July 11, 2025 • 32 mins
Why did the Trump Administration make a 180 on the Epstein story? We continue our discussion on the conspiracy theory that doesn't want to go away. We also debunk a hoax story about the new Superman movie directed by James Gunn.
Support the show: https://redpilledamerica.com/support/
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:03):
This is Red Pilled America. You're listening to part two
of this week's Fambogie. Join the fambam Go to Redpilled
America dot com click join in the top menu. Have
you heard any audio documentary series like Red Pilled America?
(00:23):
Of course you have not. We're the only ones of
our kind. We need your support. There's a reason why
we're the only ones of our kind, because it is
very hard to produce storytelling shows. Please go to Red
Pilled America dot com and click join in the top menu.
We need you. So we're going to continue on with
this Epstein list fiasco and try to get a you know,
(00:46):
give you a little bit of an idea as to
how this all happened and what happened. So what just
happened with all this? But I first want to just
give you, guys an example of how conservatives you have
used this as clickbait throughout the years. You have a
cash battel in twenty twenty three. Who's now the FBI
(01:08):
director talking about this Epstein list in twenty twenty three.
Speaker 2 (01:12):
You know, it's the same thing with Epstein's list. It's like,
what the hell are these Republicans doing?
Speaker 3 (01:16):
Oh?
Speaker 4 (01:17):
I saw you give out. I saw you make news
this morning about that. I gotta get to that. You
say that the FBI has Epstein's list, they're sitting on it.
That doesn't seem like something you should do. You're protecting
the world's foremost predator. That seems like an evil thing
to do, regardless of who may be embarrassed in the
release of that list. Why is the FBI protecting the
(01:37):
largest scale pederist in human history?
Speaker 1 (01:39):
Okay, do you hear the premise that he's using right there?
He's the largest scale pederist in human history. That was
Benny Johnson, who's always the most accurate a social media
influencer there is out there. By the way, another Andrew
Tate hoster that gave him a very friendly platform and
(02:01):
connected him with Elena.
Speaker 5 (02:03):
Yeah.
Speaker 3 (02:03):
I really feel like people like Benny Johnson d c Draino.
I don't feel like they're any better than like your
CNN's You're Jake Tapperts. You know, these are people that
are just they're Charlotteans and they're duping their audience.
Speaker 1 (02:13):
It's the same exact thing.
Speaker 3 (02:15):
It's the same exact exact thing.
Speaker 1 (02:16):
Exactly why conservative media started to blossom was in response
to the CNNs of the world. You're going to get
a response to these people, all these people that kind
of got duped by this story that all these people
that's like this, Benny Johnson and d C. Draino, that
make a mistake and then they just kind of sweep
it under rug when they're caught. So this is cash
(02:37):
Betel going on with Bennie Johnson.
Speaker 2 (02:39):
Well, you don't think that Bill Gates is lobbying Congress.
We're night and day to prevent the disclosure of that list.
And why is it that the Senate?
Speaker 6 (02:48):
You know?
Speaker 2 (02:48):
And good for Senator Blackburn to try to get it out.
But then Dick Turbin comes over the top and says, no,
we're not going to release the names. I don't care
about the list itself. But if released the names, right,
what the hell of the House Republicans doing? They have
the majority. You can't get the list. You're going to
accept Dick Durbin's word or whoever that guy is, as
to who is on that list and who isn't, and
(03:08):
that a cannon can't be released. Put on your big
boy pants and let us know who the pedophiles are.
We have an election coming up, and we need to
adjudicate this matter of the polls.
Speaker 1 (03:18):
So that's Cash Battel before he became the FBI director.
Here's Dan Mangino in twenty twenty three, also talking about
the Epstein list and this Epstein story.
Speaker 6 (03:32):
Listen, that Jeffrey Epstein's story is a big deal. Please
do not let that story go. Keep your eye on this,
Catherine Rummler, I want you, we need to keep the
heat on this case. Folks. There are a lot of
people who are knee deep in the Washington swamp who
are not telling you the truth about serious allegations out
(03:52):
there that Epstein may have had video and audio of
people out there doing things they shouldn't have been doing.
And you should be asking yourself the question, how is
it that all these people, THEIA director, the Obama fixer,
Bill Clinton, all intersected, passed with Jeffrey Epstein. Jeffrey Epstein
isn't with us anymore, and nobody seems to want to
talk about it.
Speaker 1 (04:13):
Okay, So once again, this is Cash Battel and Dan
Bongino before they went into the White House. And I
want to kind of like make a little bit of
a correction here if I kind of got on this
the wrong way. Were they doing clickbait? Here was Cash
Battel and Dan Bungino doing clickbait? I don't know. I
don't know. I don't know them. I don't know either
one of them. They could have Genua Winley had these
(04:37):
opinions about the Epstein thing or felt that it needed
to be investigated. But then they went into the White
House and they looked into it and they said, no,
he killed himself. And the thing that they are in
charge of looking at is the looking to see if
there was actual a pedophile ring and were the elites
(04:59):
associated with it through some Epstein list. They looked at
it and they said, no, this is not correct. Okay,
And I have to give them applaud them because they're
going to get some heat on something like this. And
now there's people that are out there and I think
it's a fair point, but it's also kind of continues
the conspiracy theory going. But there's some people out there
(05:19):
are saying, okay, well, the FBI and the CIA and
all these kinds of intelligence agencies got rid of it
before these guys went into office, And that's possible. That's possible.
But at the same time, you have to kind of
trust these guys that had taken this one position before
they went in and now have looked at everything and
(05:39):
are seeing something different.
Speaker 3 (05:40):
Yeah, I mean, I don't consider Bongino or Cash Paatel
in the same category as some of those other influencers.
I really don't. I don't think that Dan Bongino is
a grifter and I don't think the Cash Patel is
a grifter either.
Speaker 1 (05:54):
Mean either. But you know, you do have people that
have been using this issue as kind of a rallying
cry or a political kind of attack against your opponents.
Here's Don Junior talking about this same issue.
Speaker 7 (06:07):
Well, is that that my father could be convicted of
thirty four crimes but no one on Epstein's list has
even been brought to light. How is I'm trying to
figure out how that's possible. Right, It's almost like they're
trying to protect those pedophiles for some reason. I can't
imagine why.
Speaker 1 (06:23):
Okay, So that's Don Junior, and you know there is
Trump himself talking about this Epstein issue. Bill Clinton, nice guy.
Speaker 8 (06:36):
Got a lot of problems coming up, in my opinion,
with the famous island with Jeffrey Epstein a lot of problems.
Speaker 4 (06:42):
You raised the question of Jeffrey Epstein in your remarks event.
Speaker 8 (06:44):
And he's got a problem. I don't think the problem
will be I don't know, but that island was really
a cesspool. There's no question about it. Just ask Prince Andrew,
he'll tell you about it. The island was an absolute cesspool. So,
and he's been there for many times. Well, I can't
say friends, but I know friendly.
Speaker 9 (07:02):
You know them.
