June 12, 2024 • 29 mins
Judge Jeanine, author of Crimes Against America and host of the Five, joins us to discuss the verdict in the Hunter Biden trial.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
All right, Leonard Skinners simple man that could only mean
one thing on this radio program, all things self proclaimed
simple man. That means all things Bill O'Reilly, All things
Bill O'Reilly at billoreilly dot com. Mister O'Reilly, sir, I'm
gonna need some discipline from you today. Are you able
to show a little bit of discipline?
Speaker 2 (00:21):
No?
Speaker 1 (00:23):
Oh, come on, of course you can. By the way,
I got a copy of your new book. I just
started reading it. I don't want to give it away yet.
It's not out till September, but thank you for sending
me an early galley that's okay, and.
Speaker 2 (00:34):
You get it free and you can put it on
eBay and get big money if you want.
Speaker 1 (00:38):
Can I sell it now and get get it for
free and leak it? Would you want me to do that,
mister O'Reilly. I'll be glad to But I would not
do that to you because you know you're a friend
of the show and a personal friend. Why would I
do that to you?
Speaker 2 (00:51):
That'd be mean the same possibilities. Look, confronting the President's
out September tenth, I wanted to get you one of
the first copies, so you read it and tell me
because you'll tell me the truth, whether it's good or
boring a lot.
Speaker 1 (01:04):
So you know, here's how I know it's going to
be good because you're too excited about it. And and
I'm just warning you ahead of time. If you think
you're coming on this program when you launch that book
and you're getting a cupcake interview, that is not happening.
I'm just warning you right now, o'reiley. I have disagreements
on who the worst president of all time is. We're
(01:25):
going at it. I'm just you know, prepare for battle,
mister O'Reilly.
Speaker 2 (01:29):
We'll prepare, all right.
Speaker 1 (01:31):
So here's what puzzles me, because you are a smart guy,
a great analyst, you know the issues. And you said
something I don't know, maybe he said it on air
somewhere I read it, I don't recall where, And I
just want to make sure I got it right that
you said that there's no evidence at all that Joe
(01:51):
Biden is involved in any of these nefarious activities involving
the the Hunter Biden quote family business. Do you do
you actually believe there's no evidence?
Speaker 2 (02:04):
No, that's not what I said. I said, there is
overwhelming evidence that Joe Biden sold his office of the
vice presidency so that his son and brother could make money.
That's number one.
Speaker 1 (02:20):
Okay, So so why did the headline you know which
headline I'm talking about.
Speaker 2 (02:24):
Said something else? So comer the congressman came on and said, oh,
Joe Biden committed all of these crimes. We know he
committed crimes. Well, if you know, Congressman, then you need
to pass that along to me and the American people
and Sean Hannity, because right now Biden is guilty of
ethical violations, no question, but federal crimes. The evidence has
(02:51):
not been put forth yet.
Speaker 1 (02:54):
That was okay, let me go over some issues and
see if I might not be able to change your mind,
because the big takeaway for me from this whole trial
with Hunter. Look, this drug issue to me was the
low hanging fruit. The tax issue, another low hanging fruit issue,
the big tax years, the Barisma years. This guy David Weiss,
(03:16):
who just dragged his feet, I would argue on purpose
because he didn't want to charge Hunter with anything. Then
he offered the sweetheart deal and he was only forced
to do this because of a judge in Delaware, and
that was bring this case. The evidence when you look
at Hunter that the big issues involving Hunter all around
the laptop. But the big takeaway from this trial is
(03:39):
that the government introduced into evidence that laptop is being
very very real and not tampered with. No disagreement from you, correct?
Speaker 2 (03:50):
Correct?
Speaker 1 (03:51):
All right? Joe Biden told this nation over and over
and over again. Did he not misster O'Reilly that not
one time did he ever talk to his son Hunter,
or brother or anybody for that matter about their foreign
business dealings. Did he say that?
Speaker 2 (04:08):
He said it, but it's not look as all politicians do.
Speaker 1 (04:13):
He's wait, wait a minute, that's a very definitive statement.
If you like, I'll play you no montage of it.
Speaker 2 (04:20):
But he's dancing, so he'll say, yeah, I got on
the phone with them, and yeah I chatted with them,
but it wasn't about direct dealings with my son and brother.
That's what he's bill.
Speaker 1 (04:34):
He's dancing. I never once spoke to my son, my brother,
or anybody for that matter about their foreign business deals
at all. Okay, now, did he or did he not
meet with one of those foreign business partners for example,
and there were others. Elena Battarina, the former First Lady
(04:55):
of Moscow, Russian oligarch at the Cafe Milano. That's an
established fact. The little laptop and elsewhere.
Speaker 2 (05:01):
You agree with that, yes, But he can say that
he was talking about Putin with Elena. He can say
that he was given Elena a verbal tour of Washington,
d C. The crux of the matter here is this,
and it's very simple because I'm a simple man, as
you know, and Leonard Skinner knows. If Joe Biden derived
(05:26):
personal benefit from helping his son and his brother, that
is a crime.
Speaker 1 (05:33):
That is Let's let now, let's look at the evidence.
You're you're, you're, you're you're actually tracking with me. I'm
giving you an a plus for being a cooperative guest today,
right because now that the government established the laptop as
being very real and I'm tampered with, right, uh, And
you look at the laptop, who is the person that
(05:54):
implicates Joe Biden the most as it relates to the
very heart of the issue that you just brought up,
whether or not Joe Biden himself benefited, Well, that would
be Hunter Biden. Because Hunter Biden complains bitterly that that
half his income has to go to pops. He complains,
(06:15):
they talk about ten percent for the big guy. He
complains and works with the head of finance for his company,
Eric Sherwin is his name. On which account they're going
to pay for Pops' home repairs, and apparently it was
extensive and Pops was basically draining as well as fargo account.
Speaker 2 (06:36):
Oh count, let me stop you there, because you don't
want to get too much. You want let's let the
folks did.
Speaker 1 (06:42):
Trying to keep it simple, Bill, I know, let's let.
Speaker 2 (06:45):
The folks digest what you said. That was on the laptop.
That's a fact. But you have to show, Homer has
to show because the Justice Department, Merrick Garland will never investigate,
which is a real scandal. That's a real scandal where
you have the FBI and the Adjust Department.
Speaker 1 (07:04):
It's it's even deeper, Bill, because for four years they've
known the laptop is real.
