April 4, 2025 • 37 mins
We discuss the weird fight between Candace Owens and blogger House in Habit over RFK Jr., and the shocking twist in the Elon Musk baby mama drama with grifter Ashley St. Clair.
Support the show: https://redpilledamerica.com/support/
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:03):
This is Red Pilled America.
Speaker 2 (00:10):
Welcome to Part two of Red Pilled America's Fambugate.
Speaker 1 (00:14):
And don't forget to listen to our audio documentary series
coming on Monday, April the seventh, What Is an American?
It's a lot harder question to answer than we thought.
We get deep into it. We do a multiple part
series on this, and we uncover some things about our
politicians in Washington, DC that shocked us. Be sure to
(00:35):
check this out once again, What's an Americans? It's gonna
be one of the most important series that we've ever done,
you know. It's so let's get into this little beef
that's been going on between House and Habit, which is
(00:59):
one of the most popular substacks, which is a blogging
site in America, House in Habits kind of like a
gossip site and Candice Owens. There's this beef that's going
on to kind of revealed this trend that we've been
seeing happening in conservative media. And this is the reason
why we want to do this story. There's this trend
happening with grifters now that are entering into this into
(01:24):
conservative media and getting a lot of power, and we
need to start calling this out because it's everywhere right
now and people are following. These people have enormous followings.
This House and Habit Girl has a million, over a
million followers on Instagram. You got Ian Carroll who comes
(01:46):
into this story huge on Twitter, over a million followers.
His videos now are going viral. So we thought this
was a story that we needed to share with you guys,
just to kind of for you to keep an eye
out for this kind of stuff.
Speaker 2 (01:59):
Yeah, you guys obviously on who Candice Owens is, and
we are, for the record, we are not calling her
a grifter. Who we are calling a grifter is his
House and Habit woman. Her name is Jessica Reid Krause. Now,
in twenty sixteen, this woman was such a leftist that
she went to the Women's March and she wore a
(02:19):
pussy hat. And she has done a complete one eighty.
She is now full Maga. She was one of the
independent journalists that got the uh the blank epstein binder,
okay from Pam Bondi. She was one of the few
that got That's that's how much she has risen in
the Maga movement. Now. The way that she got into
(02:41):
the Maga movement was via RFK Junior. She was on
the campaign with him, and she covered him extensively. She
had full access to him, you know, she was at
Martha's vineyard with them, on their boats, like, spent so
much time with them, became very very close to RFK
Junior and his wife, Cheryl Hines. Now, she'd also developed
(03:03):
a very close relationship with another journalist that was on
the campaign, on the RFJK Junior campaign with her by
the name of Olisya Nuzzy. If that name sounds familiar,
it's because that is the woman that RFK Junior allegedly
had the digital affair with. Now, when House and Habit
found out that Olivia Nuzzy and RFK Junior were, you know, sexually,
(03:29):
romantically involved, whatever it was, she was very upset about it,
and she wrote a scathing, scathing article about Olivia Nzzy.
She called her big boned, She basically called her a
fatso and a wannabe. And she was very upset, and
you know, she said to her readers that she needs
to do better, that she was totally duped by this woman.
(03:51):
And I have to say, you know, somebody that was
following this story very closely, she seemed very sincere.
Speaker 1 (03:59):
It was a big story at the time as well too.
Speaker 2 (04:01):
Yeah, we talked, we covered it here on the fanband,
and you know, I'd been following House in Habit, I
even I told you about it. I've been following her.
She was always, you know, at the events, and she
was always with her best friend of fourteen years, a
woman named Denise, who was her foot photographer, and it
(04:21):
just looked like, you know, just a great relationship. Well,
come to find out that House in Habit had decided
that she wanted to do a hit piece on Candace Owens.
And she had a writer that worked for her named
Emily Hagen. And Emily is actually a very very good writer.
(04:44):
I have read some of her stuff and she's a
great writer. So Emily is tasked with writing a hit
piece on Candace Owens. She admits that she's not a
big fan of Candace. Emily admits it anyway, So she
writes this article. She submits it to Jessica, and Jessica
says that she needs to run it by somebody, and
(05:04):
Emily's like, who, who do you need to run it by?
Turns out she's going to run the article by someone
who's now helping her run her substack none other than
Olivia Nuzzy herself. So that's kind of weird, don't you think.
The woman that was trying to take down RFK Junior
(05:25):
and his wife and Jessica was so upset about it,
now they're friends, their secret friends, and she's helping her
run her site. That is very suspect. So Emily the
writer is completely confused by.
Speaker 1 (05:40):
She was the one that's writing the hit piece on
the condice.
Speaker 2 (05:41):
She's like, wait a minute, why does Olivia have to
look at it, read it, and why does this have
to be a secret, Like what's really going on here?
So this comes out.
Speaker 1 (05:52):
And one of the things that comes out from it
that I thought was interesting is that Olivia nsy was
reading this girl's article on Candace and said, there's too
much kind of like, there's too much fluff in here.
What you need to do is you need a clean shot.
Speaker 2 (06:06):
It needs to be a clean shot to take out Candace. Yes. So,
by the way, in the meantime, Jessica Read writes another
substack okay, and in it she says some disparaging things
about Candace Owens, Tucker, Carlson, Andy and Carol this is
not the hit piece. This is a completely separate piece,
and this is the piece that gets on Candace's radar.
(06:28):
So Candace says something on Instagram about it, like, hey, like,
I don't know why House and Habit like took a
swipe at me. YadA YadA YadA. Well, House and Habit
catches wind that Candace Owens has responded, and you can
just tell in her Instagram stories that she's loving it.
She's like, ugh, Candace Owens is taking a swipe of
me right now and her stories whatever, Candace, I'm busy
(06:52):
right now. I'm currently at the White House. She's like,
putting all that show truck I'm shadowing. And then she
basically says that Candace has lost access to the President
because she's an anti Semite. And then she posts a
picture of Candace and her husband wearing what looked to
be red maga hats that say make America great again.
(07:13):
But they actually don't say make America great again. I
think they say like make marriage great again or make
weddings great again. It was like, you know something something
cute that was wedding related. There's a party gift, but
Jessica Reid Kraus House and Habit is really like showing
her teeth to Candace. And then she threatens Candace and
says if she sends her a DM and says, if
(07:34):
you uh, you better watch it or I'm going to
expose you and your husband and all of your wealth.
Speaker 1 (07:41):
She's basically very, very rich.
Speaker 2 (07:43):
And by the way, if I know anything about Candace Owens,
it's that if you're going to go for her, you
better get that clean shot and because if not, she's
going to come for you.
Speaker 1 (07:52):
So what it looked like to me from an outsider's
perspective when I was watching this story and wasn't like
kind of in it like you because you had been
watching her for a while, it seemed to be that
Candace was breaking into the pop culture world. Actually, Candis
had been doing pop culture for a very long time,
but she viewed it as a new thing, this House
(08:14):
and Habit. She viewed it as a new thing that
Candace was doing, and she was breaking into her category,
into her territory, and so she was basically starting a
fight with Candace because of that. Candace has you know,
four times the following that she does on Instagram, you know,
many many times that on Twitter and on YouTube. She
(08:35):
doesn't have a YouTube station, this House and Habit person,
So you know, it kind of looked like she was
one trying to call her out for getting into her territory,
and two maybe trying to create beef to get follows
and to kind of just to build some kind of
a media a media push. But she missed, and all
of this dirt started to come out on her, that
(08:56):
her friends on House and Habit, that she had fired
some friends or some friends left that had been with
her for many, many years. And it was just this
back and forth and this back and forth. So where
it starts to take this turn is so Candace starts
to dig into this story and she's starting to claim
(09:19):
that it's there's some kind of a black male story
on RFK Junior and that these people are trying to
blackmail him. He's come out as pretty heavily behind Israel.
