May 8, 2025 • 16 mins
Former CIA officer and host of The Wright Report, Bryan Dean Wright, joins Buck to dig into the Letitia James saga. Together, they trade war stories from the intel world and make the case that the deep state isn’t a conspiracy theory—it’s real, deeply entrenched, and finally being exposed.
Never miss a moment from Buck by subscribing to the Buck Sexton Show Podcast on IHeart Radio, Apple Podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts!
Connect with Buck Sexton:
Facebook – / bucksexton
X – @bucksexton
Instagram – @bucksexton
TikTok - @BuckSexton
YouTube - @BuckSexton
Website – https://www.bucksexton.com/
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:11):
You're listening to the Buck Sexton Show podcast, make sure
you subscribe to the podcast on the iHeartRadio app or
wherever you get your podcasts.
Speaker 2 (00:20):
Secret Agent man Brian Dean Wright joins us right now.
He is my CIA brother from another mother, and he
is the host of the Right Report, and unlike me,
he actually looks like he could have worked at the CIA, although,
as I like to tell people, really, to look like
you work at the CIA, you want to be kind
of the upper end of middle aged, balding and like
(00:43):
quite paunchy, with no sense of style whatsoever.
Speaker 3 (00:46):
But people like.
Speaker 2 (00:47):
To think that it's like you slick, well dressed, well
put together.
Speaker 3 (00:52):
So you know, it all depends.
Speaker 1 (00:54):
Well, let me tell you, I don't have a child
like you, so I'm actually sleeping. So if there's anybody
who has any excuse, it's you not to be all
all dolled up. But yeah, you're right though, actually Whene
works the agency.
Speaker 3 (01:06):
You're right.
Speaker 1 (01:06):
The Ponche guys were the ones who are like, wait
a minute, you're not Bond, not Jason Bourd. You look
like the guy you know. It's so you're right, I'm
hearing you.
Speaker 2 (01:15):
Well, yeah, you want you want to fit into the crowd,
and you want people to think he's not a secret,
he's not a super spy. That guy could be worth
working at Mutual of Omaha. Like, if you're gonna be
trying to infiltrate the People's Republic of China, you don't
want them going look at this guy. This guy looks
like he's a super soldier. It's like, no, no, you
want to want some dork. So I was great at that.
All right, let's let's dive into some of this. Letitia James.
(01:36):
First of all, do you think I'm sure you're following
the story. She's a very anti Trump. Attorney general for
the state of New York ran on prosecuting Trump, which
is a total just it's it's it's insane that somebody
could do that, and that that's just considered okay, but whatever,
it's New York, my home state, unfortunately formerly. A couple
of things, one is, do you think that she's gonna
(01:57):
be able to skate out of this whole thing with
the mortgage fraud allegation or is Pam BONDI just gonna
say you do the crime, you do the time.
Speaker 1 (02:07):
Yeah, all's fair and loving, and that the case. Look,
you know when former Governor Cuomo said that the only
reason that Trump was being prosecuted was because of its
last name. When a Democrat says that, you know that
the whole scam is up, and I think that that's
what we're watching here. You know, politics is a nasty,
dirty business, and this DJ is getting it right back
(02:28):
to her, and that's how it works. She has to
note that she was going to get in the deep
end of the pool on this and really engage in
law fair so here it comes back. So you know,
whether that is how you run a republic is not
the question. But the fact of the matter is that's
where we're at. And you know, she deserves everything she gets.
Speaker 2 (02:45):
Yeah, and you see that she's also part of this.
Seventeen states that in just the last couple of days
have come forward suing the Trump administration because Trump has
pulled federal permits for wind energy projects. As I've pointed
this out, that they are these big turbines or these
you know, these big yeah like turbines, these windmills. Basically right,
(03:09):
they are queens and arts for migratory birds. I mean,
they just chop up including threatened species. They're horrible for
the bird population because birds f line them and die
huge numbers. Like I'm not like this is a real thing, right,
I mean, you know.
Speaker 3 (03:26):
They're out west.
Speaker 1 (03:27):
The data supports what you're saying. There was a number
of studies a couple of years ago showed anywhere from
between three and eight hundred thousand, three hundred thousand, eight
hundred thousand birds a year on land are killed by
these things. Now, we don't know the exact number because
it's hard to go out and do it an audit. Second,
a lot of critters get eaten and the cavities come
along and take them. But the point is you're absolutely right.
And in fact, our Interior Department actually issues permits to
(03:51):
kill a certain number of bald eagles every year, which
is just shocking to think about. Our national bird gets
slaughtered by these things. And by the way, you're not
allowed to know what the number is on the birds.
