Anatomy of a Lie - 3.13 - The Sean Hannity Show

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Let not your heart be troubled. You are listening to
the Sean Hannity Radio show podcast. All right, a lot
of news breaking today, And we told you, we told you,
We told you. By the way that I mentioned, we
told you so, and we kind of told you so.
No evidence of Trump Russia collusion. You should be angry
about this because the level of this hoax and lie

(00:22):
and propaganda, misinformation. You know how deep this has run
within the media, the willing accomplices of all things democrat,
is unbelievable. I'm gonna give you a full breakdown of
everything and what this means and what this says, and
what should happen and what may not happen. The President
now has in California. He's on his way. He's gonna

(00:43):
be looking at varying prototypes of the types of wall
that they will be building on the southern border. And
they actually have, uh, they have literally lined up the
different types of walls that they can build. I don't know.
I don't see one that's gold leaf that says the
words Trump on it yet, but I haven't seen them all,
but it's always a possibility. Um anyway, it's and the

(01:04):
wall is massive. This is not gonna be a wall
that somebody can just so, let me get one of
those ladders and climb up. I actually tried to do
that once you had one of those hook ladders. I'm
literally fighting to get It. Wasn't easy to do, but
I while I went down to the border twelve times.
I've been there everywhere from the Rio grand to San
Diego and everywhere in between. And I've told you many times.

(01:27):
You've seen it on TV. Horseback, all terrain vehicles, helicopters,
uh votes. I've been sitting through security meetings for years
and we still have a problem at the border. I
got into this with Jorge Ramos the other night, big time,
and I'm like, Okay, I sat there and I played him.
When I was with then Governor Rick Perry at the time,
and we sat through a security briefing that Barack Obama

(01:49):
had been invited to it and didn't go to. So
I called the governors that could I come, I'd like
to sit through that briefing anyways. Part of the briefing, well,
they went over the crime statistics and in a seven
year period, six crimes were committed by illegal immigrants against Texans. Yeah,
and some included murder and rape, and and violent crimes

(02:09):
and drugs and and everything you can in between. That's
a lot of crimes against one state in seven years.
But of course, and I said to Rama, well, why
don't we go meet those six people. So he runs
out leaking to the press, Hannity wants to meet the dreamers.
I said, that's not what I said on TV. I said,
let's meet the people. Because he always says they are

(02:31):
very small percentage of those committing crimes. That's not true either.
There are three point five percent of the population illegal immigrants,
and it is according to the federal your federal government,
who you must love and trust so much. Those of
you on the left, Oh, it's thirteen and a half
percent of the crime in the country. Well, that's a
significant amount of crime being committed by people that never

(02:53):
respected our laws and and our sovereignty as a nation. Anyway,
that's why the presidents down there to day. We'll follow that. Uh,
we've got Hillary Clinton, she's back in the news. You know.
I pointed out there's something very very odd and strange
that is happening, and that is, in certain moments Democrats

(03:16):
they reveal themselves irredeemable deplorables was an example. Uh, clinging
to their God, their guns, their bibles, their religion. That
that would be another one. You know, spread the wealth around,
that would be another one. So Hillary Clinton is in
India and starts to you know, focus blame on why

(03:38):
it is she lost. I'd love to know how much
he's getting paid for her speeches there. You know that
she's the one that referred to Trump supporters as irredeemable deplorables,
adding a Trumps and his backers are also racist and misogynists.
Now she said these remarks while in India over the weekend.
It sounds a lot like her Deploy Horrible's commentary in September.

(04:02):
If you look at the map of the United States,
is all that read in the middle where Trump wont
I win the coast? I when you know Illinois and Minnesota,
places like that. And then she went on, but what
that map doesn't show you as I won the places
that represents two thirds of America's gross domestic product. I
won the places that are optimistic, diverse, dynamic, moving forward.

(04:25):
And then she turned to Trump voters and she goes
and in his whole campaign, make America Great Again? Was
looking backward. You know, you didn't like black people getting rights.
You don't like women, you know, getting jobs, and and
you don't want to. You know, see the Indian government
succeeding more than you are. You know, not do well

(04:46):
with white men, and we don't do well with married
white women. UM. And part of that is an identification
with the Republican Party UH, and a a sort of
ongoing pressure UH to vote the way that your husband,

(05:08):
your boss, UH, your son, whoever believes you should. Countries
U deserves the governments they get. Does the manicure deserve
Donald Trump? What's going wrong? Well, I would have to

(05:32):
say no, we did not deserve that. His whole campaign
make America Great Again was looking backwards. You know, you
didn't like black people getting rights. You don't like women,
you know, getting jobs. You don't want it. You know,
see that Indian Americans succeeding more than you are. Whatever
your problem is, I'm going to solve it. You know

(05:52):
it's so outrageous, but it's so predictable. I will tell
you there is a phenomenon, and I'm looking at thirty
years of personal experience, something about presidential candidates when they lose,
they lose it. I mean, think back, think of al
Gore losing to George W. Bush. He lost his mind.

(06:13):
Al Gore absolutely goes off the deep end because Al
Gored never thought he should have lost to George W. Bush.
And then you know, look at John McCain. John McCain
loses to Barack Obama, absolutely lost it. Became an entirely
different person, very angry, very bitter. I mean, I've a
lot of people lose primaries and they go this way.

(06:34):
And Hillary has lashed out pretty much against everybody because
she lost the election, and now she's blaming the American
people for her losing. All Right, we're gonna get to that.
We're still not at our top story of the day,
which is, of course, the House Intel Committee. I told
you this was probably coming yesterday, and that is no
evidence of Trump Russia collusion. I'll give you the details
in a second. Rex Tillerson is out as Secretary of State,

(06:58):
and Mike Pompeio, who I happened to like a lot
and think is extraordinarily bright, smart, and a really really
brilliant guy in a lot of ways. I don't agree
with everything obviously he says, but um, he's now going
to be Secretary of State. UM, I didn't see that
Rex Tillerson was on the same page as his boss.
And if you're gonna be the Secretary of State, you've

(07:19):
got to be on the same page as your boss.
It's really that simple. Anyway, Rex said he's out as
of March thirty one, and he got a presser today
and here's part of what he said. I received a
call today from the President United States at a little
afternoon time from Air Force one, and I've also spoken
to White House Chief of Staff Kelly to ensure we

(07:40):
have clarity as to the days ahead. What is most
important is to ensure an orderly and smooth transition during
the time that the country continues to face significant policy
in national security challenges. Has such effective At the end
of the day, I'm delegating all responsibilities of the Office

(08:01):
of the Secretary to Deputy Secretary of State Sullivan. My
commission is Secretary of State will terminate at midnight marche
Between now and then, I will address a few administrative
matters related to my departure and work towards a smooth
and orderly transition for Secretary State Designate Mike Pompeo. So

(08:28):
my colleagues in the State Department and the inter Agency,
much remains to be done to achieve our mission on
behalf of the American people, with allies and with partners.
I closed by thanking Hall for the privilege of serving
beside you for the last fourteen months. Importantly, to the
three plus million Americans, thank you for your devotion to

(08:52):
a free and open society. Two acts of kindness towards
one another, to honesty and the quiet, hard work that
you do every day to support this government with your
tax dollars. All of us, we know, want to leave
this place as a better place for the next generation.

(09:12):
I'll now return to private life. It's a private citizen,
as a proud American's proud of the opportunity I've had
to serve my country. God bless all of you. God
Bless the American people. God bless America. Now all morning long,
have you've been watching the corrupt media, lying media in
this country. They've been running with the fake news that

(09:34):
well Rex was totally blindsided by his firing, and that
Trump never spoke to him personally, and that he had
every intention of carrying on a Secretary of State right
up until he got the access morning, and that of
course would make Trump look bad. That's all part of
the narrative, which I'm gonna get into with this House
Intelligence report in a second. You know, he didn't have
the decency to give him a heads up, instead humiliated

(09:55):
him publicly. Except according to The Hill and other sources,
is that's not how it went down at all. And
the White House, you know, reportedly fired and an aid
at the State Department who told the media that Rex
Tillerson was blindsided by the firing. The AP is first
first reporting that the firing of the Under Secretary of State,

(10:16):
Steve Goldstein, and citing officials, was prompted by his statement
that he released responding to Tillerson's firing, in which he
said that Tillerson did not speak to Trump before the
firing and is unaware of the reason behind the dismissal. Now,
that statement strongly suggested that Rex Tillerson found out about
his firing from Twitter, though it differs from published accounts

(10:37):
of the decision that cited White House sources, and Goldstein
also said Tillerson at every intention of staying before he
was fired, but the AP sided too. White House officials
reporting that Tillerson was told that he would be removed
on Friday. NBC News tweeted the White House Chief of
Staff John Kelly delivered the news to him on Friday.

(10:58):
The AP reported that Kelly had told Tillerson that he
might be uh, that there might be a presidential tweet
that would concern him. So there was no blind siding,
no attempts of public humiliation, and no pink slips. And
you serve at the pleasure of the president. That's the
way these jobs go. Now onto our big top story.
I want to I want to just lay this out

(11:18):
for you you. We have now been sold a bill
of goods, a hoax, a lie, a conspiracy theory that
even continues in spite of the fact that there's no
evidence of any Trump Russia collusion. Now we do have
evidence that there was Russia interference in the election. Nobody

(11:41):
disputes that. We believe that now for a long time
that we know that. Inteen Devon Newness personally warned Barack
Obama and said to Obama, uh, the Russians are trying
to influence our elections like they've been doing the European elections.
He wrote a great column that was in the Washington Times.
But when you look at this report and what it says,

(12:05):
the major finding is that the House Intel Committee have
now ended their fourteen month phase of this Russian investigation.
There's still a lot of other investigations to come. It
confirms everything we have been telling you, and it also
confirms that the media and Democrats have been flat out

(12:26):
lying to every American for over a year with their breathless,
hysterical reporting and they, out of pretty much whole cloth,
created a Russian collusion conspiracy theory, all designed to smear
and delegitimized Donald Trump. And it's all been a lie.