Speaker 8 (07:03):
They play at my clubs a lot. I have clubs,
and everybody likes.
Speaker 9 (07:05):
To play a political problem for her.
Speaker 8 (07:07):
If she runs the president, it could be a political problem. Look,
he could be a political problem right now he's teflon and.
Speaker 1 (07:14):
Right now maybe not okay. So it was something that
he's been talking about for quite some time and using
to attack his political opponents. This is what I think happened.
And I want to play this clip from Bill O'Reilly.
From everything that I've ran across, I think Bill O'Reilly
has the best take on this. And here's Bill O'Reilly.
Speaker 5 (07:33):
I talked to President Trump man and man eye to
eye on Saint Patrick's Day about this and the Kennedy
files and the King files. It was all one conversation,
and he said, and I agree. There are a lot
of names associated with Epstein had nothing to do with
Epstein's conduct. They maybe had lunch with him, or maybe
had some correspondence for one thing or another. If that
(07:56):
name gets out, those people are destroyed because it's not
going to be any context. Media doesn't care about content,
so you can't do that. You can't destroy human beings
by putting out the files, whatever they may be.
Speaker 1 (08:11):
So that's Bill O'Reilly's take. And he says, and I
believe what he's saying here. He spoke to Trump about this,
and Trump said, you know, there's people that were associated
with this man. You put out his book and you're
going to see all these names in there, and there's
no connection to them being pedophiles or part of some
sex trafficking ring, but they're in his book.
Speaker 2 (08:33):
Yeah.
Speaker 3 (08:33):
And I mean, I think that Trump he put it
best when he said the island was a cesspool. It
was a cesspool of degeneracy, probably drugs, hookers, you know,
girls that were too young, but not little kids. Okay,
we're not talking four year old, five year old, six
year old, you know what I mean. They were not
(08:55):
trafficking children.
Speaker 5 (08:56):
There.
Speaker 3 (08:57):
There were dirty old men and probably a bunch of
hookers and a bunch of cocaine.
Speaker 1 (09:01):
I wonder if there's a lot of lube, you know,
if they had to like have the same supplier of
lube that.
Speaker 3 (09:07):
Yeah, baby, baby, yeah, yeah, yeah.
Speaker 1 (09:10):
He liked everything slick.
Speaker 4 (09:12):
By the way.
Speaker 1 (09:13):
We saw where that story went, and we called that
one as well too. This is why I think Bill
O'Reilly is correct. There's a little kind of known clip
that has not been making the rounds within conservative media
because they're all trying to basically paint Trump is kind
of backpedaling on a promise that he's made. Here's Trump
talking to Rachel Campost and this clip has not been
(09:35):
making the round so much. But this is but prior
to him winning the election. This is kind of his
thought process on releasing some of these files, like the
JFK files and some of these kinds of conspiracy theory
related topics and releasing those files. Here's Trump's response.
Speaker 3 (09:53):
Would you declassify the Epstein files?
Speaker 7 (09:56):
Yeah?
Speaker 8 (09:57):
Yeah, I would, all right, yes, I would. I think
that less so because you know, you don't know, if
you don't want to affect people's lives of its phony
stuff in there, because it's a lot of phony stuff with.
Speaker 4 (10:06):
That whole world.
Speaker 1 (10:08):
Okay, So there he is, he says it, you know,
like this is before he's in the White House, he's
talking about the Epstein files, and he gets in there,
he sees all of these names in these files that
have nothing to do with anything. And this is once
again a theory, and I tend to believe this is
what happened. He sees all of these names associated with
(10:29):
this man. Conservative influencers and conservative media has been painting
Jeffrey Epstein as the biggest You just heard Benny Johnson
say that the biggest pedophile ring organizer.
Speaker 3 (10:41):
In uh a pedophile?
Speaker 1 (10:44):
He said no, he said he was a pederass orchestrator
orchestrator of a pedophile ring that there is out there.
And so of course, if there's names that are completely
out of context within this man's file, it's going to
destroy these people's lives. I'm sure Trump has gotten a
lot of phone calls people are saying, oh, it's Trump's
(11:04):
name is in there well, including Elon Musk, by the way,
who ended up deleting that tweet. Trump was very open
about their relationship. There's pictures of them out there in
the world. So you know, you're seeing this problem now
with this alt media what I like to call outrage
media is that they have so much invested in this
(11:26):
that now they're taking it out on Trump. And I
think his popularity has been somewhat hit through this story
because their credibility has been hit now, you know. And
the fascinating thing you have like Patrick Bett, David all
these people that are speaking out about the fact that
this Epstein list hasn't been released, like they're so concerned
(11:46):
about child sex trafficking, yet they're all kind of chummy
with Andrew Tate. They gave him fluff interviews. I think
if Epstein was anything, he was kind of in the
realm of an Andrew Tate in that he was kind
of a pimp, kind of a guy that brought people around,
They connected them with hookers, that connected them with prostitutes,
(12:10):
and created these party environments on his island and in
his mansions and what have you. But this is what
happens when you rely on political hacks. Okay, I remember
back in the day when everybody was going at Obama.
This is what kind of stopped me from listening to
(12:31):
the media on a day to day basis. Was back
in the Obama timeframe. We had taken some major hits
by going at the Obama administration. You guys know that story.
We exposed his use of the National Endowment for the Arts.
It was a hatch violation. They initially said we were lying,
they apologized. We got way deep in this whole kind
(12:51):
of political investigation kind of world. Fast forward and then
people are going at Obama for golfing so much. Oh,
he's lazy, he's golfing all the time. And I'm watching
all of conservative media go at Obama for golfing all
the time, and I'm like, this man is working constantly.
(13:12):
There's very few people in the world that work as
much as a US president. Okay, if he wants to
go golf every once in a while, what is the
big deal? And so I at that time kind of
started to turn off political media. Sure enough, when Trump
comes around and he's in the White House, he's golfing
(13:33):
all the time. Nobody complains about that on conservative media.
This is what the business model is for this influencer
alt media crowd. It's outrage media. It's constantly pulling up
these things that are going to get you so riled up.
What's going to get you riled up? Well, prostitution and
(13:56):
some guy hiring prostitutes and bringing drugs to an island
and parting with elites. That's not going to get you going.
But children, sex slaves, that's going to get you going. Okay,
this is what we're seeing right now, and I'm telling
you it is a crisis in conservative media annult media,
because right now we have a little bit of attention
(14:18):
and a little bit of power and they're blowing it.
