Fauci's Lies - March 17th, Hour 2

Gregg Jarrett sits down with  Congressman Jim Jordan of Ohio to review the many impacts of Dr. Fauci's lies around COVID.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
And welcome to the Sean Hannity Show. I'm Greg Jarrett,
pleased to be filling in for Shawn a Fox News
legal analysts. Follow me on Twitter at Greg Jarrett. Read
my legal columns and listen to my podcast The Brief
on my website d Greg Jarrett dot com. And also
you can pre order my brand new book, The Trial

(00:21):
of the Century. It's available online again for pre order
right now at Barnes and Noble dot com or Amazon
dot com. Now, hearings are taking place on Capitol Hill
digging deep into weather doctor Anthony Fauci manipulated public opinion
to conceal his own role in funding dangerous experiments inside

(00:43):
the Wuhan Laboratory in China, where the deadly coronavirus may
well have leaked, killing more than six million people worldwide.
Joining me now to talk about it is Congressman Jim Jordan,
Republican of Ohio. He's chairman of the House Judiciary Committee,
also a member of the Oversight Committee, and importantly the

(01:04):
subcommittee that's investigating doctor Anthony Fauci's suspected misconduct and cover up. Congressman,
thanks so much for being here. I watched the recent
hearing of your subcommittee, and doctor Robert Redfield was testifying
that gain of function experiments, in his judgment, probably created

(01:24):
and caused the virus, and it almost surely leaked from
the Wuhan lab, killing more than six million people worldwide,
more than a million Americans. Are you persuaded that doctor
Fauci played a role in all of that by spending
US taxpayer dollars to fund these dangerous gain of function

(01:47):
research experiments inside that very Wuhan lab. Yeah, Greg, I
am convent that that's what happened, and maybe more importantly,
I'm convinceded doctor Fouci tried to cover it up and
downplay it after he discovered what had happened. And remember
that the task force gets formed on January twenty nine,
twenty twenty. Two days later, January thirty first, ten thirty
two pm, doctor Fouchy gets an email from doctor Anderson.

(02:09):
The email says, virus looks engineered virus, not consistent with
evolutionary theory. The next day he gets another email from
doctor Gary which says, virus. I don't know how this
happened in nature, but it would be easy to do
in a laugh, Doctor Fauschy gets those two guys on
the conference call. After the conference call, three days later,
those two guys changed their story one hundred and eighty degree.
I think the reason they did that is because Fouchie

(02:31):
got him in line and said, Fellas, we can't have
this information getting out that we had funded gain a
function research in a lab in China that was not
up to code and was doing this gain a function
research where this virus most likely started. So that I
think is what happened. And doctor Fauchi had to cover
that up. Competing with that information getting out there knowing

(02:52):
he had done what he had done. Yeah, he had
to conceal his role and absolve himself in the deadliest
man made catastrophe, one of them in history. Now, Congressman,
the nih now admits that it funneled money through a
third party to that Wuhan lab for experiments that quote

(03:17):
had the unexpected result of creating a coronavirus that was
more infectuous. That's a quote from the NIAGE. And the
agency produced the records proving that they'd done that. So
when Anthony Fauci denied that NIAGE ever funded gain a
Function research, exactly these kinds of risky deadly experiments. I

(03:42):
mean he was lying, wasn't he. And the last time
I checked, lying to Congress is a crime. It's called
perjury as well as false statements to Congress. Would you agree, yeah,
it sure is. I mean, they duced up this virus.
But doctor Pocky tried to say somehow that that really
wasn't gain a function, even though that that's the exactly
what happened. Even though doctor Redfield says that he believes

(04:04):
it was gain a function. Research being done at this
at the WU hunt into the virology. Here's the other
thing that I think is important. When those emails come
out right at the start January thirty, first February first,
those emails come out, Doctor Fauzi doesn't share them with
doctor Redfield, who's on the coronavirus task Force. He doesn't
share him with anyone else in the government. Just him
and doctor Collins. Get these virologists on a phone call,

