June 2, 2025 • 28 mins
Should a journalist's personal life be used to judge their reporting? To find the answer, we analyze the shocking story of reporter Glenn Greenwald...and Alt Media's reaction to the video of his private life that was allegedly leaked to the public.
Support the show: https://redpilledamerica.com/support/
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:03):
This is Red Pilled America. Hey, it's Patrick Carrelci.
Speaker 2 (00:09):
And I'm Adriana Cortez and welcome to Red Pilled Americas
and Boogie.
Speaker 1 (00:30):
I hope you guys week is starting off well. This
is Red Pilled America's fam bogie. If you want to
join the FANBAM, we need you guys, show us some love.
You need to support what you love or it just
fades away into the darkness. Go to Red Pilled America
dot com, click join in the top menu. Become a
(00:51):
FANBAMD member. We need it. It makes the show healthy.
Speaker 2 (00:54):
And get add free access to our entire archive of episodes.
Speaker 1 (00:58):
You guys, exactly add free access two hundred plus episodes,
plus our backstage and a little bit behind the scenes stuff.
So this has been a crazy end of a week.
And I didn't think that we this was even gonna
be a topic that we're gonna be discussing.
Speaker 2 (01:14):
I do not have this on my bingo card.
Speaker 1 (01:17):
Let me tell you I didn't want to talk about this.
I mean, because it's just it feels gross.
Speaker 2 (01:22):
It is gross, you guys, buckle in. Buckle in because
this is a doozy. It's and a little bit uncomfortable.
Speaker 1 (01:29):
I gotta say it's also one of these insane mask
off moments for alt media and the direction that alt
media is going right now. So alt media since the
election of Trump, had this little bit of a power moment.
I would say, you know it is it kind of
a first kind of a coming of age moment. Definitely
going back to the days of our old friend Andrew Breitbart,
(01:52):
where you know, these kinds of blogs were just getting
off the ground and starting to make some noise and
really kind of breaking some national stories on Obama and
the Obama administration and really kind of trying to hold
the legacy media's feet to the fire. And now it's
(02:13):
kind of been evolving into this basically the new boss
same as the old boss kind of a thing. And
it's the story that kind of really displays this is
this Glenn Greenwald story.
Speaker 2 (02:26):
Okay, tell us a little bit about who Glenn Greenwald
is for those people who may not be familiar with him.
Speaker 1 (02:31):
So Glenn Greenwald is a journalist. He used to write
for The Guardian. He started this kind of alternative media
platform called Intercept. He got ousted from there. I think
he was primarily because of the Russiagate stuff, I believe,
and kind of his reporting on Trump wasn't always negative,
(02:53):
and so he left there. He started this new platform
called System Update, which I believe is a kind of
a rumble show. But he also you can find it
on all the other social media platforms, thought to be
this kind of well respected journalist. He's the guy that
broke the Snowden surveillance story years ago. He's critical of
(03:16):
the Brazilian president, He's played a critical role.
Speaker 2 (03:19):
And he lives in Brazil.
Speaker 1 (03:20):
Correct, he lives in Brazil.
Speaker 2 (03:21):
He's an American.
Speaker 1 (03:22):
He's an American. I want to get into that because
that's a big part of this story. He goes very
hard on Israel, and I think that's where he's found
his support base in this kind of crisis moment that
he's having right now, it's almost not even a crisis moment,
which is the kind of striking thing. There's been a
few outlets and a few kind of media personalities that
(03:44):
have condemned his recent acts, but we will get into
that right now. He's been a critic of Trump's deportations,
and this is where like that I kind of butted
heads with him because I kind of called him out.
The man is an American, but he has lived in
Brazil basically since two thousand and five, so for twenty years,
and he broadcasts from Brazil. I didn't know that until
(04:07):
he did an interview with Tucker Carlson last year. I
always thought that he was an American. He's kind of
well known in you know, kind of American media, but
he's lived in Brazil for about twenty years now, and
from that far off land. He's criticizing Trump and the
way he's deporting people. And I called him out on it,
and so we kind of had a little bit of
(04:28):
a back and forth on it. I liked some of
his reporting. His made appearances on our show through clips
and stuff. Is some of the reporting that he's done
in the kind of the Gaza war and what have you.
And but now this story breaks late last week. I
want to say, it was Friday night.
Speaker 2 (04:46):
It was Friday night. I remember it well because you
literally said out loud, oh my god, oh my god,
that's Glenn Greenwald. Those were your exact words.
Speaker 1 (04:59):
So there's this video that went around and at first
I thought, maybe this is AI or maybe this isn't
really him, And I thought, now, that this can't be him.
I guess I knew he was gay.
Speaker 2 (05:11):
We both knew he was gay, definitely knew that.
Speaker 1 (05:13):
But it wasn't kind of something that was really prominent
or I just didn't you know, it wasn't something that
you kind of cared about. It's like, whatever, the guy's gay.
But now he's been caught in this leaked video that
of this kind of you know, it's hard for me
to even talk about what was in the video, but
I'll try to explain it to you guys. So there's
this leaked video that went crazy Friday evening. The man
(05:38):
is in this Glenn Greenwold is in a mini skirt
and the kind of a lace top.
Speaker 2 (05:43):
Well, it's not really, it's more of an apron.
Speaker 1 (05:46):
Yeah, I mean it's very cheeks are exposed.
Speaker 2 (05:48):
It's like very caps but.
Speaker 1 (05:51):
A skirt kind of yes, because you could see his backside.
Speaker 2 (05:54):
Yes, it's an apron.
Speaker 1 (05:55):
He's dressed kind of like a little girl in that way,
and all you see is this camera on him. He
looks like he's high and he's on his knees.
Speaker 2 (06:05):
Yeah, we don't know if he's high or not.
Speaker 1 (06:07):
Nobody looks like he's to be.
Speaker 2 (06:10):
Intoxicated and ebriated on something.
Speaker 1 (06:12):
Well, and I'll get into that, because there's been kind
of a back and forth that he had with a
Twitter ex user, and you could see he doesn't ever
deny that aspect of it because somebody kind of called
him out as a subscriber of his called him out
and said, can you please explain this because it looks
like there's drug paraphernalia there. You look like you're high.
Can you please explain this? And he does not explain it.
