November 16, 2023 • 29 mins
Former Federal Prosecutor Brett Tolman and Alan Dershowitz, author of the new Book the War Against the Jews, discuss the ongoing civil trial against Donald Trump and his family, the continuing rise of anti-semitism across the nation and actions taken against student who choose to speak out against their woke professors. They will also touch on Biden’s absurd meeting with China’s Xi during meetings in California, followed by a press conference where he called him a dictator
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Going up next our final News Roundup and Information Overload.
Speaker 2 (00:05):
Hour all right, News Roundup and Information Overload. Our toe
free telephone numbers eight hundred and ninety four one Sean
if you want to be a part of the program.
In a second, we're going to check in with Professor
Alan Dershowitz. By the way, he's just authored a brand
new book. This guy has an ability to write books,
and he writes them himself and in no time. I mean,
(00:27):
I guess when you're a professor at Harvard, you're that
smart you can do it that quickly, because for me,
it is, you know, hate to admit it publicly, but
it takes like a year. And also check in with
former prosecutor, Federal Prosecutor Brett Tolman. We're going to talk
about the war, what's going on in Israel. We're going
to talk about what's going on in the Trump family.
You know, I keep harping on the fact that Joe
(00:50):
Biden has not upheld his oath of duty to uphold
the Constitution of the United States. He has now been
picking and choosing which laws he cares to enforce, and
he's even taken it further. Joe Biden and his administration.
They've been lying to us repeatedly that the border is safe,
(01:10):
the border is secure, the borders closed, none of which
is true. We have nearly eight million illegal immigrants since
Joe Biden has become president that have come into our country.
We have thousands that have come in from the Middle East,
including Iran and Syria, China and Russia, tens of thousands,
and nobody is being vetted at the border. Now I contend,
(01:34):
I pray to God I'm wrong, but I contend it's
one hundred percent certainty that among that eight million people
that he has allowed in people with nefarious intentions, that
want to commit acts of terror and likely will down
the line. And they are plotting, They are planning, They
are scheming either another nine to eleven or worse, or
(01:56):
another October seventh or worse. And they won't have blood
on their hands if, in fact, we find out later. Oh,
they will let in because of Joe Biden's open border policies,
and of course Joe aiding a betting and assisting. But anyway,
here's Christopher Ray. It took him a long time, but
(02:17):
even he's now concerned about the people pouring across the
southern border.
Speaker 3 (02:21):
I think anytime you have a group of people in
the United States that we don't know nearly enough about,
that is the source of concern for us from a
perspective in our lane of protecting Americans here. Wording it
maybe another way, if it were lower, if that number
were lower and the border wasn't as open as it is,
and we'd be safer. I think greater fidelity about who's
(02:44):
coming in this country and how they're getting in is
essential to making sure we protect Americans from all sorts
of threats, including a potential terrorist attack.
Speaker 2 (02:53):
Yeah, I do too, all right, And then I want
to play this for you. And I've heard enough of
this to last a lifetime. There has been more virulent
hatred anti Semitism worldwide than I ever thought we'd ever
hear in our lifetimes or maybe even historically ever again,
(03:15):
especially after Nazi Germany. In all my career, I have
avoided using Nazi analogies. I felt other people overuse them
and use them inappropriately, and they have, they absolutely have.
And but what I have been able to see that
the IDEF has shown me the atrocities of what what
(03:38):
and by the way Hamas was filming themselves with GoPro
cameras is akin to what happened in Nazi Germany. And
to hear, you know, in Australia gas the Jews and
f the Jews. And to see hundreds of thousands of
people in major cities all across Europe. And to hear
from the River to the sea and the halls of Congress,
(04:00):
which means to destroy Israel. To hear calls for Antifada,
to hear about students having to lock themselves in rooms
and prestigious universities, and there are virtually no consequences for
the students that have this bigotry, this hatred against the
Jewish people. I'd never thought i'd see it. I thought
(04:23):
I could. I thought I was unshockable. After doing radio
I just started in what nineteen eighty seven? I thought
I heard it all. No, I didn't. And every day
I see this, and the angrier I get, and the
more resolved I get that those that are supporting radical
Islamic terrorism, those that support them and aid and have
(04:45):
bet them, are just as guilty as the terrorists themselves.
And this should be widely condemned by anybody that has
a heart, a conscience and a soul, and I'm sorry.
This is one of those moments where you either have
moral clarity, a clear understanding of right and wrong, or
you don't. And there are way too many people on
(05:07):
college campuses, way too many people showing up in places
like Times Square and other big cities and even small
towns that have been supporting the terrorist group AMAS, whose
own charter calls for the destruction of Israel. Here's one
pro quote Palestine protester protesting yesterday at DNC headquarters saying
the police are shoving them.
Speaker 4 (05:28):
You're outside the DNZ, outside the party claim to the
other side of life quality, the thing.
Speaker 5 (05:37):
That we want to pull up to their knowledge. I'm
going now and you're meeting a spot to police.
Speaker 2 (05:45):
Shoving and just down the stairs shoving their thanks.
Speaker 4 (05:51):
Because the Farm Party protester.
Speaker 6 (05:59):
Uh.
Speaker 2 (05:59):
Anyway, that's what's going on every day around the country
and around the world.
Speaker 5 (06:05):
Anyway.
Speaker 2 (06:06):
Joining us now, former federal Prosecutor Brett Towman is with
US Professor Alan Dershowitz, who just came out with this
brand new book. Author of the book it's called The
War against the Jews. Welcome both of you back to
the program. Professor, you and I you know, in the
in the early days of our relationship, I think it
was during clinton impeachment. You know, we battled pretty hard,
(06:27):
you know, politically, politically we had some disagreements, but I
always had respect for you.
Speaker 5 (06:32):
I knew you were a brilliant professor.
Speaker 2 (06:36):
I don't see how you any longer can associate with
a party that tolerates a big portion of which tolerates
the likes of Congresswoman to leave and others.
Speaker 5 (06:50):
I don't and I really have a hard time.
Speaker 2 (06:53):
How can you ever support your old You taught at
Harvard for decades. How do you explain thirty some odd
groups there blaming Israel for being victims of terror and
supporting a terrorist group like Hamas. I gotta imagine that
you're probably really conflicted right now over some of this.
Speaker 1 (07:15):
Well, I hate the people who do that. And yesterday
a group of one hundred Harvard professors wrote a letter
to the administration saying, you know you're much to pro Israel. Basically,
they were on the side of Hamas, and nobody should
be fooled into thinking this has anything to do with
the ceasefire. This all started on October eighth, the day
(07:36):
after the slaughter before Israel fired a single shot. National
Lawyer's Guild, this despicable hard left lawyers organization, which is
in every law school in the country, praised Hamas for
raping and beheading, saying that it was a justified military activity,
called for the release of every murderer in prison at
(07:58):
Israel didn't say a word about the hostage is This
is the National Lawyer's Guild. These are Harvard students, these
are Harvard professors. I have offered anybody who runs against
to leave. Anyone who runs against the squad, I don't care.
