June 2, 2025 • 32 mins
Should a journalist's personal life be used to judge their reporting? In Part 2, we conclude our analysis of the shocking story of reporter Glenn Greenwald...and Alt Media's reaction to the video of his private life that was allegedly leaked to the public.
Support the show: https://redpilledamerica.com/support/
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:03):
This is Red Pilled America. You're listening to Red Pilled
America's Famboogie, and we're talking about this video that went
viral last week about Glenn Greenwald. And if you didn't
listen to part one, this video of this pretty big
(00:25):
alt media personality went viral on the at the end
of last week, and it shows him in this incredibly
compromising position. It's basically gay humiliation porn.
Speaker 2 (00:37):
And you know what, I didn't even know there was
such a thing.
Speaker 1 (00:40):
I didn't know that there was such a thing either.
And the funny thing is, so you started to do
some research on this when I started to say, okay, well,
people are saying that he retweeted it, and so you
have to start looking into that to make sure that
you can actually say that he retweeted it. And you
see that he denied it. Well, I started looking into
it and I found the account that originally put it
(01:01):
out and it's called Finn Doom FORAZ and I did,
and I had no idea what findom was. Well, this
is the problem when these stories come up. We went
through this with Jack Murphy back in the day. You know,
we went through this with the Hunter Biden stuff. We
went through this with Eliza Blue and all that kind
of stuff. I'm researching Findom and apparently there's this entire community,
(01:27):
or this fetish community of financial domination. Okay, don't google
this and don't search this because the stuff that pops up,
you don't want it in your history. All right. I
didn't know findom or financial domin. I'm looking this thing up,
and I'm seeing these accounts whereas these like women or men,
gay men saying I will take all your money from
(01:47):
you and and I will leave you with nothing and
I will love it. You pay them to basically humiliate you.
And it's a shocking community. I can't believe that there
are things like that out there. And what we see
in this video is that he basically gets on the
(02:08):
laptop and pays him right in front of him. He's
demanded the gay prostitute, alleged gay prostitut, I should say,
demanded Glenn Greenwall go on his laptop and pay. You
see Glenn, who looks strung out, goes on the laptop,
starts typing away, pays him what looks like two thousand dollars,
shows him on the laptop that he did that and
(02:30):
you're seeing this all on camera, and I'm like, what
am I watching?
Speaker 2 (02:34):
By the way, Also, what I thought was kind of
weird was that Glenn Greenwald was following that account.
Speaker 1 (02:42):
Yes, there's been some screenshops of that.
Speaker 3 (02:44):
Ye, yes, yes, they're the ones that leaked to the video.
So was this whole.
Speaker 2 (02:48):
Thing part of the dominatrix humiliation?
Speaker 1 (02:53):
That's what's a lot of the theory is out there,
is that he when he retweets this, and like you said,
there's bread crumbs who said this in Partant one, there's
bread crumbs out there that kind of show that he
retweeted it, because you can see the responses to the
initial tweet and it includes Glenn Greenwald's name and the
reply part of it, and so you could see that
(03:15):
he retweeted it. He denied retweeting it, but he did
retweet it. And so he deflects tries to equate what
he's doing to what Trump has done in the past
and the depravity that Trump has been involved with, which
is basically infidelity, fidelity he achieved on his wife, and
you can't equate the two. First of all, you're talking
about infidelity in marriages. That goes back twenty sometimes thirty years, okay,
(03:40):
and Trump seems to have stabilized that aspect of his
life a very long time ago now. And he also,
you know, once again blamed him on having some relationship
with it jeff Jeffrey Epstein, which is not true. After
that information went out there, everybody stayed away from him.
He was a pariah in the social circles. But to
try to equate those two things, when you are coming
(04:03):
out straight and saying I am not embarrassed and I
have no regrets. Now, we spoke out about Trump when
all of this kind of stuff with Stormy Daniels kind
of went down, and him constantly getting in these kinds
of these positions to where he's left himself open to attack.
We condemned him a couple of years ago when this
stuff all came out and he was getting attacked legally
(04:25):
for that. Our listeners got mad that we came forward
on that.
Speaker 3 (04:29):
Yeah, we got a lot of heat for it.
Speaker 1 (04:30):
But he's trying to make a position it that we didn't.
We didn't have a problem with that, and we didn't
have our come to Jesus moment with all of that activity.
Speaker 2 (04:40):
I have a problem with that kind of behavior. I
don't care who's engaging in it. And I want to
know what Glenn Greenwall did, which is basically pay a prostitute,
allegedly prostitute for sex and do some illegal drugs with them.
How is that different than what Hunter Biden was doing.
Speaker 1 (04:57):
Yeah, it's not. Well, people will say, well, Glenn Greenwald's
dad isn't running for president. Okay, fine, but this man
has a huge prousting behavior. And is it consent when
you are Glenn Greenwald that has this enormous platform, He
has an enormous audience. I think he has close to
two million followers on Twitter alone. He has you know,
(05:18):
millions of followers on his other platforms and listeners and
what have you. Is it consensual with the kind of
power dynamic difference that is there in his country and
the kind of his ability to kind of destroy people
as you can see all of these crazed kind of
libertarian everything goes. If it's consensual personalities out there that
(05:39):
have come to his support, I don't know if there's
sense in that situation.
Speaker 3 (05:44):
There is consent, Yes, I believe that there is consent.
Speaker 2 (05:47):
There are two adult men engaging in behavior, But I
don't care if it's consensual, it's still disgusting.
Speaker 1 (05:55):
It's disgusting. It's disgusting, and he should be embarrassed because
he has children. And I mean, were the kids there.
I mean, he's creating his porn, the these porn videos.
Were his kids around.
Speaker 2 (06:07):
I don't know where the kids were, but I'll tell
you what. When we saw this video Friday night, before
we were going to bed, I said to Patrick, I'm
not gonna be able to sleep.
Speaker 3 (06:16):
This is going to give me nightmares. And it gave
me nightmares.
Speaker 1 (06:19):
A horror film. It's a horror film. It was a
horror film because the way you see him looking into
the camera and then you see you know, you've seen
him before on his like rumble shows or you know,
system update or whatever, and you see the look on
his face. At first, I thought this must.
Speaker 3 (06:32):
Be it's a blackmail.
Speaker 1 (06:33):
He's being black I think it was blackmail. I thought
he was being held hostage. I thought he was being
held hostage. I'm like, what's going on here? And then
that's what everybody kind of ran to. It's like, oh, okay,
it's blackmail, and you know it's it's the Jews or
it's the Zionist or it's the massad ors Israel, and
I'm like, he never said that in his response. He
never said that he was being blackmailed. Okay, So this
(06:56):
is the question. When you see something like this, can
you separate their activity behavior, this degenerate behavior, compartmentalize that,
and still trust their reporting.
Speaker 3 (07:10):
There are levels to behaviors, to good and bad behaviors.
Speaker 2 (07:17):
And for the most part, I can, if you're asking me,
I can. But in this case, I don't know if
I can. Every time I see him, I'm going to
be I'm going to remember, but.
Speaker 3 (07:29):
I don't know. I don't know that it has anything
to do is reporting for me.
