Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Hour two Sean Hannity Show, toll free. Our number is
eight hundred and nine to four one Sean if you
want to be a part of the program. As we
mentioned earlier, these months and months long investigation into the
autopen issue and how it was used to commute the
sentences of nearly every federal inmate on death row, never
mind you know, people close to Joe Biden. Yet after
(00:23):
this long investigation, as I explained in the last hour,
they concluded in the House Oversight Committee and Government Reform
Committee that the autopen pardons should be recon should be
considered void, that Joe Biden was losing command of himself
(00:43):
while in office, not personally involved in many of the pardons,
commutations other executive actions signed by an autopen. The committee
asked the Justice Apartment Department to address the legal consequences
of House Investigator's conclusion, which deems void executive actions and
clemency warrens signed by the autopen during the Biden administration,
(01:05):
and that do not include documentation providing that the President
made the decision in any way, shape, matter of form.
That means all of these commutations, all of these pardons,
including family members and close associates may be Nolan void
in the end. That's one issue. But just breaking within
the last hour at justinnews dot com and the House
(01:27):
Judiciary Committee has put out new documents prove that Benny
Thompson and Liz Cheney were working hand in hand with
Jack Smith. We've got a lot of breaking news today. Anyway,
there's only one person that can unpack this and make
it understandable, and that's our good friend John Solomon. He's
the founder, editor in chief, chief investigative reporter of justinnews
(01:51):
dot com. Sir, welcome back to the program. We have
a lot to unpack here today. If you just if
you just go through the table of contents and the summary, Wow,
just start there, and then when you get into the
specificity in detail, you go wow, wow, wow all the
way across the board.
Speaker 2 (02:08):
Yeah, listen, we had a president who was allowing other
people to carry out his decision making. That's what this
report says. And there's a moment you know, the staff
secretary is probably one of the most important jobs in
the White House. That's the person that controls all the
paper and make sure that the president has approved what
he's signing or what's going to be signed, and that
(02:28):
staff secretary told the committee that she often didn't have
contact with President Biden for weeks at a time. How
would she know the paper she was moving was approved
by the president. She didn't. She didn't have that level
of contact. And what you see is as the Biden
presidency dragged on, just like our eyes told us and
our ears told us, right, he's looking for the direction
from the Eastern money on how to get out of
(02:50):
the White House. He's going the wrong way on stage.
He's got cheat sheets and notes and teleprompter telling me
you need the excess stage right, things that a normal
person with normal mental faculties whitn't. We knew our eyes
and ears were telling us Joe Biden was diminished. What
you saw behind the scenes was he wasn't conducting the
work of the presidency. His staff was doing it on
his behalf. And according to James Comer, they weren't getting
(03:13):
the necessary proof or even clarity that Joe Biden was
approving what he did. So the committee says, based on
the evidence we saw, presidential actions that weren't decided clearly
by Joe Biden should be invalidated, and they refer that
to the Justice Department. This could be one of the
largest potential undoings of a presidency in American history. If
(03:34):
the Justice Department makes specific determinations that Joe Biden did
not authorize this executive order, did not authorize this pardon,
did not authorize, or did not properly sign this legislation
with his own knowledge and will, you could actually see
the Trump Justice Department invalidate actions that were Joe Biden's
(03:54):
decisions to make, but he failed to do.
Speaker 3 (03:57):
We do how do you think that way?
Speaker 1 (04:00):
How do we best proceed from here? Obviously the Attorney
General will get involved in this. Obviously the Attorney General
will look at their conclusion. We know all of it's true.
Anyone with eyes to see and ears to hear could
see the precipitous decline from the beginning when he was
running for president and hiding in his basement, you know,
(04:20):
all the way through the end of his presidency, mumbling
and bumbling and stumbling and dazed and confused. And you know,
I played these tapes almost every night. Now, in the beginning,
when I was pointing out the obvious, it kind of
was like a lone voice in the wilderness. What a
shock and you were there right with me. What a shock.
