December 8, 2023 • 38 mins
In this episode, Tudor speaks with Joel Wallskog and Ernest Ramirez, who have experienced vaccine injuries from the COVID-19 vaccine. They discuss their personal journeys and the lack of support they have received. They also highlight the censorship and lack of transparency surrounding vaccine injuries. The conversation touches on the need to address direct-to-consumer pharmaceutical marketing and the pressure to get vaccinated. They also introduce React 19, an advocacy organization for those injured by the COVID-19 shots. The Tudor Dixon Podcast is part of the Clay Travis & Buck Sexton Podcast Network - new episodes debut every Monday, Wednesday, & Friday. For more information visit TudorDixonPodcast.com.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:01):
Welcome to the Tutor Dixon Podcast. We've all heard about
folks who have been vaccine injured from the COVID nineteen vaccine,
but the thing is that we hear it in whispers,
and if it gets too loud, it gets censored. Today
we're done with the censors, and we're going to speak
with a man who lost his son and a doctor
(00:22):
who can no longer practice due to his vaccine injury.
Before we deep dive into the COVID vax I want
to talk to you a little bit about your health,
because you can't put a price on your health. I
stay energized and keep doing what I love every day
because I get the maximum servings a nutrition of fruits
and vegetables. I rely on Balance of Nature's Fruits and
(00:42):
Veggies and a capsule to give me the maximum nutrition
of thirty one real whole fruits and veggies every day.
Balance of Nature is giving all of our listeners thirty
five percent off any first preferred order plus free shipping
with promo code Tutor. You just have to go to
balanceinnature dot com and enter that promo code tutor to
get started today. Balance of Nature's Fruits and Veggies and
(01:03):
a capsule are powdered after an advanced vacuum cold process,
keeping the maximum nutrition intact. Put your health first the
easy way with Balance of Nature's Fruits and Veggies and
a capsule. Get thirty five percent off that first preferred
order shipped free to you with promo code tutor at
balancednature dot com. I feel confident about my health because
of Balance of Nature. You need to check out all
(01:24):
the testimonials from people just like you on their website
and see how Balance of Nature is making a difference
in their lives. Go now to Balance of Nature dot
com and get thirty five percent off your first preferred
order shipped free with promo code tutor. Now, I am
so pleased to welcome to I would say warriors out
there who have been fighting to get the word out
(01:47):
about what is going on with some folks who are
getting the COVID nineteen vaccine and tell the truth that
we're really not. We haven't been allowed to hear. They've
been trying to censor. But we're done with that today.
So I want to welcome Joel Wolskog and Ernest Ramirez
to the podcast. Thank you so much for coming today.
Speaker 2 (02:07):
Thank you so much for having us.
Speaker 1 (02:09):
Thank you Mom, absolutely, Joel. I want to start with you.
You are an orthopedic surgeon from Milwaukee. You got the
COVID vaccine, and you know, first, I want to say,
we have heard so many people come to us and
say I got the vaccine. I mean, I've even seen
(02:30):
Megan Kelly come out and talk about getting the vaccine
and then having an autoimmune disorder just afterward and saying,
there's no way that this just suddenly happened to me.
And I think everybody has somebody who has either been
injured or at least had side effects that were very
severe for a long time. But we're talking about way
beyond this. Ernest lost his son, you ended up losing
(02:55):
your practice. Really tell us to walk us a little
bit down through your journey, Joel.
Speaker 3 (03:03):
My journey really started with me getting my one and
only Maderna injection on December thirtieth of twenty twenty. Before that,
anybody that knows me in a very very busy practice,
I love my job, very active, really had no significant
medical problems whatsoever. On December thirtieth, I get my shot.
I was very uneventful, and then about five to seven
(03:25):
days afterwards. I remember waking up from bed and telling
my wife my feet were not and it was definitely
more than it was like electrical shock shocks or sensations
in my legs. I did what I always do, which
is just keep working and just not to try to
figure out. Okay, I don't know what it is, but
it'll get better. But I was within several days after
(03:45):
that that I was at work talking to a patient,
sitting down next to an exam table, but speaking of them,
them in a chair and me and a chair also,
and I tried to get up. I pushed myself up
and then I fell back and I fell down, and
I realized and clearly my legs just didn't work at
that point, And it was at that point I knew
that there was something more serious going on. And then
(04:06):
within several days I got MRIs of my brain and
spinal cord, and pretty quickly I got diagnosed with transverse
my alitis.
Speaker 1 (04:15):
So this is I have never even heard of this.
I was reading your story and I'm like, I hope
he's going to say these words because I don't even
know how to pronounce them. What is that?
Speaker 2 (04:25):
So?
Speaker 3 (04:25):
Transverse my alitis is an injury to either your brain
or spinal cord, and what happens is your own immune
system chooses to kind of attack your nerves or your
nerve on So I have a demilinated lesion at the
thoracic level at about TH eight or T nine. So
the milin is the protective sheath that's around your brain
(04:46):
and spinal cord, and the milin helps kind of your
nerves to conduct electrical impulses correctly. And basically for me,
what happened was my own immune system chose to attack
my nerves around.
Speaker 1 (05:00):
My mind is like an autoimmune as well.
Speaker 3 (05:03):
Yeah, I mean most likely this was an autoimmune issue.
And again my symptoms started about five to seven days
after the shot. That's transverse my litis. Now a lot
of people know and I've heard about giam beret. Giam
beret is really the same disorder, but it deals with
peripheral nerves. So transverse my alitis is kind of often
(05:24):
autoimmune attack on your brain or spinal cord. Giam Beret
syndrome is really more of an attack on your peripheral nerve,
so they're very much similar. Since that time, I've also
developed this autonomia. So your auto Your autonomic nervous system
is that part of your nervous system that controls involuntary
(05:44):
functions like blood pressure, heart rate, digestion, et cetera. So
for me, the other thing I've had ever since the shot,
within about a week after, is it's just wide fluctuations
of my heart rate and blood pressure. And unfortunately, what
happens sometimes too is I just pass out. So I
have these what we call sincaple episodes, just sitting down
(06:05):
and I just pass out. So unfortunately I'm not even
driving anymore, which kind of stinks, but it is what
it is.
Speaker 1 (06:11):
And this all happened when you're fifty years old. I mean,
this is not you're like in the middle of life.
Speaker 3 (06:18):
I'm a big water skier. I'm a big watersports guy,
a waksurf. I mean I did all that stuff until,
you know, until really December of twenty twenty. So I
have four kids. We're a very very active family. But
things are quite a bit different now.
Speaker 1 (06:37):
Wow. Well, Ernest, I want to get to you because
I ride your story early on and I just I
want to say, I'm so sorry. I can't even imagine
what this feels like. But I think people need to
hear your story because I think people need to know
(06:57):
that this vaccine was pushed on children, and your son
was healthy before he received this vaccine. Is that correct, Yes, ma'am.
Speaker 2 (07:08):
He was very healthy. He was he dedicated to sport.
Speaker 4 (07:15):
He loved baseball, and when he wasn't playing baseball, you
were playing basketball. You're in the neighborhood with with his friends.
So I mean he would even during COVID we were
locked down, he'd run two laps in our subdivision just
to keep in shape, to keep you know, in shape
with the sport he loved the most. So he never
(07:38):
had any issues all these years, other than snip was
once in a while as a normal kid, but he
never had to be you know, I've never had to
take him to the doctor.
Speaker 1 (07:50):
So you were pretty actively talking about this after it happened,
and this was your son got the shot, and then
it was just days after that that he collapsed.
Speaker 2 (08:01):
Is that correct, yes, ma'am.
Speaker 4 (08:03):
It's five days afterwards. And when this happened, I didn't
I didn't know. I mean I had never heard nothing.
I haven't heard anything about any side effects, any issues,
and so naturally I thought, you know, how could this
be you know, I didn't even connect it with the vaccine.
You know, I wasn't expecting it to be that vaccine
(08:26):
that affected my son, not until I met you know,
something told me to go to d C and send
it around. Johnson reached out to me to he wanted
to talk to me, and that's where I met Brian
dressing doctor Joe Wallskot. I realized this wasn't just me
my son, if it affected people all over the world.
