June 18, 2025 • 28 mins
Bill O’Reilly, author of the upcoming book, Confronting Evil Assessing the Worst of the Worst, discusses the attacks being volleyed between Iran and Israel.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:30):
All right, let him skin a simple man, and that
can only mean one thing on this radio program, and
that is whole things self proclaimed simple man. That means
all things Bill O'Reilly, all things Bill O'Reilly at billoreilly
dot com. We have not spoken about this conflict at
We haven't spoken at length about the conflict with Israel
(00:51):
and Iran. To me, the Trump doctrine is very very simple.
The same guy that wiped out the isis Californ, the
same guy that wiped out bag Daddy and his top
you know, lieutenants and associates. The same guy, Donald Trump
that took out Solamani on a tarmac, has said since
(01:13):
twenty eleven we actually went back and looked that Iran
can never have a nuclear weapon. He has said it
again and again and again. And I think we are
now at the hour is midnight. They've gotten very close
with their enrichment at sixty percent according to every published report,
and even the IAEA is saying so. And it takes
(01:36):
about three weeks to get to ninety percent weapons great enrichment,
and that is a clear and present danger for the
world to the number one state sponsor of terror. So
I think it is the Trump doctrine that they can't
have a nuclear weapon. But I also believe it's consistent
with things that Donald Trump has done in the past
and consistent with the Trump doctrine, the part of the
(01:59):
Trump talk and that says, well, We're never going to
be a part of these forever.
Speaker 2 (02:03):
Wars anymore and foreign entanglements.
Speaker 1 (02:06):
This is about a country that is that has stated
openly they want death to Israel, death to America. They
have terrorized America and and killed many Americans over the years.
I went through that in the last hour. Are we
in agreement, mister O'Reilly?
Speaker 3 (02:23):
Essentially, but there's a change in tactics. So I wrote
a book called Killing the Killers, and I ran down
all of the things you just mentioned. A bag Daddy
and Solomoni isis destruction, all of it. And it was
all methodically done, and it was all done very quietly.
(02:46):
It wasn't like this one. And what people may not
know is that we did partner up with Israel to
take out Solomony, and that you that you who backed
out of that arrangement at the last minute, which angered
Donald Trump, was never really made public. But Trump does
(03:09):
not trust net Nyahu. I can say that was certainty.
So this one's a little bit different because it's got
a little more urgency to it. And I just did
my research this morning, and you may know more than
me on this, But I don't think Donald Trump has
(03:31):
made up his mind yet about US air power. That's
what I have right now. He really hasn't made a decision.
Is that where you have no Okay, so you feel
that you have that he has made a decision, which
would be.
Speaker 1 (03:47):
All indications are now it's subjects to change. Is that
change the president? The president has been very, very firm.
I mean, it's pretty fascinating that Donald Trump, president of
the United States, can put out put up a social
media post and the population of Tehran starts leaving in
(04:07):
droves and they can't even get out of they can
they can't get out of Dodge fast enough. Sure, it
is very I think that I don't think he gives
idle threats. I think he means it. I think he's
given the Iranians every opportunity for peace. Steve Whitkoff has
been over backwards for peace and there it is an
(04:28):
existential threat to the entire world, and he understands that part,
just like the isis Caliphate was and just like Soloman,
he was. And I don't think he's gonna have to
any qualms about taking out that final facility.
Speaker 3 (04:42):
All right, So let me interview you. We did this
a couple of weeks ago and everybody loved it.
Speaker 1 (04:47):
Is it going to be a cupcake interview? Is it
going to be a real tough one?
Speaker 3 (04:50):
So you believe that, And I don't want to put
words in your mouth, but it's inebitable that the US
Air Force is going to go up and what is
it Furlough Mountain? Is that what it is?
Speaker 2 (05:03):
That is correct?
Speaker 1 (05:05):
This is the one that has buried three hundred feet
deep into the ground.
Speaker 2 (05:08):
That is correct.
Speaker 3 (05:09):
So you believe that these plans have been drawn up
and they're just ready for the President to say go.
Is that what you believe now?
Speaker 1 (05:17):
As the President told me that he has not only
the US military can take out Iran's most dangerous nuclear site.
I'm reading the I'm reading the tea leaves, and we
both know Donald Trump for this length of time, we
are now on the precipice of taking this number one
state sponsor of terror that has a history of killing
(05:40):
Americans and taking that nuclear threat which would hold the
world hostage off the table forever. It's a window of
opportunity because they don't have any missile defense system because
the Israelis knocked it out. They own the skies over Iran.
The Israelis took out two of the three sides rights
(06:00):
and the one remaining site is Iran's most dangerous site
and it's the for de Bordeaux if fuel enrichment planned,
and you're right, it's on the side of a mountain.
It's very three hundred feet below ground. And my conversations
with military professionals think it's going to take four bunker
(06:21):
buster bombs to take that sucker out, Well, not one.
Speaker 3 (06:24):
Not too US gets involved, and the untended consequences are
going to be on us. So the last that I
heard was that the President was still holding out the
Mulles will surrender unconditionally, which would mean that the United Nations,
with presence from the United States would have to be
(06:44):
that would go in and physically force the dismantlement of
all of this uranium enrichment. That's what an unconditional surrender
would meet. And Trump was still hoping that would happen
for the Mullers to save their own butts, because if.
Speaker 1 (07:02):
If the Mullas did that, then I could see that
scenario play out. Actually I would prefer that scenario. I would,
but that would but it would mean Bill an unconditional surrender.
It would mean the next day, our guys go in
there and we start dismantling that place immediately. Actually, and
I don't think the Iranians will ever give into that.
Speaker 3 (07:24):
And net nya who couldn't object to that even thought
ya who wants to just incinerate the whole place.
Speaker 1 (07:32):
No, I don't think that ya who would object to
that if it was a real dismantlement of their nuclear
program that removes the threat. I think I'm known Bbe
for thirty years. I have every belief. You know, what's
the downside for him is no downside?
Speaker 3 (07:47):
What's the Mulls out too? But from what I understand,
Trump is not going to say the Mullers have to go.
He would make a deal with the Mullas that they
would surrender, give up their nuke ambitions, but they would
keep their jobs. I think they.
Speaker 2 (08:04):
Keep their jobs.
Speaker 1 (08:05):
But you know what, Israel has their own say in this,
and knowing Donald Trump, like for example, the Israelis could
have taken out their entire power grid, which has gas driven. Interestingly,
and all of their refineries are clustered on one little island.