And you know we were, you know, attacked upmercifully as usual.
(04:42):
Only when George Clooney recognized it at a fundraiser and
wrote something in The New York Times did people now
start to pay attentions to everything we were saying.
Speaker 2 (04:51):
Yeah, it is remarkable. Listen, American people weren't full. They
knew what was going on. That's why Joe Biden's popularity
was dropping. They could see with their own eyes the
guy couldn't cut it. He couldn't even make it through
a debate with being understandable or comprehensive. And so I
think the American people knew.
Speaker 1 (05:08):
By the way, the best line in that debate was,
mister Trump, would you like to respond to a president?
Biden said, I don't know what the hell he said?
And I don't think he knows what the.
Speaker 3 (05:16):
Hell he said.
Speaker 2 (05:18):
Yeah, that caught exactly what everyone was thinking in the
back of their mind at that moment. It was a
brilliant moment in the debate, much like the Reagan joke
that he made with mond Dale and Age. At the
end of the day, several things are going to have
to happen if pambody decides this is worth the current
resources of the Justice part. Keep in mind, this is
a Justice department that's out there trying to solve crime
(05:41):
in DC, in Chicago and other places. It's a justice
department trying to put together the largest weaponization investigation in
history and put together a potential grand conspiracy case. Is
it worth the time to go back and compel Biden
officials to who took the Fifth Amendment or declined to
answer questions in Congress? Put them before grand jury and say, hey,
(06:02):
was Joe Biden mentally deficient? Did you lie about it?
Should the twenty fifth Amendment have been in vogue? Did
you take actions on his behalf that he never approved?
If they go that route, it's going to be a
dramatic and extraordinary investigation and a presidency that's already diminished
by its poor records starting with Afghanistan and the border
(06:22):
crisis that itself created, you could go into history as
one of the most laughable and one of the most
disrespected presidencies in history because it will turn out the
guy in charge wasn't capable of being in charge. That
is what this report is telling us. Congress has concluded.
Speaker 1 (06:37):
Look We're going to spend days really unpacking this. But
if you go through the headlines in this report, and
the summary of this report, and the list of transcribed
interviews in this report, the depositions in this report, you
know who was really running the White House, the inner circle,
how they all conspired to cover up what was transparent
(06:58):
to the rest of the country. Biden's cognitive deterioration is
bad health. How was in a circle was either delusional
or complicit about his cognitive health and the president and
what really was a cover up? I just don't believe
the people that said, well, it look great to me
and more energy than I ever dreamed of having. I
(07:20):
mean really, and who made the ultimate decision with the
auto pen. Now I'd like to stay on this for
two hours today and really unpack it, but we have
other news that I've got to get to. And you know,
for example, this just broke as we were coming on
the air, and I know you have a copy of it.
It was put out by the House Judiciary Committee, and
that is new documents proving Benny Thompson and Liz Cheney,
(07:43):
they write on X were working hand in hand with
Jack Smith. And this relates to text messages with Mark Meadows.
By the way, they made such a big deal of
my text messages and made them public, Nobody in the
media seemed to care about my privacy at the time.
Remember it was oh my gosh, Sean Hannity said this
or more Hannity's private text messages forget about privacy in
(08:06):
my life.
Speaker 4 (08:07):
Yeah.
Speaker 2 (08:08):
Well, what you're seeing here now is what we've kind
of always suspected, which was that the Arctic Cross investigation
was less about investigating a matter involving January six and
more about penning down the people around the President Trump
who might be valuable to him going into twenty twenty
four by the summer. By the spring and summer of
twenty twenty four, when a overtly anti Trump FBI agent
(08:31):
opens Arctic Cross, was keep in mind that Tim Tebow,
the agent who opened this case for the Washington Field
office of FBI, is a guy whose own text messages
got him in trouble. He was tweeting out anti Trump messages.
