September 26, 2025 • 37 mins
We discuss the James Comey indictment, and how the FBI allegedly helped create the "Insurrection" narrative with plain clothes agents. We also talk about Jimmy Kimmel's return to late night and how conservatives can get some long-term victories. Finally, we debunk a Charlie Kirk assassination theory that's going viral. Don't miss this Famboogie!
Support our sponsor: Ruff Greens (discount code: REDPILLED)
Visit our YouTube channel here.
Support the show: https://redpilledamerica.com/support/
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:03):
This is Red Pilled America. Hey, it's Patrick.
Speaker 2 (00:09):
Curlci and I'm Adrianna Cortez and welcome to Red Pilled
America's fam Boogie.
Speaker 1 (00:31):
All lies will be revealed. All lies are being revealed
right now. Welcome to Red Pilled America's fam Boogie. Komy
got indicted.
Speaker 2 (00:43):
I love it, I love it, I love it to do.
Speaker 1 (00:47):
What a week this has been? Yeah, a lot of whims,
a few reality checks that we're going to get into.
I hope you guys are doing well. This is Red
Pilled America's fam Boogie, where we talk about things that
are happening in the culture. If you want to join
the fanbam, go to Redpilled America dot com and click
Join in the top menu. And if you haven't heard,
(01:09):
we're starting to do video versions of our documentaries. It's
over at YouTube. We'll leave a link in the show notes.
Go check that out, leave a like or a comment.
We'd really appreciate it. I know you guys just we
have a lot of audio people out there. I've got
a lot of that comments. Oh yeah, you know. I
love hearing you guys and listening to you guys audio wise.
(01:31):
I'll be in the garden or I'll be doing housework
and I want to hear audio. But video is a
great way to promote the show and to capture clips
and to post on social media. That's why we're going
into that realm.
Speaker 2 (01:47):
Yeah, well, listen, we live in the age of social media,
and social media video is king. So if Red Pilled
America wants to continue to change America one story at
a time, we had to go to video, and so
we bit the bullet and we did it, and we
really need your support. We need you guys to go
to YouTube, type in Red Pilled America Podcast in the
(02:09):
search menu, follow us there, like it, and share it
with your friends. Most importantly, share it on your social
media challenges channels.
Speaker 1 (02:18):
And we're also on Rumble as well too, so you
can go Red Pilled America on Rumble as well and
it'll pop up. We're just getting started on it. It's
going to be a long endeavor, so, but we could
take all the help that we can get.
Speaker 2 (02:30):
Sure can.
Speaker 1 (02:30):
So we're going to talk about the comy indictment. We're
getting it into this fed surrection, the information that's being
leaked out to the public in regards to all of
these undercover FBI agents there, and we don't even know
some of the other departments that we're at the j
six on January sixth, that we're there. Going to get
into that. I want to talk a little bit about
(02:51):
Jimmy Kimmel and him coming back to the air and
some stuff that we kind of produce predicted on that,
and then we want to address this Charlie Kirk conspiracy
theories that are out there about his murder, because I
got to tell you, the conspiracy thing is so big
(03:12):
on the right right now. Everybody starts off with believing
the conspiracy theory rather than the the what's being told
by the government agencies. So I want to get into
that because there's some big ones out there that I
looked into, and we'll discuss that a little bit later
in the show. But let's start off with this Comy indictment.
(03:33):
I'm sure many of you guys have already heard that
James Comy, the former director of the FBI, is being
indicted by the DOJ for lying under oath, And of
course the legacy media is going crazy ape shit on
this right now. They think that it's unprecedented, that it's
(03:56):
a you know, weaponization of the DOJ.
Speaker 2 (03:59):
All the things that we have already said about what
they've done to our people.
Speaker 1 (04:02):
I mean, it's it's so clear. You just look at
the mugshot cam, you know, collage of all of the
Trump former aids and former lawyers and former Trump associated
and Trump thank you. It is asinine. They had to
literally change the law to go after Trump in one
(04:24):
of the districts, in the New York district. They had
to change the law to make it and did it
for a short amount of time so that they can
prosecute him. Talk about weaponization. So I think the evidence
is out there. It's pretty clear that he lied under oath.
I want to play a couple of clips here because
(04:44):
I think at the end of the day, it is
a little bit of a death spiral if we just
start going out there for retribution. But I think the
key here is and I think that the Trump administration
is doing a pretty good job of this so far,
is just followed the truth and dirty cops need to
be prosecuted. And that's the thing that we hear from
the left all the time. That's the central point of
(05:07):
the Black Lives Matter movement was that there's dirty cops
out there that are going after people and they need
to face justice. Here is James Comy that clearly was
targeting the Trump administration. He targeted Michael Flynn. He even
gloats and mocks Michael Flynn and the Trump administration that
(05:29):
he sent over his people over there hoping to basically
catch him in a lie, and then attempted to prosecute
him on that lie. And that is now, ironically what
James Comy is facing. He's facing charges based on lying
under oath. Let's play a little bit of the evidence
(05:50):
of this lying under oath. Here he is speaking out
a hearing, claiming that he didn't leak any information to
the media, and then a while later admitting that he
leaked to the media.
Speaker 3 (06:04):
Director Comy, have you ever been an anonymous source in
news reports about matters relating to the Trump investigation or
the Clinton investigation? Never have you ever authorized someone else
at the FBI to be an anonymous source in news
reports about the Trump investigation or the Clinton investigation.
Speaker 1 (06:27):
Now, so that's him speaking to Senator Chuck Grassly at
a hearing. Here he is shortly after that hearing saying
the exact opposite.
Speaker 4 (06:35):
I needed to get that out into the public square.
And so I asked a friend of mine to share
the content of the memo with a reporter, then do
it myself. For a variety of reasons, but I asked
him to because I thought that might prompt the appointment
of a special counsel.
Speaker 1 (06:48):
So that's what started the entire Russian collusion hoax, the
investigation that went on that basically dogged Trump for his
entire first term.
Speaker 2 (07:00):
And that's why Trump started to call him him Leaking
Comy is that James Comy. That was the first nickname
that he got him because he was a leaker. He
was leaking to the press.
Speaker 1 (07:12):
And he's such a he's a self snitcher. Oh, he's
self snitching. He is self snitching.
Speaker 2 (07:19):
Listen, I want to tell you people something. Never ever
self snitch. Okay, this is a lesson here. This is
an Adrianna pro tip. Do not self snitch.
Speaker 1 (07:28):
Smelf stitching is self or s self snitching is one
of the best phrases that's ever been created.
Speaker 2 (07:35):
I coined it.
Speaker 1 (07:36):
Yeah, there's a guy on YouTube. He has a whole thing,
his whole opening song. He's a lawyer that looks at
people that self self snitch. I love that channel. So anyways,
here is also Comy talking in response to Ted Cruz
also getting caught in a lie.
Speaker 5 (07:52):
Chairman Grassley asked you, point blank, quote, have you ever
been an anonymous source in news report about matters relating
to the Trump investigation of the Clinton investigation? You responded
under oath quote never. He then asked you, quote, have
you ever authorized someone else of the FBI to be
an anonymous source in news reports about the Trump investigation
(08:14):
or the Clinton administration? You responded again under oath No. Now,
as you know, mister McCabe, who works for you, has
publicly and repeatedly stated that he leaked information to the
Wall Street Journal.
Speaker 1 (08:26):
Who's telling the truth.
Speaker 6 (08:28):
I can only speak to my testimony.
Speaker 4 (08:30):
I stand by what the testimony you summarized that I gave,
and I'm not going to characterize Andy's testimony, but mine
is the same today.
Speaker 1 (08:37):
So you know, he's sticking to his guns there. That
was in September twenty twenty so, and this.
Speaker 2 (08:43):
Is also when Trump started calling him. He went from
leaking James Cooney to lyne James Coney. Now I just
came straight uplying.
Speaker 1 (08:50):
Oh, he's progressing, progressing, Yeah, it's all progressing. So you know,
it's pretty clear. There's been some reporting on this done
by Catherine Heridge. Herridge used to be over at Fox.
