9-26-25 - 6am - Hatred Against ICE

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Like Congress has done it again. They're spending money that
they don't have on something that they don't need to
spend it on. If they need security teams, they could
fund it by finding each Congressman each time they use
the words Estapo, Nazi, Hitler, terrorists when talking about Ice.

(00:24):
That would fund their security teams.

Speaker 2 (00:27):
Bells, Bells, we could eliminate the national debt if we
did that. Just charge them every single time. I had
a strange thought about speaking of ice. I was reading
a story yesterday about the Ice shootings in Dallas, and.

Speaker 3 (00:43):
It just, I don't know.

Speaker 2 (00:44):
As I was reading through the story, it just dawdled
me that all of these leftist nut jobs are using
guns to kill people. I thought they were anti gun,
and it comes to assassinations or terrorism, gun seems to

(01:05):
be the instrument of choice. Then I wake up this
morning and I'm just peruising through several websites just to
kind of see, you know, as I kind of do
drive in to just kind of get a feel for.

Speaker 3 (01:19):
What the craziness is today.

Speaker 2 (01:22):
Can remember when Rush had his Operation Chaos back. I
forget which elect It must have been two thousand and seven,
because it was Hillary and Obama were in a neck
and neck race in Pennsylvania, and Rush was trying to
keep Hillary's campaign alive long enough to perhaps derail Barack Obama.

(01:48):
I know it seems weird to think about it today
because we know just exactly how bad Barack Obama was
and we know how crazy Hillary Clinton is. So it
was a Hobson's choice. Do we want, you know, evil
or crazy? Well, you know, pretty much two sides of
the same coin. Apparently some of these gen Zers are

(02:11):
just waking up to what Operation Chaos is. This courtesy
of TikTok.

Speaker 4 (02:17):
Just register a Republican. Just register a Republican. You're a
blue dot in a red area. Just register a Republican.

Speaker 5 (02:23):
Then you get to say and who gets to be
their primary candidate?

Speaker 4 (02:26):
Register a Republican. Just register Republican. It doesn't matter. You
can go online.

Speaker 5 (02:30):
That one card doesn't make a difference, It doesn't actually
mean anything.

Speaker 4 (02:33):
You can just register Republican. Let's all just register a Republican.
We can all register Republican.

Speaker 6 (02:39):
What will happen of the.

Speaker 4 (02:40):
Republican Party and the Maga Party all starts getting crazy
leftist LGBTQ folk and just we can all just register Republican.
There's nothing stopping them.

Speaker 5 (02:49):
If they're going to round up all the leftists and
the Democrats, we can all just register a Republican.

Speaker 4 (02:54):
It's all fake anyway, it's all made up. Register a Republican.

Speaker 5 (02:57):
You can vote for whoever you want in the general elections,
but in the primaries you would have a voice and
a less crazy candidate maybe and making it to the
last stage of the game here, just trudges to Republican.

Speaker 4 (03:10):
Just do it, Just just rudge.

Speaker 1 (03:12):
You anything else.

Speaker 2 (03:14):
Now, what you can't see, obviously is her eyes. The
eyes always give it away. You will know them by
their eyes. You look at their eyes and you realize
they're just absolutely crazy the Democrat Party. Oh the other
thing about that, that crazy eyed woman in that TikTok

(03:36):
video is if you just register Republican, you might get
a less crazy candidate to vote for in the general. Well,
you're not going to vote for I mean, does she
really think that? And she points out that less crazy
means LGBTQ, and and you know, maybe a Marxist, Leninist, socialist,

(04:01):
communists whatever this somehow that's less crazy.

Speaker 3 (04:03):
Than a conservative.

Speaker 2 (04:04):
I don't get it, but I just found it interesting
that Operation Chaos is non on them, like, oh, we
could register Republican then and then vote in the primary.

Speaker 3 (04:15):
Yeah.

Speaker 2 (04:16):
Well, I hate to tell her, but in the Republican primaries,
that's where the crazies usually show up. I mean, that's
where the nut jobs usually show up as in the primary.
The Democrat Party is absolutely complicit in these acts of terrorists,
that terrorism that's been committed. Gavin Newsom, their presumptive presidential candidate,

(04:40):
is arguably the most prominent Democrat.

