April 28, 2025 • 29 mins
Mark Halperin, Editor-in-chief of 2WAY and host of the new show -Next Up with Mark Halperin on Megyn Kelly’s MK Media- joins to talk about his new show and all of the other news of the day.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
All right, thanks scotch On an hour two Sean Hannity Show,
told free on numbers eight hundred and nine to four one, Sean,
if you want to be a part of the program.
One of the things I'm very proud of as a
member of the press, I have never been to a
White House correspondence dinner. I've been pressured a lot over
the years to attend, and somehow I was able to
(00:22):
withstand that pressure doesn't come down anymore. But in all
the years I've been doing talk radio and my twenty
ninth year on the Fox News Channel, I've never I've
just found a way out of it. Every time I
was asked to go, didn't want to go. Don't particularly
like a lot of the people in the media. They
don't particularly like me, So let's be upfront about it.
(00:42):
And it's just interesting the self righteousness in this room
of people that really don't understand that. Whether or not
they'd like to admit it or not, Legacy media, as
far as I'm concerned, is they're dead. If they were
going to have impact the years they spent and destroying
Donald Trump and smearing and slandering and peddling lives and
(01:04):
conspiracy theories Tamala Harris would have won by a landslide.
That didn't happen because the American people rejected their message.
With all that said, over the weekend, they had their
correspondence dinner where they've pat themselves on the back. They
get all dressed up and they try to look real
pretty and handsome, and well, here's the president of the
White House Correspondence Association. We are not the enemy of
(01:27):
the people, and you got to stand and go.
Speaker 2 (01:30):
We journalists are a lot of things.
Speaker 3 (01:33):
We are competitive and pushy, we are impatient, and sometimes
we think we know everything.
Speaker 2 (01:39):
But we're also human.
Speaker 3 (01:41):
We miss our families and significant life moments in service
to this job. We care deeply about accuracy and take
seriously the heavy responsibility of being stewards of the public's trust.
What we are not is the opposition. What we are
not is the enemy of the people. And what we
are not is in and the of the state.
Speaker 1 (02:03):
They allowed so many lies to be told about Donald Trump.
Did they have a tell the real valuation ofmar A Lago.
Let's start with something very very basic, fundamental and simple.
There's a lot that they have done, and there's a
lot of lying that's taken place, and a lot of
conspiracy theories that have been peddled. There's one moment of truth,
but frankly, it's way too little, way too late, and
(02:26):
they missed the whole boat. On Joe Biden's cognitive decline,
Alex Thompson, Axio's reporter, said this one.
Speaker 4 (02:32):
Serious note to my bones. I believe that reporting and
the White House correspond Association is as necessary as ever.
President Biden's decline and its cover up by the people
around him is a reminder that every White House, regardless
of party, is capable of deception. But being truth tellers
(02:55):
also means telling the truth about ourselves. We myself included,
missed a lot of this story, and some people trust
us less because of it. We bear some responsibility for
faith in the media being at such lows.
Speaker 5 (03:15):
I say this because.
Speaker 4 (03:16):
Acknowledging errors builds trust and being defensive about them further
erodes it.
Speaker 5 (03:24):
We should have done better.
Speaker 1 (03:25):
Okay, they didn't miss it as an institution, They purposely
ignored it because they have a political agenda, would be
my analysis. Anyway, here to weigh in on this and
so much more, Editor in Chief, Two Way, host of
his new show next up with Mark Halprin. It's on
MK Media, which is which is Megan Kelly's network. And anyway,
(03:47):
he's here to talk about his new show, and he's
going to have interviews upcoming with Ted Cruz and again
our old buddy Gavin Newsom. Mark Calprin is back with us.
Who's a good friend of the program.
Speaker 6 (03:57):
Mark, how are you sewand with you?
Speaker 2 (04:00):
My goal is to only book friends of yours onto
my show. It's going to be like a running.
Speaker 5 (04:05):
Is that it? Well, I guess that's it. I'm panned
from your sholf.
Speaker 1 (04:08):
I'm never gonna make it, you know, in light of
what took place and all the lives that have been told,
and it's very specifically about Donald Trump, and they're standing
with the American people.
Speaker 5 (04:22):
I think is next to niro a zero.
Speaker 1 (04:25):
Had they been if they had influence, you tell me
if I'm wrong or not. If they had had influence,
Donald Trump never would have been elected. I think they've
lost trust and I don't think they have the ability
to get it back anymore.
Speaker 2 (04:40):
Well, I listened to your list of stories that they
did a poor job on and and as you said,
not just because they were lazy or they didn't, you know,
get up, get get up and be aggressive, but because
of a desire to see keep Donald Trump from winning.
And it was like, I mean, this is an offense.
It was such a partial list. I mean, you had
about ten things on there, and you and I could
(05:01):
come up with fifty more. This is you know, there's
so many things going on in what you played from
Alex Thompson, who, to his credit, was one of the
few reporters besides us who tried to cover the obvious
cognitive decline of the president. But when he says we
got to be honest and he gets tep a applause,
the influence will be diminished. I think the influence could
(05:24):
come back, but it would require a level of acknowledgment
of what they did and why that I think is
probably beyond most of them. He didn't do the why right.
He just said we fell short and I fell short.
Didn't say why, and you and I know the reasons. Why.
Speaker 1 (05:40):
Wait when did you first notice his decline? Because I
noticed it and was talking about it before the twenty
twenty election.
Speaker 2 (05:46):
Twenty twenty seventeen, I saw him do a book event
for book he was promoting in twenty seventeen, and he
was interviewed by a very friendly interviewer in front of
about one thousand people. And when the event ended, I
turned to my wife and I said, thank goodness, his
career in public life is over. And how embarrassing that
his family is letting him do this book tour because
he's in no shape to do a book tour. He was,
(06:08):
he was glassy eyed, he was he had trouble following
the conversation twenty seventeen, and I was talking about it
and writing about.
Speaker 6 (06:15):
It since then.
Speaker 2 (06:16):
And as I said before, you didn't need inside sources
to see a cognitive decline, you just needed a stand subscription.
Speaker 1 (06:24):
Well, yeah, exactly. And there were very few of us
willing to call it out. And when I did call
it out, I was, you know, absolutely excoriated early on
for doing it. And then it became like a nightly
segment on the show because there was almost any time
Joe spoke, it was transparent and obvious. I would also
argue that, as you know, we're now at the one
(06:46):
hundred day mark of the Trump presidency, that I see
these polls come out, and Matt Towry rightly, he said,
don't be fooled by these polls, and you were one
of the few objective journalists that saw the trends leading
up to this election that were very favorable to Donald Trump.
