Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Hey, fellas, I'm going to be down in Colorado for
thirty six hours because that's all I can take over Thanksgiving.
I just wanted to let you know. Don't worry. I'm
not going to come see you in income Poops. I'm
just going to take the light rail and try to
get to where I have to go. I tell you
this as a message. If you don't hear from me
within about two days after the end of the Thanksgiving holiday,
(00:23):
send help.
Speaker 2 (00:25):
Well, there won't be he helped to send because as
Dragon and I have been laughing for a couple of
days now, we had the fentanyl in the storeroom down
on Highland's Ranch. Then we had the myth. I'm not
sure where they found the myth, but it's the both
of them. Like the fennyl was one of the biggest
things ever and the myth is now one of the
biggest things ever. And the local media has been very
(00:51):
very I think the local cops are very, very proud
of the fact that these are the largest seizures ever.
Or in the case of the fentlel I guess I
have to say it's really really the largest discovery ever.
Because they didn't really investigate it. They just kind of
stumbled upon it, Gaes, somebody bought an abandoned storage unit.
Is there really something to be proud of because that
(01:14):
means that But for the fact that they were able
to stop the distribution of that myth and that fentanyl,
that myth in that fentanyl.
Speaker 3 (01:23):
Was targeted here, it was here. We're happy it's off
the street. It fantastic, yes, but it should never have
been here to take place?
Speaker 4 (01:35):
Why? Why?
Speaker 5 (01:36):
Why?
Speaker 2 (01:37):
And how much longer? And of course I haven't seen
it because I haven't watched any local news lately. But Dragon,
I'll bet you a dollar to a donut that we've
had the press conference where they've they've got, you know,
some guy that looks like a cop, you know, I
gues I'm generalizing, looks like a cop, particularly a federal.
Speaker 4 (01:58):
Cop, you know, like a d A agent or something.
Speaker 2 (02:01):
And then they zoom out and then there's probably a
giant Oh you've alay made a gesture and there's a
giant table with all the drugs all piled up, the
drugs and the money and everything else, and they're all
pointing at it like, oh, look what we got, Look
what we found, and again, congratulations on finding it.
Speaker 4 (02:20):
How about we stop it from getting here in the
first place. Am I? Am I being unreasonable?
Speaker 3 (02:26):
No, I'm right there with you on that same mind frame.
Let's make sure it's not here.
Speaker 2 (02:31):
Right, Let's let's let's stop the importation of drugs into this.
In fact, let's just uh wait.
Speaker 4 (02:37):
Cow.
Speaker 2 (02:41):
Three three one zero three, say it along with me,
sing along with Mitch zero three three three.
Speaker 4 (02:51):
If that's what it takes, If it takes, say it.
If if if you can't do three three one zero
three and in your brain it has to be three
three one o three, then do that he said it.
(03:11):
Do it. You've you've probably heard.
Speaker 2 (03:14):
Because maybe you've thought about it with me, because I
think some of you do think this about me. You've
heard the old saying that somebody is dumb as a stump,
dumb as a rock. It is of course an insult
because it compares that person's intelligence to that of any
random inanimate object. And in this case, it's either a
(03:35):
fallen tree, a felled tree like a stump you know
out in your yard somewhere or out in the field
that you know you gotta tear it out some point
but you haven't, or it's just a big a big
giant rock, Just a big giant rock. Every time I
see or hear the Pride of South Dallas, Jasmine the Crockett.
(03:57):
Every time I see or hear Jasmine the Crockett, that stumper,
that rock comes to mind. The sumb materialized in my
by Cokettel brain yesterday when I saw a clip of
Jasmine trying to defend her fellow dim with a Democrat,
(04:18):
Stacy Plackett, who was revealed on Monday to have been
texting with Jeffrey Epstein for advice during a life congressional
hearing back in twenty nineteen. Who was your mentor growing up,
Jeffrey Epstein? Who did you go to for dating advice?
Jeffrey Epstein? Oh, I'm a delegate to the United States Congress.
(04:43):
From Where was she from? She's from the Dominican not
Dominican Republic, the Virgin Islands or somewhere I don't remember.
Speaker 4 (04:49):
Who cares.
Speaker 2 (04:51):
Yeah, I get my advice from Jeffrey Epstein. Now in
the clip that you'll hear in a minute, you'll hear
the Pride of South Dallas sitting at her side trying
to claim that her colleague's actions were just fine because
former congresswoman or Congressman Lee Zelden, who is a Republican,
(05:11):
actually received campaign contributions from a person named Jeffrey Epstein
back in the day. There's just one problem. The guy
that contributed to Zelden's congressional campaign was a college professor
who happened to have the same name. When I read
(05:33):
that and discovered that in show prep yesterday evening, I
thought to myself, Holy crap, can.
Speaker 4 (05:38):
You imagine that right now?
Speaker 2 (05:40):
Your name is Jeffrey Epstein, even if it's doctor Jeffrey Epstein.
Speaker 4 (05:47):
No matter where you go and somebody.
Speaker 2 (05:49):
You know calls out something bad about Jeffrey Epstein, you
got to bury your head now. In this clip, you'll
hear Jasmine blame Republicans for her idiotic error when she
was pressed on the matter by CNN's Caitlyn Collins. You'll
also hear her deny to Collins that she ever said
exactly what. You will hear her say, Oh, this is
(06:12):
just this is glorious.
Speaker 6 (06:15):
You talk about Republicans taking money from a Jeffrey Epstein.
Speaker 3 (06:18):
Here's what you said, who.
Speaker 7 (06:24):
Also took money from somebody named Jeffrey Epstein. As I
had my team dig in very quickly met Romney, the
NRCC Lee Zelden, George bush Win, read, Nickcain, Caitlin, Rick Lazio.
Speaker 6 (06:45):
You mentioned to Leiz Elden there he's now a cabinet secretary.
He responded and said it was actually a doctor, Jeffrey Epstein,
who's a doctor that doesn't have any relation to the
convicted sex strucker. Unfortunate for that doctor, but that.
Speaker 4 (06:55):
Is who to a prior campaign of his.
Speaker 6 (06:58):
Do you want to correct the record on the people?
Speaker 3 (07:00):
I never said that.
Speaker 2 (07:02):
Wait, wait a minute, you've already heard a little hint
of that. Do you want to correct the record about
Lee Zelden?
Speaker 4 (07:09):
I mean Dallas South Dallas. Hello, Hello, I think you
got a problem.
Speaker 2 (07:17):
You know, my favorite congress person, my favorite Congress critter
used to be Sheila Jackson Lee, who was from Harris County, Houston, Texas,
because she used to be the dumbest member of Congress. Well, Texas, you.
Speaker 4 (07:29):
Still hold on. I know, I know ours, ours are
in the running.