At some point. He is running this health initiative, this
(09:40):
Maha initiative, and people are kind of criticizing him. Why
are you talking about Israel? If you are running this
health stuff, you're supposed to be make America healthy again,
but yet you're talking about anti Semitism. Why are you
kind of going off, you know, off this what you're
supposed to be, what we hired you to do, basically,
(10:01):
And so Candace starts floating this black male story and
that he's somehow being blackmailed. Well, this Ian Carroll guy
jumps into this because what Candice noticed is that the
house and habit person went after her, Ian Carroll and
Tucker Carlson, three people that I would say the pro
(10:23):
Israel lobbies or the pros and mural community have viewed
as being anti Israel. So she tries to make that
connection there, and you know that's up to her. She
wants to make that connection, that's fine.
Speaker 2 (10:35):
But by the way, I will add that a lot
of people that were close to house and habit to
Jessica Ree Krause, did come out and say that Jessica
was compromised. Yes, and really that is really the point
of why we are having this discussion now with you guys.
It's because, and we've talked about this before on the show.
(10:55):
You know, so many of these big MAGA and now
MAHA influencers are they're compromised.
Speaker 1 (11:05):
And they're brand new to the scene. Yes, they're brand new.
These people just got here and now they are all
in it. They're all up in the White House. They're
all in there shadowing the president, as she says, they're
right there when the Epstein fake binder was released and
they're pushing stories out there, they're right in there. And
(11:27):
I am I will say that it's fair for Candice
to question the fact that she is now friends with
Olivia Nuzi, who broke this sexting or who was involved
in this sexting story with RFK Junior. And there is
definitely something very strange there. And the point that I
think that you're trying to get at is we need
(11:47):
to stop giving these people this kind of power within
the conservative movement. There are so many people that have
risen up that had just turned conservative yesterday, whether it
be Ashley saying Claire, which we're going to get into,
whether it be this house and Habit person, or whether
(12:08):
it be this Ian Carroll guy. Okay, so Ian Carroll
sees this opportunity with this thing kind of blowing up,
and it was blowing up on Instagram. There was a
back and forth for multiple days where where this house
and habit person was putting up something and then Candace
was responding, Candace is kind of destroying her, in my opinion,
(12:29):
making her look very bad, kind of showing her for
what she was as far as losing a lot of friends,
throwing friends under the bus. You did a video on this,
and she blocked you, because House and blocked you. So
Ian Carroll gets in on this story, and I just
want to play a couple of minutes, one minute of
this story of how he kind of jumped in on
(12:51):
this story, because I think it's very telling.
Speaker 3 (12:54):
So the Bobby Kennedy blackmail story is currently breaking in
many directions all across the Internet, and American politics is
not going to be the same after this weekend.
Speaker 1 (13:07):
After this weekend, American politics will not be the same.
That's how he opens this video.
Speaker 3 (13:13):
That's not hyperbole. This is not just a hook. And
I don't really know where to start, but this is
the kind of story that I've gotten enough calls from
enough people tonight, and enough people there's enough going on
that I feel like we need to make a video
right now to keep some people safe and to get
as much as we all know out on the internet
right now so that everyone can be safe.
Speaker 1 (13:32):
Okay, So he's suggesting that people are going to potentially
be suicided because of this story. Okay, this is what
this Ian Carroll guy is saying this. He released this
last Friday, I think it was March twenty eighth. Okay,
so that's leading into the weekend. This story's going to
break so big, you guys against RFK Junior once this
weekend is over.
Speaker 2 (13:53):
Not just a hook.
Speaker 1 (13:54):
No, it's not a hook. This isn't hYP Perboley.
Speaker 3 (13:56):
And the best place for everyone to start is at
Cannas's video that she put up today that she very
aptly titled One Nation under Blackmail. Go watch it. She
does a way better job of explaining a bunch of
what's going on than I could. But as soon as
I was like ten minutes into it, and then I
started getting phone calls from sources telling me more information
(14:18):
that is corroborating and taking it even further than what
is exposed in that video. And I have sources telling
me that there are people in like media and around
Bobby that know about this and know it's coming and
are trying to protect him and save him from this.
But it is past that, and there is no saving
anyone from this. I think and we just have to
(14:39):
deal with what's about to happen.
Speaker 1 (14:40):
Okay. So he goes into this huge like leader that
this thing is going to be huge, and he talks
about this blackmail story and how he's getting all these
inside sources verse he says, five, six, no seven, sources
came to me and told me about so many sources,
got so many insights.
Speaker 2 (14:58):
Trust And really quickly the.
Speaker 1 (15:01):
Story is is there's this sexting scandal that's going to
come out on RFK Junior, that there's all of these
pictures and all these things that are going to come out.
And Okay, this guy is the human version of Q. Okay,
he is the new Q. He says something these huge things.
(15:24):
Allegedly his name might as well be Ian allegedly Carol Okay,
he uses allegedly all of the time he makes these
huge statements, they end up going nowhere. This was a
guy that was a huge RFK guy back in the day.
Now he's somehow saying that that RFK is compromised. This
(15:46):
man is a real trouble, okay, because he comes out
and he creates this these problems, and you have all
of these Republicans and Conservatives that are listening to this
man now as if he has all of these inside
stories and he has all of these inside connections. I
think that this is a perfect example of what this
(16:07):
guy does. Is what Sernovich said. A couple I want
to say, this was uh not that long ago. He
visited an old friend of our show, chef Andrew Gruhle,
and his wife, and he was kind of talking about
how people rise in political media, and this is what
(16:30):
Sernovic had to say about that.
Speaker 4 (16:33):
If you really want to rise in the political commentating sphere,
you have to give people certainty. They actually don't care
if you're wrong. They don't.
Speaker 1 (16:40):
Yeah, that's a good point.
Speaker 4 (16:41):
So people will try to hold things against people there
nobody cares. They want. What's gonna happen with RFK? If
I just tweeted out r K Junior is a lock
that would go wild. Everybody would love to hear it.
Where whereas and then if something happened, I could just say, oh, oh,
well that he was a lock. But then this other
thing happened. But with certainty, always with certainty, he was
(17:02):
a lock. And then this guy I but trayed us
at the eleventh hour. Okay, Cernovich knows what he's talking
about boom boom boom boom viral viral. But when I post,
I don't know everybody needs the on their telephone pressure campaign.
Nobody wants to hear it. Not nobody, but a lot
of people don't want to hear it. Rise in political
commentary is always speak with certainty. Nobody cares if you're wrong,
(17:22):
Nobody will hold you accountable for being wrong, and if
you are wrong, you just say some new piece of information.
The same thing with the finance market. Oh, buy the
stock at fifty bye by like Jim Kramer. I mean,
everybody knows if you invest with Jim Kramer, that's not
going to go well. Yes, but you know what, he's
got a show for twenty years. He's making thirty forty
million dollars a year because nobody cares. The people don't
(17:44):
really care me personally. That's not interesting to me creatively, right,
But so for those watching, always speak with certainty if
you want to build your political commentary brand or be
a finance pro brand, and then you can always blame
the market. Oh, what I said was true, but then
Trump did a tariff and I I was wrong.
Speaker 1 (18:03):
Okay, so he nails it there, and that's what this guy,
Ian Carroll does. He talks with certainty. He talks as
if he has all of these inside tracks, and this
horrible sexting scandal is going to come out on RFK.
First of all, if you know anything about RFK Junior's past,
you would know that a sexting scandal is not going
(18:25):
to do anything with this man. This man's wife committed
suicide and there's been.
Speaker 2 (18:32):
Over his affairs, over his infidelities.
Speaker 1 (18:34):
Yes, okay, so this is the mother of his children
committed suicide over his affairs. He's a serial cheater, serial cheater.
And so now what we're supposed to believe from this
Ian Carroll guy is that there's this blackmail digital story
(18:55):
that's going to come out that's just going to change everything.
