5-21-25 - 7am - I Bought The Biden Book and PSA Testing

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Splitting. I actually saw cars splitting one time when I
was heading north on Pena Boulevard. I was in the
middle lane, and I think we were moving very slowly.
I don't think we were stopped, and all of a sudden,
on my left side, I heard something loud coming by,

(00:21):
and it was a car going in between the middle
and left.

Speaker 2 (00:30):
Penia Boulevard only has two lanes each.

Speaker 3 (00:32):
Direction, and you only have thirty seconds for a talkbacks
hereah brevity.

Speaker 2 (00:38):
I don't know, we'll go through some soundbites, so I
did yesterday. I during the show, I ordered my copy
of Original Sin, and I stopped by the Barnes and
Noble over and Lone Tree, and I picked it up,

(00:58):
and I've now read I'm guessing the first it's not
that big of a book. I didn't keep the receipt.
In fact, I even asked about the return policy. I said, so.

Speaker 3 (01:13):
You're standing there with the book in hand, going what's
your return policy?

Speaker 2 (01:16):
I did. Actually I was a little deceitful. I said,
I'm getting this as a gift, but I don't whether
they want it or not. What's the return policy? And
she said, well, we just you know, thirty days we
need a receipt. I said, okay, thank you. So I
get the receipt on my desk. And so sometime yesterday afternoon,
I sat down and I read I don't know, two

(01:36):
or three, maybe maybe three chapters, and all I told
Dragon is swinging. All I can think about is the
story is interesting. But what I can't get over is

(01:56):
the questions I have about And not questions, but it's
it's it's a lesson that is an obvious lesson and
one that all of you, I mean, I know you
already know this, but now it's it's kind of like
we got the receipts again Democrats and the media. But

(02:19):
I repeat myself, lie, they just lie. It's it's it's
not even it's not even None of this is even
funny anymore, you know, the the progression of the Democrats'
attempts to shame you out of talking about and it's

(02:43):
it is about Biden's health during the campaign, going all
the way back to actually going back to based on
what I'm reading in the book, and now that I'm
starting to dig a little more into this, I remember Dragon,
and I I remember during the campaign. I remember even

(03:06):
before the campaign, when you know you had all you
had what three thousand Democrats running, and Biden was just
crashing everywhere. He wasn't showing up in Ioway, he wasn't
doing well in New Hampshire. And you know, he finally
gets you know that they're starting to panic because Bernie's
doing so well. There were lapses then, but they were

(03:28):
interspaced far enough, and he was not. At that point.
He was just I mean, and I say this, and
I kind of do mean it this way. He was
just kind of a former vice president. How many former
vice presidents can you name? And what do those former
vice presidents do? Very few go on to become president.

(03:52):
Most of them just kind of go back into the
private sector, or depending on their age, they just go
back into they go into retirement, and they live out
their lives. They might they might write books or whatever.
I mean. Even Richard Nixon, you know, Nixon disappears as
a former president. Nixon disappears and it starts to write,

(04:13):
and he writes some amazing books. He was probably at
his best writing the books that he wrote post Watergate
about foreign affairs and international affairs and just kind of
his life. They're very good books. But the Democrats have

(04:36):
a a playbook, just like an NFL coach has got
their chart of their plays, and they attempt to shame
you out of talking about Biden's mental health and his
physical health. Stop talking about it because it's not true.
Stop talking about this because well, he's not the president anymore. Well,

(04:57):
now you've got to stop talking about it because he
has cancer. You know it's the problem. You know, it's
the pattern. Stop talking, stop talking, stop talking. Don't talk
about it because it's false. Don't talk about it because
he's not the president anymore. Don't talk about it because
he has cancer. Don't talk about it because we don't
want to talk about it. The first commandment of the

(05:17):
Democrat Party thou shalt shut the f up. So all
they're gas lighting, they're shaming, all the what about isn't
all the other dishonest rhetoric rhetorical techniques, Those are just
simply attempts to try to stop you from talking about
whichever lie they're telling you at any given moment. Why

(05:40):
should they stop at cancer. There are a lot of
medical professionals pointing out that are Prostate cancer diagnosis doesn't
just come out of the blue like this. Any guy
knows your doctor has told you that it's easily detectable
in blood work. It takes you and years to progress.