Speaker 2 (07:09):
Okay, so four years anything, that's a huge, huge scandal
that they there's evidence, anecdotal evidence that money passed from
Jim and Hunter Biden to Joe Biden. But it's anecdotal,
all right. So a lawyer in a defense position could
tear it apart. He could say, hey, the guy.
Speaker 1 (07:31):
But can they tear it apart when they followed the
money that in other words, if the money went for
the home repairs, which it did, if the money went
to the big guy, which it did, if the money
went there, then would you not acknowledge that even one
(07:54):
check for one home repair shows that Joe benefited from
from these financial dealings, and that Hunter Biden, who admits
he had no experience, for example, an oil or energy
or gas or Ukraine or China, and he made millions
and millions of dollars. Then the what's app message? I'm
sitting here with my father and why didn't you fulfill
(08:15):
your obligation in between everybody he knows and my ability
to hold a grudge. You're going to regret it? And
a few days later, five million dollars end up in
one a Hunter's accounts. Isn't that a little bit more
than an anecdotal bill.
Speaker 2 (08:29):
It's not enough to bring the charge. So Comer has
to produce a check to a construction company for work
done on a Joe Biden property.
Speaker 1 (08:45):
We have not That's what the committee in my interviews
with Comer that said that they've already been able to identify.
Speaker 2 (08:51):
Is it you don't have it. I don't have it.
Where is it?
Speaker 1 (08:54):
I don't know when they're going to release it, But
that's what he says. He has hey show it because
sherw Remember the back and forth between Hunter and Sherwin.
Who's the money guy? You know which account are we
gonna take this from. There's a track record of that
bill and those are the records that Comer has referred
(09:16):
to often in interviews. Has he shown it to everybody?
Speaker 2 (09:19):
No, he is not.
Speaker 1 (09:21):
But all right, so either he's lying or the money
was paid for Pops's home repairs. It's one or the other.
And I would assume that Comber wouldn't risk his reputation
and lie. That seems rather odd to me, don't you think.
Speaker 2 (09:35):
What I think is he hasn't produced any physical evidence.
Speaker 1 (09:41):
But remember there's also one other thing. There are criminal
referrals going on. I'm not sure he has the ability
to release that.
Speaker 2 (09:48):
He could certainly release it to the public. He can
give it a.
Speaker 1 (09:51):
You, he can me ask you this. Let me ask
you this. Joe Biden is on tape because of the
Council of Farm Relations. Okay, in October, as reported by
John Solomon October of twenty fifteen, interagency agreement that Ukraine
had made enough progress on the issue of corruption. Therefore
a billion and gloan guarantees were going to be given
(10:13):
to Ukraine. Joe Biden was in charge of Ukraine. That's
October twenty fifteen. Fast forward to December of twenty fifteen,
and five or six days before Joe makes the trip
to Ukraine, he's on the phone again, according to reports,
with Hunter Biden, who is in Dubai with Maorisma executives. Again,
Hunter's being paid millions and he has no experience, and
(10:35):
he's addicted to drugs, hard drugs at the time. Okay,
the five days later when he goes to the Ukraine,
he brags, in his own words, you're not getting the
billion unless you fire the prosecutor who is investigating the
oil and gas giant Barisma that is paying his son
as a direct result of his actions that were against
(10:57):
Obama administration official policy. His son directly benefited financially from
his actions. Now, if you look at the bribery statute,
Bill O'Reilly, one doesn't need to benefit themselves. It would
also include those around them, loved ones, family members of
(11:17):
people they know that would seem to fit into that
category directly, wouldn't it.
Speaker 2 (11:22):
You can make a case.
Speaker 1 (11:25):
Bill you're hedging. I can't believe you're hedging.
Speaker 2 (11:27):
I'm not hedging. I'm telling you why it hasn't been brought. Okay,
I can tell you why.
Speaker 1 (11:33):
It hasn't been brought. Republicans don't have enough of a
majority to bring it. Oh, and Merrick Garland's not going
to bring it trying.
Speaker 2 (11:40):
This in the court of public opinion. Okay, it hasn't
been brought, and you could bring it on a conspiracy basis,
So I can't.
Speaker 1 (11:48):
Because Merrick Garland has to be the one to charge it.
Speaker 2 (11:52):
You remember this happened during the Trump administration, which is
why Trump was impeached, because he called Zelensky and said, hey,
if you've got anything that shows that Vice President Biden
was benefiting and his son was benefiting, I want to
see it was.
Speaker 1 (12:09):
But back up a second. You're asking why hasn't Comer
done anything? Number One, there are they have a two
vote majority. Now they were down to one vote majority.
So the impeachment inquiry now has become a series of referrals.
They just referred both Hunter and Jim Biden to the
Department of Justice. Relying to Congress now for the for
(12:32):
the issue of whether or not this was a real
quid pro quo, which it appears to be. And Joe
fired this guy, and as a result of firing a
prosecutor in Ukraine against Obama administration policy that his son
Hunter benefited even though he had no experience and was
addicted to drugs. He can't bring that charge. He can
(12:53):
only refer that charge, which, by the way, according to reports,
they're planning to do. He said that this.
Speaker 2 (12:58):
Week he is have to bring the charge himself to Congression.
Speaker 1 (13:03):
So he has to refer it, and then Merrik Garland
would have to bring it.
Speaker 2 (13:06):
He can refer all day long, but tomorrow he can
come out and say, here's the physical evidence, here are
the banking records, here's the check here's how Joe Biden benefited.
And if Attorney General Merrick Garland will prosecuted, we're going
to impeach him.
Speaker 1 (13:23):
That's what, okay, And they don't have the votes to
impeach them. They're wasting their.
Speaker 2 (13:27):
Time, none of that. If you have physical evidence that
Joe Biden benefited financially from all of this grift.
Speaker 1 (13:36):
But Bill, you're you're you're defying all logic and common sense?
Why would a vice president? I'll tell you, what, do
you have time to stick around? Because this is too important?
Show it you do you have? You have you have
time to stick around?
Speaker 3 (13:49):
Or what?
Speaker 2 (13:50):
Sure?
Speaker 1 (13:50):
Always I know I'm too nice to you. That's my problem.
Eight hundred and nine four one, Shawn is number. Also
get your calls in the next half hour. We'll try
and wrap this up with mister O'Reilly all things O'Reilly
at billoreilly dot com. All right, we continue all things simple.