Speaker 2 (07:35):
Ours have made the semi finals, but they haven't made
the finals yet. But Texas is you know, Texas just
has beautiful women and they've got done congresswomen.
Speaker 6 (07:45):
But that is who doing to a prior campaign of his.
Do you want to correct the record on the people?
Speaker 8 (07:50):
And I never said that it was that Jeffrey Epstein,
just so that people understand when you make a donation,
your picture is not there. And because they decided to
spring this on us in real time, I.
Speaker 2 (08:00):
Want to they decided to spring You said that your
staff is the one that did that.
Speaker 4 (08:08):
Your staff is the one that did it. Roll the
tape again, you talked.
Speaker 6 (08:14):
About Republicans taking money from a Jeffrey Epstein.
Speaker 7 (08:17):
Here's what you said, who also took money from somebody
named Jeffrey Epstein. As I had my team digg in
very quickly, met Romney, the NRCC, Lee z Elden, George
bush Win, read Nickcaine, Calin Rick Lazio.
Speaker 6 (08:44):
You mentioned to lese Elden there he's now a cabinet secretary.
He responded and said it was actually a doctor, Jeffrey Epstein,
who's a doctor that doesn't have any relation to the
convicted sex truncker. Unfortunate for that doctor, but that is
who to a prior campaign of his. Do you want
to correct the record on the.
Speaker 8 (08:58):
People that never said that it was that Jeffrey Epstein.
Speaker 4 (09:02):
Now she's cracked about that.
Speaker 2 (09:04):
She said, hey, Jeffrey Epstein got a cya, Yeah, you
get a cya. But she ignores the fact that she
also said, my staff quickly dug up these names. It
was her staff that did it. Her staff failed her.
Speaker 8 (09:18):
People understand, when you make a donation, your picture is
not there. And because they decided to spring this on
us in real.
Speaker 2 (09:25):
Because they decided to spring this on us. No, you
said you had your staff quickly research.
Speaker 8 (09:33):
I wanted the Republicans to think about what could potentially
happen because I knew that they didn't even try to
go through the FEC.
Speaker 4 (09:39):
So my team what they did is they Googled. And
that is specifically why, Oh it's doctor Google.
Speaker 3 (09:45):
You can always trust Google exactly.
Speaker 4 (09:47):
Google's never wrong about anything.
Speaker 8 (09:49):
A Jeffrey Epstein. Unlike Republicans, I at least don't go
out and just tell lies because it was not the
same one.
Speaker 4 (09:57):
That's fine.
Speaker 8 (09:57):
But when Lee Zelden had something to say, all he
had to say was it was a Diffrey Jeffrey Jeffrey Epstein.
He admitted that he did receive donations from A Jeffrey Epstein,
so at least I wasn't trying to mislead people. Now,
have I dug in to find out who this doctor is?
I have not, So I will trust and take What
he says is that it wasn't that Jeffrey Epstein. But
(10:17):
I was not attempting to mislead anybody. I literally had
maybe twenty minutes before I had.
Speaker 4 (10:24):
To do that debate.
Speaker 6 (10:25):
Yeah, but people might see that say, well, you're trying
to make it sound like he took money from I
did not registered TEX offender.
Speaker 8 (10:31):
No, but I literally did not know when you search
SEC files, And that's what I had my team to do.
Speaker 4 (10:36):
I Textede again. She missed.
Speaker 2 (10:37):
She had her team do it, and so they just
saw Jeffrey. Why do you think do you think if
they saw Jeffrey Epstein that was all they were looking for,
Just find the name. They never never crossed their mind.
There might be another Michael Brown somewhere. Gee, what what
a more common name than Michael Brown? Yeah, Jeffrey Epstein
(11:01):
not quite a common right, So you might think, hey,
we're searching the FEC files. Maybe we ought to, you know,
go to doctor Google again and find out whether this
is the same guy or not. The purpose was to
try to denegrate Lee Zelden, and she got caught.
Speaker 8 (11:19):
And listen, we're going up there saying that she took
donating right.
Speaker 6 (11:23):
But some one might say, well, your team should have
done the homework to make sure it wasn't the Condronatics.
Speaker 8 (11:27):
Within twenty minutes, you could not find that out, not
from just doing a quick search on fec so number one.
I made sure that I was clear that it was
a Jeffrey Epstein, but I never said that it was
specifically that Jeffrey Epstein, because I knew that we would
need more time to really digt you talked.
Speaker 2 (11:44):
So in other words, I knew what I was trying
to accomplish, and I accomplished when I was trying to accomplish,
but then I got caught, and so now I'm just
trying to Well, I remember I said, just a Jeffrey Epstein.
Speaker 4 (11:55):
If we have a text, what dragon.
Speaker 3 (11:57):
From twenty seventy three group number twenty seventy three, Mike
or Michael, is Jasmine Crockett in any way liable for
slander for her Epstein donor scam.
Speaker 2 (12:05):
No, she's protected by the Speech and Debate clause, So
you can the speech and debate clause the founders put
in the Constitution primarily so that people could freely debate
and even say nasty things about one another, even if
they are false. Now, if she had gone out, this
becomes kind of a gray area. But if she had
(12:27):
gone out, let's say she was in South Dallas and
she went on a you know, she went on w
FAA in Dallas, and she said something on the television
station about oh, yeah, Lee's olden took Oh she went
to New York. And make it even better, she went
to New York and did it because he was a
congressman from New York.
Speaker 4 (12:44):
Then she may not be.
Speaker 2 (12:46):
Protected by the speech and debate clause. But it's a
great question because let's just assume for a moment, ask
soon make an ass of you and me. When you
assume that she might have been liable for defamation, libel,
(13:06):
and slander. What are his damages A dollar, a million dollars,
a bazillion dollars. So he might win the case that
she defamed him, libeled, and slandered him, but he has
to prove damages. He might win the issue. Yeah you
said something, it was false and it was derogatory toward
(13:29):
my reputation. Now what's that worth? What's that worth?
Speaker 4 (13:33):
Now? That's but hang on, that's.
Speaker 3 (13:36):
Chasing a quick rabbit hole here. He would probably have
a better case. The doctor Epstein would probably have a
better case against the Epstein estate rather than her, because.
Speaker 2 (13:46):
Except except if you, if you really want to go
down this rabbit hole just a little bit, then might
she has a perfect defense? I said a Jeffrey Epstein. Yeah,
so that's that would if I were representing her, that
would be my defense. We didn't say it was the
bad guy.
Speaker 3 (14:01):
But would he possibly have a case doctor Epstein have
a case against the Jeffrey Epstein estate or anything, because
everything that happened, he could clearly have bost business because
but that's but nothing was done purposely, Okay, all right, gotcha, Yeah.
Speaker 2 (14:17):
There's there's no there's no intent there to do in nothing. Yeah,
but that's not even the dumbest part of the story.
