Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Look across the pond, see our future. It's dark. Michael,
I don't know five, six, eight, ten, twelve years, however
long I've been listening to you for whatever reason, that
was the first time I've ever laughed out of a
good old fashioned dad joke that you made. Ah, you
(00:21):
still got surprises, Michael, still got surprises.
Speaker 2 (00:25):
Okay, let me be really stupid here. Why was it?
Why was it a dad joke? Because it's a power outage.
It's a dull wow that you should.
Speaker 3 (00:36):
I feel like you were clever until you didn't realize
what you did. Yes, yeah, yeah, Now everybody thinks you're stupid.
Speaker 2 (00:42):
Yeah, now I feel like actually stupid. Yeah yeah dark.
Speaker 4 (00:49):
Uh.
Speaker 5 (00:50):
Let's go back to January when we started hearing these stories.
Speaker 3 (00:59):
Tike trev Washington's Reagan National Airport at six point twenty
four in the morning, as we continue to follow the
latest on what is a search and rescue effort underway
this morning after a commercial jet collided midair with a
military helicopter near Reagan National last night to aircraft crashing
into the Potomac River, where now we can report more
(01:19):
than thirty bodies have been recovered so far. That's according
to our affiliate NBC Washington US figure skating athletes.
Speaker 2 (01:26):
We're among them.
Speaker 5 (01:28):
So NBC, as I said, it's restricted.
Speaker 6 (01:33):
We are told that this was a routine training flight,
but beyond that, we just don't know what was involved here.
We did get a very late night tweet from the
new Secretary of Defence Pete Haigsath. He said that there
was there would be an immediate investigation by the Army
and the DoD the Department of Defense. That makes sense, frankly,
that's something that we would expect. They have investigative arms
(01:56):
because the reality is there are air traffic crashes and incidents.
There are air accidents that occur throughout the military. This
isn't even the first one this week. And F thirty
five crashed in Alaska earlier this week.
Speaker 1 (02:09):
Fortunately the pilot.
Speaker 6 (02:10):
Was able to escape to eject before that plane went down.
That jet went down in a flame, So this isn't
even the first crash that we've.
Speaker 1 (02:19):
Seen this week.
Speaker 6 (02:21):
I got to tell you a Mika, you know, this
is early in the Trump administration. This is going to
be one of the first tests for the first for
the Secretary of Defense.
Speaker 1 (02:29):
Pete Haigsath.
Speaker 6 (02:30):
This Army helicopter crash he was tweeting, laid into the night,
and we'll see exactly how the Pentagon under new leadership
responds to this. At this point, again, the Army is
not able to say the status of those three soldiers.
But the situation sadly does not look very good.
Speaker 2 (02:49):
And see the President weighed in on it too.
Speaker 7 (02:54):
Do you have any concerns that you were commentary about
things you have described as common sense? Were your observations
could in any way interfere with the thorough investigation of
the crash.
Speaker 8 (03:06):
No.
Speaker 4 (03:06):
I think they'll do an investigation. It'll probably come out
the way I said it. I'd like to put it
up front. I'm so tired of listening to things happened
to our country and then people say we'll do an investigation,
and three years.
Speaker 9 (03:17):
Later they come out with a report that nobody looks at.
Especially not in all cases can you do that?
Speaker 4 (03:22):
But in this case, you know you had you had
a helicopter that was the black Hawk was too high,
it was above the two hundred limed by double shouldn't
have been there. And there were some other mistakes made too,
and I pointed them out also, and I was right
on all of it, but they'll still do an investigation
just to check it out.
Speaker 9 (03:40):
But an investment.
Speaker 5 (03:42):
So The New York Times explains this friends headline. Friends
say Army captain killed in mid air collision was a brilliant,
fearless pilot, And they go on to explain that four
minutes before the accident is the helicopter approached the key
bridge from which it would fly south along the Potomac River.
(04:04):
Warrant Officer Eves stated that it was at three hundred
feet and descending to two hundred feet, necessary because the
maximum height for its route closer to the airport had
dropped to two hundred feet. But even as it reached
that juncture, Warrant Officer Eves evidently felt obligated to repeat
his instruction. The black Hawk was at three hundred feet,
(04:25):
he said, and needed to descend. Captain Lobuck said she would,
but two and a half minutes later, the black Hawk
still was above two hundred feet, a dangerously high level. Now,
the the captain who was there as doing the check
(04:50):
ride has a lot more experience, obviously than than does
the captain that was flying it, And I think that
is important to realize. But it appears that along the
way she disregarded the words of her co pilot chief
(05:13):
warrant officer, the second chief officer too, Andrew Lloyd Eves,
who was in charge of doing the evaluation of doing
the check ride with her that January night. And that's
what the time was trying to explain. And he had
a lot more flying experience, obviously than she did, with
more than twice as many hours in the app in
(05:35):
the air. Now, when you're doing a check ride, he
could have taken the controls at any time. It's like
you've seen these uh safe driving companies that teach people
how to drive, well, you know that there's a brake
(05:57):
pedal on their side. I've I've seen some that actually
have steering wheels, and of course they have access to
the gears everything so that they then.
Speaker 2 (06:06):
If you drive with your wife, she always tries to
find that brake pedal while you're driving.
Speaker 5 (06:13):
Yes, and they can anticipate a non existent accident well
before it happened. There's the stop side up there right, yes,
two hundred yards away, yes, yes, But the New York
Times go, so he could have done that at any point.
(06:36):
And when she didn't descend to two hundred feet. It's
kind of questionable why didn't he. Let's go back to
the New York Times story, the Blackhawk was fifteen seconds
away from crossing paths with the jet. The Times rights
that weren't. Officer Eves told Lowback that he believed that
(06:59):
air traffic control wanted them to turn the left, opening
more space between the helicopter and Eagle Flight fifty three
forty two, which was heading for runway thirty three at
an altitude of roughly three hundred feet. She did not
turn left. Humh New York Times again, listen closely. The
(07:23):
New York Times rights the black Hawk was fifteen seconds
away from crossing paths with the jet. Warrant Officer Eves
told Lowback he believed that air traffic control wanted them
to turn left, opening more space between the helicopter and
(07:44):
Flight Eagle flight fifty three forty two, which was headed
for runway thirty three at an altitude of roughly three
hundred feet. She did not turn left. She did not
turn left. I think there's a question that The Times
(08:09):
doesn't seem to address. Why didn't Eves act more aggressively?