Man Bill O'Reilly is with us, and we're talking about
the issue is involving Hunter, now that the government is
(14:12):
fully completely acknowledged that the laptop is real. Now, before
I get to the main crux of the question where
we were at, how angry are you? Are you as
angry as me that Joe Biden lied about it, the
laptop being real? Hunter lied about it. We know the
media mob they always lie about it, just like they
(14:33):
lied about Russia collusion for three years, all because I
would argue they were all in bed. They all they
cared about was electing Joe Biden. On a scale of
one to one thousand, Bill, How bad is that? In
terms of election interference and the people that just flat
out lied to us about it.
Speaker 2 (14:53):
Well, I think we live in the most corrupt time
in the United States history now. And yes, am I
as angry as you know, because I take a different
tact on this. If you're on a battlefield, which the
country is, you want to win the battle. If you
get angry while you're fighting, you're going to lose. So
(15:16):
what I want and I want you to give me
sixty seconds and then you can.
Speaker 1 (15:20):
I have righteous anger, there's.
Speaker 2 (15:23):
Nothing wrong with that. But from my perch and the
analysis that I bring, here's what I see. You got
to get Joe Biden out of this. Now he may
explode in the debate and that'll be the end of them.
The eight Tajiks who were caught yesterday attached to ISIS
(15:45):
plotting some terrorist activity in the United States. It's a
big story. It's being suppressed by the corrupt media. But
if there is a terror attack, that Biden will be done.
He won't be able to run. But say that doesn't happen,
say there's no terror attack, and say that he gets
through the debate. Biden does, So, now you want to
knock him out. I want to knock him out, all right,
(16:08):
I don't want him on the ticket in November the way,
bye bye bye.
Speaker 1 (16:12):
By the way, Bill is not talking about physically knocking
out the president. For you woke lunatics out there that
will not interpret that comment properly.
Speaker 2 (16:21):
Go ahead, but lunatics don't listen to Hanne. But I
get you drift because it will go on the Internet
and then there's a lunatics there. So Comer and the
other Republicans obviously they're partisans. They want to win the election,
they want more power in Congress and all of that.
The way to do that, Hannity is the court of
public opinion. And my analysis is, if you know, all
(16:44):
right that Joe Biden as vice president or afterward, okay,
derived money from his brother or his son, money or
construction or anything that helped him and Jill, you have it,
you can prove it. You need to show it, and
you need to show it now.
Speaker 1 (17:04):
I think that's very good advice. Now, I think it's
sad because the Republicans have a small majority, and a
lot of Republicans are weak and all they think about
is their reelection, and they're just as pathetic as Democrats
and Frankly, there's only a handful of people in Washington
that I really have deep respect for. However, let me
(17:24):
go back to where we left off, and that is
we now know that Hunter Biden. I don't care if
it's with the CEFC and the money that was handed
over and the What's App message that we have talked
at length about. But now that we know that the
laptop is real and that What's Apps message that said,
(17:45):
I'm sitting here with my father and would like to
understand why the commitment made has not been fulfilled. I
will be certain, between the man sitting next to me
and every person he knows, and my ability to hold
a grudge, that you will regret not following my direction.
I'm sitting here waiting for the call with my father.
A few days later, five million dollars was wired to
(18:07):
a bank account associated with Hunter, again, according to the committee.
Now let's go to this part two of this. Now,
Hunter admits on Good Morning America, no experience in energy, oil, gas,
or Ukraine or China. Okay, now let's go to Joe Biden.
Joe Biden admits when he speaks to the Council of
Foreign Relations that I told him You're not getting a
(18:28):
billion dollars. You got six hours unless you fired the prosecutor.
Son of a bee. They fired the prosecutor. What was
the result of that action? Hunter, no experience addicted to
drugs got paid millions because of Joe's direct actions that
went against Obama administration policy at the time. So here's
(18:49):
my question, and I know it's long winded, but stay
with me. Why would a vice president of our country
ever do what he just did and then have his
own son benefit. None of this is in dispute pill
because we know that Hunter got paid the money. They're
not even disputing it, they're justifying it. And Joe Biden,
(19:14):
he's bragging about the fact that he took the action
to fire the prosecutor. And my question is, you know
we have an attorney general that won't do anything with it.
So I guess you kind of gave me the answer.
Your answer is just bringing to the court of public opinion.
But we've kind of been talking about this for years
and now it's only been confirmed that the laptop is real,
(19:35):
and it takes on a little bit more urgency and
it's reality now, it's not conjecture as some had suggested.
Speaker 2 (19:44):
People believe what they want to believe. Kennedy and the
eight Trumpers want to believe that Joe Biden didn't do
anything wrong. But if you prove beyond a reasonable doubt
in the court of public opinion that he did, then
Biden is finished. So if I'm a defense attorney, I
say this, Yeah, Hunter Biden said to the Chinese guy,
(20:04):
my father sitting next to me. But Hunter Biden was
lying his father wasn't there. Okay, So you can destroy
that anecdotal, hearsay evidence. What you cannot destroy is if
Comer and Jordan and the rest of the Republicans heading
the committees in the House have evidence that shows Joe
(20:27):
Biden benefited financially himself. That is the end.
Speaker 1 (20:33):
Okay, mister O'Reilly. I think your strategy is sound. I
think they tried the impeachment route. They didn't have enough
Republicans to support them. I think they're doing the criminal
referral route, which they should do. And the last option
is the only option, which is to bring it to
the American people. Lay out the case, and I'm going
(20:54):
to tell you the problem they're going to run into.
I'll cover it, you'll cover it. And a few others
will cover it, and the rest of the mob will
absolutely ignore it. And then you'll get the intel types
that will go out there and say it's all bs
and they'll muddy the waters. That's what's going to happen, Bill,
(21:15):
And this is the sad part of it, because what
should happen is that the Attorney general of this country
should not have a politicized and weaponized office where he
is protecting the Biden family. And that is the real
tragedy of what will prevent it from going as viral
as I think you think this might go. Because this
(21:38):
has been out there for a long time.
Speaker 2 (21:40):
Bill, real quick, the Republican Party is going to have
a billion dollars to run Trump until now to November.
That's a lot of TV ads. That's what you do.
Speaker 1 (21:52):
You don't depend I don't think it's about listen. I
think it's the only best option they have. But it's
a sad option for the country because where we're living
in a time where the rule of law doesn't exist.
Speaker 2 (22:04):
Shows, you run those ads on the network, shows this
is what we have. Okay. That blows up all up.
And that's what the Republicans have to do.
Speaker 1 (22:17):
I hope you're right. I'm not sure at all work
I think the most the sad part is is this
is clearly an investigation for the Attorney general. The attorney
generals known this laptop is real for four years. The
FBI is known for four years, and they haven't done
a thing bill and that tells me that we have
(22:39):
a weaponized and politicized DOJ. Do you agree with that statement?
