December 13, 2023 • 31 mins
Bill O'Reilly and Sean sit down and review President Biden's shifting narrative surrounding his business dealings with Hunter Biden. We've moved from President Biden having nothing to do with Hunter Biden's business to language that is much less assured.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
All right, let us chet a.
Speaker 2 (00:34):
Simple man, all things simple man, self proclaimed Bill O'Reilly
All things O'Reilly at his website billoreilly dot com. It
has been ages, mister O'Reilly since I spoke to you.
It's great to have you on the program. It probably
will be our last show before Christmas. I want to
wish you and your family, even your children that you
call urchins, a merry Christmas and a very very happy
(00:57):
New Year.
Speaker 3 (00:59):
Well that's very nice, if you, Hannity, I'll accept those wishes.
Thank you.
Speaker 2 (01:04):
All right, So we just had James comeran for the hour.
We went through this whole rigamarole. Hunter, you know, doesn't
want to sit down for the deposition. Now we have
both James Comer and Jim Jordan. They have said that
Hunter has defied lawful subpoenas. They will now initiate contempt
of Congress proceedings and we will not have a well,
(01:27):
there will not be special treatment because his last name
is Biden. Now I just happen to find because I
have a Crackerjack team led by maybe your biggest fan, Linda,
and we've found Joe Biden on tape, answering the question
whether or not people who are subpoenaed and don't appear,
(01:47):
whether they should be arrested. You might want to hear this,
mister o'reiley. This should be on the nose spin Zone.
By the way, listen.
Speaker 1 (01:55):
By congressional subpoenas on the January sixth committee.
Speaker 4 (01:59):
I hope that the committee goes after him and holds
him accountable.
Speaker 1 (02:03):
Did any consecut.
Speaker 2 (02:04):
I do, yes, I think they should be prosecuted. So
is he saying that about his son Hunter?
Speaker 5 (02:10):
Now?
Speaker 3 (02:11):
No, because he doesn't know what he's saying.
Speaker 2 (02:15):
No, No, No. He was very clear there that if
you defy a congressional subpoena that you should be arrested.
Speaker 3 (02:23):
Yes, but he's not putting it into the context of
my son's doing the same thing. That's incapable. He can't
do that. He's not mentally up. But he's here. This
is a fascinating story because remember Steve Bannon went to
prison for four months.
Speaker 2 (02:41):
Well he didn't go to pre I think he's on appeal,
but he got sentenced to four months and a sixty
five hundred dollar fine.
Speaker 3 (02:46):
Right, But wasn't he he he was detained in some
way Bannon, was it house arrest or whatever? He was
detained and he had to pay sixty five hundred dollars
and he may very well have to send the rest
of his sentence in some kind of facility. Now that
puts Merrick Garland in a very difficult position because you
(03:11):
can't just do that to Bannon and go through the
whole procedure and not do it to Hunter Biden, can you?
Speaker 2 (03:18):
But they also did it to Peter Navarro. It's not
just Bannon.
Speaker 3 (03:22):
Well he's awaiting. Tomorrow's awaiting and we don't know what's
going to happen to him. But Bannon was sentenced to
four months in prison. So now Garlands sitting there, I
can guarantee you right at this moment in Washington, d C.
Going I gotta bring this guy in. He's got to
(03:44):
come in because I can't justify it, and you can't,
nobody can. How can you justify it by doing this
to Bannon, spending all taxpayer money prosecuting him, And it's
exactly the same thing that Hunter Biden did, exactly the
same thing. So I expect that will happen.
Speaker 2 (04:02):
Mister O'Reilly, you're a very smart man. What I'm going
to play for you is what I've been playing for
this audience, and what we have put together is a
shifting narrative. The narrative began when Joe Biden was running
for president that he never once spoke to his son
or his brother or anybody for that matter about their
(04:24):
farm business dealings. Then you will hear that evolve into
I've never talked to my son about his business. That
evolves into President Biden has never been in business with
his son and never invited into et cetera, et cetera.
And then today it evolved into Hunter saying that my
(04:47):
father is not financially involved in his businesses, and he
mentions barisma, etc. This is the evolution of or changing stories,
or the evolution of a lie, because with each new
piece of evidence that came out of either the ways
the Means Committee, or the Oversight Committee or the Judiciary committee,
(05:09):
they change the language. Words matter. Mister O'Reilly. You know
that because you have the word of the day every day.
But listen, how many.
Speaker 5 (05:17):
Times have you ever spoken to your son about his
overseas business dealing.
Speaker 4 (05:21):
I've never spoken my son about his overseas for the service.
Speaker 3 (05:24):
I have never discussed with my son, or my brother
or anyone else being having to deal with their business.
Speaker 5 (05:31):
Period One of your sons from our business associates is
claiming that you were on speakerphone a lot with them
talking business. Is that what?
Speaker 2 (05:39):
Never talked business in?
Speaker 3 (05:41):
I know you have a lousy question.
Speaker 2 (05:43):
Why is that a lousy question? Because it's not.
Speaker 6 (05:45):
True periods of the White House and the President still
stand behind his comment that he's never been involved and
has never even spoken to his son about.
Speaker 2 (05:54):
His So I've been asked this question a million times.
Speaker 3 (05:57):
The answer is not going to change. The answer remains
the same. The president and it was never in business
with his son.
Speaker 6 (06:02):
Can you categorically say that the President of United States
was not involved in those business dealings and did not
profit from any of them.
Speaker 4 (06:09):
From our side of the equation, I can tell you
that Hunter did not share his business with his dad.
I can tell you that he did not share money
from his businesses with his dad.
Speaker 3 (06:19):
Why you interacted with so many of your son and
brothers foreign business associates. I'm not going to comment that
I did not, and especially a bunch of lies and
interacts with either leerals associates. I did not. There's lies.
Speaker 4 (06:32):
Let me state as clearly as I can my father
was not financially involved in my business, not as a
practicing lawyer, not as a board member of Barisma, not
in my partnership with a Chinese private businessman, not in
my investments at home nor abroad, and certainly not as
an artist.
Speaker 2 (06:52):
Now, both Biden's light on the issue of getting money
from China. We'll get back to that in a minute.
What do you make mister O'Reilly simple man? Analysis of
the ever changing narrative since more and more evidence has
been coming forward.
Speaker 3 (07:08):
Well, this is lawyer talk that the Bidens are doing now,
and the lawyers know I think every American who wants
to know. Remember a lot of people believe what they
want to believe, so they don't want to believe that
Joe Biden did anything wrong. And that's what You're not
going to convince them, no matter how many soundbites you got,
(07:28):
they just won't do it. But the lawyer is there
in business to get the Biden's off, so they know
they can't go in to the original statement that I
never spoke about business with my son, and nobody believes that.