(06:32):
He's just kind of like, I could do whatever I
want in my private time, what have you. So we'll
get to that in a second. So the camera's on
him and he's kissing this black man's hand. People are
deducing that he's a gay prostitute, and he starts to
suck his toes in his feet, and then then the
guy spits on the floor and tells him directs him
(06:57):
to lick it up and slurp it up. So he's
slurping up this guy's loogie from a logie. It's spit
it okay, and then Glenn. He proceeds to make Glenn
go onto his laptop and pay him what looks like
about two thousand dollars US dollars. I'm not sure of
(07:20):
the currency, but I think it's two thousand dollars. So
he pays them this money. Once again, there appears to
be drug paraphernalia on the bed next to him, and
it's this this incredibly depraved video of this man doing
this kind of BDSM kind of like a you know,
(07:40):
shame kind of or just like embarrassment kind of video.
He's being dominated, it's.
Speaker 2 (07:45):
Being dominated and degraded, and he clearly wants to be
because he's paying for it.
Speaker 1 (07:50):
So this the way this video got out. There was
this site. It was called I think it's called finn
dom Okay for oz Yes hosts the video. Glenn apparently
looks like and he's denied this, but I don't think.
I think the breadcrumbs kind of prove otherwise. He retweeted
(08:12):
this and then shortly afterwards unretweeted it.
Speaker 2 (08:18):
Yes. And the thing about retweets is that it wasn't
accidental because when you retweet, you actually have to do
it twice. You hit retweet and then it asks you
if you would like to quote retweet or just retweet exactly.
You have to.
Speaker 1 (08:33):
See, so it's not like the like button. I don't
know if you remember this. Years ago, Ted Cruz got
kind of caught probably checking out some porn or something
on Twitter, and he he hit the like button on
some porn stars or some porn channel I think, And
and so they're like, oh, that those likes is just
(08:53):
a one thing. There's not like a second button that
you have to push. Maybe he, you know, accidentally was
scrolling and he hit it. Who knows. But with a tweet,
your exactly right, a retweet, you have to you have
to basically hit it twice to kind of confirm it.
Speaker 2 (09:09):
Yes.
Speaker 1 (09:09):
So so this video goes out, he potentially retweets it
and everyone's like, wait a minute, what's going on here?
And you could see it now because if you go
there and you try to find that that tweet, you
can see the responses to people saying did you just
retweet this? Glenn? And you could see his name In
the way that Twitter works, when somebody responds, it shows
(09:33):
who you're responding to, and it has Glenn's name in there.
So everybody was shocked. I was shocked. I couldn't believe
what I was seeing. This is a major media figure, Okay,
this is a guy that you know this, this snowed
in story was a big, big deal. This guy has
been on Tucker Carlson multiple times. He's been on all
(09:53):
of the major media outlets. He's you know, chummy with
Candace Owens. He goes on Megan Kelly's show all the time.
He's like friends with all of these major, major media people.
And so you see this and you're sitting back and waiting,
how are people going to respond to this? Okay, So
(10:14):
he puts out a response following day, and I want
to read I want to read that because this kind
of says a lot. Okay about the videos last night,
videos were released online depicting behavior in my private life.
Some were distorted and others were not. They were published
without my knowledge or consent, and its publication was therefore criminal.
(10:36):
Though we do not yet know exactly who is responsible,
we are close to knowing, and the motive was a
maliciously political one. As for the content of the videos,
I have no embarrassment or regret about them. The videos
depict consenting adults engaging in intimate actions in their private lives.
(10:57):
They all display fully consensual behavior, harming nobody. Obviously, it
can be uncomfortable and unpleasant when your private behavior is
made public against your will. That's why the behavior is
private in the first place. But the only wrongdoing here
is the criminal and malicious publication of the videos in
an attempt to malign perceived political enemies and advance a
(11:20):
political agenda. Others are, of course free to form their
own judgments, as some are prone to do about others'
private lives, and I will it won't change my work.
I will continue all the many prongs of my journalism
and pursue the causes most important to me, exactly as before.
Speaker 2 (11:39):
Okay, So that's a good statement. I will say that
that's a statement that was well put.
Speaker 1 (11:45):
Together, okay, And I'm going to say why it is
absolutely not a good statement.
Speaker 2 (11:51):
Okay.
Speaker 1 (11:51):
And I want to get to why that is not
a good statement. Right after the break, you're listening to
Red Pilled Americas fam Boogie, and we're talking about this
kind of mask off moment that we have an alternative media.
And before we parted, you, Adriana, I read the Glenn
(12:15):
Greenwald statement and she said that she thought it was,
you know, a solid statements.
Speaker 2 (12:19):
It was a solid statement as far as statements go.
Speaker 1 (12:22):
Well, on paper, it sounds solid.
Speaker 2 (12:24):
But here's the thing what I here's what I'd like
to say. I think a lot of people fell for
the consenting adults argument. People were like, so it was smart.
Speaker 1 (12:40):
Well, the thing that I wanted to focus on, and
I want to get to that consenting adults aspect of
things as well too, because I think it's it's flawed.
But the thing that I really wanted to get to
is you.
Speaker 2 (12:53):
Guys should see the look on his face.
Speaker 1 (12:55):
Is this this part where he said that he had
I have no embarrassment or regret about them the video. Okay,
there's that statement. This man he's a father, Yes.
Speaker 2 (13:07):
He's a father. And you know what, I have been
a consenting adult and if something of mine was leaked,
I would feel very embarrassed, very very embarrassed. What would
you be embarrassed by any private moment that we have had,
if that was leaked, I would feel incredibly embarrassed about.
Speaker 1 (13:26):
Okay, but you don't have any videos where you are
licking a prostitute's foot and slipping up.
Speaker 2 (13:34):
So obviously I'm saying even if I'm doing normal heterosexual
just sex.
Speaker 1 (13:38):
Of course that's embarrassing.
Speaker 2 (13:39):
Yes, normal people feel embarrassed by that.
Speaker 1 (13:41):
The thing that is troubling about it is the man
is a parent. Okay, he has kids, and now there's
a video out there where not only is he paying,
allegedly paying a gay male prostitute, there's also drug paraphernalia
in the frame. When you become a parent, all of
(14:02):
this kind of consenting adults bs goes out the door.
You have a child that you have to protect. And
on top of that, he is saying that he has
no regrets. So now he's putting this message out there
to the public that this is normal behavior for consenting adults.
Speaker 2 (14:23):
All right. I think we should add for context that
Glenn has two children, two boys that he adopted with
his former husband who passed away.