Was he fearful of Lobock? Who outranked him. The fact
(08:29):
that Lobox's errors were clearly responsible for the accident raised
another set of questions that the Times didn't ask. Had
lil Beck ever had other problems flying? How was she
chosen to be trained for this particular mission involving night
flying along the Potomac. I've seen those helicopters, I don't think.
(08:51):
I mean, I've I've flown Marine one, flown on Marie.
I haven't flown Marine one. I've flown on Marine one
across the Potomac and at low altitude past DCA, and
then gone up to a higher altitude and gone on
(09:13):
down to Richmond, Virginia. I've done that a couple of
times with the President. But that article is I think
an example. As I read through the article, I thought
to myself, Okay, are you implying anything here? Is there
something that you want to say that you're afraid to say?
(09:33):
Is there something that you want to say that you're
not going to say? Why weren't questions asked? Why weren't
the controls? You know, why didn't they take the control
away from the pilot? Why didn't they force her?
Speaker 2 (09:47):
There's in It's just weird.
Speaker 5 (09:53):
The headline missteps, equipment problems and a common but risky
practice to a fatal crash. But is that really what happened?
You know, when this story first broke, there were all
(10:13):
these ancillary stories about how ATC the air traffic Control
was busy, and there were stories about was the black
Hawk pilots where they wearing night vision goggles? Were they
not wearing night vision goggles which would obviously complicate them
seeing ambient light, all of that sort of stuff.
Speaker 2 (10:32):
But the.
Speaker 5 (10:36):
It's obvious that we know the cause of the accident.
The black Hawk was flying too high. It flew directly
into the regional jet, meaning that the regional jet never
had a chance. What the Times actually found the news
(10:59):
and the article is that Lobox copilot reportedly warned her
numerous times that her helicopter needed to descend in the
minutes before the accident, and just seconds before the crash,
he suggested that she move left to avoid the jet,
(11:22):
but she didn't respond to that. I want to know,
which the New York Times doesn't address. Did she not
hear it? Was there any cross talk? Cross chatter? Was
the you know, was there any sort of I mean,
I've never piloted aircraft or a helicopter fixed to rotary wing.
(11:44):
I've never piloted any of them, but I have sat
with the headsets on, listening to the pilots, sometimes communicating
with the pilot that I want to go here or there,
or let's set down, you know, in a disaster zone,
let's let's sit can can you set it down over there?
(12:05):
And I've had to have you know, a fairly extensive company,
what do you mean there? Describe me where there is?
Because you know, I'm sitting behind the pilot and so
I'm pointing out I want to go over there, So
I have to describe what's on the ground, and the
pilot's looking on the ground, uh, and we're trying to
ascertain that we're both talking about the same they're there
(12:25):
before they land, and sometimes at least for me, because
I'm I'm hard of hearing anyway, and that I've got
auditory processing problems, so i hear all of this noise
and chatter, and I'm not really sure that the pilot
heard me or that I heard the pilot, And so
that conversation takes a little more time than what I
would think would be necessary. But I understand that maybe
it's maybe it's all me. I don't know, But why
(12:52):
didn't she respond? Is there any question about I mean,
I think it raises the quest was this a suicide mission?
I mean that was the first thing I thought when
I read the New York Times article. Was it a
suicide mission? Did she know precisely what she was doing?
I had no basis for that whatsoever, except the New
(13:16):
York Times, in reporting this story and reporting at least
sensibly on the investigation, leave so many questions hanging that
I naturally start trying to ask the questions and start
providing my own answers to the questions based on just
what are all the different possibilities. Again, it's a great
(13:39):
example of the cabal not really in this case.
Speaker 2 (13:43):
I don't know. Do they know?
Speaker 5 (13:46):
Is there something in the report that hasn't been disclosed?
Is there something that off record that they know? If
we're going to go off the record and talk about
this report, whoever they interviewed and talked to, did they
say something that you know, hey, listen, can we go
off the record? We also won't wonder because maybe she
had some issues, maybe it was just inexperience and she
(14:08):
shouldn't have been doing it in the first place. Maybe
she needed more training elsewhere before she started flying that
particular congested airspace.
Speaker 2 (14:16):
I don't know.
Speaker 5 (14:17):
It just seems to me that it's an example of
the cabal that as much is left out, while at
the same time that they try to claim that they're
really telling you all the stories about it, and I'm
not really sure that's true. There's there's a lot of
problems in the New York Times story, and there are
(14:40):
there are a lot of things that the New York
Times tries to walk up to but never crosses the
line in telling us what are people involved in the investigation?
Because there is, whether you want to believe it or not,
there are the official reports, worts, and they're what the
(15:02):
investigators believe that may or may not be in the report.
It's a four thousand word story. In a four thousand
word story which is not all that long, it's kind
(15:26):
of interesting that a lot of those things were not addressed.
Speaker 2 (15:34):
Is it the results?
Speaker 10 (15:37):
Is there?
Speaker 2 (15:39):
Sexism involved? Any number of things?
Speaker 5 (15:43):
But I just I as I read the story, I
thought to myself, I don't know, they're they're blaming a
lot of stuff for the crash, except the one thing
they never address in the death of almost seventy people
is the pilot herself. I'm not trying to be sexist.
(16:07):
I'm just saying, when you ignore a command to Okay,
well you didn't hear me descend, so let's move to
the left, which would avoid the crash, and instead she
just continues straight on. Makes you wonder, makes me wonder
what was really going on there? What was really happening
(16:35):
When you go back and you think about Trump listen again, I'm.
Speaker 7 (16:42):
Going to crash. Do you have any concerns that you
were commentary about things you have described as common sense
for your observations could in any way interfere with the
thorough investigation of the crash.
Speaker 10 (16:55):
No.
Speaker 4 (16:55):
I think they'll do an investigation. It'll probably come out
the way.
Speaker 9 (16:58):
I said it. I'd like to put it up front.
Speaker 4 (17:00):
I'm so tired of listening to things happened to our
country and then people say we'll do an investigation, and
three years later they come up with a report that
nobody looks at especially not in all cases can you
do that? But in this case, you know you had
you had a helicopter that was the black Hawk, was
too high. It was above the two hundred lived by
double shouldn't have been there. And there were some other
(17:23):
mistakes made too, and I pointed them out also, and
I was right on all of it.
Speaker 9 (17:26):
But they'll still do an investigation just to check it out.
But I think that's so.
Speaker 5 (17:33):
Do we know anymore today or not? And are there
unknown are there unknown knowns to quote a former Defense secretary,
that are out there that the New York Times or
the NTSB or anybody else for that matter of DD
just doing the investigation does not want us to know.