Most people don't know that either, and it's a layup
target for the Israelis. They so far have only hit
(08:28):
one refinery to send a message, but there are other
options on the table for the Israelis to just devastate them.
Speaker 3 (08:36):
Absolutely, but Trump doesn't want that.
Speaker 1 (08:38):
Trump Donald Trump is not Donald Trump's not directing what
the Israelis are doing. He definitely has input. They definitely
need our support. The President has been very supportive of Israel,
completely supportive. I believe we probably have helped in more
ways than we know. But at the end of the day,
(09:00):
Israel is the country that's getting pounded with hundreds of
thousands of rockets over the last few decades and they're
sick of it.
Speaker 3 (09:06):
Yeah, and understandably, so we're sympathetic to that. But let
me do some reporting on the Haniti radio program. So
this didn't get a lot of play at all, but
there were phone calls and one of the reasons that
Trump had to come back from Alberta from the G
seven number one he didn't want to be there anyway,
he doesn't. You know, they have a lot of regard
(09:27):
for those people there. And number two, he had to
talk to both she and Putin, and he did, and
he had to layer out worst case scenario, which is
US bombers go in, and best case scenario, which is
MOS surrender. But he had to take their temperature about Okay,
we have to take them out. That's not debatable. They're
(09:49):
not going to get a nuclear weapon. So you both
have to understand that. The calls were separate. Of course, Okay,
you bother, there's stand it's inevitable and it's not going
to change that. They're not going to get a nuclear weapons.
So both Putin and She know that, and Trump was
trying to gauge their reaction to it, okay, whether they
(10:10):
were going to be a bella coos uh, and they weren't.
In fact, Putin, who plays both sides, you know, I said, look,
I'll help you negotiated and then Trump said, now we
don't need one. She just negotiate Ukraine, which was happy
to see that. By the way, you don't want that
weasel Putin In there. But he had to take their
(10:31):
temperature both countries to see if there's going to be
any react if we do use air power, and the
consensus from the White House is no, not anything. They'll
make statements and day, you know how it is. But
behind the scenes, are they going to do anything to us? No? Okay,
the Arabs are the same way. They're not going to
(10:53):
do anything. It's not going to be any oil Shenanigans,
not gonna be you could in the.
Speaker 2 (10:58):
Arabs are going to be so clebrating.
Speaker 1 (11:00):
Egypt, Jordan, the Saudis, the Emirates, the Gulf States, they're
all going to be celebrating. They don't want They've they've
already partnered with the US to prevent Iranian hegemony.
Speaker 3 (11:10):
Just like Asad in Syria. Nobody wanted him. And you
know he's over in Russia now because it's the only
one take him.
Speaker 2 (11:17):
But that's where the Iyatole may end up pretty soon.
Speaker 3 (11:20):
Uh Iran is no Alis, none. But Trump does not
want the United States to be portrayed as this military hungry,
expansionist power. He doesn't. And you know, the most ascent
on this is coming from inside the United States. The
(11:42):
MAGA people, Bannon that crew, and then they hate Trumpers, all.
Speaker 1 (11:47):
Right, quick break right back more with all things simple Man,
Bill O'Reilly, All things O'Reilly at Bill oreilly dot com.
As we continue continuing out, Bill O'Reilly has agreed to
stay with us. Bill O'Reilly, of course, all things O'Reilly
man at billoreilly dot com. It is in complete alignment
with what Donald Trump has said. I mean, I've been
(12:08):
following the intramural debate. People have tried to drag me
into it, getting I'm just ignoring it because I think
it's silly, because people obviously didn't pay attention to Solomony
or the ISIS Caliphate or Bagdaddy and all his associates.
This is very consistent with what Donald Trump has done
in the past, and it is in keeping with the
(12:28):
Trump doctrine, which I support and I don't believe in
forever wars either.
Speaker 3 (12:33):
Scent in the world on military action, Twitter am by
US is coming from the US.
Speaker 1 (12:41):
Have you seen the Pollsville eighty yet seventy nine percent
of Democrats suppose Iran getting nuclear weapons seventy nine percent
of independence all adults seventy nine percent. Do you know
where that's coming from? That's coming from fake news CNN.
If you look Robert Kahelli your Falgar Insider advantage. Matt
(13:03):
Towery the question, what is your opinion of President Trump's
position that Iran must be prevented from developing a nuclear
weapon by any means necessary? Response seventy four point four
percent approve of the President doing what is necessary to
get rid of it. Harvard Harris. Eighty five percent say
(13:24):
Tehran must never get a bomb ever. I mean these
polls and there's more. If you want me to keep going.
Speaker 3 (13:31):
No, Look, I think that folks are on the side
of neutralizing Iran, especially in this area. But the headlines
are garnered by the dissenters.
Speaker 2 (13:45):
And that's well, you know what that is.
Speaker 1 (13:47):
You talked about this little intramural battle within you know,
the Maga world. First of all, I think the argument
is superfluous and silly because it's so almost like people
just their memories have been white clean of Donald Trump
and what his true doctrine is. Of course, it's not
forever wars. He doesn't want that. I will tell you
(14:08):
what Donald Trump's goal here would be. In my opinion,
his goal would be, Okay, we have a window of
opportunity as safely as possible. Every military action is danger
to take out their nuclear sites, rid the world of
this terrorist state having that weapon that would hold the
world hostage. And then the next most important thing you
(14:30):
probably do would be to protect our interest in the
region very closely, because the Iranians are unpredictable. Whatever missiles
they might have left, they might try to fire at us.
The third thing that I think he would do is nothing.
I think the mission would be accomplished. No nukes for Iran,
and then whatever the Israelis decided to do. I think
that will be between the Israelis and the Iranians, and
(14:52):
we're out of it.
Speaker 3 (14:53):
Well, I mean he's not going to do nothing. I
mean he has to be.
Speaker 1 (14:58):
He's taken out, he's taken out the the biggest facility.
Speaker 3 (15:01):
That's not nothing, right, So the President the United States
is gonna be involved with whatever happens to Iran. And
I think that both you and I agree. Even if
the Mullas survives, they are now powerless. They've shown they
can't defend themselves, They've depleted their arsenal, the nukes are
(15:23):
gonna go, and the Persian people hate them.
Speaker 1 (15:26):
So you want to stay there. You want to stay
for five more minutes, so you got a roll.
Speaker 3 (15:29):
Sure, you know, all right? More with the anything Let's.
