Democrats for Iran - June 17th, Hour 1

Sean recounts the stories of Democrats calling for the destruction of Israel and full support for Iran.  These leftist radicals are truly scary!

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
All right, thank you Scott Shannon, and thanks to all
of you for being with us. Right down our toll
free telephone number if you want to be a part
of this extra ravaganza, it is eight hundred and nine
for one Sean. If you want to join us news,
I promise you'll never get from the state run corrupt
legacy media mob officially dead as of November fifth, last year,

(00:23):
because nobody trusts them because they lie so often. We
have a lot of polling that has come out today.
We'll start with that, and this is joint polling two
of our favorite posters. I remind you that both Trafalgar,
the Trafalgar Group that's Robert Kahaley and Insider Advantage as
Matt Towery, both now the twenty sixteen presidential election, twenty

(00:49):
twenty presidential election, twenty twenty four presidential election. And what's
amazing about them is they poll Donald Trump correctly more
than anybody. They have one question that they put out,
what is your opinion of President Trump's position that Iran
must be prevented from developing a nuclear weapon by any

(01:14):
means necessary. That is a very strong question for a polster.
What is your opinion of President Trump's position that Iran
must be prevented from developing from developing a nuclear weapon
by any means necessary. They approved seventy four point four percent,
disapproved twenty two point nine percent. And it just tells

(01:37):
me that, you know, regardless of the chatter and the
radicalism of the left and some isolationist others, the world understands.
And this is why why do you think all the
countries in the Middle East have been eerily silent because
they're all cheering for Israel to knock out these nuclear sites,

(01:59):
because they all fear Iranian hegemony. Which is why Donald Trump,
very successfully in his first term, was able to create
an unprecedented alliance that he never got credit for intelligence
sharing among the US and Israel and the Saudis and
the Emirates and the Jordanians and the Egyptians and all

(02:19):
of it against Iranian hegemony. Not one country in that
region wants the Iranian regime to ever have a nuclear weapon,
because all they do is for men terrorism, and each
country individually has radicals within their ranks, and so they're
constantly threading needles, and unfortunately it often results in them

(02:41):
trying to placate both sides or turning a blind eye
towards the radicalism. And then, by the way, that has
to stop in these countries. They have to start arresting
and they have to start eliminating those people in their
countries that have bought into this radicalism. Another poll is
out Harvard Harris. Eighty five percent say Tehran must never

(03:06):
get the bomb. Fifty four percent directly back a US
strike on their nuclear assets, sixty percent would support Israel
if talks fail. It goes across party lines, and it
couldn't be any more specific that, you know, giving up
a nuclear and Richmond program has got to be a
precondition to the US accept any deal, and that would

(03:29):
have to be immediate, although I don't know. It's what
one of the most amazing things is. And Elon Musk
did link up Starlink for people to have some connection
to the outside world because the regime shut off any
access to the Internet. However, people are able to bypass
it with the starlink connection. But they are leaving Tehran

(03:51):
in droves because President Trump said get out now while
you can, and they're leaving. I mean, the convoy is
it's it's unbelieved to see it's bumper to bumper traffic.
It's sort of like in the lead up in the
days leading up to you know, a hurricane that is
projected to hit your town or your city. You have

(04:11):
one top Democrat and this now goes to the heart
of where the Democratic Party is. And you know, Democratic
leaders have sided with these you know, they've been silent
or complicit with these pro terrorist campus protesters. They've tolerated
virulent anti semitism in their own ranks in the halls
of Congress on these college campuses. They've taken up the

(04:33):
cause of you know, wife beating, gang banging, criminal illegals.
They've tried to block the National Guard from interfering with
anti ICE rioters even as they're arresting and doing the job,
and the Constitution gives them jurisdiction through the supremacy clause.
But interfering with anti ICE rioters that they try to

(04:55):
burn city cities down and light it was like they
did about Joe's cognitive state and open borders and the
economy and pretty much on everything else about Donald Trump. Well,
now they found another noxious cause to get behind. Democrats
are now lining up what to support the Iranian regimes,
you know, desire and ambition for producing nuclear weapons, which

(05:18):
Iranian leaders have vowed to use to wipe Israel and
the US off the face of the earth. You have
a top Democratic Senator, Hillary Clinton's vice presidential nominee, no Less,
now trying to block President Trump from helping Israel take
out Iranian Iran's nuclear program. Good, by the way, good
luck defending that position. In the twenty twenty six mid term,