If you're a Republican, I will support you financially. I
will come and campaign for you. I am not just
(08:19):
a right or wrong Democrat under any circumstances. I think
the Republicans are doing a much better job right now
in defending American values, Israel values, Judio Christian values than
the Democrats are doing. So I can be supportive of
doing the right thing because moral clarity is absolutely essential,
and moral clarity is nonpartisan.
Speaker 2 (08:42):
I would agree, but there's a lot of moral clarity
missing in the world. Let me ask you from this standpoint,
we saw the events of last night, and you know,
I guess we've got to go to the legal side
of this, or a former federal prosecutor Brett And as
I was watching, you know, the protesters terrorizing Congressional Democrats
(09:08):
inside the DNC headquarters, you don't why they're angry at
some of them for actually supporting Israel. They now you
correct me if I'm wrong. Can anybody make any intelligent
case that Israel caused October seventh? Because I don't think
they can, because the facts bear out that Israel was
a victim of a surprise terrorist attack that would be
(09:30):
the equivalent of losing nearly forty thousand Americans in a
single day if you look at the population differences.
Speaker 7 (09:36):
Yeah, Sean, you're exactly right. I joined the professor and
you in calling for you know, this is a time
we need moral clarity. We also need factual and legal clarity.
There's no question in my mind that right now Joe
Biden trying to play both sides is actually adding fuel
to the fire of the of this reprehensible, you know
(10:01):
movement that we see, whether it's in you know, higher education,
whether it's those that are protesting, they are emboldened because
they do not fear those that are in charge those
that are in charge of the government that would enforce
our laws, they're not afraid of them. Let's let's face it.
I served in the National Security area and worked in
(10:23):
that area arena for over a decade. And what we're
seeing right now coming across the border, I have no
doubt in my mind that Moss sympathizers and terrorists, you know,
American hating terrorism groups are being filled with individuals that
are coming across this border. They will join these protests,
(10:45):
and TIFA will join them. All those that hate America
are being emboldened because of a refusal to identify the
facts as they really are and to utilize our laws
to prosecute them and to deter others from doing the same.
Speaker 2 (11:01):
Do you have any doubt, Brett that among the eight
million illegal immigrants that Joe is allowed into this country
without vetting him, do you have any doubt, because I
don't have any doubt that among them are terrorists that
will PLoP, plan and scheme the next attack on this country.
Speaker 5 (11:16):
Well, by the way, I do pray that I'm wrong.
I don't think I'm wrong.
Speaker 7 (11:20):
I pray that we're wrong. But you know, John Ratcla
Ratcliffe and I had former Director of National Intelligence, very
close friend of mine. We have spoken about this. We
are well aware of those you know individuals. You know,
multiple individuals that are associated with terrorist organizations have come
across the border. We've caught a few of them. That's
how we know they're coming across.
Speaker 5 (11:42):
But what we we have to be more.
Speaker 7 (11:43):
Concerned about is who we haven't been able to catch.
And you can't catch people you don't try to catch,
you can't.
Speaker 2 (11:50):
Why are we letting anybody in the country unvetted? It's
a form of insanity. Professor Dershowitz, do you agree with
me that I'm pretty much likely right that among the
illegals that have come into this country that Joe has
let in and ate it and a vetted that there
are going to be people that want to commit acts
of terror against Americans in America. And as a lawyer,
(12:13):
I ask you, how did Joe Biden get away with
not enforcing the laws of the land. We have a
process for changing laws. He chose not to go that route.
Speaker 1 (12:22):
Well, I wish he had been vetting people, because not
only are the people coming across the border, but they'll
be joined when we get terrors in the United States,
by my students, by students at Harvard and NYU. Just yesterday,
a great law firm in New York filed an eighty
two page lawsuit against NYU and documented page after page
(12:45):
of vicious anti Semitic, anti American, anti Judeo Christian, not
only statements, but acts. And they'll be lass about that
and the next time there's a terrorist attack in the
United States, and there will be because everybody always emulates
a terrorist attacks that are successful.
Speaker 6 (13:03):
And I'm up, but.
Speaker 2 (13:04):
Aren't the odds significantly higher? Especially and do you agree
with me? The odds are pretty darn high, if not
one hundred percent certain that among the eight million Joe
is allowed in this country unvetted, that terrorists are among them,
isn't it.
Speaker 5 (13:22):
I mean, it's going to happen, Professor, I.
Speaker 6 (13:24):
Have no doubt about that.
Speaker 1 (13:25):
But these kids, these Hitler youth, who now don't wear
swastikas but wear green, you know, headbands, they're going to join.
Do you remember You're a little too young to remember this,
but in the early nineteen seventies, these radical kids, college students.
Speaker 2 (13:40):
I appreciate the compliment, professor, but I do remember the
nineteen seventies go ahead.
Speaker 1 (13:46):
They were blowing up for dicks. How they were trying
to blow up the University of Wisconsin. That's going to
happen here. These Harvard kids, these well.
Speaker 2 (13:54):
You mean like friends of of Barack Obama, like Bill
Ayers and Bernardine Dorn of the Weather Underground in groups
like that at the time.
Speaker 1 (14:02):
Absolutely, and I immediately called that to the attention of
the American public when that happened, because and the people
who killed the policeman in Westchester, New York and went
to jail for the rest of their lives, but then
they got parole. But we're going to get that in
the United States. We're going to see a spate of
terrorism with a combination of people coming in through the
(14:22):
borders and people who are already here. Because this is
like what happened in Nazi Germany, in Mussolini Hitler and
Mussolini Italy, in the Iyatola Komane, and in Stalin's the
Soviet Union. Most of those started with young kids in colleges.
People say, oh, college kids, Oh, it's like a panthe raid.
(14:43):
No it's not. These are vicious, vicious kids.
Speaker 5 (14:47):
Professor.
Speaker 2 (14:48):
We appreciate you as always, Thank you for joining US
federal prosecutor former federal prosecutor Brett Tolman. Thank you. Eight
hundred nine four one. Shawn is number. We'll get to
your calls coming up. Final half hour. All right, eight
hundred and niney four one, Sean, as we continue from Nashville.
All right, Elisa, is it Alisa? Elisa, Long Island, New York.
Speaker 5 (15:09):
What's up? Elisa? How are you hi?
Speaker 8 (15:12):
Okay, Sean, how are you?
Speaker 5 (15:13):
I'm good? Glad you called.
Speaker 8 (15:15):
Okay. First, I want to preface this with I am
a huge fan of yours. I listen to your radio
show every day, and my husband and I we watch
you every single night. But I'm a little upset with you, Sean.
I'm upset that you are hosting a Ron de Santis
Gavin Newsom debate.