Over the Daily Caller, Thomas English reveals that Crockett staff
further fell for obvious hope donations by domor by donors
claiming to work for Epstein and listing their occupation to.
Speaker 4 (14:35):
Be child molester.
Speaker 2 (14:37):
Here's an excerpt from that gem of a story Democrat
Texas Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett not only sight of the wrong
Jeffrey Epstein in her Tuesday floor speech attacking Republicans, records
show her team also appears to have fallen for obvious
troll donations listing Epstein's occupation as quote child molester. Crockett
(14:59):
claim to the Republican figures, including ep administrator Lee Zelden,
took money from somebody named Jeffrey Epstein. Zelden and others
quickly pointed out the donations came from a New York
physician and other individuals who share the same name, not
the deceased sex offender. Some of the donations were made
after Epstein's death. A Daily Caller review of the Federal
(15:22):
Election Commission records Crockett listed included when read, which is
the Republican online fundraising platform which has received multiple micro
donations from someone using the name quote Jeffrey Epstein while
listing their occupation as child molester and their employer as
(15:44):
Jeffrey Epstein.
Speaker 4 (15:46):
The troll entries included.
Speaker 2 (15:47):
Donations as small as a dollar and four cents, with
one dated February twenty eight, twenty twenty five, nearly six
years after Epstein air Quote died in a Manhattan jail
cell in August of twenty nineteen. The entries list a
Palm beach floor the address. Now that's funny. I don't
(16:12):
care who you are now. Naturally in their role as
a propagain the megaphone for the Democrat Party, CNN also
provided Plasket with a platform to defend her own self.
Speaker 4 (16:21):
Guess what Stacey says. She's moving all on and you
all just need to move on to together.
Speaker 9 (16:28):
And you asked the question, and I understand you're saying, well,
he was a constituent, right, and whether or not they're
good about you're just trying to get information to get
to bed the truth. But at this time, this was
happening after he had already pleaded guilty to state prostitution charges.
And then there was that Miami Herald article that came
out in twenty eighteen detelling how widespread the sexual abuse was,
(16:48):
interviewing eighty women who said that he sexually abused her.
So I abused them, I should say.
Speaker 1 (16:54):
So.
Speaker 9 (16:55):
I'm wondering, as you look back, do you think that
it was an error in judgment to be communicating with him?
Speaker 5 (17:00):
Oh?
Speaker 2 (17:01):
Do you think it was an air to be communicating
during a congressional hearing with Jeffrey Epstein hanging tight.
Speaker 3 (17:08):
Good morning, Michael and Dragon. Let's be clear.
Speaker 2 (17:11):
The text line is three three one three on eighty
five oh K zero A.
Speaker 4 (17:23):
You know, I'm glad to know that we still have
a smart ass audience. Yeah.
Speaker 3 (17:26):
They're not passive aggressive at all, not at all, not
at all.
Speaker 4 (17:30):
Touche toche.
Speaker 2 (17:33):
So Stacey Plackett is texting with the pedophile and the
criminal Jeffrey Epstein during a congressional hearing, and CNN once
again kind of wants to ask, uh, what were you doing?
By the way, just as A I don't want very
(17:53):
lead here, but they were going to censure her. I
think that vote failed.
Speaker 9 (18:00):
Together and you asked the question, and I understand you're saying, well,
he was a constituent, right, and whether or not they're
good about you're just trying to get information to get
to belie the truth. But at this time this was happening.
Speaker 2 (18:10):
Now a congressional hearing is trying to get to the truth.
What No, I don't think.
Speaker 9 (18:17):
So he had already pleaded guilty to state prostitution charges,
and then there was that Miami Herald article that came
out in twenty fourteen detelling how widespread the sexual abuse was,
interviewing eighty women who said that he sexually abused her
so abused them, I should say, so, I'm wondering, as
you look back, do you think that it was an
(18:37):
error in judgment to be communicating with him at all?
Do you have any regrets?
Speaker 5 (18:41):
Well, listen, I think Jeffrey Epstein is a reprehensible person, absolutely.
Speaker 2 (18:46):
Disgusting, But it's who I go to for advice. Of course,
I guess I could say dragging things. I'm a reprehensible person.
He actually works with me. So it's the same thing.
Speaker 5 (18:57):
I lived in a house, lived in a house during
childhood with a mother who had been sexually abused by
her dad, and I know the effect that that had
on her as well as us as her family, and
so I understand what the victims are going through and
I want them to get their relevant, with their justice,
their peace out of this.
Speaker 4 (19:19):
I believe that Jeffrey Epstein.
Speaker 5 (19:20):
Had information, and I was going to get information to
get it the truth. Having a friendship with him is
not something that I would deem to have, and so.
Speaker 2 (19:33):
I'm just looking for a friendship with him is not
something I would deem to have. And let's make sure
that you understand that. I. You know, it's such a
it's such a good tool when you're answering questions like
this to first identify yourself with the victims. Oh, you know,
(19:58):
I grew up in a household where a mother was,
you know, sexually molested. So I understand the victims. And
you know, I think that he's a reprehensible individual, and
he has all this other stuff that makes him somebody
that I do not want, and I don't deem him
to be a friend or anything else. Yet, in the
(20:19):
congressional hearing where you're trying to get to the truth,
you go to a convicted criminal that you say is despicable.
Yet you're looking for advice, not information. You were looking
for advice.
Speaker 5 (20:37):
I'm moving forward, and I think that that's what we
as American people should do, is move forward. If individuals
are not involved in illegal activity, extending his criminal enterprise
or his financial enterprise, or all of those things, I
think that you need to look at what people are
doing moving forward.
Speaker 9 (20:57):
Wait, let me just better understand that what is that point?
Speaker 2 (20:59):
Because I know this is hard to comprehend. But there's
some actual journalism taking place on CNN right here.
Speaker 4 (21:08):
Are doing moving forward? Wait, let me just better understand that.
What is that point?
Speaker 9 (21:12):
Because at the time he was a known sex offender
and it had been detailed all the sexual There are
a lot.
Speaker 5 (21:17):
Of people who have done a lot of crimes, and
as a prosecutor, you get information from people where you can.
I've interviewed confidential informants, I've interviewed narcotics, drug traffickers and others.
And that doesn't mean that I'm their friend. That doesn't
mean that they are friendly with me. It means that
(21:37):
they have information that I need and that I'm trying
to get it to truth.
Speaker 9 (21:41):
And that's what I do in no regrets, basically is
what you're saying, I'm moving forward.
Speaker 4 (21:45):
Oh there you go. You know what.
Speaker 2 (21:47):
You can keep asking me these questions, but I'm moving
on the gate, you know, kind of like em blazing saddles,
where you know they show up at the gate. Yeah,
they need a roll of dimes to get through the gate.
