3-18-25 - 8am - Transgender Animal Tests, Postal Worker and Keep It Up DOGE

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
You didn't give us the most important detail about your getting.

Speaker 2 (00:03):
By a coach story.

Speaker 3 (00:05):
Were there any bicycles using the bike lane?

Speaker 2 (00:08):
Of course not.

Speaker 4 (00:10):
It was even nice out yesterday.

Speaker 2 (00:13):
Well this was all this was on Sunday. It was
on Sunday.

Speaker 3 (00:17):
It was nice on Sunday, and there wasn't Uh you
know how Broadway can get fairly congested during the week, uh,
whether trush hour or not.

Speaker 2 (00:28):
So it was Sunday afternoon.

Speaker 3 (00:30):
I want to say, I want to say it was
around I don't know, one two o'clock in the afternoon
and so hardly any traffic at all except at the intersections.

Speaker 2 (00:40):
Were people trying to figure out do I turn here?
Do I park? What do I do? What do I do?

Speaker 3 (00:46):
Yeah, it was It would have been a gorgeous day
to drive up and down Broadway and start stop at
one of the dispensaries and you know, get a little
a little weed and then go over and have some
sushi over a go fishing or something. The Trump administration
has announced that they're going to terminate Oh see, this

(01:09):
is where our priorities are so screwed up. They're going
to terminate these taxpayer funded grants for transgender.

Speaker 2 (01:24):
Mice experiments on animals.

Speaker 3 (01:28):
According to a watchdog group called the White Coast What
Can't Get It Out the White Coat Waste Project, It
was initially awarded under the Autopen administration. These grants were
directed to Havard University and we're just now recently ended

(01:50):
by the National Institutes of Health. One grant valued at
two hundred ninety dollars. They wanted to keep it under
three hundred grand I GUESS was designated for research on
gender affirming testosterone therapy on breast cancer risk and treatment outcomes.

(02:13):
So it was supposed to explore breast cancer risk associated
with testosterone therapy and transmasculine individuals. Now, I don't know
what a transmasculine individual is. I have finally, after several years,
understood and got it in my head that I translate transman,

(02:35):
you know, trans male, that is that that's a person
wanting to become a male whatever you were before, I
don't know. Or a trans female, trans woman is what
you're wanting to transition to a female. Now they throw
at me the word transmasculine and I have no freaking
CLYU what it means, no idea. They were go to

(02:58):
conduct experiments on female female mice. So what were they
gonna do. They were gonna take the mice. They were
gonna take them to Rocky Mountain Men's clinic. No, I'm
just joking. They were going to administer testosterone at the
same time that they got rid of their ovaries. Talk
about macroscopic surgery. You're gonna take the ovaries out of

(03:18):
a out of a mouse. Do you put a little
mask on their nose for the anesthesia?

Speaker 2 (03:23):
Is that what you do? Or are you just not caring?
You just open them up.

Speaker 3 (03:27):
The study started back in September of twenty three, was
initially said to conclude in this August was cut short
by that evil Trump administration and, as the Colorado's Sun
calls it, an assault on federal spending. Now there's another
grant too. This one was just under five hundred thousand,

(03:48):
at four hundred and forty two, four hundred and forty four.
Do you ever stop on one to yourself? Like where
do they get these numbers? Like did they count go
back to the mice with the testosterone? Did they have
to count? Like the number of tiny, tiny, tiny little
needles they get to inject the mice with the testosterone.

Speaker 1 (04:04):
I think it's similar with something similar to your female stuff.
That they just pulled a number out of the air
and went, this is good.

Speaker 2 (04:10):
Yeah, that's a good number.

Speaker 3 (04:11):
Except when Bush pulled the number out of his butt
for ground zero, that was a nice round number.

Speaker 4 (04:18):
Yeah, like thirty billion.

Speaker 3 (04:19):
Yeah, where do you come up with four hundred and
forty two, four hundred and forty four dollars?

Speaker 4 (04:23):
Because it's not five hundred exactly. You're getting a deal.

