November 15, 2023 • 32 mins
Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky, joins today to discuss the recent $12 million taxpayer-funded NIH research facility in Colorado that will import bats from Asia. He will also touch on the House two-step CR, end-of-year spending, and the overall budget process.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Stay right here for our final news roundup and information overload.
All right, News roundup, Information overload, our thank you for
being with us. It's eight hundred and nine foot one
Sean if you want to be a part of the program.
In a minute, we'll be joined by Kentucky Senator Ram Paul.
But there he is your FBI director. You know when
the FBI director comments on the skyrocketing number of suspected
(00:24):
terrorists at our border and says, I can't really speak
to that issue. And then Christopher Ray talks about over
the past two years, how they have seized enough fentanol
to kill two hundred and seventy million Americans. Then he
talks about the threat level in the country since October
the seventh, the worst terror attack at Israel's history, has
(00:48):
gone so much higher. A lot of these threats are
targeted at the Jewish community. And then he admits that
the FBI is conducting multiple investigations into individuals in our
country affiliated with the terrorist group Hamas. And then lastly
he discusses threats by Iran and his Belah to attack
(01:09):
Americans on US soil. Senator Ran paula Kentucky is with
US Senator when I hear our FBI director talking about
the skyrocketing number of suspected terrorists at our border, and
when I hear that him talk about seizing enough ventanyl
to kill almost every American two hundred and seventy million Americans,
(01:29):
and talk about the threat level, especially after October seventh,
to the Jewish community and acknowledging that we have people
affiliated with Hamas in our country and the threat of
Iran and his belaw on American soil. Why hasn't may
orcus and Biden and Kamala Harrison, Why haven't they closed
the border considering they're not vetting any of these people,
(01:52):
and they've been lying to us saying the borders closed
and the border secure.
Speaker 2 (01:56):
I think that ultimately their philosophy is of open borders.
I think think they truly do want as many people
to come across as possible. If they look at the
politics of Texas, they say the more illegal immigrants that
come in, the longer they're here, their children will vote,
and that their children are voting three to one Democrat,
And so they see this as a way of transforming
(02:16):
the country and the politics of this. It's also why
when you look at the specific human tragedy of you know,
smuggling of humans and young girls across the border, and
the drug trade, all the things that go along with
this open border spot process. They don't really seem to
care about those individuals too much. It isn't really concerned
for those individuals. They don't really care. They care purely
(02:39):
about the power politics of votes. And they think they
can make America basically permanently a Democrat left leaning country
by allowing unlimited numbers of people across the border.
Speaker 1 (02:51):
Well, it's pretty unbelievable. And yet we keep being lied to.
How come how do they get away with just looking
at us in the eye and saying the order is
secure and the borders are closed. And yet that day
we're watching illegal immigrants cross into the country, and we
know they're not getting betted.
Speaker 2 (03:09):
You know, I don't think ultimately they will win this.
And there's going to be a shift sometime that's going
to happen in the Electric when the electric decides that
these people don't care about my safety, that they're allowing
people to come across who are potentially terrorists, they're allowing
people to come across who are criminals, they're allowing rapists
and drug dealers to come across here, and human traffickers.
(03:30):
And I think when that finally hits home, when the
violence comes to all the cities, and I think it's there,
But when it finally becomes realized that this is the
policy of Democrats and not care about the crime that's
being brought into their community, the drugs are being brought
into your community, I think there is a breaking point
at which the electric breaks the other way, and that
maybe they miscalculate that open borders is going to help
(03:53):
them win elections.
Speaker 1 (03:54):
Oh I don't think so. How do you you know
we do have a rule of law. Maybe I'm just
struggling with us a little more than I should. But
if we believe we know for a fact people in
the thousands have been coming from the Middle East to
our southern border. We know that there have been tens
of thousands of communist Chinese and Russians that have come
(04:15):
across that border. My question is, Senator, you know, do
you think they're coming here because they want a better
life for themselves of their families, But do we have
to assume that many of them are coming here with
the farious intentions and that there are terror cells that
Joe Biden is currently letting into this country that when
they're here will plot, plan and scheme nine to eleven,
(04:38):
two point zero or far worse than that.
Speaker 2 (04:41):
You know, I think it's a combination. Obviously, there are
some good people just want a better way of life.
There's some people who are potentially terrorists. There's some people
that are criminals, rapists, human trafficker. So it's a combination.
But if you don't please your border, you don't know
who's who, and so you can expect the worst or
believe the worst, but you've got to please your border.
And ultimately this requires a change in policies. So it's
important for conservatives to know that if all of a
(05:02):
sudden they put forward a big Ukraine bill and they said, oh,
we're going to give some money for border security, if
the money is just dumped into the system we have,
it'll just basically go to Chicago and New York to
house these people. It'll get hotel rooms for them, you know,
across the United States. But it won't fix the problem.
You have to change the policy. You know, when Trump
had basically put pressure on the president of Mexico and
(05:24):
they got to remain in Mexico policy that required Mexico
actually acceding to what we wanted, and it worked, and
we had it for a while and the numbers were,
you know, ninety percent less than they are now. But
you have to go back to that. You have to
have a policy where you can't just come to the
border and get admittance. If you come across the border
and you didn't come across properly, you have to be
put right back on the other side of the border.
(05:46):
All you do is do that for a month or two,
and there's several thousand people on a camp over there,
and then they quit coming. They're coming now because basically
CNN sends a beacon signal to the entire world to
walk to the United States that Biden will let you in.
Speaker 1 (05:59):
That's exactly what's happening. Let me shift the gears on
you a little bit here. Congratulations on your best selling book, Deception,
the Great COVID cover Up. If we did have equal
justice under the law, I think that Anthony Fauci would
be under a major investigation today. But we also I
want to ask you about this twelve million dollars taxpayer
(06:21):
funded NIH research facility in Colorado that I can't believe
apparently is going to import bats from Asia. Are they
also going to have gain of function research?
Speaker 2 (06:34):
Senator, This is just a death wish. This is a
gamble that we should not take as a civilization. We
should be treating this as if, Hey, why don't we
import in a radioactive atomic bomb from China and bring
it right into the middle of Colorado. No, it's a
terrible disaster. There will be gain of function research because
they are doing it across the United States, and my
(06:57):
fear is that there will be another accident and another accident.
You know, if the virus is a more deadly virus.
This virus as deadly as as it was, was point
three percent deadly. Can you imagine if the next one's
five percent deadly or fifty percent deadly. We're talking about
something that could end civilization as we know it. And
(07:18):
apparently Peter Dayzac's involved with this. He's the guy that
in the book we talk about was the leader of
Eco Health Alliance, which is the main funder of the
research that went on in Wuhan that led to this pandemic. Now,
finally the government has said that Wuhan Lab's not going
to get money for ten years, but there's been no
ban on Peter Dazak. Peter Dazak has arguably committed acts
(07:41):
that really need to be judged by the legal system.
He needs to be brought in apparently he was apparently
brought in for deposition recently by Congress, and yet money
still flowing to this guy. He should be have a
permanent lifetime ban on money for his involvement in the
Wuan project because you know, he never released his records.
Even when the NIH asking for records, he said they're
(08:01):
proprietary and I won't do it. When the WHO asking
this when they were investigations by Lancet, he refused to
give any of his records. For that refusal refusing to
cooperate in the investigation, he should be permanently disbarred from
getting any of our taxpayer money.