(08:52):
And so that's very upsetting because, you know, our own
system that was suppor put in place take care for
our people, haven't.
Speaker 2 (09:05):
They haven't done anything.
Speaker 4 (09:07):
I mean, all they have been doing is injured and
killing people, and they're not trying to resolve the issue,
not trying to help the injured. So it's you know,
like I said, it's really upsetting to me. I'm getting tired.
They need, you know, they need to stand up.
Speaker 1 (09:26):
Uh you know, my friend, have you heard anything from
the pharmaceutical companies.
Speaker 2 (09:31):
Oh?
Speaker 4 (09:32):
No, I've emailed arovisor I've commented on a lot of
posts where they ask people to get vaccinated for their
for themselves and their family. They won't reply to me.
You know, I've reached out to Biden, also emailed them
several times, hoping, you know, to upset them, you know,
(09:55):
so they can respond to me. I don't care, it
doesn't matter to me. Reached out to my own governor
Abbot with no response, And like I said, you know,
these people don't scare me.
Speaker 2 (10:08):
They no longer scare me.
Speaker 1 (10:09):
Let's take a quick commercial break. We'll continue next on
the Tutor Dixon Podcast. What do you think about the
Attorney General suing Pfizer? Have you heard about that lawsuit?
Speaker 2 (10:23):
Yes?
Speaker 4 (10:23):
And I'm trying to figure out why now when we've
been trying to get in contact with anyone to try
to you know, not to profit, but to help, and
now all of a sudden they want to do it
three years later. You know, that's I don't know what
are they going to benefit? Are they going to benefit
(10:44):
out of it, or are we as a group going
to benefit?
Speaker 2 (10:47):
That's my question right there.
Speaker 4 (10:49):
I mean, if they win, I can hear I can
see them patting each other on the back, You're all excited.
Speaker 2 (10:56):
But what about the rest of us?
Speaker 1 (10:59):
That's good question. And we asked that to Attorney General
con Paxton. I said, I if you win this lawsuit,
does that mean that the money goes to these families
who have been injured or lost their loved ones. And
he said, you know, if I win the lawsuit, that
goes to the legislature. So you know, that's interesting how
those things work with government and when then the legislature decides. Well,
(11:21):
I certainly hope that the legislature is going to meet
with you folks. Have you heard from anyone from the
Texas legislature, No, ma'am.
Speaker 2 (11:31):
We haven't.
Speaker 3 (11:33):
I have some contacts that we're trying to work with
to contact Attorney General Paxson. But you know, Tutor, we
have our own lawsuit that we filed in federal court
back in October in federal court and Donald Louisiana that
is against HI and HRSA. So the Health and Human
Services about the compensation program that is intended to help
(11:56):
those injured by the countermeasures in this case, the COVID
nineteen vaccine has been a dismal failure, so as a
ninety seven percent failure rate, I'm sorry, denialerate. And to date,
the CICP, which is a countermeasures injury compensation program, has
only paid out eight individuals, eight Americans for their COVID
(12:17):
vaccine injuries for a total of thirty thousand dollars. So
the PREP Act immunity, you know, the PREP Act is
act that gives pharma immunity from prosecution. So I understand
the theory behind the PREP Act, but the balance there
is supposed to be that if you do get injured
by a countermeasure, remember early on, I mean these the
(12:39):
COVID shots were not vaccines. They were called countermeasures administered
to the Department of Defense. So we follow a lawsuit
in October through Aaron Series group. It was REACT nineteen
as well as several other injured people from the Southeast,
basically for the violation of our fifth and seven Amendment rights.
(12:59):
So it prevented us from due process and a jury trial.
So that lawsuit also directly challenges the PREP Act. I
applaud you know, the Attorney General of Texas, you know,
for pushing the envelope. We also have another lawsuit we're
involved in. You know, Brand Dressing, who's my co chair,
has never sued anyone in her life. If you look
up a censorship lawsuit she has. It's Brand Dressing at
(13:22):
all versus Joe Biden at all, and all of your
listeners should know that all the censorship that's at the
beginning of the pandemic, which which is where the communications
went out to the social media groups that said don't
publish even true stories of vaccine injury so as not
to go against the current narrative, all came directly from
the from the White House.
Speaker 1 (13:43):
Well, and I want to I want to get to that.
Don't let me skip over that, because I think that's
incredibly important. I want to get to that. But let's
let me unpack the prep Act a little bit for
a second. For people listening, the prep Act is decades old.
This is not something that was new for COVID. I
think some people think, oh, this was in place for COVID.
This was kind of resurrected or they said, Okay, we're
(14:07):
going to put this under the prep Act so that
these companies can create this quickly and we can get
it on the market. And I think that it was
very shortsighted because nobody really understood what it was going
to take to create this that they called a vaccine.
But as you mentioned, it's a countermeasure and a vaccine.
We know very clearly that a vaccine protects you from something.
(14:29):
But this does not. And so the interesting take on
the Texas lawsuit, and I think that people need to
understand the PREP Act is federal and so that's why
we as a country, as a whole cannot go after
the pharmaceutical companies for vaccine injuries because they are protected federally.
But state by state Attorney General Conpacston he is suing
(14:52):
because he's saying that they misrepresented what they had. They're
saying that it was ninety five percent effective, and it
really had no eficacy whatsoever, because you could get the
vaccine and you could get COVID a few days later,
and you could get the vaccine, or your friend could
be near you and have the vaccine and they could
get COID. Didn't stop the spread of COVID. So even
(15:15):
if you had the vaccine and had COVID, you could
give it to somebody with the vaccine. I mean, it
was just all a lie. And so that I mean certainly,
that's not the reason that you want to go after them.
You want to go after them because you were injured
and they are protected from that. That's the crazy thing
about the PREP Act. They are protected from the two
of you. And that's why this you know they have
(15:36):
to juggle this and say, okay, we can sue them
on this lie that this was effective. To me, it's
just a terrible shame that you can't you can't do
anything to sue for what happened to you. And I
love that your lawsuit is addressing that and saying, well,
wait a minute, why should they be protected by this
federal law now? Ernest, I want to get to you
because we talked about the censorship, and you were censored.
(16:00):
You came out and said, hey, I want to spread
the word about this. I want to let people know.
And I think it's so key. You know, we had
some young people in our area who died of heart conditions,
died of blood clots. Fifteen year old, seventeen year old.
These are things that we had never seen before. And
(16:21):
I just want to be clear, so much so that
one of these young people was sent from hospital to
hospital and they didn't know what the problem was because
it was so unusual to see this kind of blood
clot in a teenager. I don't know that that was
the vaccine. I don't know that, but I have to
say all of these things that are we're seeing come together,
(16:44):
like the damar Hamlins of the world and all of
these things that it just seemed to all be happening
at the same time. I just find it hard to
believe that there is not a common denominator here. And Ernest,
you were censored for saying that.
Speaker 4 (16:57):
Wall See the thing, I've never told anyone one not
to take it or to take it. I've tried to
make people see what happened to us, what happened to
me and my son, just to give them some information,
and that's why they kept centering me for whatever reason.
And the thing is, that's kind of funny how so
(17:20):
many people have just been dropping dead suddenly since all
this began, since they pushed out that job. Now, oh
now they're trying to make it normal, and which is
we all know it's not. Or like then then it
even has me thinking about skids back in the day,
(17:40):
sudden send infant death.
Speaker 2 (17:43):
Well, that's the same thing.
Speaker 4 (17:44):
Now all of a sudden we have SADS and it's
all due because of this rollout. So that's there. This
is just telling me that they've been testing all kinds
of stuff on all our all our people, and if
it's something like what we're going to do now now
they're gonna put another little tag on it.
Speaker 1 (18:05):
Do you know, by chance what the percentage of children
who have who ended up dying from SIDS compared to SADS?
I just am curious as a vaccine rolls out, are
those numbers? Are those percentages similar at all?
Speaker 4 (18:23):
I don't know, Joel, my boy, than I do on
that portion not, but I'm pre sure it's a lot
higher now.
