Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Mike regarding Philadelphia and Newark Airport, approach control is always regionalized.
Approach control for all Central Colorado airports is based out
of Fort Collins, Colorado, and they handle approach control for
DIA Rocky Mountain Airport's Centennial Pueblo, et cetera. Approach control
turns it over to the local tower five miles from
(00:20):
their runway.
Speaker 2 (00:22):
Let's get back to the history lesson real quickly. The
reason this history lesson is so dang important is if
you stop and really focus on what you're being fed
through your eyeballs and your ears, ru on the precipice
of tyranny. We'ru on the precipice of absolute fascists. That's
(00:47):
why the anti fascists are out stony and rioting and
burning and doing everything they do to stop immigrations and
customs enforcement from enforcing federal law duly enacted federal law.
And I'm not talking about recent federal law. I'm talking
about the nineteen thirty four Immigration and Naturalization Act as
(01:11):
amended throughout time, but originally enacted back in nineteen thirty
four or so. And we went through an election in
which we had seen what the previous administration had done
by opening the floodgates allowing all of these criminals, not all,
(01:31):
but criminals, families, unaccompanied minors, people from our enemies like
from the Chinese Communist Party, giving temporary protective status to Venezuelans.
And the number is, well, this first event, nobody knows
what the number is. Ten million, twenty million, I don't know,
(01:54):
pick any number. I think at this point you could
just pick any number that you want to choose, and
this is valid as the number that you want to
choose because nobody knows. Nobody knows. And part of that campaign,
part of the twenty twenty four campaign, was what are
you going to do about all of the illegal aliens,
(02:19):
the people who are present, unlawfully present in the United States?
Speaker 3 (02:22):
What are you going to do with them? Well, I'm
going to deport them.
Speaker 2 (02:26):
Now we can argue details about Okay, I'm going to
deport the most violent first. And I do think that
has morphed somewhat into well, yeah, while we're out looking
for the violent, if we find somebody else that's in
the country unlawfully, we're just going to deport them too. Now,
did anybody did you think, did you honestly think at
(02:48):
some point that the deportation of somebody who was in
the country unlawfully just sat aside for a moment, the
criminals and the gang bangers. Do you think that the
thirty five year old male from Guatemala who has a
wife and a couple of kids at home, who's having
(03:11):
a difficult time caring and feeding for them, and so
he makes the track through you know, everything to make
it into this country, finally gets here illegally, lands a
job somehow, or you know, gets fraudulent papers and uses
the fraudulent papers to fill out all of his I
(03:32):
nine immigration information and somehow.
Speaker 3 (03:35):
Oh, I don't know.
Speaker 2 (03:35):
Maybe he gets a CDL a commercial driver's license somewhere
and he starts driving a commercial truck. Can't read English,
can't speak English, maybe read love English, maybe understands basically
like that read octagonal red sign that has a single
world up. Maybe I think I'm supposed to stop that.
(03:58):
Or it comes up to a traffic light, I think
the top light, which I think has read because I'm colorblind,
I think I'm supposed to stop there. Or the guy
that just comes here and starts his own landscaping business
and he comes up to you know, he goes door
to door looking, you know, offering. You know, speaks broken English,
(04:20):
but you know, hey, I'll mow your yard and trim
the bushes and do everything, and I'll do it for
you know, forty dollars a week or thirty five dollars
a week or whatever, or I'll do special projects or whatever.
And he takes the money that he gets paid and
he sends he remits some of that back to his wife.
(04:42):
You can't help but feel sorry for him. I feel
sorry for him, but that doesn't mean I want him
to stay in this country. He broke our laws, and
we cannot be a nation if we don't know one
who is here. And if those who are here are
here lawfully and are here doing what they're supposed to
(05:04):
do lawfully, or they are? Are they criminals? Are they
a danger or threat to my family to my place
of business? Are they here just living off the government tap?
So I'm working my ass off, you're working your ass off.
We're paying all these taxes, and are they just leeching
off us to get a phone, to get you know,
(05:26):
a shelter somewhere, and to get some clothing and maybe
even you know, they somehow get transportation. They get a
free rt D pass or something. I don't know what
they get, but they get everything. We wanted them gone.
We want them gone because when we can't afford it,
I mean, just being practical, we cannot afford it. Some
(05:49):
estimates are that it's upwards of four hundred billion dollars
just for these tax credits that were providing that we're
being provided to get the health care for you legal aliens.
Speaker 3 (06:01):
I don't care what the number is. I honestly don't.
Speaker 2 (06:04):
I don't care whether it's four million dollars or four
hundred billion dollars, whatever it is. We can't spend it,
and I think morally we have no obligation to spend it.
So I went them out of here. I want them gone.
Did you think that whether it was the guy I
described as running the landscape business, or it's a member
of Trenda Ragua, or it's a member of MS thirteen,
(06:29):
did you think that any of those were going to
be easy deportations. You could argue that, yeah, some of
them might be Michael, because some of them might be
scared of you know, they're scared of incarceration, They're scared
of you know, just you know, the guys that are
wearing you know, the all of the body armor, and
they've got guns, and they look mean and they are mean.
They're big, tough guys and women, and you don't want
(06:51):
to mess with them.
Speaker 3 (06:52):
So you know what I've heard.
Speaker 2 (06:54):
I've heard somewhere that I could go on that app
using the phone that somebody gave me and I could
get a free ticket to go back home one thousand
dollars or whatever it is and go back home. Maybe
I'll do that to avoid it. There will be some
of those, and then there will be those, particularly those
who are gang bangers, members of TDA or MS thirteen
(07:18):
or any other gangs, and they're going to fight. So
did you really believe that this was going to be easy?
Did you really think that people would just oh cought me?