(04:25):
get their stories straight. Three days later, those same virologists said,
I don't know how this happens in nature, but it'd
be easy to do in a lab. Those same vis
viral just changed their tune one hundred and eighty degrees
and say Now now they say, anyone who thinks they
come from a lab, you're a nut job, You're a
conspiracy theorist. So the only intervening events seems to be
that conference call where Fauchi and Collins get on there

(04:46):
and tell them what they're gonna now stick to what
their story is going to be. And of course, as
we pointed out in the hearing, three months later, both
doctor Anderson and doctor Gary, these two virologists, they get
a nine million dollars grant from doctor Fausi. So I
think his actions after this vibrus breaks out also confirm
that the idea that they were doing gain a function
research at that last Yeah, and Tauci is trying to

(05:07):
passwords here. He's trying to change the definitions by saying, well,
I didn't fund fund gain a function research, I funded
reverse genetics. Well, I went through some of his past
speeches in which he said reverse genetics is gain of function.

(05:28):
So he's coming up with a vapid excuse to try
to get out of potential perjury charges. Now he sure is,
and this is this is one of the things we
should do, Greg, is we should pass legislation that we
that says we will not be funding gain a function research,
and frankly, at a minimum, we shouldn't be funding it
and doing it in China, for goodness sakes with American

(05:50):
tax dollars. So this is this is scary stuff. And
the other thing I think is real important. We're now
hearing from the left and from founcine. Some of them
they're saying, well, it could be nature, it could be
a lab leak. We're not sure, but you know, we
need to move on, We need to Well, that's not
what you said back three years ago. You said anyone

(06:11):
who questioned the bad to a pangle on to a
hippoponymous to Joe Rogan, the nature, anyone who questioned that
they were crazy, they were conspiracy theorists. And you you
censored people online like doctor Batatara. So you did all
kinds of things and now it's like, oh, well, you know,
everything's fine, let's move That is not how this works.
When you did the kind of things that you did

(06:32):
to people who were expressing a different opinion and frankly
had a different hypothesis about how this virus began. I think,
as I said in my introductory or remarks, I think
Fauci is panicking now because he realizes that he's been
caught and caught line to Congress, which again is perjury.

(06:52):
So the other day he blubbered on CNN, prosecute me
for what? This is craziness. What are they taught thing about?
I mean, this is a guy who strikes me as
realizing that, you know, you on the Congressional Committee have
got his number, and you know, I would like to
see the Department of Justice conduct a criminal investigation, not

(07:17):
into Faucci, not just into Fauci's role in helping to
create this virus inside a lab, but then lying about it.
Are the what are the chances DJ would do that, Well,
they're probably pretty slim, but let's let's hope. So and
and here's the here's the broader context as well. This
wasn't the only thing he told us that wasn't true.

(07:38):
I mean, think about it. They told us it wasn't
our tax dollars. They told us it wasn't gaining a
function research. They told us it didn't a leak from
a lab. But they also told us there's no such
thing as natural immunity. First virus in history, no such
thing as natural immunity. I mean, they think about that.
They told us that the vaccinated couldn't get the virus,
they told us that the vaccinated couldn't transmit the virus.
They told us that mask work. I mean, everything they

(08:00):
told us turned out to defalse. And while they're telling
us all these things that turned out to be untrue,
they were centering people who were saying things that were
actually true. So that is the broader context, and it's
why that's why so many people are so frustrated and
set up with the three years of frankly false information
coming from our government, and in particular coming from doctor Falci.

(08:22):
Let me switch topics now, if I may. My guest
is Jim Jordan, chairman of the House Judiciary committees on
the Oversight Committee. Let me switch topics to something that
you're dealing with on the other committees, and that is
the Hunter Biden Joe Biden influenced pedaling investigations. You're a
top member of the Oversight Committee. After resisting for so long,

(08:45):
the Treasury Department is finally giving you access to the
many about one hundred and fifty Suspicious Activities reports in
which US banks flag transactions that bear signs of money laundering.
Another criminal activities involving the Bidens. What can you tell
us about that? Well, I think the point of the

(09:06):
key term is the title of these these reports. They're
called suspicious activity reports, and as the name would suggest,
the name would imply that it's about suspicious taking activity.
So maybe you have an account with very little money
and all of a sudden shazam, here comes several million
dollars being transferred into this account and then right away
moved out and made payments are made to Biden family members.

