June 19, 2024 • 31 mins
Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky is here to discuss today’s hearing on the truth behind Covid-19. He is a ranking member of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, and today was the first bipartisan senate hearing on the origins of COVID-19. Senator Paul has worked for nearly two years to secure this hearing that will allow the American people to hear from expert witnesses on the possibility that COVID-19 was the result of a lab leak.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Thanks Scot chat an hour two Sean Hannity Show, Toll free,
our numbers eight hundred and ninety four one Sean if
you want to be a part of the program. We
are learning more and more and more about how much
we were outright lied to as it relates to COVID nineteen.
And it's it's kind of scary that the government on
such a high level and so many of our quote trusted,
(00:25):
supposedly trusted institutions, you know, went with outright falsehoods as
it relates to the vaccine. Oh, you get the vaccine
and you're never ever going to get COVID wrong. If
you get the vaccine, you're never going to infect others wrong.
I mean everything that they told us HCQ doesn't do
a thing wrong. I mean, we have how many studies
(00:46):
now that have shown that taken early at mitigate symptoms
natural immunity. Oh, you still need the shot, you know,
even young people need the shot. But young people weren't
dying from COVID nineteen. And now nobody really wants to
talk about the impact of you know, taking the shot,
getting the boosters and myocarditis and people that have been
(01:09):
having issues with blood clotting and the connection to it.
Kansas has now sued Pfiser over misrepresentations and adverse events
because of the COVID nineteen vaccine AstraZeneca, which was similar
to Maderna and Peiser that's been pulled off the market
in Great Britain. And now we have a whole new
(01:30):
controversy emerging, and that is the former CDC director Robert
Redfield is now predicting a bird flu pandemic that will
happen in you know, just a short period of time. Anyway,
he was discussing this and he actually is predicting when
it enters humans compared to COVID nineteen, he said the
(01:51):
mortality rate will be somewhere between twenty five and fifty percent.
And he's predicting that this is going to be the
next pandemic and I'll likely happen sooner than we think.
I don't know whether to believe anybody at this particular
point in time. And then he went through great specificity
about the receptors that scientists have found five amino acids
(02:12):
that must change and the key receptor in order for
bird fluid to gain a propensity to bind to a
human receptor and then be able to go human to human.
Is that once the virus gains the ability to attach
to the human receptor and go human to human, well
that's when you're going to have the pandemic. And it's
just a matter of time. He doesn't know how long
(02:32):
it will take for the five amino acids to change,
but since it's been detected in cattle herds around the country,
he says he's concerned. And I think the most frightening
things that he said, I know exactly what amino acids
have to change, because in twenty twelve, against my recommendation,
scientists did these experiments actually publish them. I'm like, you
(02:54):
got to be kidding me, so manipulating more viruses in
labs and that these will wipe out twenty five to
fifty percent of the population. The one person that has
really been in the forefront of exposing so much about
what has gone wrong with COVID and challenging Anthony Fauci
has been Senator Rand Paul. I mean, it's all chronicle
(03:16):
that is best selling book which is called Deception, The
Great COVID Cover Up. It's on Hannity dot com, Amazon
dot com, bookstores everywhere, and here's him saying, Fauci and
other scientists privately worried about COVID being engineered in a lab,
and then publicly they just dismissed it and lied to you.
Speaker 2 (03:34):
Federal court orders reveal that even doctor Fauci himself privately
acknowledge concerns about gain and function research in Wuhan and
mutations in the virus that suggest it might have been
engineered just days before he commissioned the Proximal Origin vapor.
Despite these private doubts, publicly, these so called experts in
(03:55):
their allies were dismissing the LAbau theory as a conspiracy.
Within days, Anderson, Lipken, and Gary were putting final touches
on what would be remembered as one of the most
remarkable reversals in modern history. In their Proximal Origin paper,
these scientists concluded, we do not believe that any type
of laboratory based scenario is plausible. Privately they were saying
(04:19):
one thing. Publicly they were saying another. Media pundance parroted
the narrative, while social media platform censored discussion about the
lab leak, labeling it as misinformation and stifling open discourse
about the virus' origins. The cover up went beyond public statements.
Federal agencies and key officials withheld and continue to conceal
(04:43):
crucial information from both Congress and the public.
Speaker 1 (04:47):
Anyway, Senator and doctor Ram Paul is back with us.
By the way, The COVID Cover Up is his book.
If you haven't gotten a copy of it, it's a
must read. It's on Hannity dot com. Senator, welcome back.
Speaker 3 (05:01):
Thanks having me Sean. You know, the Avian flu is
a really intriguing subject, and this is what kind of
got it all started, because back in twenty ten, some
scientists in the Netherlands purposely mutated it, gave it the
five to eight new mutations and made it aerosolized, spreading
through the air, and more transmissible to mammals. And people said,
(05:22):
what kind of crazy research is this? But Anthony Fauci
responded this way. He said, yes, something like this could
create a pandemic, but the knowledge is worth the risk.
And that statement, to this day, I think is probably
one of the most careless, arrogant, and wrongheaded statements that
I can imagine from somebody in public health that the
risk of a pandemic, you know, it's worth the risk
(05:44):
to get the knowledge. And I'm guessing that a million
American families would probably say to Anthony Felton, you know what,
it wasn't worth the risk from my loved one to
die for the knowledge. And many scientists we had one
in committee today said that really we haven't gained useful
knowledge from these kind of aware of its.
Speaker 1 (06:00):
Well, the idea that Fauci said in twenty twelve, even
if it meant a worldwide pandemic, he's still in favor
of gain of function research is beyond any comprehension that
I have. The fact that Director Redfield is actually saying
that he's aware of the very experiments that took place
as it relates to ab and flu or you know this,
(06:23):
that we've been talking about bird flu that would take
out twenty five to fifty percent of the population or
have a twenty five or fifty percent mortality, and that
he talks about the five specific amino acids that would
need to change, and that that research has already taken
place in twenty twelve and they know exactly how to
(06:44):
do it in a lab tells me that it's almost inevitable.
I mean, do you agree with that analysis that it
would wipe out twenty five to fifty percent of the population.
Speaker 3 (06:52):
Yeah, if it's mutated, And the thing is is it's
less likely to happen in nature, it's more likely to
happen in a lab. So the real debate is should
we be funding people who are doing these kind of
experiments in the lab and we don't know for certain
it might not happen in nature, but I think it's
less likely to. Animal viruses tend to do very well
(07:13):
within the animal and don't transmit as well with humans
if you mutate them, like we believe that the lab
in Wuhan mutated COVID nineteen to make it more transmissible.
Then an animal virus all of a sudden shows up
in humans and spreads like wildfire. That was COVID nineteen.
It's one of the arguments for why we think it
was manipulating the lab is that most animal viruses, like
(07:34):
the first stars one back in two thousand and three,
it didn't transmit very well, so it could get into
humans and it was pretty deadly, about ten percent deadly,
but it didn't transmit very well. So if people just
stayed home when they were sick, it should have burned
itself out pretty quickly, but mutating it is the biggest age,
or the biggest age or for Avian flu or frankly
for Spanish flu. You know, the Spanish flu was from
(07:56):
twenty from nineteen eighteen and somewhere between fifteen, you know,
one hundred million people died worldwide. We three scientists the
MIT wanted to prove that the Biden administration wasn't doing enough.
The Biden administration says that fixed the problem, and by
guidance that they wrote some kind of minor rule that
it won't happen. So three scientists at MIT a couple
(08:17):
of weeks ago said, well, we'll just try to order
the pieces to make Spanish flu online and see if
we can do it.
