September 26, 2025 • 45 mins
We discuss the James Comey indictment, and how the FBI allegedly helped create the "Insurrection" narrative with plain clothes agents. We also talk about Jimmy Kimmel's return to late night and how conservatives can get some long-term victories. Finally, we debunk a Charlie Kirk assassination theory that's going viral. Don't miss this Famboogie!
Support our sponsor: Lear Capital (800-480-1100)
Visit our YouTube channel here.
Support the show: https://redpilledamerica.com/support/
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:03):
This is Red Pilled America.
Speaker 2 (00:10):
You're listening to Red Pilled America's fam Boogie. Welcome to
Part two. But before we get into it, you guys,
we want to remind you that we're doing YouTube video now.
This has been a long time in the making, so
please head over to YouTube. Put in Red Pilled America Podcast,
look us up, give us a follow, and watch our
new video. Give it a like, share it and you.
Speaker 1 (00:29):
Could also see it in the show notes. We'll leave
a link. We're going to get into this Jimmy Kimmel
fiasco right now. We spoke about this last week, this
consequence culture that seemed to be people were basically saying
it was cancel culture, and it was obviously not cancel culture.
It was a man who lied on public airwaves about
(00:53):
who murdered Charlie Kirk and was taken off swiftly taken off.
Well now he's back on and he had the biggest
ratings ever for his show, the most watched monologue. And
you know what I found was kind of disgusting in
a way is if you look at the video for
(01:14):
that episode they came back, it's right, you know, the
the icon or the image that they use for the video.
It says, as I was saying, that's what Trump said
when he came back after almost being assassinated. So he's
throwing himself in that and to use that as also
kind of the lead in after he lied about Charlie
(01:38):
Kirk's murderer. It's just kind of a mocking, a subtle
mocking at a whole other level. Well, you know, it
is now being said. You know, once this information came
out that he was going to be back on air,
both Next Star and Sinclair, the affiliates, the ABC affiliates
that I think they were in something like thirty eight
(01:58):
markets or something like that, a huge maybe it was
thirty eight million households, something like that. They came forward
and said that they were going to continue to preempt them,
and I tweeted out on our red Pilled America account,
our ex account, saying that I think that that's going
to be short lived. I think that at some point
Sinclair and Next Star are going to bring his show
(02:21):
back to the air. And the primary reason why that prediction,
why I made that prediction, was is that ultimately, and
you correctly said in our discussion last week about this,
that they hadn't said that they fired him, and that
was a very clear indication that at some point they
were going to bring him back. We're probably going to
be bringing it back. They're kind of testing the waters.
(02:42):
I think they're going to see if he was going
to apologize or how he was going to respond to
them in meetings and what have you. But you correctly
kind of framed that.
Speaker 2 (02:51):
I have to say it was much more short lived
though than I thought. I thought they were going to
hold out a little bit longer.
Speaker 1 (02:56):
I didn't think it was going to be that long,
and so I went on to Twitter and I said,
I think this is going to be short lived. And
sure enough, I want to say, it was like forty
eight hours, you know, seventy two hours later, Sinclair is
now stating that they're going to end the preemption and
bring him back. And it's kind of an interesting take
(03:16):
because they initially said they wanted him to apologize, which
he did not, and they want him to give a
donation to Turning Point USA, which he did not. But
Sinclair has now ended his preemption and I think, you know,
it's kind of easy to see this coming because ultimately,
these studios, these all these content providers. The issue that
(03:39):
they have is having access to talent. The talent run
the Hollywood industry. If you don't have access to the talent,
then you cannot create the content that people want to see.
And so you had all of these major artists, these
major actors, these directors, these kind of big wigs that
(04:01):
have been involved in all I would for some time,
I think it was over four hundred signed a letter
with the ACLU saying that they need to fight for
free speech. Once I saw that letter come out, I
was like, Okay, this is going to be a pretty
short lived thing because ABC is going to bring him back.
They need to bring him back because if they don't,
(04:24):
it not only impacts that show, it impacts all of
their shows, all of their content. Disney is creating movies,
they have other channels, they have countless cable networks that
they've Some of these artists were already saying that they
were going to boycott Disney and they were not going
to work with them if they did not bring Jimmy
(04:46):
Kimmel back, which.
Speaker 2 (04:47):
By the way, I don't believe. I don't believe that
when push comes to shove at the end of the day,
that they would turn down the jobs.
Speaker 1 (04:53):
I think they would. And here's why I think they
would is because you had the union coming forward and
also speaking out for Jimmy Kimmel. If the union says
something and then actually starts to employ that and put
that into action, you are you have to follow along
with the union the same way that they have the strikes.
When they have the writers strike or they have the
(05:14):
actor Guild strike, or they have the director's Guild strike.
You have to follow what your union does or you
risk being kicked out of those unions. So the second
that you have the unions come forward and say that,
the artists kind of typically historically follow along with those
with those threats.
Speaker 2 (05:32):
Yeah, I don't I don't disagree with those those things
or that logic, But if the studio would have held strong,
I believe if they didn't break, the studio would would
ultimately be able to.
Speaker 3 (05:46):
Win, perhaps because you see.
Speaker 1 (05:49):
That in in uh in some they're not going to
hold strong. I mean, you have people internally there that
also believe and align with Jimmy Kimmel. And that's been
the problem with the conservative movement kind of completely walking
away from Hollywood decades ago. They've relinquished that institution and
(06:10):
it's been completely infested by liberals and far left activists,
and we're seeing how that plays out right now. And
the issue here now is that Jimmy Kimmel has become
a figurehead of the MAGA resistance. He'll be on the
air for the foreseeable future because of that. They will
not even if his show loses money and loses money
(06:32):
in a big way, they will not cancel him because
he has successfully positioned himself as this kind of loggerhead
against the MAGA movement. And you saw these people rally,
you know, in his defense. It doesn't matter whether the
general public wants him there or not, or whether the
(06:53):
these kind of free market principles work or not. It's
that the studio is calculating, and I think it was
a business calculation. They don't want to lose this talent
in some of their other projects and create this issue
for themselves, this business issue for themselves.
Speaker 3 (07:09):
They were they're.
Speaker 1 (07:10):
Also potentially being sued by their shareholders. There is a
group of shareholders that are coming forward demanding the communications
that were happening behind the scenes to judge whether Disney
management was being pressured or not. By government forces. So
I mean, I think this has been a kind of
(07:30):
an interesting case study, and also it kind of shows
the public that I think, if we continue to make
all of our kind of resistance to the left as
political activism, it's going to be short lived victories. And
(07:51):
we're seeing that right now. Jimmy Kimmel, everyone kind of says, oh,
his ratings are low, his ratings are low, and his ratings,
his Nielsen ratings are low. But if you go to YouTube,
he has a pretty big following on YouTube. His views
generally get in the millions.
Speaker 2 (08:06):
Which heard that we're also on YouTube now.
Speaker 1 (08:11):
But the hypocrisy, I think is the thing that's been
bothering so many people. Here is all of these late
night comedians cheering on Trump's censorship. This is how you
know that they're completely full of shit when it comes
to their free speech arguments.
Speaker 4 (08:25):
Trump has been suspended from Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, and even Snapchat.
But don't worry, mister president. There are still plenty of
apps you do have access to. You still have Spotify
to drown out the sound of millions of people cheering
as you leave Google, Apple and Amazon removed the Parlor
app from their platforms. Parlor is where all the right
wingers gather to post qann sense and misspell.
Speaker 3 (08:49):
The word parlor.
Speaker 4 (08:50):
Trumpers are complaining bitterly that they're being silenced. They, in fact,
they won't shut up about being silenced.
Speaker 5 (08:55):
I love having Donald Trump off Twitter. Not to mention
all the other toxic racists and conspiracy theorists that have
been booted off. A lifetime Twitter ban has got a sting.
They took away his precious. Twitter isn't the only social
media side that wants nothing to do with our president.
He's also been banned or restricted from a bevy of
other platforms, including Facebook, Snapchat, Instagram, Reddit, and even Twitch.
(09:20):
What are you waiting for? Porn Hub? It's not a coincidence,
it's a consequence. I know it's hard for you to
recognize it because you've never faced one before.
Speaker 6 (09:30):
Lifetime ban. Trump's basically the Pete Rose of social media.
Right now, Trump's phone is stuffed into a pile of
rice after being drenched with tears. In addition to Twitter,
Trump has been banned or restricted from Apple, Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, Google, Amazon, Pinterest, TikTok, YouTube, Reddit, Twitch, Stripe, Discord,
(09:59):
and shopify. Trump started this year thinking he should be
on Mount Rush. For now he can't even get on Instagram.
Speaker 7 (10:04):
Elon Musk is in the middle of purchasing Twitter Well. Today,
Musk said that one of the first things he would
do after the acquisition goes through is lift the permanent
Twitter ban on Donald Trump. Tell you are banning Trump
was like one of the few clicked, almost good things
Twitter has done in like a decade is that Donald
(10:25):
Trump is a scam account. It's all a scam. All
it's a scam.
Speaker 1 (10:30):
So those are all the late night hosts on pretty
much every you know public wave channel. They it's like
a monopoly board to them. And there's a reason why
they go ape shit when somebody like Jimmy Kimmel or
somebody like Stephen Colbert are taken off is because they
want complete control of the monopoly board. If they don't
(10:52):
have complete control of that, other information can get out
there to the public. And the public airwaves are important
because it gets they have full penetration of America. You're
in every household when you have control of these public airwaves,
as opposed to cable, which doesn't get into every household.