Speaker 2 (18:31):
Right.
Speaker 3 (18:32):
I don't know the answer to that. Part of the
problem is we haven't been getting true and transparent data,
you know, from the philaceutical companies, and we never really
know the denominator. And that's why people ask me all
the time, what is the true instance of adverse events
(18:52):
after the shots? The answers I don't know. And it's
not because I don't want to know. It's because not
given the true and transparent data, who owns the data?
Everyone thinks it's the FDA or CDC or the government.
No pharmacy owns their pine of control data. So it's
only through Aaron Siri, for example, that you know, sue
(19:14):
them through a Foyer request that we even got some
of the data, like the Pfizer data, which is frankly
pretty alarming. Remember early on they wanted to have seventy
five years to release the data.
Speaker 1 (19:24):
So that's why I think that we need to figure
out how to connect you with Attorney General Ken Paxton,
because that was one of the things that he said
last week when we talked to him. He said, what
I hope from this, or what I know from this,
is that because we're suing them for this, they will
have to give us their data and then we can
flip through and find out what the truth is. And
(19:46):
so this is a way to break that free. That
was even we had a researcher from the University of
Wisconsin actually on the podcast a few months back, and
he said, I have always been able to get every
piece of data from these pharmaceutical companies on anything any
drug that they have out there. And he said, this
(20:07):
is totally closed down. I can't see Maderna, I can't
see Pfizer, I can't see any of these companies because
they have all of their data lockdown. And it's unheard
of to have this data lockdown. And so the question
that I think we all pose when we see that
as what are you hiding? Why?
Speaker 2 (20:27):
Right?
Speaker 3 (20:27):
I mean, the scientific process involves true and transparent data
and allows people the opportunity to evaluate other people's data
in their research. That's why I always say, you know,
in Reacting Team, we're a we're a science based advocacy
organization for those Americans injured.
Speaker 2 (20:44):
By the shots.
Speaker 3 (20:45):
We talk, we talked data, we talk talk science, but
what we're up against is censorship, deception, and frankly, lives
goes against the narrative that the vaccines are you know,
the answer and the way out is censored. And frankly,
you know, I just have to mention something about Travis
kelce So you know, you saw I watched Sunday Night
(21:06):
Football last night. You have Travis Kelcey, who is a
well known, respected, you know, football player who people and
young men respect, telling them to go out and get
two shots, you know, get your flu shot and get
your COVID shot. That's just evil's And.
Speaker 1 (21:24):
That's an interesting statement because you know, my girls, we're
not a huge football house. I mean, we have four
daughters and that's just not their jam, right, But they
know Travis kelce because of we are Swifties. In our house.
We have four Swifties and so they know this, and
that's I think that those folks have so much influence,
(21:45):
and so in other countries they are not allowed to
have They're not allowed to advertise pharmaceuticals and certainly not
allowed to have role models. And I say role models
because if you play a sport like that, people look
up to you. If you have a talent that other
people don't have, you are a role model to those people.
Same with if you are able to sing like Taylor Swift,
(22:07):
you are a role model. And other countries say no,
we're not going to allow role models or pharmaceutical companies
to advertise, certainly not to children. How did we get
here in the United States?
Speaker 3 (22:19):
Well, tutor, tuitor, the pharm of money, you know, is
all over the place. It's ubiquitous. I mean that pharma
money has captured politics, particularly at the federal level. It
captures our scientific journals, it captures our media, and it's
all over the place. And that pharm of money brings
(22:40):
a significant amount of control. Now I'm a little bit
older than you, quite a bit so, but I remember.
Speaker 1 (22:46):
Back I want to know that we're so true, but
you're not that much older. And thank you for saying
that though, But when I when.
Speaker 3 (22:51):
I was a kid, guess what there were cigarette commercials everywhere.
Speaker 1 (22:55):
Yes, of course with the camel and you were like,
he's so cool and joke cool. Well they got rid
of that, right, the Marlborough man.
Speaker 2 (23:03):
Right.
Speaker 3 (23:03):
So if you listen to you know RFKA Junior, for example,
Robert F. Kenney Junior, he is one proponent that would
eliminate direct consumer pharmaceutical marketing.
Speaker 1 (23:14):
And that is but so how do you do that?
Do you do you have to And because I really
think that the audience needs to hear this, because we've
talked about this a couple of times that this is abnormal?
Does it have to be a bill? Does do you
have to lobby for that? Is this something that you
can do with a lawsuit? What is the way that
you stop this insanity of a massive amount of money
(23:35):
going Because you can you can advertise drugs that people
then I mean think about if you see a drug
people go oh gosh, I must need that, right, it's
coming from a trusted source.
Speaker 2 (23:50):
I agree with you totally.
Speaker 3 (23:51):
I think it's certainly complicated, but I think the direct
consumer pharmaceutical marketing is one element that needs to be addressed,
probably through the federal life. And again, how do you
control that locally, while it's probably through federal funding. I mean,
just think about how many states years ago had an
eighteen year old drinking age and how did they get
(24:13):
everyone forced to go up to twenty one by controlling funding.
And I think that may be the element to try
to stop the direct to consumer pharmaceutical monitoring, which is
horrible and people like Travis Kelsey should be embarrassed because
telling direct young men, which is what he's doing, to
go get vaccinated with your flu shot, which they don't
(24:33):
need that anyway, causing them like Ernest, I mean, losing
his son. Ernest doesn't want to you know, isn't doing
this for himself. I'm not doing this for myself, and
we're doing this for all these other people that have
been injured that need help and support. But we also
want to stop further injury. Again, the term safe and
effective just discussed me because it is an overly simplistic
(24:58):
anti science marketing campaign.
Speaker 1 (25:02):
So we I mean, obviously we know that there were
massive pressures. Whether it was your job, or whether it
was your school or just what we saw on TV,
there was a massive amount of pressure. It wasn't even pressure,
I got it. I mean it was so much more
than pressure about getting the vaccine. It was like you
were a part of a dark, disgusting society. If you
(25:25):
were not going to get the vaccine, you were shamed,
you were bullied. It was it was unlike anything we'd
ever seen in the United States. I mean, and it
was so dystopian. You have to go in and you
have to show your papers to get anywhere. I mean,
it was just shocking to see that happen in the
United States. And Ernest, I know you said you got
it because you thought it was the right thing to do,
(25:47):
but afterward you said it was like playing Russian roulette.
What do you think about the way this was rolled
out and young men in particular, Earnest, because now we
know that folks have come out and said, well, maybe
this wasn't the safest for young men. And even if
that's not happening in the United States, over in Europe
(26:07):
they said, we're going to stop giving this to kids,
and young men are not going to get this because
we don't feel like it's the right thing to do.
What do you say to Americans who are still saying
every young man has to go out and get the vaccine.
Speaker 4 (26:20):
Oh thing is if they they're opening up their eyes overseas,
why don't they see that here? We need to ask
to get it out there where people can see the
evidence so they can actually understand that there is a
side of pets. I mean a lot of people tell me, well,
(26:41):
I got it. Not nothing happened to me. Not everyone
got the actual mRNA. Some people got you know, you
can't contaminate the whole population because that nobody.
Speaker 2 (26:54):
If it affects everyone, nobody's gonna get it. You know.
Speaker 4 (26:57):
Oh no, this happened so and so, and I'm not
to get it. Then, so they mixed it. They didn't
give it to just everyone. That's why I'm like, I said,
it's Russian re litt. Let's see if I don't die
from this. Well, let's see if I don't get affected
by this. I mean, it's just it's an ongoing nightmare.
I'm sorry, but that's what it is.
Speaker 1 (27:17):
Well, that's why I asked about the SIDS versus SAD
situation too, because obviously every kid is getting those vaccines.
But it's a certain effect, a certain amount that affect
different or if that's what happens, but it's a certain
amount that are ending up dying of SIDS, and is
that is that a similar ratio for adults to children.
(27:38):
I mean, it just it's just curious to me. But
like you said, this is being pushed on people still today,
and we still don't have the data. I think that's
the most concerning part. We just don't know. We don't know,
but I know that people have come out and said, oh,
this is absolutely not Did your son have any heart
(27:58):
issues before this.