They're completely blowing it. And we're going to start to
see how this is going to start to bleed into
the social media platforms that have now kind of professed
free speech. You're going to start to see a blowback
on this. You're going to start to see the pendulum swing,
and we're going to get to that. Right after the break,
(14:44):
you're listening to Red Pilled America's fan Body. Keep an
eye out for What's an American The finale coming a
week from today, July eighteenth. So you know, Adrianna brought
up something during the break that I thought is kind
of an important point to bring up. Is some of
you guys are going to be upset by our take
(15:05):
on this. And you know, I don't want, we don't
mean to upset people, but it is our job too,
and we feel it is our obligation to get to
the truth on these kinds of things and tell you
guys the truth and no matter what the consequence is,
deliver the truth to you guys. The people that have
(15:28):
been kind of disillusioned by this Epstein's story, I'm sorry
that you got sucked in to this story and have
been following it for so many years only for it
to conclude in this way. It's kind of like what
the mainstream media did to liberal viewers with the entire
(15:49):
Russia collusion story. Yeah, and the Mulla report, the Mulla Report,
and it's going to deliver everything that they hoped for,
and it's going to show how Trump was completely compromised
by the Russians and that went on for years.
Speaker 3 (16:04):
I mean, these people are in the business of audience
capture and they will say and do anything to capture
your attention and to get your money.
Speaker 1 (16:12):
Yeah, and it's a business model that Abbey can't and
we can't. It's not in us to do it. And
it's the reason why you see these huge accounts like
Benny Johnson and these kinds of guys and DC Dreno,
where they are able to draw these enormous audiences because
they peddle these things and then the second that they're
all debunked, they just kind of move on to the
(16:34):
next thing and then they're pitching the public something else.
Speaker 3 (16:37):
Yeah, and we've said this before, it would have been
very very easy for us to go down that route,
considering that we launched this show you know, about a
guy that was getting in bed with other people's children
in Hollywood, and believe us, we were in the belly
of the beast. We were there with all of the
Hollywood executives, the show runners, the people running the studios,
(17:01):
a list celebrities.
Speaker 1 (17:02):
We were there very clear when we told that story
that everybody was on our side. All those people were
on our side until they heard that we were conservatives,
But before then they were just as aghast as we
were by a guy getting in bed with other people's kids. Okay,
if this was some like crazed child pedophiles out there
(17:22):
like within all of Hollywood, we would have seen it
and we would have seen their response and being okay
with that. They weren't okay with that, but they were
more afraid of conservatives and getting that stink on them
could mean for their careers. So they you know, pushed
us away because of that. But that does not mean that,
you know, there's child pedophile rings all over the place.
(17:46):
And please hear us out on this. Look and see
what we did with the Sound of Freedom thing. Look
and see how we've covered this topic. We have done
years and years of research on it, and every time
we get proven right.
Speaker 3 (17:59):
Yeah, And what I will tell you was going on there.
What was going on going on a lot was a
lot of drugs, a lot of you know, sexual deviance,
a lot of degenerates, a lot of people having affairs,
sleeping with that person, you know, this woman sleeping with
this young guy that works for her on this show.
(18:19):
A lot of that's going on, for sure, But child
sex trafficking zero.
Speaker 1 (18:24):
And this is kind of how this how I really
feel that alternative media and conservative media and however you
want to brand it, this alt media world is failing
their audiences. This recent story now that's been coming out,
this Superman story, the Superman movie that's going to be
launching a story came out this past week and the
(18:46):
headlines were kind of your standard, Oh, this is going
to be a woke movie. Variety put out a story
on this. It says Variety says, James Gunn claims Superman
is about an immigrant. So you read that headline from
Variety and you immediately think, oh my god, this thing
is going to be as woke as snow White. And
(19:06):
they're already tanking the movie. Of course, outrage media starts
going at it. You have John Root, who's kind of
a culture commentator, guy in sports in Hollywood, and he says,
the worst thing Superman, James Gunn and anyone involved in
this movie could have done is make this movie political.
The choice of words from gun calling Superman an immigrant
(19:30):
story is a pr nightmare. Why even compare or give
the idea that you're comparing Superman to illegal immigrants being
deported by Ice? Why so I see this story and
I'm starting to see it take shape. You have Stephen Miller,
a writer for I believe it's, you know, Red State
(19:50):
or one of those guys. Superman isn't an immigrant, He's
an orphan. The fact they can spend three hundred million
dollars in a film and can't get this very basic
concept correct. Really is something. And this goes down the
line and you have Fox News as a chiron that
says a super woke, iconic hero movie to embrace pro
immigrant themes. Here's the thing. It's like they didn't even
(20:13):
read the original article where this quote came from. It
came from the Times of London, Okay. And you go
and you actually read the article and you see that
the journalist that's asking James Gunn, who's the director of Superman,
he's trying to make it political. The reporter is not
(20:35):
James Gunn, so he tries to basically connect the fact
that Superman was created by I believe, two Jews, and
the reporter tries to connect that fact to this immigrant issue,
and James Gunn kind of says, Okay, yeah, I guess
you know, you could kind of say that Superman was
an immigrant, but what this story is really about. He
(20:57):
kind of deflects the question, Like anybody that's smart, that
has a three hundred million dollar franchise under his belt
and is about to do more of these series, he deflects.
And here's a perfect example of how he deflects once again,
Variety in the Hollywood media are trying to basically make
(21:18):
this into a political issue. Here is James Gunn talking
to somebody from Variety and how he deflected this question
about it being an immigrant movie.
Speaker 9 (21:31):
You said, it's an immigrant story, it's a political movie.
Maga today is going nuts. What do you have to
say to Maga? I have anything else. I think this
movie's for everybody. I don't have anything to.
Speaker 7 (21:41):
Say to anybody, like I'm not here to judge people,
you know, you know, I think this is a movie
about kindness, and I think that's something everyone can relate to.
Speaker 1 (21:51):
So he did a very Jeames gun Yeah, he's really
right right here right now. Yeah, what does that means
that we are no a you kidding me? I still
look and you still look like we're at least thirty
two in our thirty two two inch we haven't aged
a bit.
Speaker 3 (22:07):
Only everybody else's Yeah, your eyesight's clearly going.
Speaker 1 (22:12):
So but there he is, kind of once again trying
to get goaded by a variety. He went, had the
same thing happen with the Times of London. Hollywood Reporter
runs with it, so it's deadline like all the thing.
Speaker 3 (22:23):
He's just trying not to get fired again.
Speaker 1 (22:25):
Exactly exactly. And by the way, I don't like this
guy's politics. I don't you know he's he's done and
said some kind of jokes that I don't align with.
I would never put it, I would bear into the world.
But the truth be told, this guy we hate him too.
He is not. He did not try to make this
a political movie. He did not try to make it
(22:47):
into a movie about immigrants. It was the reporters that
were pushing it in this direction. And this is what
reporters do, especially entertainment news reporters, And this is the goal. Okay,
because you wouldn't wonder why why would they do this,
why would they want to turn off fifty percent of
the US population from going to seeing this huge, big
(23:11):
tent franchise. Well, this is why. If they turn conservatives off,
if they turn you off from these kinds of movies,
from Hollywood films, they turned you off from storytelling. And
then you never go down that path. You don't try
to become a storyteller, you don't try to create that
kind of content. You don't go to the movies and
(23:33):
support other storytellers that might align with your views. Because
you view all of Hollywood as this woke industry that
hates you, that's going to sucker punch you every time
you go to the movies. All right, this is why
the Hollywood media and the Hollywood journalists do this. It's
to basically make you feel like this is not a
(23:55):
realm for you, so stay away from it. And it's
been working for decades. Conservatives have been staying away from storytelling.