And I gotta get this story out right now so
people don't get murdered and suicided.
Speaker 2 (19:03):
And I think what I'm getting is that the picks
are like Anthony Weener type of picks. Okay, that's what
I think, But I don't know what's going on.
Speaker 1 (19:13):
Well, here's the thing here it is. We are now
a week after he posted this video. Okay, the weekend
is long in the rear view mirror. It's come and gone.
Where is this story that he's talking about. Where is
this huge, ground shifting, life changing thing that was supposed
to come out after last weekend? Nothing? And just like
(19:38):
Mike Cernovich said there, he'll never be held accountable for it.
He says these things with certainty, allegedly, allegedly allegedly, but
guess what, wink wink, and then nothing comes of it.
And the reason why he has a following is because
he is anti Israel and he's anti jew in my opinion,
(19:59):
watching and listening to his approach with everything, he ties
everything back to the Jews. He ties everything back to
some kind of a you know, conspiracy in that matter
he's he tried to assume, he tried to kind of
tie a conspiracy to Andrew Breitbart. I don't bet you
he doesn't even know that Andrew Breitbart is Jewish, that
he was murdered by, you know, some kind of weird cabal.
Speaker 2 (20:22):
He's saying that he was murdered.
Speaker 1 (20:23):
But he doesn't even know that Andrew is Jewish. Once
he knows that, I'm sure he's going to kind of
change that kind of around a little bit. This is
a serious problem that we have in conservative media right now.
Speaker 2 (20:34):
Yeah, there are so many grifters. And you know the
whole point of this conversation is that we just want
you guys to be wary of, you know, people when
they first come on to the scene, you know, like
this house and habit woman who now has so much
power and access to the president. And really just give
it time because in time these people will reveal who
(20:58):
they are. But most importantly, don't give these people your
hard earned money until they are properly vetted. You know,
Patrick and I have been doing this for a long
long time. Redfield America has been around for over six
years now, but before.
Speaker 1 (21:15):
That, go back to two thousand and nine.
Speaker 2 (21:16):
Two thousand and nine. We have been in this space
for a long time and we have seen things, We
have heard things, and you know, there's a reason that
you don't see us at like the Marlago parties and
hanging out with that person. You know, once you get
in there, you see things that you hope you wish
you didn't see. You know, it's things that you don't
want to be associated with. You know, this person's a drunk,
(21:37):
this person sleeping with that married person, it's a lot
of mess. And this person's you know, in bed with
this corporation or this entity let's call it, that has
very very deep top pockets and is paying them to
push an agenda and a narrative. And we see that
a lot. So you guys just just be careful and
(21:59):
don't don't always believe these people, especially if they're new
to the scene or if they're pushing these really ridiculous
conspiracy theories and they don't have receipts and you know,
and again we're not talking about Candace. Candace does bring
the receipts, and I feel like she was justified, very
(22:20):
justified in going after house and habit.
Speaker 1 (22:23):
Yeah, but she's getting in bed with this Ian Carroll guy,
and it's just so frustrating for me to see her
do this. This guy is a grifter, he's he is
a time and time again pushes these conspiracy theories, and
now she's putting her brand in with him. She just
recently released a podcast with him, and it's just like,
(22:46):
I don't know, I think it's a huge mistake. I
think she's making an enormous mistake by aligning with this guy.
Is he a gifted video maker and kind of streamer. Yes,
because he's willing to go into this conspiracy area and
just throw big statements out there like he did last
week leading into the weekend, and nothing comes out of it.
Speaker 2 (23:07):
I mean, I don't think doing, you know, one episode
or having a person on your show one time, is
you aligning with them. You know, we've had plenty of
people on the show that we don't agree with and
when we end up not agreeing with the in the future.
I mean, I do agree Ian Carroll is a huge problem.
I think he's a total grifter. I think he's completely
full of shit. I think he says whatever he wants
(23:28):
to say whenever he you know, he says whatever he
needs to say whenever he needs to say it.
Speaker 1 (23:32):
One hundred percent, and you know that's a fair statement.
I just think that she is putting her She is
aligning with this man. It's more than just you know,
us covering a story on somebody and then turning out
to be, you know, not the greatest person in the world.
She is aligning with this guy, and I think it's
a problem. I think it's trouble. I don't think she
(23:54):
should do it, but you know, that's just you know,
that's a fifty five year old man that's been around
for a while and knows a grifter, and I see
you one.
Speaker 2 (24:03):
Well, just you guys, don't give your hard earned money
to then you know, the new and shiny thing or
to conspiracy theory.
Speaker 1 (24:12):
You very careful with that. We're going to get into
some interesting kind of update on the Ashley Saint Clair story.
Something blew my mind. You guys are going to want
to hear this, and we're going to get into it
right after the break. You're listening to Red Pilled America's
(24:33):
fam Boogie. Become part of the fan bam and listen
to our show ad free. Go to Redpilled America dot
com click join the top menu. We need you guys
be ready to hear our new documentary series coming out
on Monday, What's an American. You're going to want to
check this out. It's going to be our one of
our most important series that we've done to date. So
(24:54):
this Ashley Saint Clair story, I cannot help but talk
about this because it's blowing my mind what I learned
earned this last week. So for you, anyone, anyone that
hasn't hasn't seen the update on this Ashley Saint Clair
did this immedia stunt last week where she basically sold
(25:20):
a Tesla that was given to her by Elon Musk.
Speaker 2 (25:22):
One hundred thousand dollars car.
Speaker 1 (25:24):
So she goes and she gets car Vanna to come
through and she she goes to Carvana is the company
that you can sell your car to, a used car to,
And then somehow who knows how, the Daily Mail is
there and a couple other paparazzi to kind of ask
her what's going on. And this is Ashley Saint Clair's
(25:46):
response to the journalists. I'm selling it because I need
to make up.
Speaker 2 (25:52):
For the sixty percent cut that Elon.
Speaker 1 (25:54):
Made to or such child So Elon made a sixty
percent cut to the child support. She's she's saying.
Speaker 3 (26:03):
Against humans.
Speaker 1 (26:05):
Yeah, that's Annus opera.
Speaker 2 (26:06):
I'm no woman that let's stick out.
Speaker 1 (26:09):
So he's she's basically going at Elon, you know, saying, oh,
look at his stocks. She goes at his company. You know,
he this is what he does to women that speak out.
Speaker 2 (26:19):
And she's playing the victim. She's playing the victim, and
she's painting him as a bad father who doesn't take
care of his children.
Speaker 1 (26:26):
Yes, exactly. And it's very telling is that she said
he cut it by sixty percent. She doesn't say that
give a number, but she says he cut it by
a percentage, okay, And there might be a reason why
she said that. Elon responds to this video.
Speaker 2 (26:42):
No, no, no, He responds to Laura Lumer.
Speaker 1 (26:45):
Yeah, but the video is. Laura Lumber posts the video
and he said, and this is what he says. I
don't know if the child is mine or not, but
I am not against finding out. No court order is
needed despite not knowing for sure. I have given Ashley
two point five million dollars and I am sending her
(27:06):
five hundred thousand dollars per year. Okay. So apparently he's
making the claim that he gave her a two point
five million dollar payment plus five hundred thousand dollars per
year to cover their expenses and what have you. Laura
Lumer posts this. He responds to Laura Lumer. Laura Lumer
calls her a gold digger and saying that she's selling
this one hundred thousand dollars and she has the babarazzi
(27:27):
there and what have you. So Ashley sees this, and
she responds to this, and she says, Elon, we asked
you to confirm paternity through a test before our child,
who you named, was even born. You refused you and
you weren't sending me money. You were sending support for
(27:49):
your child that you thought was necessary until you withdrew
most of it to maintain control and punish me for disobedience.