Speaker 1 (14:35):
An infection of let's get into this, okay. So there's
reports out there that the reason why he moved to Brazil,
or the reason why he started going to Brazil was
for sex tourism. Apparently a prostitution is legal in Brazil.
He had some connection to gay porn sites and also
(14:55):
gay escort sites. This is back in the early two thousands.
Speaker 2 (14:59):
And by the way, I don't think that this is
being disputed by anybody it's not and it's been out
there for a while.
Speaker 1 (15:05):
The New York Daily News did something on this a
while ago. There's like, you know, investigations on this. This
information is out there, and he, I think, has claimed
that it was just brief, that there is some connection
via some lawsuits that he needed to get paid for
that he because he's a lawyer, practicing lawyer at one point.
So he's going to this country to allegedly for sex tourism.
(15:30):
He meets this nineteen year old young man, he's thirty eight.
Speaker 2 (15:34):
That's a big age difference.
Speaker 1 (15:35):
From a poor neighborhood in Brazil. He ends up moving
in with this man within days reportedly, and has been
living in Brazil ever since then.
Speaker 2 (15:45):
Okay, they were later married.
Speaker 1 (15:47):
They were later married, and they ended up getting custody
of two brothers. I think it was in twenty seventeen,
and then he ended up adopting them, officially adopting these
two boys in twenty eighteen. Okay, So now he's a
father of two children that he has adopted, and he
(16:09):
is now has this video out there where he is
involved in these incredibly depraved videos to a gay prostitute
with drugs in the frame, and he's saying he has
no embarrassment and no regrets.
Speaker 2 (16:24):
He is proud of his foot fetish.
Speaker 1 (16:26):
So on top of that, if this man was a
heterosexual man and he had adopted two kids, there would
be questions about do we need to check on the
welfare of these kids. This man is living in a
country that has the age of consent is fourteen years old. Okay,
what is he doing in Brazil as an American living
(16:47):
there for twenty years broadcasting about all of these American
politics from Brazil? And on top of that, he has
this And this is something that I thought was very
honorable when I first heard about it, but now that
I've seen these videos, I'm starting to think differently. On Tucker,
he talked about having this refuge for dogs, and there's
(17:08):
like tons and tons of dogs, hundreds of dogs, a
bunch of dogs. I'm not to sure the count, but
a lot of dogs on this kind of, you know, shelter.
But it's also a shelter for homeless people, so homeless
people come there. I guess there's some kind of relationship
with homeless people and their dogs. So we're talking about
incredibly vulnerable people and we're seeing now the kind of
(17:30):
sexual depravity this man is into, and some people have
even suggested that this video, because you know, it looks
like he retweeted it, that this was kind of part
of the kink, the same kind of shame that he's
absorbing and loving and getting a sexual arousal from in
the video. He's now having a public version of that,
(17:51):
very public version of that. And with all of that
in mind, I think his statement that he has no
regrets and no embarrassment about these videos is reprehensible. I
think that he should have regret about it. If I
was taking a videos of myself on the toilet going
to the bathroom and that got out there, I would
be embarrassed far.
Speaker 2 (18:09):
Because you're a normal person. You're not into degradation. And
so that's clearly what he's into, and that's why he
retweeted it.
Speaker 1 (18:16):
So there's that aspect of it that I think is
just it's shocking that a man in his position would
take the position that he has no regrets for something
like this. Now, immediately, the conspiracy theorists that are out
there that are kind of like part of his realm
or his circuit. He is basically of the anti Israel
(18:38):
faction of the media. Okay, he's a Jew, which is
kind of this unique position that he's in. And so
this video gets out there and immediately the people in
his immediate kind of circle start to say, oh, well,
this is being done by the Zionists, this is being
done by Mosad to embarrass him, to shut him up
(18:59):
about the things that he talks about in regards to Israel.
But there's no evidence of that. And on top of that,
he's gone at the right wing president in Brazil. It
could easily have been those. I mean, he goes at people.
He's gone at the deep State before in regards to,
you know, some of the surveillance stuff, So it could
be that. I mean, there's so many people that he's
made enemies with, So there is no evidence of Israel
(19:22):
out there being the ones that release this. Couldn't be
them one percent. It could be them, But you know,
if you don't want, you know, these kinds of loogie
slurping videos of yourself out there in the public, don't
take them. Now. Obviously, if people have intimate videos of
themselves and somebody maliciously publishes that, that is wrong. It
(19:43):
is wrong, But it's still Newsworthy.
Speaker 2 (19:45):
Yeah it is. And let me say this because I
feel like we're probably gonna get some pushback on this.
You know, Patrick and have been married for almost twenty
two years. We're coming up on our I want to say,
thirty fourth anniversary, our first date. You know, we are
obviously consenting adults. We are married for a long time.
We would never make a video of ourselves in you know,
(20:07):
having sex. Number one, We would be very very careful
to just not even engage in that behavior because if
that behavior, if that got leaked, that would be humiliating
and embarrassing to our daughter, to our family, and to ourselves.
Like you just you don't do certain things as an
adult exactly.
Speaker 1 (20:24):
Well, this isn't like the Clippers owner that got caught
arguing with his then girlfriend and drop the ND bomb
in their private discussion in their house. He was recorded
without his knowledge or consent, that that audio was put
out there into the public. He ended up having to
sell the team because of it. This isn't that.
Speaker 2 (20:42):
No, no, no, can you s it?
Speaker 1 (20:43):
In the video he was making, he was part of it.
He knew he was being videotaped, and.
Speaker 2 (20:48):
So they were making gay pearn.
Speaker 1 (20:49):
So this whole consenting adults argument, I think is flawed.
It just doesn't There comes a point where it does
matter the kinds of things that you are willing to do.
And there's obviously a gradation of this. There's different levels
of like what should be considered acceptable and normal precisy.
(21:13):
Now people are like, oh, you know, kind of one
of his protection things like these arguments that some of
his media protectors are doing. And I want to talk
about some of those people that are protecting him right now.
