8-1-25 - 8am - Punished for Helping Ice

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Situation, the talk of the town, Michael and Dragon breaking
it down.

Speaker 2 (00:04):
From left to right.

Speaker 3 (00:05):
They spin the toe with Chassi Flairs on Never Fail.

Speaker 1 (00:09):
The topics range from big to small world affairs to
a quirky call Michael Shark has went off c Dragon
chuns and with the job.

Speaker 4 (00:18):
Too hellup right lop buttoo huh?

Speaker 5 (00:28):
What's it up?

Speaker 3 (00:29):
Goodbers?

Speaker 5 (00:29):
Your mission is to assure the little girl from Virginia.

Speaker 6 (00:31):
Who says Micah says go here dot come, grows.

Speaker 5 (00:35):
Up in the land of the Free and the home
of the brave. The rules are engaging for that mission.
RS follows. First rule, you want text their written set
rep to Secretary of Brown at three three one zero
three on your phone. Second rule you will download the
iHeartMedia app where you will mark the situation with Michael
Brown and the weekend with Michael Brown as your favorites.
Third rule you will use a red microphone button on

(00:56):
the iHeartMedia a to record your verbal set rep for
the Secretary and his ex oh Dragon red Beard.

Speaker 1 (01:01):
Fourth rule, go to the website Micao says go here
dot com.

Speaker 5 (01:05):
Were you a bottle? Michael Brown? On all social media platforms.
Is that understood?

Speaker 1 (01:10):
Good now, But.

Speaker 6 (01:13):
When I was in school, A B plus was ninety
two percent and AS was ninety three ninety five. There's
a Facebook post from a California parents showing their grading skill.
Now it has really slipped bottom of the A range
is eighty four, B range is sixty four percent, C

(01:33):
range is forty four, and D range.

Speaker 1 (01:36):
Is twenty four.

Speaker 6 (01:37):
That means on multiple choice tests you should be able
to get a D.

Speaker 1 (01:44):
Yeah. Just pick your pattern of ABC or D and
just go through.

Speaker 7 (01:50):
My kids graduating high school are like c's get degrees,
but it got better than c's. Don't get me wrong,
but that was just the fun saying that they would say,
yeah and you, oh yeah, I barely made it, okay,
Oh I barely made it.

Speaker 1 (02:05):
All right, Okay, all right.

Speaker 8 (02:08):
I just wanted to make sure someone sent this story
to Dragon. He printed it out for me, handed it
to me, and my comment was, I've got and I've
got pages of notes about this. In fact, last night
I was going to turn this into a Michael Brown minute,
but I just couldn't figure out a way to condense

(02:29):
it down to one hundred and seventy one words, which
is my pace for a sixty second spot. But let's
do the story anyway, because now's as good a time
as any, and particularly since these deputies involved down in
Mason County have now been disciplined for violating a state law.

(02:51):
What do they do? Will they help some federal agents
make some immigration arrests? Oh my god, stop the presses.
You mean law and force cooperated with law enforcement and
somebody who was had an expired visa got in trouble.

Speaker 1 (03:09):
Hang on a minute, let me catch my breath.

Speaker 8 (03:13):
Let's start with this understanding that Colorado did not the
polit Bureau did not make it a crime in at
least in the sense of imposing criminal penalties or charges
for state or local law enforcement to cooperate with US
Immigrations and Customs Enforcement ICE in an immigration case. Now

(03:36):
you can still cooperate, but I'll explain later, but not
in this sense. It has enacted civil statues that prohibit
cooperation in very specific.

Speaker 1 (03:49):
Ways, and those.

Speaker 8 (03:53):
The violation of this statue is enforceable, but only not
through criminal prosecution, but through internal disciplinary actions civil lawsuits.
You can get it an injunction. But the point is
it's all non criminal mechanisms. And this Colorado law, which

(04:19):
seems to me to be a violation of the supremacy clause.
But we'll get to that in a minute. These Colorado
laws prioritize state authority over federal civil immigration enforcement. How
in the hell do you do that? How does when
immigration is very specifically a federal subject matter. Go read

(04:45):
the US Constitution. It's one of the few things it's
spelled out that this is a function of the federal
government immigration and naturalization, not state government.

Speaker 1 (04:57):
So it seems to me.