Speaker 4 (08:22):
Now.
Speaker 3 (08:22):
They told the FBI and Advance were doing it because
it is illegal, but they were able to get the
pieces to make Spanish flu from ninety five percent of
the companies. They ordered from these DNA companies. And so
the fact that you can order up the parts for
the Spanish flu and created in your lab should scare
us all.
Speaker 1 (08:40):
It should scare us in a world where there's a
lot of evil actors. Then China, you know, we could
start with them, and Russia and Iran and North Korea. Don't.
I wouldn't put anything past any of these countries. It's
it's kind of scary that And by the way, that's
why people need to read Deception and the Great COVID
cover Up. I mean when we talk about, you know,
(09:03):
the fact that we funded the Wuhan Virology Lab with
a knew coronavirus research and gain and function research took place,
and nobody did anything about it. And that's again part
of your book, Deception, the Great COVID cover Up. It's
on Hannity dot com, Amazon dot com, bookstores around the
country or people urge people to read it, and they
knew about it the whole time, and they lied to
(09:24):
the American people the whole time. You know, if God forbid,
we faced another COVID moment or pandemic, maybe it is
bird flu. I don't know. Uh, you know, how does
anybody trust anything that they have to say? I'll never
listen to these people again.
Speaker 3 (09:40):
Yeah, there's still a lack of curiosity. And you're right
that was brought up in our hearing today, that sort
of the people that are hesitant to believe government scientists
now are because they haven't been honest with us. And
we had a group of virologists, international virologists surrounding Anthony Fauci,
and privately they were all saying that they believed that
the virus looked manipulated. Some of them are fifty fifty,
(10:02):
some of them are eighty twenty, some of them are
ninety ten. Some of them were convinced it just couldn't
have happened in nature. But then almost exactly the same day,
they're saying that they're publicly putting out a paper saying
the opposite. And that's why today one of the scientists
on our side said that this scientist, Bob Gary, had
committed fraud and that three of his papers are being
(10:23):
retracted at this point. And these are the people that
are arguing for skimpy or no controls on gain of function.
And we've got to win this debate or I believe
somebody will maliciously mutate either smallpox or the Spanish flu
or the Avian flu, and then we're going to have
something that makes COVID nineteen look like a game. I mean,
(10:45):
we're going to look like a play game compared to
what can happen if one of these more DEBI viruses
escapes the lab.
Speaker 1 (10:52):
All right, clickbreak bore with Senator Ram paula Kentucky on
the other side. Also, your calls coming up eight hundred
and ninety four one Sean our number. As we continue.
Speaker 4 (11:06):
Every single day.
Speaker 5 (11:08):
This is the Sean Hannity Show.
Speaker 1 (11:11):
Hey, what if your home's title, which is the legal
document that proves you own your home, is in some
criminals name well, that's called home title theft and criminals
all over the world can find your homes title online
and then they'll forge your signature. They'll take out loans
against your home or even worse, sell your home. Now,
how do you know some criminals not taking over the
(11:32):
title to your home. You can find out what's sign
up at home title lock dot com and use the
promo code Sean se A n All right, we continue
with Kentucky Senator medical doctor Ram Paul is with us.
His book is Deception, The Great COVID Cover Up. Let
me change topics on you. In nine days is going
(11:53):
to be a presidential debate, Donald Trump versus Joe Biden,
and uh a phenomenon took place. I assume you were
at the State of the Union. I'm guessing you were
at the State of the Union and we saw a
Joe Biden that we'd never seen before and we have
not seen since. And I referred to it as jacked
(12:13):
up Joe or hyper caffeinated Joe or something Joe. I
don't know. It was not that Joe Biden. We knew
before the debate, and we've not seen that Joe Biden
emerged since. And I'm predicting that that Joe Biden will
probably re emerge for the debate with Donald Trump. I
don't know why I think that, but I think that
you know, whatever that was caffeine and red bull, I
(12:35):
don't know that they gave Joe. I think probably they're
going to follow the same protocol, which was it's interesting
seventy percent of Americans even support drug testing the candidates,
which I think would be a good idea, which Joe
Biden will never agree to. The question I have for
you is, you know, did you notice the same thing.
(12:57):
You're a medical doctor, and it is fascinating to me
that after the State of the Union, we never saw
that Joe Biden again, and he went back to being,
you know, his his cognitive mess self. And my question
is that because maybe all of that quote red Bull
caffeine or something else or whatever, it was dangerous to
(13:20):
his health. Because I've got to imagine if that worked
that night, why not why not give him the same
caffeine or red Bull every day.
Speaker 3 (13:27):
Yeah, I don't think you can make a medical diagnosis
over TV, but there have been some that conjecture that adderall, well.
Speaker 1 (13:34):
We're not on TV, we're on radio. But that's okay, senator,
I'll forgive you.
Speaker 3 (13:39):
Or radio, but when you see him on TV that
you can't make a diagnosis of washing him on TV.
But some have conjectured adderall other stimulants, you know. But
what it reminds me of, though, if you were giving
advice to Trump on this reminds me of the old
Rush Limbas skit. Remember when he said, hit debate people
that you have to like Kaye is the left loads
of his brain behind you? Because one load of his
(14:01):
brain was enough to defeat most people. One debate had
a funny skit on that. But it's kind of what
Trump needs to think about, is I think he can
handily defeat him in the two debates that I remember
last time. The first one he did it, but he
was so aggressive that he didn't come off as well.
And I think independents won a nicer version of Donald Trump,
and that's who you're trying to convience. Really, forty percent
(14:23):
of us are on one side, the other in about
ten or twenty percent in the middle, and I think
those require a more friendly sort of approach. And it's
it's hard because you have to win. You got to
win your points. You want to intellectually defeat your opponent,
but you have to do it in a way in
which people don't think you're an ogre. And I think
the second debate, when Trump came back the second time,
I think some people had coached him a little bit
(14:43):
on that. And I think he won both debates intellectually,
but I think he came off better in the second debate,
and that's what the I.
Speaker 1 (14:51):
Actually think they're doing him a favor by muting his microphone.
But we do know it's going to be a three
on one debate. I mean, I don't trust fake Jake
Tapper or fake Dana Bash. I mean their liberal talk
show host. They're not going to be fair.
Speaker 3 (15:04):
Yeah, it's hard to find somebody that would be objective.
And I think there's a lot of indications that CNN
may not be the most objective of networks, So I'm
not I'm surprised he chose to do it, to tell
you the truth, but yeah, you know, and being willing
to debate is important. I think the fact that he's
willing to debate, at least with Boden, I think is
a sign that he had to do something to go
(15:26):
forward with that. And I think a lot of people
will tune in. Frankly, they want to see how both
of them can still handle themselves.
Speaker 1 (15:32):
Oh, that must see TV. You got to watch that. Yeah,
and I know you have to run, Senator, but we
always appreciate you having us. By the way, it's called deception,
the Great COVID cover up. Senator Rampaul medical doctor Rampaul
Amazon dot com. We have a link on Hannity dot
com and bookstores around the country. Senator, Thank you as always.
Speaker 3 (15:53):
Thanks all, John r.
Speaker 1 (15:55):
Twenty five to the top of the hour, watch shows.
Schedules suddenly become even lighter than usual as he now
prepares to stay up later at night, change his clock,
and of course, drink a lot of red bill and
start getting used to being jacked up. Joe again, nine
days till the debate, one hundred and thirty nine days
(16:16):
till election day, and just ninety days until early voting
starts in Pennsylvania, and then it rolls out around the country.