But one of the things that they're doing is they're
sarcastically saying, oh, I didn't know that Glenn Greenwald was gay,
kind of like sarcastically saying everybody knew he was gay,
So why are you guys so surprised that his video
(21:33):
is out there? And my response to that is that
is this natural, normal gay activity to hire a gay prostitute,
slurp his spit off the ground, lick his feet and
then and then videotape that all, and then pay him
on and then have drugs in the frame, I mean,
is potentially like drug paraphernilia in the frame. Is that
(21:55):
normal gay behavior? Because I was told and I think
all of us were told back in the old gay
marriage thing was that, oh, okay, gay marriage is it's
the same thing, you know, and we're the same people,
we just love differently. And so now I'm just love.
Now I'm seeing something completely different. Now I'm seeing something
(22:17):
to where this noise he's trying, he's trying to normalize
this behavior in a way that just doesn't make any sense.
This consenting adult thing is hogwash. It's hogwash. Okay. It's
not a good argument, because in order for society to function,
there needs to be some limitations, and maybe if he
(22:39):
wants to do those things, try not videotaping exactly, you know.
I mean, I'm not saying that that even makes it good,
but don't videotape it. Okay. So there's that aspect of it.
Speaker 2 (22:50):
By the way, I think we should add that the
drugs that are in the video, what most people are
saying that the drugs what they are is that it's
a meth pipe. We don't know that for sure, but
that is what the majority of people that are that
are saying that it's you know, are saying it's a
math pipe. Yeah, it could be like a marijuana pipe.
Speaker 1 (23:10):
Bet So he responds he basically responds, and I want so.
Jason Whitlock, very it was very surprised came out in
his defense. Jason Whitlock is somebody that I respect. I
listen to his show often. He comes out and he
(23:31):
first he says that he's one of the best journalists
that are out there, that he's been following him for
a while. His statement was this, Glenn Rick Greenwald is
still the best journalist working today. I will lift him
up in prayer and ask that he get delivered from
homosexual sin. I will also continue to thank God for
Glenn's commitment to honest, courageous journalism. I think you're going
(23:51):
to start to see, you know, a trend here on
all of the people that are coming out in his defense,
because they all seem to be pretty critical of Israel.
Which you can be critical of Israel, but it seems like,
you know, and I think you made this comment the
other day, Adriana. As long as you are against Israel,
anything goes okay. You can get away with anything within
that group. You could do anything like Andrew Tate. You
(24:12):
can be on video of time after time after time
talking about how you've smacked women, hit women, audio can
come out of you saying horrible things to women. You
could put this horrible message out there to mand like
Andrew Tate has. But as long as he's against Israel,
then it's ok it's okay. And we're seeing this now
with Glenn Greenwald, and we're seeing this with.
Speaker 2 (24:34):
Others, by the way, and we're going to see a
trend with all the people that came out to defend him.
So it seems to be the trend.
Speaker 1 (24:42):
It's clearly the trend. It's clearly the trend. So then
Jason Whitlock puts out this statement, serious thoughtful replies, only
can you separate Glenn Greenwald's courageous journalism from his moral,
degenerate personal lifestyle? If their scripture to guide us, please share? Thanks.
Glenn Greenwald jumps into this thread says this serious, thoughtful question,
(25:04):
how have you been able to separate what you regard
as Donald Trump's inspired and noble political leadership from the
repeated behaviors in his private life long considered deeply immoral
and degenerate under the most widespread and long standing Christian
and Western moral dogma. Then he goes on to list
all of the you know, all of Trump's degenerate activity
(25:26):
overlapping affairs and marriages. This is Glenn Greedwald writing serial
adulteres affairs with porn stars that he paid to cover up,
closely cavorting with Jeffrey Epstein after he was publicly convicted
of sex trafficking of minors. That's a lie, okay, He
goes on, will leave to this side the multiple allegations
(25:47):
of sexual assault from various women to whom he wasn't married,
even though one was repeatedly upheld in court. We all
know how that was completely you know, law fair against
him and complete bogus. The actually changed laws to go
after Trump. He knows that, but he's right now flailing
for his credibility, so he puts us out there. He
(26:07):
goes on. For his whole adult life, Trump lived the
life of a libertine Manhattan billionaire, not even close to
a paragon of sexual moral virtue. One of the things
I've always liked about Trump is he never purported to
be a moralist, because he knew his life didn't permit
that pretense, and it wasn't something he pretended to value. Nor,
as his many close libertine friends demonstrate or say, his
(26:30):
choice of Matt Gates or attorney general. So he goes on,
he basically is deflecting here. He's basically saying, what about Trump? Now?
My response to this, and it's gotten so far the
most responses on this thread. We responded this. I said,
everything you mentioned of Trump, some true, with others alleged,
is in his distant past. But you are currently living
(26:54):
this disgusting, degenerate lifestyle right now with no regrets. Stop deflecting.
Serious truth seekers will never take you so seriously again.
So right there, he point blank lied about Trump, and
this is somebody that all of these A media people
are holding up as the paragon of independent journalism. He
(27:16):
claims that Trump had a close association with Jeffrey Epstein
after he was convicted of sex with minors. That is
not true. He had a falling off. This has been
reported by multiple outlets. Trump he was part of these
social circles of which Jeffrey Epstein was. You know, when
you're in the big moneyed areas and you're kind of
(27:37):
in this media spotlight, you end up meeting a lot
of people, and so he's around this person. They were
kind of friendly at these social events. They had a
falling out in two thousand and four, and then in
two thousand and eight was when the first time that
it was publicly known and confirmed that he was being
involved sexually with minors. Okay, so, but to deflect and
(27:58):
to make himself look better, he's dragging Trump into this.
And on top of that, I'll say once again, this
stuff is he's talking about from twenty years ago, but
he's now living this lifestyle. He's right now saying that
he has no regrets, in no embarrassment. My translation for
that is is that he's gonna do potentially more meth
(28:18):
enhanced prostitute slurping up of prostitute's spit on the ground,
addressed as a little girl in a mini skirt, who
knows whether the kids are in the house anymore, or
what have you. He's going to continue that kind of
lifestyle or that kind of activity and behavior. Now, should
(28:39):
this be somebody that we listen to when it comes
to their media reporting? Can you separate? And Jason Whitlock
brought that up there. Can we separate his personal activity
with the reporting that he does. We're going to get
into that in part two. Join us there
This is Red Pilled America. Hey, it's Patrick Carrelci.
Speaker 2 (00:09):
And I'm Adriana Cortez and welcome to Red Pilled Americas
and Boogie.
Speaker 1 (00:30):
I hope you guys week is starting off well. This
is Red Pilled America's fam bogie. If you want to
join the FANBAM, we need you guys, show us some love.