But you're really only punishing your son. It's ironic that
your last effort in court was to try to gag
me while you use a social media channel you literally own,
(28:10):
to distribute derogatory messages about me and our child to
the entire world. It's all about control with you, and
everybody can see it. America needs you to grow up,
you petulant manchild. So this thing got.
Speaker 2 (28:25):
Ugly starting real what is she talking?
Speaker 1 (28:29):
She was the first person to kind of go to
the media with it, and it's.
Speaker 2 (28:33):
To the whole world to see.
Speaker 1 (28:35):
Yes, well, this is the part that blew my mind. Okay,
Milo put this tweet out and I'm like, there's no
way this is true. There's no way that this is true.
He puts out this the maximum amount Elon Musk would
be forced to pay after childcare, health and education in
(28:57):
New York is thirty one thousand, one hundred and ten
dollars a year. If small, that's the nickname that he
uses with her. If Smashley keeps this up, that's what
she will be left with. Okay, And I thought, wait
a minute, I've and I've argued this before in the past.
He didn't They've never been married. She wasn't even they
(29:19):
weren't even in a steady relationship. So she can't claim
like common law, she can't claim that this was the
lifestyle that I was leading. She can't claim that, you know,
I've got used to this lifestyle, so I need this
amount of money. She had a child with him. But
I'm thinking, okay, he's a billionaire. She's gonna be and
everyone's like, oh, you know, he's gonna she got the bag.
(29:42):
Oh my god, she's so smart. She worked it. She
she got that bag. She got that bag. Well, it
turns out that Milo is right. New York City has
a very interesting law. Okay, this is the law. They
basically cap child support at six one hundred and sixty
(30:04):
three thousand dollars of combined parental income, and then each
parent is supposed to pay a percentage of that I
think it's around seventeen or eighteen percent something along those lines.
So when you do the calculation, you learn that that
is actually true, that it is seventeen percent for one child.
(30:25):
The guideline percentage is seventeen percent of the combined combined
parental income up to the cap. So there's a cap,
so it doesn't matter if he's a billionaire or not.
He's the it's capped at one hundred and sixty three
thousand dollars, so he is really only obligated to like
thirty thousand dollars to pay her per year. Now, if
(30:48):
you guys might remember this, when this whole story broke
and she went to the media, she explained this story,
believe it's to the New York Post, and she explained
kind of the back story on this whole thing, and
she wanted to move to Texas to be closer to him,
and he said.
Speaker 2 (31:05):
No, no, no, stay in New York.
Speaker 1 (31:07):
Stay in New York. Okay. And by the way, the
most fun, the fast, most fascinating thing. And I almost
feel bad laughing about this because there's a child associated
with this. But she's doing this, Okay, she's doing this.
She does this story with New York Post, and she
has this chessboard in the background dramatically in the background,
(31:28):
and a couple of times she's like seated right next
to the chessboard like she's the chess player in this
she's the smart one.
Speaker 2 (31:35):
She's gonna play.
Speaker 1 (31:36):
She's gonna play him. She's got the bag coming and
lo and behold, there's a cap in New York. And
she's screwing herself now because.
Speaker 2 (31:46):
Her son, this poor child, she got.
Speaker 1 (31:49):
This chunk of money from this band. She hasn't denied it,
by the way, she never denied that when he put
that information out there. She didn't say, no, you didn't
send me two point five million. She actually confirmed it
because she said, no, you didn't say to me, you
send it to our son. Okay, nobody needs two point
five million dollars, all right, to raise a baby. Okay.
(32:11):
So all of these people that were out there that
congratulated her on her marriage or her excuse me, her
new child, this new child that was coming into the world,
and all these people out there that laughed and said, oh,
she's smart. She got that bag. She didn't get that bag.
Speaker 2 (32:27):
No, she did not.
Speaker 1 (32:28):
She got played. She's getting played and she's digging herself
more and more into a into a a a. She's
digging a hole for herself. And the funny thing is
this goes back to this last segment that we had.
Here is another grifter that entered into the Maga movement.
She had just turned uh you know conservative. You could
(32:51):
obviously see that she was not. There's videos out there
where she was saying that illegal immigration isn't a problem.
Are you guys voting for illegal immigrations are are idiots?
She's clear playing the whole trad thing for years.
Speaker 2 (33:06):
Oh yeah, and she's got two babies by two different
baby daddies, both had them out of wedlock.
Speaker 1 (33:13):
Yes, So I guess the moral of the story is
is once again, watch these people and don't let them
in the movement.
Speaker 2 (33:21):
Yeah. And by the way, my low calls are smashly
for a reason. You know, Ashley was it all of
the fancy Maga parties. You see her mingling all up
with all like, you know, the fancy famous Maga stars.
She was right up in that mix. And she's exactly
the kind of person that we wanted to stay away from.
Speaker 1 (33:42):
I don't get it. She's not attractive, she is not
she's I don't know about miss Young. She's not attractive.
Speaker 2 (33:50):
I mean she's not She's not a supermodel. You know,
she's not conventionally beautiful.
Speaker 1 (33:54):
She's good looking to ugly people and to old people,
and that's it.
Speaker 2 (33:58):
Well I'm old, so I don't think she's ugly. But
what I think is fascinated is she's trying to play
the victim. She is actually delusional enough to believe that
people are going to feel sorry for her. I mean,
what are you kidding? I thought this girl was smart,
but clearly she is not.
Speaker 1 (34:15):
Why does she think that she deserves, you know, half
a billion dollars or something because she got pregnant with
a billionaire.
Speaker 2 (34:21):
She baby trapped him.
Speaker 1 (34:22):
She baby trapped him, She honey trappedhim, baby trapped him,
and she's now she's getting what she deserved. And unfortunately,
this kid is going to be the one that's going
to suffer because now because of her, all of this
is being played out in the media.
Speaker 2 (34:35):
And now this this baby is one day going to
grow up and he's gonna read all of this.
Speaker 1 (34:38):
Because she obviously had the money. She wasn't like she
was broke.
Speaker 2 (34:42):
I guess her money here is don't be a dirty hoe.
Speaker 1 (34:46):
Do not be a dirty hoe. Don't teach your kid
to do this kind of thing. This is just not
the way that we should be teaching our kids.
Speaker 2 (34:55):
Is there not the kinds of people that we want
as representatives of the conservative movement?
Speaker 1 (35:00):
Not even close, God, not even c I.
Speaker 2 (35:04):
What has happened to family values? That's what those are
the people that we need to lift up within the concern.
Speaker 1 (35:12):
This is what's become the commodity now is the follower count. Yes,
if you can get a social media follower count, you
are king. You know, there was an old saying, I
think it was Sumner Redstone when he talked about Hollywood.
He said content was king. If you whoever makes the
content and has the content, they're the king of the
entertainment business. Well, in the social media world, followers are king.
(35:36):
Whoever has the most followers ends up getting influence and
they end up getting attention. They're being propped up by
all of us.
Speaker 2 (35:45):
Well, I'm on my way because I got my tenth
follower on Instagram.
Speaker 1 (35:50):
By the way, if you guys are into fashion, any
the ladies out there, you want to check out a
great fashion blog and get fashion inspiration. Go to Adriana
Underscore Jade on Instagram. Adriana has a great Instagram page.
Speaker 2 (36:02):
There, and you guys shall do a lot of skincare
and wellness for women of a certain age.
Speaker 1 (36:09):
Do not let these grifters in. You know who they are.
Try to find people that you trust and just stick
with those people. We're gonna be going backstage right now, guys,
and we are you talking about some stuff that's been
going on with the Daily Wire's some some financial issues
that have been going on over there. We're going to
(36:30):
talk about that. We're also going to review a couple
of TV shows and talk about some Hollywood stuff. You guys,
arenna want to join us, Go to red Pilled America
dot com. Support the show, support what you love, or
it goes away. Guys. We need you, guys, and be
sure to check out our series coming out on April seventh,
What's an American. It's gonna be one of the most
important series we've ever done. Check it out.