You know, Yeah, I'm working at you know, the diner here,
and you happen to be you know, you came in
for a cup of coffee on a break and you realize, oh,
(07:40):
there's an illegal alien, let's detain him.
Speaker 3 (07:45):
Hmm.
Speaker 2 (07:47):
By the way, they get their due process too, don't
worry about that. They get their due process. So if
you thought it was going to be easy. You were
being naive. But let's say that even if it was
going to be easy, did you really believe for a
minute that the radical left in this country who wanted
(08:12):
those people here because they honestly want to destroy this country. Remember,
we're under we are still undergoing. We're fighting back and
we're pushing back, but we're undergoing this fundamental transformation of
the United States from a constitutional republic to whatever the
(08:33):
hell it is that the Marxist left wants, which I
think is what they really want, is a socialist utopia
which will turn into a dictatorship. Let's think about the chaos.
So if the chaos gets bad enough, which again gets
back to rules for radical and cloward pivot strategy, if
if the chaos gets bad enough, there will be people,
(08:56):
some in these quarters, some in this audience, who would
actually scream and holler and beg for a strong armed
dictator to return law and order to the country.
Speaker 4 (09:12):
Hmm.
Speaker 2 (09:14):
Because historically we know that when things get so bad
that there's a breakdown in civil society. I don't think
we're there yet, but I think we're on the path
to that that when it gets to the penultimate stage,
that there is chaos in the streets, whether that be
(09:36):
a civil war or just rampant, unabated crime occurring everywhere
such that you are scared to go from your home
to to the grocery store. You'll plead for somebody to
take control this human nature because you want the care
(10:00):
to stop. I hope you're not there yet, but if
you are, be careful what you wish for, because you
may end up with that tyrannical dictator, because they.
Speaker 3 (10:12):
Historically, we know that's what always happens.
Speaker 2 (10:16):
The dictator comes in and promises law and order, discipline, prosperity.
They'll promise you everything, and the next thing you know,
you're living in tyranny. That's kind of what we're going
through right now. And it started, it really started with
(10:37):
Woodrow Wilson in the progressive left movement, but it reached
hyper speed with Barack Obama and his promise to fundamentally
transform this country.
Speaker 3 (10:50):
That's a fact.
Speaker 2 (10:51):
That's just the way it is. And you've got to
understand that it's hard to believe that we would have
a president that would be elected that would actually want
to fundamentally transform this country into something other than a
constitutional republic.
Speaker 3 (11:06):
But he does, he did, he still does.
Speaker 2 (11:09):
And Biden comes along, and Biden was just a tool
for Obama. And now everybody is all in a dither
because we said, fortunately, we said enough is enough. They
always overreach. They overreached with Obama, they overreached with Biden.
(11:34):
Biden was because of his absence, I think, because of
his mental incapacity, and I think because he wasn't really
running the country. Democrats in the House, in the Senate
just went hogwild on spending because there were no there
(11:54):
was no funnel to kind of narrow that spending. Republicans impotent.
And of course the more you spend, the more chaos
you create, because that leads to economic chaos. You couple
that with opening the borders and letting all these people in.
Doesn't make any difference. We don't care whether it's the
(12:16):
person that just wants to mow somebody's yard or it's
TDA or MS thirteen.
Speaker 3 (12:22):
They did not care.
Speaker 2 (12:23):
All they wanted was as many people as possible to
flood the country so that you can dissolve the country.
And now we saw that, we reacted to it, and
we despite what Kamala Harris tells you, the closest election
in the twenty first century.
Speaker 3 (12:44):
What bull crap.
Speaker 2 (12:46):
But despite what she says, no, we overwhelmingly in the
electoral college and in the popular vote said enough is
enough and stop. Now we're getting what we add four.
So you should expect that the cabal is going to
react the way they have reacted, and that you're going
(13:08):
to be told not to believe your ears and eyes
about what's occurring in the streets of our cities. Now,
let's take Denver for example. Yes, I know the history
lesson is coming up, but we've got it. You've got
to understand all of these things. First, Denver is a
craphole city, but we don't see widespread even though the
(13:33):
crime is bad, we don't see it now. Primarily we
don't see it because local news media doesn't cover it
a lot. But I would challenge you to really go look.
Don't just get on the twenty five or the seventy
and drive around the perimeter of downtown. You get into
downtown Denver, you go to the Rhino District, or you
(13:57):
go to Lodo, but then you go to Ward five points.
You just kind of go a little further beyond five point,
it's still there. You don't even have to go outside.
Uh well, I want to focus on Denver. You don't
have to be in downtown Denver. You can go almost
anywhere else in town, and if you really pay attention,
(14:20):
you will see the homelessness, the crime, the drugs, everything.
This is a decaying city. It is a decaying, dying city.
And if you want evidence evidence of that on either
Instagram or x go follow the account do Better Denver,
Do Better dm vr and you'll see it. It's it's
(14:41):
it's it is providing you the empirical evidence of the
downfall of this city. Now take Denver. Same in Portland,
same in Seattle, same in Los Angeles, same in San Diego.
It's same in Chicago, it's same in Boston. It's same
in Dallas, it's same in Houston. In it's same in
(15:02):
parts of Oklahoma City or Tulsa. It's the same in
parts of Little Rock. It's the same in Atlanta. It's
the same in Miami. It's the same in Tampa Saint Pete.
It's the same in Uh I mentioned Boston, Yet it's
the same in Portland, Maine, in Portland, Oregon. Anywhere you look,
you'll find it. America's cities are dying, and they're dying
(15:24):
because of progressive leftist politics Democrat politics. So the natural
reaction when we start trying to correct course is that
those on the left will react, and they will react
with violence. That's what they're trained to do, that's what
they're indoctrinated about. That is there, that is their standard
(15:48):
operating procedure. That's their stop is they are going to
go engage in violence. They want the violence, and they're
being encouraged to.