You need to support what you love or it just
fades away into the darkness. Go to Red Pilled America
dot com, click join in the top menu. Become a
(00:51):
FANBAMD member. We need it. It makes the show healthy.
Speaker 2 (00:54):
And get add free access to our entire archive of episodes.
Speaker 1 (00:58):
You guys, exactly add free access two hundred plus episodes,
plus our backstage and a little bit behind the scenes stuff.
So this has been a crazy end of a week.
And I didn't think that we this was even gonna
be a topic that we're gonna be discussing.
Speaker 2 (01:14):
I do not have this on my bingo card.
Speaker 1 (01:17):
Let me tell you I didn't want to talk about this.
I mean, because it's just it feels gross.
Speaker 2 (01:22):
It is gross, you guys, buckle in. Buckle in because
this is a doozy. It's and a little bit uncomfortable.
Speaker 1 (01:29):
I gotta say it's also one of these insane mask
off moments for alt media and the direction that alt
media is going right now. So alt media since the
election of Trump, had this little bit of a power moment.
I would say, you know it is it kind of
a first kind of a coming of age moment. Definitely
going back to the days of our old friend Andrew Breitbart,
(01:52):
where you know, these kinds of blogs were just getting
off the ground and starting to make some noise and
really kind of breaking some national stories on Obama and
the Obama administration and really kind of trying to hold
the legacy media's feet to the fire. And now it's
(02:13):
kind of been evolving into this basically the new boss
same as the old boss kind of a thing. And
it's the story that kind of really displays this is
this Glenn Greenwald story.
Speaker 2 (02:26):
Okay, tell us a little bit about who Glenn Greenwald
is for those people who may not be familiar with him.
Speaker 1 (02:31):
So Glenn Greenwald is a journalist. He used to write
for The Guardian. He started this kind of alternative media
platform called Intercept. He got ousted from there. I think
he was primarily because of the Russiagate stuff, I believe,
and kind of his reporting on Trump wasn't always negative,
(02:53):
and so he left there. He started this new platform
called System Update, which I believe is a kind of
a rumble show. But he also you can find it
on all the other social media platforms, thought to be
this kind of well respected journalist. He's the guy that
broke the Snowden surveillance story years ago. He's critical of
(03:16):
the Brazilian president, He's played a critical role.
Speaker 2 (03:19):
And he lives in Brazil.
Speaker 1 (03:20):
Correct, he lives in Brazil.
Speaker 2 (03:21):
He's an American.
Speaker 1 (03:22):
He's an American. I want to get into that because
that's a big part of this story. He goes very
hard on Israel, and I think that's where he's found
his support base in this kind of crisis moment that
he's having right now, it's almost not even a crisis moment,
which is the kind of striking thing. There's been a
few outlets and a few kind of media personalities that
(03:44):
have condemned his recent acts, but we will get into
that right now. He's been a critic of Trump's deportations,
and this is where like that I kind of butted
heads with him because I kind of called him out.
The man is an American, but he has lived in
Brazil basically since two thousand and five, so for twenty years,
and he broadcasts from Brazil. I didn't know that until
(04:07):
he did an interview with Tucker Carlson last year. I
always thought that he was an American. He's kind of
well known in you know, kind of American media, but
he's lived in Brazil for about twenty years now, and
from that far off land. He's criticizing Trump and the
way he's deporting people. And I called him out on it,
and so we kind of had a little bit of
(04:28):
a back and forth on it. I liked some of
his reporting. His made appearances on our show through clips
and stuff. Is some of the reporting that he's done
in the kind of the Gaza war and what have you.
And but now this story breaks late last week. I
want to say, it was Friday night.
Speaker 2 (04:46):
It was Friday night. I remember it well because you
literally said out loud, oh my god, oh my god,
that's Glenn Greenwald. Those were your exact words.
Speaker 1 (04:59):
So there's this video that went around and at first
I thought, maybe this is AI or maybe this isn't
really him, And I thought, now, that this can't be him.
I guess I knew he was gay.
Speaker 2 (05:11):
We both knew he was gay, definitely knew that.
Speaker 1 (05:13):
But it wasn't kind of something that was really prominent
or I just didn't you know, it wasn't something that
you kind of cared about. It's like, whatever, the guy's gay.
But now he's been caught in this leaked video that
of this kind of you know, it's hard for me
to even talk about what was in the video, but
I'll try to explain it to you guys. So there's
this leaked video that went crazy Friday evening. The man
(05:38):
is in this Glenn Greenwold is in a mini skirt
and the kind of a lace top.
Speaker 2 (05:43):
Well, it's not really, it's more of an apron.
Speaker 1 (05:46):
Yeah, I mean it's very cheeks are exposed.
Speaker 2 (05:48):
It's like very caps but.
Speaker 1 (05:51):
A skirt kind of yes, because you could see his backside.
Speaker 2 (05:54):
Yes, it's an apron.
Speaker 1 (05:55):
He's dressed kind of like a little girl in that way,
and all you see is this camera on him. He
looks like he's high and he's on his knees.
Speaker 2 (06:05):
Yeah, we don't know if he's high or not.
Speaker 1 (06:07):
Nobody looks like he's to be.
Speaker 2 (06:10):
Intoxicated and ebriated on something.
Speaker 1 (06:12):
Well, and I'll get into that, because there's been kind
of a back and forth that he had with a
Twitter ex user, and you could see he doesn't ever
deny that aspect of it because somebody kind of called
him out as a subscriber of his called him out
and said, can you please explain this because it looks
like there's drug paraphernalia there. You look like you're high.
Can you please explain this? And he does not explain it.
(06:32):
He's just kind of like, I could do whatever I
want in my private time, what have you. So we'll
get to that in a second. So the camera's on
him and he's kissing this black man's hand. People are
deducing that he's a gay prostitute, and he starts to
suck his toes in his feet, and then then the
guy spits on the floor and tells him directs him
(06:57):
to lick it up and slurp it up. So he's
slurping up this guy's loogie from a logie. It's spit
it okay, and then Glenn. He proceeds to make Glenn
go onto his laptop and pay him what looks like
about two thousand dollars US dollars. I'm not sure of
(07:20):
the currency, but I think it's two thousand dollars. So
he pays them this money. Once again, there appears to
be drug paraphernalia on the bed next to him, and
it's this this incredibly depraved video of this man doing
this kind of BDSM kind of like a you know,
(07:40):
shame kind of or just like embarrassment kind of video.
