Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:03):
You are entering the freedom, huge smoking cond of evidence
on the Biden crime family's corruption. Iran puts out fake
news to hurt Trump and the media falls for it.
Plus tonight pivotal presidential debate. Let's get to it. Buck
(00:27):
sextonshing the news and disseminating information with actionable intelligence. Make
no mistake Americans great, You're great American again. This is
the Buck Sexton Show. Former CIA analysts can speak to
three hours without a phone call. Try doing that sometimes, no,
(00:50):
Welcome to the Buck Sexton Show. My friends, My, oh my,
what a day this already is. And it's just going
because we got that debate tonight and we have so
much to talk about with regard to Hunter Biden, Joe Biden.
Let's just let's just start with this. We've now gone
(01:11):
from the Hunter Biden story about corruption, about selling influence
to his access to his father. We've gone from this
is blocked on social media ostensibly because it's a smear
and it's not true, right too, well, actually it's Russian
disinformation to Okay, it's all true, but our editorial judgment
(01:37):
is it's not really a story. It's a little over
a week they tried for maybe a day or two there. Oh,
it's a non story because Joe Biden's not tied to it.
And I said, look, if Joe Biden has no hand
in any of this, Hunter being a screw up may
not be enough. But this is quite a bit different.
A lot of information, a lot of information coming out
(02:00):
that is real based on this laptop, based on the communications.
This is smoking gun level stuff in a normal criminal trial.
Let's say, if you had the defendant's email saying that
kind of stuff that Hunter Biden saying about a corrupt
influence scheme, they'd be taking a plea deal. It'd be
(02:20):
all over. But now we know the FBI had the
laptop for a year, didn't do anything. It may have
been subpoenaed though as part of a money laundering probe.
Gee that information never got out. What a surprise that
that wouldn't be leaked, something that would actually hurt a Democrat.
And if you're wondering, hold on, are they really saying
that this is all not a story that the emails
(02:43):
coming out to suggest, not to suggest, to state that
Joe Biden was getting a piece of this, that Hunter
Biden was getting huge deals done with foreign adversary governments, okay,
like China, that Hunter Biden was getting huge deals done,
making a miss amount of money, giving kickbacks to his dad,
(03:03):
and that everybody knew what was going on here. His
business partner has come forward to confirm all this. The
guy's a Navy vetter, and he's just like, look, I've
got to tell the truth on this one. And he's
got receipts, as they say, he's got the documents. We're
beyond now rumor, innuendos, speculation. We're talking cold hard facts,
(03:24):
my friends. That's where this Biden scandal currently is. And
you have to laugh. NPR, their public editor, put this
out earlier today. Why haven't you seen any stories from
NPR about the New York Post Hunter Biden's story. The
answer they give this is their managing editor for news quote,
(03:46):
we don't want to waste our time on stories that
are not really stories, and we don't want to waste
the listeners and readers time on stories that are just
pure distractions. That's right, friends, taxpayer funded in part, NPR
is taking the position, now, oh sure you can prove
everything that The New York Post has been saying from
(04:08):
the beginning that Conservatives Republicans have been pointing out about
the bidens going on two years now. You can prove this,
but it's not really a story. How is this not
a story? That's absurd? I mean, that's so stupid and
so dishonest that it's hard to even debate it because
(04:30):
it feels like we must be talking about somebody who's
not smart enough to even understand the issues at hand.
I mean, the NPR people, do they not know anything
about politics? They're the political editors that are making this statement.
But what you see, my friends, right now is the
mainstream media engaging in an institutional mass self immolation to
(04:56):
protect Biden. It's hard to fathom why they would ever
do this till you recognize that they view a Trump
victory as an existential threat to their professional and emotional
well being. And so this is going to get much uglier,
my friends, much uglier. Indeed, it's it's stunning. I mean,
(05:18):
of the many accomplishments real Donald Trump, or Donald Trump
rather can point to in his first four years, exposing
the liberal mainstream media beyond any doubt as the unrepentant
and reckless frauds they are, will go down in history
as among the most important and useful shared that one
on Twitter earlier today. I think folks see exactly what
(05:41):
I mean. There's no going back for the media now,
there's there's no They're never going to be able to
make this argument. Oh, we're just journos. Oh we're just
being honest. You know, we're just nonpartisan. Here. The China
component of this is stunning. I mean, the Barisma and
Ukraine stuff is bad enough, but now we find out
that there's information about a Chinese government payoff to the
(06:05):
Biden family. You mean, our primary, really our only geopolitical rival,
knew that by funneling some cash nothing to them. I
mean the Chinese Communist Party, it's got five ten million
bucks in the couch cushions and then some and this
is a joke to them, a pittance. They can help
steer some aspect of US foreign policy just by paying
(06:28):
off the then vice president's son, the things that they've
accused Trump and his family of doing. When this is
why the hypocrisy is so mind blowing. What the Democrats
have been accusing Trump and his family of doing for
years without evidence, unfairly maligning them, is what Joe Biden
and his family not just Hunter, also his brother. That's
(06:51):
what they've been doing. They are accusing the other side
of what they themselves are guilty of doing. China's getting
away scott free with stealing billions of dollars in intellectual
property from US companies and billions more with their predatory
trade practices until Donald Trump steps up. But before that
(07:13):
they were getting away with it. And it makes so
much more sense the moment you find out that the
Bidens and others in our ruling class we're getting beach houses,
benzes and BMW's out of the deal. Oh okay, why
push back on China when business is so good? Side
business that is, you know, that's really what this is
turning into. You realize that US foreign policy was kind
(07:36):
of a side hustle for the Bidens. The main event
was getting cash, getting paid. It's amazing, friends, it's amazing.
But this is what we're up against. This is what
we were seeing. I mean, yesterday, the desperate media tried
to suggest that a Rudy Giuliani hidden camera ambush for
a Borat film was a big news story. But somehow Ulani,
(08:00):
having ironclad proof that Hunter Biden was selling access to
his vice president Dad is a non story or its
Russian disinformation. This is all you have to know. The
media can't go any lower. They have no integrity to
protect it. It's all over for them now. In that regard,
(08:20):
I mean, they can only fool those who wish to
be fooled. It can only fool people who are either
not honest enough or not smart enough for this to,
you know, to see the truth of what's really going
on here. So many people doing excellent work on this one.
Sean Davis over at the Federalist has been diving into
(08:44):
these emails. This is from his Twitter, he writes. Quote
an emailed to Hunter Biden's partner from a top Chinese
official on July twenty six, twenty seventeen, shows the Chinese
energy company CEFC proposed a five million dollar interest free
loan to the Biden family based on their trust on
(09:07):
the Biden family. There's a quote that he polls should
CEFC keep lending more to the family. Less than two
weeks later, on August eighth, twenty seventeen, five million dollars
was wired from a CEFC affiliated investment vehicle to a
Delaware LC which spent the next year transferring nearly four
(09:32):
point eight million dollars directly to Hunter Biden's firm, according
to Senate investigators. Friends, this is exactly how you would
engage in a access peddling, in a corrupt scheme where
you're selling US foreign policy for personal gain. This is
(09:55):
exactly how you would do it. You have the negotiations,
You fly to China on Air fours two with Dad,
You meet with a bunch of Chinese businessmen. Then you
have them just give an interest free loan and they
park it in a unnamed Delaware you know, an unknown
Delaware LC and then that siphons off the money to
(10:17):
your consulting fur, which you then get a piece of.
I mean it looks like money laundering to me, friends,
I mean, we're gonna have to look at what some
of the legal experts find with these kinds of transactions.
But it certainly stinks to high heaven. We know that much.
These are not theories, my friends. This is all traceable,
it is all provable, and it is all real. We
(10:39):
have the evidence. And yet they're trying to pretend like
this is somehow still nothing. Oh no, We're way way
beyond that. But what I want you to be prepared
for is that even though the media has been exposed
as completely corrupt, frauds more so than anything else you
(11:02):
can really think of, because this is all coming down
at once, right before the election, and they're doing everything
they can. There's a pathetic panic that has overtaken the
mainstream media. They're doing whatever they can to try to
avoid talking about any of this. They're downplaying it, they're
lying about it. It's only going to get worse. They've
already made their choice. Their choice is Joe Biden. Really,
(11:24):
their choice is anybody but Trump, and they will do
anything in their power to make sure that happens. There
is nothing that is too debased, nothing that is too fraudulent,
too pathetic for the biggest news organizations, the biggest names
and mainstream news to carry the last buckets of water
(11:47):
for Biden necessary in this election where we know it's
going to be very very tight. We know it's going
to be very close. So just be ready for this,
be ready for exactly what's going to happen here, because yes,
the Joe and Hunter Biden corruption apparatus is even worse
(12:08):
than I initially thought, or at least there's much more
proof of it, and the efforts to suppress it have
proved that our media is depraved beyond salvation. But it's
still going to be a very close election, and the
Libs do not care about the truth, they do not
care about the Biden corruption, and so Biden can still win.
(12:33):
Keep the pressure on my friends and keep pushing. You're
in the Freedom mund This is the Buck Sex and
Show podcast now now would be a shadow doubt. The
laptop is in fact Hunter Biden's. The emails are in
fact accurate. The big guy reference in one of the
emails is in fact Joe Biden. We know Hunter Biden
(12:54):
had deals with communist Chiny Ukraine, deals with this company
Barisma that Leaven the State Department said was a concern,
and he was getting cast from the mayor of Moscow's wife,
so all that, of course this should come up. Indeed,
that's what we know, and there's still more that I
think we're destined to find out in the days ahead,
and all of this going into an election tonight where
(13:14):
Biden shows up, it's not gonna be able to hide.
Here's a prediction. There will be a critical moment of
muting the debate moderator tonight in this debate will find
a point at which Biden is on the ropes. You know,
the Russian is cut and rocky circling, and he's about
to about to finish him off, and they'll freeze it.
(13:36):
They'll mute, they'll mute President Trump and then talk over
him as well. Guaranteed to happen tonight at that moment
where it's finally clear that Joe Biden can't evade anymore,
but let's also talk about what he's trying to evade.
A business associate of Hunter Biden's named Tony bob Lynsky
(13:57):
has put out a statement. I want to read this
statement to you so you understand the full scope of
what we're talking about here. This is all information just
the last twenty four hours coming out. Looks really bad
for the Biden camp. Don't whatever the media says as
a joke. This is all a nightmare for them. It
really is. He writes, my name is Tomy Babolynski. The
(14:20):
facts set forth below are true and accurate. They are
not any form of domestic or foreign disinformation. Any suggestion
to the contrary is false and offensive. I am the
recipient of the email published seven days ago by the
New York Post, which showed a copy to Hunter Biden
Rob Walker. That email is genuine, so this is one
of the guys involved in these communications. Here's what he writes.