Hey want to remind you, since the terror attacks in
Israel on October the seventh, we see what's happening. Anti
Semitism on the rise all around the country, you know,
on the halls of Congress, college campuses, all across the country,
(16:37):
all across Europe, all across Australia, all across the world.
It's sad and it's sick, and it's reminiscent of the
nineteen thirties. But we have proudly partnered with the International
Fellowship of Christians and Jews, and frankly, we're just asking
that you take a stand with us and the IFCJ
you know, when it matters, and frankly, let the people
(17:00):
in Israel no, they're not alone, that you support their
right to win their war against radical Islamic terrorism. Now,
for the entire month of June, we are asking that
you just simply sign a pledge. That pledge will be
delivered to the President of Israel to show that here
in America we're not only standing with them in solidarity,
(17:20):
but we're speaking up and not afraid to speak up,
and we're taking a stand with the IFCJ International Fellowship
of Christians and Jews and letting the people in Israel
know that they're not alone here. Now, just to simply
sign the pledge, go to their website. It's one word
support IFCJ dot org. SUPPORTIFCJ dot org. Hopefully you'll stand
(17:42):
with us and take a stand today. All right, let's
get to our phones. Eight hundred and ninety four one
sean if you want to be a part of the program.
Margie is out in Long Island and New York. Margie, Hi,
how are you. How's my old stomping grum You miss me?
Anybody out there miss me?
Speaker 4 (17:59):
Oh?
Speaker 6 (17:59):
Yeah, miss you? But I want to hear more of you.
So we've got to just keep on listening, and I
hope everybody else can come on over and listen to
you as well from the other side.
Speaker 1 (18:08):
But uh, yeah, you're very grateful to our affiliate in
New York, the all do Am seven to ten WR
and the great Mark Simone, and we've got a great
team there.
Speaker 5 (18:19):
Yeah.
Speaker 6 (18:19):
I listened to you guys, on the way I'm home
and on the way into work. I have an hour
ride into Melville every morning, so it's it's a good
station to keep me posted with everything of what's going on.
So thank you, Old I'm just I'm very that was
my dog, Sorry about that. I'm just very frustrated because
even though we hear about the polls, you know, Trump
(18:40):
is soaring and Biden. I want to see something like
ten Biden and ninety percent Trump, and I think that
it should be that, And I want to know why
isn't it. People I talk to at work there's still
you know, they don't like Trump, and I just can't.
Speaker 5 (18:55):
I can't.
Speaker 6 (18:56):
It just it kills me. I don't know what else
to say. You know, it's just frustrating, Goshan, it really is.
Speaker 1 (19:02):
Look, I know, I you can start asking them questions,
you know, simple questions. You know, do you think that
Joe has a serious cognitive decline problem? And just just
sit back and let him answer? Ask him about Trump's conviction,
Say what was he convicted of? And just shut up
and let an answer. You can ask them, do you
(19:23):
think that Joe's border policies have created a national security
danger for the country. Do you think Joe's economic policies
have benefited you and your family and most Americans?
Speaker 5 (19:36):
Uh?
Speaker 1 (19:37):
Do you like defund, dismantle and no bail laws?
Speaker 7 (19:40):
Uh?
Speaker 1 (19:41):
Do you like the fact that Joe has basically surrendered
in the war on terrorism and abandoned Israel? Are you
concerned that you know the world's most nefarious players uh?
And are top geo political foes. Are you concerned at
all that these people are on the march and Joe
(20:01):
Biden just seems completely incapable. And I'm willing to confront them,
you know, just ask the basic questions and let them
try and answer, and they're not going to be able
to answer, and in a weird way, you'll be kind
of confronting them and saying to them, why are you
supporting this guy? So I think you have an opportunity.
You know, with everybody that you run into, you can
(20:22):
do it in a nice way. I'm not saying to
get in a fistfight over it. But but you're also
in a very very liberal state. I mean, New York
is pretty much like California. They've lost their mind and
it's become for so many uninhabitable, and you know that's
why you see Wall Street South now all these big
(20:43):
companies are leaving. That's why you see a mass migration
out of New York, out of New Jersey, out of Illinois,
out of California to Florida.
Speaker 6 (20:53):
Probably soon too, you know, as soon as I can retire,
I'll be out of here too, because I just it
just doesn't make sense. And you know, I lived here
all my life. I was born and Grace on Long Island,
Master and stuff Accounty.
Speaker 4 (21:06):
Listen.
Speaker 1 (21:06):
I have a lot of friends still that are there,
a lot, and I'm very grateful for the opportunities that
New York gave me. But it's not my first rodeo
outside of New York. I lived five years in Rhode Island,
five years in California. I lived two years in Alabama,
four years in Georgia, and I've kind of been you know,
(21:28):
when you start out in radio, you travel, you just
you go wherever they're willing to hire you, and you know,
so for me, but I found my home. I will
say that I feel at home in Florida, and this
is you know, this, this is the place that I
want to be and the place that I feel like
I belong.
Speaker 6 (21:47):
Well, I'm going to take your advice for speaking with
my coworkers. And also I'll probably call you in a
couple of years to find out what areas in Florida
are the best to be because a couple of years
from now will be down there, right right around the Corno.
Speaker 5 (22:01):
I mean maybe. No.
Speaker 1 (22:02):
Let me tell you, you really can't make a mistake
in Florida now. If you're looking for coastal areas, whether
you like the West coast of Florida, you know, Sarasota,
Fort Myers, Naples, Florida, Whether you like Southern Florida, South
Florida and Miami, A lot of people like that area.
Whether you go up the east coast of Florida, like
you know an Alapan and Palm Beach and Delray Beach
(22:26):
and Boyton Beach and straight on up the coast to Jupiter.
If you're big into golf, you're gonna love Jupiter Vero Beach.
You can't go wrong. If you're in Tampa, you can't
go wrong. If you're in Orlando and the I for Carda,
you can't go wrong. You really, I mean the Panhandle, Jacksonville,
I mean, there's so many beautiful parts of the state,
(22:48):
and I know that you know it'd be worth taking
a couple of vacations down here. Come on down, take
a look and see where you and your family may
want to settle.
Speaker 6 (22:57):
Yeah, I have a family recently moved down there a
couple of years now, so we'll probably end up down
there visiting and checking around and all, even the Carolinas.
But I'll definitely take your word of advice about speaking,
you know, with co workers and all. And then.
Speaker 1 (23:13):
I love the Carolinas. I like North End, South Carolina.
I think they're great places. I like Tennessee also, I
like Texas also. I mean, depends what kind of lifestyle
you want. Maybe maybe you can take the cold I can't.
You know, maybe get yourself a nice Montana little baby
ranch and and and raise a couple of cattle and
hang out with a buffalo row who knows we have
a beautiful country.
Speaker 5 (23:34):
I'll tell you that I know we do.
Speaker 6 (23:36):
We really do. We have to take advantage of it
and make it, make it the best it can be.
Speaker 4 (23:40):
You know.
Speaker 1 (23:41):
So Yeah, I've never been afraid to move, and other
people have and I'm just not a homebuddy like that.
I I don't get locked into houses. I don't get
locked into properties. I just you know, I try to
be happy wherever I am and I have got in
my life, So I mean, what else do you need
beyond that?
Speaker 6 (24:02):
That's right, that's right, you said it, all.
