2-26-25 - 7am - Gas Stations, Denver City Council Deletes 'X' Account and iPhone Racist

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Silly, Michael.

Speaker 2 (00:01):
The reason they don't want gas stations near light rail
is because they want to force them to put in
affordable housing, and they can't do that if there's a
gas station there. But who's going to force them. I'm
always fascinated by the whole affordable housing concept because if
if I own a piece of property, we still have

(00:26):
the right of private property in this country. Can't believe
I said that. Ostensibly we still have the right of
private property in this country. So if I own a
corner lot on a busy intersection, not a corner lot

(00:47):
on you know, in a residential section, or you know,
a lot at the end of a cul de sac.
I own a lot on a busy intersection, two arterial
streets intersecting each other. Now I look at that property
and I think that's that's an asset. I would like

(01:09):
to maximize that asset. So what am I going to
do with it?

Speaker 1 (01:16):
Now?

Speaker 2 (01:16):
I could build a convenience store and then lease the
building out to one of the convenience store chains I could.
I could lease it out to seven eleven, or I
could lease it out to Circle K to I don't know, Bucke's,

(01:36):
or somebody I could I could do that. That would
I'd have the capital costs of construction, all of the
permitting and everything else. But then I would have a
steady stream of income because you know, I might have
depending on the arrangement, I might have a revenue share
from the convenience store too, particularly if it's a prime location.

(02:01):
I could I could if the zoning permitted, which again
gets to an idea of private property rights.

Speaker 1 (02:07):
Uh.

Speaker 2 (02:08):
Maybe I could build some condos on that corner, much
like we have is mix a mixed usee condo like
we have over here on the corner of Quebec and Bellevue,
where the the lower portion underground is a parking garage,
the h on ground is a mixed use of office space.

Speaker 3 (02:29):
Uh.

Speaker 2 (02:29):
I think there's a restaurant. I'm trying to visualize what's
on that one particular corner across from the McDonald's.

Speaker 1 (02:36):
Uh.

Speaker 2 (02:36):
And then I could build some condos above that, so
a mixed use development, and probably sell that off to
a real real estate investment trust or maybe just keep
it maintained, you know, depending on what my what my
skill set is, or what my bandwidth is in terms
of am I do I just own the property, or

(02:58):
do I have a constry production company, do have a
management company?

Speaker 1 (03:01):
Whatever.

Speaker 2 (03:02):
But the point is I would look at that asset,
which is land, and I want to maximize.

Speaker 1 (03:08):
The value of that. And you would think.

Speaker 2 (03:12):
That the city in County at Denver would also want
me to maximize the use of that property because what's
going to pull in more revenue for them? Well, think
about a think about the mixed use. So the mixed
use you have obviously you got property taxes, and then

(03:36):
if there's a couple of retail outlets, you would have
the property taxes, and now you've got the sales taxes.
And then if you have the condos on top, you've
got the property taxes that you're going to pay on that.
So you've maximized your value, and you have increased the
value to the city in county because now they have

(03:58):
tax revenue coming from that. Or let's just say that
it's it's it's it seems like a good place to
build just condos. Again, you've got property taxes, you've got uh,
you've got people that have moved into that area, so

(04:19):
they're close, maybe they're closer. It's jobs, but you've increased
the amount of and by trafficing, I don't necessarily mean cars.
I mean people moving around, because moving around, going from
place to place is generally how unless you just sit
on your fat ass at home all day, that's how
you do some consuming. You you leave that place and

(04:43):
you go to lunch, or you go to dinner, or
you go to the grocery store, you go, you go
to the doctor's office, you do whatever. It's it's people
moving around that is part of economic activity. But and
again that's a maximum use of that property. So so
now I've maximized my asset, created a revenue stream for myself,

(05:05):
and put it to its best and highest use, which
is a phrase often used in planning commissions. What's the
best and highest use for that property? What would not
be the best and highest use? Again, I own the property.
I Michael Brown owned that property on the corner busy intersection.

Speaker 1 (05:29):
What incentive do I have to put low income housing? Oh?