(06:02):
Sometimes it's progressing. You don't even know it unless you
get checked. You do the regular things. You get the
PSA test, you get the digital examination, you get your colonoscoby.
It's easily detectable, and it should have been detected at
his last annual physical. Even Ezekiel Emmanuel, who by the way,

(06:25):
is an oncologist. I did not realize is ezek Emmanuel
was an on college. He's actually a cancer doctor. Do
you know who Zeke Emmanuel is, right? I mean, he's
the godfather of Obamacare. He's the brother Duram Emmanuel, Obama's
former chief of staff, former congressman, and former mayor of Chicago.

(06:45):
He says that Biden had to have learned about his
diagnosis many years ago, going back to probably twenty fourteen.
Now think about this, if Biden was undergoing cancer treatment
during his presidency.

Speaker 3 (07:00):
Jump in here relatively quickly though. As I was driving
in this morning, one of the main news national guys
was saying that he hadn't had a PSA blood test
since twenty fourteen, and maybe.

Speaker 2 (07:13):
That's why he stopped having blood tests because it had
been detected and he's undergoing treatment, which leads to the
point I was about to make if Biden was undergoing
cancer treatments during his presidency, because going all the way
back to twenty fourteen, maybe that explains all of those

(07:36):
trips to Delaware. It would even probably explain some of
his behavior. The chemo brain. So you take chemo brain
and add on that brain surgery, two brain surgeries, aneurysm.
That's one thing that there are a few things I'm
learning about some of these things that we talked about

(07:58):
on a very superficial level about his aneurysms and stuff
they were allowed. It was a lot worse than you know,
Dragon and I just casually mentioned, No, don't forget he
had a couple of brain aneurysms. They were a lot
worse than we unintentionally just kind of gloss over.

Speaker 3 (08:19):
The brain surgery in the eighties is very different than
brain surgery today.

Speaker 2 (08:23):
And so you take chemo brain, and you take his
aging and his propensity because of other factors in his life.
The other problem, the other physical problems that we had
that he had that did not get disclosed, which kind
of goes back to the idea that it's probably going
back to twenty fourteen, that you know, the chemo brain

(08:47):
and then the ongoing dimension and everything else. It really
is a serious question about a cover up, again, worse
than Watergate. And of course he and Jill would keep
it under wraps because otherwise it would only strengthen a
twenty fifth Amendment challenge. So who else knew about it?

(09:09):
And when do they know it? And who the hell
was performing the duties of the president of the United
States for four years? Well, the book starts to address that.
I'm not going to address that in necessarily a lot today,
but as I work through the book, I'll address it
some more because I'm beginning to get hints out of
the book about who really was running the country in

(09:30):
US ironic dragon. Guess what they refer to the group
that was probably running the country the politbureau. Now, remember,
and for those of us who have lived through Biden,
and by that I mean those of us who go

(09:51):
back even when he was a US senator, he always
used his personal tragedies as a get out of jail
free card. Heard that when we played all those that audio,
I shouldn't say all of those, but that eight minutes
of audio that we have from October twenty twenty three,
when Biden deflected a question that he did not want

(10:12):
to answer about his handling of classified documents by claiming
Caming that his son Bo had died. He couldn't remember
the exact year, but he used it as an excuse.
If he'll use his dead son, why wouldn't he use
a cancer diagnosis. Now, reminder, we still don't know what
happened to Joe Biden the day he resigned from the

(10:33):
twenty twenty four presidential campaign via a tweet during a
Sunday brunch, right in the middle of a week long
disappearance from the public eye. Remember that he was in Rehoboth.
And now this cancer diagnosis certainly adds a new wrinkle.
So here's what happens. Now. Democrats are going to call
you a heartless ghoul for criticizing a cancer patient, and