Speaker 8 (05:00):
That if you are a law enforcement officer and you
take an oath to uphold the Constitution of the United
States and the constitution of your state, whether that be
Colorado or Texas or New Mahico or wherever it is,
then your failure to cooperate or help with federal enforcement

(05:27):
despite the statute I'm not talking about because the statue
is on the books, but I'm just saying, I think
you have an obligation when you take that oath to cooperate,
regardless what that whoops, regardless of what the a holes
out of the Pulit Bureau say. The violations do not

(05:49):
result in criminal prosecution based on everything that I can
read about this statue, So what is the statute. It's
Colorado Revised Statute twenty four seventy six points Nash one
O two. It's house built nineteen eleven twenty four and
acted back in twenty nineteen. It clarifies and limits the

(06:12):
authority of state and local law enforcement in enforcing federal
civil immigration laws. There's some key provisions. Law enforcement officers
are barred from arresting or detaining an individual solely on
the basis of a civil immigration detainer request from ICE. So, ICE,

(06:32):
you know, has an illegal alien in Denver. Let's just
you know, no, let's use Mason County because that's where
this case is, where the story comes from. Now these
aren't the facts, but I'm just using it. I'm gonna
use Macon County as an example. ICE has a particular

(06:55):
illegal alien in Mason County that they have they ICE
has a warrant for they have a detainer, maybe they
have a removal order. So they call the Mason County
Sheriff's office. Hey, we're looking for Jose, and Jose is
last we know is in Mason County. If you see Jose,

(07:16):
could you please pick up Jose and hold him for us.
It's ifi whether in those particular facts that I just
gave you. It's iffy where they get whether they can
even do that or not.

Speaker 1 (07:31):
Here's what's not ify an.

Speaker 8 (07:36):
Officer in Mason County and again apply it to anywhere
in the country, any any state that's a sanctuary state
that has similar laws. You do a traffic stop and
there is there are enough questions, you know, maybe an
expired license, driver's license, maybe you know, you ask, you know,

(07:58):
you simply ask, you know, where are you from? Because
whatever expired license you have, or even whatever legitimate, legitimate
license you have, say is from Utah or it's from
New Mexico, and you get stopped in Mason County and
they just ask, you know, because it's just a law
enforcement technique. You know, your driver's license expired or not

(08:20):
says that you live in uh Tas, New Mexico, but
you're stopped in Mason County, so they might just ask, well,
where are you from, to see if you even know
what's on the driver's license, because if you know, I would.
But then again I'm a jerk. If law enforcement asked

(08:41):
me where I was from and I was out of state,
I'd say Colorado because that's the minimum man I want
to give them. Then they're free to ask me, well,
we're in Colorado. Oh, well I'm from Highlands Ranch. That
might lead to a conversation, well, where the hell's at?
I don't know, but I'm I'm not going to now

(09:05):
now if I'm if I'm stopped in Colorado and a
Colorado State trooper or you know, a local law enforcement
in Colorado asks me where I'm from. Well, my driver's
license says Colorado. So I'm going to answer, well, I'm
from Highlands Ranch or wherever I might live.

Speaker 1 (09:24):
The point is.

Speaker 8 (09:27):
This is just kind of standard routine law enforcement procedure,
but you can't. You're barred if you're if you're a
Colorado LEO, you are barred from arresting or detaining an
individual solely on the basis of Ice asking you to
do so. Now, Probation officers or department employees are prohibited

(09:51):
from providing an individual's personal information to federal immigration authorities.
So you have your parole officer and you've got somebody
in your system, in fact, you're going to see them,
and ICE you know, is looking for that individual, or
ICE you know just you know you're having coffee with
that because you know, Mason County, it's not a height,
it's not a very dense county. And so an immigration officer,

(10:14):
you know you, you're at the Dennis and you're having
coffee together.

Speaker 1 (10:17):
Oh who are you going to see? Well, no, I
can't tell you that. It's insane.

