September 6, 2023 • 32 mins
In this episode, Tudor welcomes back investigative reporter John Solomon to discuss the latest findings in the Biden Family Corruption saga. Plus, John sheds some light on how much Barack Obama is involved and what he's been aware of since being in Office in the White House. The Tudor Dixon Podcast is part of the Clay Travis & Buck Sexton Podcast Network - new episodes debut every Monday, Wednesday, & Friday. For more information visit TudorDixonPodcast.com
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Hey, this is Buck Sexton and you're listening to the
Tutor Dixon Podcast, part of the Clay Travers and Buck
Sexton podcast Network. Welcome to the Tutor Dixon Podcast. Today.
I am joined by my friend John Solomon. He is
an award winning investigative journalist and the founder, CEO, and
editor in chief of Just the News, also host of
(00:21):
John Solomon Reports and News Not Noise? Is that right?
Speaker 2 (00:25):
Am?
Speaker 1 (00:25):
I getting that correct?
Speaker 2 (00:26):
Just the News No Noise?
Speaker 3 (00:27):
Yeah, Just No Noise. Yeah, that's the show on America's Voice.
We have a lot of fun with that.
Speaker 1 (00:33):
All right. Well, okay, I love watching you. I love
what you do. I love how deep you get into
these stories. And there's something I want to dig into
with you right now because I think a lot of
people across the country are saying, wow, could this really happen?
And that is this issue of the fourteenth Amendment keeping
Trump off the ballot. We've had a lot of people
(00:53):
across the country saying this. We've even had Adam Schiff resurface.
It's like he was like, you know what, I wasn't
able to be success with my lines about Russia. So
I've got to get into this one. It cann't happen.
Speaker 2 (01:05):
Well, listen, anything can happen.
Speaker 3 (01:06):
If you told me, we would have the ruling party
indict the guy that's going to run against him in
the next election four times. I want to laughed you
off a few years ago, but that's really happened. You know,
anything's possible if the law is followed. According to all
the constitutional scholars I've talked to, both on the conservative
side and liberals, said, listen, Alan Dershowitz voted for Joe Biden.
He's an unabashed liberal and unabashed Democrat. He says, you
(01:29):
can't apply the fourteenth Amendment to the circumstance. So all
the scholars tell me, not a chance in heck, there's
already been one ruling against it, I think in Florida
that seemed to be consistent with what the scholar said.
Speaker 2 (01:41):
But who knows.
Speaker 3 (01:41):
I mean, could some states somewhere have a judge that
rules yes, and then we end up in some sort
of appellate battle shore. But the scholars say that if
you apply the fourteenth Amendment appropriately, Donald Trump cannot be
disqualified for running for president. And we'll see if the
courts agree with that assessment.
Speaker 1 (02:00):
Well, It seems a little bit odd because the clause
that they're pulling out talks about insurrection, but no one
has been charged with insurrection. He has not been charged
with insurrection. He's not been convicted of anything. But even
some of these guys that we see getting eighteen years,
they weren't charged with insurrection. So how do you suddenly
now bring out insurrection?
Speaker 3 (02:21):
Yeah, well, listen, who knows what the next the superseding
indictment will be. I mean, Jack Smith is still working
a grand jury here in Washington. Could they try to
do that? I don't know. I mean, it's a pretty
big stretch to call Donald Trump's behavior an insurrection when
he told people to do it peacefully. Right, It's kind
of one of the key pieces of evidence that Donald
Trump has always had in his back pocket about January sixth.
Speaker 2 (02:44):
It's hard to know.
Speaker 3 (02:45):
I mean, the truth of the matter is Donald Trump
lives rent free in the heads of most Democrats, including
Joe Biden, and including Adam Schiff and many others, and
so they can't stop them through popular vote. They're worried
about that. They can't stop up them. Right now, in
the polls, he's rising in the polls they thought, oh,
four diatments, I don't knock him out. No, it didn't.
It made him stronger. So are they recalibrating their strategies.
(03:08):
I'm sure they are, But I don't think the American
people will settle for anything other than allowing Donald Trump
to run and let the American people make the decision
no matter what jury in Washington, d C. Georgia, New York,
or Florida says, the American people think they're the jurors
who get to decide in November twenty twenty four. And
I don't think Democrats have picked that message up yet,
(03:29):
but they will soon because the polls are very very
clear on this issue.
Speaker 1 (03:33):
So I want to dig into that because we've had
Democrats saying they're defending democracy. That's their whole story, is
that they want the people to decide. Clearly they've changed
their minds in this case. But if you look at
what has happened over the past few years, we've had
these kind of radical secretaries of state be placed across
the country by this Soro's fund. We know that that's
(03:55):
what happened. In Arizona. You've got Katie Hobbs, who became
Secretary of State now she's governor. This seems to be
a trend that's happening. They get in, they change the laws,
they change how votes are processed or whatever the election
system is processed, and then suddenly it becomes a blue state.
They end up moving from there to the governor's seat.
(04:16):
So I want to talk about Michigan because Jocelyn Benson,
who is the Secretary of State here, is now one
of the leading champions on this whole fourteenth Amendment thing.
She has said time and time again, Oh, I'm all
about democracy. We're saving democracy. She got an award from
Joe Biden for protecting democracy on January sixth of this year.
(04:37):
She received this award because she's such a champion. This
champion is now out there actively on CNN, MSNBC talking
about she is going to ensure that he cannot be
on the ballot. How deep is this secretary of state
situation across the country and what should we be looking
(04:59):
for with these folks who are suddenly changing their tune
on whether or not people get to decide.
Speaker 2 (05:04):
You know, there's a.
Speaker 3 (05:05):
Lot of history that's going to play out in the
next few months. George Soros has invested millions in getting
allies down in the state and local level. Some of
them are those prosecutors that are now letting people go
free who commit violent crimes, and then of course they
get led free and they commit more violent crimes. I'm
surprised there, but he's getting those prosecutors have done it.
The prosecutor that Soros funded in Saint Louis took down
(05:27):
Eric Brighten's as a city and governor for a case.
She later admitted it was bogus and have the evidence
to back it up. But getting them and died it
was enough to get them out of offers. It is
it possible that any one of these things could play
out in the state. I think when it gets to
the federal pellet level and to the national level, the
fourteenth Amendment has to be applied according to the Constitution,
(05:49):
not according to the whims of a Sours elected official
or a state official. And I think this court, this
Supreme Court, is a very strict constitutionalist court, and I
think it will by the language of the Constitution and
they will turn it down. That's what all the legal
scholars are saying. But could there be some twists and
turns along this journey? Absolutely. Remember when Christopher Steele's dossier
(06:12):
was taken seriously, the country got taken for a ride
for a long time. I think there'll be some many
different follies by the Democrats because they're fearful of Donald
Trump's strength. Their efforts to attack Donald Trump have only
made him stronger in recent months, and in Michigan there's
a real problem. Donald Trump is having a conversation with
automakers that the Democratic Party isn't Donald Trump says, I
(06:33):
know that Joe Biden, the Democrats are sending your jobs
to China.
Speaker 2 (06:36):
I'm not going to let him do that.
Speaker 3 (06:38):
The Democrats don't have a good response to that, right,
They've got Gooshen and now they've got videos of these
guys walking around and communists propaganda. And the Democrats don't
have an answer for that. Donald Trump does, so They're
going to probably try a lot of different things.
Speaker 2 (06:52):
I think at the end of the day, the United States.
Speaker 3 (06:54):
Supreme Court will not allow the Fourteenth Amendment to be
applied in any way other than the way that the
country monitored when it enacted that amendment.
Speaker 1 (07:03):
Well, you talked about these radical das, and we have
this situation with the Secretary of State here in Michigan.