Speaker 2 (04:27):
You're getting a deal. It's nine nine, nine eighty nine.

Speaker 1 (04:33):
Uh.

Speaker 3 (04:33):
This one was focused on, quote, molecular mechanisms of hormone
mediated sex differences in wound healing.

Speaker 2 (04:44):
Can you repeat that verbatim?

Speaker 4 (04:46):
Sure can't?

Speaker 2 (04:47):
All right?

Speaker 3 (04:47):
Molecular mechanisms of hormone mediated What the hell is that?
Sex differences in wound healing? Now it was going to
get two point two million through twenty twenty.

Speaker 4 (05:00):
So does a guy healed differently than a girl?

Speaker 2 (05:03):
Is that?

Speaker 4 (05:04):
Is that what they're trying to study right there?

Speaker 3 (05:10):
Molecular mechanism, So it's studying mallets, something about.

Speaker 2 (05:16):
Any tangle pieces.

Speaker 3 (05:18):
Of hormone medicated I'm sorry, hormone mediated. So the hormones
have they go to an arbitration panel and they have
a mediator and they're trying to mediate between the male
and female hormones. Like who's going to be in charge here?
So if you are like if your hormones, like every
man and woman have both testosterone and estrogen in them,

(05:42):
we both have male and female hormones, well maybe the
hormones are having a fight, and so they're mediating. And
this is going to study the mediation at a molecular level.
And it's also with respect to your wounds being able
to get healed. So I guess when you're wound, like like,
I've got this tiny little scratch on my finger right here. No,

(06:03):
I'm not giving you the finger, but it's right there.

Speaker 2 (06:05):
See see that.

Speaker 4 (06:06):
See that finger's next one?

Speaker 2 (06:08):
Oh, it's that one. That's that one. There you go.

Speaker 3 (06:12):
So I got this tiny little scratch on the knuckle
right there because I'm a knuckle dragger, and so I've
got this tiny little scratch. And so right now the
hormones my my testosterone and my estrogen are battling each other.
So they need to mediate, and this study is going
to help them how to mediate. And now they're not
gonna be able to do it and my wound's never
gonna heal. Or what if my wound heals with estrogen

(06:35):
instead of testosterone and I become a little female.

Speaker 1 (06:38):
Yeah, they're trying to figure out whether or not a
transgender female will heal differently than a normal female.

Speaker 2 (06:49):
All right, here's the next paragraph. Oh boy.

Speaker 3 (06:52):
The research involved experiments examining wound healing and animals treated
with eggs hormones, aiming to understand the impacts of transgender
hormone therapy. Now, Anthony Bolotti, who's the president of the
This Waste Organization, praised the Trump administration for cutting these grants,

(07:15):
and he described it as a victory against wasteful taxpayers
spending on animal experiments.

Speaker 1 (07:24):
I mean, if you want to do those experiments, go
ahead and do those experiments, just don't take any money
from the government to do so.

Speaker 2 (07:29):
Exactly.

Speaker 3 (07:32):
Anyway, they reported that when they looked at the whole
plethora of all of these grants on animals about transgender whatever,
it was mediation more.

Speaker 2 (07:40):
Than eight million dollars.

Speaker 3 (07:43):
Householvers like Committee chairman James Comer, reported just last month
that two hundred and forty one million dollars from your
pockets has been utilized for transgender animal experiments during the
Auto administration. I thought we were opposed to experimenting on animals.

(08:07):
I didn't think we were going to do that anymore.

Speaker 1 (08:08):
And we just choose pedophiles and murderers and experiment on them.

Speaker 2 (08:14):
That deserves a di.

Speaker 4 (08:22):
You know, go ahead and experiment on them a.

Speaker 3 (08:27):
If you're wondering where your mail is. A former postal
worker from DC has been found guilty of stealing more
than one point six million dollars in US treasury and
private party checks. He's worked for the Postal Service. He
committed the acts between December of twenty twenty and March
of twenty twenty three. There's a press release that I

(08:49):
got from the US Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia.
This guy that posited the checks.