Speaker 1 (07:34):
I don't really trust anyone. For me. What I do
is is I look at everybody's source material. The first
time I think he made an appearance through video clip
or through you know, like kind of media clips into
our show was his reporting on the Gaza war and
some of the falsehoods that either the Israeli media or
(07:55):
there Israel government we're putting out there. And I listened
to some of his reports on it, and then I
verified it. I verified it actually with Israeli media outlets
that we're also backing what he was saying. So my
position is always I check everybody out. I start from
a place of distrust when it comes to these kinds
of stories, and then I move from there. So as
(08:18):
far as his reporting goes, it won't change my opinion
on it because I'm going to check out everything anyways.
But for the public, the public doesn't have time to
look into everything. They just don't. You have to rely
on what these people are saying. In most cases, people
(08:39):
are busy. They have the other things to do. They
have family to raise, they have work to go to,
they have responsibilities in life.
Speaker 2 (08:45):
Yeah, so you find people that you trust and you
trust their word.
Speaker 1 (08:48):
But we have pattern recognition in our lives for a reason,
and it is a defense mechanism. And when you see
somebody acting like this that is so compromised, the things
that he was doing in this video tells you that
this wasn't his first time. To get to the level
to where you are slurping up a male prostitutes saliva
(09:11):
from the ground in a what looks like a schoolgirl costume,
like a trashy schoolgirl costume. The level to get to
that tells me something about your character. I'm sorry, it does.
And if that is your character and you're willing to
put that on camera, because that's part of the kink,
is to put it on camera, your judgment is not
(09:35):
going to be something that I want to place any
kind of credibility in. We are turning to these media
sources to find the truth. That's why we all turn
into media. I guess that's not entirely true. Some people
just like to hear the confirmation bias and what have you.
But in most cases, you turn to the media because
(09:56):
you are trying to get to the truth. And now
you see somebody that is this compromise, that is this
willing to be dominated and humiliated. I just don't think
that you could compartmentalize that kind of activity. I just
don't see it.
Speaker 3 (10:12):
You know. I have to say that, and I've said
this before on this show.
Speaker 2 (10:15):
I have a problem when two gay men adopt children
or you know, have them vi a surrogacy.
Speaker 3 (10:23):
I have a problem with that with Dave Ruben.
Speaker 2 (10:25):
I've had a problem with that with Glenn Greenwald, and
that that alone is enough for me that I don't
listen to. You know, Dave Ruben, We've had him on
the show We're not going to play that show, I
think ever again are we? And I don't follow Glenn
Greenwald either. Those kinds of things for me are too
much of a barrier for me to get past. So
(10:47):
I was already not there with them.
Speaker 1 (10:50):
So the most the biggest mask off thing of this
all was the all media's circling of the wagons around him. Okay,
you had a shocking number of people that came out
in his support. You had basically martyr Maide, which I
really enjoyed, their fear and loathing, his fear and loathing
(11:12):
in Darryl Cooper is his name. He put out a
podcast called Fear and Loathing in Jerusalem I think is
the title of it, and it was kind of tells
the story of Israel's founding and it's super long. I
want to say, it's like twenty plus hours something. In
those things, I didn't get through the entire thing. I
got through most of it, though very very long. It's
(11:32):
very long. It's interesting. But here he is. He comes
out and says that this is a character assassination. Okay,
how is it a character assassination? This wasn't a secret video,
and he retweeted it Okay, so how is this a
character assassination? So you have Martyr Maide come out and
say that kind of thing.
Speaker 2 (11:50):
I's assassinating his own character by.
Speaker 1 (11:53):
Retweeting yes, dude, yeah, And why use it character assassination
if he says there's no regrets.
Speaker 3 (11:57):
I he has no regrets. She's been embarrassed about it.
Speaker 1 (11:58):
So you have guys like him, So it makes me
question Martyr Maid's judgment. And there's a you're gonna see
a common thread here. Candice Owen's comes forward. She calls
him the most important and honest voice of our time. Okay,
you had James O'Keeffe come forward and say he's one
of the most he's one of the most legendary journalists
(12:19):
of all time. And he goes into this kind of
argument that leaking secretly recorded videos should not be done.
Coming from James O'Keeffe, that is just kind of a shocking,
shocking position. Okay, so that's James O'Keeffe. Ian Carroll comes forward,
calls Glenn Greenwald one of the best journalists of our time.
(12:42):
He blamed Israel with no evidence whatsoever. Megan Kelly comes
forward and says she loves and respects Glenn Greenwald, Russell
Brand gre Gleenwald is fantastic. Dave Smith says the greatest
journalist of the twenty first century is Glenn Greenwald, with
the exception of maybe Julian Assan, she says, Sagar and Jetti,
(13:06):
the guy from He's really popular on YouTube, says Greenwald
is a courageous warrior. Jake Shields, the UFC guy that's
fairly outspoken against Israel. One of the few journalists with
integrity as Glenn Greenwald. We already said Jason Whitlock. Charlie
Kirk calls him a free free speech warrior. What's going
on here.
Speaker 2 (13:25):
What's going on here is that if you hate Israel enough,
then I guess anything goes.
Speaker 1 (13:30):
And I think that's with most of the people.
Speaker 3 (13:32):
It feels like a common threat.
Speaker 1 (13:34):
I don't think that's the case with Charlie Kirk and
with Megan Kelly, but I think with the rest of
the people that I named, they are in war with
the Zionists and the pro Israel groups and it is
clouding their judgment. In my opinion, they and this is
the problem with Israel derangement syndrome. We have been critical
(13:57):
of some of these kind of attacks on free speech
on campuses, and some of these anti free speech laws
that have been tried to get passed here in the
United States. We have been critical of some of the
Gaza misinformation that was put out there by Israel at
the time of the attack, the terrible attacks. We were
(14:18):
critical about all of that, and there I think there
are things to legitimately criticize Israel over. But to allow
your hatred for a country to cloud your mind so
much that you allow people like Andrew Tait, and you
allow activities and behavior like Glenn Griedwald to go unquestioned
(14:40):
and uncritiqued, you should be looking in the mirror if
that is how much your fight with Israel is taking
such a paramount position in your thinking.
Speaker 2 (14:50):
I mean, to not be able to say, yeah, this
is obviously disgusting and super weird behavior. I mean, this
is not you know, your regular run of the mill
sexual behavior. It's just not to not be able to
say that is weird.
Speaker 1 (15:07):
So just shut up, Just don't say anything. Let the
guy talk himself, don't you know, circle the wagons like
this man is Joe Biden or Hunter Biden, and like
the Democrats and the legacy media did. I'm telling you,
the old media is becoming no better than the legacy
media in this realm, no better.
Speaker 2 (15:26):
I was just having a conversation with my mom about this,
and she said to me, you know, I told you
I didn't like that guy before, right, I told you
she thing's weird.
Speaker 1 (15:34):
She did that.
Speaker 2 (15:35):
She thinks it's weird that he lived in Brazil. She
didn't like the fact that he, you know, him and
this husband.
Speaker 3 (15:40):
Adopted two brothers. She thought that was strange.
Speaker 2 (15:43):
And then we started and then we got into the
Hunter Biden thing, right, like, how is it any different?
And I said to my mom, I have to say,
I think that what Glenn Greenwald did is more disgusting.
Speaker 3 (15:54):
And she said, I don't know about that.