Speaker 8 (10:23):
Now, if you take a really broad interpretation and the
related laws you got Senate Bill twenty one one thirty
one in the House built twenty three eleven hundred, a
broader interpretation and those other laws extend those restrictions so
as to prevent state or local government employees from sharing

(10:44):
id about individuals with ICE or entering into an agreement
for immigration detention facilities. You can't even say, oh, yeah,
well we'll leaseh you at the jabel cell. We'll loan
you a jail cell for twenty four hours, or will
loan you a jail cell, or will offer you a
jail cell, but it's gonna cost you. I don't know

(11:04):
what the goin rate is for a jail cell overnight,
but let's just say it's two hundred and fifty bucks. Yeah,
I can't even do that. There are some allowances officers
can cooperate with ICE if it big if here you're
actually executing a warrant that's issued by a federal judge
or a federal magistrate, or you are honoring a writ

(11:25):
from a state or federal judge for a prisoner transfer.
Oh well, okay, well what's unusual about that? You would
do that anyway? Right? Or coordination for telephone or video interviews.
You can do this. You can coordinate telephone or video
interviews between ICE and individuals who are in custody, but

(11:48):
only if you advise the individual of their rights that
they can decline the interview. They can remain silent, they
can obviously consult an attorney. It's a kind of a
modified miranda warning. Look, ICE wants to talk to you
about We just want to tell you you don't have
to talk to them, which is true, but you're just

(12:09):
adding another layer because if they're already in custody, they've
already been read their miranda rights, or they should have been.
The other exception is if you're participating in a joint
operation that's enforcing local, state, or federal criminal laws. Not
immigration matters, but criminal laws. So you're you're on a

(12:30):
task force, you're investigating trend to Aragua. Well, you can
do that. But don't you dare ask when you when
you if you're a local law enforcement and you're on
a task force and you go out to Aurora or
Denver and you're arresting trend to Arragua, so you're the
ice guide. You just happen to put one of them
in the back of your car. Don't you dare you

(12:52):
know you're the local law enforcement and you happen to
put you know, one of these people in the back
of your car, don't you dare ask them anything about
their immigration status? Means insane, totally insane. And again when
emphasize the statutes do not specify criminal penalties, no fines,
no imprisonment for the violation of anything I just described.

(13:14):
All the enforcement relies on civil remedies, such as lawsuits
by the Attorney General, which you know Phil Wiser is
going to do to try to get an injunction against say,
Mason County to prevent further violations. Well, we're going to
go to court and make sure the judge and joins
you from never violating.

Speaker 1 (13:32):
This law again. Oh what about a bull crap?

Speaker 8 (13:36):
You can also engage in internal agency discipline. You know,
you can put them on unpaid leave. Where you can,
you can kill them a written reprimand shame on you
for cooperating with ICE. Do you ever think about the
yahoo's that right these laws? Do you ever think, I mean,
think about the idiots down at Pullfax Broadway that this

(13:58):
is this is the crap they come up with, and
this is the crap that Jared pulled the signs and
these laws had been upheld in court. There's a twenty
twenty four ruling that dismissed a challenge from Teler County
that affirmed that local law enforcement cannot comply with ICE
detainers without getting first or having in their hands a
federal warrant. So let's get to Mason County. It's laughably stupid.

(14:31):
This is well, let me just give you the details.
Here's the violation June seventh. But in June, a deputy
by the name of Zwink, Alexander Zwink, pulled over a
Brazilian nursing student. She's nineteen years old. Her name is
Caroline Dias Goncalvis Gonkovas.

Speaker 1 (14:52):
I don't know.

Speaker 8 (14:53):
She's a University of Utah student and she hasn't expired visa.
Let me emphasize again she has expired v She was
stopped for a traffic violation in Mason County. Now, no
state laws were broken beyond the traffic violation, but the
deputy asked about her birthplace.

Speaker 1 (15:13):
Where were you born?

Speaker 8 (15:15):
Now she didn't necessarily have to answer because he's not
a federal enforcement officer, but he was probably you know
where you from. I think it's a perfectly legitimate question.
That violated the calido statue. Yeah, but then he went further.

(15:41):
Zwink is a cops cop. I don't know this guy
from Adam, don't know anything about except what I've been reading.
But you know what he did. He asked about her birthplace,
and then he shared her location, her vehicle description, and
other identifying detail with some Immigration and Enforcement Immigrations and

(16:04):
Customs enforcement agents, some ICE agents via a signal group chat.
This was being used by a multi agency drug task force. Now,
I've tried to in my mind play out. Okay, you're
a local cop, you're a deputy sheriff. You're on a

(16:26):
multi state, multi jurisdiction drug task force. You've got somebody
in front of you that you stopped on a traffic stop.
You've gone as far as you think you can go
in terms of you know, detaining, asking questions. You don't
find any probable cause. You don't even have a reasonable

(16:47):
suspicion although you've got an expired visa. She must have
showed the visa or something. I don't remember, but you
you have just enough questions that you know you can't
go any further with the susset back to the person
that you've stopped for the traffic violation, but you share
that information with your friends on the task force.

