Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Hour two Sean Hennity Show.
Speaker 2 (00:01):
Eight hundred and nine fourt one, Shawn is a number
if you want to be a part of the program.
It turns out that this report about sitting senators, there
were first eight, then there's nine. We're not the only
Republican operatives around the country that were being targeted and
spied on. Now it turns out that our friend Jim
(00:25):
Jordan was one of them. And I have now had
an opportunity to review documents obtained by Jim Jordan showing
that in twenty twenty two, lawyers running the Arctic Frost
investigation subpoenaed Verizon for Jim Jordan's complete phone records going
all the way back to January twenty twenty. Now understand,
(00:46):
this was supposed to be an investigation about January sixth,
twenty twenty one, and that's not all. They wanted his address,
his payment information, unique identifiers of all his vices.
Speaker 1 (01:00):
In other words, they wanted to.
Speaker 2 (01:01):
Know where he was the moment he contacted anybody, called anybody,
texted anybody, and by the way, that would mean they
know the location of the people he was calling and texting.
And then to top it all off, the subpoena came
with a court order of secrecy, and Verizon was not
allowed to tell anyone about the data request because a
(01:22):
court determined, and this is the sickest part of all this,
this is Jim Jordan. He is the chairman of the
very powerful House Judiciary Committee. He has been a well
respected congressman his entire career. But anyway, a court determined
that quote disclosure would result in flight from prosecution or
(01:45):
witness intimidation. How you come to that conclusion is obscene, absurd, unjust, unfair,
and an invasion of one's personal liberties, constitutional liberties, never
mind unlawed full search and seizure. Verizon answered, we reached
out to them and they said to us, we uncovered
(02:08):
new information regarding Chairman Jordan. We shared it with him
as soon as possible. We're committed to restoring trust through transparency.
Why did they ever hand it over in the first place.
And in case you forgot, you know, this is our friend,
Jim Jordan of Ohio. I mean straight as an arrow,
Jim Jordan. Anyway, he joins us. Now, sir, welcome back
(02:28):
to the program.
Speaker 3 (02:29):
Yeah, good to be with you, Sean, And then Shawn
if they can do it to the president. If they
can do it to you, if they can do it
to me, imagine just to just think about the normal people,
great great people across this country. They can do it
to anybody, all your listeners, all your viewers. I mean,
that's the part that is most frustrating, and I think
most most troubling is with if they can get who
(02:51):
you called, who called you, how long the call was,
when the call took place, and where you're standing at,
where you're located at when you make the call, for
two and a half years, get all that. Think about that,
they can determine pattern of life. They know when you're
talking to your spouse, when you're talking to your kids,
when I'm talking to our grandkids. For goodness, say, they
can learn all that stuff. That is just so wrong
(03:12):
for the government to do that when they're supposed to
be investigating an alternate elector at slates from certain states.
Why do they want to go back clear till January
of twenty twenty and so I want to know did
Chris Ray, now did we know Lisa Monico signed off
on the start of Artie Cross Because we have that
document that we got from the Justice Department who told
(03:34):
Merrik Garland, we think you should sign off an okay
Arctic Cross beginning this investigation. Well, the day when they
signed off and Artie Cross started twelve days later they
sent a subpoena to Verizon to get the phone records
we just talked about for two and a half years.
So I want to talk to those guys at some
point too. But the first one on the list is
Jack Smith.
Speaker 2 (03:53):
Well, I want to talk to him too. Now he's
been demanding of public hearing. Is why would Congress allow
him to create what he wants to create, which is
a public circus? Uh, you have you're not under any
You know that you're not compelled in any way to
give him a platform for him to go out there
(04:15):
and pontificate and and try and shift the narrative rather
than answer questions that he's supposed to be answering. Congress.
And by the way, that is the job of Congress.
We have co equal branches of of of government. That
you know, one of your roles is designed to be
a check and balance against other roles of government. And
(04:36):
and clearly to me, this has crossed the line. And
so what's going to happen in that regard.