I mean, you don't fly to China on Air Force two,
(07:49):
which is a what fifteen sixteen hour flight, and you
don't have any conversation about what Hunter Biden's going to
do in China, Vice President none. Come on, you know, Look,
it comes a point where fair minded Americans who seek
information know what happened. And everybody knows that Jim and
(08:14):
Hunter Biden used the Vice President's office to get money
from foreign concerns. That's what happened. Now we have to
find out if Joe Biden himself profited directly from that
and how much he helped his brother and son grift,
(08:36):
because it was a grift, and what I mean by
that is there was no service granted in return for
the money.
Speaker 2 (08:45):
The bribery statue does not require that he benefited. However,
that Hunter Biden himself implicates his own father in his laptop,
But go ahead, let's advance it.
Speaker 3 (08:58):
We got to advance the story on the Hanny radio program.
Biden can't continue as president if there's linkage into him
getting financial benefit from his son or brother. He's done.
He's through. It's like Nixon Watergate tapes. That's it.
Speaker 2 (09:18):
Then let me ask you Bill when his own son
says on his own laptop complains he has to give
half his income to Pops when he complains, and there
are multiple emails about what account should we use to
pay off pops home repairs. I've been doing this for
eleven years. When Tony Bobolinski was in meetings with Joe
(09:38):
and Hunter, everybody knows that ten percent goes to the
big guy, meaning Joe Biden. When all of that evidence
and then and then Joe himself, through pseudonym emails, is
writing the financial guy, you know, three hundred and fifty
times or so. Is that not enough? Their twenty show
(09:59):
corp voriations ten Biden family members paid. That's an awful
lot of money, tens of millions of dollars, no services
apparently rendered, none that they've mentioned. Then, of course you
have the actions that he took as vice president. He
went against Obama administration policy five days after a phone
(10:20):
conversation with Barisa executives and Hunter when they were in
Dubai when they said they desperately needed DC help, and
he leveraged a billion dollars to get the prosecutor fired
in Ukraine who was investigating Barisma that was paying his
son Hunter millions. And Hunter admits he had no experience
and energy oil gas Ukraine and was addicted to drugs
(10:43):
at the time. Now, did he take official actions as
the ten twenty three forms suggests, and did he did
his family benefit because that would fit the bribery statue?
Speaker 3 (10:55):
Is it enough? It might be if America Garland lets
you do the closing statement?
Speaker 2 (11:03):
Is that a canswer? Oh, I'm sure that's going to happen.
Speaker 3 (11:07):
Bill me from the Attorney General saying look, I want
you to the closing statement. I heard you on the
radio with O'Reilly and so you come on it. It
might be enough. But there are two things outstanding. Number One,
the defense now is for all the money that was
floating around that when it wound up in Joe and
(11:28):
Jill Biden's pocket, it was payoffs for loans that the
Bidens had extended to their brother and their son. That's
the defense. Well, as Comer pointed out, where's the original.
Speaker 2 (11:45):
Loan, Well, they would be For example, Bill O'Reilly, if
I loaned you money, there would be bank show your
bank account exactly and show the date. And by the way,
as a matter of law, I'm sorry, good.
Speaker 3 (12:02):
Yeah. If the Bidens can't show they lent the money,
then guilty. Then they're guilty. That's pretty simple. You've got
the show in a statement, whether it's your bank account
or brokerage, that you transferred money for a loan to
Jim and Joe to Hunter and Jim. Okay, well, so far.
(12:24):
You would think if the White House did loan the
money that we'd all have that bank statement. Correct, they
would have dud.
Speaker 2 (12:32):
They would have been able to produce it. And by
the way, Bill, if you loan money, I believe it's
over fifteen thousand dollars a year, clare it. You got
to declare it well, and you also have to as
a matter of law, if I'm not mistake in charge
interest to make it officially a loon.
Speaker 3 (12:48):
And did that for my nephew. I just did that
for my nephew.
Speaker 2 (12:53):
Why didn't you just give them the money?
Speaker 3 (12:54):
Bill, you're rich, Well, whatever it may be, I'm a
good guy for much. And I said, look, the kid
is just you know, he needs to buy a home
and we're going to help him. But you have to
obey the irs loss on the law.
Speaker 2 (13:13):
I tell everybody follow every dot at I and cross
tea or they will get you.
Speaker 3 (13:17):
So circumstantially right now, all right. On December thirteenth, twelve
days before Christmas. Joe Biden is guilty. Circumstantially he's guilty,
but in a court of law, the jury can go
(13:38):
any way. So my posture is I'm already convinced that
Joe Biden is corrupt, as are you. We are both
convinced the President of the United States is a corrupt
man and has been for quite some time. That is
not enough. So what we need to do is advanced
(14:01):
the story. The impeachment inquiry should pass. The subpoenas have
to be enforced. Hunter Biden has to be charged by
Merrick Garland. All this stuff has to happen very quickly,
and I think it will. I really think that this
is the beginning of the end for Joe Biden.
Speaker 2 (14:20):
Mister O'Reilly, I agree with you completely. What does Bill
O'Reilly do on Christmas?
Speaker 3 (14:27):
You know, I don't brood on Christmas. It's one of
the few days of the year. I'm not brooding because
Irish guy's brewed. That's what we do for our hobbies.
Speaker 2 (14:37):
Oh my gosh, I'm not a bruder, but go ahead, yeah.
Speaker 3 (14:41):
You brew I've seen you brood, Kennedy, believe me. Oh
my gosh, breaking the halls. I live in a house
that's one hundred and ten years old. It's a great
Christmas house.
Speaker 2 (14:53):
I bet the heat works great in that house.
Speaker 3 (14:56):
It's actually comfortable. All the urchins are condu two orchids
are coming along with all of the rest of the family,
and we'll have a nice traditional Christmas. Because I believe
in I.
Speaker 2 (15:07):
Need to interview your children and find out what they
think about you calling them urchins, Kennedy.
Speaker 3 (15:13):
As long as I'm picking up their tabs, they don't.
Speaker 2 (15:16):
What I call them, all right, Bill, Bill O'Reilly, all
things simple man, all things Bill O'Reilly dot com. We
really appreciate you being with us.
Speaker 3 (15:27):
Bill and everybody go to Bill O'Reilly dot com for
the best Christmas gifts ever, will save you a ton
of money. And Merry Christmas to the Hannity Qlan. Thanks
for having you.
Speaker 2 (15:36):
Sean, all right, we appreciate it, Bill, Thank you, all right.
Eight hundred nine four one. Sean. If you want to
be a part of the program, call now, and maybe
if you disagree, I really want to hear from you.
Eight hundred ninety four one, Shawn, all right. We're awaiting
this vote on the official impeachment inquiry. It's expected to pass.
I think the only Republican that I've heard so far
(15:59):
that would vote no oh is ken buck In out
of Colorado. But you know, with Washington, he does never know.
Speaker 3 (16:06):
Uh.
Speaker 2 (16:07):
In the meantime, let us get to our busy phones.
All right, Rona's in San Diego, Coco Radio. What's going on, ron?
How are you? Thanks for checking in.
Speaker 5 (16:16):
I'm good, Sean, thanks for taking McCall. You are a
great American, sir, and it's a it's a privilege to
talk to you.