(05:39):
Senator Tim Kaine introduced a resolution seeking to prevent the
US from getting involved in a military conflict with Iran
without congressional approval. The resolution reaffirms existing law directing the
President to end any use of US armed forces for
hostilities against Iran. Blah blah blah. That this is now

(06:01):
the party of radicalism. The only exceptions to that rule,
and we'll play him later in the program today is
Senator John Fetterman. He's actually calling on Israel to show
no mercy and to take out the Iranian Supreme Leader
Ali Kamanie, and Fetterman told the Washington Free Beacon Israel
should use its successful campaign against against Hazbalah in Lebanon,

(06:23):
which culminated in the assassination of the thirty two year
leader Hassan Norasla and Neraza. I'm sorry, Nasralla a model
for how to deal with Iran, and just like Nazraala,
Fetterman replied. When asked whether the Jewish state should target Khamanee,
he said, in fact, it should have been when Israel

(06:44):
began to dismantle Iran. Now they've taken out their nuclear scientists.
This Democratic Party, before we get into there's a lot
of specifics and a lot of news to share with
you today, but we saw it this weekend, the party
of compact and love. You know, the base of the
Democratic Party. I would argue it is the Democratic Party.

(07:05):
There are no moderate voices but for John Fetterman, who's
under constant attack by the radical left and the likes
of Chucky Schumer and Hakim Jeffries. They are scared to
death of their own party members that can. It's controlled
by Jasmine Crockett and the squad and AOC and Elizabeth

(07:26):
Warren and Grandpa Bernie. I mean, you saw all these
left wing protesters this weekend in cities all across the country.
In some cases they were left wing protesters in New
York openly supporting Iran. The Democratic Party is the crazy party.
They're the party of radical coastal elitists that you know

(07:46):
that champion the rights of men to play women's sports.
I mean, think about this. They are so out of touch.
You've got people out in the street. They're dressed like
Islamic extremists calling for the destruction of it is from
the river to the sea. How often have we discussed
that being said on college campuses, you know, virulent hatred,

(08:08):
anti semitism. These protests have gone on now for nearly
two years, since October seventh. I'm not sure what part
of murder, rape, torture, beheading, and kidnapping they don't understand,
but they clearly don't understand or don't want to understand it.
The same party that turned this you know, suspected human trafficker,
gang member, illegal immigrant, they've become the party of Abrego Garcia.

(08:31):
They turned this guy into a folk hero until the
polls show yeah, this is backfiring on you. Okay, well
we'll amandon that position now. The party that blocks highways,
attacks law enforcement federal buildings all because Ice, you know,
went into Los Angeles and they found criminal illegal immigrants
convicted of murder and child rape and gang activity and

(08:56):
other heinous crimes to keep the people, the law abiding
citizens of Los Angeles safe. The same party that you
know turned a blind eyed didn't say a word about
the calls for assassination of President Trump or Elon Musk
that burned Tesla's uh in dealerships around the country, firing
bullets into Tesla dealerships, you know, burning Tesla charging stations.

(09:21):
Oh what did Elon Musk do? He rescued astronauts and
he found, you know, hundreds of billions of waste, fraud
and abuse. You know, they think it's corrupt in a
constitutional crisis that hundreds of billions of dollars on deism, wokeism, transgenderism,
l g B, t q ism is being spent, not
even in this, around the around the globe. You know,

(09:43):
the US Senate Democrats supporting championing the right the rights
of men to play women's sports. The same party that
supports supports racist DEI policies over meritocracy and hard work.
The same party that believed the Russia hoax buys abuse.
They sat silent as long as it was against Donald Trump.

(10:03):
The same party that didn't care the Statute of Limitations
had run out on this issue, of which was a
misdemeanor in New York turned into a novel legal theory
by Alvin Bragg, just so they can call Donald Trump
a convict. I mean, the things that they didn't care about,
the phone evaluation of mar A Lago, They didn't care
about the double standard when it came to rating mar

(10:26):
A Lago but not rating Joe Biden's four locations where
he had top secret classified information. The same party that
lacks any self awareness with this ridiculous nationwide no kings
protests this weekend. You know, we had an election. They lost,
Donald Trump won, and they helped him win, and he

(10:46):
won every swing state and the popular vote. And now
they're acting like, you know, they don't care about acts
of violence. They're mostly peaceful vandalism, mostly peaceful intimidation, you know,
attacking law enforcement, mostly peaceful. You know, it's it's it's
pretty bizarre. Donald Trump is now demanding the unconditional surrender