Speaker 1 (08:18):
Well, I don't know why we would ever do this.
This is insanity. What is the one big takeaway? You know,
as I'm pretty certain that Joe Biden is never going
to bring up COVID, intellectual property theft, unfair trade practices, aggret,
the spy balloon, aggressive actions against our fighter jets and
(08:38):
international airspace, our Navy being confronted in international waterways by China.
I don't think it's going to be brought up. The
hostilities over Taiwan airspace. I don't think any of that's
coming up with Joe Biden in China. And I think,
you know, I think that President She is going to
see a very weak president probably inside be laughing to himself.
Speaker 2 (09:01):
I think you're exactly right in this. I don't see
Biden standing up to She in any meaningful way. And
even with the whole idea of this research, you know,
we could have put pressure on them from the very beginning. Instead,
when the Trump administration offered three scientists to go to
China to study the origins of this with the who,
(09:22):
China rejected all of them and said, oh no, we
want Peter Dazak, the guy who was funding the lab,
as if he weren't conflicted enough on this. So now
I don't expect Biden to have the strength of character
or presence of mind really to be able to negotiate
from a position of strength. So I don't expect a
lot of this meeting.
Speaker 1 (09:40):
All right, quick break more with Senator Rampaul coming up,
and then your calls eight hundred and ninety four one
sean our number if you want to be a part
of the program. As we continue, all right, we continue
with Senator Ram Paul. By the way, another big congratulations
to him on his best selling book that came out.
It's called Deception, the Great COVID cover up a lot
(10:02):
of information in there that you're gonna it's gonna shock you,
and it should shock you and this should never happen again.
But we continue with Senator Paul. What do you think
about the way Congress can never seem to follow regular
order and pass appropriations bills. I understand the situation that
Speaker Johnson was in. He's only been on the job
(10:23):
for three weeks and he's only got a three vote majority,
and he's got very in fact, various factions within the
Republican Party in the House, and his hands are tied.
It's becoming dysfunctional at this point.
Speaker 2 (10:37):
Well, there is something the Speaker can do, and this
is what I'm encouraging conservatives over there that I deal
with on a daily basis to advocate for, is that
if he still does each of the appropriation bills individually,
if there's twelve different appropriation bills, the Senate will respond
by doing maxibuses or omnibuses. They're gonna bundle them all
together and send them back. I believe the Speaker has
(10:59):
the power to say, we will only conference on individual bills.
So let's say the Senate sends nine bills over there
together and the House does them individually. Then you have
twelve bytes at the apple. And it may be that
on one twelfth of government, maybe you can leverage to
reduce the IRS agent's being hired. Maybe you can reduce
some of the prohibitions on gas cars, things like that.
(11:22):
There may be points of leverage when you divide government
spending into twelve. So if Conservatives hang in there, and
if the Speaker will say we are not conferencing on
groups of bills, only on individual bills, and if they
actually do that during the period of these continuous solutions,
then I think they'll they'll end up being some success.
Today on the floor, we will get the House version
(11:42):
and I will oppose it, but I will also introduce
an amendment to cut about fifty dollars fifty billion dollars
worth of spending, because I think the levels after the
pandemic and after the bidens spending, I can't vote to
continue them at the same level. So I'm in league
with the Conservatives on the House side and saying this
spending level is too high.
Speaker 1 (12:00):
The spending level is too high. I mean, we just
had another two trillion dollars in debt. Senator. I never
thought we'd get to a point as a country before
our government. You're the one you're a part of, and
it's not your fault. Uh, we pay it before we
can spend one dime. We're now spending a trillion dollars
just to pay off the debt annually, a trillion dollars.
(12:22):
That's a sustainable Senator.
Speaker 2 (12:24):
Yeah. And we're accumulating debt at about a trillion dollars
every three months. The last three months we added another trillion.
So it is out of control, and I fear there
is coming a day of reckoning. I think our biggest
threat to our country is from within, not from without.
It's the demise of the dollar. It's a day in
which there's a panic worldwide and people say we're no
(12:45):
longer buying the dollar because these people cannot balance their budget.
You know. Look, half of the European Union has an
annual balance budget. Denmark Sweden, they balance their annual budget.
Germany they balance their budget even though they have big
welfare states and a lot of taxes, they don't run
a huge debt every year.
Speaker 1 (13:02):
So yeah, by the way, one reason why is because
we're stupid enough to be funding the UN, the WEF
the WHO, the Paris Climate Accords, all things we need
to stop doing.
Speaker 2 (13:12):
In my opinion, you're exactly right, and we fund everything.
And the only thing that's true in Washington is they
will never make a decision or a choice to fund
one thing versus another. They say, let's fund it all,
just put it on our tab. And this is the
real problem in state capital. State legislators make decisions in
your city council, they make decisions because there's a finite
(13:33):
amount of money. Only in Washington is the money considered
to be infinite, and the federals er will print it up.
So no one ever makes any tough decisions up here.
I've never heard of anybody. In fact, when the speaker
came forward and said the israel Aid will be paid
for by cutting IRS money, that's the first time we've
had a speaker with any guts in the entire time
i've been up here who would actually offset new spending
(13:54):
by getting rid of existing spending.
Speaker 1 (13:56):
Oh, we appreciate you, senator, thanks for being with us.
By the way, if not had a chance to read
the Senator Ram Paul's book, it's called The Deception, The
Great COVID cover up Amazon dot com bookstores around the country.
Thank you, senator, appreciate it a lot. Thanks Sean eight
hundred nine foot one, Shawn is a number. All right?
I talk about this all the time. What are you
(14:18):
going to do if God forbid you have a perpetrator
that breaks into your house, your business, whatever, confronts you
on the street and wants to bring harm to you
or to your family. Now, I've been a big believer
and still am a big believer in my Second Amendment rights.
I've had a license to carry my entire adult life,
and I've now been introduced to Berner b y r NA.
(14:43):
What's burner? Berner is an effective non lethal alternative looks
like a gun, fires like a gun, and it shoots
projectiles that have two different pepper sprays that will disperse
along with tear gas. And it's legal in all fifty states,
no background checks needed, and it frankly works they not
(15:04):
only have the pistols, they now come out with a
rifle version which I love even more, which is called
the Mission for Linda. I mean. And on top of that,
they have their twelve gauge non lethal shotgun round. You
put it in your own your own shotgun, and that
can be around and a means to you incapacitate any perpetrator.
(15:26):
It's an option. I like having the choice. I've been
practicing often now that I got my new I finally
got them delivered. I got the new mission for that
I purchased, and I'm glad I did.
Speaker 3 (15:37):
Yeah.
Speaker 4 (15:37):
And you know what's really cool about Berna. I was
talking to their CEO the other day. He really cares
so much about safety. That's the thing that he cares
the most about. He's like, I don't want people to
think that just because they're getting a less lethal gun,
they don't need to be trained.
Speaker 1 (15:51):
They do.
Speaker 4 (15:51):
So they have all these awesome safety videos and they
even have your video up using the Mission for using
those twelve gauge les lethal bullets and showing how to
clear a house and how to do it safely with
I love.
Speaker 1 (16:02):
I've sent around firearms my whole life, and that day
when they sent their special forces guys over and we
went and met them. I got to tell you something,
I learned a lot that day.