I think she went over to CBS. I'm not sure
she's there right now, but that these exchanges is where
they have him. And this is the thing that's so
fascinating about it. When you looked at what they were
(09:12):
doing to Trump. They had to come up with these
kind of novel things of him, like faking his you know,
I think the worth of his house on a mortgage,
kind of a remortgage or something along those lines. And
then they had to change the law to be able
to do They had to change the law to deal
with the Egene Carroll. They had to change the law
in regards to statute of limitations to be able to
(09:33):
do that. To get him with that case, this is
clean cut. It's just a straight up lying under oath.
Nothing novel needs to be created, no laws need to
be changed. This is the kind of thing that we
should be pursuing. This is one of the highest cops
in the land. He got as close to treason as
(09:57):
you could possibly get in trying to basically create a
coup again the president through investigations through law fair. He
got fired legally fired. He leaked to the public conversations
that he had through a friend that he admits to
right there into the New York Times or Wall Street
(10:20):
General New York Times. I've heard two different kinds of
leaking paths. And in order for there to be an
investigation against Trump for the Russia collusion thing, and then
that literally took up most of Trump's presidency all because
of this man. This man was fired and he was
(10:41):
potentially worried about some of the things that were being
done at the FBI against Trump during the campaign process
of his election in twenty fifteen. In twenty sixteen, it's
just it's so clean, and it's so perfect, and now,
like Jimmy Kimmel, James Comey is going to kind of
plead victim throughout this entire process. And this is where
(11:03):
I find it so ridiculous. Here he is bragging about
how he entrapped Michael Flynn.
Speaker 2 (11:11):
You look at this White House now and it's hard
to imagine two FBI agents sending up in the sit room.
How did that happen?
Speaker 4 (11:17):
I sent them something I probably wouldn't have done or
maybe gotten away with in a more organized investigation, more
organized administration in the George W. Bush administration, for example,
or the Obama administration. The protocol two men that all
of us have perhaps increased appreciation for over the last
(11:39):
two years. And in both of those administrations, there was process.
And so if the FBI wanted to send agents into
the White House itself to interview a senior official, you
would work through the White House Council and they'd be
discussions and approvals and who would be there. And I
(11:59):
thought it's early enough, Let's just send a couple guys over.
So we placed a call to Flynn, said, Hey, we're
sending a couple of guys over. I hope you'll talk
to them. He said, sure. Nobody else was there. They
interviewed him in a conference room with the White House
Situation Room, and he lied to them. And that's what
(12:19):
he's now played guilty to.
Speaker 1 (12:21):
He is such a piece of shit, this guy, he
really is.
Speaker 2 (12:24):
You know what I hate about him is that he's
a fake Republican. Is a fake Republican.
Speaker 1 (12:29):
He's an establishment guy. This is everything that Trump fought against,
is everything that's wrong with politics is he is establishment guy.
That protects the establishment of both the Republicans and the Democrats.
And you hear it, he's just dripping with his smugness.
In this conversation, he admits to having an open White
(12:51):
House that was like, oh yeah, sure, come over and talk.
You know, let's let's come over talk, taking advantage of
that openness, and also admitting that the other two was
it Bush and Obama that they did not have They
had a process basically to hold off that openness or
to keep that openness out of the of the FBI investigations.
(13:14):
So you know, the fact that he is now claiming
victim is pretty rich. Here. He is talking about locking
up Donald Trump.
Speaker 6 (13:24):
Can victim bar him from future service. Have the prosecutors,
the local prosecutors in New York, pursue him for the
fraudster that he was before he ever became president. Lock
him up for the garden variety floruds he did there,
But don't give him that center stage, that dominant role
in our national life just down the street where Joe
(13:45):
Biden is trying to heal this nation.
Speaker 1 (13:47):
So this was said on January twenty first, twenty twenty one,
in the wake of j six. This is all part
of the narrative, and we're going to talk about this
in a little bit, that they sent in a bunch
of undercover FBI agents into January sixth.
Speaker 2 (14:06):
You're wearing plain clothes.
Speaker 1 (14:07):
Plain clothes officers. Now we don't even know if some
of the violence that happened there was incited by those people,
because you see on camera, and we'll get into that
a little bit later. You have people that have their
faces entirely closed or covered off trying to start telling
people to go inside of the capitol. Who were those people.
(14:29):
We'll get into that in a little bit. So, but
this is him talking in the wake of this jan
sixth thing, like just building on the narrative of this
man being a criminal, Trump being a criminal, we need
to lock him up. Here he is smugly discussing about
how easy it would be to lock up Donald Trump,
a former president. So this is June twenty twenty four,
(14:52):
James Comey speaking to Jen Saki, who is at MSNBC.
She was a former advisor to Obama and a spokesperson
for the Biden White House.
Speaker 7 (15:00):
So a lot of people have suggested that there are
there are a range of factors that would make it
difficult to put a former There's not The system has
not been tested in this way. Do you agree with
that that it would be difficult or nearly impossible for
the law enforcement institutions to put him in actual jail.
Speaker 4 (15:14):
No, they would just put him in a double wide
somewhere out near the fence, out in the grass, and
he would eat there, he'd shower there, he'd exercise there.
He'd be away, as Donia Perry said, from general population.
But it's obviously doable.
Speaker 1 (15:27):
This is a guy that was on a mission. Listened
to him basically campaigning for Biden leading up to the
twenty twenty four election. Tell me, if you listen to
this man, if you think that he could have been
an unbiased officer while he was the director of the FBI,
are you.
Speaker 8 (15:46):
Concerned that it may get a test unlike any other
if Donald Trump is re elected.
Speaker 9 (15:51):
I mean, when you think about a second Trump administration,
what do you think the implications would be for the FBI?
Speaker 1 (15:57):
Oh?
Speaker 4 (15:57):
Serious, for the Justice Department and the FBI, Because Trump
is coming for those institutions. He knows their power, and
I think he has regrets that he didn't work hard
enough to corrupt them last time. So he's coming for them,
and that's a danger for all Americans. He's going to
put people in positions in those organizations. He didn't have
all stars the last time. He'll have the bottom of
the barrel this time, but people who will want to
(16:19):
do his will, and that should weary every American. This
election matters because of a reason like that. People have
to participate. You cannot sit on the sideline. I don't
care how you feel about Joe Biden. You must vote
for him because the consequences on the other side are
too severe.
Speaker 1 (16:36):
So does that sound like somebody that was probably biased
during the Trump admisionive?
Speaker 2 (16:41):
It sounds like someone who's worried that he could go
to jail if Trump gets elected again.
Speaker 1 (16:45):
Yes, and you saw that building.
Speaker 2 (16:48):
And building and building.
Speaker 1 (16:49):
Definitely, he was definitely concerned if Trump got back into
the White House that he would be targeted potentially and
his lying under oath. He knew he was lying under oath.
Speaker 2 (17:00):
Of course, he knew he was lying under oath. Although
I do think that he believe that Trump would not
be president again.
Speaker 1 (17:05):
Oh, I think that it's I think with all the
smugness you heard after the j six all the smugness
that you heard up to that he thought, yes, there's
no way this man is going to be back.
Speaker 2 (17:15):
He has a deep understanding of the corruption that's going
on in government, yes, and what they're doing exactly to
cook the books. He knows he's part of that.
Speaker 1 (17:26):
So, you know, I think that it's kind of interesting
now that you have people just going crazy saying that
this is unprecedented, that you know, what the Trump administration
is doing right now is weaponizing the DOJ. Here's CNN
talking about Bannon when they indicted Bannon for refusing to
be involved in the corrupt J six hearings.
Speaker 8 (17:49):
Well, Jake, we now know that Steve Bannon has been
charged with two counts of contempt of Congress, and the
Department of Justice issuing a release saying that those two
counts stem from his failure to appear for a deposition
and also his failure to produce a documents for the
House Select Committee. So, yes, now, Steve Bannon, who is
former chief strategist at the White House, indicted on two
(18:11):
counts of contempt of Congress, one for refusing to appear
for deposition, one for failing to produce documents, and of
course Jake. This will send a warning shot to the
President's allies who have so far refused to cooperate or
appear or may in the future refuse. This is a
warning shot to them that the Department of Justice will
(18:32):
and ken move forward and charge people with contempt of
Congress here.