Speaker 3 (15:58):
Enact the violence.
Speaker 2 (16:01):
So when Trump steps in and says I'm going to
send in the National Guard and I'm going to stop this.
I'm going to enforce federal law, everybody screams, oh my gosh,
he's a dictator, that he's a Nazi. He's ironically they
call him a fascist too, So make up your mind,
are you a fascist or are you a Nazi? But
(16:24):
put it under the umbrella of he's a tyrannical dictator.
That's what they all tell us. If you really listen
to what the networks or the cables tell you, he
is a tyrannical dictator. Except that's a complete lack of
understanding of our history and the laws and what he's doing,
(16:48):
which is squarely within the four corners of the law,
and we have the history to prove it. And that
gets us back to President Dwight David Eisenhower and Little Rock,
Arkansas in nineteen fifty seven. Now, granted, Eisenhower was reluctant.
(17:08):
He didn't really want to escalate things by sending in
or federalizing, invoking the Insurrection Act, federalizing the National Guard
troops which had already been deployed by the Arkansas government
at the time over FABUS. But he knew at some
point that what was more important politics for the necessity
(17:33):
of the supremacy of federal law and that we restore
law and order. And Ei Eisenhower said, I'm going to restore.
Speaker 3 (17:42):
Law and orders. He would kind of expect a general
to do that. The details of what he did.
Speaker 5 (17:50):
Now, how do I turn this? How do I turn this?
Speaker 3 (18:10):
Now? Were you ready? Are you repeating it? Yep?
Speaker 2 (18:14):
Okay, So it was how do I turn this? And
then there was just silence, yep? Was it the full
thirty seconds?
Speaker 3 (18:20):
The remaining yep. I turned it on. You just need
to keep going, Yeah, just keep trying, keep trying, and
you can do it. You can do it. You can
do it.
Speaker 2 (18:32):
So, as I said, Eisenow was reluctant to intervene in
Little Rock, but he recognized that what was at stake.
What was at stake was law and order, the supremacy
clause of the United States Constitution, and the legitimacy of
the Supreme Court decision that said in Brown v. Board
(18:55):
of Education nineteen fifty four that separate but equal was
unconstituted and that you had to integrate. Desegregation had to
start taking place. So he intervened. He saw on the
little black and white TV what was going on. He
had the reports that he got from people, and I'm
(19:16):
sure he had on the ground about what was happening
in Little Rock. So he signed Executive Order ten seven
point thirty that federalized the National Guard that the Governor
of Arkansas had already set out, but questionable what.
Speaker 3 (19:30):
He was doing with that National Guard. And then he
did this.
Speaker 2 (19:37):
He dispatched the one hundred and first Airborne more than
a thousand pair of troopers. They escorted the Little Rock nine,
the nine kids that just wanted to go to school
at Central High School. They cleared a path, took escorted
them in and for weeks those soldiers patrolled the hallways
(19:59):
and the grounds of Central High School, and they quelled
the mob action fully outfitted paratroopers, rifles and all. That
was a historic turning point. The federal government had physically
(20:20):
enforced the Supreme Court's mandate for integration, and he had
done so at a risk, for a political cost and
a personal risk, So it's not new. And then Eisenhower
did something else, pretty nascent for the time. Who won
a national television and he explained what he had done.
Speaker 6 (20:43):
The President of the United States, leaving my fellow citizens
for a few minutes this evening, I should like to
speak to you about the serious situations that has arisen
Little Rock. To make this talk, I have come to
(21:03):
the President's office in the White House. I could have
spoken from Rhode Island, where I have been staying recently,
but I felt that in speaking from the House of Lincoln,
of Jackson, and of Wilson, my words would better conveyed
both the sadness I feel in the action I was
(21:24):
compelled today to make and the firmers with which I
intend to pursue this course until.
Speaker 4 (21:31):
The orders of the Federal Court at Little Rock can
be executed without unlawful interference in that city. Under the
leadership of demagogic extremists, disorderly mobs have deliberately prevented the
carrying out of proper orders.
Speaker 3 (21:51):
From a federal court.
Speaker 4 (21:53):
The local authorities have not eliminated that violent opposition, and
under the law, I yesterday issued a proclamation calling upon
the mob to disperse. This morning, the mob again gathered
in front of the Central High School of Little Rock,
obviously for the purpose of again preventing the carrying out
(22:17):
of the court's order relating to the admission of Negro
children to that stool. Whenever normal agencies prove inadequate to
the task, and it becomes necessary for the executive branch
of the federal government to use its powers and authority
to uphold federal courts, the President's responsibility is inescapable. In
(22:44):
accordance with that responsibility, I have today issued an executive
order directing the use of troops under federal authority to
aid in the execution of federal law at Little Rock, Arkansas.
Became necessary when my proclamation of yesterday was not observed
(23:05):
and the obstruction of justice still continues. It is important
that the reasons for my action be understood by all
our citizens. As you know, the Supreme Court to the
United States has decided that separate public educational facilities for
(23:28):
the races are inherently unequal, and therefore compulsory school segregation
laws are unconstitutional. Our personal opinions about the decision have
no bearing on the matter of enforcement. The responsibility and
the authority of the Supreme Court to interpret the Constitution
(23:50):
are very clear. Local federal courts were instructed by the
Supreme Court to issue such orders and decrees as might
be necessary to achieve admission to public schools without regard
to race, and with all deliberate speed. During the past
(24:11):
several years, many communities in our southern states have instituted
public school plans or gradual progress in the enrollment and
attendance of school children of all races, in order to
bring themselves into compliance with the law of the land.
Thus they demonstrated to the world that we are a
(24:33):
nation in which laws, not men, are supreme. I regret
to say that this truth, that cornerstone of our liberties,
was not observed in this instance.