Speaker 2 (16:23):
I A privilege is mine. Thank you.
Speaker 5 (16:26):
I respectfully, UH disagree with you and Bill O'Reilly. I
don't think. I don't think anything is going to happen
to Hunter Biden or Joe Biden. They're gonna they're gonna
figure out a way to sweep with some of the carpet.
And it's, like you said before, it goes from it
goes from well, I never talked to my son about this,
(16:47):
and I never, you know, I never. It's just it's
just a you know, he's got the he's got the
deal J in his pocket, and I just don't think
that anything will come out of this, To be honest,
with yes, what are your thoughts?
Speaker 2 (17:02):
Well, you raise a good point. History would favor your
theory because nothing ever happened to Hillary. You know, we
had this, you know, Durham investigation, Horoitz investigation. Nothing happened
to the people involved in that. I can go back
and forth and back and forth, and the weaponization of
(17:23):
our justice system is real, and we have a dual
justice system, you know. For example, look at the issue
involving Hunter Biden today. And now we have Jim Jordan
and we have James Comer, by the way, both will
be on Hannity tonight, and he defied a lawful subpoena
and the usual standard investigation. If you are subpoenaed to testify,
(17:45):
you first subpoena, you first testify behind closed doors under oath.
And in that environment, it's not five minutes of republican
five minutes a Democrat where you can barely get a
thought out. No, it's an hour for a Republican, an
hour for a Democrat, and you really get to hone
in and dig down deep and get and get questions answered.
And to his credit, James Comer said, no, then we
(18:09):
can have the public hearing if you want to have
a public hearing. Hunter Biden went out there today and
he tried to make the case, I'm here, I'm ready
to testify at a public hearing. What are Republicans afraid of?
They're not afraid of anything. They're willing to give him
his public hearing. But just like every Trump, they had
(18:29):
to go behind closed doors first. And the sad thing
is is that the medium lies on behalf of the
Biden team. That they act as though that they want
to hide this behind closed doors. But that's exactly what
the Adam Shifts and did, Jamie Raskins of the world did,
and everybody else. That is the standard procedure. So now
(18:52):
as Comer and Jordan said, he defied what is a
lawful subpoena, they will now initiate content to Congress proceedings.
They will not provide special treatment because his last name
is Biden. Now, this whole sordid story, large part is
about the issue of special treatment for the Bidens. You know,
(19:14):
the idea that this guy Weiss investigated this for four
years and couldn't find he didn't want to charge Hunter
with anything, and then only because of the whistleblowers coming
out did they come up with a sweetheart deal. And
then only because of a brave judge in Delaware did
that sweetheart deal fall apart right before their eyes. They
(19:36):
made it to the finish line, they didn't cross it.
And only because you know, people like Rudy Giuliani's attorney,
Bob Costello, you know, got a copy of Hunter's laptop,
or we even in the position to know everything we know. Anyway,
those three factors, I will tell you provide what it
is to me, overwhelming, incontrovertible evidence Joe Biden's lies are
(19:58):
now being exposed. The American people see it when you
look at the Shell corporations, the number of family members paid,
lack of any services that they've been able to show
anybody that they provided. They had an opportunity to answer
all of that under oath today and they put on
a show. The media fell for the show. But I
would say this, this is why. Look, the main reason
(20:22):
Democrats ask for this impeachment vote today. They asked for
it by saying they're not going to cooperate. So once
it becomes an official impeachment inquiry, well that will empower
Jason Smith on the Houseways and Means Committee, Calmer on
the Oversight Committee and Jordan On Judiciary to be able
to get more evidence that is necessary for them to
(20:43):
complete their investigation. It has been a heavy lift the
whole time, getting suspicious activity reports, getting you know, witnesses
to come in and testify, and put evidence together, and
get financial records. It's been hard. But everything I see
so far, the evidence is overwhelming and it is incontrovertible.
(21:03):
And I believe that Joe Biden is in far deeper
trouble than anybody in the media or anybody in the
Democratic Party knows tonight, based on real, strong, solid evidence
and a whole lot of lies that they told. Does
that answer your question?
Speaker 5 (21:20):
Yes, sir, I hope you're right, Sean, I really do.
Speaker 2 (21:23):
All right, my friend, Let not your heart be trouble. Ron,
hang in there. Tory is in Wisconsin. Hey, Tory, how
are you?
Speaker 6 (21:30):
I'm good? How are you?
Speaker 2 (21:32):
I'm good? Thank you for calling.
Speaker 6 (21:34):
Yeah, you said you wouldn't get a liberal to call in.
Well I'm a liberal. I'm calling in.
Speaker 2 (21:39):
I liberal calling in Tory, the liberal from Wisconsin.
Speaker 3 (21:43):
I am all right.
Speaker 2 (21:45):
So what's on your mind today? What do you think
of all this?
Speaker 6 (21:48):
Pardon me?
Speaker 2 (21:50):
What do you think of all this, did Joe Biden?
Will you be honest enough to admit that when he
said over and over again that not one time did
he ever talked to his son, brother, or anybody for
that matter, about their Foreigm business dealings, will you acknowledge
that was a lie?
Speaker 6 (22:06):
Absolutely?
Speaker 2 (22:08):
Okay? Will you acknowledge that, in fact, Joe Biden took
official action when he fired the prosecutor in Ukraine who
was investigating his son and the company that was paying
him millions, even though his son had no experience in energy, oil,
gas or Ukraine. Would you acknowledge that by firing that prosecutor,
(22:30):
he took official action that financially benefited his family.
Speaker 6 (22:35):
I think that has to play out in the courts.
Speaker 2 (22:39):
Okay. Why else would a vice president give me any
idea that you may have. Why would a vice president
go against administration policy, leverage a billion dollars, give a
timeline of six hours to fire some prosecutor in Ukraine
or he's not going to give them the money. Why
would a vice president ever involve him up in something
(23:00):
like that if it didn't impact his own family.
Speaker 6 (23:04):
I think it's extremely suspect, and I think it deserves
to be played out in the courts.
Speaker 2 (23:10):
You do know that if he took official action as
that ten twenty three forms suggests, and that he took
official action that benefited his family financially, you do know
that he would be guilty of bribery based on the
statutory language in federal law. You do know that, right,
I do. So you're saying there's a good chance that
Joe Biden was bribed.
Speaker 6 (23:34):
I am saying that it needs to play out in
the courts, just as anything else. I don't think it's
an either or. I think if Biden or Trump or
anybody else broke the law, the courts need to take
care of it.
Speaker 2 (23:52):
Don't you find it odd that Hunter Biden who went
on Good Morning America and was asked if he had
any experience in Ukraine or oil or gas or energy,
that he said he had none. Don't you find it odd?
He got paid millions from Ukraine from an energy company
and millions from China from an energy company. Do you
(24:15):
find that odd?
Speaker 5 (24:19):
Oh?
Speaker 2 (24:19):
Oh, one other thing. And he was an admitted drug
addict at the time.