Speaker 2 (22:43):
Sure? I mean, Department of Justice under Merrick Garland is
extremely corrupt. And what frustrates me is that Trump could
have been more aggressive when he was in because he knew.
Trump knew that Biden was corrupt as vice president. And
you know, I know that Trump was obsessed with the
(23:04):
election and all of that, and his attention was diverted.
I know that. But he had a window of two
and a half months, and that's when it could have.
Speaker 1 (23:15):
All happened till the laptop didn't break until in the
New York Post, until just a few weeks before the election.
Speaker 2 (23:23):
Didn't need the laptop. He could have assigned special councils
to look into all of this, and when when Biden
came in, Biden could not fire those special councils.
Speaker 1 (23:34):
Well, it's you know, I guess at this point maybe
you have more faith in the ability to bypass a
very corrupt media establishment. As we saw in the weeks
leading up to the twenty twenty election, they were able
to suppress a story that absolutely would have swayed the election.
You do agree with that.
Speaker 2 (23:55):
And it was a disgrace. But now the Republicans have
the momentum. Biden as a failed president. Most people think
he's corrupt. I think he's corrupt.
Speaker 1 (24:05):
Just nail it down, all right, Well, we appreciate you
being with us all things simple man, Bill O'Reilly, all
things O'Reilly at Billoreilly dot com. We appreciate your extended stay.
And I hope they're listening at the White House, and
I hope they're listening at Trump campaign headquarters.
Speaker 2 (24:22):
Any time check me in.
Speaker 1 (24:24):
Eight hundred nine four one, Shawn if you want to
be a part of the program.
Speaker 2 (24:32):
The Final Hour Roundup is next.
Speaker 1 (24:34):
You do not want to miss it, and stay tuned
for the Final Hour Free for All on the Sean
Hannity Show. You know, since the terror attacks on October
the seventh, well, we've been watching and witnessing a virulent
anti semitism on the rise. We see it on college
campuses across the country. We see it in Europe, we
(24:57):
see it in Australia. I mean it's terrible. We have
proudly partnered with the International Fellowship of Christians and Jews,
and today they're simply asking all of us to stand well,
not just with us, but with the IFCJ, kind of
like Oscar Schindler did. As they point out, and we
want to show the people in Israel that they're not
alone here in their battle against radical Islamic terrorism. Now
(25:20):
for the month of June, they're simply asking everyone that's
listening to my voice please sign a pledge which will
be delivered to the President of Israel that shows that
we here in America, we're not only standing in solidarity,
but we are speaking up on their behalf so that
they can win the war that was started against them. Anyway,
take a stand today with us and the International Fellowship
(25:43):
of Christians and Jews. Let the people in Israel know
that they are not alone in this battle. Just sign
a pledge. When you go to their website, it's support
IFCJ dot org. It's one word support IFCJ dot org
and take a stand today. All right, let's get to
a phones here. Nancy's been listening to our debate with
(26:05):
mister O'Reilly. Nancy, how are you glad you called?
Speaker 3 (26:08):
Thanks An, I'm a first time caller, but a long
time listener.
Speaker 1 (26:12):
Well, thank you. I appreciate you being out there. What's
on your mind today?
Speaker 3 (26:15):
Okay, the laptop now has been authenticated along the information
on it, and they used it to convict Hunter. Now,
my question is what happens with the chain of custody
with the laptop. Does it go to the ga DJ
for possible prosecution of the Biden crime family, does it
miraculously disappear or does it wind up on Joe's garage
(26:37):
floor next to the corvette.
Speaker 1 (26:39):
I think with this weaponized, politicized DOJ, I think the
answer is very very obvious, and that is nothing is
going to happen under Merrick Carla, not that as it
relates to the Bidens, not at all. And that's a
sad reality. I wish I could give you better news,
but I can't. And that was the whole point of
the debate with O'Reilly. I mean, he thinks, well, okay,
(27:00):
going to happen, you know, put out ads. I know
what the Democrats will say that, well, okay, ads are great,
but he hasn't been indicted. Why should we believe it.
Speaker 3 (27:10):
Yeah, well that's the problem. America doesn't see any justice.
We only see a party of corruption. Is that what
we see in the country.
Speaker 1 (27:18):
Yeah, that's a party of corruption for sure. It's sad.
I appreciate the call, Nancy, thank you for being out there.
Let us say hi to is it Meka? Micah? Meka,
Micah Oregon? How are you, Micah? How are you?
Speaker 4 (27:33):
I'm doing good? How are you? Sean?
Speaker 1 (27:34):
What's up? Man? Glad you call awesome?
Speaker 4 (27:36):
I'm just I want to run my opinion by you.
So it's about the Hunter Biden gun trial. So I
hope people see that, you know, responsible gun owners, they
aren't doing they aren't doing this, they're not lying on forms,
and they're definitely not throwing their gun away, you know.
And then you have Joe Biden's response, like I said,
(27:57):
as a senator, you know, ban all this, Well, that's
not that's not the problem. You know, gun control isn't
the problem here if people being irresponsible like Hunter and
do you think that Joe Biden saying that is just
the way to buy vote. Basically.
Speaker 1 (28:15):
Yeah, look, I think that that Joe Biden has successfully
with the help of all the people that we've mentioned.
His Department of Justice weaponized, the FBI, weaponized, you know,
the Intel Agency, you know heads and former leaders, weaponized,
the media mob in their pocket, big Tech, you know,
not on not on Republican side. It's just you got
(28:37):
a lot of powerful institutions and forces here that are
working hard to get Joe Biden reelected, and they seem
to be willing to do anything to stop Trump. And
if they could keep them in a courtroom or jail
cell every day for the next one hundred and forty
five days, they do it. I mean, that's how bad
things have gotten. Very scary scenario for our country, don't
(28:59):
you think?
Speaker 2 (29:00):
Oh?
Speaker 4 (29:00):
Absolutely. I think it's horrible what they've done to Donald Trump.
I mean, and then you have the Biden family that
can seem to get away with whatever they want, and.
Speaker 1 (29:11):
They got away with it in twenty twenty only with
the help of the FBI pre bunking, the fifty one
Intel officials, the media mob, and Big Tech, which they
had prepared for such a story and wouldn't tell the
truth to that. I mean, this is the United States
of America and it's run like a banana republic. How pathetic.
(29:33):
Wouldn't expect this in this great country, But that is
the reality that we now know about the twenty twenty election.
It's so sad.