Speaker 2 (24:47):
I just want you to contemplate those words a nation
of laws, not of men, and that there were localities
in this case Little Rock, who had taken it upon
themselves to decide, well, we don't like that, so we're
(25:08):
just not going to follow it. And so it becomes
incumbent upon him, as the President of the United States,
to see that what was that oath he takes something
about to see that the laws of the country are
faithfully executed. That's what Donald Trump is doing. Now, this
is President Eisenhower nineteen fifty seven. It's twenty twenty five.
(25:35):
So that's what sixty eight years ago. No, whatever it is,
the Republic survived. We actually survived because somebody stood up
and said, this is not how we do businesses in
this in this country, the chaos has to stop. I
(26:00):
have the authority to stop the chaos. Local and state
officials are refusing to do so, in particular in Little Rock.
So Governor Pritsker, since you and Mayor Johnson, since you
are not doing what you were supposed to do, then
I'll step in and do it for you. So when
(26:23):
Pritzker says to the camera, Okay, well you're going have
to come through me, pritch Grow to sit down and
listen to this. We survived that, we survived it, and
actually it made us stronger. And by the way, Eisenhower,
(26:43):
when he fulfilled his two terms, left office. Only then
we got a new president, John F. Kennedy, which, by
the way, John F. Kennedy faced similar things and did
similar things too. You don't know your history, you ignore
(27:09):
your history. You're susceptible to falling into the trap of
what the cabal is feeding you. That all what we're
facing right now is absolute tyranny in a dictatorship.
Speaker 3 (27:23):
I'll be right back.
Speaker 7 (27:24):
Remember many times when the troops were deployed, it was
not only their rifles, but they had those nice shiny
bayonets on the end of those rifles, because bayonets always
seemed to get people's attention.
Speaker 3 (27:41):
Indeed they did, so did President Eisenhower.
Speaker 4 (27:46):
It was my hope that this localized situation would be
brought under control by city and state authorities. If the
use of local police powers had been sufficient, our traditional
method of leaving the problem in the wad those hands
would have been pursued.
Speaker 2 (28:01):
Oh so, if the locals had just done what they
were supposed to do, I wouldn't have had to act.
G huh, lather rents repeat.
Speaker 4 (28:15):
When large gatherings are obstructionists made it impossible for the
decrees of the court.
Speaker 3 (28:21):
To be carried out.
Speaker 4 (28:22):
Both the law and the national interests demanded that the
President take action. Here is a sequence of events in
the development of the Little.
Speaker 3 (28:34):
Rock School case.
Speaker 4 (28:36):
In May of nineteen hundred and fifty five, the Little
Rock School Board approved a moderate plan for the gradual
desegregation of the public.
Speaker 3 (28:46):
Schools in that city.
Speaker 4 (28:48):
It provided that a start toward integration would be made
at the present term in the high school, and that
the plan would be in full operation by nineteen sixty three.
Here I might say that in a number of communities
in Arkansas, integration in the schools has already started, and
(29:08):
without violence of any kind. Now, this Little Rock plan
was challenged in the courts by some who believes that
the period of time as proposed in the plan was
too long. The United States Court in Little Rock, which
has supervisory responsibility under the law for the plan of
(29:29):
desegregation in the public schools, dismissed the challenge, thus approving
a gradual rather than an abrupt change from the existing system.
The court found that the school board had acted in
good faith in planning for a public school system free
from racial discrimination. Since that time, the Court has on
(29:54):
three separate occasions, issued orders directing that the plan carried out.
All persons were instructed to refrain from interfering with the
effortance of this fool lord, to comply with the law,
proper and sensible observance of the law. Then demanded the
respectful obedience which the nation has our right to expect
(30:17):
from all its people. This, unfortunately has not been the
case that.
Speaker 2 (30:23):
A little rock, or in Chicago, or in Seattle, or
in Portland or in Denver, any sanctuary city, sanctuary state.
We expect compliance with the law, and we're not getting it.
And here's a president who said, you know what, it's
my job. I take a solemn oath that I would
(30:43):
faithfully execute the laws and preserved protecting, defend the Constitution.
And so he did, and he forced people to comply,
and the Republic survived. If I mean, we can play
all sorts of what if games. Had he not done
(31:04):
what he had done, it would have spread like a
contagion throughout the country. Oh you mean kind of like
it is now, Michael, Yeah, exactly the way it is now.
The difference between then and now is that what we've
(31:24):
seen going on, has been going on now for years,
and so it's going to be even more troublesome and
more difficult to try to overcome and restore law and order.
But that's precisely what Donald Trump is doing. Is he
the perfect vessel for doing it? Is he the former
commander of the Allied Forces? No, he's a real estate developer,
(31:46):
he's a billionaire, and he talks funny, he's got funny hair.
But he's the duly elected commander in chief following the Constitution,
following the statue against rogue elements at state and local
levels who are not doing so. And that's creating the chaos.
(32:09):
That is the source of the chaos. And do not
forget that. You can dislike Trump all you want, I
don't care. But what he's doing has historical precedent, constitutionally authorized,
and is in line with his.
Speaker 3 (32:30):
Oath of office.
Speaker 2 (32:32):
So the reaction that you're seeing is because, oh, someone
has stood up to the mob, someone has stood up
to the anarchists and said, you know what, No, I'm
going to preserve this republic. Kennedy next. You think Eisenhower
was bad, Oh, Kennedy was even worse.
Mike regarding Philadelphia and Newark Airport, approach control is always regionalized.
Approach control for all Central Colorado airports is based out
of Fort Collins, Colorado, and they handle approach control for
DIA Rocky Mountain Airport's Centennial Pueblo, et cetera. Approach control
turns it over to the local tower five miles from
(00:20):
their runway.