And you kept telling people, if you want to if
(07:07):
you want to delude yourself and buy into what primetime
MSDNC is telling you, that's fine, but that's not what's
really happening on the ground.
Speaker 5 (07:16):
But if you look at the.
Speaker 1 (07:17):
Actual pollsters that were more accurate in twenty four you
get a very different story told about where Donald Trump
is and what they're not factoring in is the first
hundred days of the Democrats, where three or four of
the last most recent polls show their approval rating at
the lowest level level in the twenties, and a party
(07:40):
that has also I think taken a very hard, sharp
left turn towards the radicalized left, with Jasmine Crockett AOC
the Squad and Bernie leading the way.
Speaker 2 (07:51):
Well, you're right about the poor shape of the Democrats,
but I disagree with you about where the president's poll
standing is because they're play of private Republican polls to
show the same thing these public polls. I think you know,
first of all, the President's not running for election in
the midterms are over a year away. So we've seen
other presidents like President Reagan have had low poll numbers
(08:11):
or President Clinton and then and then are able to
come back. So I don't think people should overreact. But
there's no doubt that whatever wherever you want to put
is general approval rating, wherever you want to put his
approval rating on things like the economy or the border,
his numbers are down. They've not cratered, they've not collapsed,
but they are down. And even his own advisors would
(08:32):
tell you they aim to do better this week, trying
to dominate the news by talking about the first hundred
days and the next hundred days, but also by getting
more results, particularly on the economy, than they've gotten. So
the President's numbers are down, but they're not disastrously down.
And again it doesn't mean much at this point as
long as he finds a way to get things to
be improved.
Speaker 5 (08:53):
I think he's got a long way to go.
Speaker 1 (08:55):
I think he's taking taking on and has taken on,
some of the most consoplet quent and difficult issues of
our time. Certainly by give him very high grades securing
the border and the process of keeping his promise to
get rid of criminal immigrants to start, I would say that,
you know, taking on trying to bring peace to Europe
(09:16):
and peace to the Middle East.
Speaker 5 (09:17):
Those are heavy lifts.
Speaker 1 (09:18):
I think the president doing something that no president has
done in fifty or sixty years, challenging unfair tariffs that
have been placed on America by friend and foe alike,
is a pretty bold move. Time will tell whether he's
successful at it or not. Also, moving towards energy dominance.
I mean, there's not a single issue he's taken on
(09:41):
here that is not transformational. You know, eliminating you know,
extending his tax cuts, making impermanent, eliminating tax on tip,
social security, and overtime. These are are all big ideas.
Speaker 2 (09:52):
Yeah, look, three quick things one Time will tell, And
people shouldn't judge him by his pulle numbers currently and
they say the same thing about democratic presidents judging by
the results. If he ends the war it was Ukraine
and Russia, fantastic, If to terrorift lead to a stronger
American economy, fantastic, So number one, judgement buyer results. Number two,
he is trying to do historically big things, and that's
(10:13):
inevitably going to shake things up and cause people to
have concerns if they don't understand exactly what he's doing.
And number three, on things like Ukraine and tariffs and
what the terrorists are aiming to change. I have sympathy
for the President and his advisors when they say, what's
your alternative? People who want to carp about what he's doing.
What's your alternative? How do you plan to have long
(10:35):
term economic growth for the United States? How do you
plan to end the war in Ukraine? If you don't
have an alternative plan, I think it's you've got less
standing to say what child Trump's doing isn't going to
work or isn't a good idea. These are the things
he ran on, and he's doing them, and I think
I think we'll know in the next hundred days a
lot more about on those two projects and some of
(10:56):
the others you mentioned where he stands.
Speaker 1 (11:02):
We continue now friend Mark Alfern as well us. He
has his new podcast out and it is next up
with Mark Alfern. So you kind of dismissed when I
brought up the issue of the Democrats, but we saw
the quote sit in this weekend. We've seen a lot
of singing and chanting and now the Party of dropping
a lot of f bombs. And we saw them at
the joint session with their bingo paddles, and they couldn't
(11:25):
have the decency to stand for mothers that lost their
children or young man that be cancer. And I don't
really see any leadership out of them. I see a
lot of fear in their their leadership, like Hakeem Jefferies
and Chuck Schumer, that they wouldn't dare take on the
more radicalized party because for fear of losing their power.
Speaker 5 (11:46):
Am I wrong?
Speaker 2 (11:47):
No? I basically agree with your nasis. I think todam
a great party is in a world of herd and
they're not in a terrific position to be the opposition.
They're benefiting now though, because they're you know, particularly because
the media environment is back to being very anti Trump,
they're able to have things to talk about. I think
that that you take the case for instance of this
judge who was arrested in Wisconsin. I mean, the facts
(12:10):
don't seem to be in dispute. Judge tried to let
someone go who not only had committed a federal events
by being in the country legally, but by engaging in
violence against other people, and it seems like the judges'
attitude was, I'd rather this person be free than be
in federal custody. The Democrats have turned that into some
(12:31):
sort of assault on the separation of powers and an
effort to intimidate the judiciary. I suppose that there was
another way to do it, to be less intimidating, But
I would think anyone who cared about law enforcement and
the rule of law would be delighted to send a
message that judges shouldn't be running underground railroad for illegal aliens.
Speaker 1 (12:51):
So well, I mean, in this particular case, they're claiming
a constitutional crisis, but yeah, the judge in this case
helped an illegal and that had been through through the
court system and with a deportation order go through a
back room and to escape ICE officials, knowing that they
that these ICE officials were there waiting to arrest this
(13:11):
individual after that particular court hearing which dealt with domestic abuse. So,
I mean, if that's the hell they want to die on,
or a Brego Garcia and bringing a Brego Garcia back
to the United States, I think they're making very poor choices,
and I think congressmen quay, are the Democrat is.
Speaker 5 (13:28):
Right on that?
Speaker 2 (13:29):
Yeah? I agree and that And then my point is
the two examples the judge and then I'm the so
called Maryland man, I think are indications that the Democratic.
Speaker 1 (13:37):
Maryland man, if I hear Maryland man one more time,
I'm going to jump.
Speaker 2 (13:41):
I said it in their quotes. It just shows to
me their examples that the party does not have its bearings.
The Trump's arrangement syndrome is still too high for them
to really understand where to be picking their spots to say,
here's what we stand for, Here's what the Republicans stand for,
to say, here's what we stand for law US judges
and people in the country legally who who have affiliations
(14:05):
with gangs and a history of spaslo accusations dispaslobies. I
just those to me are rare, resonant examples of why
there's reason to doubt that the Democrats have their act
together at all at this point.