(12:47):
And I'm gonna explain the anatomy of a lie when
we get back, right glad you whether Sean Hannity show
news information, you're not gonna get mainstream media. So this
House Intel Committee investing gation has gone on fourteen months,
fourteen months, and they provided an overview and a document yesterday.
More information will follow, and that is a fourteen month

(13:11):
bipartisan investigation into the Russia actively targeting the US election.
You gotta remember Barack Obama was personally worn by Devin Newness,
who is the House Intel Committee chair Devin Newness wrote
a piece in the Washington in Washington Times in that
Russia was gonna do this, and that Russia has been

(13:32):
doing this. Barack Obama just days before the election, told
Donald Trump to stop whining. There is no serious, no
serious person out you could even you could even rig
you could no serious person because they're so decentralized and

(13:56):
the numbers of votes involved, there's no evidence that that
has had in the past or that there are instances
in which that will happen this time. And so, uh,
I'd invited Mr Trump to stop whining and go try
to make his case to get votes. No serious person

(14:16):
whatever believed that this is possible. He was specifically warned,
and he said it right up to the election. Now
Hillary loses, which people didn't think was gonna happen, and
so that they're grasping at straws. They need some explanation. Now.
They did everything they can do to destroy Donald Trump
and the lead up to the election, so why would

(14:36):
they stop then? Why not just recognize that the American
people have spoken and as the American people will decide. Now,
that wasn't good enough for them. So after fourteen months,
this is what they concluded, we have found no evidence
of collusion, of co ordination, or conspiracy between the Trump
campaign and the Russians. How anti Trump research in made

(15:00):
its way from Russian sources to the Clinton campaign. They've
discovered how that happened, and the problematic contacts between members
of the intelligence community, more specifically James Clapper and those
officials and the news media. And James Clapper went about
telling the world off, this is outrageous, these leaks, and
on and on and on. It turns out he was

(15:21):
one of the main leakers. I'm gonna explain how profoundness
is and what it means and how it should impact
all of us when we get back later on Sydney
Powell and Sarah Carter all way in, we have Congressman
Mark Meadows, Congressman Uh, Jim Jordan are gonna check in today,
and uh, we have Pastor Scott and Reverend Charles Christian
Adams battling over the Democratic love of furicon. Alright now

(15:45):
until the top of the All right, the President now
has arrived at the border and he's looking at different
border prototypes. He's meeting up with and talking to It
seems like a high ranking person in the border patrol. Uh,
let's pick this up from where it started just a
minute ago. Well was it like until you built the
wall and the wall, by the way, is that wall

(16:08):
up there which is a sheet metal but still at
least it works a little bit? How was it before
you built the wall? So there was effectively no border
in San Diego. It was a chaotic situation that this
fence behind me, it was made out of scrap metal
that the military wasn't using, that we set in place
to really just delineate the border once it needed something,
and it changed our environment. We went from we we

(16:28):
decreased the oily cross border traffic by with that fence
and the roads and the lights and the technology. So
that's with a scrap metal wall that they just put
together with excess material and it worked, and that wall
they can get over very easily. These walls they can.
But you know, for the people that say no wall,

(16:49):
if you didn't have walls over here, you wouldn't even
have a country. You wouldn't even have a country. And
by the way, the state of California is begging us
to build walls in certain areas. They don't tell you that,
And we said no, we won't do it until we
build a whole wall. But there are certain areas, as
you know, where they're really wanting us to build a wall.
And because the people are complaining, people are pouring in,

(17:11):
so you know, they don't talk about that. We have
the preferences, Well, I do have a preference. The problem
is you have to have see through. You have to
know what's on the other side of the wall, and
I mean a preference is something like that. The problem
is you don't know what's on the other side of
the wall. And if you don't know what I mean,
you could be two ft away from a criminal cartel

(17:32):
and you don't even know they're there. Now, we have
equipment to take care of that, X ray equipment, etcetera.
But if you're on that side of the wall, that's
the hardest wall to scale. It's got a lot of assets.
The problem is, tell them what do you think about
the importance of sea through when I have a sea
through wal Sir, I know what's approaching the border, but
port approaches. We have great partners in Mexico and the

(17:52):
law enforcement on that side. I can call them for assistance.
I don't get the opportunity to get ahead of a
threat if I can't see the approach, and what's the
danger of not have to see it through when the
steel metal fence behind us. We learned from that in
backt in the nineties, we went in actually cut in
boards where we can see on the south side. We
found that that smugglers were using the fence to hide
behind and they were either rocking our agents or they

(18:15):
were to acquire larger groups of people in our cotics
and then they were just rushed across the border quickly. Now,
if you just have a pure fence, now that's a fence,
a very sur defence. But coming up I noticed the
first thing. I noticed, what cow many holes are in
that fence. Now they fix the holes, but it doesn't
look very good. They just patch it with more fence.
But you take a look at the fence and it's
a very powerful fence. Not doing the trick because they

(18:37):
cut holes in it and then they're patching holes all
the time. I'm just looking. You have hundreds of holes
cut in and patched, so the fence is not strong enough.
It's not the right idea. But for those people, if
you don't have a wall system and you're gonna have
We're not gonna have a country. There's a lot of
problems in Mexico. They have a lot of problems over there,

(18:59):
and they have the tels and the cartels. We're fighting
the cartels. So we're fighting them hard. Nobody ever fought
him like we fought him. I mean, we fight them hard.
But the fact is, if you don't have a wall system,
it would be bedlam. I imagine it's very hard to
control a just person, Elser. It's a combination of all.
So we'll look at it. The walls where you have
some three really some see through capability. If you don't

(19:21):
have some see through, it's a problem. So we'll take
a look up here. So what they have, Just to
paint the picture for you a little bit. The President
now on the border in San Diego, beating with border patrol.
A ton of press obviously following with the President and

(19:42):
what he's being told. He's got different prototypes of different walls,
and one of the things the President is being told
by border patrol is that they've got to have some
capability of actually seeing through on the other side, because
it gives them an opportunity to you know, apprehend at
one point, just play up the wall in that particular
area in San Diego. The border patrol agent that was

(20:05):
bringing the President around and showing him the different areas
actually said to the President, well, and then that's just
you know, cheap fencing that they threw up there for
the most part, and that worked, you know, pretty well.
So the bottom line is do you want to have
a country that is governed by the rule of law
or not? And that's what it's all about. We'll have

(20:27):
full coverage of all this tonight on Hannity. One interesting
bit of news that I just got ahold of. Apparently
Barack Obama's presidential campaign hired the same Fusion Gps to
dig up dirt on Mitt Romney, and the Obama campaign
hid their payments to Fusion Gps through the law firm

(20:48):
Perkins Cooeie. It's all sound familiar, and the arrangement is
exactly the same one that the Clinton campaign and the
d n C used to pay Fusion Gps for their
investigation into then candidate Donald Trump, and the contract led
to the creation of the infamous Steele dossier. Pretty interesting.

(21:08):
What do Barack Obama know about this? What did the
Obama campaign who told Hillary how to do it. He
just can. What you do is you funnel the money
Fusion GPS. You'd go through this law firm. Okay, you
paid the law firm Perkins Cooeye and Perkins Cooeye, then
pays Fusion GPS, fusing GPS, then hires Christopher Steele. Christopher
Steele has a lot of contexts in Russia, Russian contacts,

(21:30):
even Russian government contacts. And then he'll get fake lies, propaganda.
We won't verify it, but will act like it's true.
And then we'll feed it to the media and we'll lie, manipulate,
propagandize the American people. It's gonna be great. Nobody will
even know, and Hillary would be elected and nobody would
ever find out. It's gonna be awesome. Tell Vladimir, by

(21:51):
the way, tell Vladimir that we're gonna a lot more
flexibility after the elections, the listener more flexibility. You know,
it's amazing about that. The media, Democrats, they've been lying

(22:13):
for over a year about all of this. I mean,
this is an incredible finding after fourteen months. It was
a lackluster pre election response to Russian interference that they
were warned about. That was the Obama administration. In other words,
you got a pattern of Russian attacks on American and

(22:35):
European allies. You have the president. Then Obama warned in
is no pre election response. You heard what he said
just two weeks Ah this you have to be pretty stupid.
No serious person would ever believe any of this. And
then we find out what is important. We have no
evidence found, no evidence of collusion, coordination, conspiracy between the

(22:55):
Trump campaign and the Russians. How anti Trump research made
its way from um Russian sources to the Clinton campaign,
and problematic contacts between senior intelligence community officials and the media.
This all sound familiar because this is what we've been
telling you. It's a major development. And I will tell
you this this fourteen month investigation. What else can you

(23:17):
look into? Why is this ongoing? Except that it's a
political witch hunt? I mean, and this does not include
anything involving abuse, uranium one, the unmasking scandal, and the
Clinton Boughton paid for Dacia. That's not that's not part
of what the House Intel Committee released yesterday. And the

(23:38):
key findings are there's no evidence showing any sort of
collusion between the Trump campaign in Russia. So what does
this mean for Robert Mueller? If anything, you know, Robert Mueller, Okay,
if they didn't find it, what is he gonna find?
He's not He's just moving into other areas with the
support of Rod Rosenstein. Rod Rosenstein is rushing to Mueller's