Speaker 6 (24:26):
But Seawn, don't you think.
Speaker 2 (24:28):
No, no, no, I asked you a question. Don't you
do you think that sounds highly unusual to you and
very suspicious.
Speaker 6 (24:36):
I think it sounds very suspicious. It sounds very illegal,
and it also sounds like something that is done on
a regular basis with politics.
Speaker 2 (24:46):
Forget about other people. I'm talking about the Bidens. Now,
we spent enough time over the last five six years
talking about the Trumps. So Joe Biden Hunter Biden had
no business being paid millions with no experience, did he?
Speaker 6 (25:00):
Okay? But Sean, you've talked about Trump, but you were
always standing up for him and finding excuses for him,
and I'm telling you there's no excuse for anybody doing this.
Speaker 2 (25:11):
Well, do you have any evidence that Donald Trump took
a bribe. I've never heard that allegation.
Speaker 6 (25:19):
No, not that Donald Trump took a bribe.
Speaker 2 (25:21):
What is the worst thing in your mind that Donald
Trump did.
Speaker 6 (25:28):
I think he started the insurrection.
Speaker 2 (25:32):
He started the insurrection. Now you're talking about his speech
on January sixth. I am the one in which he said,
now many of you will peacefully and patriotically march to
the Capitol so your voices will be heard. That speech.
I know that everyone here will soon be marching over
to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically, make your
(25:54):
voices heard.
Speaker 6 (25:57):
Yes, that speech?
Speaker 2 (25:59):
Ye, so that speech that he said peacefully patriotically. So
you think that that proves he was encouraging some type
of insurrection? Yes, okay, I think you'd have a hard time.
I mean, look, I think Donald Trump can't get a
fair hearing in DC. I don't think you can get
a fair one in New York or Volton County. Do
(26:20):
you not see the danger of where we are? Do
you not see that?
Speaker 3 (26:25):
You know?
Speaker 2 (26:25):
With all of Hunter's issues, including the gun charge, why
why hasn't he been charged? He didn't register under the
rules of the under Pharaoh laws. All the amounts of money,
tens of millions of dollars from our top geo political foes, Russia, China,
you know, Kazakhstan, Ukraine, Romania. You know. Why would Joe
(26:48):
Biden lie about ever meeting Hunter's business partners when he
was at dinner with them and we have photographic evidence.
Why would he lie about being on phone calls with
Hunter's business partners? Why do you think he lied about
all that?
Speaker 6 (27:02):
The only reason anybody lies is to hide something. I'm
agreeing with you on that shot.
Speaker 2 (27:08):
Really really, so you don't really think for that highly
of Joe Biden. I could tell that.
Speaker 6 (27:14):
I voted for Joe Biden, and I'm very sorry that
I did. But I'm also a never trumper. I'm not saying.
Speaker 2 (27:20):
Who would you like to be president? You'd vote for me? Right?
Speaker 6 (27:25):
If I had to vote today? I don't know. I
don't know.
Speaker 2 (27:30):
Okay, that's a fair answer. I can accept that, all right, Corey.
You know what you sound like a nice lady. I
don't know what it is, the tony, your voice, the cadence,
the pitch. It's just perfect. God bless you have a
great holiday. Okay.
Speaker 6 (27:43):
I listen to you every day on my ride home
from work because I like to hear the other side.
Speaker 2 (27:50):
Am I the other side to you?
Speaker 6 (27:53):
The other side? But you are also, I believe, honest
and moderate, and I enjoy listening. Thank you.
Speaker 2 (28:01):
I'm very glad you're out there listening. I don't get
to pursue my dream doing this every day. But for
people that agree and disagree with me, you're welcome to
call any time, Okay.
Speaker 6 (28:11):
I always want to hear the other side.
Speaker 2 (28:14):
Paul in Florida, the Free State of Florida, Hey Paul,
how are you?
Speaker 3 (28:18):
Hey?
Speaker 2 (28:18):
Sean what's going on, sir.
Speaker 5 (28:21):
I think the situation for Hunter is being managed so
he can be the best senator from Delaware, so you
can keep Abiden back in the Senate.
Speaker 2 (28:31):
By the way, every Republican as of now has voted
on the impeachment inquiry two hundred and sixteen yays. That
means who would move forward? It looks like this is
going to win in the House of Representatives to twelve against.
It looks like that motional pass.
Speaker 5 (28:47):
Thank god.
Speaker 2 (28:50):
Yeah, looks like certainly looking like it. Anyway, I'll come
back with the answer when we come back. Eight hundred
and ninety four one, Shawn is our number. Hey, listen,
don't forget about Preborn with your end of the year
giving Linda, did you notice that the Biden administration gave
groups like Planned Parenthood and including Planned Parenthood over two
billion dollars? Yeah, it's horrible. Talk about like using your
tax dollars against us.
Speaker 3 (29:11):
It's awful.
Speaker 2 (29:12):
Well, and then you have groups like Preborn. They don't
get a penny from the federal government. They offer three
four D ultrasounds to any expecting mom, They offer counseling services,
they help moms after they have babies, and what they've
discovered is through the science of ultrasound. When they introduce
expecting moms to the miracle of birth within them, and
those moms here their heartbeat and they get to see
(29:33):
facial features, can count fingers and toes. More women than
ever before are choosing life anyway. The only way this
great mission continues is through the generosity of the pro
life community, those that believe in the sanctity of life,
and this holiday season that it's the perfect time to
give because right now they have a matching grant going on,
and that means whatever you donate, it will be twice
(29:56):
what it was worth because somebody else's imagining it anyway,
Born dot com, slash Sean Sea n or you can
take out your cell phone dial pound two fifty and
say the keyword baby. By the way, the House appears
to have the impeachment inquiry votes. It looks like this
is a done deal. We'll have more on the other side.
Hannity Tonight, Jim James Comer, Jim Jordan, and Jason Smith
(30:19):
all on together nine Eastern. All right, it's official. The
House voted to open a Biden official of Biden impeachment inquiry.
As we have been anticipating all day. We have on
the program tonight on Hannity nine Eastern on the Fox
News Channel. Will load it up with this. We have
James Comer, we have Jason Smith, and we also have
(30:44):
Jim Jordan is going to join us. Without those three,
that wouldn't have happened. We'll get to all of that tonight.
That's all coming up nine eastern. We hope you'll sell
you DVR Hannity on the Fox News Channel. And how
important this is also Hunter Biden speaks out today. We'll
get to all of that, and we'll have the latest
on the illegal immigrant crisis. We have Senator Joe Manchon
(31:06):
will join us tonight on the show. We have Ron
de Santis, and we have the great one, Mark Levin
will join us. Set you DVR Hannity nine Eastern on
the Fox News Channel. This is a big step because
all of the stonewalling now must come to an end,
and now they have the ability to do it in
the House and Joe Biden's White House will have to cooperate.
(31:26):
We'll see you tonight at nine. Back here tomorrow. Thank
you for making the show possible. See you tonight
All right, let us chet a.