Speaker 2 (00:22):
Let's get back to the history lesson real quickly. The
reason this history lesson is so dang important is if
you stop and really focus on what you're being fed
through your eyeballs and your ears, ru on the precipice
of tyranny. We'ru on the precipice of absolute fascists. That's
(00:47):
why the anti fascists are out stony and rioting and
burning and doing everything they do to stop immigrations and
customs enforcement from enforcing federal law duly enacted federal law.
And I'm not talking about recent federal law. I'm talking
about the nineteen thirty four Immigration and Naturalization Act as
(01:11):
amended throughout time, but originally enacted back in nineteen thirty
four or so. And we went through an election in
which we had seen what the previous administration had done
by opening the floodgates allowing all of these criminals, not all,
(01:31):
but criminals, families, unaccompanied minors, people from our enemies like
from the Chinese Communist Party, giving temporary protective status to Venezuelans.
And the number is, well, this first event, nobody knows
what the number is. Ten million, twenty million, I don't know,
(01:54):
pick any number. I think at this point you could
just pick any number that you want to choose, and
this is valid as the number that you want to
choose because nobody knows. Nobody knows. And part of that campaign,
part of the twenty twenty four campaign, was what are
you going to do about all of the illegal aliens,
(02:19):
the people who are present, unlawfully present in the United States?
Speaker 3 (02:22):
What are you going to do with them? Well, I'm
going to deport them.
Speaker 2 (02:26):
Now we can argue details about Okay, I'm going to
deport the most violent first. And I do think that
has morphed somewhat into well, yeah, while we're out looking
for the violent, if we find somebody else that's in
the country unlawfully, we're just going to deport them too. Now,
did anybody did you think, did you honestly think at
(02:48):
some point that the deportation of somebody who was in
the country unlawfully just sat aside for a moment, the
criminals and the gang bangers. Do you think that the
thirty five year old male from Guatemala who has a
wife and a couple of kids at home, who's having
(03:11):
a difficult time caring and feeding for them, and so
he makes the track through you know, everything to make
it into this country, finally gets here illegally, lands a
job somehow, or you know, gets fraudulent papers and uses
the fraudulent papers to fill out all of his I
(03:32):
nine immigration information and somehow.
Speaker 3 (03:35):
Oh, I don't know.
Speaker 2 (03:35):
Maybe he gets a CDL a commercial driver's license somewhere
and he starts driving a commercial truck. Can't read English,
can't speak English, maybe read love English, maybe understands basically
like that read octagonal red sign that has a single
world up. Maybe I think I'm supposed to stop that.
(03:58):
Or it comes up to a traffic light, I think
the top light, which I think has read because I'm colorblind,
I think I'm supposed to stop there. Or the guy
that just comes here and starts his own landscaping business
and he comes up to you know, he goes door
to door looking, you know, offering. You know, speaks broken English,
(04:20):
but you know, hey, I'll mow your yard and trim
the bushes and do everything, and I'll do it for
you know, forty dollars a week or thirty five dollars
a week or whatever, or I'll do special projects or whatever.
And he takes the money that he gets paid and
he sends he remits some of that back to his wife.
(04:42):
You can't help but feel sorry for him. I feel
sorry for him, but that doesn't mean I want him
to stay in this country. He broke our laws, and
we cannot be a nation if we don't know one
who is here. And if those who are here are
here lawfully and are here doing what they're supposed to
(05:04):
do lawfully, or they are? Are they criminals? Are they
a danger or threat to my family to my place
of business? Are they here just living off the government tap?
So I'm working my ass off, you're working your ass off.
We're paying all these taxes, and are they just leeching
off us to get a phone, to get you know,
(05:26):
a shelter somewhere, and to get some clothing and maybe
even you know, they somehow get transportation. They get a
free rt D pass or something. I don't know what
they get, but they get everything. We wanted them gone.
We want them gone because when we can't afford it,
I mean, just being practical, we cannot afford it. Some
(05:49):
estimates are that it's upwards of four hundred billion dollars
just for these tax credits that were providing that we're
being provided to get the health care for you legal aliens.
Speaker 3 (06:01):
I don't care what the number is. I honestly don't.
Speaker 2 (06:04):
I don't care whether it's four million dollars or four
hundred billion dollars, whatever it is. We can't spend it,
and I think morally we have no obligation to spend it.
So I went them out of here. I want them gone.
Did you think that whether it was the guy I
described as running the landscape business, or it's a member
of Trenda Ragua, or it's a member of MS thirteen,
(06:29):
did you think that any of those were going to
be easy deportations. You could argue that, yeah, some of
them might be Michael, because some of them might be
scared of you know, they're scared of incarceration, They're scared
of you know, just you know, the guys that are
wearing you know, the all of the body armor, and
they've got guns, and they look mean and they are mean.
They're big, tough guys and women, and you don't want
(06:51):
to mess with them.
Speaker 3 (06:52):
So you know what I've heard.
Speaker 2 (06:54):
I've heard somewhere that I could go on that app
using the phone that somebody gave me and I could
get a free ticket to go back home one thousand
dollars or whatever it is and go back home. Maybe
I'll do that to avoid it. There will be some
of those, and then there will be those, particularly those
who are gang bangers, members of TDA or MS thirteen
(07:18):
or any other gangs, and they're going to fight. So
did you really believe that this was going to be easy?
Did you really think that people would just oh cought me?
You know, Yeah, I'm working at you know, the diner here,
and you happen to be you know, you came in
for a cup of coffee on a break and you realize, oh,
(07:40):
there's an illegal alien, let's detain him.
Speaker 3 (07:45):
Hmm.