She just put that gate down. I am not, well,
you can't go through here anymore. Nope, And CNM willingly
obliges before I let you go, congresswoman, and I call
(22:09):
you congress woman. You're a non voting going yeah, whatever.
This new generation of Democrats is really something. I'm not
sure think what that is, but they are really something now.
Nothing to see here. Uh, this is in my opinion
I've expressed now over a couple of segments about Epstein,
(22:33):
this really is a political side show. As I said yesterday,
and I'll say it again, and maybe I'll be wrong.
Speaker 4 (22:44):
I don't think so. But I think people are.
Speaker 2 (22:47):
All just wound up like crazy that these documents are
going to be a smoking gun, that be a smoking cannon,
it's going to be a howitzer. That's just you know,
the smoke's just everywhere and it'll blow away and there'll
be nothing there, nothing there now. At the same time,
(23:09):
if that's going on, the Democrats will use this to
make you believe that there is something there, because as
long as you believe that there might be something, there
might be Donald Trump's if there's Donald Trump in.
Speaker 4 (23:20):
All the way and leave only gutting, that's what's really
going on.
Speaker 2 (23:28):
Here's Pam Bondi revealing that the Biden administration intentionally funneled
millions of your tax dollars to a known ring of
human smugglers. Now everybody's all wrapped around the axle about
Jeffrey Epstein, who's wrapped around the axle about.
Speaker 10 (23:43):
This major enforcement actions right here in Tampa. We unsealed
the indictment charging twelve defendants operating a massive right here
in Tampa, a massive illegal smuggling ring. The defendants engaged
in a conspiracy to bring illegal aliens from Cuba to.
Speaker 3 (24:02):
The US per profit.
Speaker 10 (24:03):
They coached their clients, including children who came to airports alone,
came to our country alone, were put on planes for
connecting flights lied to border patrol agents due to coaching
and law enforcement. They charged up to forty thousand dollars
(24:25):
per victim. They used Zell to transfer over seven million
dollars over the course of this scheme, and I believe
had profits cash of over eighteen million.
Speaker 3 (24:40):
It is.
Speaker 2 (24:43):
It is just, this is sickening that people aren't more outraged.
And I think it's because we don't actually are incapable
of putting a face to these victims. Children who are
being sent airports solo, just anybody they can pick them up.
They got, you know, mules and other people that are
picking them up and then just selling them into slavery,
(25:07):
selling them into sex slavery, or whatever it might be.
It is one of the most despicable aspects of illegal
immigration that does not get enough attention.
Speaker 3 (25:17):
Would it be fantastic if every Jeffrey Epstein in the
United States sent Jasmine Crockett a two dollars campaign donation?
Speaker 4 (25:26):
Huh?
Speaker 2 (25:28):
That's actually a pretty good idea, because then they're faced
with the conundrum of do we keep the two bucks
or do we go through all the trouble of having to,
you know, file the report that this particular donation is
being returned. Then you'd have to file that report with
the FEC. You'd have to cut a check. You'd have to,
(25:49):
you know, assuming that you don't have any way to
use zel or you know, PayPal or something, you'd have
to then cut a check and literally physically mail a
check back to somebody for two dollars and four cents.
I didn't even know what a first class stamp costs anymore.
What's the first class stamp?
Speaker 4 (26:08):
Dragon? Do you have any any clue whatsoever?
Speaker 3 (26:11):
Fifty two cents? Oh is it really that nd? I
really don't know you, Yes, you have no clue either.
So I don't have time to go through the entire.
Speaker 2 (26:19):
Story today, but yesterday I casually mentioned the tea.
Speaker 3 (26:23):
Oh we were way off.
Speaker 5 (26:26):
Uh.
Speaker 3 (26:27):
Standard sized rectaicular envelope stamps start at seventy eight cents.
Speaker 4 (26:32):
Seventy eight cents yep. Wow.
Speaker 2 (26:35):
So if you bought forever stamps twenty years ago and
still had some man, what an investment you're rolling in it? Right?
Speaker 4 (26:43):
May I'm telling you what?
Speaker 2 (26:44):
You know, we instead of crypto, instead of bitcoin or
gold or you know, anything else, or for that matter,
invidious stock, we should have invested in forever stamps. And
there's such a market for because people are making so
many things these days.
Speaker 3 (26:58):
For sure, When was the last time you mailed something Texas?
Three three one oh three? Yeah, when was the last
time you put a stamp on something and mailed it?
Speaker 2 (27:08):
What did you and did you do it from your home?
Like you know, is there a neighborhood box or did
you do it have to go to the post office?
What did you mail? And how much did it cost you?
Three three one zero three? Or if you was in
it too, dragon three three one oh three, but he
was in it to me three three one zero three yes.
Speaker 3 (27:31):
Uh, can you.
Speaker 4 (27:33):
Answer that question.
Speaker 3 (27:34):
When is the last time I put a stamp on
something and nailed it?
Speaker 4 (27:36):
Yeah? I have no freaking clue me either.
Speaker 2 (27:40):
I I don't know, because now you know, through through
most banks you can just do bill pay right, Yeah,
so that they if you can't like transfer money, you can,
they'll send the paper check.
Speaker 3 (27:55):
I want to say, it's been more than ten years.
Speaker 2 (27:58):
I don't think it's I think it's been that long
for me because I think I've probably mailed something, but
I just can't imagine what it might be, you know,
like maybe a maybe a handyman that doesn't take any
sort of transfer payments that I don't know. Three three,
one zero three?
Speaker 4 (28:17):
What is it?
Speaker 2 (28:17):
How long ago was it? What'd you pay for it?
I talked briefly about Jason Crowe in this group of
Democrats that have decided that their success will be to
call upon the military and the deep state to engage
in sedition, to ignore lawful orders of the president of.
Speaker 4 (28:39):
The commander in chief. And they went on to x.
Speaker 2 (28:44):
I'm sure they went on TikTok elsewhere too. But here's
Senator atleas A Slotkin kind of giving you the baseline
for what they say, Well, what is it about democrats
and these liberals always wanting to do these little videos,
have a little you.
Speaker 3 (28:59):
Can see that video of that, Michael says, go here
dot com. What's Michael says, go here dot com? And
why do you have to see that Michael says, go
here dot com because it's.
Speaker 2 (29:07):
Not in the podcast. So I'm sure it's not in
the podcast because of why lawyers, lawyers, that's right, because
of the damn lawyers. So I guess, as I said yesterday,
we need to equip all of our members of the
members of the military with lawbooks or something. But yesterday
Martha McKell I think it is Martha McCallum took after
(29:30):
Jason Crowe and just simply asked a simple question, tell
me what illegal orders are being issued.
Speaker 4 (29:40):
Oh fun was had by all
Hey, fellas, I'm going to be down in Colorado for
thirty six hours because that's all I can take over Thanksgiving.