They've been slowly going away from the movies. They have
not been getting involved in that business, going into screenwriting,
getting their kids to go into screenwriting and acting and
storytelling and creating basically the thing that creates American culture. Okay,
(24:19):
they have been discouraging you from doing all of those
things by using this very tactic. This is not your place,
guy's stay away. And when you actually look at this story,
you actually see something completely different. He was not trying
to make it political. It would actually be completely foolish
for a man, for a director at his level to
make this a political play with a movie like Superman.
(24:42):
And by the way, this movie's gonna kill it in
the box office, I think because it super Dog.
Speaker 3 (24:48):
Well, I'm all about the super dogs.
Speaker 1 (24:49):
Reports are that it's not even like woke like people
are going to see it, including conservatives. They're saying, this
whole thing about immigrants is this world.
Speaker 3 (24:56):
And by the way, the tactic of you know, keeping
us away, that's a tactic that worked on us for
a time as well, for a very long turned off
on by it. But you know what, there's been an
evolution and a growth, and now we're on the other
end of it. Yes, and we're not going to stop.
We're not going to stop. We're going to continue to
tell stories here.
Speaker 1 (25:13):
And we're going to keep pushing that. We are going to.
Speaker 3 (25:16):
Keep encouraging you to also create art.
Speaker 1 (25:19):
Yes, we are the vanguard of this movement. We have
been now for many many years, before we even launched
Red Pilled America, we've been arguing for the power of
storytelling and for conservatives to not walk away from it
and to find middle ground with some of these people
and to understand this art form and this human condition
(25:41):
that can be conveyed through stories. It's really really important.
And I'm just so frustrated with alt media and the
way they've been going. And you're starting to see this
play out now, you're seeing now trouble at X you
have GROC, which is their AI tool, has been kind
of going rogue.
Speaker 3 (25:59):
It's totally been going round.
Speaker 1 (26:01):
I think they kind of turned off a filled her
on it and it came out as mecha Hitler.
Speaker 3 (26:07):
That's crazy.
Speaker 1 (26:08):
And it started answering questions in the personality of what
he was calling himself or it was calling itself as
mecha Hitler, and it was kind of shocking some of
the responses that he was getting very anti Semitic in
some responses. I actually noticed this last week when I
went on GROC and I was asking it some questions
and it kind of gives bullet points. A lot of
(26:29):
the times when you're like within a thread or you're
on a post and you just kind of hit the
grock button and it gives you three bullet points, and
the first one kind of explains what the posts about,
the second one gives you context, and the third one
kind of gives you conclusion, and the third one in
this sense, in this time that I tried, it was
completely unrelated to the post, and I thought, WHOA, this
(26:50):
is weird. It's like something's up with the algorithm. It's
completely breaking down right now because it gave me something
that had absolutely nothing to do with the post itself,
and then all this mecha Hitler stuff started to come out.
Well you know this, these kind of crazy responses, and
people are prompting it. They're kind of like, you know,
poking the bear a little bit. Well, it turns out
(27:13):
that Linda I'm going to butcher her last name, Yacharino.
She was the CEO of X. She resigned and it
was literally right in the wake of this whole kind
of Grock debacle, and it just this is the kind
of thing that I'm I want to get out there
to you guys that something that we need to be
(27:35):
concerned about is that once you're given a little bit
of power. We only have a couple of years right
now with this MAGA movement in charge in Washington, DC.
You need to use that power wisely, and you need
to use it with some kind of a moral backbone, Okay,
and don't spread lies out there, and don't you know,
(27:58):
politicize things that shouldn't be or don't need to be politicized.
The whole idea of alt media was creating an answer
to the legacy media's lies. But you don't counter those
with more lies or lies that you want to hear, okay,
And so I think at the end of the day,
we feel an obligation as somebody that's kind of have
(28:22):
a connection way back to the Breitbart days. You know,
we did Breitbart's first big national story. We've been there
from a very very early days. We feel an obligation
to call out conservative media and alt media when it
starts to go astray, because we are supposed to be
the answer to legacy media. All right, we need a
(28:45):
functioning media institution. The United States founders relied on that.
It's the reason why it's the first Amendment, Okay, because
that's how important it was. So don't take us as
being like kind of, oh, you guys are always ready
to kind of beat up the right. No, you have
(29:07):
enough people beating up the mainstream media and the legacy media.
We have been doing that for fifteen years or more now.
But at the same time, we cannot criticize the legacy
media and not criticize alt media when they make their mistakes.
And we're going to continue to do that, And I
hope that you continue on this journey with us, because
(29:30):
we think that it's an important part of correcting this
media institution.
Speaker 3 (29:36):
You know what, we hate the liars.
Speaker 1 (29:38):
Yeah, we're not.
Speaker 3 (29:39):
Absolutely hate the liars that purposefully mislead the audience for
clickbait and to line their pockets. I just I can't
stand for it.
Speaker 1 (29:52):
Well, and this is why they're not coming up with solutions. Okay,
they've figured out a standard human trait, outrage. Outrage is
going to drive you to click. It's going to make
you come back. You're going to hear what you want
to hear. You're going to all your biases are being
(30:12):
fulfilled by these people, and it makes them money. But
you know what it doesn't do. It doesn't provide you
any solutions. It doesn't provide you any solutions on how
to deal with your daily life, how to deal with
your kids, how to deal with with making a better
culture both locally and nationally. Like, it doesn't provide you
(30:34):
any of that. You know, it's the same thing that
all of them complain about. You're a victim in their eyes,
You're a victim of all of these media elites and
Hollywood and all of these kinds of things. They continue
to push the same victim ideology, but just with a
different spin. They don't provide solutions but if you're looking
for the truth, you and you want to find the
(30:56):
truth that is solution based, and that's what Red Pilled
America is about.
Speaker 3 (31:02):
It is, you know what, one thing to add I
think a lot of people kind of look at us
as political commentators, but that's not what we are at
the end of the day. What we are is we're creatives.
We're storytellers, and we're looking to leave the world a
better place of telling beautiful stories that can help people. Yes,
you know, I don't want to put out negativity or
(31:24):
ugliness into the world. There's enough of that and I
just cannot stand the people are that are doing that
for clickbait. It is very, very disappointing. It is always
going to call out those people, whether it's on the
left or the right.
Speaker 1 (31:42):
That's it for this week's edition of Famboogie. Please keep
an eye out for What's an American. It's going to
be coming out a week from today, July eighteenth. Keep
your eye out, please share it. We need your guys support.
Go to Redpilled America dot com, click join in the
top menu, become a fan band member. Story te Killing
(32:03):
is what creates culture. It is so important and we
need you guys support in our mission. Thanks everybody, enjoy
the rest of your week.
Speaker 5 (32:11):
Bye.
Speaker 3 (32:11):
Everyone.