She came out and she said, this was the most
secure election that we've ever had in Michigan. You have
been breaking this news on what happened in Muskegan, Michigan,
because they had these voter registrations come in. It looks
(07:24):
like there were between eight and ten thousand dropped off
and there's a lot of question as to whether or
not they're legitimate. It's interesting to me because if you
had this happen in every county across the state, you
could potentially have eight hundred thousand fraudulent people or fraudulent
registrations come through. If you look at the election from
(07:45):
twenty fourteen. Between twenty fourteen and twenty eighteen, somehow there
just happened to be in Michigan eight hundred thousand new
Democrat voters that came out and they have stayed for
Gretchen Whitmer. At what point are we to say, how
in four years did the Democrats come up with eight
hundred thousand new votes. That seems kind of ridiculous.
Speaker 3 (08:09):
Well, listen, the Republicans have done something similar in North Carolina.
North Carolina was trending blue and now it's very strongly read.
It even has a supermajority in North Carolina. It's a
new era of voting strategies and some of the Republican
states are way behind. There is a new type of voter.
I call it a couch potato voter. Traditionally they were
(08:30):
called low propensity voters. They're never going to show up
on election day. They're either too busy, too lazy to
get too many other priorities ahead of voting.
Speaker 2 (08:38):
But if you make it easy for.
Speaker 3 (08:39):
Them to vote, make it easy for them to register,
they'll vote early, and they'll probably vote early in the
way that the person who solicits them to vote asks
them to do it. Republicans haven't played that game except
in a few places. They've done it in North Carolina
very effectively. They did it in New York in twenty
twenty two, and that's why there are four New York
Republicans seats.
Speaker 2 (08:57):
There's a few places in California they played with it.
Speaker 3 (09:00):
And the reason Ron Johnson won in Wisconsin and Tim Michaels,
the Republican candidate for governor did not. By the way,
identical in policy, both facing an onslaught of anti abortion
ads and also endorsed by Donald Trump, so literally they
were like identical on paper. And Ron Johnson gets tens
(09:21):
of thousands more votes than did Tim Michaels. How could
that happen on the same ticket. The answer is Ron
Johnson did the early voting game. He got out early,
registered people early. He got low propensity voters that weren'ting
to get to the polls and get them to vote.
Speaker 2 (09:35):
Republicans can change this dynamic.
Speaker 3 (09:38):
If you look at the five states where Republicans lost
in twenty twenty, they lost by camlet of total, like
around eighty thousand votes. That is not hard to overcome
when you think that Democrats spent tens of millions of
dollars trying to chase those low propensity early voters and
they barely wanted these states. If Republicans were to mount
an early voting operation in Michigan and other states, they
(10:01):
can make up the game. Now, Michigan was a little
bit wider spread, right, it was more. It was a
six figure spread. But there's a great disenchantment with Joe
Biden and his economy in Michigan. People feel like the
automakers industries in grave danger. The way Joe Biden is
running the country, those voters could be flipped back. The
key is Republicans can't sit on their hands and let
(10:22):
Democrats start every major electoral every major election in a
state two hundred to two hundred and fifty thousand votes
behind because Democrats did early voting with low prensity voters
and Republicans did.
Speaker 2 (10:33):
It's that simple.
Speaker 3 (10:34):
But you know that seventy eighty thousand votes spread could
be very quickly changed if Republicans got in the early
voting game.
Speaker 2 (10:40):
It looks like they are now. That said, what one
on a Muskegan looks criminal.
Speaker 3 (10:44):
The police department, the Michigan State Police, and the Attorney General,
Dana Nesla, Democrat, says they believe there was some criminality there.
They referred it to the FBI, and two and a
half years later, the FBI doesn't seem to have done
anything with it, like many things that the FBI has
dealt with that are pit sensitive.
Speaker 2 (11:00):
Yeah, I know you're surprised. I'm not. I am too.
Speaker 3 (11:04):
It's a problem right now for Americans. But those things aside,
and the GBI strategies, by the way, never charge. They
deserve the presumption of innocence. But there's some you know,
you look at what the employees were saying. The employees
were telling the police. I saw red flags data nessla
a Democratic attorney. Gentlemen, that's hey, there's something that looked
criminal here. That's why we brought the FBI. In two
and a half years later, we don't have a resolution.
(11:26):
That's a shameful statement about the dual system of justice.
Speaker 2 (11:30):
But take that off the table.
Speaker 3 (11:31):
If Republicans get in early voting, they can level these
races in Nevada, Wisconsin, Georgia. There are a lot of
places where they could quickly make up ground just by
getting low propensity voters who are never going to vote
election to just get them to vote early.
Speaker 1 (11:45):
Let's take a quick commercial break. We'll continue next on
a Tutor Dixon podcast. You bring up auto workers. I
think that's interesting because right now, obviously we're looking at
this potential strike it with the auto union that would
be in Michigan, So Michigan is obviously on high alert
as to whether or not they're going to strike. That's
(12:05):
against all three. So you've got four gm and stillances
who are involved. They've been in tough negotiations. Ford has
offered a nine percent raise. The union is staying strong
that they want a forty six percent raise. That's a
significant raise, a forty six percent raise, but actually more
than that because they want to go to a thirty
two hour work week. You have Donald Trump talking to
(12:28):
union members. It's what he did in twenty sixteen. He
didn't talk to the union bosses. He wasn't the guy
who was out there saying I'm endorsed by the union
bosses like Whitmer and Biden. He talked to the union members.
The union members are the ones who are working on
voting day. On election day, they're working, so it's harder
for them to get to the polls. This could be
(12:48):
critical time for people to say, look, you've got early vote.
We've in some counties, we'll have early voting in Michigan,
we will have absentee and we have no reason absentee
in the state of Michigan. So what is the message
going to when do Republicans? I mean, I get that
Donald Trump is having this conversation, but we see these
outside groups on the Democrat side that are just hammering
(13:12):
people with a message on early voting and the reasons
that they have Exactly what you're saying they're getting reasons
to them and saying vote for us. I can see
nothing more critical than right now when these guys are
facing potentially Stilantis going to Mexico, Ford, moving down to Tennessee.
You see the writing in the wall. These companies could
(13:33):
move out of the state of Michigan. That hurts not
only the union guys, that hurts the shops that supply
the union guys. So when is is that the effective
next move for the Republicans to say, Okay, forget about
the fact that the unions are given so much money
to the Democrats. Go out and talk to the union members,
go out and talk to the hard workers.
Speaker 3 (13:53):
Yeah, listen, that is a strategy. It's what Donald Trump
did in twenty sixteen. I think that Democrats did a
better job during the pandemic in twenty twenty. I'm not
sure the Republican National Committee and the Republican state parties
are going to be the place where this early voting
thing is one. I think it's going to take a
private initiative. There's a lot of dysfunction in the Michigan
Republican Party, as you're acutely aware of. There, there's a
(14:14):
lot in the RNC. I was just listening to an
RNC presentation as a reporter the other day, and the
RNC person was saying, Oh, here's what we'll do. We'll
just get people who are going to vote on election
day to vote early. That does not change the equation.
You still end up with the exact same net sum
of voters. You've got to go out and get people
who are not a voting on election and get them
to vote early. I'm not sure the parties have the
(14:35):
right mindset. It's going to take a private initiative across
this country. It's not expensive to do. It just takes
someone to step into it. There appears to be willing
donors and others that are now beginning to work on
this sort of a project.
Speaker 2 (14:48):
It could radically change the.
Speaker 3 (14:49):
Races in Arizona, in Georgia, in Nevada, Wisconsin. Michigan's a
little bit larger, but if you have that conversation with
the automate, with the autoworkers, that hey, in five years,
your industry is not going to be in Michigan because
of all these policies. That's a very powerful vote for
existence that you might gain. And if you make it
(15:10):
easy for them to do it early. You probably put
it in the bank early, so I think it's going
to be You.
Speaker 1 (15:15):
Make a good point that Donald Trump did that. I mean,
I know Michigan seems like a mammoth state, but Michigan
was won by Donald Trump in twenty sixteen. It is
not impossible. But I hear what you're saying because I've
talked to some of the more formed organizations in the
Republican Party, like the RNC, and there is still this
mindset of well, we've got we know how we've done
(15:38):
it in the past, we'll just extend that. We'll do
it a little differently. But I think you're absolutely right.