All right, Leonard Skinners simple man that could only mean
one thing on this radio program, all things self proclaimed
simple man. That means all things Bill O'Reilly, All things
Bill O'Reilly at billoreilly dot com. Mister O'Reilly, sir, I'm
gonna need some discipline from you today. Are you able
to show a little bit of discipline?
Speaker 2 (00:21):
No?
Speaker 1 (00:23):
Oh, come on, of course you can. By the way,
I got a copy of your new book. I just
started reading it. I don't want to give it away yet.
It's not out till September, but thank you for sending
me an early galley that's okay, and.
Speaker 2 (00:34):
You get it free and you can put it on
eBay and get big money if you want.
Speaker 1 (00:38):
Can I sell it now and get get it for
free and leak it? Would you want me to do that,
mister O'Reilly. I'll be glad to But I would not
do that to you because you know you're a friend
of the show and a personal friend. Why would I
do that to you?
Speaker 2 (00:51):
That'd be mean the same possibilities. Look, confronting the President's
out September tenth, I wanted to get you one of
the first copies, so you read it and tell me
because you'll tell me the truth, whether it's good or
boring a lot.
Speaker 1 (01:04):
So you know, here's how I know it's going to
be good because you're too excited about it. And and
I'm just warning you ahead of time. If you think
you're coming on this program when you launch that book
and you're getting a cupcake interview, that is not happening.
I'm just warning you right now, o'reiley. I have disagreements
on who the worst president of all time is. We're
(01:25):
going at it. I'm just you know, prepare for battle,
mister O'Reilly.
Speaker 2 (01:29):
We'll prepare, all right.
Speaker 1 (01:31):
So here's what puzzles me, because you are a smart guy,
a great analyst, you know the issues. And you said
something I don't know, maybe he said it on air
somewhere I read it, I don't recall where, And I
just want to make sure I got it right that
you said that there's no evidence at all that Joe
(01:51):
Biden is involved in any of these nefarious activities involving
the the Hunter Biden quote family business. Do you do
you actually believe there's no evidence?
Speaker 2 (02:04):
No, that's not what I said. I said, there is
overwhelming evidence that Joe Biden sold his office of the
vice presidency so that his son and brother could make money.
That's number one.
Speaker 1 (02:20):
Okay, So so why did the headline you know which
headline I'm talking about.
Speaker 2 (02:24):
Said something else? So comer the congressman came on and said, oh,
Joe Biden committed all of these crimes. We know he
committed crimes. Well, if you know, Congressman, then you need
to pass that along to me and the American people
and Sean Hannity, because right now Biden is guilty of
ethical violations, no question, but federal crimes. The evidence has
(02:51):
not been put forth yet.
Speaker 1 (02:54):
That was okay, let me go over some issues and
see if I might not be able to change your mind,
because the big takeaway for me from this whole trial
with Hunter. Look, this drug issue to me was the
low hanging fruit. The tax issue, another low hanging fruit issue,
the big tax years, the Barisma years. This guy David Weiss,
(03:16):
who just dragged his feet, I would argue on purpose
because he didn't want to charge Hunter with anything. Then
he offered the sweetheart deal and he was only forced
to do this because of a judge in Delaware, and
that was bring this case. The evidence when you look
at Hunter that the big issues involving Hunter all around
the laptop. But the big takeaway from this trial is
(03:39):
that the government introduced into evidence that laptop is being
very very real and not tampered with. No disagreement from you, correct?
Speaker 2 (03:50):
Correct?
Speaker 1 (03:51):
All right? Joe Biden told this nation over and over
and over again. Did he not misster O'Reilly that not
one time did he ever talk to his son Hunter,
or brother or anybody for that matter about their foreign
business dealings. Did he say that?
Speaker 2 (04:08):
He said it, but it's not look as all politicians do.
Speaker 1 (04:13):
He's wait, wait a minute, that's a very definitive statement.
If you like, I'll play you no montage of it.
Speaker 2 (04:20):
But he's dancing, so he'll say, yeah, I got on
the phone with them, and yeah I chatted with them,
but it wasn't about direct dealings with my son and brother.
That's what he's bill.
Speaker 1 (04:34):
He's dancing. I never once spoke to my son, my brother,
or anybody for that matter about their foreign business deals
at all. Okay, now, did he or did he not
meet with one of those foreign business partners for example,
and there were others. Elena Battarina, the former First Lady
(04:55):
of Moscow, Russian oligarch at the Cafe Milano. That's an
established fact. The little laptop and elsewhere.
Speaker 2 (05:01):
You agree with that, yes, But he can say that
he was talking about Putin with Elena. He can say
that he was given Elena a verbal tour of Washington,
d C. The crux of the matter here is this,
and it's very simple because I'm a simple man, as
you know, and Leonard Skinner knows. If Joe Biden derived
(05:26):
personal benefit from helping his son and his brother, that
is a crime.
Speaker 1 (05:33):
That is Let's let now, let's look at the evidence.
You're you're, you're, you're you're actually tracking with me. I'm
giving you an a plus for being a cooperative guest today,
right because now that the government established the laptop as
being very real and I'm tampered with, right, uh, And
you look at the laptop, who is the person that
(05:54):
implicates Joe Biden the most as it relates to the
very heart of the issue that you just brought up,
whether or not Joe Biden himself benefited, Well, that would
be Hunter Biden. Because Hunter Biden complains bitterly that that
half his income has to go to pops. He complains,
(06:15):
they talk about ten percent for the big guy. He
complains and works with the head of finance for his company,
Eric Sherwin is his name. On which account they're going
to pay for Pops' home repairs, and apparently it was
extensive and Pops was basically draining as well as fargo account.
Speaker 2 (06:36):
Oh count, let me stop you there, because you don't
want to get too much. You want let's let the
folks did.
Speaker 1 (06:42):
Trying to keep it simple, Bill, I know, let's let.
Speaker 2 (06:45):
The folks digest what you said. That was on the laptop.
That's a fact. But you have to show, Homer has
to show because the Justice Department, Merrick Garland will never investigate,
which is a real scandal. That's a real scandal where
you have the FBI and the Adjust Department.
Speaker 1 (07:04):
It's it's even deeper, Bill, because for four years they've
known the laptop is real.
Speaker 2 (07:09):
Okay, so four years anything, that's a huge, huge scandal
that they there's evidence, anecdotal evidence that money passed from
Jim and Hunter Biden to Joe Biden. But it's anecdotal,
all right. So a lawyer in a defense position could
tear it apart. He could say, hey, the guy.