Speaker 4 (16:12):
We learned a lot, and our audience can learn a
lot by going to Burner dot com, going to handity
dot com, and we strongly advise you to get your
own less lethal because it really can save your life
and not hurt the person trying to hurt.
Speaker 1 (16:23):
You by RNA dot com slash Hannity by RNA dot
com slash Hannity, and you're gonna love this non lethal
defense option. You can't always believe what the other side claims.
That's why there's the Sean Hannity Show. Hi twenty five
(16:44):
to the top of the hour. We'll get to your
calls here in a second eight hundred nine to fourt one, Shawn,
if you want to be a part of the program.
All right, Christmas is going to be here. Next week
is Thanksgiving, and that means get ready. Christmas is right
around the corner. And if you're looking for a really
special gift, I urge you to go to the website
Henry USA one word dot com. Why because you can
(17:06):
get their free holiday gift guide. They'll mail it to you.
Every Henry is made right here in America. All their
parts are American, but they do use old school fine craftsmanship,
the finest I've ever seen. And you're giving somebody if
you give them a Henry, you're giving them a work
of art. You're giving them a future family heirloom. They're
going to be passed down for generations, always backed by
(17:28):
the company's lifetime warrant. I will tell you this is
a very special company. Their performance every Henry I own,
it's top notch, accurate out of the box. They shoot smooth,
they shoot straight, reliable from day one and it remains reliable.
They got over two hundred models of rifles and shotguns
revolvers you can choose from. In other words, they got
(17:49):
something for everybody on your gift list this year, whether
they're outdoorsmen or hunters, or beginners or collectors anyway, or
you know they need home or business, self defense, whatever
it happens to be anyway, check it out right now.
Go to HENRYUSA dot com get their free gift guide.
They'll send free decals with it and a list of
dealers where you are. Henry USA dot com. You're gonna
(18:13):
love this company. I love this company. Eight hundred ninety
four one, Shawn. If you want to be a part
of the program, Ryan is in Kansas. Ryan, You're next
on the Sean Hannity Show.
Speaker 3 (18:22):
Hi doing sewn first time caller.
Speaker 1 (18:25):
Love you, sir, Thank you, buddy, appreciate it. Glad you're
out there.
Speaker 3 (18:28):
Hey, quick question. I just was monoring something on the
news yesterday and I just couldn't believe it when they
told me that we were negotiating with terrorists. I thought
it had always been our policy.
Speaker 2 (18:40):
That we don't.
Speaker 3 (18:41):
Negotiate with terrorists.
Speaker 1 (18:42):
A great point.
Speaker 3 (18:44):
I mean, as a strong country, we have to stand
up for everyone and we just go and like, listen
strong with teams.
Speaker 1 (18:55):
I'm gonna tell you in principle everything you're saying, you know,
I like, for example, when Biden paid the Mullows and
Iran six billion dollars as a ransom for five Americans.
You know, I just I was apoplectic. If you're one
of the family members of the two hundred plus or
four hundred plus, there's all these estimates about how many
(19:17):
hostages AMAS actually has, and your family member, you know,
may have an opportunity to be released to deep down
in my heart. Do I want the government to do
everything humanly possible to try and save my loved one.
Of course I do, because I have a heart, I
(19:37):
have a conscience, and I have a soul. It's not
as cut and dry as people like to make it
out to be. Deals like this are happen to be
made all the time. But you can't. It's got you
can't be in a position where you're paying a billion
two per hostage. You just can't do that. It's got
(20:00):
to be one for one. And if I was Israel,
you know, the problem is if you take Palestinians or
even hamas terrorist hostage, they don't care about those hostages.
Speaker 2 (20:10):
You know.
Speaker 1 (20:11):
The only people that care about hostages in this conflict
are Israel and the United States. Nobody else seems to care.
Speaker 3 (20:17):
And you're right, you know, you're right, Sean. The thing
about it is it shows weakness.
Speaker 1 (20:24):
It shows weakness, and it does one other thing, and
it encourages more hostage.
Speaker 3 (20:28):
Taking, absolutely, And I just and I just feel.
Speaker 1 (20:33):
However, if it was your son or daughter, wouldn't you
want the government to be trying Because I would. I
admit I'm a hypocrite on the issue. The total hypocrite.
Speaker 3 (20:42):
Sean, I would be doing everything. I'd be finding a
way I could go over there and talk to people
in trying to rescue them myself.
Speaker 1 (20:50):
But reality, I'd offer to surrender myself and let my
kid go. I mean, that's what good people do. So
I'm not going to be as harsh on that, even
though I know in the end it results at all
likelihood it will result in more hostage taking. However, I
(21:15):
am very, very sympathetic and understanding to the families of
loved ones.
Speaker 3 (21:22):
I understand. When I was stationed in Germany, I went
and visited Docou and Aschmitz, and just going there just
puts me and I can feel the emotion that every
one of those family members are feeling. It's just you
can't believe it.
Speaker 1 (21:40):
Well, it's terrible. And by the way, this is the
nineteen thirties all over again. I never thought we would
see stuff like this in our lifetime. And the sheer
numbers of people worldwide that are showing their anti Semitism
and their hatred and their bias and their racist them
and they're bigotry's shocking to me.
Speaker 2 (22:02):
You know.
Speaker 1 (22:03):
I look, I'm old school. I kind of believe in
the way my parents raised me is that every human
being is a child of God and the only difference
is human beings have the choice of propensity towards good
or propensity towards evil. And you know, I'm praying hard
for these hostages, but I'm also praying hard for Israel's
(22:24):
full and complete victory over terrorism radical islamis. John is
in California disagrees with me. What's up, John? How are
you hi?
Speaker 5 (22:34):
Sean? This is John from California. I always listen to
your program, and I think you're a very smart man.
But run for president. I would vote for you, but
I don't know if you want that job.
Speaker 1 (22:45):
By the way, you're you're recording this conversation, aren't you?
Speaker 2 (22:48):
OK?
Speaker 1 (22:50):
That's fine, Okay, that's how That's how sophisticated our technology is.
Why do you feel a need to record this conversation?
Speaker 2 (22:59):
Uh?
Speaker 1 (22:59):
Do you do you work for an organization?
Speaker 2 (23:01):
Do you know? I don't work.
Speaker 5 (23:04):
I don't work for anybody. I'm just doing this itself.
Speaker 1 (23:07):
Because is it your plan to put this on social
media and say that Sean Hannity wouldn't let me say,
kill the Jews or something.
Speaker 5 (23:14):
No, I just turned it off. If that makes you
feel better, if that's what you want, that's fine.
Speaker 1 (23:18):
Well, it says you disagree with me on the issue
of Hamas. So do you support Hamas? Do you not
recognize that moss a terrorist organization.
Speaker 5 (23:27):
I'm a Palestinian, I'm a Christian Palestinian. I was born
in Palestine.
Speaker 1 (23:31):
And ask you that I asked you is Hamas a
terrorist organization? That's the question I asked you.
Speaker 5 (23:38):
As far as I'm concerned, though I think there are
resistance of the occupation.
Speaker 1 (23:43):
Resistance, Well, Israel has not been occupying Gaza. I've been
there myself. They have not been there for many, many years.
So you're saying that an organization that has as part
of their charter it calls for the destruction of Israel.
You're saying, the people that are on in October seventh
went into Israel, and we know, we have videotape of it.