Speaker 1 (14:19):
I hope you take a look at the Gavin Newsom
and the Santas debate that I was able to moderate
before you interview Gavin, because Gavin's a little bit out
of touch with how well his state is doing and
blaming Fox News for it. But anyway, Mark Alperm, we
always appreciate you being on the program.
Speaker 5 (14:36):
Thank you so much, sir.
Speaker 2 (14:38):
Thank you, sir. Good to talk to you all right.
Speaker 5 (14:40):
Bill in New York, Bill, Hi, how are you glad
you called? Sir?
Speaker 6 (14:44):
Hey Sean love your show. I just wanted to say.
Speaker 5 (14:49):
Thank you.
Speaker 6 (14:49):
And I just never could figure out, being a person
who studied history, why we would even think that Russia
would give up the last segment of their western border
and lose out on their western port to access the Mediterranean.
And with the promises that we had made related to
(15:11):
the Ukraine and not joining NATO and everything else, why
are we poking a Russian bear? And I couldn't understand
the past administration. And yeah, we empowered them to fight
to last as long as they did, but at the
end of the day, it just doesn't make sense logistically financially,
(15:34):
and it's left in their hands now to lose land
and lose a tremendous position that they had that they
could have negotiated honorably and kept the promises that they
were made.
Speaker 1 (15:48):
I'm going to tell you the biggest, the biggest mistake
Ukraine made was many many years earlier. I think Clinton
was president when they gave up their nuclear program. That
was their biggest mistake. They never should have given it up.
That was number one, number two. I think. You know
then we had Mince one and Mince two. And you know,
(16:08):
unfortunately in this case, if you look at Crimea, which
is what eleven years ago now that that land was
annexed under Obama and Biden, if you look at what
happened three years ago that happened under Joe Biden, and
Joe Biden had an opportunity is as Putin was amassing
troops and he didn't take advantage of it. If Putin
(16:30):
had territorial claims, I think there were certainly better ways
than the one he chose to resolve it. And you know,
maybe it wouldn't have gotten resolved. Maybe the war was inevitable,
but the way it evolved is it became a proxy
war between the United States and then with Russia. And
we don't have hundreds of billions more dollars to pour
(16:53):
into this thing, and there's now an opportunity for peace.
It now seems to hind the two sides and whether
they want this to continue. I would argue, I don't think.
I don't think Europe will ever step up and provide
the weaponry that would be needed to allow this to
continue to be a stalemate. And I think it's inevitable
(17:16):
that Putin's going to win this war. And I think
it's frustrating because I think Putin is a murdering dictator thug,
and I wish he never did this, but I can
wish till the cows come home now. Now, basically, you
dealt a horrible hand. And I give a lot of
credit to President Trump for trying to resolve this. If
he can pull this off, it'll be miraculous. It's not
(17:37):
going to be a great ideal. It's not going to
be a great deal for Ukraine. But they don't have
any cards to play here. They have nothing. The only
thing they have left is to count on the good
graces of other countries to fight the war and give
them the weaponry to fight it, although they're running out
of manpower to even fight the war anyway.
Speaker 6 (17:57):
Well, you alluded to it just before, and it was
all about diplomacy. We have three eight hundred pound guerrillas
on the search US, the Chinese and the Russians, and
when we have a beef, we don't communicate, we get
involved with a proxy war. Did anybody do even game
theory analysis or just look at it from a practical
(18:19):
point of view.
Speaker 1 (18:22):
You're asking me if Joe Biden thought about it. When
he was asked at the time when the troops and
the military equipment were amassing on the Ukrainian border by
Plutin in Russia, he was asked what would happen, what
the consequence would be in his answer was, well, it
depends if it's a minor incursion. And this after Crimea
had been annexed when he was vice president. So he's
(18:44):
rather dumb, naive, checked out, and absolutely responsible for the
mess here. And somehow that the American people are going
to tolerate endless wars and proxy wars like this. It
just is not going to happen. And I don't think
should happen. I really don't anyway, my friend. I appreciate
your insight, your call eight hundred and nine to four one, Seawan,
(19:04):
if you want to be a part of the program,
Dan my free state of Florida. Dan, how are you
glad you called? Oh?
Speaker 7 (19:09):
Hi, Sean Hi. It's an honor. Naturally, I must compliment
you for the words you said, just a few simple
words before the last election over Eber the fifth. It's brilliant,
but so simple. You said, you are all you're my deputies.
I'm deputizing all of you. You have to get out
(19:30):
and vote and ten tell ten other people to vote,
and tell them to vote and so on.
Speaker 1 (19:36):
And I was also deputizing people that they get informed.
That's why we created the Kamala files, that Tim Walls files,
so that people could be aware of what they would
Otherwise what we would have been stuck with wouldn't have
been good.
Speaker 7 (19:49):
Well, I can't tell you brilliant people in the world
like you, and you might say, well, pardon me no
to say a few things in a few words. What
I wanted to say is way back in nineteen sixty six,
about this time of the year, I was part of
the Florida National Guard in a mass unit like the
(20:10):
TV show. I was at Fort Stewart, Georgia getting OJT
and I had a dear Special Forces sergeant. When the
first that I got there, I gave my shot. My
end was shaking. It's still Shakespeare for a different reason.
I'm a couple of years older than my nephew, Donald Trump,
who I love dearly. He was a dear man. He said, Dan, look,
(20:35):
don't get fancy, just stop the bleeding. If you don't
do that, nothing else matters. I have that written in
my kitchen, hanging up on the wall. I'll never forget
it because it's the truth. Donald Trump is doing nothing
but nothing short of that. He's got his hands on
all the arteries of our country. And that's why people say, oh,
(20:57):
he's doing this, he's doing that. He's too fast. He's
trying to make up for four years of a horror show.
And he has got everybody who he has hired so
far I think is fabulous. And the people at Fox
are fabulous. You're saying, you're trying to save our country.
Nothing short of that shot.
Speaker 1 (21:16):
Nothing well, I mean, honestly, I can't imagine. I don't
think we would have had a shot, I really do.
I think it would have been we would have been
too far gone. He's got a very heavy lift in
front of him. He's taken on a lot of damage
that was done prior to him. Joe Biden left him
(21:36):
a mess on the economy, He left it a mess internationally,
and to his credit, he's moving at the speed of
light and he's trying hard to resolve all of it.
A lot of these things are going to take time.
I think probably in this first one hundred days, the
greatest success that we can see that is visible is
on the border.