(10:54):
they're actually already doing that. Why can't you just leave
this old sick man alone? Haven't you hand the hand
handled this poor sweet grandpa enough? You know? Blah blah
blah blah. That's because they're complicit. And that's what we've
got to understand about why this story has legs and
whine continues because the Democrat Party is complicit. Even if
they didn't know the exact diagnosis, they knew something was

(11:17):
very wrong with them. I'm again, I you know, if
if the book is let's say a little over an
inch thick, it's not that big of a book. I'm
a quarter of an inch or so into the book
and I'm not even really into the good stuff yet.

Speaker 3 (11:38):
Real quick, here, for argument's sake, for why he may
not have gotten a PSA test after twenty fourteen. According
to the NIH, they say, although there is no upper
age limit for screening, but they should be excuse me,
they should not be offered with men with a life
expectancy of less than ten years and the average man.
This would imply that PSA testing would be discontinued by

(12:02):
the mid to late seventies.

Speaker 2 (12:04):
Okay, I don't want to go off on a tangent here,
but that may be what the NIH says. But I
can tell you that both of my doctors say that's
bull crap. And they say that because we don't know. Yeah,
average lifespan of a male in this country is what
seventy two or something. Can't say, and you're going to

(12:24):
die before that. But because it is so easily treatable,
that's why they continue any good any I think again, Dragon,
with all due respects, screw Nih. Any decent doctor, particularly
an anti aging doctor like I use. I have both
a PCP and an anti aging doctor, insist on continuing

(12:45):
to test and get the PSA levels because it is
still a good indicator. And because it's so easily treatable.
They want to catch it. Because if my life span
is going to be ninety five, then they will and
I'm out it today. They want to catch it today
so I can live to ninety five. So I just
call BS on that. Nih.

Speaker 3 (13:06):
I completely agree. I just do you know me, I
got to find the excuses and yeah, the reason right, But.

Speaker 2 (13:11):
Just hang on here. The point I want to make
is this, the Democrats are complicit in all of this.
The Democrats have shown themselves that they will do anything
and everything, even when they know that the country is
in danger. Now, I know you don't have the bit
unless you have read the book, you don't have the

(13:32):
benefit of it. And again I point out, I'm barely
into this book. I'm not a third of the way
I might be a fourth of the way of the book,
and the conclusion I'm coming in coming to is and
there are two conclusions. One, I'm incredibly angry at Jake

(13:54):
Tapper and Alex I can't remember is it Johnson or
whatever's last name is, but Alex Johnson, Alex Thompson. I
think it's Thompson. Those two reporters knew this. Now Tapper
has tried to uh and you'll hear Tapper in a minute,
tried to rationalize some of his things, and he, in

(14:17):
a conversation with Megan Kelly this week, talked about how
he really does feel like he is he's now been.
He doesn't use the word humiliated, but he feels a
lot of humility. I think that's his code way of
saying he really does feel humiliated now that the book's

(14:37):
written and he realizes hindsight, oh, this does really look bad.
Because I did interview Biden at least twice, if not
three times, when he was either running or as president,
including that SoundBite that Dragon likes to use where Biden
talks about which was during the campaign, about how you
know he'll be so transparent about his health. They could see,

(15:02):
just as we all saw that he was in no
shape to be the president of the United States of America.
And yet the cabul didn't say anything. And every time
those on the right side or the independent side, in
the middle of the of the journalist spectrum kept saying, look, listen, watch,

(15:24):
there's something wrong. The Democrats were in absolute unison, publicly
facing to make sure that you never ever bought fully
into what those conservative media outlets were saying, or that
you had some doubt in your mind, or you were

(15:47):
trying to rationalize in your mind that well, you know what,
maybe it's not quite as bad. He's just an old man.
And we all began to forget things, and we, you know,
some things just you know, our brains get crowded and
we can't think of any particular thing, you know. I'll
give you a personal example. Yesterday a friend of mine
asked me something about they we had planned to go