(23:58):
defense because Rob Rosenstein is the one that appointed Robert Mueller,
and they're all best friends. And these guys have to
now justify their existence, you know, saying, well, the Special
Council is not an unguided missile. Oh that is a missile.
Is that how we're supposed to look at special counsels?
It wasn't their mandate to look into Trump Russia collusion,

(24:19):
and they haven't found any. And all Rosenstein's trying to
do is now cover himself because this information proves that
Mueller is in and has been in a giant witch hunt.
And of course, you know, what does this say about
your news media? Hang on one second. Trump is now
talking again. Let's listen. He's at the border in San Diego.
See what he's saying. What it was in the It

(24:41):
was an open wound. Frankly, it was really really bad.
People just pouring across drugs, everything else, pouring across now.
Of course you have a much bigger worldwide drug problem.
If we ever had nothing here. We have allows you
all over here now. But at least it's ups. When
we put up the real world, we're gonna stop. Maybe

(25:03):
more than that, but this is what it is now
with a not very good wall. But here it is before,
and the people just pouring across. The President's holding up
pictures from actually fencing tivot ball here you have Ballard.
You get it's outdated materials, but it proved the concept.
But serve the economic driver of this outlet mall that

(25:24):
was built after we re established law and order in
San Diego. Second and right behind that's over five grand
new homes where people have felt so safe near the
border they moved back in. That's only because the US
Bordertold re established law and order. So they re established
law and order in San Diego when they put up
the wall. And it's not a superior wall. It's an

(25:44):
inferior world, but it's a wall. And you actually use
the term re established law and order. This or amazing
you hear it. Pros say what you want, this is life.
Gives are the facts of life. That's incredible that's incredible,
and a part of San Diego needs a wall. They
want a wall very desperately. They're willing to do anything

(26:06):
to get it. I said, no, I approved the whole wall,
California through the whole wall. Now, we're not gonna do
you little pieces that you want. Approved the whole wall.
You know, we'll show you all of this tonight. I mean,
but it is pretty historic. And the president looking at
the varying prototypes and he's looking now at pictures before
the wall that they built that is not as good.
And I think it's a pretty important point that they

(26:27):
were able to build, you know, numerous homes in San
Diego because people felt safe because they re established law
and order and people couldn't come across at will, which
is what those images show from the nine nineties. Um,
but let me get back to this. You know, we've
had a pattern. Everyone talks about putting a bad actor,
you know, the hostile regime that is Russia. Nobody's doubting

(26:48):
any of that, or ever has. And you know, okay,
so we knew that they tried to sew political discord.
Another interesting development is Obama did nothing to stop it,
and the committee agrees with the intelligence communities overall assessment
on Russian interference. But they find that Putin did not
have a preference of Donald Trump as a candidate, which

(27:09):
we now knew from the original noon As memo. In
other words, they just wanted discord in America anyway they
could provoke it. And Republicans also in this Intel report
making very clear that the only part of the investigation
that is closed is this. There's so much more to come.
You know, there's a great piece outs our CARDI will

(27:29):
join us in the next hour, and our sources are
confirming this. You know, here we have the Obama Director
of National Intelligence, James Clapper, has apparently been identified as
the leaker to fake news CNN of information that then
President elect Donald Trump and then President Barack Obama were
briefed about as part of this pony dossier, and it

(27:51):
claims that the Russians have compromising information on President Trump.
This goes to the you know, Hooker's urinating in the
bed story. And then we now know from our Carter's
piece the Clapper was in contact with CNN is Jake
Tapper at roughly the exact same time that CNN published
a report about President elect Trump and President Obama being
briefed about the dossier, and if you remember, this created

(28:13):
a massive firestorm, and it helped lay the groundwork for
the media's Trump Russia collusion conspiracy theory that they have
now been pushing ever since. And Clapper, by the way,
was either the original source or the confirming source for
that report. And you look at this, you know, House
Intel report. You know, it is pretty unbelievable what we

(28:35):
have now heard throughout the years. It's been over fourteen
months now, we've been uncovering this scandal and telling you
the truth and shocked every step of the way. And
the House Intel committees still going further in their work,
and I think this is only the beginning. But you know,
they proved that we what everything we've been telling you
on this program and on TV is true. Anybody with

(28:57):
half a brain could see there was no collusion. And
the media should be apologizing to the American people, and
they're not. They were spreading outright lies, propaganda, misinformation, and
conspiracy theories for a year and in some cases, you know,
fourteen sixteen months, and Democrats are in the same position
as the media. You know, how pathetic has the media

(29:20):
been in all this how pathetic as as you know
Adam Schiff been in all of this, He's known the
entire time there was no evidence. And he finally got
called out by Mega McCain about a week and a
half ago and he had, oh, it's already out there,
the evidence. There is no evidence. And in Obama, just
like we've been telling you, you know, we're finding he
did nothing to stop the Russian election interference, even though

(29:42):
he was warned as early as the headline from Newness
is op ed is you know the bear out there
talking about Russia wanting to interfere in our elections anyway?
And I think what's worse is that while all this
interference was happening, Obama was shaming candidate Trump up winding.
No serious person would ever believe this. It's unbelievable that

(30:05):
this is the biggest abuse of power scandal in the
history of this country, the biggest corruption scandal in the
history of this country, and your news media has been
missing in action, soaking up the lies of the Democratic
Party the entire time. And the sad part is the

(30:25):
witch hunt continues. This is pretty interesting. A new book
by David Corn and Michael Izakoff. You know who's the
investigative reporter in the Monocle Whinskey case. Anyway, Um, apparently
they have identified the Russian source for Trump's Stasier's Golden
Showers episode in Moscow, and when contacted by the Daily Caller,

(30:49):
that source now says the Golden Shower episode never happened.
Now you think the FBI might have been able to
find out Robert Mueller could have found that out during
their investigation of for they presented it before vis a judge.
Is the bulk of information to get a warrant just
buy on an opposition party candidate? Yes, just say just
thinking so. Congressman, you are ending the interview phase here

(31:12):
of the House Intelligence Committee investigation into Russia's meddling in
the election. You've got a draft report out tonight that
you're going to give the Democrats tomorrow. Give us the headline,
what did you find? What the headlines are that we've
we've reached that point where we've interviewed all the folks
we need to. We've we've looked at some three thousand,
three hundred thousand documents, seventy three interviews that we've done
across the course of to say, trying to answer the

(31:32):
four questions that originally set out for a committee to answer. Yes,
the Russians tried to interfere with the UH, with our investors,
with our election process. Yes, they had cyber attacks, active
measures going on. We could find no evidence of collusion
between either campaign and the Russians. UH, And we also
have some recommendations, and we'll have recommendations that speak to

(31:53):
what we do with elections going forward. How imported it
is for Americans to be on guard on the process.
It's sacred to our democracy, a representative republic. Quite frankly then,
that is the electing of leadership across the country. But
on the big piece of the puzzle that everybody has
been talking about, which is one of the reasons why
your investigation was struck in the first place, no collusion

(32:13):
that you found, no evidence, no evidence of collusions between
the Trump campaign and the Russians. How are the campaign
Based upon the number of people that you've talked to,
the number of documents that you've looked at, and the
interim conclusion that you have come to based on the
evidence at hand, do you think that the Mueller investigation
could possibly find anything different than you did when it

(32:34):
comes to collusion between the Trump campaign of Russia. So John,
I don't want to I don't want to go there.
We're not having anything to do whatsoever. The Muller investigation.
He's got separate tools, separate authorities, and everything else. And
you believe, you believe. I hope he does a terrific
job of whatever it is he's doing. But we didn't
find any evidence of collusion that I don't know that
he will either. How many different ways can you say?
An hour two Sean Hannity's show, Now, that was the

(32:56):
news that was made last night the House Intel Committee
with a preliminary report, no evidence of collusion whatsoever. And
that was my Conway, Congressman Conway of the House Intel
Committee saying that no evidence of collusion on anybody's part,
But it certainly seems that in another way that there
was a lot of collusion as it relates to Hillary
Clinton and her campaign. And then of course we've got

(33:17):
the revelation that the former Director of National Intelligence, James Clapper,
leaked information as it relates to the dossier to the
UH two CNN, which could be a violation of law
in and of itself. Anyway here to help us sort
through all of this. From the Freedom Caucus, it's Chairman
Mark Meadows, North Carolina Congressman, and from the great state

(33:38):
of Ohio, Congressman Jim Jordan is with us. Welcome both
of you back to the program. Glad you're with us,
Thanks so much. All right, let's start with this well
interim report. This is one part of the many investigations
that are ongoing. What is your take, Congressman Medows, Well,
I mean, we show what we've known for some time
is that there's no collusion between the Trump campaign and

(34:01):
and literally the allegations that have been made, and so
it not only verifies that, but but Sean is important
to point out, we've spent more time uh investigating uh
this uh Democrat paid for Docier and the supposed collusion
between the Trump campaign and the Russians, and and yet

(34:24):
there's nothing here to to really support that. So it's
it's time that we get on to the people's business,
and that's the real Trump agenda, and that's making sure
that we put the government back in its rightful place.
And that's uh the owners should be the American people,
and that's what we need to be focused on. It
should be what we've been both. This has been a

(34:44):
fourteen month investigation and now you can go back and
you can listen to Adam Schiff, who I think wants
to be a host on cable television. Congress been Jordan's
because I mean the guy has been on only you know,
nearly three hundred times, and uh, you know, I'm try
and understand from my my perspective here after fourteen months
and they have nothing. You know, how was it? People