Speaker 3 (04:44):
Just the day.

Speaker 2 (04:45):
Before one of his federal crazies or one of his
fellow crazies, shot up an ice facility in Dallas, killing two,
he said, this.

Speaker 3 (04:55):
Look they had.

Speaker 7 (04:57):
We had a fifteen year old disabled kid Los Angeles
was waiting for his sister.

Speaker 3 (05:03):
So I just worry.

Speaker 2 (05:04):
Remind you before you hear the rest of this, before
you hear the rest of the story. This story has
been completely debunked. This story is absolutely false.

Speaker 7 (05:14):
We had a fifteen year old disabled kid in Los
Angeles was waiting for his sister to come out of high.

Speaker 3 (05:19):
School, and they pulled out guns on this kid.

Speaker 7 (05:23):
They pulled out guns and handcuffed this young child. That's
happening in the United States of America. Masked men jumping
out of unmarked cars, people disappearing, no due process, no oversight,
zero accountability happening in the United States of America. Today
people ask, well, is authoritarianism? You're being hyperbolic, were being
hyperbolic if you're a black and brown community.

Speaker 3 (05:45):
It's here in this country.

Speaker 7 (05:47):
And so I'm deeply proud that I had the privilege
of assigning the nation's first bill to address the issue
of masking, also to require you have simple identification to point.
I mean, if some guy jumped out of an umarke
car in a van with a mascot tried to grab me,
I mean, by definition, you're gonna push back. And so

(06:09):
this these these are not just authoritarian tendencies. These are
authoritarian actions by an authoritarian government.

Speaker 3 (06:16):
You saw what Stephen Miller said last week.

Speaker 7 (06:18):
Bishop put Chills, a find called the Democratic Party an
extremist organization, basically a terrorist organization, said he's going after
his enemies. You saw the tweet that Donald Trump sent
out True social basically telling Pam BONDI I want these
three people taken out. That's happening in the United States.
This can't be normalized. None of this could be.

Speaker 2 (06:39):
Normalized the governor factor, said Marty dan.

Speaker 4 (06:42):
Here I.

Speaker 2 (06:45):
Found the only reason I found that clip interesting is yesterday,
I don't know, for ten minutes, while I was waiting
on something, I started going through reels on Facebook and
it started.

Speaker 3 (06:58):
I don't know why.

Speaker 2 (06:59):
Maybe it's because I said the word Johnny Carson somewhere
in a monologue here that it started feeding me. About
every second or third reel on Facebook was a clip
from the Johnny Carson Show, and I realized that, Wow,
what he had to say, even to this day was funny.

(07:21):
Thirty forty years later, however long, it's been still funny,
even though we've moved on technologically and socially and politically
and everything else. What he was saying then was funny
and today is still funny.

Speaker 3 (07:35):
This is on Colbert not funny at all.

Speaker 2 (07:39):
And as Newsom well knows, there is nothing authoritarian about
the way ICE enforces immigration law. Why do ICE agents
wear masks? And why do ICE agents keep now keep
their shields, their badges in their pockets or you know,
on their belt with the shirt covering it up.

Speaker 3 (07:58):
Why do they do that?

Speaker 2 (08:00):
Because we now know that if they're identified, they follow
them home, they docks them.

Speaker 3 (08:08):
And they shoot at them.

Speaker 2 (08:11):
There is an app ondred at least one hundred thousand downloads.
Maybe it's more. Now you want to know where ICE
agents are actively working so that you can go shoot
at them or throw rocks or try to obstruct justice,
Well there's an app for that, and you can do that.

(08:31):
That kind of rhetoric is absolutely amazing, and it's just
it's so divorced from reality. I'm beginning to believe that
we actually live in a world that is just not reality.
The calls for violence mortar on explicit. This is Abigail Spamberger.

(08:55):
She's the Democrat candidate for government governor of Virginia running
a against Winsoon. The is the the black lieutenant governor.
Let rage fuel.

Speaker 8 (09:08):
You, Let your rage feel you. Every time we hear
a new story, we let it fuel us. Every time
we turn on the news, we let it fuel us.
Every time something bad is happening, we say, oh, that's motivation.

Speaker 9 (09:28):
I'll tell you this.