(09:28):
Maybe you have accalents that are moving money amongst various
different accounts. These are all kind of things that raise
suspicions at the Treasury Department and at these banks, and
so Chairman Comer has been trying to get a hold
of this information for a long long time. It looks
like now finally staff and members will be able to
go view them in camera. I don't know why. I

(09:49):
think in the past they were actually given to the Chairman,
But in this situation they're saying, no, no, you're gonna
have to come in and look at it. You can't
take they can't take anything out. You're gonna have to
come in and take notes and look at the information.
So that's a step in the right direction. But we'll see.
But again, when you have this mini one hundred and fifties,
but what's been reported suspicious activity at banking records, I

(10:10):
think that that says a lot and we'll see what
the documents show. The chairman of the Oversight Committee, James Comer,
says that the First Stars report shows money going from
China to three Biden family members, and also your committee
supoena to the banking records of three of hundred Biden's

(10:30):
business associates, including John rob Walker and Congressmen. Comber has
said publicly that Walker was wired roughly three million dollars
from Chinese Communist Party connected individuals and then Walker forwarded
the money to three Biden family members. And I suppose

(10:55):
the question is what were those three Biden family members
doing for millions in cash? What do you think? Yeah,
what was the service was? What was the work, what
was the expertise? What was done to warrant that kind
of money? What were they being paid for? I think
that is the fundamental question, and frankly I don't have
an answer to it. I don't know that. I don't

(11:16):
know who does. But I know that Chairman Comer and
the Committee is committed to finding an answer to that
sort of fundamental foundational question. What were they providing that
warranted being paid to sum of money if it's something legitimate,
some a little bit of legitimate business, Okay, that's one thing,
but we don't know what it is. Um were they
providing legal counsel where they? I don't know now? Supposedly

(11:36):
it somehow connected to an energy energy interest that the
these Chinese businessmen had, which kind of a concerning thing
in and of itself. So we don't know. But again
that's the question I think we have to answer, and
that Chairman Comer and the Committee are committed to to
finding out. Yeah, that Chinese energy deal with CEFC, the
Chinese company again with close ties to the Communist Party

(11:59):
that's ed the Biden's roughly six million dollars are are
you convinced, Congressman that Joe Biden was involved in his
son's schemes. Well, we have an eyewitness who was part
of this business operation at least at one point, who
came forward a few years ago. Mister Bob Olinsky, you

(12:19):
have the emails that people say now are authentic. Um,
you know, we thought they were authentic at the time.
Of course, that are part of the laptop. So you've
got documents that that suggests that strongly. You got an
eyewitness who was part of the business operation who says that,
I think that's pretty compelling evidence. And then of course
now you have this these one hundred and fifty suspicious

(12:39):
activity reports that we're going to get a chance to
begin to look at. So I think all that, all
that raises all kinds of concerns that it involved Joe Biden.
I guess the the story answers. We don't know, but
there's a lot of evidence that seems to point in
that direction. And again, one of those, one of the
piece of evidence is an eyewitness who was part of
this deal. So um, again, I think that's why we
do the investigation, make sure the country has the facts

(13:02):
about what went on. Marrick Garland testified recently and insisted
that there was no need for him to recuse himself,
even though the federal regulations require it, they demand it,
it's not optional, but he won't do it. And his
excuse is, well, the US Attorney David Weiss and Delaware
he has complete independence to do whatever he wants. Here's

(13:25):
what I don't get in and I think many listeners
don't get Weiss has been investigating this now gets into
its fifth year. How is and no criminal charges have
ever been filed despite a plethora of evidence on the
laptop alone. How is it possible that you can conduct