This is Red Pilled America.
Speaker 2 (00:10):
Welcome to Part two of Red Pilled America's Fambugate.
Speaker 1 (00:14):
And don't forget to listen to our audio documentary series
coming on Monday, April the seventh, What Is an American?
It's a lot harder question to answer than we thought.
We get deep into it. We do a multiple part
series on this, and we uncover some things about our
politicians in Washington, DC that shocked us. Be sure to
(00:35):
check this out once again, What's an Americans? It's gonna
be one of the most important series that we've ever done,
you know. It's so let's get into this little beef
that's been going on between House and Habit, which is
(00:59):
one of the most popular substacks, which is a blogging
site in America, House in Habits kind of like a
gossip site and Candice Owens. There's this beef that's going
on to kind of revealed this trend that we've been
seeing happening in conservative media. And this is the reason
why we want to do this story. There's this trend
happening with grifters now that are entering into this into
(01:24):
conservative media and getting a lot of power, and we
need to start calling this out because it's everywhere right
now and people are following. These people have enormous followings.
This House and Habit Girl has a million, over a
million followers on Instagram. You got Ian Carroll who comes
(01:46):
into this story huge on Twitter, over a million followers.
His videos now are going viral. So we thought this
was a story that we needed to share with you guys,
just to kind of for you to keep an eye
out for this kind of stuff.
Speaker 2 (01:59):
Yeah, you guys obviously on who Candice Owens is, and
we are, for the record, we are not calling her
a grifter. Who we are calling a grifter is his
House and Habit woman. Her name is Jessica Reid Krause. Now,
in twenty sixteen, this woman was such a leftist that
she went to the Women's March and she wore a
(02:19):
pussy hat. And she has done a complete one eighty.
She is now full Maga. She was one of the
independent journalists that got the uh the blank epstein binder,
okay from Pam Bondi. She was one of the few
that got That's that's how much she has risen in
the Maga movement. Now. The way that she got into
(02:41):
the Maga movement was via RFK Junior. She was on
the campaign with him, and she covered him extensively. She
had full access to him, you know, she was at
Martha's vineyard with them, on their boats, like, spent so
much time with them, became very very close to RFK
Junior and his wife, Cheryl Hines. Now, she'd also developed
(03:03):
a very close relationship with another journalist that was on
the campaign, on the RFJK Junior campaign with her by
the name of Olisya Nuzzy. If that name sounds familiar,
it's because that is the woman that RFK Junior allegedly
had the digital affair with. Now, when House and Habit
found out that Olivia Nuzzy and RFK Junior were, you know, sexually,
(03:29):
romantically involved, whatever it was, she was very upset about it,
and she wrote a scathing, scathing article about Olivia Nzzy.
She called her big boned, She basically called her a
fatso and a wannabe. And she was very upset, and
you know, she said to her readers that she needs
to do better, that she was totally duped by this woman.
(03:51):
And I have to say, you know, somebody that was
following this story very closely, she seemed very sincere.
Speaker 1 (03:59):
It was a big story at the time as well too.
Speaker 2 (04:01):
Yeah, we talked, we covered it here on the fanband,
and you know, I'd been following House in Habit, I
even I told you about it. I've been following her.
She was always, you know, at the events, and she
was always with her best friend of fourteen years, a
woman named Denise, who was her foot photographer, and it
(04:21):
just looked like, you know, just a great relationship. Well,
come to find out that House in Habit had decided
that she wanted to do a hit piece on Candace Owens.
And she had a writer that worked for her named
Emily Hagen. And Emily is actually a very very good writer.
(04:44):
I have read some of her stuff and she's a
great writer. So Emily is tasked with writing a hit
piece on Candace Owens. She admits that she's not a
big fan of Candace. Emily admits it anyway, So she
writes this article. She submits it to Jessica, and Jessica
says that she needs to run it by somebody, and
(05:04):
Emily's like, who, who do you need to run it by?
Turns out she's going to run the article by someone
who's now helping her run her substack none other than
Olivia Nuzzy herself. So that's kind of weird, don't you think.
The woman that was trying to take down RFK Junior
(05:25):
and his wife and Jessica was so upset about it,
now they're friends, their secret friends, and she's helping her
run her site. That is very suspect. So Emily the
writer is completely confused by.
Speaker 1 (05:40):
She was the one that's writing the hit piece on
the condice.
Speaker 2 (05:41):
She's like, wait a minute, why does Olivia have to
look at it, read it, and why does this have
to be a secret, Like what's really going on here?
So this comes out.
Speaker 1 (05:52):
And one of the things that comes out from it
that I thought was interesting is that Olivia nsy was
reading this girl's article on Candace and said, there's too
much kind of like, there's too much fluff in here.
What you need to do is you need a clean shot.
Speaker 2 (06:06):
It needs to be a clean shot to take out Candace. Yes. So,
by the way, in the meantime, Jessica Read writes another
substack okay, and in it she says some disparaging things
about Candace Owens, Tucker, Carlson, Andy and Carol this is
not the hit piece. This is a completely separate piece,
and this is the piece that gets on Candace's radar.
(06:28):
So Candace says something on Instagram about it, like, hey, like,
I don't know why House and Habit like took a
swipe at me. YadA YadA YadA. Well, House and Habit
catches wind that Candace Owens has responded, and you can
just tell in her Instagram stories that she's loving it.
She's like, ugh, Candace Owens is taking a swipe of
me right now and her stories whatever, Candace, I'm busy
(06:52):
right now. I'm currently at the White House. She's like,
putting all that show truck I'm shadowing. And then she
basically says that Candace has lost access to the President
because she's an anti Semite. And then she posts a
picture of Candace and her husband wearing what looked to
be red maga hats that say make America great again.
(07:13):
But they actually don't say make America great again. I
think they say like make marriage great again or make
weddings great again. It was like, you know something something
cute that was wedding related. There's a party gift, but
Jessica Reid Kraus House and Habit is really like showing
her teeth to Candace. And then she threatens Candace and
says if she sends her a DM and says, if
(07:34):
you uh, you better watch it or I'm going to
expose you and your husband and all of your wealth.
Speaker 1 (07:41):
She's basically very, very rich.
Speaker 2 (07:43):
And by the way, if I know anything about Candace Owens,
it's that if you're going to go for her, you
better get that clean shot and because if not, she's
going to come for you.
Speaker 1 (07:52):
So what it looked like to me from an outsider's
perspective when I was watching this story and wasn't like
kind of in it like you because you had been
watching her for a while, it seemed to be that
Candace was breaking into the pop culture world. Actually, Candis
had been doing pop culture for a very long time,
but she viewed it as a new thing, this House
(08:14):
and Habit. She viewed it as a new thing that
Candace was doing, and she was breaking into her category,
into her territory, and so she was basically starting a
fight with Candace because of that. Candace has you know,
four times the following that she does on Instagram, you know,
many many times that on Twitter and on YouTube. She
(08:35):
doesn't have a YouTube station, this House and Habit person,
So you know, it kind of looked like she was
one trying to call her out for getting into her territory,
and two maybe trying to create beef to get follows
and to kind of just to build some kind of
a media a media push. But she missed, and all
of this dirt started to come out on her, that
(08:56):
her friends on House and Habit, that she had fired
some friends or some friends left that had been with
her for many, many years. And it was just this
back and forth and this back and forth. So where
it starts to take this turn is so Candace starts
to dig into this story and she's starting to claim
(09:19):
that it's there's some kind of a black male story
on RFK Junior and that these people are trying to
blackmail him. He's come out as pretty heavily behind Israel.