(17:54):
That gets back to the main point of even talking
about the story that I read time story, do you
trust the cabal at all? Because I don't, And every
time I read stories that make very clear, Hey, the
investigation shows that, Okay, let's move to our left, meaning
(18:18):
will avoid the plane altogether, and she completely ignores that.
Speaker 2 (18:23):
I just want to know why.
Speaker 1 (18:24):
There you go, Michael, All is now right with the world.
You have successfully restored order across the board. Thank you
for not getting your own gosh darn joke.
Speaker 2 (18:38):
Well, what can I say?
Speaker 5 (18:43):
It was mentioned earlier in the program somewhere about I
was a talkback. I think about Trump putting the or
not Trump, but the administration putting the pictures of the
illegal aliens that have been captured and deported on the
lawn of the White House, so that when the media
(19:05):
is out doing their hits, they those pictures are in
the background. That's really part of a broader effort by
the administration to showcase its commitment to tightening these immigration
controls and getting these dirt bags out of the country.
So they lined the driveway on the north lawn it's
(19:26):
called Pebble Beach, where the corporate media hold all their
live reports with, but these they lined it up with
these images of these illegal aliens who have been apprehended
during the first one hundred days. And of course they're
doing it on the during the marking of the one
hundred days or whatever you want to call it. Their
(19:46):
yard signs. They got the name and the criminal charges
for each individual. And it's difficult because I watched I
forget who it was, but I watched somebody yesterday that
was doing their report, some White House correspondent, and you
could tell the cameraman was the reporter was trying to
(20:06):
stand where they all normally stand because they want the
White House in the background. They want to make sure
that you know, it's really cool that they see that.
They're up close to the to the to the north
port of Go and the cameraman was angling up upwards
towards the reporter's face as as opposed to straight on.
Speaker 2 (20:25):
But they couldn't quite get the.
Speaker 5 (20:27):
The placards, if you will, the posters out of the
visual the box of the camera now the good as
they could have zoomed in obviously on the reporter's face,
but that would have looked weird, so they gave up.
It was hard to read the names, but it was
very clear what they were. They were illegal aliens and
the shoulder rested or whatever they I think there's a hundred.
(20:52):
It included an illegal Jamaican national arrested by Ice in
Baltimore who had been convicted of first degree murder. There
was another yard sign that illustrated an illegal from Burkina
Fasso who was arrested last week in Buffalo, who had
a previous conviction for rape. There were a number of
criminals that had prior convictions for violent sex crimes, some
(21:14):
against miners need a taxpayer relief shot, aggravated assault and
battery crans related to their gang membership, and it's just
funny when you look at them just all lined up
like a political yard sign. Well, it was early yesterday
(21:37):
morning when Caroline Levett, the Press Secretary at Home and
we played part of that, addressed the media regarding the
display on the White House lawn and their success in
removing these illegals from the border. Quote between President Trump's
inauguration in April one of this month, only nine illegal
(21:57):
aliens were released into the United States. Do you remember,
Holman said, quote a staggering ninety nine point ninety nine
decrease from the more than one hundred and eighty four
thousand illegals that were released in the country under Biden
during the same period.
Speaker 2 (22:14):
And then she said total attempt at.
Speaker 5 (22:16):
Illegal crossings at the southwest border hit a record low
in February, only to fall to another record low again
last month in March. But the best part of all
was Holman taking the cabal to task over falsely alleging
that the Trump administration deported a two year old American citizen.
(22:40):
And he said, what we did is we removed children
with their mothers who requested it. That's a parental decision.
Parenting one oh one. I'll tell you what. If we
didn't do it, the story would be Trump administration is
separating families again, when we're actually keeping families together. When
a parent says, I want my two year old to
go with me, we make that happened. They weren't deported.
(23:02):
The parents made the decision, and it's pretty strong.
Speaker 8 (23:12):
He made this country legally, and you ignor a judge's
order about about deporting. If you choose have you a
citizen child, knowing you're in this country legally, you put
yourself in that position. You put your family in that position.
What we did is remove children with their mothers who
requested the children to depart with them. This is a
parental decision, parental pre parenting one on one. The mothers
(23:35):
made that choice. Now, I tell you what if we
didn't do it, the story today be Trump administration separating
families again. No, we're keeping families together. So when a
parent says, I want I want my two year old
baby to go with me, we made that happen. They
weren't deported. We don't import you as citizens. The parents
made that decision, not in the United States government. But
I don't hear any questions about Theyke and Roddy had
(23:57):
a mother. She's never going to see her again. Rachel Moore,
she had five children, Yeah, you know those, She'll never
gonna see your name again. This administration doing the right thing.
Speaker 5 (24:10):
We kind of glossed over that final point yesterday that
the parents of these children, some adults who have been
murdered by illegal aliens, they don't get to go with
their moms. That family unit has been destroyed, absolutely obliterated.
(24:33):
I don't think we ought to forget that. But what's
been the response from the Democrats to that? Yesterday the
Democrats held a sit in for I think I think
it's four hours on the steps of the Capitol, and
it was freaking hilarious because they had I don't know
(24:54):
who it was, but they had somebody that was sitting
in front of Corey Booker, the Senator from New Jersey,
Keen Jeffries, the House Minority leader from New York, sitting
sitting on the steps together. So here are these two
black guys sitting on the steps together. They got some
dumb white guys sitting between them a step below them
who had the microphone who sings some stupid I think
(25:17):
it was supposed to be a protest.
Speaker 2 (25:18):
Song, but I don't I don't know what it was.
Speaker 5 (25:21):
And then he turns to Corey Booker and basically says,
you'll sing after me.
Speaker 2 (25:26):
And so Cory Booker turns around to.
Speaker 5 (25:28):
The massive amount of people sitting on this sit in.
I mean, there must have been at least I would say,
would I say massive, It's hard to count that many,
but I would say they're probably at least eighteen people there.
Speaker 2 (25:40):
I was gonna say a dozen. Yeah, looks like a dozen.
I haven't counted in the picture that I hear on CNN,
but yeah, i'd say twelve days or more.
Speaker 5 (25:47):
Reporters there, look behind the scene, turn the came around
the show where the real sit in is taking place.
But I found it funny that it was a sit in,
because a sit in when I think of like when, uh,
you know, you grew up as a kid in the sixties,
there were sit ins in high school.
Speaker 2 (26:07):
You refuse to go to class, you like you broke.
Speaker 8 (26:09):
The rules.