There are people, especially on the Republican side. You've got
people that are at their we're now the blue collar party.
They're at work. They forget, you know. I mean, I
think about my life, and I think that the people
outside of the politicals don't. Politicos don't think about the
(16:00):
people outside of this world. The normal people are not
focused on the news every day, on the political climate.
Every day they see what they see sent to their phone,
they get that message, they make a decision based on that.
They're not seeking out a lot of information because we're
in a new world where it's tough to find childcare.
You're working all day, you're running your kids to different events,
(16:22):
you're coming home and you're exhausted. So we're not meeting
our own people. We're not educating our own people. That's
been my complaint. I'm like, we've got to talk to
our own people, because come election day, those folks are
running their kids to practice, they've got to go to work.
They're going to forget. The Democrats are taking advantage of
all this time ahead of the election. They could have
(16:44):
a month or two ahead of the election that they're
getting votes in and we're just like, well, we'll get
them out on election Day.
Speaker 3 (16:50):
Yeah, and then something like a printer jam in Maricopa
COUNTI ruins your plan for even the best day turn out.
Republicans have to wake up and smell the roses. They've
got to do this. Ronald Reagan used to say, I'm
a principal guy, but I'll never unilatterally disarm, and right
now the Republicans are unilatally disarmed when it comes to
the early voting game.
Speaker 2 (17:09):
And by the way, younger voters.
Speaker 3 (17:10):
Are less likely to vote on the day of they
got kids, they'd rather be playing video games. You can
have to get them out and get away. You get
him out is get him to vote early, and then
you know the votes in the bank. You can track
it through provisional status. Get it out there. It's not
rocket science what the Democrats did. The Republicans just haven't
shown a will or a capability to match it. But
(17:32):
if they were to match it, particularly if Donald Trump
is the nominee, with his ability to get his base out,
Democrats would be in a really significant a world of panic.
I think to see that there was a massive thing going.
Speaker 2 (17:45):
On, it has done.
Speaker 3 (17:46):
Take a look at how Glenn Youngin flipped a blue Virginia.
Virginia have been blue for ten twelve years solidly. He
did it, and he did it with the early voting.
He did it with a guy named doctor Mark Campbell,
and they were tracking a database every day and they
just knew we got that vote to bank at that
vote de bank at the next vote to bank. It
can be done. And you're right, people don't live on airways.
There's so much money the Republicans waste on glitzy, multimillion
(18:09):
dollar ad campaigns. You're so much more effective if you
can communicate in the personal space of a cell phone
or on a social media platform. Donald Trump did that
pretty well in sixteen. The Republican Party as a whole
has done it poorly. But we live our phones now.
Our cell phones are our life devices. If you want
to get someone, spend some time on a digital ad
on their phone. Way more effective than the super expensive
(18:33):
television ads that most people turn off or fast forward to,
or go to the kitchen during coreper.
Speaker 1 (18:37):
Where they're not even watching, because so many cord cutters
are not watching those expensive ads. And we're at a
moment where I just think, how could it possibly be
that we don't feel incredibly confident going into twenty four
And I don't think we're there. I mean, the polls
would tell us not to feel incredibly confident. But you've
got this stuff going on with Joe Biden right now
that is shocking. It looks like the biggest case of
(19:00):
corruption we've ever seen in the history of the United States.
And you have an article out today that says you've
got people quoted. I think it was New Gingrich that
came on your program and said there is no way
Obama couldn't have known. He didn't know something. He had
to have known something. How significant is that statement from
someone like the former speaker.
Speaker 3 (19:21):
Well, listen, even in a down Democratic party that doesn't
like old Joe Biden, who deloks his age and looks
fumbling most days, they still have the Barack Obama legacy
and he's sort of lionized. But if you want to
disillusion all those young Democrats that got into politics by
believing Barack Obama, show Barack Obama for what he was.
(19:41):
He had a Secretary of State and a vice president.
It's two top officials that you'd have in any administration.
They both were shaking down foreign interest making money off
of government policy. Hillary Clinton did it through the Clinton
Foundation and her husband Bill did it through speaking fees.
Speaker 2 (19:56):
They were taking tons of money from Russia. Think about that. Russia, Russia, Russia.
Speaker 3 (20:00):
Before it was a problem for a fake problem for Republicans,
it was a real problem for Democrats. And then Joe
Biden's there with his son and Hunter Biden's going along
targeting the countries that his father has a policy responsibility,
and he's making millions in the personal bank for the family,
and what countries there are they Russia, Ukraine, China, Romania, Kazakhstan,
not countries that we have great relationships with, or countries
(20:22):
we should be very dubious. If they're giving millions of
dollars to the family of the sitting vice president, there's
no chance that Barack Obama didn't get warned about this.
Republicans should go find those warnings. They should go find
out what did Barack Obama know? When did he know it?
Another thing, a lot of this is done on private
emails Hillary Clinton or private email server Joe Biden fifty
four hundred pseudonym fake email names, or emails with fake
(20:44):
names that he used to correspond. That's a common pattern
that occurred on the Barack Obama watch. And then there's
a third part of it. The idea of weaponizing the
United States government to go after your political enemies began
on Barack Obama's watch. First, it was the IRS targeting
scandal in twenty sixteen. Right, Yeah, Barack Obama is told
before anyone else knows that Hillary Clinton's going to hang
(21:06):
a fake Russia shingle on Donald Trump's house, and he
sets there quietly and lets it happen.
Speaker 2 (21:11):
In fact, he even encourages a post action report.
Speaker 3 (21:13):
And in his final days in office, Barack Obama sitting
right alongside Joe Biden in his inner circle. They're having
a meeting saying, the FBI just said there's no reason
to pursue Mike Flynn anymore. President Trump's soon to be
national security advisor. Let's concoct one and they're sitting around
talking about the Logan act or doing an interview even
though an interview isn't warranted under the FBI's rules. That's
(21:35):
how Barack Obama spent his final days in office trying
to figure out how he could hamper Donald Trump's beginning
of his presidency. That needs to be exposed. It needs
to be told in a cohesive term, and I guarantee
you there's going to be defensive briefings and mornings at
the Intelligence Committee at some point. Had it there's no
chance Hunter Biden is involved with a company involving China
(21:56):
Energy where one of its guys are picked up for bribery,
Patrick Coe. He's dealing directly with Hunter Biden, and there's
no chance that Barack Obama isn't warned about that, as
well as many other things. The Russian oligarch, you corrupt
Ukrainian company. Joe Biden's getting warned about it. It has to
be ls. The government just completely failed, and Barack Obama
(22:16):
would get warned. We know he did get warned about
Hillary Clinton Russia colusion. There a probably many other warnings
and that's why Nut king Rich and now James Cober saying, hey.
Speaker 2 (22:24):
We're going to go all the way to the top.
What did Barack Obama no? When did you know it?
Speaker 1 (22:27):
Let's take a quick commercial break. We'll continue next on
the Tutor Dixon podcast. There's so many things that link
to this, because you see that Donald Trump gets impeached
and this is right off the bat that they start
calling on this Ukraine call. The Ukraine call is a problem.
But you also as an administration, as an Obama administration,
(22:52):
you have to know that this was happening, that Joe
Biden truly was putting his own son on the board.
There was potentially these this bribery situation that his son
was not qualified for this. But protecting you hear Victor Chokin,
the prosecutor who was let go, You know that he
feels that the president was in a situation that he
couldn't do anything. He had to go with what Joe
(23:14):
Biden said. And then you look back at the twenty
twenty election and you look at that Democrat primary, and
it was a little bit weird how everybody just kind
of eventually stepped away and said, we're going to just
let Joe run. But it seems like people were a
little nervous that the Trump administration had actually found out
what was going on. They would have to have Joe
(23:35):
Biden back in office then to try to cover their tracks.
So why not just have everybody step aside and say, Joe,
you're going to take over. We're going to go and
clean things up so that these other folks can't come
in and find out what really happened.
Speaker 2 (23:48):
Listen.