Speaker 1 (24:05):
Right, thank you? Margie got bleshing all my friends in
New York. Okay, Gail is in Washington State. Your state's
a mess too. How are you, Gal?
Speaker 5 (24:14):
I'm doing well?
Speaker 4 (24:15):
So things.
Speaker 1 (24:16):
Hey, what's going on?
Speaker 6 (24:18):
Well?
Speaker 5 (24:18):
I was thinking about the debate and the way that
Trump should handle it. I think he and his team
should put together a website that has facts and links
to all the information that they will most likely be
covering during the debate and while it's going on, while
he's got eyeballs on him, he should give that website
out and encourage people to go there and do research
(24:39):
for themselves and see the policy, see the numbers, see
the difference for themselves.
Speaker 1 (24:45):
I don't think it's a bad idea, and I think
that would be great for Trump to do that. I
would expect that a lot of the questions are going
to be very predictable. Probably half the debate is going
to be about democracy and peril retribution. It's gonna be
about January sixth, it's going to be about the twenty
(25:06):
twenty election. It's going to be about abortion. They're going
to try and avoid the topics that would impact Joe
and they're just going to try and stick with the
superfluous Donald Trump will be. It'll be a three on
one debate. He's certainly aware of it. I think the
biggest thing challenge he has is not to allow them
(25:26):
to piss him off, because that's what they're gonna be.
Joe's strategy is going to be to call him a
convict a thousand times, and I wouldn't react to it.
And my answer would be, Joe, when you're out of office,
hopefully in January of twenty twenty five, be careful about
the lawfare of that you started, because there's a lot
of incriminating evidence on your son's laptop about you. But
(25:48):
we can save that for another day. There you go.
Speaker 4 (25:53):
I think you're right.
Speaker 5 (25:53):
That's exactly how it's going to play out during debate.
Speaker 1 (25:57):
Hang in there, Gail, God bless you are. Merlin. Arizona.
We need Arizona desperately. How are you, Merlin?
Speaker 4 (26:04):
Yes, it's pleasure to speak with you. Sean. I'm a
big fan of yours have been listening to you for.
Speaker 7 (26:09):
A long time since the Hannity Combs erav.
Speaker 4 (26:14):
I do have a concern.
Speaker 7 (26:15):
I've been hearing a lot on the polls and stuff
like that. It's almost as if the Democrats know that
they're going to be losing the presidency and they're not
really throwing much weight into that to keeping it.
Speaker 4 (26:28):
I noticed in the swing states like.
Speaker 7 (26:30):
Nevada and Arizona where I'm at, that he's leading greatly
in those polls, but the other ones like Ruben Diego
and all of the Senates in the Congress positions, the
Democrats are leading. So it's almost as if they don't
care about the presidency. We'll be sitting there cheering on
(26:51):
when Trump wins and grateful that he's in there, but
then it could possibly turn out to be a lane
duck presidency if we lose the House in the Senate.
Speaker 4 (26:59):
And I just wanted to know your take on that.
Speaker 1 (27:01):
What you're saying is absolutely true. There's a gap between
Donald Trump seems to be outperforming sending candidates and congressional candidates,
and all I can say to any voter is don't
split your ticket. That if you want Donald Trump to
be able to govern and get things done. He's going
to need a Republican Senate or Republican House, and he's
(27:22):
going to need the biggest majorities possible. So if you
want Donald Trump to have a successful four years, you've
got to make that a top priority for sure. So
you know, I do see the gap. It does concern me,
but I'm just urging people, you know, we still have
time for these candidates to step up and get their
(27:42):
message out. And I'd make that very plea to people.
Don't send Donald Trump to Washington alone, you know, send
people that support him and support his agenda with him
so that he can be successful. And the more successful
he is, the better off it is for all of us.
Kind of that simple.
Speaker 7 (28:00):
I agree one hundred percent. I enjoyed the four years
that he was in. My pay went up drastically. I've
been a truck driver for thirty three years, and now.
Speaker 4 (28:09):
We're feeling the crunch of it all as.
Speaker 7 (28:12):
To what's going on, especially with the high fuel prices
and everything.
Speaker 4 (28:15):
And I just like I said, I've seen both those
and listening to the polls.
Speaker 7 (28:20):
And I think it was Jake Tapper that kind of
brought it out and Mike Del Jorno brought a little
bit onto it, also, saying that you know, let's let's
not lose the prize, let's not send him there by himself.
Speaker 4 (28:31):
We've got to look at everything, not just the presidency.
Speaker 1 (28:35):
Well said. I can't say it any better. And I
hope people now, with one hundred and thirty nine days
left all election Day and ninety days till early voting starts,
I hope people are dialing in because this is going
to happen fast. We're nine days out of this first debate.
These are important, consequential times, and we've got to treat
him as such. All right, quick break right back to
(28:55):
our phones, our toll free numbers, eight hundred and ninety
four one, Sean, if you want to be a part
of the program as we continue this Tuesday, on the left.
Speaker 2 (29:08):
Is trying to extinguish conservative voices, and he's.
Speaker 1 (29:12):
Fighting fire with fire, standing up for your beliefs.
Speaker 3 (29:17):
It's Sean Hannity.
Speaker 4 (29:19):
On the air. Right now.
Speaker 1 (29:25):
Let's get back to our busy phones, eight hundred and
ninety four to one. Shawn is on number. Vicky is next. Vicky. Hi,
how are you glad you called?
Speaker 8 (29:33):
Hi? Sean? I'm a longtime listener watcher. Thank you time caller.
Speaker 1 (29:40):
I'm glad you checked in. What's going on out in Arizona?
Speaker 8 (29:43):
Well, live in Prescott and I cannot get a job.
To save my soul, I am now supplementing my meager
social security with delivering food.
Speaker 1 (29:55):
And actually, are you like, do you like do Uber
eats or Instagra card? What do you do or dash?
If you do door dash, are you allowed to do
Uber Eats? Are you allowed to do instatcart?
Speaker 8 (30:07):
You know, I think you can. You'd have to really
more manage your time pretty well because when you're on
door dash and you've got to set number of hours
you're going to work, they expect you to be picking
up their orders. So it's kind of I would think
it would be pretty hard to do two things, but
I do know dorivers out there that do it.
Speaker 1 (30:28):
You're you're kind of stuck doing this because of the
Biden economy, that's what you're telling us.
Speaker 8 (30:33):
Absolutely, this didn't happen to me until twenty twenty one.
I was and then my husband died in twenty My
savings went out, our savings, the stock market went you
know what happened?
Speaker 4 (30:46):
Was it?
Speaker 8 (30:47):
And so yes, I'm now living on a very mejor
social Security and this is the job that I can
get at my age. That's that's the thing. Nobody will
hire anybody over sixty five?
Speaker 4 (31:02):
Is it?
Speaker 1 (31:03):
Is it enough to help you get by fairly?
Speaker 8 (31:06):
But I am getting Yes.
Speaker 4 (31:08):
Uh.
Speaker 1 (31:09):
I'm proud of you, you know why, because you do
what you need to do to survive. You're a survivor.
And I like your grit and I love your toughness.
I wish you didn't have to do it. I wish
you could just enjoy your retirement years. I hope you
find some personal satisfaction in doing it as well, because
you're providing a great service and doing a great job
for people. And uh, you know, I have more questions.
(31:33):
I don't have time, unfortunately, but you know, uh, stand by,
we're gonna, we're gonna, we're gonna send you out a
little care package.
Speaker 8 (31:39):
Okay, Oh thank you, Sean.