Speaker 1 (15:33):
Go anything all things simple man, Bill O'Reilly or billoreilly
dot com. So we're talking about the necessity to do this.
We're talking about the American people overwhelmingly instinctively know that
this terror organization has got to go. Let me ask
you this question for those people out there that might
(15:54):
be resistant, which are a very tiny minority, which is
why I've kind of been ignoring the noise, because the
media wants to gin up that this fake, phony, fraudulent
MAGA Conflict Award that I don't even believe is reel.
I mean, there are people that are differing points of view,
but I respect diferring points of view.
Speaker 2 (16:13):
You don't have to agree with me every time.
Speaker 1 (16:15):
I believe that I support the Trump doctrine and its
purity based on his past actions. But you know, because
I believe in it, not because it's Donald Trump. But
at the end of the day, what happened. What would happen,
Bill O'Reilly if one rocket from a foreign country were
fired into the United States of America, what do you
(16:36):
think the American people would demand? I'd be worn one
rocket and there's hundreds of thousands over the years that
have been fired into Israel. Why would anyone expect Israel
to respond to accept this as they have for so
long and not finally end this once and for all
(16:57):
and cut off the head of the snake.
Speaker 3 (17:00):
Look, you're talking logic, and to the people who hate
Israel and the anti Semis, there's no logic involved. Let
me make a point that's been almost ignored by everybody
about this Iranian USA Israel situation, which is, you know,
obviously ultra important for people to understand. None of this
(17:21):
would be happening if Biden hadn't surrendered in Afghanistan. None
of it, okay, because.
Speaker 1 (17:26):
What wouldn't It wouldn't have happened either if Obama didn't
make that you know, one point seven billion dollar debacle
deal with Iran, and it wouldn't have happened if Joe
enforced the sanctions that were working in bankrupting Iran that
Donald Trump had put in place, and he turned a
blind eye towards him and they got rich, and that
(17:48):
funded his proxy terror war and funded more of his
build out of his nuclear program than nuclear program.
Speaker 3 (17:54):
For a column at Tom billo'reilly dot com. With all
the numbers. All the money went in Obama's money, Biden's money,
but it's beyond that. So when Biden surrendered in Afghanistan,
then the signal was sent to the bad people in
the world. Okay, we don't have now a real authoritative
(18:20):
United States any longer. We have a weak United States.
And you can see it. You can see it in Ukraine.
Putin not only Ukraine, but in Georgia and other former
Soviet republics. He started almost immediately, okay, to go in
and intrude and to inject Soviet Russian forces in there. China,
(18:45):
same thing, South China, Sea, building up the uh you know,
on and on and on and on and in ran
the Mulla is basically saying, hey, I it's not gonna
do anything. We can enrich all we want, we can
do whatever we want to do here. He's not going
to do anything that the scenario just lead out to
(19:05):
you is indisputable. You can't say it didn't happen, because
it did. When I was in Beijing three weeks ago
and they were asking me about Taiwan, which is far
and away their biggest issue, the Chinese communists, And I
just remind your listeners that I spoke with the Pollet
bureau there for almost two hours, and it was clear
(19:28):
to me by their questions that they felt they had
much more license to build up a very offensive capability
under Joe Biden than in Trump's first term. People are
forgetting about that. So when you see the Democratic Party,
(19:49):
which is going to object to whatever Donald Trump does,
you know he goes in and bombs the Mountain, You're
going to hear Democrats screen they hear it. You're gonna
hear the media, The New York Times washing posts are
all going to scream all you should have waited, you
should have been more diplomatic, you shouldn't given more time.
And I'm not against giving it a little more time.
(20:11):
I wouldn't give it a lot, but I'd give it,
you know, maybe a few more days to see how
the Mullers are going to be destabilized by their own people. Remember,
the Iranian army could turn on the Mullers. That would
be the key to it.
Speaker 2 (20:28):
And most of a lot of these top guys are dead.
Israeli's got them.
Speaker 3 (20:33):
That sends a message to all of the remaining Iranian army.
Speaker 2 (20:39):
Yeah, it does.
Speaker 1 (20:40):
Here, Why do we make predictions will reconvene next week
and see if either one.
Speaker 2 (20:44):
Of us are right or both of us are right.
Speaker 1 (20:46):
Okay, My prediction is is that by this time next week,
the Iranian nuclear program will be completely dismantled.
Speaker 3 (20:56):
All right, you heard it on the Hannity radio program.
That's a pretty barrel prediction.
Speaker 2 (21:01):
And I will take us involvement.
Speaker 1 (21:04):
And I believe that the Mullas if in fact they
are stupid enough, and they've shown themselves to be pretty
stupid and not taking Trump's deal. If they are stupid
to try to strike at Americans, they will not have
any power in that country and they will never have
the ability.
Speaker 2 (21:23):
To make money.
Speaker 1 (21:24):
And at that point you can figure a squared B
squared C squared right.
Speaker 3 (21:29):
I expect the Mullas to that. I expect Trump to
run out of patience.
Speaker 2 (21:33):
And that he's running out of patience. He's had it.
Speaker 1 (21:38):
They were given the ultimate ultimatum, he said earlier today.
Speaker 3 (21:42):
Yeah, and I mean, look that's fair.
Speaker 1 (21:46):
Yeah, he all but begged them to do the deal.
But they can't have a nuclear weapon. He's been saying
it since twenty eleven. The world's been saying it. Now,
their defenses are down, We're two thirds of the way there.
We got to finish the job. I don't want a
forever war. I do believe that he was right on
Solo MONI. I think he was right on Bagdaddy and associates.
(22:08):
I think he was right to take out the Caliphate.
If he takes out Iran's final nuclear facility, their largest
one and most dangerous one. I think it is consistent
with the Trump doctrine and doesn't violate it in any way.
If the Iranians want to expand this, they will. There
will be hell to pay, but it won't be a
forever war. I can promise you that there won't be
boots on the ground. It'll you know, I've been telling
(22:30):
people that future wars are not going to be fought
on the battlefield. They're going to be fought in air
conditioned offices.
Speaker 3 (22:36):
Bill.
Speaker 2 (22:37):
That's why we need the next generation of weaponry.
Speaker 3 (22:39):
Chinese know that as well. Thanks for having me.
Speaker 1 (22:42):
I appreciate it, all right, mister O'Reilly all things O'Reilly,
Billoreilly dot Com.
Speaker 2 (22:48):
Appreciate it.