Speaker 3 (23:48):
One of the most important stories I wrote I wrote
last week, and it is really shocking because the impeachment
witnesses Joe Biden, the national news media, the US intelligence community,
the State Department all told this one story. Yeah, like
John Solomon reported in April of twenty nineteen, Joe Biden
did fire the prosecutor investigating his son, and he did
it by withholding a billion dollars. But don't worry, that
(24:10):
wasn't Joe Biden acting in his son's interest. It was
Joe Biden carrying out a career recommendation by career federal
government officials. And last week I went and got those
officials recommendations. I fought through them through Foy, I fought
through them through sources. I got Congress to go get him.
When you take Joe Biden did the opposite of what
career officials told him. He was actually told to give
the billion dollar loan guarantee, and that Victor Chokin, the prosecutor,
(24:33):
was doing an okay job, He's making progress in the
fight against endemic corruption. He did the opposite. So for
four years, that entire Cabala people, the State Department, the
Intelligence Committee, Joe Biden's things, Adam Schiff, and all the
impeachment managers, they gave the American people a false story.
To orchestrate that where so many people had the same
(24:53):
storyline takes a lot of work, and to go get
those documents and disprove it took even longer to four years.
Speaker 2 (24:58):
To get those documents.
Speaker 3 (25:00):
But it is now eminently clear the reason Joe Biden
fired the prosecutor and withheld the billion dollars had nothing
to do with career officials recommendations. It was opposite of
what they recommended. Now, the question for Congress is why
did he do it? Devin Archer tells us, well, because
Barisma was pressuring Hunter Biden to get rid of that prosecutor,
because the prosecutor was upping an corruption investigation against the company.
(25:23):
Republicans should be able to prove that that's the case.
They should be able to prove those impeachment witnesses lied.
They should be able to prove that whether or not
the ten twenty three FBI form which claims from a
trusted informant Joe Biden was paid ten million dollars, they
should be able to find out if that's true. If
they do those things, the Biden presidency heads into the
(25:44):
twenty twenty four election even more wounded than it is now.
He's already sub forty percent in approval. Seventy seven percent
of the country thinks it's sent in the wrong direction.
About a similar number think he's too old to handle
the job. Imagine if you could close the loop and
show that Donald Trump's concern, based on my early reporting
in twenty nineteenth, actually had full merit. Impeachment was bogus,
(26:05):
and it was actually Joe Biden as a crooked guy
that would really slam Democrats' chances in twenty twenty four.
The Republicans have the power to do it. The question
is to have the will and skill. We'll find out.
Speaker 1 (26:16):
I think it goes beyond just the impeachment was bogus.
This is a cover up to the highest degree, because
those people that were in those hearings, not only did
they take millions of taxpayer dollars to hold those hearings
and continuously beat an administration over their head and a
precurrent president over his head for something that they knew
(26:37):
was all false. It's not just that they knew the
allegation was false, that's right. They knew what Joe Biden
had done was wrong. So if they knew and they
helped cover it up, I mean, how big could this
be and what kind of repercussions could there be for
folks like Adam Schiff, who clearly he had all the facts.
(26:59):
I think this is the thing that people need to understand.
He was behind the scenes, He's running this hearing. Hey
knows everything at this point about Ukraine. He knows everything
about what Joe Biden did because he's got to look
at it because the can of worms has now been opened.
But you've got to think that when Donald Trump even
asked that question, the minute he talked about that phone call,
(27:21):
they all went, we've got to do something because if
he finds out people are going down, and you know
how government works, they're going to all cover their own butts.
And I think Republicans and Democrats could be involved because
everybody's going, we've all done something. We got to protect
the big guy.
Speaker 3 (27:39):
Yeah, listen, James Comer talks about the protection racket. Jim
Jordan talks about the protection racket around the Biden family.
Speaker 2 (27:46):
It's really true.
Speaker 3 (27:47):
Later this week, I'm going to show that the very
first whistleblower to raise concerns about what Hunter Biden's business
enterprises we're doing, goes all the way back to November
of twenty sixteen. The government has known since twenty sixteen,
Why Brock I'm still in power. Important theme that keeps
emerging here that Hunter Biden looked like he was involved
(28:07):
in some sort of businesses that were doing money launding
and doing other untoward scenes, maybe a Ponzi scheme. And
this banker is a major banker and then make a
senior executive and a major bank company. He's so concerned
that not enough's being done about it. He goes to
the Securities in Exchange Commission in November of twenty sixteen
and says, hey, look what I found.
Speaker 2 (28:27):
And it's a pretty compelling argument that there's.
Speaker 3 (28:29):
Even a picture of Barack Obama, Joe Biden, and Hunter
Biden together on the cover sheet of one of the
presentations for this whistleblower complaint. Somehow the deep deep state
bureaucracy kept out a secret for seven years. They kept
these documents I mentioned the other day showing Joe Biden's
impeachment story was bogus for four years. The power of
the media, the administrative state, and the political powers that
(28:54):
be in the Democratic Party and inside the intelligence community
to keep things secret is vast and strong, and it's
really disrupted the American election experience the last four years.
Just think about what Mike Morrell did in line to
all of us in writing a letter that had no
basis saying Hunter biden laptop was rushing disinformation.
Speaker 2 (29:13):
I owed of evidence that was true.
Speaker 3 (29:14):
In fact, the FBI had already corroberated the laptop months
before the campaign with Joe Biden and Mike Morrell made
that storyline narrative. At some pointint Americans are going to
get upset. I think they already are upset that they
keep getting fed lies and then three years later it
all comes collapsing down. Twenty twenty four could be the
election where they exact that toll and if there's a
(29:36):
cover up, if the Republicans can not only show that
Joe Biden and his family were involved in this unethical conduct,
but that a large cover up was underway, much like
the Watergate was a major coverup, that could be a
significant slingshot for Republicans to really run the table in
twenty twenty four. Twenty twenty four can be a watershed election.
(29:57):
It could be one of those we're throwing the bums
out where you see a massive change like we saw
with the Tea Party in twenty ten, or the nineteen
ninety four New Gingrich Revolution, or the nineteen eighty Reagan
swamp over Jimmy Carter. It's setting up politically and polling
wise to be that sort of election. The one thing
(30:17):
that's not setting up is the Republican strategy. It doesn't
seem to be cohesive enough or syncd with the opportunity
that Republicans have. That is a failure of party leadership,
is a failure of elected leadership. Somebody's got to take
the reins of the party and realize there's a surfway
forming that Republicans can win by, but they aren't necessarily
(30:38):
have the surfboard on top of that wave right now.
Speaker 1 (30:41):
There are a few people that know that that can happen,
and let's hope that those people get the attention of
the folks who need to know. I think that we
look at this and you think about that time when
you have Hunter Biden doing all of this. I mean
Hunter Biden at that point his life is a dead beat.
I mean, this is a sad story, but he's a
(31:02):
drug addict. He's hardly able to function. He's not doing
this alone. I mean, I think that's the most frustrating
part about this. You have somebody who struggles with addiction,
who struggles with all of these different prostitution, all of
these different vices. Right he's barely able to function. He's
having a relationship with his brother's dead or his dead
(31:24):
brother's wife. He's in this turmoil in his life. This
is not someone who's functioning on all levels. He has
the last named Biden. There is the only chance of
him being successful overseas is because his father is somehow involved.
The only question I have is is he asking Dad
for help or is Dad saying you're going to do this.
(31:45):
I'm the puppet master and you owe me because you're
such a problem for me, and I'm going to make
sure you do this. I mean to be continued. We
will continue talking about this. We have to find out.
But John, I think what you're saying is so key.
I hope that all of those folks out there that
are supportive of Republicans are listening because there is a plan.
You just have to get on board with the plan.
(32:07):
John Solomon, thank you for being here.
Speaker 2 (32:08):
Good to be with it.