(24:03):
How do I know because I've been able to see it,
of the atrocities and the murder and the death and destruction,
and the rapes and the beheadings and the killing of
innocent men, women and children and babies. And you're saying
to me that Hamas doing that is not terrorism.
Speaker 5 (24:22):
To you, But isn't what Israel doing to the people
of gods are the same thing?
Speaker 1 (24:26):
Calling Okay, you know what, Answering my question with your
question is not an answer. I'll ask you again. We
have videotaped evidence. Hamas took the video. I guess they're
proud of the evil they perpetrated. They killed innocent men, women, children,
and babies. They even beheaded babies, they even burned babies.
(24:48):
And you're you're going to tell my audience on seven
hundred and thirty five radio stations around the country that
that's not terrorism.
Speaker 5 (24:57):
I thought that the news went back and said there
was no evidence of be any children.
Speaker 1 (25:01):
Oh no, there's evidence. The idea of has the evidence.
I promise you I've seen it.
Speaker 5 (25:07):
No evidence.
Speaker 1 (25:08):
Okay, and you you won't even acknowledge that in their
own charter that Hamas is a terrorist organization.
Speaker 5 (25:15):
Well, isn't Israel doing the same thing, except that Israels?
Speaker 1 (25:18):
Okay. I keep going back to this little game you play.
You see, I ask a question and then you want
to not answer and ask me a question. I'm asking
the questions. Okay, So answer, Okay, does Hamas have in
their charter the call for the destruction of the state
of Israel. That's a yes or no question.
Speaker 5 (25:37):
No, even when Jimmy Carter had a meeting a long
time ago.
Speaker 1 (25:41):
Hey, hey, John, you can put your tape recorder on
because I want you to hear this loud and clear.
You are ignorant, and you are naive, and you are
absolutely clueless about what the group Hamas is about. Did
you hear me loud and clear? Did you hear that?
You are? You are an ignorant human being? You are
(26:04):
you are either ill informed or you're just justifying the
terrorist actions one of the other. I don't know. I
don't have time to give you. You know, I don't have
the desire to pursue this any further because people like
you that don't condemn terrorism and terrorists I have no
time for. I really don't, so enjoy your ignorant bliss
(26:26):
that you're currently living in. By the way, Linda, give
me props for picking up that this thing was recorded.
Speaker 4 (26:32):
Listen. I mean, you know that's what thirty years of
radio does give you.
Speaker 1 (26:34):
Good ears, and my ears are shot. So the fact
that I heard it is a miracle, truely, and you
heard it right, away too, because you I saw it,
you like simultaneously texting me being recorded. It's hilarious.
Speaker 4 (26:48):
Typical.
Speaker 1 (26:49):
Oh and by the way, every word of that call
aired everywhere. Word of that call is on the air. Anyway,
Maria in New York, Maria, how are you?
Speaker 6 (27:00):
How are you.
Speaker 1 (27:03):
Well? After that last call? I'm a little irritated.
Speaker 6 (27:06):
Oh boy, all right, Well you're going to really enjoy
this call.
Speaker 1 (27:10):
Okay.
Speaker 3 (27:11):
School teacher in New.
Speaker 6 (27:12):
York City, Okay, And I want to let you know
exactly what's happening in New York City the migrant children. Okay,
the city of New York. We don't have public schools.
We have government schools. And in these government schools, they
are filling them with migrant children. There was in a
(27:32):
day that goes by that not one to three children
are involved.
Speaker 7 (27:36):
In a school, some more than others in classrooms.
Speaker 8 (27:41):
So you have thirty two children who are sitting there
and not one of them speak English, not one.
Speaker 1 (27:49):
Now. As New York City, which by the way, I'm
not speaking about you, my guess is you're probably one
of the really good teachers that a kid would would
be lucky to have, and that you would inspire them
and you'd insist on a real education. So is New
York City. With this influx of illegal immigrants into New
York thanks to Joe Biden, you're seeing a massive increase
(28:13):
in kids coming from other countries and they don't speak English,
and you don't have enough teachers or resources to provide
the education that they would need if they're going to
stay in this country. Is that correct?
Speaker 6 (28:28):
That's correct now under Barack Obama. He said his mantra
was all teachers are English language teachers, which is not true.
Speaker 2 (28:40):
We all go to school for a.
Speaker 6 (28:41):
Specialty e an L EESL teacher, English second language teacher.
Those are teachers that's specialize.
Speaker 7 (28:52):
Gain access to a new language.
Speaker 3 (28:54):
But we are expected in.
Speaker 7 (28:56):
The classroom to give children those skills.
Speaker 6 (28:59):
We are not.
Speaker 5 (29:01):
That is not our specialty.
Speaker 6 (29:03):
No.
Speaker 1 (29:03):
As a matter of fact, you'd have to be bilingual
to start with English. Teaching English as a second language,
that in and of itself is a full time job.
You're not hiring new people to fulfill those positions. And
what does that mean that the children that are already
in school, whose parents live in New York, whose parents
(29:24):
I would assume pay taxes in New York, they are
now suffering, and their kids will suffer, and their educational
will be set back even further because New York City
schools public schools are some of the worst in the
country already. Is that a fair statement? Fair?
Speaker 7 (29:42):
But I have more for you. So every child since
COVID gets an ipen or some type of divices so
that they can access school in case we have to
ever be locked down again.
Speaker 6 (29:57):
Okay, Now, of.
Speaker 7 (30:00):
The billions, billions of dollars that are being spent on
legal immigrants in this city, what we have is a
situation where they're actually cutting back on all of these
things like giving children devices, like having proper materials, like
(30:21):
cutting positions inside the Department of Education in technology or
curriculum or things of that nature.
Speaker 6 (30:32):
So it isn't just one thing that's happening, but it's
all the way from the top all the way down.
And the only children that will suffer because these children
who come in most times are transient. They live here,
they go back to their country, they come back, they
move around, they'll move out of the state when they
(30:52):
can't stay here anymore. But what will happen is those
children who belong in the schools, who are legal, who
parents pay.
Speaker 2 (31:03):
Taxes.
Speaker 6 (31:04):
They will not only have been given a less and
black luster education from.
Speaker 8 (31:11):
COVID, but now they will not Their needs will not
be met because of the children who are sitting in
seats who honestly don't belong in our government schools.
Speaker 1 (31:25):
What you are describing is a very real problem, especially
in sanctuary cities and states. But now almost every city
in town around the country is becoming a border city
or state. A friend of mine is a principal out
in Long Island, and now they have taken on literally
hundreds and hundreds of illegal immigrants brought to New York
(31:49):
by Joe Biden, and they don't have the ability and
capacity and the finances to hire the teachers. Therefore, the
students in the school. He wasn't doing particularly well to
begin with, although my friend is trying hard. Now we'll
be set back educationally even further. That is a national tragedy.
(32:11):
And I know you're gonna do the best you can,
but under those circumstances, I don't think any teacher can
do their job to the best of their ability. All Right,
that's gonna wrap things up at today, Hannity from Nashville. Tonight,
we have Nikki Haley, Larry Kudlow, Steven Miller, Mike how
could be Kid Rock tonight? That ought it'd be fun,
Mike Pence and his daughter, and much more. Say in
(32:33):
DVR Hannity nine Eastern on Box We'll see you tonight
from Nashville. Back here tomorrow, No, actually back here on Friday.
Thank you for making this show if possible,
Stay right here for our final news roundup and information overload.