Speaker 1 (22:54):
Busy busy telephones, Peggy and Pennsylvania.
Speaker 2 (22:58):
Hey Peggy, how are you Sean?
Speaker 4 (23:00):
Thank you for taking my call.
Speaker 2 (23:02):
Thank you for calling. Glad you're there, Yes.
Speaker 5 (23:05):
Sean, the way I look at it, I'm not going
to waste a lot of time here. But our Lord
voted early July thirteenth, twenty twenty four. He saved our president,
President Trump, who he knew was going to be president,
and that president was saved for a reason, and that
is for the reason is to finish this reprobate forever.
(23:28):
He's a reprobate with the Ayatola is a reprobate with
a depraved heart. And there's no other way to look
at it. And the Lord, I believe, if you connect
the dots, it is very simple to understand it that
he Donald Trump was spared and God voted early on
July thirteenth.
Speaker 1 (23:48):
And there's no doubt when you come within a millimeter
of losing your life. And I remember saying this to
President Trump before the election. I said, God didn't save
your life and no reason, and.
Speaker 2 (24:01):
He looked at me.
Speaker 1 (24:03):
I actually think that event changed him, as it would
probably change anybody, and in every good way imaginable. In
my view, it's very humbling to be on death's door.
It really is. Anyway, good call, Peggy, we appreciate it.
We'll stay in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Janet is next, Janet.
How are you glad you called hi?
Speaker 4 (24:23):
Sean? I completely agree with that caller. I was there
that day and saw it happen, and she's absolutely positively right.
But what I was calling about is just on a
much lighter note. I want to no more bust than
Linda's chops from you for saying coffee until you learn
to say burn a launcher and not burner.
Speaker 2 (24:44):
Oh my gosh, it is a burner. Launcher.
Speaker 4 (24:47):
It's not a burner. It's a burner.
Speaker 1 (24:50):
Berna, Berna, Berna? Is you sound exactly the same either way?
You say it?
Speaker 5 (24:55):
Now right?
Speaker 1 (24:56):
If you don't think it's funny, Linda Silver Palette past,
just sw us'll.
Speaker 6 (25:03):
You say?
Speaker 2 (25:05):
I'll say waffe walk Radio, New y York.
Speaker 6 (25:09):
That's how those words are said.
Speaker 2 (25:11):
That's not out they're said New York.
Speaker 6 (25:15):
I have on you that you have not been able
to acclimate and use the words the way they should
be said, including burn. Burner is actually the one word
you say.
Speaker 2 (25:24):
Like I get it right every time.
Speaker 1 (25:27):
I don't even know what you're talking about.
Speaker 6 (25:31):
Actually, poor Katie Deluge recalls about that.
Speaker 2 (25:34):
It's so funny Janet.
Speaker 1 (25:36):
Janet she did she By the way, she I know
why you're defending her because she's a fellow Pennsylvania He
lives in Pennsylvania.
Speaker 6 (25:44):
And what's interesting is that my fellow Pennsylvanians say I
have a New York accent, and my New York friends
say I have a Pennsylvania accent because certain words.
Speaker 2 (25:51):
Are combination of the worst of both of you.
Speaker 6 (25:54):
The truth, completely fair, and totally agree with you without questions.
Speaker 1 (25:59):
You see that Janet, she admits that I am one
hundred percent right.
Speaker 6 (26:03):
On this one particular issue.
Speaker 1 (26:04):
As a side, I am one hundred percent right on
every issue.
Speaker 4 (26:14):
Says and jag Off. You're being a jag.
Speaker 1 (26:17):
Off to look at that John A lot of John's
Oh man, I'm getting I'm getting some major shade throw
my way.
Speaker 6 (26:24):
We say HOGI instead of hero. I. Remember when I
first moved to New York and I asked and they
were like, what the hell is that?
Speaker 2 (26:30):
Definitely, I know you have tasty cakes instead of you
know yo yo.
Speaker 6 (26:34):
Juah wahs, we have tasty cakes. Yeah.
Speaker 2 (26:36):
By the way, was in Florida is one? I was
actually at a wah wah uh not that long ago.
As a matter of fact, this weekend I was at
a wah wah.
Speaker 6 (26:46):
Pretty weird. I mean, I'm glad for them.
Speaker 2 (26:49):
That's weird, all right. Can I appreciate you? Thank you.
Speaker 1 (26:54):
Let us go to the Free State of Florida, My
Free State of Florida and Roberto next Roberto, you're on
the Sean Hannity Show.
Speaker 7 (27:02):
Hi, Hi, good afternoon, John tak it for taking my call.
Speaker 2 (27:06):
Where are you from and where are you from in
Florida at Miami?
Speaker 1 (27:10):
Well, come to our Fort Lauderdale show, don't you know?
Tickets are going fast down there. The Broward Center for
Performing Arts is a week from this coming Sunday, June
twenty ninth.
Speaker 4 (27:20):
I got it.
Speaker 7 (27:20):
No, I got it down on my calendar for sure.
I'm looking forward that.
Speaker 3 (27:24):
Okay.
Speaker 7 (27:25):
Just to follow up on the LA issues with the
riots and two issues that they have. One is that
the liberal government that they have and the politicians they have,
they're all concerned about all these rioters and demonstrators that
are out there on the civil liberties, but they're not
concerned about the free people that live in LA and
California that are trying to get to work and they
(27:46):
can't get to work, and there are businesses are closed,
and at the same time they're trying to get to
their families and maybe to a sick one. The fire
rescues can't get out because they're blocking the road, and
you're defending them instead of the citizens.
Speaker 3 (28:01):
How old?
Speaker 7 (28:02):
How long is that going to go on?
Speaker 2 (28:04):
The people that.
Speaker 1 (28:05):
They're arresting were murderers and child molesters and gang members
and drug dealers. And I listened to these idiots that
you know are in charge in the state of Florida
and Karen Bass comparing ice raids to COVID lockdowns, and
stunning numbers show that Donald Trump's immigrant illegal immigrant crackdown
(28:28):
has beaten the border crisis and literally now you know,
the United States is winning this conflict. But you know,
we still have known terrorists and murderers and rapists. I
don't know how you ever get all of them. But
the sanctuary state madness continues. The New Jersey police refuse
to arrest an illegal alien escape bee who tried to
(28:49):
turn themselves in. And it's got to stop anyway, my friend,
appreciate the call eight hundred and ninety four one, Shawn.