Speaker 2 (05:35):
I might get a grant, But then with low income housing,
those are probably going to be rental units. So now
I run the risk just going to the extreme, I
run the risk that they'll end up being like an
apartment complex. And say, don't let me think of someplace maybe, oh,
I don't know, maybe Denver or Aurora where trend to

(05:57):
rock with decides they want to take up they want
to take up their place their operations there. Or maybe not,
maybe that's too extreme. So instead, now I have low
income housing recipients that are dependent upon whatever rental subsidy

(06:19):
they get. So I'm not going to get the maximum
value that I could have gotten with a private rental
to you know, some young couple that's you know, they
don't have kids yet, but they want to live close
to this where this area is. They both have good incomes,
and I can build really nice condos or apartments or

(06:43):
duplex or whatever it might be and make more money
versus what's minecenting for low income and all the hassles
that come with that, all the government bread tape, all
the government regulations, everything else. So or what would incentivize
me to put in low income housing?

Speaker 4 (07:06):
Oh, all of the rest of you.

Speaker 2 (07:09):
They're going to subsidize the purchase of the land because
now in Denver you have a low income housing department
and they're actually going to buy that land, or you know,
maybe they might even try imminent domain. I don't know,
So that land never gets put to its highest and

(07:30):
best use. And then let's just say it's low income
housing to what benefit is that to the treasury coffers
of the city and County of Denver. What benefit is
that to the restaurants, the medical offices, the grocery stores,
or anybody else that lives in that in that or

(07:50):
operates a business in that area. Well, that's diminished. It's
not as good as it could be. So the idea
that Denver wants to stop gas stations, so you could
put that to your point, low income housing is not
the best and highest use for that property. And if

(08:12):
you want to put low income housing now you're looking
at government involvement. And when you look at government involvement,
that means you're going to you're not going to make
property taxes probably exempt. And if they're not exempt, what's
the valuation of that Because you could have built you know,

(08:33):
let's say a twelve hundred square foot condo and now
instead you've got an eight hundred square foot low income housing,
you know, one bedroom or studio or whatever that's occupied
now by you know, people on welfare. So you're not
going to sity in counties don't make any money on
that and you haven't gotten your maximum value of that asset.

(08:55):
Government needs to stay out of the business of doing
these things as long as we're talking about sitting County
of Denver, you and else. They did yesterday they deleted
their X account formerly Twitter, blaming what they described as
increased political rhetoric surrounding. Here we go again Elon Musk

(09:19):
and his newly formed Department of Government Efficiency. So because
Elon Musk owns X, and because Elon Musk is also
involved in heading up the Department of Government Efficiency trying
to reduce waste, fraud and abuse make the government more effective.
So here you have the Denver City Council, which they're

(09:40):
all politicians, and now they're admitting they actually can't deal
with politics. So their inability to deal with political discussion
is to shut down a social media account where these
politicians' constituents can go to get political news about what
they're doing. So you got it, You got what they're doing.

(10:07):
A man descend of all who's president of the city Council,
told the Denver Gazette that quote, as long as X
is owned by Elon Musk and as long as he's
an appointee of the President Donald Trump, and as long
as he's bidding on contracts for the federal government. As
council president, I have made the decision that we cannot

(10:29):
have city council be a part of that. Why why not?
I'll tell you why. Because there are a bunch of
Weasley cowards. There are a bunch of Weasley cowards that
don't want anybody, you know, tweeting at them or saying
something or posting things about them, when indeed, X has

(10:50):
turned out to be one of the most Look how
many police departments, how many fire departments use X to
disseminate information out and how many of local, state, and
national newspapers also have accounts because they want to disseminate
their information. It's a way to further your reach. But

(11:14):
the Denver City Council doesn't want to do that because
they are a bunch of political cowards. They don't put
not only are the political cowards, but there are a
bunch of hypocrites too. So the same people that want
to limit what you can do with private property. You
can't build the gas station there, it's too close to
the light rail. And we're going to shut down our