He's being dominated, it's.
Speaker 2 (07:45):
Being dominated and degraded, and he clearly wants to be
because he's paying for it.
Speaker 1 (07:50):
So this the way this video got out. There was
this site. It was called I think it's called finn
dom Okay for oz Yes hosts the video. Glenn apparently
looks like and he's denied this, but I don't think.
I think the breadcrumbs kind of prove otherwise. He retweeted
(08:12):
this and then shortly afterwards unretweeted it.
Speaker 2 (08:18):
Yes. And the thing about retweets is that it wasn't
accidental because when you retweet, you actually have to do
it twice. You hit retweet and then it asks you
if you would like to quote retweet or just retweet exactly.
You have to.
Speaker 1 (08:33):
See, so it's not like the like button. I don't
know if you remember this. Years ago, Ted Cruz got
kind of caught probably checking out some porn or something
on Twitter, and he he hit the like button on
some porn stars or some porn channel I think, And
and so they're like, oh, that those likes is just
(08:53):
a one thing. There's not like a second button that
you have to push. Maybe he, you know, accidentally was
scrolling and he hit it. Who knows. But with a tweet,
your exactly right, a retweet, you have to you have
to basically hit it twice to kind of confirm it.
Speaker 2 (09:09):
Yes.
Speaker 1 (09:09):
So so this video goes out, he potentially retweets it
and everyone's like, wait a minute, what's going on here?
And you could see it now because if you go
there and you try to find that that tweet, you
can see the responses to people saying did you just
retweet this? Glenn? And you could see his name In
the way that Twitter works, when somebody responds, it shows
(09:33):
who you're responding to, and it has Glenn's name in there.
So everybody was shocked. I was shocked. I couldn't believe
what I was seeing. This is a major media figure, Okay,
this is a guy that you know this, this snowed
in story was a big, big deal. This guy has
been on Tucker Carlson multiple times. He's been on all
(09:53):
of the major media outlets. He's you know, chummy with
Candace Owens. He goes on Megan Kelly's show all the time.
He's like friends with all of these major, major media people.
And so you see this and you're sitting back and waiting,
how are people going to respond to this? Okay, So
(10:14):
he puts out a response following day, and I want
to read I want to read that because this kind
of says a lot. Okay about the videos last night,
videos were released online depicting behavior in my private life.
Some were distorted and others were not. They were published
without my knowledge or consent, and its publication was therefore criminal.
(10:36):
Though we do not yet know exactly who is responsible,
we are close to knowing, and the motive was a
maliciously political one. As for the content of the videos,
I have no embarrassment or regret about them. The videos
depict consenting adults engaging in intimate actions in their private lives.
(10:57):
They all display fully consensual behavior, harming nobody. Obviously, it
can be uncomfortable and unpleasant when your private behavior is
made public against your will. That's why the behavior is
private in the first place. But the only wrongdoing here
is the criminal and malicious publication of the videos in
an attempt to malign perceived political enemies and advance a
(11:20):
political agenda. Others are, of course free to form their
own judgments, as some are prone to do about others'
private lives, and I will it won't change my work.
I will continue all the many prongs of my journalism
and pursue the causes most important to me, exactly as before.
Speaker 2 (11:39):
Okay, So that's a good statement. I will say that
that's a statement that was well put.
Speaker 1 (11:45):
Together, okay, And I'm going to say why it is
absolutely not a good statement.
Speaker 2 (11:51):
Okay.
Speaker 1 (11:51):
And I want to get to why that is not
a good statement. Right after the break, you're listening to
Red Pilled Americas fam Boogie, and we're talking about this
kind of mask off moment that we have an alternative media.
And before we parted, you, Adriana, I read the Glenn
(12:15):
Greenwald statement and she said that she thought it was,
you know, a solid statements.
Speaker 2 (12:19):
It was a solid statement as far as statements go.
Speaker 1 (12:22):
Well, on paper, it sounds solid.
Speaker 2 (12:24):
But here's the thing what I here's what I'd like
to say. I think a lot of people fell for
the consenting adults argument. People were like, so it was smart.
Speaker 1 (12:40):
Well, the thing that I wanted to focus on, and
I want to get to that consenting adults aspect of
things as well too, because I think it's it's flawed.
But the thing that I really wanted to get to
is you.
Speaker 2 (12:53):
Guys should see the look on his face.
Speaker 1 (12:55):
Is this this part where he said that he had
I have no embarrassment or regret about them the video. Okay,
there's that statement. This man he's a father, Yes.
Speaker 2 (13:07):
He's a father. And you know what, I have been
a consenting adult and if something of mine was leaked,
I would feel very embarrassed, very very embarrassed. What would
you be embarrassed by any private moment that we have had,
if that was leaked, I would feel incredibly embarrassed about.
Speaker 1 (13:26):
Okay, but you don't have any videos where you are
licking a prostitute's foot and slipping up.
Speaker 2 (13:34):
So obviously I'm saying even if I'm doing normal heterosexual
just sex.
Speaker 1 (13:38):
Of course that's embarrassing.
Speaker 2 (13:39):
Yes, normal people feel embarrassed by that.
Speaker 1 (13:41):
The thing that is troubling about it is the man
is a parent. Okay, he has kids, and now there's
a video out there where not only is he paying,
allegedly paying a gay male prostitute, there's also drug paraphernalia
in the frame. When you become a parent, all of
(14:02):
this kind of consenting adults bs goes out the door.
You have a child that you have to protect. And
on top of that, he is saying that he has
no regrets. So now he's putting this message out there
to the public that this is normal behavior for consenting adults.
Speaker 2 (14:23):
All right. I think we should add for context that
Glenn has two children, two boys that he adopted with
his former husband who passed away.
Speaker 1 (14:35):
An infection of let's get into this, okay. So there's
reports out there that the reason why he moved to Brazil,
or the reason why he started going to Brazil was
for sex tourism. Apparently a prostitution is legal in Brazil.
He had some connection to gay porn sites and also
(14:55):
gay escort sites. This is back in the early two thousands.
Speaker 2 (14:59):
And by the way, I don't think that this is
being disputed by anybody it's not and it's been out
there for a while.