Speaker 1 (15:57):
There's some miners, potentially some miners, is.
Speaker 2 (16:00):
She did say that, but there we don't know that
for sure. So all we're seeing is drug use constitutes.
Speaker 3 (16:07):
And on top of the levels of degregation.
Speaker 1 (16:09):
You have all of these people they went at Hunter
for years, all of these alt media people. They went
at Jeffrey Tuban, the Tuban guy from CNN who basically
got caught masturbating he thought on a zoom call. He
thought the camera was offre he thought he was out,
he gets caught masturbating. The alt media had a field
day with that. I didn't really care too much about
(16:32):
it. It was like it was kind of revealing, obviously, and
it was embarrassing, but they ran with it because anytime
there's something with political implications, they use it and without
any regard to hypocrisy.
Speaker 2 (16:46):
Yeah, but then again, let's go back to the levels
of degregation. Not as bad as the Hunter Biden stuff
Jeffery Tube and you know I would go Jeffrey Hunter Glenn, Yes, yes,
we have to be able to do that as a society.
Speaker 1 (16:59):
Or how about the Anthony Wiener stuff, I mean, in
the in the attacks on Anthony Wiener and yes.
Speaker 3 (17:05):
He was a minor. Yes, so that goes that's worse.
Speaker 1 (17:11):
But but what I'm saying here is is that people
are trying to make this seem like discussing this and
criticizing or judging Glenn Greenwald on his behavior that gets
leaked out into the public is somehow outside of the pale,
like you.
Speaker 3 (17:29):
Just can't wash all over again.
Speaker 1 (17:32):
People don't know what that is.
Speaker 3 (17:35):
Years ago, our.
Speaker 2 (17:36):
Daughter was in elementary school and they did a dance
about the Chumash Indians, and they learned about the Chumash Indians.
And one of the things that the Chumash do is
that right when their babies are born, they punch them
in the face to flatten out their noses. And when
the kids told this story, all the parents were horrified,
and the teacher said, no, no, no, don't judge. And
I was like, no, no, no, yes, we can judge.
Speaker 1 (17:58):
We told our daughter people it was the prime them
for the trans.
Speaker 3 (18:01):
Movement all one hundred percent.
Speaker 2 (18:03):
You're a lifestyle you're allowed to judge. You know, you
can have an opinion about this, and typically your first
knee jerk reaction is probably the correct one.
Speaker 1 (18:11):
So you have this common thread between you know, most
of these people, and they're being anti Israel, and that
is why they are defending Glenn at all costs, and
no matter what he says, they are defending him at
all costs because they are all part of their comrades
in their war against Israel and their war against Scionism.
(18:32):
But then you'll have the Megan Kelly's and the Charlie
Kirks of the world that came out in his defense.
And I want to get to why I think people
like that are defending Glenn Greenwold, and we'll talk about
that right after the break. You're listening to Red Pilled
America's Famboogie, and we're going to wrap up this discussion
about this Glenn Greenwald horrible disgusting video that went around
(18:57):
that he is not embarrassed by, He has no regrets,
and is society that we want? Is that something that
he wants for his kids? Is that something that we
want our kids to think is normal to bring a gay,
male prostitute home and let them humiliate you on camera.
Speaker 2 (19:18):
Or any type of prostitute. I don't care if it's
male or female. I mean there are levels, Like I
said before, but what the hell that's gross?
Speaker 1 (19:26):
And you know, do we want to live in a
world where all of your private at home things, even
things that you may have recorded, you want them put
out there in the world. No. But here's the thing.
It got out there. And this is a guy that
was critical in the release of the Snowden surveillance classified information.
(19:46):
So to talk about releasing things that shouldn't go out there,
the hootspa that it takes to take that position, I mean, yes,
I'm sure you feel violated because something that you filmed
at home in private got out there into the world.
But you you've done that, that's part of your stock
in trade. You were the critical person behind releasing the
(20:08):
Snowden's surveillance information. So you know, what are you talking about?
But why is it that guys like Charlie Kirk or
someone like Megan Kelly would come out and defend Glenn Greenwald.
And I think, you know, we're in Pride Month right now.
It just kicked off, and I think, what's going on here?
(20:29):
Is this a lot like you know, there's been a
lot of like complaints in Hollywood as there being a
gay mafia in Hollywood that will take you out if
you are anti gay in Hollywood, or you know, if
you put any kind of messages out there. You know,
mel Gibson has been attacked in the past and what
have you. Well, I got some news for conservative audiences
(20:51):
out there. There's a similar thing within the conservative media world.
Some of them are out in the open, like Dave Rubin,
some are not, some are closeted. And there is a
lot of gay media personalities within the conservative world that
are very have very big platforms. And I think that
(21:13):
is why you see somebody like Charlie Kirk and someone
like Megan Kelly coming forward is because they know that
they know that there is very influential gay media personalities
within the conservative movement, and so they want to be
careful with that topic and they don't want to alienate
those people, and they want to come out as kind
(21:33):
of open and inclusive. But there is a difference between
what Glenn Greenwald has done on camera and is proud
of and unashamed of. And at one point I want
to read something here for you guys where he actually
talks about being proud of the things that he has
done in his private life and somebody like Trump who
(21:56):
has maybe been unfaithful in the past. Well obviously, but
he's been unfaithful in the past, and he's been woman
is iSER and what have you. But there's a difference
between those two things. And he's also had his come
to Jesus moment and he's been married now, you know,
faithfully and happily for twenty years, and he seemed to
(22:16):
have left that life behind him and at least he's
not going to come out and support that kind of behavior.
Speaker 2 (22:22):
Well, I've never seen any gay porn of Trump that
I can confirm.
Speaker 1 (22:28):
But I think that that is what we're seeing with
these kinds of you know, circlings of the wagons. There's
no ever one reason why people come forward. You know,
there's been a lot of talk that there's a lot
of Gatar money running around in conservative media, and you know,
and people have been accused like Tucker Carlson who put
out an interview of Glenn Greenwald the day that this
(22:48):
story basically broke and talked about Jeffrey Ebstein and that
Glenn Greenwald was getting to the bottom of Glenn of
Jeffrey Ebstein. The absolute just the laughability of that. They
talk about the humiliation of the legacy media as this
guy releases a humiliation or he said he didn't release it,
(23:09):
but a video goes out there of his humiliation porn.
I mean, it's just it's the hypocrisy is so glaring.
I'm literally seeing exactly what we have been complaining about
with CNNMSNBC, ABC News, CBS News, all of them. You're
seeing that in this story and we've been talking about
(23:31):
this now for years. People get on our case about this,
Oh why you guys always beating up conservative media. This
is why we're supposed to be the answer to legacy media.
We are supposed to be correcting an institution that has
fallen apart, and trust in the institution has fallen apart,
and we are supposed to be creating an institution that
people can trust.
Speaker 2 (23:52):
This is why we're the friend List. We don't toe
the line, and we're never going to no, We're we're
going to say the truth. We're going to say it
like it is. By the way, you know who I
felt like had a good take once again, Interestingly.
Speaker 1 (24:04):
Milo Milo is the best on this kind of I.
Speaker 2 (24:07):
Say, Milo, you know, he he came correct on.