That's why they is so important. For them to hold
(11:16):
onto these public airwave stations, and why they want all
of late night completely consumed with left leaning comedians because
they have this kind of leeway to be able to
at times lie through jokes and they could just say, oh,
it's just a joke, you know, it doesn't matter whether
(11:36):
it's true or not. I'm making something funny. They have
a tool and a vehicle and a platform to mock
the president every single night, and then they could export
the clips of that onto all of the social media platforms.
And in addition to that, there's an air of legitimacy
when you are on ABC or NBC or CBS, because
(11:58):
we're talking about legacy channels that have been around for
what now plus one hundred years if you go back
to the rate times of radio. So there's a legitimacy
associated with that that they want to block from the
conservative movement. There is a problem in that, and I
think conservatives are to blame for allowing this to happen
(12:19):
for so long.
Speaker 2 (12:20):
And I want to go back to something you said
earlier which I really want to drive home, and it's
that if the right doesn't start to take culture seriously,
then every win will be short lived. I just don't
want that point to not be driven home.
Speaker 1 (12:37):
It's a huge one, and it became the kind of
the thesis of our Phylish Schlaffley series or two part
series on Philish Slaughley to where you know, it's as
clear as day. Here was a political activist, incredibly effective
political activist, a whip smart woman. She goes up against
this movement, this Equal Rights Amendment movement era movement. She
(13:02):
battles them for like a decade and beats them politically
through activism. She takes this amendment off of some of
the states. They don't get enough votes, the Equal Rights
Amendment doesn't get passed, which would have you know, kind
of brought in all of these kind of genderless rules
back in the day. So what does the left do.
They go into Hollywood, they go into the education, they
(13:26):
go into all of these kinds of institutions, these cultural institutions,
and they change the culture via these institutions. So a
political win ended up being a short lived win in
the long run. These because the Left understood the power
of these cultural institutions. If the people are aligned with
(13:48):
you culturally through propaganda, through lies and what have you
going through these institutions, then you end up winning. I
want to play a clip. This is I listened to
this interview probably twice a year just to kind of
remind me. It's Andrew Breibart being asked about why he
started Big Hollywood, and this is kind of his discussion.
(14:10):
It's with this guy, kind of a really early blogger.
His name is Luke Ford, and this is a right
around the launch of Big Hollywood. Brightepart News is Big Hollywood,
and here he is talking about why he launched Big Hollywood.
Speaker 8 (14:24):
The conservative movement has completely detached itself from the concept
of popular culture and thinks that it can survive in
the twenty first century on politics and legislation alone and
political rhetoric and great writing reflecting conservative principles. And that's
(14:45):
not going to happen. What needs to happen is at
the conservative movement, based in Washington, d C. For the
most part, and with ancillary entities around the country, New
York City, Dallas, Virginia. These people have ignored anything west
of the Mississippi for a generation and they're suffering the
(15:07):
consequences and the election of Barack Obama as evidence of that.
They the conservative movement proper did not embrace Ronald Reagan initially,
but it eventually came to accept him as the standard
bearer of conservatism. He was successful less because he carried
conservative principles, but because he came from Hollywood and he
(15:30):
understood the importance of communication and pop culture. It took
them a long time to realize that that magic was
a good way to sell conservatism. That bride eyed optimism,
and so the conservative movement needs to go focus on
Hollywood in countless ways. It needs to encourage its young
(15:50):
to go out to Hollywood to become screenwriters, actors, producers
below the line workers. It also needs to focus on
Hollywood proper film reviews and become engaged in the debate
out there. It's interesting that we have so many people
in the conservative movement who write about legislation and political
(16:13):
controversies every single day, but very few people focus on
pop culture. And pop culture is the DNA of who
we are, and we export that through the satellite dishes
and in our DVDs and on the television screen and
in films across the world. And if we don't alter
(16:35):
that DNA, if we don't try to inject in it,
our best qualities and not our worst qualities. Our fate
is in the hands of people who don't agree with us,
and that fate is in people in Hollywood that we
disagree with right now, so we have to take them
on using their skills.
Speaker 1 (16:53):
So, I mean, that is such a profound statement he had.
It was an interview that he did with Luke Forward
in January seventh, two thousand and nine. Shortly after that
they launched Big Hollywood, and then we met him, you know,
half a year or so after that. But he says
it right there, and it's it's still now we're talking
(17:14):
sixteen years later. It still has not seeped into the
conservative movement. How important. And I see this on Twitter
and I see people, oh, you know, laughing at him,
coming back at Jimmy Kimmel like it's no big deal,
Like his ratings are low, So it doesn't matter. It
matters because it's not just here. We're not just creating
(17:34):
problems for ourselves here in the United States. We export
our Hollywood content out there into the world, out there,
into international communities. There's a reason why you see like
these big artists, like you know, a Brad Pitt or
what have you. In ads in Japan, or in ads
in France, or in ads in you have now you
(17:54):
have Angelina Jolie speaking. I think it was in Italy
poorly about the United States to the Italian press. Comes
basically everybody that is against the American whale of life,
the traditional American whale of life are now that you
have these messes emissaries excuse me out there into these
(18:15):
international communities speaking poorly about the United States, to the
media out there that's even farther left than our American media,
and creating in an atmosphere that despises Trump and just
despises the American people.
Speaker 2 (18:30):
Yeah, they have a global platform. Imagine if those people
were pro America patriot and they were spreading the message
of prosperity in America, of happiness, of family values, of
everything that we believe in, everything that is good, rather
(18:51):
than this hate for our country and the way that
our country was built.
Speaker 1 (18:57):
Exactly. So that is why we keep coming back to this,
to this topic. And we're not going to let you know,
Andrew's words die. You know, this has been something that
we've been fighting for, even you know, before we met Andrew.
It was one of the reasons why I think he
gravitated towards us, and you know he states that in
his book, you know, thank you for our understanding that
(19:18):
the culture is more and art and music is more
important than politics. This has been something that we've been
fighting for for years and years and years, and it's
what brought us together with Andrew back in two thousand
and nine.
Speaker 2 (19:30):
Yeah, and you know, listen, it's been and it's going
to be, you know, a long, long march. And it's
a schleip because the reality is is that we haven't
even been able to get Andrew's legacy Brightbart to support us.
So even people on the right aren't doing the right
(19:50):
thing and supporting culture and storyteller.
Speaker 3 (19:52):
I think they're not.
Speaker 1 (19:53):
I think the issue, I think what people they've part
of the problem. What's happened in the conservative movement is
the media stuff is there's a quick gratific. You get
it immediately you put out a story out there. You
kind of there's an immediate gratification associated with that. The
storytelling stuff, it takes time. You have to right, you
(20:15):
have to modify it, you keep going back to it,
you have to develop it, and your product doesn't get
out for sometimes weeks, months, sometimes years to where if
you just sit in front of a microphone and just
kind of pontificate on the things of the day, it's
very easy to get that kind of stuff out quickly.
And so that is kind of I think why a
(20:37):
lot You've seen a lot of these conservative movement people
shy away from all of the Hollywood stuff, and all
they do now is just kind of poo pooh wokeness
in Hollywood when it comes forward, and they are we
do not have a farm league the same way that
the left does. They have control of the entire infrastructure,
(20:59):
whether it be the film schools, whether it be the
Rotten to Made It, whether it be the film reviews,
whether it be you know, the literary you know people
that sign books and that that sign people to write
books and to give them, you know, money to write books.
These people control in all of these cultural institutions. And
(21:20):
so it's something that we keep trying to drive home
because it is so important. Otherwise you're going to have
this kind of a little bit of political activism that
happens occasionally that gets people off the air for a
couple of days and then they come back even stronger.
You would be lying to yourself if you did not
say that. Jimmy Kimmel is not stronger now than he
(21:44):
was a week and a half two weeks ago. He
is definitely stronger now. He has secured his position there
and he's going to go at Trump even harder because
now he feels a little bit immune from these FCC
rules out there that they are supposed to be, you know,
have this public interest for a content that they're supposed
to put out there in the public air waves. He
(22:05):
feels a little bit immune to that right now. That
is why we say it's so important to get involved
in the culture. I want to talk a little bit
about this YouTube censorship and as well as some of
these Charlie Kirk conspiracy theories, and we're going to get
to that right after the break, But first, how safe
is your retirement? War is everywhere. Debt continues to skyrocket,
(22:26):
and the dollar is losing purchasing power. The value of
the dollar is falling fast. That's why more people are
converting their IRA and four oh one k to a
gold and silver IRA to protect their retirement savings. In
twenty twenty five, both gold and silver have risen an
impressive twenty nine percent, and many experts project even bigger
(22:47):
gains ahead. Take action now convert some of your IRA
or four oh one K to a gold and silver
IRA with Lear Capital. Call eight hundred four eight zero
one one zero zero for your free Precious Metals Guide
and IRA transfer kit, and with a qualified purchase, get
up to fifteen thousand dollars in bonus gold or silver
(23:08):
deposited directly into your precious metals IRA. Lear Capital, the
nation's leader in precious medals for twenty eight years. Call
today eight hundred four eight zero one one zero zero.