Speaker 2 (27:59):
Happened, No, ma'am.
Speaker 4 (28:01):
I mean, like I said, he was he loved running, exercising.
I mean, he put me to shame because he never
got tired.
Speaker 2 (28:13):
I will try to settle them down, calm him down.
Speaker 4 (28:15):
He wanted to keep on going, he wanted more, and
like I said, he his plans were to join the
Air Force. And that's why I get I get upset.
I said, he wanted to fight for his country, the
same one that turned their back on him. So I
don't appreciate that at all. What I do appreciate is
(28:37):
people I meet.
Speaker 2 (28:38):
Along the way.
Speaker 4 (28:39):
They'll come up and they'll show me their children and
they'll boast about it. They tell me, my child has
not received not one vaccination since we heard your story.
So with that makes me feel good. I'm fortunately.
Speaker 1 (28:57):
So many of us are like I can't I tell
you how grateful we are that you sharing this, because
I'm in the same boat. I have four daughters, and
as soon as I started to hear these stories, I
was like, got to protect them, I've got to keep
them away from this. And I think there are still
people out there that think you know you're crazy if
(29:19):
you feel like you can't do this. But guess what.
My kids have gotten sick and they've tested positive for
COVID and nothing happened to them. Nothing happened to them,
So why was I told that my kids would not
get through this? And the crazy part about the thing
that makes me the most mad is that this is
not like we saw it hitting America for the first time.
It had already been in China for months for months,
(29:42):
so we already knew that kids were not dying from COVID.
The kids were not the big movers of COVID. They
weren't sharing COVID, it wasn't spreading through children. Most kids
weren't getting it, or if they were, they were not
getting severe infections. So why the push on kids? And
still to this day, I feel like we have not
(30:03):
received an answer on that. Why the push for kids?
And I got to tell you that I've had I
have people in my office that after they got the vaccine,
they had terrible side effects. I got the vaccine. I
had side effects that were unusual side effects that I
could not have predicted having. And you just you. I
think that those of us who had it, honestly are like,
(30:25):
what is what is the long term effect of this?
What is inside of me? And how what else will
it do?
Speaker 4 (30:31):
If you said it right there? Why so much attack
on our children that then years they're trying to control it.
I mean, we can go down different paths on this
subject right there. And because it all has to turn
on the children, they're injuring and killing our kids and
those that aren't affected, they're putting it in their mind
(30:53):
to get these animal you know, cutting their self to
pieces so which they won't be able to have children
when they grow older. They're just attacking our children in
any way they can possible. So on all this transgender stuff,
(31:14):
that's one thing. It all has to do with the children. Now,
Like I said, we can go down different paths on this,
but that's what it is.
Speaker 2 (31:21):
They're going to affect our kids one way or another.
Speaker 1 (31:25):
Let's take a quick commercial break. We'll continue next on
the Tutor Dixon Podcast. You can go down a real
rabbit hole of why why is this stuff? And the
stuff that is coming after our kids, Like you just
talked about the transgender stuff. A lot of that is
coming through these social media platforms that you were censored on.
You were censored on, but they can go after our
(31:47):
kids and push these radical agendas and our kids and
nobody says anything that's loving, that's caring, Yes, and that's
most of that is coming from the world's best propagandists,
which is China, who are coming to destabilize the country.
And I know this sounds like this is a lot,
but really this is all connected and we have no
(32:08):
defense if we can't speak out, but you guys are
speaking out, and Joel, I just want to give you
a little a moment to talk about REACT nineteen so
people know that it's out there, because I think so
many people are lost, so many people who have been
injured like you or lost someone like Ernest, are like
where do we go? So can you tell us a
little bit about REACT nineteen So people know there's a place,
(32:29):
there's a home.
Speaker 3 (32:30):
Well, and thank you Twitter, I just wanted to say that,
you know. REACT nineteen is I think the world's largest
advocacy organization for those injured by the COVID shots. We're
certainly the largest in the United States, I think in
the world. We started this organization with ten people in
November twenty twenty one, and now we represent over thirty
six thousand Americans injured by the COVID shots.
Speaker 1 (32:51):
Wow.
Speaker 3 (32:52):
We are not here just to tell our sad stories.
We occasionally do primarily to try to fundraise for the
injured people, but we're really trying to take our negative
reac actions and turn it into positive actions. Our mission
is threefold, is to support the injured physically, financially and emotionally. Financially,
we've given out over three quarters of a million dollars
to injured Americans for uncovered medical expenses. Compare that to
(33:14):
thirty thousand dollars that our US government has paid out
through the CICP program, which I referred to before. I
wish we could give out more, but again, every dollar
that comes into that program goes right out. So physically,
we've created care networks so we can't find providers that
listen to us, believe us, and have any idea what
(33:35):
to do. So we've created provider networks across the country,
medical providers, mental health providers, and now we're creating a
spiritual network to help these people give them support. We
also do research. We have an ongoing research program right now.
If anyone's interested that's injured by the COVID shots that
can take a look. It's on our website. And then
(33:56):
we have emotional support. We have well lower thirty six
thousand some people housed in social media based support groups.
We also have an advocacy program that assigns a nurse
or social worker to an injured American that needs really
more one on one help. Those are the ones that
are really marginalized before the injury. But I've seen twitor
is that anyone that's marginalized before their injury, they have
(34:18):
hard time paying their bills, they have the job they
don't like, they have relationships that aren't great. Their shot
injury is exponentially more disabling. And now the other thing
we're doing too is we have a lot of litigation
going on. We're involved in DC a lot with compensation
reform with regardless two House bills right now that are
(34:41):
working on trying to move towards compensation reform. And then
the other thing that I'm really excited about is we're
going to try to open the first ever clinic to
focus on COVID shot injury but also to include long
COVID It's going to be a multi specialty clinic. We
hope to be open in the first quarter of two
thousand twenty four, and that'll be down here in Texas.
(35:03):
And why are we doing it? Number one, we have
the injured, really have an unman need. Their care is horrible.
And the other thing is we're going to prove that
our care is so bad we're going to do it ourselves.
So there's a group of us within Reacting Team that
are partnering with a bunch of national healthcare providers that
(35:23):
we trust, that are nationally recognized experts, and we're going
to try to create what we calls the moving gold
poster gold standard of care for complex chronic illnesses like
long home end and COVID shot injury. So my hope
is that's not a one off. My hope is that
if we can get this model down, it's a nonprofit
multi specialty clinic. We're going to repeat it in Florida
(35:45):
or southeast I would say northeast, midwest West, but not
as far as California.
Speaker 1 (35:52):
That sounds amazing. Before we before I let you go,
I think that Ernest, your story is so important for
people here and I want people to connect with your son.
So tell us a couple of stories about who he was.
Speaker 2 (36:07):
He was.
Speaker 4 (36:09):
He was loving, a loving child. I swear anyone that
met him loved him dearly. He like I said, I
couldn't have asked for a better son. He He was
a blessing to me. Like I said. We we got
into baseball since he was small, and we lived for baseball.
(36:32):
He you know, training games. It was just something a
father's son deal that like I had never had before
in my life. And it was so great to have
something to share with my son. And also he loved hunting, fishing, camping.
(36:54):
I mean, we did so many things together. That's why
I always said he was my best friend, you know,
because he was always there, you know he was it
was always what are we going to do? What do
we want to do? And come on dad? You know
it was it was it was wonderful. I mean, I'm
(37:16):
missed that every day he is.
Speaker 1 (37:20):
I mean, the beautiful thing is that he couldn't have
been the boy that he was without having an amazing dad.
And the impact that he had on you as a
father is why you're fighting so hard for other parents today.
And I just got to tell you we are so
thankful for you and for your son.
Speaker 2 (37:39):
Thank you, mom, I appreciate that.
Speaker 1 (37:42):
Thank you both. Joel Wolskog and Ernest Ramirez, thank you
so much for being here. Everybody, buddy check out React nineteen.