Speaker 2 (00:34):
Simple man, all things simple man, self proclaimed Bill O'Reilly
All things O'Reilly at his website billoreilly dot com. It
has been ages, mister O'Reilly since I spoke to you.
It's great to have you on the program. It probably
will be our last show before Christmas. I want to
wish you and your family, even your children that you
call urchins, a merry Christmas and a very very happy
(00:57):
New Year.
Speaker 3 (00:59):
Well that's very nice, if you, Hannity, I'll accept those wishes.
Thank you.
Speaker 2 (01:04):
All right, So we just had James comeran for the hour.
We went through this whole rigamarole. Hunter, you know, doesn't
want to sit down for the deposition. Now we have
both James Comer and Jim Jordan. They have said that
Hunter has defied lawful subpoenas. They will now initiate contempt
of Congress proceedings and we will not have a well,
(01:27):
there will not be special treatment because his last name
is Biden. Now I just happen to find because I
have a Crackerjack team led by maybe your biggest fan, Linda,
and we've found Joe Biden on tape, answering the question
whether or not people who are subpoenaed and don't appear,
(01:47):
whether they should be arrested. You might want to hear this,
mister o'reiley. This should be on the nose spin Zone.
By the way, listen.
Speaker 1 (01:55):
By congressional subpoenas on the January sixth committee.
Speaker 4 (01:59):
I hope that the committee goes after him and holds
him accountable.
Speaker 1 (02:03):
Did any consecut.
Speaker 2 (02:04):
I do, yes, I think they should be prosecuted. So
is he saying that about his son Hunter?
Speaker 5 (02:10):
Now?
Speaker 3 (02:11):
No, because he doesn't know what he's saying.
Speaker 2 (02:15):
No, No, No. He was very clear there that if
you defy a congressional subpoena that you should be arrested.
Speaker 3 (02:23):
Yes, but he's not putting it into the context of
my son's doing the same thing. That's incapable. He can't
do that. He's not mentally up. But he's here. This
is a fascinating story because remember Steve Bannon went to
prison for four months.
Speaker 2 (02:41):
Well he didn't go to pre I think he's on appeal,
but he got sentenced to four months and a sixty
five hundred dollar fine.
Speaker 3 (02:46):
Right, But wasn't he he he was detained in some
way Bannon, was it house arrest or whatever? He was
detained and he had to pay sixty five hundred dollars
and he may very well have to send the rest
of his sentence in some kind of facility. Now that
puts Merrick Garland in a very difficult position because you
(03:11):
can't just do that to Bannon and go through the
whole procedure and not do it to Hunter Biden, can you?
Speaker 2 (03:18):
But they also did it to Peter Navarro. It's not
just Bannon.
Speaker 3 (03:22):
Well he's awaiting. Tomorrow's awaiting and we don't know what's
going to happen to him. But Bannon was sentenced to
four months in prison. So now Garlands sitting there, I
can guarantee you right at this moment in Washington, d C.
Going I gotta bring this guy in. He's got to
(03:44):
come in because I can't justify it, and you can't,
nobody can. How can you justify it by doing this
to Bannon, spending all taxpayer money prosecuting him, And it's
exactly the same thing that Hunter Biden did, exactly the
same thing. So I expect that will happen.
Speaker 2 (04:02):
Mister O'Reilly, you're a very smart man. What I'm going
to play for you is what I've been playing for
this audience, and what we have put together is a
shifting narrative. The narrative began when Joe Biden was running
for president that he never once spoke to his son
or his brother or anybody for that matter about their
(04:24):
farm business dealings. Then you will hear that evolve into
I've never talked to my son about his business. That
evolves into President Biden has never been in business with
his son and never invited into et cetera, et cetera.
And then today it evolved into Hunter saying that my
(04:47):
father is not financially involved in his businesses, and he
mentions barisma, etc. This is the evolution of or changing stories,
or the evolution of a lie, because with each new
piece of evidence that came out of either the ways
the Means Committee, or the Oversight Committee or the Judiciary committee,
(05:09):
they change the language. Words matter. Mister O'Reilly. You know
that because you have the word of the day every day.
But listen, how many.
Speaker 5 (05:17):
Times have you ever spoken to your son about his
overseas business dealing.
Speaker 4 (05:21):
I've never spoken my son about his overseas for the service.
Speaker 3 (05:24):
I have never discussed with my son, or my brother
or anyone else being having to deal with their business.
Speaker 5 (05:31):
Period One of your sons from our business associates is
claiming that you were on speakerphone a lot with them
talking business. Is that what?
Speaker 2 (05:39):
Never talked business in?
Speaker 3 (05:41):
I know you have a lousy question.
Speaker 2 (05:43):
Why is that a lousy question? Because it's not.
Speaker 6 (05:45):
True periods of the White House and the President still
stand behind his comment that he's never been involved and
has never even spoken to his son about.
Speaker 2 (05:54):
His So I've been asked this question a million times.
Speaker 3 (05:57):
The answer is not going to change. The answer remains
the same. The president and it was never in business
with his son.
Speaker 6 (06:02):
Can you categorically say that the President of United States
was not involved in those business dealings and did not
profit from any of them.
Speaker 4 (06:09):
From our side of the equation, I can tell you
that Hunter did not share his business with his dad.
I can tell you that he did not share money
from his businesses with his dad.
Speaker 3 (06:19):
Why you interacted with so many of your son and
brothers foreign business associates. I'm not going to comment that
I did not, and especially a bunch of lies and
interacts with either leerals associates. I did not. There's lies.
Speaker 4 (06:32):
Let me state as clearly as I can my father
was not financially involved in my business, not as a
practicing lawyer, not as a board member of Barisma, not
in my partnership with a Chinese private businessman, not in
my investments at home nor abroad, and certainly not as
an artist.
Speaker 2 (06:52):
Now, both Biden's light on the issue of getting money
from China. We'll get back to that in a minute.
What do you make mister O'Reilly simple man? Analysis of
the ever changing narrative since more and more evidence has
been coming forward.
Speaker 3 (07:08):
Well, this is lawyer talk that the Bidens are doing now,
and the lawyers know I think every American who wants
to know. Remember a lot of people believe what they
want to believe, so they don't want to believe that
Joe Biden did anything wrong. And that's what You're not
going to convince them, no matter how many soundbites you got,
(07:28):
they just won't do it. But the lawyer is there
in business to get the Biden's off, so they know
they can't go in to the original statement that I
never spoke about business with my son, and nobody believes that.
I mean, you don't fly to China on Air Force two,
(07:49):
which is a what fifteen sixteen hour flight, and you
don't have any conversation about what Hunter Biden's going to
do in China, Vice President none. Come on, you know, Look,
it comes a point where fair minded Americans who seek
information know what happened. And everybody knows that Jim and
(08:14):
Hunter Biden used the Vice President's office to get money
from foreign concerns. That's what happened. Now we have to
find out if Joe Biden himself profited directly from that
and how much he helped his brother and son grift,
(08:36):
because it was a grift, and what I mean by
that is there was no service granted in return for
the money.