Speaker 1 (15:05):
The New York Daily News did something on this a
while ago. There's like, you know, investigations on this. This
information is out there, and he, I think, has claimed
that it was just brief, that there is some connection
via some lawsuits that he needed to get paid for
that he because he's a lawyer, practicing lawyer at one point.
So he's going to this country to allegedly for sex tourism.
(15:30):
He meets this nineteen year old young man, he's thirty eight.
Speaker 2 (15:34):
That's a big age difference.
Speaker 1 (15:35):
From a poor neighborhood in Brazil. He ends up moving
in with this man within days reportedly, and has been
living in Brazil ever since then.
Speaker 2 (15:45):
Okay, they were later married.
Speaker 1 (15:47):
They were later married, and they ended up getting custody
of two brothers. I think it was in twenty seventeen,
and then he ended up adopting them, officially adopting these
two boys in twenty eighteen. Okay, So now he's a
father of two children that he has adopted, and he
(16:09):
is now has this video out there where he is
involved in these incredibly depraved videos to a gay prostitute
with drugs in the frame, and he's saying he has
no embarrassment and no regrets.
Speaker 2 (16:24):
He is proud of his foot fetish.
Speaker 1 (16:26):
So on top of that, if this man was a
heterosexual man and he had adopted two kids, there would
be questions about do we need to check on the
welfare of these kids. This man is living in a
country that has the age of consent is fourteen years old. Okay,
what is he doing in Brazil as an American living
(16:47):
there for twenty years broadcasting about all of these American
politics from Brazil? And on top of that, he has
this And this is something that I thought was very
honorable when I first heard about it, but now that
I've seen these videos, I'm starting to think differently. On Tucker,
he talked about having this refuge for dogs, and there's
(17:08):
like tons and tons of dogs, hundreds of dogs, a
bunch of dogs. I'm not to sure the count, but
a lot of dogs on this kind of, you know, shelter.
But it's also a shelter for homeless people, so homeless
people come there. I guess there's some kind of relationship
with homeless people and their dogs. So we're talking about
incredibly vulnerable people and we're seeing now the kind of
(17:30):
sexual depravity this man is into, and some people have
even suggested that this video, because you know, it looks
like he retweeted it, that this was kind of part
of the kink, the same kind of shame that he's
absorbing and loving and getting a sexual arousal from in
the video. He's now having a public version of that,
(17:51):
very public version of that. And with all of that
in mind, I think his statement that he has no
regrets and no embarrassment about these videos is reprehensible. I
think that he should have regret about it. If I
was taking a videos of myself on the toilet going
to the bathroom and that got out there, I would
be embarrassed far.
Speaker 2 (18:09):
Because you're a normal person. You're not into degradation. And
so that's clearly what he's into, and that's why he
retweeted it.
Speaker 1 (18:16):
So there's that aspect of it that I think is
just it's shocking that a man in his position would
take the position that he has no regrets for something
like this. Now, immediately, the conspiracy theorists that are out
there that are kind of like part of his realm
or his circuit. He is basically of the anti Israel
(18:38):
faction of the media. Okay, he's a Jew, which is
kind of this unique position that he's in. And so
this video gets out there and immediately the people in
his immediate kind of circle start to say, oh, well,
this is being done by the Zionists, this is being
done by Mosad to embarrass him, to shut him up
(18:59):
about the things that he talks about in regards to Israel.
But there's no evidence of that. And on top of that,
he's gone at the right wing president in Brazil. It
could easily have been those. I mean, he goes at people.
He's gone at the deep State before in regards to,
you know, some of the surveillance stuff, So it could
be that. I mean, there's so many people that he's
made enemies with, So there is no evidence of Israel
(19:22):
out there being the ones that release this. Couldn't be
them one percent. It could be them, But you know,
if you don't want, you know, these kinds of loogie
slurping videos of yourself out there in the public, don't
take them. Now. Obviously, if people have intimate videos of
themselves and somebody maliciously publishes that, that is wrong. It
(19:43):
is wrong, But it's still Newsworthy.
Speaker 2 (19:45):
Yeah it is. And let me say this because I
feel like we're probably gonna get some pushback on this.
You know, Patrick and have been married for almost twenty
two years. We're coming up on our I want to say,
thirty fourth anniversary, our first date. You know, we are
obviously consenting adults. We are married for a long time.
We would never make a video of ourselves in you know,
(20:07):
having sex. Number one, We would be very very careful
to just not even engage in that behavior because if
that behavior, if that got leaked, that would be humiliating
and embarrassing to our daughter, to our family, and to ourselves.
Like you just you don't do certain things as an
adult exactly.
Speaker 1 (20:24):
Well, this isn't like the Clippers owner that got caught
arguing with his then girlfriend and drop the ND bomb
in their private discussion in their house. He was recorded
without his knowledge or consent, that that audio was put
out there into the public. He ended up having to
sell the team because of it. This isn't that.
Speaker 2 (20:42):
No, no, no, can you s it?
Speaker 1 (20:43):
In the video he was making, he was part of it.
He knew he was being videotaped, and.
Speaker 2 (20:48):
So they were making gay pearn.
Speaker 1 (20:49):
So this whole consenting adults argument, I think is flawed.
It just doesn't There comes a point where it does
matter the kinds of things that you are willing to do.
And there's obviously a gradation of this. There's different levels
of like what should be considered acceptable and normal precisy.
(21:13):
Now people are like, oh, you know, kind of one
of his protection things like these arguments that some of
his media protectors are doing. And I want to talk
about some of those people that are protecting him right now.
But one of the things that they're doing is they're
sarcastically saying, oh, I didn't know that Glenn Greenwald was gay,
kind of like sarcastically saying everybody knew he was gay,
So why are you guys so surprised that his video
(21:33):
is out there? And my response to that is that
is this natural, normal gay activity to hire a gay prostitute,
slurp his spit off the ground, lick his feet and
then and then videotape that all, and then pay him
on and then have drugs in the frame, I mean,
is potentially like drug paraphernilia in the frame. Is that
(21:55):
normal gay behavior? Because I was told and I think
all of us were told back in the old gay
marriage thing was that, oh, okay, gay marriage is it's
the same thing, you know, and we're the same people,
we just love differently. And so now I'm just love.
Now I'm seeing something completely different. Now I'm seeing something
(22:17):
to where this noise he's trying, he's trying to normalize
this behavior in a way that just doesn't make any sense.