Speaker 1 (31:42):
Love you, I stay, stay on hold, love you back.
Thanks Scot chat an hour two Sean Hannity Show, Toll free,
our numbers eight hundred and ninety four one Sean if
you want to be a part of the program. We
are learning more and more and more about how much
we were outright lied to as it relates to COVID nineteen.
And it's it's kind of scary that the government on
such a high level and so many of our quote trusted,
(00:25):
supposedly trusted institutions, you know, went with outright falsehoods as
it relates to the vaccine. Oh, you get the vaccine
and you're never ever going to get COVID wrong. If
you get the vaccine, you're never going to infect others wrong.
I mean everything that they told us HCQ doesn't do
a thing wrong. I mean, we have how many studies
(00:46):
now that have shown that taken early at mitigate symptoms
natural immunity. Oh, you still need the shot, you know,
even young people need the shot. But young people weren't
dying from COVID nineteen. And now nobody really wants to
talk about the impact of you know, taking the shot,
getting the boosters and myocarditis and people that have been
(01:09):
having issues with blood clotting and the connection to it.
Kansas has now sued Pfiser over misrepresentations and adverse events
because of the COVID nineteen vaccine AstraZeneca, which was similar
to Maderna and Peiser that's been pulled off the market
in Great Britain. And now we have a whole new
(01:30):
controversy emerging, and that is the former CDC director Robert
Redfield is now predicting a bird flu pandemic that will
happen in you know, just a short period of time. Anyway,
he was discussing this and he actually is predicting when
it enters humans compared to COVID nineteen, he said the
(01:51):
mortality rate will be somewhere between twenty five and fifty percent.
And he's predicting that this is going to be the
next pandemic and I'll likely happen sooner than we think.
I don't know whether to believe anybody at this particular
point in time. And then he went through great specificity
about the receptors that scientists have found five amino acids
(02:12):
that must change and the key receptor in order for
bird fluid to gain a propensity to bind to a
human receptor and then be able to go human to human.
Is that once the virus gains the ability to attach
to the human receptor and go human to human, well
that's when you're going to have the pandemic. And it's
just a matter of time. He doesn't know how long
(02:32):
it will take for the five amino acids to change,
but since it's been detected in cattle herds around the country,
he says he's concerned. And I think the most frightening
things that he said, I know exactly what amino acids
have to change, because in twenty twelve, against my recommendation,
scientists did these experiments actually publish them. I'm like, you
(02:54):
got to be kidding me, so manipulating more viruses in
labs and that these will wipe out twenty five to
fifty percent of the population. The one person that has
really been in the forefront of exposing so much about
what has gone wrong with COVID and challenging Anthony Fauci
has been Senator Rand Paul. I mean, it's all chronicle
(03:16):
that is best selling book which is called Deception, The
Great COVID Cover Up. It's on Hannity dot com, Amazon
dot com, bookstores everywhere, and here's him saying, Fauci and
other scientists privately worried about COVID being engineered in a lab,
and then publicly they just dismissed it and lied to you.
Speaker 2 (03:34):
Federal court orders reveal that even doctor Fauci himself privately
acknowledge concerns about gain and function research in Wuhan and
mutations in the virus that suggest it might have been
engineered just days before he commissioned the Proximal Origin vapor.
Despite these private doubts, publicly, these so called experts in
(03:55):
their allies were dismissing the LAbau theory as a conspiracy.
Within days, Anderson, Lipken, and Gary were putting final touches
on what would be remembered as one of the most
remarkable reversals in modern history. In their Proximal Origin paper,
these scientists concluded, we do not believe that any type
of laboratory based scenario is plausible. Privately they were saying
(04:19):
one thing. Publicly they were saying another. Media pundance parroted
the narrative, while social media platform censored discussion about the
lab leak, labeling it as misinformation and stifling open discourse
about the virus' origins. The cover up went beyond public statements.
Federal agencies and key officials withheld and continue to conceal
(04:43):
crucial information from both Congress and the public.
Speaker 1 (04:47):
Anyway, Senator and doctor Ram Paul is back with us.
By the way, The COVID Cover Up is his book.
If you haven't gotten a copy of it, it's a
must read. It's on Hannity dot com. Senator, welcome back.
Speaker 3 (05:01):
Thanks having me Sean. You know, the Avian flu is
a really intriguing subject, and this is what kind of
got it all started, because back in twenty ten, some
scientists in the Netherlands purposely mutated it, gave it the
five to eight new mutations and made it aerosolized, spreading
through the air, and more transmissible to mammals. And people said,
(05:22):
what kind of crazy research is this? But Anthony Fauci
responded this way. He said, yes, something like this could
create a pandemic, but the knowledge is worth the risk.
And that statement, to this day, I think is probably
one of the most careless, arrogant, and wrongheaded statements that
I can imagine from somebody in public health that the
risk of a pandemic, you know, it's worth the risk
(05:44):
to get the knowledge. And I'm guessing that a million
American families would probably say to Anthony Felton, you know what,
it wasn't worth the risk from my loved one to
die for the knowledge. And many scientists we had one
in committee today said that really we haven't gained useful
knowledge from these kind of aware of its.
Speaker 1 (06:00):
Well, the idea that Fauci said in twenty twelve, even
if it meant a worldwide pandemic, he's still in favor
of gain of function research is beyond any comprehension that
I have. The fact that Director Redfield is actually saying
that he's aware of the very experiments that took place
as it relates to ab and flu or you know this,
(06:23):
that we've been talking about bird flu that would take
out twenty five to fifty percent of the population or
have a twenty five or fifty percent mortality, and that
he talks about the five specific amino acids that would
need to change, and that that research has already taken
place in twenty twelve and they know exactly how to
(06:44):
do it in a lab tells me that it's almost inevitable.
I mean, do you agree with that analysis that it
would wipe out twenty five to fifty percent of the population.
Speaker 3 (06:52):
Yeah, if it's mutated, And the thing is is it's
less likely to happen in nature, it's more likely to
happen in a lab. So the real debate is should
we be funding people who are doing these kind of
experiments in the lab and we don't know for certain
it might not happen in nature, but I think it's
less likely to. Animal viruses tend to do very well
(07:13):
within the animal and don't transmit as well with humans
if you mutate them, like we believe that the lab
in Wuhan mutated COVID nineteen to make it more transmissible.
Then an animal virus all of a sudden shows up
in humans and spreads like wildfire. That was COVID nineteen.
It's one of the arguments for why we think it
was manipulating the lab is that most animal viruses, like
(07:34):
the first stars one back in two thousand and three,
it didn't transmit very well, so it could get into
humans and it was pretty deadly, about ten percent deadly,
but it didn't transmit very well. So if people just
stayed home when they were sick, it should have burned
itself out pretty quickly, but mutating it is the biggest age,
or the biggest age or for Avian flu or frankly
for Spanish flu. You know, the Spanish flu was from
(07:56):
twenty from nineteen eighteen and somewhere between fifteen, you know,
one hundred million people died worldwide. We three scientists the
MIT wanted to prove that the Biden administration wasn't doing enough.
The Biden administration says that fixed the problem, and by
guidance that they wrote some kind of minor rule that
it won't happen. So three scientists at MIT a couple
(08:17):
of weeks ago said, well, we'll just try to order
the pieces to make Spanish flu online and see if
we can do it.
Speaker 4 (08:22):
Now.
Speaker 3 (08:22):
They told the FBI and Advance were doing it because
it is illegal, but they were able to get the
pieces to make Spanish flu from ninety five percent of
the companies. They ordered from these DNA companies. And so
the fact that you can order up the parts for
the Spanish flu and created in your lab should scare
us all.