Give us the website that they can go to, so
it's w w W. Thank you guys so much. Thank
you Tutor, and thank you all for joining us on
the Tutor Dixon Pod. For this episode and others, go
to Tutor diixonpodcast dot com. You can subscribe right there,
(38:04):
or head over to the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or
wherever you get your podcasts and join us next time
on the Tutor Dixon Podcast. Have a blast day.
Welcome to the Tutor Dixon Podcast. We've all heard about
folks who have been vaccine injured from the COVID nineteen vaccine,
but the thing is that we hear it in whispers,
and if it gets too loud, it gets censored. Today
we're done with the censors, and we're going to speak
with a man who lost his son and a doctor
(00:22):
who can no longer practice due to his vaccine injury.
Before we deep dive into the COVID vax I want
to talk to you a little bit about your health,
because you can't put a price on your health. I
stay energized and keep doing what I love every day
because I get the maximum servings a nutrition of fruits
and vegetables. I rely on Balance of Nature's Fruits and
(00:42):
Veggies and a capsule to give me the maximum nutrition
of thirty one real whole fruits and veggies every day.
Balance of Nature is giving all of our listeners thirty
five percent off any first preferred order plus free shipping
with promo code Tutor. You just have to go to
balanceinnature dot com and enter that promo code tutor to
get started today. Balance of Nature's Fruits and Veggies and
(01:03):
a capsule are powdered after an advanced vacuum cold process,
keeping the maximum nutrition intact. Put your health first the
easy way with Balance of Nature's Fruits and Veggies and
a capsule. Get thirty five percent off that first preferred
order shipped free to you with promo code tutor at
balancednature dot com. I feel confident about my health because
of Balance of Nature. You need to check out all
(01:24):
the testimonials from people just like you on their website
and see how Balance of Nature is making a difference
in their lives. Go now to Balance of Nature dot
com and get thirty five percent off your first preferred
order shipped free with promo code tutor. Now, I am
so pleased to welcome to I would say warriors out
there who have been fighting to get the word out
(01:47):
about what is going on with some folks who are
getting the COVID nineteen vaccine and tell the truth that
we're really not. We haven't been allowed to hear. They've
been trying to censor. But we're done with that today.
So I want to welcome Joel Wolskog and Ernest Ramirez
to the podcast. Thank you so much for coming today.
Speaker 2 (02:07):
Thank you so much for having us.
Speaker 1 (02:09):
Thank you Mom, absolutely, Joel. I want to start with you.
You are an orthopedic surgeon from Milwaukee. You got the
COVID vaccine, and you know, first, I want to say,
we have heard so many people come to us and
say I got the vaccine. I mean, I've even seen
(02:30):
Megan Kelly come out and talk about getting the vaccine
and then having an autoimmune disorder just afterward and saying,
there's no way that this just suddenly happened to me.
And I think everybody has somebody who has either been
injured or at least had side effects that were very
severe for a long time. But we're talking about way
beyond this. Ernest lost his son, you ended up losing
(02:55):
your practice. Really tell us to walk us a little
bit down through your journey, Joel.
Speaker 3 (03:03):
My journey really started with me getting my one and
only Maderna injection on December thirtieth of twenty twenty. Before that,
anybody that knows me in a very very busy practice,
I love my job, very active, really had no significant
medical problems whatsoever. On December thirtieth, I get my shot.
I was very uneventful, and then about five to seven
(03:25):
days afterwards. I remember waking up from bed and telling
my wife my feet were not and it was definitely
more than it was like electrical shock shocks or sensations
in my legs. I did what I always do, which
is just keep working and just not to try to
figure out. Okay, I don't know what it is, but
it'll get better. But I was within several days after
(03:45):
that that I was at work talking to a patient,
sitting down next to an exam table, but speaking of them,
them in a chair and me and a chair also,
and I tried to get up. I pushed myself up
and then I fell back and I fell down, and
I realized and clearly my legs just didn't work at
that point, And it was at that point I knew
that there was something more serious going on. And then
(04:06):
within several days I got MRIs of my brain and
spinal cord, and pretty quickly I got diagnosed with transverse
my alitis.
Speaker 1 (04:15):
So this is I have never even heard of this.
I was reading your story and I'm like, I hope
he's going to say these words because I don't even
know how to pronounce them. What is that?
Speaker 2 (04:25):
So?
Speaker 3 (04:25):
Transverse my alitis is an injury to either your brain
or spinal cord, and what happens is your own immune
system chooses to kind of attack your nerves or your
nerve on So I have a demilinated lesion at the
thoracic level at about TH eight or T nine. So
the milin is the protective sheath that's around your brain
(04:46):
and spinal cord, and the milin helps kind of your
nerves to conduct electrical impulses correctly. And basically for me,
what happened was my own immune system chose to attack
my nerves around.
Speaker 1 (05:00):
My mind is like an autoimmune as well.
Speaker 3 (05:03):
Yeah, I mean most likely this was an autoimmune issue.
And again my symptoms started about five to seven days
after the shot. That's transverse my litis. Now a lot
of people know and I've heard about giam beret. Giam
beret is really the same disorder, but it deals with
peripheral nerves. So transverse my alitis is kind of often
(05:24):
autoimmune attack on your brain or spinal cord. Giam Beret
syndrome is really more of an attack on your peripheral nerve,
so they're very much similar. Since that time, I've also
developed this autonomia. So your auto Your autonomic nervous system
is that part of your nervous system that controls involuntary
(05:44):
functions like blood pressure, heart rate, digestion, et cetera. So
for me, the other thing I've had ever since the shot,
within about a week after, is it's just wide fluctuations
of my heart rate and blood pressure. And unfortunately, what
happens sometimes too is I just pass out. So I
have these what we call sincaple episodes, just sitting down
(06:05):
and I just pass out. So unfortunately I'm not even
driving anymore, which kind of stinks, but it is what
it is.
Speaker 1 (06:11):
And this all happened when you're fifty years old. I mean,
this is not you're like in the middle of life.
Speaker 3 (06:18):
I'm a big water skier. I'm a big watersports guy,
a waksurf. I mean I did all that stuff until,
you know, until really December of twenty twenty. So I
have four kids. We're a very very active family. But
things are quite a bit different now.
Speaker 1 (06:37):
Wow. Well, Ernest, I want to get to you because
I ride your story early on and I just I
want to say, I'm so sorry. I can't even imagine
what this feels like. But I think people need to
hear your story because I think people need to know
(06:57):
that this vaccine was pushed on children, and your son
was healthy before he received this vaccine. Is that correct, Yes, ma'am.
Speaker 2 (07:08):
He was very healthy. He was he dedicated to sport.
Speaker 4 (07:15):
He loved baseball, and when he wasn't playing baseball, you
were playing basketball. You're in the neighborhood with with his friends.
So I mean he would even during COVID we were
locked down, he'd run two laps in our subdivision just
to keep in shape, to keep you know, in shape
with the sport he loved the most. So he never
(07:38):
had any issues all these years, other than snip was
once in a while as a normal kid, but he
never had to be you know, I've never had to
take him to the doctor.
Speaker 1 (07:50):
So you were pretty actively talking about this after it happened,
and this was your son got the shot, and then
it was just days after that that he collapsed.
Speaker 2 (08:01):
Is that correct, yes, ma'am.
Speaker 4 (08:03):
It's five days afterwards. And when this happened, I didn't
I didn't know. I mean I had never heard nothing.
I haven't heard anything about any side effects, any issues,
and so naturally I thought, you know, how could this
be you know, I didn't even connect it with the vaccine.
You know, I wasn't expecting it to be that vaccine
(08:26):
that affected my son, not until I met you know,
something told me to go to d C and send
it around. Johnson reached out to me to he wanted
to talk to me, and that's where I met Brian
dressing doctor Joe Wallskot. I realized this wasn't just me
my son, if it affected people all over the world.
(08:52):
And so that's very upsetting because, you know, our own
system that was suppor put in place take care for
our people, haven't.
Speaker 2 (09:05):
They haven't done anything.
Speaker 4 (09:07):
I mean, all they have been doing is injured and
killing people, and they're not trying to resolve the issue,
not trying to help the injured. So it's you know,
like I said, it's really upsetting to me. I'm getting tired.
