September 8, 2025 • 29 mins
Sean Hannity opens with bombshell reports on alleged deep state coverups, featuring investigative journalist John Solomon of JustTheNews.com. Solomon details explosive evidence questioning the legality of Joe Biden's late-term pardons, possibly signed with an auto pen and even delegated to Kamala Harris, with limited direct oversight raising red flags for DOJ and Congress. The show dives into newly uncovered FBI memos and "prohibited access" files, exposing internal concerns of obstruction and bias in high-profile cases like Hillary Clinton's emails and Hunter Biden. Sean frames these revelations as a turning point for Congressional inquiries, underlining their real-world implications. In the second half, guest Gene Hamilton of America First Legal spotlights a new Parent and Student Action Center's empowering families to push back against woke curricula, bureaucratic agendas, and defend parental rights, as recent school board clashes show this battle is far from over.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Thanks Scott han An Hour two Sean Hannity Show, eight
hundred and nine four one, Shawns a number if you
want to be a part of the program.
Speaker 2 (00:07):
I know.
Speaker 1 (00:07):
The state run legacy media mob has largely been ignoring
how the deep state is being exposed. There's two big
stories out today. One the White House, the Trump White
House Council raising very serious questions about the legality of
Joe Biden's final wave of pardons and commutations, urging the
(00:29):
DOJ and Congress to interview the former president's advisors to
determine if he truly authorized acts of clemency and pardons
signed by an auto pen operated by his staff, and
more and more. Even Joe Biden's interview in The New
York Times indicate that he only set down standards and
(00:50):
criteria which would invalidate probably every one of them.
Speaker 2 (00:54):
And so we're going to get to the bottom of that.
Speaker 1 (00:56):
The other big issue is material evidence has been discovered
in previously secret, prohibited access case files raising concern about
FBI agents and the abuse of their authority or obstruction
of investigations to help democrats. Anyway, here, with all the
deep dive investigative reporting, is our friend John Solomon again,
(01:21):
chief investigative reporter, founder editor in chief Justinnews dot com.
Speaker 2 (01:24):
Sir, how are you.
Speaker 3 (01:25):
I'm well, you said those up right. It's an amazing
moment to see some of these documents come out. I'm
really shocked by some of the things we're finding right now.
Speaker 1 (01:33):
All right, let's start with commutations and pardons and auto
pen and Joe Biden and in his own words, I
find it pretty damning. And that was the New York
Times interview. But if you listen to White House Counsel
David Warrington, and you wrote this in your piece and
a memo to President Donald Trump's Chief of Staff Susie Wiles,
they do not have the authority to conduct interviews the
(01:55):
White House Council, doesn't. We recommend that you approved making
the information contained in this memorandum and the supporting materials
available to entities that do have the power explain that.
Speaker 3 (02:06):
Yeah, this is a very powerful moment in the in
the unraveling of the Biden era and potentially what we
didn't know about President Biden because it was hidden from us.
First off, what Dave Warrington's investigation found was that the
President Joe Biden's staff believed he had a legal obligation
to sign by hand any pardons that he gave. That
(02:28):
was the rule that they created at the beginning of
the presidency. But as the presidency went on, Joe Biden
was working less and less. He was in the office
lesson s and they couldn't get pardons in front of him.
There was a memo at one point says because of
the president's limited schedule, sometimes things weak to get a
single pardon from him. At some point, Joe Biden became
so disinterested in exercising one of the most awesome powers
(02:50):
that he had his presidents, the pardoner of the power
to partner commutation. He outsourced it to Vice President Kamala Harris, which,
by the way, the constitution doesn't allow for. That is
a body of evidences out there. And now what Dave
Warrington says is listen to make sure that these memos
are an accurate reflection, to make sure we can come
to a question about whether these commutations and pardons were legal. Remember,
(03:12):
President Biden gave thirty seven people a reprieve from death
pamilies that juries that imposed them. He undid the will
of the juries. They may be invalid based on some
of the evidence. What Dave Warranton is asking is that
the Justice Department in Congress, do subpoenas, do compelled interviews,
and find out if these documents are an accurate reflection.
(03:34):
If they are, there's a strong possibility that the Trump
Justice Department could come and declare some of those pardons
and commutations legally in balot.
Speaker 1 (03:43):
All right, So what this thing concludes with, according to
the memo, is if Biden made every clemency decision pardon decision,
then why do is briefing books from December of twenty
twenty four to January twenty twenty five contain nothing of
substance on pardons mutations that he allegedly approved. Now, that
goes to a previous report that you had where his
(04:06):
very own Department of Justice, the second in command, and
this is behind Meryk Garland was warning two days before
Joe left office that raising the question of the legality
of all of that. So even they thought that they
had legal issues going into this, Oh.
Speaker 3 (04:24):
Yeah, they had legal issues at the beginning. They believe
the president has an obligation to sign he uses the
auto pen instead, and as they get towards the end,
they're very concerned that these mass category pardons where the
president isn't even identifying which people he might be pardoning.
He just like, hey, here's a class. Did you guys
figure it out? They were deeply concerned that this was
illegal and not sustainable in the courts. And that is
(04:46):
the mess that Joe Biden left this country as he
exited the White House. And I think we're going to
have to walk through this for a period of time
until we get some final answers. But the fact that
his own Justice Department had concerns about his behavior, that is,
his own staff couldn't get him to pay attention to pardons,
and that's why he was outsourcing it. And at the
very beginning they told the guy, hey, you got to
(05:07):
sign on the dotted line. An auto pen doesn't work.
The fact it didn't allow any of those three concerns,
I think is going to become a major issue. I
would expect James Comer to ramp up these interviews and
maybe the Justice Department to start to take some action.
And then there's one final part, because about a month
ago President Biden raried his head up and said, I listen,
the reason I used the auto pen is that there
(05:28):
were fifteen hundred pardons that I didn't have time to
sign them all, and Dave Warrington's great review puts the
lie to that one. It turns out those mass pardons
only required two personal signature, so it wasn't a lot
of work. It wasn't fifteen hundred signatures. But unfortunately Joe
Biden didn't do that. As far as we can tell,
no evidence in the arch is that he attended the
(05:48):
meetings or that he personally approved some of these. And
I think given that there's going to be a pretty
strong investigation in Congress and the Justice Department the next
few weeks, and I wouldn't be surprised before we get
to the holidays season the Justice departments made a determination
on the legality of some of these pardons and commutations.
Speaker 1 (06:06):
Well, right after you were on the program late last week,
we had on James Comer the House Overside Committee, and
he raised the possibility of bringing in people if Kamala
Harris was in fact, if this was handed off to her,
of her being called in, maybe Biden family members being
called in something you and I've discussed in the past,
(06:26):
and that would include you know, Hunter Biden, Jim Biden
people that as a matter of law, would not have
the ability to invoke the Fifth Amendment because they themselves
got these pardons. And by the way, I'd call an
Adam schiff while I'm at it.