Speaker 5 (26:12):
Or you you know, you go back further, you go
back to the sixties or the fifties, and you did
a sit in that meant you went to a white's
only lunch counter and you sat down there, or you
refuse to go to the back of the bus. There
there were there was There were no cops beating them
up there. There was nobody with the fire hose trying
(26:34):
to hose, you know, trying to clean. That would have
been wonderful. I'd love to have seen that, Like, uh,
we got a hose down the steps and stil so
the the janitorial service starts at the top of the
steps and you know, they got the big hoses with
the spray nozzle and they start spraying the steps down.
Oh sorry, we didn't know. We didn't see you sitting there.
I would have love to have seen that. But there
(26:54):
was something else they did yesterday, not them, but the Democrats,
Aby Pritzker, the governor of Illinois, the heir the Hyatt family.
Makes your question whether or not you should stay at
a Hyatt, But that's a personal preference. You can choose
to stay at the Hyatt if you want to.
Speaker 2 (27:14):
Uh.
Speaker 5 (27:15):
He was giving a speech and he's calling for mass protests.
Speaker 11 (27:21):
In my life have I called from mass and protests
for mobilization for disruption, But I am.
Speaker 2 (27:28):
That disruption he wants to disrupt.
Speaker 9 (27:47):
There cannot know a moment of peace.
Speaker 2 (27:51):
Cannot know moment if.
Speaker 10 (27:52):
You're understand that we will to fight.
Speaker 4 (27:54):
Their cruelty with every megaphone and microphone that we have.
Speaker 2 (27:58):
We must be casting at least he.
Speaker 5 (28:02):
I mean, disturbing is one thing, but at least he says,
we'll fight them with you know, microphones.
Speaker 4 (28:08):
In them on the soapbox and then punish them at
the ballot box.
Speaker 5 (28:14):
So would break him into soapbox and we beat him
at the ballot box. And then he decides that, well
that was enough. I need to be able to on
the MSNBC and explain to them what I really mean here, that.
Speaker 10 (28:26):
They do have power.
Speaker 6 (28:29):
Maybe you just answered my question, but there was a
very powerful call to action. We've played this in your
speech mass protest mobilization.
Speaker 1 (28:37):
You also say the reckoning is here.
Speaker 5 (28:40):
What does that mean?
Speaker 1 (28:41):
What should people?
Speaker 9 (28:42):
How should we understand that?
Speaker 10 (28:45):
Well, that was specifically about what we as a democratic
party need to be doing. That we can't be a
party of do nothing, of not getting things done for again,
the people that we care the most about, the people
that we're focused on. That's working families, right, the middle class,
working class, the.
Speaker 1 (29:05):
Most vulnerable in our society.
Speaker 10 (29:07):
It's important to us to stand up in this crisis
and to speak out and again push.
Speaker 2 (29:14):
Back and hmm.
Speaker 5 (29:18):
So now you've got one faction of the Democrats who
are doing a sit in and singing songs and that's
their protest. If that's the kind of disruption they want
to do, then okay, do that all day long, because
I don't think that moves the needle whatsoever. In fact,
I think that it should be the subject of a
(29:40):
lot of late night comedians, but they obviously they won't
touch it. Saturday Night Live won't touch it, but they
should because it's really stupid. But this shows that at
least some people in the Democrat Party, and I imagine JB.
Pritzker is trying to lay the groundwork to help on
the mid terms and then eventually run for president in
(30:01):
twenty twenty eight, because he's actually calling to do something.
Speaker 10 (30:06):
Class, working class, the most vulnerable in our society. It's
important to us to stand up in this crisis.
Speaker 5 (30:15):
So don't sit down, stand up, complete opposite of what
those in Congress are calling for. Let's go sit down,
let's go do us sit in, and let's you know,
let's draw a whole bunch of reporters and get people,
you know, all twelve to eighteen people to sit in
with us, and it got it got some national attention
(30:37):
for about five seconds of TV time. But Christker says,
don't sit in, stand up. So are we starting to
see the Democrat Party divide or coalesce? I think they're
dividing and scrambling.
Speaker 1 (30:57):
Michael and Dragon, good morning. I hope you're well. I
just got my Excel Energy power.
Speaker 12 (31:02):
Build yesterday, and guess what, it has a special sheet
in there that says, where does your electricity come from?
The twenty twenty four energy mix for Colorado is win
thirty four and a half percent, natural gas thirty three percent,
cold twenty one percent, solar ten point six percent, and
(31:23):
all others that one. I guess Excel is trying to
be what do you want to say, transparent, But man,
they're still pushing that wind and solar stuff.
Speaker 5 (31:35):
Have a great day, and you can pay more and
have all your electricity come from wind and solar.
Speaker 2 (31:41):
But don't do it.
Speaker 5 (31:43):
So Prisker is out there bellowing about, you know, mass
protests and mass mobilization. Well, it's probably too soon. After
the hundreds of the liberal establishment sanctioned Black Lives Matter
riots that calls all that billions of dollars and damages
not to understand what he really means by, you know,
(32:03):
let's go out there and do mass mobilization and disruption.
Pritzker's currently pulling at number ten among all these unaspiring
Democrats that want to be president, and he wants to
outdo his rivals for the overheated rhetoric. But there is
for this guy who's a billionaire from Silicon Valley, who's
(32:24):
a transgender cousin, he's really at the forefront of pushing
the radical gender ideology in schools and in medical facilities.
So the heir to the Hyatt hotels really is out
there pushing that radical agenda about lgbtqism and your children.
Speaker 10 (32:48):
I first got my start in activism right here in
the state of California as a little kid growing up
in Silicon Valley in the nineteen seventies.
Speaker 1 (32:58):
My mother was an active for.
Speaker 11 (33:00):
Reproductive rights and LGBTQ rights, and she took me to
Pride parades back when well they weren't really parades, they
were protests. So I'd have to laugh when I hear
the right wing carry on about the dangers of exposing
kids to trans people or same sex couples, because I'm
(33:24):
living proof that introducing your kids to the gay agenda
might result in them growing.
Speaker 2 (33:29):
Up to be governor.
Speaker 5 (33:34):
That's who's running for president, that's their their agenda is
is really to the extreme, nobody. I don't want anybody
to any government to force parents to expose their children
to anything that the parents don't want to expose their
(33:55):
children to them. So I really doubt that many at
least still annoy your residents. Living south of maybe one
hundred and thirty eighth Street, I really do enjoy living
under such a rich Marxist version of this tubby tub
tub That's what's just going to lead the Democrats right
again into a Democrat death spiral.
Speaker 2 (34:17):
Have at it.