Speaker 1 (18:36):
So there you have it. They're very clear in using
the DOJ to send a warning to Trump allies, and
I think they were worried about They wanted to put
this man down forever. They wanted to put the Trump
and the MAGA world down forever. They wanted to as
many of them put behind bars or get as many
(18:57):
of them with mug shots to send the MAGA movement
a message because they knew but they had done behind
the scenes using the mechanics of the federal government to
take Trump out when he was in office. I want
to get into this FED surrection because I think it
kind of shows exactly what was in play here throughout
(19:21):
this narrative machine that they put in motion starting in
the beginning of twenty twenty. And we'll get to that
right after the break. But before we do that.
Speaker 2 (19:28):
We have an exciting announcement. We actually have a new
sponsor that's come on to support the show. They're called
rough Greens.
Speaker 1 (19:34):
I don't know if you guys know this, but we
make our dogs meals every day.
Speaker 2 (19:39):
I don't believe in giving my dog kibble, I never have.
I like to make them fresh food. However, when you're
making that fresh food, it's not hitting all the nutrients
and all the vitamins that a dog actually needs. So
that's where rough Greens comes in because what you do
is you take their product and you sprinkle it over
whatever you're feeding your dogs. If you guys are feeding
your dog's kibble, you can use rough Greens to basically
(20:02):
get them everything that they need because their product supports
long term health by providing live nutrients including essential vitamins, minerals, probiotics,
digestive enzymes, and omega oils. So this product, you guys,
it has changed our lives. Our dogs are doing so
(20:22):
much better. My English bulldog, Pablo, he was really suffering
with really bad allergies. And I hate to say this,
but he was very, very gassy. I mean to the
point where we would have to leave our bedroom in
the middle of the night.
Speaker 1 (20:36):
We'd be like, oh no, oh god. I know.
Speaker 2 (20:38):
It was awful. But now I'm telling you he's not
itching and his gas, his digestive system is so much better.
It's incredible.
Speaker 1 (20:46):
And we started this rough Greens now for several months
and our dogs, we've seen a major, major difference with it.
If you love your dogs the same way that we do,
you want to make sure that they get all the
nutrients that you guys would want in our little furry children.
You love those dogs, you want them to live a
longer life, You want them to live healthier. Get Roughgreens.
(21:07):
Rough Green supplements the diets with natural antioxidants and anti
inflammatory compounds that help reduce oxidative stress, support immune defense,
and slow age related decline, helping dogs stay active, mobile
and alert as they age.
Speaker 2 (21:24):
The best thing about it is that you don't have
to change your dog food. So now if Patrick sneaks
in some kibble, I don't get quite as angry because
now we just add our Roughgreens. And the great thing
for you is Roughgreens is offering a free Jumpstarter trial bag.
You just have to cover the shipping, So you go
onto roughgreens dot com and use discount code red pilled
(21:46):
to claim your free Jumpstart trial bag at Roughgreens dot com.
Speaker 1 (21:50):
That's Ruffgreens dot com promo code red Pilled. So don't
change your dog's food, just add Roughgreens and watch the
health benefits come alive.
Speaker 2 (22:01):
I promise you you are going to love this.
Speaker 1 (22:08):
You're listening to Red Pilled America's famboogie. Become a fan
band member. Go to red Pilled America dot com click
join in the top venu. We need you, guys, We
need your support. We're the only storytelling show of its
kind for a reason. It's hard to produce storytelling shows
of this nature. Support which you love or it goes away. Guys.
So I want to get into this feder fed surrection
(22:32):
because you know, we've heard these stories for quite some
time that there was potentially playing clothes FBI agents there
that were kind of starting incitement or starting this insurrection.
And you know, we spoke to people even on our show,
people like Nick Searcy, who did several documentaries on the
J six I think called it. Capital Punishment was one
(22:54):
of his one of his documentaries, and that was one
of the things where he went there and he said,
I didn't see any of this, I didn't see any
of this kind of fighting going on or this kind
of battle between the cops and the people that I
was around. I just saw people there to just patriotically
speak their free speech and protest the government. And you
(23:16):
had people like Tucker Carlson, you know, speaking about the
potential of there being federal agents playing closed federal agents
there potentially inciting the crowd. And then video starts to
come out where you see the actual even clothed agents
that were there, the Capitol police looked like they were
(23:37):
inciting the crowd. Well, now elked memo comes out stating
that almost three hundred FBI agents were present at J six,
causing an internal revolt. This is from zero Hedge. The
headline leaked memo reveals FBI deployed a stunding two hundred
(23:58):
and seventy four agents on j six, causing internal revote volt.
The FBI I deployed nearly three hundred playing agents to
the US Capitol during the January sixth, twenty twenty one riot,
in an effort that became so chaotic it caused an
internal schism within the agency that led many rank and
file at the bureau that core competencies had been lost
(24:22):
to wokeness and the employees had become pawns in a
political war, according to an after action report hidden from
the public for over four years until it was obtained
by Just the News. As John Solomon over at Just
the News, pretty good reporter, Wow, so you know, And
(24:43):
now the thing is is they're saying, well, some of
these people were deployed after the riot had started. We
don't know those that those numbers haven't been released yet,
but I think it's going to be coming. But we
also don't have what other agencies potentially had played and
closed operatives there. And the the fascinating thing is is
(25:04):
you start looking at the video and you see people
going there, and they're encouraging people to go in. And
at one point a guy is completely disguised. You can't
see his face. All you could see he has glasses on,
even he's hiding everything, and he pulls down the glass
of the window at the Capitol and when he realized
(25:26):
he's being recorded, he starts to blame another guy right
in front of the camera, and then this same cameraman says,
don't go in there, that's against the law. And then
you hear he also catches with his microphone. These people,
these kind of disguised people telling people to go inside,
(25:47):
to go in through the window. So and a lot
of these people weren't indicted because if you look at
the J six indictments and all the hearings, you have
all of these red acted names or these or these
people that were anonymously working with the government, and so
you don't see their names, but they say that they
were involved with it, So you don't know whether they
(26:07):
were FBI agents or not.
Speaker 2 (26:10):
Why would they be Why would those people be being
protected otherwise.
Speaker 1 (26:15):
Well, they could just be a plea deal. They could
be working as a plea deal. I don't I'm not
going to get prosecuted if I work with the government.
So there is, you know, an argument that those people
were working on a plea deal. But I think now
when you have the new FBI in there, and see
that's the other thing. Go back to the Komy thing.
This is the FBI giving up this information. Komy is
getting charged, getting indicted off of FBI information. And now
(26:39):
some of this information is going to start coming out
again from the FBI, and we will learn some of
those masked people that are anonymously working with the government
to prosecute some of these j six ers, we will
learn whether they were FBI agents or not. But here
is where things start to get interesting. Here's Christopher Ray,
the former FBI director, lying under oath again saying that
(27:03):
he didn't know whether there was any undercover FBI agents
on the scene for j six.
Speaker 10 (27:10):
Two were there in an undercover capacity on January sixth?
How many were there?
Speaker 9 (27:14):
Again, I'm not sure that I can give you that number.
As I said here, I'm not sure there were undercover
agents on scene.
Speaker 10 (27:23):
I find that kind of a remarkable statement. Director, at
this point, you don't know whether there were an undercover
federal agents FBI agents in the crowd or in the
capitol on January sixth.
Speaker 3 (27:36):
I say that.
Speaker 9 (27:37):
Because I want to be very careful. There have been
a number of court filings related to some of these topics,
and I want to make sure that I stick with
him what's in.
Speaker 10 (27:44):
I understand that, But I just I thought I heard
you say you didn't know whether there were FBI agents
or informants or human sources in the capital or the
in vicinity on January sixth. Did I misunderstand you? I
thought that's what you say.
Speaker 9 (28:01):
So I referred very specifically to undercover.