I just wanted to let you know. Don't worry. I'm
not going to come see you in income Poops. I'm
just going to take the light rail and try to
get to where I have to go. I tell you
this as a message. If you don't hear from me
within about two days after the end of the Thanksgiving holiday,
(00:23):
send help.
Speaker 2 (00:25):
Well, there won't be he helped to send because as
Dragon and I have been laughing for a couple of
days now, we had the fentanyl in the storeroom down
on Highland's Ranch. Then we had the myth. I'm not
sure where they found the myth, but it's the both
of them. Like the fennyl was one of the biggest
things ever and the myth is now one of the
biggest things ever. And the local media has been very
(00:51):
very I think the local cops are very, very proud
of the fact that these are the largest seizures ever.
Or in the case of the fentlel I guess I
have to say it's really really the largest discovery ever.
Because they didn't really investigate it. They just kind of
stumbled upon it, Gaes, somebody bought an abandoned storage unit.
Is there really something to be proud of because that
(01:14):
means that But for the fact that they were able
to stop the distribution of that myth and that fentanyl,
that myth in that fentanyl.
Speaker 3 (01:23):
Was targeted here, it was here. We're happy it's off
the street. It fantastic, yes, but it should never have
been here to take place?
Speaker 4 (01:35):
Why? Why?
Speaker 5 (01:36):
Why?
Speaker 2 (01:37):
And how much longer? And of course I haven't seen
it because I haven't watched any local news lately. But Dragon,
I'll bet you a dollar to a donut that we've
had the press conference where they've they've got, you know,
some guy that looks like a cop, you know, I
gues I'm generalizing, looks like a cop, particularly a federal.
Speaker 4 (01:58):
Cop, you know, like a d A agent or something.
Speaker 2 (02:01):
And then they zoom out and then there's probably a
giant Oh you've alay made a gesture and there's a
giant table with all the drugs all piled up, the
drugs and the money and everything else, and they're all
pointing at it like, oh, look what we got, Look
what we found, and again, congratulations on finding it.
Speaker 4 (02:20):
How about we stop it from getting here in the
first place. Am I? Am I being unreasonable?
Speaker 3 (02:26):
No, I'm right there with you on that same mind frame.
Let's make sure it's not here.
Speaker 2 (02:31):
Right, Let's let's let's stop the importation of drugs into this.
In fact, let's just uh wait.
Speaker 4 (02:37):
Cow.
Speaker 2 (02:41):
Three three one zero three, say it along with me,
sing along with Mitch zero three three three.
Speaker 4 (02:51):
If that's what it takes, If it takes, say it.
If if if you can't do three three one zero
three and in your brain it has to be three
three one o three, then do that he said it.
(03:11):
Do it. You've you've probably heard.
Speaker 2 (03:14):
Because maybe you've thought about it with me, because I
think some of you do think this about me. You've
heard the old saying that somebody is dumb as a stump,
dumb as a rock. It is of course an insult
because it compares that person's intelligence to that of any
random inanimate object. And in this case, it's either a
(03:35):
fallen tree, a felled tree like a stump you know
out in your yard somewhere or out in the field
that you know you gotta tear it out some point
but you haven't, or it's just a big a big
giant rock, Just a big giant rock. Every time I
see or hear the Pride of South Dallas, Jasmine the Crockett.
(03:57):
Every time I see or hear Jasmine the Crockett, that stumper,
that rock comes to mind. The sumb materialized in my
by Cokettel brain yesterday when I saw a clip of
Jasmine trying to defend her fellow dim with a Democrat,
(04:18):
Stacy Plackett, who was revealed on Monday to have been
texting with Jeffrey Epstein for advice during a life congressional
hearing back in twenty nineteen. Who was your mentor growing up,
Jeffrey Epstein? Who did you go to for dating advice?
Jeffrey Epstein? Oh, I'm a delegate to the United States Congress.
(04:43):
From Where was she from? She's from the Dominican not
Dominican Republic, the Virgin Islands or somewhere I don't remember.
Speaker 4 (04:49):
Who cares.
Speaker 2 (04:51):
Yeah, I get my advice from Jeffrey Epstein. Now in
the clip that you'll hear in a minute, you'll hear
the Pride of South Dallas sitting at her side trying
to claim that her colleague's actions were just fine because
former congresswoman or Congressman Lee Zelden, who is a Republican,
(05:11):
actually received campaign contributions from a person named Jeffrey Epstein
back in the day. There's just one problem. The guy
that contributed to Zelden's congressional campaign was a college professor
who happened to have the same name. When I read
(05:33):
that and discovered that in show prep yesterday evening, I
thought to myself, Holy crap, can.
Speaker 4 (05:38):
You imagine that right now?
Speaker 2 (05:40):
Your name is Jeffrey Epstein, even if it's doctor Jeffrey Epstein.
Speaker 4 (05:47):
No matter where you go and somebody.
Speaker 2 (05:49):
You know calls out something bad about Jeffrey Epstein, you
got to bury your head now. In this clip, you'll
hear Jasmine blame Republicans for her idiotic error when she
was pressed on the matter by CNN's Caitlyn Collins. You'll
also hear her deny to Collins that she ever said
exactly what. You will hear her say, Oh, this is
(06:12):
just this is glorious.
Speaker 6 (06:15):
You talk about Republicans taking money from a Jeffrey Epstein.
Speaker 3 (06:18):
Here's what you said, who.
Speaker 7 (06:24):
Also took money from somebody named Jeffrey Epstein. As I
had my team dig in very quickly met Romney, the
NRCC Lee Zelden, George bush Win, read, Nickcain, Caitlin, Rick Lazio.
Speaker 6 (06:45):
You mentioned to Leiz Elden there he's now a cabinet secretary.
He responded and said it was actually a doctor, Jeffrey Epstein,
who's a doctor that doesn't have any relation to the
convicted sex strucker. Unfortunate for that doctor, but that.
Speaker 4 (06:55):
Is who to a prior campaign of his.
Speaker 6 (06:58):
Do you want to correct the record on the people?
Speaker 3 (07:00):
I never said that.
Speaker 2 (07:02):
Wait, wait a minute, you've already heard a little hint
of that. Do you want to correct the record about
Lee Zelden?
Speaker 4 (07:09):
I mean Dallas South Dallas. Hello, Hello, I think you
got a problem.
Speaker 2 (07:17):
You know, my favorite congress person, my favorite Congress critter
used to be Sheila Jackson Lee, who was from Harris County, Houston, Texas,
because she used to be the dumbest member of Congress. Well, Texas, you.
Speaker 4 (07:29):
Still hold on. I know, I know ours, ours are
in the running.
Speaker 2 (07:35):
Ours have made the semi finals, but they haven't made
the finals yet. But Texas is you know, Texas just
has beautiful women and they've got done congresswomen.
Speaker 6 (07:45):
But that is who doing to a prior campaign of his.