(35:05):
are saying, well, we need to investigate even further. What
are they talking about? Well, there were two takeaways from yesterday, Sean.
The first was day they told us what we already knew,
which was there's no collusion between the Trump campaign, no
coordination between the Trump campaign Russians to influence the election.
The second thing is they confirmed what we all suspected,
namely that James Clapper was leaking information and not just
any information. It looks like he leaked information after that

(35:28):
critical meeting on January six where the intelligence community goes
up and tells President elect Trump about the dossier. And
I think they did that meeting so that they could
give the dossier of legitimacy and then Mr Clapper supposedly
leaks the CNN and then BuzzFeed prints the whole thing. Remember,
at that point, the dossier had already been used, had
already been taken to the price of court to secure

(35:49):
the warrant. So those, in my mind were the two
takeaways yesterday. One confirmed what we already knew, no collusion
between Trump and Russians. The second what we all suspected
Clapper was leaking information. It says we've found no evidence
of collusion, coordination, or conspiracy between the Trump campaign and
the Russians. How the anti Russian, anti Trump research literally

(36:12):
made its way from Russian sources to the Clinton campaign.
And it's problematic because we have people in the intelligence community,
you know, leaking information to the news media. Here. Now,
this doesn't include the amasking scandal, this doesn't include uranium one,
this doesn't include the dossier. This this is very specific
towards the whole charge that we've heard for since the

(36:34):
election in and that is that, oh, there's been Trump
Russia collusion. There has not. There's no evidence of it.
Is anybody ever on the Democratic side presented any evidence
of it. I have not seen it. The shock, you know,
I think I think Jim makes a good point. One
of the key components here is that James Clapper being
a leak er to the media and being the source

(36:57):
that authenticates a document the quite frankly was a Democrat
campaign opposition research doctor David gave it authenticity, where where
all of a sudden it took on a life of
its own. And so you know, his particular role should
be wanted to keep the America's secrets. Instead he was

(37:18):
out there spilling the beans and trying to create a
narrative that we now have spent fourteen months trying to investigate. Well,
the bottom line is where do we go from here?
And and what about Robert Mueller, because Robert Mueller seems
to have moved very far away from what his original
mandate was supposed to be. Now I'm looking at Rod
Rosenstein and what I think of ridiculous comments by him,

(37:41):
and that is that the Special Counsel is not an
unguided missile. He's telling us, I don't believe there's any
justification at this point for terminating the Special Council. All
I can tell the Special Counsel is doing is setting
perjury traps for people and and getting into people's finances
that had nothing to do with Trump, nothing to do
with Russia at all. Yeah, the best thing Rod Rosenstein

(38:01):
could do is him and Jeff Sessions appoint the Second
Special Council, make sure that individuals not from the swamp,
make sure they're from somewhere across the heartland and the
utmost character, and they do this investigation. And while that's
going on, we in Congress need to continue to do
our investigation. And it'd be nice if Rod Rosenstein will
give us the information we asked him for. That's what
he can do best. He can say what he wants
about them all investigation. What we know is to date

(38:23):
not one bit of evidence showing any type of coordination
between the Russians and President Trump's campaign. So why don't
Rob Rosenstein and Jeff Sesson disappoint that second Special Council
and give us the information we need to do our investigation. Well, John,
let me let me jump in there real quickly, because
Jim makes a valid point. You know, on Oversight UH
and Government Reform Committee, the Judiciary Committee, we've requested some

(38:45):
one point two million doctor the same ones that the
Inspector General is looking at. But we want those an
unredacted form. We've we've gotten less than ten thousand unique
documents today and uh, and we continue you define, this
is Rod Rosenstein our administration. Uh, we continue to ask

(39:06):
for it, and yet we get it in a fashion that,
quite frankly, has very little value. So it's important that
we get the documents so that we can get to
the bottom of the story. And I think you will
see it points in a very different direction towards Hillary
Clinton and the Democrat campaign to spend this narrative. Okay,
so the way do we go with Muller at the

(39:26):
end here? You know, because I played last night on Hannaday.
I played literally, you know, just a week and a
half before the election, then President Obama telling Donald Trump
to to to stop whining that no serious person would
ever think it's possible that the Russians could ever, you know,
have any impact on our electoral electoral system or anybody else.

(39:46):
And it turns out that if you go back to
May of twenty fourteen, Devin Nowness of the House Intel
Committee was warning Obama about this very specific threat and
that Obama did nothing and even and it seems this
narrative only emerged because they never thought Hillary was gonna lose,
and she did lose. Yeah, I think, uh, I think
based on the fact that Mr Clapper was leaking information,

(40:08):
they were a little more concerned about the undermining what
the American people did when they made Donald Trump president
than they than they may have been in actually dealing
with the issue at hand, namely the fact Russia was
trying to so chaos in our electoral process. I don't
think they did, but never the fact that that that
they were trying to do that. So, yeah, we should
we gotta take that seriously. Um, and let's hope that
going forward we're doing the things they need to be done. Well,

(40:30):
I hope. So what about the second special counsel? It
seems when the Attorney General mentioned a Chatton Bream last
week that in fact he had had now for a
couple of months, somebody that once worked at the d
J now investigating a lot of these issues, especially Faiza
abuse issues. Where's that going to go? I mean, is
that the prelude to a special council? Why has it

(40:51):
taken so long to get a special counsel? Well, it
shouldn't take so long. Jim and I have been asking
for the second Special Counsel for almost seven months. It
does look like we're closer to that decision than we've
ever been before, but there's a reluctance, and the reluctance
many times is to suggest, once you appoint that that
perhaps there was some type of bias within the Department

(41:14):
of Justice in d o J. And we believe Jim
and I both believe the vast majority of of our
FBI and d o J officials are great public servants,
but there is enough suggestion that a few people acted inappropriately,
specifically with regards to getting the pison warrant and the
way that it was done and using the dossier that

(41:36):
we believe only an independent third party could do that.
So the pressure will continue to ramp up until hopefully
UH they make that appointment. Mischanan think about this, UH.
James Comby has been fired, Andrew McCabe has stepped down.
Jim Ribicki, former chief of staff, has has left the FBI.
Jim Baker, former General Counsel, has been reassigned and demoted.
Peter Struck has been demoted and reassigned. Lisa Page demoted

(41:58):
and reassigned. That's the top pulled the FBI so we're
supposed to think that they can investigate themselves. Of course
we need a second special counsel, but let's make sure
you don't pick someone from the swamp who's part of
the deal, pick someone outside of their endless figured out
and then let's, like, Congress, get the information that we
need so we can get answers for the American people. Well,
I think that's the bottom line. I also think the
American people. You know, in spite of all of this,

(42:20):
we've been able to get a lot of things done.
I was frankly stunned when the Heritage Foundation came out
with their study that showed that the president has already
accomplished six of his agenda, which was higher than Ronald
Reagan's first year at UH. And usually in first years
of presidencies we get a lot done. I think we
could have gotten even a lot more of that done had,
you know, we had more Freedom Caucus members in the

(42:40):
House and the Senate. What do you guys both expect
that will be accomplished legislatively this year? And does the
president have the authority to get money for the wall
from other places? Well, we're here shortly, you know, we're
obviously looking at at the Omnibus spending package coming up
here and coming days. Uh. But the real thing is

(43:01):
and and Jim and I think I think we both agree, uh,
when it comes to funding sanctuary cities, and and really
these mayors who are willing to oppose the President's agenda
and really opposed the rule of law. Perhaps the money's
the federal moneys that go to law enforcement officers in
those areas should be held back until they're actually gonna

(43:23):
work and and uphold the rule of law and make
sure their communities are safer. And so that's one aspect
that we can get done. But I can tell you
the President is really laser focused on making sure that
not only we address the transportation needs, but we roll
back regulations. So it's it's actually working out pretty well.
Regulates and taxes are down, the economies of Isis is backpeddling,

(43:46):
the embassy has going to Jerusalem, and Gorsages on the
Supreme Court. Pretty done good first year by anyone standard.
You wouldn't know that if you listen to CNN. But
if you listen to the right people and you talk
to Americans across the country, they know it was a
pretty darn good year for President. Well, I think at
the end of the day or either one of you
worried about Congress and which way that's gonna go. Inen, Well,
I think we're we're worried. But you know, as Jim

(44:08):
always says, it never hurts to do what he told
the American people you would do. That's what this president
is doing. He's weighing in campaign promise after another. I
don't think we can sit back and and coast for
the next seven months. We need to be serious about
moving forth the agenda. If we are, then the results
will take care of themselves in November. And if not, then, uh,

(44:30):
then certainly we do have plenty to worry about in
the mid terms. All Right, thank you both for being
with us. Jim Jordan, Ohio congressman, thank you. And Congressman
Mark Meadows from North Carolina told free on telephone numbers
eight hundred nine for one, Shawn, you want to be
a part of the program. All right, let's get to
our busy phones here. Then we have Sarah Carter and
Sidney Powell gonna join us. Now that the House Intel

(44:51):
Committee has come out with their well conclusion that which
we've known all along there's no evidence of Trump Russia collusion. Well,
what has Mueller got to do here? Rob in Dallas, Texas.
Rob on the answer, Rob, how are you glad you called?
Welcome to the Sean Hannity Show. Oh, thank you. I'm well, Sean,
and thank you for taking the call. Certainly, with that
revelation from the House Intel Committee, after a year of investigation,

(45:15):
we have zero, no shred, no hint of evidence at
any collusion between the Trump administration and Russia. None. Did wanna.
I did want to make a further point, Sean. Last
week and throughout various shows, you do a great job
of vocalizing glittany of nefarious actions that we suspected took

(45:37):
place before the election, But we didn't have any proof
at that point. But I wanted to real quickly highlight
something we emphatically did know. Sean, the d n C
informed the FBI of an alleged hack into their server
prior to the election. You would think that our top
policing agency would need to take a look at those servers. No, no,