Speaker 8 (09:29):
I have an appointment who is incredibly motivating.

Speaker 2 (09:33):
Oh motivating mine because she's she's a black conservative, I guess,
to a liberal, to a Marxist, a black conservative is like.

Speaker 3 (09:40):
Oh my god, Satan, It's satan.

Speaker 2 (09:44):
Senator Chris Murphy, Democratic Connecticut confirms that the Democrats will
stick with this strategy if whipping it's based into a
frenzy with hysterical lies. Even after the latest anti ICE
terrorist attack via MSNBC, I.

Speaker 3 (10:01):
Couldn't take it anymore. Twenty years of the foot pain.

Speaker 2 (10:04):
I should just break down and buy the YouTube thing
these three foods like the play what does it.

Speaker 3 (10:11):
Cost to do the YouTube? Add free right and here
we go?

Speaker 10 (10:16):
Is it for leaders, especially at the very very top
of the governments?

Speaker 3 (10:19):
Set the tone? Listen.

Speaker 10 (10:20):
It should not matter whether the radicalization comes from the
right or the left or you know, sort of the
non ideological, deep drug recissness of the internet. This president,
this vice president has had a chance now since the
assassination of Charlie Kirk, to bring the country together to
try to stamp out all sorts of violence, including political violence,
and they refuse to do that.

Speaker 4 (10:40):
What they are trying to do is.

Speaker 10 (10:41):
Exploit these murders and these shootings in order to silence
only to send and political opposition on the left. No
criticizing the way that ICE is rounding up people in
this country in a deeply inhuman and immoral way, is
not an incitement to violence.

Speaker 2 (11:01):
You know, the way ice is rounding up people by
finding them like where they're maybe illegally working, or maybe
where they live, or maybe when they're walking from one
place to another.

Speaker 3 (11:16):
In all seriousness, how is that.

Speaker 2 (11:18):
Any different than a local yocal cop, local law enforcement
who has a warrant out for a bald headed red
beard formerly overweight, now at a very healthy weight guy
that works at a radio station and is usually there

(11:39):
between you know, five am and you know one pm
or something, and you know he's going to be there,
so you go, mister redbeard, and you drag him out
of the building, or you know the home address of
that same guy, or you know that hey we you know,

(12:04):
a camera saw somebody or somebody recognize him and he
was walking down a street somewhere, and so you pull
up in a couple of squad cars and you come
to a screeching halt and you jump out and you're grabbing.
Then you throw him in a squad car. That's making
an arrest.

Speaker 10 (12:21):
Why is it different, Centator, There is a moment where
you cross the line. But what they are trying to
do is to destroy the ability for people who oppose
their policies to legitimately engage in political debate, and we
are not going to let them do that.

Speaker 2 (12:37):
You can engage in legitimate political debate all you want to,
We just don't want to do it at the end
of a rifle. Yeah. You people are crazy, absolutely crazy Democrats.
They've gotten a taste of blood and they want more.
Those targeted for violence are designated by the media as divisive.

Speaker 11 (13:01):
It stood out to me, obviously, because we have seen
just the rhetoric escalate. We've also seen the very dramatic
videos of ice nabbing individuals and tossing them into unmarked vehicles.
A lot of these iations have been masked, and so
it has been very divisive and there's been a lot
of fear.

Speaker 4 (13:21):
In the different communities.

Speaker 12 (13:22):
And the FBI stands in full support of the ongoing
response and the investigation. Charlie Kirk is a divisive figure, polarizing, lightning, raw,
whatever term you want to use.

Speaker 2 (13:33):
Why they they cannot help themselves. They simply cannot help themselves.
What's happening right now in terms of these people that
are being rounded up, arrested, detained, whatever word you want

(13:54):
to use. Isn't that what we voted for. Isn't that
what we've said that we really need in this country
because they're infiltrating, they're overtaking business, they're taking jobs away
from Americans. They're here illegally. They have committed at least

(14:16):
a misdemeanor by coming at least one time across the
border illegally. And if they went back home, maybe to
you know, carry some money over to family, or they
went home to visit some family and then they came
back illegally across again, that's a felony. And for decades,

(14:37):
for as long as I can remember, anyway, we have
been yelling and screaming and hollering, do something. Why don't
you do something? Nobody does anything about taking these people
out of the country. And now we have an administration that,
I have you thought about it in these terms, made

(14:58):
a campaign promise and is now fulfilling that campaign promise.
The campaign promise was we'll deport these people who came
here illegally, who remain in the country illegally. Now they
may have wandered off the reservation a little bit. In
terms that we're going to get the worst of the worst,
and now they're just finding anybody that they can who's

(15:20):
in the country illegally and deporting them.