Speaker 1 (24:11):
This, you know, and he basically called out his I
guess his former husband that passed away from some weird
and gastro intestinal.
Speaker 3 (24:19):
Not Milo's husband, Glenn greenwalds.
Speaker 1 (24:21):
Milo talked about Glenn Greenwald's husband who passed away a
couple of years ago. He died of some kind of uh,
gastro intestinal infection.
Speaker 3 (24:30):
Oh, I thought he had cancer.
Speaker 1 (24:32):
Milo says that apparently, I don't know how to say this,
but I have to say it. Okay, he got some
kind of gastro intestinal infection and apparently one of the
primary ways to get that. There's like a few ways
that it's kind of common. It's through food, they're kind
of contaminated water. And another way is through fecal mouth transmission.
(24:55):
So in other words, a mouth coming into a.
Speaker 3 (24:57):
Contact with I feel like I need to take a shower.
Speaker 1 (24:59):
Feces, okay, or fecal particles.
Speaker 3 (25:03):
It's very dirty right now.
Speaker 1 (25:04):
I want to read this just to kind of underscore
this position that Glenn Greenwald is taking on his activity.
This is one of his listeners or one of his subscribers.
It's called Andrew Breitbart Clips. Kind of Weirdly, this person
says to Glenn, I am trying so hard to see
past the video, but the demonic eyes and meth pipe
really bother me more than the sexual deviance. Would love
(25:26):
to hear some acknowledgment of your use of this dangerous
brain altering drug or why that meth pipe was present.
If not used the way crack Myth impacts the brain
can absolutely impact your journalism, professional life, and as a subscriber,
I want to know if it is or not. Glenn
(25:47):
Greenwald responds, the point I've made from the start is
that the moral and ethical code I believe in for
my own life is one I am satisfied, and I
am fulfilling the fruits of my personal and professional life,
and the values they represent speak for themselves. I'm quite
proud of them. I'm quite proud of them, he says.
(26:07):
And I feel no obligation to confine myself to the
various moral codes others profess to believe in when it
comes to private behavior. So basically, he doesn't deny the
drug use, and he's proud of his personal life and
his personal behavior and his moral code. Okay, of which
this behavior is his moral code. So that alone is
(26:29):
kind of reason to believe that you can't trust everything
that comes out of his mouth when it comes to
his journalistic integrity. Is that somebody that's partaking in that
kind of behavior is going to have a skewed judgment
on the world. Period. It's just the way that it is.
I will say this, if he would have came forward
(26:50):
and said, you know what, I'm ashamed of what I've done.
As a father, I want to give an example to
my children, and as a public figure, I want to
put the right message out there, and I ask for
your guys's forgiveness. I shouldn't be doing this kind of
a thing. It is morally wrong. People would have moved on.
We probably wouldn't even be discussing this. It'd be like, oh,
(27:12):
I mean, this is kind of a funny, gross thing
that went around, but we would have left it at that.
And I still would have felt the same way about
having to check everything that he puts out there if
I want to use that as a news source. But
people are forgiving, People are willing to forgive, and we
have to have a society where you can be forgiven
(27:33):
for your transgressions. But he is doubling down and saying,
I'm good with this. This is my moral code, and
I'm fine with this. This is the way I live
my life, and I'm proud of the way I live
my life.
Speaker 2 (27:46):
And by the way, it's a way that he's been
living his life clearly for a long time. It's interesting
when these kinds of things come out, what you find
out about people. I did not know about Glenn's past
and his involvement in gay porn sites or with you know,
gay escort sites.
Speaker 3 (28:03):
I'm bothered by that. I don't like it. I think
it's disgusting.
Speaker 1 (28:05):
Yeah it is, and you know what.
Speaker 2 (28:06):
I'm glad to know it now because I'm not interested
in reporting anymore because of it.
Speaker 3 (28:11):
Sorry, but I'm not.
Speaker 1 (28:12):
So I would say, you know, in conclusion on this topic,
I would say this, you really have to hold your
media personalities to account. They have to be called out
on this. They could have just kept quiet. They could
have said that, you know, the kind of behavior that
he is proud of and that he is unembarrassed by
and has no regrets for is disgusting and we don't
(28:35):
want that in our community. They didn't do that. All
they did was heap praise on him. And these are
major personalities that I mentioned. We need to hold these
people accountable because now all we're going to end up
having is a legacy media and an alt legacy media,
and that's it, and that's what's formed right now. The
institution is completely breaking down. How do you trust people
(28:59):
when these are the kinds of people that they're willing
to align with the andrew Tates of the world. And
it's strange all of these people are doing it, All
of these people are aligning with these people. It's shocking
to me. They hate Israel that much that they can't
see past their nose and just condemned behavior that needs
(29:19):
to be condemned.
Speaker 2 (29:20):
I mean, listen, if there was a video of let's say,
for example, Megan Kelly doing this exact same thing, smoking
meth with a hired prostitute dressed like a little girl
being degraded, people would be horrified and disgusting. Yes, but
(29:41):
I feel like because he's gay, yes, it's provided him
almost a shield because people are afraid to say it
because they don't want to be called homophobes.
Speaker 1 (29:51):
There's this kind of mantra that went around about the
black community for years. It was kind of the prejudice
or the racism of low expectations. I think something like that. Yes,
and a lot of people on the left would have
low expectations for the black community, so they would let
certain kinds of behavior go by. And I'm seeing the
same exact thing with the gay community, especially if they
(30:14):
are conservative and gay. There's low expectations because of that.
Do you not expect these people to live normal lives?
I do, and I know that they can. They're capable
of that, So why can't we hold them to the
same standard that we would hold Megan Kelly if she
was caught with a meth pipe on a bed, with
a prostitute slipping up his saliva from the ground and
(30:37):
then paying him on for financial domination finndom. I mean,
of course, we would be horrified if Megan Kelly did that,
So why can't we be horrified if a gay man
is doing that. I mean, I expect more from the
gay community. I expect them to live decent lives. Yeah,
and so I think we need to call to account
(31:00):
all of these alt media personalities that came to his defense,
and they need to feel it, they need to feel it.
I admire many of these people, most of the people
that I have lumped into this group of people that
have come and circled the wagons around Glenn Greenwald. But
we cannot create an infrastructure, a media infrastructure that we
(31:22):
can trust if this is what we are building, If
we're going to build the same thing that the legacy
media has built that will not hold to account people
that are doing We're going to go backstage right now.
So join us at Redpilldamerica dot com if you want
(31:43):
to join the Fanbam Cook join the top menu. We're
going to talk about the Jeffrey Epstein suicide that Dan
Bongino said, never happened. I thought that was kind of
an interesting twist to this story. We're also going to
give an update on Tim Ballard and some of his
troubles now in Argentina. You guys are gonna want to
hear this. And finally we're gonna get into the Trump
(32:04):
court winds. He's had some big court wins this week.
Join us backstage at the Fan Bam Guys
Speaker 2 (32:12):
M
This is Red Pilled America. You're listening to Red Pilled
America's Famboogie, and we're talking about this video that went
viral last week about Glenn Greenwald. And if you didn't
listen to part one, this video of this pretty big
(00:25):
alt media personality went viral on the at the end
of last week, and it shows him in this incredibly
compromising position. It's basically gay humiliation porn.