(11:10):
from Iran. The sterness language to date, the President warning
earlier today he's losing patience with Iran and for quote
unconditional surrender, saying that he wouldn't target the country's leader.
We know where he is, he said, but we're not
going to target come a knee for now. Doesn't mean

(11:30):
it's off the table, and a series of social media
posts as of this afternoon, he said, the US knows
where the Iranian Supreme Leader is hiding. He is an
easy target, but it's safe there. We're not going to
take him out or kill him, at least for now.
Our patients is wearing thin unconditional surrender, he wrote. In

(11:53):
a separate post, he said, Tehran has lost control of
Iran's airspace. We now complete total control of the skies
over Iran, and they have good skytrackers and other defensive
equipment and plenty of it. But it doesn't compare to
American made, conceived and manufactured weaponry. Nobody does it better

(12:14):
than the good old US of A. And Trump used
the word wei, but it wasn't immediately clear if that
meant that the US is taking a more active role
in Israel's unfolding attacks. The President returned to Washington, got
home about four point thirty this morning on Air Force
one to deal with matters at home. He's not being

(12:37):
specific about it. He has never wavered in his space
in terms of where he stands let me tell you
what the three options are. Where we are right now.
The Israelis took out two of their three nuclear sites.
The third site, I'll go into great specificity. There are
really three ways to take out that site. The first

(12:58):
two options are not good. Off One, the Israelis can
go it alone with a tactical nuke. Nobody wants that option,
not a good option. Option two, they can send in commandos.
That would be a great risk and harm potentially to
Israeli fighters. Not the best option, but controlling the skies.

(13:21):
The best option would be bunker buster bombs, but Israel,
according to reports I can't confirm one hundred percent, they
don't have bunker busters. That would take the US not
only to provide it, but probably to complete the mission,
because they don't have the B fifty two that would

(13:42):
be necessary to deliver that bomb, the mother of all bombs,
thirty thousand pounds. And it's a whole process to knock
out this one site. It's buried three hundred feet deep
into the ground. And so those are the three options
on the table now. And the question is is the
world better without the number one state sponsor of terror

(14:06):
having nuclear weapons? How many rockets would need to be
fired into America before you would demand, as an American
citizen that your country fight back because Israel and I've
told the story many times. I've been to these border
towns and cities that have been hit with tens of
thousands of rockets. I've seen the Golden Dome in the

(14:29):
Iron Dome in action. I have been in the terror tunnels.
They have taken enough. They deserve a peaceful solution, assuming
this mission can be completed. It is not without risk.
I want to be very clear, but the Trump doctrine
is clear. They can't have nukes, and he still doesn't

(14:50):
believe in forever wars. He wants this knocked out and
done and over with. Then it will be up to
the Israelis if they take out their power grid, which
is gas driven, take out their ability to make money,
which would be to knock out their refineries, an easy
attack considering most of the refineries are on one little island.
Eight hundred ninety four one Shawn is a number. If

(15:12):
you want to be a part of the program, we're
going to go on the ground in Tel Aviv. What
has life been like there with all the hundreds and
hundreds of ballistic missiles they've been able to shoot down,
according to the idea, about ninety five percent of them.
But it's still, you know, pretty unbelievable. The President now
demanding unconditional surrender from the Iranians, and we know exactly

(15:37):
where the so called Supreme Leader is hiding. He is
an easy target but is safe there. We're not going
to take him out kill at least not for now,
but we don't want missiles shot at civilians or American soldiers.
Our patients is wearing thin. Thank you for your attention
to this matter. I mean it is. You know, there

(15:59):
is some internal I am staying away from the noise
among certain people, but I will tell you there is
a lot of noise, and there's a lot of people
that have agendas. Here's my agenda. My agenda is frankly
in sync with what the President believes. I believe in
the Trump doctrine, in this case, the Trump dot What

(16:19):
is the Trump doctrine here? The Trump doctrine is Iran
cannot have nuclear weapons. If you don't understand that, I
can't I there's no way I can educate you to
the level you need to be educated at to understand it.
I'm not going to waste my time. The American people
get it, and I go back to the insider advantage
in Trafalgar Pol coming out today, what is your opinion

(16:41):
of President Trump's position that Iran must be prevented from
developing a nuclear weapon by any means necessary. Seventy four
point four percent approved, twenty two point nine percent disapprove,
two point seven percent no opinion. Harvard Harris eighty five
percent say hey, Ron must never get the bomb, fifty
four percent back of US strike on their nuclear assets,

(17:05):
sixty percent with support Israel. If talks fail, it goes
across party lines. America backs the strength. That's where we are.
The inner circle of Iran Supreme leader has been hollowed out.
This is a report that the eighty six year old
Supreme leader Ali Kamani has seen his main military and

(17:27):
security advisors killed by Israeli airstrikes, leaving major holes in
his inner circle. I mean they took out his nuclear signedists,
they took out some of the top leaders of the
Iranian Revolutionary Guard, and one report that he is even
negotiating a potential asylum move out of Iran and into Russia.