Speaker 1 (32:09):
Tutor, thanks and thank you all for joining us on
the Tutor Dixon Podcast. As always, for this episode and others,
check out tutordisonpodcast dot com. You can subscribe right there,
or head over to the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or
wherever you get your podcasts and check us out next
time on the Tutor Dixon Podcast. Have a blessing,
Hey, this is Buck Sexton and you're listening to the
Tutor Dixon Podcast, part of the Clay Travers and Buck
Sexton podcast Network. Welcome to the Tutor Dixon Podcast. Today.
I am joined by my friend John Solomon. He is
an award winning investigative journalist and the founder, CEO, and
editor in chief of Just the News, also host of
(00:21):
John Solomon Reports and News Not Noise? Is that right?
Speaker 2 (00:25):
Am?
Speaker 1 (00:25):
I getting that correct?
Speaker 2 (00:26):
Just the News No Noise?
Speaker 3 (00:27):
Yeah, Just No Noise. Yeah, that's the show on America's Voice.
We have a lot of fun with that.
Speaker 1 (00:33):
All right. Well, okay, I love watching you. I love
what you do. I love how deep you get into
these stories. And there's something I want to dig into
with you right now because I think a lot of
people across the country are saying, wow, could this really happen?
And that is this issue of the fourteenth Amendment keeping
Trump off the ballot. We've had a lot of people
(00:53):
across the country saying this. We've even had Adam Schiff resurface.
It's like he was like, you know what, I wasn't
able to be success with my lines about Russia. So
I've got to get into this one. It cann't happen.
Speaker 2 (01:05):
Well, listen, anything can happen.
Speaker 3 (01:06):
If you told me, we would have the ruling party
indict the guy that's going to run against him in
the next election four times. I want to laughed you
off a few years ago, but that's really happened. You know,
anything's possible if the law is followed. According to all
the constitutional scholars I've talked to, both on the conservative
side and liberals, said, listen, Alan Dershowitz voted for Joe Biden.
He's an unabashed liberal and unabashed Democrat. He says, you
(01:29):
can't apply the fourteenth Amendment to the circumstance. So all
the scholars tell me, not a chance in heck, there's
already been one ruling against it, I think in Florida
that seemed to be consistent with what the scholar said.
Speaker 2 (01:41):
But who knows.
Speaker 3 (01:41):
I mean, could some states somewhere have a judge that
rules yes, and then we end up in some sort
of appellate battle shore. But the scholars say that if
you apply the fourteenth Amendment appropriately, Donald Trump cannot be
disqualified for running for president. And we'll see if the
courts agree with that assessment.
Speaker 1 (02:00):
Well, It seems a little bit odd because the clause
that they're pulling out talks about insurrection, but no one
has been charged with insurrection. He has not been charged
with insurrection. He's not been convicted of anything. But even
some of these guys that we see getting eighteen years,
they weren't charged with insurrection. So how do you suddenly
now bring out insurrection?
Speaker 3 (02:21):
Yeah, well, listen, who knows what the next the superseding
indictment will be. I mean, Jack Smith is still working
a grand jury here in Washington. Could they try to
do that? I don't know. I mean, it's a pretty
big stretch to call Donald Trump's behavior an insurrection when
he told people to do it peacefully. Right, It's kind
of one of the key pieces of evidence that Donald
Trump has always had in his back pocket about January sixth.
Speaker 2 (02:44):
It's hard to know.
Speaker 3 (02:45):
I mean, the truth of the matter is Donald Trump
lives rent free in the heads of most Democrats, including
Joe Biden, and including Adam Schiff and many others, and
so they can't stop them through popular vote. They're worried
about that. They can't stop up them. Right now, in
the polls, he's rising in the polls they thought, oh,
four diatments, I don't knock him out. No, it didn't.
It made him stronger. So are they recalibrating their strategies.
(03:08):
I'm sure they are, But I don't think the American
people will settle for anything other than allowing Donald Trump
to run and let the American people make the decision
no matter what jury in Washington, d C. Georgia, New York,
or Florida says, the American people think they're the jurors
who get to decide in November twenty twenty four. And
I don't think Democrats have picked that message up yet,
(03:29):
but they will soon because the polls are very very
clear on this issue.
Speaker 1 (03:33):
So I want to dig into that because we've had
Democrats saying they're defending democracy. That's their whole story, is
that they want the people to decide. Clearly they've changed
their minds in this case. But if you look at
what has happened over the past few years, we've had
these kind of radical secretaries of state be placed across
the country by this Soro's fund. We know that that's
(03:55):
what happened. In Arizona. You've got Katie Hobbs, who became
Secretary of State now she's governor. This seems to be
a trend that's happening. They get in, they change the laws,
they change how votes are processed or whatever the election
system is processed, and then suddenly it becomes a blue state.
They end up moving from there to the governor's seat.
(04:16):
So I want to talk about Michigan because Jocelyn Benson,
who is the Secretary of State here, is now one
of the leading champions on this whole fourteenth Amendment thing.
She has said time and time again, Oh, I'm all
about democracy. We're saving democracy. She got an award from
Joe Biden for protecting democracy on January sixth of this year.
(04:37):
She received this award because she's such a champion. This
champion is now out there actively on CNN, MSNBC talking
about she is going to ensure that he cannot be
on the ballot. How deep is this secretary of state
situation across the country and what should we be looking
(04:59):
for with these folks who are suddenly changing their tune
on whether or not people get to decide.
Speaker 2 (05:04):
You know, there's a.
Speaker 3 (05:05):
Lot of history that's going to play out in the
next few months. George Soros has invested millions in getting
allies down in the state and local level. Some of
them are those prosecutors that are now letting people go
free who commit violent crimes, and then of course they
get led free and they commit more violent crimes. I'm
surprised there, but he's getting those prosecutors have done it.
The prosecutor that Soros funded in Saint Louis took down
(05:27):
Eric Brighten's as a city and governor for a case.
She later admitted it was bogus and have the evidence
to back it up. But getting them and died it
was enough to get them out of offers. It is
it possible that any one of these things could play
out in the state. I think when it gets to
the federal pellet level and to the national level, the
fourteenth Amendment has to be applied according to the Constitution,
(05:49):
not according to the whims of a Sours elected official
or a state official. And I think this court, this
Supreme Court, is a very strict constitutionalist court, and I
think it will by the language of the Constitution and
they will turn it down. That's what all the legal
scholars are saying. But could there be some twists and
turns along this journey? Absolutely. Remember when Christopher Steele's dossier
(06:12):
was taken seriously, the country got taken for a ride
for a long time. I think there'll be some many
different follies by the Democrats because they're fearful of Donald
Trump's strength. Their efforts to attack Donald Trump have only
made him stronger in recent months, and in Michigan there's
a real problem. Donald Trump is having a conversation with
automakers that the Democratic Party isn't Donald Trump says, I
(06:33):
know that Joe Biden, the Democrats are sending your jobs
to China.
Speaker 2 (06:36):
I'm not going to let him do that.
Speaker 3 (06:38):
The Democrats don't have a good response to that, right,
They've got Gooshen and now they've got videos of these
guys walking around and communists propaganda. And the Democrats don't
have an answer for that. Donald Trump does, so They're
going to probably try a lot of different things.
Speaker 2 (06:52):
I think at the end of the day, the United States.
Speaker 3 (06:54):
Supreme Court will not allow the Fourteenth Amendment to be
applied in any way other than the way that the
country monitored when it enacted that amendment.
Speaker 1 (07:03):
Well, you talked about these radical das, and we have
this situation with the Secretary of State here in Michigan.
She came out and she said, this was the most
secure election that we've ever had in Michigan. You have
been breaking this news on what happened in Muskegan, Michigan,
because they had these voter registrations come in. It looks
(07:24):
like there were between eight and ten thousand dropped off
and there's a lot of question as to whether or
not they're legitimate. It's interesting to me because if you
had this happen in every county across the state, you
could potentially have eight hundred thousand fraudulent people or fraudulent
registrations come through. If you look at the election from
(07:45):
twenty fourteen. Between twenty fourteen and twenty eighteen, somehow there
just happened to be in Michigan eight hundred thousand new
Democrat voters that came out and they have stayed for
Gretchen Whitmer. At what point are we to say, how
in four years did the Democrats come up with eight
hundred thousand new votes. That seems kind of ridiculous.