Speaker 3 (06:40):
Uh oh, yeah, I think all of that. And Kamala Harris,
I think is one of those, as you mentioned, that
is on the circle list now. I think given the
fact that there's a clear reference that the President outsourced
these pardon decisions to her, knowing what she did could
be very significant, and she hesitated in most congressional investigations
to date, I think she is next up in the
(07:00):
potential bise of congressional subpoene and congressional interviews. So more
to come.
Speaker 1 (07:07):
You've raised other important questions, and the memo raised his questions.
If the president approved the pardons of commutations, why did
staff often wait days before communicating any of these decisions.
Why were these not included in any memos? Why is
it on a whole variety of issues? You know, why
didn't anybody know who ultimately made the decision to use
(07:29):
the auto pen? You know, were staffers to the Chief
of Staff and Deputy chief of Staff for policies sending
emails on their behalf regarding pardons and other issues without
informing recipients. And if he was fit to serve meeting
Joe Biden as president, why did he need cheat sheets
explaining that he had proved the commutations for fifteen hundred people?
(07:51):
And why did he tell the New York Times that
he set down criteria and standards. I'll add that question myself.
Speaker 3 (07:57):
Yeah, listen, the fact that his briefing books silent on
these issues. You were president, the briefing book, doesn't it
and what you're going to be doing today. Never in
the briefing book is the Hey, mister president, you're going
to sign these fifteen hundred car or you're going to
improve these fifteen hundred commutations for people who know how
the paperwork process works in the White House. It is
a red flag and potentially a smoking gun that the
(08:19):
president's own briefing books suggested. We all.
Speaker 1 (08:23):
Explain why his own Justice Department only two days before
he left office, the second in charge behind or one
of the top lieutenants behind Murray garla and raised the
issue two days before they left the White House.
Speaker 3 (08:35):
Yeah, because they knew there were these categories of people
who had gotten either drug offenses or COVID pendenty during
the COVID era, and Joe Biden did not have the time,
nor was there any evidence that anyone had looked at
all the names and said who was on this list?
As the president personally improving everyone, is he just giving
an okay to let someone else decide that and to
(08:58):
them that was a miss use of the part and power.
You know, the great thing about the parton power in
its history, it's derived from British law going all the
way back to the thirteenth century, and American courts and
British courts in the derision of the development of this
law are very clear. Any deviation from the appropriate process
the gates they pardon. That is the long term standard
(09:20):
that the courts have set. And right now there's pretty
strong evidence that Joe Biden didn't deviated went way off
course on this and that may come around to invalidate
some of these decisions he made. Imagine, if you're sitting
on death rowe, you think you got off and you
might be put back on now Joe Biden may have
played the ultimate painful trick on you.
Speaker 1 (09:39):
All right, quick break more with Investigative Reporter founder editor
in chief Justinnews dot Com. John Solomon, your calls on
the other side, eight hundred and nine to four one, Shawn,
as we continue.
Speaker 3 (09:54):
The information you need the man. This is the a
Sean Hannity Show.
Speaker 1 (10:03):
Hi, we contit you with John Solomon, Founder, editor in chief,
chief investigative reporter Justinnews dot com. Can you go into
detail the piece you wrote up about how material evidence
has now been discovered and previously quote secret prohibited access
case files raising concern about FBI agent's abuse of authority
(10:23):
or obstruction of investigations. This is what we have referred
to often over the years as the deep state.
Speaker 3 (10:31):
Yeah, now, this could be one of the most significant developments.
And what we're learning is that Cash Betel and his
team using career agents letting the people do their job,
agents doing their job without political interfaarence are discovering that
inside all of these prohibited case files these are case files,
or most agents, even if you were working on a case,
you weren't allowed to access some of the evidence. It
(10:51):
was kept off of the books. And these are the
most sensitive investigations about Hillary Clinton, Hunter Bidenman and the
Clinton Foundation and CEFC, the China company that was paying
lots of money to Hunter Biden and the Biden family.
These were kept off the books, and when Cash Bettel's
team got to look inside the books, they started to
(11:12):
discover some very various concerns timelines that suggested that there
was obstruction and interference not by witnesses. Normally, obstruction charges
are you're investigating in a witness or somebody gets involved
and tries to block the FBI. The FBI was blocking
prosecutors from doing their job. And you begin to see
a senior executives so concerned by what their bosses are
(11:36):
doing above them, what the Andy mccabs and James Comey's
of the world were doing above them, they start writing
memos to file keeping book on their bosses so that
if anything ever comes to this, they wrote down a memorial,
a memo saying, hey, for some reason, we didn't follow
the rules there for some reason, Hillary Clinton got a pass.
This is so extraordinary, It's the rarest thing. I just
interviewed an FBI agent worked for more than two decades
(11:57):
in the fay SA. I never wrote a memo of
I never felt in the entire time in twenty years,
I needed to do something like that, and yet here
you have the executive assistant director, like the number three
official in the FBI writing memos saying, this happened is
a little unusual about Hillary Clinton's laptop. I'm writing it,
And he writes it the day before the election, the
(12:17):
September seventh, twenty sixteen, just before Donald Trump wins. This
guy feels so compelled by what he witnesses his boss
is doing that he actually writes a memoo file. And
they're discovering this. Now timeline is written by people saying, hey,
the story out there isn't what it is. This is
what really happened. You see this protection racket around Democrats,
Hillary Clinton, Hunter Biden, people like that. And then of
(12:38):
course the abuse is in trying to pursue the Donald
Trumps and the Carter Pages and the George Papadopolis. It
is almost when I just talked to two or three people, like,
can you ever remember a time where the FBI was
investigating its own agent's obstruction? Like? Never, No, this is
like unprecedented. So what cash Betel has done has now
created a body of evans to go look at They'm
(12:59):
going to is ented to the Justice Department as far
as I can tell the Justice Department will decide whether
some of the things that the FBI did actually obstructed
prosecutors from doing their job in legitimate criminal investigations. That
is a rear and unprecedent moment.
Speaker 1 (13:15):
Now, if you go back to June, the Senate Judiciary
Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley urged the FBI to probe how
the bureau under James Colemy used the segregated system is
what you're describing here of politically sensitive cases known as
prohibited access case files. Fast forward to FBI Director Cash
Bettel recently locating a document showing that then Executive assistant
(13:38):
Director Randall Coleman wrote a memo to file the day
before the twenty sixteen presidential election. That's the one where
Donald trumpete Hillary Clinton laying out the unusual behavior of
FBI managers after fresh evidence in Clinton's classified email scandal
were discovered on former Congressman Anthony laptop.