Speaker 1 (08:55):
Mike, No, no, stop stop. We can use the mail
service for voting. It is safe and secure. This kind
of thing does not happen, Michael.

Speaker 3 (09:09):
Wait till I give you a little factory that I'm
purposely leaving out of the story, and then tell me
if you still feel the same way. So this guy
would deposit the checks that had been altered so he
could put them into bank accounts that he controlled the
Attorney's office. The Prosecutor's office indicated that bank surveillance footage

(09:30):
showed him conducting deposits and withdrawls involving the stolen funds
it was spent on. Well, this is what I would
spend it on too, international travel, luxury hotel stays, purchase
a gentlemen's clubs. I mean, you know, why not go
to a gentlemen's club, hookers and hookers and blow get
a go to the ATM, get a bunch of you know,
Benjamin's and step them in the g strings of all

(09:52):
the girls. Well, you know what, I apologize because maybe
it wasn't women, Maybe it was ment. He was convicted
last Thursday of several charges, conspiracy to commit theft of mail,
bank fraud, theft of mail, and engaging in monetary transactions

(10:13):
with property derived from unlawful activities. So the bank fraud
carries a maximum of thirty years, then male theft can
results in up to five years. He was also convicted
of unlawful procurement of something else because well, let me
just give his last name, Machimba something something. Machimba can

(10:38):
pronounce his first name. During the course of this prosecution,
he also ended up being prosecuted for unlawful procurement of
citizenship or naturalization.

Speaker 2 (10:51):
You see, this.

Speaker 3 (10:52):
Guy just happened to falsely claim to US Citizenship and
Immigration Services officers that he had not committed crimes for
which he had not been arrested during his naturalization process.
That could lead to ten years of imprisonment, imprisonment and denaturalization.

(11:13):
He's scheduled to be sentenced on August eighth. He was
a illegal alien with number one. Now you're saying, but
wait a minute, Michael, he was naturalized.

Speaker 2 (11:28):
Yes, he came.

Speaker 3 (11:29):
Here illegally, and then he lied to US Citizenship and
Immigration Services that he you know, he was here on
an asylum clane using the CBP APP and so now
he's here on asylum and now he's entitled to apply
for citizenship, and so he.

Speaker 2 (11:46):
Lied on that too.

Speaker 3 (11:47):
So to Dragon's point, I think we ought to use
the postal service to vote, because what could possibly go
wrong at Chiksila of Machimba, forty four years old. There's
nothing to see here. It's just a story I thought
was fun. The United States is and here's Trump again.

(12:08):
You know, he is a Putin puppet. We are pulling
out of the International Center for the Prosecution of the
Crime of Aggression against Ukraine. Never heard of that me either,
I'd never heard of this. I've heard of the International
Criminal Court, but no, we have something called which was
created solely for this purpose, the International Center for the

(12:32):
Prosecution of the Crime of Aggression against Ukraine. That's a
group that the Autopen administration joined in twenty twenty three,
and the purpose was simply the virtue signal about Putin
and others being guilty of war crimes. So clearly Biden
or not Biden, Trump is trying to dial back Biden's

(12:53):
emphasis on personally attacking the Russian leader for alleged crimes
while he tries to seek a negoti some sort of
peace settlement. Now, this group was established only two go
after Russia and its allies including Belarus, North Korean Iran

(13:14):
for aggression against Ukraine. Now, I don't know how and
where they got their jurisdiction. I don't know how and
where they got their authorities. And I don't know how
and where Biden thought that we could just join this
and virtue signal. The President of Euros, the European Union

(13:37):
Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation is the one that created
this center, has confirmed that, Yeah, we're going to pull
out our participation by the end of the month. Now
the group's going to continue being dedicated to prosecuting those
behind major international crimes in Ukraine, but we won't be

(14:00):
able to do anything without American support. If you're going
to be investigating international crimes in Ukraine, are you also
going to investigate crimes committed by if Any Zelensky or