That's eight hundred four eight zero one one zero zero
eight hundred four eight zero one one zero zero. Keep
in mind that any investment has a certain amount of
(23:28):
risk associated with it, and you should only invest if
you can afford to bear the risk of loss. Before
making investment decisions, you should carefully consider and review all
risks involved. You're listening to Red Pilled America's Famboogie. Become
a fanband member by going to Redpilled America dot com
and clicking join in the top menu. Support storytelling, Support
(23:51):
what you love guys, or it fades away. I wanted
to expand a little bit more on this last discussion
that we had about this whole Jimmy Kimmel thing and
how important it is for us to have long term
wins and political activism alone doesn't do that. A case
in point here is you have this Google admits censorship.
Speaker 3 (24:13):
Now.
Speaker 1 (24:13):
I don't know if you guys saw this, but in
a recent hearing, Google admitted that the Biden administration censorship
pressures were imposed on YouTube and they felt pressure to
basically terminate and ban certain users. And there you have,
you know, another kind of indication that all of these
(24:34):
you know, late night people are full of shit because
they're saying, oh, this is unprecedented, that the president was
fighting against free speech and he used the FCC to
pressure to get Jimmy Kimmel off, which it turned out
to be that not being the case, ended up being
that the ABC executives were concerned, at least this is
the stories put out by the Hollywood press that they
(24:55):
were concerned that Jimmy was going to fan the flames
by coming back and not apologizing and doubling down on
blaming the MAGA people for the assassination of Charlie kirk. So,
but now you have the Google people basically saying no,
they were actually we were pressured by the Biden administration
as well, and they're saying now that they're gonna, you know,
(25:18):
all the people that were banned from YouTube, They're going
to bring back those people. But it's already been tested.
Alex Jones tried to open an account, and so did
Nick Fuentes. Both of their accounts were nuked, you know,
pretty quickly. I'm pretty sure Owen Benjamin doesn't also does
not have an account there as well. But it is
incredibly important for us to spread our wings within the
(25:40):
creative space. We cannot be happy with an ophead here
or you know, Fox News there, or AM Radio, but
they pushed us into these kind of ghetto digital ghettos,
all right. And I thought this was another important clip
because we're working on some other stories and some of
(26:01):
these old clips have been coming out there. I listened to.
I listened to these these interviews at least a couple
times a year because it kind of reminds me of
the fight that we're in. Here is Andrew Breitbart talking
about wanting more than just AM Radio, and wanting more
than just this kind of gilded ghetto that we have
been relegated to This is in an interview with the
(26:22):
Hoover Institute.
Speaker 9 (26:24):
I you, I Andrew Breitport. I'm at war with the
mainstream media. I'm at war with the mainstream media because
they portray themselves as objective observers reality when they're hacks
who think they can destroy everything America stands for. But
shouldn't you relax? Things are working out. There's Fox News,
there's rush limbo there.
Speaker 10 (26:44):
That's not enough. That's not enough. That's not enough. This
is what angers me.
Speaker 3 (26:48):
So about that. That's what I want to know.
Speaker 4 (26:50):
Why are more relaxed.
Speaker 9 (26:51):
We're twenty years into it. Just as you said, you say, oh, okay,
I'll take.
Speaker 10 (26:54):
A because AM radio an op ed column and Fox
News is not enough the big what you want.
Speaker 8 (27:03):
But I want.
Speaker 10 (27:05):
I want a center right nation to fight for its
soul and its soul is represented in the arts. Its
soul is represented in in in in a in a
world in which media is everything. AM radio is the
lowest form of communication. It's it's it's it's it's tinny,
it's not it's it's it's not robust, it's not avatar.
(27:28):
I want avatar. I want the right to enter the
world of media to the extent and invest in media
the way that the left does. George Soros is throwing
money like crazy. You want an NPR, I want everything,
I want us, I want all right, they have an NPR.
They're so slick and understanding how important media is. They've
(27:48):
convinced the government to pay them to propagate their worldview.
How come we're not fighting for money to propagate our
world because we don't believe in it. Okay, Then use
the free market to convey the same ideas with the
same level of sophistication and excellence that NPR does, because
they are superior at what they do, just as John
Stewart is superior at what he does. I grant Hollywood
(28:11):
and the experts in propaganda for what they do. In fact,
that's what annoys you, that it annoys me, and it
annoys that our side does not commit to this battle.
Speaker 1 (28:23):
It's not just storytelling that you know, your standard kind
of films and TV shows. They become good at narrative building,
which is why you see in the wake of Charlie
Kirk's assassination where everything was pointing towards conservatives dominating the
(28:43):
news cycles and the narrative. After that, they did a
jiu jitsu move and made Jimmy Kimmel the victim who
didn't die. He just basically was suspended for a matter
of a couple of days. Because that's how good they
are at the narrative building. And when they have control
of practically the entire narrative machine, then they could do
(29:04):
those kinds of jiu jitsu moves. That is why it
is so important to be involved and get involved culturally
to all of these cultural institutions, and the right has
completely abdicated it's a responsibility in that area. And for
years I remember hearing them, Oh, you know, we're busy,
we're working, you know, Oh you know, we're doing real work,
(29:27):
we're building real things. Well, while they were doing that,
the left completely saturated all these cultural institutions, took them
over and now has people posting and dancing on the
grave of a guy like Charlie Charlie Kirk because culturally
they're not going to be filling that many repercussions because
(29:48):
of it, which I want to lead into this whole
you know, Charlie Kirk conspiracy theories. Now with some of
these assassination conspiracy theories because we're seeing these out there
like crazy, Like all of you, I'm sure you guys were,
you know, bothered and hurt by the assassination of Charlie Kirk.
It deeply moved us here at red Pilled America. And
(30:10):
I wasn't admittedly a huge Charlie Kirk follower. I didn't
listen to a lot of his stuff, although I paid
attention to him because he's kind of was a big
figure in the conservative movement. But I wouldn't call myself
like an avid supporter or fan of his. But it
deeply bothered me when he was killed for it because
(30:32):
he was just a nice guy. He seemed like to
be a nice guy.
Speaker 2 (30:36):
Yeah, I mean, if I'm being honest, I don't feel
like I've still recovered. I'm not recovered from it.
Speaker 1 (30:39):
I'm not recovered from it yet either, And which is
so which bothers me when I see the ability of
the left to change the narrative so quickly and to
create a victim in Jimmy Kimmel is stunning. But I
also need to call out the things that are happening
within our own circle when it comes to these conspiracy
theories that are being out there about Charlie Kirk. Now,
(31:03):
and I think that we have been so saturated with
the conspiracy theory bug and virus on the right because
it leads to clicks and it gets enormous views. So
this Range Day bro puts up this video and it's
an alternative theory on the assassination of Charlie Kirk. And
(31:27):
he claims to have got these two different videos that
show one looks like some kind of a shot coming
from behind Charlie Kirk in this building, in this kind
of dark area in this building, and then he get
does a close up on Charlie's head. I'm sorry, this
is going to get be a little bit graphic, but
(31:47):
he shows right when he's hit blood splatter coming from
the back of his head. And he goes into this
discussion about the assassination, and he's very definitive about what
he's found.
Speaker 6 (32:03):
Ladies and gentlemen, I now have acquired proof that the
FBI's official story is false.
Speaker 4 (32:08):
Whether knowingly or unknowingly.
Speaker 6 (32:09):
We're going to have an entire monologue and talk about
a lot of these things.
Speaker 1 (32:12):
So he goes on in this video to make the
claim that we now know you know with certainty that
he was shot from behind. Okay, sounds very very and
you know this guy's you know, has all these guns
and rifles behind him. He comes with all this kind
of credibility as an expert on ballistics.
Speaker 2 (32:32):
And also when you look at the video that he's showing,
it does look like something's coming out from the back
of Charlie's head. Yes, it does. He's saying it's blood
until your mind thinks, oh my god, that is blood.
Speaker 3 (32:42):
Yes.
Speaker 1 (32:43):
So, but now when you actually look at the other
angle of this shot, which anyone with any credibility would
and should do.
Speaker 2 (32:53):
You should if you're going to be making videos like
this and claim.
Speaker 1 (32:56):
Kind of a claim of course, Okay, when you look
at it from from the other angle, from the profile
angle of Charlie Kirk, One, there's no bullet that goes
into his head. And two, this blood splatter that this
guy is highlighting is not blood splatter. It's some either
it's something in his ear. It's an earpiece. It's like
a clear ear piece, and you see it shootout right
(33:19):
when Charlie Kirk is hit. Now, if I'm putting out
a video making definitive claims that this definitively shows that
the FBI's story is false. I'm going to check that
other angle, but of course he does not, and because
he doesn't show it here in this video, if he did,
you would clearly see that it's the earpiece that's shooting
(33:40):
out in the back. This video now has six point
three million views, and if you look in the comments,
what you see is is a movement Charlie supporters and
a MAGA movement that are completely in line with what
this guy is saying.
Speaker 3 (34:00):
This is a serious.
Speaker 1 (34:02):
Problem we are having now because what you do is
is you go on to some of the one of
the more popular conservative podcasts in Patrick Bett David and
they give this discussion, this theory, this alternative theory, credibility
and credence.
Speaker 11 (34:21):
Another angle of a potential shooter of where this shot
couldn't talk about Charlie Kirk.
Speaker 3 (34:26):
Now about Charlie Kirk. That's on that one we're talking
about conversation. Yeah, that was.