Speaker 3 (14:01):
This goes back to the shut it down memo we
talked about in your show a few weeks ago when
I broke that. So the FBI has two simultaneous investigations
going on. Hither Clinton won the email case one the
pay to play allegations at the Clinton Foundation, going all
the way back to Peter Schweitzer's great book. Both are
highly active in the middle of the twenty sixteen election,
(14:21):
and all of a sudden, Andy McCabe steps in and said,
no more, and we're investigating Hillary Clinton's foundation unless I
prove it. And then the Deputy Attorney General comes in,
Sally Aids, who works for Obama, saying shut it down.
I don't want any more investigation. That's in it of
its self obstruction. But then something happens to Anthony Wiener
laptop has found and on that laptop are all these
emails that are related to the private server. Now, most
(14:43):
of us have known about that and the private email
server in the mishandling of the FBI net. But there
was a second component about the discovery of the emails
that is now concerned Cash Betel's leadership team. Those emails
were not only relevant to whether she moved classified information
through her server, they had potential evidence of whether deals
were being made or if you made a donation to
the Cooton Foundation you could get a favor from the
(15:05):
State Department. And it appears there is strong concern based
on what mister Coleman and others have written in these
memos that they may have been keeping that from investigators
so that Hillary Culton wouldn't face a potential crowd home
investigation or new evidence in that. That's what this is
all about, this new memo.
Speaker 1 (15:23):
John Solomon, justinnews dot com, Thank you, sir, appreciate your
time as always.
Speaker 3 (15:27):
To be with you. Shawn, thank you so much.
Speaker 1 (15:30):
You know, with kids going back to school, you would
think that things have changed now. Things are dramatically different
than they were maybe four or five years ago in
terms of DEI and and you know, woke education in schools.
It has been challenged. Donald Trump has taken it to
a new level. As a result, there have been significant changes,
(15:55):
but not enough in terms of changes. Parental rights are
front and center, you know, still for your kids in
education debates. That's why you need tiger moms like Linda
that show up at school board meetings and cause chaos.
Speaker 2 (16:11):
Do you cause chaos when you go if necessary? Absolutely
anything for my children. And do they know you by name?
I think they know me pretty well.
Speaker 1 (16:21):
Yeah, they know they know, Oh there she is. When
you walk in the room, it's like, oh no, it's
going to be one of those meetings, right, How often
does that happen? I would say every meeting is like that.
Speaker 2 (16:32):
You know, you have to stand up against the work ideology.
I'm all in, I'm not afraid. I'll love to fight. Well,
you're fighting.
Speaker 1 (16:40):
You know, if we would just focus on reading, writing, math, science, history, computers,
you know, things that will benefit kids' lives, certainly imposing
the you know, the golden rule love God. Well, you
can't mention God in a lot of public schools. Love
God with all your heart, mind, body and soul, and
(17:00):
your neighbor as yourself, and the simple golden rule of
you know, treat others the way you want to be treated.
It kind of covers every HR book from start to finish.
I don't care if it's five hundred pages or five pages.
But we're still dealing with a lot of these issues now.
Gene Hamilton's going to join us in a second, the
new president of American First Legal. You might recall that
(17:23):
was started by Steven Miller. He has launched a new
parent and Student Action Center. It's a one stop hub.
It's designed to give you parents and students practical resources
so that you can push back against woe, curricula, union
driven agendas, discrimination in schools. I mean, you are allowed
(17:44):
to like Donald Trump, you are allowed to be a conservative.
But they say the effort is about arming families with
knowledge and tools that they need to fight back effectively
against school bureaucracies, activists, agendas, teachers' unions, ensuring the parents,
not special interests, will direct their child's education. I mean,
(18:05):
you know again, we spend more per capita on education
than any other industrialized country, and we have the worst
test results you. We have institutionalized failure at best, institutionalized mediocrity. Now,
let me play for you if I may hear Temecula, California,
the Temecula Valley Unified School District confronted and harassed moms
(18:31):
at a student walkout for opposing boys in girls' locker rooms. Yes,
this is still happening.
Speaker 2 (18:38):
And I know you all are on the wrong side
of the istory, and I know that's like you are
endangering children's times by doing does not make anybody today
he protest linea.
Speaker 3 (19:00):
Gay and and you're acting like, okay, so I'm along
the perils and you're this line?
Speaker 4 (19:07):
Is that is that who's resist Jesus loves that young
man just as much as you loves you.
Speaker 3 (19:12):
It is a.
Speaker 2 (19:16):
Young man. You don't get to tell somebody you do
what they are. You don't get to tell.
Speaker 3 (19:21):
Somebody what they are yours.
Speaker 2 (19:23):
I can raise my voice of my lads.
Speaker 3 (19:27):
Go ahead, Thank you so much for being here, Thank
you for seeing much for your.
Speaker 2 (19:30):
Person and the rights. We're doing the same. We're indeed children,
and that's where y is not supposed.
Speaker 3 (19:37):
To do that.
Speaker 2 (19:37):
I am not endangering children.
Speaker 3 (19:39):
I'm here for the rights of.
Speaker 4 (19:40):
Children over Yes, this is not the right schools, children
that we're scared to go in that vacuum.
Speaker 2 (19:44):
Hey, but I not to go in that bathroom. The
administration name pad.
Speaker 4 (19:49):
Just be dows have to either right or moral or
value by everybody seas going.
Speaker 2 (19:57):
Because what you're doing is wrong. I his permission. In
a na is loved, She is loved, She is loved,
She is what she wants to be. You don't get
to tell her that you're not her parents. I could
see whatever I want if you don't.
Speaker 1 (20:15):
Anyway, if you would have told me when I started
in radio in nineteen eighty seven that I'd be talking
about politicians fighting for the right to put feminine hygiene
products in boys' bathrooms in grade school. I wouldn't have
believed you. You know, if you would have told me
that if you send your kid off to college, they
(20:37):
spend their first day at school walking around a courtyard
asking people what pronoun would you like to be called by?
I probably would not have believed you. If you would
have told me that there are vice presidential candidates that
run states that offer gender affirming care for minors without
(20:57):
parental consent, I probably would.
Speaker 2 (20:59):
Not have believed you. But that's the world we're now
living it.
Speaker 1 (21:03):
That's where the American First Legal Center and their new
Parent and Student Action Center is all about. Gean Hamilton
is with us, he's heading this up. How are you,
mister Hamilton, Welcome back to the program.
Speaker 3 (21:15):
I'm doing well.
Speaker 4 (21:16):
Thanks for having me on, Sean.
Speaker 2 (21:18):
Would you have believed it, you know, thirty forty years ago.
Speaker 3 (21:21):
No way, no way, There's not a chance.