(14:22):
any of his foot soldiers, or any of the businesses
in Ukraine that we know are corrupt because Biden went
over there and promised them some USAID money USAID money
unless until they got rid of a prosecutor that Biden
didn't like. Are you going to investigate that too? There's
also something called the Justice departments. Now, this was set

(14:44):
up in twenty twenty two by Merrick Garland, probably the
worst Attorney general in the history of the country. Close
to it, he set up something called the Department of
Justices War Crimes Accountability Team WARCAT is what they call.
They were supposed to support efforts to prosecute Russians following

(15:06):
the invasion of Ukraine. So what we were doing. I
want you to think about the autopen administration. They were
setting up all of these virtue signaling organizations that were
threatening Putin with prosecution. What do you think Putin thought
about that? Just being I want to be realistic here,

(15:30):
do you think that at some point, shall we go
or one of his secretaries or somebody walked into you know,
walked into the Kremlin, walked into Putin's big giant office
and said, oh, we've got really bad news. The Department
of Justice, you know, the ones that are going after Trump.
They've set up something called WARCAT.

Speaker 2 (15:51):
What's that?

Speaker 3 (15:52):
He says, Well, that's their War Crimes Accountability Team, and
they're going to prosecute you for your invasion of Ukraine.
Oh okay, bomb them some more than bomb them now.
I couldn't find any reason why that the Trump administration
is leading this organization other than redirecting resources or trying

(16:16):
to save money. But the question it begs the question,
why didn't they just go to Putin? Why didn't they
just like, why didn't why didn't Biden pick up the
phone and just say, hey, VLab, can we have a conversation,
Like I'm opposed to what you're doing? And we're sending

(16:36):
you know, munitions and armaments and money and everything else
order to Ukraine to try to stop you can you could,
could we have a conversation? He never did. And everybody
wore Ukrainian pins, they flew Ukrainian flags, They did everything
except anything diplomatic. They didn't try anything diplomatic. And all

(17:01):
we did was just kept sending money, money, money, money, arms, arms, arms,
munitions and munitions and munitions. And nobody ever thought to call, Hey,
why don't we call this guy? We've talked to him
for decades. We've always picked up the phone and called Vlad.
Why don't we get Vlad on the phone and see, hey,
we're going to continue to send these munitions. But is

(17:21):
there is there any chance of maybe working out something?
No attempt whatsoever. And now when Trump comes in and
just says, hey, this war is awful, it's killing millions
on both sides. What don't we call Vlad? Now you're
a Putin puppet. Wow, there's no bias in the media whatsoever.

(17:45):
I don't know why I think that diapers we should
send diapers to.

Speaker 2 (18:04):
Mike.

Speaker 5 (18:04):
I think we only really need one rule for liberals,
And if they would obey by it.

Speaker 2 (18:10):
We could handle it.

Speaker 5 (18:12):
That is, thou shalt not use government money for anything
you want.

Speaker 2 (18:18):
Yeah, I can go for that.

Speaker 3 (18:22):
So yesterday, in a little bit last week, I think
maybe on the weekend program too, I talked about the
Department of ED and Trump's attempts to dismandle it, and.

Speaker 2 (18:32):
You know, footnote.

Speaker 3 (18:33):
I find it interesting that you don't hear a lot
from Doge about the Department of ED. And I can't
help but wonder if that's because Linda McMahon, who is
one smart cookie, if she hasn't said, uh, we'll do
this ourselves. I know how to run a business and

(18:56):
I'm pretty damn good at it, and uh, I'm a
big ass wrestlers will leave me alone. But anyway, the
Democrats had been just absolutely blasting Trump for trying to
cut their research budget. In particular, there's a contractor that
does support services for students with disabilities who are nearing graduation. Now,

(19:25):
when you look at some of these grants, you think
to yourself, wow, we're getting pretty specific. It's like the
whole thing earlier about studying transgenderism and mice and whether
or not it affects wound healing. You know, hormones effect
wound healing. But it's not clear that the research that

(19:45):
this organization was doing was either necessary or successful. If
you know any teachers, you should go ask them. But
there's all any state and federal money available that helps
students with disabilities to do things like, you know, learn

(20:09):
how to use a checkbook, a banking account, how to
you know, think these are kids that are learning disabled,
whatever form that might take to help them learn how
to adjust to everyday life. Which I'm thinking that Dragon,
I should take that because Dragon and I. I'm not
trying to make a joke here, I'm like really serious.