This is Red Pilled America. You're listening to part two
of this week's Fambogie. Join the fambam Go to Redpilled
America dot com click join in the top menu. Have
you heard any audio documentary series like Red Pilled America?
(00:23):
Of course you have not. We're the only ones of
our kind. We need your support. There's a reason why
we're the only ones of our kind, because it is
very hard to produce storytelling shows. Please go to Red
Pilled America dot com and click join in the top menu.
We need you. So we're going to continue on with
this Epstein list fiasco and try to get a you know,
(00:46):
give you a little bit of an idea as to
how this all happened and what happened. So what just
happened with all this? But I first want to just
give you, guys an example of how conservatives you have
used this as clickbait throughout the years. You have a
cash battel in twenty twenty three. Who's now the FBI
(01:08):
director talking about this Epstein list in twenty twenty three.
Speaker 2 (01:12):
You know, it's the same thing with Epstein's list. It's like,
what the hell are these Republicans doing?
Speaker 3 (01:16):
Oh?
Speaker 4 (01:17):
I saw you give out. I saw you make news
this morning about that. I gotta get to that. You
say that the FBI has Epstein's list, they're sitting on it.
That doesn't seem like something you should do. You're protecting
the world's foremost predator. That seems like an evil thing
to do, regardless of who may be embarrassed in the
release of that list. Why is the FBI protecting the
(01:37):
largest scale pederist in human history?
Speaker 1 (01:39):
Okay, do you hear the premise that he's using right there?
He's the largest scale pederist in human history. That was
Benny Johnson, who's always the most accurate a social media
influencer there is out there. By the way, another Andrew
Tate hoster that gave him a very friendly platform and
(02:01):
connected him with Elena.
Speaker 5 (02:03):
Yeah.
Speaker 3 (02:03):
I really feel like people like Benny Johnson d c Draino.
I don't feel like they're any better than like your
CNN's You're Jake Tapperts. You know, these are people that
are just they're Charlotteans and they're duping their audience.
Speaker 1 (02:13):
It's the same exact thing.
Speaker 3 (02:15):
It's the same exact exact thing.
Speaker 1 (02:16):
Exactly why conservative media started to blossom was in response
to the CNNs of the world. You're going to get
a response to these people, all these people that kind
of got duped by this story that all these people
that's like this, Benny Johnson and d C. Draino, that
make a mistake and then they just kind of sweep
it under rug when they're caught. So this is cash
(02:37):
Betel going on with Bennie Johnson.
Speaker 2 (02:39):
Well, you don't think that Bill Gates is lobbying Congress.
We're night and day to prevent the disclosure of that list.
And why is it that the Senate?
Speaker 6 (02:48):
You know?
Speaker 2 (02:48):
And good for Senator Blackburn to try to get it out.
But then Dick Turbin comes over the top and says, no,
we're not going to release the names. I don't care
about the list itself. But if released the names, right,
what the hell of the House Republicans doing? They have
the majority. You can't get the list. You're going to
accept Dick Durbin's word or whoever that guy is, as
to who is on that list and who isn't, and
(03:08):
that a cannon can't be released. Put on your big
boy pants and let us know who the pedophiles are.
We have an election coming up, and we need to
adjudicate this matter of the polls.
Speaker 1 (03:18):
So that's Cash Battel before he became the FBI director.
Here's Dan Mangino in twenty twenty three, also talking about
the Epstein list and this Epstein story.
Speaker 6 (03:32):
Listen, that Jeffrey Epstein's story is a big deal. Please
do not let that story go. Keep your eye on this,
Catherine Rummler, I want you, we need to keep the
heat on this case. Folks. There are a lot of
people who are knee deep in the Washington swamp who
are not telling you the truth about serious allegations out
(03:52):
there that Epstein may have had video and audio of
people out there doing things they shouldn't have been doing.
And you should be asking yourself the question, how is
it that all these people, THEIA director, the Obama fixer,
Bill Clinton, all intersected, passed with Jeffrey Epstein. Jeffrey Epstein
isn't with us anymore, and nobody seems to want to
talk about it.
Speaker 1 (04:13):
Okay, So once again, this is Cash Battel and Dan
Bongino before they went into the White House. And I
want to kind of like make a little bit of
a correction here if I kind of got on this
the wrong way. Were they doing clickbait? Here was Cash
Battel and Dan Bungino doing clickbait? I don't know. I
don't know. I don't know them. I don't know either
one of them. They could have Genua Winley had these
(04:37):
opinions about the Epstein thing or felt that it needed
to be investigated. But then they went into the White
House and they looked into it and they said, no,
he killed himself. And the thing that they are in
charge of looking at is the looking to see if
there was actual a pedophile ring and were the elites
(04:59):
associated with it through some Epstein list. They looked at
it and they said, no, this is not correct. Okay,
And I have to give them applaud them because they're
going to get some heat on something like this. And
now there's people that are out there and I think
it's a fair point, but it's also kind of continues
the conspiracy theory going. But there's some people out there
(05:19):
are saying, okay, well, the FBI and the CIA and
all these kinds of intelligence agencies got rid of it
before these guys went into office, And that's possible. That's possible.
But at the same time, you have to kind of
trust these guys that had taken this one position before
they went in and now have looked at everything and
(05:39):
are seeing something different.
Speaker 3 (05:40):
Yeah, I mean, I don't consider Bongino or Cash Paatel
in the same category as some of those other influencers.
I really don't. I don't think that Dan Bongino is
a grifter and I don't think the Cash Patel is
a grifter either.
Speaker 1 (05:54):
Mean either. But you know, you do have people that
have been using this issue as kind of a rallying
cry or a political kind of attack against your opponents.
Here's Don Junior talking about this same issue.
Speaker 7 (06:07):
Well, is that that my father could be convicted of
thirty four crimes but no one on Epstein's list has
even been brought to light. How is I'm trying to
figure out how that's possible. Right, It's almost like they're
trying to protect those pedophiles for some reason. I can't
imagine why.
Speaker 1 (06:23):
Okay, So that's Don Junior, and you know there is
Trump himself talking about this Epstein issue. Bill Clinton, nice guy.
Speaker 8 (06:36):
Got a lot of problems coming up, in my opinion,
with the famous island with Jeffrey Epstein a lot of problems.
Speaker 4 (06:42):
You raised the question of Jeffrey Epstein in your remarks event.
Speaker 8 (06:44):
And he's got a problem. I don't think the problem
will be I don't know, but that island was really
a cesspool. There's no question about it. Just ask Prince Andrew,
he'll tell you about it. The island was an absolute cesspool. So,
and he's been there for many times. Well, I can't
say friends, but I know friendly.
Speaker 9 (07:02):
You know them.
Speaker 8 (07:03):
They play at my clubs a lot. I have clubs,
and everybody likes.
Speaker 9 (07:05):
To play a political problem for her.
Speaker 8 (07:07):
If she runs the president, it could be a political problem. Look,
he could be a political problem right now he's teflon and.
Speaker 1 (07:14):
Right now maybe not okay. So it was something that
he's been talking about for quite some time and using
to attack his political opponents. This is what I think happened.