(17:48):
I'm sure putin will be their arms open. But you know,
the president is now seeking a real end to the escalation.
Now the question is they were there's one site remaining.
To me the most important thing and if you ask
what the goals should be, and I know people have

(18:09):
different views on this, and I accept that people have
different views on this. Do I think the Israelis have
you know, the Israelis are the country that have withstood
that that the you know, hundreds of thousands of missiles
being fired into their country. The Iranians have been you know,
they help plot, plan and scheme with the Iranian Revolutionary

(18:32):
Guard and their CUDS forces. The October seventh attack, that's
the equivalent of forty thousand dead Americans in a day
based on extrapolated out population sizes, et cetera. But also
the kidnapping, the torture, the beheading, you know, the rape,
and everything else in between. So the Israelis, you know,

(18:54):
at the end of the day, as far as I'm concerned,
once the nuclear threat is forever neutralized, the world is
a safer place. The Israelis have every right in my view,
And if you had let's say, the one town that
I was in in what twenty fourteen or fifteen, there

(19:16):
wrote a border town with Gaza. In the previous ten
years have been hit with ten thousand missiles. One little town,
and I mean little. This is the town where kids
playing underground bunker playgrounds. Because it only takes twelve thirteen
seconds for one of these missiles when they're fired from Gaza,
what you can see with the naked eye to make
it into that town. And it's amazing to me that

(19:40):
this town has been able to survive in spite of
this never ending onslaught. How many missiles fired into America
would you take before you would wipe out the enemy
that did this? And the you know, look, we have
at least twenty four dead in Israel. They are targeting,
you know, large civilian population areas like Tel Aviv. And

(20:03):
we'll get a report at the top of the hour
about that they have now activated their new aerial defense
system for the first time since its inception. It's the
Barrock Megan meaning Lightning Shield for the first time Sunday night,
saying they intercepted and destroyed multiple Iranian drones and if
you're Israel, how many more it has to stop? This

(20:24):
is now the missiles are getting bigger two thousand pound
ballistic missiles they're building for their ambition is four thousand
pound bombs. I mean, now you're talking about mass casualties.
And does anybody ask yourself, maybe you do doubt, maybe
you don't think they would do it. I personally think

(20:44):
they would do it. And that is if you marry
radical Islamic terrorism with the number one state sponsor of
terror that has provided funding to Hamas and Hezbola and
the Islamic Jihad and the Huti they fired directly into Israel.
And then you add into that the Iraqi militia, the

(21:06):
Syria militia, and you have one common denominator and that
is that is the Mulls in Iran. And they have
been hell bent on this whole thing. Now, what to
know about the three options? Option one not a good
option to use the tactical nuke under any circumstances. However,

(21:30):
Irans for now fuel enrichment plant is the one remaining.
It is a fortress. It is built deep within the mountains,
up to three hundred feet underground, located about one hundred
miles south of Tehran. Remember, the people of Tehran have
been born by Donald Trump to get out of town
and get out quickly. There's one facility remaining on Israel's

(21:54):
hit list and the world's hit list, and it may
take American bust bunking buster bunker bombs to do it,
you know, short of commandos. You know, getting into the
facility a very dangerous operation by any measure, but three
hundred feet underground, and you know America has these, you know,

(22:15):
thirty ton bunker buster bombs, and you know this what's
called a fifty seven a b massive ordinance penetrator is
thought to be capable of reaching the facility. Maybe it
would take two of them. I'm not sure. I'm not
an expert in bunker busters. While Israel has surprised Western

(22:38):
intelligence in the past with the scope of its arms
and strategies, we don't know. Nothing suggests that they have
the means to penetrate this one nuclear sites defenses and
get deep into the ground where it is to inflict
the damage so that no more enrichment of uranium can
take place. Now anyway, this this one place was was