(46:01):
I'm sorry, We're going to provide CrowdStrike a Ukrainian firm
who could not possibly have any anything against Russia. To
go ahead and do that forensic analysis and our top
policing agency, it's just going to take that information from
crapd strike at face value. Listen what you're saying, and
the issues with CrowdStrike are a thousand percent accurate. Why

(46:25):
the FBI didn't insist on seeing those computers is beyond
any comprehension I have. Why they were allowed to do that,
I don't know. All right, quick break, we'll come back
and Sydney Powell Sarah Carter join us next our top story. Yes,
no evidence of Trump Russia collusion will continue. Donald Trump,
now since at the threshold of impeachment, you told the

(46:49):
Washington Post last week that quote, there's a smell of
treason in the air when it comes to this investigation.
A lot of people are free to use the t
word treason, but in the end, that's what people are investigating.
There's any day to be watching ari it is today. Russia, Russia, Russia.
A lot going on. Well, you know, it's been a
long time, as you said, it's been fifteen months. We

(47:11):
interviewed something like seventy three witnesses, looked at something like
three d and ten thousand documents. But you know, this
can surprise anyone. I mean, it really just can't. How
How how long have you been saying that? How long
have I and others been saying that? For Heaven's sakes,
Diane Feinstein said this, James Clapper said this, And I
challenge Mr Schiff who seems to think that there's some

(47:32):
secret evidence that he can't reveal. Two things on that.
One is, do you does anyone in the world believe
that there was evidence of clusion that it would not
have been leaked it under the circumstances that we've seen,
of course it would. You would already know about it.
And the second thing, this, this is such an important point, Sean.
We've been accusing people of conspiracy and treason, and at

(47:53):
the end of the day, these people are innocent, aren't
these Aren't these others who opposed what the Republicans have
said on this? Aren't they willing to come forward and
just say, you know what, maybe we got this wrong.
It's not fair to these individuals to keep this cloud
over them when it there just isn't evidence. We'll support
that you got hard well. Chris unfortunately can't go into

(48:13):
the evidence. That's a big you can't reveal you know.
I can't reveal that, Chris. Of course, there's one thing
to say, there's evidence. There's another thing to say, we
can prove a reasonable doubt, or there's enough evidence to
bring to a gran jury for purposes of criminal didictment.
I don't think we can say anything definitively at this point.
We are still at the very early stage of the investigation.

(48:35):
Last March, you said you had more than circumstantial evidence
of treasonous collusion with Russia. What specifically were you referring to,
and please be specific, because if it's true, I do
believe Americans have the right to know a year later
what that is. Well, I certainly certainly said that there's
ample evidence of collusion. I've never used the word treason.
Only Steve Bannon has used that word. Um, but if

(48:59):
you look at the fact that are already in the
public domain, they're pretty damning all right. That was Adam
Schiff in the Great Evolution of his Opinions. I thought
Megan McCain was unbelievable in that interview. Joining us, Now,
what where do we go from here? We have Sydney
Powell is with us, author of the best selling book
License to Kill exposing corruption in the Department of Justice

(49:19):
and a federal appellate attorney and senior adviser for American
First and Sarah Carter, investigative reporter, Fox News contributor. Welcome
both of you, Sydney. I mean, you know, he he
did say all of that a year ago, and here
we are a year later, you know, fourteen months into
this investigation. They kills still cannot define what collusion is
because it doesn't exist, but they still want to keep going. Yes,

(49:42):
I think it's going to take a second Special counsel Seawan,
certainly as long as Rod Rosenstein is in the Department
of Justice, because he's one of the people that signed
the phony FAISA application, and so did Dana Blente, who
I think now maybe General Counsel at the FBI. Well, so,
I mean, at this point, does he just get to
go on a fishing expedition off into any area he wants,

(50:05):
you know, financial dealings going back twenty years for that
have nothing to do with either the Trump campaign or
anything to do with Russias. That is basically a fishing expedition.
Find anything you can justify your existence, stay in existence
as long as you can. It is a fishing expedition.
But I think even worse than that, it's a targeted
hunting expedition. I mean, I think they definitely targeted people

(50:30):
in and around the President, in the White House and
in other places, and they're going after it as hard
as they can to find whatever they can, to squeeze
everybody they can, to put increasing pressure on the president
and destroy the administration. Well, I think of in large
part everything we knew, this was not the biggest surprise

(50:50):
in the world, Sarah Carter, But I mean it is
pretty devastating after fourteen months, you know, having the House
Intel Committee, which I think they have investigated this harder
than anybody to say, they found zero evidence of any collusion, coordination,
conspiracy between the Trump campaign and the Russians, and they
did describe how anti Trump research, you know, did make

(51:12):
its way from Russian sources to the Clinton campaign and
a lot of this, as you wrote in your article
last night, we have intel officials at the highest level,
in one case, the Director of National Intelligence, James Clapper
leak in CNN. Yes, and that's going to be part
of this report. Okay, that's coming out as soon as

(51:32):
we see the full report. The full scope of it, Sean,
A lot more details will be coming out, particularly with
leaks and how the Russians got their information to the
Clinton campaign. And I think that's vitally important because as
you know, as Sydney so put it so well, I mean,
this is the reason why a second Special Council is
being advocated by members like Tray Gaudy, uh and others

(51:57):
who have come Sean Han of the of course, yeah,
if you look at not just Clapper, but today former
CIA director John Brennan puts out you know this, uh,
this tweet that says leadership of House Intel Committee has
traded that last vestige of integrity for politics. With other

(52:19):
investigative shoes yet to drop. Well, I have something to
say to former FBI, former CIA director John Brennan, who
I had the pleasure of interviewing before he left the CIA.
The other investigative shoes that are going to drop are
going to be the FAISA investigation that is ongoing abuse
of the Fifth Court, the unmasking which he was asked
about in a hearing, and the dossier. Those are three

(52:43):
major investigations, ongoing investigations where the shoe is about to drop,
and it's not going to drop on the Trump campaign.
It's going to drop on the former Obama administration officials
that appear to have colluded to taint an incoming president
and actually stop him for being the president elect. So
this is going to be a very intense investigation. It's

(53:04):
not going to stop with Russia. We know there's no
Russian collision. Now, It's going to go on. And those
are the investigations that the American public are waiting for.
At the end of the day, I started the year
by saying, this is the year of the boomerang. All right,
So now we have learned an awful lot since your
first report March eight of seventeen, when you and John

(53:24):
Solomon reported that there was a FISA warrant against the
Trump campaign, and even the President tweeted out something to
the effect that you know, he was being spied on,
and everybody in the media mocked him. Nobody picked up
on what you had been saying. I was excoriated and
oppressed as being a conspiracy theorist because I I fully
had confidence in your reporting, and it turned out everything

(53:47):
that you wrote was a thousand percent true and then
some uh and in fact, you know, now we find
ourselves at you know, the special counsels and pointed. But
think of all that we learned in the last year.
You know, we learned that Hillary rigged the primary. In
the last year, we learned that from Donna Brazil's book.
We learned that Hillary Clinton, that the investigation into our
email server that was rigged, that the fix was in

(54:10):
with James Comey and and Peter Struck and Lisa Page
and Andrew McCabe and likely Lauretta Lynch. And then we
learned that, Yeah, finally after a year, we found out
that it was Fusion GPS being paid by the Clinton campaign.
They didn't want to tell us that for a long time,
and that it was bought and paid for by Hillary
and the money she used from her campaign and the
money she was controlling at the d n C. And

(54:32):
we discovered, Oh, by the way, it became according to
the Grassly Grand Memo, it became the bulk of information
in the application for the first fiser warrant on carter
page a Trump associate an opposition campaign in the lead
up to a presidential election, and then it was renewed
four times based on unverified salacious information that was put

(54:52):
out there. I mean, it's unbelievable to me. And we
learned from the Five the Court decision itself that was unsealed,
that there was death stantly abuse of the Five the process,
including by the FBI who gave private contractors acts unlimited
access to raw FI intail. M Sarah, what are you

(55:14):
gonna say? Oh, I was gonna say that needs absolutely
right on that. I mean, look, they're going to be
looking at the extent of abuse by the FBI, by
the Bureau in the Fifth Court, not just Carter Page,
but how far did this go? And those were revealed
in documents by the FISK. I mean, the Fifth Court
went after the Obama administration and reprimanded them for their

(55:35):
behavior and what they did with the FISK by and
including the FBI, and how they were sharing information with
contractors that weren't even cleared to have this information, and
how they expanded under Obama these rules for sharing information
and the unmasking of Americans. I think we forget that
is where this all started, I mean, and this is

(55:57):
where it might end. We have to find out why
people like Samantha Power were unmasking three hundred over three
hundred people in the last year. What did you determine
it was a three hundred and fifty increase in just
one year, wasn't it. That's absolutely true, was three hundred
and it was a three increase from when they first

(56:18):
from two thousand thirteen on when the laws were changed.
In the last year it increased exponentially, which is when um,
we saw Samantha Powers when that was revealed that there
were over three hundred maskings done by her alone, one
every day until she left office, which was so unusual
because even if you talk to others who held her position.
I'll give an example. I spoke with Ambassador John Bolton

(56:39):
about this and he said, in my entire career at
the u N there were only five unmaskings. It's hard
to imagine. Why are you an ambassador would be conducting
unmaskings of America. Well, but it's even worse than that.
She had said publicly that that she wasn't the one
doing it, but it was being done in her name.
How does that happen? And why happened that a man

(57:00):
behind the curtain? So what what I'm hearing both of
you say, and Sarah, what you're saying here is unmasking.
That's that's separate and apart from what we're learning from
the House Intel Committee. Uh, the dossier is basically separate
and apart. Uranium one is separate and apart. So really,
none of this beyond what Mueller is doing. And god knows,

(57:21):
I think he has so overreached every step of the way,
and it's been such a partisan team that he's put together.
In every step of the way, we get we keep
getting more evidence, but it works in the opposite direction.
It's the opposite of what everybody thought. Donald Trump didn't
pay for a Russian dossier full of salacious lies about Hillary.