Speaker 3 (04:42):
You know that second of all good points on it
and a great question. But the second, we are a separate,
equal branch of government. We have what's called this speech
or debate clause, which says when you're when you're doing
your job, they can't go get that information or you
couldn't do your jobs as a member of the legislative
branch not to mention that, you know, I have to
get to get the privilege of being top Republican on
the Judiciary Committee, and they were doing this. So we
(05:03):
think the fundamental problem here with how they did this
to senators through the former Speaker of the House, Kevin McCarthy,
and now for two and a half years for me.
So that is critical. And you're right, we may want
to bring Jacksmith in for a public hearing. That may
be appropriate, but we want to talk to everyone beforehand,
and him beforehand in a deposition format where we can
(05:26):
take our time, ask all the questions, do the follow
up questions. And remember this, Thomas Wyndham, who we referred
to the Justice Department for obstructing our investigation, was Jack
Smith's pop deputy. We brought him in, he wouldn't answer questions.
He had literally tried to obstruct, and that's why we
referred him one of the questions. We asked him one
of the questions we asked him because this was after
we first learned about the senator several weeks ago, we
(05:48):
asked him, who else, what are the members of Congress?
What are the members of the United States Senate? Did
you get the phone logs on? And he would not
answer that question. Well, now we know why, because it
was it We didn't know.
Speaker 2 (06:00):
Did he answer any questions because my understanding is a
number of these guys took the fifth on every question.
Speaker 3 (06:06):
Yeah, he took the fifth seventy one times. Mister Bratt,
another the key deputy of Jack Smith, took the fifth
seventy four times. So yeah, these guys. So again, we
want all this information. We're getting it from the carriers.
We're going to go to every agency that was involved
in this whole thing, whether it was the National Archives
where there's a postal service, the Inspector General, the FBI,
(06:27):
the DOJ, and we're going to go to Verizon and
AT and T get everyday and the banks that were
involved because it looks like they got some bankrupt as
are certain people. So we want to get all that
information and bring in mister Smith asking the questions that
I think we all need answers to and the country
needs answers to.
Speaker 2 (06:42):
I remember at different times because thousands of my personal
text messages that were never gotten from me were released
to the public between Paul Maniford January sixth, Kayleie Mcananey,
and the list goes on and on, Mark Meadows. All
of this was released publicly. No nobody asked for my permission.
Nobody cared about my privacy, you know, and it was
(07:05):
wal to wall coverage on networks like MSDNC and CNN.
And now one person really cared about my civil liberties.
And you watch these people, you would think that Donald
Trump is taking away everyone's civil liberties. Nothing has ever
happened like this that I can think of in history.
Let me play you Lindsey Graham's reaction when he found
out that, in fact, his records were targeted.
Speaker 4 (07:30):
My phone records were seized as part of this.
Speaker 1 (07:34):
I am tired of this.
Speaker 4 (07:35):
The third leading DJ lawyer left DJ in Washington to
work for Alvin Bragg and Manhattan.
Speaker 1 (07:42):
What was that all about?
Speaker 4 (07:44):
Fanny Willis's boyfriend spent a day in the White House
talking to the Jack Smith people.
Speaker 1 (07:50):
What was that all about?
Speaker 4 (07:52):
I think this was an worse than Watergate, an effort
to destroy President Trump, charge him with crimes that are
just ridiculous, come after people like me. I'm not gonna
put up with this craft anymore. I'm gonna sue. I'm
gonna sue the hell out of my people.
Speaker 1 (08:06):
How much you're going to sue them? Tens of millions of.
Speaker 4 (08:08):
Dollars because I went to Fanny Willis in Atlanta, spent
one point two million dollars with that.
Speaker 1 (08:16):
In Atlanta.
Speaker 4 (08:17):
Now find out they tap, they spyal on my phone
records as a senator and a private citizen. Chaired in
the Judiciary Committee in twenty twenty three, I am going
to sue. If you don't sue, they'll keep doing it.
Speaker 1 (08:31):
Don't run away from this. Republicans fight back. I agree
with him. What do you plan to do?
Speaker 3 (08:38):
We passed legislation to change how these non disclosure orders work.