Do you want to correct the record on the people?
Speaker 8 (07:50):
And I never said that it was that Jeffrey Epstein,
just so that people understand when you make a donation,
your picture is not there. And because they decided to
spring this on us in real time, I.
Speaker 2 (08:00):
Want to they decided to spring You said that your
staff is the one that did that.
Speaker 4 (08:08):
Your staff is the one that did it. Roll the
tape again, you talked.
Speaker 6 (08:14):
About Republicans taking money from a Jeffrey Epstein.
Speaker 7 (08:17):
Here's what you said, who also took money from somebody
named Jeffrey Epstein. As I had my team digg in
very quickly, met Romney, the NRCC, Lee z Elden, George
bush Win, read Nickcaine, Calin Rick Lazio.
Speaker 6 (08:44):
You mentioned to lese Elden there he's now a cabinet secretary.
He responded and said it was actually a doctor, Jeffrey Epstein,
who's a doctor that doesn't have any relation to the
convicted sex truncker. Unfortunate for that doctor, but that is
who to a prior campaign of his. Do you want
to correct the record on the.
Speaker 8 (08:58):
People that never said that it was that Jeffrey Epstein.
Speaker 4 (09:02):
Now she's cracked about that.
Speaker 2 (09:04):
She said, hey, Jeffrey Epstein got a cya, Yeah, you
get a cya. But she ignores the fact that she
also said, my staff quickly dug up these names. It
was her staff that did it. Her staff failed her.
Speaker 8 (09:18):
People understand, when you make a donation, your picture is
not there. And because they decided to spring this on
us in real.
Speaker 2 (09:25):
Because they decided to spring this on us. No, you
said you had your staff quickly research.
Speaker 8 (09:33):
I wanted the Republicans to think about what could potentially
happen because I knew that they didn't even try to
go through the FEC.
Speaker 4 (09:39):
So my team what they did is they Googled. And
that is specifically why, Oh it's doctor Google.
Speaker 3 (09:45):
You can always trust Google exactly.
Speaker 4 (09:47):
Google's never wrong about anything.
Speaker 8 (09:49):
A Jeffrey Epstein. Unlike Republicans, I at least don't go
out and just tell lies because it was not the
same one.
Speaker 4 (09:57):
That's fine.
Speaker 8 (09:57):
But when Lee Zelden had something to say, all he
had to say was it was a Diffrey Jeffrey Jeffrey Epstein.
He admitted that he did receive donations from A Jeffrey Epstein,
so at least I wasn't trying to mislead people. Now,
have I dug in to find out who this doctor is?
I have not, So I will trust and take What
he says is that it wasn't that Jeffrey Epstein. But
(10:17):
I was not attempting to mislead anybody. I literally had
maybe twenty minutes before I had.
Speaker 4 (10:24):
To do that debate.
Speaker 6 (10:25):
Yeah, but people might see that say, well, you're trying
to make it sound like he took money from I
did not registered TEX offender.
Speaker 8 (10:31):
No, but I literally did not know when you search
SEC files, And that's what I had my team to do.
Speaker 4 (10:36):
I Textede again. She missed.
Speaker 2 (10:37):
She had her team do it, and so they just
saw Jeffrey. Why do you think do you think if
they saw Jeffrey Epstein that was all they were looking for,
Just find the name. They never never crossed their mind.
There might be another Michael Brown somewhere. Gee, what what
a more common name than Michael Brown? Yeah, Jeffrey Epstein
(11:01):
not quite a common right, So you might think, hey,
we're searching the FEC files. Maybe we ought to, you know,
go to doctor Google again and find out whether this
is the same guy or not. The purpose was to
try to denegrate Lee Zelden, and she got caught.
Speaker 8 (11:19):
And listen, we're going up there saying that she took
donating right.
Speaker 6 (11:23):
But some one might say, well, your team should have
done the homework to make sure it wasn't the Condronatics.
Speaker 8 (11:27):
Within twenty minutes, you could not find that out, not
from just doing a quick search on fec so number one.
I made sure that I was clear that it was
a Jeffrey Epstein, but I never said that it was
specifically that Jeffrey Epstein, because I knew that we would
need more time to really digt you talked.
Speaker 2 (11:44):
So in other words, I knew what I was trying
to accomplish, and I accomplished when I was trying to accomplish,
but then I got caught, and so now I'm just
trying to Well, I remember I said, just a Jeffrey Epstein.
Speaker 4 (11:55):
If we have a text, what dragon.
Speaker 3 (11:57):
From twenty seventy three group number twenty seventy three, Mike
or Michael, is Jasmine Crockett in any way liable for
slander for her Epstein donor scam.
Speaker 2 (12:05):
No, she's protected by the Speech and Debate clause, So
you can the speech and debate clause the founders put
in the Constitution primarily so that people could freely debate
and even say nasty things about one another, even if
they are false. Now, if she had gone out, this
becomes kind of a gray area. But if she had
(12:27):
gone out, let's say she was in South Dallas and
she went on a you know, she went on w
FAA in Dallas, and she said something on the television
station about oh, yeah, Lee's olden took Oh she went
to New York. And make it even better, she went
to New York and did it because he was a
congressman from New York.
Speaker 4 (12:44):
Then she may not be.
Speaker 2 (12:46):
Protected by the speech and debate clause. But it's a
great question because let's just assume for a moment, ask
soon make an ass of you and me. When you
assume that she might have been liable for defamation, libel,
(13:06):
and slander. What are his damages A dollar, a million dollars,
a bazillion dollars. So he might win the case that
she defamed him, libeled, and slandered him, but he has
to prove damages. He might win the issue. Yeah you
said something, it was false and it was derogatory toward
(13:29):
my reputation. Now what's that worth? What's that worth?
Speaker 4 (13:33):
Now? That's but hang on, that's.
Speaker 3 (13:36):
Chasing a quick rabbit hole here. He would probably have
a better case. The doctor Epstein would probably have a
better case against the Epstein estate rather than her, because.
Speaker 2 (13:46):
Except except if you, if you really want to go
down this rabbit hole just a little bit, then might
she has a perfect defense? I said a Jeffrey Epstein. Yeah,
so that's that would if I were representing her, that
would be my defense. We didn't say it was the
bad guy.
Speaker 3 (14:01):
But would he possibly have a case doctor Epstein have
a case against the Jeffrey Epstein estate or anything, because
everything that happened, he could clearly have bost business because
but that's but nothing was done purposely, Okay, all right, gotcha, Yeah.
Speaker 2 (14:17):
There's there's no there's no intent there to do in nothing. Yeah,
but that's not even the dumbest part of the story.
Over the Daily Caller, Thomas English reveals that Crockett staff
further fell for obvious hope donations by domor by donors
claiming to work for Epstein and listing their occupation to.
Speaker 4 (14:35):
Be child molester.