Speaker 4 (21:24):
And it's really unreal because it's not just that one
school district in California, right, we know this is happening
all across the country. Every parent across the country is
dealing with similar issues on a daily basis, and so
this new action center is precisely for those types of
situations like the clip you played. Say that your daughter
(21:48):
is attending school and your school district has a policy
that allows young men to go into the bathroom with her.
We have a template for you and an explainer and
resources to be able to push back, to file a
complaint asserting your child's rights under Title nine of the
Civil Rights Act. You submit this complaint to the Department
(22:10):
of Education, then they can act on it well.
Speaker 1 (22:14):
So, in other words, whatever situation parents and students may
find themselves in, you are providing a template for them
to follow so that they can go through the proper
procedure and fight back.
Speaker 4 (22:26):
One hundred percent Sean, that is exactly what this is about. So,
whether we're talking about Title nine, whether we're talking about
race discriminations under Title six, whether we're talking about radical
curricula being introduced into schools, in proper surveys, soliciting their
views on matters of sexuality, and all kinds of other issues,
(22:46):
we are equipping parents with the tools that they need
to fight back, to push back, to go through the
proper channels to hold people accountable. Because as great as
it is and as wonderful as it is that we
have an administration in Washington, d C. That finally supports
and believes in the rights of parents across this country.
There's only so much that they can do on their own,
(23:07):
and so what these tools enable parents to do is
to push back at the local level and to also
let the federal government intervene on their behalf where there
are violations of the students' rights.
Speaker 1 (23:20):
Quick break right back more with Gene Hamilton. He is
the new president of america First Legal that was created
by Stephen Miller. He's launched a new service for parents.
It's called Parents and Student Action Center, so you can
deal with the woke mob in your school district.
Speaker 3 (23:43):
The final hour of the Sean Hannity shows up next.
Speaker 1 (23:46):
Hang on for Sean's Conservative solutions.
Speaker 4 (23:52):
This coming March.
Speaker 2 (23:55):
It runs in exactly the opposite direction, and it would
be I suspect a near unanimity in the room that
trans athletes have no place in.
Speaker 3 (24:07):
The female category. I don't think this is any question.
Speaker 2 (24:10):
I just think it was a strange.
Speaker 3 (24:12):
I mean I felt, I mean I was the reason
I'm ashamed of my performance of that panel because I
share your.
Speaker 2 (24:19):
Position one.
Speaker 1 (24:22):
And I was Colt all right, we continue now. Geene
Hamilton is with us. If you're having problems with DEI
or a woke agenda in your public school, you want
to you're gonna want to get in touch with the
American First Legal Parent and Student Action Center. We continue
with its new president, Jean Hamilton. I think it's great
that you're doing this. I love that American First Legal
(24:44):
even exists in the first place. This is definitely definitely needed,
But I know it's it's kind of lonely for parents
if if they're standing out there, A lot of parents
just want to put their head in the They don't
want to be confrontational. Most most parents are not like Linda.
They're not as vocal. They're not showing up at school
(25:07):
board meetings. I never went to a school board meeting
in my life, to be very frank with you, you know,
the only issue I had when my son was in
sixth grade many years ago was I knew a science
teacher wanted to show the kids Earth and the Balance
by Al Gore, and I said, my son will not
be attending that class, and I'm sure his grade will
not suffer. And that was the end of that conversation.
(25:29):
That was it his grade did not suffer by the way, that's.
Speaker 3 (25:33):
Great, John.
Speaker 4 (25:34):
Yeah, Look, I think parents.
Speaker 2 (25:36):
Like, well, you want to know.
Speaker 1 (25:37):
The sad part is I'm going to be very blunt.
Because I'm a public figure that you know, there was
a certain degree of of I would even call it
unnatural fear that I might say something publicly, and that
gave me a lot more leverage than the average parent,
which is unfair. I don't deserve it. But I also
(25:58):
spoke of you know, there were of other parents that
took my lead on it, and they said, yeah, well,
if your son's not going, and mine's not going either,
and it worked out for other people as well.
Speaker 2 (26:08):
But it shouldn't take that.
Speaker 4 (26:10):
No, it shouldn't. It shouldn't take that. And what these
tools are intended to do, and you can find them
on our website. If you just google America First Legal
Parent and Student Action Center, or you go to our
ex page, or you go to any of our other
social media pages, you can find the links to these tools.
What these tools enable parents to do is to push back,
but also there's a way that you can talk contact
(26:30):
America First Legal and our team will evaluate any case
that's referred to as for potential legal action. And so
just to give you a couple of examples, we represent
a student in her family in Fairfax County, Virginia, which
is at the epicenter of some of this ridiculousness. We
also now represent, in partnership with other lawyers, the two
(26:50):
parents in Loudon County, or the two students, two young
boys who were punished by the school district for videotaping
a girl going into their bathroom.
Speaker 1 (27:01):
Well, let me ask you about this then, because I
think you know and I'm very aware of the case
that you're talking about. Yeah, because this is now mom's
confronted by a teacher for protesting boys in their daughter's bathroom,
and I mean that's like almost standard. Fair Let me
ask you about the Seattle case, where the school district
there all kids need to learn about gender and sexuality.
(27:23):
Parents are not not allowed there to opt out their
kids about opt out requests. Seattle Public school Schools works
to provide a wide range of educational opportunities that reflect
whose students are, help them build empathy for others, and
prepare them to be compassionate citizens of a diverse and
(27:44):
changing world. There is no option to quote opt students
out of learning about particular identities or groups of people.
This guidance is reinforced by the State Superintendent's office the
policies of other major urban dey districts, including states like California,
New York, et cetera, et cetera. So you can't even
(28:05):
opt your kids out legally if you're in Seattle. I'm sorry.
Doesn't that conflict with something called parental rights?
Speaker 4 (28:14):
Yes, yes it does, Sean, And look, I suspect that
the Seattle Public school system is in They're in the
FA stage of the phrase, and the FO will come
soon because they are flatly wrong. Federal law under the
PPRA permit students and parents to withdraw from this type
(28:36):
of radical curriculum from being forced upon them. They can
opt out, and the Supreme Court affirmed the rights of
parents to be able to opt their kids out of
this type of radical ideology in classes just earlier this year,
and in case my mood versus Taylor, So, Seattle public schools,
they might think that they're doing something, they might think
(28:58):
that they're on solid ground, But with action from committed
parents and with the right legal support, we can fight back,
and we will, and we can hold people like Seattle
Public schools accountable.
Speaker 2 (29:10):
How can people get in touch with you because we
have to run.
Speaker 4 (29:13):
Go to our website aflegal dot org and there's a
contact US formed everywhere and fill it out and we'll
be happy to hear from any parents.