It's called law enforcement sensitive law information, is what it
was the some folks report on a couple years ago.
The point so, you're right, these things are queens and
aren't for birds. They're awful, They're parable.
Speaker 2 (04:09):
For the entire Yes, and beyond that though, I think
the bigger challenge here that everyone sees is somehow Democrats
are of the belief that what one president has discretion
to allow, so you can choose yes or no. Another president,
in this case Trump or Republican, does not have the
discretion to yes or no. And I just see there's
(04:33):
a fundamental problem with that.
Speaker 1 (04:34):
Right.
Speaker 2 (04:34):
It's like, if the federal governments going to give permits
for this based on discretion, it also has discretion to
not give permits for this.
Speaker 1 (04:42):
Precisely what's good for use, good for gander? Righty, you're
you're talking about one set of rules for Democrats.
Speaker 3 (04:49):
Migratory foul up.
Speaker 1 (04:52):
Yeah, well done, Yeah, you're right. Look, and I think
we've all seen this over the past five or ten years.
You know, it's, uh, there's one set of rules for everybody,
and then there's another special set for Democrats. And I
think that we're seeing that in this particular industry, which
again is President Trump has correctly pointed out. It's a
horrific form of energy. It's a very expensive form of energy.
Birds as part of that, the actual wind blades themselves.
(05:16):
Sometimes you made up a bals of wood which comes
from South America, cutting down some of those native forests
that don't regrow very quickly. So this is a really
dirty form of energy. There's no such thing as green
with wind power. It's all dirty in one way or
the other.
Speaker 3 (05:29):
But you're right, the.
Speaker 1 (05:31):
Rules the Democrats want for everybody else versus themselves is
quite something. Energy included.
Speaker 2 (05:37):
Now, I have to say the deep state and the
efforts to clean it up, which you and I guess
are technically some of the people in the comments going
to say we're deep state stooges. I like to point
out the deep state wasn't even aware of my existence
because I was so low on the on the you know,
the orange chart. And it's been fifteen years, so I
think I've learned some things since my deep state days.
(05:59):
But let's dive into this here in just a second.
First up, our sponsor, have you heard about America is
quote one hundred and fifty trillion dollars secret trust fund.
A former presidential advisor, Jim Rickards, just released an explosive story.
A fifteen figure fortune owned by the government, trapped for
more than a century, starting this summer, could be released
to the public. It's big enough to pay off our
national debt. Four times over, but something even more stunning
(06:22):
is likely to happen next. You can check it out
at birthright twenty twenty five dot com. That's birthright twenty
twenty five dot com paid for by Paradigm Press. All Right,
mister Brian Dean writes, is are things actually getting better
over at the CIA and in the intel community more broadly?
After all the weaponization, the politicization, the trands, awareness days,
(06:46):
YadA YadA, Is it.
Speaker 3 (06:48):
Actually getting better? From what you can tell?
Speaker 1 (06:51):
So the short answer is yes. A lot of folks
at the agency really do appreciate the leadership of Ratcliffe
and his deputy From the public, folks that I speak
with that are still on the inside being been surprised
by his professionalism. I don't know why people are surprised
about that, but indeed they are.
Speaker 3 (07:07):
So.
Speaker 1 (07:07):
He really is a SPIESPI and I think that you
should offer a hat tip to him into his staff.
They're doing God's work over there, and I think that
they are cleaning things up. But I will also tell
you that I know there are still a lot of
people at the Agency and especially the FBI, that absolutely
hate guys like Cashtel and Deputy Dan Bongino and others.
They talk smack. I mean, I know about one of
(07:28):
the offices out west. They will talk absolute smack and
trash about the director of the FBI and the deputy director.
So that's happening still. It's also happening with Ratcliffe. So
bottom line is they're trying to clean it up, but
it's going to take a while to rip these people
out of the CIA, FBI and other places. They're there
for their long reasons, the deep staters that they're there
(07:50):
for their own politics, and that's going to take time
to identify them and remove them.
Speaker 2 (07:55):
So it is working, but slowly, slowly. So that's right, Okay, Well,
I mean good, that's good to hear. I just feel
like one of the challenges that some of these individuals
who have taken on these roles at different places under Trump,
as well intentioned and cable as they may be, is
that these are these these bureaucracies. The one thing that
they excel at is not excelling in anything and doing
(08:18):
exactly what they've always been doing.
Speaker 1 (08:22):
Look, I think that's fair, and I think one of
the things that I've I've just been trying to ring
the bell on is this a Venezuela assessment that says
that the the Duro regime is not sending in their
TDA gang, this trend de Raco gang, They're not sending
them in to the country, when in fact they are.