Speaker 10 (28:03):
Yeah, and so are you acknowledging then there were undercover agents?
Speaker 9 (28:09):
As I said here right now, I do not believe
there were undercover agents on slee.
Speaker 1 (28:14):
So that is the former director of the FBI claiming
no knowledge of there being undercover agents there at J six.
Speaker 2 (28:22):
So what I'm hearing is that this is another liar.
Speaker 1 (28:25):
This is a what would a Trump? What would Trump's
name be for this guy? Now?
Speaker 2 (28:29):
I don't know if he had a nickname for him.
Speaker 1 (28:31):
Find Oh my god, you gotta find that one. Yeah.
Here he is lying under oath because there's no way
that the FBI director would not know if there were
undercover agents at J six. All of these guys never
thought Trump would ever be back in office. They thought
that they muddied him up enough that they took down
(28:53):
enough of the people around him that they that the
MAGA movement wasn't going to be strong enough to bring
him back into office, and that there would be even
if a Republican did win, it would be an establishment
Republican later on that would not want to look into
these claims. You're seeing this, All of these lies are
being revealed right now, and I think you're starting to
(29:16):
hear the Trump DOJ say, I think there's gonna be
some other things that are going to come out on this.
You're even hearing Trump say that, Yeah.
Speaker 2 (29:22):
I don't think he had a nickname for him actually.
Speaker 1 (29:24):
And the funny thing is is that, as always the
legacy media, we're doing everything to poo poo these theories
that there were undercover agents on site. Here is Brian
Stelter from CNN mocking Tucker Carlson about this FBI operatives theory.
Speaker 6 (29:43):
When you you.
Speaker 11 (29:47):
Make an ass, Tucker Carlson must have forgotten this lesson
from the Odd Couple because his latest January sixth conspiracy
theory makes huge assumptions in a baseless bid to let
rioters off the hook.
Speaker 6 (30:03):
But strangely, some of the key people who participated on
January sixth have not been charged.
Speaker 11 (30:09):
Here's Marjorie Taylor Green, assuming Carlson is right and saying,
we need names and answers about the FBI operatives who
were involved. But this is just yet another baseless theory
that Carlson has hyped to millions of people. The existence
of unnamed, as yet uncharged co conspirators does not mean
(30:29):
that they were working under cover for the FBI. But
in tucker world, conspiracy beats reality. Just look at his
banner on screen asking what really happened on January sixth,
as if it's some sort of mystery, and his guest.
Speaker 1 (30:44):
Of a prior relationship with the federal government.
Speaker 11 (30:47):
Darren Beatty, a former speechwriter for President Trump, attended a
conference frequented by white nationalists, but Tucker never mentioned any
of that. Instead, he promoted BET's website, which posted a
just asking questions sort of story jesting that the FEDS
infiltrated militia groups who ransacked the Capitol. This is how
(31:08):
the right wing media world works. Starts on a fringe website,
gets on a Tucker's show, then it spreads all throughout
the GOP. And that's what's happened in the last twenty
four hours. In the MAGA echo chamber. The idea is
that brave patriots were entrapped by the Feds, were tricked,
or were pushed into starting a riot. No evidence at all,
lots of evidence of the contrary, but Tucker somehow seems
(31:28):
to need to provide excuses for these rioters, so let
them off the hook, to say they were innocent, brave patriots.
It started right away and it's continued to this day.
And now here we are talking about Tucker promoting an
inside job false flag theory. It's all more of the same.
And I think in some ways, don it is so
insidious because they're presenting seven or eight different theories, none
(31:49):
of which makes sense, but all of which provide excuses.
I think in some ways it's because the insurrection was
so shameful, it was so criminal, it was such an
attack on our democracy that there has to be an excuse.
Tucker has to present these alternative realities in order to
let his viewers, I guess sleep better at night.
Speaker 1 (32:08):
To be honest, on people like Brian Stelter are political
operatives right there on the front lines. All of these
legacy media people are just political operatives. Brian Stelter is designed.
His whole career is to run cover for the deep state,
(32:28):
to run cover for Democrat politicians, and to pooh pooh
theories that are coming out from the Republican side so
that they become marginalized and it doesn't get picked up
and gives basically arguments for the legacy media to fight
back against these quote unquote baseless theories. Well, now we're
(32:48):
seeing that these baseless theories were actually correct. There was
undercover FBI agents at J six, and I think this
is what we're really You're constantly seeing as we're constantly
getting this example that the legacy media has completely lost
all of its credibility, and Ryan Stilter doesn't worry about
(33:14):
people clipping these kinds of stories and putting it out
there to the public. By the way, I want to
give some credit to May's More for coming up with
some of these these clips that we have shown on X.
He's pretty good at finding these kinds of contradictions out
there check them out. But this is it's he doesn't
worry about it because the establishment is not going to
(33:37):
penalize him. That this is literally his job to go
out there as almost kind of an information suicide bomber.
Doesn't care whether he is wrong on these kinds of
things because it doesn't matter. He's trying to basically destroy
these theories and keep them past down as long as
(33:58):
he possibly can until the next kind of establishment figure
comes in and just kind of create distance and then
it all goes away eventually. But now with social media,
with the new media, with people like Andrew Breitbart that
opened the door to this kind of methodology and this
kind of tactic of exposing legacy media and their lives.
(34:21):
I just think their power has been so diminished, and
we're seeing that time and time again. And this is
the point that I want to take with all of this,
With this, with the FED surrection, with this James Comy indictment,
there is a slippery slope about, you know, going after
your quote unquote enemies, right. If that is truly what
(34:43):
the Trump administration is doing, at some point, they will
have a political price to pay for that. But that's
not what we're seeing here. As long as they follow
the truth. As long as they are sticking to the facts,
following the evidence, and exposing these people for their lives
and for their crimes against the American people, I think
(35:07):
that they are going to be going in the right direction.
And so far it seems like they are doing that.
They're going after James Comey, a dirty cop, clearly a
dirty cop that lied under oath to basically undermine a
duly elected president. They are going and they're exposing everything
that happened at J six and exposing the deep state,
(35:28):
creating chaos. I mean, imagine if it ends up being
found out that the FBI were the ones that instigated this,
they are going completely against what a functioning government should
be doing. Those people are there to protect the American people.
If they're there. Now, if we learn to create a
(35:49):
narrative to be able to destroy MAGA forever, that is
one of the biggest stories of a generation. And I
think that what you're seeing is just slowly but surely
you're going to see we're seeing this exorcism happen right
now of the United States government. You're seeing an exorcism.
(36:09):
You're seeing You saw it with Charlie Kirk, all these people,
and that was in the general population posting these videos
laughing and dancing on his grave. Now you're seeing the
legacy media. Now you're seeing the James Comey's of the world,
the Brian Stelters of the world getting exposed. They're going
to lash out so crazily over the course of the
(36:31):
next couple of years. And I think at the end
of the day, you have to ignore these people and
just continue to follow the truth. The bottom line is
the truth must win, because if it doesn't, you see
what these people do. They create these narratives to go
after peaceful, patriotic Americans. They use these narratives to go
(36:54):
after a sitting, duly elected president. That cannot happen in
a functioning republic. Can't. And so at the end of
the day, I think as long as our president in
this administration continues to follow the truth, then he's going
to be in a good position.
Speaker 2 (37:18):
All right, guys, So we're going to wrap up Part
one of Fambogie. So before we do, though, we want
to remind you, guys to please support our sponsors. If
you love your dog, get your dog some rough grains.
We're going to see you over at part two. So
grab your coffee, grab your wine, grab your water, and
meet us over there.
Speaker 1 (37:34):
Yeah. We're going to be talking about Jimmy Kimmel and
his coming back to the air and some issues in
regards to that, and we're going to talk about these
Charlie conspiracy theories that are running rampant right now. Join
us at Part two.
This is Red Pilled America. Hey, it's Patrick.
Speaker 2 (00:09):
Curlci and I'm Adrianna Cortez and welcome to Red Pilled
America's fam Boogie.