(13:48):
a five year long investigation into the president's son and
likely the president of himself and no criminal charges? I
bet you're asked that question as well. What do you
usually say? What are your suspicions? Congressman? And then there's
I think there's another fundamental question, and you've raised this.
I think maybe you are the first to raise it,
is how was the decision made not to appoint a

(14:10):
special counsel? And I'm not saying you have to have
a special counsel here, but this would look this would
looks like the one situation that would most warrant a
special counsel. So how was that decision made? Who was
involved in saying no to a special counsel? Was it
raised at all? I think you know, we have a
special counsel for President Trump, we have one now for
the classified doctors with President Biden. How is this situation

(14:31):
not fit that category. So I think that's a fundamental question. Also,
I don't know why it takes five years. I think
a lot of people are asking. The only one who
had would have that answer is is the US attorney
in Delaware? I guess in Merrick Arland. But I don't
know that we're going to get any information from these
guys if we ask that question. All right. Congressman Jim Jordan,
Republican of Ohio, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, top

(14:53):
member of the Oversight Committee, also on the subcommittee investigating
doctor Anthony Fauci's cover up. Congressman, many thanks for being
with us, appreciating you bad great, thanks on the good
work you do. Take care. Thank you. We're gonna take
a short break. I'm Greg Jarrett filling in for Sean
Hannity on the Sean Hannity Show. We'll be right back

(15:16):
standing up for watch Rite with America. We're back on
the Sean Hannity Show. Welcome back to the Sean Hannity Show.
On Greg Jarrett filling in for Sean. I'm happy to
be here. I'm a lawyer and Fox News legal analysts.
Follow me on Twitter at Greg Jarrett. You can read
my legal columns. Listen to my podcast The Brief on

(15:37):
my website thee Greg Jarrett dot Com. And my new book,
The Trial of the Century is available now for pre
order online. Publishers Weekly calls it a colorful, dramatic account
of one of the most consequential free speech debates in
American history. The book is about the famous Scopes Monkey trial,

(15:59):
a young schoolteacher in Tennessee handcuffed, arrested, charged with teaching
this science of evolution in a public school, which at
the time was banned. Legendary defense attorney Clarence Darrow's withering
cross examination of fundamentalist leader William Jennings Brian described at
the time of The New York Times as the most

(16:21):
amazing court scene in Anglo Saxon history. Well, you can
read about it in my new book, Trial of the Century.
Preorder it now at Amazon dot com or Barnes and
Noble dot com or other booksellers online. I also have
a new column out on my website. It describes how
Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg appears determined to indict former

(16:45):
President Donald Trump on legally feeble charges over the seven
year old episode involving Stormy Daniels and in a remarkable
legal Sumrsaul Bragg wants to turn a dubious misdemeanor business
records violation into a felony by bootstrapping some imagined campaign violation.

(17:12):
Joining me now to talk about it, as well as
the latest on the Hunter Biden Joe Biden investigation into
suspected influence pedaling. John Solomon, an award winning investigative journalist,
is the CEO, founder and editor in chief of Just
the News, one of the best websites online. And John,

(17:32):
thanks for being here. Always great talking to you. Before
we get to the Biden investigation. What's your reaction to
what Manhattan da Alvin Bragg is doing here resurrecting his
dead seventy year old case against Trump based on what
I describe as a cockamami interpretation of a law, no
credible evidence, and of course, the star witness Michael Cohen,

(17:54):
an admitted liar, he went to prison for his dishonesty,
and the obviously has an ax to grind against Trump.
What do you make of this? Well, listen, if your
case depends on a porn star and two disgraced lawyers,
because you got two of them here. Michael Cohen and
Michael Avnati, You're probably in some big trouble. And there's

(18:15):
there are two ways that the modern judicial system seems
to weaponize charges. One as by bringing him in the court.
The other is by leaking them and trying to change
a perception in the court of public opinion. And the
amount of leaks in detail that have been coming out
of an investigation that should be done in secret, I
think concerns anyone who cares about the integrity of the investigation.