And the intel assessment that was put out over the
past through a Freedom of Information act in the press
over the past couple of weeks, it's just I think
(08:44):
we're seeing more deep state shenanigans by how these assessments
are put together. And that's the part that still concerns me,
especially on the analytical side. This is your old old shop.
There are a lot of people there who get very,
very excited about a particular country or particular belief and
they don't want to change their views or assessments, and
they end up undermining the President of the United States,
and I think that's happening here with this Venezuela stuff.
Speaker 2 (09:05):
Sponsors Birch Gold Group tariffs have thrown the global economy
into a bit of a you could say, chop. There's
inflation that we're still troubled by, and you know, they
didn't lower rates at the FED just today, So there
is something you can do with all of this uncertainty
out there a silver lining that some people miss, perhaps
a gold lining if you will, Gold and silver bullion
(09:27):
are excluded from tariffs, and gold and silver are a
great way to prepare for an uncertain economic future with
a portion of your savings. If you're concerned about what
to do given all this economic disruption, you should get
a free consultation with a Birch Gold precious metal specialist.
The first step is to text Buck to ninety eight
ninety eight ninety eight. Receive your free no obligation infoKit
(09:50):
on gold. Learn how to hold gold then silver in
a tax sheltered account. Birch Gold will help you convert
an existing iray or four oh one k into a
gold iray for no money out of pocket, a plus
rating with a Better Business Bureau. Text my name Buck
Buck to ninety eight ninety eight ninety eight. That's Buck
texted to ninety eight ninety eight ninety eight. Mister BDW,
you a host of the right report. Let's move on
(10:12):
to India Pakistan. I think it's I think it's amazing.
You know, I told my audience on radio about this.
I think last week one that there was a mass
casualty terror attack in Kashmir Pakistani terrorists. You know, this
is a long standing thing in this disputed area between
Indian and Pakistan.
Speaker 3 (10:29):
Uh And it was the first time a lot of
people had heard about it.
Speaker 2 (10:32):
And then I mentioned, you know, India is cutting off
water from the Indus River to all the agriculture in Pakistan.
Speaker 3 (10:37):
Which is a big deal.
Speaker 2 (10:38):
And there's also gonna be some military These are Yeah,
these are countries that have nuclear weapons, as we all know,
and they really don't like each other, and their entire
real like frontline militaries are basically aligned to just stare at.
Speaker 3 (10:53):
Each other across the border. Right.
Speaker 2 (10:55):
India is a huge country, but if you look at
where the military deployments are, it's right there with Pakistan.
But no one seems even troubled by the fact that
India has hit hit some hit some targets inside of
Pakistan said, don't worry, it's non escalatory. I saw that
was the quote, not escalatory. Well, okay, I guess it's
not escalatory.
Speaker 1 (11:17):
Should I not be worried or should I be worried?
Speaker 3 (11:19):
Yet?
Speaker 1 (11:19):
You're right, Look all the elements for a really big
and horrific conflict are there. You know, we've got about
one hundred and seventy nuclear warheads in Pakistan. We've got
a very unstable government historically anyway, it's a government that
has a facade or veneer of democracy.
Speaker 3 (11:34):
It's not really true.
Speaker 1 (11:35):
The military and the Intel agency in Pakistan lead that country.
And then of course on the other side, with Modi
and the Hindu Nationalism sending their troops to the border,
you know, fighting this what forty fifty sixty plus year
fight between the Hindus and the Muslims in that Kashmir region.
It's going to be I think a very very dangerous
thing that these two nations are now looking at. Shall
(11:56):
we or can we escalate? I tell you from an
American perspective, one of the things that we learned back
in December was that Pakistan is developing a long range
or IC be a missile that will hit the United States.
So we should very much be interested in this flick.
They've got these one hundred and seventy plus nuclear warheads
that could potentially be on a missile that could hit
this country. As Pakistan has pulled closer to China, India's
(12:18):
potentially pulled closer to the United States. That's the big picture.
Fight that I see in the next five to ten years,
as these nations continue to fight each other, literally and
otherwise just being drawn into the fight between China and
the United States. That's my fears is this missile has
developed in Pakistan, how this could boil over even to
this country.
Speaker 2 (12:38):
Let's do a lightning round here, something really easy. Are
we going to do a strike or back in Israeli
strike on the Iranian nuclear facilities?
Speaker 3 (12:44):
You know, what do you think, man?