They need, you know, they need to stand up.
Speaker 1 (09:26):
Uh you know, my friend, have you heard anything from
the pharmaceutical companies.
Speaker 2 (09:31):
Oh?
Speaker 4 (09:32):
No, I've emailed arovisor I've commented on a lot of
posts where they ask people to get vaccinated for their
for themselves and their family. They won't reply to me.
You know, I've reached out to Biden, also emailed them
several times, hoping, you know, to upset them, you know,
(09:55):
so they can respond to me. I don't care, it
doesn't matter to me. Reached out to my own governor
Abbot with no response, And like I said, you know,
these people don't scare me.
Speaker 2 (10:08):
They no longer scare me.
Speaker 1 (10:09):
Let's take a quick commercial break. We'll continue next on
the Tutor Dixon Podcast. What do you think about the
Attorney General suing Pfizer? Have you heard about that lawsuit?
Speaker 2 (10:23):
Yes?
Speaker 4 (10:23):
And I'm trying to figure out why now when we've
been trying to get in contact with anyone to try
to you know, not to profit, but to help, and
now all of a sudden they want to do it
three years later. You know, that's I don't know what
are they going to benefit? Are they going to benefit
(10:44):
out of it, or are we as a group going
to benefit?
Speaker 2 (10:47):
That's my question right there.
Speaker 4 (10:49):
I mean, if they win, I can hear I can
see them patting each other on the back, You're all excited.
Speaker 2 (10:56):
But what about the rest of us?
Speaker 1 (10:59):
That's good question. And we asked that to Attorney General
con Paxton. I said, I if you win this lawsuit,
does that mean that the money goes to these families
who have been injured or lost their loved ones. And
he said, you know, if I win the lawsuit, that
goes to the legislature. So you know, that's interesting how
those things work with government and when then the legislature decides. Well,
(11:21):
I certainly hope that the legislature is going to meet
with you folks. Have you heard from anyone from the
Texas legislature, No, ma'am.
Speaker 2 (11:31):
We haven't.
Speaker 3 (11:33):
I have some contacts that we're trying to work with
to contact Attorney General Paxson. But you know, Tutor, we
have our own lawsuit that we filed in federal court
back in October in federal court and Donald Louisiana that
is against HI and HRSA. So the Health and Human
Services about the compensation program that is intended to help
(11:56):
those injured by the countermeasures in this case, the COVID
nineteen vaccine has been a dismal failure, so as a
ninety seven percent failure rate, I'm sorry, denialerate. And to date,
the CICP, which is a countermeasures injury compensation program, has
only paid out eight individuals, eight Americans for their COVID
(12:17):
vaccine injuries for a total of thirty thousand dollars. So
the PREP Act immunity, you know, the PREP Act is
act that gives pharma immunity from prosecution. So I understand
the theory behind the PREP Act, but the balance there
is supposed to be that if you do get injured
by a countermeasure, remember early on, I mean these the
(12:39):
COVID shots were not vaccines. They were called countermeasures administered
to the Department of Defense. So we follow a lawsuit
in October through Aaron Series group. It was REACT nineteen
as well as several other injured people from the Southeast,
basically for the violation of our fifth and seven Amendment rights.
(12:59):
So it prevented us from due process and a jury trial.
So that lawsuit also directly challenges the PREP Act. I
applaud you know, the Attorney General of Texas, you know,
for pushing the envelope. We also have another lawsuit we're
involved in. You know, Brand Dressing, who's my co chair,
has never sued anyone in her life. If you look
up a censorship lawsuit she has. It's Brand Dressing at
(13:22):
all versus Joe Biden at all, and all of your
listeners should know that all the censorship that's at the
beginning of the pandemic, which which is where the communications
went out to the social media groups that said don't
publish even true stories of vaccine injury so as not
to go against the current narrative, all came directly from
the from the White House.
Speaker 1 (13:43):
Well, and I want to I want to get to that.
Don't let me skip over that, because I think that's
incredibly important. I want to get to that. But let's
let me unpack the prep Act a little bit for
a second. For people listening, the prep Act is decades old.
This is not something that was new for COVID. I
think some people think, oh, this was in place for COVID.
This was kind of resurrected or they said, Okay, we're
(14:07):
going to put this under the prep Act so that
these companies can create this quickly and we can get
it on the market. And I think that it was
very shortsighted because nobody really understood what it was going
to take to create this that they called a vaccine.
But as you mentioned, it's a countermeasure and a vaccine.
We know very clearly that a vaccine protects you from something.
(14:29):
But this does not. And so the interesting take on
the Texas lawsuit, and I think that people need to
understand the PREP Act is federal and so that's why
we as a country, as a whole cannot go after
the pharmaceutical companies for vaccine injuries because they are protected federally.
But state by state Attorney General Conpacston he is suing
(14:52):
because he's saying that they misrepresented what they had. They're
saying that it was ninety five percent effective, and it
really had no eficacy whatsoever, because you could get the
vaccine and you could get COVID a few days later,
and you could get the vaccine, or your friend could
be near you and have the vaccine and they could
get COID. Didn't stop the spread of COVID. So even
(15:15):
if you had the vaccine and had COVID, you could
give it to somebody with the vaccine. I mean, it
was just all a lie. And so that I mean certainly,
that's not the reason that you want to go after them.
You want to go after them because you were injured
and they are protected from that. That's the crazy thing
about the PREP Act. They are protected from the two
of you. And that's why this you know they have
(15:36):
to juggle this and say, okay, we can sue them
on this lie that this was effective. To me, it's
just a terrible shame that you can't you can't do
anything to sue for what happened to you. And I
love that your lawsuit is addressing that and saying, well,
wait a minute, why should they be protected by this
federal law now? Ernest, I want to get to you
because we talked about the censorship, and you were censored.
(16:00):
You came out and said, hey, I want to spread
the word about this. I want to let people know.
And I think it's so key. You know, we had
some young people in our area who died of heart conditions,
died of blood clots. Fifteen year old, seventeen year old.
These are things that we had never seen before. And
(16:21):
I just want to be clear, so much so that
one of these young people was sent from hospital to
hospital and they didn't know what the problem was because
it was so unusual to see this kind of blood
clot in a teenager. I don't know that that was
the vaccine. I don't know that, but I have to
say all of these things that are we're seeing come together,
(16:44):
like the damar Hamlins of the world and all of
these things that it just seemed to all be happening
at the same time. I just find it hard to
believe that there is not a common denominator here. And Ernest,
you were censored for saying that.
Speaker 4 (16:57):
Wall See the thing, I've never told anyone one not
to take it or to take it. I've tried to
make people see what happened to us, what happened to
me and my son, just to give them some information,
and that's why they kept centering me for whatever reason.
And the thing is, that's kind of funny how so
(17:20):
many people have just been dropping dead suddenly since all
this began, since they pushed out that job. Now, oh
now they're trying to make it normal, and which is
we all know it's not. Or like then then it
even has me thinking about skids back in the day,
(17:40):
sudden send infant death.
Speaker 2 (17:43):
Well, that's the same thing.
Speaker 4 (17:44):
Now all of a sudden we have SADS and it's
all due because of this rollout. So that's there. This
is just telling me that they've been testing all kinds
of stuff on all our all our people, and if
it's something like what we're going to do now now
they're gonna put another little tag on it.
Speaker 1 (18:05):
Do you know, by chance what the percentage of children
who have who ended up dying from SIDS compared to SADS?
I just am curious as a vaccine rolls out, are
those numbers? Are those percentages similar at all?
Speaker 4 (18:23):
I don't know, Joel, my boy, than I do on
that portion not, but I'm pre sure it's a lot
higher now.
Speaker 2 (18:31):
Right.
Speaker 3 (18:32):
I don't know the answer to that. Part of the
problem is we haven't been getting true and transparent data,
you know, from the philaceutical companies, and we never really
know the denominator. And that's why people ask me all
the time, what is the true instance of adverse events
(18:52):
after the shots? The answers I don't know. And it's
not because I don't want to know. It's because not
given the true and transparent data, who owns the data?
Everyone thinks it's the FDA or CDC or the government.