Speaker 2 (07:47):
By the way, they get their due process too, don't
worry about that. They get their due process. So if
you thought it was going to be easy. You were
being naive. But let's say that even if it was
going to be easy, did you really believe for a
minute that the radical left in this country who wanted
(08:12):
those people here because they honestly want to destroy this country. Remember,
we're under we are still undergoing. We're fighting back and
we're pushing back, but we're undergoing this fundamental transformation of
the United States from a constitutional republic to whatever the
(08:33):
hell it is that the Marxist left wants, which I
think is what they really want, is a socialist utopia
which will turn into a dictatorship. Let's think about the chaos.
So if the chaos gets bad enough, which again gets
back to rules for radical and cloward pivot strategy, if
if the chaos gets bad enough, there will be people,
(08:56):
some in these quarters, some in this audience, who would
actually scream and holler and beg for a strong armed
dictator to return law and order to the country.
Speaker 4 (09:12):
Hmm.
Speaker 2 (09:14):
Because historically we know that when things get so bad
that there's a breakdown in civil society. I don't think
we're there yet, but I think we're on the path
to that that when it gets to the penultimate stage,
that there is chaos in the streets, whether that be
(09:36):
a civil war or just rampant, unabated crime occurring everywhere
such that you are scared to go from your home
to to the grocery store. You'll plead for somebody to
take control this human nature because you want the care
(10:00):
to stop. I hope you're not there yet, but if
you are, be careful what you wish for, because you
may end up with that tyrannical dictator, because they.
Speaker 3 (10:12):
Historically, we know that's what always happens.
Speaker 2 (10:16):
The dictator comes in and promises law and order, discipline, prosperity.
They'll promise you everything, and the next thing you know,
you're living in tyranny. That's kind of what we're going
through right now. And it started, it really started with
(10:37):
Woodrow Wilson in the progressive left movement, but it reached
hyper speed with Barack Obama and his promise to fundamentally
transform this country.
Speaker 3 (10:50):
That's a fact.
Speaker 2 (10:51):
That's just the way it is. And you've got to
understand that it's hard to believe that we would have
a president that would be elected that would actually want
to fundamentally transform this country into something other than a
constitutional republic.
Speaker 3 (11:06):
But he does, he did, he still does.
Speaker 2 (11:09):
And Biden comes along, and Biden was just a tool
for Obama. And now everybody is all in a dither
because we said, fortunately, we said enough is enough. They
always overreach. They overreached with Obama, they overreached with Biden.
(11:34):
Biden was because of his absence, I think, because of
his mental incapacity, and I think because he wasn't really
running the country. Democrats in the House, in the Senate
just went hogwild on spending because there were no there
(11:54):
was no funnel to kind of narrow that spending. Republicans impotent.
And of course the more you spend, the more chaos
you create, because that leads to economic chaos. You couple
that with opening the borders and letting all these people in.
Doesn't make any difference. We don't care whether it's the
(12:16):
person that just wants to mow somebody's yard or it's
TDA or MS thirteen.
Speaker 3 (12:22):
They did not care.
Speaker 2 (12:23):
All they wanted was as many people as possible to
flood the country so that you can dissolve the country.
And now we saw that, we reacted to it, and
we despite what Kamala Harris tells you, the closest election
in the twenty first century.
Speaker 3 (12:44):
What bull crap.
Speaker 2 (12:46):
But despite what she says, no, we overwhelmingly in the
electoral college and in the popular vote said enough is
enough and stop. Now we're getting what we add four.
So you should expect that the cabal is going to
react the way they have reacted, and that you're going
(13:08):
to be told not to believe your ears and eyes
about what's occurring in the streets of our cities. Now,
let's take Denver for example. Yes, I know the history
lesson is coming up, but we've got it. You've got
to understand all of these things. First, Denver is a
craphole city, but we don't see widespread even though the
(13:33):
crime is bad, we don't see it now. Primarily we
don't see it because local news media doesn't cover it
a lot. But I would challenge you to really go look.
Don't just get on the twenty five or the seventy
and drive around the perimeter of downtown. You get into
downtown Denver, you go to the Rhino District, or you
(13:57):
go to Lodo, but then you go to Ward five points.
You just kind of go a little further beyond five point,
it's still there. You don't even have to go outside.
Uh well, I want to focus on Denver. You don't
have to be in downtown Denver. You can go almost
anywhere else in town, and if you really pay attention,
(14:20):
you will see the homelessness, the crime, the drugs, everything.
This is a decaying city. It is a decaying, dying city.
And if you want evidence evidence of that on either
Instagram or x go follow the account do Better Denver,
Do Better dm vr and you'll see it. It's it's
(14:41):
it's it is providing you the empirical evidence of the
downfall of this city. Now take Denver. Same in Portland,
same in Seattle, same in Los Angeles, same in San Diego.
It's same in Chicago, it's same in Boston. It's same
in Dallas, it's same in Houston. In it's same in
(15:02):
parts of Oklahoma City or Tulsa. It's the same in
parts of Little Rock. It's the same in Atlanta. It's
the same in Miami. It's the same in Tampa Saint Pete.
It's the same in Uh I mentioned Boston, Yet it's
the same in Portland, Maine, in Portland, Oregon. Anywhere you look,
you'll find it. America's cities are dying, and they're dying
(15:24):
because of progressive leftist politics Democrat politics. So the natural
reaction when we start trying to correct course is that
those on the left will react, and they will react
with violence. That's what they're trained to do, that's what
they're indoctrinated about. That is there, that is their standard
(15:48):
operating procedure. That's their stop is they are going to
go engage in violence. They want the violence, and they're
being encouraged to.
Speaker 3 (15:58):
Enact the violence.
Speaker 2 (16:01):
So when Trump steps in and says I'm going to
send in the National Guard and I'm going to stop this.
I'm going to enforce federal law, everybody screams, oh my gosh,
he's a dictator, that he's a Nazi. He's ironically they
call him a fascist too, So make up your mind,
are you a fascist or are you a Nazi? But
(16:24):
put it under the umbrella of he's a tyrannical dictator.