(11:36):
ex account because we don't want you to know what
we're doing now. Their rationale is, oh, but we still
have to comply with the open meetings law and we
still have to post the agendas. How many of you
have How many of you have ever gone to the
City and County building to look up on the bulletin board.
You know, they've got the big glass kind of bulletin

(11:57):
boards there where they'll post the agenda that meets the
open meetings requirement, the open meetings law requirement. How many
of you done that versus how many of you ever
looked at an x account and looked to see, Oh,
I wonn know what the city Council's done today. Let's
go look at their ex account and see what they've
posted about what they're doing, about what they're discussing. You
can't do that anymore. Transparency doesn't exist all in the

(12:20):
name because it's Elon Musk and it's Donald Trump. Weasels
nothing but a bunch of weasels. Speaking of weasels, a
federal district court judge in Seattle, Washington has temporarily temporarily
blocked Trump's executive order that suspended refugee resettlement in the
United States. Again, you had a big news day yesterday.

(12:44):
The move is just, in my opinion, as part of
the latest law fare efforts by all these far left
and progressive NGOs to try to hamper Trump's administration's efforts
to undo former President Joe Biden's.

Speaker 1 (12:55):
Mass immigration policies.

Speaker 2 (12:58):
The primary injunction issued by District Court Judge Jamal Whitehead
is going to be I should say could be, but
I believe it will be the subject of an emergency
appeal by the Trump Department of Justice to the US
Supreme Court because it raises serious constitutional questions because, namely,
it appears at Judge Whitehead, in issuing the priminary injunction,

(13:21):
has determined this that a congressionally authorized refugee resettlement program
falls under judicial rulings and congressional actions regarding executive branch impoundments.
What's an impoundment an empowerment? According to the Impoundments Act
and several court rulings, the President of the United States

(13:44):
must generally generally comply with congressionally appropriated programs and cannot
significantly reduce their funding and contravention of the will of Congress.
But in this instance, it's unclear whether President Trump's action
even constitutes an impoundment. The determination of qualifications for asylum

(14:09):
status or the determination of qualifications for immigrations into the
United States at large generally falls under I shouldn't even
say generally. I think it explicitly falls into the purview
of the executive branch, and the Immigration and Naturalization Act,

(14:31):
which enjoys broad national security powers and exceptions, grants almost
unlimited authority over immigration policy to the executive branch. But
despite all of that, this Federal District judge in Washington
contends that Trump's executive orders tend amount to quote, an
effective nullification of Congressional will. He goes on to state

(14:53):
that specifically that it abrogates or abolishes the Refugee Act
of nineteen, that it abolishes the Administrative Procedure Act, and
that if that it somehow abrogates the Fifth Amendments Due
process clause. Now, the first two provisions that are cited

(15:14):
by Judge Whitehead can still be circumvented under the president's
broad national security powers. And I don't know that the
Fifth Amendment due process claim appears can be completely nonsensical
to me. But what is certain is that the ruling
could represent perhaps prematurely for the Trump White House. The

(15:34):
opening salable in a much broader fight over impoundments. Now,
let's think about just the impoundments specifically for a moment,
because the Impoundment Act and some court rulings says that
the president must generally comply with appropriated programs and can't

(15:54):
significantly reduce their funding in contravention of the will of Congress.
But this is a refugee resettlement program that was enacted
or adopted by the Biden administration. So if it's something
that the court's completely ignored and Biden, acting under his

(16:19):
executive authority, created a refugee resettlement program, then why can't
the new president say I don't like that program, and
that program is in contravention of all the other things
that we're trying to do in terms of all the
acts that were taking under the Immigration and Naturalization Act,

(16:41):
So therefore I'm going to abolish that program. I think
this is probably opens a huge constitutional quagmire. Now, it's
not one that I'm not willing to fight. I think
the Trump Department Justice ought to fight this one because

(17:04):
I think this is one where both the Impoundment Act
and the powers of the presidency under the Immigration and
Naturalization Act can be addressed by the Supreme Court. I
hope they do file an appeal directly with the US
Supreme Court. Do you want to get it on. Here's
a good chance to get it on.

Speaker 1 (17:30):
Michael, that's ridiculous.