(14:42):
This afternoon, I received a request from the Senate Committee
on Homeland Security and Government Affairs and the Senate Committee
on Finance requesting all documents relating to my business affairs
with the Biden family, as well as various foreign entities
and individuals. I have extensive relevant record and communications, and
I intend to produce those items to both committees in
(15:04):
the immediate future. I am the grandson of a thirty
seven year Army intelligence officer, the son of a twenty
plus year career naval officer, and the brother of a
twenty eight year career Naval flight officer. I myself served
our country for four years and left the Navy as
Lieutenant Bobolynski. I held a high level security clearance and
(15:25):
was an instructor and then CTO for Naval Nuclear Power
Training Command. I take great pride in the time my
family and I serve this country. I am also not political,
he goes on. The twenty seven email is in fact
a reference to Joe Biden. The other jb reference in
(15:45):
that email is Jim Biden, Joe's brother. Hunter Biden called
his dad the big guy or my chairman, and frequently
referenced asking him for his sign off or advice on
various potential deals that we were discussing. I've seen Vice
President Biden saying he never talked to Hunter about his business.
I've seen firsthand that that's not true, because it wasn't
(16:09):
just Hunter's business. They said they were putting the Biden
family name and its legacy on the line. I realized
that Chinese were not really focused on a healthy financial
return on investment. They were looking at this as a
political or influence investment. Once I realized that Hunter wanted
to use the company as his personal piggy bank by
(16:30):
just taking money out of it as soon as it
came from the Chinese, I took steps to prevent that
from happening. The Johnson report connected some dots in a
way that shocked me. It made me realize the Bidens
had gone behind my back and gotten paid millions of
dollars by the Chinese, even though they told me they
hadn't and wouldn't do that to their partners. I would
(16:52):
ask the Biden family to address the American people and
outline the facts so I can go back to being irrelevant,
and so I am not in a position to have
to answer those questions for them. I don't have a
political acts to grind. I just saw behind the Biden curtain,
and I grew concerned with what I saw. The Biden
family aggressively leveraged the Biden family name to make millions
(17:16):
of dollars from foreign entities, even though some were from
communist controlled China. God bless America. One more thing that
Lieutenant Babolinski writes here, The few campaign contributions I have
made in my life were to Democrats. If the media
and big tech companies had done their jobs of the
past several weeks, I would be irrelevant in this story.
(17:38):
Given my long standing service and devotion to this country,
I could no longer allow my family name to be
associated or tied to Russian disinformation or implied lies and
false narratives dominating the media right now. After leaving the military,
I became an institutional investor, investing extensively around the world.
What I'm outlining to you is fact. I know it
is fact because I lived it. I am the CEO
(18:01):
of Cino Hawk Holdings, which was a partnership between the
Chinese operating through CEFC and Chairman Yee and the Biden family.
I was brought into the company to be the CEO
by James Gillier and Hunter Biden. And the reference to
the big guy and the much publicized May thirteenth email
is in fact Joe Biden friends his partners are talking.
(18:24):
We've got all the proof. It's all real. Biden family
is a crime family and they think they're about to
become the next first family of the United States. Thanks
for listening to the Bus Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe
on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get
your podcasts. I mean, really, give this a little thought.
(18:47):
What's the response to all of this? Now? They were
telling this last week not true, not true? Then Russian disinformation,
Russian disinformation, And now, well, what exactly is it? Oh,
it's it's not important. If it's not important, why were
we hearing so much about how it was Russian disinformation?
Why even pay attention enough to it to make that claim?
(19:10):
And of course it's important. They're they're insulting our intelligence,
my friends, they are insulting your intelligence, mind, intelligence, every American.
That's what the media is up to right now. They're
putting Jill Biden out there saying that these are smears
against my family. Nah no, I'm sorry, these are facts.
(19:32):
The Democrats had a lot of different options in this campaign.
They could have gone with a lot of people. I'll
say this, say what you will about you know, Pete Buddha,
Judge or Bernie Sanders. But they weren't taking payoffs from
the Chinese. I've just you know, credit where it's due.
Democrats had a lot of options, even Elizabeth Warren, I mean,
for all of her flaws, not taking payoffs from foreign government,
(19:54):
selling influence, doing other shady stuff. I'm sure. But Democrats
brought this on themselves. They wanted to run a head fake,
fraudulent candidate with big name recognition, tay Do Obama, that
they could pretend was a moderate, and they thought they
could just ram them, just like they were gonna ram
Hillary Clinton down everybody's throats, and they wanted to ram
(20:15):
John Carry down everybody's throats. They thought they were gonna
pull it off. And look, they still might. Don't get
me wrong, They've got so much of an institutional and
platform advantage that even running a candidate as flawed as
this guy, with all the lies that they're having to tell,
maybe it still works. Doesn't mean that we can't talk
about how insane this is, how crazy these circumstances are
(20:37):
we find ourselves in. First of all, here's Joe Biden saying, Oh,
it's all a smear. Sure, it is play eighteen. You know,
as a mother, I mean it really. I don't like
to see my son attacked, and certainly I don't like
to see my husband attacked. But for me or to me,
these are distractions. I mean, this election is not about
(21:01):
Joe Biden or Jill Biden, or Kamala or Doug. It
is about the American people. The American people don't want
to hear these smears against my family. The American people
are struggling right now. No, actually, I think they want
to hear it. Sorry, Jill. I think I think they
are curious now that it's fact, now that there's smoking
(21:21):
gun evidence. I think that we've been told for four
years that Donald Trump is a man of lacking, lacking
in character, and his family has made all this money
and shady ways, and you know, Trump Tower Moscow and
some guy whose name I can't even pronounce from one
of the stands, and the Miss Universe pageant and all
the stuff we've heard about this now all of a sudden,
(21:43):
none of that counts for Joe Biden. This guy's been
in public life his whole life, and somehow he's very,
very very rich. A lot of Democrats for whom that's
the case, well, looks like they may have to pay
the piper now, so to speak, at least the Biden's might.
The only justice is going to come. Just so you
understand this at the ballot box, I want everyone to
(22:06):
be very clear, just as I said with Benghazi and
Obama in the twenty twelve election, once Obama won that
re election, forget about justice for Benghazi and what happened
there wasn't wasn't going to occur because they controlled, They
controlled the game, they control the refs, they control the players.
Not gonna happen. Biden wins, all this goes away. In fact,
(22:28):
they're gonna go after people that expose this. They're gonna
go for payback. It's not going to be enough to
merely push aside the obvious Biden family corruption. They're gonna
want to make examples of people. How dare you expose
the Democrat, the Democrat candidate for who he and his
family members really are. Remember it's the brother, it's the son.
(22:50):
I mean, getting in on this for sure from a
lot of different angles. And then you have the responses
to all this from the media, which are are honestly
mind blowing. I mean, it's it's hard to think of
how anybody could do this. Wake up, think their job
is somehow guided by principles, facts, honesty, ethics, and then
(23:12):
do what this media is doing. You know, the President
I mentioned this yesterday and really get into the details.
The President sat down with sixty minutes and Leslie Stall recently.
You know, all these all these boomer media establishments, with
these boomer correspondents who are just deeply unimpressive party hacks
who have gotten you know, really fat and happy by
(23:32):
being highly mediocre but playing the institutional political game well
enough to rise up the ranks at these But there's
been around a long time, you know, time to retire
Leslie Stall. We've had enough. She's not the only one.
There's a ton of them, whether you're talking about you know,
Dan Rather or Larry King or these guys. They never
want to give it up. It's never time to focus
on something else in life. It's always me, me, me,
(23:53):
more money, more attention, me me. That's who's at the
top of the mainstream media apparatus. Not the smartest, not
the best, not the most ethical. It's really the most
narcissistic and the most selfish. That's unfortunately what these legacy outlets,
what these legacy outlets prize. I mean, that's what does
(24:13):
well for you. You're advantaged by taking that approach. Here's
Leslie's Stall, for whatever reason, gets access to the President.
She sits down in an interview with him, and I
just want you to hear her completely laughable. Smack yourself
in the face because you can't believe you're hearing something
so stupid. Defense of why media outlets like hers have
(24:38):
no interest in the Hunter Biden laptop. This is Remember
this is the president. They taped the interview while it
was being taped so that sixty minutes can't get away
with their usual editing crap. So this is the White
House releasing the rough of the rough cut of this
play it. I think it's one of the biggest scandals
I've ever seen. And you don't go thright because you
(24:59):
want to talk about well, because it can't be verified
talking about insignificant things. I'm telling you, of course verified.
Excuse me, they found the laptop, Leslie? What can be verified?
Why you said that even the family hasn't the family
on the laptop. He's gone into hiding for five days.
(25:22):
He's gone into hiding. He's preparing for your debate. It's
taken in five days to prepare. I doubt it. Okay,
so let's get back he's preparing for the debate. That's
not even the funniest thing here. It can't be verified.
Here is supposed to be a famous and dogged journalist,
(25:42):
gets to the truth, gets the facts, gets the answers,
and her response to why they won't even touch this
enormously consequential story at the absolute peak of an election
presidential election cycle is it can't be verified. Uh. This
would be like if you sat down with the FBI
and you had something for them, They're like, oh, this
(26:02):
needs to be investigated exactly. Isn't that what you do here?
Isn't this the Federal Bureau of Investigation? Otherwise what would
you say you do here? Leslie? Stall journalist sixty minutes.
CBS lots of money going into this. They can't find
a way. First of all, it's already verified to anybody
(26:23):
who's not an idiot. But if they want to play
this verification game, the oh we kid, it would be
like she said, whoaa, sorry, mister president. What you're asking
for is journalism and that's not what we do here.
It's pretty much what she's telling him can't be verified. No,
it's first of all, it's verified. And second of all,
if that was really a position they could take, then
(26:45):
they should be the ones working to verify whether this
is real or not. But remember, CBS is the same
news outlet that at the absolute peak of a previous
presidential cycle, put forward National Guard documents that use Microsoft
word font that didn't exist from the year of the
supposed National Guard document involving George W. Bush. So you know,
(27:10):
they know their fake news, and then some they know
how to play this game, they know what to do.
It's just it's just incredible to watch this play out.
They're so terrified, there's such fraudulent cowards the media and
the Democrat Party. They're all, let's just talk about other
let's talk more about healthcare. Let's talk about all these
other No. I'm sorry. They put the President of the
(27:32):
United States through a four year long but I'm sorry,
three year long special counsel investigation and then impeachment based
on nothing. They impeach Trump for bringing up answers about
Hunter Biden corruption with the president of Ukraine. And it
turns out that that's a completely legitimate inquiry because there
(27:56):
is corruption involving Hunter Biden in Ukraine. So I'm sorry
he is there some special I was saying this back
when we were looking at this call, and whether it
was legitimate or not. Is Joe Biden because he was
formerly the vice president or his family members allowed to
break the law? Is there some special get out of
jail free car while we find out? Guess it's called
(28:16):
being a democrat. It's called being a democrat. It's just
amazing as we see how obvious all of this is.
