now
they are Brits that themselves are starting to raise the

(21:02):
alarm about the increasingly tyrannical government that labor is now
in control of. They're weaponizing censorship, they're weaponizing invasions of privacy.
So far, this labor government has arrested more than thirty
people for writing and sharing on social media particular posts,

(21:26):
and then they fast track the sentencing. Now there's there's
no justification for spreading disinformation, But I don't object to it.
I mean, let me rephrase that, I do object to it,
but I don't want to preclude it. You would be

(21:48):
You'd be amazed at the amount of disinformation that I
see every single day, either on x or on Facebook
or on the Drudge Report, that for that matter, even
in the New side of the Wall Street Journal. You
can find this information. It doesn't take much effort. You
can find it. But when you start trying to criminalize it,

(22:16):
that's a political motivation. That is just simply a bridge
too far. So what's happened. The British government has effectively
forced Apple to drop in to end in encryption of iCloud. Now,
if you're not an Apple aficionado like I am, iCloud

(22:37):
is just precisely that it's a cloud service and you
can put your photos in the cloud, you can put
your text messages in the cloud. I do partial backups
to the cloud. I back up certain things to the
cloud in addition to a couple of portable hard drives,
because I'm a nut job when it comes to backups.

(23:00):
The thing I like about Apple is it's end to
end encryption. Particularly Dragon. Dragon, you've got an iPhone. I
know you have an iPhone because you know not exchange
emoji sometimes yes, yeah, so I know Dragon's got so
the messages thank goodness that Dragon sends me, and even more,
thank goodness the message Eye. Messages that I send Dragon

(23:21):
are encrypted end to end. So if the bosses down
the hallway decide to try to hack in and read
our messages, where we're you know, berating them for not
fixing the light bulbs.

Speaker 2 (23:32):
Well, we don't want them to see that, to which
we would.

Speaker 1 (23:34):
Never do, which we would never ever do, but just hypothetically,
if we were about something that were I mean, I
don't think over the weekend you said a word to
me complaining about your weekend job. I don't think you
said one word to me about that. Correct, Yeah, that's right,
just in case somebody's listening.

Speaker 2 (23:50):
They're not, that's for sure.

Speaker 1 (23:53):
Well, if they're not here, the chances of them there
is like mine's zero exactly minus zero. So Apple's really
pissed me off because Apple decided to actually do that. Now,
one of the options would have been they could have
created a backdoor for encrypted data, which would have given

(24:15):
the UK government access to user data globally, not just
in Britain. Did Apple make the right decision? I don't
think so. Should it have quit Britain altogether? Or I
think comply with the government's demands. Well, when you're a
trillion dollar company, they flip back and forth between number one,

(24:36):
two and three all the time. Microsoft, Apple, Nvidia. I mean,
who knows that it's always one of the other. Amazon,
They're always number one at one point or another. To understand,
precisely what's happening in Britain and why. And to gain
some insight into these questions, you've really got to dig deeply.

(24:57):
But the home of the magnet Carta has reached the
point where they don't care about free speech. This is,
while this may not seem to be costing tax dollars,
it does in this sense. Now, Apple chose to drop
in to end encryption rather than creating just a particular

(25:21):
back door that was, you know, they could have put
in all sorts of requirements in order to access a
backdoor into a user's phone, you need or to messages
between users, you need to give us a warrant, a
search ward or whatever. But they just capitulated. Now, I,

(25:42):
if I'm Tim Cook, I've got a problem because every
time I have an Apple event, there is at some
point in that presentation that they talk about Apple's commitment
to privacy and their commitment to protect your messages from

(26:03):
ackers and from government and anybody else, because they believe
that whatever Dragon and I send back and forth to
each other ought to be encrypted and ought to be
you know, shielded from the prying eyes of you know,
spying spouses or spying managers. Or spying governments or anybody else.
But they didn't ycapitulated, and they gave in to the

(26:26):
demands of the United Kingdom. Now I don't know whether
it's practical at all, but on the production lines, any
any phone or device, laptop or otherwise, iPad, whatever it
might be, that is destined to the UK, then is

(26:50):
there not some way to make iOS eighteen point three
point one or whatever version we're at right now. Okay,
this is going to the UK, so privacy is not
built into that operating system. Anywhere else in the world.
We keep the same we keep the same code. I'm
not a code writer, I'm not a tech geek in

(27:11):
that sense of the word. But it seems to me
that with everything else you could do, you could do that.
It might increase the cost. Uh, but I not even
living in the UK, but be more than willing to
pay a little more for a product that ensures my
privacy than when they just completely capitulates to a request

(27:31):
by the government. I want. But this is in my DNA,
as it should be in most Americans DNA. I want
people government, people to have to fight, to have to
go to a court, to have to stand in front
of a judge and say we need to get access
to Michael Brown's phone because we have a reasonables We

(27:52):
have probable cause, not reasonable suspicion, we have a probable
cause to believe that he's committed these crimes. And we
think that there is and here's why we think there
is this information on his phone or his iPad or
his laptop that would show us evidence of that crime.
And then let a judge inside, because then that gives
me the opportunity to fight that warrant. That's the whole part.