Speaker 2 (14:37):
Here's an excerpt from that gem of a story Democrat
Texas Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett not only sight of the wrong
Jeffrey Epstein in her Tuesday floor speech attacking Republicans, records
show her team also appears to have fallen for obvious
troll donations listing Epstein's occupation as quote child molester. Crockett
(14:59):
claim to the Republican figures, including ep administrator Lee Zelden,
took money from somebody named Jeffrey Epstein. Zelden and others
quickly pointed out the donations came from a New York
physician and other individuals who share the same name, not
the deceased sex offender. Some of the donations were made
after Epstein's death. A Daily Caller review of the Federal
(15:22):
Election Commission records Crockett listed included when read, which is
the Republican online fundraising platform which has received multiple micro
donations from someone using the name quote Jeffrey Epstein while
listing their occupation as child molester and their employer as
(15:44):
Jeffrey Epstein.
Speaker 4 (15:46):
The troll entries included.
Speaker 2 (15:47):
Donations as small as a dollar and four cents, with
one dated February twenty eight, twenty twenty five, nearly six
years after Epstein air Quote died in a Manhattan jail
cell in August of twenty nineteen. The entries list a
Palm beach floor the address. Now that's funny. I don't
(16:12):
care who you are now. Naturally in their role as
a propagain the megaphone for the Democrat Party, CNN also
provided Plasket with a platform to defend her own self.
Speaker 4 (16:21):
Guess what Stacey says. She's moving all on and you
all just need to move on to together.
Speaker 9 (16:28):
And you asked the question, and I understand you're saying, well,
he was a constituent, right, and whether or not they're
good about you're just trying to get information to get
to bed the truth. But at this time, this was
happening after he had already pleaded guilty to state prostitution charges.
And then there was that Miami Herald article that came
out in twenty eighteen detelling how widespread the sexual abuse was,
(16:48):
interviewing eighty women who said that he sexually abused her.
So I abused them, I should say.
Speaker 1 (16:54):
So.
Speaker 9 (16:55):
I'm wondering, as you look back, do you think that
it was an error in judgment to be communicating with him?
Speaker 5 (17:00):
Oh?
Speaker 2 (17:01):
Do you think it was an air to be communicating
during a congressional hearing with Jeffrey Epstein hanging tight.
Speaker 3 (17:08):
Good morning, Michael and Dragon. Let's be clear.
Speaker 2 (17:11):
The text line is three three one three on eighty
five oh K zero A.
Speaker 4 (17:23):
You know, I'm glad to know that we still have
a smart ass audience. Yeah.
Speaker 3 (17:26):
They're not passive aggressive at all, not at all, not
at all.
Speaker 4 (17:30):
Touche toche.
Speaker 2 (17:33):
So Stacey Plackett is texting with the pedophile and the
criminal Jeffrey Epstein during a congressional hearing, and CNN once
again kind of wants to ask, uh, what were you doing?
By the way, just as A I don't want very
(17:53):
lead here, but they were going to censure her. I
think that vote failed.
Speaker 9 (18:00):
Together and you asked the question, and I understand you're saying, well,
he was a constituent, right, and whether or not they're
good about you're just trying to get information to get
to belie the truth. But at this time this was happening.
Speaker 2 (18:10):
Now a congressional hearing is trying to get to the truth.
What No, I don't think.
Speaker 9 (18:17):
So he had already pleaded guilty to state prostitution charges,
and then there was that Miami Herald article that came
out in twenty fourteen detelling how widespread the sexual abuse was,
interviewing eighty women who said that he sexually abused her
so abused them, I should say, so, I'm wondering, as
you look back, do you think that it was an
(18:37):
error in judgment to be communicating with him at all?
Do you have any regrets?
Speaker 5 (18:41):
Well, listen, I think Jeffrey Epstein is a reprehensible person, absolutely.
Speaker 2 (18:46):
Disgusting, But it's who I go to for advice. Of course,
I guess I could say dragging things. I'm a reprehensible person.
He actually works with me. So it's the same thing.
Speaker 5 (18:57):
I lived in a house, lived in a house during
childhood with a mother who had been sexually abused by
her dad, and I know the effect that that had
on her as well as us as her family, and
so I understand what the victims are going through and
I want them to get their relevant, with their justice,
their peace out of this.
Speaker 4 (19:19):
I believe that Jeffrey Epstein.
Speaker 5 (19:20):
Had information, and I was going to get information to
get it the truth. Having a friendship with him is
not something that I would deem to have, and so.
Speaker 2 (19:33):
I'm just looking for a friendship with him is not
something I would deem to have. And let's make sure
that you understand that. I. You know, it's such a
it's such a good tool when you're answering questions like
this to first identify yourself with the victims. Oh, you know,
(19:58):
I grew up in a household where a mother was,
you know, sexually molested. So I understand the victims. And
you know, I think that he's a reprehensible individual, and
he has all this other stuff that makes him somebody
that I do not want, and I don't deem him
to be a friend or anything else. Yet, in the
(20:19):
congressional hearing where you're trying to get to the truth,
you go to a convicted criminal that you say is despicable.
Yet you're looking for advice, not information. You were looking
for advice.
Speaker 5 (20:37):
I'm moving forward, and I think that that's what we
as American people should do, is move forward. If individuals
are not involved in illegal activity, extending his criminal enterprise
or his financial enterprise, or all of those things, I
think that you need to look at what people are
doing moving forward.
Speaker 9 (20:57):
Wait, let me just better understand that what is that point?
Speaker 2 (20:59):
Because I know this is hard to comprehend. But there's
some actual journalism taking place on CNN right here.
Speaker 4 (21:08):
Are doing moving forward? Wait, let me just better understand that.
What is that point?
Speaker 9 (21:12):
Because at the time he was a known sex offender
and it had been detailed all the sexual There are
a lot.
Speaker 5 (21:17):
Of people who have done a lot of crimes, and
as a prosecutor, you get information from people where you can.
I've interviewed confidential informants, I've interviewed narcotics, drug traffickers and others.
And that doesn't mean that I'm their friend. That doesn't
mean that they are friendly with me. It means that
(21:37):
they have information that I need and that I'm trying
to get it to truth.
Speaker 9 (21:41):
And that's what I do in no regrets, basically is
what you're saying, I'm moving forward.
Speaker 4 (21:45):
Oh there you go. You know what.
Speaker 2 (21:47):
You can keep asking me these questions, but I'm moving
on the gate, you know, kind of like em blazing saddles,
where you know they show up at the gate. Yeah,
they need a roll of dimes to get through the gate.
She just put that gate down. I am not, well,
you can't go through here anymore. Nope, And CNM willingly
obliges before I let you go, congresswoman, and I call
(22:09):
you congress woman. You're a non voting going yeah, whatever.
This new generation of Democrats is really something. I'm not
sure think what that is, but they are really something now.