With the judge, you can't put these gag orders for
these extended periods of time, years and years, and you
got to notify, and we raise the threshold when you
can do it. We just passed that bill out of
committee on Tuesday. I actually think we should also look
at for members of Congress, because of the separate, equal
branch of government, because of the Constitution, because of the
speechure of debate clause that is in the Constitution, we
(08:59):
should say you cannot get a gag order on information
that is given to the Justice Department on a member
of Congress. You cannot do that. Now, if you have
a congressman who did something like William Jefferson did years ago,
where he had ten thousand dollars cash in his freezer
in his office, well that's a criminal thing. So go
get a warrant and you and treat it as a
(09:20):
criminal That's fine. But the dependant has a chance to
know all that this is.
Speaker 1 (09:23):
A phishing expedition. That's all.
Speaker 2 (09:26):
This was a phishing expedition. How did they ever get
permission to do any of this.
Speaker 3 (09:32):
Lisa Monico signed off on this investigation. We have the
signature on the page she signed off, and she recommended
to the Attorney General of the United States Merrick Garland,
head of the Justice Department in the Biden DOJ in
the Biden administration. They signed off on they okayed Artie Frost,
and they did that on April thirteenth, twenty twenty two.
Twelve days later, they issued a subpoena for two and
(09:53):
a half years of my phone records. That is how
this thing started. And you know why, Sean, You know
your text has got lead. You know what they did,
just mean because you're close to the president. You talk
about weaponized government, weaponized Justice department where it's supposed to
be equal treatment under the law we had. We're going
to go fishing for anything and everything up to two
and a half years for the top Republican on the
(10:15):
Judiciary Committe. We're going to get that information, gather it
all up, figure out who's calling, where that, who's he
talking to you, how long he talks. We'll get all
that information. And oh, by the way, they we're also
going to go up to people not only on that side,
but we're going to go after and try to censor
what they tweet, what they post, what they say. That
is how bad it was. In God bless President Trump
if he doesn't win. If he doesn't win, you know
(10:38):
they were going to put him in prison.
Speaker 2 (10:39):
Oh forget it, I mean going to do I'm not
complaining we live in the greatest country God gave, ma'am,
but this is an abuse of power that I believe
is a clear and present danger to our constitutional republic
and a clear violation of our Our Bill of rights
are our privacy rights, and it is far We're firs
(11:00):
than people think. Look, I've almost come to accept that
this is a part of my job. I know that
you have come to accept that this is a part
of your job. However, I do think we owe it
to the countries that no other American has to go
through this. It may not sound like a big deal
to some people, but I promise you when it happens
to you, it's going to be a big deal.
Speaker 3 (11:21):
Yep, yep, it's we got by the way.
Speaker 2 (11:25):
And when they get your phone records, I wonder how
many times you and I were talking, because it's not
a shock to anybody listening to this program that I
consider you a deal personal friend.
Speaker 3 (11:34):
Yep, I mean they get that information. And Na when
I mean it's just like and Nana, where you're at
when you're doing it. It's it's wrong. And everyone knows
we have a fourth and amend, but we have a
bill rights, We have the greatest constitution ever put down ever, ever,
ever and they know it's wrong. And yet these these guys.
Speaker 2 (11:51):
We were probably talking about the fact that Jim Jordan
was one of the greatest wrestlers in the state of
Ohio all his time wrestling in high school and at
Ohio State.
Speaker 1 (12:02):
You only lost one match your entire career.
Speaker 3 (12:05):
Correct, Well, that's high school. I lost a few more
in college and I coached at Ohio State, but I
wrestled for the Badgers in college. So but yeah, it's
been good. It's I always say, Sean, I wanted to
play middle linebacker, but when you're my size, you got
to wrestle. So it's been a great.
Speaker 2 (12:19):
Actually, if you don't have to play middle linebracker, you
would have been a great full back. On my view,
you w'd been awesome. You would have been you had
been incredible.
Speaker 3 (12:27):
Actually, well, you're kind. You're kind anyway. I appreciate what
you do and the fact that you get the truth
and millions and millions of people every day.
Speaker 1 (12:36):
I said something last night.