Look across the pond, see our future. It's dark. Michael,
I don't know five, six, eight, ten, twelve years, however
long I've been listening to you for whatever reason, that
was the first time I've ever laughed out of a
good old fashioned dad joke that you made. Ah, you
(00:21):
still got surprises, Michael, still got surprises.
Speaker 2 (00:25):
Okay, let me be really stupid here. Why was it?
Why was it a dad joke? Because it's a power outage.
It's a dull wow that you should.
Speaker 3 (00:36):
I feel like you were clever until you didn't realize
what you did. Yes, yeah, yeah, Now everybody thinks you're stupid.
Speaker 2 (00:42):
Yeah, now I feel like actually stupid. Yeah yeah dark.
Speaker 4 (00:49):
Uh.
Speaker 5 (00:50):
Let's go back to January when we started hearing these stories.
Speaker 3 (00:59):
Tike trev Washington's Reagan National Airport at six point twenty
four in the morning, as we continue to follow the
latest on what is a search and rescue effort underway
this morning after a commercial jet collided midair with a
military helicopter near Reagan National last night to aircraft crashing
into the Potomac River, where now we can report more
(01:19):
than thirty bodies have been recovered so far. That's according
to our affiliate NBC Washington US figure skating athletes.
Speaker 2 (01:26):
We're among them.
Speaker 5 (01:28):
So NBC, as I said, it's restricted.
Speaker 6 (01:33):
We are told that this was a routine training flight,
but beyond that, we just don't know what was involved here.
We did get a very late night tweet from the
new Secretary of Defence Pete Haigsath. He said that there
was there would be an immediate investigation by the Army
and the DoD the Department of Defense. That makes sense, frankly,
that's something that we would expect. They have investigative arms
(01:56):
because the reality is there are air traffic crashes and incidents.
There are air accidents that occur throughout the military. This
isn't even the first one this week. And F thirty
five crashed in Alaska earlier this week.
Speaker 1 (02:09):
Fortunately the pilot.
Speaker 6 (02:10):
Was able to escape to eject before that plane went down.
That jet went down in a flame, So this isn't
even the first crash that we've.
Speaker 1 (02:19):
Seen this week.
Speaker 6 (02:21):
I got to tell you a Mika, you know, this
is early in the Trump administration. This is going to
be one of the first tests for the first for
the Secretary of Defense.
Speaker 1 (02:29):
Pete Haigsath.
Speaker 6 (02:30):
This Army helicopter crash he was tweeting, laid into the night,
and we'll see exactly how the Pentagon under new leadership
responds to this. At this point, again, the Army is
not able to say the status of those three soldiers.
But the situation sadly does not look very good.
Speaker 2 (02:49):
And see the President weighed in on it too.
Speaker 7 (02:54):
Do you have any concerns that you were commentary about
things you have described as common sense? Were your observations
could in any way interfere with the thorough investigation of
the crash.
Speaker 8 (03:06):
No.
Speaker 4 (03:06):
I think they'll do an investigation. It'll probably come out
the way I said it. I'd like to put it
up front. I'm so tired of listening to things happened
to our country and then people say we'll do an investigation,
and three years.
Speaker 9 (03:17):
Later they come out with a report that nobody looks at.
Especially not in all cases can you do that?
Speaker 4 (03:22):
But in this case, you know you had you had
a helicopter that was the black Hawk was too high,
it was above the two hundred limed by double shouldn't
have been there. And there were some other mistakes made too,
and I pointed them out also, and I was right
on all of it, but they'll still do an investigation
just to check it out.
Speaker 9 (03:40):
But an investment.
Speaker 5 (03:42):
So The New York Times explains this friends headline. Friends
say Army captain killed in mid air collision was a brilliant,
fearless pilot, And they go on to explain that four
minutes before the accident is the helicopter approached the key
bridge from which it would fly south along the Potomac River.
(04:04):
Warrant Officer Eves stated that it was at three hundred
feet and descending to two hundred feet, necessary because the
maximum height for its route closer to the airport had
dropped to two hundred feet. But even as it reached
that juncture, Warrant Officer Eves evidently felt obligated to repeat
his instruction. The black Hawk was at three hundred feet,
(04:25):
he said, and needed to descend. Captain Lobuck said she would,
but two and a half minutes later, the black Hawk
still was above two hundred feet, a dangerously high level. Now,
the the captain who was there as doing the check
(04:50):
ride has a lot more experience, obviously than than does
the captain that was flying it, And I think that
is important to realize. But it appears that along the
way she disregarded the words of her co pilot chief
(05:13):
warrant officer, the second chief officer too, Andrew Lloyd Eves,
who was in charge of doing the evaluation of doing
the check ride with her that January night. And that's
what the time was trying to explain. And he had
a lot more flying experience, obviously than she did, with
more than twice as many hours in the app in
(05:35):
the air. Now, when you're doing a check ride, he
could have taken the controls at any time. It's like
you've seen these uh safe driving companies that teach people
how to drive, well, you know that there's a brake
(05:57):
pedal on their side. I've I've seen some that actually
have steering wheels, and of course they have access to
the gears everything so that they then.
Speaker 2 (06:06):
If you drive with your wife, she always tries to
find that brake pedal while you're driving.
Speaker 5 (06:13):
Yes, and they can anticipate a non existent accident well
before it happened. There's the stop side up there right, yes,
two hundred yards away, yes, yes, But the New York
Times go, so he could have done that at any point.
(06:36):
And when she didn't descend to two hundred feet. It's
kind of questionable why didn't he. Let's go back to
the New York Times story, the Blackhawk was fifteen seconds
away from crossing paths with the jet. The Times rights
that weren't. Officer Eves told Lowback that he believed that
(06:59):
air traffic control wanted them to turn the left, opening
more space between the helicopter and Eagle Flight fifty three
forty two, which was heading for runway thirty three at
an altitude of roughly three hundred feet. She did not
turn left. Humh New York Times again, listen closely. The
(07:23):
New York Times rights the black Hawk was fifteen seconds
away from crossing paths with the jet. Warrant Officer Eves
told Lowback he believed that air traffic control wanted them
to turn left, opening more space between the helicopter and
(07:44):
Flight Eagle flight fifty three forty two, which was headed
for runway thirty three at an altitude of roughly three
hundred feet. She did not turn left. She did not
turn left. I think there's a question that The Times
(08:09):
doesn't seem to address. Why didn't Eves act more aggressively?
Was he fearful of Lobock? Who outranked him. The fact
(08:29):
that Lobox's errors were clearly responsible for the accident raised
another set of questions that the Times didn't ask. Had
lil Beck ever had other problems flying? How was she
chosen to be trained for this particular mission involving night
flying along the Potomac. I've seen those helicopters, I don't think.