(20:29):
Adjusting to everyday life is kind of difficult. I can't
use my damn app at Walmart, at Sam's Club. You know,
you ask me how many bags I want to purchase?
I don't want to purchase any bags. So it's not
clear that this research is either necessary or successful. But
when you look at the invoices for something called the

(20:50):
American Institute for Research, a pretty cute acronym AIR, because
that's about what they are engaged in is just air. Well,
it turns out that this is a great example of
indirect costs. I was trying again, you know so much
show prep has done when I'm out with friends and

(21:12):
family and stuff, and even my son at it an
Shoots as he and I have talked about this because
indirect costs. You get a grant from the FEDS to
do some sort of research, regardless of the legitimacy of
that research, they tack on additional money for indirect costs.

(21:37):
It's basically saying to a Shoots or saying to any
other recipient here the Department of or here the American
Institute for Research is the is, the grant is the
grant grantee. They get extra money on top of the
grant for overhead. Now, let me just establish a quick

(21:59):
little baseline before I give you some of these facts.
Nih has said it's gonna it's now going to be
fifteen percent, no more than one hundred percent. So you
might get a grant for a million dollars to study,
you know, the masturbatory practices of male or female mice,

(22:19):
and it's a million dollar grant, but we're going to
give you an extra million dollars to cover your so
called air quotes here overhead. And so then the recipient
of that grant will take the money and just pay
personnel costs, maybe make a trip to to Tahiti. It's
an audited it's just free money.

Speaker 2 (22:42):
From you from you.

Speaker 3 (22:46):
Well, now it turns out that the American Institute for Research,
a grantee of the Department of Education, was building outrageous
amounts for these indirect costs. I'm looking at an invoice
from November eighteen, twenty twenty four. It shows Now, remember
the American Institute for Research air billed for the month

(23:09):
of October four hundred eleven thousand, nine hundred and sixty
one dollars thirty five cents for one month. Of the
more than four hundred eleven thousand dollars, two hundred and
fourteen thousand dollars was total indirect charges. And on top

(23:31):
of that, there was just something called a fee for
seven percent of twenty six thousand, nine hundred fifty dollars
seventy four cents.

Speaker 2 (23:45):
A fee.

Speaker 3 (23:46):
That's like I got my plate renewed on the Grand Cherokee.

Speaker 2 (23:50):
The other day.

Speaker 3 (23:53):
And of course you know you can deduct the owner's
tax for what's designated designated as the owner's tax, which
was one line. And if I recall correctly, I think
my owner tax was one hundred eighty nine dollars. And
the reason I think it was one hundred eighty nine
dollars because the total registration cost was two hundred eighty

(24:16):
nine dollars. So what's everything else fees? And if you
go through and you look at the fees, those are taxes.
They've just designated them as fees. But no matter which way,
I don't care what you type into the program that

(24:38):
that that training cost or that overhead cost or that
it's it's all still going to government functions. So it's
not a fee.

Speaker 2 (24:50):
It's a tax.

Speaker 3 (24:54):
I think. I think a difference is maybe this is
a different without a distinction, with a difference without a distinction.
If I which is another whole story, but if I
buy my park pass through them, is that a fee

(25:15):
or a tax? I think that might be a fee
because you pay a fee to enter the park, Whereas
if I pay a so called fee on my car
registration that goes to support a county function, Well in

(25:37):
that attax, because a park isn't necessarily a government function.
That could be a private function too, it just happens
to be a government park. So I'm trying to rationalize
it into my head. The point being that when you
look at these invoices from the American Institute for Research,
all these indirects is just money that they're going to

(25:59):
go spa and however they want. And the twenty six
thousand plus dollars as a seven percent fee for what
it just says total fee seven percent twenty six thousand,
nine hundred and sixty nine hundred and fifty dollars seventy
four cents. Then there's a second invoice from this past January.