Nothing to see here. Uh, this is in my opinion
I've expressed now over a couple of segments about Epstein,
(22:33):
this really is a political side show. As I said yesterday,
and I'll say it again, and maybe I'll be wrong.
Speaker 4 (22:44):
I don't think so. But I think people are.
Speaker 2 (22:47):
All just wound up like crazy that these documents are
going to be a smoking gun, that be a smoking cannon,
it's going to be a howitzer. That's just you know,
the smoke's just everywhere and it'll blow away and there'll
be nothing there, nothing there now. At the same time,
(23:09):
if that's going on, the Democrats will use this to
make you believe that there is something there, because as
long as you believe that there might be something, there
might be Donald Trump's if there's Donald Trump in.
Speaker 4 (23:20):
All the way and leave only gutting, that's what's really
going on.
Speaker 2 (23:28):
Here's Pam Bondi revealing that the Biden administration intentionally funneled
millions of your tax dollars to a known ring of
human smugglers. Now everybody's all wrapped around the axle about
Jeffrey Epstein, who's wrapped around the axle about.
Speaker 10 (23:43):
This major enforcement actions right here in Tampa. We unsealed
the indictment charging twelve defendants operating a massive right here
in Tampa, a massive illegal smuggling ring. The defendants engaged
in a conspiracy to bring illegal aliens from Cuba to.
Speaker 3 (24:02):
The US per profit.
Speaker 10 (24:03):
They coached their clients, including children who came to airports alone,
came to our country alone, were put on planes for
connecting flights lied to border patrol agents due to coaching
and law enforcement. They charged up to forty thousand dollars
(24:25):
per victim. They used Zell to transfer over seven million
dollars over the course of this scheme, and I believe
had profits cash of over eighteen million.
Speaker 3 (24:40):
It is.
Speaker 2 (24:43):
It is just, this is sickening that people aren't more outraged.
And I think it's because we don't actually are incapable
of putting a face to these victims. Children who are
being sent airports solo, just anybody they can pick them up.
They got, you know, mules and other people that are
picking them up and then just selling them into slavery,
(25:07):
selling them into sex slavery, or whatever it might be.
It is one of the most despicable aspects of illegal
immigration that does not get enough attention.
Speaker 3 (25:17):
Would it be fantastic if every Jeffrey Epstein in the
United States sent Jasmine Crockett a two dollars campaign donation?
Speaker 4 (25:26):
Huh?
Speaker 2 (25:28):
That's actually a pretty good idea, because then they're faced
with the conundrum of do we keep the two bucks
or do we go through all the trouble of having to,
you know, file the report that this particular donation is
being returned. Then you'd have to file that report with
the FEC. You'd have to cut a check. You'd have to,
(25:49):
you know, assuming that you don't have any way to
use zel or you know, PayPal or something, you'd have
to then cut a check and literally physically mail a
check back to somebody for two dollars and four cents.
I didn't even know what a first class stamp costs anymore.
What's the first class stamp?
Speaker 4 (26:08):
Dragon? Do you have any any clue whatsoever?
Speaker 3 (26:11):
Fifty two cents? Oh is it really that nd? I
really don't know you, Yes, you have no clue either.
So I don't have time to go through the entire.
Speaker 2 (26:19):
Story today, but yesterday I casually mentioned the tea.
Speaker 3 (26:23):
Oh we were way off.
Speaker 5 (26:26):
Uh.
Speaker 3 (26:27):
Standard sized rectaicular envelope stamps start at seventy eight cents.
Speaker 4 (26:32):
Seventy eight cents yep. Wow.
Speaker 2 (26:35):
So if you bought forever stamps twenty years ago and
still had some man, what an investment you're rolling in it? Right?
Speaker 4 (26:43):
May I'm telling you what?
Speaker 2 (26:44):
You know, we instead of crypto, instead of bitcoin or
gold or you know, anything else, or for that matter,
invidious stock, we should have invested in forever stamps. And
there's such a market for because people are making so
many things these days.
Speaker 3 (26:58):
For sure, When was the last time you mailed something Texas?
Three three one oh three? Yeah, when was the last
time you put a stamp on something and mailed it?
Speaker 2 (27:08):
What did you and did you do it from your home?
Like you know, is there a neighborhood box or did
you do it have to go to the post office?
What did you mail? And how much did it cost you?
Three three one zero three? Or if you was in
it too, dragon three three one oh three, but he
was in it to me three three one zero three yes.
Speaker 3 (27:31):
Uh, can you.
Speaker 4 (27:33):
Answer that question.
Speaker 3 (27:34):
When is the last time I put a stamp on
something and nailed it?
Speaker 4 (27:36):
Yeah? I have no freaking clue me either.
Speaker 2 (27:40):
I I don't know, because now you know, through through
most banks you can just do bill pay right, Yeah,
so that they if you can't like transfer money, you can,
they'll send the paper check.
Speaker 3 (27:55):
I want to say, it's been more than ten years.
Speaker 2 (27:58):
I don't think it's I think it's been that long
for me because I think I've probably mailed something, but
I just can't imagine what it might be, you know,
like maybe a maybe a handyman that doesn't take any
sort of transfer payments that I don't know. Three three,
one zero three?
Speaker 4 (28:17):
What is it?
Speaker 2 (28:17):
How long ago was it? What'd you pay for it?
I talked briefly about Jason Crowe in this group of
Democrats that have decided that their success will be to
call upon the military and the deep state to engage
in sedition, to ignore lawful orders of the president of.
Speaker 4 (28:39):
The commander in chief. And they went on to x.
Speaker 2 (28:44):
I'm sure they went on TikTok elsewhere too. But here's
Senator atleas A Slotkin kind of giving you the baseline
for what they say, Well, what is it about democrats
and these liberals always wanting to do these little videos,
have a little you.
Speaker 3 (28:59):
Can see that video of that, Michael says, go here
dot com. What's Michael says, go here dot com? And
why do you have to see that Michael says, go
here dot com because it's.
Speaker 2 (29:07):
Not in the podcast. So I'm sure it's not in
the podcast because of why lawyers, lawyers, that's right, because
of the damn lawyers. So I guess, as I said yesterday,
we need to equip all of our members of the
members of the military with lawbooks or something. But yesterday
Martha McKell I think it is Martha McCallum took after
(29:30):
Jason Crowe and just simply asked a simple question, tell
me what illegal orders are being issued.
Speaker 4 (29:40):
Oh fun was had by all
Popular Podcasts
Las Culturistas with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang
Ding dong! Join your culture consultants, Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang, on an unforgettable journey into the beating heart of CULTURE. Alongside sizzling special guests, they GET INTO the hottest pop-culture moments of the day and the formative cultural experiences that turned them into Culturistas. Produced by the Big Money Players Network and iHeartRadio.
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.