At some point. He is running this health initiative, this
(09:40):
Maha initiative, and people are kind of criticizing him. Why
are you talking about Israel? If you are running this
health stuff, you're supposed to be make America healthy again,
but yet you're talking about anti Semitism. Why are you
kind of going off, you know, off this what you're
supposed to be, what we hired you to do, basically,
(10:01):
And so Candace starts floating this black male story and
that he's somehow being blackmailed. Well, this Ian Carroll guy
jumps into this because what Candice noticed is that the
house and habit person went after her, Ian Carroll and
Tucker Carlson, three people that I would say the pro
(10:23):
Israel lobbies or the pros and mural community have viewed
as being anti Israel. So she tries to make that
connection there, and you know that's up to her. She
wants to make that connection, that's fine.
Speaker 2 (10:35):
But by the way, I will add that a lot
of people that were close to house and habit to
Jessica Ree Krause, did come out and say that Jessica
was compromised. Yes, and really that is really the point
of why we are having this discussion now with you guys.
It's because, and we've talked about this before on the show.
(10:55):
You know, so many of these big MAGA and now
MAHA influencers are they're compromised.
Speaker 1 (11:05):
And they're brand new to the scene. Yes, they're brand new.
These people just got here and now they are all
in it. They're all up in the White House. They're
all in there shadowing the president, as she says, they're
right there when the Epstein fake binder was released and
they're pushing stories out there, they're right in there. And
(11:27):
I am I will say that it's fair for Candice
to question the fact that she is now friends with
Olivia Nuzi, who broke this sexting or who was involved
in this sexting story with RFK Junior. And there is
definitely something very strange there. And the point that I
think that you're trying to get at is we need
(11:47):
to stop giving these people this kind of power within
the conservative movement. There are so many people that have
risen up that had just turned conservative yesterday, whether it
be Ashley saying Claire, which we're going to get into,
whether it be this house and Habit person, or whether
(12:08):
it be this Ian Carroll guy. Okay, so Ian Carroll
sees this opportunity with this thing kind of blowing up,
and it was blowing up on Instagram. There was a
back and forth for multiple days where where this house
and habit person was putting up something and then Candace
was responding, Candace is kind of destroying her, in my opinion,
(12:29):
making her look very bad, kind of showing her for
what she was as far as losing a lot of friends,
throwing friends under the bus. You did a video on this,
and she blocked you, because House and blocked you. So
Ian Carroll gets in on this story, and I just
want to play a couple of minutes, one minute of
this story of how he kind of jumped in on
(12:51):
this story, because I think it's very telling.
Speaker 3 (12:54):
So the Bobby Kennedy blackmail story is currently breaking in
many directions all across the Internet, and American politics is
not going to be the same after this weekend.
Speaker 1 (13:07):
After this weekend, American politics will not be the same.
That's how he opens this video.
Speaker 3 (13:13):
That's not hyperbole. This is not just a hook. And
I don't really know where to start, but this is
the kind of story that I've gotten enough calls from
enough people tonight, and enough people there's enough going on
that I feel like we need to make a video
right now to keep some people safe and to get
as much as we all know out on the internet
right now so that everyone can be safe.
Speaker 1 (13:32):
Okay, So he's suggesting that people are going to potentially
be suicided because of this story. Okay, this is what
this Ian Carroll guy is saying this. He released this
last Friday, I think it was March twenty eighth. Okay,
so that's leading into the weekend. This story's going to
break so big, you guys against RFK Junior once this
weekend is over.
Speaker 2 (13:53):
Not just a hook.
Speaker 1 (13:54):
No, it's not a hook. This isn't hYP Perboley.
Speaker 3 (13:56):
And the best place for everyone to start is at
Cannas's video that she put up today that she very
aptly titled One Nation under Blackmail. Go watch it. She
does a way better job of explaining a bunch of
what's going on than I could. But as soon as
I was like ten minutes into it, and then I
started getting phone calls from sources telling me more information
(14:18):
that is corroborating and taking it even further than what
is exposed in that video. And I have sources telling
me that there are people in like media and around
Bobby that know about this and know it's coming and
are trying to protect him and save him from this.
But it is past that, and there is no saving
anyone from this. I think and we just have to
(14:39):
deal with what's about to happen.
Speaker 1 (14:40):
Okay. So he goes into this huge like leader that
this thing is going to be huge, and he talks
about this blackmail story and how he's getting all these
inside sources verse he says, five, six, no seven, sources
came to me and told me about so many sources,
got so many insights.
Speaker 2 (14:58):
Trust And really quickly the.
Speaker 1 (15:01):
Story is is there's this sexting scandal that's going to
come out on RFK Junior, that there's all of these
pictures and all these things that are going to come out.
And Okay, this guy is the human version of Q. Okay,
he is the new Q. He says something these huge things.
(15:24):
Allegedly his name might as well be Ian allegedly Carol Okay,
he uses allegedly all of the time he makes these
huge statements, they end up going nowhere. This was a
guy that was a huge RFK guy back in the day.
Now he's somehow saying that that RFK is compromised. This
(15:46):
man is a real trouble, okay, because he comes out
and he creates this these problems, and you have all
of these Republicans and Conservatives that are listening to this
man now as if he has all of these inside
stories and he has all of these inside connections. I
think that this is a perfect example of what this
(16:07):
guy does. Is what Sernovich said. A couple I want
to say, this was uh not that long ago. He
visited an old friend of our show, chef Andrew Gruhle,
and his wife, and he was kind of talking about
how people rise in political media, and this is what
(16:30):
Sernovic had to say about that.
Speaker 4 (16:33):
If you really want to rise in the political commentating sphere,
you have to give people certainty. They actually don't care
if you're wrong. They don't.
Speaker 1 (16:40):
Yeah, that's a good point.
Speaker 4 (16:41):
So people will try to hold things against people there
nobody cares. They want. What's gonna happen with RFK? If
I just tweeted out r K Junior is a lock
that would go wild. Everybody would love to hear it.
Where whereas and then if something happened, I could just say, oh, oh,
well that he was a lock. But then this other
thing happened. But with certainty, always with certainty, he was
(17:02):
a lock. And then this guy I but trayed us
at the eleventh hour. Okay, Cernovich knows what he's talking
about boom boom boom boom viral viral. But when I post,
I don't know everybody needs the on their telephone pressure campaign.
Nobody wants to hear it. Not nobody, but a lot
of people don't want to hear it. Rise in political
commentary is always speak with certainty. Nobody cares if you're wrong,
(17:22):
Nobody will hold you accountable for being wrong, and if
you are wrong, you just say some new piece of information.
The same thing with the finance market. Oh, buy the
stock at fifty bye by like Jim Kramer. I mean,
everybody knows if you invest with Jim Kramer, that's not
going to go well. Yes, but you know what, he's
got a show for twenty years. He's making thirty forty
million dollars a year because nobody cares. The people don't
(17:44):
really care me personally. That's not interesting to me creatively, right,
But so for those watching, always speak with certainty if
you want to build your political commentary brand or be
a finance pro brand, and then you can always blame
the market. Oh, what I said was true, but then
Trump did a tariff and I I was wrong.
Speaker 1 (18:03):
Okay, so he nails it there, and that's what this guy,
Ian Carroll does. He talks with certainty. He talks as
if he has all of these inside tracks, and this
horrible sexting scandal is going to come out on RFK.
First of all, if you know anything about RFK Junior's past,
you would know that a sexting scandal is not going
(18:25):
to do anything with this man. This man's wife committed
suicide and there's been.
Speaker 2 (18:32):
Over his affairs, over his infidelities.
Speaker 1 (18:34):
Yes, okay, so this is the mother of his children
committed suicide over his affairs. He's a serial cheater, serial cheater.
And so now what we're supposed to believe from this
Ian Carroll guy is that there's this blackmail digital story
(18:55):
that's going to come out that's just going to change everything.
And I gotta get this story out right now so
people don't get murdered and suicided.
Speaker 2 (19:03):
And I think what I'm getting is that the picks
are like Anthony Weener type of picks. Okay, that's what
I think, But I don't know what's going on.