They're not even being clever with the fraud that they're
perpetrating right now. They're not even they're not even impressive
with the propaganda. I mean, what you're seeing here could
(28:38):
be changing the course of history for this country. And
the media pretends that the smoking gun emails of the
Biden family and the Biden family's corruption, which now seems
to go all the way up to Joe Biden himself,
are no big deal. But these are the same journals
who cheered an FBI investigation, including FISA warrants of the
(29:03):
Trump campaign based solely on lies paid for by the DNC.
Not only did the media run with the stories that
were all lies, all just fabrications and nonsense about how
Carter Page and George Papadopoulos were Russian agents part of
a conspiracy to steal the election. Not only did the
(29:25):
media run with that in its you know, as though
it were gospel, the FBI, Obama's FBI, Obama's DOJ used
that stuff as the basis for an actual criminal investigation,
and used FISA warrants and use national security letters and
(29:46):
used the most intrusive tools of the federal apparatus to
spy on people. And now we're going to forget all
of that. We're going to pretend that they're not playing
the game as as dirty as they possibly can. I
don't think so's it's amazing, friends. Oh now there, what's
(30:08):
the latest? So, but Trump has a bank account in China,
I'm hearing this one. This is this is what you're
being told though. Oh my gosh, but there's a bank account.
I mean, okay, what's in the bank account? How much money?
They seem to think that that normal intelligent people can't
figure out that. If you're worth a billion dollars and
you know you've got a bank account somewhere with one
hundred grand, nobody cares. Doesn't mean anything. It's like finding
(30:30):
a twenty dollar bill in your back pocket of pants
you haven't worn in a while. Oh, he's gonna foreign
bank account. Well, how much is in this bank account?
What were they doing with this bank act? But anything
to get us talking about something else, something other than
this issue. And it's just so fitting too, because you know,
Trump is the one who's been willing to show that
(30:53):
China is a problem for the United States, our elites,
and it goes all the way across politics, really bipartisan senses,
the think tanks in DC. They've done nothing but not
just apologize. They've done apologias for China. They'll defend Chinese
trade practices and policies because oh, they're just trying to
(31:14):
catch up. The wealthier they get, the more liberal they'll
get don't worry, and we realize, oh, are you getting
wealthier too, Democrat and Republican lobbyists and think tankers and politicians,
Are you getting wealthier while China gets wealthier? Turns out, yeah,
it looks like that is the answer. But oh, don't worry.
(31:34):
Obama showed up just in time to make jokes about
how there's a there's a Trump Chinese bank account Play twenty.
We know that he continues to do business with China
because he's got a secret Chinese bank account. How is
that possible? How is that possible? A secret Chinese bankccount?
Cut Listen, Can you imagine if I that a secret
(31:57):
Chinese bank account when I running from reelection? You think
you think? You think Fox News might have been a
little concerned about that. They would have called me Beijing Berry. Yes,
this bank account is so secret that it paid one
hundred and eighty eight thousand dollars in taxes in China
(32:19):
from twenty thirteen to twenty fifteen. What do we what
do we really think is in here citing an analysis
of the president's tax records. So it's in his tax records.
So in what way exactly is the bank account secret.
I'm just wondering, right, this is a total smoke screen,
(32:40):
smoke screen, desperate smokescreen from the libs. Trump's tax records
showed investments of at least you ready for this, one
hundred and ninety two thousand dollars in five companies that
pursued interests business interests in China, according to the New
York Times. Oh my gosh, one hundred and ninety thousand dollars?
(33:05):
Did you? Does anyone think that Trump cares about one
hundred and ninety thousand dollars in business deals? Really? That's
a big that's a big deal. They guy's worth billions.
You're in the freedom hunt. This is the Buck Sexton
Show podcast. I want to share this one with you
(33:26):
is a fun one. Yesterday the Washington Examiners Susan Farreccio.
But as a bride spelt who's like running around trying
to put out all the fires for the bid he's
running around, is very very upset. How dare you say
that we're not very hotest blay clip one? The bottom
line is it deserves scrutiny by all media outlets. And
if they pick and choose this and decide it's not
(33:48):
worth their time. Um, I think that's showing real bias.
I think everybody deserves to look at the Moller stuff,
and everyone should look at this and give Buying the
scrutiny that he You know, he's not running for president
of the glee club. He's running for president of the
United States. And this is serious. This is not last
year's news. It's whether or not his son was coordinating
(34:09):
to get him to talk to these Ukraine oligarchs and
he was benefiting from it. I mean, it's it's it's
really dirty. Look at give me Brunst. Then I want
to move on to the Google which is a related story. Brian.
You know I said it was last season. You're saying
it's new. I think bottom line is we don't know
what is real and what is fake in these emails,
if there is anything real in them. Yeah, but that
(34:31):
doesn't stop any from from from reporting the Muller and
the dossier and all that stuff. I understand that you
have a lot of about now now we have ethics. Okay,
now we have it now. Don't you dare? Don't you
dare act like newsrooms didn't have ethics in twenty seventeen
and twenty eighteen. Well, I know they think, oh you can't,
you can don't dare me all you want, Brian, I've
been doing this for thirty years, so say whatever you want.
(34:53):
It's my view and I've a right to say it.
I was is that the newest media was unethical With Miller,
you'll dare? Do you dare? She's like, actually, I having
a dare, little man, go eat a donut. I've had
enough for you. I love it. It was great. Susan
Fareccio never seen her work before Big Fan, Now that
was great. How dare you saying the video is not Autista?
(35:13):
How dare don't know? Whatever Jeff Zucker's paging, it's not enough.
I mean to debase yourself like this on TV or
on radio or wherever this was. I think it was
a TV show for the amusement of your ignorant and
brainwash lib audience, so they don't have to be confronted
with facts they don't like. It's a tough job, but
(35:34):
Brad Stelter's there is ready to do it for everybody.
Excuse made Zucker? Could I have a pat on the
head please? I would like a pat on the head.
Thanks for listening. To the bus seton show podcast. Remember
to subscribe on Apple podcast, the iHeart Radio app, or
wherever you get your podcasts. A second major news story
(35:54):
that's really overshadowed by the Biden bombshells, But this one's
big two because of the implications, but also what it
shows us about what the media has been saying in
the past and how serious they are willing to take
their own words. You have heard no doubt for years
about Russian interference in our election, and there's this constant specter,
(36:18):
this constant fear of, oh my gosh, at howny moments,
Russia might interfere. Russia's hiding under your bed and it's
in the closet. Putin might steal everything from you. Oh no,
what are we going to do? Right? They've they've made
everyone think that Russia is a huge, huge problem for
(36:39):
all of us, when the reality as we see it,
is that Russia. Sure it is sometimes in opposition to
US interests, but they did not steal the last election
with one hundred thousand dollars of Facebook ads by some
bot farm in a basement in Russia somewhere, right'. It's
just insane. There's no way but they lost all sense
(37:03):
or they abandoned all sense of context and all sense
of you know, the way that anybody who's being honest
would would weigh these issues. So we had this Russia
collusion stealing the election thing, and you kept hearing about
Russian interference at our election, and we're supposed to always
be worried about this. Well, it turns out Iran has
(37:26):
tried to interfere in our election and exposed a lot
about certain groups, certain individuals in that process. Here is
the DNI Ratcliffe making an announcement about this just last night.
This was breaking news yesterday evening play fourteen. We would
like to alert the public that we have identified that
(37:48):
two foreign actors, Iran and Russia, have taken specific actions
to influence public opinion relating to our elections. First, we
have confirmed that some voter registration information has been obtained
by Iran and separately by Russia. This data can be
(38:09):
used by foreign actors to attempt to communicate false information
to registered voters that they hope will cause confusion, so chaos,
and undermine your confidence in American democracy. To that end,
we have already seen Iran sending spoofed emails designed to
(38:31):
intimidate voters in cite social unrest and damage President Trump.
Iran is sending emails. What are those emails saying? What
is the Iranian government doing here? That's what you have
to look at first and to see see what's happening,
so we can really understand all of this. But I
(38:52):
will tell you this much, just based on the statement
of the DNI. Here, what we know is that Iran
is interfering in our election on behalf of Joe Biden,
and by the rules established by our biased and moronic
media in twenty sixteen. This now means that if Trump loses,
(39:14):
we could spend four years whining about how Iran stole
the election for Biden, and maybe we can even unleash
a Special Council on him because of it. Now, let
me say, because I'm not crazy, Iran is not stealing
the election for Joe Biden. It's not going to happen.
They don't have the influence operations capability. It's just that
they can't. But what the Democrats did in twenty sixteen
(39:38):
was essentially look at the circumstances that we're looking at
now with Iran and say, oh, but Russia did something
and because Russia did something and we're sad that the
election was lost. Let's say that Russia's the reason the
election was lost. Let's wildly exaggerate the ability of the
Russian trolls the form to influence things in this election cycle,
(40:04):
because that makes us feel better, and it also then
becomes a weapon against the other side, even though there
was no Russian collusion. To this day, it is a
widespread belief among Democrats that the only reason they lost
that twenty sixteen election is because of Russian intervention. That's
what they tell themselves. That is the widespread belief among Democrats,
(40:27):
and that also then justifies in their minds their complete
lack of any respect for the office and any willingness
to really concede that Trump is in fact the president.
They will not concede that, they won't do it because
they say, not my president, and illegitimate and hashtag resistance
(40:48):
and all this stuff all because of Russia. So we're
now in a place where we could say we very
well could if we wanted to be a bunch of
dishonest cry babies, like the Democrats by and large are,
we could do the same thing. So thanks Iran, you've
now given us a ready made excuse, just like the
Democrats took in twenty sixteen. If our guy doesn't win,
it's because of Iran, Iran, Iran, Iran. We'll just talk
(41:10):
about it all the time. That would be stupid, it
would be intellectually dishonest. But it's exactly what It's exactly
what they did. That is how they played the game.
But now, now, the funnier part for me is that
when this initially happened, you know what the media reaction was. Well,
(41:32):
it's not clear that the emails were it's not clear
that the emails we're actually gonna gonna hurt Trump. You know,
it's threatening Biden supporters. Okay, let's look at this. The
Iranians created spoofed emails that were being sent around where
it was supposedly proud boys. Remember all the focus on
(41:52):
proud boys a few weeks ago and white supremacists. Who
wants to who wants to guess if a moderator Trenet's
gonna it's gonna ask President Trump? Excuse me, sir, but
my journalistic integrity forces me to ask this question. I
don't want to ask it, but I have to ask it.