(57:41):
You know, it wasn't his dossier that was used to
do uh that never became verified and was used to
get a fiser warrant to spy on Hillary's campaign. So
everything is backwards. When I heard your tape playing, someone
was commenting about collusion between the White House and the
president and everything thing that was going on, I thought, Yes,
that was the Obama white House. That's who was colluding

(58:04):
with the Russians and the Clinton campaign and the Democratic
National Committee to create this spire storm to destroy Donald Trump. Well,
and that was the thing. I mean, they look the
Clinton campaign, Hillary Clinton's campaign, the d n C. They
pay Fusion GPS to dig up dirt on the Russians. Well,
how are you going to dig up dirt on President
Trump and Russia? So where are you going to get

(58:26):
that from? Well you got to go to the Russians,
So they must have at that point known. And Christopher
Steel goes to former Russian FSB spies, current FSB spies,
puts together this dossier. And not only that, let's talk
about it. Frankly, he goes to the State Department officials,
people who were friends with him, who by the way,
are very close to Hillary Clinton, Sidney bluemantal Cody Sheer.

(58:49):
They're feeding him information too, because we how do we
know that? Because the Senate Judiciary Committee Senator Charles Grassley
and Lindsey Graham both look into this and finally disclosed
this criminal referral they have on Christopher Steele, who, by
the way, lie to the FBI. I mean, this is incredible,
and not only did the American public. Shouldn't we be

(59:13):
able to get the original and subsequent renewal Faiza Warrence
and take a look at him. It doesn't I think
we need the actual documents. The American people deserve to
see the actual documents. All Right, We'll take a break,
We'll come back. Sydney Powell and Sarah Carter are with
us as we continue with Sarah Carter, investigative reporter, Fox

(59:34):
News contributor, and Sydney Powell is back with us, author
of License to Lie, exposing corruption of the Department of Justice.
You know, I'm just trying to figure out where is
Robert Muller going in all of this, Sydney. You know,
the team that he has surrounded himself with. I've talked
about the partisan nature of that team that he's assembled,
and they don't have any Republican or Trump donors. They

(59:56):
only have Obama, Clinton and d NC donors. And you
got the they have Andrew Weiseman destroyed Arthur Anderson an
eighty five thousand jobs and made up crimes and send
innocent people to prison and hit evidence that showed they
were innocent. How many? How many times did he withhold
exculpatory evidence in cases that you know? At least two
in cases that I can think of. Sarah documented one

(01:00:19):
in an article that she did, and I've certainly documented
a lot of evidence that was hidden in my book
License to Lie? Well, what Wiseman is the lead villain
of License to Lie? And then we have to ask ourselves, Sarah,
why did Mueller? I know he's friends with Wiseman. He's
been protecting Wiseman for twenty years or more. He brought

(01:00:39):
him into the FBI to serve as a general counsel
and special assistant. He knows him very well, so did
he not think end in picking him even for the
en Rohn Task Force. A lot of Katherine Rummler, who
wound up being Obama's White House counsel. She's in License
to Lie and she's now defending Susan Rice on the
unmaskings and Susan's efforts in the in the Obama white

(01:01:01):
House and her role in all this, including that note
to self that she wrote to document a meeting ten
or fifteen days earlier in which they purportedly didn't talk
about the Steel dossier and that particular meeting. It's unbelievable.
You guys have been doing phenomenal work. I can't thank
you enough. Sarah Carter, Sidney Powell. It's pretty unbelievable to
me that the rest of the media has just decided

(01:01:22):
to sit on what is the biggest abuse of power
that has ever taken taken place in American history, and
they seem unfazed by it. And even though we now
know no evidence of Trump Russia collusion, they just keep going.
And if they don't have that, they've got another, you know,
fifty hours a day of stormy, you know, anything to
destroy and de legitimize President Trump. Quick break right back,

(01:01:42):
will continue. Mr Trump said, there's a lot of ers.
Do you think America's innocent? Did I lied tod? Was
that an alternative fact on? That's what they said, right,

(01:02:08):
And look at the way they jumped on Mr Trump.
Who could you compel America with Mr Putin? No, you're
not as good as Mr Putin or Russia, because the
judgment of God is not on Russia. The judgment of
God is on America. You're the most rotten nation on there.

(01:02:30):
That is why God has come and you are number
one on his list to be destroyed. In this book,
there's a law for retaliation, a law retaliation like for

(01:02:53):
like the Bible says, and I a tooth a life.
See now, as long as they kill us and go
to Wendy's and have a burger and go to sleep,
they're gonna keep killing us. But when we die and

(01:03:18):
they die, then soon we're gonna sit at a table
and talk about retired. We want some of this. We'll
tell us Damn Country or Salama Lake. White folks are

(01:03:47):
going down and Satan is going down in Furrican. By
God's grace has pull the cover of that seat. Tey June,

(01:04:09):
here's the saye all right there it is the man himself,
Louis far Acon. And you know, the anybody that's ever
followed Louis Farakon should know that he is incredibly racist,
incredibly anti Semitic. And one of the problems now the
Democratic Party has is that, well, a lot of Democrats

(01:04:33):
are friends with this guy. And I think the most
incredible thing that came out is that, oh in two
thousand and eight, there was a picture of Louis Farcon
with Barack Obama, and that picture was hidden on purpose
from public view because well, that would have heard his
chances of being elected president anyway. You've got uh. Now,

(01:04:53):
seven particular congressmen are saying that these congressmen that are
friends with Farcon need to resign here to be with us.
And we have Pastor Darryl Scott, executive director of the
National Diversity Coalition for Trump and Senior pastor of the
New Spirit Revival Center. The Reverend Charles Christian Adams is
with us, Presiding Pastor of the Hartford Memorial Baptist Church.

(01:05:15):
Welcome both of you to the program. Uh. Do you
know Reverend Adams? Do you know Lewis Farcon? I do
not know him personally, but I have done work with
the Nation of Islam in the city of Detroit and
in other cities where I have lived in U ministry.

(01:05:36):
Do you find him to be anti Semitic? Well, you
just heard and and racist. I find a lot of
his remarks to the anti semitic and uh offensive, But
I also find a lot of the work that they
are doing in communities that have been marginalized to be

(01:05:56):
effective and acceptable. So you're saying that he's like a
good racist and anti semi. Doesn't my interpreting what you're
he was a good racist semit How you're saying the
racist and anti semi, Well, you're saying the racist and
anti semi does good works. The Nation of Islam does
excellent work in the African American community. Isn't he the

(01:06:18):
leader of that group who are so he's the leader
of that group. Yes, absolutely, has been for a long time.
And I do not agree with everything that a coon
has said about you, about homosexuals and about the Christian Church,
although of late he's kind of changed gold views. But
I don't agree with him on a lot of levels.

(01:06:39):
But I do understand uh people's willingness to work with
the Nation of Islam because I've done him myself. They
do good work in the community. So a organization led
by a virulent anti semit and racist does good work
in the community, and you work with them. I will
work with anybody of good will who is doing effective

(01:07:01):
and positive work in the community. And you don't think
this is divisive what he's said. You don't think his
words are devices everything you said. You don't think his
words are dividing the country and dividing groups and individuals.
When I would think Pastor Scott that a pastor's job
is to bring people together. I uh, First of all,

(01:07:23):
I was going recordless. State didn't that lewis sharak and
is full of more crap in the Christmas Turkey. I
need you to get that in your mind. How much
crap a Turkey and stuff to win him around Christmas time.
I don't know him personally, but I have a Jewish
friend that knows him and a Jewish friend that paid him.
He did work for this Jewish friend of mine too. Um,

(01:07:49):
he did work for the Jewish friend of mine to
advance a cause that the Jewish friend had, and he
used race dating to advance the cast. So I have
a different conception of Lewis faircon because I know some
things from behind the scene that he sells people out
for the sake of a dollar. I mean, if he's
he's he's a virulent anti semi. He's a racist, he

(01:08:11):
hates white people, and a lot of Christian passes, Black
Christian passes actually suck up to this guy. And I'm
not amazed at the fact that all of these so
called black leaders are sucking up to him as well,
these those those democrats, because to be honest in the
black community, a writer of passage for them is to
suck up to Lewis Faricon because they think they need

(01:08:32):
his affirmation or his vapidation to um confirm their blackness
or they're standing in the black community. Sarack Obama was
in Chicago all those years I'm there. There's probably a
lot of pictures of him with Fara con Uh and
and a lot of these other blacks. I had to
speak in an event one time. If someone told me
after I finished speaking, I was speaking on behalf of
our president, and they said, well, you need to meet

(01:08:54):
with the minister, I said, minister who uh a minister Faricon. No,
I don't need to meet with that guy. I wouldn't
meet with him. He's an anti Christian, he's a racist,
he's anti Semite, he's anti white people. Um, and he's
pro Fericon and he's playing a lot. Let me ask,
Let me ask Reverend Adams, this question elevant. The nation

(01:09:16):
of Islam is not even genuine Islam. It's a hybrid
creation of Elijah Mohammed his movement. This guy has become
irrelevant and the only thing that gives him relevancy. If
some black people get beat up or something, now he
comes back crawling up him under his right. What if
there was a group of white supremacists, Nazis, neo Nazis