(16:10):
to one Italian place and we at the last minute
decided not to go to this place. And we were
in I was in a group of people and they
and one guy said, well, where did you go? And
I honestly couldn't think about it for a moment. And
the reason I couldn't think about it for a moment.
Was it was someplace we didn't normally go to. So
in my brain I'm running through, well, no, we didn't

(16:30):
go to Venice, we didn't go to far, we didn't
go to and then about thirty minutes later, oh, yeah,
we went to this place that we've only been to
once or twice. That's just kind of this old school
Italian place. Does that mean I'm getting demented? No, it
was just it wasn't important to me. It just wasn't
something important. I was trying to maintain somewhere in my

(16:51):
frontel lobe to remember, Oh, somebody ever asked me where
did I have dinner? Two weeks ago? I could answer
the question, not going to be silenced. But he's life.
If you pray, then pray for you know, biden soul.
How about while you do that, you got to recognize

(17:14):
that he lied, His family lied, the Democrats lied, the
leadership lied, and the media lied, all to convince you
that there was nothing wrong.

Speaker 1 (17:25):
Well, I think next time I.

Speaker 3 (17:27):
Come rolling through Denver, I'm gonna.

Speaker 1 (17:29):
Roll down a twenty five and track splitting lanes with
this big rig.

Speaker 2 (17:36):
When you do, would you just let me know that
you're doing it so that we can watch, because we
want to. We want to get behind you and videotape
the carnages you go through town.

Speaker 3 (17:45):
Hey, we already had that one trucker coming down nice
seventy Do it.

Speaker 2 (17:48):
Not long ago? Too soon? Uh?

Speaker 3 (17:52):
No, let go?

Speaker 2 (17:53):
No not, are you kidding? He ask me if I
think it's too soon. So after after speculating that Biden's
team must have been aware of his prostate cancer at
the time of that last physical examination he had in
twenty twenty four we learn now that yes, he has

(18:16):
not had a PSA test, the the prostate specific antigen test,
since twenty fourteen. So let's go back to twenty fourteen
and next thing about what's going on. You've got a
crisis in Eastern Europe, You've got to unrest in the
Middle East. You've got a deep concern for resurgent threat overseas.

(18:36):
Joe Biden is flying between continents, he's doing Shuttle diplomacy,
he's leading panels, he's breathing NATO, he's doing all this,
you know, all the things that he wants that Barack
Obama's out there wanting him to do, but quietly, behind
the scenes, his medical chart shows this final PSA test
and it would be the last, which is the obvious question.

(19:01):
And I know many people think it's because of the
age and dragon sites in IH. I don't want to
site in IH. I want to cite the American Eurological Association.
Biden was seventy one. He had if I can claim

(19:26):
for him, he had, he had vitality. Do you listen
to his voice then versus the voice now or even
during his presidency, because remember there's a gap there. He
had at least some modicum of mental clarity, and he
arguably had when he was seventy one years old, which

(19:49):
is now proof because he's like he's eighty two hour
or something. He arguably had a greater than a ten
year life expectancy, which is the key threshold set by
the American Neurological Association for determining whether or not a
PSA test should continue. Here's what the American Neurological Association says, quote,
Routine PSA screening is not recommended for men over age

(20:15):
seventy semi colon. However, for select men in excellent health
with more than a ten to fifteen year life expectancy,
screening may be considered. Now, that seems pretty straightforward because
previous guidelines, like the NIH guideline had already declared that

(20:40):
routine screening and men over seventy actually they claim did
more harm than good because it, you know, the argument was,
you get unnecessary biopsies, you get false alarms, you know,
false positives, you might have potential incontinence and potential impotence. Well,
so enough, they say stop. But the American Neurological Stamps

(21:05):
was a lot more measured than obviously the NIH. They
didn't close the door entirely for men like me, healthy,
highly functional, intellectually sharp, you can question that. I don't
care and still on the ascent of doing what they're doing.