Speaker 5 (17:32):
That area Peoria and I seventy is a bunch of
commercial warehouses that people driving commercial.

Speaker 4 (17:39):
Vehicles and vans and Amazon.

Speaker 1 (17:41):
Trucks and whatever else need to get gassed.

Speaker 4 (17:43):
And those gas stations.

Speaker 1 (17:45):
They're always busy.

Speaker 5 (17:47):
Is there any common sense?

Speaker 4 (17:49):
No?

Speaker 2 (17:52):
I can't believe you actually are referencing something the city
and County of Denver did or does and then using
the word common sense. I look, we love you like
a brother, but maybe today might be the day to
like therapy, maybe a little therapy, because I'm, I'm, we're,

(18:16):
we're genuinely concerned about you. Let's then let me do
some text messages real quick, because I haven't looked at them.
This is a this is pretty good question. Five, five, six, six, Mike.
At what level does a store go from a convenience

(18:37):
store to a grocery store.

Speaker 4 (18:40):
Dragon fresh produce or fresh meats?

Speaker 1 (18:44):
Maybe, yeah, yeah, maybe that's the different.

Speaker 6 (18:46):
Yeah, I've seen some gas stations have like apples and
oranges and bananas, like.

Speaker 2 (18:49):
I think the circle k over here got some fresh fruit.

Speaker 1 (18:51):
And that's about it.

Speaker 4 (18:52):
You're getting your fresh ground.

Speaker 1 (18:53):
Oh they've got meat, they got the roller food.

Speaker 4 (18:56):
Oh well, but that's me. That's that's cuh.

Speaker 1 (19:00):
Well, we'll grocery stores have cooked chicken, but.

Speaker 4 (19:03):
Maybe the raw stuff.

Speaker 1 (19:05):
Have you seen the.

Speaker 2 (19:06):
Viral video going around of the woman walking into a
grocer store, you know where they have the rotisserie chicken
and she opens what up, pulls a leg off, eats
it and puts the leg back in and steals it
back up and scoots it over.

Speaker 4 (19:18):
That's disgustingly beautiful.

Speaker 1 (19:20):
Isn't it.

Speaker 2 (19:21):
It's just a public service announcement to be sure and
check your rotisserie chicken before put again in your basket.

Speaker 1 (19:29):
Uh.

Speaker 2 (19:31):
That's a good I don't know. But why why is
there an exception for Costco or King soupers? I don't
safely have gas. Whole Foods would never sell a gas
because it's not organic. So well, I guess it really
is organic when you think about it.

Speaker 4 (19:49):
I don't know.

Speaker 1 (19:49):
That's a great question. Uh.

Speaker 2 (19:53):
Forty four to sixty seven points out that you know,
if you do low income housing, you run the risk
of a meth lab. Although tick I loves I love
speech to text your method lab, you run the risk
of a method lab on your property. You can't get
rid of the six two eight eight. They can't get

(20:15):
rid of the drama. Queen's fast enough. What's that about?
I'm not sure what that one's about. Uh forty four
to sixty seven. Michael, speaking of Denver, I keep hearing
capitalist teas about garbage collection beginning at six am. I
know that might not bother you, but that would make
me very cranky. You know what drives me crazy about
garbage collection schedules? They always change. Now we're required in

(20:39):
our neighborhood to have the garbage out by six am,
So almost everybody on my little street puts their garbage
out the night before. Now, sometimes I won't put it
actually on the curb the night before, because, like like
last night, I thought it was supposed to be really
windy and we didn't have that much garbage, so I
was afraid, you know, it might blow it over and

(21:01):
then I have to pick up garbage. So I left
it up against the garage and then put it to
the curb this morning.

Speaker 6 (21:06):
I have a question here though, that did the hoa
get pissed off if you put it out on the
curb too early the night before so you know that
you can only have it out at six pm rather
than you know, four, Did they get a little pissed
off about that?

Speaker 2 (21:19):
They never have with our streets. I've never heard. I've
never heard of the complain about it.

Speaker 4 (21:23):
Gotcha?