If you want to be a part of the program
All right, let him skin a simple man, and that
can only mean one thing on this radio program, and
that is whole things self proclaimed simple man. That means
all things Bill O'Reilly, all things Bill O'Reilly at billoreilly
dot com. We have not spoken about this conflict at
We haven't spoken at length about the conflict with Israel
(00:51):
and Iran. To me, the Trump doctrine is very very simple.
The same guy that wiped out the isis Californ, the
same guy that wiped out bag Daddy and his top
you know, lieutenants and associates. The same guy, Donald Trump
that took out Solamani on a tarmac, has said since
(01:13):
twenty eleven we actually went back and looked that Iran
can never have a nuclear weapon. He has said it
again and again and again. And I think we are
now at the hour is midnight. They've gotten very close
with their enrichment at sixty percent according to every published report,
and even the IAEA is saying so. And it takes
(01:36):
about three weeks to get to ninety percent weapons great enrichment,
and that is a clear and present danger for the
world to the number one state sponsor of terror. So
I think it is the Trump doctrine that they can't
have a nuclear weapon. But I also believe it's consistent
with things that Donald Trump has done in the past
and consistent with the Trump doctrine, the part of the
(01:59):
Trump talk and that says, well, We're never going to
be a part of these forever.
Speaker 2 (02:03):
Wars anymore and foreign entanglements.
Speaker 1 (02:06):
This is about a country that is that has stated
openly they want death to Israel, death to America. They
have terrorized America and and killed many Americans over the years.
I went through that in the last hour. Are we
in agreement, mister O'Reilly?
Speaker 3 (02:23):
Essentially, but there's a change in tactics. So I wrote
a book called Killing the Killers, and I ran down
all of the things you just mentioned. A bag Daddy
and Solomoni isis destruction, all of it. And it was
all methodically done, and it was all done very quietly.
(02:46):
It wasn't like this one. And what people may not
know is that we did partner up with Israel to
take out Solomony, and that you that you who backed
out of that arrangement at the last minute, which angered
Donald Trump, was never really made public. But Trump does
(03:09):
not trust net Nyahu. I can say that was certainty.
So this one's a little bit different because it's got
a little more urgency to it. And I just did
my research this morning, and you may know more than
me on this, But I don't think Donald Trump has
(03:31):
made up his mind yet about US air power. That's
what I have right now. He really hasn't made a decision.
Is that where you have no Okay, so you feel
that you have that he has made a decision, which
would be.
Speaker 1 (03:47):
All indications are now it's subjects to change. Is that
change the president? The president has been very, very firm.
I mean, it's pretty fascinating that Donald Trump, president of
the United States, can put out put up a social
media post and the population of Tehran starts leaving in
(04:07):
droves and they can't even get out of they can
they can't get out of Dodge fast enough. Sure, it
is very I think that I don't think he gives
idle threats. I think he means it. I think he's
given the Iranians every opportunity for peace. Steve Whitkoff has
been over backwards for peace and there it is an
(04:28):
existential threat to the entire world, and he understands that part,
just like the isis Caliphate was and just like Soloman,
he was. And I don't think he's gonna have to
any qualms about taking out that final facility.
Speaker 3 (04:42):
All right, So let me interview you. We did this
a couple of weeks ago and everybody loved it.
Speaker 1 (04:47):
Is it going to be a cupcake interview? Is it
going to be a real tough one?
Speaker 3 (04:50):
So you believe that, And I don't want to put
words in your mouth, but it's inebitable that the US
Air Force is going to go up and what is
it Furlough Mountain? Is that what it is?
Speaker 2 (05:03):
That is correct?
Speaker 1 (05:05):
This is the one that has buried three hundred feet
deep into the ground.
Speaker 2 (05:08):
That is correct.
Speaker 3 (05:09):
So you believe that these plans have been drawn up
and they're just ready for the President to say go.
Is that what you believe now?
Speaker 1 (05:17):
As the President told me that he has not only
the US military can take out Iran's most dangerous nuclear site.
I'm reading the I'm reading the tea leaves, and we
both know Donald Trump for this length of time, we
are now on the precipice of taking this number one
state sponsor of terror that has a history of killing
(05:40):
Americans and taking that nuclear threat which would hold the
world hostage off the table forever. It's a window of
opportunity because they don't have any missile defense system because
the Israelis knocked it out. They own the skies over Iran.
The Israelis took out two of the three sides rights
(06:00):
and the one remaining site is Iran's most dangerous site
and it's the for de Bordeaux if fuel enrichment planned,
and you're right, it's on the side of a mountain.
It's very three hundred feet below ground. And my conversations
with military professionals think it's going to take four bunker
(06:21):
buster bombs to take that sucker out, Well, not one.
Speaker 3 (06:24):
Not too US gets involved, and the untended consequences are
going to be on us. So the last that I
heard was that the President was still holding out the
Mulles will surrender unconditionally, which would mean that the United Nations,
with presence from the United States would have to be
(06:44):
that would go in and physically force the dismantlement of
all of this uranium enrichment. That's what an unconditional surrender
would meet. And Trump was still hoping that would happen
for the Mullers to save their own butts, because if.
Speaker 1 (07:02):
If the Mullas did that, then I could see that
scenario play out. Actually I would prefer that scenario. I would,
but that would but it would mean Bill an unconditional surrender.
It would mean the next day, our guys go in
there and we start dismantling that place immediately. Actually, and
I don't think the Iranians will ever give into that.
Speaker 3 (07:24):
And net nya who couldn't object to that even thought
ya who wants to just incinerate the whole place.
Speaker 1 (07:32):
No, I don't think that ya who would object to
that if it was a real dismantlement of their nuclear
program that removes the threat. I think I'm known Bbe
for thirty years. I have every belief. You know, what's
the downside for him is no downside?
Speaker 3 (07:47):
What's the Mulls out too? But from what I understand,
Trump is not going to say the Mullers have to go.
He would make a deal with the Mullas that they
would surrender, give up their nuke ambitions, but they would
keep their jobs. I think they.
Speaker 2 (08:04):
Keep their jobs.
Speaker 1 (08:05):
But you know what, Israel has their own say in this,
and knowing Donald Trump, like for example, the Israelis could
have taken out their entire power grid, which has gas driven. Interestingly,
and all of their refineries are clustered on one little island.
Most people don't know that either, and it's a layup
target for the Israelis. They so far have only hit
(08:28):
one refinery to send a message, but there are other
options on the table for the Israelis to just devastate them.
Speaker 3 (08:36):
Absolutely, but Trump doesn't want that.