Speaker 1 (08:40):
It should scare us in a world where there's a
lot of evil actors. Then China, you know, we could
start with them, and Russia and Iran and North Korea. Don't.
I wouldn't put anything past any of these countries. It's
it's kind of scary that And by the way, that's
why people need to read Deception and the Great COVID
cover Up. I mean when we talk about, you know,
(09:03):
the fact that we funded the Wuhan Virology Lab with
a knew coronavirus research and gain and function research took place,
and nobody did anything about it. And that's again part
of your book, Deception, the Great COVID cover Up. It's
on Hannity dot com, Amazon dot com, bookstores around the
country or people urge people to read it, and they
knew about it the whole time, and they lied to
(09:24):
the American people the whole time. You know, if God forbid,
we faced another COVID moment or pandemic, maybe it is
bird flu. I don't know. Uh, you know, how does
anybody trust anything that they have to say? I'll never
listen to these people again.
Speaker 3 (09:40):
Yeah, there's still a lack of curiosity. And you're right
that was brought up in our hearing today, that sort
of the people that are hesitant to believe government scientists
now are because they haven't been honest with us. And
we had a group of virologists, international virologists surrounding Anthony Fauci,
and privately they were all saying that they believed that
the virus looked manipulated. Some of them are fifty fifty,
(10:02):
some of them are eighty twenty, some of them are
ninety ten. Some of them were convinced it just couldn't
have happened in nature. But then almost exactly the same day,
they're saying that they're publicly putting out a paper saying
the opposite. And that's why today one of the scientists
on our side said that this scientist, Bob Gary, had
committed fraud and that three of his papers are being
(10:23):
retracted at this point. And these are the people that
are arguing for skimpy or no controls on gain of function.
And we've got to win this debate or I believe
somebody will maliciously mutate either smallpox or the Spanish flu
or the Avian flu, and then we're going to have
something that makes COVID nineteen look like a game. I mean,
(10:45):
we're going to look like a play game compared to
what can happen if one of these more DEBI viruses
escapes the lab.
Speaker 1 (10:52):
All right, clickbreak bore with Senator Ram paula Kentucky on
the other side. Also, your calls coming up eight hundred
and ninety four one Sean our number. As we continue.
Speaker 4 (11:06):
Every single day.
Speaker 5 (11:08):
This is the Sean Hannity Show.
Speaker 1 (11:11):
Hey, what if your home's title, which is the legal
document that proves you own your home, is in some
criminals name well, that's called home title theft and criminals
all over the world can find your homes title online
and then they'll forge your signature. They'll take out loans
against your home or even worse, sell your home. Now,
how do you know some criminals not taking over the
(11:32):
title to your home. You can find out what's sign
up at home title lock dot com and use the
promo code Sean se A n All right, we continue
with Kentucky Senator medical doctor Ram Paul is with us.
His book is Deception, The Great COVID Cover Up. Let
me change topics on you. In nine days is going
(11:53):
to be a presidential debate, Donald Trump versus Joe Biden,
and uh a phenomenon took place. I assume you were
at the State of the Union. I'm guessing you were
at the State of the Union and we saw a
Joe Biden that we'd never seen before and we have
not seen since. And I referred to it as jacked
(12:13):
up Joe or hyper caffeinated Joe or something Joe. I
don't know. It was not that Joe Biden. We knew
before the debate, and we've not seen that Joe Biden
emerged since. And I'm predicting that that Joe Biden will
probably re emerge for the debate with Donald Trump. I
don't know why I think that, but I think that
you know, whatever that was caffeine and red bull, I
(12:35):
don't know that they gave Joe. I think probably they're
going to follow the same protocol, which was it's interesting
seventy percent of Americans even support drug testing the candidates,
which I think would be a good idea, which Joe
Biden will never agree to. The question I have for
you is, you know, did you notice the same thing.
(12:57):
You're a medical doctor, and it is fascinating to me
that after the State of the Union, we never saw
that Joe Biden again, and he went back to being,
you know, his his cognitive mess self. And my question
is that because maybe all of that quote red Bull
caffeine or something else or whatever, it was dangerous to
(13:20):
his health. Because I've got to imagine if that worked
that night, why not why not give him the same
caffeine or red Bull every day.
Speaker 3 (13:27):
Yeah, I don't think you can make a medical diagnosis
over TV, but there have been some that conjecture that adderall, well.
Speaker 1 (13:34):
We're not on TV, we're on radio. But that's okay, senator,
I'll forgive you.
Speaker 3 (13:39):
Or radio, but when you see him on TV that
you can't make a diagnosis of washing him on TV.
But some have conjectured adderall other stimulants, you know. But
what it reminds me of, though, if you were giving
advice to Trump on this reminds me of the old
Rush Limbas skit. Remember when he said, hit debate people
that you have to like Kaye is the left loads
of his brain behind you? Because one load of his
(14:01):
brain was enough to defeat most people. One debate had
a funny skit on that. But it's kind of what
Trump needs to think about, is I think he can
handily defeat him in the two debates that I remember
last time. The first one he did it, but he
was so aggressive that he didn't come off as well.
And I think independents won a nicer version of Donald Trump,
and that's who you're trying to convience. Really, forty percent
(14:23):
of us are on one side, the other in about
ten or twenty percent in the middle, and I think
those require a more friendly sort of approach. And it's
it's hard because you have to win. You got to
win your points. You want to intellectually defeat your opponent,
but you have to do it in a way in
which people don't think you're an ogre. And I think
the second debate, when Trump came back the second time,
I think some people had coached him a little bit
(14:43):
on that. And I think he won both debates intellectually,
but I think he came off better in the second debate,
and that's what the I.
Speaker 1 (14:51):
Actually think they're doing him a favor by muting his microphone.
But we do know it's going to be a three
on one debate. I mean, I don't trust fake Jake
Tapper or fake Dana Bash. I mean their liberal talk
show host. They're not going to be fair.
Speaker 3 (15:04):
Yeah, it's hard to find somebody that would be objective.
And I think there's a lot of indications that CNN
may not be the most objective of networks, So I'm
not I'm surprised he chose to do it, to tell
you the truth, but yeah, you know, and being willing
to debate is important. I think the fact that he's
willing to debate, at least with Boden, I think is
a sign that he had to do something to go
(15:26):
forward with that. And I think a lot of people
will tune in. Frankly, they want to see how both
of them can still handle themselves.
Speaker 1 (15:32):
Oh, that must see TV. You got to watch that. Yeah,
and I know you have to run, Senator, but we
always appreciate you having us. By the way, it's called deception,
the Great COVID cover up. Senator Rampaul medical doctor Rampaul
Amazon dot com. We have a link on Hannity dot
com and bookstores around the country. Senator, Thank you as always.
Speaker 3 (15:53):
Thanks all, John r.
Speaker 1 (15:55):
Twenty five to the top of the hour, watch shows.
Schedules suddenly become even lighter than usual as he now
prepares to stay up later at night, change his clock,
and of course, drink a lot of red bill and
start getting used to being jacked up. Joe again, nine
days till the debate, one hundred and thirty nine days
(16:16):
till election day, and just ninety days until early voting
starts in Pennsylvania, and then it rolls out around the country.
Hey want to remind you, since the terror attacks in
Israel on October the seventh, we see what's happening. Anti
Semitism on the rise all around the country, you know,
on the halls of Congress, college campuses, all across the country,
(16:37):
all across Europe, all across Australia, all across the world.