(21:26):
They left room for discretion, and both of my doctors
have exercised that discretion. They acknowledged what experienced clinicians know
that anybody that's vigorous at age sixty five or seventy
or seventy one or seventy two, they don't have five

(21:46):
years ahead. They probably have twenty years ahead. I look
at at at my genomes, and I look at my telemony.
I get all those scans, I get all of those
analytics done, and I tend to have those that match

(22:10):
my mother who's ninety four years old, and she's starting
at ninety four, she's starting to appear starting to lose
a little bit, which begs the question we don't ask
often enough. If we don't screen a man like Joe Biden,

(22:30):
are we missing something serious? Or could it even be malpractice? Now?
Legally speaking, no, I don't think it's medical malpractice because
that requires a breach of the standard of care resulting
in harm that is against accepted professional consensus. That's a

(22:51):
fairly high standard to come to cross if you're involved
in a medical malpractice suit. So, given that recommendation against
routine screening from ME in over seventy was an effect,
and that a lot of providers were pulling back on
testing during that period, opting not to screen that was
not outside the standard of care in twenty fourteen, but ethically, clinically,

(23:13):
and quite frankly, not just Biden's own mental profile, his
physical profile, but what about his position now? I know
there's room for debate because while the median seventy year
old male may not benefit from a late life PSA,

(23:34):
Joe Biden in twenty fourteen was not a median male
so to ignore the PSA testing in somebody that was
high functioning, high position, lots of responsibility might not be
malpracticed in a courtroom, but could be considered at least
a missed opportunity for preventative care or preventive care, some

(23:55):
people say, especially considering a prostate cancer remains the second
leading cause of death and American men. So let's just
for a moment, but let's just say that Biden had
aggressive prostate cancer burring beneath the surface, one that would
not show symptoms until it actually metastasized. By twenty twenty,

(24:18):
he'd be seventy eight and leading a nation through a pandemic.
By then, treatment options might have been limited, but a
timely PSA would have changed the trajectory. Would it have
saved his life? Well maybe, who knows? Would have spared
suffering or complexity of the treatment protocols that he might

(24:39):
have to undergo. Now, of course, it would may throw
a quick curve out there, Well, you just hang on
a second drego. Most importantly, would it have fit within
the American Neurological Association guidelines? And the point is it
would have. So then it becomes and I know this
may be a distinction without a difference for some of you,
but it is for me. The reason I had not

(25:02):
intended to mention the NIH is because it's the NIH.
It's the same organization that gave us doctor Fauci the
NIAI d gave us all of the COVID protocols, and
gave us all of that. I would much rather as
much as I dislike a lot of things like the
American Pediatric Association or the American Bar Association, at least

(25:26):
those are not captured entities in the sense that the
NIH might be. So it's it's all about every single individual.
You know, when I when I talk to my anti
aging doctor about should I do this scan or should

(25:48):
I do that scan, he'll tell me the pros and
cons and he'll tell me what his recommendation is, and
then say this, but if you're curious about it, and
if you're willing to pay for it, because most of
these kinds of scans are not paid for, and it'll
give you some peace of mind, then go for it.
Because it's not going to hurt anything. So it's not

(26:11):
necessarily about treating age. It's about treating the individual, and
the guidelines just simply help us draw some general lines.
But the really good clinicians, like I think that doctor
Grossman and doctor Sendell are they know when to blur
those lines for the right reasons, and they know when
that those guidelines are indeed just that a guideline. And

(26:34):
you would think that in a country is as highly
developed as ours, and one that does everything they can
to protect the lives of a president and a vice president,
that you would have said, you know what, considering that
we don't know it was, you know, maybe he would
a told Obama, screw you, I'm going to run for
president anyway. I'm going to go up against Hillary. Probably

(27:00):
should have a PSA test, and it might have been clinically justifiable,
as you know, it could have been actually justifiable. Think
about this as a stopping point. They could have done
it back then and said, okay, yeah, well okay, maybe
we had you know, maybe we come back and we
do it a year from now, Maybe we do it
for another couple of years, and then we stopped. But

(27:22):
when you think about all of the other things, the
health problems and the effects on his physiology and his
mental well being, of all of the stuff that he
went through with bow and Hunter, his first wife, just

(27:42):
the pressures of being in the White House. All of that,
it really raises a big question. Why not you want
to ask something.