Speaker 1 (00:31):
All lies will be revealed. All lies are being revealed
right now. Welcome to Red Pilled America's fam Boogie. Komy
got indicted.
Speaker 2 (00:43):
I love it, I love it, I love it to do.
Speaker 1 (00:47):
What a week this has been? Yeah, a lot of whims,
a few reality checks that we're going to get into.
I hope you guys are doing well. This is Red
Pilled America's fam Boogie, where we talk about things that
are happening in the culture. If you want to join
the fanbam, go to Redpilled America dot com and click
Join in the top menu. And if you haven't heard,
(01:09):
we're starting to do video versions of our documentaries. It's
over at YouTube. We'll leave a link in the show notes.
Go check that out, leave a like or a comment.
We'd really appreciate it. I know you guys just we
have a lot of audio people out there. I've got
a lot of that comments. Oh yeah, you know. I
love hearing you guys and listening to you guys audio wise.
(01:31):
I'll be in the garden or I'll be doing housework
and I want to hear audio. But video is a
great way to promote the show and to capture clips
and to post on social media. That's why we're going
into that realm.
Speaker 2 (01:47):
Yeah, well, listen, we live in the age of social media,
and social media video is king. So if Red Pilled
America wants to continue to change America one story at
a time, we had to go to video, and so
we bit the bullet and we did it, and we
really need your support. We need you guys to go
to YouTube, type in Red Pilled America Podcast in the
(02:09):
search menu, follow us there, like it, and share it
with your friends. Most importantly, share it on your social
media challenges channels.
Speaker 1 (02:18):
And we're also on Rumble as well too, so you
can go Red Pilled America on Rumble as well and
it'll pop up. We're just getting started on it. It's
going to be a long endeavor, so, but we could
take all the help that we can get.
Speaker 2 (02:30):
Sure can.
Speaker 1 (02:30):
So we're going to talk about the comy indictment. We're
getting it into this fed surrection, the information that's being
leaked out to the public in regards to all of
these undercover FBI agents there, and we don't even know
some of the other departments that we're at the j
six on January sixth, that we're there. Going to get
into that. I want to talk a little bit about
(02:51):
Jimmy Kimmel and him coming back to the air and
some stuff that we kind of produce predicted on that,
and then we want to address this Charlie Kirk conspiracy
theories that are out there about his murder, because I
got to tell you, the conspiracy thing is so big
(03:12):
on the right right now. Everybody starts off with believing
the conspiracy theory rather than the the what's being told
by the government agencies. So I want to get into
that because there's some big ones out there that I
looked into, and we'll discuss that a little bit later
in the show. But let's start off with this Comy indictment.
(03:33):
I'm sure many of you guys have already heard that
James Comy, the former director of the FBI, is being
indicted by the DOJ for lying under oath, And of
course the legacy media is going crazy ape shit on
this right now. They think that it's unprecedented, that it's
(03:56):
a you know, weaponization of the DOJ.
Speaker 2 (03:59):
All the things that we have already said about what
they've done to our people.
Speaker 1 (04:02):
I mean, it's it's so clear. You just look at
the mugshot cam, you know, collage of all of the
Trump former aids and former lawyers and former Trump associated
and Trump thank you. It is asinine. They had to
literally change the law to go after Trump in one
(04:24):
of the districts, in the New York district. They had
to change the law to make it and did it
for a short amount of time so that they can
prosecute him. Talk about weaponization. So I think the evidence
is out there. It's pretty clear that he lied under oath.
I want to play a couple of clips here because
(04:44):
I think at the end of the day, it is
a little bit of a death spiral if we just
start going out there for retribution. But I think the
key here is and I think that the Trump administration
is doing a pretty good job of this so far,
is just followed the truth and dirty cops need to
be prosecuted. And that's the thing that we hear from
the left all the time. That's the central point of
(05:07):
the Black Lives Matter movement was that there's dirty cops
out there that are going after people and they need
to face justice. Here is James Comy that clearly was
targeting the Trump administration. He targeted Michael Flynn. He even
gloats and mocks Michael Flynn and the Trump administration that
(05:29):
he sent over his people over there hoping to basically
catch him in a lie, and then attempted to prosecute
him on that lie. And that is now, ironically what
James Comy is facing. He's facing charges based on lying
under oath. Let's play a little bit of the evidence
(05:50):
of this lying under oath. Here he is speaking out
a hearing, claiming that he didn't leak any information to
the media, and then a while later admitting that he
leaked to the media.
Speaker 3 (06:04):
Director Comy, have you ever been an anonymous source in
news reports about matters relating to the Trump investigation or
the Clinton investigation? Never have you ever authorized someone else
at the FBI to be an anonymous source in news
reports about the Trump investigation or the Clinton investigation.
Speaker 1 (06:27):
Now, so that's him speaking to Senator Chuck Grassly at
a hearing. Here he is shortly after that hearing saying
the exact opposite.
Speaker 4 (06:35):
I needed to get that out into the public square.
And so I asked a friend of mine to share
the content of the memo with a reporter, then do
it myself. For a variety of reasons, but I asked
him to because I thought that might prompt the appointment
of a special counsel.
Speaker 1 (06:48):
So that's what started the entire Russian collusion hoax, the
investigation that went on that basically dogged Trump for his
entire first term.
Speaker 2 (07:00):
And that's why Trump started to call him him Leaking
Comy is that James Comy. That was the first nickname
that he got him because he was a leaker. He
was leaking to the press.
Speaker 1 (07:12):
And he's such a he's a self snitcher. Oh, he's
self snitching. He is self snitching.
Speaker 2 (07:19):
Listen, I want to tell you people something. Never ever
self snitch. Okay, this is a lesson here. This is
an Adrianna pro tip. Do not self snitch.
Speaker 1 (07:28):
Smelf stitching is self or s self snitching is one
of the best phrases that's ever been created.
Speaker 2 (07:35):
I coined it.
Speaker 1 (07:36):
Yeah, there's a guy on YouTube. He has a whole thing,
his whole opening song. He's a lawyer that looks at
people that self self snitch. I love that channel. So anyways,
here is also Comy talking in response to Ted Cruz
also getting caught in a lie.
Speaker 5 (07:52):
Chairman Grassley asked you, point blank, quote, have you ever
been an anonymous source in news report about matters relating
to the Trump investigation of the Clinton investigation? You responded
under oath quote never. He then asked you, quote, have
you ever authorized someone else of the FBI to be
an anonymous source in news reports about the Trump investigation
(08:14):
or the Clinton administration? You responded again under oath No. Now,
as you know, mister McCabe, who works for you, has
publicly and repeatedly stated that he leaked information to the
Wall Street Journal.
Speaker 1 (08:26):
Who's telling the truth.
Speaker 6 (08:28):
I can only speak to my testimony.
Speaker 4 (08:30):
I stand by what the testimony you summarized that I gave,
and I'm not going to characterize Andy's testimony, but mine
is the same today.
Speaker 1 (08:37):
So you know, he's sticking to his guns there. That
was in September twenty twenty so, and this.
Speaker 2 (08:43):
Is also when Trump started calling him. He went from
leaking James Cooney to lyne James Coney. Now I just
came straight uplying.
Speaker 1 (08:50):
Oh, he's progressing, progressing, Yeah, it's all progressing. So you know,
it's pretty clear. There's been some reporting on this done
by Catherine Heridge. Herridge used to be over at Fox.
I think she went over to CBS. I'm not sure
she's there right now, but that these exchanges is where
they have him. And this is the thing that's so
fascinating about it. When you looked at what they were
(09:12):
doing to Trump. They had to come up with these
kind of novel things of him, like faking his you know,
I think the worth of his house on a mortgage,
kind of a remortgage or something along those lines. And
then they had to change the law to be able
to do They had to change the law to deal
with the Egene Carroll. They had to change the law
in regards to statute of limitations to be able to
(09:33):
do that. To get him with that case, this is
clean cut. It's just a straight up lying under oath.