(18:35):
It seems as though the prosecutors and their witnesses are
trying to try this case and the press before grand
jury gets a legitimate chance to adjudge the credibility of
the evidence and the witnesses. And you know, a lot
of people I've talked to I always trying to keep
an open a lot of people talking and said, this
is an enormous legal stretch. These are Democrat and Republican
lawyers and former prosecutors who said, listen, unless or something,

(18:57):
we don't know, this is a big stretch. And I'm
gonna take you to one of them. We all know
very well. We've all talked to him many times. Alan
Dershowitz now let's put Alan Dershowitz in perspective. He's openly
and avotly liberal. He says he voted for Joe Biden
in twenty twenty, but he wrote a column in the
last couple of days stating very clearly that the effort
to try to bring charges against Donald Trump in New

(19:18):
York on this Stormy Daniels matter was akin to what
the Jim Crow Southern prosecutors tried to do in the
nineteen fifties to discredit civil rights activists, basically weaponizing a
non existent charge to try to change someone politically, harm
someone politically. When a Joe Biden's supporter is saying that
maybe the prosecutors in New York auto take another pause

(19:41):
and think about what they're really doing here. Yeah, you
would think Bragg would have enough on his plate with
the out of control, rampant crime in New York City,
But instead he wants to bring this politically motivated case
based on zero evidence in zero laws. Really, I mean,
it just speaks volumes about you know, how New York

(20:03):
City is being operated this day. But let me move
on to something. Let me mention one other thing that a
a lot of people might not remember, but This showed
the dual system of justice. There was some stories back
four or five years ago that in two thousand and eight,
during the two thousand and eight presidential campaign, Hillary Clinton
had a staffer who had engaged in some form of

(20:23):
bad sexual harassment and they swept it under the rug.
And the reason the victims couldn't talk in that case,
and keep in mind that Hillary Clinton was based in
New York at the time, the reason they couldn't speak
was that she had executed nondisclosure agreements with the people
that were involved. Interesting that a nondisclosure agreement was okay
for a Democrat presidential candidate in fifteen years ago and

(20:44):
even five years ago when it came to light, But
they're the same circumstances with Donald Trump. Seems to have
created some conceived criminal case. I do think that people
to go back and look at Hillary Clinton case, but
a long time since I looked at it, but I
remember it very clearly. Yeah, absolutely, And by the way,
you know, I mean people should know that, you know,
nondisclosure agreements are perfectly legal, but you know, this is

(21:09):
a da is trying to criminalize it, and you know,
abusing his authority and position of power, weaponizing the law
for a political reason, very much like my book Trial
of the Century, weaponizing you know, the justice system for

(21:29):
what was then political and religious reasons. They were banning
textbooks in schools that had a chapter on religion. They
were arresting school teachers for teaching out of the textbook
which was state approved. Again, weaponization of the justice system.
Let me move on, because you've got a terrific story

(21:51):
out about how the Oversight Committee in the House has
now been able and I'm using your words to penetrate
a labyrinth of at least a dozen bank accounts that
were used to funnel money from foreign sources to Joe
Biden's family. Tell us about that, John, Yeah, this is
from an interview I did yesterday with Congressman James Comer

(22:14):
and the chairman of the House Oversight Committee. They were
given access to the suspicious activity reports that the Treasury
Department has had on record for many years flagging transactions
in and around and involving Hunter Biden and his business partners.
And he said, from that and from separate witness testimony,
because there are several cooperating witnesses, including a business partner

(22:36):
very close to Hunter Biden, who also interacted with the
finances of Joe Biden when who was Vice president, that
they now have identified at least a dozen accounts, and
they expect there's going to be more. Where money comes
in from these foreign entities that comes into LLC's lyse.
He's moving to the private accounts of family members, and
he said there are many family members involved in the
sharing of this money. And then some of those personal