Speaker 1 (12:48):
I think Trump's reflex his peace and I think that
that makes sense, and I think that he wants to
try to fix a lot of other issues like Mexico
and the southern border. He might refer to Israel, but
I think that he's going to try to deflect.
Speaker 2 (13:01):
So you don't think that that's coming, that's imminent any
time soon.
Speaker 3 (13:06):
I don't.
Speaker 1 (13:06):
I don't think that that's his preference. Look, he's very
anti war, that's been very con He's also said that
any fewer nations with fewer nukes, So that's intention, and
I think that you see that reflected in the Maga base.
A lot of people not sure what to think or
feel on this, but he has reflexes peace. But he
also appreciates that we can have nuclear weapons, So that's
what I think he wants to get to the bottom too.
You know, can diplomacy restrict this program? If so, it's
(13:29):
not worth the war.
Speaker 2 (13:30):
If you and I had a presidential finding to do
a subversion operation in Greenland to get the thirty thousand
people there to go with some kind of a plebiscite
and join America, would we need to call any of
our buddies or do you think you and I could
pull that off?
Speaker 3 (13:45):
Just to do the ideel?
Speaker 2 (13:46):
Like we could do it.
Speaker 1 (13:48):
I feel like I could wear this suit and you
could blend, you know, so we could hit it at
two different angles. Yeah.
Speaker 3 (13:53):
Uh, do you want to Greenland for America? Like? I
think this wouldn't be that hard.
Speaker 1 (14:00):
Look, it's a very important issue in that the nuclear
missiles that would fly from Russia or China to this
country would fly over place like Greenland, and so that's
why that chunk of territory becomes so very important. Second,
Greenland's I believe it was their foreign minister said that
actually they need to grow closer to China. So the
issue is very serious. We shouldn't be messing around with
this chunk of territory. And I think that the President
(14:21):
understands that, and that's why we should be doing something
very serious with Greenland. I don't know if it's invasion
or not. I think you and I can probably cook
up a few things to push their political leadership a
little closer to us.
Speaker 2 (14:32):
The President told us to, and we're allowed to pull
out the bag of tricks.
Speaker 3 (14:36):
Yeah.
Speaker 2 (14:36):
I don't think other could be that complicated, and it'd
be better for everybody, probably the best.
Speaker 3 (14:40):
Thing ever for Greenland.
Speaker 2 (14:41):
Trump would be a fantastic overlord of all things Greenland
if it came to it.
Speaker 3 (14:46):
But I do Goldland.
Speaker 1 (14:47):
It's gonna be gold Goldland.
Speaker 2 (14:49):
Yeah, it's gonna be fantastic because what is I mean Denmark.
I've been to Denmark, lovely country, nice people, but it
is what are they going to do with it? I mean,
come on, they got nothing nonsense. By the way, you know,
I was in your neck of the woods. I was
in Tucson recently and is beautiful. I actually was really
(15:10):
with how nice Tucson was. One funny thing that had
happened was I was gonna go on these there's all
these trails right near the hotel where I was staying
and I asked the front desk lady, and I said,
which trail should I take? She got a map and
there's like hundreds of miles of trails, like, well, all right,
I'm just gonna and I looked at her and I said,
which one can you promise me has no rattlesnakes on it?
And she looked all like, oh my gosh. She goes, sir,
(15:30):
I can't. I can't guarantee on behalf of the hotel
that there'll be no rattlesnakes on any of the trails.
And I was like, okay, lady, I guess I'm just
gonna have to, you know, pick my poison here.
Speaker 3 (15:39):
But those routeners are running around there. Yeah.
Speaker 1 (15:43):
And it's not only that, but did you know the
cartels are probably near one of the resorts that you
were at, the from the Watchukas all the way up
to the mountains that are called the Santa Canlina Mountains,
probably right where you were at. They are sending in
cartel guys to set up radar facilities to catch a
lot of the border patrol signals, whether it be radios
and other things cell phones as well, to try to
(16:04):
figure out where the border patrol guys are going at
so the nick of the Woods. Depending on the trail
that you go on up there, you got to be
really careful. You're not just gonna run into rattlesnakes, you're
running to cartelos. You gotta be real carefulut there.
Speaker 2 (16:16):
Yeah, I'm glad I didn't get bitten by a snake
or kidnapped.
Speaker 3 (16:20):
Lucky. Mean, all right, go check out the Right Report.
Speaker 2 (16:23):
It's a great podcast with this very smart fellow also
from the CIA. But we're not deep state, Okay, it's
it's not true, not deep state formed. We love the
small state, we love the shallow, good state patriots. We
don't do any of that stuff. But Brian Dey right,
always a pleasure, my friend. Thanks for making the time,
of course,
You're listening to the Buck Sexton Show podcast, make sure
you subscribe to the podcast on the iHeartRadio app or
wherever you get your podcasts.