Speaker 3 (15:23):
And I'm okay with that.

Speaker 2 (15:25):
If they're going to deport them by taking them and
detaining them because they have committed a misdemeanor, at the
very least, they've committed a misdemeanor. So if you're going
to take them, if you're going to round some people
up in let's say Dallas County, and then you're going
to take them to a detention center so that you

(15:45):
can get them in front of an immigration judge to
get a removal order so you can actually send them
back to Guatemala or Mexico or someplace else, then that's
what I voted for.

Speaker 3 (15:56):
That's what I want. Now.

Speaker 2 (15:58):
The fact that we now have people that are trying
to shoot the people, to kill the people who are
simply enforcing the law. You tell me who the crazies are,
I'm the crazy one. No, I'm not the crazy one.
I proudly and forcefully say, Yeah, this is exactly what
I voted for. This is exactly what I wanted. I

(16:20):
wanted the people in this country that are here illegally
to be removed, and I want the border closed down.
So we've closed down the border, and now we're starting
to take people out of the country. And the left
is going crazy and in partnership with the cabal, the mainstream,
meaning the dominant media, what are they doing. They're trying
to convince you that somehow this is authoritarian, that this

(16:42):
is this is a dictatorship, So this is tyranny. I
truly believe that if George Orwell were alive today, George
Orwell would realize he did not go far enough in
terms of new speak and how they bastardize the language
so that you think that what they're doing is somehow
more and illegal. I can you imagine being an Ice

(17:08):
agent and you're out on an operation. You now have
to I mean, your head's always in a swivel anyway,
because any law any law enforcement officer, their heads should
always be on a swivel. They should always be watching.
Because apparently we've reached the stage in this country. And

(17:30):
I think it's temporary, but I think this is part
of a natural progression of Hey, listen, we have for
decades not enforced the law. We are going to start
forcefully enforcing the law. There's a natural reaction from the
left that says, oh my god, this is horrible, horrible, horrible,
and even some conservatives go, oh, my heart breaks. Yeah, well,
you know what, did your heart break for the person that, oh,

(17:53):
I don't know, try to shoot the kids in Evergreen?
Does your heart break for the guy that shot Charlie Kirk?
Does your heartbreak for the people at murder people every
single day?

Speaker 13 (18:02):
Good morning, Michael and Dragon, Happy Friday. I wonder if
the people who complain about the way that criminal illegal
aliens are being detained, being aggressive and everything, they understand
that when they heighten the interaction at all of the
protests and everything, the ice has to respond accordingly and

(18:23):
maybe even a little further. Do they realize they're part
of the problem. Uh? Anyway, probably not have great weekend.

Speaker 3 (18:30):
Guess thanks, No, they do not.

Speaker 2 (18:33):
And you know, that's a great talk back because it
brought to mind a video, a news clip, so it's
not just like some stranger but I and again, I
think it was in California. I think it was Los
Angeles as a matter of fact, where they were arresting
the husband of this couple.

Speaker 3 (18:55):
And I don't remember.

Speaker 2 (18:57):
I just don't recall whether it was at home or business,
but they were coming out onto the street. And what
does the wife do. The wife jumps on the back
of Immigrations and Customs enforcement official. So the guy who
is trying to handcuff and arrest this illegal alien gets

(19:18):
attacked by the spouse. She's jumping on her on his back,
you know, trying to get her arms around his neck
and pounding his head. And then you see a couple
of I assume they're either Homeland Security investigative officers, but
they might even be well they if it's Los Angeles,
they couldn't be. The LAPD could have been the Los

(19:40):
Angeles County Sheriff's office, but with police signed police on
their backs, so obviously cops that are now having to
jump in. And it becomes a melee, I mean, a complete, little,
just mittle mini riot, all because the spout. Now, don't
get me wrong, the spouse, I understand she's upset that

(20:03):
her husband who's here illegally. Whether she's an American saysens
or not, I don't know, and I don't care. I
understand her frustration, and I understand her fear and everything
going on, but that does not justify her jumping on
the back of the arresting officer and then trying to
pummel him and trying to, you know, wrestle him down
to the ground.