He did not like Trump. He opens this investigation, and
it's supposed to be about January sixth, but it doesn't
open until the spring of twenty twenty two. Why is
that no one opens a case six or nine, or
(08:54):
ten or eleven, thirteen months after the alleged crime. He's
opening it as Donald Trump is beginning to rise in
the right. You see Donald Trump's recovery. All of a sudden,
Donald Trump's talking about being a viable candidate for twenty
twenty four. The Democrats are like, this can't be possible.
We impeached him.
Speaker 1 (09:09):
Well, remember Arctic first started three days after he announced
he's running.
Speaker 2 (09:13):
That's right, and he's viable on the polls too, And
it realizes that it isn't just a pipe dream. Donald
Trump could potentially win twenty twenty four. So they opened
up something that occurred fifteen months later, and they try
to look at January sixth as a conspiracy. There was
a conspiracy to create fake electors and stop the Senate
from investigator stopped the Senate from certifying the vote. Now,
(09:36):
as we know, the Senate did certify the vote. This
investigation had nothing to do with the violence that day.
It was a theory that maybe we should look at
all of MAGA world as one giant criminal enterprise that
tried to stop the accounting of votes, which, by the way,
they didn't stop the accounting votes they actually occurred that day.
And then you see all of the president's inner circle,
(09:56):
all of his friends. In today's documents, you see one
hundred and sixty potential targets that are named in these
FBI documents. Now, do we really think there was one
hundred and sixty people involved in the conspiracy to stop
one hundred senators from vote counting the vote, which, by
the way, they did that day. This is an investigation
that occurs long after the alleged crime, and it's designed
(10:17):
to really map who is in magaworld. Who can we
pin down in magaworld so they can't be an asset
to President Trump in twenty twenty four. That's what it
looks like to those who've been going through the documents.
It looks like an opposition research project. Oh and if
you say, well, that never happened before in FBI history,
well it did. Remember in twenty sixteen, Russia collusion was
(10:38):
a campaign opposition research project masquerading as a criminal investigation.
Here are the people who know the work best inside
the FBI, inside the Judiciary Committee, inside the Senate Judiciary Committee.
They're beginning to see this as the assemblance of an
enemy's list, then pinning those enemies down. If you've got
to go get a lawyer, if you've got to go
before the grand jury, if you've got to testify before Congress,
(11:00):
you're not spending your time helping Donald Trump win the
twenty twenty four election. I think the people who know
it best now are starting to view this as an
opposition political operation masquerading as a criminal case. Now Jack
Smith will say that's not the case. I'm sure the
FBI agents will say that's not the case. They deserve
their say, But you have to ask yourself, why are
you starting a January sixth investigation fifteen months after the
(11:22):
alleged crime, And why are you're looking at so many people?
Remember the things we know? Eight senators and one House
member had their phone records taken, thirty million lines of
phone data from everyday Americans. Their phone data was included
in the Congress and then sent to at least in
some cases, sent to the FBI. You see here today
Mark Meadows phone calls and all the names of people
(11:45):
that Mark Medows was talking to get sent to the
FBI in a letter from the Congressional Committee, Do we really.
Speaker 3 (11:51):
Is that legal? Because I included in this.
Speaker 2 (11:55):
Well they got it. Here's my theory of how they
got it from the reporting I'm doing. I bet you
instead of going to the phone companies and dropping a subpoenam,
they went to the National Archives and said, just give
us all the phone bill records and we'll take it
from there. I bet you that's what we're going to
find out. Now, that's a great end run around a
subpoena and the normal court review that you would get
(12:16):
for your my privacy to be violated. Congress may have
done an end run. Let's wait and see when we
get the final data. But the early indications from the
letters and documents that thing is it looks like they
were using the phone bill records or the phone log
records that the National Archives get as a data mining
resource and kind of going around the normal way you
go to the phone companies or other people to get it.
(12:37):
That we'll see if that checks out. But if it does,
what you're seeing is a massive opposition researching that had
no regard for your privacy, my privacy or anyone who
called the White House. It was simply who knows Donald Trump,
who's helping Donald Trump? And let's pin them down in controversy, investigation,
legal bills, and others. That's what the people who've been
working this case for the last month or two field
(12:59):
their Now, let's see when people look at the documents.