Speaker 1 (29:20):
All right, that's AFL dot org. We appreciate it. Gene Hamilton,
thank you so much for being with us. It's a great,
great service you're providing.
Thanks Scott han An Hour two Sean Hannity Show, eight
hundred and nine four one, Shawns a number if you
want to be a part of the program.
Speaker 2 (00:07):
I know.
Speaker 1 (00:07):
The state run legacy media mob has largely been ignoring
how the deep state is being exposed. There's two big
stories out today. One the White House, the Trump White
House Council raising very serious questions about the legality of
Joe Biden's final wave of pardons and commutations, urging the
(00:29):
DOJ and Congress to interview the former president's advisors to
determine if he truly authorized acts of clemency and pardons
signed by an auto pen operated by his staff, and
more and more. Even Joe Biden's interview in The New
York Times indicate that he only set down standards and
(00:50):
criteria which would invalidate probably every one of them.
Speaker 2 (00:54):
And so we're going to get to the bottom of that.
Speaker 1 (00:56):
The other big issue is material evidence has been discovered
in previously secret, prohibited access case files raising concern about
FBI agents and the abuse of their authority or obstruction
of investigations to help democrats. Anyway, here, with all the
deep dive investigative reporting, is our friend John Solomon again,
(01:21):
chief investigative reporter, founder editor in chief Justinnews dot com.
Speaker 2 (01:24):
Sir, how are you.
Speaker 3 (01:25):
I'm well, you said those up right. It's an amazing
moment to see some of these documents come out. I'm
really shocked by some of the things we're finding right now.
Speaker 1 (01:33):
All right, let's start with commutations and pardons and auto
pen and Joe Biden and in his own words, I
find it pretty damning. And that was the New York
Times interview. But if you listen to White House Counsel
David Warrington, and you wrote this in your piece and
a memo to President Donald Trump's Chief of Staff Susie Wiles,
they do not have the authority to conduct interviews the
(01:55):
White House Council, doesn't. We recommend that you approved making
the information contained in this memorandum and the supporting materials
available to entities that do have the power explain that.
Speaker 3 (02:06):
Yeah, this is a very powerful moment in the in
the unraveling of the Biden era and potentially what we
didn't know about President Biden because it was hidden from us.
First off, what Dave Warrington's investigation found was that the
President Joe Biden's staff believed he had a legal obligation
to sign by hand any pardons that he gave. That
(02:28):
was the rule that they created at the beginning of
the presidency. But as the presidency went on, Joe Biden
was working less and less. He was in the office
lesson s and they couldn't get pardons in front of him.
There was a memo at one point says because of
the president's limited schedule, sometimes things weak to get a
single pardon from him. At some point, Joe Biden became
so disinterested in exercising one of the most awesome powers
(02:50):
that he had his presidents, the pardoner of the power
to partner commutation. He outsourced it to Vice President Kamala Harris, which,
by the way, the constitution doesn't allow for. That is
a body of evidences out there. And now what Dave
Warrington says is listen to make sure that these memos
are an accurate reflection, to make sure we can come
to a question about whether these commutations and pardons were legal. Remember,
(03:12):
President Biden gave thirty seven people a reprieve from death
pamilies that juries that imposed them. He undid the will
of the juries. They may be invalid based on some
of the evidence. What Dave Warranton is asking is that
the Justice Department in Congress, do subpoenas, do compelled interviews,
and find out if these documents are an accurate reflection.
(03:34):
If they are, there's a strong possibility that the Trump
Justice Department could come and declare some of those pardons
and commutations legally in balot.
Speaker 1 (03:43):
All right, So what this thing concludes with, according to
the memo, is if Biden made every clemency decision pardon decision,
then why do is briefing books from December of twenty
twenty four to January twenty twenty five contain nothing of
substance on pardons mutations that he allegedly approved. Now, that
goes to a previous report that you had where his
(04:06):
very own Department of Justice, the second in command, and
this is behind Meryk Garland was warning two days before
Joe left office that raising the question of the legality
of all of that. So even they thought that they
had legal issues going into this, Oh.
Speaker 3 (04:24):
Yeah, they had legal issues at the beginning. They believe
the president has an obligation to sign he uses the
auto pen instead, and as they get towards the end,
they're very concerned that these mass category pardons where the
president isn't even identifying which people he might be pardoning.
He just like, hey, here's a class. Did you guys
figure it out? They were deeply concerned that this was
illegal and not sustainable in the courts. And that is
(04:46):
the mess that Joe Biden left this country as he
exited the White House. And I think we're going to
have to walk through this for a period of time
until we get some final answers. But the fact that
his own Justice Department had concerns about his behavior, that is,
his own staff couldn't get him to pay attention to pardons,
and that's why he was outsourcing it. And at the
very beginning they told the guy, hey, you got to
(05:07):
sign on the dotted line. An auto pen doesn't work.
The fact it didn't allow any of those three concerns,
I think is going to become a major issue. I
would expect James Comer to ramp up these interviews and
maybe the Justice Department to start to take some action.
And then there's one final part, because about a month
ago President Biden raried his head up and said, I listen,
the reason I used the auto pen is that there
(05:28):
were fifteen hundred pardons that I didn't have time to
sign them all, and Dave Warrington's great review puts the
lie to that one. It turns out those mass pardons
only required two personal signature, so it wasn't a lot
of work. It wasn't fifteen hundred signatures. But unfortunately Joe
Biden didn't do that. As far as we can tell,
no evidence in the arch is that he attended the
(05:48):
meetings or that he personally approved some of these. And
I think given that there's going to be a pretty
strong investigation in Congress and the Justice Department the next
few weeks, and I wouldn't be surprised before we get
to the holidays season the Justice departments made a determination
on the legality of some of these pardons and commutations.
Speaker 1 (06:06):
Well, right after you were on the program late last week,
we had on James Comer the House Overside Committee, and
he raised the possibility of bringing in people if Kamala
Harris was in fact, if this was handed off to her,
of her being called in, maybe Biden family members being
called in something you and I've discussed in the past,
(06:26):
and that would include you know, Hunter Biden, Jim Biden
people that as a matter of law, would not have
the ability to invoke the Fifth Amendment because they themselves
got these pardons. And by the way, I'd call an
Adam schiff while I'm at it.
Speaker 3 (06:40):
Uh oh, yeah, I think all of that. And Kamala Harris,
I think is one of those, as you mentioned, that
is on the circle list now. I think given the
fact that there's a clear reference that the President outsourced
these pardon decisions to her, knowing what she did could
be very significant, and she hesitated in most congressional investigations
to date, I think she is next up in the
(07:00):
potential bise of congressional subpoene and congressional interviews. So more
to come.
Speaker 1 (07:07):
You've raised other important questions, and the memo raised his questions.