Speaker 3 (08:09):
Well, listen, the Republicans have done something similar in North Carolina.
North Carolina was trending blue and now it's very strongly read.
It even has a supermajority in North Carolina. It's a
new era of voting strategies and some of the Republican
states are way behind. There is a new type of voter.
I call it a couch potato voter. Traditionally they were
(08:30):
called low propensity voters. They're never going to show up
on election day. They're either too busy, too lazy to
get too many other priorities ahead of voting.
Speaker 2 (08:38):
But if you make it easy for.
Speaker 3 (08:39):
Them to vote, make it easy for them to register,
they'll vote early, and they'll probably vote early in the
way that the person who solicits them to vote asks
them to do it. Republicans haven't played that game except
in a few places. They've done it in North Carolina
very effectively. They did it in New York in twenty
twenty two, and that's why there are four New York
Republicans seats.
Speaker 2 (08:57):
There's a few places in California they played with it.
Speaker 3 (09:00):
And the reason Ron Johnson won in Wisconsin and Tim Michaels,
the Republican candidate for governor did not. By the way,
identical in policy, both facing an onslaught of anti abortion
ads and also endorsed by Donald Trump, so literally they
were like identical on paper. And Ron Johnson gets tens
(09:21):
of thousands more votes than did Tim Michaels. How could
that happen on the same ticket. The answer is Ron
Johnson did the early voting game. He got out early,
registered people early. He got low propensity voters that weren'ting
to get to the polls and get them to vote.
Speaker 2 (09:35):
Republicans can change this dynamic.
Speaker 3 (09:38):
If you look at the five states where Republicans lost
in twenty twenty, they lost by camlet of total, like
around eighty thousand votes. That is not hard to overcome
when you think that Democrats spent tens of millions of
dollars trying to chase those low propensity early voters and
they barely wanted these states. If Republicans were to mount
an early voting operation in Michigan and other states, they
(10:01):
can make up the game. Now, Michigan was a little
bit wider spread, right, it was more. It was a
six figure spread. But there's a great disenchantment with Joe
Biden and his economy in Michigan. People feel like the
automakers industries in grave danger. The way Joe Biden is
running the country, those voters could be flipped back. The
key is Republicans can't sit on their hands and let
(10:22):
Democrats start every major electoral every major election in a
state two hundred to two hundred and fifty thousand votes
behind because Democrats did early voting with low prensity voters
and Republicans did.
Speaker 2 (10:33):
It's that simple.
Speaker 3 (10:34):
But you know that seventy eighty thousand votes spread could
be very quickly changed if Republicans got in the early
voting game.
Speaker 2 (10:40):
It looks like they are now. That said, what one
on a Muskegan looks criminal.
Speaker 3 (10:44):
The police department, the Michigan State Police, and the Attorney General,
Dana Nesla, Democrat, says they believe there was some criminality there.
They referred it to the FBI, and two and a
half years later, the FBI doesn't seem to have done
anything with it, like many things that the FBI has
dealt with that are pit sensitive.
Speaker 2 (11:00):
Yeah, I know you're surprised. I'm not. I am too.
Speaker 3 (11:04):
It's a problem right now for Americans. But those things aside,
and the GBI strategies, by the way, never charge. They
deserve the presumption of innocence. But there's some you know,
you look at what the employees were saying. The employees
were telling the police. I saw red flags data nessla
a Democratic attorney. Gentlemen, that's hey, there's something that looked
criminal here. That's why we brought the FBI. In two
and a half years later, we don't have a resolution.
(11:26):
That's a shameful statement about the dual system of justice.
Speaker 2 (11:30):
But take that off the table.
Speaker 3 (11:31):
If Republicans get in early voting, they can level these
races in Nevada, Wisconsin, Georgia. There are a lot of
places where they could quickly make up ground just by
getting low propensity voters who are never going to vote
election to just get them to vote early.
Speaker 1 (11:45):
Let's take a quick commercial break. We'll continue next on
a Tutor Dixon podcast. You bring up auto workers. I
think that's interesting because right now, obviously we're looking at
this potential strike it with the auto union that would
be in Michigan, So Michigan is obviously on high alert
as to whether or not they're going to strike. That's
(12:05):
against all three. So you've got four gm and stillances
who are involved. They've been in tough negotiations. Ford has
offered a nine percent raise. The union is staying strong
that they want a forty six percent raise. That's a
significant raise, a forty six percent raise, but actually more
than that because they want to go to a thirty
two hour work week. You have Donald Trump talking to
(12:28):
union members. It's what he did in twenty sixteen. He
didn't talk to the union bosses. He wasn't the guy
who was out there saying I'm endorsed by the union
bosses like Whitmer and Biden. He talked to the union members.
The union members are the ones who are working on
voting day. On election day, they're working, so it's harder
for them to get to the polls. This could be
(12:48):
critical time for people to say, look, you've got early vote.
We've in some counties, we'll have early voting in Michigan,
we will have absentee and we have no reason absentee
in the state of Michigan. So what is the message
going to when do Republicans? I mean, I get that
Donald Trump is having this conversation, but we see these
outside groups on the Democrat side that are just hammering
(13:12):
people with a message on early voting and the reasons
that they have Exactly what you're saying they're getting reasons
to them and saying vote for us. I can see
nothing more critical than right now when these guys are
facing potentially Stilantis going to Mexico, Ford, moving down to Tennessee.
You see the writing in the wall. These companies could
(13:33):
move out of the state of Michigan. That hurts not
only the union guys, that hurts the shops that supply
the union guys. So when is is that the effective
next move for the Republicans to say, Okay, forget about
the fact that the unions are given so much money
to the Democrats. Go out and talk to the union members,
go out and talk to the hard workers.
Speaker 3 (13:53):
Yeah, listen, that is a strategy. It's what Donald Trump
did in twenty sixteen. I think that Democrats did a
better job during the pandemic in twenty twenty. I'm not
sure the Republican National Committee and the Republican state parties
are going to be the place where this early voting
thing is one. I think it's going to take a
private initiative. There's a lot of dysfunction in the Michigan
Republican Party, as you're acutely aware of. There, there's a
(14:14):
lot in the RNC. I was just listening to an
RNC presentation as a reporter the other day, and the
RNC person was saying, Oh, here's what we'll do. We'll
just get people who are going to vote on election
day to vote early. That does not change the equation.
You still end up with the exact same net sum
of voters. You've got to go out and get people
who are not a voting on election and get them
to vote early. I'm not sure the parties have the
(14:35):
right mindset. It's going to take a private initiative across
this country. It's not expensive to do. It just takes
someone to step into it. There appears to be willing
donors and others that are now beginning to work on
this sort of a project.
Speaker 2 (14:48):
It could radically change the.
Speaker 3 (14:49):
Races in Arizona, in Georgia, in Nevada, Wisconsin. Michigan's a
little bit larger, but if you have that conversation with
the automate, with the autoworkers, that hey, in five years,
your industry is not going to be in Michigan because
of all these policies. That's a very powerful vote for
existence that you might gain. And if you make it
(15:10):
easy for them to do it early. You probably put
it in the bank early, so I think it's going
to be You.
Speaker 1 (15:15):
Make a good point that Donald Trump did that. I mean,
I know Michigan seems like a mammoth state, but Michigan
was won by Donald Trump in twenty sixteen. It is
not impossible. But I hear what you're saying because I've
talked to some of the more formed organizations in the
Republican Party, like the RNC, and there is still this
mindset of well, we've got we know how we've done
(15:38):
it in the past, we'll just extend that. We'll do
it a little differently. But I think you're absolutely right.
There are people, especially on the Republican side. You've got
people that are at their we're now the blue collar party.
They're at work. They forget, you know. I mean, I
think about my life, and I think that the people
outside of the politicals don't. Politicos don't think about the
(16:00):
people outside of this world. The normal people are not
focused on the news every day, on the political climate.