Speaker 5 (21:55):
But then there's going to be more.
Speaker 1 (21:58):
I would argue, you're going to see a lot of
trade deals over time, and when that happens, I think
it'll calm people down, calm the markets down a little bit,
and I think people will see the wisdom in challenging
a system that has ripped us off for fifty sixty years.
And at least he had the courage to stand up
to these people and say stop ripping us off. But
(22:20):
you know, I don't like being ripped off. I hate
when people rip me off.
Speaker 7 (22:23):
No too, But Shana, I don't know what we do
without you and Fox.
Speaker 6 (22:27):
I saw Tom Holman this morning.
Speaker 7 (22:30):
If I could see him, I doubt I ever will
I give him a hug. Same with you, Same with
we appreciate Fox. There's no way to say it. I
don't have the time, you don't have the time. I
just want Donald Trump. I think he's too dear a person.
He doesn't want to hurt people, certainly, and I ran
certainly children, but we have got to stop them whatever
(22:53):
by any means necessary. He has to be it.
Speaker 1 (22:58):
They cannot get a nuclear weapon. That you have to
start there. And I think if they're going to make
a deal with Iran, it's got to include dismantling their
nuclear capability facilities. That means every one of them, every
one of them, and they need to be done by Americans.
And I think there's got to be anywhere, any place,
anytime inspections. And if they decide they don't want the
(23:21):
peaceful plan and the peaceful out if you will, then
they will be responsible for what happens next, and to
me that will be very catastrophic. They will lose their
nuclear sites, and I would argue they probably should lose
their refinery so they don't have the ability to have
the monies to film in any more terror. Anyway, my friend,
(23:42):
I appreciate your kind words and your patriotism. God bless you.
You are certainly not what is wrong with our great
country right now, that's for sure, all right, Quick break
right back to our busy phones. Eight hundred and nine
four one Sean. As we continue this Monday.
Speaker 8 (24:01):
The final hour roundup is next. You do not want
to miss it, and stay tuned for the final hour
free for all on the Sean Hannity Show.
Speaker 1 (24:14):
Right back to our phones eight hundred and nine to
four one, Shawn, if you want to join us, Amanda,
You're next on the Sean Hannity Show.
Speaker 9 (24:21):
Hi, Hi, how are you?
Speaker 5 (24:23):
I'm good? What's going on?
Speaker 9 (24:25):
I just wanted to touch base because the last well, for
a while now, you've been talking about your new Tesla
and how much you love it, and the really the
thing that sticks out to me is the fact that
you keep talking about how it drives itself. It's got
the capability to do that by itself. I was just
kind of wondering if that's ever going to be something
that maybe possibly could be used for people with epilepsy
(24:47):
because a lot of them cannot drive. But if we
had a vehicle that could sense not that it's coming on,
but a person's having a seizure and they could go
into auto drive and pull over so slowly, well.
Speaker 1 (25:01):
I could tell you that technology is here. I mean,
they're they they already have prototypes for like self driving ubers.
I mean, there's going to be a massive shift in
the workforce in a lot of ways. That's why I
think it's kind of important these ten the ten trillion
(25:24):
dollars has been committed in new manufacturing, you know, between
artificial intelligence and this this kind of new technology. I mean,
you literally are looking at the possibility of driver lest
transportation now in the very near future, and you know,
artificial intelligence and robotics and all these things. I mean,
(25:49):
it's replace a lot of jobs. Funny story about a
talk show host in Australia. Apparently they had an artificial
intelligence voice do a radio show for the better part
of six months before people caught up to it and
caught onto it and then people felt portrayed by it.
(26:10):
But the fact that they could do it is pretty amazing.
Now I happen to know somebody that has really advanced
in AI, and I get deeper and deeper into it
myself in my spare time. It's it's pretty amazing and
pretty wild. And I could I could put in their
information about what the news of the day is, and
(26:31):
you know what would Sean Hannity think about it? It'll come,
It'll spit it out in mere seconds. It's crazy.
Speaker 9 (26:37):
Yeah, I just that would be awesome because I know
my daughter has epilepsi and to try to get a
job is very difficult because she has to work around
everybody else. So I just whenever you keep talking about
your Tesla and that being an awesome feature, I just
can't help but think that that would be an awesome
feature for someone who.
Speaker 5 (26:56):
Oh absolutely think.
Speaker 1 (26:58):
I definitely think that you're going to see this sooner
than then later, to be honest, I mean, once they
can prove that it's safe and effective. You know, there's
even been talk of people that, hey, you can put
your car to work or you while you're not using it, Like,
for example, I went to the movies I told this story,
and I parked the car far away from the movie theater,
and there is on the control app on a Tesla,
(27:21):
you know, where I just press a button and says
come to me, and then I'm watching in real time
my tesla with no driver, pack out of a parking
spot safely and then make its way towards me like
it's a valet, and it drives right up to where
I am, and I get my car and I take
it from there, and then I can put in my
navigation where I'm going and press a button and it
(27:44):
will take me right to my front door. And I
don't have to do a thing. I don't have to
press the pedal, I don't have to hold the wheel,
I don't have to do I just can't text on
my phone.
Speaker 5 (27:51):
Because it picks that up like instantly.
Speaker 1 (27:54):
You do have to pay You do have to pay
attention even though you're in self driving mode, right.
Speaker 6 (28:00):
But that's where I was.
Speaker 9 (28:01):
I was kind of saying, if it could just censor,
because I know she has a monitor on her on
her arm, it gives her freedom to more.
Speaker 1 (28:09):
Into I guarantee, I guarantee you that technology will exist
one day and somebody like her will be able to drive. Guarantee,
I just a matter of when. And I think that's
that's it's great. It'll enhance people's lives. But you know
that that's also part of the genius of where Elon
Musk is in terms of his thinking. I mean, that's
what neuralink is all about, you know, using AI to
(28:30):
help people that are blind perhaps see again, and people
with spinal cord injuries that they may one day be
able to walk again. I think is great thank you,
But you know, we we've got to understand the world
is changing and a lot of jobs that i'm will
will be taken over by artificial intelligence, and people are
(28:50):
going to have to adapt to the marketplace. There was
an article today about gen Z gen Zers now rejecting
college and larger and larger numbers and a lot of
people going a trade school. If you want a job
that's going to be secure. I can't see AI replacing
a construction worker or a plumber, or an electrician or
somebody in the trades. I can't see that. But I
(29:12):
can't see them replacing auto workers and people on the
line that I can see for sure. Anyway, I appreciate
the call. Eight hundred and nine four one. Shawn is
on number. You want to be a part of the program.