Speaker 2 (00:37):
And you know what, I didn't even know there was
such a thing.
Speaker 1 (00:40):
I didn't know that there was such a thing either.
And the funny thing is, so you started to do
some research on this when I started to say, okay, well,
people are saying that he retweeted it, and so you
have to start looking into that to make sure that
you can actually say that he retweeted it. And you
see that he denied it. Well, I started looking into
it and I found the account that originally put it
(01:01):
out and it's called Finn Doom FORAZ and I did,
and I had no idea what findom was. Well, this
is the problem when these stories come up. We went
through this with Jack Murphy back in the day. You know,
we went through this with the Hunter Biden stuff. We
went through this with Eliza Blue and all that kind
of stuff. I'm researching Findom and apparently there's this entire community,
(01:27):
or this fetish community of financial domination. Okay, don't google
this and don't search this because the stuff that pops up,
you don't want it in your history. All right. I
didn't know findom or financial domin. I'm looking this thing up,
and I'm seeing these accounts whereas these like women or men,
gay men saying I will take all your money from
(01:47):
you and and I will leave you with nothing and
I will love it. You pay them to basically humiliate you.
And it's a shocking community. I can't believe that there
are things like that out there. And what we see
in this video is that he basically gets on the
(02:08):
laptop and pays him right in front of him. He's
demanded the gay prostitute, alleged gay prostitut, I should say,
demanded Glenn Greenwall go on his laptop and pay. You
see Glenn, who looks strung out, goes on the laptop,
starts typing away, pays him what looks like two thousand dollars,
shows him on the laptop that he did that and
(02:30):
you're seeing this all on camera, and I'm like, what
am I watching?
Speaker 2 (02:34):
By the way, Also, what I thought was kind of
weird was that Glenn Greenwald was following that account.
Speaker 1 (02:42):
Yes, there's been some screenshops of that.
Speaker 3 (02:44):
Ye, yes, yes, they're the ones that leaked to the video.
So was this whole.
Speaker 2 (02:48):
Thing part of the dominatrix humiliation?
Speaker 1 (02:53):
That's what's a lot of the theory is out there,
is that he when he retweets this, and like you said,
there's bread crumbs who said this in Partant one, there's
bread crumbs out there that kind of show that he
retweeted it, because you can see the responses to the
initial tweet and it includes Glenn Greenwald's name and the
reply part of it, and so you could see that
(03:15):
he retweeted it. He denied retweeting it, but he did
retweet it. And so he deflects tries to equate what
he's doing to what Trump has done in the past
and the depravity that Trump has been involved with, which
is basically infidelity, fidelity he achieved on his wife, and
you can't equate the two. First of all, you're talking
about infidelity in marriages. That goes back twenty sometimes thirty years, okay,
(03:40):
and Trump seems to have stabilized that aspect of his
life a very long time ago now. And he also,
you know, once again blamed him on having some relationship
with it jeff Jeffrey Epstein, which is not true. After
that information went out there, everybody stayed away from him.
He was a pariah in the social circles. But to
try to equate those two things, when you are coming
(04:03):
out straight and saying I am not embarrassed and I
have no regrets. Now, we spoke out about Trump when
all of this kind of stuff with Stormy Daniels kind
of went down, and him constantly getting in these kinds
of these positions to where he's left himself open to attack.
We condemned him a couple of years ago when this
stuff all came out and he was getting attacked legally
(04:25):
for that. Our listeners got mad that we came forward
on that.
Speaker 3 (04:29):
Yeah, we got a lot of heat for it.
Speaker 1 (04:30):
But he's trying to make a position it that we didn't.
We didn't have a problem with that, and we didn't
have our come to Jesus moment with all of that activity.
Speaker 2 (04:40):
I have a problem with that kind of behavior. I
don't care who's engaging in it. And I want to
know what Glenn Greenwall did, which is basically pay a prostitute,
allegedly prostitute for sex and do some illegal drugs with them.
How is that different than what Hunter Biden was doing.
Speaker 1 (04:57):
Yeah, it's not. Well, people will say, well, Glenn Greenwald's
dad isn't running for president. Okay, fine, but this man
has a huge prousting behavior. And is it consent when
you are Glenn Greenwald that has this enormous platform, He
has an enormous audience. I think he has close to
two million followers on Twitter alone. He has you know,
(05:18):
millions of followers on his other platforms and listeners and
what have you. Is it consensual with the kind of
power dynamic difference that is there in his country and
the kind of his ability to kind of destroy people
as you can see all of these crazed kind of
libertarian everything goes. If it's consensual personalities out there that
(05:39):
have come to his support, I don't know if there's
sense in that situation.
Speaker 3 (05:44):
There is consent, Yes, I believe that there is consent.
Speaker 2 (05:47):
There are two adult men engaging in behavior, But I
don't care if it's consensual, it's still disgusting.
Speaker 1 (05:55):
It's disgusting. It's disgusting, and he should be embarrassed because
he has children. And I mean, were the kids there.
I mean, he's creating his porn, the these porn videos.
Were his kids around.
Speaker 2 (06:07):
I don't know where the kids were, but I'll tell
you what. When we saw this video Friday night, before
we were going to bed, I said to Patrick, I'm
not gonna be able to sleep.
Speaker 3 (06:16):
This is going to give me nightmares. And it gave
me nightmares.
Speaker 1 (06:19):
A horror film. It's a horror film. It was a
horror film because the way you see him looking into
the camera and then you see you know, you've seen
him before on his like rumble shows or you know,
system update or whatever, and you see the look on
his face. At first, I thought this must.
Speaker 3 (06:32):
Be it's a blackmail.
Speaker 1 (06:33):
He's being black I think it was blackmail. I thought
he was being held hostage. I thought he was being
held hostage. I'm like, what's going on here? And then
that's what everybody kind of ran to. It's like, oh, okay,
it's blackmail, and you know it's it's the Jews or
it's the Zionist or it's the massad ors Israel, and
I'm like, he never said that in his response. He
never said that he was being blackmailed. Okay, So this
(06:56):
is the question. When you see something like this, can
you separate their activity behavior, this degenerate behavior, compartmentalize that,
and still trust their reporting.
Speaker 3 (07:10):
There are levels to behaviors, to good and bad behaviors.
Speaker 2 (07:17):
And for the most part, I can, if you're asking me,
I can. But in this case, I don't know if
I can. Every time I see him, I'm going to
be I'm going to remember, but.
Speaker 3 (07:29):
I don't know. I don't know that it has anything
to do is reporting for me.
Speaker 1 (07:34):
I don't really trust anyone. For me. What I do
is is I look at everybody's source material. The first
time I think he made an appearance through video clip
or through you know, like kind of media clips into
our show was his reporting on the Gaza war and
some of the falsehoods that either the Israeli media or
(07:55):
there Israel government we're putting out there. And I listened
to some of his reports on it, and then I
verified it. I verified it actually with Israeli media outlets
that we're also backing what he was saying. So my
position is always I check everybody out. I start from
a place of distrust when it comes to these kinds
of stories, and then I move from there. So as
(08:18):
far as his reporting goes, it won't change my opinion
on it because I'm going to check out everything anyways.