Speaker 3 (27:54):
Or say I just want to throw out there that
I know that the price state cancer is in no
relation whatsoever to COVID. But the man got COVID twice
during his presidency, So you would think that the medical
staff at that point in time would throw everything at
the wall at him to try and figure out to
see where his health is.

Speaker 2 (28:12):
And ask the question, why is he susceptible to it?
Why is now he's in that age bracket where they
say you are at the highest risk, So you can
on surface answer the question. But for a guy that
keeps getting the jabs and keeps getting the COVID, at

(28:33):
some point you might want to say, particularly when you
have access even post vice presidency, you still have access
to Walter Reid and the best medical care.

Speaker 3 (28:45):
Again, I'm not trying to make a correlation between prostate
cancer and COVID, r the jabs or anything of that nature,
but being the President of the United States catching COVID twice,
you'd think they would just screen for absolutely everything.

Speaker 4 (28:56):
Burning Michael had it physically yesterday, and turns out the
modern convention is no more digital probe, no more turn
your head and cough. Apparently the thinking is that the
PSA blood scoring is much better, and if the eggs
are scrambled, you're going to tell somebody about it.

Speaker 2 (29:15):
Have a good day. Wait, wait a minute, turn your
head and cough has nothing to do with your prostate.
That's checking for hernie. Hernia, is right, Yeah, yeah, that's
checking for hernia. So I've been asked to turn my
head and cough in decades. I don't remember. Oh maybe

(29:38):
I'm getting old in de minded. I don't remember the
last time I was told to term my head and cough.
I do remember the last time I had a digital examination,
and that was during my last annual physical. And I
get my blood work done every three months. In every
three months, they'd run you know, they take a sample

(30:01):
and they do a prostate emagen test. So I get
the PSA numbers. I know what the PSA numbers are
every three months, and it's always about you know, one
point one or zero point nine. It's just right right
in that range. And so you know, the only thing
I'm doing right now for is a colonoscopy. But I

(30:23):
find it because here's what I find interesting forty five eighteen, Michael, anyway,
you can talk about something other than Biden's prostate for
the rest of the show. Yuck. No, it's not about
Biden's prostate. It's about the Trump derangement syndrome that the
Democrats are involved in. Because what's going on here is

(30:44):
all of the lying. If you just you know you,
you got to listen to the entire program. It's about
Trump derangement syndrome. And it's about the Democrats that will
lie about everything. Because if they'll lie about this, what
won't they lie about? And if you've ever had any

(31:06):
doubt about the cabal trying to deceive you, to convince
you that what you see with your own eyes and
what you hear with your own ears is not true,
that's the extent that they'll go to. And I know
that you, I know people in this audience, particularly you,

(31:27):
you don't succumb to that. But I don't have three
hundred and fifty million people listening to this program. So
you have to learn that this is what's happening. So
when you're at dinner, you're with your family, and you
got the crazy uncle that has trump and derangement syndrome.
You are empowered with facts to go point out that. Listen,

(31:51):
they when you sit down and you watch you know,
John Dickerson, whoever the other y'aho is on the CBS
evening News. You you should take everything they say with
a grain of salt. You should assume that they are
lying to you. You should take the time to go
figure out for your damned self what the truth is
about what's going on. Now when we get back, you're

(32:15):
going to hear Jake Tapper is now in the book tour,
and so finally, now that it's out in the open,
they have to at least pretend but by they I
mean to cabal at least pretend that, oh, we're going
to hold Jake Tapper's feet to the fire about why

(32:37):
didn't you cover this instead of just writing a book,
because you know what, he could have covered it. He
could have probed and probed and probed no pun intending
thinking of crust needs. They could have probed all day
long and still written the book.