Do you to announce white supremacy, mister President, like for
the fiftieth time, right. I know I'm gonna take a
(42:15):
lot of heat for this, sir. I know I'm not
gonna get invited to the fancy parties and people aren't
going to high five me at the country club or
maybe they'll do all of those things because I asked
this question, but do you did announce white supremacy, sir? Yeah,
they're gonna do that. I think it's a pretty good
chance they'll be. Yeah. Look, Savanna Guthrie did it recently
after it was already done by Chris Wallace. Yeah, I'll
(42:37):
never nothing, Chris Wallace says, puts out. I have no
interest in any of it. I mean I never did
really before, to be honest, but definitely not not at
this point. So now we get to the emails and
what they were really meant to do. So they send
out emails pretending to be proud boys, and the Iranian
you know, the Iranian government and these Iranian false flag
(42:59):
actor saw this as an opportunity to create greater division
in the US. And let me also say that this
is now something we should expect all the time because
the Democrats, for partisan purposes wildly exaggerated the effect and
the influence of even a very minor web based influence
(43:21):
operation for our election. Now all countries that want to
mess with us around the world can do this, doesn't
matter how effective it is, doesn't matter if they get caught.
At a minimum, the story breaks, and then one side
in our country can blame the other and say, well,
Russia or China or Iran or North Korea or wherever,
(43:43):
depending on who actually does it helped you cheat, Therefore
you didn't really win. You see how that pulls us apart.
You see how that creates tremendous friction, and therefore it's
a great victory. Doesn't have to be significant. You don't
have if you're Iran, don't have to change the results
of the election to poison American politics by doing just
(44:05):
a little bit of interference in the election. You see,
that's the standard that has now been set. Because the
Democrats are crybabies, you can't accept that they lost. So
this just encourages And this isn't a new theory. I've
been telling you this for years. This just encourages other
countries to get on this game. In fact, if you
listen to old shows. I mean, I have to go
back and find it. But I was saying, you're gonna
have other countries to do this. I said it. I
(44:28):
knew it. Other countries will get involved in this game
because if nothing else, it's just a way of showing
national spite for America from some other place that doesn't
like us, that some regime that you know has. It
shows disrespect. It doesn't have to be effective for it
to be a very clear middle finger extended in Uncle
(44:49):
Sam's direction. So then the media pretended, well, if it's
from Proud Boys, which it wasn't, But if we're going
to say it's from Proud Boys, and then if we're
going to say that the Proud Boys are you know
that the Proud Boys are trying to intimidate Democrats from
going to vote. Why is this? This is feigned stupidity.
I think, I don't know. A lot of journalists are
(45:10):
really dumb. Unfortunately, your average journalist is like a B
English literature student from a third tier liberal arts college
or you know, a second or third rung state school somewhere.
That's that's what you get for a lot of journals.
It's not a particularly impressive bunch and the ones that
went to fancy schools. Overwhelmingly they are either legacy admits
(45:32):
or affirmative action admits or you know, trust me, not
a lot of geniuses running around in the mainstream media.
But you already knew that. So now we look at
what really happens when these emails go around, right, the
Proud Boys are allegedly it's not them, it's a spoof.
We've already established that, but they're allegedly threatening Biden voters.
(45:53):
The whole point is, then the Biden camp can turn
around and see see look at these right wing extremists
threatening people on behalf of Donald Trump. Donald Trump is
a white supremacist Donald Trump. You know, it just plays
in that narrative. That's how it harms Trump. Obviously, people
aren't really gonna not show up at the polls because
(46:14):
of this Iranian influence operation. This is not reality. What's
much more likely is what's exactly happened here, which is
that Trump gets blamed for something that not only Trump
didn't do, but not even Trump supporters have done, or
even Proud Boys or whatever, and it helps the Biden
campaign as a result. It's also something that points to
(46:36):
how if you're Iran, you really want Biden to win.
Look at what Trump has done to the Iranians pulled
out of the deal. Said sorry, you guys are jerks.
Your country is not going to be allowed to play
in the international community the way that it wants to.
We're gonna keep sanctions in place, and if you mess
with us, we're gonna come down on you like an anvil.
(46:58):
And oh, by the way, Cosam Solomon, who was the
architect of many murder missions against US soldiers, right, Iran
was not at war with us. This was done and
this was done as a total black ops you know,
off the book, so to speak, situation on the part
of the Iranians. They were killing our soldiers. The Iranian
(47:19):
government was ordering our soldiers killed, and Kosam Solimani was
at the heart of this. And then President Trump gave
the order to turn Kossum into a pink mist and
that is what happened. And we were told, oh my gosh,
the Iranian response, the fury will shake us down to
our foundation, and actually Trump made it very clear to them, Yeah,
(47:40):
we took him out. That was the right move. He
deserved it. You want to try something else, It's like
I've said all along. Trump can be a little bit unpredictable,
but kind of like having Doc Holiday on the street, Howitzer,
you want the guy who's willing to pull the trigger
and keep the enemy off balance to be part of
your team. You want him on your side. And that
certainly worked with the Iranians, which also reminds me of
(48:03):
of Obama talking about foreign policy, and also just how
how not normal everything is well here. Obama is supposed
to be the secret weapon the Democrats have held in
reserved at the last moment here play twenty one. We're
not gonna have a president that goes out of his
way to insult anybody who doesn't support him or threaten
(48:25):
them with jail. That's not normal presidential behavior. We wasn't
tolerated from a high school principle. We wren't tolerated from
a coach. We w wasn't tolerated from a co worker.
We wasn't tolerated in our own family, except for maybe
crazy uncle somewhere. You know, Yeah, he's he's he's I
(48:49):
mean we Why would we expect and accept this from
the president of the United States? Why why Obama yelling
the whole time He's talking. What is he keep his
voice up here? Well, he's on a microphone. I'm just
gonna because it. You know, I don't miss that guy
(49:10):
at all. I tell you I don't miss him at all.
But he was also saying on foreign policy that we need,
I need to be respected again like we were under
the Obama administration. Of course, that's the that's the takeaway,
that's what it's supposed to be for that And I'm
just gonna say I actually remember, and Obama apparently doesn't.
(49:33):
The bloody catastrophes in Syria and Libya, the rise of
isis major deterioration in our situation in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Are troops deployed their Obama's embarrassing apology tour, bowing to
foreign heads of state for no apparent reason, palettes of
cash for Iran. These are all defining disasters of the
(49:56):
Obama foreign policy era. What are the defining foreign policy
design of the Trump administration? Peace deals in the Middle East,
moving the embassy to Jerusalem, finally hitting back at the
Iranians and not suffering any real consequences, pulling out of
the disastrous Paris climate, a cord that no one's really
going to enforce anyway, where's the big Oh he was
(50:21):
too nice to Kim Jong un in negotiations. That's what
we're supposed to all be losing sleep at night about. Sorry,
not gonna happen. You're in the Freedom This is the
Buck Sex and Show podcast. I'm keeping the terrorists, jihadist
and violent extremists the hell out of our country. If
(50:43):
that's okay, well, and I will never say it because
it's not good to say it. And I'm not good
on nice beautiful wood because I can tell it's ours
because it's They spend a lot of money on building
these things. But you haven't seen too much happening on
that front, have you. Huh? You notice? Okay, Well, keep
your eyes hey, keep your eyes out. Okay, keep your
eyes open because they'd love to do something. Just keep
(51:03):
your eyes open. But there's a reason for things not happening. Also,
President has also managed to keep the terrorists, the jee hottests,
the extremists at least all balance and much quieter they've
been in years. President Trump's administration is the first one
that I can remember as an adult where we didn't
(51:25):
have the constant specter of another mass casualty. Gee, hottest
attack hanging over our heads. He gets no credit for this,
at least from the media and from the left. He
hasn't started a new war. We're not embroiled in some
new conflict. Gets no credit from the anti war demonstrators,
and the so called peace movement in this country really
(51:46):
just usually a trojan horse for a lot of socialists
and radical Marxists. Oh, we just want world peace, except
when the communist dictators are running wild all over the place.
Then then all of a sudden, it's you know, glory
revolution time. And you should also remember that Trump, on
the one hand, says how great America is all the time.
(52:08):
And this is Joe what Joe Biden says, because you know,
I've often told you before there are people who take
pride in being American in this country, and there are
people who take pride in thinking they're better than America.
The latter are known as Democrats. Here's Joe Biden basically
saying that Play for America was an idea, an idea.
(52:29):
We hold these truths to be self evident. We've never
lived up to it, but we've never walked away from
it before. And I just think we have to be
more honest. Let our kids know as we raise them
what actually did happen, Acknowledge our mistakes so we don't
repeat them. We've never lived up to them. M I
(52:51):
don't know. I think in World War Two we defeated
the true global threat of fascism and and stop the
external nation of millions and millions of people six million
Jews eleven million people in total in the Nazi death camps.
I think we lived up I think that the guy
storming the beaches at Normandy, and I think those you know,
(53:13):
fighting on the barren, rocky landscape of Iwajima, I think
they lived up to it. I think we have many
times lived up to it. But Joe Biden's a Democrat.
A lot of people with sad, empty visions of themselves
and the country that they live in, who are just
desperate for approval and power and don't spend much time
(53:37):
thinking about issues like humility and how lucky they are
now that's for Republicans. Democrats would rather just trash the
country that's given them so much, and Joe Biden's a great,
a great champion of that trashing. Thanks for listening to
the Bus and Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts,
(53:57):
at the iHeartRadio app or wherever you get your podcast.
Got a debate tonight in Nashville. Love Nashville place. I
really would like to spend more time. Great town, great people, food, music,
so much to recommend it, and I know it's becoming
a bigger destination nationwide. People say I'm gonna move to Tennessee.
(54:20):
I'm moving Nashville or Memphis. You know there's some great
cities there, Chattanooga. I hear nice things about Chattanooga. But
debate tonight in Memphis. I'm sorry, in Nashville, not Memphis.
Debate tonight in Nashville, and the President's going to have
some opportunities to push his opponent on things that we
know the media won't don't expect. I mean, I don't
think anybody believes that there will be a serious push
(54:45):
from the moderators to get something out of Joe Biden
that he doesn't want to share, because they're not there
to get the truth. The reason for this debate, as
far as the moderators are concerned, is that Joe Biden
can check off the box. After basically hiding in the
basement for most of the campaign, so he can pretend
like he's running an actual campaign, and so that maybe
(55:07):
they can trip Trump up a little bit and get
some last minute undecided to sway over to Joe Biden.
That's what the moderators are thinking. They don't care what
Trump supporters think of their bias. They could care less.
In fact, they will wear the scorn of Trump supporters
as a badge of honor. Depending on how the debate
goes tonight. They'll think it shows what serious and good
(55:29):
journals they are. Well, there's one area where I think
there will be a bit of a push, and that's
on court packing, because you know, there's a new answer
now from Joe Biden. For weeks he was saying, I
can't I can't answer that because my answer will be
a story as a presidential candidate that people talk about,
(55:52):
to which everybody said, yeah, correct. But he got away
with it for a while, and it's because he ultimately
doesn't want to tell the left wing base of the
Democrat Party. They're not willing to completely remake an essential
American governmental institution that is necessary for the balance of powers,
(56:16):
and it's necessary that not just become an obvious, blatant
tool of politics, and it already has to some degree,
but making it worse, it's not going to make it better.