Speaker 5 (15:30):
Why would you be upset about that?
Speaker 8 (15:33):
Because why even give Gavin Newsom a platform? He's a
smooth talker, a smooth looker, and I'm just afraid you
give him that platform that this could be I know
you're trying to give it. Give this to him so
Ron de Santis will come out looking good, but which
I have no doubt. Well, I'm hoping that he would,
but I'm just afraid what if it backfires and we
(15:54):
sway somebod Well, I.
Speaker 2 (15:55):
Don't know what you're talking about, backfire the state. Let
me just explain what the debate is. And then maybe
because I think too many people think this is rated
related to the presidential election, it's not. This happened organically
when I was interviewing Gavin Newsom. One of the reasons
that I did reach out to Governor Newsom the first
(16:16):
time is I want everybody to be very well aware
that there are other people that may become a part
of this twenty twenty four presidential election race. Now, other
people may think it's a good strategy, Oh let's ignore it,
let's put our head in the sand. But that's not
going to stop the Democrats from doing what they are
(16:37):
planning to do. And I don't think anybody can say
with any certainty that Joe Biden is going to be
the candidate in November twenty twenty four. So I like
people to be aware of exactly what the possibilities are.
I actually think it was smart on my part to
do that, and so you know, I'll explain it that way,
and in the course of me interviewing him, I went
(16:59):
in very prepared. You're right, he's a great politician. He
gave very slick answers and you know what, but I
also got out facts about his record, you know, and
by the way, it's just out there.
Speaker 5 (17:15):
It's true.
Speaker 2 (17:15):
For example, he's the only governor in the history of
California to lose population. Is it related to the high
taxes they have? Is it related to regulation? I mean,
why is he the governor of a sanctuary state. So
I put a lot of faith in people that they're
going to decide who they You know, maybe people will
judge the debate on style, but maybe other people will
(17:39):
judge it on substance. But I'm also let me give
you one last comment, and I want to hear what
else you.
Speaker 6 (17:44):
Have to say.
Speaker 5 (17:45):
Okay, I believe.
Speaker 2 (17:47):
That whenever conservative ideas are put against liberal leftist ideas,
conservatism will win that debate on substance every time.
Speaker 5 (17:59):
Now, if people looking.
Speaker 2 (18:00):
For I don't know, style over substance, maybe you're right,
but well, you know, time will tell.
Speaker 5 (18:12):
But tell me what you're afraid of.
Speaker 2 (18:14):
I mean, don't you think it's a healthy thing that
America knows that this guy's lurking in the background.
Speaker 8 (18:19):
Oh no, without a doubt, and they all know it. Listen,
when he first showed up there, he was in a
white house walking around. You know, what was that last year?
Speaker 2 (18:26):
I mean, well, you mean when he flipped his jacket
over his shoulder and acted like he owned the place.
Speaker 8 (18:30):
Yeah, like he owned the place exactly. So I'm just
you know, I don't have to you know, how he is,
and I'm just afraid that he might. You know, maybe
there's some Republicans out there, and I said, oh, maybe
he's not so bad. Now, it's good all of a sudden,
now with this happening with the with Chi over there,
you know, and he's cleaning up everything and all the
he's cleaning up all the homeless and all the illegal
(18:52):
immigrants over there, cleaning the streets. So everybody's got his number,
that's for sure. You know.
Speaker 5 (18:58):
I don't know if that's done on the local level.
Speaker 2 (19:00):
I don't know if he'd you know, well, what role
he may or may not have played in it, that's
neither here nor there. This is a debate between two
of the biggest governors in the country, and they could
not have more different governing philosophies on the issues that matter,
on economics, on how they dealt with COVID, on how
they deal with illegal immigration, on their energy beliefs. You know,
(19:26):
to me, there's just so much to talk about, and
just hearing these these divergent views, I think is a
healthy process. And I'm going to be honest, I think
it's going to be a very interesting debate, especially on substance.
You know, if they stare on substance. I can't be
a home monitor and step in and say, you know,
(19:48):
please be nicer.
Speaker 5 (19:48):
And I'm not not going to be Chris.
Speaker 8 (19:50):
Wallace right, and I will listen, but I understand what
you're saying.
Speaker 1 (19:55):
I was just a.
Speaker 8 (19:56):
Little concerned because I didn't want to give him on
Fox News. And I know you're being fair, believe me this,
and I understand where you're coming from. I just didn't
want to give him that platform. If he happens to
be then the Democratic candidate, then he will be debating
with our Republican candidate at the time, So I didn't
want to give him anything.
Speaker 5 (20:15):
Well, let me ask you a question. Let's say that happened.
Speaker 2 (20:19):
Let's say your scenario comes to it gets born out.
Do you think it's better or worse that this debate
had taken place because whoever the Republican nominee is, and
Donald Trump has a significant lead, they have an opportunity
to see him in action debating. Is that a plus
(20:40):
or a minus for a Republican candidate.
Speaker 8 (20:42):
Yeah, now, I see what I understand what you're saying.
I understand what you're saying, but I'm still not sure.
I don't trust the guy. I don't trust him, and
I just don't want to go.
Speaker 5 (20:51):
That's fair.
Speaker 2 (20:52):
You know a lot of people hate me. Listen, I
will tell you in real life he's a nice guy.
If you meet him, I promise you he would shake
your hand, Lisa, and look you in the eye and say,
all right, even though we disagree, it's very nice to.
Speaker 8 (21:04):
Meet you, Okay, all right.
Speaker 2 (21:07):
By the way, And if I go to a restaurant
I've been to, I won't mention names. I've been to
places where there are prominent left wingers liberals, and I've
either sent over drinks a bottle of wine or walked
over if I'm passing by them, said hey, how are you,
Sean Hannity, Very nice to meet you. And I always
treat everybody, regardless of their political views with respect of
(21:30):
course you do.
Speaker 8 (21:30):
No, I don't doubt that at all. I don't doubt
that at all. But I just wanted to give you
my opinion.
Speaker 1 (21:35):
That was it.
Speaker 8 (21:35):
But I will be watching you.
Speaker 5 (21:38):
Got to admit, I think this is going to be
a pretty highly watched debate.
Speaker 8 (21:41):
Yes, I'm sure it will be. I'm sure it will be.
Speaker 2 (21:43):
Sure well, but I think it's healthy for the country. Look,
I'm not the one debating. I'm going to be bringing
up the issues on the table. I'm going to be
bringing in the information that is available for everybody, and then,
you know, try and understand. Maybe people on both sides
of the aisle will have an understanding, considering we're so divided,
(22:05):
a better understanding of why people think and do the
things that they do. Let's go to Tricia is an Oregon.
Hey Tricia, how are you welcome to Nashville. What's going on?
Speaker 4 (22:19):
Good? How are you?
Speaker 5 (22:20):
I'm good?
Speaker 4 (22:20):
Thank you, thank you, thank you for letting me come
on your show. I absolutely love Linda, Bob.