Speaker 2 (21:24):
Okay, So I like, I think last night, I think
I put it out after dinner, which would be like
a four thirty PM.

Speaker 1 (21:31):
No, I think I put it out like a six
or six thirty last night.

Speaker 2 (21:34):
But what pisses me off is then like Tamra's not
working today, so she's at home, so she'll create moreage garbage.
So we have I took your advice, Dragon, and I
went on Amazon and I bought, like, you know, a
big pile of plastic bags, so I can also take
them to the grocery store.

Speaker 1 (21:50):
Right, And so now we.

Speaker 2 (21:51):
Use that to just put whatever's in the next morning
and take that out because normally our trash had not
been picked up at the earliest might be noon, one,
two o'clock. And then suddenly it's like six thirty am
and it's gone. And then so the next morning you

(22:12):
like get everything out, and then it's two o'clock in
the afternoon. There's no rhyme or reason to win. It's
picked up.

Speaker 6 (22:19):
These are first world problems most definitely, that are.

Speaker 1 (22:22):
Very very serious.

Speaker 2 (22:24):
Because I have a routine and I'm OCD and I
want my you know, the next thing I want done.
I want someone to come and clean my garbage camp.
It is filthy.

Speaker 4 (22:37):
There are services out there to get.

Speaker 1 (22:38):
Services could do it.

Speaker 2 (22:39):
I'm going to hire someone to do it because it's
too cold and I don't want to hook up my
hoses or anything right now to do it myself. So
I want somebody to come and do it. So if
you have a garbage cleaning service text By the way,
I'm looking for a carpenter. While we're at it. I
have reached.

Speaker 1 (22:53):
Out to two.

Speaker 4 (22:57):
Like a woodworker.

Speaker 2 (22:59):
Well I need So we're our laundry room. Our little
space is for our washer and dryer. We have bifold doors, okay,
and the bifold doors have come apart, the railing has
come apart. And Tamera saw this. This is the danger
of of something like Pinterest. But she has seen where

(23:21):
they have framed that opening and put doors that open
outward from the middle, because we both hate bifold doors.
Bifold doors are just pieces of cheap crap, and so
she's thinking, you know, find a carpenter that could frame
that and put in you know, putting in the hinges
and put doors.

Speaker 1 (23:40):
That just open out.

Speaker 2 (23:41):
I think that's questionable because when this house was built,
washers and dryers weren't behemoths, and now that they're behemoths,
there's very, if any space to even close the bifold doors,
So I questioned, But anyway, I at least need to
bifold doors done, and then.

Speaker 1 (24:03):
We have three.

Speaker 2 (24:05):
Base boards that need to be replaced, and I don't
have the skills to do that.

Speaker 6 (24:11):
You're handy, You've got tools, though, and you claim to
have used all of those tools for their intended purposes,
So why don't you just do it?

Speaker 2 (24:19):
Because one, uh, the base boards need to be replaced.
They need to be so that would mean a trip
to home depot with a piece of base board to match.
So if they match, then I would have to prime. Well,
I guess they'd probably be come prime, but then I'd
have to paint huh. And then they also have to

(24:39):
be cut at the angle. And all I have is
a handsaw, and I can just see me totally effing
up the.

Speaker 4 (24:47):
Angle circular little hand in hand circular saw.

Speaker 1 (24:50):
No, I just have a handsaw, just like a.

Speaker 4 (24:52):
Like you would say, No, you don't have a power saw.

Speaker 1 (24:55):
No, I don't.

Speaker 2 (24:56):
Okay, are you freaking kidding me? I'm a lawyer, sue
people that have power saws.

Speaker 4 (25:02):
Oh oh, I.

Speaker 2 (25:04):
Cut my hand off through the power through the manufacturer.

Speaker 6 (25:08):
They did have a little angular adjustments so you could
angle that. The power sawns just fine.

Speaker 2 (25:13):
And Dandy did not have to get a power saw. Look,
my garage is already full of crap. I don't want
any more crap in my garage.

Speaker 6 (25:19):
A red blooded American mail should jump at the chance
to buy a new tool.