Our friend Mark Simona at the top of the next
hour
All right, thanks scotch On an hour two Sean Hannity Show,
told free on numbers eight hundred and nine to four one, Sean,
if you want to be a part of the program.
One of the things I'm very proud of as a
member of the press, I have never been to a
White House correspondence dinner. I've been pressured a lot over
the years to attend, and somehow I was able to
(00:22):
withstand that pressure doesn't come down anymore. But in all
the years I've been doing talk radio and my twenty
ninth year on the Fox News Channel, I've never I've
just found a way out of it. Every time I
was asked to go, didn't want to go. Don't particularly
like a lot of the people in the media. They
don't particularly like me, So let's be upfront about it.
(00:42):
And it's just interesting the self righteousness in this room
of people that really don't understand that. Whether or not
they'd like to admit it or not, Legacy media, as
far as I'm concerned, is they're dead. If they were
going to have impact the years they spent and destroying
Donald Trump and smearing and slandering and peddling lives and
(01:04):
conspiracy theories Tamala Harris would have won by a landslide.
That didn't happen because the American people rejected their message.
With all that said, over the weekend, they had their
correspondence dinner where they've pat themselves on the back. They
get all dressed up and they try to look real
pretty and handsome, and well, here's the president of the
White House Correspondence Association. We are not the enemy of
(01:27):
the people, and you got to stand and go.
Speaker 2 (01:30):
We journalists are a lot of things.
Speaker 3 (01:33):
We are competitive and pushy, we are impatient, and sometimes
we think we know everything.
Speaker 2 (01:39):
But we're also human.
Speaker 3 (01:41):
We miss our families and significant life moments in service
to this job. We care deeply about accuracy and take
seriously the heavy responsibility of being stewards of the public's trust.
What we are not is the opposition. What we are
not is the enemy of the people. And what we
are not is in and the of the state.
Speaker 1 (02:03):
They allowed so many lies to be told about Donald Trump.
Did they have a tell the real valuation ofmar A Lago.
Let's start with something very very basic, fundamental and simple.
There's a lot that they have done, and there's a
lot of lying that's taken place, and a lot of
conspiracy theories that have been peddled. There's one moment of truth,
but frankly, it's way too little, way too late, and
(02:26):
they missed the whole boat. On Joe Biden's cognitive decline,
Alex Thompson, Axio's reporter, said this one.
Speaker 4 (02:32):
Serious note to my bones. I believe that reporting and
the White House correspond Association is as necessary as ever.
President Biden's decline and its cover up by the people
around him is a reminder that every White House, regardless
of party, is capable of deception. But being truth tellers
(02:55):
also means telling the truth about ourselves. We myself included,
missed a lot of this story, and some people trust
us less because of it. We bear some responsibility for
faith in the media being at such lows.
Speaker 5 (03:15):
I say this because.
Speaker 4 (03:16):
Acknowledging errors builds trust and being defensive about them further
erodes it.
Speaker 5 (03:24):
We should have done better.
Speaker 1 (03:25):
Okay, they didn't miss it as an institution, They purposely
ignored it because they have a political agenda, would be
my analysis. Anyway, here to weigh in on this and
so much more, Editor in Chief, Two Way, host of
his new show next up with Mark Halprin. It's on
MK Media, which is which is Megan Kelly's network. And anyway,
(03:47):
he's here to talk about his new show, and he's
going to have interviews upcoming with Ted Cruz and again
our old buddy Gavin Newsom. Mark Calprin is back with us.
Who's a good friend of the program.
Speaker 6 (03:57):
Mark, how are you sewand with you?
Speaker 2 (04:00):
My goal is to only book friends of yours onto
my show. It's going to be like a running.
Speaker 5 (04:05):
Is that it? Well, I guess that's it. I'm panned
from your sholf.
Speaker 1 (04:08):
I'm never gonna make it, you know, in light of
what took place and all the lives that have been told,
and it's very specifically about Donald Trump, and they're standing
with the American people.
Speaker 5 (04:22):
I think is next to niro a zero.
Speaker 1 (04:25):
Had they been if they had influence, you tell me
if I'm wrong or not. If they had had influence,
Donald Trump never would have been elected. I think they've
lost trust and I don't think they have the ability
to get it back anymore.
Speaker 2 (04:40):
Well, I listened to your list of stories that they
did a poor job on and and as you said,
not just because they were lazy or they didn't, you know,
get up, get get up and be aggressive, but because
of a desire to see keep Donald Trump from winning.
And it was like, I mean, this is an offense.
It was such a partial list. I mean, you had
about ten things on there, and you and I could
(05:01):
come up with fifty more. This is you know, there's
so many things going on in what you played from
Alex Thompson, who, to his credit, was one of the
few reporters besides us who tried to cover the obvious
cognitive decline of the president. But when he says we
got to be honest and he gets tep a applause,
the influence will be diminished. I think the influence could
(05:24):
come back, but it would require a level of acknowledgment
of what they did and why that I think is
probably beyond most of them. He didn't do the why right.
He just said we fell short and I fell short.
Didn't say why, and you and I know the reasons. Why.
Speaker 1 (05:40):
Wait when did you first notice his decline? Because I
noticed it and was talking about it before the twenty
twenty election.
Speaker 2 (05:46):
Twenty twenty seventeen, I saw him do a book event
for book he was promoting in twenty seventeen, and he
was interviewed by a very friendly interviewer in front of
about one thousand people. And when the event ended, I
turned to my wife and I said, thank goodness, his
career in public life is over. And how embarrassing that
his family is letting him do this book tour because
he's in no shape to do a book tour. He was,
(06:08):
he was glassy eyed, he was he had trouble following
the conversation twenty seventeen, and I was talking about it
and writing about.
Speaker 6 (06:15):
It since then.
Speaker 2 (06:16):
And as I said before, you didn't need inside sources
to see a cognitive decline, you just needed a stand subscription.
Speaker 1 (06:24):
Well, yeah, exactly. And there were very few of us
willing to call it out. And when I did call
it out, I was, you know, absolutely excoriated early on
for doing it. And then it became like a nightly
segment on the show because there was almost any time
Joe spoke, it was transparent and obvious. I would also
argue that, as you know, we're now at the one
(06:46):
hundred day mark of the Trump presidency, that I see
these polls come out, and Matt Towry rightly, he said,
don't be fooled by these polls, and you were one
of the few objective journalists that saw the trends leading
up to this election that were very favorable to Donald Trump.
And you kept telling people, if you want to if
(07:07):
you want to delude yourself and buy into what primetime
MSDNC is telling you, that's fine, but that's not what's
really happening on the ground.