That's what they all tell us. If you really listen
to what the networks or the cables tell you, he
is a tyrannical dictator. Except that's a complete lack of
understanding of our history and the laws and what he's doing,
(16:48):
which is squarely within the four corners of the law,
and we have the history to prove it. And that
gets us back to President Dwight David Eisenhower and Little Rock,
Arkansas in nineteen fifty seven. Now, granted, Eisenhower was reluctant.
(17:08):
He didn't really want to escalate things by sending in
or federalizing, invoking the Insurrection Act, federalizing the National Guard
troops which had already been deployed by the Arkansas government
at the time over FABUS. But he knew at some
point that what was more important politics for the necessity
(17:33):
of the supremacy of federal law and that we restore
law and order. And Ei Eisenhower said, I'm going to restore.
Speaker 3 (17:42):
Law and orders. He would kind of expect a general
to do that. The details of what he did.
Speaker 5 (17:50):
Now, how do I turn this? How do I turn this?
Speaker 3 (18:10):
Now? Were you ready? Are you repeating it? Yep?
Speaker 2 (18:14):
Okay, So it was how do I turn this? And
then there was just silence, yep? Was it the full
thirty seconds?
Speaker 3 (18:20):
The remaining yep. I turned it on. You just need
to keep going, Yeah, just keep trying, keep trying, and
you can do it. You can do it. You can
do it.
Speaker 2 (18:32):
So, as I said, Eisenow was reluctant to intervene in
Little Rock, but he recognized that what was at stake.
What was at stake was law and order, the supremacy
clause of the United States Constitution, and the legitimacy of
the Supreme Court decision that said in Brown v. Board
(18:55):
of Education nineteen fifty four that separate but equal was
unconstituted and that you had to integrate. Desegregation had to
start taking place. So he intervened. He saw on the
little black and white TV what was going on. He
had the reports that he got from people, and I'm
(19:16):
sure he had on the ground about what was happening
in Little Rock. So he signed Executive Order ten seven
point thirty that federalized the National Guard that the Governor
of Arkansas had already set out, but questionable what.
Speaker 3 (19:30):
He was doing with that National Guard. And then he
did this.
Speaker 2 (19:37):
He dispatched the one hundred and first Airborne more than
a thousand pair of troopers. They escorted the Little Rock nine,
the nine kids that just wanted to go to school
at Central High School. They cleared a path, took escorted
them in and for weeks those soldiers patrolled the hallways
(19:59):
and the grounds of Central High School, and they quelled
the mob action fully outfitted paratroopers, rifles and all. That
was a historic turning point. The federal government had physically
(20:20):
enforced the Supreme Court's mandate for integration, and he had
done so at a risk, for a political cost and
a personal risk, So it's not new. And then Eisenhower
did something else, pretty nascent for the time. Who won
a national television and he explained what he had done.
Speaker 6 (20:43):
The President of the United States, leaving my fellow citizens
for a few minutes this evening, I should like to
speak to you about the serious situations that has arisen
Little Rock. To make this talk, I have come to
(21:03):
the President's office in the White House. I could have
spoken from Rhode Island, where I have been staying recently,
but I felt that in speaking from the House of Lincoln,
of Jackson, and of Wilson, my words would better conveyed
both the sadness I feel in the action I was
(21:24):
compelled today to make and the firmers with which I
intend to pursue this course until.
Speaker 4 (21:31):
The orders of the Federal Court at Little Rock can
be executed without unlawful interference in that city. Under the
leadership of demagogic extremists, disorderly mobs have deliberately prevented the
carrying out of proper orders.
Speaker 3 (21:51):
From a federal court.
Speaker 4 (21:53):
The local authorities have not eliminated that violent opposition, and
under the law, I yesterday issued a proclamation calling upon
the mob to disperse. This morning, the mob again gathered
in front of the Central High School of Little Rock,
obviously for the purpose of again preventing the carrying out
(22:17):
of the court's order relating to the admission of Negro
children to that stool. Whenever normal agencies prove inadequate to
the task, and it becomes necessary for the executive branch
of the federal government to use its powers and authority
to uphold federal courts, the President's responsibility is inescapable. In
(22:44):
accordance with that responsibility, I have today issued an executive
order directing the use of troops under federal authority to
aid in the execution of federal law at Little Rock, Arkansas.
Became necessary when my proclamation of yesterday was not observed
(23:05):
and the obstruction of justice still continues. It is important
that the reasons for my action be understood by all
our citizens. As you know, the Supreme Court to the
United States has decided that separate public educational facilities for
(23:28):
the races are inherently unequal, and therefore compulsory school segregation
laws are unconstitutional. Our personal opinions about the decision have
no bearing on the matter of enforcement. The responsibility and
the authority of the Supreme Court to interpret the Constitution
(23:50):
are very clear. Local federal courts were instructed by the
Supreme Court to issue such orders and decrees as might
be necessary to achieve admission to public schools without regard
to race, and with all deliberate speed. During the past
(24:11):
several years, many communities in our southern states have instituted
public school plans or gradual progress in the enrollment and
attendance of school children of all races, in order to
bring themselves into compliance with the law of the land.
Thus they demonstrated to the world that we are a
(24:33):
nation in which laws, not men, are supreme. I regret
to say that this truth, that cornerstone of our liberties,
was not observed in this instance.
Speaker 2 (24:47):
I just want you to contemplate those words a nation
of laws, not of men, and that there were localities
in this case Little Rock, who had taken it upon
themselves to decide, well, we don't like that, so we're
(25:08):
just not going to follow it. And so it becomes
incumbent upon him, as the President of the United States,
to see that what was that oath he takes something
about to see that the laws of the country are
faithfully executed. That's what Donald Trump is doing. Now, this
is President Eisenhower nineteen fifty seven. It's twenty twenty five.