Every day they see what they see sent to their phone,
they get that message, they make a decision based on that.
They're not seeking out a lot of information because we're
in a new world where it's tough to find childcare.
You're working all day, you're running your kids to different events,
(16:22):
you're coming home and you're exhausted. So we're not meeting
our own people. We're not educating our own people. That's
been my complaint. I'm like, we've got to talk to
our own people, because come election day, those folks are
running their kids to practice, they've got to go to work.
They're going to forget. The Democrats are taking advantage of
all this time ahead of the election. They could have
(16:44):
a month or two ahead of the election that they're
getting votes in and we're just like, well, we'll get
them out on election Day.
Speaker 3 (16:50):
Yeah, and then something like a printer jam in Maricopa
COUNTI ruins your plan for even the best day turn out.
Republicans have to wake up and smell the roses. They've
got to do this. Ronald Reagan used to say, I'm
a principal guy, but I'll never unilatterally disarm, and right
now the Republicans are unilatally disarmed when it comes to
the early voting game.
Speaker 2 (17:09):
And by the way, younger voters.
Speaker 3 (17:10):
Are less likely to vote on the day of they
got kids, they'd rather be playing video games. You can
have to get them out and get away. You get
him out is get him to vote early, and then
you know the votes in the bank. You can track
it through provisional status. Get it out there. It's not
rocket science what the Democrats did. The Republicans just haven't
shown a will or a capability to match it. But
(17:32):
if they were to match it, particularly if Donald Trump
is the nominee, with his ability to get his base out,
Democrats would be in a really significant a world of panic.
I think to see that there was a massive thing going.
Speaker 2 (17:45):
On, it has done.
Speaker 3 (17:46):
Take a look at how Glenn Youngin flipped a blue Virginia.
Virginia have been blue for ten twelve years solidly. He
did it, and he did it with the early voting.
He did it with a guy named doctor Mark Campbell,
and they were tracking a database every day and they
just knew we got that vote to bank at that
vote de bank at the next vote to bank. It
can be done. And you're right, people don't live on airways.
There's so much money the Republicans waste on glitzy, multimillion
(18:09):
dollar ad campaigns. You're so much more effective if you
can communicate in the personal space of a cell phone
or on a social media platform. Donald Trump did that
pretty well in sixteen. The Republican Party as a whole
has done it poorly. But we live our phones now.
Our cell phones are our life devices. If you want
to get someone, spend some time on a digital ad
on their phone. Way more effective than the super expensive
(18:33):
television ads that most people turn off or fast forward to,
or go to the kitchen during coreper.
Speaker 1 (18:37):
Where they're not even watching, because so many cord cutters
are not watching those expensive ads. And we're at a
moment where I just think, how could it possibly be
that we don't feel incredibly confident going into twenty four
And I don't think we're there. I mean, the polls
would tell us not to feel incredibly confident. But you've
got this stuff going on with Joe Biden right now
that is shocking. It looks like the biggest case of
(19:00):
corruption we've ever seen in the history of the United States.
And you have an article out today that says you've
got people quoted. I think it was New Gingrich that
came on your program and said there is no way
Obama couldn't have known. He didn't know something. He had
to have known something. How significant is that statement from
someone like the former speaker.
Speaker 3 (19:21):
Well, listen, even in a down Democratic party that doesn't
like old Joe Biden, who deloks his age and looks
fumbling most days, they still have the Barack Obama legacy
and he's sort of lionized. But if you want to
disillusion all those young Democrats that got into politics by
believing Barack Obama, show Barack Obama for what he was.
(19:41):
He had a Secretary of State and a vice president.
It's two top officials that you'd have in any administration.
They both were shaking down foreign interest making money off
of government policy. Hillary Clinton did it through the Clinton
Foundation and her husband Bill did it through speaking fees.
Speaker 2 (19:56):
They were taking tons of money from Russia. Think about that. Russia, Russia, Russia.
Speaker 3 (20:00):
Before it was a problem for a fake problem for Republicans,
it was a real problem for Democrats. And then Joe
Biden's there with his son and Hunter Biden's going along
targeting the countries that his father has a policy responsibility,
and he's making millions in the personal bank for the family,
and what countries there are they Russia, Ukraine, China, Romania, Kazakhstan,
not countries that we have great relationships with, or countries
(20:22):
we should be very dubious. If they're giving millions of
dollars to the family of the sitting vice president, there's
no chance that Barack Obama didn't get warned about this.
Republicans should go find those warnings. They should go find
out what did Barack Obama know? When did he know it?
Another thing, a lot of this is done on private
emails Hillary Clinton or private email server Joe Biden fifty
four hundred pseudonym fake email names, or emails with fake
(20:44):
names that he used to correspond. That's a common pattern
that occurred on the Barack Obama watch. And then there's
a third part of it. The idea of weaponizing the
United States government to go after your political enemies began
on Barack Obama's watch. First, it was the IRS targeting
scandal in twenty sixteen. Right, Yeah, Barack Obama is told
before anyone else knows that Hillary Clinton's going to hang
(21:06):
a fake Russia shingle on Donald Trump's house, and he
sets there quietly and lets it happen.
Speaker 2 (21:11):
In fact, he even encourages a post action report.
Speaker 3 (21:13):
And in his final days in office, Barack Obama sitting
right alongside Joe Biden in his inner circle. They're having
a meeting saying, the FBI just said there's no reason
to pursue Mike Flynn anymore. President Trump's soon to be
national security advisor. Let's concoct one and they're sitting around
talking about the Logan act or doing an interview even
though an interview isn't warranted under the FBI's rules. That's
(21:35):
how Barack Obama spent his final days in office trying
to figure out how he could hamper Donald Trump's beginning
of his presidency. That needs to be exposed. It needs
to be told in a cohesive term, and I guarantee
you there's going to be defensive briefings and mornings at
the Intelligence Committee at some point. Had it there's no
chance Hunter Biden is involved with a company involving China
(21:56):
Energy where one of its guys are picked up for bribery,
Patrick Coe. He's dealing directly with Hunter Biden, and there's
no chance that Barack Obama isn't warned about that, as
well as many other things. The Russian oligarch, you corrupt
Ukrainian company. Joe Biden's getting warned about it. It has to
be ls. The government just completely failed, and Barack Obama
(22:16):
would get warned. We know he did get warned about
Hillary Clinton Russia colusion. There a probably many other warnings
and that's why Nut king Rich and now James Cober saying, hey.
Speaker 2 (22:24):
We're going to go all the way to the top.
What did Barack Obama no? When did you know it?
Speaker 1 (22:27):
Let's take a quick commercial break. We'll continue next on
the Tutor Dixon podcast. There's so many things that link
to this, because you see that Donald Trump gets impeached
and this is right off the bat that they start
calling on this Ukraine call. The Ukraine call is a problem.
But you also as an administration, as an Obama administration,
(22:52):
you have to know that this was happening, that Joe
Biden truly was putting his own son on the board.
There was potentially these this bribery situation that his son
was not qualified for this. But protecting you hear Victor Chokin,
the prosecutor who was let go, You know that he
feels that the president was in a situation that he
couldn't do anything. He had to go with what Joe
(23:14):
Biden said. And then you look back at the twenty
twenty election and you look at that Democrat primary, and
it was a little bit weird how everybody just kind
of eventually stepped away and said, we're going to just
let Joe run. But it seems like people were a
little nervous that the Trump administration had actually found out
what was going on. They would have to have Joe
(23:35):
Biden back in office then to try to cover their tracks.
So why not just have everybody step aside and say, Joe,
you're going to take over. We're going to go and
clean things up so that these other folks can't come
in and find out what really happened.
Speaker 2 (23:48):
Listen.
Speaker 3 (23:48):
One of the most important stories I wrote I wrote
last week, and it is really shocking because the impeachment
witnesses Joe Biden, the national news media, the US intelligence community,
the State Department all told this one story. Yeah, like
John Solomon reported in April of twenty nineteen, Joe Biden
did fire the prosecutor investigating his son, and he did
it by withholding a billion dollars. But don't worry, that
(24:10):
wasn't Joe Biden acting in his son's interest. It was
Joe Biden carrying out a career recommendation by career federal
government officials. And last week I went and got those
officials recommendations. I fought through them through Foy, I fought
through them through sources. I got Congress to go get him.