Speaker 5 (22:29):
Why are you sucking up to Linda?
Speaker 4 (22:32):
But I called for something totally different that your last
few callers have me all fired up.
Speaker 5 (22:38):
Yeah about the new something?
Speaker 4 (22:39):
I really think that it's a good thing. People can
finally see what an end that ding dong he is
about policies, And of course you would shake your hand
and you know, try to convince you he's a nice guy.
Speaker 8 (22:54):
The devil would do the same thing.
Speaker 2 (22:57):
Well, the question is, do you think the American people
and people that want a conservative president, is it better
off burying their head in the sand or knowing what
every possibility could be.
Speaker 4 (23:11):
Yes, absolutely, absolutely, And I agree with your other caller
a lot of the issues we're having in this country
with the violence and all that, more people need Jesus,
that is for sure.
Speaker 5 (23:24):
You know, Earth to God, Coming God, you know.
Speaker 4 (23:27):
Yeah, you know.
Speaker 2 (23:30):
Actually it's a great song by John Rich. The lyrics
go like this, in case you're interested, it goes Earth
to God, Come in God. I know you're there hearing
our prayers. Wherever you are. We need you now to
send your love down take away the pain in your
holy name, and we ask this now. We need your light,
(23:50):
We need your love to heal the world that you
made and save us now in our darkest hour with
your amazing grace. Earth to God. Pretty powerful, right. John
Rich wrote that go go google the video it's amazing.
I'll put it up on Hannity to it dot com.
Speaker 1 (24:10):
Okay, I won't.
Speaker 5 (24:11):
Put it up.
Speaker 2 (24:12):
I don't know how to put it up. I don't
even know how to get it to my website. My
staff won't let me have access to anything. Can you
believe that? My own staff said, nope, we're not giving
you access to your own website. That's my website. I
own it. I own my Twitter handle. I do, right, Blair,
I think I do. The reason you own it, well,
(24:32):
you better fix it and send it, put it in
my name. If you try and steal it, I'll sue you,
and you don't want my attorneys on you.
Speaker 5 (24:39):
You know my attorneys. Anyway. I appreciate the call.
Speaker 2 (24:43):
Thank you very much, Tricia eight hundred and ninety four
one Shawn or number if you want to be a
part of the program.
Speaker 5 (24:48):
We got time.
Speaker 2 (24:49):
For one more call. Let's say hi to Ron in Wisconsin.
Hey Ron, how are you.
Speaker 9 (24:55):
Hi?
Speaker 6 (24:55):
John? I just wanted to say quick about Alyssa. You know,
to paraphrase Thomas Jefferson, truth is great and will prevail
if not this honor of her natural weapons being free
and open debate. So go ahead with that debate. I'm
fully in favor of that. But the reason I called
was with Markwayne Mullens. You were talking about him yesterday. Yeah,
(25:18):
you know, I'm sixty seven. I grew up in a
Brooklyn housing project in the sixties. Then we moved to
Valley Stream in sixty eight.
Speaker 2 (25:25):
By the way, Valley Stream very close to where I
grew up in Franklin Square.
Speaker 6 (25:29):
Right, That's why I mentioned it.
Speaker 2 (25:31):
By the way, do you remember Karl Hopples and Valley Stream?
Speaker 1 (25:34):
Sure?
Speaker 6 (25:35):
Yeah, yeah.
Speaker 2 (25:36):
My dad worked at Carl Hopples in Baldwin and in
Balle Stream. I believe I know Baldwin for sure.
Speaker 9 (25:45):
So my nephews, I wrote an essay for them called
thirteen Lessons I Learned in Brooklyn. Your kids don't warn't
pre school and less than number twelve is it hurts
to be punched in the notes because when we were
little kids who used to have fights, you get punched
in your nose, You're like, oh, that hurts doing that
when I grow up. When my kids were in college,
(26:05):
I broke up a couple of fights and they were
like these freshman or sophomores with probably a broken nose,
brief blood coming out of their nose, and they had
a shocked look on their face, like, oh that hurts.
Because these young kids don't fight. They're always supervised. They
think fighting is like on a video game or in
the movies, and they don't realize bad things happen when
you're an adult in your fight.
Speaker 5 (26:26):
Listen.
Speaker 2 (26:27):
One of the reasons that my sense is insistent. There
are two days that I kind of dread the most
because I'm going to get beat up pretty bad. One
is called keeping it real day, and that means for
an hour and a half, my sense will confront me
at a moment's notice, with no notice on any situational
(26:51):
thing or moment that could happen in my life. He
might come up behind me and he might start choking
me out. And I mean when he puts me in
a choke hold, he is trying to choke me out.
I've been choked out, I passed out. I've had that
happen to me in training. Then the other day is
called pain day. You know, you can't win a fight
if you can't take pain. All right, So I stand
(27:14):
there as a good student, and you know, I tighten
up my my my abs and he fires away, usually
by the fourth or fifth shot, I'm down on my knees.
He knocks me right down on my ass. The other
thing is I imagine stretching out your arm and one
(27:35):
really strong guy taking his fist and hammer punching every
part of your arm. That's part of my training and
so and the thinking behind it is, if you can't
take a punch, you can't win a fight. You gotta
expect that they're gonna get something, that you're gonna get
hit somehow. You try not to, but if you get hit,
you got to be able to continue if you want
(27:57):
to win.
Speaker 5 (27:58):
Anyway.
Speaker 2 (27:59):
I would talk about this all day. I wish I
had more time, and that's going to ramp things up
to today. Hannity Tonight Live audience, We are in beautiful Nashville, Tennessee.
Tommy Larryon, Joey Jones, Josh Hawley, New Gingrich, Charlie Hurt,
Brian Bremberg, also Alan Dershwitz, Greig Jarrett. He had no
charges for Biden on the document scandal. Why because we
(28:19):
have a two tier justice system. All happening in Nashville tonight, Hannity,
Fox News. See you then back here tomorrow. Thank you
for making the show possible. You know, most people have
no idea that they have an invisible gap to their
homes protection.
Speaker 6 (28:33):
Now.
Speaker 2 (28:33):
This invisible threat is called house stealing from FBI crime
stories and I quote con artists.
Speaker 5 (28:39):
They pick a house.
Speaker 2 (28:39):
It can be a vacation home, of rental property, or
the home that you're living in right now, They transfer
the deed of your house into their name by obtaining
forms and using fake IDs. They file the paperwork with
proper authorities and guess what, they end up owning your
home now. Once that step is complete, they take out
loans using your home as collateral, and they can even
(29:00):
sell your home without you knowing it. Call our friends
at home titlelock dot com right now get your free
complete title scan. Just dial pound two fifty on yourself,
say the keyword protect my title and you'll be connected
directly to home title Lock. Now your complete title scan
and the first thirty days of protection are absolutely free.