Nothing novel needs to be created, no laws need to
be changed. This is the kind of thing that we
should be pursuing. This is one of the highest cops
in the land. He got as close to treason as
(09:57):
you could possibly get in trying to basically create a
coup again the president through investigations through law fair. He
got fired legally fired. He leaked to the public conversations
that he had through a friend that he admits to
right there into the New York Times or Wall Street
(10:20):
General New York Times. I've heard two different kinds of
leaking paths. And in order for there to be an
investigation against Trump for the Russia collusion thing, and then
that literally took up most of Trump's presidency all because
of this man. This man was fired and he was
(10:41):
potentially worried about some of the things that were being
done at the FBI against Trump during the campaign process
of his election in twenty fifteen. In twenty sixteen, it's
just it's so clean, and it's so perfect, and now,
like Jimmy Kimmel, James Comey is going to kind of
plead victim throughout this entire process. And this is where
(11:03):
I find it so ridiculous. Here he is bragging about
how he entrapped Michael Flynn.
Speaker 2 (11:11):
You look at this White House now and it's hard
to imagine two FBI agents sending up in the sit room.
How did that happen?
Speaker 4 (11:17):
I sent them something I probably wouldn't have done or
maybe gotten away with in a more organized investigation, more
organized administration in the George W. Bush administration, for example,
or the Obama administration. The protocol two men that all
of us have perhaps increased appreciation for over the last
(11:39):
two years. And in both of those administrations, there was process.
And so if the FBI wanted to send agents into
the White House itself to interview a senior official, you
would work through the White House Council and they'd be
discussions and approvals and who would be there. And I
(11:59):
thought it's early enough, Let's just send a couple guys over.
So we placed a call to Flynn, said, Hey, we're
sending a couple of guys over. I hope you'll talk
to them. He said, sure. Nobody else was there. They
interviewed him in a conference room with the White House
Situation Room, and he lied to them. And that's what
(12:19):
he's now played guilty to.
Speaker 1 (12:21):
He is such a piece of shit, this guy, he
really is.
Speaker 2 (12:24):
You know what I hate about him is that he's
a fake Republican. Is a fake Republican.
Speaker 1 (12:29):
He's an establishment guy. This is everything that Trump fought against,
is everything that's wrong with politics is he is establishment guy.
That protects the establishment of both the Republicans and the Democrats.
And you hear it, he's just dripping with his smugness.
In this conversation, he admits to having an open White
(12:51):
House that was like, oh yeah, sure, come over and talk.
You know, let's let's come over talk, taking advantage of
that openness, and also admitting that the other two was
it Bush and Obama that they did not have They
had a process basically to hold off that openness or
to keep that openness out of the of the FBI investigations.
(13:14):
So you know, the fact that he is now claiming
victim is pretty rich. Here. He is talking about locking
up Donald Trump.
Speaker 6 (13:24):
Can victim bar him from future service. Have the prosecutors,
the local prosecutors in New York, pursue him for the
fraudster that he was before he ever became president. Lock
him up for the garden variety floruds he did there,
But don't give him that center stage, that dominant role
in our national life just down the street where Joe
(13:45):
Biden is trying to heal this nation.
Speaker 1 (13:47):
So this was said on January twenty first, twenty twenty one,
in the wake of j six. This is all part
of the narrative, and we're going to talk about this
in a little bit, that they sent in a bunch
of undercover FBI agents into January sixth.
Speaker 2 (14:06):
You're wearing plain clothes.
Speaker 1 (14:07):
Plain clothes officers. Now we don't even know if some
of the violence that happened there was incited by those people,
because you see on camera, and we'll get into that
a little bit later. You have people that have their
faces entirely closed or covered off trying to start telling
people to go inside of the capitol. Who were those people.
(14:29):
We'll get into that in a little bit. So, but
this is him talking in the wake of this jan
sixth thing, like just building on the narrative of this
man being a criminal, Trump being a criminal, we need
to lock him up. Here he is smugly discussing about
how easy it would be to lock up Donald Trump,
a former president. So this is June twenty twenty four,
(14:52):
James Comey speaking to Jen Saki, who is at MSNBC.
She was a former advisor to Obama and a spokesperson
for the Biden White House.
Speaker 7 (15:00):
So a lot of people have suggested that there are
there are a range of factors that would make it
difficult to put a former There's not The system has
not been tested in this way. Do you agree with
that that it would be difficult or nearly impossible for
the law enforcement institutions to put him in actual jail.
Speaker 4 (15:14):
No, they would just put him in a double wide
somewhere out near the fence, out in the grass, and
he would eat there, he'd shower there, he'd exercise there.
He'd be away, as Donia Perry said, from general population.
But it's obviously doable.
Speaker 1 (15:27):
This is a guy that was on a mission. Listened
to him basically campaigning for Biden leading up to the
twenty twenty four election. Tell me, if you listen to
this man, if you think that he could have been
an unbiased officer while he was the director of the FBI,
are you.
Speaker 8 (15:46):
Concerned that it may get a test unlike any other
if Donald Trump is re elected.
Speaker 9 (15:51):
I mean, when you think about a second Trump administration,
what do you think the implications would be for the FBI?
Speaker 1 (15:57):
Oh?
Speaker 4 (15:57):
Serious, for the Justice Department and the FBI, Because Trump
is coming for those institutions. He knows their power, and
I think he has regrets that he didn't work hard
enough to corrupt them last time. So he's coming for them,
and that's a danger for all Americans. He's going to
put people in positions in those organizations. He didn't have
all stars the last time. He'll have the bottom of
the barrel this time, but people who will want to
(16:19):
do his will, and that should weary every American. This
election matters because of a reason like that. People have
to participate. You cannot sit on the sideline. I don't
care how you feel about Joe Biden. You must vote
for him because the consequences on the other side are
too severe.
Speaker 1 (16:36):
So does that sound like somebody that was probably biased
during the Trump admisionive?
Speaker 2 (16:41):
It sounds like someone who's worried that he could go
to jail if Trump gets elected again.
Speaker 1 (16:45):
Yes, and you saw that building.
Speaker 2 (16:48):
And building and building.
Speaker 1 (16:49):
Definitely, he was definitely concerned if Trump got back into
the White House that he would be targeted potentially and
his lying under oath. He knew he was lying under oath.
Speaker 2 (17:00):
Of course, he knew he was lying under oath. Although
I do think that he believe that Trump would not
be president again.
Speaker 1 (17:05):
Oh, I think that it's I think with all the
smugness you heard after the j six all the smugness
that you heard up to that he thought, yes, there's
no way this man is going to be back.
Speaker 2 (17:15):
He has a deep understanding of the corruption that's going
on in government, yes, and what they're doing exactly to
cook the books. He knows he's part of that.
Speaker 1 (17:26):
So, you know, I think that it's kind of interesting
now that you have people just going crazy saying that
this is unprecedented, that you know, what the Trump administration
is doing right now is weaponizing the DOJ. Here's CNN
talking about Bannon when they indicted Bannon for refusing to
be involved in the corrupt J six hearings.
Speaker 8 (17:49):
Well, Jake, we now know that Steve Bannon has been
charged with two counts of contempt of Congress, and the
Department of Justice issuing a release saying that those two
counts stem from his failure to appear for a deposition
and also his failure to produce a documents for the
House Select Committee. So, yes, now, Steve Bannon, who is
former chief strategist at the White House, indicted on two
(18:11):
counts of contempt of Congress, one for refusing to appear
for deposition, one for failing to produce documents, and of
course Jake. This will send a warning shot to the
President's allies who have so far refused to cooperate or
appear or may in the future refuse. This is a
warning shot to them that the Department of Justice will
(18:32):
and ken move forward and charge people with contempt of
Congress here.
Speaker 1 (18:36):
So there you have it. They're very clear in using
the DOJ to send a warning to Trump allies, and
I think they were worried about They wanted to put
this man down forever. They wanted to put the Trump
and the MAGA world down forever. They wanted to as
many of them put behind bars or get as many
(18:57):
of them with mug shots to send the MAGA movement
a message because they knew but they had done behind
the scenes using the mechanics of the federal government to
take Trump out when he was in office. I want
to get into this FED surrection because I think it
kind of shows exactly what was in play here throughout
(19:21):
this narrative machine that they put in motion starting in
the beginning of twenty twenty. And we'll get to that
right after the break. But before we do that.