Speaker 2 (12:37):
I want you to reiterate this is, you know, all
of these issues Faiza Warrence and Russia, Russia impeachment issues,
we were right on all of it. Yeah, yes, and
I'm proud of the fact that we did our due
diligence and worked hard and got it right.
Speaker 1 (12:55):
But this is what you always say, explain.
Speaker 3 (12:58):
Yeah, the only thing we get wrong when we start
these investigations. The only thing is it's always worse than
we thought, every single time, every single time we thought,
like when we first got this Rushes off it the
Russia of the Spinal his CAMPI, they spied on his campaign,
they got four vicees, they lied to the fights. It's
always worse than we thought. You go in Peach on
(13:19):
one and Peach for two. Then it's then it's Fannie
Willis that that was worse than we thought. Who's who
thought that we've did this? This Wade guy would be
involved going to the White House talking with January sixth
committee here in DC. Like it just keeps and then
Arctie Cross, Jack Smith, you know, it just it's always worse,
and it's and the one constant for the Democrats, the
one constant over the last decade go after Trump and
(13:40):
anyone close to him. That's what they've done. And it's
that is that is exactly what they've done. So much
so they shut the government down for forties for a
month and a half because they thought it would hurt
President Trump. That's how crazy it is become. And again
I think most Americans fee through it. But what helps
him see through it is the fact that you're talking
about it and you have the a voice to reach
(14:01):
so many people. That has made it. That has made
a huge difference. But you go back to the beginning,
it was basically you and a handful of journalists, good journalist,
a handful that we're working a lot with you, and
then a handful of people in Congress. That was it.
Everyone was like, oh, this Russia clusion must be some truth,
like it's bs. It was all bs. But you saw
it and you talked about it. But for you talking
(14:21):
about it, I don't know that we get it done
in Congress. What Devin was able to do, what we
were all able to work on, it just doesn't happen.
So thank you for all.
Speaker 2 (14:29):
That, Congressman Jim Jordan's sorry this happened to you, and
I mean that with all my heart.
Speaker 1 (14:34):
Thank you for being with us.
Speaker 2 (14:35):
You know obviously you know Comrade Marches, Mom, Donnie and
Trump and meeting, and I wish more of it was public.
But going into this meeting, we have Mom Donnie the candidate.
You know he's going to take on Donald Trump. Then
we have the lead up to this meeting today very
different tune.
Speaker 5 (14:52):
Listen, My administration would be Donald Trump's worst nightmare. I
have many disagreements with the President. I believe that we
should be relentless and pursue all avenues and all meetings
that could make our city affordable for every single New Yorker.
I intend to make it clear to President Trump that
I will work with him on any agenda that benefits
(15:15):
New Yorkers.
Speaker 1 (15:16):
Oh looks like zoron.
Speaker 2 (15:18):
And by the way, the Democratic Socialists of America are
pissed off at him, you know, for changing his position.
Then we have Mom Donnie talking about these free buses
and you know how important they are. But yesterday says
he has no idea I was going to fund it.
But I can tell you why. He's really the governor
of New York and he'll get HOCl to do whatever
(15:40):
he wants her to do. He is ostensibly the governor
of New York. He's governor of name only. Listen, and
the other one, you've.
Speaker 6 (15:47):
Been talking about fast and free buses, in your meeting
with the governor. I've heard you talk about many times
that you don't want to take money away from mt
you want to put money back in. It's something that
she agrees with, right, we don't want to takeway money
from the MTA. How are you getting that money the
seven hundred millions make the buses free into the MCA.
If she's not for raising taxes.
Speaker 7 (16:04):
You know, I think that the two clearest ways to
raise that money is through the raising of the state's
corporate tax to matchst in New Jersey. I think that
a lot of this is still a case to be made,
whether it's the corporate tax or that's the personal income
tax on those who make more than a million dollars
a year or more. I think that these are the
clearest ways. I've also said that if there are other
ways to raise this funding, the most important fact is
that we fund it, not the question of how we
(16:25):
do it, but that we do it.