Speaker 2 (00:20):
Secret Agent man Brian Dean Wright joins us right now.
He is my CIA brother from another mother, and he
is the host of the Right Report, and unlike me,
he actually looks like he could have worked at the CIA, although,
as I like to tell people, really, to look like
you work at the CIA, you want to be kind
of the upper end of middle aged, balding and like
(00:43):
quite paunchy, with no sense of style whatsoever.
Speaker 3 (00:46):
But people like.
Speaker 2 (00:47):
To think that it's like you slick, well dressed, well
put together.
Speaker 3 (00:52):
So you know, it all depends.
Speaker 1 (00:54):
Well, let me tell you, I don't have a child
like you, so I'm actually sleeping. So if there's anybody
who has any excuse, it's you not to be all
all dolled up. But yeah, you're right though, actually Whene
works the agency.
Speaker 3 (01:06):
You're right.
Speaker 1 (01:06):
The Ponche guys were the ones who are like, wait
a minute, you're not Bond, not Jason Bourd. You look
like the guy you know. It's so you're right, I'm
hearing you.
Speaker 2 (01:15):
Well, yeah, you want you want to fit into the crowd,
and you want people to think he's not a secret,
he's not a super spy. That guy could be worth
working at Mutual of Omaha. Like, if you're gonna be
trying to infiltrate the People's Republic of China, you don't
want them going look at this guy. This guy looks
like he's a super soldier. It's like, no, no, you
want to want some dork. So I was great at that.
All right, let's let's dive into some of this. Letitia James.
(01:36):
First of all, do you think I'm sure you're following
the story. She's a very anti Trump. Attorney general for
the state of New York ran on prosecuting Trump, which
is a total just it's it's it's insane that somebody
could do that, and that that's just considered okay, but whatever,
it's New York, my home state, unfortunately formerly. A couple
of things, one is, do you think that she's gonna
(01:57):
be able to skate out of this whole thing with
the mortgage fraud allegation or is Pam BONDI just gonna
say you do the crime, you do the time.
Speaker 1 (02:07):
Yeah, all's fair and loving, and that the case. Look,
you know when former Governor Cuomo said that the only
reason that Trump was being prosecuted was because of its
last name. When a Democrat says that, you know that
the whole scam is up, and I think that that's
what we're watching here. You know, politics is a nasty,
dirty business, and this DJ is getting it right back
(02:28):
to her, and that's how it works. She has to
note that she was going to get in the deep
end of the pool on this and really engage in
law fair so here it comes back. So you know,
whether that is how you run a republic is not
the question. But the fact of the matter is that's
where we're at. And you know, she deserves everything she gets.
Speaker 2 (02:45):
Yeah, and you see that she's also part of this.
Seventeen states that in just the last couple of days
have come forward suing the Trump administration because Trump has
pulled federal permits for wind energy projects. As I've pointed
this out, that they are these big turbines or these
you know, these big yeah like turbines, these windmills. Basically right,
(03:09):
they are queens and arts for migratory birds. I mean,
they just chop up including threatened species. They're horrible for
the bird population because birds f line them and die
huge numbers. Like I'm not like this is a real thing, right,
I mean, you know.
Speaker 3 (03:26):
They're out west.
Speaker 1 (03:27):
The data supports what you're saying. There was a number
of studies a couple of years ago showed anywhere from
between three and eight hundred thousand, three hundred thousand, eight
hundred thousand birds a year on land are killed by
these things. Now, we don't know the exact number because
it's hard to go out and do it an audit. Second,
a lot of critters get eaten and the cavities come
along and take them. But the point is you're absolutely right.
And in fact, our Interior Department actually issues permits to
(03:51):
kill a certain number of bald eagles every year, which
is just shocking to think about. Our national bird gets
slaughtered by these things. And by the way, you're not
allowed to know what the number is on the birds.
It's called law enforcement sensitive law information, is what it
was the some folks report on a couple years ago.
The point so, you're right, these things are queens and
aren't for birds. They're awful, They're parable.
Speaker 2 (04:09):
For the entire Yes, and beyond that though, I think
the bigger challenge here that everyone sees is somehow Democrats
are of the belief that what one president has discretion
to allow, so you can choose yes or no. Another president,
in this case Trump or Republican, does not have the
discretion to yes or no. And I just see there's
(04:33):
a fundamental problem with that.
Speaker 1 (04:34):
Right.