(22:58):
accounts of the Biden family members then go on to
pay off bills for Joe Biden provide other financial benefits
to Joe Biden. So, as he said at the end
of the interview, we are getting very close to Joe Biden.
This was not an influenced peddling scheme that stopped that
his son or his brother. This was a one that
ultimately provided some financial benefits to Joe Biden. And the

(23:20):
reason that's significant to me is about two years ago
I corroborated some emails that were on the famous laptop
that showed that Eric Schwarren, the business partner now cooperating
with the Congressional investigators, wrote Hunter Biden saying that he
had paid some of his father's bills using Hunter Biden's money,

(23:41):
and then later that Joe Biden wanted to repay a
sign for some of the things, so he was going
to divert. Joe Biden, the Vice President, was going to
divert some of his Delaware texts refund to repay some
of the money that Hunter Biden had laid out for him.
So this evidence gets further corroborated by the bank transfers
at James Comer went and reviewed yesterday and his comments

(24:02):
are very point. He spent a lot of time talking
about Joe Biden, and he said, listen, if we corroborate
this the way we think we're going to Joe Biden
might have a tax problem. You also may have an
ethics problem because gifts and loans to elected officials are
supposed to be disclosed on your ethics form. So you
can see where this investigation is going. The bull's eye
has moved from Hunter Biden and his tax issues and
all of his other Quadria problems to the president himself

(24:26):
based on the cash flow that they now see. So John,
this money is being funneled the Bidens through limited liability
corporation shell corporations to evade detection. One would assume that
smacks of money laundering, doesn't it. Well, that was always,
as you know, a concern that Ron Johnson and Chuck Rassie,

(24:51):
who first looked at the Stars back in nineteen and
twenty raised. It is a concern that some of the
prosecutors who got referred this information that Delaware prosecutor or
mister Weiss also was reportedly looking at money laundering is
one of the many possible things that went on here.
It's very interesting that people could set up an LLC
for a very legitimate reason, or you could use it

(25:12):
as a shell corporation. What James Comer said in the interviews,
very specific, very precise with his words, is we looked
a lot of these LLC's, and they don't have any
expertise for the work that they allegedly were doing, and
none of the work ultimately ends up resulting in any
real business deals. They look like money changes hands, but
no business deal gets executed. He uses the Chinese Energy

(25:34):
Company and some other examples. So when you see a
company set up for a purpose, but it actually doesn't
do that purpose, and the only thing it does is
money comes in and it's immediately thrown out of the
account to a personal account. It looks like they're laundering
money to potentially gain political influence inside the Biden family.
That's the suspicion, that's the concern. There's another element that
he's tied together why he really believes that this isn't

(25:57):
just you know, bad business deals, that this is an
influence pad scheme. He says that in the last year
of Joe Biden's vice presidences, he's thinking of returning to
the public sector private sector after forty plus years in
political office. He says that Joe Biden starts meeting with
a lot of the business partners that are funneling this
money to his son, So he's directly involved in the

(26:20):
engagement with these business partners. He's meeting with his son's
business partners who are moving the money to family members
and family members then moving the money to provide some
personal benefit to Joe Biden. That's a very important evidentiary line. Again,
we want to wait and see did Hunter Biden Joe
Biden deserve the assumption of innocence, that benefit of the the
doubt until we get all the facts out there. But
Comber is very careful, very specific, and you kind of

(26:42):
get a sense what evidence. He's now relying on bank
records in cooperating witness is much like a mob prosecutor would.
Very interesting moment in this investigation. Yeah, I think they've
turned a corner because now the Biden Treasury Department is
finally being forced to give the Oversight Committee access to
the roughly one hundred and fifty suspicious activity reports of

(27:06):
the banks flagged to the Financial Crimes Unit at the
Treasury Department, and other words, these we suspect these are
representative of potential crimes. They've also subpoine at the records
of John Rob Walker, a close business partner of Hunter Biden.
You know, three million dollar wire transfer to Walker and