If the president approved the pardons of commutations, why did
staff often wait days before communicating any of these decisions.
Why were these not included in any memos? Why is
it on a whole variety of issues? You know, why
didn't anybody know who ultimately made the decision to use
(07:29):
the auto pen? You know, were staffers to the Chief
of Staff and Deputy chief of Staff for policies sending
emails on their behalf regarding pardons and other issues without
informing recipients. And if he was fit to serve meeting
Joe Biden as president, why did he need cheat sheets
explaining that he had proved the commutations for fifteen hundred people?
(07:51):
And why did he tell the New York Times that
he set down criteria and standards. I'll add that question myself.
Speaker 3 (07:57):
Yeah, listen, the fact that his briefing books silent on
these issues. You were president, the briefing book, doesn't it
and what you're going to be doing today. Never in
the briefing book is the Hey, mister president, you're going
to sign these fifteen hundred car or you're going to
improve these fifteen hundred commutations for people who know how
the paperwork process works in the White House. It is
a red flag and potentially a smoking gun that the
(08:19):
president's own briefing books suggested. We all.
Speaker 1 (08:23):
Explain why his own Justice Department only two days before
he left office, the second in charge behind or one
of the top lieutenants behind Murray garla and raised the
issue two days before they left the White House.
Speaker 3 (08:35):
Yeah, because they knew there were these categories of people
who had gotten either drug offenses or COVID pendenty during
the COVID era, and Joe Biden did not have the time,
nor was there any evidence that anyone had looked at
all the names and said who was on this list?
As the president personally improving everyone, is he just giving
an okay to let someone else decide that and to
(08:58):
them that was a miss use of the part and power.
You know, the great thing about the parton power in
its history, it's derived from British law going all the
way back to the thirteenth century, and American courts and
British courts in the derision of the development of this
law are very clear. Any deviation from the appropriate process
the gates they pardon. That is the long term standard
(09:20):
that the courts have set. And right now there's pretty
strong evidence that Joe Biden didn't deviated went way off
course on this and that may come around to invalidate
some of these decisions he made. Imagine, if you're sitting
on death rowe, you think you got off and you
might be put back on now Joe Biden may have
played the ultimate painful trick on you.
Speaker 1 (09:39):
All right, quick break more with Investigative Reporter founder editor
in chief Justinnews dot Com. John Solomon, your calls on
the other side, eight hundred and nine to four one, Shawn,
as we continue.
Speaker 3 (09:54):
The information you need the man. This is the a
Sean Hannity Show.
Speaker 1 (10:03):
Hi, we contit you with John Solomon, Founder, editor in chief,
chief investigative reporter Justinnews dot com. Can you go into
detail the piece you wrote up about how material evidence
has now been discovered and previously quote secret prohibited access
case files raising concern about FBI agent's abuse of authority
(10:23):
or obstruction of investigations. This is what we have referred
to often over the years as the deep state.
Speaker 3 (10:31):
Yeah, now, this could be one of the most significant developments.
And what we're learning is that Cash Betel and his
team using career agents letting the people do their job,
agents doing their job without political interfaarence are discovering that
inside all of these prohibited case files these are case files,
or most agents, even if you were working on a case,
you weren't allowed to access some of the evidence. It
(10:51):
was kept off of the books. And these are the
most sensitive investigations about Hillary Clinton, Hunter Bidenman and the
Clinton Foundation and CEFC, the China company that was paying
lots of money to Hunter Biden and the Biden family.
These were kept off the books, and when Cash Bettel's
team got to look inside the books, they started to
(11:12):
discover some very various concerns timelines that suggested that there
was obstruction and interference not by witnesses. Normally, obstruction charges
are you're investigating in a witness or somebody gets involved
and tries to block the FBI. The FBI was blocking
prosecutors from doing their job. And you begin to see
a senior executives so concerned by what their bosses are
(11:36):
doing above them, what the Andy mccabs and James Comey's
of the world were doing above them, they start writing
memos to file keeping book on their bosses so that
if anything ever comes to this, they wrote down a memorial,
a memo saying, hey, for some reason, we didn't follow
the rules there for some reason, Hillary Clinton got a pass.
This is so extraordinary, It's the rarest thing. I just
interviewed an FBI agent worked for more than two decades
(11:57):
in the fay SA. I never wrote a memo of
I never felt in the entire time in twenty years,
I needed to do something like that, and yet here
you have the executive assistant director, like the number three
official in the FBI writing memos saying, this happened is
a little unusual about Hillary Clinton's laptop. I'm writing it,
And he writes it the day before the election, the
(12:17):
September seventh, twenty sixteen, just before Donald Trump wins. This
guy feels so compelled by what he witnesses his boss
is doing that he actually writes a memoo file. And
they're discovering this. Now timeline is written by people saying, hey,
the story out there isn't what it is. This is
what really happened. You see this protection racket around Democrats,
Hillary Clinton, Hunter Biden, people like that. And then of
(12:38):
course the abuse is in trying to pursue the Donald
Trumps and the Carter Pages and the George Papadopolis. It
is almost when I just talked to two or three people, like,
can you ever remember a time where the FBI was
investigating its own agent's obstruction? Like? Never, No, this is
like unprecedented. So what cash Betel has done has now
created a body of evans to go look at They'm
(12:59):
going to is ented to the Justice Department as far
as I can tell the Justice Department will decide whether
some of the things that the FBI did actually obstructed
prosecutors from doing their job in legitimate criminal investigations. That
is a rear and unprecedent moment.
Speaker 1 (13:15):
Now, if you go back to June, the Senate Judiciary
Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley urged the FBI to probe how
the bureau under James Colemy used the segregated system is
what you're describing here of politically sensitive cases known as
prohibited access case files. Fast forward to FBI Director Cash
Bettel recently locating a document showing that then Executive assistant
(13:38):
Director Randall Coleman wrote a memo to file the day
before the twenty sixteen presidential election. That's the one where
Donald trumpete Hillary Clinton laying out the unusual behavior of
FBI managers after fresh evidence in Clinton's classified email scandal
were discovered on former Congressman Anthony laptop.
Speaker 3 (14:01):
This goes back to the shut it down memo we
talked about in your show a few weeks ago when
I broke that. So the FBI has two simultaneous investigations
going on. Hither Clinton won the email case one the
pay to play allegations at the Clinton Foundation, going all
the way back to Peter Schweitzer's great book. Both are
highly active in the middle of the twenty sixteen election,
(14:21):
and all of a sudden, Andy McCabe steps in and said,
no more, and we're investigating Hillary Clinton's foundation unless I
prove it. And then the Deputy Attorney General comes in,
Sally Aids, who works for Obama, saying shut it down.