Speaker 2 (08:45):
The bribery statue does not require that he benefited. However,
that Hunter Biden himself implicates his own father in his laptop,
But go ahead, let's advance it.
Speaker 3 (08:58):
We got to advance the story on the Hanny radio program.
Biden can't continue as president if there's linkage into him
getting financial benefit from his son or brother. He's done.
He's through. It's like Nixon Watergate tapes. That's it.
Speaker 2 (09:18):
Then let me ask you Bill when his own son
says on his own laptop complains he has to give
half his income to Pops when he complains, and there
are multiple emails about what account should we use to
pay off pops home repairs. I've been doing this for
eleven years. When Tony Bobolinski was in meetings with Joe
(09:38):
and Hunter, everybody knows that ten percent goes to the
big guy, meaning Joe Biden. When all of that evidence
and then and then Joe himself, through pseudonym emails, is
writing the financial guy, you know, three hundred and fifty
times or so. Is that not enough? Their twenty show
(09:59):
corp voriations ten Biden family members paid. That's an awful
lot of money, tens of millions of dollars, no services
apparently rendered, none that they've mentioned. Then, of course you
have the actions that he took as vice president. He
went against Obama administration policy five days after a phone
(10:20):
conversation with Barisa executives and Hunter when they were in
Dubai when they said they desperately needed DC help, and
he leveraged a billion dollars to get the prosecutor fired
in Ukraine who was investigating Barisma that was paying his
son Hunter millions. And Hunter admits he had no experience
and energy oil gas Ukraine and was addicted to drugs
(10:43):
at the time. Now, did he take official actions as
the ten twenty three forms suggests, and did he did
his family benefit because that would fit the bribery statue?
Speaker 3 (10:55):
Is it enough? It might be if America Garland lets
you do the closing statement?
Speaker 2 (11:03):
Is that a canswer? Oh, I'm sure that's going to happen.
Speaker 3 (11:07):
Bill me from the Attorney General saying look, I want
you to the closing statement. I heard you on the
radio with O'Reilly and so you come on it. It
might be enough. But there are two things outstanding. Number One,
the defense now is for all the money that was
floating around that when it wound up in Joe and
(11:28):
Jill Biden's pocket, it was payoffs for loans that the
Bidens had extended to their brother and their son. That's
the defense. Well, as Comer pointed out, where's the original.
Speaker 2 (11:45):
Loan, Well, they would be For example, Bill O'Reilly, if
I loaned you money, there would be bank show your
bank account exactly and show the date. And by the way,
as a matter of law, I'm sorry, good.
Speaker 3 (12:02):
Yeah. If the Bidens can't show they lent the money,
then guilty. Then they're guilty. That's pretty simple. You've got
the show in a statement, whether it's your bank account
or brokerage, that you transferred money for a loan to
Jim and Joe to Hunter and Jim. Okay, well, so far.
(12:24):
You would think if the White House did loan the
money that we'd all have that bank statement. Correct, they
would have dud.
Speaker 2 (12:32):
They would have been able to produce it. And by
the way, Bill, if you loan money, I believe it's
over fifteen thousand dollars a year, clare it. You got
to declare it well, and you also have to as
a matter of law, if I'm not mistake in charge
interest to make it officially a loon.
Speaker 3 (12:48):
And did that for my nephew. I just did that
for my nephew.
Speaker 2 (12:53):
Why didn't you just give them the money?
Speaker 3 (12:54):
Bill, you're rich, Well, whatever it may be, I'm a
good guy for much. And I said, look, the kid
is just you know, he needs to buy a home
and we're going to help him. But you have to
obey the irs loss on the law.
Speaker 2 (13:13):
I tell everybody follow every dot at I and cross
tea or they will get you.
Speaker 3 (13:17):
So circumstantially right now, all right. On December thirteenth, twelve
days before Christmas. Joe Biden is guilty. Circumstantially he's guilty,
but in a court of law, the jury can go
(13:38):
any way. So my posture is I'm already convinced that
Joe Biden is corrupt, as are you. We are both
convinced the President of the United States is a corrupt
man and has been for quite some time. That is
not enough. So what we need to do is advanced
(14:01):
the story. The impeachment inquiry should pass. The subpoenas have
to be enforced. Hunter Biden has to be charged by
Merrick Garland. All this stuff has to happen very quickly,
and I think it will. I really think that this
is the beginning of the end for Joe Biden.
Speaker 2 (14:20):
Mister O'Reilly, I agree with you completely. What does Bill
O'Reilly do on Christmas?
Speaker 3 (14:27):
You know, I don't brood on Christmas. It's one of
the few days of the year. I'm not brooding because
Irish guy's brewed. That's what we do for our hobbies.
Speaker 2 (14:37):
Oh my gosh, I'm not a bruder, but go ahead, yeah.
Speaker 3 (14:41):
You brew I've seen you brood, Kennedy, believe me. Oh
my gosh, breaking the halls. I live in a house
that's one hundred and ten years old. It's a great
Christmas house.
Speaker 2 (14:53):
I bet the heat works great in that house.
Speaker 3 (14:56):
It's actually comfortable. All the urchins are condu two orchids
are coming along with all of the rest of the family,
and we'll have a nice traditional Christmas. Because I believe
in I.
Speaker 2 (15:07):
Need to interview your children and find out what they
think about you calling them urchins, Kennedy.
Speaker 3 (15:13):
As long as I'm picking up their tabs, they don't.
Speaker 2 (15:16):
What I call them, all right, Bill, Bill O'Reilly, all
things simple man, all things Bill O'Reilly dot com. We
really appreciate you being with us.
Speaker 3 (15:27):
Bill and everybody go to Bill O'Reilly dot com for
the best Christmas gifts ever, will save you a ton
of money. And Merry Christmas to the Hannity Qlan. Thanks
for having you.
Speaker 2 (15:36):
Sean, all right, we appreciate it, Bill, Thank you, all right.
Eight hundred nine four one. Sean. If you want to
be a part of the program, call now, and maybe
if you disagree, I really want to hear from you.
Eight hundred ninety four one, Shawn, all right. We're awaiting
this vote on the official impeachment inquiry. It's expected to pass.
I think the only Republican that I've heard so far
(15:59):
that would vote no oh is ken buck In out
of Colorado. But you know, with Washington, he does never know.
Speaker 3 (16:06):
Uh.
Speaker 2 (16:07):
In the meantime, let us get to our busy phones.
All right, Rona's in San Diego, Coco Radio. What's going on, ron?
How are you? Thanks for checking in.
Speaker 5 (16:16):
I'm good, Sean, thanks for taking McCall. You are a
great American, sir, and it's a it's a privilege to
talk to you.
Speaker 2 (16:23):
I A privilege is mine. Thank you.
Speaker 5 (16:26):
I respectfully, UH disagree with you and Bill O'Reilly. I
don't think. I don't think anything is going to happen
to Hunter Biden or Joe Biden. They're gonna they're gonna
figure out a way to sweep with some of the carpet.