(28:16):
That's the whole part of the Fourth Amendment. You present
me with a warrant, I might have to turn over
the device immediately, or I might even have the option,
in particular circumstances, of moving to quash that subpoena so
that you cannot take the device, depending on how fast
I can get a lawyer to act, how fast we

(28:38):
can get to a courtroom. But at least I've got
at least I have a fighting chance. You have none
of that in the UK, none whatsoever. So now think
about the combination of the two things. No longer have
encrypted end to end messaging, emails or anything else. And
on top of that, if you say something in those

(29:01):
messages that just offend someone who's maybe not even a
part of that message chain, but you've offended a group
of people. You have said something bigoted, you have said
something negative, you have said something that if you said
it to their face, much like in Germany, you say
it to their face. Oh you're now guilty of a
speech crime, and we'll prosecute you and we'll put you

(29:23):
in jail. Now take this leap with me. If that's
what the UK in France, well I can't in particular
say France. But if that's what the UK and Germany
are doing, don't you think that their priorities are wrong
as opposed to focusing on freedom and they're fighting for

(29:45):
freedom in the Ukraine or in Ukraine, but they're not
fighting for freedom among their own people. Something's wrong in.

Speaker 3 (29:52):
Europe, Michael, I just always go the opposite way. The
left is screaming when they say Orange man Bad and
Mars man Bad. I just know that we're right over
the target.

Speaker 1 (30:07):
Amen Buber number fifty three twenty Michael beat Beauford Tilly pukes.
The people are really sick, sex sick, sick, poor poor,
poor Buford Old Beauford. I never named him.

Speaker 2 (30:24):
I guess it wouldn't be Beauford.

Speaker 1 (30:27):
It wouldn't be absolutely wouldn't be Beauford fifty two thirteen, Michael.
Just wait until Europe or Canada jail's one of our athletes.
That's when people will notice what's going on.

Speaker 2 (30:37):
Something similar happened with one of the tennis players who
refused to get vaccinated. I mean, we wouldn't let him.

Speaker 1 (30:43):
He couldn't go to Australia. Okay, if I recall, right,
he come buy. You know they were they were in
the finals or something and they couldn't go to the
Australian finals. Because it's totally totally absurd. I want to
get to this before we leave today, because otherwise it's
going to get too stale. But Trump was hosting the
National Governors Association and they were all in the East room,

(31:07):
and it became a parent during the meeting that Democrats
have found the hill that they're willing to die on,
and that's the whole transsexual psychosis that we're dealing with.
The Governor of Maine, Janet Mills just bluntly announced in
the middle of the meeting in front of everybody she's
going to defy Trump's executive voter that prevents biological males

(31:30):
from competing in female sports man. You got to learn
at some point to choose the hill you want to
die on and where you want to announce that you're
going to take that hill to die on. So imagine
if all fifty seven governors were there. Remember we have
fifty seven states, So if all fifty seven governors were there,

(31:53):
they're all sitting around these nice, you know, round tables
of you know, six or eight, and they're all sitting
there having nice dinner in the East room, and the
freaking president of the United States of America is up
front talking about what he's been doing and how he
wants to work with the executive work with the governors.

(32:14):
And you get this.

Speaker 5 (32:15):
Then CIA has complied immediately, by the way, that's good,
But I understand Maine is the Maine here, the governor
of Maine.

Speaker 1 (32:24):
Are you not going to comply with it?

Speaker 5 (32:26):
I'm fer laws, Well, we are the federal law. Well
you better do it. You better do it because you're
not going to get any federal funding at all if
you don't. And by the way, your population, even though
it's somewhat liberal, orthough I did very well there. Your
population doesn't want men playing in women's sports, so you
better you better comply because otherwise you're not getting any

(32:47):
any federal funding. See every state. Good, I'll see you,
and could I look forward to that. That should be
a really easy one and enjoy your life after governor,
because I don't think you'll be an elected politics on.

Speaker 1 (33:01):
Shut up? Are you not gonna comply with that? I'm
complying with the state and federal laws. You know what
I find fascinating about that statement is, now, I know
Trump said, well, I am the federal law. You know,
it's so ragadicio. But Title nine, Title nine is federal law,

(33:21):
and as the administrator is, as the chief executive of
the executive Branch, he has said that under Title nine,
under this law, which prohibits discrimination, we're gonna stop all discrimination.
And she's like, okay, well you know what we're gonna
you know, we're gonna go to court. Okay, well, well
i'll see you in court. Before they were flushed out

(33:44):
of the White House, Democrats used a twisted interpretation of
Title nine so they could impose transsexual situents on these
local schools. Now, presumably the leverage of federal funding is
going to come into play now. The shoes on the
other foot, because hours after she got her smack down
in front of all the other governors, like there's one
governess kind of sitting right in front of the camera,

(34:05):
looks around the room like, oh, I was here when
the fight started. They've already announced an investigation into the
main Department of Education. Yeah. Uh, be careful which fight
you decide to pick and choose