It's sad and it's sick, and it's reminiscent of the
nineteen thirties. But we have proudly partnered with the International
Fellowship of Christians and Jews, and frankly, we're just asking
that you take a stand with us and the IFCJ
you know, when it matters, and frankly, let the people
(17:00):
in Israel no, they're not alone, that you support their
right to win their war against radical Islamic terrorism. Now,
for the entire month of June, we are asking that
you just simply sign a pledge. That pledge will be
delivered to the President of Israel to show that here
in America we're not only standing with them in solidarity,
(17:20):
but we're speaking up and not afraid to speak up,
and we're taking a stand with the IFCJ International Fellowship
of Christians and Jews and letting the people in Israel
know that they're not alone here. Now, just to simply
sign the pledge, go to their website. It's one word
support IFCJ dot org. SUPPORTIFCJ dot org. Hopefully you'll stand
(17:42):
with us and take a stand today. All right, let's
get to our phones. Eight hundred and ninety four one
sean if you want to be a part of the program.
Margie is out in Long Island and New York. Margie, Hi,
how are you. How's my old stomping grum You miss me?
Anybody out there miss me?
Speaker 4 (17:59):
Oh?
Speaker 6 (17:59):
Yeah, miss you? But I want to hear more of you.
So we've got to just keep on listening, and I
hope everybody else can come on over and listen to
you as well from the other side.
Speaker 1 (18:08):
But uh, yeah, you're very grateful to our affiliate in
New York, the all do Am seven to ten WR
and the great Mark Simone, and we've got a great
team there.
Speaker 5 (18:19):
Yeah.
Speaker 6 (18:19):
I listened to you guys, on the way I'm home
and on the way into work. I have an hour
ride into Melville every morning, so it's it's a good
station to keep me posted with everything of what's going on.
So thank you, Old I'm just I'm very that was
my dog, Sorry about that. I'm just very frustrated because
even though we hear about the polls, you know, Trump
(18:40):
is soaring and Biden. I want to see something like
ten Biden and ninety percent Trump, and I think that
it should be that, And I want to know why
isn't it. People I talk to at work there's still
you know, they don't like Trump, and I just can't.
Speaker 5 (18:55):
I can't.
Speaker 6 (18:56):
It just it kills me. I don't know what else
to say. You know, it's just frustrating, Goshan, it really is.
Speaker 1 (19:02):
Look, I know, I you can start asking them questions,
you know, simple questions. You know, do you think that
Joe has a serious cognitive decline problem? And just just
sit back and let him answer? Ask him about Trump's conviction,
Say what was he convicted of? And just shut up
and let an answer. You can ask them, do you
(19:23):
think that Joe's border policies have created a national security
danger for the country. Do you think Joe's economic policies
have benefited you and your family and most Americans?
Speaker 5 (19:36):
Uh?
Speaker 1 (19:37):
Do you like defund, dismantle and no bail laws?
Speaker 7 (19:40):
Uh?
Speaker 1 (19:41):
Do you like the fact that Joe has basically surrendered
in the war on terrorism and abandoned Israel? Are you
concerned that you know the world's most nefarious players uh?
And are top geo political foes. Are you concerned at
all that these people are on the march and Joe
(20:01):
Biden just seems completely incapable. And I'm willing to confront them,
you know, just ask the basic questions and let them
try and answer, and they're not going to be able
to answer, and in a weird way, you'll be kind
of confronting them and saying to them, why are you
supporting this guy? So I think you have an opportunity.
You know, with everybody that you run into, you can
(20:22):
do it in a nice way. I'm not saying to
get in a fistfight over it. But but you're also
in a very very liberal state. I mean, New York
is pretty much like California. They've lost their mind and
it's become for so many uninhabitable, and you know that's
why you see Wall Street South now all these big
(20:43):
companies are leaving. That's why you see a mass migration
out of New York, out of New Jersey, out of Illinois,
out of California to Florida.
Speaker 6 (20:53):
Probably soon too, you know, as soon as I can retire,
I'll be out of here too, because I just it
just doesn't make sense. And you know, I lived here
all my life. I was born and Grace on Long Island,
Master and stuff Accounty.
Speaker 4 (21:06):
Listen.
Speaker 1 (21:06):
I have a lot of friends still that are there,
a lot, and I'm very grateful for the opportunities that
New York gave me. But it's not my first rodeo
outside of New York. I lived five years in Rhode Island,
five years in California. I lived two years in Alabama,
four years in Georgia, and I've kind of been you know,
(21:28):
when you start out in radio, you travel, you just
you go wherever they're willing to hire you, and you know,
so for me, but I found my home. I will
say that I feel at home in Florida, and this
is you know, this, this is the place that I
want to be and the place that I feel like
I belong.
Speaker 6 (21:47):
Well, I'm going to take your advice for speaking with
my coworkers. And also I'll probably call you in a
couple of years to find out what areas in Florida
are the best to be because a couple of years
from now will be down there, right right around the Corno.
Speaker 5 (22:01):
I mean maybe. No.
Speaker 1 (22:02):
Let me tell you, you really can't make a mistake
in Florida now. If you're looking for coastal areas, whether
you like the West coast of Florida, you know, Sarasota,
Fort Myers, Naples, Florida, Whether you like Southern Florida, South
Florida and Miami, A lot of people like that area.
Whether you go up the east coast of Florida, like
you know an Alapan and Palm Beach and Delray Beach
(22:26):
and Boyton Beach and straight on up the coast to Jupiter.
If you're big into golf, you're gonna love Jupiter Vero Beach.
You can't go wrong. If you're in Tampa, you can't
go wrong. If you're in Orlando and the I for Carda,
you can't go wrong. You really, I mean the Panhandle, Jacksonville,
I mean, there's so many beautiful parts of the state,
(22:48):
and I know that you know it'd be worth taking
a couple of vacations down here. Come on down, take
a look and see where you and your family may
want to settle.
Speaker 6 (22:57):
Yeah, I have a family recently moved down there a
couple of years now, so we'll probably end up down
there visiting and checking around and all, even the Carolinas.
But I'll definitely take your word of advice about speaking,
you know, with co workers and all. And then.
Speaker 1 (23:13):
I love the Carolinas. I like North End, South Carolina.
I think they're great places. I like Tennessee also, I
like Texas also. I mean, depends what kind of lifestyle
you want. Maybe maybe you can take the cold I can't.
You know, maybe get yourself a nice Montana little baby
ranch and and and raise a couple of cattle and
hang out with a buffalo row who knows we have
a beautiful country.
Speaker 5 (23:34):
I'll tell you that I know we do.
Speaker 6 (23:36):
We really do. We have to take advantage of it
and make it, make it the best it can be.
Speaker 4 (23:40):
You know.
Speaker 1 (23:41):
So Yeah, I've never been afraid to move, and other
people have and I'm just not a homebuddy like that.
I I don't get locked into houses. I don't get
locked into properties. I just you know, I try to
be happy wherever I am and I have got in
my life, So I mean, what else do you need
beyond that?
Speaker 6 (24:02):
That's right, that's right, you said it, all.
Speaker 1 (24:05):
Right, thank you? Margie got bleshing all my friends in
New York. Okay, Gail is in Washington State. Your state's
a mess too. How are you, Gal?
Speaker 5 (24:14):
I'm doing well?
Speaker 4 (24:15):
So things.
Speaker 1 (24:16):
Hey, what's going on?
Speaker 6 (24:18):
Well?