Speaker 1 (19:13):
Well, here's the thing here it is. We are now
a week after he posted this video. Okay, the weekend
is long in the rear view mirror. It's come and gone.
Where is this story that he's talking about. Where is
this huge, ground shifting, life changing thing that was supposed
to come out after last weekend? Nothing? And just like
(19:38):
Mike Cernovich said there, he'll never be held accountable for it.
He says these things with certainty, allegedly, allegedly allegedly, but
guess what, wink wink, and then nothing comes of it.
And the reason why he has a following is because
he is anti Israel and he's anti jew in my opinion,
(19:59):
watching and listening to his approach with everything, he ties
everything back to the Jews. He ties everything back to
some kind of a you know, conspiracy in that matter
he's he tried to assume, he tried to kind of
tie a conspiracy to Andrew Breitbart. I don't bet you
he doesn't even know that Andrew Breitbart is Jewish, that
he was murdered by, you know, some kind of weird cabal.
Speaker 2 (20:22):
He's saying that he was murdered.
Speaker 1 (20:23):
But he doesn't even know that Andrew is Jewish. Once
he knows that, I'm sure he's going to kind of
change that kind of around a little bit. This is
a serious problem that we have in conservative media right now.
Speaker 2 (20:34):
Yeah, there are so many grifters. And you know the
whole point of this conversation is that we just want
you guys to be wary of, you know, people when
they first come on to the scene, you know, like
this house and habit woman who now has so much
power and access to the president. And really just give
it time because in time these people will reveal who
(20:58):
they are. But most importantly, don't give these people your
hard earned money until they are properly vetted. You know,
Patrick and I have been doing this for a long
long time. Redfield America has been around for over six
years now, but before.
Speaker 1 (21:15):
That, go back to two thousand and nine.
Speaker 2 (21:16):
Two thousand and nine. We have been in this space
for a long time and we have seen things, We
have heard things, and you know, there's a reason that
you don't see us at like the Marlago parties and
hanging out with that person. You know, once you get
in there, you see things that you hope you wish
you didn't see. You know, it's things that you don't
want to be associated with. You know, this person's a drunk,
(21:37):
this person sleeping with that married person, it's a lot
of mess. And this person's you know, in bed with
this corporation or this entity let's call it, that has
very very deep top pockets and is paying them to
push an agenda and a narrative. And we see that
a lot. So you guys just just be careful and
(21:59):
don't don't always believe these people, especially if they're new
to the scene or if they're pushing these really ridiculous
conspiracy theories and they don't have receipts and you know,
and again we're not talking about Candace. Candace does bring
the receipts, and I feel like she was justified, very
(22:20):
justified in going after house and habit.
Speaker 1 (22:23):
Yeah, but she's getting in bed with this Ian Carroll guy,
and it's just so frustrating for me to see her
do this. This guy is a grifter, he's he is
a time and time again pushes these conspiracy theories, and
now she's putting her brand in with him. She just
recently released a podcast with him, and it's just like,
(22:46):
I don't know, I think it's a huge mistake. I
think she's making an enormous mistake by aligning with this guy.
Is he a gifted video maker and kind of streamer. Yes,
because he's willing to go into this conspiracy area and
just throw big statements out there like he did last
week leading into the weekend, and nothing comes out of it.
Speaker 2 (23:07):
I mean, I don't think doing, you know, one episode
or having a person on your show one time, is
you aligning with them. You know, we've had plenty of
people on the show that we don't agree with and
when we end up not agreeing with the in the future.
I mean, I do agree Ian Carroll is a huge problem.
I think he's a total grifter. I think he's completely
full of shit. I think he says whatever he wants
(23:28):
to say whenever he you know, he says whatever he
needs to say whenever he needs to say it.
Speaker 1 (23:32):
One hundred percent, and you know that's a fair statement.
I just think that she is putting her She is
aligning with this man. It's more than just you know,
us covering a story on somebody and then turning out
to be, you know, not the greatest person in the world.
She is aligning with this guy, and I think it's
a problem. I think it's trouble. I don't think she
(23:54):
should do it, but you know, that's just you know,
that's a fifty five year old man that's been around
for a while and knows a grifter, and I see
you one.
Speaker 2 (24:03):
Well, just you guys, don't give your hard earned money
to then you know, the new and shiny thing or
to conspiracy theory.
Speaker 1 (24:12):
You very careful with that. We're going to get into
some interesting kind of update on the Ashley Saint Clair story.
Something blew my mind. You guys are going to want
to hear this, and we're going to get into it
right after the break. You're listening to Red Pilled America's
(24:33):
fam Boogie. Become part of the fan bam and listen
to our show ad free. Go to Redpilled America dot
com click join the top menu. We need you guys
be ready to hear our new documentary series coming out
on Monday, What's an American. You're going to want to
check this out. It's going to be our one of
our most important series that we've done to date. So
(24:54):
this Ashley Saint Clair story, I cannot help but talk
about this because it's blowing my mind what I learned
earned this last week. So for you, anyone, anyone that
hasn't hasn't seen the update on this Ashley Saint Clair
did this immedia stunt last week where she basically sold
(25:20):
a Tesla that was given to her by Elon Musk.
Speaker 2 (25:22):
One hundred thousand dollars car.
Speaker 1 (25:24):
So she goes and she gets car Vanna to come
through and she she goes to Carvana is the company
that you can sell your car to, a used car to,
And then somehow who knows how, the Daily Mail is
there and a couple other paparazzi to kind of ask
her what's going on. And this is Ashley Saint Clair's
(25:46):
response to the journalists. I'm selling it because I need
to make up.
Speaker 2 (25:52):
For the sixty percent cut that Elon.
Speaker 1 (25:54):
Made to or such child So Elon made a sixty
percent cut to the child support. She's she's saying.
Speaker 3 (26:03):
Against humans.
Speaker 1 (26:05):
Yeah, that's Annus opera.
Speaker 2 (26:06):
I'm no woman that let's stick out.
Speaker 1 (26:09):
So he's she's basically going at Elon, you know, saying, oh,
look at his stocks. She goes at his company. You know,
he this is what he does to women that speak out.
Speaker 2 (26:19):
And she's playing the victim. She's playing the victim, and
she's painting him as a bad father who doesn't take
care of his children.
Speaker 1 (26:26):
Yes, exactly. And it's very telling is that she said
he cut it by sixty percent. She doesn't say that
give a number, but she says he cut it by
a percentage, okay, And there might be a reason why
she said that. Elon responds to this video.
Speaker 2 (26:42):
No, no, no, He responds to Laura Lumer.
Speaker 1 (26:45):
Yeah, but the video is. Laura Lumber posts the video
and he said, and this is what he says. I
don't know if the child is mine or not, but
I am not against finding out. No court order is
needed despite not knowing for sure. I have given Ashley
two point five million dollars and I am sending her
(27:06):
five hundred thousand dollars per year. Okay. So apparently he's
making the claim that he gave her a two point
five million dollar payment plus five hundred thousand dollars per
year to cover their expenses and what have you. Laura
Lumer posts this. He responds to Laura Lumer. Laura Lumer
calls her a gold digger and saying that she's selling
this one hundred thousand dollars and she has the babarazzi
(27:27):
there and what have you. So Ashley sees this, and
she responds to this, and she says, Elon, we asked
you to confirm paternity through a test before our child,
who you named, was even born. You refused you and
you weren't sending me money. You were sending support for
(27:49):
your child that you thought was necessary until you withdrew
most of it to maintain control and punish me for disobedience.
But you're really only punishing your son. It's ironic that
your last effort in court was to try to gag
me while you use a social media channel you literally own,
(28:10):
to distribute derogatory messages about me and our child to
the entire world. It's all about control with you, and
everybody can see it. America needs you to grow up,
you petulant manchild. So this thing got.