(26:21):
In January, they billed sixty thousand, nine hundred and thirteen
dollars that was built, and they built in January for
December of that twenty nine more than twenty nine thousand
dollars was indirect, and there was again a seven percent
fee for thirty nine hundred dollars. So the cumulative amount

(26:45):
that this organization had charged was eleven million, seventy six thousand,
four hundred ninety three dollars seventy nine cents, of which
out of eleven million, five million, twenty eight thousand, than
four hundred and forty six dollars seventy seven cents were
indirect and almost a million dollars seven hundred and twenty

(27:06):
four thousand plus were additional fees. Now, if the Inspector General,
who's supposed to be doing his job, which obviously is
not because nobody's looked at this until Dosee exposes it,
wouldn't you want to know, like, what's the indirect.

Speaker 2 (27:27):
Now?

Speaker 3 (27:27):
In response to questions from Doze and others about these invoices,
a spokesman for this research outfit says air's indirect rates
are similar to those of other social and behavioral research organizations,
and we have always abided by our approved rates. He

(27:48):
goes on to say, for government contractors, indirect costs include
such costs as it data security. You know, you got
to pay for your antivirus program and compliance and reporting.

Speaker 2 (28:03):
So you get a.

Speaker 3 (28:04):
Grant from the government which requires that you comply with
certain things. So you charge the government to comply with
the certain things that the moneys get that the government's
giving you money to go do your research, and then
the government's paying you on top of that your costs
to comply with the requirements.

Speaker 2 (28:23):
Of the grand This is more than this is a.

Speaker 3 (28:28):
Fifty percent indirect fee, which is generally considered to be excessive.
As I said, NIH has reduced their indirect to only
fifteen percent in an effort to stop all this overcharging.
So what does the Department of edsay about it contracts

(28:48):
with indirect rates? They say, I'm quoting verbatim, contracts with
indirect rates over fifty percent take gross advantage of taxpayer dollars,
preventing the reason the contracts exist. Our students incoming leadership
will no longer allow these unacceptable terms. And that's what,

(29:10):
like the Colorado Sun says, is an assault on federal spending. Really,
But I've got a larger question, a much broader question.
This has been going on for years. There are invoices
for this particular organization going back for years.

Speaker 2 (29:32):
So I want to.

Speaker 3 (29:33):
Know what have you accomplished? Do we have any metrics?
Can you show us what you've done?

Speaker 2 (29:43):
Now?

Speaker 3 (29:43):
The current president, the CEO they just changed, but the
one that just left at the end of twenty twenty
three after fourteen years earned two million, two hundred ninety fourth,
six hundred and thirty seven dollars in twenty twenty two,

(30:04):
which was almost double as one million dollars he earned
in twenty twenty one. Humh, So you just double your
your indirect expenses more than cover the cost of your
CEO salary. This is the grift that DOGE is trying

(30:24):
to eliminate. And this is what the Colorado's Sun refers to,
an assault on federal spending. And then I want to
know where were the inspectors general? Where was the inspector
general for the Department of Education? Why did it take
someone outside government? Why did it take someone that that

(30:47):
succeeded the autopen administration to say, well, wait, wait a minute.

Speaker 2 (30:53):
Let's stop this.

Speaker 3 (30:54):
This is one example, three or four invoices, and you've
saved millions of dollars. Doge, keep on going.

Speaker 6 (31:08):
Morning from South Dakota. I'm back home, so I can
leave it live message instead of a text. Where are
all those disgruntled Tesla owners? Come on, get ahold of us.
Everyone have a great day.

Speaker 2 (31:20):
Dragon.