Speaker 2 (04:34):
It's like, if the federal governments going to give permits
for this based on discretion, it also has discretion to
not give permits for this.
Speaker 1 (04:42):
Precisely what's good for use, good for gander? Righty, you're
you're talking about one set of rules for Democrats.
Speaker 3 (04:49):
Migratory foul up.
Speaker 1 (04:52):
Yeah, well done, Yeah, you're right. Look, and I think
we've all seen this over the past five or ten years.
You know, it's, uh, there's one set of rules for everybody,
and then there's another special set for Democrats. And I
think that we're seeing that in this particular industry, which
again is President Trump has correctly pointed out. It's a
horrific form of energy. It's a very expensive form of energy.
Birds as part of that, the actual wind blades themselves.
(05:16):
Sometimes you made up a bals of wood which comes
from South America, cutting down some of those native forests
that don't regrow very quickly. So this is a really
dirty form of energy. There's no such thing as green
with wind power. It's all dirty in one way or
the other.
Speaker 3 (05:29):
But you're right, the.
Speaker 1 (05:31):
Rules the Democrats want for everybody else versus themselves is
quite something. Energy included.
Speaker 2 (05:37):
Now, I have to say the deep state and the
efforts to clean it up, which you and I guess
are technically some of the people in the comments going
to say we're deep state stooges. I like to point
out the deep state wasn't even aware of my existence
because I was so low on the on the you know,
the orange chart. And it's been fifteen years, so I
think I've learned some things since my deep state days.
(05:59):
But let's dive into this here in just a second.
First up, our sponsor, have you heard about America is
quote one hundred and fifty trillion dollars secret trust fund.
A former presidential advisor, Jim Rickards, just released an explosive story.
A fifteen figure fortune owned by the government, trapped for
more than a century, starting this summer, could be released
to the public. It's big enough to pay off our
national debt. Four times over, but something even more stunning
(06:22):
is likely to happen next. You can check it out
at birthright twenty twenty five dot com. That's birthright twenty
twenty five dot com paid for by Paradigm Press. All Right,
mister Brian Dean writes, is are things actually getting better
over at the CIA and in the intel community more broadly?
After all the weaponization, the politicization, the trands, awareness days,
(06:46):
YadA YadA, Is it.
Speaker 3 (06:48):
Actually getting better? From what you can tell?
Speaker 1 (06:51):
So the short answer is yes. A lot of folks
at the agency really do appreciate the leadership of Ratcliffe
and his deputy From the public, folks that I speak
with that are still on the inside being been surprised
by his professionalism. I don't know why people are surprised
about that, but indeed they are.
Speaker 3 (07:07):
So.
Speaker 1 (07:07):
He really is a SPIESPI and I think that you
should offer a hat tip to him into his staff.
They're doing God's work over there, and I think that
they are cleaning things up. But I will also tell
you that I know there are still a lot of
people at the Agency and especially the FBI, that absolutely
hate guys like Cashtel and Deputy Dan Bongino and others.
They talk smack. I mean, I know about one of
(07:28):
the offices out west. They will talk absolute smack and
trash about the director of the FBI and the deputy director.
So that's happening still. It's also happening with Ratcliffe. So
bottom line is they're trying to clean it up, but
it's going to take a while to rip these people
out of the CIA, FBI and other places. They're there
for their long reasons, the deep staters that they're there
(07:50):
for their own politics, and that's going to take time
to identify them and remove them.
Speaker 2 (07:55):
So it is working, but slowly, slowly. So that's right, Okay, Well,
I mean good, that's good to hear. I just feel
like one of the challenges that some of these individuals
who have taken on these roles at different places under Trump,
as well intentioned and cable as they may be, is
that these are these these bureaucracies. The one thing that
they excel at is not excelling in anything and doing
(08:18):
exactly what they've always been doing.
Speaker 1 (08:22):
Look, I think that's fair, and I think one of
the things that I've I've just been trying to ring
the bell on is this a Venezuela assessment that says
that the the Duro regime is not sending in their
TDA gang, this trend de Raco gang, They're not sending
them in to the country, when in fact they are.
And the intel assessment that was put out over the
past through a Freedom of Information act in the press
over the past couple of weeks, it's just I think
(08:44):
we're seeing more deep state shenanigans by how these assessments
are put together. And that's the part that still concerns me,
especially on the analytical side. This is your old old shop.
There are a lot of people there who get very,
very excited about a particular country or particular belief and
they don't want to change their views or assessments, and
they end up undermining the President of the United States,
and I think that's happening here with this Venezuela stuff.