Speaker 2 (28:25):
Ugly starting real what is she talking?
Speaker 1 (28:29):
She was the first person to kind of go to
the media with it, and it's.
Speaker 2 (28:33):
To the whole world to see.
Speaker 1 (28:35):
Yes, well, this is the part that blew my mind. Okay,
Milo put this tweet out and I'm like, there's no
way this is true. There's no way that this is true.
He puts out this the maximum amount Elon Musk would
be forced to pay after childcare, health and education in
(28:57):
New York is thirty one thousand, one hundred and ten
dollars a year. If small, that's the nickname that he
uses with her. If Smashley keeps this up, that's what
she will be left with. Okay, And I thought, wait
a minute, I've and I've argued this before in the past.
He didn't They've never been married. She wasn't even they
(29:19):
weren't even in a steady relationship. So she can't claim
like common law, she can't claim that this was the
lifestyle that I was leading. She can't claim that, you know,
I've got used to this lifestyle, so I need this
amount of money. She had a child with him. But
I'm thinking, okay, he's a billionaire. She's gonna be and
everyone's like, oh, you know, he's gonna she got the bag.
(29:42):
Oh my god, she's so smart. She worked it. She
she got that bag. She got that bag. Well, it
turns out that Milo is right. New York City has
a very interesting law. Okay, this is the law. They
basically cap child support at six one hundred and sixty
(30:04):
three thousand dollars of combined parental income, and then each
parent is supposed to pay a percentage of that I
think it's around seventeen or eighteen percent something along those lines.
So when you do the calculation, you learn that that
is actually true, that it is seventeen percent for one child.
(30:25):
The guideline percentage is seventeen percent of the combined combined
parental income up to the cap. So there's a cap,
so it doesn't matter if he's a billionaire or not.
He's the it's capped at one hundred and sixty three
thousand dollars, so he is really only obligated to like
thirty thousand dollars to pay her per year. Now, if
(30:48):
you guys might remember this, when this whole story broke
and she went to the media, she explained this story,
believe it's to the New York Post, and she explained
kind of the back story on this whole thing, and
she wanted to move to Texas to be closer to him,
and he said.
Speaker 2 (31:05):
No, no, no, stay in New York.
Speaker 1 (31:07):
Stay in New York. Okay. And by the way, the
most fun, the fast, most fascinating thing. And I almost
feel bad laughing about this because there's a child associated
with this. But she's doing this, Okay, she's doing this.
She does this story with New York Post, and she
has this chessboard in the background dramatically in the background,
(31:28):
and a couple of times she's like seated right next
to the chessboard like she's the chess player in this
she's the smart one.
Speaker 2 (31:35):
She's gonna play.
Speaker 1 (31:36):
She's gonna play him. She's got the bag coming and
lo and behold, there's a cap in New York. And
she's screwing herself now because.
Speaker 2 (31:46):
Her son, this poor child, she got.
Speaker 1 (31:49):
This chunk of money from this band. She hasn't denied it,
by the way, she never denied that when he put
that information out there. She didn't say, no, you didn't
send me two point five million. She actually confirmed it
because she said, no, you didn't say to me, you
send it to our son. Okay, nobody needs two point
five million dollars, all right, to raise a baby. Okay.
(32:11):
So all of these people that were out there that
congratulated her on her marriage or her excuse me, her
new child, this new child that was coming into the world,
and all these people out there that laughed and said, oh,
she's smart. She got that bag. She didn't get that bag.
Speaker 2 (32:27):
No, she did not.
Speaker 1 (32:28):
She got played. She's getting played and she's digging herself
more and more into a into a a a. She's
digging a hole for herself. And the funny thing is
this goes back to this last segment that we had.
Here is another grifter that entered into the Maga movement.
She had just turned uh you know conservative. You could
(32:51):
obviously see that she was not. There's videos out there
where she was saying that illegal immigration isn't a problem.
Are you guys voting for illegal immigrations are are idiots?
She's clear playing the whole trad thing for years.
Speaker 2 (33:06):
Oh yeah, and she's got two babies by two different
baby daddies, both had them out of wedlock.
Speaker 1 (33:13):
Yes, So I guess the moral of the story is
is once again, watch these people and don't let them
in the movement.
Speaker 2 (33:21):
Yeah. And by the way, my low calls are smashly
for a reason. You know, Ashley was it all of
the fancy Maga parties. You see her mingling all up
with all like, you know, the fancy famous Maga stars.
She was right up in that mix. And she's exactly
the kind of person that we wanted to stay away from.
Speaker 1 (33:42):
I don't get it. She's not attractive, she is not
she's I don't know about miss Young. She's not attractive.
Speaker 2 (33:50):
I mean she's not She's not a supermodel. You know,
she's not conventionally beautiful.
Speaker 1 (33:54):
She's good looking to ugly people and to old people,
and that's it.
Speaker 2 (33:58):
Well I'm old, so I don't think she's ugly. But
what I think is fascinated is she's trying to play
the victim. She is actually delusional enough to believe that
people are going to feel sorry for her. I mean,
what are you kidding? I thought this girl was smart,
but clearly she is not.
Speaker 1 (34:15):
Why does she think that she deserves, you know, half
a billion dollars or something because she got pregnant with
a billionaire.
Speaker 2 (34:21):
She baby trapped him.
Speaker 1 (34:22):
She baby trapped him, She honey trappedhim, baby trapped him,
and she's now she's getting what she deserved. And unfortunately,
this kid is going to be the one that's going
to suffer because now because of her, all of this
is being played out in the media.
Speaker 2 (34:35):
And now this this baby is one day going to
grow up and he's gonna read all of this.
Speaker 1 (34:38):
Because she obviously had the money. She wasn't like she
was broke.
Speaker 2 (34:42):
I guess her money here is don't be a dirty hoe.
Speaker 1 (34:46):
Do not be a dirty hoe. Don't teach your kid
to do this kind of thing. This is just not
the way that we should be teaching our kids.
Speaker 2 (34:55):
Is there not the kinds of people that we want
as representatives of the conservative movement?
Speaker 1 (35:00):
Not even close, God, not even c I.
Speaker 2 (35:04):
What has happened to family values? That's what those are
the people that we need to lift up within the concern.
Speaker 1 (35:12):
This is what's become the commodity now is the follower count. Yes,
if you can get a social media follower count, you
are king. You know, there was an old saying, I
think it was Sumner Redstone when he talked about Hollywood.
He said content was king. If you whoever makes the
content and has the content, they're the king of the
entertainment business. Well, in the social media world, followers are king.
(35:36):
Whoever has the most followers ends up getting influence and
they end up getting attention. They're being propped up by
all of us.
Speaker 2 (35:45):
Well, I'm on my way because I got my tenth
follower on Instagram.
Speaker 1 (35:50):
By the way, if you guys are into fashion, any
the ladies out there, you want to check out a
great fashion blog and get fashion inspiration. Go to Adriana
Underscore Jade on Instagram. Adriana has a great Instagram page.
Speaker 2 (36:02):
There, and you guys shall do a lot of skincare
and wellness for women of a certain age.
Speaker 1 (36:09):
Do not let these grifters in. You know who they are.
Try to find people that you trust and just stick
with those people. We're gonna be going backstage right now, guys,
and we are you talking about some stuff that's been
going on with the Daily Wire's some some financial issues
that have been going on over there. We're going to
(36:30):
talk about that. We're also going to review a couple
of TV shows and talk about some Hollywood stuff. You guys,
arenna want to join us, Go to red Pilled America
dot com. Support the show, support what you love, or
it goes away. Guys. We need you, guys, and be
sure to check out our series coming out on April seventh,
What's an American. It's gonna be one of the most
important series we've ever done. Check it out.
Hosts And Creators
Adryana Cortez
Patrick Courrielche
Popular Podcasts
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com