No pharmacy owns their pine of control data. So it's
only through Aaron Siri, for example, that you know, sue
(19:14):
them through a Foyer request that we even got some
of the data, like the Pfizer data, which is frankly
pretty alarming. Remember early on they wanted to have seventy
five years to release the data.
Speaker 1 (19:24):
So that's why I think that we need to figure
out how to connect you with Attorney General Ken Paxton,
because that was one of the things that he said
last week when we talked to him. He said, what
I hope from this, or what I know from this,
is that because we're suing them for this, they will
have to give us their data and then we can
flip through and find out what the truth is. And
(19:46):
so this is a way to break that free. That
was even we had a researcher from the University of
Wisconsin actually on the podcast a few months back, and
he said, I have always been able to get every
piece of data from these pharmaceutical companies on anything any
drug that they have out there. And he said, this
(20:07):
is totally closed down. I can't see Maderna, I can't
see Pfizer, I can't see any of these companies because
they have all of their data lockdown. And it's unheard
of to have this data lockdown. And so the question
that I think we all pose when we see that
as what are you hiding? Why?
Speaker 2 (20:27):
Right?
Speaker 3 (20:27):
I mean, the scientific process involves true and transparent data
and allows people the opportunity to evaluate other people's data
in their research. That's why I always say, you know,
in Reacting Team, we're a we're a science based advocacy
organization for those Americans injured.
Speaker 2 (20:44):
By the shots.
Speaker 3 (20:45):
We talk, we talked data, we talk talk science, but
what we're up against is censorship, deception, and frankly, lives
goes against the narrative that the vaccines are you know,
the answer and the way out is censored. And frankly,
you know, I just have to mention something about Travis
kelce So you know, you saw I watched Sunday Night
(21:06):
Football last night. You have Travis Kelcey, who is a
well known, respected, you know, football player who people and
young men respect, telling them to go out and get
two shots, you know, get your flu shot and get
your COVID shot. That's just evil's And.
Speaker 1 (21:24):
That's an interesting statement because you know, my girls, we're
not a huge football house. I mean, we have four
daughters and that's just not their jam, right, But they
know Travis kelce because of we are Swifties. In our house.
We have four Swifties and so they know this, and
that's I think that those folks have so much influence,
(21:45):
and so in other countries they are not allowed to
have They're not allowed to advertise pharmaceuticals and certainly not
allowed to have role models. And I say role models
because if you play a sport like that, people look
up to you. If you have a talent that other
people don't have, you are a role model to those people.
Same with if you are able to sing like Taylor Swift,
(22:07):
you are a role model. And other countries say no,
we're not going to allow role models or pharmaceutical companies
to advertise, certainly not to children. How did we get
here in the United States?
Speaker 3 (22:19):
Well, tutor, tuitor, the pharm of money, you know, is
all over the place. It's ubiquitous. I mean that pharma
money has captured politics, particularly at the federal level. It
captures our scientific journals, it captures our media, and it's
all over the place. And that pharm of money brings
(22:40):
a significant amount of control. Now I'm a little bit
older than you, quite a bit so, but I remember.
Speaker 1 (22:46):
Back I want to know that we're so true, but
you're not that much older. And thank you for saying
that though, But when I when.
Speaker 3 (22:51):
I was a kid, guess what there were cigarette commercials everywhere.
Speaker 1 (22:55):
Yes, of course with the camel and you were like,
he's so cool and joke cool. Well they got rid
of that, right, the Marlborough man.
Speaker 2 (23:03):
Right.
Speaker 3 (23:03):
So if you listen to you know RFKA Junior, for example,
Robert F. Kenney Junior, he is one proponent that would
eliminate direct consumer pharmaceutical marketing.
Speaker 1 (23:14):
And that is but so how do you do that?
Do you do you have to And because I really
think that the audience needs to hear this, because we've
talked about this a couple of times that this is abnormal?
Does it have to be a bill? Does do you
have to lobby for that? Is this something that you
can do with a lawsuit? What is the way that
you stop this insanity of a massive amount of money
(23:35):
going Because you can you can advertise drugs that people
then I mean think about if you see a drug
people go oh gosh, I must need that, right, it's
coming from a trusted source.
Speaker 2 (23:50):
I agree with you totally.
Speaker 3 (23:51):
I think it's certainly complicated, but I think the direct
consumer pharmaceutical marketing is one element that needs to be addressed,
probably through the federal life. And again, how do you
control that locally, while it's probably through federal funding. I mean,
just think about how many states years ago had an
eighteen year old drinking age and how did they get
(24:13):
everyone forced to go up to twenty one by controlling funding.
And I think that may be the element to try
to stop the direct to consumer pharmaceutical monitoring, which is
horrible and people like Travis Kelsey should be embarrassed because
telling direct young men, which is what he's doing, to
go get vaccinated with your flu shot, which they don't
(24:33):
need that anyway, causing them like Ernest, I mean, losing
his son. Ernest doesn't want to you know, isn't doing
this for himself. I'm not doing this for myself, and
we're doing this for all these other people that have
been injured that need help and support. But we also
want to stop further injury. Again, the term safe and
effective just discussed me because it is an overly simplistic
(24:58):
anti science marketing campaign.
Speaker 1 (25:02):
So we I mean, obviously we know that there were
massive pressures. Whether it was your job, or whether it
was your school or just what we saw on TV,
there was a massive amount of pressure. It wasn't even pressure,
I got it. I mean it was so much more
than pressure about getting the vaccine. It was like you
were a part of a dark, disgusting society. If you
(25:25):
were not going to get the vaccine, you were shamed,
you were bullied. It was it was unlike anything we'd
ever seen in the United States. I mean, and it
was so dystopian. You have to go in and you
have to show your papers to get anywhere. I mean,
it was just shocking to see that happen in the
United States. And Ernest, I know you said you got
it because you thought it was the right thing to do,
(25:47):
but afterward you said it was like playing Russian roulette.
What do you think about the way this was rolled
out and young men in particular, Earnest, because now we
know that folks have come out and said, well, maybe
this wasn't the safest for young men. And even if
that's not happening in the United States, over in Europe
(26:07):
they said, we're going to stop giving this to kids,
and young men are not going to get this because
we don't feel like it's the right thing to do.
What do you say to Americans who are still saying
every young man has to go out and get the vaccine.
Speaker 4 (26:20):
Oh thing is if they they're opening up their eyes overseas,
why don't they see that here? We need to ask
to get it out there where people can see the
evidence so they can actually understand that there is a
side of pets. I mean a lot of people tell me, well,
(26:41):
I got it. Not nothing happened to me. Not everyone
got the actual mRNA. Some people got you know, you
can't contaminate the whole population because that nobody.
Speaker 2 (26:54):
If it affects everyone, nobody's gonna get it. You know.
Speaker 4 (26:57):
Oh no, this happened so and so, and I'm not
to get it. Then, so they mixed it. They didn't
give it to just everyone. That's why I'm like, I said,
it's Russian re litt. Let's see if I don't die
from this. Well, let's see if I don't get affected
by this. I mean, it's just it's an ongoing nightmare.
I'm sorry, but that's what it is.
Speaker 1 (27:17):
Well, that's why I asked about the SIDS versus SAD
situation too, because obviously every kid is getting those vaccines.
But it's a certain effect, a certain amount that affect
different or if that's what happens, but it's a certain
amount that are ending up dying of SIDS, and is
that is that a similar ratio for adults to children.
(27:38):
I mean, it just it's just curious to me. But
like you said, this is being pushed on people still today,
and we still don't have the data. I think that's
the most concerning part. We just don't know. We don't know,
but I know that people have come out and said, oh,
this is absolutely not Did your son have any heart
(27:58):
issues before this.
Speaker 2 (27:59):
Happened, No, ma'am.
Speaker 4 (28:01):
I mean, like I said, he was he loved running, exercising.
I mean, he put me to shame because he never
got tired.
Speaker 2 (28:13):
I will try to settle them down, calm him down.
Speaker 4 (28:15):
He wanted to keep on going, he wanted more, and
like I said, he his plans were to join the
Air Force. And that's why I get I get upset.