Speaker 5 (07:16):
But if you look at the.
Speaker 1 (07:17):
Actual pollsters that were more accurate in twenty four you
get a very different story told about where Donald Trump
is and what they're not factoring in is the first
hundred days of the Democrats, where three or four of
the last most recent polls show their approval rating at
the lowest level level in the twenties, and a party
(07:40):
that has also I think taken a very hard, sharp
left turn towards the radicalized left, with Jasmine Crockett AOC
the Squad and Bernie leading the way.
Speaker 2 (07:51):
Well, you're right about the poor shape of the Democrats,
but I disagree with you about where the president's poll
standing is because they're play of private Republican polls to
show the same thing these public polls. I think you know,
first of all, the President's not running for election in
the midterms are over a year away. So we've seen
other presidents like President Reagan have had low poll numbers
(08:11):
or President Clinton and then and then are able to
come back. So I don't think people should overreact. But
there's no doubt that whatever wherever you want to put
is general approval rating, wherever you want to put his
approval rating on things like the economy or the border,
his numbers are down. They've not cratered, they've not collapsed,
but they are down. And even his own advisors would
(08:32):
tell you they aim to do better this week, trying
to dominate the news by talking about the first hundred
days and the next hundred days, but also by getting
more results, particularly on the economy, than they've gotten. So
the President's numbers are down, but they're not disastrously down.
And again it doesn't mean much at this point as
long as he finds a way to get things to
be improved.
Speaker 5 (08:53):
I think he's got a long way to go.
Speaker 1 (08:55):
I think he's taking taking on and has taken on,
some of the most consoplet quent and difficult issues of
our time. Certainly by give him very high grades securing
the border and the process of keeping his promise to
get rid of criminal immigrants to start, I would say that,
you know, taking on trying to bring peace to Europe
(09:16):
and peace to the Middle East.
Speaker 5 (09:17):
Those are heavy lifts.
Speaker 1 (09:18):
I think the president doing something that no president has
done in fifty or sixty years, challenging unfair tariffs that
have been placed on America by friend and foe alike,
is a pretty bold move. Time will tell whether he's
successful at it or not. Also, moving towards energy dominance.
I mean, there's not a single issue he's taken on
(09:41):
here that is not transformational. You know, eliminating you know,
extending his tax cuts, making impermanent, eliminating tax on tip,
social security, and overtime. These are are all big ideas.
Speaker 2 (09:52):
Yeah, look, three quick things one Time will tell, And
people shouldn't judge him by his pulle numbers currently and
they say the same thing about democratic presidents judging by
the results. If he ends the war it was Ukraine
and Russia, fantastic, If to terrorift lead to a stronger
American economy, fantastic, So number one, judgement buyer results. Number two,
he is trying to do historically big things, and that's
(10:13):
inevitably going to shake things up and cause people to
have concerns if they don't understand exactly what he's doing.
And number three, on things like Ukraine and tariffs and
what the terrorists are aiming to change. I have sympathy
for the President and his advisors when they say, what's
your alternative? People who want to carp about what he's doing.
What's your alternative? How do you plan to have long
(10:35):
term economic growth for the United States? How do you
plan to end the war in Ukraine? If you don't
have an alternative plan, I think it's you've got less
standing to say what child Trump's doing isn't going to
work or isn't a good idea. These are the things
he ran on, and he's doing them, and I think
I think we'll know in the next hundred days a
lot more about on those two projects and some of
(10:56):
the others you mentioned where he stands.
Speaker 1 (11:02):
We continue now friend Mark Alfern as well us. He
has his new podcast out and it is next up
with Mark Alfern. So you kind of dismissed when I
brought up the issue of the Democrats, but we saw
the quote sit in this weekend. We've seen a lot
of singing and chanting and now the Party of dropping
a lot of f bombs. And we saw them at
the joint session with their bingo paddles, and they couldn't
(11:25):
have the decency to stand for mothers that lost their
children or young man that be cancer. And I don't
really see any leadership out of them. I see a
lot of fear in their their leadership, like Hakeem Jefferies
and Chuck Schumer, that they wouldn't dare take on the
more radicalized party because for fear of losing their power.
Speaker 5 (11:46):
Am I wrong?
Speaker 2 (11:47):
No? I basically agree with your nasis. I think todam
a great party is in a world of herd and
they're not in a terrific position to be the opposition.
They're benefiting now though, because they're you know, particularly because
the media environment is back to being very anti Trump,
they're able to have things to talk about. I think
that that you take the case for instance of this
judge who was arrested in Wisconsin. I mean, the facts
(12:10):
don't seem to be in dispute. Judge tried to let
someone go who not only had committed a federal events
by being in the country legally, but by engaging in
violence against other people, and it seems like the judges'
attitude was, I'd rather this person be free than be
in federal custody. The Democrats have turned that into some
(12:31):
sort of assault on the separation of powers and an
effort to intimidate the judiciary. I suppose that there was
another way to do it, to be less intimidating, But
I would think anyone who cared about law enforcement and
the rule of law would be delighted to send a
message that judges shouldn't be running underground railroad for illegal aliens.
Speaker 1 (12:51):
So well, I mean, in this particular case, they're claiming
a constitutional crisis, but yeah, the judge in this case
helped an illegal and that had been through through the
court system and with a deportation order go through a
back room and to escape ICE officials, knowing that they
that these ICE officials were there waiting to arrest this
(13:11):
individual after that particular court hearing which dealt with domestic abuse. So,
I mean, if that's the hell they want to die on,
or a Brego Garcia and bringing a Brego Garcia back
to the United States, I think they're making very poor choices,
and I think congressmen quay, are the Democrat is.
Speaker 5 (13:28):
Right on that?
Speaker 2 (13:29):
Yeah? I agree and that And then my point is
the two examples the judge and then I'm the so
called Maryland man, I think are indications that the Democratic.
Speaker 1 (13:37):
Maryland man, if I hear Maryland man one more time,
I'm going to jump.
Speaker 2 (13:41):
I said it in their quotes. It just shows to
me their examples that the party does not have its bearings.
The Trump's arrangement syndrome is still too high for them
to really understand where to be picking their spots to say,
here's what we stand for, Here's what the Republicans stand for,
to say, here's what we stand for law US judges
and people in the country legally who who have affiliations
(14:05):
with gangs and a history of spaslo accusations dispaslobies. I
just those to me are rare, resonant examples of why
there's reason to doubt that the Democrats have their act
together at all at this point.