Biden was asked by sixty minutes about court packing, and
this was fascinating because he's got this new answer. He
just came up at play three. I've elected. What I
will do is I'll put together a national commission of
(56:38):
bipartisan commission of scholars, constitution scholars, Democrats, Republicans, liberal, conservative,
and I will ask them do over a one hundred
and eighty days come back to me with recommendations as
to how to reform the court system because it's getting
out of whack the way which is being handled. And
(57:01):
it's not about court packing. There's a number of other
things that are conscious scholars have debated, and I'd look
to see what recommendations that commission might make. So you're
telling us you're going to study this issue about whether
to pack the court, no, whether there's a number of
alternatives that are well beyond packing. This is a live ball. Oh,
it is a live ball. No, it is a live ball.
(57:22):
We're going to have to do that, and you're going
to find there's a lot of conservative conscious scholars are
saying it as well, the last thing we need to
do is turn the Supreme Court and digest a political football.
Whoever has the most votes gets whatever they want. Presidents
come and go, Supreme Court justice to stay for generations.
First of all, what was that? Yeah? Versions coming and going,
(57:44):
you know, and yeah, a lot of scholar a conservative
scholars or no, no, no. This is the kind of
sound leadership, though you should expect from Joe Biden. On
an issue like this of such great national importance. You're
going to have a guy who's saying, well, I'm going
to form a committee, and the committee's gonna tell me
(58:05):
what I should do. We're all supposed to say, oh,
that's great, Joe, Yeah, form that committee, man, awesome. There's
only one of two outcomes that the committee will give him, right.
I don't mean by their decision, I mean why he
would do that. One is so that he can say
I formed a committee and then just ignore it and
do whatever he wants. Or two he wants to use
(58:27):
the committee as an excuse for not doing anything. I
think it's most likely the first one. I had the
committee come together, But why would this? What do you
need a committee for? This is a matter of what
the Congress is going to do. The Congress is the committee,
and so it's really just up to whether the President
would support this or not. So what Joe Biden is
(58:48):
telling you is that at this stage, after being in
politics for over forty years, he in elected office for
over forty years, he wants you to know that he's
not really sure how he feels about court packing. He
will he thinks it needs more study. M Yes, this
is the leadership that you'll be able to expect from
(59:11):
from Joe Biden. And this is the kind of really clear,
you know, fearless, out in the front stuff that you'll
expect from Joe Biden. Look, I think we all need
to understand, first of all, the Democrats are caught here
because they're the ones that created the arms race in
the Supreme Court in the first place. You look back
(59:32):
during the Clinton years Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Suitor, and
you know these I know that wasn't he might he's
not Clinton years, but whatever, you look back at left
wing judges, Republicans have waved through left wing judges time
and time again. Republicans have voted alongside with Democrats to
put forward Ruth Bader Ginsberg and Atlanta Kagan and you know,
(59:54):
even so to Mayor, which is she's an embarrassment to
the Supreme Court, but you know she sits on it,
and you know, suitor, and you know, go down the list.
Republicans go along with that. It's Democrats who are like, no,
we must have somebody that suits our ideological positions on
the court, and we will stop anybody who does not
(01:00:14):
fall into that category. Well, you've been able as a leftist.
They've been able to get away with that for a
long time. But eventually people tire of that. They see
what's really happening. They understand that the Democrats are playing
games here and that their interest is not in what's
best for the rule of law and for the institution
(01:00:36):
of the Supreme Court. Their interest is in getting their way,
having the Supreme Court be a super legislature. It's exactly
what they're trying to do here. So that's, you know,
as we focus in on why they're so upset over
the elevation of the completely qualified Amy Coney Barrett, their
(01:00:58):
complaints are just because we're seeing who they really are.
Senator Mike League gets at play eleven one party the
Democrats has been the aggressor. In every single instance, at
every step along the way, our side has used our
constitutional authority and the other side has abused its authority.
There is no tit for tat. There's just tat. Democrats
(01:01:21):
killed Judge Bourke's nomination for partisan political reasons. They killed
Miguel Astrada's nomination for partisan political reasons. They slandered Justice Thomas,
Justice Alito, and Justice Kavanaugh for partisan political reasons. They
knoked the filibuster again for partisan political reasons. And now
they're trying to scuttle this meeting, this hearing, this vote
(01:01:44):
for partisan political reasons. When it comes to the judiciary,
abuse of power is their agenda? Correct. The whole point
of the Supreme Court, as far as lives are concerned,
is to get what they want. It's not to have
an eminent body of scholars and you know, esteemed intellectuals
(01:02:09):
in the matter and matters of legal jurisprudence who are
going to come to constitutionally faithful decisions. That's not the
purpose of the Supreme Court. As far as the Democrat Party,
the American left is concerned, it's transactional. We have this thing,
we want it to do the things we want it
to do. Look, Republicans are the ones who always end
(01:02:32):
up putting up these judges like Roberts, who just keep
betraying what we thought was their judicial philosophy. In the
case of Roberts, because you know, he likes being thought
of as the guy who's protecting the institution of the court.
He likes that he won't really get trashed in the
editorial pages of the New York Times the way other judges,
other judges like Alito and Thomas will, And do you know,
(01:02:54):
so it's really about vanity. One man's vanity is changing
federal law in a sense for all the rest of us.
That's what we end up with the left. They never
on the big issues, they never break ranks because they
know why they're there. They understand that this is the expectation,
that that's why they were put into this job in
the first place. But nonetheless, the Democrats are whyming about
(01:03:19):
this because we are days away from what should be
the Amy Coney Barrett confirmation conclusion, I think on this Monday.
So you know, Chuck Schumer is very upset about this.
Here he is Play twenty three. I am here to
stand with my colleagues on the Judiciary Committee, who are
(01:03:40):
boycotting today's committee markup on the nomination of Judge Amy
Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court. This is not a
decision the members of the committee have taken lightly, but
a Republican majority has left us no choice. We are
boycotting this illegitimate hearing. The nomination of Amy Cony Barrett
(01:04:07):
is the most illegitimate process I have ever witnessed in
the Senate. Why is it illegitimate? This is the only
thing you have to do. Ask that very basic, very
straightforward question. What exactly about this is illegitimate? They don't, Oh,
it's an election year. Where is that in the Constitution?
(01:04:28):
Where is that in the rules of the Senate, in
the law anywhere? So? How is it illegitimate? For the Democrats?
Is a stand in word they're using here for I
don't like, I don't like what's happening, So I'm just
gonna call it illegitimate. They're they're bastardizing. They are changing
in real time the definition of the word because it's
(01:04:50):
useful for them. Corey Booker, who hopefully he's not going
to cry as he says this, also is calling for
the sen a GOP to stop the Barrett nomination because
people have voted early. What play twelve. This is not right.
It is wrong, and we should have a nation right now,
(01:05:14):
in the midst of an election where people know that
their healthcare is on the ballot, that equal justice is
on the ballot, that access to securing your most fundamental
rights and equalities on the ballot, that we should not
wait for the American people to speak as they already
are speaking, and wait to do this until after the
next inauguration. To me, this is stunning. It is anti democratic,
(01:05:40):
and it is an affront to what I believe or
a lot of our shared most cherished values and ideas.
In addition to that, it's contrary to the very words
of so many of my colleagues. I mean, none of
their arguments are even a little bit compelling. It's all
just kind of an emotional appeal to their fellow Democrats.
So bad what they're doing is like so upsetting, I'm
(01:06:02):
so mad about it. Completely legitimate, it is the opposite
of illegitimate. It is totally legitimate, and everyone can see that,
or at least anybody who is being honest. Amy Coney
Barrett will be a fine Supreme Court Justice. Donald Trump
will have installed three Supreme Court picks in his first
four years, which is also a reminder for a lot
(01:06:25):
of people who felt like they were holding their nose
in the last election voting for Trump because of judges
and because of the need to have judges who will
protect the Constitution and not be left wing activists. They
played the right hand, They made the right move. They
can't have any doubts or any regrets about that now
seeing what's actually ended up happening. So that's I think
(01:06:49):
that that should be very encouraging because I look, I'm
seeing these polls. I see what's going on right now
with this effort to make it seem like the Trump
campaign can't win. It's already too late. You know, they're
too far behind, not buying it, not buying it. I
know that in some key states, Trump or rather Biden
(01:07:11):
is underperforming where Hillary was, But who knows what the
polls think about How dishonest the media is in this
election cycle, more than I've ever seen before. I mean,
they're more willing to be blatant in the dishonesty. They
used to be a little bit more subtle. There was
more more tactical caution in their bias than that. Right now,
(01:07:32):
it's just anything for Biden. I mean, they're all just
like little Biden bots running around doing everything can to
help him. So I think there's also the very real
chance that a lot of these polling agencies, they're not
going to be wrong, untentially buy a lot, but they're
always the tie is always going to go to the
Biden if you know what I mean. They're always going
(01:07:52):
to skew in that direction because that's what happened in
twenty sixteen. I think that's what's happening once again because
someone's gonna pay them and they want to be on
the right side of the Democrat apparatus. You're in the
Freedom Mind. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Doctor
(01:08:14):
Jill Biden is not really a doctor, but why let
me take some medical advice from her on masking and
rallies play nineteen. Well, I think this administration has made
a political I mean, we need to listen to the
to the doctors and the scientists. That's what we have
to do. And I think it's totally irresponsible that people
(01:08:35):
are going to these rallies and they're not wearing masks.
They're not socially distancing. Um, it's irresponsible and people will
die because of this. People will die because of Trump, right,
that's what that's That's the would be first lady. There,
she's already been the second Do we call her a
second lady? I don't know if that's a thing, but
there's the would be first lady telling us all this
(01:08:58):
about masks. I gotta tell you my face. Favorite mask
wearing story from this week is Chris Cuomo, who loves
to go on TV be like hey, you know, really serious,
look in his eyes, really a lot of gravitas he's
pulling together. He's a wear a mask, you know, save lives.
Wear a mask. Right. It turns out there's a letter
(01:09:18):
which has I believe been verified at this point, and
it was on Tucker's show last night from his building,
his fancy building in New York City where he lives,
where he is being scolded for putting other residents at
risk for not wearing a mask in his own building.
(01:09:39):
So when it comes to his own actions, and I
think the surprise is absolutely nobody one of the biggest
wear a mask or you're a bad person advocates does
not himself around other people wear a mask when there's
not a camera around. Does anyone get surprised at all
by this kind of a fraud? Nah? Right, we actually
(01:10:01):
expect it at this point. I think everyone just figures, oh, okay,
so you know another another BS journalist here who's doing
what we all know they do, which is say one
thing for the cameras and try to get the clicks
and the likes and the follows, and then when it
comes to their own personal behavior they completely dispense with. Look,
I didn't wear a mask all summer in my building,
even though it was required because there was no COVID
(01:10:21):
in New York. And it's absurd. And I also think
that wearing a mask for the five seconds I walked
through my lobby is idiocy. But I tell you that
every day, like I tell you that all the time.