(25:35):
So that's what sixty eight years ago. No, whatever it is,
the Republic survived. We actually survived because somebody stood up
and said, this is not how we do businesses in
this in this country, the chaos has to stop. I
(26:00):
have the authority to stop the chaos. Local and state
officials are refusing to do so, in particular in Little Rock.
So Governor Pritsker, since you and Mayor Johnson, since you
are not doing what you were supposed to do, then
I'll step in and do it for you. So when
(26:23):
Pritzker says to the camera, Okay, well you're going have
to come through me, pritch Grow to sit down and
listen to this. We survived that, we survived it, and
actually it made us stronger. And by the way, Eisenhower,
(26:43):
when he fulfilled his two terms, left office. Only then
we got a new president, John F. Kennedy, which, by
the way, John F. Kennedy faced similar things and did
similar things too. You don't know your history, you ignore
(27:09):
your history. You're susceptible to falling into the trap of
what the cabal is feeding you. That all what we're
facing right now is absolute tyranny in a dictatorship.
Speaker 3 (27:23):
I'll be right back.
Speaker 7 (27:24):
Remember many times when the troops were deployed, it was
not only their rifles, but they had those nice shiny
bayonets on the end of those rifles, because bayonets always
seemed to get people's attention.
Speaker 3 (27:41):
Indeed they did, so did President Eisenhower.
Speaker 4 (27:46):
It was my hope that this localized situation would be
brought under control by city and state authorities. If the
use of local police powers had been sufficient, our traditional
method of leaving the problem in the wad those hands
would have been pursued.
Speaker 2 (28:01):
Oh so, if the locals had just done what they
were supposed to do, I wouldn't have had to act.
G huh, lather rents repeat.
Speaker 4 (28:15):
When large gatherings are obstructionists made it impossible for the
decrees of the court.
Speaker 3 (28:21):
To be carried out.
Speaker 4 (28:22):
Both the law and the national interests demanded that the
President take action. Here is a sequence of events in
the development of the Little.
Speaker 3 (28:34):
Rock School case.
Speaker 4 (28:36):
In May of nineteen hundred and fifty five, the Little
Rock School Board approved a moderate plan for the gradual
desegregation of the public.
Speaker 3 (28:46):
Schools in that city.
Speaker 4 (28:48):
It provided that a start toward integration would be made
at the present term in the high school, and that
the plan would be in full operation by nineteen sixty three.
Here I might say that in a number of communities
in Arkansas, integration in the schools has already started, and
(29:08):
without violence of any kind. Now, this Little Rock plan
was challenged in the courts by some who believes that
the period of time as proposed in the plan was
too long. The United States Court in Little Rock, which
has supervisory responsibility under the law for the plan of
(29:29):
desegregation in the public schools, dismissed the challenge, thus approving
a gradual rather than an abrupt change from the existing system.
The court found that the school board had acted in
good faith in planning for a public school system free
from racial discrimination. Since that time, the Court has on
(29:54):
three separate occasions, issued orders directing that the plan carried out.
All persons were instructed to refrain from interfering with the
effortance of this fool lord, to comply with the law,
proper and sensible observance of the law. Then demanded the
respectful obedience which the nation has our right to expect
(30:17):
from all its people. This, unfortunately has not been the
case that.
Speaker 2 (30:23):
A little rock, or in Chicago, or in Seattle, or
in Portland or in Denver, any sanctuary city, sanctuary state.
We expect compliance with the law, and we're not getting it.
And here's a president who said, you know what, it's
my job. I take a solemn oath that I would
(30:43):
faithfully execute the laws and preserved protecting, defend the Constitution.
And so he did, and he forced people to comply,
and the Republic survived. If I mean, we can play
all sorts of what if games. Had he not done
(31:04):
what he had done, it would have spread like a
contagion throughout the country. Oh you mean kind of like
it is now, Michael, Yeah, exactly the way it is now.
The difference between then and now is that what we've
(31:24):
seen going on, has been going on now for years,
and so it's going to be even more troublesome and
more difficult to try to overcome and restore law and order.
But that's precisely what Donald Trump is doing. Is he
the perfect vessel for doing it? Is he the former
commander of the Allied Forces? No, he's a real estate developer,
(31:46):
he's a billionaire, and he talks funny, he's got funny hair.
But he's the duly elected commander in chief following the Constitution,
following the statue against rogue elements at state and local
levels who are not doing so. And that's creating the chaos.
(32:09):
That is the source of the chaos. And do not
forget that. You can dislike Trump all you want, I
don't care. But what he's doing has historical precedent, constitutionally authorized,
and is in line with his.
Speaker 3 (32:30):
Oath of office.
Speaker 2 (32:32):
So the reaction that you're seeing is because, oh, someone
has stood up to the mob, someone has stood up
to the anarchists and said, you know what, No, I'm
going to preserve this republic. Kennedy next. You think Eisenhower
was bad, Oh, Kennedy was even worse.
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
My Favorite Murder with Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark
My Favorite Murder is a true crime comedy podcast hosted by Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark. Each week, Karen and Georgia share compelling true crimes and hometown stories from friends and listeners. Since MFM launched in January of 2016, Karen and Georgia have shared their lifelong interest in true crime and have covered stories of infamous serial killers like the Night Stalker, mysterious cold cases, captivating cults, incredible survivor stories and important events from history like the Tulsa race massacre of 1921. My Favorite Murder is part of the Exactly Right podcast network that provides a platform for bold, creative voices to bring to life provocative, entertaining and relatable stories for audiences everywhere. The Exactly Right roster of podcasts covers a variety of topics including historic true crime, comedic interviews and news, science, pop culture and more. Podcasts on the network include Buried Bones with Kate Winkler Dawson and Paul Holes, That's Messed Up: An SVU Podcast, This Podcast Will Kill You, Bananas and more.