And it's, like you said before, it goes from it
goes from well, I never talked to my son about this,
(16:47):
and I never, you know, I never. It's just it's
just a you know, he's got the he's got the
deal J in his pocket, and I just don't think
that anything will come out of this, To be honest,
with yes, what are your thoughts?
Speaker 2 (17:02):
Well, you raise a good point. History would favor your
theory because nothing ever happened to Hillary. You know, we
had this, you know, Durham investigation, Horoitz investigation. Nothing happened
to the people involved in that. I can go back
and forth and back and forth, and the weaponization of
(17:23):
our justice system is real, and we have a dual
justice system, you know. For example, look at the issue
involving Hunter Biden today. And now we have Jim Jordan
and we have James Comer, by the way, both will
be on Hannity tonight, and he defied a lawful subpoena
and the usual standard investigation. If you are subpoenaed to testify,
(17:45):
you first subpoena, you first testify behind closed doors under oath.
And in that environment, it's not five minutes of republican
five minutes a Democrat where you can barely get a
thought out. No, it's an hour for a Republican, an
hour for a Democrat, and you really get to hone
in and dig down deep and get and get questions answered.
And to his credit, James Comer said, no, then we
(18:09):
can have the public hearing if you want to have
a public hearing. Hunter Biden went out there today and
he tried to make the case, I'm here, I'm ready
to testify at a public hearing. What are Republicans afraid of?
They're not afraid of anything. They're willing to give him
his public hearing. But just like every Trump, they had
(18:29):
to go behind closed doors first. And the sad thing
is is that the medium lies on behalf of the
Biden team. That they act as though that they want
to hide this behind closed doors. But that's exactly what
the Adam Shifts and did, Jamie Raskins of the world did,
and everybody else. That is the standard procedure. So now
(18:52):
as Comer and Jordan said, he defied what is a
lawful subpoena, they will now initiate content to Congress proceedings.
They will not provide special treatment because his last name
is Biden. Now, this whole sordid story, large part is
about the issue of special treatment for the Bidens. You know,
(19:14):
the idea that this guy Weiss investigated this for four
years and couldn't find he didn't want to charge Hunter
with anything, and then only because of the whistleblowers coming
out did they come up with a sweetheart deal. And
then only because of a brave judge in Delaware did
that sweetheart deal fall apart right before their eyes. They
(19:36):
made it to the finish line, they didn't cross it.
And only because you know, people like Rudy Giuliani's attorney,
Bob Costello, you know, got a copy of Hunter's laptop,
or we even in the position to know everything we know. Anyway,
those three factors, I will tell you provide what it
is to me, overwhelming, incontrovertible evidence Joe Biden's lies are
(19:58):
now being exposed. The American people see it when you
look at the Shell corporations, the number of family members paid,
lack of any services that they've been able to show
anybody that they provided. They had an opportunity to answer
all of that under oath today and they put on
a show. The media fell for the show. But I
would say this, this is why. Look, the main reason
(20:22):
Democrats ask for this impeachment vote today. They asked for
it by saying they're not going to cooperate. So once
it becomes an official impeachment inquiry, well that will empower
Jason Smith on the Houseways and Means Committee, Calmer on
the Oversight Committee and Jordan On Judiciary to be able
to get more evidence that is necessary for them to
(20:43):
complete their investigation. It has been a heavy lift the
whole time, getting suspicious activity reports, getting you know, witnesses
to come in and testify, and put evidence together, and
get financial records. It's been hard. But everything I see
so far, the evidence is overwhelming and it is incontrovertible.
(21:03):
And I believe that Joe Biden is in far deeper
trouble than anybody in the media or anybody in the
Democratic Party knows tonight, based on real, strong, solid evidence
and a whole lot of lies that they told. Does
that answer your question?
Speaker 5 (21:20):
Yes, sir, I hope you're right, Sean, I really do.
Speaker 2 (21:23):
All right, my friend, Let not your heart be trouble. Ron,
hang in there. Tory is in Wisconsin. Hey, Tory, how
are you?
Speaker 6 (21:30):
I'm good? How are you?
Speaker 2 (21:32):
I'm good? Thank you for calling.
Speaker 6 (21:34):
Yeah, you said you wouldn't get a liberal to call in.
Well I'm a liberal. I'm calling in.
Speaker 2 (21:39):
I liberal calling in Tory, the liberal from Wisconsin.
Speaker 3 (21:43):
I am all right.
Speaker 2 (21:45):
So what's on your mind today? What do you think
of all this?
Speaker 6 (21:48):
Pardon me?
Speaker 2 (21:50):
What do you think of all this, did Joe Biden?
Will you be honest enough to admit that when he
said over and over again that not one time did
he ever talked to his son, brother, or anybody for
that matter, about their Foreigm business dealings, will you acknowledge
that was a lie?
Speaker 6 (22:06):
Absolutely?
Speaker 2 (22:08):
Okay? Will you acknowledge that, in fact, Joe Biden took
official action when he fired the prosecutor in Ukraine who
was investigating his son and the company that was paying
him millions, even though his son had no experience in energy, oil,
gas or Ukraine. Would you acknowledge that by firing that prosecutor,
(22:30):
he took official action that financially benefited his family.
Speaker 6 (22:35):
I think that has to play out in the courts.
Speaker 2 (22:39):
Okay. Why else would a vice president give me any
idea that you may have. Why would a vice president
go against administration policy, leverage a billion dollars, give a
timeline of six hours to fire some prosecutor in Ukraine
or he's not going to give them the money. Why
would a vice president ever involve him up in something
(23:00):
like that if it didn't impact his own family.
Speaker 6 (23:04):
I think it's extremely suspect, and I think it deserves
to be played out in the courts.
Speaker 2 (23:10):
You do know that if he took official action as
that ten twenty three forms suggests, and that he took
official action that benefited his family financially, you do know
that he would be guilty of bribery based on the
statutory language in federal law. You do know that, right,
I do. So you're saying there's a good chance that
Joe Biden was bribed.
Speaker 6 (23:34):
I am saying that it needs to play out in
the courts, just as anything else. I don't think it's
an either or. I think if Biden or Trump or
anybody else broke the law, the courts need to take
care of it.
Speaker 2 (23:52):
Don't you find it odd that Hunter Biden who went
on Good Morning America and was asked if he had
any experience in Ukraine or oil or gas or energy,
that he said he had none. Don't you find it odd?
He got paid millions from Ukraine from an energy company
and millions from China from an energy company. Do you
(24:15):
find that odd?
Speaker 5 (24:19):
Oh?
Speaker 2 (24:19):
Oh, one other thing. And he was an admitted drug
addict at the time.
Speaker 6 (24:26):
But Seawn, don't you think.
Speaker 2 (24:28):
No, no, no, I asked you a question. Don't you
do you think that sounds highly unusual to you and
very suspicious.