Speaker 5 (29:20):
Do it today.
Speaker 2 (29:21):
Just dial pound two fifty on your cell phone, say
the keyword protect my title and they are standing by
it right now waiting for your call.
Going up next our final News Roundup and Information Overload.
Speaker 2 (00:05):
Hour all right, News Roundup and Information Overload. Our toe
free telephone numbers eight hundred and ninety four one Sean
if you want to be a part of the program.
In a second, we're going to check in with Professor
Alan Dershowitz. By the way, he's just authored a brand
new book. This guy has an ability to write books,
and he writes them himself and in no time. I mean,
(00:27):
I guess when you're a professor at Harvard, you're that
smart you can do it that quickly, because for me,
it is, you know, hate to admit it publicly, but
it takes like a year. And also check in with
former prosecutor, Federal Prosecutor Brett Tolman. We're going to talk
about the war, what's going on in Israel. We're going
to talk about what's going on in the Trump family.
You know, I keep harping on the fact that Joe
(00:50):
Biden has not upheld his oath of duty to uphold
the Constitution of the United States. He has now been
picking and choosing which laws he cares to enforce, and
he's even taken it further. Joe Biden and his administration.
They've been lying to us repeatedly that the border is safe,
(01:10):
the border is secure, the borders closed, none of which
is true. We have nearly eight million illegal immigrants since
Joe Biden has become president that have come into our country.
We have thousands that have come in from the Middle East,
including Iran and Syria, China and Russia, tens of thousands,
and nobody is being vetted at the border. Now I contend,
(01:34):
I pray to God I'm wrong, but I contend it's
one hundred percent certainty that among that eight million people
that he has allowed in people with nefarious intentions, that
want to commit acts of terror and likely will down
the line. And they are plotting, They are planning, They
are scheming either another nine to eleven or worse, or
(01:56):
another October seventh or worse. And they won't have blood
on their hands if, in fact, we find out later. Oh,
they will let in because of Joe Biden's open border policies,
and of course Joe aiding a betting and assisting. But anyway,
here's Christopher Ray. It took him a long time, but
(02:17):
even he's now concerned about the people pouring across the
southern border.
Speaker 3 (02:21):
I think anytime you have a group of people in
the United States that we don't know nearly enough about,
that is the source of concern for us from a
perspective in our lane of protecting Americans here. Wording it
maybe another way, if it were lower, if that number
were lower and the border wasn't as open as it is,
and we'd be safer. I think greater fidelity about who's
(02:44):
coming in this country and how they're getting in is
essential to making sure we protect Americans from all sorts
of threats, including a potential terrorist attack.
Speaker 2 (02:53):
Yeah, I do too, all right, And then I want
to play this for you. And I've heard enough of
this to last a lifetime. There has been more virulent
hatred anti Semitism worldwide than I ever thought we'd ever
hear in our lifetimes or maybe even historically ever again,
(03:15):
especially after Nazi Germany. In all my career, I have
avoided using Nazi analogies. I felt other people overuse them
and use them inappropriately, and they have, they absolutely have.
And but what I have been able to see that
the IDEF has shown me the atrocities of what what
(03:38):
and by the way Hamas was filming themselves with GoPro
cameras is akin to what happened in Nazi Germany. And
to hear, you know, in Australia gas the Jews and
f the Jews. And to see hundreds of thousands of
people in major cities all across Europe. And to hear
from the River to the sea and the halls of Congress,
(04:00):
which means to destroy Israel. To hear calls for Antifada,
to hear about students having to lock themselves in rooms
and prestigious universities, and there are virtually no consequences for
the students that have this bigotry, this hatred against the
Jewish people. I'd never thought i'd see it. I thought
(04:23):
I could. I thought I was unshockable. After doing radio
I just started in what nineteen eighty seven? I thought
I heard it all. No, I didn't. And every day
I see this, and the angrier I get, and the
more resolved I get that those that are supporting radical
Islamic terrorism, those that support them and aid and have
(04:45):
bet them, are just as guilty as the terrorists themselves.
And this should be widely condemned by anybody that has
a heart, a conscience and a soul, and I'm sorry.
This is one of those moments where you either have
moral clarity, a clear understanding of right and wrong, or
you don't. And there are way too many people on
(05:07):
college campuses, way too many people showing up in places
like Times Square and other big cities and even small
towns that have been supporting the terrorist group AMAS, whose
own charter calls for the destruction of Israel. Here's one
pro quote Palestine protester protesting yesterday at DNC headquarters saying
the police are shoving them.
Speaker 4 (05:28):
You're outside the DNZ, outside the party claim to the
other side of life quality, the thing.
Speaker 5 (05:37):
That we want to pull up to their knowledge. I'm
going now and you're meeting a spot to police.
Speaker 2 (05:45):
Shoving and just down the stairs shoving their thanks.
Speaker 4 (05:51):
Because the Farm Party protester.
Speaker 6 (05:59):
Uh.
Speaker 2 (05:59):
Anyway, that's what's going on every day around the country
and around the world.
Speaker 5 (06:05):
Anyway.
Speaker 2 (06:06):
Joining us now, former federal Prosecutor Brett Towman is with
US Professor Alan Dershowitz, who just came out with this
brand new book. Author of the book it's called The
War against the Jews. Welcome both of you back to
the program. Professor, you and I you know, in the
in the early days of our relationship, I think it
was during clinton impeachment. You know, we battled pretty hard,
(06:27):
you know, politically, politically we had some disagreements, but I
always had respect for you.
Speaker 5 (06:32):
I knew you were a brilliant professor.
Speaker 2 (06:36):
I don't see how you any longer can associate with
a party that tolerates a big portion of which tolerates
the likes of Congresswoman to leave and others.
Speaker 5 (06:50):
I don't and I really have a hard time.
Speaker 2 (06:53):
How can you ever support your old You taught at
Harvard for decades. How do you explain thirty some odd
groups there blaming Israel for being victims of terror and
supporting a terrorist group like Hamas. I gotta imagine that
you're probably really conflicted right now over some of this.
Speaker 1 (07:15):
Well, I hate the people who do that. And yesterday
a group of one hundred Harvard professors wrote a letter
to the administration saying, you know you're much to pro Israel. Basically,
they were on the side of Hamas, and nobody should
be fooled into thinking this has anything to do with
the ceasefire. This all started on October eighth, the day
(07:36):
after the slaughter before Israel fired a single shot. National
Lawyer's Guild, this despicable hard left lawyers organization, which is
in every law school in the country, praised Hamas for
raping and beheading, saying that it was a justified military activity,
called for the release of every murderer in prison at
(07:58):
Israel didn't say a word about the hostage is This
is the National Lawyer's Guild. These are Harvard students, these
are Harvard professors. I have offered anybody who runs against
to leave. Anyone who runs against the squad, I don't care.