(01:09:37):
and uh in your view, they wanted to do some
good work in a city or a town, would you
partner with them too? Reverend Adams well, I think if
you have common interest. It's almost like President Trump saying
that they're good people on both sides of the Charlotte. Still, Uh,
you're not answering. You're not answering. If the ku Klux plan,

(01:09:59):
if the a ku Klux Klan wanted to build a park,
you know, in a in an area of town that
needs a park, and they asked you to help with it. Um,
they're quote doing a good work. Would you partner with them?
I would partner without partnered with worse as a matter
of fact, with the real reality is though I wouldn't

(01:10:20):
partner with the clue. I wouldn't want anything. I wouldn't
want anything to do. Wait a minute, Henry Ford has
been known for his anti Semitic task, but yet we
will partner with Ford Motor Company in positive programs. We

(01:10:40):
know that the history of the United States has been
littered with racist organizations that have had racist task. But
the question that's not our question. I'm asking you, Reverend
Scot'm asking you, Reverend Scott. I'm asking you, Reverend Adams,
why you would work with people that have these vicious views. Listen,
I wouldn't work with him simply because my participation with him,

(01:11:02):
and anything he does validates them. I'm adding my signature
to everything that he stands for. Uh. They had a
church in Cleveland, Ohio one time that had Louis Vilcon
come in and speak, and they I got into some
controversy on my radio station because I said they might
as well offer a swine on the altar. That's the
abomination of deflation. I have that feeling Antichrist to come

(01:11:24):
in and speaking of Christian Churchill. No, I wouldn't share
a platform with them. I wouldn't share I wouldn't do anything.
But now, if it was a dead person laying on
the street, they needs to be picked up, and he
was picking up with his arms, and I get his leg,
of course, but I'm doing that for that person. But
I wouldn't do anything that would validate or authenticate or
act like I'm an agreement with anything that that man does,
because I'm opposed everything that he does and everything that

(01:11:44):
he stands for. And the nation BUSINALM. I don't know
what good work you're saying. They're doing so bad the
national business, I'm quite frankly it's playing it out well.
I think that's a generalization and an oversimplification. They are
doing work in the prison playing. I'm not laughing because
they are helping prisoners the whole purpose. They're not They're

(01:12:08):
not doing prisonee entry to make society better. They're doing
prison me entry to convert those guys, not to Muslims.
It's religious. It's not social that they're doing it for.
They're not doing it to make a guy that businesses.
We cannot talk together past the walker, But what I'm
telling you is they are creating opportunities in the African
Americans for uh community, for people who cannot get employed

(01:12:32):
in mainstream America. They are in the prisons teaching positive,
uplifting values of accountability and responsibility to people who have
been abandoned by a justice system that incarcerates and does
not rehabilitating. As a matter of fact, they're hobilitating those

(01:12:54):
who cannot be rehabilitating on the street. The justice system
is not snatching black people off the street and put
and then sail off for nothing. Now, if you got
busted selling some dope and committing a crime and you
think you're it, don't do the crime. If you can't
do the time. But they're not trying to bring you
guys out to make them better social better socially. They
want to convert them to Islam. That's the purpose. That's

(01:13:17):
why they engaged to convert them to Islam. Then after
they convert them to Islam, they wanted to get a
job so they can continue to support islab right. And
you know, I'm telling the truth. You flowed somebody's community
with the illicit drugs. You allow a double digit com beauty.
I'm talking. All right, We're gonna we're gonna take a break.

(01:13:38):
We'll come back. Cool things down a little bit, Pastor Scott,
Reverend Charles Christian Adams eight hundred nine for one, sean,
we need to put the American flag down because we've
got as much else on the event at the Confederate flag.
Who are we fighting today? It's the people carry American flag.

(01:14:04):
What flag do the police air? What flag flies over
the Nonjustice Department? What flag flies over the White House
where a black man live? This corn every day? What
about that flag? All right, there's faricon talking about putting

(01:14:25):
down the American flag. You know, I mean, we're gonna
tear this g D country up. I can't believe in
any way. Reverend Adams you'd ever want to do business
with this guy? It shocks my soul, or do business
with you know, neo Nazi groups, or you know any
hate groups like this are people that you know live
and on this vitriol and animus and hatred and divisiveness. Well,

(01:14:46):
I don't know. Why do you want to be around
those people? I want nothing to do with them. I
wouldn't even know where to look to not be around
the center. I'm not talking about sinning. I'm talking about
virulent hatred, racism, anti semit tis him. Why would you
work with people that are racist and anti semis? Why
would you work with them? I wouldn't. I would love
to have a conversation with Pharah Cohn about his beliefs,

(01:15:09):
but I know that we have immediate issues that need
to be dealt with in the African American community. And
the whole thing that has stirred this up has been
the presence of the Women's March leader at the Savior's
Day event, in which you ought to give her a
medal for sitting through a three or four hour speech
of anybody, But whatever the case may be, I wouldn't

(01:15:32):
do it. But I think a lot of the problem
has been not her sitting there listening, not even and
I'm talking about you, I don't you don't understand. I
didn't anybody that sits through. But I mean, just like
the people that win to that million man marches, I said,
you can't separate the man from the marches. Well, he
represents good things, Pastor Scott, he doesn't represent good things.

(01:15:53):
He represents if he's good. Thing he's trying to represent
is his own, thank account, and he's using people. He's
playing Black people like considdle and they're falling for every time.
You don't need that guy's affirmation as a lot of
these quote unquote black leaders think they do. And Reverend Adams,
we're not talking about you having to have some random

(01:16:13):
contact with him. We're talking about the Bible says what
fellowship has like with the darkness. That can't that that
has to be a dividing line of I can't cross
this line because of who this cat guy is and
what this guy represents. They talked about Adolf Hitler. This
guy's worse than Hitler because if he had the power
up Hitler, he'd killed more people than Hitler did. He's
an he advocates murder. He advocates violence. How could you

(01:16:38):
say that he does some good things when he's bad,
outweighs his good I gotta leave it there. We're gonna
give you the last word, Pastor Scott today. We appreciate
both of you being with us when we come back.
Wide open telephones eight hundred nine for one, Shawn is
a toll free number. You want to be a part
of the program, quick break, right back. We'll have a

(01:16:58):
lot more in the breaking news, no evidence a collusion,
your reaction to that, and the other news of the day,
Rex Tillers sent out and much more straight ahead, alright
till the top of the hour. We're gonna get to
your calls here in just a minute. You know. So
the House comes out with this report, which is devastating.
After fourteen months, we have found no evidence of collusion, coordination,

(01:17:19):
conspiracy between the Trump campaign and the Russians. Uh. And
there are other initial findings how anti Trump research actually
was taken from Russian sources and given to the Clinton campaign.
When we know how that happened, they bought and paid
for it. You know, we've been playing for you the
montage of all of these people that have been telling

(01:17:39):
us smoke, but there's no fire, no evidence, no evidence,
no no, no, no, no, no, no, no evidence. And
yet the breathless hysteria that you've heard now for over
a year. It is unbelieved as the biggest hoax, conspiracy,
lie that's ever been perpetrated on the American people. Listen
to this. But Mr Clapper then went on to say

(01:18:02):
that to his knowledge, there was no evidence of collusion
between members of the Trump campaign and the Russians. We
did not conclude any evidence in our report. And when
I say our report, that is the n s A, FBI,
and C I A with my office, the Director of
National Intelligence, that had anything any reflection of collusion between
the members of Trump campaign and the Russians. There was

(01:18:23):
no evidence of that in our report. Was Mr Clapper
wrong when he said that, I think he's right about
characterizing the report which you all have read. We did
not include any evidence in our report. And I say
our that's n s, A, FBI, and CIA with my
office the Director of National Intelligence that had anything that

(01:18:47):
had any reflection of collusion between members of the Trump
campaign and the Russians. There was no evidence of that
included in our report. Have you seen anything, either intelligence briefings,
through intelligence briefings, anything to back up any of the
accusations that you have made. They have the documentation that

(01:19:07):
they did the hacking, the hacking on the d n
c R and on some of us. You know that
the collusion though we have not. Do you have evidence
that there was in fact collusion between Trump associates and
Russia during the campaign not at this time. Have you
seen anything that suggests any collusion between the Russians and
the Trump campaign. Well, there's an awful lot of smoke there,

(01:19:30):
let's put it that way. People that might have said
they were involved, to what extent they were involved, to
what extent the president might have known about these people
or whatever. There's nothing there from that standpoint that we
have seen directly linking our president to any of that.
Did evidence exist of collusion, coordination, conspiracy between the Trump
campaign and Russian state actors at the time you learned

(01:19:55):
of twenty sixteen efforts. I don't know whether or not
such collusion that's your term, such collusion existed. I don't know.
The big questions, of course, is is there any evidence
of collusion you have seen yet? Is there There is
a lot of smoke. We haven't smoking gun at this point,
but there is a lot of smoke. Diane Feinstein has

(01:20:15):
said there's no evidence of collusion, So collusion between whom?
Can you tell us that. I'm not prepared to say
that there's proof you could take to a jury, but
I can't say that there is enough that we ought
to be investigating. At the time you separated from service
in January seventeen, had you seen any evidence that uh,
Donald Trump or any member of his campaign colluded, conspired

(01:20:38):
to coordinated with Russians or anyone else to infiltrade or
impact our voter infrastructure. Um, not beyond what has been
out there, open source, and not beyond anything that I'm
sure this committee has already seen and heard before directly

(01:20:58):
from the intelligence community. You know, for the life of me,
that is what we are the only people, or very
few of us that have been pointing all of this
out that there is no evidence, and we've been telling
you for a long time, and the media keeps advancing
the narrative even still. That's how insane things are in
this country as we speak. Alright, when Shawn is our number,

(01:21:22):
you want to be a part of the program, dan
Is in Michigan, Dan the man, how are you glad
you called? Sir? Yeah? Hey, Sean, great, great? Um okay,
hey Sean. Let's cut to it with the House uh
Intelligence signings. Here, you and your show exposed all the
corruption and the fact that there's no evidence of conclusions
the criminals are in the Jett Department. The House Committee

(01:21:44):
just put the report out there is you've been talking
about saying there's no evidence. So here's the question, Sean,
is Jeff Sessions gonna finally say the Obama administration is
no longer going to run the Justice Department As of today,
I am running it. I am shutting down the Meal thing.
We're not playing that criminal game anymore and it's over with.