(08:51):
I mean, I've I've flown Marine one, flown on Marie.
I haven't flown Marine one. I've flown on Marine one
across the Potomac and at low altitude past DCA, and
then gone up to a higher altitude and gone on
(09:13):
down to Richmond, Virginia. I've done that a couple of
times with the President. But that article is I think
an example. As I read through the article, I thought
to myself, Okay, are you implying anything here? Is there
something that you want to say that you're afraid to say?
(09:33):
Is there something that you want to say that you're
not going to say? Why weren't questions asked? Why weren't
the controls? You know, why didn't they take the control
away from the pilot? Why didn't they force her?
Speaker 2 (09:47):
There's in It's just weird.
Speaker 5 (09:53):
The headline missteps, equipment problems and a common but risky
practice to a fatal crash. But is that really what happened?
You know, when this story first broke, there were all
(10:13):
these ancillary stories about how ATC the air traffic Control
was busy, and there were stories about was the black
Hawk pilots where they wearing night vision goggles? Were they
not wearing night vision goggles which would obviously complicate them
seeing ambient light, all of that sort of stuff.
Speaker 2 (10:32):
But the.
Speaker 5 (10:36):
It's obvious that we know the cause of the accident.
The black Hawk was flying too high. It flew directly
into the regional jet, meaning that the regional jet never
had a chance. What the Times actually found the news
(10:59):
and the article is that Lobox copilot reportedly warned her
numerous times that her helicopter needed to descend in the
minutes before the accident, and just seconds before the crash,
he suggested that she move left to avoid the jet,
(11:22):
but she didn't respond to that. I want to know,
which the New York Times doesn't address. Did she not
hear it? Was there any cross talk? Cross chatter? Was
the you know, was there any sort of I mean,
I've never piloted aircraft or a helicopter fixed to rotary wing.
(11:44):
I've never piloted any of them, but I have sat
with the headsets on, listening to the pilots, sometimes communicating
with the pilot that I want to go here or there,
or let's set down, you know, in a disaster zone,
let's let's sit can can you set it down over there?
(12:05):
And I've had to have you know, a fairly extensive company,
what do you mean there? Describe me where there is?
Because you know, I'm sitting behind the pilot and so
I'm pointing out I want to go over there, So
I have to describe what's on the ground, and the
pilot's looking on the ground, uh, and we're trying to
ascertain that we're both talking about the same they're there
(12:25):
before they land, and sometimes at least for me, because
I'm I'm hard of hearing anyway, and that I've got
auditory processing problems, so i hear all of this noise
and chatter, and I'm not really sure that the pilot
heard me or that I heard the pilot, And so
that conversation takes a little more time than what I
would think would be necessary. But I understand that maybe
it's maybe it's all me. I don't know, But why
(12:52):
didn't she respond? Is there any question about I mean,
I think it raises the quest was this a suicide mission?
I mean that was the first thing I thought when
I read the New York Times article. Was it a
suicide mission? Did she know precisely what she was doing?
I had no basis for that whatsoever, except the New
(13:16):
York Times, in reporting this story and reporting at least
sensibly on the investigation, leave so many questions hanging that
I naturally start trying to ask the questions and start
providing my own answers to the questions based on just
what are all the different possibilities. Again, it's a great
(13:39):
example of the cabal not really in this case.
Speaker 2 (13:43):
I don't know. Do they know?
Speaker 5 (13:46):
Is there something in the report that hasn't been disclosed?
Is there something that off record that they know? If
we're going to go off the record and talk about
this report, whoever they interviewed and talked to, did they
say something that you know, hey, listen, can we go
off the record? We also won't wonder because maybe she
had some issues, maybe it was just inexperience and she
(14:08):
shouldn't have been doing it in the first place. Maybe
she needed more training elsewhere before she started flying that
particular congested airspace.
Speaker 2 (14:16):
I don't know.
Speaker 5 (14:17):
It just seems to me that it's an example of
the cabal that as much is left out, while at
the same time that they try to claim that they're
really telling you all the stories about it, and I'm
not really sure that's true. There's there's a lot of
problems in the New York Times story, and there are
(14:40):
there are a lot of things that the New York
Times tries to walk up to but never crosses the
line in telling us what are people involved in the investigation?
Because there is, whether you want to believe it or not,
there are the official reports, worts, and they're what the
(15:02):
investigators believe that may or may not be in the report.
It's a four thousand word story. In a four thousand
word story which is not all that long, it's kind
(15:26):
of interesting that a lot of those things were not addressed.
Speaker 2 (15:34):
Is it the results?
Speaker 10 (15:37):
Is there?
Speaker 2 (15:39):
Sexism involved? Any number of things?
Speaker 5 (15:43):
But I just I as I read the story, I
thought to myself, I don't know, they're they're blaming a
lot of stuff for the crash, except the one thing
they never address in the death of almost seventy people
is the pilot herself. I'm not trying to be sexist.
(16:07):
I'm just saying, when you ignore a command to Okay,
well you didn't hear me descend, so let's move to
the left, which would avoid the crash, and instead she
just continues straight on. Makes you wonder, makes me wonder
what was really going on there? What was really happening
(16:35):
When you go back and you think about Trump listen again, I'm.
Speaker 7 (16:42):
Going to crash. Do you have any concerns that you
were commentary about things you have described as common sense
for your observations could in any way interfere with the
thorough investigation of the crash.
Speaker 10 (16:55):
No.
Speaker 4 (16:55):
I think they'll do an investigation. It'll probably come out
the way.
Speaker 9 (16:58):
I said it. I'd like to put it up front.
Speaker 4 (17:00):
I'm so tired of listening to things happened to our
country and then people say we'll do an investigation, and
three years later they come up with a report that
nobody looks at especially not in all cases can you
do that? But in this case, you know you had
you had a helicopter that was the black Hawk, was
too high. It was above the two hundred lived by
double shouldn't have been there. And there were some other
(17:23):
mistakes made too, and I pointed them out also, and
I was right on all of it.
Speaker 9 (17:26):
But they'll still do an investigation just to check it out.
But I think that's so.
Speaker 5 (17:33):
Do we know anymore today or not? And are there
unknown are there unknown knowns to quote a former Defense secretary,
that are out there that the New York Times or
the NTSB or anybody else for that matter of DD
just doing the investigation does not want us to know.
(17:54):
That gets back to the main point of even talking
about the story that I read time story, do you
trust the cabal at all? Because I don't, And every
time I read stories that make very clear, Hey, the
investigation shows that, Okay, let's move to our left, meaning
(18:18):
will avoid the plane altogether, and she completely ignores that.