Speaker 2 (25:23):
Well, okay, I'll go buy a new tool. But it's
not gonna be It's gonna be a hand it's not
gonna be a table saw. Can I ran out part
of your garage?

Speaker 1 (25:30):
Can I?

Speaker 2 (25:30):
Can you kick your mother in law out of her
space so I can put all my extra crap in
your garage? And then can I have the access code
to your garage. So when I need something, I can
drive all the way over to your house and you know,
at two am and get what I need out of
the garage.

Speaker 1 (25:43):
How can I do that? What an ass?

Speaker 2 (25:47):
I think that I actually wanted you to be the
producer of this program. Sometimes I just I really questioned
my own sanity. Michael, I thought they immigrant this is
a forty four sixteen. I thought that immigration policy was
exclusively the preview of the federal government, as decided in
the Arizona case when Jim Brewers governor there. How can
local judges prevent the president from exercising his executive powers?

(26:09):
This really confuses me. When Joe Biden was doing his
stupid stuff, I don't recall judges preventing his actions.

Speaker 1 (26:16):
That's exactly the point that I was trying to make.

Speaker 2 (26:19):
This is an immigration issue that Joe Biden, under the
Immigration and Naturalization Act, decided to have a refugee relocation program,
and so he moves some money around like you know,
some sort of card game. And then Trump comes along

(26:40):
and says, I don't want that program. Why can't he
take it away? So this judge, by enjoining Trump from
doing that, has set up a great case on the
Impoundment Act and the Immigration and Naturalization Act as to
how far our executive powers. You see, Sometimes I think

(27:04):
these judges are stupid because they are so infected with
Trump derangement syndrome, which I kind of thought we were
kind of over that, so infected with Trump derangement syndrome
that they don't think two or three steps ahead. They
just looked and they're like, ah, look, I'm a federal
district judge. Boom, pound the gabble, and I'm gonna tell

(27:25):
Trump he can't do it. Well, he may wish that
he had never brought that case or granted that injunction,
because that probably would be six to three, But the
Supreme Court may whack them down and say Nope, can't
do it. And then everybody across the country, every little
district court judge all across the country, is now going
to have to comply with that Supreme Court decision. Speaking

(27:52):
speaking of which there was here, this is how the
remember Hank Johnson. Hank Johnson is always concerned. Hank Johnson
from Isn't It Georgia always concerned that Guam was going
to tip over if we put too many soldiers on Guam.

Speaker 7 (28:14):
For President willfully failed or refused to comply with the
court ruling. They could be held in contempt of court theoretically,
but it would be up to the US Marshal Service,
which is a part of the Justice Department, to be
the enforcement arm for the federal courts.

Speaker 4 (28:34):
Is that correct?

Speaker 5 (28:37):
Your hypothetical would have to play itself out.

Speaker 7 (28:40):
It would be the US Marshals, who fall under the
Department of Justice, who would have to carry out the
contempt order. And so what would happen if the US
Marshal Service, under the command of the Justice Department, at
the direction of the President, refuse used to carry out

(29:02):
a court order of contempt? What what would then be
the state of our democracy?

Speaker 5 (29:10):
Again, I'm here on behalf of the Judicial Conference to
talk about the shortage of judges that we have, and
I would comment on those needs put in particular, So.

Speaker 2 (29:21):
He wants marshals to want arrest Donald Trump for failing
to carry out a contempt citation by telling the US
Martial Service not to do it. Yeah, I think that's
what he wants. He wants the US Marshals to arrest
Donald Trump.

Speaker 5 (29:34):
Is it just me or does it seem like the
liberal mob is about to take to the streets again
and violent protest.

Speaker 2 (29:42):
Well, I don't condone violence. I part of me kind
of wishes they would because I think that would.

Speaker 4 (29:47):
Be mostly peaceful protest.

Speaker 2 (29:50):
Yes, mostly, I think that might be the end of
a lot of them. So I was not aware of this.
Somebody on the text line told us this story.