Speaker 1 (17:08):
Just in case that might be somebody you're looking for.
Seems completely reasonable to me.

Speaker 8 (17:15):
But once he shared that information that enabled ICE to
locate and arrest her. She was detained for I think
over two weeks in an ICE facility before she was released.
There was another deputy, Eric Olsen, who also participated in
similar information sharing during a separate traffic stop. Those actions

(17:38):
violated Colorado law. Yeah, doing what law enforcements to do
violated law because it prohibits detaining individuals for immigration purposes
without a warrant. That's not really involved here, but it
also bans sharing personal information with ICE for civil enforcement

(17:58):
till the deputy's focus immigration status exceeded their state authority. Well,
whoop poop, do you do accept that here's what they
did to officers when.

Speaker 6 (18:20):
Michael, this guy in Arkansas, I believe it was that
committed the double murder of those two parents in front
of their young daughters. Do they have the death penalty
in Arkansas? This guy deserves it in front of the cameras.
It makes me sick. Those little girls had to live

(18:41):
through that and witness that horrifying it is.

Speaker 8 (18:46):
I don't know whether Arkansas has the death penalty or not.
I would I would like to think that Arkansas does,
but I don't know. We should call Sarah and asker
whether they have it. Yes, I agree with you about
if you don't. In the background of the story, so
this family three I think it's three girls, mom and

(19:07):
dad go to a state park to go hiking. I
forget whether they were camping or not, but they were
out on a family outing.

Speaker 1 (19:16):
And this.

Speaker 8 (19:19):
Dirt bag, the psycho that is a he had been
fired as a teacher. He'd been he'd jumped from school
to school, to school to school. He just was a
horrible teacher and obviously backcrap crazy too. But he attacks,
he jumps out attacks Dad, Mom talk about Mama Bear.

(19:47):
Mom sees that her husband is being attacked, grabs the girls,
gets them back to safety, goes back to help her husband,
and ends up getting knife to death. Also, can you

(20:07):
imagine the horror going through now? I yes, the children,
they're alive. However, they're alive and they'll be, you know,
burden with this for the rest of their lives. And
the parents have gone on to a better world. But

(20:28):
can you imagine during that time period the horror that's
going through both of their minds as they are being murdered.
And mom has protected her babies and come back to
protect her husband or to do whatever she can do
for her husband, then she becomes a victim also, and

(20:49):
then they're left to die by this guy. Yes, mm hm,
I you know I have friends are on all sides
of the death penalty. I happen to favor the death penalty.
I think the problem with the death penalty is it's
not swift enough. And I understand, I'm all for due process,

(21:13):
and I think that you know, if you're if you're
involved in a murder case. And I've been involved in
murder cases and they've been on they've been taken up
on appeal, I was involved. I wasn't involved in the appeals. Uh,
and it takes forever. So it seems to me that
you get due process by having a trial, the criminal trial,

(21:33):
and then yes, okay, we'll entitle you to one appeal
and it be on that. No, you get the juice
or the jolt or whatever however they do it, or
the bullet. I don't I don't care, but I just
do believe that there are some individuals who who have
lost their You know, God can do whatever he wants

(21:54):
to do, but as long as we on this planet
have any sort of rule and laws by which we're
going to allow ourselves to live in a society, you've
lost that right. He lost that right, and we'll take
away your life for it. You can tell me you
call me a human horrible human being, call somebody that

(22:16):
cares back to these cops. So, according to the ABC
News story, one of the deputies, Alexander's Wink was sued
by Colorado's Attorney General last week after his cooperation with
federal immigration agents on a drug task force was revealed.
Following the junior rest of the college student from Brazil

(22:37):
with an expired visa following an internal investigation. A second
Mason County Sheriff's Office deputy and task force member, this
is Eric Coulson, was also found to have shared information.
The two deputies used a signal chat to relay information
to federal agents. According to documents released Wednesday by the
Sheriff's office, Zwink was placed on three weeks of unpaid leave.

(23:02):
Olsen was given two weeks of unpaid leave. According to
Mason County Sheriff Todd roll Rwell, both were removed from
the task force. Two supervisors were also disciplined. One was
suspended without pay for two days, another received a letter

(23:22):
of reprimand a third supervisor received counseling. The sheriff noted
that the deputies believed they were following routine procedures but
were unaware of the prohibitions. Now in a civil lawsuit,
it's been pointed out that they had should have known

(23:48):
about the new proceedings because they're both shown to have
on their I guess their official computers. They were both
shown to have open and read two emails about the
new policies. Yeah, I don't want to minimize what's happening

(24:09):
to these deputies. Dragon Yees everyone's while you and I
get emails about company policy, right.