Speaker 3 (20:24):
I mean, it's insanity.

Speaker 2 (20:25):
So to your point, no, they do not realize what
There is a complete cognitive dissonance between their actions and
the fact that ICE is having to cover up their
shields and wear masks, and even if they do that,
it does not prevent them from being physically attacked or
shot at. I kept wondering, for example, why why does

(20:49):
the guy who's anti ICE in Dallas, why does he
end up killing detainees and doesn't strike any ICE agents.
News reports indicate that the kid had no experience with
a gun whatsoever, and he was just wildly randomly shooting
at whoever it was down there. I mean, it's good grief,

(21:14):
just a theory, but that could be why he shot
himself in the end, going oh crap, I shot the
good guys. Yeahs. Or he could have shot himself accidentally
too driving that's how stupid the guy is.

Speaker 3 (21:27):
So it's.

Speaker 2 (21:30):
We've we're getting what we wanted and more we're getting
what we wanted, and the reaction that is occurring on
the streets. Do not let that dissuade you from believing
that what's happening is the right thing. It's what we
voted for and it's what we wanted. This morning, well

(21:56):
technically their morning, The London Telegraph had an article. The
headline is Starmer the Prime Minister Starmer just proved he
cannot be trusted on migration. That's what they call illegal immigration.
So as you hear the word migration in here, I'm
just telling you what the story says the Prime Minister.

(22:19):
The subhead says, once pledged to defend free movement, he
is not the right man to tackle voters' concerns over
this crisis.

Speaker 3 (22:29):
You see in the UK they're beginning to.

Speaker 2 (22:33):
Wake up and realize, uh oh, this was probably a
bad idea. Let me just skip through some of the
beginning of this. In the third paragraph, they write, back
in May, Sir Kiir gave what was trailed just like
today as a major speech on immigration. Back then in May,

(22:54):
his message was that quote, we risk becoming an island
of strangers, not a nation that walks forward together close
quote or rather, they write those were the words they
came out of his mouth. But the following month he
said how much he deeply regrets uttering them, and that
he should have read the speech more carefully and held

(23:16):
it up to the light a bit more so, who
knows what he thinks of today's latest version of how
the hell do we stop reform? Because that's what if
they don't want? The Prime minister in the United Kingdom
is kind of like Barack Obama. He says one thing
and uses just the right words, but unless you understand newspeak,

(23:39):
you don't really understand what he's really talking about. The
paper says, but let's assume that he didn't know what
he was saying this morning, including the admission that, as
he also put it in his article for this newspaper, quote,
this is the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom. For years,
left wing, including my own, did shy away from people's

(24:03):
concerns about illegal immigration. The Telegraph rights you have to
love that shy away line, which he used both in
his speech and in his article, as if the Labor
Party and the left had simply chosen to ignore the
idea that there was even an issue. What actually happened,
they say, of course, is that the Labor government under

(24:26):
Tony Blair engaged in a deliberate act of social engineering
to create a truly multicultural country, designed to rub the
right's nose in diversity and portray them as racist. Not
my words but those of Andrew Nether, former speech writer
to Barbara Rosche, the then immigration minister, who said this

(24:48):
was the intention of Labour's immigration policy, and it did
this by deliberately concealing what it was up to, pretending
there would be no impact, because it was well aware
how unpopular it would be. Labor regarded ordinary voters as
ignorant racists who needed to have the truth hidden for
their own good. Remember Gordon Brown's reaction during the twenty

(25:09):
ten election after speaking to Jillian Duffy, a voter expressing
something less than wild enthusiasm about immigration.

Speaker 3 (25:16):
She was he ranted in private, a bigoted woman.