I just got to look at them. The first thing that.
Speaker 1 (13:04):
The last question is, I'm running out of time and
I have too many questions for you. How did Liz
Cheney and Benny Thompson get away with just wiping clean
and getting rid of all the records of their investigation?
Speaker 2 (13:15):
Well, not all of them. We have the trans because
we have a lot of them right, But there are
some missing videotapes, there are some missing other documents that
they are still being tried to be found. I talked
to very loud of Milk who spent two years looking
for him. He still hasn't found him two years later.
We don't know why certain ones are missing it. We've
got to get to the bottom of that. Are they
truly missing or are they hiding somewhere that we haven't
found them. Sometimes you hide things in plain sight. What
(13:37):
we are seeing though, like these letters today, is you
see that they're really acting as an extra arm of
the FBI. Hey just take the stuff we got we'll
help you investigate this. We'll see whether that exceeds some
of the privacy protections that Americans have. I think there
are some really good civil liberty cases, and the first
one's been filed already. Senator Marshall Blackburn has sued over
her phone records being taken, saying it violate at my privacy.
(14:00):
Let's see if that opens the door. Congress has some
limits on what it can do to Americans. Let's see
if they've crossed the line. And then when they cross
the line, if they did giving it to the FBI,
did they do an end run around the civil liberty
protections that the FBI nearly would have for us. That
is some of the big questions that are going to
be answered in the next few weeks.
Speaker 1 (14:18):
Unbelievable work, really unbelievable John Solomon, he'll be joining us
on Hannity tonight. Great work as usual, John Solomon, and
is always thank you for sharing it with us. Just
thenews dot com founder editor in chief, chief investigator, reporter.
This is a lot to get into. It's going to
take us the entire week, I think to really unpack
(14:39):
the magnitude of how profoundness is. We had a president
that really didn't know what day of the week it was,
and everybody knew it. And they're making decisions as though
they're president and we don't know who they are. That's scary,
Thank you, my friend. Anyway, we've got a lot, I mean,
the ones great state of New York. Wow, I mean,
(15:00):
what's about to happen to It is chilling, It is frightening.
But it's it's more broad than that. You have, you know,
left wing ideas. The radicalization of the Democratic Party is
now on full display for the entire world to see.
Now you can say and argue, I believe that it's
(15:20):
going to be in the end, probably very good for Republicans.
How's that good for Republicans? Once Marxist Kami Mamdani, you know,
once this is exposed to be a fraud and a failure,
and once he defunds the police and sends them the
social workers, and as I played you know earlier in
the program, everything is going to be free, free, free, free, free,
(15:44):
I'm just telling you, and nobody's going to pay for it.
It's it's never gonna happen what he's saying. And New
York's not going to be safe is not going to
be the financial security that people think that he's never
going to be able to fulfill these promises, won't have
the money, and the country's gonna watch this fail spectacularly.
(16:05):
They're watching AOC, the squad, Jasmin Crockett, Grandpa Bernie Polka, Hantas.
They're the real leaders of the Democratic Party. It's not
Hakeem Jefferies, it's not Chucky Schumer, the the they're minority
leaders in name only. They really have no influence anymore.
And the radicals have now taken over their party. Here's
(16:26):
President Trump talking about AOC and Jasmine Crockett. Who are
my favorites?
Speaker 5 (16:31):
They have Jazzmin Crockett, a low IQ erson. They have
AOC's low IQ. You give her an IQ test, have
her passed? Like the exams that I decided to take
when I was at Walter Reed I took. That was
a very hard Uh, they're.
Speaker 2 (16:48):
Really aptitude tests.
Speaker 5 (16:49):
I guess at a certain point when they're cognitive tests.
Let AOC go against Trump, Let Jasmine go against Trump.