Speaker 11 (34:31):
And from my opinion, Patrick, this dude and a bunch
of shooters and a bunch of snipers and me and
Tom actually had a conversation last night. Never go with
the official narrative, and when you're seeing different angles and
me and Mike you've been talking about this too, and
I don't want to show close up to anything like
that pack because I don't want to get it gets
they blow out his face, but it's still graphic. You're
going to see something on Charlie's right side, like a
(34:51):
little blood spat on the right side, and it looks
like an exit wolves.
Speaker 6 (34:55):
Do you see this time?
Speaker 3 (34:56):
Yes? I did.
Speaker 5 (34:56):
I was watching a report by what appeared to be
a very rational and specific ex military, a gentleman from Turkey.
Speaker 1 (35:05):
So they go on and discuss this video as it
being like you know, highly credible, and they even promote
the guy and tell everybody to go over there. And
why Well, because they see the algorithm basically benefiting, you,
benefiting from putting out this kind of content. This thing
has over six million views, and so they want to
(35:26):
kind of capitalize.
Speaker 2 (35:28):
I want to capitalize on that. They want to get
the engagement, they want to get the clicks, they want
to get the likes, they want to get the shares.
So that's what social media, that's that's the game. And
so when they see something that the audience is falling for.
Speaker 1 (35:41):
They go with it without even doing the kind of research.
I mean, to be responsible to do a little bit
of research before you put something like this out there.
I mean, this is what you're basically saying by taking
on this position is you're basically saying that Dan Bongino
and Cash Betel to clearly maga people are lying to
(36:04):
the public and that are basically trying to cover up
what actually happened to Charlie Kirk. You're also attacking Charlie
Kirk's wife and turning point USA because you're also claiming
that they are inept at not trying to push this
issue forward. The guy, his father said that he confessed
(36:29):
to him the shooter, the shooter's father. This isn't something
like Lee Harvey Alswald where you can claim that he
was a patsy where he jumped off the top of
the building and they caught him right there with everything. No,
this guy took off and left, and there's actually images
of him going to kind of a fast food place
(36:49):
to get something to eat or ice cream or what
have you. He gets two hundred plus miles away from
the shooting site, he goes days without getting caught, and
then eventually is caught by his parents by the away
who turn him in, who claim that he confessed to them.
You have text messages, so now you're saying that the
(37:11):
FBI run by Cash Battal and Dan Bongino are lying
about those text messages. They have found this shooter's DNA
on a towel. They found the shooter's DNA on a
screwdriver near the I believe on the rooftop that he
would have needed to basically take apart this rifle. And
(37:32):
then there's other people that are out there that are
searching for the truth that show that you can easily
take it apart very quickly and put it into your
pants and hide it and walk onto campus with them
in your pants. So I mean, but of course that
only gets like twenty thousand views. But this charlatan that
(37:54):
is putting out this information without kind of verifying everything
else on it gets six million plus views. And this
is the problem now that we're seeing on the right,
these conservative YouTubers are gaming the algorithm, and they see
this kind of these kind of audiences that almost always
(38:17):
gravitate towards conspiracy theories as their base. They don't want
to believe anything but a conspiracy theory. It's almost like
a victimhood ideology that has infected the right because you're
constantly thinking, I'm being wronged here, I'm being lied to here,
even by my side. It really is the victim ideology
(38:41):
that you see on the left, but the right's version
of it. Because there is there does come a time
where you do have to kind of look at the
evidence and say, Okay, this makes sense. Otherwise, Cash Bital,
Dan Bongino, Turning Point, and Erica Kirk are all lying
to me, and they are hiding the true killer. And
(39:03):
you know what you're doing by doing all of this
is you're basically diminishing this son of a bitch that
killed him, and you're giving him arguments in a court
of law that he can use to get off. And
I'm seeing this happen time and time again by huge
YouTubers now that are coming forward with these theories left
(39:27):
and right. Oh, that it was a it's his mic
that was on his T shirt, okay, which would mean
that it was his own people that killed him. By
the way that.
Speaker 2 (39:36):
It exploded, that it exploded sort of explosion, that's another
big around.
Speaker 3 (39:41):
Yeah, exactly.
Speaker 2 (39:41):
You know what people love conspiracy theories, they do I
spoke to somebody today that I hadn't spoke to in
a long long time, and first thing she brought up is, Oh,
my gosh, who do you think killed Charlie Kirk? I said,
what are you talking about? She said, I don't believe
for one second that it was the guy that they're
telling us. And you know what else, I don't trust
the wife. And I thought, what are are you talking about?
(40:04):
Right now? These conspiracy theories are running rampant, and they're dangerous.
Speaker 1 (40:09):
They're dangerous because they are really letting off this guy
who who literally turned himself in.
Speaker 2 (40:15):
Yeah, I think it's disgusting.
Speaker 1 (40:17):
You think it's disgusted drives me like completely. It's just
it goes against everything. We cannot replace the legacy media
with this slop that's out there right now, and.
Speaker 2 (40:30):
There's so much of it, there's so much, so much of.
Speaker 1 (40:33):
It, These this kind of conspiracy theory slop and all
this AI slop that's just getting dumped onto the American
public right now. You know, it's it's kind of giving
credence to the censors, you know, because people are going
to gravitate to this shit no matter what. They're going
to gravitate to this stuff because they love a conspiracy theory.
(40:54):
I love it, And that's already happening within, like you know,
less than two weeks of his death, and all these
conspiracy theories are already coming out on his death and
what have you, and people saying, oh, it's a magic
going with this magic bullet like JFK. No, it wouldn't
have been lodged in him. But if you look and
you see that there has been thirty odd six cases
or case studies where it does get lodged into the
(41:16):
person that gets shot. And so this isn't like some
kind of a rare occurrence, and it just I don't
know how this gets fixed other than just continue to
tell the truth.
Speaker 2 (41:29):
Well, I mean, listen, I'm going to say this until
I'm blue in the face. And I know you guys
are probably sick of me saying this, but this is
why we need you, guys, our audience, our red pilled
America audience, to share our show, Share it on social media,
Go onto you poop, give us a like, follow us there.
We have got to continue to spread the truth because
(41:51):
there's so much crap out there, so much slop that's
completely saturating the social media airwaves.
Speaker 1 (41:59):
I mean, if you're going to jump into conspiracy theories,
I would say one that is kind of fun if
you can actually think about one being kind of interesting.
On this is this Snake Eyes movie that came out.
I believe it was in nineteen ninety eight. I don't
know if you saw this one out. It kind of
like is more another data point for this us being
(42:21):
in a simulation because you have a guy that got
the victim in this movie was killed. His name was
Charles Kirkland. He was killed by a gunshot to the
neck by a sniper, and the sniper's name had Tyler
in it. The same thing with the person that was killed,
(42:45):
you know that killed Charlie kirk His name was Lincoln Tyler.
And there's a Trump connection that it was filmed at
the taj Mah Hall. So there's like there's these other
conspiracy angles where you could kind of like, oh, okay,
this is kind of interesting. Maybe we're living in a simulation.
I mean, look at how this was done in nineteen
ninety eight, so it's all factual information. It was put
out there in nineteen ninety eight, so there's nothing kind
(43:08):
of like you know, you know, potentially false about the
information that when I saw that, I was like, oh,
this can't be real. And I started looking into it,
I'm like, oh my god, it's actually every one of
these points is actually true, other than I think they
said the movie was released on September tenth, and I
don't think that there was any or excuse me, they
said that the killing in the movie happened on September tenth.
(43:29):
There's been no corroboration of that.
Speaker 2 (43:30):
Okay, but yeah, I agree the simulation. That's a good,
you know, theory to get into.
Speaker 1 (43:34):
But I mean, but at least it's not like it's
based in some kind of like interesting kind of you know,
factual information. But instead these guys are just jumping on
this slop. I don't have the DNA within me to
lie to the public in that way or lie by omission,
you know, And that's kind of you know, we've spoken
(43:55):
about this with the coin Toss series that we did
part of the problem with this whole twenty four seven
news cycle. And if you guys want to go check
our YouTube movie on this, our YouTube documentary on this,
it's out there right now. It's about a twenty minute
documentary on this. It's it turns our Coin Toss audio
documentary into a video version. We talk about how the
(44:16):
twenty four hour news cycle is kind of what ruined
the legacy media in that this constant need to put
content out there, this beast that you constantly need to feed,
and you're seeing that with guys like you know this
segment on Patrick Bett David who I typically you know,
I enjoy his podcast, but when I saw him put
this out there and I'm like, how do you put
(44:36):
this out there with not checking on this? Like, look
into this a little bit. It's really important. The truth
does matter. That's it for this week's version of fam Boogie.
We're working on another Red Pilled America's story behind the scenes.
Keep an eye out for it. It's coming out soon.
And please go check out our video documentary series over
(45:00):
at YouTube. Get a subscribe, a lie comment, it's free
to do all of that. You'll be supporting the show
and if you want to become a fanband member, go
to Redpilled America dot com and click join in the
top menu.
Speaker 3 (45:13):
Support which you lover goes away.
Speaker 1 (45:14):
Guys, Thanks for your support and enjoy your weekend.
Speaker 10 (45:18):
Hi.
Speaker 2 (45:18):
Everyone,
This is Red Pilled America.
Speaker 2 (00:10):
You're listening to Red Pilled America's fam Boogie. Welcome to
Part two. But before we get into it, you guys,
we want to remind you that we're doing YouTube video now.