(01:22:06):
Is he going to have the guts to do it?
The problem is that, and this I think was the
biggest mistake from the get go. If Jeff Sessions by
thinking that campaigning against Hillary Clinton and for Donald Trump
forced him into recusal, he never should have accepted that job.
And what he has done with that one bad decision

(01:22:29):
created this entire mess. Because Rob Rosenstein is the one
that will make that decision, not Jeff Sessions. Now, in
the course of this we've discovered a lot of other things,
and you know, again, we're appeeling the onion every day
throughout the year. And we've discovered a lot of other
things including, Oh, the dossier was bought and paid for
by Clinton. Oh, the fix was in with the Clinton

(01:22:51):
email investigation. Oh. We discovered that, Oh, that phony bought
and paid dossier was was the bulk of evidence used
for anifies the application advisor renewals. Oh, and they never
told the told the visor court judges ever, that Hillary
paid for it, and they tried to create an impression
that there was dual sourcing when there was only one source.

(01:23:12):
So we learned all of this in spite of what
all these people that wanted to undermine Trump we're trying
to do here. So you know, I don't know if
that's a good thing a bad thing, But I don't
think any of this is really good for the country.
I just don't. I don't see this as a good
thing in any way. I think the country has been
you know, it's divided the country. I mean, it's uh

(01:23:32):
put the we don't the president's focus is not on
the things that should be focused on, you know, and
and where is this ever gonna end because there's nothing
that I hear or read about Robert Mueller that has
anything to do with Trump and Russian collusion anymore. Now
it's about perjury traps, and well, it's that obstruction because
you got mad and you stated publicly that Jeff Sessions

(01:23:54):
was annoying. He never should have accused himself, and that's
what that that's the problem and the dangers of special counts.
Go ahead, you go. Did I say one more thing? Yeah? Yeah, okay, Hey, okay,
so all right, okay, so I heard exactly what you
just said. Right, okay, But shouldn't But shouldn't the shouldn't
the House Intelligence Committee report after seventy three witnesses in

(01:24:15):
the fourteen months, should and all the lies that have
come out through your show when you've been brilliant, by
the way, shouldn't that give Sessions enough confidence and guts
to stand up and say, Obama people, the hell out
of the Jetts Department. I am taking over. Listen, We've
learned Jeff Sessions is doing a lot of things we

(01:24:35):
didn't know about. I first reported. My sources told me
it turned out to be true that as part of
his recusally never recused himself from Uranium one and then
what two months ago, month and a half ago, there
was an indictment in the Iranium one case. We learned
last week that the Clinton Foundation is under an active
FBI investigation, so we know that's happening. We expect the

(01:24:58):
inspector generals were court any day, any weak now, and
in that report, I would suspect that you're gonna see
that a lot of top people at the Justice Department,
the FBI, and in the intel community we're doing a
lot of things that were wrong and probably illegal. So
we're getting there. I think we have more than triggered

(01:25:19):
just on the issue of lying to afis a court
judge and manipulating affis a court judge, that that should
be enough in and of itself. Writing an exoneration before
an investigation, that should be a crime in and of itself.
You know, deleting subpoenab emails and destroying the hard drive
and breaking up the vices, that's so obstruction of justice itself.
You know, there's a there's a ton of crimes have

(01:25:40):
been committed here, and it's only the question at the
end of this is are we gonna be a nation
of laws or are we gonna be we're gonna have
equal justice under the law, or are we gonna have
a two tier justice system? And I don't know the
answer right now, I really don't. Anyway, I appreciate it.
Thank you for the call of Verona, because in Pittsburgh, PA,

(01:26:01):
the ricks or Cone raisers going on there today. What's
going on? How does it look on the ground, Veronica?
You know what, Uh, it's tough. I've been trying to
check it out. You know, the eyes of Texas are
upon you, well, the eyes of America are upon Southwestern
p a UM. The election is really critical to the

(01:26:22):
mid term. To me, it's like light up night and
Black Friday to kick off the Christmas shopping. But then
the last minute shoppers can make your fourth quarter. So
I don't think this is a mandate about Trump. Um.
The congressional districts are changing. I got up this morning
and painfully tuned into my local CBS station, just trying

(01:26:44):
to get some information on what the field was out there.
I I, um, uh, you know, I'm all fired up.
I was at the Trump rally on Saturday Saturday night,
and there's a lot of plus um Trump. But the
thing that worries me in this election and any of
them going forward, is that now the Trump's won supporters

(01:27:09):
maybe just want to ride on his coattail. Daddy Trump
will take care of us. You know. It's it's easy
to say, yeah, I voted for Trump, but another thing
to say, I'm out there working so is agenda is implemented. Look,
I've gotta I've gotta be honest here. Um, when we
start really digging down into in these mid term elections,

(01:27:30):
one of the main questions I think people are gonna
have to reconcile in their own minds. And I already
know pretty much where I have to be because it
just is to me there's too much at stake. If
Nancy Pelosi ever becomes the Speaker of the House, we
are in deep trouble. I mean really deep trouble. And
I put nothing past her. And on top of that,

(01:27:52):
you know, look at where the Democrats led the country
in the eight years of Obama. It's been a disaster. Nothing,
nothing good came of it. None of those promises were
ever fulfilled. You know, Hope and change ended up being
you know, thirteen million more Americans on food stamps, eight
million more in poverty, doubling our debt and all the
other statistics I throw out all true. Thank you, Veronica,

(01:28:13):
good luck there in the eighteenth will be watching tonight
Sue in Pompano Beach in Florida. What's up, Sue? How
are you good? How you doing? Sean? I'm good, what's
going on? Thank you for all you do, and thank
you at all for the movie Let There Be Light.
You know, it's now on DVD and it's also you
can get it on demand at home, which is pretty cool.
You can get it at Walmart, Amazon dot com, Hannity

(01:28:34):
dot com. I'm very happy that Booye has done so well.
Thank you all. I loved it. Um the Real Debt
to the Car obviously trying to play for a long time.
And George Stefanopolis, he's about his the rritating to me
as Hillary, but I always thought, you know, I can't
stand him on the gm A anymore. And then of
course now he's going to be doing the James Coney,

(01:28:55):
you know. And my main thing is I just read
the other day that Good Morning America is looking at
maybe getting ready to him because they want to make
the show a little more entertaining and more soft and that.
So they're kind of saying he just doesn't see him anymore.
So I'm really hoping, because I really wanting to. Look,

(01:29:16):
I'm not a fan of George Stephanopolos. He's always been
a hardcore Clinton night. I don't think he's ever changed,
and I don't think he ever will change. I think
in his heart and soul, he's you know, a liberal Democrat. Um.
But with that said, I mean, they try and present
him as if he's some objective news reporter, and he's not.
He never has been and he never will be. Agree

(01:29:37):
I agree that, but but you know, going with the issues,
I don't trust any of these people in the media.
Look when I go to these conventions and when I
show up at these debates, and you know, they hate
the fact that that Fox is successful, that I'm successful,
and they have nothing but dripping contempt, and I look
at them as the biggest phony liars I've ever met

(01:29:58):
in my life. I think they I'm honest about who
I am, They're not honest. They try and pretend they're fair, objective,
and they're not. They all have political agendas and they
pursue them daily. Totally. So much agree with you, I
can't stand it. I totally agree. I appreciate it, and
you know, look, we're fighting for a lot of good
things for the country, not the least of which is

(01:30:21):
we want to leave this place better than we found it.
It's really not about us at this point. I mean,
it's really about future generations. And from my perspective, the
only way we're gonna get there is if we've pursued
these conservative policies that actually work. Every time we've tried conservatism,
conservatism works. Look at the job growth in just the

(01:30:43):
last year because of one change in president. It's amazing.
Look at all the burdens and regulations gone. Look at
America now pursuing energy independence, the employer mandate gone, all
of these. You know, these are all profound things. The
Supreme Court would be so different to day if Hillary
Clinton had one. All right, that's gonna wrap things up

(01:31:04):
at today Hannity tonight nine Eastern on the Fox News Channel.
The President down by the border, looking at different prototypes,
his conversations with border patrol agents, and it's actually all
really fascinating. We'll have full coverage of all of that.
The House Intel Committee, in concluding their investigation into so
called Russia collusion and to no one's surprise except the

(01:31:25):
liberal media that keeps going with a non story, zero
evidence of any collusion between the Russians and the Trump campaign.
Huge news and by the way, your media sources, how
do they handle it? Will delve into that and so
much more. Nine Eastern C DVR. We'll see you tonight
at nine. We'll see you back here tomorrow and as always,
thanks for being with us.

All Episodes

Anatomy of a Lie - 3.13

Episode Transcript

The Sean Hannity Show News

Host

Sean Hannity

Popular Podcasts

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

24/7 News: The Latest

Crime Junkie

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Anatomy of a Lie - 3.13