Speaker 2 (24:22):
Yes, you read them, Yeah, but you know they're going
to be on the test.

Speaker 7 (24:37):
Uh huh.

Speaker 1 (24:38):
And they're gonna be the same questions.

Speaker 3 (24:40):
Over and over and over and over and over again.

Speaker 1 (24:41):
Uh huh. And nine percent of the time. Do the policies
have anything to do with what we do? Nope, Nope,
not at all.

Speaker 8 (24:51):
Now, just because I'm a lawyer, I don't read them verbatim,
like word for word, but I looked at the subject
matter and make it. I make it a NEWI determination.
Does this relate to me the subject matter?

Speaker 1 (25:04):
Yes?

Speaker 8 (25:04):
Okay, Second step is skin the email. Third step hit
delete pretty much now if first step subject matter doesn't
relate to me, second step delete For.

Speaker 7 (25:22):
Me, it's just first step. Did this come from corporate?

Speaker 2 (25:27):
You know?

Speaker 1 (25:27):
They're on the floor here somewhere. I think, oh, that's
too early.

Speaker 7 (25:30):
I'm sorry.

Speaker 8 (25:31):
It's not ten o'clock yet, it's not din clock. It's
not ten o'clock yet. They were out partying last night.
And it wasn't at this birthday party at least when
I left.

Speaker 1 (25:42):
Truly weren't here.

Speaker 8 (25:45):
H So, our illustrious Attorney General Phil Wiser was filed
the civil lawsuit against Lincoln's state court, accusing him of
unlawfully cooperating with Ice. Now tell me what's the purpose
of the lawsuit.

Speaker 1 (25:59):
Really, what are you gonna do.

Speaker 8 (26:02):
You're gonna get a judge to slap him on the
hands and say, bad little boy, don't do that again,
because the sheriff's already put him on unpaid leave for
what a couple of weeks? You get suspended unpaid leave.
And now your damn attorney general in this state who
wants defierly to be governor so badly he doesn't need
to go to Rocky Mountain, menskman, because he has an

(26:24):
erection all of his own, because he wants to be governor.
Oh my god, I want to be governor. And now
he's gonna sue these deputies. Phil Wiser, bite my ass.
What are you accomplishing here?

Speaker 6 (26:38):
Oh?

Speaker 8 (26:38):
I know exactly what you're accomplishing. You're playing to your choir.
You're playing to your cong congregants in the church of
the dumbasses that run this state and all the dumbass
Democrats they are gonna vote for you. You're doing it
purely for publicity purposes, because you can't charge them at

(26:58):
the crime. You can't throw them in jail. All you
can do is is sue them in civil court for
a violation that is not criminal. So what's your goal? Accountability?
They've already been held accountability deterreds. You don't think these
guys are already pissed off because they've lost two weeks

(27:19):
of pay and they've been there and now they're in
the public eye. Now, let me just add a little
salt in the wound. Immigrant rights groups, including the ACLU
of Colorado and the Colorado Immigrants Rights Coalition demanded investigations
and accountability, and they argue that the incidents reflect unlawful collaboration.

(27:44):
I'm sorry, I just find that phrase freaking hilarious. When
I think of law enforcement, I think of a family.
I think of the blue line. You know, whether you're
an FB eye agent or you're a local Yokal deputy,

(28:04):
you're part of law enforcement, which is a family that
we put on a pedestal in this country because we
ask them to do things that we don't want to do,
and that's go arrest dirt bags, go serve a warrant,
you know, or break up a domestic violence fight somewhere
where you know, we may have one next hour in
a taxpayer relief shot.

Speaker 1 (28:24):
We may have a.

Speaker 8 (28:25):
Domestic I don't know, I'd have it looked, but we
often have domestic violence cases where oh, cops end up
having to shoot somebody because of a domestic violence case
where they're just trying to investigate, you know, whether the
one of the spouses is getting beat up beaten up
by the other. And now the chief law enforcement officer
of this state, the Attorney General, is going after his

(28:48):
Wink and Olsen after they've already been punished. Now to
give the sheriff of Macon County a tiny little bit
of credit, he says, the lawsuit by the Attorney.