(27:31):
then he distributes it, according to the evidence, to various
Biden family members and John we're talking about, you know,
not just a couple of family members, but you know,
apparently according to Chairman Comer, you know, we're talking about
six or seven Biden family members, right, that's what it
looks like. Yeah, and a dozen accounts. Half dozen family members,

(27:53):
he said, one of them shocked them. It's not a
name they've put out the game. We've talked about some
brothers and of course Hunter bidens some business partners and friends.
He said one family member shocked. James Kober he was
shocked to see that this person was involved in receiving
money and forwarding it on to the family. We don't
know who that person is. It we're digging deep into that,
but it does it doesn't raise a lot of questions

(28:16):
about how how far ranging was us who got benefits.
We know from earlier testimony an uncle and aunt of
Hunter Biden we're going on a shopping spree funded we
believed by a foreign entity. There's a lot of rumblings,
but now he's saying there was a previously unknown member
of the family who routed money from a foreign entity

(28:39):
up and through to the president or to the president's family.
And so we're watching that very closely. There's a pattern,
and I think that's one of the things that James
Comber stressed. It didn't happen just one or two times.
It's over and over again, and almost all of the payees.
The countries that are doing this are adversarial Russia, Ukraine, China,

(29:00):
he mentioned yesterday United Air of Membrance. He said, there's
a Middle East connection we haven't focused on yet. All
of those are our countries. He says it should raise
the red flag, and they did raise a red flag
at the banks. That's why the stars were filed. Yeah,
before I'll let you go, I wanna make mention that
you guys at Just the News, you're gaining access to

(29:22):
more whistleblowers than anybody, and so people need to stay
tuned for that. Right. We've got about thirty seconds. Yeah,
we do. In fact, we're trying to hire some more
reporters that we're doing a little subscription campaign that if
you go to justin use dot com slash subscribe, if
you subscribe, we're gonna take every money from the subscription
to hire some more reporters. We need about four or
five reporters. We're dealing with more than fifty whistle blew

(29:44):
overs in the last six months. Really the whistle on
government ron doing under Joe Biden's presidency. It is amazing.
You are always all over those breaking news. One of
the best investigative journalists in America, John Solomon of Just
the News. Go to the website. Help them out if
you can with this endeavor for whistleblowers and more reporters

(30:05):
and so forth. John, many thanks for being with us here.
On the Sean Hannity Show. Appreciating Greg. Great owner. Can't
wait to see your book. I'm getting excited. Yeah yeah,
it's called The Trial of the Century, available now for
pre order online. We're going to take a quick break
more when we come back on the Sean Hannity Show.
I'm Greg Jarrett, filling in for Sean. It's time to

(30:33):
take back America. This is a seed show. Hey, welcome
back to the Sean Hennedy Show. I'm Greg Jarrett. Coming
up next another one of America's best investigative journalists, Peter Schweitzer,
also best selling author. You're not gonna want to miss
our discussion about some of the latest breaking news. He's

(30:56):
all over. It will be right back. I'm Greg Jarrett.
This is the Sean Hannity Show. Hey, did you know
the Pure Talk saves the average family close to a
thousand dollars a year when they switch from the big
carriers AT and T, Verizon, T Mobile. Well, that's right.
You can save a fortune and you get the exact
same service as these big carriers. You get their ultra
fast five G. You can get unlimited talk and text

(31:19):
and plenty of data, and it's only thirty bucks a month,
and with pure Talk, they are so sure you're going
to love their service they back it up with their
one hundred percent satisfaction money back guarantee. So instead of
paying a fortune to the big carriers, cut your bill
in half with pure Talk my cell phone company. Then
start enjoying great perks like a US customer service team.

(31:40):
They're gonna make your switch easy, and you'll be supporting
a company that's veteran owned and shares your values. And
as you covered with their money back guarantee, it's simple
to make the switch style pound two fifty. Say the
keywords save now. Do it now, you save an additional
fifty percent off your first month. That's pound two fifty
keywords saved now from our friends at pure Talk. Simply

(32:00):
smarter wireless