Why don't they get Jasmine the first couple of questions. Seriously,
a tiger an elephant that you're have? You know when
you get up to about five or six, and then
when you get up to ten and twenty and twenty five,
they couldn't come close to answering any of those questions.
Speaker 3 (17:13):
Unbelievable.
Speaker 1 (17:14):
Now, I will add this to you, you know, because
this is now gotten insane. We're now on the verge
of running out of money for forty two million Americans.
For snap, the military is not being paid. Over three
thousand plus flights delayed yesterday alone around the country and
over the weekend. And because air traffic controllers like, well,
(17:37):
we're not getting paid, So why am I going to work?
Speaker 3 (17:39):
What's the point?
Speaker 1 (17:41):
And you know, and what are they demanding one point
five trillion dollars? What do they want? The money for
hundreds of millions for health care for illegal immigrants, they
want a refund MPR and PBS. Here's Mike Johnson describing that,
you know, to reopen the government for seven weeks. They're
also demanding millions of dollars for global lgbtq AI plus
(18:05):
awareness campaigns. I don't know what the A in the
I is. I'm not I can't keep up. Well, here's
what he said.
Speaker 6 (18:10):
Things like four million dollars for global lgbtq I plus
awareness campaigns around the world. Four million dollars for the
LGBTQI plus democracy grants in the Balkans. They want two
million dollars for feminist Democratic Principles projects in Africa. We're
not doing that. But again the question is why why
(18:32):
this sounds crazy? It is why would they do this?
And what we saw on vivid display over the weekend
was the re emphasis of this fact. This is motivated
purely out of fear. And what do we mean by that.
Speaker 3 (18:47):
You saw the Democratic.
Speaker 6 (18:48):
Leader in the House, Hakim Jeffreys, endorse Zoron Mmdani for
mayor of New York City on Friday. It was an
illustration of what we're facing here now.
Speaker 3 (19:00):
The Republicans are not stupid.
Speaker 1 (19:01):
They're now going to force votes on funding SNAP and
funding are our defense forces, and funding our air traffic controllers.
And you know, at some point if they don't want support,
you know, paying our military air traffic controllers and help
out the forty two million Americans SNAP recipients. You know,
(19:24):
I'm just telling you right now, it's all on them.
That's why the Federal you know, Workers Union, the largest
government employees union, which by the way, it's filled with
Democrats are demanding Democrats open up the government. Air traffic
controlers missed a full paycheck because of this ongoing shutdown.
According to Transportation to A Secretary Sean Duffy, flight delays
(19:46):
on Monday, roughly three thousand, three hundred and seventy flights
were delayed just this past Monday. That's a lot of
flights delayed, you know, And you know JD. Van's headed
to the hill today. As it's just they just dig
in their heels and dumb and dumber. But this is
backfired spectacularly on them, and it's crushing small businesses. On
(20:08):
top of it, federal workers now bracing for a missed
paycheck as this now enters week number five. Anyway, New
York Congresswoman Claudia Tenny is with us, Well, your state
has gone to hell in a hand basket.
Speaker 3 (20:21):
Good luck.
Speaker 4 (20:23):
He thanks Sean. I appreciate that. I'm a lifelong resident here,
but we're trying to.
Speaker 3 (20:28):
Worry I abandoned ship on you.
Speaker 4 (20:29):
I left, Yes, we know that. Yeah, a lot of
people did. They led the way I think people like, well,
I'm not going.
Speaker 3 (20:35):
To say I left, I'd say they chased me. Out.