I'm honest about it. And now, because my building is
so paranoid, fine, I wear a mask when I walk
in and out. I take it off the second I
get into fresh air, but I carry one in my
back pocket. He used the same mask all the time.
It's disgusting. It's like putting a swamp on my mouth. Now.
(01:10:43):
But anyway, but I'm consistent someone like Cuomo is a fraud,
wants you to wear a mask, wants to be able
to control you, and wants the virtue signaling points for
demanding that control, but has no interest himself in living
by the mandates that he forces upon you. You're a
(01:11:04):
bad person if you don't do it. He's a good
person for telling you to do it, but he's not
going to do it. That really is the Democrat Party
defined right now. It's true of the way they view
the environment, taxes, social justice, everything just all a big
bacchanal of hypocrisy. Thanks for listening to the Buses and
(01:11:26):
Show podcast. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app,
or wherever you get your podcasts. Harsani time, everybody. David Harsani,
senior writer of National Review, Friend of the Show is
with us now. He has a fair minded and honest
eye looking at all the stuff going on right now
with this Hunter Biden mess and the journalism or lack
(01:11:49):
thereof around it. Great to have you back, David. What's up?
Always a pleasure? Thank you? So right? Yeah, I mean
a whole lot of sec we got we got emails
now and people like Leslie Stall are telling the President
United States to his face, well, we can't verify the laptop.
I mean, you work for CBS sixty minutes. I thought
(01:12:10):
the whole point was that they could verify things. The
journalists really are just pretending to be inept morons, it
seems at this point, because they can't come up with
a better excuse. It's a completely new standard as well.
I mean they just I was thinking before about the
Atlantic story, where where you know, we've learned that supposedly
or allegedly, Donald Trump had said all these horrible things
(01:12:31):
about soldiers. There wasn't a single on the record source
to corroborate that story. Nothing. Now we haven't on the
record source. The guy's a Navy eve who was Hunter's partner,
saying yes, these emails are real or this. I'm not
sure if you said that about every email, but certain emails,
and that yes, Joe Biden or at least Hunter told
(01:12:52):
them that Joe Biden was a big part of what
was going on. Now, whether that's true or not, in
the end, and I think that there is plenty of
evidence that he knew about it, Joe. It's certainly verified
as within the normal journalistic ethics, right. I mean, you
can talk about it now. It's in the public record.
There are people who are on the record saying it's true.
(01:13:14):
We know that the laptop is real. We have the
signed paper from Hunter at the Delaware shop right near
where the Bidens I think lived. So it's just insane.
It's just insane that they won't cover it, and when
they do, they're always just sort of trying to explain
it away, or or it becomes like a pouncing story.
The Repotans are ready to pounce on Hunter stuff. And
it's not really even a bad Hunter. It's about Joe Biden.
(01:13:36):
Well that's that's take a ten percent cut. That's what
he was doing. That's the part of this. And I
was saying, Hunter Biden being the world's biggest screw up
in a million different ways and even perhaps trading off
his dad's name on his own. You know, it's bad.
But I don't think that you blame I don't think
you blame a political candidate for the actions of their children,
per se. I think that that is a line you
(01:13:59):
can draw. But that's not what we're seeing here. We're
seeing Hunter Biden in emails and communications talking about how
Dad gets a cut. Dad knows about all this. The
business partner Bablinsky, I think is his name, Lieutenant Bablinsky.
He says that Joe Biden knew all about this and
that it was all done. And it's just a reminder,
(01:14:21):
you know, you would think they couldn't get away with
something like this, David, so brazen and so unethical and
very likely illegal by the way, you think, except if
they won't, even if the journals won't even touch this
story with all the information and corroboration it currently has.
Do we really think that anybody was going to want
of their own volition look into the Biden's finances years ago?
(01:14:44):
Of course not No. And and now there's more. We
have verified more information, and this story corroborated more of
the things that the Post has reported and has had
more on the real real sources on the record who
were involved in the situation that we did for four
years of Russia Gate story is that still haven't been corrected,
that still haven't been corroborated. In fact, they've been mostly debunked.
(01:15:06):
And yet now they're pretending that they have this high
ethical standard. I mean, it's insane, And you're right, this
is about listen. I think the Hunter's story would should
be a story on its own if it's true, because
it matters to you know, it's newsworthy. I no, no,
if it's criminal, But the idea that the presidential candidate
would allowed his son to leverage off the United States
(01:15:28):
government and then take a ten percent cut, that's a
pretty big story. I don't even know if it's illegal,
but it sounds pretty corrupt. I'd like to know more
about it. You know, it seems to me like that
actually would be you know that that in a fair
minded for a fair minded person, if Joe Biden was
really getting a ten percent cut of his son doing
deals based off of access to Joe Biden. First of all,
I do believe that that is a criminal conspiracy. I
(01:15:49):
think that that qualifies as quid pro quel corruption. Corruption
cases are always a little tricky and there's a lot
of stuff that goes into it, but I think that
it probably would meet that threshold from what I know
of the law. But beyond that, if I were a
fair minded person, that would be disqualifying. I mean, that
is straight up disgusting behavior for not just like a
state senator or a city councilman the Vice president of
(01:16:11):
the United States. How many stories have we read about
how people come to this country from you know, diplomats
and stay at a Trump property. Well, that's okay, that's newsworthy.
Doesn't this seem at least as newsworthy as those stories.
Is the front running presidential candidate we're talking about, and
you know, we don't know. It would be crazy to
(01:16:32):
think that all of this is just made up by Hunter,
you know, in his emails. Even if that were true,
they won't even ask him the question. And when they
do ask one I saw one Wisconsin reporter asked, they
do it in this really grading way where they're like,
can you believe what these crazy Republicans are saying about you?
You know, do you have a comment on this craziness
(01:16:53):
and that? And then he gets to like tea off
on them. But they never asked him a simple question,
did you ever benefit financially from what Hunter was doing
in Ukraine or in China? Did you know about it?
Because he lied it, right, he lied in the past
and said he knew nothing about what Hunter was doing.
We know that that's probably not true now, right, I mean,
that's the fact that there has not been a real
(01:17:13):
ask of did you ever make any money off of
anything Hunter did? And asking a straightforward way. I can
guarantee that if someone asked that question, they would not
get a clear denunciation from Joe Biden on There would
be some massona you know, Trump's the real you know,
they the usual Biden bluster. You would not get a
(01:17:35):
real answer from him on it. Because I think they're
going to be able to prove David in this last stretch.
I mean, I know some of the people who have
access to the emails that I think they're going to
be able to prove this. Yeah, I mean he would
just say, yeah, come on, you know, how dare are
you and and try to distract and the media helped him.
They bought a week with Russian disinformation, which was just
a complete nonsensical lie, and then they bought they're trying
(01:17:57):
to buy another week and then just trying to pull
it out. Fine, I don't even know if this story
would change anything that much. I don't know, but it
is newsworthy, and journalists just actively not only actively not
covering it, but trying to censor it. I don't mean
government censorship, but what Twitter has done to the New
York Post account. That is nuts, and I just I
don't even know what would happen if they did that
(01:18:18):
to the New York Times, which has run countless, you know,
stories that they haven't verified. I mean, even the tax story.
I don't even know if that's true. Did they speak
to I don't know. We just have to trust them
to some extent. The Post has been more transparent about
the political and part is in nature of how that
information was gathered, which I think is good to be
transparent about. It doesn't mean that the information is untrue
(01:18:42):
or that the laptop is certainly seems we're speaking to
David Harsani, senior writer at National Review dot com. David,
the Post got The New York Post got trashed by
fellow journalists, which I just think is is inexcusable. It's
so appalling on so levels. People were sneering at it.
(01:19:02):
Oh it's a tabloid. Oh, Rupert Murdock owns it. Oh,
as if it's like the newspaper that talks about you know,
aliens landing in the desert and bringing back you know,
a baby Jesus or something. You know what I mean,
those things like they really were demeaning the newspaper last
week for the most obvious political purposes. No one's now
that it's clear the New York Post was one hundred
(01:19:23):
percent corrected in the right. There's no apologies or even hey,
maybe we'll be a little more fair minded to you
guys next time. From the rest of the journalist Condre, Yeah, no,
I mean they their their mission is to get Joe
Biden elected. That's their mission. I mean, not all of them,
but most of them. The political press, the Washington Posts, CNN, MSNBC,
(01:19:45):
we all, you know, we know all the names. I mean,
the Atlantic Rant ran with that story that that you
know about about Trump saying all those terrible things about soldiers,
I mean, and that that's a magazine filled but pseudo
intellectuals and sort of nons just spewing out five thousand
word nonsensical articles every single day. And yet we're supposed
(01:20:05):
to take them seriously. But not reporters at the New
York Post, which breaks stories all the time, biggest city
in the world, large, one of the largest circulations in America.
I mean, it's just nuts. And where are all these
people like Brian stet All, both of those CNN media
reporters and everyone else who who is constantly acting like
being critical of journalism as an attack on the First Amendment.
(01:20:26):
You know what I'm saying. They make no distinction between
those except if it's about some reporter they don't like
at the Daily Car or at you know, wherever, at
the New York Post. I mean that, you know, I'm
getting sick of like complaining about them in the sense
that I think we just have to move on and
we have to build our own media infrastructure and do
what we have to do, because you can't fight this
all the time because they don't care. There's no one above,
(01:20:48):
there's no like editor in chief saying you have to
act more professionally. There's no one stopping them anymore. I mean,
you see them on Twitter. They just sort of sneer
and laugh and retweet mediamas. You know what I mean.
So yeah, I look, I think that journalists as a
professional class are arguably the most dishonest and worst people
engage in what is ostensibly a legal trade in the country.
(01:21:10):
I mean, I really believe that, Like I would take
any number of other how I would take you know,
I don't know, you know, casino owners and strip club
barons over journalists these days in terms of the ethics
of their job, because at least those other folks are
telling you what they're really doing. Journalists are engaged in
a perpetual fraud. They're lying to the public about what
(01:21:31):
their goals are and what they're doing. But I would
have agreed with you even when I was working in
a newspaper fifteen years ago on that. So I'm not
going to argue, but I think you're right. And then
they just want to quickly add because they drive me bananas.