All right, News roundup, Information overload, our thank you for
being with us. It's eight hundred and nine foot one
Sean if you want to be a part of the program.
In a minute, we'll be joined by Kentucky Senator Ram Paul.
But there he is your FBI director. You know when
the FBI director comments on the skyrocketing number of suspected
(00:24):
terrorists at our border and says, I can't really speak
to that issue. And then Christopher Ray talks about over
the past two years, how they have seized enough fentanol
to kill two hundred and seventy million Americans. Then he
talks about the threat level in the country since October
the seventh, the worst terror attack at Israel's history, has
(00:48):
gone so much higher. A lot of these threats are
targeted at the Jewish community. And then he admits that
the FBI is conducting multiple investigations into individuals in our
country affiliated with the terrorist group Hamas. And then lastly
he discusses threats by Iran and his Belah to attack
(01:09):
Americans on US soil. Senator Ran paula Kentucky is with
US Senator when I hear our FBI director talking about
the skyrocketing number of suspected terrorists at our border, and
when I hear that him talk about seizing enough ventanyl
to kill almost every American two hundred and seventy million Americans,
(01:29):
and talk about the threat level, especially after October seventh,
to the Jewish community and acknowledging that we have people
affiliated with Hamas in our country and the threat of
Iran and his belaw on American soil. Why hasn't may
orcus and Biden and Kamala Harrison, Why haven't they closed
the border considering they're not vetting any of these people,
(01:52):
and they've been lying to us saying the borders closed
and the border secure.
Speaker 2 (01:56):
I think that ultimately their philosophy is of open borders.
I think think they truly do want as many people
to come across as possible. If they look at the
politics of Texas, they say the more illegal immigrants that
come in, the longer they're here, their children will vote,
and that their children are voting three to one Democrat,
And so they see this as a way of transforming
(02:16):
the country and the politics of this. It's also why
when you look at the specific human tragedy of you know,
smuggling of humans and young girls across the border, and
the drug trade, all the things that go along with
this open border spot process. They don't really seem to
care about those individuals too much. It isn't really concerned
for those individuals. They don't really care. They care purely
(02:39):
about the power politics of votes. And they think they
can make America basically permanently a Democrat left leaning country
by allowing unlimited numbers of people across the border.
Speaker 1 (02:51):
Well, it's pretty unbelievable. And yet we keep being lied to.
How come how do they get away with just looking
at us in the eye and saying the order is
secure and the borders are closed. And yet that day
we're watching illegal immigrants cross into the country, and we
know they're not getting betted.
Speaker 2 (03:09):
You know, I don't think ultimately they will win this.
And there's going to be a shift sometime that's going
to happen in the Electric when the electric decides that
these people don't care about my safety, that they're allowing
people to come across who are potentially terrorists, they're allowing
people to come across who are criminals, they're allowing rapists
and drug dealers to come across here, and human traffickers.
(03:30):
And I think when that finally hits home, when the
violence comes to all the cities, and I think it's there,
But when it finally becomes realized that this is the
policy of Democrats and not care about the crime that's
being brought into their community, the drugs are being brought
into your community, I think there is a breaking point
at which the electric breaks the other way, and that
maybe they miscalculate that open borders is going to help
(03:53):
them win elections.
Speaker 1 (03:54):
Oh I don't think so. How do you you know
we do have a rule of law. Maybe I'm just
struggling with us a little more than I should. But
if we believe we know for a fact people in
the thousands have been coming from the Middle East to
our southern border. We know that there have been tens
of thousands of communist Chinese and Russians that have come
(04:15):
across that border. My question is, Senator, you know, do
you think they're coming here because they want a better
life for themselves of their families, But do we have
to assume that many of them are coming here with
the farious intentions and that there are terror cells that
Joe Biden is currently letting into this country that when
they're here will plot, plan and scheme nine to eleven,
(04:38):
two point zero or far worse than that.
Speaker 2 (04:41):
You know, I think it's a combination. Obviously, there are
some good people just want a better way of life.
There's some people who are potentially terrorists. There's some people
that are criminals, rapists, human trafficker. So it's a combination.
But if you don't please your border, you don't know
who's who, and so you can expect the worst or
believe the worst, but you've got to please your border.
And ultimately this requires a change in policies. So it's
important for conservatives to know that if all of a
(05:02):
sudden they put forward a big Ukraine bill and they said, oh,
we're going to give some money for border security, if
the money is just dumped into the system we have,
it'll just basically go to Chicago and New York to
house these people. It'll get hotel rooms for them, you know,
across the United States. But it won't fix the problem.
You have to change the policy. You know, when Trump
had basically put pressure on the president of Mexico and
(05:24):
they got to remain in Mexico policy that required Mexico
actually acceding to what we wanted, and it worked, and
we had it for a while and the numbers were,
you know, ninety percent less than they are now. But
you have to go back to that. You have to
have a policy where you can't just come to the
border and get admittance. If you come across the border
and you didn't come across properly, you have to be
put right back on the other side of the border.
(05:46):
All you do is do that for a month or two,
and there's several thousand people on a camp over there,
and then they quit coming. They're coming now because basically
CNN sends a beacon signal to the entire world to
walk to the United States that Biden will let you in.
Speaker 1 (05:59):
That's exactly what's happening. Let me shift the gears on
you a little bit here. Congratulations on your best selling book, Deception,
the Great COVID cover Up. If we did have equal
justice under the law, I think that Anthony Fauci would
be under a major investigation today. But we also I
want to ask you about this twelve million dollars taxpayer
(06:21):
funded NIH research facility in Colorado that I can't believe
apparently is going to import bats from Asia. Are they
also going to have gain of function research?
Speaker 2 (06:34):
Senator, This is just a death wish. This is a
gamble that we should not take as a civilization. We
should be treating this as if, Hey, why don't we
import in a radioactive atomic bomb from China and bring
it right into the middle of Colorado. No, it's a
terrible disaster. There will be gain of function research because
they are doing it across the United States, and my
(06:57):
fear is that there will be another accident and another accident.
You know, if the virus is a more deadly virus.
This virus as deadly as as it was, was point
three percent deadly. Can you imagine if the next one's
five percent deadly or fifty percent deadly. We're talking about
something that could end civilization as we know it. And
(07:18):
apparently Peter Dayzac's involved with this. He's the guy that
in the book we talk about was the leader of
Eco Health Alliance, which is the main funder of the
research that went on in Wuhan that led to this pandemic. Now,
finally the government has said that Wuhan Lab's not going
to get money for ten years, but there's been no
ban on Peter Dazak. Peter Dazak has arguably committed acts
(07:41):
that really need to be judged by the legal system.
He needs to be brought in apparently he was apparently
brought in for deposition recently by Congress, and yet money
still flowing to this guy. He should be have a
permanent lifetime ban on money for his involvement in the
Wuan project because you know, he never released his records.
Even when the NIH asking for records, he said they're
(08:01):
proprietary and I won't do it. When the WHO asking
this when they were investigations by Lancet, he refused to
give any of his records. For that refusal refusing to
cooperate in the investigation, he should be permanently disbarred from
getting any of our taxpayer money.
Speaker 1 (08:18):
Well, I don't know why we would ever do this.
This is insanity. What is the one big takeaway? You know,
as I'm pretty certain that Joe Biden is never going
to bring up COVID, intellectual property theft, unfair trade practices, aggret,
the spy balloon, aggressive actions against our fighter jets and
(08:38):
international airspace, our Navy being confronted in international waterways by China.