And I want to play this clip from Bill O'Reilly.
From everything that I've ran across, I think Bill O'Reilly
has the best take on this. And here's Bill O'Reilly.
Speaker 5 (07:33):
I talked to President Trump man and man eye to
eye on Saint Patrick's Day about this and the Kennedy
files and the King files. It was all one conversation,
and he said, and I agree. There are a lot
of names associated with Epstein had nothing to do with
Epstein's conduct. They maybe had lunch with him, or maybe
had some correspondence for one thing or another. If that
(07:56):
name gets out, those people are destroyed because it's not
going to be any context. Media doesn't care about content,
so you can't do that. You can't destroy human beings
by putting out the files, whatever they may be.
Speaker 1 (08:11):
So that's Bill O'Reilly's take. And he says, and I
believe what he's saying here. He spoke to Trump about this,
and Trump said, you know, there's people that were associated
with this man. You put out his book and you're
going to see all these names in there, and there's
no connection to them being pedophiles or part of some
sex trafficking ring, but they're in his book.
Speaker 2 (08:33):
Yeah.
Speaker 3 (08:33):
And I mean, I think that Trump he put it
best when he said the island was a cesspool. It
was a cesspool of degeneracy, probably drugs, hookers, you know,
girls that were too young, but not little kids. Okay,
we're not talking four year old, five year old, six
year old, you know what I mean. They were not
(08:55):
trafficking children.
Speaker 5 (08:56):
There.
Speaker 3 (08:57):
There were dirty old men and probably a bunch of
hookers and a bunch of cocaine.
Speaker 1 (09:01):
I wonder if there's a lot of lube, you know,
if they had to like have the same supplier of
lube that.
Speaker 3 (09:07):
Yeah, baby, baby, yeah, yeah, yeah.
Speaker 1 (09:10):
He liked everything slick.
Speaker 4 (09:12):
By the way.
Speaker 1 (09:13):
We saw where that story went, and we called that
one as well too. This is why I think Bill
O'Reilly is correct. There's a little kind of known clip
that has not been making the rounds within conservative media
because they're all trying to basically paint Trump is kind
of backpedaling on a promise that he's made. Here's Trump
talking to Rachel Campost and this clip has not been
(09:35):
making the round so much. But this is but prior
to him winning the election. This is kind of his
thought process on releasing some of these files, like the
JFK files and some of these kinds of conspiracy theory
related topics and releasing those files. Here's Trump's response.
Speaker 3 (09:53):
Would you declassify the Epstein files?
Speaker 7 (09:56):
Yeah?
Speaker 8 (09:57):
Yeah, I would, all right, yes, I would. I think
that less so because you know, you don't know, if
you don't want to affect people's lives of its phony
stuff in there, because it's a lot of phony stuff with.
Speaker 4 (10:06):
That whole world.
Speaker 1 (10:08):
Okay, So there he is, he says it, you know,
like this is before he's in the White House, he's
talking about the Epstein files, and he gets in there,
he sees all of these names in these files that
have nothing to do with anything. And this is once
again a theory, and I tend to believe this is
what happened. He sees all of these names associated with
(10:29):
this man. Conservative influencers and conservative media has been painting
Jeffrey Epstein as the biggest You just heard Benny Johnson
say that the biggest pedophile ring organizer.
Speaker 3 (10:41):
In uh a pedophile?
Speaker 1 (10:44):
He said no, he said he was a pederass orchestrator
orchestrator of a pedophile ring that there is out there.
And so of course, if there's names that are completely
out of context within this man's file, it's going to
destroy these people's lives. I'm sure Trump has gotten a
lot of phone calls people are saying, oh, it's Trump's
(11:04):
name is in there well, including Elon Musk, by the way,
who ended up deleting that tweet. Trump was very open
about their relationship. There's pictures of them out there in
the world. So you know, you're seeing this problem now
with this alt media what I like to call outrage
media is that they have so much invested in this
(11:26):
that now they're taking it out on Trump. And I
think his popularity has been somewhat hit through this story
because their credibility has been hit now, you know. And
the fascinating thing you have like Patrick Bett, David all
these people that are speaking out about the fact that
this Epstein list hasn't been released, like they're so concerned
(11:46):
about child sex trafficking, yet they're all kind of chummy
with Andrew Tate. They gave him fluff interviews. I think
if Epstein was anything, he was kind of in the
realm of an Andrew Tate in that he was kind
of a pimp, kind of a guy that brought people around,
They connected them with hookers, that connected them with prostitutes,
(12:10):
and created these party environments on his island and in
his mansions and what have you. But this is what
happens when you rely on political hacks. Okay, I remember
back in the day when everybody was going at Obama.
This is what kind of stopped me from listening to
(12:31):
the media on a day to day basis. Was back
in the Obama timeframe. We had taken some major hits
by going at the Obama administration. You guys know that story.
We exposed his use of the National Endowment for the Arts.
It was a hatch violation. They initially said we were lying,
they apologized. We got way deep in this whole kind
(12:51):
of political investigation kind of world. Fast forward and then
people are going at Obama for golfing so much. Oh,
he's lazy, he's golfing all the time. And I'm watching
all of conservative media go at Obama for golfing all
the time, and I'm like, this man is working constantly.
(13:12):
There's very few people in the world that work as
much as a US president. Okay, if he wants to
go golf every once in a while, what is the
big deal? And so I at that time kind of
started to turn off political media. Sure enough, when Trump
comes around and he's in the White House, he's golfing
(13:33):
all the time. Nobody complains about that on conservative media.
This is what the business model is for this influencer
alt media crowd. It's outrage media. It's constantly pulling up
these things that are going to get you so riled up.
What's going to get you riled up? Well, prostitution and
(13:56):
some guy hiring prostitutes and bringing drugs to an island
and parting with elites. That's not going to get you going.
But children, sex slaves, that's going to get you going. Okay,
this is what we're seeing right now, and I'm telling
you it is a crisis in conservative media annult media,
because right now we have a little bit of attention
(14:18):
and a little bit of power and they're blowing it.
They're completely blowing it. And we're going to start to
see how this is going to start to bleed into
the social media platforms that have now kind of professed
free speech. You're going to start to see a blowback
on this. You're going to start to see the pendulum swing,
and we're going to get to that. Right after the break,
(14:44):
you're listening to Red Pilled America's fan Body. Keep an
eye out for What's an American The finale coming a
week from today, July eighteenth. So you know, Adrianna brought
up something during the break that I thought is kind
of an important point to bring up. Is some of
you guys are going to be upset by our take
(15:05):
on this. And you know, I don't want, we don't
mean to upset people, but it is our job too,
and we feel it is our obligation to get to
the truth on these kinds of things and tell you
guys the truth and no matter what the consequence is,
deliver the truth to you guys. The people that have
(15:28):
been kind of disillusioned by this Epstein's story, I'm sorry
that you got sucked in to this story and have
been following it for so many years only for it
to conclude in this way. It's kind of like what
the mainstream media did to liberal viewers with the entire
(15:49):
Russia collusion story. Yeah, and the Mulla report, the Mulla Report,
and it's going to deliver everything that they hoped for,
and it's going to show how Trump was completely compromised
by the Russians and that went on for years.