Speaker 2 (16:27):
I mean, these people are pathetic, they are just they
are cowering before these people. All right, Donnie Dallas next
Sean Hannity Show, what's up, Donnie?
Speaker 1 (16:35):
How are you?
Speaker 8 (16:37):
John? My brother? It is an honor and I'm proud
to talk to you. How are you?
Speaker 1 (16:41):
I'm good, my brother.
Speaker 2 (16:42):
Did you hear we odd on Greg Abbot this week
and Chip Roy this week? Greg Abbot thinks that in
your city of Dallas that there may be sharia courts.
Speaker 1 (16:52):
They're investigating that.
Speaker 8 (16:53):
Now, Yeah, I'll follow that pretty close. Of course. You know,
I listen to a talk radio all day long, listen
to your show every day, and so yeah, thank you.
I want a close eye on that.
Speaker 2 (17:04):
Uh, I'm a little shocked by it.
Speaker 1 (17:07):
But anyway, what's going on.
Speaker 8 (17:08):
Well with Moron Momdami going to the Oval office today,
They're just the same kind of appropriate to call, especially you.
I wanted to get your opinion on how long do
you think that it's going to be in New York
before the people that voted for mom Dami to start
rioting whenever they figure out that they're not going to
(17:29):
get all this free stuff.
Speaker 2 (17:31):
I don't think that's what's going to be. I don't
think that's going to create the unrest in New York.
I think the Mamdannie supporters are going to believe their
carte blanche to do any darn thing they want.
Speaker 1 (17:43):
And that means if.
Speaker 2 (17:44):
You think the protests in the summer of twenty twenty
were bad.
Speaker 1 (17:48):
Buckle up.
Speaker 2 (17:49):
I think it's going to get a lot worse, and
I think it's going to spread all throughout the city
and the Five Boroughs as they refer to affectionately in
New York.
Speaker 1 (17:56):
I think it's going to be that bad.
Speaker 2 (17:58):
And I don't think Mam Donnie's going to do a
thing to rise up against the very people that put
him in office.
Speaker 8 (18:03):
To you, you know what, I don't see how he
can because uh, you know, these people have proven.
Speaker 2 (18:09):
Well, what do you think he's gonna do. He's not
hiring police, He's going to send in social workers. You
think he's actually going to stop the people that voted
from him when they go out there and you know,
they're protesting, and those protests become predictably out of control
and probably violent. I don't believe he's going to lift
a finger. He's probably going to be there supporting him.
Speaker 8 (18:30):
Yeah, And I think he'll be too afraid to and
somehow or another, he'll get Hoko involved and pass the
buck onto her.
Speaker 3 (18:37):
No.
Speaker 2 (18:37):
Well, if anything, he's gonna blame Hokel, but he'll get
Hokl to do whatever he wants him to do. Hochel
knows her political future now is in Mamdani's hands. He's
not the governor, he's ostensibly the governor. He's governor in
name only.
Speaker 8 (18:50):
God.
Speaker 2 (18:50):
It's not gonna end well that I can predict. I mean,
it's going to give us a lot of material for
the next next four years to cover, but not material
that I'd like to cover. I'd rather be covering the
revival of New York and you know Rudy Giuliani two
point zero, but they blew that opportunity. Now, Linda doesn't
like when I bring it up, but she had predicted
(19:12):
Curtis Slee what was going to win up till the
day before the election. I said, I love Curtis, I
stayed with him. I'm not I'm totally urging people to
vote for him. But he's not going to win. Did
I not tell you that, Linda?
Speaker 1 (19:23):
You did? Why don't you say it? Boss? You're right,
You're not right.
Speaker 9 (19:27):
The reason that we didn't have a fair election is
because I don't have a fair election process in New York.
And even though he got seven percent of the vote,
he could have got seven hundred percent of the vote.
Speaker 1 (19:37):
It wouldn't matter.
Speaker 9 (19:38):
They would have just kept bringing eleven over again.
Speaker 1 (19:41):
There's no voter crazy conspiracy line. I can't conspiracy. They
don't do voter I d here.
Speaker 3 (19:48):
I could go in.
Speaker 1 (19:49):
Three times and vote Donnie.