I don't want any more investigation. That's in it of
its self obstruction. But then something happens to Anthony Wiener
laptop has found and on that laptop are all these
emails that are related to the private server. Now, most
(14:43):
of us have known about that and the private email
server in the mishandling of the FBI net. But there
was a second component about the discovery of the emails
that is now concerned Cash Betel's leadership team. Those emails
were not only relevant to whether she moved classified information
through her server, they had potential evidence of whether deals
were being made or if you made a donation to
the Cooton Foundation you could get a favor from the
(15:05):
State Department. And it appears there is strong concern based
on what mister Coleman and others have written in these
memos that they may have been keeping that from investigators
so that Hillary Culton wouldn't face a potential crowd home
investigation or new evidence in that. That's what this is
all about, this new memo.
Speaker 1 (15:23):
John Solomon, justinnews dot com, Thank you, sir, appreciate your
time as always.
Speaker 3 (15:27):
To be with you. Shawn, thank you so much.
Speaker 1 (15:30):
You know, with kids going back to school, you would
think that things have changed now. Things are dramatically different
than they were maybe four or five years ago in
terms of DEI and and you know, woke education in schools.
It has been challenged. Donald Trump has taken it to
a new level. As a result, there have been significant changes,
(15:55):
but not enough in terms of changes. Parental rights are
front and center, you know, still for your kids in
education debates. That's why you need tiger moms like Linda
that show up at school board meetings and cause chaos.
Speaker 2 (16:11):
Do you cause chaos when you go if necessary? Absolutely
anything for my children. And do they know you by name?
I think they know me pretty well.
Speaker 1 (16:21):
Yeah, they know they know, Oh there she is. When
you walk in the room, it's like, oh no, it's
going to be one of those meetings, right, How often
does that happen? I would say every meeting is like that.
Speaker 2 (16:32):
You know, you have to stand up against the work ideology.
I'm all in, I'm not afraid. I'll love to fight. Well,
you're fighting.
Speaker 1 (16:40):
You know, if we would just focus on reading, writing, math, science, history, computers,
you know, things that will benefit kids' lives, certainly imposing
the you know, the golden rule love God. Well, you
can't mention God in a lot of public schools. Love
God with all your heart, mind, body and soul, and
(17:00):
your neighbor as yourself, and the simple golden rule of
you know, treat others the way you want to be treated.
It kind of covers every HR book from start to finish.
I don't care if it's five hundred pages or five pages.
But we're still dealing with a lot of these issues now.
Gene Hamilton's going to join us in a second, the
new president of American First Legal. You might recall that
(17:23):
was started by Steven Miller. He has launched a new
parent and Student Action Center. It's a one stop hub.
It's designed to give you parents and students practical resources
so that you can push back against woe, curricula, union
driven agendas, discrimination in schools. I mean, you are allowed
(17:44):
to like Donald Trump, you are allowed to be a conservative.
But they say the effort is about arming families with
knowledge and tools that they need to fight back effectively
against school bureaucracies, activists, agendas, teachers' unions, ensuring the parents,
not special interests, will direct their child's education. I mean,
(18:05):
you know again, we spend more per capita on education
than any other industrialized country, and we have the worst
test results you. We have institutionalized failure at best, institutionalized mediocrity. Now,
let me play for you if I may hear Temecula, California,
the Temecula Valley Unified School District confronted and harassed moms
(18:31):
at a student walkout for opposing boys in girls' locker rooms. Yes,
this is still happening.
Speaker 2 (18:38):
And I know you all are on the wrong side
of the istory, and I know that's like you are
endangering children's times by doing does not make anybody today
he protest linea.
Speaker 3 (19:00):
Gay and and you're acting like, okay, so I'm along
the perils and you're this line?
Speaker 4 (19:07):
Is that is that who's resist Jesus loves that young
man just as much as you loves you.
Speaker 3 (19:12):
It is a.
Speaker 2 (19:16):
Young man. You don't get to tell somebody you do
what they are. You don't get to tell.
Speaker 3 (19:21):
Somebody what they are yours.
Speaker 2 (19:23):
I can raise my voice of my lads.
Speaker 3 (19:27):
Go ahead, Thank you so much for being here, Thank
you for seeing much for your.
Speaker 2 (19:30):
Person and the rights. We're doing the same. We're indeed children,
and that's where y is not supposed.
Speaker 3 (19:37):
To do that.
Speaker 2 (19:37):
I am not endangering children.
Speaker 3 (19:39):
I'm here for the rights of.
Speaker 4 (19:40):
Children over Yes, this is not the right schools, children
that we're scared to go in that vacuum.
Speaker 2 (19:44):
Hey, but I not to go in that bathroom. The
administration name pad.
Speaker 4 (19:49):
Just be dows have to either right or moral or
value by everybody seas going.
Speaker 2 (19:57):
Because what you're doing is wrong. I his permission. In
a na is loved, She is loved, She is loved,
She is what she wants to be. You don't get
to tell her that you're not her parents. I could
see whatever I want if you don't.
Speaker 1 (20:15):
Anyway, if you would have told me when I started
in radio in nineteen eighty seven that I'd be talking
about politicians fighting for the right to put feminine hygiene
products in boys' bathrooms in grade school. I wouldn't have
believed you. You know, if you would have told me
that if you send your kid off to college, they
(20:37):
spend their first day at school walking around a courtyard
asking people what pronoun would you like to be called by?
I probably would not have believed you. If you would
have told me that there are vice presidential candidates that
run states that offer gender affirming care for minors without
(20:57):
parental consent, I probably would.
Speaker 2 (20:59):
Not have believed you. But that's the world we're now
living it.
Speaker 1 (21:03):
That's where the American First Legal Center and their new
Parent and Student Action Center is all about. Gean Hamilton
is with us, he's heading this up. How are you,
mister Hamilton, Welcome back to the program.
Speaker 3 (21:15):
I'm doing well.
Speaker 4 (21:16):
Thanks for having me on, Sean.
Speaker 2 (21:18):
Would you have believed it, you know, thirty forty years ago.
Speaker 3 (21:21):
No way, no way, There's not a chance.
Speaker 4 (21:24):
And it's really unreal because it's not just that one
school district in California, right, we know this is happening
all across the country. Every parent across the country is
dealing with similar issues on a daily basis, and so
this new action center is precisely for those types of
situations like the clip you played. Say that your daughter
(21:48):
is attending school and your school district has a policy
that allows young men to go into the bathroom with her.
We have a template for you and an explainer and
resources to be able to push back, to file a
complaint asserting your child's rights under Title nine of the
Civil Rights Act. You submit this complaint to the Department
(22:10):
of Education, then they can act on it well.