But for the public, the public doesn't have time to
look into everything. They just don't. You have to rely
on what these people are saying. In most cases, people
(08:39):
are busy. They have the other things to do. They
have family to raise, they have work to go to,
they have responsibilities in life.
Speaker 2 (08:45):
Yeah, so you find people that you trust and you
trust their word.
Speaker 1 (08:48):
But we have pattern recognition in our lives for a reason,
and it is a defense mechanism. And when you see
somebody acting like this that is so compromised, the things
that he was doing in this video tells you that
this wasn't his first time. To get to the level
to where you are slurping up a male prostitutes saliva
(09:11):
from the ground in a what looks like a schoolgirl costume,
like a trashy schoolgirl costume. The level to get to
that tells me something about your character. I'm sorry, it does.
And if that is your character and you're willing to
put that on camera, because that's part of the kink,
is to put it on camera, your judgment is not
(09:35):
going to be something that I want to place any
kind of credibility in. We are turning to these media
sources to find the truth. That's why we all turn
into media. I guess that's not entirely true. Some people
just like to hear the confirmation bias and what have you.
But in most cases, you turn to the media because
(09:56):
you are trying to get to the truth. And now
you see somebody that is this compromise, that is this
willing to be dominated and humiliated. I just don't think
that you could compartmentalize that kind of activity. I just
don't see it.
Speaker 3 (10:12):
You know. I have to say that, and I've said
this before on this show.
Speaker 2 (10:15):
I have a problem when two gay men adopt children
or you know, have them vi a surrogacy.
Speaker 3 (10:23):
I have a problem with that with Dave Ruben.
Speaker 2 (10:25):
I've had a problem with that with Glenn Greenwald, and
that that alone is enough for me that I don't
listen to. You know, Dave Ruben, We've had him on
the show We're not going to play that show, I
think ever again are we? And I don't follow Glenn
Greenwald either. Those kinds of things for me are too
much of a barrier for me to get past. So
(10:47):
I was already not there with them.
Speaker 1 (10:50):
So the most the biggest mask off thing of this
all was the all media's circling of the wagons around him. Okay,
you had a shocking number of people that came out
in his support. You had basically martyr Maide, which I
really enjoyed, their fear and loathing, his fear and loathing
(11:12):
in Darryl Cooper is his name. He put out a
podcast called Fear and Loathing in Jerusalem I think is
the title of it, and it was kind of tells
the story of Israel's founding and it's super long. I
want to say, it's like twenty plus hours something. In
those things, I didn't get through the entire thing. I
got through most of it, though very very long. It's
(11:32):
very long. It's interesting. But here he is. He comes
out and says that this is a character assassination. Okay,
how is it a character assassination? This wasn't a secret video,
and he retweeted it Okay, so how is this a
character assassination? So you have Martyr Maide come out and
say that kind of thing.
Speaker 2 (11:50):
I's assassinating his own character by.
Speaker 1 (11:53):
Retweeting yes, dude, yeah, And why use it character assassination
if he says there's no regrets.
Speaker 3 (11:57):
I he has no regrets. She's been embarrassed about it.
Speaker 1 (11:58):
So you have guys like him, So it makes me
question Martyr Maid's judgment. And there's a you're gonna see
a common thread here. Candice Owen's comes forward. She calls
him the most important and honest voice of our time. Okay,
you had James O'Keeffe come forward and say he's one
of the most he's one of the most legendary journalists
(12:19):
of all time. And he goes into this kind of
argument that leaking secretly recorded videos should not be done.
Coming from James O'Keeffe, that is just kind of a shocking,
shocking position. Okay, so that's James O'Keeffe. Ian Carroll comes forward,
calls Glenn Greenwald one of the best journalists of our time.
(12:42):
He blamed Israel with no evidence whatsoever. Megan Kelly comes
forward and says she loves and respects Glenn Greenwald, Russell
Brand gre Gleenwald is fantastic. Dave Smith says the greatest
journalist of the twenty first century is Glenn Greenwald, with
the exception of maybe Julian Assan, she says, Sagar and Jetti,
(13:06):
the guy from He's really popular on YouTube, says Greenwald
is a courageous warrior. Jake Shields, the UFC guy that's
fairly outspoken against Israel. One of the few journalists with
integrity as Glenn Greenwald. We already said Jason Whitlock. Charlie
Kirk calls him a free free speech warrior. What's going
on here.
Speaker 2 (13:25):
What's going on here is that if you hate Israel enough,
then I guess anything goes.
Speaker 1 (13:30):
And I think that's with most of the people.
Speaker 3 (13:32):
It feels like a common threat.
Speaker 1 (13:34):
I don't think that's the case with Charlie Kirk and
with Megan Kelly, but I think with the rest of
the people that I named, they are in war with
the Zionists and the pro Israel groups and it is
clouding their judgment. In my opinion, they and this is
the problem with Israel derangement syndrome. We have been critical
(13:57):
of some of these kind of attacks on free speech
on campuses, and some of these anti free speech laws
that have been tried to get passed here in the
United States. We have been critical of some of the
Gaza misinformation that was put out there by Israel at
the time of the attack, the terrible attacks. We were
(14:18):
critical about all of that, and there I think there
are things to legitimately criticize Israel over. But to allow
your hatred for a country to cloud your mind so
much that you allow people like Andrew Tait, and you
allow activities and behavior like Glenn Griedwald to go unquestioned
(14:40):
and uncritiqued, you should be looking in the mirror if
that is how much your fight with Israel is taking
such a paramount position in your thinking.
Speaker 2 (14:50):
I mean, to not be able to say, yeah, this
is obviously disgusting and super weird behavior. I mean, this
is not you know, your regular run of the mill
sexual behavior. It's just not to not be able to
say that is weird.
Speaker 1 (15:07):
So just shut up, Just don't say anything. Let the
guy talk himself, don't you know, circle the wagons like
this man is Joe Biden or Hunter Biden, and like
the Democrats and the legacy media did. I'm telling you,
the old media is becoming no better than the legacy
media in this realm, no better.
Speaker 2 (15:26):
I was just having a conversation with my mom about this,
and she said to me, you know, I told you
I didn't like that guy before, right, I told you
she thing's weird.
Speaker 1 (15:34):
She did that.
Speaker 2 (15:35):
She thinks it's weird that he lived in Brazil. She
didn't like the fact that he, you know, him and
this husband.
Speaker 3 (15:40):
Adopted two brothers. She thought that was strange.
Speaker 2 (15:43):
And then we started and then we got into the
Hunter Biden thing, right, like, how is it any different?
And I said to my mom, I have to say,
I think that what Glenn Greenwald did is more disgusting.
Speaker 3 (15:54):
And she said, I don't know about that.
Speaker 1 (15:57):
There's some miners, potentially some miners, is.
Speaker 2 (16:00):
She did say that, but there we don't know that
for sure. So all we're seeing is drug use constitutes.
Speaker 3 (16:07):
And on top of the levels of degregation.
Speaker 1 (16:09):
You have all of these people they went at Hunter
for years, all of these alt media people. They went
at Jeffrey Tuban, the Tuban guy from CNN who basically
got caught masturbating he thought on a zoom call. He
thought the camera was offre he thought he was out,
he gets caught masturbating. The alt media had a field
day with that. I didn't really care too much about
(16:32):
it. It was like it was kind of revealing, obviously, and
it was embarrassing, but they ran with it because anytime
there's something with political implications, they use it and without
any regard to hypocrisy.