Speaker 4 (20:38):
That's better, better wording. I would say they're chasing everyone out. Look,
we have the highest out migration of any state and
that actually started under Governor Cuomo when he couldn't stand
up to the far left. And now he's trying to
clause the way back in against Mandami. But this is
the problem we have the media in New York. It
is fawning praise for Democrats, from Chuck Schumer who's been
(21:01):
a do nothing senator to you know, a failed leader
as someone who's a non leader who just sings and
sings song and rhymes like haiking Jeffries who used to
sit next to me in the state legislature. They're weak,
they don't stand up to the far left. And that's
why New York, without it, without any media, without anyone
to hold them accountable, they've been able to take over
the entire state. The Republicans, you know, don't really have
(21:22):
a say. And Mandami, just like AOC, is another person
who is not a grassroots candidate arising you know, from
some wonderful grassroots situation. It is all AstroTurf. It has
been funded and put together by radical groups. Just like
AOC answered to casting call Zorn Mandami is also another
(21:43):
person that is another performance artist answering a casting call
millions and millions, tens of millions of dollars from left
wing radical groups, whether it's Care Action, the Islamic Circle
of North America, these huge, you know, really really radical
leftist groups. Now the Working Families Party, which is taken
you know complete, used to be sort of the party
(22:05):
of the Unions, has become the party of the far left,
the Marxists, the radicals, and they have used that money
to create this, you know, this snake oil salesman who
smiles all the time, and the people are are not.
There's no pushback because the media, the mainstream media other
than Fox and others, are the only ones standing up
and calling this out. It's going to be devastating. I
(22:27):
know that Republicans and even the President have said, look,
we'll have Mondamia to be great for Republicans, but let's
make sure that he doesn't inflict so much damage on
New York City that reverberates across the rest in New
York and is actually ultimately going to hurt the rest
of the New York is still for now the fourth
largest state in the nation and it's it's this. You know,
we're very worried here. It's a real problem from up
(22:48):
state New York. But you know, so many things have
led to this, but this is the rise of performance art.
Remember when AOC came into power, her own power in
twenty eighteen, antypled p defund the police, demoralize the police,
an anarchical view of society and law and order, and
she took down all kinds of what I thought were
left wing democrats with these Marxists derived democrats, they call
(23:11):
themselves democratic socialists. There's nothing democratic about them. They have
dominated the legislature, they're dominating New York City, and now
we've got this situation brewing with the largest city in
our nation.
Speaker 1 (23:22):
All right, quick break, right back more with New York
Congresswoman Claudia Tenny is with us. We'll get to your
calls on the other side, and much much more and
Chip Roy coming up. Eight hundred nine point one, Shawn
is a number if you want to be a part
of the program. Up next, our final roundup and information
(23:43):
Overload hour. All right, we continue now with New York
(24:14):
Representative Claudia Tenney as she talks about the precipitous decline
of her state of New York. What did you make
at this rally the other day? You know, I thought
it was pretty entertaining watching AOC say we're not the
crazy ones.
Speaker 3 (24:27):
I'm like, yeah, you are. But put that aside for
a minute.
Speaker 1 (24:30):
And Kathy Hokle gets up there and she gets booed
off the stage. Mom Donnie had to go rescue her.
And then when I asked about it, she said, oh,
I thought they were talking about the Bills. I'm like, Okay,
she can't be that dumb that she had to know
she was getting booed off the stage because she's not
viewed as radical enough. I mean, I think her days
(24:51):
are numbered.
Speaker 4 (24:53):
Well, let's hope so, but let me she will not
stand up to them. She was one of the first
major Democrats in the state of New York to actually
endorse Mondami because she's weak and feckless, and you know,
Bills fans and the Bill's mafia across New York and
people that are Bills fans outside of New York. I
take complete offense to her bringing the Bills into this.
This is our team. We have Josh Allen, the NFL MVP.
(25:16):
Terrible of her, but she is a weak governor. She
doesn't stand up to these people. She's done a complete
one to eighty on her positions. When she ran in
a Republican seat years ago for Congress, she had an
A rating from NRA. She is one of the more
She is now a leftist governor that doesn't stand up
to anyone. And I'm hoping pretty soon Elistophonic, you know,
my colleague here in the Congress is going to.
Speaker 1 (25:38):
But this is the fascinating thing because she's sucking up
to them as much as she can and they're still
not accepting her. Tucky Schumer, his entire career has been
against government shutdowns. He's only shutting it down because of
the radicals that run his party, and he's trying to cling.