Speaker 1 (22:14):
So, in other words, whatever situation parents and students may
find themselves in, you are providing a template for them
to follow so that they can go through the proper
procedure and fight back.
Speaker 4 (22:26):
One hundred percent Sean, that is exactly what this is about. So,
whether we're talking about Title nine, whether we're talking about
race discriminations under Title six, whether we're talking about radical
curricula being introduced into schools, in proper surveys, soliciting their
views on matters of sexuality, and all kinds of other issues,
(22:46):
we are equipping parents with the tools that they need
to fight back, to push back, to go through the
proper channels to hold people accountable. Because as great as
it is and as wonderful as it is that we
have an administration in Washington, d C. That finally supports
and believes in the rights of parents across this country.
There's only so much that they can do on their own,
(23:07):
and so what these tools enable parents to do is
to push back at the local level and to also
let the federal government intervene on their behalf where there
are violations of the students' rights.
Speaker 1 (23:20):
Quick break right back more with Gene Hamilton. He is
the new president of america First Legal that was created
by Stephen Miller. He's launched a new service for parents.
It's called Parents and Student Action Center, so you can
deal with the woke mob in your school district.
Speaker 3 (23:43):
The final hour of the Sean Hannity shows up next.
Speaker 1 (23:46):
Hang on for Sean's Conservative solutions.
Speaker 4 (23:52):
This coming March.
Speaker 2 (23:55):
It runs in exactly the opposite direction, and it would
be I suspect a near unanimity in the room that
trans athletes have no place in.
Speaker 3 (24:07):
The female category. I don't think this is any question.
Speaker 2 (24:10):
I just think it was a strange.
Speaker 3 (24:12):
I mean I felt, I mean I was the reason
I'm ashamed of my performance of that panel because I
share your.
Speaker 2 (24:19):
Position one.
Speaker 1 (24:22):
And I was Colt all right, we continue now. Geene
Hamilton is with us. If you're having problems with DEI
or a woke agenda in your public school, you want
to you're gonna want to get in touch with the
American First Legal Parent and Student Action Center. We continue
with its new president, Jean Hamilton. I think it's great
that you're doing this. I love that American First Legal
(24:44):
even exists in the first place. This is definitely definitely needed,
But I know it's it's kind of lonely for parents
if if they're standing out there, A lot of parents
just want to put their head in the They don't
want to be confrontational. Most most parents are not like Linda.
They're not as vocal. They're not showing up at school
(25:07):
board meetings. I never went to a school board meeting
in my life, to be very frank with you, you know,
the only issue I had when my son was in
sixth grade many years ago was I knew a science
teacher wanted to show the kids Earth and the Balance
by Al Gore, and I said, my son will not
be attending that class, and I'm sure his grade will
not suffer. And that was the end of that conversation.
(25:29):
That was it his grade did not suffer by the way, that's.
Speaker 3 (25:33):
Great, John.
Speaker 4 (25:34):
Yeah, Look, I think parents.
Speaker 2 (25:36):
Like, well, you want to know.
Speaker 1 (25:37):
The sad part is I'm going to be very blunt.
Because I'm a public figure that you know, there was
a certain degree of of I would even call it
unnatural fear that I might say something publicly, and that
gave me a lot more leverage than the average parent,
which is unfair. I don't deserve it. But I also
(25:58):
spoke of you know, there were of other parents that
took my lead on it, and they said, yeah, well,
if your son's not going, and mine's not going either,
and it worked out for other people as well.
Speaker 2 (26:08):
But it shouldn't take that.
Speaker 4 (26:10):
No, it shouldn't. It shouldn't take that. And what these
tools are intended to do, and you can find them
on our website. If you just google America First Legal
Parent and Student Action Center, or you go to our
ex page, or you go to any of our other
social media pages, you can find the links to these tools.
What these tools enable parents to do is to push back,
but also there's a way that you can talk contact
(26:30):
America First Legal and our team will evaluate any case
that's referred to as for potential legal action. And so
just to give you a couple of examples, we represent
a student in her family in Fairfax County, Virginia, which
is at the epicenter of some of this ridiculousness. We
also now represent, in partnership with other lawyers, the two
(26:50):
parents in Loudon County, or the two students, two young
boys who were punished by the school district for videotaping
a girl going into their bathroom.
Speaker 1 (27:01):
Well, let me ask you about this then, because I
think you know and I'm very aware of the case
that you're talking about. Yeah, because this is now mom's
confronted by a teacher for protesting boys in their daughter's bathroom,
and I mean that's like almost standard. Fair Let me
ask you about the Seattle case, where the school district
there all kids need to learn about gender and sexuality.
(27:23):
Parents are not not allowed there to opt out their
kids about opt out requests. Seattle Public school Schools works
to provide a wide range of educational opportunities that reflect
whose students are, help them build empathy for others, and
prepare them to be compassionate citizens of a diverse and
(27:44):
changing world. There is no option to quote opt students
out of learning about particular identities or groups of people.
This guidance is reinforced by the State Superintendent's office the
policies of other major urban dey districts, including states like California,
New York, et cetera, et cetera. So you can't even
(28:05):
opt your kids out legally if you're in Seattle. I'm sorry.
Doesn't that conflict with something called parental rights?
Speaker 4 (28:14):
Yes, yes it does, Sean, And look, I suspect that
the Seattle Public school system is in They're in the
FA stage of the phrase, and the FO will come
soon because they are flatly wrong. Federal law under the
PPRA permit students and parents to withdraw from this type
(28:36):
of radical curriculum from being forced upon them. They can
opt out, and the Supreme Court affirmed the rights of
parents to be able to opt their kids out of
this type of radical ideology in classes just earlier this year,
and in case my mood versus Taylor, So, Seattle public schools,
they might think that they're doing something, they might think
(28:58):
that they're on solid ground, But with action from committed
parents and with the right legal support, we can fight back,
and we will, and we can hold people like Seattle
Public schools accountable.
Speaker 2 (29:10):
How can people get in touch with you because we
have to run.
Speaker 4 (29:13):
Go to our website aflegal dot org and there's a
contact US formed everywhere and fill it out and we'll
be happy to hear from any parents.
Speaker 1 (29:20):
All right, that's AFL dot org. We appreciate it. Gene Hamilton,
thank you so much for being with us. It's a great,
great service you're providing.
The Sean Hannity Show News
Host
Sean Hannity
Popular Podcasts
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
NFL Daily with Gregg Rosenthal
Gregg Rosenthal and a rotating crew of elite NFL Media co-hosts, including Patrick Claybon, Colleen Wolfe, Steve Wyche, Nick Shook and Jourdan Rodrigue of The Athletic get you caught up daily on all the NFL news and analysis you need to be smarter and funnier than your friends.
The Joe Rogan Experience
The official podcast of comedian Joe Rogan.