This has been a long time in the making, so
please head over to YouTube. Put in Red Pilled America Podcast,
look us up, give us a follow, and watch our
new video. Give it a like, share it and you.
Speaker 1 (00:29):
Could also see it in the show notes. We'll leave
a link. We're going to get into this Jimmy Kimmel
fiasco right now. We spoke about this last week, this
consequence culture that seemed to be people were basically saying
it was cancel culture, and it was obviously not cancel culture.
It was a man who lied on public airwaves about
(00:53):
who murdered Charlie Kirk and was taken off swiftly taken off.
Well now he's back on and he had the biggest
ratings ever for his show, the most watched monologue. And
you know what I found was kind of disgusting in
a way is if you look at the video for
(01:14):
that episode they came back, it's right, you know, the
the icon or the image that they use for the video.
It says, as I was saying, that's what Trump said
when he came back after almost being assassinated. So he's
throwing himself in that and to use that as also
kind of the lead in after he lied about Charlie
(01:38):
Kirk's murderer. It's just kind of a mocking, a subtle
mocking at a whole other level. Well, you know, it
is now being said. You know, once this information came
out that he was going to be back on air,
both Next Star and Sinclair, the affiliates, the ABC affiliates
that I think they were in something like thirty eight
(01:58):
markets or something like that, a huge maybe it was
thirty eight million households, something like that. They came forward
and said that they were going to continue to preempt them,
and I tweeted out on our red Pilled America account,
our ex account, saying that I think that that's going
to be short lived. I think that at some point
Sinclair and Next Star are going to bring his show
(02:21):
back to the air. And the primary reason why that prediction,
why I made that prediction, was is that ultimately, and
you correctly said in our discussion last week about this,
that they hadn't said that they fired him, and that
was a very clear indication that at some point they
were going to bring him back. We're probably going to
be bringing it back. They're kind of testing the waters.
(02:42):
I think they're going to see if he was going
to apologize or how he was going to respond to
them in meetings and what have you. But you correctly
kind of framed that.
Speaker 2 (02:51):
I have to say it was much more short lived
though than I thought. I thought they were going to
hold out a little bit longer.
Speaker 1 (02:56):
I didn't think it was going to be that long,
and so I went on to Twitter and I said,
I think this is going to be short lived. And
sure enough, I want to say, it was like forty
eight hours, you know, seventy two hours later, Sinclair is
now stating that they're going to end the preemption and
bring him back. And it's kind of an interesting take
(03:16):
because they initially said they wanted him to apologize, which
he did not, and they want him to give a
donation to Turning Point USA, which he did not. But
Sinclair has now ended his preemption and I think, you know,
it's kind of easy to see this coming because ultimately,
these studios, these all these content providers. The issue that
(03:39):
they have is having access to talent. The talent run
the Hollywood industry. If you don't have access to the talent,
then you cannot create the content that people want to see.
And so you had all of these major artists, these
major actors, these directors, these kind of big wigs that
(04:01):
have been involved in all I would for some time,
I think it was over four hundred signed a letter
with the ACLU saying that they need to fight for
free speech. Once I saw that letter come out, I
was like, Okay, this is going to be a pretty
short lived thing because ABC is going to bring him back.
They need to bring him back because if they don't,
(04:24):
it not only impacts that show, it impacts all of
their shows, all of their content. Disney is creating movies,
they have other channels, they have countless cable networks that
they've Some of these artists were already saying that they
were going to boycott Disney and they were not going
to work with them if they did not bring Jimmy
(04:46):
Kimmel back, which.
Speaker 2 (04:47):
By the way, I don't believe. I don't believe that
when push comes to shove at the end of the day,
that they would turn down the jobs.
Speaker 1 (04:53):
I think they would. And here's why I think they
would is because you had the union coming forward and
also speaking out for Jimmy Kimmel. If the union says
something and then actually starts to employ that and put
that into action, you are you have to follow along
with the union the same way that they have the strikes.
When they have the writers strike or they have the
(05:14):
actor Guild strike, or they have the director's Guild strike.
You have to follow what your union does or you
risk being kicked out of those unions. So the second
that you have the unions come forward and say that,
the artists kind of typically historically follow along with those
with those threats.
Speaker 2 (05:32):
Yeah, I don't I don't disagree with those those things
or that logic, But if the studio would have held strong,
I believe if they didn't break, the studio would would
ultimately be able to.
Speaker 3 (05:46):
Win, perhaps because you see.
Speaker 1 (05:49):
That in in uh in some they're not going to
hold strong. I mean, you have people internally there that
also believe and align with Jimmy Kimmel. And that's been
the problem with the conservative movement kind of completely walking
away from Hollywood decades ago. They've relinquished that institution and
(06:10):
it's been completely infested by liberals and far left activists,
and we're seeing how that plays out right now. And
the issue here now is that Jimmy Kimmel has become
a figurehead of the MAGA resistance. He'll be on the
air for the foreseeable future because of that. They will
not even if his show loses money and loses money
(06:32):
in a big way, they will not cancel him because
he has successfully positioned himself as this kind of loggerhead
against the MAGA movement. And you saw these people rally,
you know, in his defense. It doesn't matter whether the
general public wants him there or not, or whether the
(06:53):
these kind of free market principles work or not. It's
that the studio is calculating, and I think it was
a business calculation. They don't want to lose this talent
in some of their other projects and create this issue
for themselves, this business issue for themselves.
Speaker 3 (07:09):
They were they're.
Speaker 1 (07:10):
Also potentially being sued by their shareholders. There is a
group of shareholders that are coming forward demanding the communications
that were happening behind the scenes to judge whether Disney
management was being pressured or not. By government forces. So
I mean, I think this has been a kind of
(07:30):
an interesting case study, and also it kind of shows
the public that I think, if we continue to make
all of our kind of resistance to the left as
political activism, it's going to be short lived victories. And
(07:51):
we're seeing that right now. Jimmy Kimmel, everyone kind of says, oh,
his ratings are low, his ratings are low, and his ratings,
his Nielsen ratings are low. But if you go to YouTube,
he has a pretty big following on YouTube. His views
generally get in the millions.
Speaker 2 (08:06):
Which heard that we're also on YouTube now.
Speaker 1 (08:11):
But the hypocrisy, I think is the thing that's been
bothering so many people. Here is all of these late
night comedians cheering on Trump's censorship. This is how you
know that they're completely full of shit when it comes
to their free speech arguments.
Speaker 4 (08:25):
Trump has been suspended from Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, and even Snapchat.
But don't worry, mister president. There are still plenty of
apps you do have access to. You still have Spotify
to drown out the sound of millions of people cheering
as you leave Google, Apple and Amazon removed the Parlor
app from their platforms. Parlor is where all the right
wingers gather to post qann sense and misspell.
Speaker 3 (08:49):
The word parlor.
Speaker 4 (08:50):
Trumpers are complaining bitterly that they're being silenced. They, in fact,
they won't shut up about being silenced.
Speaker 5 (08:55):
I love having Donald Trump off Twitter. Not to mention
all the other toxic racists and conspiracy theorists that have
been booted off. A lifetime Twitter ban has got a sting.
They took away his precious. Twitter isn't the only social
media side that wants nothing to do with our president.
He's also been banned or restricted from a bevy of
other platforms, including Facebook, Snapchat, Instagram, Reddit, and even Twitch.
(09:20):
What are you waiting for? Porn Hub? It's not a coincidence,
it's a consequence. I know it's hard for you to
recognize it because you've never faced one before.
Speaker 6 (09:30):
Lifetime ban. Trump's basically the Pete Rose of social media.
Right now, Trump's phone is stuffed into a pile of
rice after being drenched with tears. In addition to Twitter,
Trump has been banned or restricted from Apple, Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, Google, Amazon, Pinterest, TikTok, YouTube, Reddit, Twitch, Stripe, Discord,
(09:59):
and shopify. Trump started this year thinking he should be
on Mount Rush. For now he can't even get on Instagram.
Speaker 7 (10:04):
Elon Musk is in the middle of purchasing Twitter Well. Today,
Musk said that one of the first things he would
do after the acquisition goes through is lift the permanent
Twitter ban on Donald Trump. Tell you are banning Trump
was like one of the few clicked, almost good things
Twitter has done in like a decade is that Donald
(10:25):
Trump is a scam account. It's all a scam. All
it's a scam.
Speaker 1 (10:30):
So those are all the late night hosts on pretty
much every you know public wave channel. They it's like
a monopoly board to them. And there's a reason why
they go ape shit when somebody like Jimmy Kimmel or
somebody like Stephen Colbert are taken off is because they
want complete control of the monopoly board. If they don't
(10:52):
have complete control of that, other information can get out
there to the public. And the public airwaves are important
because it gets they have full penetration of America. You're
in every household when you have control of these public airwaves,
as opposed to cable, which doesn't get into every household.
That's why they is so important. For them to hold
(11:16):
onto these public airwave stations, and why they want all
of late night completely consumed with left leaning comedians because
they have this kind of leeway to be able to
at times lie through jokes and they could just say, oh,
it's just a joke, you know, it doesn't matter whether
(11:36):
it's true or not. I'm making something funny. They have
a tool and a vehicle and a platform to mock
the president every single night, and then they could export
the clips of that onto all of the social media platforms.