Speaker 1 (07:31):
But can they tear it apart when they followed the
money that in other words, if the money went for
the home repairs, which it did, if the money went
to the big guy, which it did, if the money
went there, then would you not acknowledge that even one
(07:54):
check for one home repair shows that Joe benefited from
from these financial dealings, and that Hunter Biden, who admits
he had no experience, for example, an oil or energy
or gas or Ukraine or China, and he made millions
and millions of dollars. Then the what's app message? I'm
sitting here with my father and why didn't you fulfill
(08:15):
your obligation in between everybody he knows and my ability
to hold a grudge. You're going to regret it? And
a few days later, five million dollars end up in
one a Hunter's accounts. Isn't that a little bit more
than an anecdotal bill.
Speaker 2 (08:29):
It's not enough to bring the charge. So Comer has
to produce a check to a construction company for work
done on a Joe Biden property.
Speaker 1 (08:45):
We have not That's what the committee in my interviews
with Comer that said that they've already been able to identify.
Speaker 2 (08:51):
Is it you don't have it. I don't have it.
Where is it?
Speaker 1 (08:54):
I don't know when they're going to release it, But
that's what he says. He has hey show it because
sherw Remember the back and forth between Hunter and Sherwin.
Who's the money guy? You know which account are we
gonna take this from. There's a track record of that
bill and those are the records that Comer has referred
(09:16):
to often in interviews. Has he shown it to everybody?
Speaker 2 (09:19):
No, he is not.
Speaker 1 (09:21):
But all right, so either he's lying or the money
was paid for Pops's home repairs. It's one or the other.
And I would assume that Comber wouldn't risk his reputation
and lie. That seems rather odd to me, don't you think.
Speaker 2 (09:35):
What I think is he hasn't produced any physical evidence.
Speaker 1 (09:41):
But remember there's also one other thing. There are criminal
referrals going on. I'm not sure he has the ability
to release that.
Speaker 2 (09:48):
He could certainly release it to the public. He can
give it a.
Speaker 1 (09:51):
You, he can me ask you this. Let me ask
you this. Joe Biden is on tape because of the
Council of Farm Relations. Okay, in October, as reported by
John Solomon October of twenty fifteen, interagency agreement that Ukraine
had made enough progress on the issue of corruption. Therefore
a billion and gloan guarantees were going to be given
(10:13):
to Ukraine. Joe Biden was in charge of Ukraine. That's
October twenty fifteen. Fast forward to December of twenty fifteen,
and five or six days before Joe makes the trip
to Ukraine, he's on the phone again, according to reports,
with Hunter Biden, who is in Dubai with Maorisma executives. Again,
Hunter's being paid millions and he has no experience, and
(10:35):
he's addicted to drugs, hard drugs at the time. Okay,
the five days later when he goes to the Ukraine,
he brags, in his own words, you're not getting the
billion unless you fire the prosecutor who is investigating the
oil and gas giant Barisma that is paying his son
as a direct result of his actions that were against
(10:57):
Obama administration official policy. His son directly benefited financially from
his actions. Now, if you look at the bribery statute,
Bill O'Reilly, one doesn't need to benefit themselves. It would
also include those around them, loved ones, family members of
(11:17):
people they know that would seem to fit into that
category directly, wouldn't it.
Speaker 2 (11:22):
You can make a case.
Speaker 1 (11:25):
Bill you're hedging. I can't believe you're hedging.
Speaker 2 (11:27):
I'm not hedging. I'm telling you why it hasn't been brought. Okay,
I can tell you why.
Speaker 1 (11:33):
It hasn't been brought. Republicans don't have enough of a
majority to bring it. Oh, and Merrick Garland's not going
to bring it trying.
Speaker 2 (11:40):
This in the court of public opinion. Okay, it hasn't
been brought, and you could bring it on a conspiracy basis,
So I can't.
Speaker 1 (11:48):
Because Merrick Garland has to be the one to charge it.
Speaker 2 (11:52):
You remember this happened during the Trump administration, which is
why Trump was impeached, because he called Zelensky and said, hey,
if you've got anything that shows that Vice President Biden
was benefiting and his son was benefiting, I want to
see it was.
Speaker 1 (12:09):
But back up a second. You're asking why hasn't Comer
done anything? Number One, there are they have a two
vote majority. Now they were down to one vote majority.
So the impeachment inquiry now has become a series of referrals.
They just referred both Hunter and Jim Biden to the
Department of Justice. Relying to Congress now for the for
(12:32):
the issue of whether or not this was a real
quid pro quo, which it appears to be. And Joe
fired this guy, and as a result of firing a
prosecutor in Ukraine against Obama administration policy that his son
Hunter benefited even though he had no experience and was
addicted to drugs. He can't bring that charge. He can
(12:53):
only refer that charge, which, by the way, according to reports,
they're planning to do. He said that this.
Speaker 2 (12:58):
Week he is have to bring the charge himself to Congression.
Speaker 1 (13:03):
So he has to refer it, and then Merrik Garland
would have to bring it.
Speaker 2 (13:06):
He can refer all day long, but tomorrow he can
come out and say, here's the physical evidence, here are
the banking records, here's the check here's how Joe Biden benefited.
And if Attorney General Merrick Garland will prosecuted, we're going
to impeach him.
Speaker 1 (13:23):
That's what, okay, And they don't have the votes to
impeach them. They're wasting their.
Speaker 2 (13:27):
Time, none of that. If you have physical evidence that
Joe Biden benefited financially from all of this grift.
Speaker 1 (13:36):
But Bill, you're you're you're defying all logic and common sense?
Why would a vice president? I'll tell you, what, do
you have time to stick around? Because this is too important?
Show it you do you have? You have you have
time to stick around?
Speaker 3 (13:49):
Or what?
Speaker 2 (13:50):
Sure?
Speaker 1 (13:50):
Always I know I'm too nice to you. That's my problem.
Eight hundred and nine four one, Shawn is number. Also
get your calls in the next half hour. We'll try
and wrap this up with mister O'Reilly all things O'Reilly
at billoreilly dot com. All right, we continue all things simple.
Man Bill O'Reilly is with us, and we're talking about
the issue is involving Hunter, now that the government is
(14:12):
fully completely acknowledged that the laptop is real. Now, before
I get to the main crux of the question where
we were at, how angry are you? Are you as
angry as me that Joe Biden lied about it, the
laptop being real? Hunter lied about it. We know the
media mob they always lie about it, just like they
(14:33):
lied about Russia collusion for three years, all because I
would argue they were all in bed. They all they
cared about was electing Joe Biden. On a scale of
one to one thousand, Bill, How bad is that? In
terms of election interference and the people that just flat
out lied to us about it.