Speaker 3 (16:04):
I mean, these people are in the business of audience
capture and they will say and do anything to capture
your attention and to get your money.
Speaker 1 (16:12):
Yeah, and it's a business model that Abbey can't and
we can't. It's not in us to do it. And
it's the reason why you see these huge accounts like
Benny Johnson and these kinds of guys and DC Dreno,
where they are able to draw these enormous audiences because
they peddle these things and then the second that they're
all debunked, they just kind of move on to the
(16:34):
next thing and then they're pitching the public something else.
Speaker 3 (16:37):
Yeah, and we've said this before, it would have been
very very easy for us to go down that route,
considering that we launched this show you know, about a
guy that was getting in bed with other people's children
in Hollywood, and believe us, we were in the belly
of the beast. We were there with all of the
Hollywood executives, the show runners, the people running the studios,
(17:01):
a list celebrities.
Speaker 1 (17:02):
We were there very clear when we told that story
that everybody was on our side. All those people were
on our side until they heard that we were conservatives,
But before then they were just as aghast as we
were by a guy getting in bed with other people's kids. Okay,
if this was some like crazed child pedophiles out there
(17:22):
like within all of Hollywood, we would have seen it
and we would have seen their response and being okay
with that. They weren't okay with that, but they were
more afraid of conservatives and getting that stink on them
could mean for their careers. So they you know, pushed
us away because of that. But that does not mean that,
you know, there's child pedophile rings all over the place.
(17:46):
And please hear us out on this. Look and see
what we did with the Sound of Freedom thing. Look
and see how we've covered this topic. We have done
years and years of research on it, and every time
we get proven right.
Speaker 3 (17:59):
Yeah, And what I will tell you was going on there.
What was going on going on a lot was a
lot of drugs, a lot of you know, sexual deviance,
a lot of degenerates, a lot of people having affairs,
sleeping with that person, you know, this woman sleeping with
this young guy that works for her on this show.
(18:19):
A lot of that's going on, for sure, But child
sex trafficking zero.
Speaker 1 (18:24):
And this is kind of how this how I really
feel that alternative media and conservative media and however you
want to brand it, this alt media world is failing
their audiences. This recent story now that's been coming out,
this Superman story, the Superman movie that's going to be
launching a story came out this past week and the
(18:46):
headlines were kind of your standard, Oh, this is going
to be a woke movie. Variety put out a story
on this. It says Variety says, James Gunn claims Superman
is about an immigrant. So you read that headline from
Variety and you immediately think, oh my god, this thing
is going to be as woke as snow White. And
(19:06):
they're already tanking the movie. Of course, outrage media starts
going at it. You have John Root, who's kind of
a culture commentator, guy in sports in Hollywood, and he says,
the worst thing Superman, James Gunn and anyone involved in
this movie could have done is make this movie political.
The choice of words from gun calling Superman an immigrant
(19:30):
story is a pr nightmare. Why even compare or give
the idea that you're comparing Superman to illegal immigrants being
deported by Ice? Why so I see this story and
I'm starting to see it take shape. You have Stephen Miller,
a writer for I believe it's, you know, Red State
(19:50):
or one of those guys. Superman isn't an immigrant, He's
an orphan. The fact they can spend three hundred million
dollars in a film and can't get this very basic
concept correct. Really is something. And this goes down the
line and you have Fox News as a chiron that
says a super woke, iconic hero movie to embrace pro
immigrant themes. Here's the thing. It's like they didn't even
(20:13):
read the original article where this quote came from. It
came from the Times of London, Okay. And you go
and you actually read the article and you see that
the journalist that's asking James Gunn, who's the director of Superman,
he's trying to make it political. The reporter is not
(20:35):
James Gunn, so he tries to basically connect the fact
that Superman was created by I believe, two Jews, and
the reporter tries to connect that fact to this immigrant issue,
and James Gunn kind of says, Okay, yeah, I guess
you know, you could kind of say that Superman was
an immigrant, but what this story is really about. He
(20:57):
kind of deflects the question, Like anybody that's smart, that
has a three hundred million dollar franchise under his belt
and is about to do more of these series, he deflects.
And here's a perfect example of how he deflects once again,
Variety in the Hollywood media are trying to basically make
(21:18):
this into a political issue. Here is James Gunn talking
to somebody from Variety and how he deflected this question
about it being an immigrant movie.
Speaker 9 (21:31):
You said, it's an immigrant story, it's a political movie.
Maga today is going nuts. What do you have to
say to Maga? I have anything else. I think this
movie's for everybody. I don't have anything to.
Speaker 7 (21:41):
Say to anybody, like I'm not here to judge people,
you know, you know, I think this is a movie
about kindness, and I think that's something everyone can relate to.
Speaker 1 (21:51):
So he did a very Jeames gun Yeah, he's really
right right here right now. Yeah, what does that means
that we are no a you kidding me? I still
look and you still look like we're at least thirty
two in our thirty two two inch we haven't aged
a bit.
Speaker 3 (22:07):
Only everybody else's Yeah, your eyesight's clearly going.
Speaker 1 (22:12):
So but there he is, kind of once again trying
to get goaded by a variety. He went, had the
same thing happen with the Times of London. Hollywood Reporter
runs with it, so it's deadline like all the thing.
Speaker 3 (22:23):
He's just trying not to get fired again.
Speaker 1 (22:25):
Exactly exactly. And by the way, I don't like this
guy's politics. I don't you know he's he's done and
said some kind of jokes that I don't align with.
I would never put it, I would bear into the world.
But the truth be told, this guy we hate him too.
He is not. He did not try to make this
a political movie. He did not try to make it
(22:47):
into a movie about immigrants. It was the reporters that
were pushing it in this direction. And this is what
reporters do, especially entertainment news reporters, And this is the goal. Okay,
because you wouldn't wonder why why would they do this,
why would they want to turn off fifty percent of
the US population from going to seeing this huge, big
(23:11):
tent franchise. Well, this is why. If they turn conservatives off,
if they turn you off from these kinds of movies,
from Hollywood films, they turned you off from storytelling. And
then you never go down that path. You don't try
to become a storyteller, you don't try to create that
kind of content. You don't go to the movies and
(23:33):
support other storytellers that might align with your views. Because
you view all of Hollywood as this woke industry that
hates you, that's going to sucker punch you every time
you go to the movies. All right, this is why
the Hollywood media and the Hollywood journalists do this. It's
to basically make you feel like this is not a
(23:55):
realm for you, so stay away from it. And it's
been working for decades. Conservatives have been staying away from storytelling.