Speaker 2 (19:51):
Thank you Martin in my free, sensible state of Florida.
Speaker 1 (19:55):
What's up, Martin? How are you good?
Speaker 10 (19:57):
Happy Friday? Sean? I am doing okay. I'm glad to
be back on the show. And I just want to
say hi to you and Linda, and I apologize with
the last time I was on. Last time kicked me
off because I gave Linda props. But I got something
important that I do want to bring up about what
they're what they're talking about in the in the in
(20:20):
that ad that the Democrats are pushing.
Speaker 2 (20:22):
Oh, you mean the you have a duty and obligation
and a right and will support you to disobey orders.
Speaker 10 (20:30):
That ad, that ad, and what I what I want
to point out is this is extremely dangerous because they're
setting up, they're setting up the environment for the next
sport hood shooter to happen. And how this will happen
is you'll have that one guy, you know. And I'm
saying this isn't characteristic of the military. Most most of
the military guys and I'm speaking as a veteran. Uh,
(20:53):
I did time in the Marine Corps, I did time
in the Army. But you'll have the one guy that
just doesn't get it. And that's like maybe one out
of one hundred, maybe one.
Speaker 2 (21:03):
Out of a thousand, probably one out of ten thousand.
You know, these guys are very special people that want
to sacrifice, protect others, put their lives on the line
for the rest of us. They are just very special people.
Speaker 10 (21:16):
Yeah, and we'll do that all day long without question.
And the good thing is we know and we're taught
what is lawful and unlawful orders. And it's like, I
hate to frame it this way, but I'm going to
because I'm afraid it's going to end up as a
big nothing burger. But it's the subtext of what they're saying,
(21:36):
we know not to follow unlawful orders, but there are
no unlawful orders being issued. They're just putting that out
there as basically I hate to say it like that,
but it's chicken what they're doing. It's very cowardly what
they're doing because they want to motivate somebody to act
but they will take no accountability when that person acts out.
Speaker 2 (21:57):
Well, I got to tell you something, they won't. I
have faith in our military. I have trust in the military.
I think they understand that, you know, politics has no
place in the military. They have a job to protect
and defend our liberties, our freedom, our constitutional republic. They're
great at it, and I think they'll live up to,
(22:18):
you know, the pledge and the promise that they made
to the country. I have every faith that they will.
Speaker 10 (22:23):
There is one thing I wanted to bring up because
I memory hold this a long time ago, and I
spoke to Rush Limball about this. The Democrats get the
Democrats get very sneaky whenever it comes to the Constitution.
About during the you know, I'd say about midway during
the Obama administration, I went through this thing in the army.
We call it BINOC is Basic Noncommissioned Officer Scores, and
(22:47):
in the curriculum. I got excited because the Constitution was
being taught and I'm thinking, Okay, this is great. I
love these topics. When we got down to it, it
got one slide. We talked about for five minutes, and
I asked the question, why was there so little coverage
on the Constitution. We saw a note to put our
(23:07):
lives of to defend this, and the rebuttal that I
got back was because it was too controversial. I doubt
that's the case now, But this is what was going on,
and this is what the games that they like to
play with our constitution and the games that they like
to play with our military.
Speaker 2 (23:21):
The Constitution is sacred to this country and we're seeing
and we talked about this with Jim Jordan. It is
something we have got to protect and the Left has
been shredding it before our very eyes because they just
their Trump de arrangement syndrome has caused them to act
(23:44):
in ways that I never thought we'd see in our lifetime.
But with that said, we can return to constitutional order. Look,
it's a little early to talk about twenty twenty six.
In January, I'm going to come on this program and
I'm going to lay out all the arguments, what is
at stake, what is important, what you need to be
(24:04):
looking for. And I can only tell you if you
don't treat this as the single most important midterm election
in your lifetime, it is, then we are going to
live through two years of never ending impeachment, never ending investigations,
never ending law fair and an abuse of power, probably
(24:26):
on steroids and human growth hormone because they're so angry.
But I got a romance. Appreciate it, Martin. Glad you called.