Speaker 2 (14:53):
Well, I think we live in the most corrupt time
in the United States history now. And yes, am I
as angry as you know, because I take a different
tact on this. If you're on a battlefield, which the
country is, you want to win the battle. If you
get angry while you're fighting, you're going to lose. So
(15:16):
what I want and I want you to give me
sixty seconds and then you can.
Speaker 1 (15:20):
I have righteous anger, there's.
Speaker 2 (15:23):
Nothing wrong with that. But from my perch and the
analysis that I bring, here's what I see. You got
to get Joe Biden out of this. Now he may
explode in the debate and that'll be the end of them.
The eight Tajiks who were caught yesterday attached to ISIS
(15:45):
plotting some terrorist activity in the United States. It's a
big story. It's being suppressed by the corrupt media. But
if there is a terror attack, that Biden will be done.
He won't be able to run. But say that doesn't happen,
say there's no terror attack, and say that he gets
through the debate. Biden does, So, now you want to
knock him out. I want to knock him out, all right,
(16:08):
I don't want him on the ticket in November the way,
bye bye bye.
Speaker 1 (16:12):
By the way, Bill is not talking about physically knocking
out the president. For you woke lunatics out there that
will not interpret that comment properly.
Speaker 2 (16:21):
Go ahead, but lunatics don't listen to Hanne. But I
get you drift because it will go on the Internet
and then there's a lunatics there. So Comer and the
other Republicans obviously they're partisans. They want to win the election,
they want more power in Congress and all of that.
The way to do that, Hannity is the court of
public opinion. And my analysis is, if you know, all
(16:44):
right that Joe Biden as vice president or afterward, okay,
derived money from his brother or his son, money or
construction or anything that helped him and Jill, you have it,
you can prove it. You need to show it, and
you need to show it now.
Speaker 1 (17:04):
I think that's very good advice. Now, I think it's
sad because the Republicans have a small majority, and a
lot of Republicans are weak and all they think about
is their reelection, and they're just as pathetic as Democrats
and Frankly, there's only a handful of people in Washington
that I really have deep respect for. However, let me
(17:24):
go back to where we left off, and that is
we now know that Hunter Biden. I don't care if
it's with the CEFC and the money that was handed
over and the What's App message that we have talked
at length about. But now that we know that the
laptop is real and that What's Apps message that said,
(17:45):
I'm sitting here with my father and would like to
understand why the commitment made has not been fulfilled. I
will be certain, between the man sitting next to me
and every person he knows, and my ability to hold
a grudge, that you will regret not following my direction.
I'm sitting here waiting for the call with my father.
A few days later, five million dollars was wired to
(18:07):
a bank account associated with Hunter, again, according to the committee.
Now let's go to this part two of this. Now,
Hunter admits on Good Morning America, no experience in energy, oil, gas,
or Ukraine or China. Okay, now let's go to Joe Biden.
Joe Biden admits when he speaks to the Council of
Foreign Relations that I told him You're not getting a
(18:28):
billion dollars. You got six hours unless you fired the prosecutor.
Son of a bee. They fired the prosecutor. What was
the result of that action? Hunter, no experience addicted to
drugs got paid millions because of Joe's direct actions that
went against Obama administration policy at the time. So here's
(18:49):
my question, and I know it's long winded, but stay
with me. Why would a vice president of our country
ever do what he just did and then have his
own son benefit. None of this is in dispute pill
because we know that Hunter got paid the money. They're
not even disputing it, they're justifying it. And Joe Biden,
(19:14):
he's bragging about the fact that he took the action
to fire the prosecutor. And my question is, you know
we have an attorney general that won't do anything with it.
So I guess you kind of gave me the answer.
Your answer is just bringing to the court of public opinion.
But we've kind of been talking about this for years
and now it's only been confirmed that the laptop is real,
(19:35):
and it takes on a little bit more urgency and
it's reality now, it's not conjecture as some had suggested.
Speaker 2 (19:44):
People believe what they want to believe. Kennedy and the
eight Trumpers want to believe that Joe Biden didn't do
anything wrong. But if you prove beyond a reasonable doubt
in the court of public opinion that he did, then
Biden is finished. So if I'm a defense attorney, I
say this, Yeah, Hunter Biden said to the Chinese guy,
(20:04):
my father sitting next to me. But Hunter Biden was
lying his father wasn't there. Okay, So you can destroy
that anecdotal, hearsay evidence. What you cannot destroy is if
Comer and Jordan and the rest of the Republicans heading
the committees in the House have evidence that shows Joe
(20:27):
Biden benefited financially himself. That is the end.
Speaker 1 (20:33):
Okay, mister O'Reilly. I think your strategy is sound. I
think they tried the impeachment route. They didn't have enough
Republicans to support them. I think they're doing the criminal
referral route, which they should do. And the last option
is the only option, which is to bring it to
the American people. Lay out the case, and I'm going
(20:54):
to tell you the problem they're going to run into.
I'll cover it, you'll cover it. And a few others
will cover it, and the rest of the mob will
absolutely ignore it. And then you'll get the intel types
that will go out there and say it's all bs
and they'll muddy the waters. That's what's going to happen, Bill,
(21:15):
And this is the sad part of it, because what
should happen is that the Attorney general of this country
should not have a politicized and weaponized office where he
is protecting the Biden family. And that is the real
tragedy of what will prevent it from going as viral
as I think you think this might go. Because this
(21:38):
has been out there for a long time.
Speaker 2 (21:40):
Bill, real quick, the Republican Party is going to have
a billion dollars to run Trump until now to November.
That's a lot of TV ads. That's what you do.
Speaker 1 (21:52):
You don't depend I don't think it's about listen. I
think it's the only best option they have. But it's
a sad option for the country because where we're living
in a time where the rule of law doesn't exist.
Speaker 2 (22:04):
Shows, you run those ads on the network, shows this
is what we have. Okay. That blows up all up.
And that's what the Republicans have to do.
Speaker 1 (22:17):
I hope you're right. I'm not sure at all work
I think the most the sad part is is this
is clearly an investigation for the Attorney general. The attorney
generals known this laptop is real for four years. The
FBI is known for four years, and they haven't done
a thing bill and that tells me that we have
(22:39):
a weaponized and politicized DOJ. Do you agree with that statement?
Speaker 2 (22:43):
Sure? I mean, Department of Justice under Merrick Garland is
extremely corrupt. And what frustrates me is that Trump could
have been more aggressive when he was in because he knew.