Speaker 2 (19:28):
We have an exciting announcement. We actually have a new
sponsor that's come on to support the show. They're called
rough Greens.
Speaker 1 (19:34):
I don't know if you guys know this, but we
make our dogs meals every day.
Speaker 2 (19:39):
I don't believe in giving my dog kibble, I never have.
I like to make them fresh food. However, when you're
making that fresh food, it's not hitting all the nutrients
and all the vitamins that a dog actually needs. So
that's where rough Greens comes in because what you do
is you take their product and you sprinkle it over
whatever you're feeding your dogs. If you guys are feeding
your dog's kibble, you can use rough Greens to basically
(20:02):
get them everything that they need because their product supports
long term health by providing live nutrients including essential vitamins, minerals, probiotics,
digestive enzymes, and omega oils. So this product, you guys,
it has changed our lives. Our dogs are doing so
(20:22):
much better. My English bulldog, Pablo, he was really suffering
with really bad allergies. And I hate to say this,
but he was very, very gassy. I mean to the
point where we would have to leave our bedroom in
the middle of the night.
Speaker 1 (20:36):
We'd be like, oh no, oh god. I know.
Speaker 2 (20:38):
It was awful. But now I'm telling you he's not
itching and his gas, his digestive system is so much better.
It's incredible.
Speaker 1 (20:46):
And we started this rough Greens now for several months
and our dogs, we've seen a major, major difference with it.
If you love your dogs the same way that we do,
you want to make sure that they get all the
nutrients that you guys would want in our little furry children.
You love those dogs, you want them to live a
longer life, You want them to live healthier. Get Roughgreens.
(21:07):
Rough Green supplements the diets with natural antioxidants and anti
inflammatory compounds that help reduce oxidative stress, support immune defense,
and slow age related decline, helping dogs stay active, mobile
and alert as they age.
Speaker 2 (21:24):
The best thing about it is that you don't have
to change your dog food. So now if Patrick sneaks
in some kibble, I don't get quite as angry because
now we just add our Roughgreens. And the great thing
for you is Roughgreens is offering a free Jumpstarter trial bag.
You just have to cover the shipping, So you go
onto roughgreens dot com and use discount code red pilled
(21:46):
to claim your free Jumpstart trial bag at Roughgreens dot com.
Speaker 1 (21:50):
That's Ruffgreens dot com promo code red Pilled. So don't
change your dog's food, just add Roughgreens and watch the
health benefits come alive.
Speaker 2 (22:01):
I promise you you are going to love this.
Speaker 1 (22:08):
You're listening to Red Pilled America's famboogie. Become a fan
band member. Go to red Pilled America dot com click
join in the top venu. We need you, guys, We
need your support. We're the only storytelling show of its
kind for a reason. It's hard to produce storytelling shows
of this nature. Support which you love or it goes away. Guys.
So I want to get into this feder fed surrection
(22:32):
because you know, we've heard these stories for quite some
time that there was potentially playing clothes FBI agents there
that were kind of starting incitement or starting this insurrection.
And you know, we spoke to people even on our show,
people like Nick Searcy, who did several documentaries on the
J six I think called it. Capital Punishment was one
(22:54):
of his one of his documentaries, and that was one
of the things where he went there and he said,
I didn't see any of this, I didn't see any
of this kind of fighting going on or this kind
of battle between the cops and the people that I
was around. I just saw people there to just patriotically
speak their free speech and protest the government. And you
(23:16):
had people like Tucker Carlson, you know, speaking about the
potential of there being federal agents playing closed federal agents
there potentially inciting the crowd. And then video starts to
come out where you see the actual even clothed agents
that were there, the Capitol police looked like they were
(23:37):
inciting the crowd. Well, now elked memo comes out stating
that almost three hundred FBI agents were present at J six,
causing an internal revolt. This is from zero Hedge. The
headline leaked memo reveals FBI deployed a stunding two hundred
(23:58):
and seventy four agents on j six, causing internal revote volt.
The FBI I deployed nearly three hundred playing agents to
the US Capitol during the January sixth, twenty twenty one riot,
in an effort that became so chaotic it caused an
internal schism within the agency that led many rank and
file at the bureau that core competencies had been lost
(24:22):
to wokeness and the employees had become pawns in a
political war, according to an after action report hidden from
the public for over four years until it was obtained
by Just the News. As John Solomon over at Just
the News, pretty good reporter, Wow, so you know, And
(24:43):
now the thing is is they're saying, well, some of
these people were deployed after the riot had started. We
don't know those that those numbers haven't been released yet,
but I think it's going to be coming. But we
also don't have what other agencies potentially had played and
closed operatives there. And the the fascinating thing is is
(25:04):
you start looking at the video and you see people
going there, and they're encouraging people to go in. And
at one point a guy is completely disguised. You can't
see his face. All you could see he has glasses on,
even he's hiding everything, and he pulls down the glass
of the window at the Capitol and when he realized
(25:26):
he's being recorded, he starts to blame another guy right
in front of the camera, and then this same cameraman says,
don't go in there, that's against the law. And then
you hear he also catches with his microphone. These people,
these kind of disguised people telling people to go inside,
(25:47):
to go in through the window. So and a lot
of these people weren't indicted because if you look at
the J six indictments and all the hearings, you have
all of these red acted names or these or these
people that were anonymously working with the government, and so
you don't see their names, but they say that they
were involved with it, So you don't know whether they
(26:07):
were FBI agents or not.
Speaker 2 (26:10):
Why would they be Why would those people be being
protected otherwise.
Speaker 1 (26:15):
Well, they could just be a plea deal. They could
be working as a plea deal. I don't I'm not
going to get prosecuted if I work with the government.
So there is, you know, an argument that those people
were working on a plea deal. But I think now
when you have the new FBI in there, and see
that's the other thing. Go back to the Komy thing.
This is the FBI giving up this information. Komy is
getting charged, getting indicted off of FBI information. And now
(26:39):
some of this information is going to start coming out
again from the FBI, and we will learn some of
those masked people that are anonymously working with the government
to prosecute some of these j six ers, we will
learn whether they were FBI agents or not. But here
is where things start to get interesting. Here's Christopher Ray,
the former FBI director, lying under oath again saying that
(27:03):
he didn't know whether there was any undercover FBI agents
on the scene for j six.
Speaker 10 (27:10):
Two were there in an undercover capacity on January sixth?
How many were there?
Speaker 9 (27:14):
Again, I'm not sure that I can give you that number.
As I said here, I'm not sure there were undercover
agents on scene.
Speaker 10 (27:23):
I find that kind of a remarkable statement. Director, at
this point, you don't know whether there were an undercover
federal agents FBI agents in the crowd or in the
capitol on January sixth.
Speaker 3 (27:36):
I say that.
Speaker 9 (27:37):
Because I want to be very careful. There have been
a number of court filings related to some of these topics,
and I want to make sure that I stick with
him what's in.
Speaker 10 (27:44):
I understand that, But I just I thought I heard
you say you didn't know whether there were FBI agents
or informants or human sources in the capital or the
in vicinity on January sixth. Did I misunderstand you? I
thought that's what you say.
Speaker 9 (28:01):
So I referred very specifically to undercover.
Speaker 10 (28:03):
Yeah, and so are you acknowledging then there were undercover agents?
Speaker 9 (28:09):
As I said here right now, I do not believe
there were undercover agents on slee.
Speaker 1 (28:14):
So that is the former director of the FBI claiming
no knowledge of there being undercover agents there at J six.
Speaker 2 (28:22):
So what I'm hearing is that this is another liar.
Speaker 1 (28:25):
This is a what would a Trump? What would Trump's
name be for this guy? Now?
Speaker 2 (28:29):
I don't know if he had a nickname for him.
Speaker 1 (28:31):
Find Oh my god, you gotta find that one. Yeah.