Speaker 2 (16:46):
Yeah, but then again, let's go back to the levels
of degregation. Not as bad as the Hunter Biden stuff
Jeffery Tube and you know I would go Jeffrey Hunter Glenn, Yes, yes,
we have to be able to do that as a society.
Speaker 1 (16:59):
Or how about the Anthony Wiener stuff, I mean, in
the in the attacks on Anthony Wiener and yes.
Speaker 3 (17:05):
He was a minor. Yes, so that goes that's worse.
Speaker 1 (17:11):
But but what I'm saying here is is that people
are trying to make this seem like discussing this and
criticizing or judging Glenn Greenwald on his behavior that gets
leaked out into the public is somehow outside of the pale,
like you.
Speaker 3 (17:29):
Just can't wash all over again.
Speaker 1 (17:32):
People don't know what that is.
Speaker 3 (17:35):
Years ago, our.
Speaker 2 (17:36):
Daughter was in elementary school and they did a dance
about the Chumash Indians, and they learned about the Chumash Indians.
And one of the things that the Chumash do is
that right when their babies are born, they punch them
in the face to flatten out their noses. And when
the kids told this story, all the parents were horrified,
and the teacher said, no, no, no, don't judge. And
I was like, no, no, no, yes, we can judge.
Speaker 1 (17:58):
We told our daughter people it was the prime them
for the trans.
Speaker 3 (18:01):
Movement all one hundred percent.
Speaker 2 (18:03):
You're a lifestyle you're allowed to judge. You know, you
can have an opinion about this, and typically your first
knee jerk reaction is probably the correct one.
Speaker 1 (18:11):
So you have this common thread between you know, most
of these people, and they're being anti Israel, and that
is why they are defending Glenn at all costs, and
no matter what he says, they are defending him at
all costs because they are all part of their comrades
in their war against Israel and their war against Scionism.
(18:32):
But then you'll have the Megan Kelly's and the Charlie
Kirks of the world that came out in his defense.
And I want to get to why I think people
like that are defending Glenn Greenwold, and we'll talk about
that right after the break. You're listening to Red Pilled
America's Famboogie, and we're going to wrap up this discussion
about this Glenn Greenwald horrible disgusting video that went around
(18:57):
that he is not embarrassed by, He has no regrets,
and is society that we want? Is that something that
he wants for his kids? Is that something that we
want our kids to think is normal to bring a gay,
male prostitute home and let them humiliate you on camera.
Speaker 2 (19:18):
Or any type of prostitute. I don't care if it's
male or female. I mean there are levels, Like I
said before, but what the hell that's gross?
Speaker 1 (19:26):
And you know, do we want to live in a
world where all of your private at home things, even
things that you may have recorded, you want them put
out there in the world. No. But here's the thing.
It got out there. And this is a guy that
was critical in the release of the Snowden surveillance classified information.
(19:46):
So to talk about releasing things that shouldn't go out there,
the hootspa that it takes to take that position, I mean, yes,
I'm sure you feel violated because something that you filmed
at home in private got out there into the world.
But you you've done that, that's part of your stock
in trade. You were the critical person behind releasing the
(20:08):
Snowden's surveillance information. So you know, what are you talking about?
But why is it that guys like Charlie Kirk or
someone like Megan Kelly would come out and defend Glenn Greenwald.
And I think, you know, we're in Pride Month right now.
It just kicked off, and I think, what's going on here?
(20:29):
Is this a lot like you know, there's been a
lot of like complaints in Hollywood as there being a
gay mafia in Hollywood that will take you out if
you are anti gay in Hollywood, or you know, if
you put any kind of messages out there. You know,
mel Gibson has been attacked in the past and what
have you. Well, I got some news for conservative audiences
(20:51):
out there. There's a similar thing within the conservative media world.
Some of them are out in the open, like Dave Rubin,
some are not, some are closeted. And there is a
lot of gay media personalities within the conservative world that
are very have very big platforms. And I think that
(21:13):
is why you see somebody like Charlie Kirk and someone
like Megan Kelly coming forward is because they know that
they know that there is very influential gay media personalities
within the conservative movement, and so they want to be
careful with that topic and they don't want to alienate
those people, and they want to come out as kind
(21:33):
of open and inclusive. But there is a difference between
what Glenn Greenwald has done on camera and is proud
of and unashamed of. And at one point I want
to read something here for you guys where he actually
talks about being proud of the things that he has
done in his private life and somebody like Trump who
(21:56):
has maybe been unfaithful in the past. Well obviously, but
he's been unfaithful in the past, and he's been woman
is iSER and what have you. But there's a difference
between those two things. And he's also had his come
to Jesus moment and he's been married now, you know,
faithfully and happily for twenty years, and he seemed to
(22:16):
have left that life behind him and at least he's
not going to come out and support that kind of behavior.
Speaker 2 (22:22):
Well, I've never seen any gay porn of Trump that
I can confirm.
Speaker 1 (22:28):
But I think that that is what we're seeing with
these kinds of you know, circlings of the wagons. There's
no ever one reason why people come forward. You know,
there's been a lot of talk that there's a lot
of Gatar money running around in conservative media, and you know,
and people have been accused like Tucker Carlson who put
out an interview of Glenn Greenwald the day that this
(22:48):
story basically broke and talked about Jeffrey Ebstein and that
Glenn Greenwald was getting to the bottom of Glenn of
Jeffrey Ebstein. The absolute just the laughability of that. They
talk about the humiliation of the legacy media as this
guy releases a humiliation or he said he didn't release it,
(23:09):
but a video goes out there of his humiliation porn.
I mean, it's just it's the hypocrisy is so glaring.
I'm literally seeing exactly what we have been complaining about
with CNNMSNBC, ABC News, CBS News, all of them. You're
seeing that in this story and we've been talking about
(23:31):
this now for years. People get on our case about this,
Oh why you guys always beating up conservative media. This
is why we're supposed to be the answer to legacy media.
We are supposed to be correcting an institution that has
fallen apart, and trust in the institution has fallen apart,
and we are supposed to be creating an institution that
people can trust.
Speaker 2 (23:52):
This is why we're the friend List. We don't toe
the line, and we're never going to no, We're we're
going to say the truth. We're going to say it
like it is. By the way, you know who I
felt like had a good take once again, Interestingly.
Speaker 1 (24:04):
Milo Milo is the best on this kind of I.
Speaker 2 (24:07):
Say, Milo, you know, he he came correct on.
Speaker 1 (24:11):
This, you know, and he basically called out his I
guess his former husband that passed away from some weird
and gastro intestinal.
Speaker 3 (24:19):
Not Milo's husband, Glenn greenwalds.
Speaker 1 (24:21):
Milo talked about Glenn Greenwald's husband who passed away a
couple of years ago. He died of some kind of uh,
gastro intestinal infection.
Speaker 3 (24:30):
Oh, I thought he had cancer.
Speaker 1 (24:32):
Milo says that apparently, I don't know how to say this,
but I have to say it. Okay, he got some
kind of gastro intestinal infection and apparently one of the
primary ways to get that. There's like a few ways
that it's kind of common. It's through food, they're kind
of contaminated water. And another way is through fecal mouth transmission.