Then you have fact checkers, which with a conceit of
which is that some person can decide an argument in
a newspaper who's just a you know, a reporter. These
(01:21:52):
are columnists, and yet now they're used by political campaigns
by Democrats all the time to say this has been
fact checked, where you know, it's an easy way to
circumvent argument. But you know, I don't want to get
too deeply into what the problems or journalism, but the
thing is that I think that the pressure that many
people have put on others to defend a post and
(01:22:14):
to talk about Twitter has actually blown this story up,
maybe even bigger than it would have been. Oh yeah,
I think I think the effectively, the suppression, what I
call the Great Suppression, magnified this story much more rapidly
than if they had allowed it to pursue, you know,
go through normal social media channels. But David, before we
let you go, we've got a big debate tonight. People
are going to be watching it soon after hearing us
(01:22:36):
right here so or listening to it. So what are
your expectations, what do you think, you know, what do
you think is going to happen? And will it matter?
I am I'm I'm skeptical that it will matter very much,
though I think you see, you know, you see a
national poll, some national posts getting wider, but put some
of the state poles, you know, getting a little closer constricting.
So I don't know how important it is. I don't
(01:22:58):
think that Trump will do worse than he did last time.
He was overly aggressive and he wouldn't let Biden speak.
But I do think this is an opportunity for Trump
to ask some questions that the media won't ask and
bring it to the attention of people who haven't even
even heard about it. That includes Hunter. Though I don't
think he should obsess on that topic. I think he
should just bring it up, but I don't know how
(01:23:20):
much it will matter. Let's see David Arsali of National
Review dot com. David, great to see him, my friend anytime.
Thanks for having me. You're in the Freedom hunt. This
is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Biden is also pleasure
(01:23:41):
mass amnesty and free federal healthcare for illegal aliens, and
we all have a heart. It will obliterate Medicare and
Social Security with it, but we all have a heart.
The problem I want to take care of everybody. The
problem is our country will be flooded with tens of
millions of people, free healthcare, free education. I always say
(01:24:03):
for them, it drives them crazy. Everybody gets a free
Rolls Royce and then they say I am misrepresenting. They
don't get a Rolls Royce. But no, but think of it.
Free healthcare and I'll always protect. I will always protect
your Medicare and your social security. President on immigration here,
which because we're in this bizarre world of COVID, has
(01:24:25):
become much less of an issue. But remember that was
his signature issue in twenty sixteen. It is what separated
him from the rest of the Republican field. It's what
broke him out ahead of that Republican field, and it's
an area where he has been proven to be very prescient.
I think the President has been shown to be right
on immigration. And when he says the Democrats, he's telling
(01:24:46):
you what I've been telling you. They want amnesty, they
get amnesty. They look they tried to get it through
and make Republicans complicit in at the last time with
the Gang of Eight Bill and Marco Rubio. Marco Rubio's
career never really recovered from that, but they tried to
make Republicans a part of it with this comment. You know,
because the Republicans who want to be considered heroes and
get a lot of nice media coverage, big donations, the
(01:25:09):
Chamber of Commercial love, you the you know, the big
moneyed interests for corporations that rely on cheap labor. You know,
there's a lot of upside to being a Republican who
supports amnesty. Paul Ryan was a Republican who really supported amnesty,
for example. You know, you get to be an establishment
guy who talks a lot about the Constitution and the debt,
(01:25:30):
but doesn't really talk about what happens tomorrow. If we
let the left get their way with policies like this.
So Trump is right when he says that there's gonna
be mass amnesty. And also with amnesty comes an enormous
additional drain on the healthcare system, right, I mean, this
is why. And they are all these like libertarian open
borders groups that I come across the stuff will say, oh,
(01:25:52):
but it will increase GDP. Yeah, but it'll increase the expenses.
And these are individuals who are in an increasingly information
based economy with already depressed wages and a lot of
areas of the country again pre COVID, COVID has messed
up the numbers, but for manual labor and for things
where illegal immigrants are more able to compete for jobs.
(01:26:12):
And that's real. And if you want to read on
that or learn more about that, Professor Borjas at Harvard
has done some of the most in depth research on it.
I've read his work and he just shows, Yeah, when
you flood an area with a lot of unskilled illegal
immigrants for jobs like you know, carpentry and you know
what you consider to be day laborer kind of work,
(01:26:33):
it brings down a lot of other wages. And you know,
carpenters who live in that area can make the same
kind of money. And it's not nationwide all at once.
It's it's really state by state, really county by county
within this state. But think about what it will do
to the healthcare system as well. You're going to bring
people in who will overwhelmingly to be dependent upon the
(01:26:53):
state via Medicaid or Medicare for All or whatever the
Democrats are proposing. That's how it's going to work. So
this is a this is a major concern. So you
can look at this and the reality of the Democrats
are going to try to do, or you can be
a fake Republican who's just This is about character. This
is about a good man versus a bad man. But guys,
(01:27:14):
does Joe Scarborough think he's a good Man's that would
be interesting. I'd like to hear that explanation. I'm not
going to go too into the personal stuff that's public
that we all know about with that guy. Not exactly
a model for how to live your life, fair enough,
but the big Trump supporter who now acts like he's
the great hero of the resistance, but he's appealing to
(01:27:35):
your your moral sensibility over at MSNBC. He works in
a network that just spews lies and nonsense and divides
people with the most aggressive and toxic identity politics narratives possible.
You know. Se annd today ran a story about how
the officer that had his knee on the neck of
(01:27:56):
George Floyd third degree murder charge dropped. Oh yeah, they
dropped that charge. They kept them more serious second degree
murder charge. But CNN and the headline third degree murder
charge dropped just to get everyone, Oh my gosh, here's
Scarborough's pitch play eight. It's interesting. You can look at
that video and I think most Americans would agree that
(01:28:18):
this election is between a good man and a bad man. Yeah,
and I feel comfortable saying that Donald Trump is a
bad man. He's a bad man. He liked him a
lot when he gave access to the president right or
(01:28:39):
access to the Republican candidate Joe Biden was I'm sorry,
Joe Scarborough rather was a big fan. But now now
he's all about integrity and honesty and Trump's a bad guy, folks.
Trump is imperfect. No one's ever said he was perfect.
He's been a good president and he brings far more
to the table and just there's so much more upside
(01:29:00):
for all of us, for all Americans, including the psycho libs,
who would scream if I said this to their faces,
and I would love to, but they won't listen to me.
It'll be better for all of us than a corrupt, phony,
fraudulent Joe Biden. Oh, he's just a moderate presidency. Nobody
really thinks that, but they're just trying to fool people.
(01:29:20):
Thanks for listening to The bus Esson Show podcasts. Remember
to subscribe on Apple podcast, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever
you get your podcasts. Rock and roll, fellow patriots, we
(01:29:41):
made ours go up to eleven. It's time for roll Call.
Roll Call. Send us your thoughts, Facebook dot com, slash
slash Buck Sexton if you want to send a message,
(01:30:02):
that way, very easy way to do it. If you
want to email us Team Buck at iHeartMedia dot com,
or if you prefer, you can send a direct message
on Instagram because I'm on the gram now. Buck Sexton
is my name on the Instagram or tex sex sex
(01:30:22):
dump whatever Keith Olverman calls me. But that's not actually
my Instagram name. But I just think that's kind of funny,
he said, it again yesterday on Twitter. What u maniac producer? Mark?
Have you ever seen the old, the old Ben Affleck
thing where he does an impersonation on SNL off Keith
Overman and Miss Precious Perfect the cat. It may be
the funniest thing Ben Affleck has ever done. I haven't.
(01:30:42):
I'll have to go YouTube. Oh you should watch it.
Miss Precious Perfect picked on by the condo board, unable
to stay with me and my mum. It's amazing, It's amazing.
You gotta watch it. It's like the bet. It's one
of the funnier things I've remember seeing on SNL. Really
for many years. This was back when SNL was a
comedy show instead of a crappy pseudo political commentary show.
(01:31:05):
I don't know if you know that. That used to
be a thing. I miss old SL. I don't watch
it anymore. Old SL was a bunch of people who
are trying to actually do funny things on Saturday night
for the entertainment of the American people. SNL for the
last ten years or so has been like a wokeness parade. Yeah,
we're so woke, man, it's gross. What do you got doing?
(01:31:25):
What do you got going on? We got the debate
coming up in just a little bit. What are you
gonna be doing? I'll be watching the debate most likely.
But do you do you do you game time eat
or do you like to pre game eat? Oh? I
pre game eat and then I'll have the football on
the other TV that the it's the Giants are playing
but they stink, so I don't really want to watch that,
but I'll have it on. So will there be there
(01:31:47):
will be Super Bowl this year? On time in January?
Is that the plan as of right now? Yeah? I
think it's still early February, but they have contingency plans
that make it all go all the way to late
March if they have to. How can how can the
New market not have better sports teams? I know for
the rest of the country, they're like, fuck, that's your problem,
we don't care. But New York should have better teams.
So the Jets are historically bad. Yeah, well that's not
(01:32:10):
a surprise. Alrighty. Let's get to the roll call here, Dan,
President Trump and the GOP is playing a dangerous game
with the conservative bass. I am voting for Trump, but
I have yet to see any accountability for actual criminal
behavior from the left, Clinton emails, Obama Spygate, IRS scandal,
(01:32:31):
Biden Shenanigans, and so on. No one is behind bars.
We will not wait forever, and in fact we have
waited long enough. It is time for accountability. If Trump
blows it during the next term, the GOP will lose
its base. I promise, uh Dan, what you're saying is true.
(01:32:52):
I mean, there has been really no accountability for the
Clinton emails, Spygate, IRS, and this Biden stuff. And I'm
not going to tell you things I don't think are true.
There's not gonna be accountability for any of that. Most likely,
there's something about Republicans where, even though they know the
other side we'll try to ruin us, imprison our children,
(01:33:13):
take all of our money, and destroy our lives, and
use the government and use federal agents and places like
the FBI and prosecutors' offices as weapons to that effect,
even though we're completely aware of that. Our team, our
side is always wow. We don't want to be too rough.
(01:33:34):
We don't want to you know, we don't want to
make anybody feel too bad. So we're just gonna like,
let bygones be bygones. And then they try to you know,
run a special counsel, or they try to throw our
kids in, you know, in prison again, or they do
whatever it is that they do and we go back.
It's just like a cycle. We just keep going through
the same cycle over and over again. So, yeah, Dan,
(01:33:56):
I hear what you're saying. Man. It's it's disappointing to
be sure. I have no disagreement with you on that,
and I think it is unfortunately unlikely to change. I
do not see it changing anytime soon. Alex. Hey, I
love the show. We love you, Alex. I imagine I'll
be listening for a long time from the way I've
(01:34:16):
been listening to y'all since the beginning of this pandemic.