Here he is lying under oath because there's no way
that the FBI director would not know if there were
undercover agents at J six. All of these guys never
thought Trump would ever be back in office. They thought
that they muddied him up enough that they took down
(28:53):
enough of the people around him that they that the
MAGA movement wasn't going to be strong enough to bring
him back into office, and that there would be even
if a Republican did win, it would be an establishment
Republican later on that would not want to look into
these claims. You're seeing this, All of these lies are
being revealed right now, and I think you're starting to
(29:16):
hear the Trump DOJ say, I think there's gonna be
some other things that are going to come out on this.
You're even hearing Trump say that, Yeah.
Speaker 2 (29:22):
I don't think he had a nickname for him actually.
Speaker 1 (29:24):
And the funny thing is is that, as always the
legacy media, we're doing everything to poo poo these theories
that there were undercover agents on site. Here is Brian
Stelter from CNN mocking Tucker Carlson about this FBI operatives theory.
Speaker 6 (29:43):
When you you.
Speaker 11 (29:47):
Make an ass, Tucker Carlson must have forgotten this lesson
from the Odd Couple because his latest January sixth conspiracy
theory makes huge assumptions in a baseless bid to let
rioters off the hook.
Speaker 6 (30:03):
But strangely, some of the key people who participated on
January sixth have not been charged.
Speaker 11 (30:09):
Here's Marjorie Taylor Green, assuming Carlson is right and saying,
we need names and answers about the FBI operatives who
were involved. But this is just yet another baseless theory
that Carlson has hyped to millions of people. The existence
of unnamed, as yet uncharged co conspirators does not mean
(30:29):
that they were working under cover for the FBI. But
in tucker world, conspiracy beats reality. Just look at his
banner on screen asking what really happened on January sixth,
as if it's some sort of mystery, and his guest.
Speaker 1 (30:44):
Of a prior relationship with the federal government.
Speaker 11 (30:47):
Darren Beatty, a former speechwriter for President Trump, attended a
conference frequented by white nationalists, but Tucker never mentioned any
of that. Instead, he promoted BET's website, which posted a
just asking questions sort of story jesting that the FEDS
infiltrated militia groups who ransacked the Capitol. This is how
(31:08):
the right wing media world works. Starts on a fringe website,
gets on a Tucker's show, then it spreads all throughout
the GOP. And that's what's happened in the last twenty
four hours. In the MAGA echo chamber. The idea is
that brave patriots were entrapped by the Feds, were tricked,
or were pushed into starting a riot. No evidence at all,
lots of evidence of the contrary, but Tucker somehow seems
(31:28):
to need to provide excuses for these rioters, so let
them off the hook, to say they were innocent, brave patriots.
It started right away and it's continued to this day.
And now here we are talking about Tucker promoting an
inside job false flag theory. It's all more of the same.
And I think in some ways, don it is so
insidious because they're presenting seven or eight different theories, none
(31:49):
of which makes sense, but all of which provide excuses.
I think in some ways it's because the insurrection was
so shameful, it was so criminal, it was such an
attack on our democracy that there has to be an excuse.
Tucker has to present these alternative realities in order to
let his viewers, I guess sleep better at night.
Speaker 1 (32:08):
To be honest, on people like Brian Stelter are political
operatives right there on the front lines. All of these
legacy media people are just political operatives. Brian Stelter is designed.
His whole career is to run cover for the deep state,
(32:28):
to run cover for Democrat politicians, and to pooh pooh
theories that are coming out from the Republican side so
that they become marginalized and it doesn't get picked up
and gives basically arguments for the legacy media to fight
back against these quote unquote baseless theories. Well, now we're
(32:48):
seeing that these baseless theories were actually correct. There was
undercover FBI agents at J six, and I think this
is what we're really You're constantly seeing as we're constantly
getting this example that the legacy media has completely lost
all of its credibility, and Ryan Stilter doesn't worry about
(33:14):
people clipping these kinds of stories and putting it out
there to the public. By the way, I want to
give some credit to May's More for coming up with
some of these these clips that we have shown on X.
He's pretty good at finding these kinds of contradictions out
there check them out. But this is it's he doesn't
worry about it because the establishment is not going to
(33:37):
penalize him. That this is literally his job to go
out there as almost kind of an information suicide bomber.
Doesn't care whether he is wrong on these kinds of
things because it doesn't matter. He's trying to basically destroy
these theories and keep them past down as long as
(33:58):
he possibly can until the next kind of establishment figure
comes in and just kind of create distance and then
it all goes away eventually. But now with social media,
with the new media, with people like Andrew Breitbart that
opened the door to this kind of methodology and this
kind of tactic of exposing legacy media and their lives.
(34:21):
I just think their power has been so diminished, and
we're seeing that time and time again. And this is
the point that I want to take with all of this,
With this, with the FED surrection, with this James Comy indictment,
there is a slippery slope about, you know, going after
your quote unquote enemies, right. If that is truly what
(34:43):
the Trump administration is doing, at some point, they will
have a political price to pay for that. But that's
not what we're seeing here. As long as they follow
the truth. As long as they are sticking to the facts,
following the evidence, and exposing these people for their lives
and for their crimes against the American people, I think
(35:07):
that they are going to be going in the right direction.
And so far it seems like they are doing that.
They're going after James Comey, a dirty cop, clearly a
dirty cop that lied under oath to basically undermine a
duly elected president. They are going and they're exposing everything
that happened at J six and exposing the deep state,
(35:28):
creating chaos. I mean, imagine if it ends up being
found out that the FBI were the ones that instigated this,
they are going completely against what a functioning government should
be doing. Those people are there to protect the American people.
If they're there. Now, if we learn to create a
(35:49):
narrative to be able to destroy MAGA forever, that is
one of the biggest stories of a generation. And I
think that what you're seeing is just slowly but surely
you're going to see we're seeing this exorcism happen right
now of the United States government. You're seeing an exorcism.
(36:09):
You're seeing You saw it with Charlie Kirk, all these people,
and that was in the general population posting these videos
laughing and dancing on his grave. Now you're seeing the
legacy media. Now you're seeing the James Comey's of the world,
the Brian Stelters of the world getting exposed. They're going
to lash out so crazily over the course of the
(36:31):
next couple of years. And I think at the end
of the day, you have to ignore these people and
just continue to follow the truth. The bottom line is
the truth must win, because if it doesn't, you see
what these people do. They create these narratives to go
after peaceful, patriotic Americans. They use these narratives to go
(36:54):
after a sitting, duly elected president. That cannot happen in
a functioning republic. Can't. And so at the end of
the day, I think as long as our president in
this administration continues to follow the truth, then he's going
to be in a good position.
Speaker 2 (37:18):
All right, guys, So we're going to wrap up Part
one of Fambogie. So before we do, though, we want
to remind you, guys to please support our sponsors. If
you love your dog, get your dog some rough grains.
We're going to see you over at part two. So
grab your coffee, grab your wine, grab your water, and
meet us over there.
Speaker 1 (37:34):
Yeah. We're going to be talking about Jimmy Kimmel and
his coming back to the air and some issues in
regards to that, and we're going to talk about these
Charlie conspiracy theories that are running rampant right now. Join
us at Part two.
Hosts And Creators
Adryana Cortez
Patrick Courrielche
Popular Podcasts
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.
Cardiac Cowboys
The heart was always off-limits to surgeons. Cutting into it spelled instant death for the patient. That is, until a ragtag group of doctors scattered across the Midwest and Texas decided to throw out the rule book. Working in makeshift laboratories and home garages, using medical devices made from scavenged machine parts and beer tubes, these men and women invented the field of open heart surgery. Odds are, someone you know is alive because of them. So why has history left them behind? Presented by Chris Pine, CARDIAC COWBOYS tells the gripping true story behind the birth of heart surgery, and the young, Greatest Generation doctors who made it happen. For years, they competed and feuded, racing to be the first, the best, and the most prolific. Some appeared on the cover of Time Magazine, operated on kings and advised presidents. Others ended up disgraced, penniless, and convicted of felonies. Together, they ignited a revolution in medicine, and changed the world.