Speaker 1 (14:19):
I hope you take a look at the Gavin Newsom
and the Santas debate that I was able to moderate
before you interview Gavin, because Gavin's a little bit out
of touch with how well his state is doing and
blaming Fox News for it. But anyway, Mark Alperm, we
always appreciate you being on the program.
Speaker 5 (14:36):
Thank you so much, sir.
Speaker 2 (14:38):
Thank you, sir. Good to talk to you all right.
Speaker 5 (14:40):
Bill in New York, Bill, Hi, how are you glad
you called? Sir?
Speaker 6 (14:44):
Hey Sean love your show. I just wanted to say.
Speaker 5 (14:49):
Thank you.
Speaker 6 (14:49):
And I just never could figure out, being a person
who studied history, why we would even think that Russia
would give up the last segment of their western border
and lose out on their western port to access the Mediterranean.
And with the promises that we had made related to
(15:11):
the Ukraine and not joining NATO and everything else, why
are we poking a Russian bear? And I couldn't understand
the past administration. And yeah, we empowered them to fight
to last as long as they did, but at the
end of the day, it just doesn't make sense logistically financially,
(15:34):
and it's left in their hands now to lose land
and lose a tremendous position that they had that they
could have negotiated honorably and kept the promises that they
were made.
Speaker 1 (15:48):
I'm going to tell you the biggest, the biggest mistake
Ukraine made was many many years earlier. I think Clinton
was president when they gave up their nuclear program. That
was their biggest mistake. They never should have given it up.
That was number one, number two. I think. You know
then we had Mince one and Mince two. And you know,
(16:08):
unfortunately in this case, if you look at Crimea, which
is what eleven years ago now that that land was
annexed under Obama and Biden, if you look at what
happened three years ago that happened under Joe Biden, and
Joe Biden had an opportunity is as Putin was amassing
troops and he didn't take advantage of it. If Putin
(16:30):
had territorial claims, I think there were certainly better ways
than the one he chose to resolve it. And you know,
maybe it wouldn't have gotten resolved. Maybe the war was inevitable,
but the way it evolved is it became a proxy
war between the United States and then with Russia. And
we don't have hundreds of billions more dollars to pour
(16:53):
into this thing, and there's now an opportunity for peace.
It now seems to hind the two sides and whether
they want this to continue. I would argue, I don't think.
I don't think Europe will ever step up and provide
the weaponry that would be needed to allow this to
continue to be a stalemate. And I think it's inevitable
(17:16):
that Putin's going to win this war. And I think
it's frustrating because I think Putin is a murdering dictator thug,
and I wish he never did this, but I can
wish till the cows come home now. Now, basically, you
dealt a horrible hand. And I give a lot of
credit to President Trump for trying to resolve this. If
he can pull this off, it'll be miraculous. It's not
(17:37):
going to be a great ideal. It's not going to
be a great deal for Ukraine. But they don't have
any cards to play here. They have nothing. The only
thing they have left is to count on the good
graces of other countries to fight the war and give
them the weaponry to fight it, although they're running out
of manpower to even fight the war anyway.
Speaker 6 (17:57):
Well, you alluded to it just before, and it was
all about diplomacy. We have three eight hundred pound guerrillas
on the search US, the Chinese and the Russians, and
when we have a beef, we don't communicate, we get
involved with a proxy war. Did anybody do even game
theory analysis or just look at it from a practical
(18:19):
point of view.
Speaker 1 (18:22):
You're asking me if Joe Biden thought about it. When
he was asked at the time when the troops and
the military equipment were amassing on the Ukrainian border by
Plutin in Russia, he was asked what would happen, what
the consequence would be in his answer was, well, it
depends if it's a minor incursion. And this after Crimea
had been annexed when he was vice president. So he's
(18:44):
rather dumb, naive, checked out, and absolutely responsible for the
mess here. And somehow that the American people are going
to tolerate endless wars and proxy wars like this. It
just is not going to happen. And I don't think
should happen. I really don't anyway, my friend. I appreciate
your insight, your call eight hundred and nine to four one, Seawan,
(19:04):
if you want to be a part of the program,
Dan my free state of Florida. Dan, how are you
glad you called? Oh?
Speaker 7 (19:09):
Hi, Sean Hi. It's an honor. Naturally, I must compliment
you for the words you said, just a few simple
words before the last election over Eber the fifth. It's brilliant,
but so simple. You said, you are all you're my deputies.
I'm deputizing all of you. You have to get out
(19:30):
and vote and ten tell ten other people to vote,
and tell them to vote and so on.
Speaker 1 (19:36):
And I was also deputizing people that they get informed.
That's why we created the Kamala files, that Tim Walls files,
so that people could be aware of what they would
Otherwise what we would have been stuck with wouldn't have
been good.
Speaker 7 (19:49):
Well, I can't tell you brilliant people in the world
like you, and you might say, well, pardon me no
to say a few things in a few words. What
I wanted to say is way back in nineteen sixty six,
about this time of the year, I was part of
the Florida National Guard in a mass unit like the
(20:10):
TV show. I was at Fort Stewart, Georgia getting OJT
and I had a dear Special Forces sergeant. When the
first that I got there, I gave my shot. My
end was shaking. It's still Shakespeare for a different reason.
I'm a couple of years older than my nephew, Donald Trump,
who I love dearly. He was a dear man. He said, Dan, look,
(20:35):
don't get fancy, just stop the bleeding. If you don't
do that, nothing else matters. I have that written in
my kitchen, hanging up on the wall. I'll never forget
it because it's the truth. Donald Trump is doing nothing
but nothing short of that. He's got his hands on
all the arteries of our country. And that's why people say, oh,
(20:57):
he's doing this, he's doing that. He's too fast. He's
trying to make up for four years of a horror show.
And he has got everybody who he has hired so
far I think is fabulous. And the people at Fox
are fabulous. You're saying, you're trying to save our country.
Nothing short of that shot.
Speaker 1 (21:16):
Nothing well, I mean, honestly, I can't imagine. I don't
think we would have had a shot, I really do.
I think it would have been we would have been
too far gone. He's got a very heavy lift in
front of him. He's taken on a lot of damage
that was done prior to him. Joe Biden left him
(21:36):
a mess on the economy, He left it a mess internationally,
and to his credit, he's moving at the speed of
light and he's trying hard to resolve all of it.
A lot of these things are going to take time.
I think probably in this first one hundred days, the
greatest success that we can see that is visible is
on the border.
Speaker 5 (21:55):
But then there's going to be more.