I don't think it's going to be brought up. The
hostilities over Taiwan airspace. I don't think any of that's
coming up with Joe Biden in China. And I think,
you know, I think that President She is going to
see a very weak president probably inside be laughing to himself.
Speaker 2 (09:01):
I think you're exactly right in this. I don't see
Biden standing up to She in any meaningful way. And
even with the whole idea of this research, you know,
we could have put pressure on them from the very beginning. Instead,
when the Trump administration offered three scientists to go to
China to study the origins of this with the who,
(09:22):
China rejected all of them and said, oh no, we
want Peter Dazak, the guy who was funding the lab,
as if he weren't conflicted enough on this. So now
I don't expect Biden to have the strength of character
or presence of mind really to be able to negotiate
from a position of strength. So I don't expect a
lot of this meeting.
Speaker 1 (09:40):
All right, quick break more with Senator Rampaul coming up,
and then your calls eight hundred and ninety four one
sean our number if you want to be a part
of the program. As we continue, all right, we continue
with Senator Ram Paul. By the way, another big congratulations
to him on his best selling book that came out.
It's called Deception, the Great COVID cover up a lot
(10:02):
of information in there that you're gonna it's gonna shock you,
and it should shock you and this should never happen again.
But we continue with Senator Paul. What do you think
about the way Congress can never seem to follow regular
order and pass appropriations bills. I understand the situation that
Speaker Johnson was in. He's only been on the job
(10:23):
for three weeks and he's only got a three vote majority,
and he's got very in fact, various factions within the
Republican Party in the House, and his hands are tied.
It's becoming dysfunctional at this point.
Speaker 2 (10:37):
Well, there is something the Speaker can do, and this
is what I'm encouraging conservatives over there that I deal
with on a daily basis to advocate for, is that
if he still does each of the appropriation bills individually,
if there's twelve different appropriation bills, the Senate will respond
by doing maxibuses or omnibuses. They're gonna bundle them all
together and send them back. I believe the Speaker has
(10:59):
the power to say, we will only conference on individual bills.
So let's say the Senate sends nine bills over there
together and the House does them individually. Then you have
twelve bytes at the apple. And it may be that
on one twelfth of government, maybe you can leverage to
reduce the IRS agent's being hired. Maybe you can reduce
some of the prohibitions on gas cars, things like that.
(11:22):
There may be points of leverage when you divide government
spending into twelve. So if Conservatives hang in there, and
if the Speaker will say we are not conferencing on
groups of bills, only on individual bills, and if they
actually do that during the period of these continuous solutions,
then I think they'll they'll end up being some success.
Today on the floor, we will get the House version
(11:42):
and I will oppose it, but I will also introduce
an amendment to cut about fifty dollars fifty billion dollars
worth of spending, because I think the levels after the
pandemic and after the bidens spending, I can't vote to
continue them at the same level. So I'm in league
with the Conservatives on the House side and saying this
spending level is too high.
Speaker 1 (12:00):
The spending level is too high. I mean, we just
had another two trillion dollars in debt. Senator. I never
thought we'd get to a point as a country before
our government. You're the one you're a part of, and
it's not your fault. Uh, we pay it before we
can spend one dime. We're now spending a trillion dollars
just to pay off the debt annually, a trillion dollars.
(12:22):
That's a sustainable Senator.
Speaker 2 (12:24):
Yeah. And we're accumulating debt at about a trillion dollars
every three months. The last three months we added another trillion.
So it is out of control, and I fear there
is coming a day of reckoning. I think our biggest
threat to our country is from within, not from without.
It's the demise of the dollar. It's a day in
which there's a panic worldwide and people say we're no
(12:45):
longer buying the dollar because these people cannot balance their budget.
You know. Look, half of the European Union has an
annual balance budget. Denmark Sweden, they balance their annual budget.
Germany they balance their budget even though they have big
welfare states and a lot of taxes, they don't run
a huge debt every year.
Speaker 1 (13:02):
So yeah, by the way, one reason why is because
we're stupid enough to be funding the UN, the WEF
the WHO, the Paris Climate Accords, all things we need
to stop doing.
Speaker 2 (13:12):
In my opinion, you're exactly right, and we fund everything.
And the only thing that's true in Washington is they
will never make a decision or a choice to fund
one thing versus another. They say, let's fund it all,
just put it on our tab. And this is the
real problem in state capital. State legislators make decisions in
your city council, they make decisions because there's a finite
(13:33):
amount of money. Only in Washington is the money considered
to be infinite, and the federals er will print it up.
So no one ever makes any tough decisions up here.
I've never heard of anybody. In fact, when the speaker
came forward and said the israel Aid will be paid
for by cutting IRS money, that's the first time we've
had a speaker with any guts in the entire time
i've been up here who would actually offset new spending
(13:54):
by getting rid of existing spending.
Speaker 1 (13:56):
Oh, we appreciate you, senator, thanks for being with us.
By the way, if not had a chance to read
the Senator Ram Paul's book, it's called The Deception, The
Great COVID cover up Amazon dot com bookstores around the country.
Thank you, senator, appreciate it a lot. Thanks Sean eight
hundred nine foot one, Shawn is a number. All right?
I talk about this all the time. What are you
(14:18):
going to do if God forbid you have a perpetrator
that breaks into your house, your business, whatever, confronts you
on the street and wants to bring harm to you
or to your family. Now, I've been a big believer
and still am a big believer in my Second Amendment rights.
I've had a license to carry my entire adult life,
and I've now been introduced to Berner b y r NA.
(14:43):
What's burner? Berner is an effective non lethal alternative looks
like a gun, fires like a gun, and it shoots
projectiles that have two different pepper sprays that will disperse
along with tear gas. And it's legal in all fifty states,
no background checks needed, and it frankly works they not
(15:04):
only have the pistols, they now come out with a
rifle version which I love even more, which is called
the Mission for Linda. I mean. And on top of that,
they have their twelve gauge non lethal shotgun round. You
put it in your own your own shotgun, and that
can be around and a means to you incapacitate any perpetrator.
(15:26):
It's an option. I like having the choice. I've been
practicing often now that I got my new I finally
got them delivered. I got the new mission for that
I purchased, and I'm glad I did.
Speaker 3 (15:37):
Yeah.
Speaker 4 (15:37):
And you know what's really cool about Berna. I was
talking to their CEO the other day. He really cares
so much about safety. That's the thing that he cares
the most about. He's like, I don't want people to
think that just because they're getting a less lethal gun,
they don't need to be trained.
Speaker 1 (15:51):
They do.
Speaker 4 (15:51):
So they have all these awesome safety videos and they
even have your video up using the Mission for using
those twelve gauge les lethal bullets and showing how to
clear a house and how to do it safely with
I love.
Speaker 1 (16:02):
I've sent around firearms my whole life, and that day
when they sent their special forces guys over and we
went and met them. I got to tell you something,
I learned a lot that day.
Speaker 4 (16:12):
We learned a lot, and our audience can learn a
lot by going to Burner dot com, going to handity
dot com, and we strongly advise you to get your
own less lethal because it really can save your life
and not hurt the person trying to hurt.
Speaker 1 (16:23):
You by RNA dot com slash Hannity by RNA dot
com slash Hannity, and you're gonna love this non lethal
defense option. You can't always believe what the other side claims.