Speaker 3 (31:21):
I don't remember like ever expressing the desire that we
wanted to come back and start leaving talkbacks. I mean,
that was pretty presumptuous of him. Don't you think to
think that we actually cared?

Speaker 4 (31:33):
He's nice, he left a rules.

Speaker 2 (31:36):
I didn't say.

Speaker 3 (31:36):
I didn't say it wasn't nice. I just the presumption
that you and I actually cared that he was gone
and leading text messages as opposed to talkbacks.

Speaker 1 (31:43):
Well, we did kind of laid in on him yesterday morning.
Muse he sent a text message rather than a talkback.

Speaker 4 (31:50):
We were surprised, Yeah, we were surprised.

Speaker 3 (31:52):
Yeah, Well we got over it and we didn't care.
The fact that they really think that we care about
him always amazes me.

Speaker 4 (32:01):
We don't care about us, and we barely.

Speaker 3 (32:03):
Care about ourselves because look what we do for, look
where we are.

Speaker 2 (32:08):
True.

Speaker 3 (32:10):
I just remind you that it's it's it's March eighteen.
So we got what we got thirteen thirty years after,
we got thirteen days.

Speaker 2 (32:18):
Left in the month and at the end of the month.

Speaker 5 (32:22):
UH.

Speaker 3 (32:22):
Senate Bill two takes effect immigrant identification document issues.

Speaker 2 (32:31):
Remember our good.

Speaker 3 (32:32):
Friend, the Marxist Tim Hernandez, Well, he was one of
the sponsors, along with Senator Julie Gonzalez and Senator Jeff
Bridges and then Representative Tim Hernandez and Elizabeth velasco the
Colondo Road and Community Safety Act. It authorizes the issue

(32:54):
into the driver's license or an ID card to an
individual who is not lawfully present in the United States
if the individual meets certain requirements. Now it repealed. Now
it does not apply to you. You damn American citizens,
U citizens of Colorado. You have to comply, but the

(33:15):
illegal aliens do not. I just want to remind you
of it, because I'm sure I'll forget about it by
March thirty. First, that bill repealed the requirement that to
get a driver's license you have to you have to
have filed a Colorado resident income.

Speaker 2 (33:35):
Tax return, So you have to you don't have to
file any.

Speaker 3 (33:37):
Income taxes or Two, it repealed the requirement that you
demonstrate residency for the preceding two years.

Speaker 2 (33:44):
Ah, you don't need that anymore. No, you just showed up.
That's good enough.

Speaker 3 (33:48):
It repealed the requirement that you provide a documented Social
Security number or an ITN from the IRS.

Speaker 2 (33:56):
You don't need any.

Speaker 3 (33:57):
Of that now you go. So as you know, let's
say you moved here from Texas. What an idiot if
you did that. But anyway, let's say you did, you
would need to file an income tax return, prove your
residency for the immediate two years, you know, provide a
Social Security number, a passport or whatever. So you got

(34:20):
to do all of those things in order to get
a driver's license. But if you come here, let's say,
from Texas via the Rio Grand River, I know you
don't have to do that. You get on the you know,
government provided bus or the NGO provided bus to come here.

Speaker 2 (34:35):
Well, all you need.

Speaker 3 (34:36):
To do is it says allowing an applicant to present
a passport, No, not an American passport, and a passport
from your country of origin, a counsular identification card or
a military ID card from your country of origin that
is unexpired or it could be expired just less than

(34:56):
ten years old, and then you can get a driver's
life or an ID card. Now I don't know, but
what could you possibly do with a driver's license in
the state of Colorado? Oh, automat we get registered to vote, Yeah,
you could do that, I don't know. Get a job
probably too. You know, somebody that's not really doing everify

(35:18):
we'd like to hire you because well, you're willing to
do this job.

Speaker 2 (35:23):
Can you show us any ID? Well, yeah, I got
a Colorado driver's license. I'm a resident of Colorado. See
this right here, and we wonder why the state sucks?
Who you Democrats