And in addition to that, there's an air of legitimacy
when you are on ABC or NBC or CBS, because
(11:58):
we're talking about legacy channels that have been around for
what now plus one hundred years if you go back
to the rate times of radio. So there's a legitimacy
associated with that that they want to block from the
conservative movement. There is a problem in that, and I
think conservatives are to blame for allowing this to happen
(12:19):
for so long.
Speaker 2 (12:20):
And I want to go back to something you said
earlier which I really want to drive home, and it's
that if the right doesn't start to take culture seriously,
then every win will be short lived. I just don't
want that point to not be driven home.
Speaker 1 (12:37):
It's a huge one, and it became the kind of
the thesis of our Phylish Schlaffley series or two part
series on Philish Slaughley to where you know, it's as
clear as day. Here was a political activist, incredibly effective
political activist, a whip smart woman. She goes up against
this movement, this Equal Rights Amendment movement era movement. She
(13:02):
battles them for like a decade and beats them politically
through activism. She takes this amendment off of some of
the states. They don't get enough votes, the Equal Rights
Amendment doesn't get passed, which would have you know, kind
of brought in all of these kind of genderless rules
back in the day. So what does the left do.
They go into Hollywood, they go into the education, they
(13:26):
go into all of these kinds of institutions, these cultural institutions,
and they change the culture via these institutions. So a
political win ended up being a short lived win in
the long run. These because the Left understood the power
of these cultural institutions. If the people are aligned with
(13:48):
you culturally through propaganda, through lies and what have you
going through these institutions, then you end up winning. I
want to play a clip. This is I listened to
this interview probably twice a year just to kind of
remind me. It's Andrew Breibart being asked about why he
started Big Hollywood, and this is kind of his discussion.
(14:10):
It's with this guy, kind of a really early blogger.
His name is Luke Ford, and this is a right
around the launch of Big Hollywood. Brightepart News is Big Hollywood,
and here he is talking about why he launched Big Hollywood.
Speaker 8 (14:24):
The conservative movement has completely detached itself from the concept
of popular culture and thinks that it can survive in
the twenty first century on politics and legislation alone and
political rhetoric and great writing reflecting conservative principles. And that's
(14:45):
not going to happen. What needs to happen is at
the conservative movement, based in Washington, d C. For the
most part, and with ancillary entities around the country, New
York City, Dallas, Virginia. These people have ignored anything west
of the Mississippi for a generation and they're suffering the
(15:07):
consequences and the election of Barack Obama as evidence of that.
They the conservative movement proper did not embrace Ronald Reagan initially,
but it eventually came to accept him as the standard
bearer of conservatism. He was successful less because he carried
conservative principles, but because he came from Hollywood and he
(15:30):
understood the importance of communication and pop culture. It took
them a long time to realize that that magic was
a good way to sell conservatism. That bride eyed optimism,
and so the conservative movement needs to go focus on
Hollywood in countless ways. It needs to encourage its young
(15:50):
to go out to Hollywood to become screenwriters, actors, producers
below the line workers. It also needs to focus on
Hollywood proper film reviews and become engaged in the debate
out there. It's interesting that we have so many people
in the conservative movement who write about legislation and political
(16:13):
controversies every single day, but very few people focus on
pop culture. And pop culture is the DNA of who
we are, and we export that through the satellite dishes
and in our DVDs and on the television screen and
in films across the world. And if we don't alter
(16:35):
that DNA, if we don't try to inject in it,
our best qualities and not our worst qualities. Our fate
is in the hands of people who don't agree with us,
and that fate is in people in Hollywood that we
disagree with right now, so we have to take them
on using their skills.
Speaker 1 (16:53):
So, I mean, that is such a profound statement he had.
It was an interview that he did with Luke Forward
in January seventh, two thousand and nine. Shortly after that
they launched Big Hollywood, and then we met him, you know,
half a year or so after that. But he says
it right there, and it's it's still now we're talking
(17:14):
sixteen years later. It still has not seeped into the
conservative movement. How important. And I see this on Twitter
and I see people, oh, you know, laughing at him,
coming back at Jimmy Kimmel like it's no big deal,
Like his ratings are low, So it doesn't matter. It
matters because it's not just here. We're not just creating
(17:34):
problems for ourselves here in the United States. We export
our Hollywood content out there into the world, out there,
into international communities. There's a reason why you see like
these big artists, like you know, a Brad Pitt or
what have you. In ads in Japan, or in ads
in France, or in ads in you have now you
(17:54):
have Angelina Jolie speaking. I think it was in Italy
poorly about the United States to the Italian press. Comes
basically everybody that is against the American whale of life,
the traditional American whale of life are now that you
have these messes emissaries excuse me out there into these
(18:15):
international communities speaking poorly about the United States, to the
media out there that's even farther left than our American media,
and creating in an atmosphere that despises Trump and just
despises the American people.
Speaker 2 (18:30):
Yeah, they have a global platform. Imagine if those people
were pro America patriot and they were spreading the message
of prosperity in America, of happiness, of family values, of
everything that we believe in, everything that is good, rather
(18:51):
than this hate for our country and the way that
our country was built.
Speaker 1 (18:57):
Exactly. So that is why we keep coming back to this,
to this topic. And we're not going to let you know,
Andrew's words die. You know, this has been something that
we've been fighting for, even you know, before we met Andrew.
It was one of the reasons why I think he
gravitated towards us, and you know he states that in
his book, you know, thank you for our understanding that
(19:18):
the culture is more and art and music is more
important than politics. This has been something that we've been
fighting for for years and years and years, and it's
what brought us together with Andrew back in two thousand
and nine.
Speaker 2 (19:30):
Yeah, and you know, listen, it's been and it's going
to be, you know, a long, long march. And it's
a schleip because the reality is is that we haven't
even been able to get Andrew's legacy Brightbart to support us.
So even people on the right aren't doing the right
(19:50):
thing and supporting culture and storyteller.
Speaker 3 (19:52):
I think they're not.
Speaker 1 (19:53):
I think the issue, I think what people they've part
of the problem. What's happened in the conservative movement is
the media stuff is there's a quick gratific. You get
it immediately you put out a story out there. You
kind of there's an immediate gratification associated with that. The
storytelling stuff, it takes time. You have to right, you
(20:15):
have to modify it, you keep going back to it,
you have to develop it, and your product doesn't get
out for sometimes weeks, months, sometimes years to where if
you just sit in front of a microphone and just
kind of pontificate on the things of the day, it's
very easy to get that kind of stuff out quickly.
And so that is kind of I think why a
(20:37):
lot You've seen a lot of these conservative movement people
shy away from all of the Hollywood stuff, and all
they do now is just kind of poo pooh wokeness
in Hollywood when it comes forward, and they are we
do not have a farm league the same way that
the left does. They have control of the entire infrastructure,
(20:59):
whether it be the film schools, whether it be the
Rotten to Made It, whether it be the film reviews,
whether it be you know, the literary you know people
that sign books and that that sign people to write
books and to give them, you know, money to write books.
These people control in all of these cultural institutions. And
(21:20):
so it's something that we keep trying to drive home
because it is so important. Otherwise you're going to have
this kind of a little bit of political activism that
happens occasionally that gets people off the air for a
couple of days and then they come back even stronger.
You would be lying to yourself if you did not
say that. Jimmy Kimmel is not stronger now than he
(21:44):
was a week and a half two weeks ago. He
is definitely stronger now. He has secured his position there
and he's going to go at Trump even harder because
now he feels a little bit immune from these FCC
rules out there that they are supposed to be, you know,
have this public interest for a content that they're supposed
to put out there in the public air waves. He
(22:05):
feels a little bit immune to that right now. That
is why we say it's so important to get involved
in the culture. I want to talk a little bit
about this YouTube censorship and as well as some of
these Charlie Kirk conspiracy theories, and we're going to get
to that right after the break, But first, how safe
is your retirement? War is everywhere. Debt continues to skyrocket,
(22:26):
and the dollar is losing purchasing power. The value of
the dollar is falling fast. That's why more people are
converting their IRA and four oh one k to a
gold and silver IRA to protect their retirement savings. In
twenty twenty five, both gold and silver have risen an
impressive twenty nine percent, and many experts project even bigger
(22:47):
gains ahead. Take action now convert some of your IRA
or four oh one K to a gold and silver
IRA with Lear Capital. Call eight hundred four eight zero
one one zero zero for your free Precious Metals Guide
and IRA transfer kit, and with a qualified purchase, get
up to fifteen thousand dollars in bonus gold or silver
(23:08):
deposited directly into your precious metals IRA. Lear Capital, the
nation's leader in precious medals for twenty eight years. Call
today eight hundred four eight zero one one zero zero.
That's eight hundred four eight zero one one zero zero
eight hundred four eight zero one one zero zero. Keep
in mind that any investment has a certain amount of
(23:28):
risk associated with it, and you should only invest if
you can afford to bear the risk of loss. Before
making investment decisions, you should carefully consider and review all
risks involved. You're listening to Red Pilled America's Famboogie. Become
a fanband member by going to Redpilled America dot com
and clicking join in the top menu. Support storytelling, Support
(23:51):
what you love guys, or it fades away. I wanted
to expand a little bit more on this last discussion
that we had about this whole Jimmy Kimmel thing and
how important it is for us to have long term
wins and political activism alone doesn't do that. A case
in point here is you have this Google admits censorship.
Speaker 3 (24:13):
Now.