When you take Joe Biden did the opposite of what
career officials told him. He was actually told to give
the billion dollar loan guarantee, and that Victor Chokin, the prosecutor,
(24:33):
was doing an okay job, He's making progress in the
fight against endemic corruption. He did the opposite. So for
four years, that entire Cabala people, the State Department, the
Intelligence Committee, Joe Biden's things, Adam Schiff, and all the
impeachment managers, they gave the American people a false story.
To orchestrate that where so many people had the same
(24:53):
storyline takes a lot of work, and to go get
those documents and disprove it took even longer to four years.
Speaker 2 (24:58):
To get those documents.
Speaker 3 (25:00):
But it is now eminently clear the reason Joe Biden
fired the prosecutor and withheld the billion dollars had nothing
to do with career officials recommendations. It was opposite of
what they recommended. Now, the question for Congress is why
did he do it? Devin Archer tells us, well, because
Barisma was pressuring Hunter Biden to get rid of that prosecutor,
because the prosecutor was upping an corruption investigation against the company.
(25:23):
Republicans should be able to prove that that's the case.
They should be able to prove those impeachment witnesses lied.
They should be able to prove that whether or not
the ten twenty three FBI form which claims from a
trusted informant Joe Biden was paid ten million dollars, they
should be able to find out if that's true. If
they do those things, the Biden presidency heads into the
(25:44):
twenty twenty four election even more wounded than it is now.
He's already sub forty percent in approval. Seventy seven percent
of the country thinks it's sent in the wrong direction.
About a similar number think he's too old to handle
the job. Imagine if you could close the loop and
show that Donald Trump's concern, based on my early reporting
in twenty nineteenth, actually had full merit. Impeachment was bogus,
(26:05):
and it was actually Joe Biden as a crooked guy
that would really slam Democrats' chances in twenty twenty four.
The Republicans have the power to do it. The question
is to have the will and skill. We'll find out.
Speaker 1 (26:16):
I think it goes beyond just the impeachment was bogus.
This is a cover up to the highest degree, because
those people that were in those hearings, not only did
they take millions of taxpayer dollars to hold those hearings
and continuously beat an administration over their head and a
precurrent president over his head for something that they knew
(26:37):
was all false. It's not just that they knew the
allegation was false, that's right. They knew what Joe Biden
had done was wrong. So if they knew and they
helped cover it up, I mean, how big could this
be and what kind of repercussions could there be for
folks like Adam Schiff, who clearly he had all the facts.
(26:59):
I think this is the thing that people need to understand.
He was behind the scenes, He's running this hearing. Hey
knows everything at this point about Ukraine. He knows everything
about what Joe Biden did because he's got to look
at it because the can of worms has now been opened.
But you've got to think that when Donald Trump even
asked that question, the minute he talked about that phone call,
(27:21):
they all went, we've got to do something because if
he finds out people are going down, and you know
how government works, they're going to all cover their own butts.
And I think Republicans and Democrats could be involved because
everybody's going, we've all done something. We got to protect
the big guy.
Speaker 3 (27:39):
Yeah, listen, James Comer talks about the protection racket. Jim
Jordan talks about the protection racket around the Biden family.
Speaker 2 (27:46):
It's really true.
Speaker 3 (27:47):
Later this week, I'm going to show that the very
first whistleblower to raise concerns about what Hunter Biden's business
enterprises we're doing, goes all the way back to November
of twenty sixteen. The government has known since twenty sixteen,
Why Brock I'm still in power. Important theme that keeps
emerging here that Hunter Biden looked like he was involved
(28:07):
in some sort of businesses that were doing money launding
and doing other untoward scenes, maybe a Ponzi scheme. And
this banker is a major banker and then make a
senior executive and a major bank company. He's so concerned
that not enough's being done about it. He goes to
the Securities in Exchange Commission in November of twenty sixteen
and says, hey, look what I found.
Speaker 2 (28:27):
And it's a pretty compelling argument that there's.
Speaker 3 (28:29):
Even a picture of Barack Obama, Joe Biden, and Hunter
Biden together on the cover sheet of one of the
presentations for this whistleblower complaint. Somehow the deep deep state
bureaucracy kept out a secret for seven years. They kept
these documents I mentioned the other day showing Joe Biden's
impeachment story was bogus for four years. The power of
the media, the administrative state, and the political powers that
(28:54):
be in the Democratic Party and inside the intelligence community
to keep things secret is vast and strong, and it's
really disrupted the American election experience the last four years.
Just think about what Mike Morrell did in line to
all of us in writing a letter that had no
basis saying Hunter biden laptop was rushing disinformation.
Speaker 2 (29:13):
I owed of evidence that was true.
Speaker 3 (29:14):
In fact, the FBI had already corroberated the laptop months
before the campaign with Joe Biden and Mike Morrell made
that storyline narrative. At some pointint Americans are going to
get upset. I think they already are upset that they
keep getting fed lies and then three years later it
all comes collapsing down. Twenty twenty four could be the
election where they exact that toll and if there's a
(29:36):
cover up, if the Republicans can not only show that
Joe Biden and his family were involved in this unethical conduct,
but that a large cover up was underway, much like
the Watergate was a major coverup, that could be a
significant slingshot for Republicans to really run the table in
twenty twenty four. Twenty twenty four can be a watershed election.
(29:57):
It could be one of those we're throwing the bums
out where you see a massive change like we saw
with the Tea Party in twenty ten, or the nineteen
ninety four New Gingrich Revolution, or the nineteen eighty Reagan
swamp over Jimmy Carter. It's setting up politically and polling
wise to be that sort of election. The one thing
(30:17):
that's not setting up is the Republican strategy. It doesn't
seem to be cohesive enough or syncd with the opportunity
that Republicans have. That is a failure of party leadership,
is a failure of elected leadership. Somebody's got to take
the reins of the party and realize there's a surfway
forming that Republicans can win by, but they aren't necessarily
(30:38):
have the surfboard on top of that wave right now.
Speaker 1 (30:41):
There are a few people that know that that can happen,
and let's hope that those people get the attention of
the folks who need to know. I think that we
look at this and you think about that time when
you have Hunter Biden doing all of this. I mean
Hunter Biden at that point his life is a dead beat.
I mean, this is a sad story, but he's a
(31:02):
drug addict. He's hardly able to function. He's not doing
this alone. I mean, I think that's the most frustrating
part about this. You have somebody who struggles with addiction,
who struggles with all of these different prostitution, all of
these different vices. Right he's barely able to function. He's
having a relationship with his brother's dead or his dead
(31:24):
brother's wife. He's in this turmoil in his life. This
is not someone who's functioning on all levels. He has
the last named Biden. There is the only chance of
him being successful overseas is because his father is somehow involved.
The only question I have is is he asking Dad
for help or is Dad saying you're going to do this.
(31:45):
I'm the puppet master and you owe me because you're
such a problem for me, and I'm going to make
sure you do this. I mean to be continued. We
will continue talking about this. We have to find out.
But John, I think what you're saying is so key.
I hope that all of those folks out there that
are supportive of Republicans are listening because there is a plan.
You just have to get on board with the plan.
(32:07):
John Solomon, thank you for being here.
Speaker 2 (32:08):
Good to be with it.
Speaker 1 (32:09):
Tutor, thanks and thank you all for joining us on
the Tutor Dixon Podcast. As always, for this episode and others,
check out tutordisonpodcast dot com. You can subscribe right there,
or head over to the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or
wherever you get your podcasts and check us out next
time on the Tutor Dixon Podcast. Have a blessing,
Host
Buck Sexton
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Special Summer Offer: Exclusively on Apple Podcasts, try our Dateline Premium subscription completely free for one month! With Dateline Premium, you get every episode ad-free plus exclusive bonus content.
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!