That's why there's the Sean Hannity Show. Hi twenty five
(16:44):
to the top of the hour. We'll get to your
calls here in a second eight hundred nine to fourt one, Shawn,
if you want to be a part of the program.
All right, Christmas is going to be here. Next week
is Thanksgiving, and that means get ready. Christmas is right
around the corner. And if you're looking for a really
special gift, I urge you to go to the website
Henry USA one word dot com. Why because you can
(17:06):
get their free holiday gift guide. They'll mail it to you.
Every Henry is made right here in America. All their
parts are American, but they do use old school fine craftsmanship,
the finest I've ever seen. And you're giving somebody if
you give them a Henry, you're giving them a work
of art. You're giving them a future family heirloom. They're
going to be passed down for generations, always backed by
(17:28):
the company's lifetime warrant. I will tell you this is
a very special company. Their performance every Henry I own,
it's top notch, accurate out of the box. They shoot smooth,
they shoot straight, reliable from day one and it remains reliable.
They got over two hundred models of rifles and shotguns
revolvers you can choose from. In other words, they got
(17:49):
something for everybody on your gift list this year, whether
they're outdoorsmen or hunters, or beginners or collectors anyway, or
you know they need home or business, self defense, whatever
it happens to be anyway, check it out right now.
Go to HENRYUSA dot com get their free gift guide.
They'll send free decals with it and a list of
dealers where you are. Henry USA dot com. You're gonna
(18:13):
love this company. I love this company. Eight hundred ninety
four one, Shawn. If you want to be a part
of the program, Ryan is in Kansas. Ryan, You're next
on the Sean Hannity Show.
Speaker 3 (18:22):
Hi doing sewn first time caller.
Speaker 1 (18:25):
Love you, sir, Thank you, buddy, appreciate it. Glad you're
out there.
Speaker 3 (18:28):
Hey, quick question. I just was monoring something on the
news yesterday and I just couldn't believe it when they
told me that we were negotiating with terrorists. I thought
it had always been our policy.
Speaker 2 (18:40):
That we don't.
Speaker 3 (18:41):
Negotiate with terrorists.
Speaker 1 (18:42):
A great point.
Speaker 3 (18:44):
I mean, as a strong country, we have to stand
up for everyone and we just go and like, listen
strong with teams.
Speaker 1 (18:55):
I'm gonna tell you in principle everything you're saying, you know,
I like, for example, when Biden paid the Mullows and
Iran six billion dollars as a ransom for five Americans.
You know, I just I was apoplectic. If you're one
of the family members of the two hundred plus or
four hundred plus, there's all these estimates about how many
(19:17):
hostages AMAS actually has, and your family member, you know,
may have an opportunity to be released to deep down
in my heart. Do I want the government to do
everything humanly possible to try and save my loved one.
Of course I do, because I have a heart, I
(19:37):
have a conscience, and I have a soul. It's not
as cut and dry as people like to make it
out to be. Deals like this are happen to be
made all the time. But you can't. It's got you
can't be in a position where you're paying a billion
two per hostage. You just can't do that. It's got
(20:00):
to be one for one. And if I was Israel,
you know, the problem is if you take Palestinians or
even hamas terrorist hostage, they don't care about those hostages.
Speaker 2 (20:10):
You know.
Speaker 1 (20:11):
The only people that care about hostages in this conflict
are Israel and the United States. Nobody else seems to care.
Speaker 3 (20:17):
And you're right, you know, you're right, Sean. The thing
about it is it shows weakness.
Speaker 1 (20:24):
It shows weakness, and it does one other thing, and
it encourages more hostage.
Speaker 3 (20:28):
Taking, absolutely, And I just and I just feel.
Speaker 1 (20:33):
However, if it was your son or daughter, wouldn't you
want the government to be trying Because I would. I
admit I'm a hypocrite on the issue. The total hypocrite.
Speaker 3 (20:42):
Sean, I would be doing everything. I'd be finding a
way I could go over there and talk to people
in trying to rescue them myself.
Speaker 1 (20:50):
But reality, I'd offer to surrender myself and let my
kid go. I mean, that's what good people do. So
I'm not going to be as harsh on that, even
though I know in the end it results at all
likelihood it will result in more hostage taking. However, I
(21:15):
am very, very sympathetic and understanding to the families of
loved ones.
Speaker 3 (21:22):
I understand. When I was stationed in Germany, I went
and visited Docou and Aschmitz, and just going there just
puts me and I can feel the emotion that every
one of those family members are feeling. It's just you
can't believe it.
Speaker 1 (21:40):
Well, it's terrible. And by the way, this is the
nineteen thirties all over again. I never thought we would
see stuff like this in our lifetime. And the sheer
numbers of people worldwide that are showing their anti Semitism
and their hatred and their bias and their racist them
and they're bigotry's shocking to me.
Speaker 2 (22:02):
You know.
Speaker 1 (22:03):
I look, I'm old school. I kind of believe in
the way my parents raised me is that every human
being is a child of God and the only difference
is human beings have the choice of propensity towards good
or propensity towards evil. And you know, I'm praying hard
for these hostages, but I'm also praying hard for Israel's
(22:24):
full and complete victory over terrorism radical islamis. John is
in California disagrees with me. What's up, John? How are
you hi?
Speaker 5 (22:34):
Sean? This is John from California. I always listen to
your program, and I think you're a very smart man.
But run for president. I would vote for you, but
I don't know if you want that job.
Speaker 1 (22:45):
By the way, you're you're recording this conversation, aren't you?
Speaker 2 (22:48):
OK?
Speaker 1 (22:50):
That's fine, Okay, that's how That's how sophisticated our technology is.
Why do you feel a need to record this conversation?
Speaker 2 (22:59):
Uh?
Speaker 1 (22:59):
Do you do you work for an organization?
Speaker 2 (23:01):
Do you know? I don't work.
Speaker 5 (23:04):
I don't work for anybody. I'm just doing this itself.
Speaker 1 (23:07):
Because is it your plan to put this on social
media and say that Sean Hannity wouldn't let me say,
kill the Jews or something.
Speaker 5 (23:14):
No, I just turned it off. If that makes you
feel better, if that's what you want, that's fine.
Speaker 1 (23:18):
Well, it says you disagree with me on the issue
of Hamas. So do you support Hamas? Do you not
recognize that moss a terrorist organization.
Speaker 5 (23:27):
I'm a Palestinian, I'm a Christian Palestinian. I was born
in Palestine.
Speaker 1 (23:31):
And ask you that I asked you is Hamas a
terrorist organization? That's the question I asked you.
Speaker 5 (23:38):
As far as I'm concerned, though I think there are
resistance of the occupation.
Speaker 1 (23:43):
Resistance, Well, Israel has not been occupying Gaza. I've been
there myself. They have not been there for many, many years.
So you're saying that an organization that has as part
of their charter it calls for the destruction of Israel.
You're saying, the people that are on in October seventh
went into Israel, and we know, we have videotape of it.
(24:03):
How do I know because I've been able to see it,
of the atrocities and the murder and the death and destruction,
and the rapes and the beheadings and the killing of
innocent men, women and children and babies. And you're saying
to me that Hamas doing that is not terrorism.
Speaker 5 (24:22):
To you, But isn't what Israel doing to the people
of gods are the same thing?