Speaker 2 (09:05):
Sponsors Birch Gold Group tariffs have thrown the global economy
into a bit of a you could say, chop. There's
inflation that we're still troubled by, and you know, they
didn't lower rates at the FED just today, So there
is something you can do with all of this uncertainty
out there a silver lining that some people miss, perhaps
a gold lining if you will, Gold and silver bullion
(09:27):
are excluded from tariffs, and gold and silver are a
great way to prepare for an uncertain economic future with
a portion of your savings. If you're concerned about what
to do given all this economic disruption, you should get
a free consultation with a Birch Gold precious metal specialist.
The first step is to text Buck to ninety eight
ninety eight ninety eight. Receive your free no obligation infoKit
(09:50):
on gold. Learn how to hold gold then silver in
a tax sheltered account. Birch Gold will help you convert
an existing iray or four oh one k into a
gold iray for no money out of pocket, a plus
rating with a Better Business Bureau. Text my name Buck
Buck to ninety eight ninety eight ninety eight. That's Buck
texted to ninety eight ninety eight ninety eight. Mister BDW,
you a host of the right report. Let's move on
(10:12):
to India Pakistan. I think it's I think it's amazing.
You know, I told my audience on radio about this.
I think last week one that there was a mass
casualty terror attack in Kashmir Pakistani terrorists. You know, this
is a long standing thing in this disputed area between
Indian and Pakistan.
Speaker 3 (10:29):
Uh And it was the first time a lot of
people had heard about it.
Speaker 2 (10:32):
And then I mentioned, you know, India is cutting off
water from the Indus River to all the agriculture in Pakistan.
Speaker 3 (10:37):
Which is a big deal.
Speaker 2 (10:38):
And there's also gonna be some military These are Yeah,
these are countries that have nuclear weapons, as we all know,
and they really don't like each other, and their entire
real like frontline militaries are basically aligned to just stare at.
Speaker 3 (10:53):
Each other across the border. Right.
Speaker 2 (10:55):
India is a huge country, but if you look at
where the military deployments are, it's right there with Pakistan.
But no one seems even troubled by the fact that
India has hit hit some hit some targets inside of
Pakistan said, don't worry, it's non escalatory. I saw that
was the quote, not escalatory. Well, okay, I guess it's
not escalatory.
Speaker 1 (11:17):
Should I not be worried or should I be worried?
Speaker 3 (11:19):
Yet?
Speaker 1 (11:19):
You're right, Look all the elements for a really big
and horrific conflict are there. You know, we've got about
one hundred and seventy nuclear warheads in Pakistan. We've got
a very unstable government historically anyway, it's a government that
has a facade or veneer of democracy.
Speaker 3 (11:34):
It's not really true.
Speaker 1 (11:35):
The military and the Intel agency in Pakistan lead that country.
And then of course on the other side, with Modi
and the Hindu Nationalism sending their troops to the border,
you know, fighting this what forty fifty sixty plus year
fight between the Hindus and the Muslims in that Kashmir region.
It's going to be I think a very very dangerous
thing that these two nations are now looking at. Shall
(11:56):
we or can we escalate? I tell you from an
American perspective, one of the things that we learned back
in December was that Pakistan is developing a long range
or IC be a missile that will hit the United States.
So we should very much be interested in this flick.
They've got these one hundred and seventy plus nuclear warheads
that could potentially be on a missile that could hit
this country. As Pakistan has pulled closer to China, India's
(12:18):
potentially pulled closer to the United States. That's the big picture.
Fight that I see in the next five to ten years,
as these nations continue to fight each other, literally and
otherwise just being drawn into the fight between China and
the United States. That's my fears is this missile has
developed in Pakistan, how this could boil over even to
this country.
Speaker 2 (12:38):
Let's do a lightning round here, something really easy. Are
we going to do a strike or back in Israeli
strike on the Iranian nuclear facilities?
Speaker 3 (12:44):
You know, what do you think, man?
Speaker 1 (12:48):
I think Trump's reflex his peace and I think that
that makes sense, and I think that he wants to
try to fix a lot of other issues like Mexico
and the southern border. He might refer to Israel, but
I think that he's going to try to deflect.
Speaker 2 (13:01):
So you don't think that that's coming, that's imminent any
time soon.
Speaker 3 (13:06):
I don't.
Speaker 1 (13:06):
I don't think that that's his preference. Look, he's very
anti war, that's been very con He's also said that
any fewer nations with fewer nukes, So that's intention, and
I think that you see that reflected in the Maga base.
A lot of people not sure what to think or
feel on this, but he has reflexes peace. But he
also appreciates that we can have nuclear weapons, So that's
what I think he wants to get to the bottom too.