Speaker 1 (08:38):
Trump Donald Trump is not Donald Trump's not directing what
the Israelis are doing. He definitely has input. They definitely
need our support. The President has been very supportive of Israel,
completely supportive. I believe we probably have helped in more
ways than we know. But at the end of the day,
(09:00):
Israel is the country that's getting pounded with hundreds of
thousands of rockets over the last few decades and they're
sick of it.
Speaker 3 (09:06):
Yeah, and understandably, so we're sympathetic to that. But let
me do some reporting on the Haniti radio program. So
this didn't get a lot of play at all, but
there were phone calls and one of the reasons that
Trump had to come back from Alberta from the G
seven number one he didn't want to be there anyway,
he doesn't. You know, they have a lot of regard
(09:27):
for those people there. And number two, he had to
talk to both she and Putin, and he did, and
he had to layer out worst case scenario, which is
US bombers go in, and best case scenario, which is
MOS surrender. But he had to take their temperature about Okay,
we have to take them out. That's not debatable. They're
(09:49):
not going to get a nuclear weapon. So you both
have to understand that. The calls were separate. Of course, Okay,
you bother, there's stand it's inevitable and it's not going
to change that. They're not going to get a nuclear weapons.
So both Putin and She know that, and Trump was
trying to gauge their reaction to it, okay, whether they
(10:10):
were going to be a bella coos uh, and they weren't.
In fact, Putin, who plays both sides, you know, I said, look,
I'll help you negotiated and then Trump said, now we
don't need one. She just negotiate Ukraine, which was happy
to see that. By the way, you don't want that
weasel Putin In there. But he had to take their
(10:31):
temperature both countries to see if there's going to be
any react if we do use air power, and the
consensus from the White House is no, not anything. They'll
make statements and day, you know how it is. But
behind the scenes, are they going to do anything to us? No? Okay,
the Arabs are the same way. They're not going to
(10:53):
do anything. It's not going to be any oil Shenanigans,
not gonna be you could in the.
Speaker 2 (10:58):
Arabs are going to be so clebrating.
Speaker 1 (11:00):
Egypt, Jordan, the Saudis, the Emirates, the Gulf States, they're
all going to be celebrating. They don't want They've they've
already partnered with the US to prevent Iranian hegemony.
Speaker 3 (11:10):
Just like Asad in Syria. Nobody wanted him. And you
know he's over in Russia now because it's the only
one take him.
Speaker 2 (11:17):
But that's where the Iyatole may end up pretty soon.
Speaker 3 (11:20):
Uh Iran is no Alis, none. But Trump does not
want the United States to be portrayed as this military hungry,
expansionist power. He doesn't. And you know, the most ascent
on this is coming from inside the United States. The
(11:42):
MAGA people, Bannon that crew, and then they hate Trumpers, all.
Speaker 1 (11:47):
Right, quick break right back more with all things simple Man,
Bill O'Reilly, All things O'Reilly at Bill oreilly dot com.
As we continue continuing out, Bill O'Reilly has agreed to
stay with us. Bill O'Reilly, of course, all things O'Reilly
man at billoreilly dot com. It is in complete alignment
with what Donald Trump has said. I mean, I've been
(12:08):
following the intramural debate. People have tried to drag me
into it, getting I'm just ignoring it because I think
it's silly, because people obviously didn't pay attention to Solomony
or the ISIS Caliphate or Bagdaddy and all his associates.
This is very consistent with what Donald Trump has done
in the past, and it is in keeping with the
(12:28):
Trump doctrine, which I support and I don't believe in
forever wars either.
Speaker 3 (12:33):
Scent in the world on military action, Twitter am by
US is coming from the US.
Speaker 1 (12:41):
Have you seen the Pollsville eighty yet seventy nine percent
of Democrats suppose Iran getting nuclear weapons seventy nine percent
of independence all adults seventy nine percent. Do you know
where that's coming from? That's coming from fake news CNN.
If you look Robert Kahelli your Falgar Insider advantage. Matt
(13:03):
Towery the question, what is your opinion of President Trump's
position that Iran must be prevented from developing a nuclear
weapon by any means necessary? Response seventy four point four
percent approve of the President doing what is necessary to
get rid of it. Harvard Harris. Eighty five percent say
(13:24):
Tehran must never get a bomb ever. I mean these
polls and there's more. If you want me to keep going.
Speaker 3 (13:31):
No, Look, I think that folks are on the side
of neutralizing Iran, especially in this area. But the headlines
are garnered by the dissenters.
Speaker 2 (13:45):
And that's well, you know what that is.
Speaker 1 (13:47):
You talked about this little intramural battle within you know,
the Maga world. First of all, I think the argument
is superfluous and silly because it's so almost like people
just their memories have been white clean of Donald Trump
and what his true doctrine is. Of course, it's not
forever wars. He doesn't want that. I will tell you
(14:08):
what Donald Trump's goal here would be. In my opinion,
his goal would be, Okay, we have a window of
opportunity as safely as possible. Every military action is danger
to take out their nuclear sites, rid the world of
this terrorist state having that weapon that would hold the
world hostage. And then the next most important thing you
(14:30):
probably do would be to protect our interest in the
region very closely, because the Iranians are unpredictable. Whatever missiles
they might have left, they might try to fire at us.
The third thing that I think he would do is nothing.
I think the mission would be accomplished. No nukes for Iran,
and then whatever the Israelis decided to do. I think
that will be between the Israelis and the Iranians, and
(14:52):
we're out of it.
Speaker 3 (14:53):
Well, I mean he's not going to do nothing. I
mean he has to be.
Speaker 1 (14:58):
He's taken out, he's taken out the the biggest facility.
Speaker 3 (15:01):
That's not nothing, right, So the President the United States
is gonna be involved with whatever happens to Iran. And
I think that both you and I agree. Even if
the Mullas survives, they are now powerless. They've shown they
can't defend themselves, They've depleted their arsenal, the nukes are
(15:23):
gonna go, and the Persian people hate them.
Speaker 1 (15:26):
So you want to stay there. You want to stay
for five more minutes, so you got a roll.
Speaker 3 (15:29):
Sure, you know, all right? More with the anything Let's.
Speaker 1 (15:33):
Go anything all things simple man, Bill O'Reilly or billoreilly
dot com. So we're talking about the necessity to do this.