Speaker 3 (30:01):
Next guy is Falk's Digital found that that's saying the
word racist in the voice to text feature on Apple
devices will periodically generate the word Trump on the screen.

Speaker 1 (30:14):
Tell me what's happening here?

Speaker 8 (30:15):
Yeah, Apple has a problem on their hands.

Speaker 1 (30:17):
So if that's true, No, FeSi, Sherlock, you really do.

Speaker 8 (30:21):
Fox Digital has found that saying the word racist and
the voice to text feature on Apple devices will generate
the word Trump before changing to the correct word. Now,
if you're sitting at home and you're thinking, hey, let
me try this, it doesn't happen every time. Fox Digital
found that it did happen some of the time. And
this was noticed by our team because there was a

(30:43):
video on TikTok showing this. So we reached out to
Apple and they did provide a statement saying to Fox quote,
we are aware of an issue with the speech recognition
model that powers dictation, and we are rolling out a
fix as soon as possible.

Speaker 1 (30:58):
Now.

Speaker 2 (30:58):
This was on Varney's show yesterday, giving an update in
just a.

Speaker 8 (31:03):
Second acknowledging it. Apple did explain that sometimes dictation will
display words with phonetic overlap, and looking at Trump and racist,
I guess there is an overlap.

Speaker 4 (31:15):
Of the R trump racist.

Speaker 3 (31:18):
Yeah, I'll leave it up to you, so I just
don't see the overlap quite frankly today.

Speaker 2 (31:22):
Yeah, Dragon, gee, sounds like what you just said to me,
an overlap Trump racist.

Speaker 6 (31:30):
Racist has the hard T on the end, but Trump
has a hard P on the end too, So it's
very different.

Speaker 2 (31:36):
From starts out with an R. Trump starts with the
t R. So the Associated Press says, uh, we are
aware of an issue with this is ap this morning.
We are aware of an issue with the speech recognition
model that powers dictation, and we are rolling out of

(31:58):
fix today. The company said that the speech recognition models
that power the voice to text feature might show words with.

Speaker 1 (32:07):
Some phonetic overlap.

Speaker 2 (32:09):
It also it also said that other words that have
an R consonant were also erroneously triggering the bug. The
Associated Press could not duplicate that problem on Wednesday, a
day after it emerged. Somebody at Apple's going to get fired. Yeah.

(32:30):
If even the associated press says we can't duplicate the problem.
And I don't get the whole explanation. This sounds like
a bunch of bull crap to me. H power a
phonetic overlap Trump racist, Yeah, there's an R, but I

(32:51):
don't see where the overlap is. So uh, I heard
something racist today and that gets in turn to I
heard Trump today.

Speaker 6 (33:08):
I mean you could think maybe it'll split it into
two words racist, into the race is at you know,
the Bandamir Speedway, the racists are at Panda.

Speaker 4 (33:18):
I don't get it.

Speaker 2 (33:18):
It's just I think Dragon red Beard is rape.

Speaker 1 (33:22):
Let me turn this. I think Dragon red Beard is racist.

Speaker 4 (33:25):
Yeah, thanks for that.

Speaker 1 (33:28):
No, I think Dragon red Beard is racist.

Speaker 4 (33:30):
Yeah, yeah, I appreciate that.

Speaker 2 (33:32):
I'm just trying to help. I'm just reflecting the goobers
that have gotten to know you over the years about
what a racist a hole you are. I mean, who
makes their mother in law park out in the snow
when she could be parking in the garage.

Speaker 4 (33:49):
She's in the garage.

Speaker 1 (33:54):
I forget the microphone was still on.

Speaker 4 (33:56):
Oh beautiful, you mean text this to you?

Speaker 2 (34:00):
Delete delete, delete, delete before that goes anywhere. Okay, I
got nothing else, Will you got anything? I'm off on
the clock right now, I got I gotta kill ten
seconds here.

Speaker 1 (34:10):
Yeah.

Speaker 2 (34:11):
Oh, somebody told me that Island Ranch Community Association does
have a thing that you can't have your you can't
have your trash out. What'd you say before seven pm? Well,
guess what I did last night. Screw them.