You know, can diplomacy restrict this program? If so, it's
(13:29):
not worth the war.
Speaker 2 (13:30):
If you and I had a presidential finding to do
a subversion operation in Greenland to get the thirty thousand
people there to go with some kind of a plebiscite
and join America, would we need to call any of
our buddies or do you think you and I could
pull that off?
Speaker 3 (13:45):
Just to do the ideel?
Speaker 2 (13:46):
Like we could do it.
Speaker 1 (13:48):
I feel like I could wear this suit and you
could blend, you know, so we could hit it at
two different angles. Yeah.
Speaker 3 (13:53):
Uh, do you want to Greenland for America? Like? I
think this wouldn't be that hard.
Speaker 1 (14:00):
Look, it's a very important issue in that the nuclear
missiles that would fly from Russia or China to this
country would fly over place like Greenland, and so that's
why that chunk of territory becomes so very important. Second,
Greenland's I believe it was their foreign minister said that
actually they need to grow closer to China. So the
issue is very serious. We shouldn't be messing around with
this chunk of territory. And I think that the President
(14:21):
understands that, and that's why we should be doing something
very serious with Greenland. I don't know if it's invasion
or not. I think you and I can probably cook
up a few things to push their political leadership a
little closer to us.
Speaker 2 (14:32):
The President told us to, and we're allowed to pull
out the bag of tricks.
Speaker 3 (14:36):
Yeah.
Speaker 2 (14:36):
I don't think other could be that complicated, and it'd
be better for everybody, probably the best.
Speaker 3 (14:40):
Thing ever for Greenland.
Speaker 2 (14:41):
Trump would be a fantastic overlord of all things Greenland
if it came to it.
Speaker 3 (14:46):
But I do Goldland.
Speaker 1 (14:47):
It's gonna be gold Goldland.
Speaker 2 (14:49):
Yeah, it's gonna be fantastic because what is I mean Denmark.
I've been to Denmark, lovely country, nice people, but it
is what are they going to do with it? I mean,
come on, they got nothing nonsense. By the way, you know,
I was in your neck of the woods. I was
in Tucson recently and is beautiful. I actually was really
(15:10):
with how nice Tucson was. One funny thing that had
happened was I was gonna go on these there's all
these trails right near the hotel where I was staying
and I asked the front desk lady, and I said,
which trail should I take? She got a map and
there's like hundreds of miles of trails, like, well, all right,
I'm just gonna and I looked at her and I said,
which one can you promise me has no rattlesnakes on it?
And she looked all like, oh my gosh. She goes, sir,
(15:30):
I can't. I can't guarantee on behalf of the hotel
that there'll be no rattlesnakes on any of the trails.
And I was like, okay, lady, I guess I'm just
gonna have to, you know, pick my poison here.
Speaker 3 (15:39):
But those routeners are running around there. Yeah.
Speaker 1 (15:43):
And it's not only that, but did you know the
cartels are probably near one of the resorts that you
were at, the from the Watchukas all the way up
to the mountains that are called the Santa Canlina Mountains,
probably right where you were at. They are sending in
cartel guys to set up radar facilities to catch a
lot of the border patrol signals, whether it be radios
and other things cell phones as well, to try to
(16:04):
figure out where the border patrol guys are going at
so the nick of the Woods. Depending on the trail
that you go on up there, you got to be
really careful. You're not just gonna run into rattlesnakes, you're
running to cartelos. You gotta be real carefulut there.
Speaker 2 (16:16):
Yeah, I'm glad I didn't get bitten by a snake
or kidnapped.
Speaker 3 (16:20):
Lucky. Mean, all right, go check out the Right Report.
Speaker 2 (16:23):
It's a great podcast with this very smart fellow also
from the CIA. But we're not deep state, Okay, it's
it's not true, not deep state formed. We love the
small state, we love the shallow, good state patriots. We
don't do any of that stuff. But Brian Dey right,
always a pleasure, my friend. Thanks for making the time,
of course,
Host
Buck Sexton
Popular Podcasts
Bookmarked by Reese's Book Club
Welcome to Bookmarked by Reese’s Book Club — the podcast where great stories, bold women, and irresistible conversations collide! Hosted by award-winning journalist Danielle Robay, each week new episodes balance thoughtful literary insight with the fervor of buzzy book trends, pop culture and more. Bookmarked brings together celebrities, tastemakers, influencers and authors from Reese's Book Club and beyond to share stories that transcend the page. Pull up a chair. You’re not just listening — you’re part of the conversation.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!