This consenting adult thing is hogwash. It's hogwash. Okay. It's
not a good argument, because in order for society to function,
there needs to be some limitations, and maybe if he
(22:39):
wants to do those things, try not videotaping exactly, you know.
I mean, I'm not saying that that even makes it good,
but don't videotape it. Okay. So there's that aspect of it.
Speaker 2 (22:50):
By the way, I think we should add that the
drugs that are in the video, what most people are
saying that the drugs what they are is that it's
a meth pipe. We don't know that for sure, but
that is what the majority of people that are that
are saying that it's you know, are saying it's a
math pipe. Yeah, it could be like a marijuana pipe.
Speaker 1 (23:10):
Bet So he responds he basically responds, and I want so.
Jason Whitlock, very it was very surprised came out in
his defense. Jason Whitlock is somebody that I respect. I
listen to his show often. He comes out and he
(23:31):
first he says that he's one of the best journalists
that are out there, that he's been following him for
a while. His statement was this, Glenn Rick Greenwald is
still the best journalist working today. I will lift him
up in prayer and ask that he get delivered from
homosexual sin. I will also continue to thank God for
Glenn's commitment to honest, courageous journalism. I think you're going
(23:51):
to start to see, you know, a trend here on
all of the people that are coming out in his defense,
because they all seem to be pretty critical of Israel.
Which you can be critical of Israel, but it seems like,
you know, and I think you made this comment the
other day, Adriana. As long as you are against Israel,
anything goes okay. You can get away with anything within
that group. You could do anything like Andrew Tate. You
(24:12):
can be on video of time after time after time
talking about how you've smacked women, hit women, audio can
come out of you saying horrible things to women. You
could put this horrible message out there to mand like
Andrew Tate has. But as long as he's against Israel,
then it's ok it's okay. And we're seeing this now
with Glenn Greenwald, and we're seeing this with.
Speaker 2 (24:34):
Others, by the way, and we're going to see a
trend with all the people that came out to defend him.
So it seems to be the trend.
Speaker 1 (24:42):
It's clearly the trend. It's clearly the trend. So then
Jason Whitlock puts out this statement, serious thoughtful replies, only
can you separate Glenn Greenwald's courageous journalism from his moral,
degenerate personal lifestyle? If their scripture to guide us, please share? Thanks.
Glenn Greenwald jumps into this thread says this serious, thoughtful question,
(25:04):
how have you been able to separate what you regard
as Donald Trump's inspired and noble political leadership from the
repeated behaviors in his private life long considered deeply immoral
and degenerate under the most widespread and long standing Christian
and Western moral dogma. Then he goes on to list
all of the you know, all of Trump's degenerate activity
(25:26):
overlapping affairs and marriages. This is Glenn Greedwald writing serial
adulteres affairs with porn stars that he paid to cover up,
closely cavorting with Jeffrey Epstein after he was publicly convicted
of sex trafficking of minors. That's a lie, okay, He
goes on, will leave to this side the multiple allegations
(25:47):
of sexual assault from various women to whom he wasn't married,
even though one was repeatedly upheld in court. We all
know how that was completely you know, law fair against
him and complete bogus. The actually changed laws to go
after Trump. He knows that, but he's right now flailing
for his credibility, so he puts us out there. He
(26:07):
goes on. For his whole adult life, Trump lived the
life of a libertine Manhattan billionaire, not even close to
a paragon of sexual moral virtue. One of the things
I've always liked about Trump is he never purported to
be a moralist, because he knew his life didn't permit
that pretense, and it wasn't something he pretended to value. Nor,
as his many close libertine friends demonstrate or say, his
(26:30):
choice of Matt Gates or attorney general. So he goes on,
he basically is deflecting here. He's basically saying, what about Trump? Now?
My response to this, and it's gotten so far the
most responses on this thread. We responded this. I said,
everything you mentioned of Trump, some true, with others alleged,
is in his distant past. But you are currently living
(26:54):
this disgusting, degenerate lifestyle right now with no regrets. Stop deflecting.
Serious truth seekers will never take you so seriously again.
So right there, he point blank lied about Trump, and
this is somebody that all of these A media people
are holding up as the paragon of independent journalism. He
(27:16):
claims that Trump had a close association with Jeffrey Epstein
after he was convicted of sex with minors. That is
not true. He had a falling off. This has been
reported by multiple outlets. Trump he was part of these
social circles of which Jeffrey Epstein was. You know, when
you're in the big moneyed areas and you're kind of
(27:37):
in this media spotlight, you end up meeting a lot
of people, and so he's around this person. They were
kind of friendly at these social events. They had a
falling out in two thousand and four, and then in
two thousand and eight was when the first time that
it was publicly known and confirmed that he was being
involved sexually with minors. Okay, so, but to deflect and
(27:58):
to make himself look better, he's dragging Trump into this.
And on top of that, I'll say once again, this
stuff is he's talking about from twenty years ago, but
he's now living this lifestyle. He's right now saying that
he has no regrets, in no embarrassment. My translation for
that is is that he's gonna do potentially more meth
(28:18):
enhanced prostitute slurping up of prostitute's spit on the ground,
addressed as a little girl in a mini skirt, who
knows whether the kids are in the house anymore, or
what have you. He's going to continue that kind of
lifestyle or that kind of activity and behavior. Now, should
(28:39):
this be somebody that we listen to when it comes
to their media reporting? Can you separate? And Jason Whitlock
brought that up there. Can we separate his personal activity
with the reporting that he does. We're going to get
into that in part two. Join us there
Hosts And Creators
Adryana Cortez
Patrick Courrielche
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
The Joe Rogan Experience
The official podcast of comedian Joe Rogan.
True Crime Tonight
If you eat, sleep, and breathe true crime, TRUE CRIME TONIGHT is serving up your nightly fix. Five nights a week, KT STUDIOS & iHEART RADIO invite listeners to pull up a seat for an unfiltered look at the biggest cases making headlines, celebrity scandals, and the trials everyone is watching. With a mix of expert analysis, hot takes, and listener call-ins, TRUE CRIME TONIGHT goes beyond the headlines to uncover the twists, turns, and unanswered questions that keep us all obsessed—because, at TRUE CRIME TONIGHT, there’s a seat for everyone. Whether breaking down crime scene forensics, scrutinizing serial killers, or debating the most binge-worthy true crime docs, True Crime Tonight is the fresh, fast-paced, and slightly addictive home for true crime lovers.