Speaker 2 (18:23):
I just want to know why.
Speaker 1 (18:24):
There you go, Michael, All is now right with the world.
You have successfully restored order across the board. Thank you
for not getting your own gosh darn joke.
Speaker 2 (18:38):
Well, what can I say?
Speaker 5 (18:43):
It was mentioned earlier in the program somewhere about I
was a talkback. I think about Trump putting the or
not Trump, but the administration putting the pictures of the
illegal aliens that have been captured and deported on the
lawn of the White House, so that when the media
(19:05):
is out doing their hits, they those pictures are in
the background. That's really part of a broader effort by
the administration to showcase its commitment to tightening these immigration
controls and getting these dirt bags out of the country.
So they lined the driveway on the north lawn it's
(19:26):
called Pebble Beach, where the corporate media hold all their
live reports with, but these they lined it up with
these images of these illegal aliens who have been apprehended
during the first one hundred days. And of course they're
doing it on the during the marking of the one
hundred days or whatever you want to call it. Their
(19:46):
yard signs. They got the name and the criminal charges
for each individual. And it's difficult because I watched I
forget who it was, but I watched somebody yesterday that
was doing their report, some White House correspondent, and you
could tell the cameraman was the reporter was trying to
(20:06):
stand where they all normally stand because they want the
White House in the background. They want to make sure
that you know, it's really cool that they see that.
They're up close to the to the to the north
port of Go and the cameraman was angling up upwards
towards the reporter's face as as opposed to straight on.
Speaker 2 (20:25):
But they couldn't quite get the.
Speaker 5 (20:27):
The placards, if you will, the posters out of the
visual the box of the camera now the good as
they could have zoomed in obviously on the reporter's face,
but that would have looked weird, so they gave up.
It was hard to read the names, but it was
very clear what they were. They were illegal aliens and
the shoulder rested or whatever they I think there's a hundred.
(20:52):
It included an illegal Jamaican national arrested by Ice in
Baltimore who had been convicted of first degree murder. There
was another yard sign that illustrated an illegal from Burkina
Fasso who was arrested last week in Buffalo, who had
a previous conviction for rape. There were a number of
criminals that had prior convictions for violent sex crimes, some
(21:14):
against miners need a taxpayer relief shot, aggravated assault and
battery crans related to their gang membership, and it's just
funny when you look at them just all lined up
like a political yard sign. Well, it was early yesterday
(21:37):
morning when Caroline Levett, the Press Secretary at Home and
we played part of that, addressed the media regarding the
display on the White House lawn and their success in
removing these illegals from the border. Quote between President Trump's
inauguration in April one of this month, only nine illegal
(21:57):
aliens were released into the United States. Do you remember,
Holman said, quote a staggering ninety nine point ninety nine
decrease from the more than one hundred and eighty four
thousand illegals that were released in the country under Biden
during the same period.
Speaker 2 (22:14):
And then she said total attempt at.
Speaker 5 (22:16):
Illegal crossings at the southwest border hit a record low
in February, only to fall to another record low again
last month in March. But the best part of all
was Holman taking the cabal to task over falsely alleging
that the Trump administration deported a two year old American citizen.
(22:40):
And he said, what we did is we removed children
with their mothers who requested it. That's a parental decision.
Parenting one oh one. I'll tell you what. If we
didn't do it, the story would be Trump administration is
separating families again, when we're actually keeping families together. When
a parent says, I want my two year old to
go with me, we make that happened. They weren't deported.
(23:02):
The parents made the decision, and it's pretty strong.
Speaker 8 (23:12):
He made this country legally, and you ignor a judge's
order about about deporting. If you choose have you a
citizen child, knowing you're in this country legally, you put
yourself in that position. You put your family in that position.
What we did is remove children with their mothers who
requested the children to depart with them. This is a
parental decision, parental pre parenting one on one. The mothers
(23:35):
made that choice. Now, I tell you what if we
didn't do it, the story today be Trump administration separating
families again. No, we're keeping families together. So when a
parent says, I want I want my two year old
baby to go with me, we made that happen. They
weren't deported. We don't import you as citizens. The parents
made that decision, not in the United States government. But
I don't hear any questions about Theyke and Roddy had
(23:57):
a mother. She's never going to see her again. Rachel Moore,
she had five children, Yeah, you know those, She'll never
gonna see your name again. This administration doing the right thing.
Speaker 5 (24:10):
We kind of glossed over that final point yesterday that
the parents of these children, some adults who have been
murdered by illegal aliens, they don't get to go with
their moms. That family unit has been destroyed, absolutely obliterated.
(24:33):
I don't think we ought to forget that. But what's
been the response from the Democrats to that? Yesterday the
Democrats held a sit in for I think I think
it's four hours on the steps of the Capitol, and
it was freaking hilarious because they had I don't know
(24:54):
who it was, but they had somebody that was sitting
in front of Corey Booker, the Senator from New Jersey,
Keen Jeffries, the House Minority leader from New York, sitting
sitting on the steps together. So here are these two
black guys sitting on the steps together. They got some
dumb white guys sitting between them a step below them
who had the microphone who sings some stupid I think
(25:17):
it was supposed to be a protest.
Speaker 2 (25:18):
Song, but I don't I don't know what it was.
Speaker 5 (25:21):
And then he turns to Corey Booker and basically says,
you'll sing after me.
Speaker 2 (25:26):
And so Cory Booker turns around to.
Speaker 5 (25:28):
The massive amount of people sitting on this sit in.
I mean, there must have been at least I would say,
would I say massive, It's hard to count that many,
but I would say they're probably at least eighteen people there.
Speaker 2 (25:40):
I was gonna say a dozen. Yeah, looks like a dozen.
I haven't counted in the picture that I hear on CNN,
but yeah, i'd say twelve days or more.
Speaker 5 (25:47):
Reporters there, look behind the scene, turn the came around
the show where the real sit in is taking place.
But I found it funny that it was a sit in,
because a sit in when I think of like when, uh,
you know, you grew up as a kid in the sixties,
there were sit ins in high school.
Speaker 2 (26:07):
You refuse to go to class, you like you broke.
Speaker 8 (26:09):
The rules.