Speaker 5 (24:18):
I was thinking about the debate and the way that
Trump should handle it. I think he and his team
should put together a website that has facts and links
to all the information that they will most likely be
covering during the debate and while it's going on, while
he's got eyeballs on him, he should give that website
out and encourage people to go there and do research
(24:39):
for themselves and see the policy, see the numbers, see
the difference for themselves.
Speaker 1 (24:45):
I don't think it's a bad idea, and I think
that would be great for Trump to do that. I
would expect that a lot of the questions are going
to be very predictable. Probably half the debate is going
to be about democracy and peril retribution. It's gonna be
about January sixth, it's going to be about the twenty
(25:06):
twenty election. It's going to be about abortion. They're going
to try and avoid the topics that would impact Joe
and they're just going to try and stick with the
superfluous Donald Trump will be. It'll be a three on
one debate. He's certainly aware of it. I think the
biggest thing challenge he has is not to allow them
(25:26):
to piss him off, because that's what they're gonna be.
Joe's strategy is going to be to call him a
convict a thousand times, and I wouldn't react to it.
And my answer would be, Joe, when you're out of office,
hopefully in January of twenty twenty five, be careful about
the lawfare of that you started, because there's a lot
of incriminating evidence on your son's laptop about you. But
(25:48):
we can save that for another day. There you go.
Speaker 4 (25:53):
I think you're right.
Speaker 5 (25:53):
That's exactly how it's going to play out during debate.
Speaker 1 (25:57):
Hang in there, Gail, God bless you are. Merlin. Arizona.
We need Arizona desperately. How are you, Merlin?
Speaker 4 (26:04):
Yes, it's pleasure to speak with you. Sean. I'm a
big fan of yours have been listening to you for.
Speaker 7 (26:09):
A long time since the Hannity Combs erav.
Speaker 4 (26:14):
I do have a concern.
Speaker 7 (26:15):
I've been hearing a lot on the polls and stuff
like that. It's almost as if the Democrats know that
they're going to be losing the presidency and they're not
really throwing much weight into that to keeping it.
Speaker 4 (26:28):
I noticed in the swing states like.
Speaker 7 (26:30):
Nevada and Arizona where I'm at, that he's leading greatly
in those polls, but the other ones like Ruben Diego
and all of the Senates in the Congress positions, the
Democrats are leading. So it's almost as if they don't
care about the presidency. We'll be sitting there cheering on
(26:51):
when Trump wins and grateful that he's in there, but
then it could possibly turn out to be a lane
duck presidency if we lose the House in the Senate.
Speaker 4 (26:59):
And I just wanted to know your take on that.
Speaker 1 (27:01):
What you're saying is absolutely true. There's a gap between
Donald Trump seems to be outperforming sending candidates and congressional candidates,
and all I can say to any voter is don't
split your ticket. That if you want Donald Trump to
be able to govern and get things done. He's going
to need a Republican Senate or Republican House, and he's
(27:22):
going to need the biggest majorities possible. So if you
want Donald Trump to have a successful four years, you've
got to make that a top priority for sure. So
you know, I do see the gap. It does concern me,
but I'm just urging people, you know, we still have
time for these candidates to step up and get their
(27:42):
message out. And I'd make that very plea to people.
Don't send Donald Trump to Washington alone, you know, send
people that support him and support his agenda with him
so that he can be successful. And the more successful
he is, the better off it is for all of us.
Kind of that simple.
Speaker 7 (28:00):
I agree one hundred percent. I enjoyed the four years
that he was in. My pay went up drastically. I've
been a truck driver for thirty three years, and now.
Speaker 4 (28:09):
We're feeling the crunch of it all as.
Speaker 7 (28:12):
To what's going on, especially with the high fuel prices
and everything.
Speaker 4 (28:15):
And I just like I said, I've seen both those
and listening to the polls.
Speaker 7 (28:20):
And I think it was Jake Tapper that kind of
brought it out and Mike Del Jorno brought a little
bit onto it, also, saying that you know, let's let's
not lose the prize, let's not send him there by himself.
Speaker 4 (28:31):
We've got to look at everything, not just the presidency.
Speaker 1 (28:35):
Well said. I can't say it any better. And I
hope people now, with one hundred and thirty nine days
left all election Day and ninety days till early voting starts,
I hope people are dialing in because this is going
to happen fast. We're nine days out of this first debate.
These are important, consequential times, and we've got to treat
him as such. All right, quick break right back to
(28:55):
our phones, our toll free numbers, eight hundred and ninety
four one, Sean, if you want to be a part
of the program as we continue this Tuesday, on the left.
Speaker 2 (29:08):
Is trying to extinguish conservative voices, and he's.
Speaker 1 (29:12):
Fighting fire with fire, standing up for your beliefs.
Speaker 3 (29:17):
It's Sean Hannity.
Speaker 4 (29:19):
On the air. Right now.
Speaker 1 (29:25):
Let's get back to our busy phones, eight hundred and
ninety four to one. Shawn is on number. Vicky is next. Vicky. Hi,
how are you glad you called?
Speaker 8 (29:33):
Hi? Sean? I'm a longtime listener watcher. Thank you time caller.
Speaker 1 (29:40):
I'm glad you checked in. What's going on out in Arizona?
Speaker 8 (29:43):
Well, live in Prescott and I cannot get a job.
To save my soul, I am now supplementing my meager
social security with delivering food.
Speaker 1 (29:55):
And actually, are you like, do you like do Uber
eats or Instagra card? What do you do or dash?
If you do door dash, are you allowed to do
Uber Eats? Are you allowed to do instatcart?
Speaker 8 (30:07):
You know, I think you can. You'd have to really
more manage your time pretty well because when you're on
door dash and you've got to set number of hours
you're going to work, they expect you to be picking
up their orders. So it's kind of I would think
it would be pretty hard to do two things, but
I do know dorivers out there that do it.
Speaker 1 (30:28):
You're you're kind of stuck doing this because of the
Biden economy, that's what you're telling us.
Speaker 8 (30:33):
Absolutely, this didn't happen to me until twenty twenty one.
I was and then my husband died in twenty My
savings went out, our savings, the stock market went you
know what happened?
Speaker 4 (30:46):
Was it?
Speaker 8 (30:47):
And so yes, I'm now living on a very mejor
social Security and this is the job that I can
get at my age. That's that's the thing. Nobody will
hire anybody over sixty five?
Speaker 4 (31:02):
Is it?
Speaker 1 (31:03):
Is it enough to help you get by fairly?
Speaker 8 (31:06):
But I am getting Yes.
Speaker 4 (31:08):
Uh.
Speaker 1 (31:09):
I'm proud of you, you know why, because you do
what you need to do to survive. You're a survivor.
And I like your grit and I love your toughness.
I wish you didn't have to do it. I wish
you could just enjoy your retirement years. I hope you
find some personal satisfaction in doing it as well, because
you're providing a great service and doing a great job
for people. And uh, you know, I have more questions.
(31:33):
I don't have time, unfortunately, but you know, uh, stand by,
we're gonna, we're gonna, we're gonna send you out a
little care package.
Speaker 8 (31:39):
Okay, Oh thank you, Sean.
Speaker 1 (31:42):
Love you, I stay, stay on hold, love you back.
The Sean Hannity Show News
Popular Podcasts
1. Stuff You Missed in History Class
Join Holly and Tracy as they bring you the greatest and strangest Stuff You Missed In History Class in this podcast by iHeartRadio.
2. Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations.
3. Crime Junkie
If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people.