If you're a Republican, I will support you financially. I
will come and campaign for you. I am not just
(08:19):
a right or wrong Democrat under any circumstances. I think
the Republicans are doing a much better job right now
in defending American values, Israel values, Judio Christian values than
the Democrats are doing. So I can be supportive of
doing the right thing because moral clarity is absolutely essential,
and moral clarity is nonpartisan.
Speaker 2 (08:42):
I would agree, but there's a lot of moral clarity
missing in the world. Let me ask you from this standpoint,
we saw the events of last night, and you know,
I guess we've got to go to the legal side
of this, or a former federal prosecutor Brett And as
I was watching, you know, the protesters terrorizing Congressional Democrats
(09:08):
inside the DNC headquarters, you don't why they're angry at
some of them for actually supporting Israel. They now you
correct me if I'm wrong. Can anybody make any intelligent
case that Israel caused October seventh? Because I don't think
they can, because the facts bear out that Israel was
a victim of a surprise terrorist attack that would be
(09:30):
the equivalent of losing nearly forty thousand Americans in a
single day if you look at the population differences.
Speaker 7 (09:36):
Yeah, Sean, you're exactly right. I joined the professor and
you in calling for you know, this is a time
we need moral clarity. We also need factual and legal clarity.
There's no question in my mind that right now Joe
Biden trying to play both sides is actually adding fuel
to the fire of the of this reprehensible, you know
(10:01):
movement that we see, whether it's in you know, higher education,
whether it's those that are protesting, they are emboldened because
they do not fear those that are in charge those
that are in charge of the government that would enforce
our laws, they're not afraid of them. Let's let's face it.
I served in the National Security area and worked in
(10:23):
that area arena for over a decade. And what we're
seeing right now coming across the border, I have no
doubt in my mind that Moss sympathizers and terrorists, you know,
American hating terrorism groups are being filled with individuals that
are coming across this border. They will join these protests,
(10:45):
and TIFA will join them. All those that hate America
are being emboldened because of a refusal to identify the
facts as they really are and to utilize our laws
to prosecute them and to deter others from doing the same.
Speaker 2 (11:01):
Do you have any doubt, Brett that among the eight
million illegal immigrants that Joe is allowed into this country
without vetting him, do you have any doubt, because I
don't have any doubt that among them are terrorists that
will PLoP, plan and scheme the next attack on this country.
Speaker 5 (11:16):
Well, by the way, I do pray that I'm wrong.
I don't think I'm wrong.
Speaker 7 (11:20):
I pray that we're wrong. But you know, John Ratcla
Ratcliffe and I had former Director of National Intelligence, very
close friend of mine. We have spoken about this. We
are well aware of those you know individuals. You know,
multiple individuals that are associated with terrorist organizations have come
across the border. We've caught a few of them. That's
how we know they're coming across.
Speaker 5 (11:42):
But what we we have to be more.
Speaker 7 (11:43):
Concerned about is who we haven't been able to catch.
And you can't catch people you don't try to catch,
you can't.
Speaker 2 (11:50):
Why are we letting anybody in the country unvetted? It's
a form of insanity. Professor Dershowitz, do you agree with
me that I'm pretty much likely right that among the
illegals that have come into this country that Joe has
let in and ate it and a vetted that there
are going to be people that want to commit acts
of terror against Americans in America. And as a lawyer,
(12:13):
I ask you, how did Joe Biden get away with
not enforcing the laws of the land. We have a
process for changing laws. He chose not to go that route.
Speaker 1 (12:22):
Well, I wish he had been vetting people, because not
only are the people coming across the border, but they'll
be joined when we get terrors in the United States,
by my students, by students at Harvard and NYU. Just yesterday,
a great law firm in New York filed an eighty
two page lawsuit against NYU and documented page after page
(12:45):
of vicious anti Semitic, anti American, anti Judeo Christian, not
only statements, but acts. And they'll be lass about that
and the next time there's a terrorist attack in the
United States, and there will be because everybody always emulates
a terrorist attacks that are successful.
Speaker 6 (13:03):
And I'm up, but.
Speaker 2 (13:04):
Aren't the odds significantly higher? Especially and do you agree
with me? The odds are pretty darn high, if not
one hundred percent certain that among the eight million Joe
is allowed in this country unvetted, that terrorists are among them,
isn't it.
Speaker 5 (13:22):
I mean, it's going to happen, Professor, I.
Speaker 6 (13:24):
Have no doubt about that.
Speaker 1 (13:25):
But these kids, these Hitler youth, who now don't wear
swastikas but wear green, you know, headbands, they're going to join.
Do you remember You're a little too young to remember this,
but in the early nineteen seventies, these radical kids, college students.
Speaker 2 (13:40):
I appreciate the compliment, professor, but I do remember the
nineteen seventies go ahead.
Speaker 1 (13:46):
They were blowing up for dicks. How they were trying
to blow up the University of Wisconsin. That's going to
happen here. These Harvard kids, these well.
Speaker 2 (13:54):
You mean like friends of of Barack Obama, like Bill
Ayers and Bernardine Dorn of the Weather Underground in groups
like that at the time.
Speaker 1 (14:02):
Absolutely, and I immediately called that to the attention of
the American public when that happened, because and the people
who killed the policeman in Westchester, New York and went
to jail for the rest of their lives, but then
they got parole. But we're going to get that in
the United States. We're going to see a spate of
terrorism with a combination of people coming in through the
(14:22):
borders and people who are already here. Because this is
like what happened in Nazi Germany, in Mussolini Hitler and
Mussolini Italy, in the Iyatola Komane, and in Stalin's the
Soviet Union. Most of those started with young kids in colleges.
People say, oh, college kids, Oh, it's like a panthe raid.
(14:43):
No it's not. These are vicious, vicious kids.
Speaker 5 (14:47):
Professor.
Speaker 2 (14:48):
We appreciate you as always, Thank you for joining US
federal prosecutor former federal prosecutor Brett Tolman. Thank you. Eight
hundred nine four one. Shawn is number. We'll get to
your calls coming up. Final half hour. All right, eight
hundred and niney four one, Sean, as we continue from Nashville.
All right, Elisa, is it Alisa? Elisa, Long Island, New York.
Speaker 5 (15:09):
What's up? Elisa? How are you hi?
Speaker 8 (15:12):
Okay, Sean, how are you?
Speaker 5 (15:13):
I'm good? Glad you called.
Speaker 8 (15:15):
Okay. First, I want to preface this with I am
a huge fan of yours. I listen to your radio
show every day, and my husband and I we watch
you every single night. But I'm a little upset with you, Sean.
I'm upset that you are hosting a Ron de Santis
Gavin Newsom debate.
Speaker 5 (15:30):
Why would you be upset about that?
Speaker 8 (15:33):
Because why even give Gavin Newsom a platform? He's a
smooth talker, a smooth looker, and I'm just afraid you
give him that platform that this could be I know
you're trying to give it. Give this to him so
Ron de Santis will come out looking good, but which
I have no doubt. Well, I'm hoping that he would,
but I'm just afraid what if it backfires and we
(15:54):
sway somebod Well, I.