I just wanted to say, Duck duck go is a
great search engine. I use it if I can't find
what I'm looking for since Google tends to hide most
conservative opinions and facts. Also, I can't wait to hear
your Dracula podcast and the others you were talking about
listening from Dallas. My mom told me about y'all when
(01:34:37):
she tuned in the radio on her way to Florida. Well, Alex,
that's great, man, Thank you so much. It's great to
have a relatively new member of Team Buck who's really
you know, into what we're doing here. Dracula podcast is
in the works, and I've got a deadline here because
it's only ten days, no less than that, nine days
before Halloween, so I want to get it out before Halloween,
so that'll be kind of cool. And as for Duck
(01:35:00):
Duck Go, I've never even heard producer Mark you've even
heard of it? I have. I know a lot of
tech people like to talk about it because they don't
like Google and all the tracking and whatnot. Oh interesting,
Duck Duck Go. Okay, you ever playing Duck Duck Goose
as a kid? Of course, what child didn't. Yeah, that
(01:35:21):
was a fun one. Duck Duck Goose was good. I
also I used to love Capture the Flag games when
I was a kid. I thought that was a great one.
Or man Hunt play those those were fun. Yeah, Capture
the Flag was great. You know. Now it's like, oh
my gosh, I'm supposed to run fast and people are
gonna chase me. That sounds like sounds like I've done
something illegal. I have no interest and had too much
(01:35:41):
effort at this point. Yeah, it's gonna I'm gonna get
winded by it, and that's no fun. We don't need that, Don.
The lack of Civics being taught in schools has advantaged
the left for years. The Biden campaign is now leveraging
this ignorance, wrongly accused the administration of mismanaging of the pandemic. Ultimately,
(01:36:02):
health is controlled by states and municipalities. How Governor Cromo
mandated the admission of COVID nineteen positive patients to nursing
homes is an example of this. The closing of business
is also at the whim of states and municipalities. I
hope the President uses the next debate to rectify this
educational negligence to inform the citizenry of the role of
(01:36:23):
the federal government in local issues like health. He needs
to explain the role of federal government and how it
is restricted from meddling in local governance. Yes, Don, I
think it's true that people not understanding really both the
foundation and origin of the government that we have and
the reasons for the limitations. I mean, you know, limitations
(01:36:46):
on government power has become almost a cultural thing. People
hear them, they say, oh, here's some right wing tea
party Bob, Well, no, of course you want a limited government.
The alternative is a government that can take away any
of your freedoms. So there's always the moral necessity for
limitations on government authority and power, and that's also what
(01:37:07):
laws serve to do. Or The biggest threat of tyranny
that we face is not from some foreign government or
foreign country, although China is getting pretty big and pretty scary.
Who knows what twenty or thirty years from now is
going to look like. The real threat of tyranny today
is here at home, and we're seeing how quickly it
can happen. We're seeing how the frog can boil slowly
(01:37:29):
in the pot with the COVID restrictions that we're under
that I'm amazed people are willing to still sit back
and deal with this the way that they are. I mean,
I would lead a civil disobedience movement in New York,
except they be me and five other people and everybody
else around us like Trump supporters get them. So what's
the point? Doesn't do anything? Don't have a critical mass
of people who think for themselves, an irrational in New
(01:37:52):
York City that can push back on this. So, as
I always telling you, you've got to have a plan.
Don't just charge the machine gun nets. For me to
be a a mask non com non compliance guy, I'd
be one of very very few people in Manhattan that
that would be taking that position. And it's not mask
non compliants all the time. I mean, you know that's
(01:38:13):
the thing. Look, if people want to wear it on subways,
I get it. I mean there's some circumstances. I'm not
crazy about it. But I also you know, they had
this the Flaming Lips, which is apparently a band. They
had a concert that a lot of people saw recently
where everyone was in their own individual plastic bubble. All
the all the audience in plastic bubbles. This is the
(01:38:35):
future that we want. This is what we think people
should be doing. This is lunacy, it's idiocy, it's it's
embarrassing for the people involved. But now they even have
it in New York Producer Mark, I have you see
in this some restaurants they set up these plastic bubbles
for people outside. Yeah, I will not be dining in
one of those. Yeah. This is why I'm now just like, look,
(01:38:56):
I want to eat takeout. I don't want to wear
a mask and deal with all this crap. So I'll
go to restaurant and pay them to make my food,
then I just take it home. I can't. I can't
sign on for this nonsense, this silliness, and it's really oppressive.
I don't understand why people don't see it that way
more they should see it that way anyway. Good A
good note, Dohn. Thanks for writing in Adam Buck on
(01:39:19):
t Swift. Isn't her whole career built on having bad
taste in men? Why would Biden want her endorsement? Shields
High Producer Mark, I defer to you. Is her? Is
that what her career is based on? But yeah, that's up.
Most of her songs involved heartbreak and breaking up with guys. Yeah.
I think that's the joke he's making. No, he has not,
she has not been. No, mhm. Interesting, she's like maybe
(01:39:43):
almost thirty now somewhere around that I think is almost
thirty something like that. Yeah, Producer Mark says it's true,
So I believe it. So there you go. Yeah, Um,
I like your joke, Adam, Thank you you're in. This
is the Buck Sex and Show podcast. All right more
(01:40:05):
roll call courtesy of Leslie. Hey there, Buck just wanted
to say, I've been listening to you for a few
months now, and I've passed the buck. With several of
my conservative gal pals, we have what we lovingly refer
to as buck Wild Girls Night now where we catch
up on our weeks and talk about your podcast over wind.
We absolutely adore you and very much appreciate your knowledge.
(01:40:28):
It's really become a bonding experience for us being conservative ladies,
because that's not an easy thing in today's world. So
thank you for being the wise man in our lives.
She'll tie well, thank you, Leslie. That's great, that's super
That's buck Wild Girls' Night. Sounds like a lot of fun,
gotta say, Producer Mark, do you have any comments that
are safe for radio? I cannot make any comments out
(01:40:49):
of fear of the FCC, fair enough, but no, that
sounds lovely, Leslie. Thank you so much for writing in
and telling us about this, and I hope you ladies
enjoy some Pino noir. Listen to this pod cast and
maybe cheese. I was gonna give cheese recon cheese is
what I've already said this. French fries, chocolate, cheese. These
are my food weaknesses. Without those I would be in
(01:41:10):
much better shape. Calorically in my daily intake. But those
are just three things that Now, as Mark Mark points out,
you can put cheese on the fries to make them
truly magnificent. But now let's turn this around for a second.
Can you put chocolate on fries? Does anyone do this?
Some people like to dip like a Wendy's frosty or
a milkshake, a chocolate milkshake into their fries into that.
(01:41:32):
I'm not a big fan of that, but I see
the appeal. M Yes, milkshakes. I had those growing up.
That's if you want to put on weight really quickly,
I think an ice cream milkshake is one of the
most effective ways you can possibly do it. So there's
that because you're drinking it so you don't even think
about it. Yeah, and it just goes right into your
just the sugar rush goes right into your blood stream.
(01:41:54):
It's already in liquid form, there's no fiber to slow
it down. And a milkshake, I mean, you can do
a milkshake that six seven, one hundred calories. Man, yeah,
part of time. It's actually sounding delicious now that I'm
talking about it out loud. Adam, Hey, Buck, what's the
Shield's hie, what's the title of that book you wrote
on socialism? Like to buy it? And what's the secret
of getting a spot on Roll Call? Keep up the
good work you gray Beard Millennial. Well, Adam, the book
(01:42:19):
is the Socialism Survival Guide. I wrote it before the pandemic,
so when I wrote it, we looked like maybe Bernie
was going to be the nominee and we were going
to be living in a very different world we're living
in now. But the ideas all still very much apply
when it comes to what the Democrats are trying to
do going forward, and I make some predictions about what
they what they will do, and my friends at Stansbury
(01:42:42):
Research also adds some financial know how into all of it,
so that there's a takeaway that you can take from
it beyond just oh my gosh, bad things are happening
because of you know, the socialism. So you can go
to Buck Electionbook dot com if you want to get
(01:43:03):
a totally free get a copy Buck Election book dot com.
We're actually giving them away now at writing in advance
at the election. As long as you know, give up,
you give your email, sign up for your email and yeah,
Buck electionbook dot Com. So check it out. And next
up in low Roll Call we have Jeff, hey Buck
(01:43:26):
and Mark Love the show. I'm passing the buck to
get younger guys I work with more informed on politics anyway.
I work in natural gas infrastructure construction and travel extensively
through the West Virginia, Pennsylvania, and Ohio areas. As the
polls are telling us, President Trump is losing in pan Ohio.
From what I see on the road, a ratio of
yard signs fifty to one in Trump's favor. Also, Trump
(01:43:49):
supporters have flags, banners, homemade signs, and billboards on their property.
I know this isn't science, but the truth about what's
out there in fly over country is hard to ignore. Well, Jeff,
I hope you're observations are in factor of a reflection,
are in fact a you know a either they're correct, right,
So there we go. I really hope you are. You're seeing.
(01:44:12):
What you're seeing is what's going to be reflected in
the election results. But as I've told you, and you know,
I'm hitting this prediction hard. If it's close, they're not
going to concede Pennsylvania. If that's the difference between winning
and losing, which maybe it won't be. But they will
not concede Pennsylvania and maybe a few other states on
election night based upon mail in balloting. But Pennsylvania is
really going to be the That's going to be a
(01:44:35):
dog fight. I'm pretty confident about that. Tim writes in
Hey Buck, I've been a listener from a Saturday Blaze
days whoa original Saturday Squad O s S. I was
a a Navy corpsman assigned to a Marine grunt battalion
thirty seven years ago. On ten twenty three eighty three,
I was in Bayirut, Lebanon for the US Marine Corps
(01:44:58):
barracks bombing carnage. Our witness has still scared me to
this day as a twenty two year old knucklehead, I
never really understood but calls all the hostilities toward us.
Almost every night we were in firefights or rocket attacks.
The VA does not consider this a war, so many
of us don't receive the care we need. Can you
do a deep dive about the first major a true
(01:45:19):
attack on America from Islamic terrorists? Thank you, simplify and
shields high ps. Tell producer Mark there's room on the
therapist couch for US mets and Giants fans to ask
us why we hate ourselves? Well, first, Tim, I did
do a deep dive on the Marine Barracks bombing some
years ago. I forget, it might have been five or
six years ago now. But on the you know, I
(01:45:40):
know you're writing in and the anniversary of it will
be tomorrow, so maybe I can bring back some of
that and tell people about what happened that day. So
that's a certainly we appreciate you writing in with that
and thank you for your service. And as for producer Mark, Yeah, Mets,
and well, who's worse right now? Mark? For their league?
The Mets, the Giants. Giants by far, they're terrible. What's
(01:46:03):
their record? They're one in five right now, that's rough.
They have one more win than the Jets do. The
Jets have not won a game yet, No, and they
won't dull season. That's got a you know, when you're
a professional and you're in a competitive lead like that,
it's gotta be tough to never win a game. But
we'll have to go and check check that out in time.
(01:46:23):
See your producer Marks predictions correct. Everybody, please pass the buck,
you know how to do it. Get somebody listened, to
the podcast, new this week during this election season until
next time, Shields High