Speaker 1 (24:26):
Calling Okay, you know what, Answering my question with your
question is not an answer. I'll ask you again. We
have videotaped evidence. Hamas took the video. I guess they're
proud of the evil they perpetrated. They killed innocent men, women, children,
and babies. They even beheaded babies, they even burned babies.
(24:48):
And you're you're going to tell my audience on seven
hundred and thirty five radio stations around the country that
that's not terrorism.
Speaker 5 (24:57):
I thought that the news went back and said there
was no evidence of be any children.
Speaker 1 (25:01):
Oh no, there's evidence. The idea of has the evidence.
I promise you I've seen it.
Speaker 5 (25:07):
No evidence.
Speaker 1 (25:08):
Okay, and you you won't even acknowledge that in their
own charter that Hamas is a terrorist organization.
Speaker 5 (25:15):
Well, isn't Israel doing the same thing, except that Israels?
Speaker 1 (25:18):
Okay. I keep going back to this little game you play.
You see, I ask a question and then you want
to not answer and ask me a question. I'm asking
the questions. Okay, So answer, Okay, does Hamas have in
their charter the call for the destruction of the state
of Israel. That's a yes or no question.
Speaker 5 (25:37):
No, even when Jimmy Carter had a meeting a long
time ago.
Speaker 1 (25:41):
Hey, hey, John, you can put your tape recorder on
because I want you to hear this loud and clear.
You are ignorant, and you are naive, and you are
absolutely clueless about what the group Hamas is about. Did
you hear me loud and clear? Did you hear that?
You are? You are an ignorant human being? You are
(26:04):
you are either ill informed or you're just justifying the
terrorist actions one of the other. I don't know. I
don't have time to give you. You know, I don't have
the desire to pursue this any further because people like
you that don't condemn terrorism and terrorists I have no
time for. I really don't, so enjoy your ignorant bliss
(26:26):
that you're currently living in. By the way, Linda, give
me props for picking up that this thing was recorded.
Speaker 4 (26:32):
Listen. I mean, you know that's what thirty years of
radio does give you.
Speaker 1 (26:34):
Good ears, and my ears are shot. So the fact
that I heard it is a miracle, truely, and you
heard it right, away too, because you I saw it,
you like simultaneously texting me being recorded. It's hilarious.
Speaker 4 (26:48):
Typical.
Speaker 1 (26:49):
Oh and by the way, every word of that call
aired everywhere. Word of that call is on the air. Anyway,
Maria in New York, Maria, how are you?
Speaker 6 (27:00):
How are you.
Speaker 1 (27:03):
Well? After that last call? I'm a little irritated.
Speaker 6 (27:06):
Oh boy, all right, Well you're going to really enjoy
this call.
Speaker 1 (27:10):
Okay.
Speaker 3 (27:11):
School teacher in New.
Speaker 6 (27:12):
York City, Okay, And I want to let you know
exactly what's happening in New York City the migrant children. Okay,
the city of New York. We don't have public schools.
We have government schools. And in these government schools, they
are filling them with migrant children. There was in a
(27:32):
day that goes by that not one to three children
are involved.
Speaker 7 (27:36):
In a school, some more than others in classrooms.
Speaker 8 (27:41):
So you have thirty two children who are sitting there
and not one of them speak English, not one.
Speaker 1 (27:49):
Now. As New York City, which by the way, I'm
not speaking about you, my guess is you're probably one
of the really good teachers that a kid would would
be lucky to have, and that you would inspire them
and you'd insist on a real education. So is New
York City. With this influx of illegal immigrants into New
York thanks to Joe Biden, you're seeing a massive increase
(28:13):
in kids coming from other countries and they don't speak English,
and you don't have enough teachers or resources to provide
the education that they would need if they're going to
stay in this country. Is that correct?
Speaker 6 (28:28):
That's correct now under Barack Obama. He said his mantra
was all teachers are English language teachers, which is not true.
Speaker 2 (28:40):
We all go to school for a.
Speaker 6 (28:41):
Specialty e an L EESL teacher, English second language teacher.
Those are teachers that's specialize.
Speaker 7 (28:52):
Gain access to a new language.
Speaker 3 (28:54):
But we are expected in.
Speaker 7 (28:56):
The classroom to give children those skills.
Speaker 6 (28:59):
We are not.
Speaker 5 (29:01):
That is not our specialty.
Speaker 6 (29:03):
No.
Speaker 1 (29:03):
As a matter of fact, you'd have to be bilingual
to start with English. Teaching English as a second language,
that in and of itself is a full time job.
You're not hiring new people to fulfill those positions. And
what does that mean that the children that are already
in school, whose parents live in New York, whose parents
(29:24):
I would assume pay taxes in New York, they are
now suffering, and their kids will suffer, and their educational
will be set back even further because New York City
schools public schools are some of the worst in the
country already. Is that a fair statement? Fair?
Speaker 7 (29:42):
But I have more for you. So every child since
COVID gets an ipen or some type of divices so
that they can access school in case we have to
ever be locked down again.
Speaker 6 (29:57):
Okay, Now, of.
Speaker 7 (30:00):
The billions, billions of dollars that are being spent on
legal immigrants in this city, what we have is a
situation where they're actually cutting back on all of these
things like giving children devices, like having proper materials, like
(30:21):
cutting positions inside the Department of Education in technology or
curriculum or things of that nature.
Speaker 6 (30:32):
So it isn't just one thing that's happening, but it's
all the way from the top all the way down.
And the only children that will suffer because these children
who come in most times are transient. They live here,
they go back to their country, they come back, they
move around, they'll move out of the state when they
(30:52):
can't stay here anymore. But what will happen is those
children who belong in the schools, who are legal, who
parents pay.
Speaker 2 (31:03):
Taxes.
Speaker 6 (31:04):
They will not only have been given a less and
black luster education from.
Speaker 8 (31:11):
COVID, but now they will not Their needs will not
be met because of the children who are sitting in
seats who honestly don't belong in our government schools.
Speaker 1 (31:25):
What you are describing is a very real problem, especially
in sanctuary cities and states. But now almost every city
in town around the country is becoming a border city
or state. A friend of mine is a principal out
in Long Island, and now they have taken on literally
hundreds and hundreds of illegal immigrants brought to New York
(31:49):
by Joe Biden, and they don't have the ability and
capacity and the finances to hire the teachers. Therefore, the
students in the school. He wasn't doing particularly well to
begin with, although my friend is trying hard. Now we'll
be set back educationally even further. That is a national tragedy.
(32:11):
And I know you're gonna do the best you can,
but under those circumstances, I don't think any teacher can
do their job to the best of their ability. All Right,
that's gonna wrap things up at today, Hannity from Nashville. Tonight,
we have Nikki Haley, Larry Kudlow, Steven Miller, Mike how
could be Kid Rock tonight? That ought it'd be fun,
Mike Pence and his daughter, and much more. Say in
(32:33):
DVR Hannity nine Eastern on Box We'll see you tonight
from Nashville. Back here tomorrow, No, actually back here on Friday.
Thank you for making this show if possible,
The Sean Hannity Show News
Host
Sean Hannity
Popular Podcasts
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Therapy Gecko
An unlicensed lizard psychologist travels the universe talking to strangers about absolutely nothing. TO CALL THE GECKO: follow me on https://www.twitch.tv/lyleforever to get a notification for when I am taking calls. I am usually live Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays but lately a lot of other times too. I am a gecko.