We're talking about the American people overwhelmingly instinctively know that
this terror organization has got to go. Let me ask
you this question for those people out there that might
(15:54):
be resistant, which are a very tiny minority, which is
why I've kind of been ignoring the noise, because the
media wants to gin up that this fake, phony, fraudulent
MAGA Conflict Award that I don't even believe is reel.
I mean, there are people that are differing points of view,
but I respect diferring points of view.
Speaker 2 (16:13):
You don't have to agree with me every time.
Speaker 1 (16:15):
I believe that I support the Trump doctrine and its
purity based on his past actions. But you know, because
I believe in it, not because it's Donald Trump. But
at the end of the day, what happened. What would happen,
Bill O'Reilly if one rocket from a foreign country were
fired into the United States of America, what do you
(16:36):
think the American people would demand? I'd be worn one
rocket and there's hundreds of thousands over the years that
have been fired into Israel. Why would anyone expect Israel
to respond to accept this as they have for so
long and not finally end this once and for all
(16:57):
and cut off the head of the snake.
Speaker 3 (17:00):
Look, you're talking logic, and to the people who hate
Israel and the anti Semis, there's no logic involved. Let
me make a point that's been almost ignored by everybody
about this Iranian USA Israel situation, which is, you know,
obviously ultra important for people to understand. None of this
(17:21):
would be happening if Biden hadn't surrendered in Afghanistan. None
of it, okay, because.
Speaker 1 (17:26):
What wouldn't It wouldn't have happened either if Obama didn't
make that you know, one point seven billion dollar debacle
deal with Iran, and it wouldn't have happened if Joe
enforced the sanctions that were working in bankrupting Iran that
Donald Trump had put in place, and he turned a
blind eye towards him and they got rich, and that
(17:48):
funded his proxy terror war and funded more of his
build out of his nuclear program than nuclear program.
Speaker 3 (17:54):
For a column at Tom billo'reilly dot com. With all
the numbers. All the money went in Obama's money, Biden's money,
but it's beyond that. So when Biden surrendered in Afghanistan,
then the signal was sent to the bad people in
the world. Okay, we don't have now a real authoritative
(18:20):
United States any longer. We have a weak United States.
And you can see it. You can see it in Ukraine.
Putin not only Ukraine, but in Georgia and other former
Soviet republics. He started almost immediately, okay, to go in
and intrude and to inject Soviet Russian forces in there. China,
(18:45):
same thing, South China, Sea, building up the uh you know,
on and on and on and on and in ran
the Mulla is basically saying, hey, I it's not gonna
do anything. We can enrich all we want, we can
do whatever we want to do here. He's not going
to do anything that the scenario just lead out to
(19:05):
you is indisputable. You can't say it didn't happen, because
it did. When I was in Beijing three weeks ago
and they were asking me about Taiwan, which is far
and away their biggest issue, the Chinese communists, And I
just remind your listeners that I spoke with the Pollet
bureau there for almost two hours, and it was clear
(19:28):
to me by their questions that they felt they had
much more license to build up a very offensive capability
under Joe Biden than in Trump's first term. People are
forgetting about that. So when you see the Democratic Party,
(19:49):
which is going to object to whatever Donald Trump does,
you know he goes in and bombs the Mountain, You're
going to hear Democrats screen they hear it. You're gonna
hear the media, The New York Times washing posts are
all going to scream all you should have waited, you
should have been more diplomatic, you shouldn't given more time.
And I'm not against giving it a little more time.
(20:11):
I wouldn't give it a lot, but I'd give it,
you know, maybe a few more days to see how
the Mullers are going to be destabilized by their own people. Remember,
the Iranian army could turn on the Mullers. That would
be the key to it.
Speaker 2 (20:28):
And most of a lot of these top guys are dead.
Israeli's got them.
Speaker 3 (20:33):
That sends a message to all of the remaining Iranian army.
Speaker 2 (20:39):
Yeah, it does.
Speaker 1 (20:40):
Here, Why do we make predictions will reconvene next week
and see if either one.
Speaker 2 (20:44):
Of us are right or both of us are right.
Speaker 1 (20:46):
Okay, My prediction is is that by this time next week,
the Iranian nuclear program will be completely dismantled.
Speaker 3 (20:56):
All right, you heard it on the Hannity radio program.
That's a pretty barrel prediction.
Speaker 2 (21:01):
And I will take us involvement.
Speaker 1 (21:04):
And I believe that the Mullas if in fact they
are stupid enough, and they've shown themselves to be pretty
stupid and not taking Trump's deal. If they are stupid
to try to strike at Americans, they will not have
any power in that country and they will never have
the ability.
Speaker 2 (21:23):
To make money.
Speaker 1 (21:24):
And at that point you can figure a squared B
squared C squared right.
Speaker 3 (21:29):
I expect the Mullas to that. I expect Trump to
run out of patience.
Speaker 2 (21:33):
And that he's running out of patience. He's had it.
Speaker 1 (21:38):
They were given the ultimate ultimatum, he said earlier today.
Speaker 3 (21:42):
Yeah, and I mean, look that's fair.
Speaker 1 (21:46):
Yeah, he all but begged them to do the deal.
But they can't have a nuclear weapon. He's been saying
it since twenty eleven. The world's been saying it. Now,
their defenses are down, We're two thirds of the way there.
We got to finish the job. I don't want a
forever war. I do believe that he was right on
Solo MONI. I think he was right on Bagdaddy and associates.
(22:08):
I think he was right to take out the Caliphate.
If he takes out Iran's final nuclear facility, their largest
one and most dangerous one. I think it is consistent
with the Trump doctrine and doesn't violate it in any way.
If the Iranians want to expand this, they will. There
will be hell to pay, but it won't be a
forever war. I can promise you that there won't be
boots on the ground. It'll you know, I've been telling
(22:30):
people that future wars are not going to be fought
on the battlefield. They're going to be fought in air
conditioned offices.
Speaker 3 (22:36):
Bill.
Speaker 2 (22:37):
That's why we need the next generation of weaponry.
Speaker 3 (22:39):
Chinese know that as well. Thanks for having me.
Speaker 1 (22:42):
I appreciate it, all right, mister O'Reilly all things O'Reilly,
Billoreilly dot Com.
Speaker 2 (22:48):
Appreciate it.
Speaker 1 (22:54):
Busy busy telephones, Peggy and Pennsylvania.
Speaker 2 (22:58):
Hey Peggy, how are you Sean?
Speaker 4 (23:00):
Thank you for taking my call.
Speaker 2 (23:02):
Thank you for calling. Glad you're there, Yes.