(24:55):
So in other words, a mouth coming into a.
Speaker 3 (24:57):
Contact with I feel like I need to take a shower.
Speaker 1 (24:59):
Feces, okay, or fecal particles.
Speaker 3 (25:03):
It's very dirty right now.
Speaker 1 (25:04):
I want to read this just to kind of underscore
this position that Glenn Greenwald is taking on his activity.
This is one of his listeners or one of his subscribers.
It's called Andrew Breitbart Clips. Kind of Weirdly, this person
says to Glenn, I am trying so hard to see
past the video, but the demonic eyes and meth pipe
really bother me more than the sexual deviance. Would love
(25:26):
to hear some acknowledgment of your use of this dangerous
brain altering drug or why that meth pipe was present.
If not used the way crack Myth impacts the brain
can absolutely impact your journalism, professional life, and as a subscriber,
I want to know if it is or not. Glenn
(25:47):
Greenwald responds, the point I've made from the start is
that the moral and ethical code I believe in for
my own life is one I am satisfied, and I
am fulfilling the fruits of my personal and professional life,
and the values they represent speak for themselves. I'm quite
proud of them. I'm quite proud of them, he says.
(26:07):
And I feel no obligation to confine myself to the
various moral codes others profess to believe in when it
comes to private behavior. So basically, he doesn't deny the
drug use, and he's proud of his personal life and
his personal behavior and his moral code. Okay, of which
this behavior is his moral code. So that alone is
(26:29):
kind of reason to believe that you can't trust everything
that comes out of his mouth when it comes to
his journalistic integrity. Is that somebody that's partaking in that
kind of behavior is going to have a skewed judgment
on the world. Period. It's just the way that it is.
I will say this, if he would have came forward
(26:50):
and said, you know what, I'm ashamed of what I've done.
As a father, I want to give an example to
my children, and as a public figure, I want to
put the right message out there, and I ask for
your guys's forgiveness. I shouldn't be doing this kind of
a thing. It is morally wrong. People would have moved on.
We probably wouldn't even be discussing this. It'd be like, oh,
(27:12):
I mean, this is kind of a funny, gross thing
that went around, but we would have left it at that.
And I still would have felt the same way about
having to check everything that he puts out there if
I want to use that as a news source. But
people are forgiving, People are willing to forgive, and we
have to have a society where you can be forgiven
(27:33):
for your transgressions. But he is doubling down and saying,
I'm good with this. This is my moral code, and
I'm fine with this. This is the way I live
my life, and I'm proud of the way I live
my life.
Speaker 2 (27:46):
And by the way, it's a way that he's been
living his life clearly for a long time. It's interesting
when these kinds of things come out, what you find
out about people. I did not know about Glenn's past
and his involvement in gay porn sites or with you know,
gay escort sites.
Speaker 3 (28:03):
I'm bothered by that. I don't like it. I think
it's disgusting.
Speaker 1 (28:05):
Yeah it is, and you know what.
Speaker 2 (28:06):
I'm glad to know it now because I'm not interested
in reporting anymore because of it.
Speaker 3 (28:11):
Sorry, but I'm not.
Speaker 1 (28:12):
So I would say, you know, in conclusion on this topic,
I would say this, you really have to hold your
media personalities to account. They have to be called out
on this. They could have just kept quiet. They could
have said that, you know, the kind of behavior that
he is proud of and that he is unembarrassed by
and has no regrets for is disgusting and we don't
(28:35):
want that in our community. They didn't do that. All
they did was heap praise on him. And these are
major personalities that I mentioned. We need to hold these
people accountable because now all we're going to end up
having is a legacy media and an alt legacy media,
and that's it, and that's what's formed right now. The
institution is completely breaking down. How do you trust people
(28:59):
when these are the kinds of people that they're willing
to align with the andrew Tates of the world. And
it's strange all of these people are doing it, All
of these people are aligning with these people. It's shocking
to me. They hate Israel that much that they can't
see past their nose and just condemned behavior that needs
(29:19):
to be condemned.
Speaker 2 (29:20):
I mean, listen, if there was a video of let's say,
for example, Megan Kelly doing this exact same thing, smoking
meth with a hired prostitute dressed like a little girl
being degraded, people would be horrified and disgusting. Yes, but
(29:41):
I feel like because he's gay, yes, it's provided him
almost a shield because people are afraid to say it
because they don't want to be called homophobes.
Speaker 1 (29:51):
There's this kind of mantra that went around about the
black community for years. It was kind of the prejudice
or the racism of low expectations. I think something like that. Yes,
and a lot of people on the left would have
low expectations for the black community, so they would let
certain kinds of behavior go by. And I'm seeing the
same exact thing with the gay community, especially if they
(30:14):
are conservative and gay. There's low expectations because of that.
Do you not expect these people to live normal lives?
I do, and I know that they can. They're capable
of that, So why can't we hold them to the
same standard that we would hold Megan Kelly if she
was caught with a meth pipe on a bed, with
a prostitute slipping up his saliva from the ground and
(30:37):
then paying him on for financial domination finndom. I mean,
of course, we would be horrified if Megan Kelly did that,
So why can't we be horrified if a gay man
is doing that. I mean, I expect more from the
gay community. I expect them to live decent lives. Yeah,
and so I think we need to call to account
(31:00):
all of these alt media personalities that came to his defense,
and they need to feel it, they need to feel it.
I admire many of these people, most of the people
that I have lumped into this group of people that
have come and circled the wagons around Glenn Greenwald. But
we cannot create an infrastructure, a media infrastructure that we
(31:22):
can trust if this is what we are building, If
we're going to build the same thing that the legacy
media has built that will not hold to account people
that are doing We're going to go backstage right now.
So join us at Redpilldamerica dot com if you want
(31:43):
to join the Fanbam Cook join the top menu. We're
going to talk about the Jeffrey Epstein suicide that Dan
Bongino said, never happened. I thought that was kind of
an interesting twist to this story. We're also going to
give an update on Tim Ballard and some of his
troubles now in Argentina. You guys are gonna want to
hear this. And finally we're gonna get into the Trump
(32:04):
court winds. He's had some big court wins this week.
Join us backstage at the Fan Bam Guys
Speaker 2 (32:12):
M
Hosts And Creators
Adryana Cortez
Patrick Courrielche
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
The Joe Rogan Experience
The official podcast of comedian Joe Rogan.
True Crime Tonight
If you eat, sleep, and breathe true crime, TRUE CRIME TONIGHT is serving up your nightly fix. Five nights a week, KT STUDIOS & iHEART RADIO invite listeners to pull up a seat for an unfiltered look at the biggest cases making headlines, celebrity scandals, and the trials everyone is watching. With a mix of expert analysis, hot takes, and listener call-ins, TRUE CRIME TONIGHT goes beyond the headlines to uncover the twists, turns, and unanswered questions that keep us all obsessed—because, at TRUE CRIME TONIGHT, there’s a seat for everyone. Whether breaking down crime scene forensics, scrutinizing serial killers, or debating the most binge-worthy true crime docs, True Crime Tonight is the fresh, fast-paced, and slightly addictive home for true crime lovers.