Speaker 5 (26:12):
Or you you know, you go back further, you go
back to the sixties or the fifties, and you did
a sit in that meant you went to a white's
only lunch counter and you sat down there, or you
refuse to go to the back of the bus. There
there were there was There were no cops beating them
up there. There was nobody with the fire hose trying
(26:34):
to hose, you know, trying to clean. That would have
been wonderful. I'd love to have seen that, Like, uh,
we got a hose down the steps and stil so
the the janitorial service starts at the top of the
steps and you know, they got the big hoses with
the spray nozzle and they start spraying the steps down.
Oh sorry, we didn't know. We didn't see you sitting there.
I would have love to have seen that. But there
(26:54):
was something else they did yesterday, not them, but the Democrats,
Aby Pritzker, the governor of Illinois, the heir the Hyatt family.
Makes your question whether or not you should stay at
a Hyatt, But that's a personal preference. You can choose
to stay at the Hyatt if you want to.
Speaker 2 (27:14):
Uh.
Speaker 5 (27:15):
He was giving a speech and he's calling for mass protests.
Speaker 11 (27:21):
In my life have I called from mass and protests
for mobilization for disruption, But I am.
Speaker 2 (27:28):
That disruption he wants to disrupt.
Speaker 9 (27:47):
There cannot know a moment of peace.
Speaker 2 (27:51):
Cannot know moment if.
Speaker 10 (27:52):
You're understand that we will to fight.
Speaker 4 (27:54):
Their cruelty with every megaphone and microphone that we have.
Speaker 2 (27:58):
We must be casting at least he.
Speaker 5 (28:02):
I mean, disturbing is one thing, but at least he says,
we'll fight them with you know, microphones.
Speaker 4 (28:08):
In them on the soapbox and then punish them at
the ballot box.
Speaker 5 (28:14):
So would break him into soapbox and we beat him
at the ballot box. And then he decides that, well
that was enough. I need to be able to on
the MSNBC and explain to them what I really mean here, that.
Speaker 10 (28:26):
They do have power.
Speaker 6 (28:29):
Maybe you just answered my question, but there was a
very powerful call to action. We've played this in your
speech mass protest mobilization.
Speaker 1 (28:37):
You also say the reckoning is here.
Speaker 5 (28:40):
What does that mean?
Speaker 1 (28:41):
What should people?
Speaker 9 (28:42):
How should we understand that?
Speaker 10 (28:45):
Well, that was specifically about what we as a democratic
party need to be doing. That we can't be a
party of do nothing, of not getting things done for again,
the people that we care the most about, the people
that we're focused on. That's working families, right, the middle class,
working class, the.
Speaker 1 (29:05):
Most vulnerable in our society.
Speaker 10 (29:07):
It's important to us to stand up in this crisis
and to speak out and again push.
Speaker 2 (29:14):
Back and hmm.
Speaker 5 (29:18):
So now you've got one faction of the Democrats who
are doing a sit in and singing songs and that's
their protest. If that's the kind of disruption they want
to do, then okay, do that all day long, because
I don't think that moves the needle whatsoever. In fact,
I think that it should be the subject of a
(29:40):
lot of late night comedians, but they obviously they won't
touch it. Saturday Night Live won't touch it, but they
should because it's really stupid. But this shows that at
least some people in the Democrat Party, and I imagine JB.
Pritzker is trying to lay the groundwork to help on
the mid terms and then eventually run for president in
(30:01):
twenty twenty eight, because he's actually calling to do something.
Speaker 10 (30:06):
Class, working class, the most vulnerable in our society. It's
important to us to stand up in this crisis.
Speaker 5 (30:15):
So don't sit down, stand up, complete opposite of what
those in Congress are calling for. Let's go sit down,
let's go do us sit in, and let's you know,
let's draw a whole bunch of reporters and get people,
you know, all twelve to eighteen people to sit in
with us, and it got it got some national attention
(30:37):
for about five seconds of TV time. But Christker says,
don't sit in, stand up. So are we starting to
see the Democrat Party divide or coalesce? I think they're
dividing and scrambling.
Speaker 1 (30:57):
Michael and Dragon, good morning. I hope you're well. I
just got my Excel Energy power.
Speaker 12 (31:02):
Build yesterday, and guess what, it has a special sheet
in there that says, where does your electricity come from?
The twenty twenty four energy mix for Colorado is win
thirty four and a half percent, natural gas thirty three percent,
cold twenty one percent, solar ten point six percent, and
(31:23):
all others that one. I guess Excel is trying to
be what do you want to say, transparent, But man,
they're still pushing that wind and solar stuff.
Speaker 5 (31:35):
Have a great day, and you can pay more and
have all your electricity come from wind and solar.
Speaker 2 (31:41):
But don't do it.
Speaker 5 (31:43):
So Prisker is out there bellowing about, you know, mass
protests and mass mobilization. Well, it's probably too soon. After
the hundreds of the liberal establishment sanctioned Black Lives Matter
riots that calls all that billions of dollars and damages
not to understand what he really means by, you know,
(32:03):
let's go out there and do mass mobilization and disruption.
Pritzker's currently pulling at number ten among all these unaspiring
Democrats that want to be president, and he wants to
outdo his rivals for the overheated rhetoric. But there is
for this guy who's a billionaire from Silicon Valley, who's
(32:24):
a transgender cousin, he's really at the forefront of pushing
the radical gender ideology in schools and in medical facilities.
So the heir to the Hyatt hotels really is out
there pushing that radical agenda about lgbtqism and your children.
Speaker 10 (32:48):
I first got my start in activism right here in
the state of California as a little kid growing up
in Silicon Valley in the nineteen seventies.
Speaker 1 (32:58):
My mother was an active for.
Speaker 11 (33:00):
Reproductive rights and LGBTQ rights, and she took me to
Pride parades back when well they weren't really parades, they
were protests. So I'd have to laugh when I hear
the right wing carry on about the dangers of exposing
kids to trans people or same sex couples, because I'm
(33:24):
living proof that introducing your kids to the gay agenda
might result in them growing.
Speaker 2 (33:29):
Up to be governor.
Speaker 5 (33:34):
That's who's running for president, that's their their agenda is
is really to the extreme, nobody. I don't want anybody
to any government to force parents to expose their children
to anything that the parents don't want to expose their
(33:55):
children to them. So I really doubt that many at
least still annoy your residents. Living south of maybe one
hundred and thirty eighth Street, I really do enjoy living
under such a rich Marxist version of this tubby tub
tub That's what's just going to lead the Democrats right
again into a Democrat death spiral.
Speaker 2 (34:17):
Have at it.
Popular Podcasts
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Special Summer Offer: Exclusively on Apple Podcasts, try our Dateline Premium subscription completely free for one month! With Dateline Premium, you get every episode ad-free plus exclusive bonus content.
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.