Speaker 6 (24:36):
I think it sounds very suspicious. It sounds very illegal,
and it also sounds like something that is done on
a regular basis with politics.
Speaker 2 (24:46):
Forget about other people. I'm talking about the Bidens. Now,
we spent enough time over the last five six years
talking about the Trumps. So Joe Biden Hunter Biden had
no business being paid millions with no experience, did he?
Speaker 6 (25:00):
Okay? But Sean, you've talked about Trump, but you were
always standing up for him and finding excuses for him,
and I'm telling you there's no excuse for anybody doing this.
Speaker 2 (25:11):
Well, do you have any evidence that Donald Trump took
a bribe. I've never heard that allegation.
Speaker 6 (25:19):
No, not that Donald Trump took a bribe.
Speaker 2 (25:21):
What is the worst thing in your mind that Donald
Trump did.
Speaker 6 (25:28):
I think he started the insurrection.
Speaker 2 (25:32):
He started the insurrection. Now you're talking about his speech
on January sixth. I am the one in which he said,
now many of you will peacefully and patriotically march to
the Capitol so your voices will be heard. That speech.
I know that everyone here will soon be marching over
to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically, make your
(25:54):
voices heard.
Speaker 6 (25:57):
Yes, that speech?
Speaker 2 (25:59):
Ye, so that speech that he said peacefully patriotically. So
you think that that proves he was encouraging some type
of insurrection? Yes, okay, I think you'd have a hard time.
I mean, look, I think Donald Trump can't get a
fair hearing in DC. I don't think you can get
a fair one in New York or Volton County. Do
(26:20):
you not see the danger of where we are? Do
you not see that?
Speaker 3 (26:25):
You know?
Speaker 2 (26:25):
With all of Hunter's issues, including the gun charge, why
why hasn't he been charged? He didn't register under the
rules of the under Pharaoh laws. All the amounts of money,
tens of millions of dollars from our top geo political foes, Russia, China,
you know, Kazakhstan, Ukraine, Romania. You know. Why would Joe
(26:48):
Biden lie about ever meeting Hunter's business partners when he
was at dinner with them and we have photographic evidence.
Why would he lie about being on phone calls with
Hunter's business partners? Why do you think he lied about
all that?
Speaker 6 (27:02):
The only reason anybody lies is to hide something. I'm
agreeing with you on that shot.
Speaker 2 (27:08):
Really really, so you don't really think for that highly
of Joe Biden. I could tell that.
Speaker 6 (27:14):
I voted for Joe Biden, and I'm very sorry that
I did. But I'm also a never trumper. I'm not saying.
Speaker 2 (27:20):
Who would you like to be president? You'd vote for me? Right?
Speaker 6 (27:25):
If I had to vote today? I don't know. I
don't know.
Speaker 2 (27:30):
Okay, that's a fair answer. I can accept that, all right, Corey.
You know what you sound like a nice lady. I
don't know what it is, the tony, your voice, the cadence,
the pitch. It's just perfect. God bless you have a
great holiday. Okay.
Speaker 6 (27:43):
I listen to you every day on my ride home
from work because I like to hear the other side.
Speaker 2 (27:50):
Am I the other side to you?
Speaker 6 (27:53):
The other side? But you are also, I believe, honest
and moderate, and I enjoy listening. Thank you.
Speaker 2 (28:01):
I'm very glad you're out there listening. I don't get
to pursue my dream doing this every day. But for
people that agree and disagree with me, you're welcome to
call any time, Okay.
Speaker 6 (28:11):
I always want to hear the other side.
Speaker 2 (28:14):
Paul in Florida, the Free State of Florida, Hey Paul,
how are you?
Speaker 3 (28:18):
Hey?
Speaker 2 (28:18):
Sean what's going on, sir.
Speaker 5 (28:21):
I think the situation for Hunter is being managed so
he can be the best senator from Delaware, so you
can keep Abiden back in the Senate.
Speaker 2 (28:31):
By the way, every Republican as of now has voted
on the impeachment inquiry two hundred and sixteen yays. That
means who would move forward? It looks like this is
going to win in the House of Representatives to twelve against.
It looks like that motional pass.
Speaker 5 (28:47):
Thank god.
Speaker 2 (28:50):
Yeah, looks like certainly looking like it. Anyway, I'll come
back with the answer when we come back. Eight hundred
and ninety four one, Shawn is our number. Hey, listen,
don't forget about Preborn with your end of the year
giving Linda, did you notice that the Biden administration gave
groups like Planned Parenthood and including Planned Parenthood over two
billion dollars? Yeah, it's horrible. Talk about like using your
tax dollars against us.
Speaker 3 (29:11):
It's awful.
Speaker 2 (29:12):
Well, and then you have groups like Preborn. They don't
get a penny from the federal government. They offer three
four D ultrasounds to any expecting mom, They offer counseling services,
they help moms after they have babies, and what they've
discovered is through the science of ultrasound. When they introduce
expecting moms to the miracle of birth within them, and
those moms here their heartbeat and they get to see
(29:33):
facial features, can count fingers and toes. More women than
ever before are choosing life anyway. The only way this
great mission continues is through the generosity of the pro
life community, those that believe in the sanctity of life,
and this holiday season that it's the perfect time to
give because right now they have a matching grant going on,
and that means whatever you donate, it will be twice
(29:56):
what it was worth because somebody else's imagining it anyway,
Born dot com, slash Sean Sea n or you can
take out your cell phone dial pound two fifty and
say the keyword baby. By the way, the House appears
to have the impeachment inquiry votes. It looks like this
is a done deal. We'll have more on the other side.
Hannity Tonight, Jim James Comer, Jim Jordan, and Jason Smith
(30:19):
all on together nine Eastern. All right, it's official. The
House voted to open a Biden official of Biden impeachment inquiry.
As we have been anticipating all day. We have on
the program tonight on Hannity nine Eastern on the Fox
News Channel. Will load it up with this. We have
James Comer, we have Jason Smith, and we also have
(30:44):
Jim Jordan is going to join us. Without those three,
that wouldn't have happened. We'll get to all of that tonight.
That's all coming up nine eastern. We hope you'll sell
you DVR Hannity on the Fox News Channel. And how
important this is also Hunter Biden speaks out today. We'll
get to all of that, and we'll have the latest
on the illegal immigrant crisis. We have Senator Joe Manchon
(31:06):
will join us tonight on the show. We have Ron
de Santis, and we have the great one, Mark Levin
will join us. Set you DVR Hannity nine Eastern on
the Fox News Channel. This is a big step because
all of the stonewalling now must come to an end,
and now they have the ability to do it in
the House and Joe Biden's White House will have to cooperate.
(31:26):
We'll see you tonight at nine. Back here tomorrow. Thank
you for making the show possible. See you tonight
The Sean Hannity Show News
Host
Sean Hannity
Popular Podcasts
United States of Kennedy
United States of Kennedy is a podcast about our cultural fascination with the Kennedy dynasty. Every week, hosts Lyra Smith and George Civeris go into one aspect of the Kennedy story.
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com