(22:59):
FIR completed in two thousand and nine. It's about one
hundred miles south of Tehran, one of three major nuclear
Richmond sites. Iran spent years fortifying this facility, which has
been able to avoid most major attacks from Israel and elsewhere.
Tehran has made sure the facility can survive airstrike attacks,
making this a much harder target. And the way a

(23:21):
bunker buster works is the bomber pilot uses a guidance
system to lock the bomb onto the target, then exit
the area. As the bomb travels to its orbit, the
first charge will detonate, clearing a path for a second charge.
The second charge would then enter the target following the
opening created by the first charge, and the thing would

(23:45):
then explode. Now sounds a little complicated. I can show
you and make visuals for you on TV tonight so
you fully completely understand it. But that's what it's going
to take, and that would probably be be us. Look
as far as the left goes, and you know, for years,
I always knew Pap Buchanan and understood that there were

(24:06):
certain things we'd never agree on. And I always viewed
Pat as kind of like an isolationist, and you know,
had certain America first policies but then had views about
other countries that I found at times even reprehensible. But
you know, we just agreed to disagree, and I agree
to disagree with some other people. Marco Levin actually had
the great one, had a great article in the New

(24:28):
York Post today and he talks about isolationists, and he
really rightly points out that isolationism, I mean, it's not
the Trump doctrine of taking out Iran's nukes is not
in America first, and not believing in long protracted wars

(24:51):
is not isolationism. I mean, if we learned anything from
World War Two and never Chamberlain meeting with Hitler and
Munich and coming back and from claiming peace in our time,
peace and our time, that that was naive and dumb
and stupid. And you know, isolationism can also be appeasement,
and you can also One of the biggest parts that

(25:14):
is unspoken about the MAGA agenda is common sense. And
nuclear weapons in the hands of the number one state
sponsor of terror, that can't death to America, death to Israel.
It just goes against common sense when you have the
opportunity to prevent them from ever getting that power, and
you can. And when you listen to people that almost

(25:36):
and Mark is right, they're incoherent. They don't even agree
upon themselves, and there's there's different factions of that that ideology,
but it's you know, it's certainly not peace through strength.
It's certainly not common sense. It's certainly if you think
it's okay, and you want to try to call this
program and explain to me how allowing the Iranian is

(26:00):
to continue their their pursuit of a nuclear weapon and
likely getting one and building out these two thousand and
four thousand pound ballistic missiles, where are we going to
be in six months or a year? The world will
be held hostage. And this is an opportunity with Prime
Minister net and Yahoo and President Trump at the helm

(26:23):
where you deal with genocidal terrorists is Nazi regime. And
you know, and the President did, to his credit, he
bent over backwards to try to convince them to choose
the path of peace, and they have chose not to
do that. And he said, it's a big mistake, you know,

(26:45):
and it's been brilliant. It doesn't mean it is without risk.
It doesn't mean it is not dangerous. But this is
a dangerous world. You don't define peace as the absence
of conflict, of the absence of war. Now, for those
that may have concerns. We don't want to be dragged
into a long quagmire, as they say, or a long
protracted war. That's part of the that's part of the

(27:08):
Trump doctrine too, and that's not the plan here to
send American troops on the ground, and nor should it
be in my view. I think the President has it
exactly right. They can't have nukes. And if it's a
joint operation or an American operation to take out this
final side, and it's going to be what it's going
to be, and then Israel at that point will make

(27:30):
up their minds whether they want to take out the
Iranian ability to have power in their country because that
grid can be taken out because they own the skies.
And then they'll decide if the regime will have any
opportunity to make money if they decide to take out
their refineries. Again, an easy target when you control the skies.

(27:51):
The most amazing thing that I've seen in terms of
video is when Trump called for the immediate evacuation of Tehran.
Everybody's they're taking Donald Trump's word for it, you know,
but it's this this bunk or buster would have to
be dropped from an American aircraft which would have wide
ranging ramifications. We have troops in the area that would

(28:15):
need protection. Again, there's nothing, nothing, nobody that can make
an argument that this is a risk free operation. There
is always risk, you know. And he said if Iran
should have signed the deal, I told them to sign
what a waste of human life. Simply stated, Iran cannot

(28:36):
have a nuclear weapon. I support the Trump doctrine and
also the doctrine that we can't have forever wars. It's
going to be go in strike, achieved the direct the
the directive, and warn them if they dare to come
after one American one American installation, that there will be

(28:57):
hell to pay. And then if they do, then there
should be hell to pay. You know. Whatever motivations other
people have, that's on them. I know what we have
to do here.