Speaker 3 (25:53):
On to power.
Speaker 1 (25:54):
I meanwhile, he's being out raised by AOC like you know,
twenty five to one, as see is the one that's
being requested as as a fundraiser, you know, even in
Virginia for Abigail Spanberger, which I find remarkable and I
think it's gonna hurt Mikey Cheryl in New Jersey and
help Jack Chitdarelli. We're doing a town hall with Jack
Chitdarelli on Thursday Night. I think he's got a shot
(26:16):
in New Jersey. This is like New Jersey's last chance
not to become New York where you live.
Speaker 4 (26:21):
Yeah, I agree, I think this is at Chitdarelli has
done an amazing job to turn that situation around. I
take a little bit of offense to Mikey Cheryl. She's
one of my colleagues. But let me tell you something.
My son went to the US Naval Academy.
Speaker 1 (26:33):
What do you mean you take a little offense at it?
Mikey Cheryl got she can't explain where she got seven
million dollars from. Really, if you had seven million dollars
in your bank account, you think you know where it
came from. He can't explain why she didn't walk with
her class at the Naval Academy. Then says, well, I
wouldn't tell them everything. Then said I told him everything.
Speaker 3 (26:51):
She does.
Speaker 1 (26:51):
She's not shooting straight with the people in New Jersey.
He's all part of this gender affirming you know, care crap.
And she won't commit to not raising taxes and she
doesn't know what a pork roll is in New Jersey.
Speaker 4 (27:02):
For crying out loud, yeah, she's let's object to really
pulls this out. I know this is going to be
a tough race, but again, we've got to have Republicans
standing strong. We've got a lot of great things going
on we've got to have We've got to get out
and get voters out to the polls. Who's a lot
of Republicans. I've been through this myself. You know, I
had a tough race in twenty twenty. I won by
one hundred and nine votes during that pandemic election. Because
(27:25):
we need to get people registered, we need to get
them engaged, we need to get them interested, and there
are people doing that New Jersey. We need to do
that in New York. Right now, it's almost too late.
Get people out, get them interested, and we can start
taking back some of these states that I think. I
got to be honest with you, John, I think if
New Jersey goes to Mikey Cheryl, that's the end of
New Jersey. I don't know if it's reversible.
Speaker 3 (27:45):
I think it's over New York.
Speaker 4 (27:47):
I feel like New York is in you know, it's
going to have to completely collapse before it could come
back again. And that's this devastating news for this, and
this is one.
Speaker 1 (27:56):
Get ready for the headline Trump to New York dropped.
Remember the headline, the fame, the infamous headline, you know,
Gerald Ford. I think maybe it was a beam, as
the mayor at the time, to New York City drop dead.
In other words, they're not getting in federal bellout.
Speaker 4 (28:14):
Yeah, it's gonna be really tough on New York. That's
the president's home state, your home state, My home state.
Speaker 2 (28:21):
Got to stay.
Speaker 1 (28:21):
I feel bad for my friends there. I wish better
for them. But with all that said, I'm telling you, Claudia,
I live in Florida. All those companies on Wall Street,
they all have big, big offices down here in Florida,
and they're getting bigger by the day. Donnie wins, they'll
have like a few remaining. You know, people in New York,
and their main headquarters are going to be Florida. Citadel
(28:44):
left Illinois, left Chicago, They're now down in Florida. Wall
Street South is very real. I mean this sincerely. I
only wish the best for my friends in New York. However,
I think it's over.
Speaker 4 (28:57):
I'm not going to give up the fight. Let's see
what we can.
Speaker 1 (29:00):
I hate to I hate to be blunt, but you know,
because I think the world of you, and I know
you're trying hard. Uh, And I know that you know,
Bruce Blakeman's trying hard, and the people in Suffolk County
in Westchester are trying hard. But New York City seems
to dominate everything. I got a roll. I appreciate you.
Claudiattennai of New York.
Speaker 3 (29:18):
Thank you.