Speaker 1 (29:07):
General is demoralizing for law enforcement.

Speaker 8 (29:10):
And noted similar information sharing by other agencies, for example
the Colorado State Patrol. Though they denied any involvement, at
least there's an allegation that the Colorado State Patrol may
have kind of done the same thing too. The bottom
line is this aligns with efforts in other Democrat led states.
So once again, we've just become another crap hole state

(29:31):
that wants to limit ICE cooperation amid all the federal pressures.
Under the Trump administration, because it always goes back to Trump.

Speaker 1 (29:37):
Right.

Speaker 8 (29:41):
Welcome to Commie Colorado. I wonder why, like Denver Police
Department has a hard time keeping officers, why would you
want to be a copp in Colorado?

Speaker 1 (29:56):
If you're currently LEO.

Speaker 8 (30:00):
I won't even give out your last four digit. I
won't even get your goober number. Why do you want
to be a cop in Colorado?

Speaker 3 (30:05):
Mike, Michael, and Dragon. I agree with you on this
death penalty thing.

Speaker 2 (30:13):
After you lose.

Speaker 3 (30:14):
Your appeal, you were drug out the back of the
courthouse and you were giving your jab, your juice, your voltage,
your bullet whatever immediately and the world gets to waunch.

Speaker 1 (30:31):
Man kind of a tough attitude. I'm glad I don't
have that kind of attitude.

Speaker 7 (30:36):
You forfeited your right to live at that point in time.
So see it just kind of like with the taxpayer
of leaf shots. You point a gun and a cop.

Speaker 1 (30:45):
Yeah, that's that's what boom boom. I want you to know.

Speaker 8 (30:49):
The future is here. It's already here. You ever think
about what you're eating.

Speaker 9 (30:57):
Hey, this is a firm boy. I'm in a flower sect.
You know, the grocery store. I wrote up something, a
whole bunch of somethings. When it comes to flour, things
are changing in the world. Have you ever heard of
cricket flower? There are at least six or seven countries
in this companies in this world that's now using crickets
insects to make flour. According to Dovers, PepsiCo is looking

(31:20):
to use cricket proteins in products such as Cheetos and
Quaker Granola oats.

Speaker 8 (31:26):
And I can kind of see just, you know, biding
into a whichever company that PepsiCo body into those granola bars,
and I would expect to buy it off the head
of a cricket, because that's kind of what I think
about granola bars.

Speaker 1 (31:38):
That Gourmet says.

Speaker 9 (31:40):
Insect related businesses in the Western world are producing insect
proteins for foods, beverages, confectioneries, and other things such as butters, oils,
and pistos, as well as spice and seasoning. So it's
most likely going to show up not be labeled, and
you're not going.

Speaker 1 (31:59):
To know, honey, could you pass me the curry crickets?

Speaker 9 (32:04):
Yeah, and pretty much everything you eat. It is expected
to preach four point six billion in sales by twenty
twenty seven and produce one point four million tons.

Speaker 1 (32:18):
Of insect protein.

Speaker 9 (32:23):
ADM Archer Middland Daniels is in the process of producing
insect foods and Decatur, Illinois right now in partnership with
in Nova Foods.

Speaker 1 (32:36):
That's on the ADM website.

Speaker 9 (32:38):
XO, which is a company that makes cricket flour, says
that crickets are sixty percent protein. However, Iowa State University
Etymology Department says that crickets are only about twelve point
nine percent, and this would explain why the the NIH
when they do their comparisons of protein levels and cricket

(32:59):
flower they compare them to plants, not animals.

Speaker 1 (33:03):
Cleveland Clinic said.

Speaker 9 (33:05):
That about thirty percent of the cricket farms looked at
have parasites that carry disease to humans and that edible
insects are as underestimated reserve of human and animal parasites YEP.
Cleveland Clinic said that that they are an underestimated reservoir

(33:25):
of parasites to humans and animals. According to the NIH,
it is stated that they claim that the exoskelepons or
the kitten is a digestible fiber, but they don't know
how it digests. I found that more than just.

Speaker 2 (33:40):
A little curious.

Speaker 9 (33:43):
And then then turn around and say that if you
consume kitten but a little trigger immune responses in the body.

Speaker 8 (33:50):
Oh yep, check your labels. Cricket flower, Yeah, I love
this soul farm boys, little boy,