Speaker 1 (24:13):
I don't know if you guys saw this, but in
a recent hearing, Google admitted that the Biden administration censorship
pressures were imposed on YouTube and they felt pressure to
basically terminate and ban certain users. And there you have,
you know, another kind of indication that all of these
(24:34):
you know, late night people are full of shit because
they're saying, oh, this is unprecedented, that the president was
fighting against free speech and he used the FCC to
pressure to get Jimmy Kimmel off, which it turned out
to be that not being the case, ended up being
that the ABC executives were concerned, at least this is
the stories put out by the Hollywood press that they
(24:55):
were concerned that Jimmy was going to fan the flames
by coming back and not apologizing and doubling down on
blaming the MAGA people for the assassination of Charlie kirk. So,
but now you have the Google people basically saying no,
they were actually we were pressured by the Biden administration
as well, and they're saying now that they're gonna, you know,
(25:18):
all the people that were banned from YouTube, They're going
to bring back those people. But it's already been tested.
Alex Jones tried to open an account, and so did
Nick Fuentes. Both of their accounts were nuked, you know,
pretty quickly. I'm pretty sure Owen Benjamin doesn't also does
not have an account there as well. But it is
incredibly important for us to spread our wings within the
(25:40):
creative space. We cannot be happy with an ophead here
or you know, Fox News there, or AM Radio, but
they pushed us into these kind of ghetto digital ghettos,
all right. And I thought this was another important clip
because we're working on some other stories and some of
(26:01):
these old clips have been coming out there. I listened to.
I listened to these these interviews at least a couple
times a year because it kind of reminds me of
the fight that we're in. Here is Andrew Breitbart talking
about wanting more than just AM Radio, and wanting more
than just this kind of gilded ghetto that we have
been relegated to This is in an interview with the
(26:22):
Hoover Institute.
Speaker 9 (26:24):
I you, I Andrew Breitport. I'm at war with the
mainstream media. I'm at war with the mainstream media because
they portray themselves as objective observers reality when they're hacks
who think they can destroy everything America stands for. But
shouldn't you relax? Things are working out. There's Fox News,
there's rush limbo there.
Speaker 10 (26:44):
That's not enough. That's not enough. That's not enough. This
is what angers me.
Speaker 3 (26:48):
So about that. That's what I want to know.
Speaker 4 (26:50):
Why are more relaxed.
Speaker 9 (26:51):
We're twenty years into it. Just as you said, you say, oh, okay,
I'll take.
Speaker 10 (26:54):
A because AM radio an op ed column and Fox
News is not enough the big what you want.
Speaker 8 (27:03):
But I want.
Speaker 10 (27:05):
I want a center right nation to fight for its
soul and its soul is represented in the arts. Its
soul is represented in in in in a in a
world in which media is everything. AM radio is the
lowest form of communication. It's it's it's it's it's tinny,
it's not it's it's it's not robust, it's not avatar.
(27:28):
I want avatar. I want the right to enter the
world of media to the extent and invest in media
the way that the left does. George Soros is throwing
money like crazy. You want an NPR, I want everything,
I want us, I want all right, they have an NPR.
They're so slick and understanding how important media is. They've
(27:48):
convinced the government to pay them to propagate their worldview.
How come we're not fighting for money to propagate our
world because we don't believe in it. Okay, Then use
the free market to convey the same ideas with the
same level of sophistication and excellence that NPR does, because
they are superior at what they do, just as John
Stewart is superior at what he does. I grant Hollywood
(28:11):
and the experts in propaganda for what they do. In fact,
that's what annoys you, that it annoys me, and it
annoys that our side does not commit to this battle.
Speaker 1 (28:23):
It's not just storytelling that you know, your standard kind
of films and TV shows. They become good at narrative building,
which is why you see in the wake of Charlie
Kirk's assassination where everything was pointing towards conservatives dominating the
(28:43):
news cycles and the narrative. After that, they did a
jiu jitsu move and made Jimmy Kimmel the victim who
didn't die. He just basically was suspended for a matter
of a couple of days. Because that's how good they
are at the narrative building. And when they have control
of practically the entire narrative machine, then they could do
(29:04):
those kinds of jiu jitsu moves. That is why it
is so important to be involved and get involved culturally
to all of these cultural institutions, and the right has
completely abdicated it's a responsibility in that area. And for
years I remember hearing them, Oh, you know, we're busy,
we're working, you know, Oh you know, we're doing real work,
(29:27):
we're building real things. Well, while they were doing that,
the left completely saturated all these cultural institutions, took them
over and now has people posting and dancing on the
grave of a guy like Charlie Charlie Kirk because culturally
they're not going to be filling that many repercussions because
(29:48):
of it, which I want to lead into this whole
you know, Charlie Kirk conspiracy theories. Now with some of
these assassination conspiracy theories because we're seeing these out there
like crazy, Like all of you, I'm sure you guys were,
you know, bothered and hurt by the assassination of Charlie Kirk.
It deeply moved us here at red Pilled America. And
(30:10):
I wasn't admittedly a huge Charlie Kirk follower. I didn't
listen to a lot of his stuff, although I paid
attention to him because he's kind of was a big
figure in the conservative movement. But I wouldn't call myself
like an avid supporter or fan of his. But it
deeply bothered me when he was killed for it because
(30:32):
he was just a nice guy. He seemed like to
be a nice guy.
Speaker 2 (30:36):
Yeah, I mean, if I'm being honest, I don't feel
like I've still recovered. I'm not recovered from it.
Speaker 1 (30:39):
I'm not recovered from it yet either, And which is
so which bothers me when I see the ability of
the left to change the narrative so quickly and to
create a victim in Jimmy Kimmel is stunning. But I
also need to call out the things that are happening
within our own circle when it comes to these conspiracy
theories that are being out there about Charlie Kirk. Now,
(31:03):
and I think that we have been so saturated with
the conspiracy theory bug and virus on the right because
it leads to clicks and it gets enormous views. So
this Range Day bro puts up this video and it's
an alternative theory on the assassination of Charlie Kirk. And
(31:27):
he claims to have got these two different videos that
show one looks like some kind of a shot coming
from behind Charlie Kirk in this building, in this kind
of dark area in this building, and then he get
does a close up on Charlie's head. I'm sorry, this
is going to get be a little bit graphic, but
(31:47):
he shows right when he's hit blood splatter coming from
the back of his head. And he goes into this
discussion about the assassination, and he's very definitive about what
he's found.
Speaker 6 (32:03):
Ladies and gentlemen, I now have acquired proof that the
FBI's official story is false.
Speaker 4 (32:08):
Whether knowingly or unknowingly.
Speaker 6 (32:09):
We're going to have an entire monologue and talk about
a lot of these things.
Speaker 1 (32:12):
So he goes on in this video to make the
claim that we now know you know with certainty that
he was shot from behind. Okay, sounds very very and
you know this guy's you know, has all these guns
and rifles behind him. He comes with all this kind
of credibility as an expert on ballistics.
Speaker 2 (32:32):
And also when you look at the video that he's showing,
it does look like something's coming out from the back
of Charlie's head. Yes, it does. He's saying it's blood
until your mind thinks, oh my god, that is blood.
Speaker 3 (32:42):
Yes.
Speaker 1 (32:43):
So, but now when you actually look at the other
angle of this shot, which anyone with any credibility would
and should do.
Speaker 2 (32:53):
You should if you're going to be making videos like
this and claim.
Speaker 1 (32:56):
Kind of a claim of course, Okay, when you look
at it from from the other angle, from the profile
angle of Charlie Kirk, One, there's no bullet that goes
into his head. And two, this blood splatter that this
guy is highlighting is not blood splatter. It's some either
it's something in his ear. It's an earpiece. It's like
a clear ear piece, and you see it shootout right
(33:19):
when Charlie Kirk is hit. Now, if I'm putting out
a video making definitive claims that this definitively shows that
the FBI's story is false. I'm going to check that
other angle, but of course he does not, and because
he doesn't show it here in this video, if he did,
you would clearly see that it's the earpiece that's shooting
(33:40):
out in the back. This video now has six point
three million views, and if you look in the comments,
what you see is is a movement Charlie supporters and
a MAGA movement that are completely in line with what
this guy is saying.
Speaker 3 (34:00):
This is a serious.
Speaker 1 (34:02):
Problem we are having now because what you do is
is you go on to some of the one of
the more popular conservative podcasts in Patrick Bett David and
they give this discussion, this theory, this alternative theory, credibility
and credence.
Speaker 11 (34:21):
Another angle of a potential shooter of where this shot
couldn't talk about Charlie Kirk.
Speaker 3 (34:26):
Now about Charlie Kirk. That's on that one we're talking
about conversation. Yeah, that was.
Speaker 11 (34:31):
And from my opinion, Patrick, this dude and a bunch
of shooters and a bunch of snipers and me and
Tom actually had a conversation last night. Never go with
the official narrative, and when you're seeing different angles and
me and Mike you've been talking about this too, and
I don't want to show close up to anything like
that pack because I don't want to get it gets
they blow out his face, but it's still graphic. You're
going to see something on Charlie's right side, like a
(34:51):
little blood spat on the right side, and it looks
like an exit wolves.
Speaker 6 (34:55):
Do you see this time?
Speaker 3 (34:56):
Yes? I did.
Speaker 5 (34:56):
I was watching a report by what appeared to be
a very rational and specific ex military, a gentleman from Turkey.