They've been slowly going away from the movies. They have
not been getting involved in that business, going into screenwriting,
getting their kids to go into screenwriting and acting and
storytelling and creating basically the thing that creates American culture. Okay,
(24:19):
they have been discouraging you from doing all of those
things by using this very tactic. This is not your place,
guy's stay away. And when you actually look at this story,
you actually see something completely different. He was not trying
to make it political. It would actually be completely foolish
for a man, for a director at his level to
make this a political play with a movie like Superman.
(24:42):
And by the way, this movie's gonna kill it in
the box office, I think because it super Dog.
Speaker 3 (24:48):
Well, I'm all about the super dogs.
Speaker 1 (24:49):
Reports are that it's not even like woke like people
are going to see it, including conservatives. They're saying, this
whole thing about immigrants is this world.
Speaker 3 (24:56):
And by the way, the tactic of you know, keeping
us away, that's a tactic that worked on us for
a time as well, for a very long turned off
on by it. But you know what, there's been an
evolution and a growth, and now we're on the other
end of it. Yes, and we're not going to stop.
We're not going to stop. We're going to continue to
tell stories here.
Speaker 1 (25:13):
And we're going to keep pushing that. We are going to.
Speaker 3 (25:16):
Keep encouraging you to also create art.
Speaker 1 (25:19):
Yes, we are the vanguard of this movement. We have
been now for many many years, before we even launched
Red Pilled America, we've been arguing for the power of
storytelling and for conservatives to not walk away from it
and to find middle ground with some of these people
and to understand this art form and this human condition
(25:41):
that can be conveyed through stories. It's really really important.
And I'm just so frustrated with alt media and the
way they've been going. And you're starting to see this
play out now, you're seeing now trouble at X you
have GROC, which is their AI tool, has been kind
of going rogue.
Speaker 3 (25:59):
It's totally been going round.
Speaker 1 (26:01):
I think they kind of turned off a filled her
on it and it came out as mecha Hitler.
Speaker 3 (26:07):
That's crazy.
Speaker 1 (26:08):
And it started answering questions in the personality of what
he was calling himself or it was calling itself as
mecha Hitler, and it was kind of shocking some of
the responses that he was getting very anti Semitic in
some responses. I actually noticed this last week when I
went on GROC and I was asking it some questions
and it kind of gives bullet points. A lot of
(26:29):
the times when you're like within a thread or you're
on a post and you just kind of hit the
grock button and it gives you three bullet points, and
the first one kind of explains what the posts about,
the second one gives you context, and the third one
kind of gives you conclusion, and the third one in
this sense, in this time that I tried, it was
completely unrelated to the post, and I thought, WHOA, this
(26:50):
is weird. It's like something's up with the algorithm. It's
completely breaking down right now because it gave me something
that had absolutely nothing to do with the post itself,
and then all this mecha Hitler stuff started to come out.
Well you know this, these kind of crazy responses, and
people are prompting it. They're kind of like, you know,
poking the bear a little bit. Well, it turns out
(27:13):
that Linda I'm going to butcher her last name, Yacharino.
She was the CEO of X. She resigned and it
was literally right in the wake of this whole kind
of Grock debacle, and it just this is the kind
of thing that I'm I want to get out there
to you guys that something that we need to be
(27:35):
concerned about is that once you're given a little bit
of power. We only have a couple of years right
now with this MAGA movement in charge in Washington, DC.
You need to use that power wisely, and you need
to use it with some kind of a moral backbone, Okay,
and don't spread lies out there, and don't you know,
(27:58):
politicize things that shouldn't be or don't need to be politicized.
The whole idea of alt media was creating an answer
to the legacy media's lies. But you don't counter those
with more lies or lies that you want to hear, okay,
And so I think at the end of the day,
we feel an obligation as somebody that's kind of have
(28:22):
a connection way back to the Breitbart days. You know,
we did Breitbart's first big national story. We've been there
from a very very early days. We feel an obligation
to call out conservative media and alt media when it
starts to go astray, because we are supposed to be
the answer to legacy media. All right, we need a
(28:45):
functioning media institution. The United States founders relied on that.
It's the reason why it's the first Amendment, Okay, because
that's how important it was. So don't take us as
being like kind of, oh, you guys are always ready
to kind of beat up the right. No, you have
(29:07):
enough people beating up the mainstream media and the legacy media.
We have been doing that for fifteen years or more now.
But at the same time, we cannot criticize the legacy
media and not criticize alt media when they make their mistakes.
And we're going to continue to do that, And I
hope that you continue on this journey with us, because
(29:30):
we think that it's an important part of correcting this
media institution.
Speaker 3 (29:36):
You know what, we hate the liars.
Speaker 1 (29:38):
Yeah, we're not.
Speaker 3 (29:39):
Absolutely hate the liars that purposefully mislead the audience for
clickbait and to line their pockets. I just I can't
stand for it.
Speaker 1 (29:52):
Well, and this is why they're not coming up with solutions. Okay,
they've figured out a standard human trait, outrage. Outrage is
going to drive you to click. It's going to make
you come back. You're going to hear what you want
to hear. You're going to all your biases are being
(30:12):
fulfilled by these people, and it makes them money. But
you know what it doesn't do. It doesn't provide you
any solutions. It doesn't provide you any solutions on how
to deal with your daily life, how to deal with
your kids, how to deal with with making a better
culture both locally and nationally. Like, it doesn't provide you
(30:34):
any of that. You know, it's the same thing that
all of them complain about. You're a victim in their eyes,
You're a victim of all of these media elites and
Hollywood and all of these kinds of things. They continue
to push the same victim ideology, but just with a
different spin. They don't provide solutions but if you're looking
for the truth, you and you want to find the
(30:56):
truth that is solution based, and that's what Red Pilled
America is about.
Speaker 3 (31:02):
It is, you know what, one thing to add I
think a lot of people kind of look at us
as political commentators, but that's not what we are at
the end of the day. What we are is we're creatives.
We're storytellers, and we're looking to leave the world a
better place of telling beautiful stories that can help people. Yes,
you know, I don't want to put out negativity or
(31:24):
ugliness into the world. There's enough of that and I
just cannot stand the people are that are doing that
for clickbait. It is very, very disappointing. It is always
going to call out those people, whether it's on the
left or the right.
Speaker 1 (31:42):
That's it for this week's edition of Famboogie. Please keep
an eye out for What's an American. It's going to
be coming out a week from today, July eighteenth. Keep
your eye out, please share it. We need your guys support.
Go to Redpilled America dot com, click join in the
top menu, become a fan band member. Story te Killing
(32:03):
is what creates culture. It is so important and we
need you guys support in our mission. Thanks everybody, enjoy
the rest of your week.
Speaker 5 (32:11):
Bye.
Speaker 3 (32:11):
Everyone.
Hosts And Creators
Adryana Cortez
Patrick Courrielche
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
Las Culturistas with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang
Ding dong! Join your culture consultants, Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang, on an unforgettable journey into the beating heart of CULTURE. Alongside sizzling special guests, they GET INTO the hottest pop-culture moments of the day and the formative cultural experiences that turned them into Culturistas. Produced by the Big Money Players Network and iHeartRadio.