Speaker 1 (21:58):
I would argue, you're going to see a lot of
trade deals over time, and when that happens, I think
it'll calm people down, calm the markets down a little bit,
and I think people will see the wisdom in challenging
a system that has ripped us off for fifty sixty years.
And at least he had the courage to stand up
to these people and say stop ripping us off. But
(22:20):
you know, I don't like being ripped off. I hate
when people rip me off.
Speaker 7 (22:23):
No too, But Shana, I don't know what we do
without you and Fox.
Speaker 6 (22:27):
I saw Tom Holman this morning.
Speaker 7 (22:30):
If I could see him, I doubt I ever will
I give him a hug. Same with you, Same with
we appreciate Fox. There's no way to say it. I
don't have the time, you don't have the time. I
just want Donald Trump. I think he's too dear a person.
He doesn't want to hurt people, certainly, and I ran
certainly children, but we have got to stop them whatever
(22:53):
by any means necessary. He has to be it.
Speaker 1 (22:58):
They cannot get a nuclear weapon. That you have to
start there. And I think if they're going to make
a deal with Iran, it's got to include dismantling their
nuclear capability facilities. That means every one of them, every
one of them, and they need to be done by Americans.
And I think there's got to be anywhere, any place,
anytime inspections. And if they decide they don't want the
(23:21):
peaceful plan and the peaceful out if you will, then
they will be responsible for what happens next, and to
me that will be very catastrophic. They will lose their
nuclear sites, and I would argue they probably should lose
their refinery so they don't have the ability to have
the monies to film in any more terror. Anyway, my friend,
(23:42):
I appreciate your kind words and your patriotism. God bless you.
You are certainly not what is wrong with our great
country right now, that's for sure, all right, Quick break
right back to our busy phones. Eight hundred and nine
four one Sean. As we continue this Monday.
Speaker 8 (24:01):
The final hour roundup is next. You do not want
to miss it, and stay tuned for the final hour
free for all on the Sean Hannity Show.
Speaker 1 (24:14):
Right back to our phones eight hundred and nine to
four one, Shawn, if you want to join us, Amanda,
You're next on the Sean Hannity Show.
Speaker 9 (24:21):
Hi, Hi, how are you?
Speaker 5 (24:23):
I'm good? What's going on?
Speaker 9 (24:25):
I just wanted to touch base because the last well, for
a while now, you've been talking about your new Tesla
and how much you love it, and the really the
thing that sticks out to me is the fact that
you keep talking about how it drives itself. It's got
the capability to do that by itself. I was just
kind of wondering if that's ever going to be something
that maybe possibly could be used for people with epilepsy
(24:47):
because a lot of them cannot drive. But if we
had a vehicle that could sense not that it's coming on,
but a person's having a seizure and they could go
into auto drive and pull over so slowly, well.
Speaker 1 (25:01):
I could tell you that technology is here. I mean,
they're they they already have prototypes for like self driving ubers.
I mean, there's going to be a massive shift in
the workforce in a lot of ways. That's why I
think it's kind of important these ten the ten trillion
(25:24):
dollars has been committed in new manufacturing, you know, between
artificial intelligence and this this kind of new technology. I mean,
you literally are looking at the possibility of driver lest
transportation now in the very near future, and you know,
artificial intelligence and robotics and all these things. I mean,
(25:49):
it's replace a lot of jobs. Funny story about a
talk show host in Australia. Apparently they had an artificial
intelligence voice do a radio show for the better part
of six months before people caught up to it and
caught onto it and then people felt portrayed by it.
(26:10):
But the fact that they could do it is pretty amazing.
Now I happen to know somebody that has really advanced
in AI, and I get deeper and deeper into it
myself in my spare time. It's it's pretty amazing and
pretty wild. And I could I could put in their
information about what the news of the day is, and
(26:31):
you know what would Sean Hannity think about it? It'll come,
It'll spit it out in mere seconds. It's crazy.
Speaker 9 (26:37):
Yeah, I just that would be awesome because I know
my daughter has epilepsi and to try to get a
job is very difficult because she has to work around
everybody else. So I just whenever you keep talking about
your Tesla and that being an awesome feature, I just
can't help but think that that would be an awesome
feature for someone who.
Speaker 5 (26:56):
Oh absolutely think.
Speaker 1 (26:58):
I definitely think that you're going to see this sooner
than then later, to be honest, I mean, once they
can prove that it's safe and effective. You know, there's
even been talk of people that, hey, you can put
your car to work or you while you're not using it, Like,
for example, I went to the movies I told this story,
and I parked the car far away from the movie theater,
and there is on the control app on a Tesla,
(27:21):
you know, where I just press a button and says
come to me, and then I'm watching in real time
my tesla with no driver, pack out of a parking
spot safely and then make its way towards me like
it's a valet, and it drives right up to where
I am, and I get my car and I take
it from there, and then I can put in my
navigation where I'm going and press a button and it
(27:44):
will take me right to my front door. And I
don't have to do a thing. I don't have to
press the pedal, I don't have to hold the wheel,
I don't have to do I just can't text on
my phone.
Speaker 5 (27:51):
Because it picks that up like instantly.
Speaker 1 (27:54):
You do have to pay You do have to pay
attention even though you're in self driving mode, right.
Speaker 6 (28:00):
But that's where I was.
Speaker 9 (28:01):
I was kind of saying, if it could just censor,
because I know she has a monitor on her on
her arm, it gives her freedom to more.
Speaker 1 (28:09):
Into I guarantee, I guarantee you that technology will exist
one day and somebody like her will be able to drive. Guarantee,
I just a matter of when. And I think that's
that's it's great. It'll enhance people's lives. But you know
that that's also part of the genius of where Elon
Musk is in terms of his thinking. I mean, that's
what neuralink is all about, you know, using AI to
(28:30):
help people that are blind perhaps see again, and people
with spinal cord injuries that they may one day be
able to walk again. I think is great thank you,
But you know, we we've got to understand the world
is changing and a lot of jobs that i'm will
will be taken over by artificial intelligence, and people are
(28:50):
going to have to adapt to the marketplace. There was
an article today about gen Z gen Zers now rejecting
college and larger and larger numbers and a lot of
people going a trade school. If you want a job
that's going to be secure. I can't see AI replacing
a construction worker or a plumber, or an electrician or
somebody in the trades. I can't see that. But I
(29:12):
can't see them replacing auto workers and people on the
line that I can see for sure. Anyway, I appreciate
the call. Eight hundred and nine four one. Shawn is
on number. You want to be a part of the program.
Our friend Mark Simona at the top of the next
hour
The Sean Hannity Show News
Host
Sean Hannity
Popular Podcasts
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com