Speaker 1 (35:05):
So they go on and discuss this video as it
being like you know, highly credible, and they even promote
the guy and tell everybody to go over there. And
why Well, because they see the algorithm basically benefiting, you,
benefiting from putting out this kind of content. This thing
has over six million views, and so they want to
(35:26):
kind of capitalize.
Speaker 2 (35:28):
I want to capitalize on that. They want to get
the engagement, they want to get the clicks, they want
to get the likes, they want to get the shares.
So that's what social media, that's that's the game. And
so when they see something that the audience is falling for.
Speaker 1 (35:41):
They go with it without even doing the kind of research.
I mean, to be responsible to do a little bit
of research before you put something like this out there.
I mean, this is what you're basically saying by taking
on this position is you're basically saying that Dan Bongino
and Cash Betel to clearly maga people are lying to
(36:04):
the public and that are basically trying to cover up
what actually happened to Charlie Kirk. You're also attacking Charlie
Kirk's wife and turning point USA because you're also claiming
that they are inept at not trying to push this
issue forward. The guy, his father said that he confessed
(36:29):
to him the shooter, the shooter's father. This isn't something
like Lee Harvey Alswald where you can claim that he
was a patsy where he jumped off the top of
the building and they caught him right there with everything. No,
this guy took off and left, and there's actually images
of him going to kind of a fast food place
(36:49):
to get something to eat or ice cream or what
have you. He gets two hundred plus miles away from
the shooting site, he goes days without getting caught, and
then eventually is caught by his parents by the away
who turn him in, who claim that he confessed to them.
You have text messages, so now you're saying that the
(37:11):
FBI run by Cash Battal and Dan Bongino are lying
about those text messages. They have found this shooter's DNA
on a towel. They found the shooter's DNA on a
screwdriver near the I believe on the rooftop that he
would have needed to basically take apart this rifle. And
(37:32):
then there's other people that are out there that are
searching for the truth that show that you can easily
take it apart very quickly and put it into your
pants and hide it and walk onto campus with them
in your pants. So I mean, but of course that
only gets like twenty thousand views. But this charlatan that
(37:54):
is putting out this information without kind of verifying everything
else on it gets six million plus views. And this
is the problem now that we're seeing on the right,
these conservative YouTubers are gaming the algorithm, and they see
this kind of these kind of audiences that almost always
(38:17):
gravitate towards conspiracy theories as their base. They don't want
to believe anything but a conspiracy theory. It's almost like
a victimhood ideology that has infected the right because you're
constantly thinking, I'm being wronged here, I'm being lied to here,
even by my side. It really is the victim ideology
(38:41):
that you see on the left, but the right's version
of it. Because there is there does come a time
where you do have to kind of look at the
evidence and say, Okay, this makes sense. Otherwise, Cash Bital,
Dan Bongino, Turning Point, and Erica Kirk are all lying
to me, and they are hiding the true killer. And
(39:03):
you know what you're doing by doing all of this
is you're basically diminishing this son of a bitch that
killed him, and you're giving him arguments in a court
of law that he can use to get off. And
I'm seeing this happen time and time again by huge
YouTubers now that are coming forward with these theories left
(39:27):
and right. Oh, that it was a it's his mic
that was on his T shirt, okay, which would mean
that it was his own people that killed him. By
the way that.
Speaker 2 (39:36):
It exploded, that it exploded sort of explosion, that's another
big around.
Speaker 3 (39:41):
Yeah, exactly.
Speaker 2 (39:41):
You know what people love conspiracy theories, they do I
spoke to somebody today that I hadn't spoke to in
a long long time, and first thing she brought up is, Oh,
my gosh, who do you think killed Charlie Kirk? I said,
what are you talking about? She said, I don't believe
for one second that it was the guy that they're
telling us. And you know what else, I don't trust
the wife. And I thought, what are are you talking about?
(40:04):
Right now? These conspiracy theories are running rampant, and they're dangerous.
Speaker 1 (40:09):
They're dangerous because they are really letting off this guy
who who literally turned himself in.
Speaker 2 (40:15):
Yeah, I think it's disgusting.
Speaker 1 (40:17):
You think it's disgusted drives me like completely. It's just
it goes against everything. We cannot replace the legacy media
with this slop that's out there right now, and.
Speaker 2 (40:30):
There's so much of it, there's so much, so much of.
Speaker 1 (40:33):
It, These this kind of conspiracy theory slop and all
this AI slop that's just getting dumped onto the American
public right now. You know, it's it's kind of giving
credence to the censors, you know, because people are going
to gravitate to this shit no matter what. They're going
to gravitate to this stuff because they love a conspiracy theory.
(40:54):
I love it, And that's already happening within, like you know,
less than two weeks of his death, and all these
conspiracy theories are already coming out on his death and
what have you, and people saying, oh, it's a magic
going with this magic bullet like JFK. No, it wouldn't
have been lodged in him. But if you look and
you see that there has been thirty odd six cases
or case studies where it does get lodged into the
(41:16):
person that gets shot. And so this isn't like some
kind of a rare occurrence, and it just I don't
know how this gets fixed other than just continue to
tell the truth.
Speaker 2 (41:29):
Well, I mean, listen, I'm going to say this until
I'm blue in the face. And I know you guys
are probably sick of me saying this, but this is
why we need you, guys, our audience, our red pilled
America audience, to share our show, Share it on social media,
Go onto you poop, give us a like, follow us there.
We have got to continue to spread the truth because
(41:51):
there's so much crap out there, so much slop that's
completely saturating the social media airwaves.
Speaker 1 (41:59):
I mean, if you're going to jump into conspiracy theories,
I would say one that is kind of fun if
you can actually think about one being kind of interesting.
On this is this Snake Eyes movie that came out.
I believe it was in nineteen ninety eight. I don't
know if you saw this one out. It kind of
like is more another data point for this us being
(42:21):
in a simulation because you have a guy that got
the victim in this movie was killed. His name was
Charles Kirkland. He was killed by a gunshot to the
neck by a sniper, and the sniper's name had Tyler
in it. The same thing with the person that was killed,
(42:45):
you know that killed Charlie kirk His name was Lincoln Tyler.
And there's a Trump connection that it was filmed at
the taj Mah Hall. So there's like there's these other
conspiracy angles where you could kind of like, oh, okay,
this is kind of interesting. Maybe we're living in a simulation.
I mean, look at how this was done in nineteen
ninety eight, so it's all factual information. It was put
out there in nineteen ninety eight, so there's nothing kind
(43:08):
of like you know, you know, potentially false about the
information that when I saw that, I was like, oh,
this can't be real. And I started looking into it,
I'm like, oh my god, it's actually every one of
these points is actually true, other than I think they
said the movie was released on September tenth, and I
don't think that there was any or excuse me, they
said that the killing in the movie happened on September tenth.
(43:29):
There's been no corroboration of that.
Speaker 2 (43:30):
Okay, but yeah, I agree the simulation. That's a good,
you know, theory to get into.
Speaker 1 (43:34):
But I mean, but at least it's not like it's
based in some kind of like interesting kind of you know,
factual information. But instead these guys are just jumping on
this slop. I don't have the DNA within me to
lie to the public in that way or lie by omission,
you know, And that's kind of you know, we've spoken
(43:55):
about this with the coin Toss series that we did
part of the problem with this whole twenty four seven
news cycle. And if you guys want to go check
our YouTube movie on this, our YouTube documentary on this,
it's out there right now. It's about a twenty minute
documentary on this. It's it turns our Coin Toss audio
documentary into a video version. We talk about how the
(44:16):
twenty four hour news cycle is kind of what ruined
the legacy media in that this constant need to put
content out there, this beast that you constantly need to feed,
and you're seeing that with guys like you know this
segment on Patrick Bett David who I typically you know,
I enjoy his podcast, but when I saw him put
this out there and I'm like, how do you put
(44:36):
this out there with not checking on this? Like, look
into this a little bit. It's really important. The truth
does matter. That's it for this week's version of fam Boogie.
We're working on another Red Pilled America's story behind the scenes.
Keep an eye out for it. It's coming out soon.
And please go check out our video documentary series over
(45:00):
at YouTube. Get a subscribe, a lie comment, it's free
to do all of that. You'll be supporting the show
and if you want to become a fanband member, go
to Redpilled America dot com and click join in the
top menu.
Speaker 3 (45:13):
Support which you lover goes away.
Speaker 1 (45:14):
Guys, Thanks for your support and enjoy your weekend.
Speaker 10 (45:18):
Hi.
Speaker 2 (45:18):
Everyone,
Hosts And Creators
Adryana Cortez
Patrick Courrielche
Popular Podcasts
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.
Cardiac Cowboys
The heart was always off-limits to surgeons. Cutting into it spelled instant death for the patient. That is, until a ragtag group of doctors scattered across the Midwest and Texas decided to throw out the rule book. Working in makeshift laboratories and home garages, using medical devices made from scavenged machine parts and beer tubes, these men and women invented the field of open heart surgery. Odds are, someone you know is alive because of them. So why has history left them behind? Presented by Chris Pine, CARDIAC COWBOYS tells the gripping true story behind the birth of heart surgery, and the young, Greatest Generation doctors who made it happen. For years, they competed and feuded, racing to be the first, the best, and the most prolific. Some appeared on the cover of Time Magazine, operated on kings and advised presidents. Others ended up disgraced, penniless, and convicted of felonies. Together, they ignited a revolution in medicine, and changed the world.