Speaker 5 (23:05):
Sean, the way I look at it, I'm not going
to waste a lot of time here. But our Lord
voted early July thirteenth, twenty twenty four. He saved our president,
President Trump, who he knew was going to be president,
and that president was saved for a reason, and that
is for the reason is to finish this reprobate forever.
(23:28):
He's a reprobate with the Ayatola is a reprobate with
a depraved heart. And there's no other way to look
at it. And the Lord, I believe, if you connect
the dots, it is very simple to understand it that
he Donald Trump was spared and God voted early on
July thirteenth.
Speaker 1 (23:48):
And there's no doubt when you come within a millimeter
of losing your life. And I remember saying this to
President Trump before the election. I said, God didn't save
your life and no reason, and.
Speaker 2 (24:01):
He looked at me.
Speaker 1 (24:03):
I actually think that event changed him, as it would
probably change anybody, and in every good way imaginable. In
my view, it's very humbling to be on death's door.
It really is. Anyway, good call, Peggy, we appreciate it.
We'll stay in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Janet is next, Janet.
How are you glad you called hi?
Speaker 4 (24:23):
Sean? I completely agree with that caller. I was there
that day and saw it happen, and she's absolutely positively right.
But what I was calling about is just on a
much lighter note. I want to no more bust than
Linda's chops from you for saying coffee until you learn
to say burn a launcher and not burner.
Speaker 2 (24:44):
Oh my gosh, it is a burner. Launcher.
Speaker 4 (24:47):
It's not a burner. It's a burner.
Speaker 1 (24:50):
Berna, Berna, Berna? Is you sound exactly the same either way?
You say it?
Speaker 5 (24:55):
Now right?
Speaker 1 (24:56):
If you don't think it's funny, Linda Silver Palette past,
just sw us'll.
Speaker 6 (25:03):
You say?
Speaker 2 (25:05):
I'll say waffe walk Radio, New y York.
Speaker 6 (25:09):
That's how those words are said.
Speaker 2 (25:11):
That's not out they're said New York.
Speaker 6 (25:15):
I have on you that you have not been able
to acclimate and use the words the way they should
be said, including burn. Burner is actually the one word
you say.
Speaker 2 (25:24):
Like I get it right every time.
Speaker 1 (25:27):
I don't even know what you're talking about.
Speaker 6 (25:31):
Actually, poor Katie Deluge recalls about that.
Speaker 2 (25:34):
It's so funny Janet.
Speaker 1 (25:36):
Janet she did she By the way, she I know
why you're defending her because she's a fellow Pennsylvania He
lives in Pennsylvania.
Speaker 6 (25:44):
And what's interesting is that my fellow Pennsylvanians say I
have a New York accent, and my New York friends
say I have a Pennsylvania accent because certain words.
Speaker 2 (25:51):
Are combination of the worst of both of you.
Speaker 6 (25:54):
The truth, completely fair, and totally agree with you without questions.
Speaker 1 (25:59):
You see that Janet, she admits that I am one
hundred percent right.
Speaker 6 (26:03):
On this one particular issue.
Speaker 1 (26:04):
As a side, I am one hundred percent right on
every issue.
Speaker 4 (26:14):
Says and jag Off. You're being a jag.
Speaker 1 (26:17):
Off to look at that John A lot of John's
Oh man, I'm getting I'm getting some major shade throw
my way.
Speaker 6 (26:24):
We say HOGI instead of hero. I. Remember when I
first moved to New York and I asked and they
were like, what the hell is that?
Speaker 2 (26:30):
Definitely, I know you have tasty cakes instead of you
know yo yo.
Speaker 6 (26:34):
Juah wahs, we have tasty cakes. Yeah.
Speaker 2 (26:36):
By the way, was in Florida is one? I was
actually at a wah wah uh not that long ago.
As a matter of fact, this weekend I was at
a wah wah.
Speaker 6 (26:46):
Pretty weird. I mean, I'm glad for them.
Speaker 2 (26:49):
That's weird, all right. Can I appreciate you? Thank you.
Speaker 1 (26:54):
Let us go to the Free State of Florida, My
Free State of Florida and Roberto next Roberto, you're on
the Sean Hannity Show.
Speaker 7 (27:02):
Hi, Hi, good afternoon, John tak it for taking my call.
Speaker 2 (27:06):
Where are you from and where are you from in
Florida at Miami?
Speaker 1 (27:10):
Well, come to our Fort Lauderdale show, don't you know?
Tickets are going fast down there. The Broward Center for
Performing Arts is a week from this coming Sunday, June
twenty ninth.
Speaker 4 (27:20):
I got it.
Speaker 7 (27:20):
No, I got it down on my calendar for sure.
I'm looking forward that.
Speaker 3 (27:24):
Okay.
Speaker 7 (27:25):
Just to follow up on the LA issues with the
riots and two issues that they have. One is that
the liberal government that they have and the politicians they have,
they're all concerned about all these rioters and demonstrators that
are out there on the civil liberties, but they're not
concerned about the free people that live in LA and
California that are trying to get to work and they
(27:46):
can't get to work, and there are businesses are closed,
and at the same time they're trying to get to
their families and maybe to a sick one. The fire
rescues can't get out because they're blocking the road, and
you're defending them instead of the citizens.
Speaker 3 (28:01):
How old?
Speaker 7 (28:02):
How long is that going to go on?
Speaker 2 (28:04):
The people that.
Speaker 1 (28:05):
They're arresting were murderers and child molesters and gang members
and drug dealers. And I listened to these idiots that
you know are in charge in the state of Florida
and Karen Bass comparing ice raids to COVID lockdowns, and
stunning numbers show that Donald Trump's immigrant illegal immigrant crackdown
(28:28):
has beaten the border crisis and literally now you know,
the United States is winning this conflict. But you know,
we still have known terrorists and murderers and rapists. I
don't know how you ever get all of them. But
the sanctuary state madness continues. The New Jersey police refuse
to arrest an illegal alien escape bee who tried to
(28:49):
turn themselves in. And it's got to stop anyway, my friend,
appreciate the call eight hundred and ninety four one, Shawn.
If you want to be a part of the program
The Sean Hannity Show News
Host
Sean Hannity
Popular Podcasts
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
The Breakfast Club
The World's Most Dangerous Morning Show, The Breakfast Club, With DJ Envy And Charlamagne Tha God!
The Joe Rogan Experience
The official podcast of comedian Joe Rogan.