I said, he wanted to fight for his country, the
same one that turned their back on him. So I
don't appreciate that at all. What I do appreciate is
(28:37):
people I meet.
Speaker 2 (28:38):
Along the way.
Speaker 4 (28:39):
They'll come up and they'll show me their children and
they'll boast about it. They tell me, my child has
not received not one vaccination since we heard your story.
So with that makes me feel good. I'm fortunately.
Speaker 1 (28:57):
So many of us are like I can't I tell
you how grateful we are that you sharing this, because
I'm in the same boat. I have four daughters, and
as soon as I started to hear these stories, I
was like, got to protect them, I've got to keep
them away from this. And I think there are still
people out there that think you know you're crazy if
(29:19):
you feel like you can't do this. But guess what.
My kids have gotten sick and they've tested positive for
COVID and nothing happened to them. Nothing happened to them,
So why was I told that my kids would not
get through this? And the crazy part about the thing
that makes me the most mad is that this is
not like we saw it hitting America for the first time.
It had already been in China for months for months,
(29:42):
so we already knew that kids were not dying from COVID.
The kids were not the big movers of COVID. They
weren't sharing COVID, it wasn't spreading through children. Most kids
weren't getting it, or if they were, they were not
getting severe infections. So why the push on kids? And
still to this day, I feel like we have not
(30:03):
received an answer on that. Why the push for kids?
And I got to tell you that I've had I
have people in my office that after they got the vaccine,
they had terrible side effects. I got the vaccine. I
had side effects that were unusual side effects that I
could not have predicted having. And you just you. I
think that those of us who had it, honestly are like,
(30:25):
what is what is the long term effect of this?
What is inside of me? And how what else will
it do?
Speaker 4 (30:31):
If you said it right there? Why so much attack
on our children that then years they're trying to control it.
I mean, we can go down different paths on this
subject right there. And because it all has to turn
on the children, they're injuring and killing our kids and
those that aren't affected, they're putting it in their mind
(30:53):
to get these animal you know, cutting their self to
pieces so which they won't be able to have children
when they grow older. They're just attacking our children in
any way they can possible. So on all this transgender stuff,
(31:14):
that's one thing. It all has to do with the children. Now,
Like I said, we can go down different paths on this,
but that's what it is.
Speaker 2 (31:21):
They're going to affect our kids one way or another.
Speaker 1 (31:25):
Let's take a quick commercial break. We'll continue next on
the Tutor Dixon Podcast. You can go down a real
rabbit hole of why why is this stuff? And the
stuff that is coming after our kids, Like you just
talked about the transgender stuff. A lot of that is
coming through these social media platforms that you were censored on.
You were censored on, but they can go after our
(31:47):
kids and push these radical agendas and our kids and
nobody says anything that's loving, that's caring, Yes, and that's
most of that is coming from the world's best propagandists,
which is China, who are coming to destabilize the country.
And I know this sounds like this is a lot,
but really this is all connected and we have no
(32:08):
defense if we can't speak out, but you guys are
speaking out, and Joel, I just want to give you
a little a moment to talk about REACT nineteen so
people know that it's out there, because I think so
many people are lost, so many people who have been
injured like you or lost someone like Ernest, are like
where do we go? So can you tell us a
little bit about REACT nineteen So people know there's a place,
(32:29):
there's a home.
Speaker 3 (32:30):
Well, and thank you Twitter, I just wanted to say that,
you know. REACT nineteen is I think the world's largest
advocacy organization for those injured by the COVID shots. We're
certainly the largest in the United States, I think in
the world. We started this organization with ten people in
November twenty twenty one, and now we represent over thirty
six thousand Americans injured by the COVID shots.
Speaker 1 (32:51):
Wow.
Speaker 3 (32:52):
We are not here just to tell our sad stories.
We occasionally do primarily to try to fundraise for the
injured people, but we're really trying to take our negative
reac actions and turn it into positive actions. Our mission
is threefold, is to support the injured physically, financially and emotionally. Financially,
we've given out over three quarters of a million dollars
to injured Americans for uncovered medical expenses. Compare that to
(33:14):
thirty thousand dollars that our US government has paid out
through the CICP program, which I referred to before. I
wish we could give out more, but again, every dollar
that comes into that program goes right out. So physically,
we've created care networks so we can't find providers that
listen to us, believe us, and have any idea what
(33:35):
to do. So we've created provider networks across the country,
medical providers, mental health providers, and now we're creating a
spiritual network to help these people give them support. We
also do research. We have an ongoing research program right now.
If anyone's interested that's injured by the COVID shots that
can take a look. It's on our website. And then
(33:56):
we have emotional support. We have well lower thirty six
thousand some people housed in social media based support groups.
We also have an advocacy program that assigns a nurse
or social worker to an injured American that needs really
more one on one help. Those are the ones that
are really marginalized before the injury. But I've seen twitor
is that anyone that's marginalized before their injury, they have
(34:18):
hard time paying their bills, they have the job they
don't like, they have relationships that aren't great. Their shot
injury is exponentially more disabling. And now the other thing
we're doing too is we have a lot of litigation
going on. We're involved in DC a lot with compensation
reform with regardless two House bills right now that are
(34:41):
working on trying to move towards compensation reform. And then
the other thing that I'm really excited about is we're
going to try to open the first ever clinic to
focus on COVID shot injury but also to include long
COVID It's going to be a multi specialty clinic. We
hope to be open in the first quarter of two
thousand twenty four, and that'll be down here in Texas.
(35:03):
And why are we doing it? Number one, we have
the injured, really have an unman need. Their care is horrible.
And the other thing is we're going to prove that
our care is so bad we're going to do it ourselves.
So there's a group of us within Reacting Team that
are partnering with a bunch of national healthcare providers that
(35:23):
we trust, that are nationally recognized experts, and we're going
to try to create what we calls the moving gold
poster gold standard of care for complex chronic illnesses like
long home end and COVID shot injury. So my hope
is that's not a one off. My hope is that
if we can get this model down, it's a nonprofit
multi specialty clinic. We're going to repeat it in Florida
(35:45):
or southeast I would say northeast, midwest West, but not
as far as California.
Speaker 1 (35:52):
That sounds amazing. Before we before I let you go,
I think that Ernest, your story is so important for
people here and I want people to connect with your son.
So tell us a couple of stories about who he was.
Speaker 2 (36:07):
He was.
Speaker 4 (36:09):
He was loving, a loving child. I swear anyone that
met him loved him dearly. He like I said, I
couldn't have asked for a better son. He He was
a blessing to me. Like I said. We we got
into baseball since he was small, and we lived for baseball.
(36:32):
He you know, training games. It was just something a
father's son deal that like I had never had before
in my life. And it was so great to have
something to share with my son. And also he loved hunting, fishing, camping.
(36:54):
I mean, we did so many things together. That's why
I always said he was my best friend, you know,
because he was always there, you know he was it
was always what are we going to do? What do
we want to do? And come on dad? You know
it was it was it was wonderful. I mean, I'm
(37:16):
missed that every day he is.
Speaker 1 (37:20):
I mean, the beautiful thing is that he couldn't have
been the boy that he was without having an amazing dad.
And the impact that he had on you as a
father is why you're fighting so hard for other parents today.
And I just got to tell you we are so
thankful for you and for your son.
Speaker 2 (37:39):
Thank you, mom, I appreciate that.
Speaker 1 (37:42):
Thank you both. Joel Wolskog and Ernest Ramirez, thank you
so much for being here. Everybody, buddy check out React nineteen.
Give us the website that they can go to, so
it's w w W. Thank you guys so much. Thank
you Tutor, and thank you all for joining us on
the Tutor Dixon Pod. For this episode and others, go
to Tutor diixonpodcast dot com. You can subscribe right there,
(38:04):
or head over to the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or
wherever you get your podcasts and join us next time
on the Tutor Dixon Podcast. Have a blast day.
Host
Buck Sexton
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Special Summer Offer: Exclusively on Apple Podcasts, try our Dateline Premium subscription completely free for one month! With Dateline Premium, you get every episode ad-free plus exclusive bonus content.
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!