Thank you for your service. Quick break right back to
our phones. Eight hundred and nine four one, Sean. If
you want to be a part of the program this Friday,
as we continue.
Speaker 11 (24:46):
The final hour of the Sean Hannity Show is up next.
Hang on for Sean's conservative solutions.
Speaker 2 (25:21):
All right this Friday, let's get back to our phones.
Eight hundred and ninety four one, Sean. If you want
to join us, Let's say hi to Johnny in New Orleans.
Speaker 1 (25:28):
Johnny, how are you, Sean?
Speaker 8 (25:30):
How are you today?
Speaker 1 (25:31):
I'm good, sir. What's going on? Happy Friday?
Speaker 7 (25:33):
Oh?
Speaker 3 (25:34):
Well man?
Speaker 8 (25:34):
Happy? Who was saying? I understand that you and Linda
went train shopping?
Speaker 1 (25:40):
Okay, yeah, we did.
Speaker 2 (25:41):
We had been on some trip and her son was
younger at the time, and her son loved Chuo Choo trains,
and we went to Target and after about an hour
of her turning over every train and examining it and
comparing the prices, which at Target is relatively inexpensive. I
got sick and tired of it, and I was with
sweet baby James and my friend Gomez, and I just
(26:04):
asked them and I said, let's go get a shopping cart.
We went and got a shopping cart, and I just
threw a bunch of trains in the shopping cart and
then I said, We're done.
Speaker 1 (26:11):
Let's go.
Speaker 10 (26:13):
Well, I figured Linda's got to be kind of a
studious right, What which one did she like? After all?
Which one did she pick?
Speaker 8 (26:20):
And the reason?
Speaker 1 (26:20):
Which one did her son like the most? Linda, You
can answer.
Speaker 9 (26:23):
That he likes Thomas. His favorite was Thomas at the time,
Thomas the Train, Thomas the.
Speaker 1 (26:29):
Choo Choo train.
Speaker 9 (26:29):
If you remember the show, you know, Thomas the Little Engine,
the Little tank Engine, and they had the whole series
with all of the other engines and a little British things.
Speaker 1 (26:37):
And if you knew that, why did you torture us
for over an hour? I didn't know it.
Speaker 9 (26:41):
I was looking over I was going to pick him,
and I was like, I think I'm going to pick
this one. First of all, you know, one part of
the story that you leave out is you weren't invited. Okay,
you guys were bored and decided to come to Tarja
with me, which I would never go to Targill.
Speaker 2 (26:56):
We went in to protect a, to protect you. Be
it process. You never know who's in target.
Speaker 9 (27:04):
You guys were the worst. You were walking all around
you talking to everybody. You're talking to people on the line.
I'm like, oh, for God's sake, I'm here for one.
Speaker 1 (27:11):
Train, one train and over an hour you spend.
Speaker 10 (27:16):
You know.
Speaker 1 (27:19):
Me, I'm scary. You know what. Watch their as you
think you'll throw a train right in their face.
Speaker 2 (27:26):
Thomas, if you come near me, I'm going to throw
Thomas the train at you.
Speaker 1 (27:30):
Not so not so threatening. I'm going to be armed.
Speaker 9 (27:32):
On one hand, I'm going to have silver palated pasta sauce,
and in the other hand, I'm going to have a trains.
You get the jar of the train, but it's coming
at you either way.
Speaker 2 (27:39):
Okay, you didn't have a jar of silver palad pasta
sauce that time.
Speaker 1 (27:42):
Because it didn't exist. You're so little. But the point
is you think you're tougher than you are. You're not
so tough.
Speaker 2 (27:47):
You talk to me game, I'm pretty tough actually, And
you you were agonizing over picking one stupid train as
a toy gift for your son. And I got sick
and tired of waiting. After an hour, you not off
me before a detail, and then I generously bought a
bunch of trains so that your son could pick from
a variety of them.
Speaker 9 (28:07):
While it was generous, it was generous out of exasperation.
Speaker 1 (28:10):
You were like, oh my god, enough.
Speaker 2 (28:12):
I'm glad you finally admit you can be exasperating. That's correct,
that's right. Adjective