Speaker 2 (15:55):
Don't know what you're talking about, backfire the state. Let
me just explain what the debate is. And then maybe
because I think too many people think this is rated
related to the presidential election, it's not. This happened organically
when I was interviewing Gavin Newsom. One of the reasons
that I did reach out to Governor Newsom the first
(16:16):
time is I want everybody to be very well aware
that there are other people that may become a part
of this twenty twenty four presidential election race. Now, other
people may think it's a good strategy, Oh let's ignore it,
let's put our head in the sand. But that's not
going to stop the Democrats from doing what they are
(16:37):
planning to do. And I don't think anybody can say
with any certainty that Joe Biden is going to be
the candidate in November twenty twenty four. So I like
people to be aware of exactly what the possibilities are.
I actually think it was smart on my part to
do that, and so you know, I'll explain it that way,
and in the course of me interviewing him, I went
(16:59):
in very prepared. You're right, he's a great politician. He
gave very slick answers and you know what, but I
also got out facts about his record, you know, and
by the way, it's just out there.
Speaker 5 (17:15):
It's true.
Speaker 2 (17:15):
For example, he's the only governor in the history of
California to lose population. Is it related to the high
taxes they have? Is it related to regulation? I mean,
why is he the governor of a sanctuary state. So
I put a lot of faith in people that they're
going to decide who they You know, maybe people will
judge the debate on style, but maybe other people will
(17:39):
judge it on substance. But I'm also let me give
you one last comment, and I want to hear what
else you.
Speaker 6 (17:44):
Have to say.
Speaker 5 (17:45):
Okay, I believe.
Speaker 2 (17:47):
That whenever conservative ideas are put against liberal leftist ideas,
conservatism will win that debate on substance every time.
Speaker 5 (17:59):
Now, if people looking.
Speaker 2 (18:00):
For I don't know, style over substance, maybe you're right,
but well, you know, time will tell.
Speaker 5 (18:12):
But tell me what you're afraid of.
Speaker 2 (18:14):
I mean, don't you think it's a healthy thing that
America knows that this guy's lurking in the background.
Speaker 8 (18:19):
Oh no, without a doubt, and they all know it. Listen,
when he first showed up there, he was in a
white house walking around. You know, what was that last year?
Speaker 2 (18:26):
I mean, well, you mean when he flipped his jacket
over his shoulder and acted like he owned the place.
Speaker 8 (18:30):
Yeah, like he owned the place exactly. So I'm just
you know, I don't have to you know, how he is,
and I'm just afraid that he might. You know, maybe
there's some Republicans out there, and I said, oh, maybe
he's not so bad. Now, it's good all of a sudden,
now with this happening with the with Chi over there,
you know, and he's cleaning up everything and all the
he's cleaning up all the homeless and all the illegal
(18:52):
immigrants over there, cleaning the streets. So everybody's got his number,
that's for sure. You know.
Speaker 5 (18:58):
I don't know if that's done on the local level.
Speaker 2 (19:00):
I don't know if he'd you know, well, what role
he may or may not have played in it, that's
neither here nor there. This is a debate between two
of the biggest governors in the country, and they could
not have more different governing philosophies on the issues that matter,
on economics, on how they dealt with COVID, on how
they deal with illegal immigration, on their energy beliefs. You know,
(19:26):
to me, there's just so much to talk about, and
just hearing these these divergent views, I think is a
healthy process. And I'm going to be honest, I think
it's going to be a very interesting debate, especially on substance.
You know, if they stare on substance. I can't be
a home monitor and step in and say, you know,
(19:48):
please be nicer.
Speaker 5 (19:48):
And I'm not not going to be Chris.
Speaker 8 (19:50):
Wallace right, and I will listen, but I understand what
you're saying.
Speaker 1 (19:55):
I was just a.
Speaker 8 (19:56):
Little concerned because I didn't want to give him on
Fox News. And I know you're being fair, believe me this,
and I understand where you're coming from. I just didn't
want to give him that platform. If he happens to
be then the Democratic candidate, then he will be debating
with our Republican candidate at the time, So I didn't
want to give him anything.
Speaker 5 (20:15):
Well, let me ask you a question. Let's say that happened.
Speaker 2 (20:19):
Let's say your scenario comes to it gets born out.
Do you think it's better or worse that this debate
had taken place because whoever the Republican nominee is, and
Donald Trump has a significant lead, they have an opportunity
to see him in action debating. Is that a plus
(20:40):
or a minus for a Republican candidate.
Speaker 8 (20:42):
Yeah, now, I see what I understand what you're saying.
I understand what you're saying, but I'm still not sure.
I don't trust the guy. I don't trust him, and
I just don't want to go.
Speaker 5 (20:51):
That's fair.
Speaker 2 (20:52):
You know a lot of people hate me. Listen, I
will tell you in real life he's a nice guy.
If you meet him, I promise you he would shake
your hand, Lisa, and look you in the eye and say,
all right, even though we disagree, it's very nice to.
Speaker 8 (21:04):
Meet you, Okay, all right.
Speaker 2 (21:07):
By the way, And if I go to a restaurant
I've been to, I won't mention names. I've been to
places where there are prominent left wingers liberals, and I've
either sent over drinks a bottle of wine or walked
over if I'm passing by them, said hey, how are you,
Sean Hannity, Very nice to meet you. And I always
treat everybody, regardless of their political views with respect of
(21:30):
course you do.
Speaker 8 (21:30):
No, I don't doubt that at all. I don't doubt
that at all. But I just wanted to give you
my opinion.
Speaker 1 (21:35):
That was it.
Speaker 8 (21:35):
But I will be watching you.
Speaker 5 (21:38):
Got to admit, I think this is going to be
a pretty highly watched debate.
Speaker 8 (21:41):
Yes, I'm sure it will be. I'm sure it will be.
Speaker 2 (21:43):
Sure well, but I think it's healthy for the country. Look,
I'm not the one debating. I'm going to be bringing
up the issues on the table. I'm going to be
bringing in the information that is available for everybody, and then,
you know, try and understand. Maybe people on both sides
of the aisle will have an understanding, considering we're so divided,
(22:05):
a better understanding of why people think and do the
things that they do. Let's go to Tricia is an Oregon.
Hey Tricia, how are you welcome to Nashville. What's going on?
Speaker 4 (22:19):
Good? How are you?
Speaker 5 (22:20):
I'm good?
Speaker 4 (22:20):
Thank you, thank you, thank you for letting me come
on your show. I absolutely love Linda, Bob.
Speaker 5 (22:29):
Why are you sucking up to Linda?
Speaker 4 (22:32):
But I called for something totally different that your last
few callers have me all fired up.
Speaker 5 (22:38):
Yeah about the new something?