Speaker 2 (25:23):
The UK is waking up to realize that Keir Starmer's
been lying to them and vacillating back and for saying
one thing but doing another when it comes to illegal immigration.
They right notice too that Sir Kerr only spoke of
illegal immigration as if that is the only issue. As
the story of how Labor acted over free Movement shows,

(25:43):
the problem has never simply been about illegal immigration, which
has always comprised a tiny percentage of immigration. Pretty much
everyone can agree that illegal immigration is wrong, and the
Prime Minister can say that without any serious comeback from
his allies. But what comrades absolutely do not agree with
is the proposition that the scale of legal of legal

(26:07):
immigration in recent decades is the bigger issue. That communities
feel utterly changed, and that previous Labor voters feel betrayed
by their former party party and equally by the Conservatives.
But there was not a word from the Prime Minister
today about legal immigration to the scale of immigration. They right,

(26:32):
the key issue even to illegal immigration, to Labour's unpopularity,
to reform success, which was at least initially built on
both main parties complicity and large scale immigration. You see,
it could be worse in the United Kingdom. It's not
just the illegal immigration, it's also the legal immigration that

(26:54):
basically saying hey, come to our country, we'll give you
citizenship and you can come to work here. And now
you've got a radical Muslim mayor's the mayor of London. Yeah,
and you've got the little towns and villages all across
the United Kingdom. Once just really wonderful places to visit,

(27:16):
now just infested with radical Islamis Mike.

Speaker 14 (27:20):
The shooting in Dallas took place a half hour before sunrise,
So the shooter was shooting and the detainees were inside
a darkened van. The shooter had no idea who was
sitting inside that darkened van in the dark when he
fired those rounds.

Speaker 2 (27:38):
Sort of, I can kind of agree with that, except
what do you think the van was just full of
just all ICE agents? I mean, if he had, he
had downloaded the app to know where ICE operations were
and also showed the he downloaded from the government website

(27:59):
the little cation of the ICE facilities. So if you
give the kid even an IQ of room temperature, he
could surely figure out that. Oh, they pull up in
vans and then they let the detainees out. My theory
is he didn't care. Yes, he was there to kill

(28:19):
ICE agents, but he didn't really care. All he wanted
to do was kill. That's the mentality. So whether you
know collateral damage, Hey, I got a few detainees. El
sucks to me me, you know. And I couldn't tell
the detainees because the agents were wearing masks, and I

(28:42):
couldn't see their badges, which tells me then that I mean,
he wasn't He was just randomly shooting, didn't know how
to use a scope or anything else. But at least
he wasn't affiliated with any particular political greed.

Speaker 15 (29:01):
I just want to play one thing for you, Juliet,
just because some of the things you're saying about motivation
and the questions people have. Jd Vance, the vice president
is out there talking about what he thinks the potential
motivations are. And I want to dissect this with you
because obviously it's the vice president.

Speaker 6 (29:19):
In Dallas, Texas, and ICE facility and Immigrations and Customs
enforcement facility was opened fire upon by a violent left
wing extremist, a person who wrote anti ICE messaging on
their bullets. And there's some evidence that we have that's
not yet public, but we know this person was politically motivated.
They were politically motivated to go after law enforcement.

Speaker 15 (29:44):
I'm playing that for you because he says it's information
that's not yet public and what are you going to
be listening for in the coming days.

Speaker 4 (29:53):
That's exactly right.

Speaker 9 (29:54):
So it's a very nuanced distinction. Someone can perform something
that is politically motivated in this case, unjustifiably, you know,
targeting an ICE facility, but not be aligned with the
political movement if the White House and JD vance, they
seem to suggest that there's evidence that he's part of

(30:15):
a network of left groups that are promoting violence, as
compared to progressive right, conservatives and left wing groups opposing
some of ISI's actions pamit.

Speaker 2 (30:29):
So the implication is that he's somehow associated with If you,
for example, I might actually believe in the tenets of Oh,
I don't know the basically let's say, biblical beliefs of.

Speaker 3 (30:46):
The Catholic Church, but I'm not. I'm a Protestant.

Speaker 2 (30:50):
I actually believe in the dogma of the Christian Church,
the Protestantism, but I'm part of Christianity. Do not have to
be a Catholic, you got to be a Methodist, the
Presbyterian to be. All they want to do is they
want to claim that, oh, he's not a member of

(31:12):
any particular group. No, but he's a follower of all
of the left which keeps advocating the violence against ICE agents.
They'll do anything to try to justify or rationalize this violence,
this insanity