Trump knew that Biden was corrupt as vice president. And
you know, I know that Trump was obsessed with the
(23:04):
election and all of that, and his attention was diverted.
I know that. But he had a window of two
and a half months, and that's when it could have.
Speaker 1 (23:15):
All happened till the laptop didn't break until in the
New York Post, until just a few weeks before the election.
Speaker 2 (23:23):
Didn't need the laptop. He could have assigned special councils
to look into all of this, and when when Biden
came in, Biden could not fire those special councils.
Speaker 1 (23:34):
Well, it's you know, I guess at this point maybe
you have more faith in the ability to bypass a
very corrupt media establishment. As we saw in the weeks
leading up to the twenty twenty election, they were able
to suppress a story that absolutely would have swayed the election.
You do agree with that.
Speaker 2 (23:55):
And it was a disgrace. But now the Republicans have
the momentum. Biden as a failed president. Most people think
he's corrupt. I think he's corrupt.
Speaker 1 (24:05):
Just nail it down, all right, Well, we appreciate you
being with us all things simple man, Bill O'Reilly, all
things O'Reilly at Billoreilly dot com. We appreciate your extended stay.
And I hope they're listening at the White House, and
I hope they're listening at Trump campaign headquarters.
Speaker 2 (24:22):
Any time check me in.
Speaker 1 (24:24):
Eight hundred nine four one, Shawn if you want to
be a part of the program.
Speaker 2 (24:32):
The Final Hour Roundup is next.
Speaker 1 (24:34):
You do not want to miss it, and stay tuned
for the Final Hour Free for All on the Sean
Hannity Show. You know, since the terror attacks on October
the seventh, well, we've been watching and witnessing a virulent
anti semitism on the rise. We see it on college
campuses across the country. We see it in Europe, we
(24:57):
see it in Australia. I mean it's terrible. We have
proudly partnered with the International Fellowship of Christians and Jews,
and today they're simply asking all of us to stand well,
not just with us, but with the IFCJ, kind of
like Oscar Schindler did. As they point out, and we
want to show the people in Israel that they're not
alone here in their battle against radical Islamic terrorism. Now
(25:20):
for the month of June, they're simply asking everyone that's
listening to my voice please sign a pledge which will
be delivered to the President of Israel that shows that
we here in America, we're not only standing in solidarity,
but we are speaking up on their behalf so that
they can win the war that was started against them. Anyway,
take a stand today with us and the International Fellowship
(25:43):
of Christians and Jews. Let the people in Israel know
that they are not alone in this battle. Just sign
a pledge. When you go to their website, it's support
IFCJ dot org. It's one word support IFCJ dot org
and take a stand today. All right, let's get to
a phones here. Nancy's been listening to our debate with
(26:05):
mister O'Reilly. Nancy, how are you glad you called?
Speaker 3 (26:08):
Thanks An, I'm a first time caller, but a long
time listener.
Speaker 1 (26:12):
Well, thank you. I appreciate you being out there. What's
on your mind today?
Speaker 3 (26:15):
Okay, the laptop now has been authenticated along the information
on it, and they used it to convict Hunter. Now,
my question is what happens with the chain of custody
with the laptop. Does it go to the ga DJ
for possible prosecution of the Biden crime family, does it
miraculously disappear or does it wind up on Joe's garage
(26:37):
floor next to the corvette.
Speaker 1 (26:39):
I think with this weaponized, politicized DOJ, I think the
answer is very very obvious, and that is nothing is
going to happen under Merrick Carla, not that as it
relates to the Bidens, not at all. And that's a
sad reality. I wish I could give you better news,
but I can't. And that was the whole point of
the debate with O'Reilly. I mean, he thinks, well, okay,
(27:00):
going to happen, you know, put out ads. I know
what the Democrats will say that, well, okay, ads are great,
but he hasn't been indicted. Why should we believe it.
Speaker 3 (27:10):
Yeah, well that's the problem. America doesn't see any justice.
We only see a party of corruption. Is that what
we see in the country.
Speaker 1 (27:18):
Yeah, that's a party of corruption for sure. It's sad.
I appreciate the call, Nancy, thank you for being out there.
Let us say hi to is it Meka? Micah? Meka,
Micah Oregon? How are you, Micah? How are you?
Speaker 4 (27:33):
I'm doing good? How are you? Sean?
Speaker 1 (27:34):
What's up? Man? Glad you call awesome?
Speaker 4 (27:36):
I'm just I want to run my opinion by you.
So it's about the Hunter Biden gun trial. So I
hope people see that, you know, responsible gun owners, they
aren't doing they aren't doing this, they're not lying on forms,
and they're definitely not throwing their gun away, you know.
And then you have Joe Biden's response, like I said,
(27:57):
as a senator, you know, ban all this, Well, that's
not that's not the problem. You know, gun control isn't
the problem here if people being irresponsible like Hunter and
do you think that Joe Biden saying that is just
the way to buy vote. Basically.
Speaker 1 (28:15):
Yeah, look, I think that that Joe Biden has successfully
with the help of all the people that we've mentioned.
His Department of Justice weaponized, the FBI, weaponized, you know,
the Intel Agency, you know heads and former leaders, weaponized,
the media mob in their pocket, big Tech, you know,
not on not on Republican side. It's just you got
(28:37):
a lot of powerful institutions and forces here that are
working hard to get Joe Biden reelected, and they seem
to be willing to do anything to stop Trump. And
if they could keep them in a courtroom or jail
cell every day for the next one hundred and forty
five days, they do it. I mean, that's how bad
things have gotten. Very scary scenario for our country, don't
(28:59):
you think?
Speaker 2 (29:00):
Oh?
Speaker 4 (29:00):
Absolutely. I think it's horrible what they've done to Donald Trump.
I mean, and then you have the Biden family that
can seem to get away with whatever they want, and.
Speaker 1 (29:11):
They got away with it in twenty twenty only with
the help of the FBI pre bunking, the fifty one
Intel officials, the media mob, and Big Tech, which they
had prepared for such a story and wouldn't tell the
truth to that. I mean, this is the United States
of America and it's run like a banana republic. How pathetic.
(29:33):
Wouldn't expect this in this great country, But that is
the reality that we now know about the twenty twenty election.
It's so sad.
The Sean Hannity Show News
Host
Sean Hannity
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
The Breakfast Club
The World's Most Dangerous Morning Show, The Breakfast Club, With DJ Envy, Jess Hilarious, And Charlamagne Tha God!