Speaker 4 (22:39):
I really think that it's a good thing. People can
finally see what an end that ding dong he is
about policies, And of course you would shake your hand
and you know, try to convince you he's a nice guy.
Speaker 8 (22:54):
The devil would do the same thing.
Speaker 2 (22:57):
Well, the question is, do you think the American people
and people that want a conservative president, is it better
off burying their head in the sand or knowing what
every possibility could be.
Speaker 4 (23:11):
Yes, absolutely, absolutely, And I agree with your other caller
a lot of the issues we're having in this country
with the violence and all that, more people need Jesus,
that is for sure.
Speaker 5 (23:24):
You know, Earth to God, Coming God, you know.
Speaker 4 (23:27):
Yeah, you know.
Speaker 2 (23:30):
Actually it's a great song by John Rich. The lyrics
go like this, in case you're interested, it goes Earth
to God, Come in God. I know you're there hearing
our prayers. Wherever you are. We need you now to
send your love down take away the pain in your
holy name, and we ask this now. We need your light,
(23:50):
We need your love to heal the world that you
made and save us now in our darkest hour with
your amazing grace. Earth to God. Pretty powerful, right. John
Rich wrote that go go google the video it's amazing.
I'll put it up on Hannity to it dot com.
Speaker 1 (24:10):
Okay, I won't.
Speaker 5 (24:11):
Put it up.
Speaker 2 (24:12):
I don't know how to put it up. I don't
even know how to get it to my website. My
staff won't let me have access to anything. Can you
believe that? My own staff said, nope, we're not giving
you access to your own website. That's my website. I
own it. I own my Twitter handle. I do, right, Blair,
I think I do. The reason you own it, well,
(24:32):
you better fix it and send it, put it in
my name. If you try and steal it, I'll sue you,
and you don't want my attorneys on you.
Speaker 5 (24:39):
You know my attorneys. Anyway. I appreciate the call.
Speaker 2 (24:43):
Thank you very much, Tricia eight hundred and ninety four
one Shawn or number if you want to be a
part of the program.
Speaker 5 (24:48):
We got time.
Speaker 2 (24:49):
For one more call. Let's say hi to Ron in Wisconsin.
Hey Ron, how are you.
Speaker 9 (24:55):
Hi?
Speaker 6 (24:55):
John? I just wanted to say quick about Alyssa. You know,
to paraphrase Thomas Jefferson, truth is great and will prevail
if not this honor of her natural weapons being free
and open debate. So go ahead with that debate. I'm
fully in favor of that. But the reason I called
was with Markwayne Mullens. You were talking about him yesterday. Yeah,
(25:18):
you know, I'm sixty seven. I grew up in a
Brooklyn housing project in the sixties. Then we moved to
Valley Stream in sixty eight.
Speaker 2 (25:25):
By the way, Valley Stream very close to where I
grew up in Franklin Square.
Speaker 6 (25:29):
Right, That's why I mentioned it.
Speaker 2 (25:31):
By the way, do you remember Karl Hopples and Valley Stream?
Speaker 1 (25:34):
Sure?
Speaker 6 (25:35):
Yeah, yeah.
Speaker 2 (25:36):
My dad worked at Carl Hopples in Baldwin and in
Balle Stream. I believe I know Baldwin for sure.
Speaker 9 (25:45):
So my nephews, I wrote an essay for them called
thirteen Lessons I Learned in Brooklyn. Your kids don't warn't
pre school and less than number twelve is it hurts
to be punched in the notes because when we were
little kids who used to have fights, you get punched
in your nose, You're like, oh, that hurts doing that
when I grow up. When my kids were in college,
(26:05):
I broke up a couple of fights and they were
like these freshman or sophomores with probably a broken nose,
brief blood coming out of their nose, and they had
a shocked look on their face, like, oh that hurts.
Because these young kids don't fight. They're always supervised. They
think fighting is like on a video game or in
the movies, and they don't realize bad things happen when
you're an adult in your fight.
Speaker 5 (26:26):
Listen.
Speaker 2 (26:27):
One of the reasons that my sense is insistent. There
are two days that I kind of dread the most
because I'm going to get beat up pretty bad. One
is called keeping it real day, and that means for
an hour and a half, my sense will confront me
at a moment's notice, with no notice on any situational
(26:51):
thing or moment that could happen in my life. He
might come up behind me and he might start choking
me out. And I mean when he puts me in
a choke hold, he is trying to choke me out.
I've been choked out, I passed out. I've had that
happen to me in training. Then the other day is
called pain day. You know, you can't win a fight
if you can't take pain. All right, So I stand
(27:14):
there as a good student, and you know, I tighten
up my my my abs and he fires away, usually
by the fourth or fifth shot, I'm down on my knees.
He knocks me right down on my ass. The other
thing is I imagine stretching out your arm and one
(27:35):
really strong guy taking his fist and hammer punching every
part of your arm. That's part of my training and
so and the thinking behind it is, if you can't
take a punch, you can't win a fight. You gotta
expect that they're gonna get something, that you're gonna get
hit somehow. You try not to, but if you get hit,
you got to be able to continue if you want
(27:57):
to win.
Speaker 5 (27:58):
Anyway.
Speaker 2 (27:59):
I would talk about this all day. I wish I
had more time, and that's going to ramp things up
to today. Hannity Tonight Live audience, We are in beautiful Nashville, Tennessee.
Tommy Larryon, Joey Jones, Josh Hawley, New Gingrich, Charlie Hurt,
Brian Bremberg, also Alan Dershwitz, Greig Jarrett. He had no
charges for Biden on the document scandal. Why because we
(28:19):
have a two tier justice system. All happening in Nashville tonight, Hannity,
Fox News. See you then back here tomorrow. Thank you
for making the show possible. You know, most people have
no idea that they have an invisible gap to their
homes protection.
Speaker 6 (28:33):
Now.
Speaker 2 (28:33):
This invisible threat is called house stealing from FBI crime
stories and I quote con artists.
Speaker 5 (28:39):
They pick a house.
Speaker 2 (28:39):
It can be a vacation home, of rental property, or
the home that you're living in right now, They transfer
the deed of your house into their name by obtaining
forms and using fake IDs. They file the paperwork with
proper authorities and guess what, they end up owning your
home now. Once that step is complete, they take out
loans using your home as collateral, and they can even
(29:00):
sell your home without you knowing it. Call our friends
at home titlelock dot com right now get your free
complete title scan. Just dial pound two fifty on yourself,
say the keyword protect my title and you'll be connected
directly to home title Lock. Now your complete title scan
and the first thirty days of protection are absolutely free.
Speaker 5 (29:20):
Do it today.
Speaker 2 (29:21):
Just dial pound two fifty on your cell phone, say
the keyword protect my title and they are standing by
it right now waiting for your call.
The Sean Hannity Show News
Host
Sean Hannity
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.