July 30, 2025 • 30 mins
Sean Hannity welcomes Sean Davis, co-founder of The Federalist, to break down bombshell revelations from Tulsi Gabbard’s declassification of Obama-era intelligence manipulation. They detail Brennan’s use of the discredited Steele dossier, PHIZA abuse, and the cover-up that shaped public opinion and elections. Hannity connects the dots from 2016 to 2024, exposing the multi-year conspiracy to undermine Donald Trump and the will of the American people.
Follow Sean and Our Guests on Social Media:
-
Facebook: facebook.com/SeanHannity
-
X (Twitter): x.com/seanhannity
-
Truth Social: truthsocial.com/@SeanHannity
Sean Davis:-
Website: TheFederalist.com
-
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Stay right here for our final news roundup and information overload.
All right, News Roundup and Information Overload, Hour eight hundred
and nine four one, Shawn our number if you want
to be a part of the program. So we have
new developments today. If you go back to the declassification
by Tulca Gabbard, let's remind you of what she said
(00:21):
when she announced she was making this declassification, some of
the things that she found, like, for example, then CIA
Director John Brennan overruling CIA officers who dared to challenge
the Russia Gate narrative. Remember, the original intelligence assessment report
(00:41):
that was put out was one that said that Donald
Trump never colluded with Russia and there was no evidence
of such. And this is weeks and weeks after the
twenty sixteen election. Here's what she said.
Speaker 2 (00:52):
The Intelligence Committee's oversight report reveals that CIA Director Brennan
overruled senior CIA officers who challenged the Obama ordered intelligence assessment,
stating quote, we don't have direct information that Putin wanted
to get Trump elected. Yet the Obama directed assessment was
published on January sixth, twenty seventeen, which explicitly stated, quote,
(01:15):
we assess Putin and the Russian government aspired to help
President elect Trump's selection chances when possible by discrediting Secretary
Clinton and publicly contrasting her unfavorably to him end of quote.
Speaker 1 (01:28):
With regards to the.
Speaker 2 (01:29):
Steele dossier, we now know that one of the source
documents that the Obama administration used in the creation of
this intelligence assessment in January of twenty seventeen was none
other than the discredited, unverified Steele dossier. The House Intel
report states quote, contradicting public claims by then CIA Director
Brennan that the dossier was not in any way incorporated
(01:52):
into this intelligence assessment. The dossier was referenced in the
intelligence assessment's main body text and further detailed in a
two page assessment annex. John Brennan lied, and he denied
using this dossier in this intelligence assessment that President Obama
ordered because he knew it was discredited. It was a
politically motivated, manufactured document. He directed senior CIA officials to
(02:17):
use it anyway.
Speaker 1 (02:19):
They knew by December twenty sixteen. That's why they got
rid of Christopher Steele. At the time. They knew it
was discredited. They were even warned about it As early
as August of twenty sixteen, Bruce Or warned James call
Me not to trust the document, that it was political
in nature, and this was the Hillary Clinton bought and
paid for Russian disinformation dossier. And anyway, it was not
(02:44):
only discredited and unverified, it has since been totally completely debunked.
It was debunked by December of twenty sixteen. And then
it raises questions about call Me, because it was the
bulk of information also used for not one, not two,
not three, but four PHIZ applications, three of which called
Me personally signed on to himself even well after the
(03:07):
point designing at least two of them, knowing completely that
it was discredited by law. Once he knows that information
presented to a PHIZA court ends up being false, at
that point he has an obligation to go back to
the Phiz of court and said, no, we made a mistake.
Then we have this big story breaking earlier today that
cash Patel has turned over documents to the Senate Judiciary
(03:30):
Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, which apparently he found a trove
of sensitive documents related to the origins of the Trump
Rushier probe that were buried in multiple quote burn bags
in a secret room inside the FBI, and sources now
telling Fox News Digital that the burn bag system is
used to destroy documents designated as classified or higher and anyway,
(03:55):
the multiple burn bags were found filled with thousands of
documents and courses now saying that one of the documents
the FBI officials found in the burn bag was the
classified annex to the former Special Council John Durham's final report,
which includes the underlying intelligence that he reviewed, and the
declassification of the classified annex is being done in close
(04:19):
coordination with John Ratcliffe, the CIA director, Cash Bettel, the
FBI director and the Director of National Intelligence Tulcy Gabbart,
and the Attorney General Pam Bondi according to people. But anyway,
this will be transmitted now to the Senate Judiciary Committee chairman.
And then this goes to the broader investigation opened by
Cash Bettel's FBI into what is a grand conspiracy to
(04:42):
put cinderblocks on the scales of elections, which it appears,
based on everything we've been reporting now for years, absolutely
positively have happened. Sean Davis with the Federalist is going
to join us in just a second, here is the
CEO and founder of The Federalist and he put up
(05:02):
a post that pointed out that there are five to
ten people that have been deeply involved in reporting on
the Russia collusion hoax from the very beginning back in
early twenty seventeen, he points out rightly, so he's one
of them, also others, and that they've been doing this
for eight years. Well, we've been doing it on this
show and been doing it on Hannity, and we've had
(05:24):
Sean Davis on various times about all of this, discussing
it with our ensemble cast. But the blockbuster revelations he
points out from last week about the fraudulent Intelligence community
assessment is not old news, and it's not and anyone
saying that there's nothing new in the recent declassification is
(05:46):
flat out lying and it's not a nothing burger. These
are called smoking guns in the industry anyway. Sean Davis
joins us. Now, sir, how are you.
Speaker 3 (05:56):
I'm doing well? Thank you for having me.
Speaker 1 (05:58):
Well, we were on similar parallel pass at the time,
and I know that people like you and others were
doing your work. We had you on numerous times to
talk about this and other issues. But what you're pointing
out in your post top Obama officials in their corrupt
media stenographers repeatedly lied when they claimed that the bogus
(06:20):
Stele dossier was which was paid for by Hillary Clinton,
and the DNC was never referenced in the body of
this intelligence assessment. Now, Pulsey Gabbard made that very bold
statement based on the declassification announcement that she made, and
she made it clearly. And fake news CNN, which went
wall to wall with this phony Russia collusion hoax all
(06:42):
those years, even cut away from the press conference because
it totally discredited what they had been reporting for the
longest period of times time, but more specifically that three
year period.
Speaker 3 (06:56):
Right, this is a major blockbuster because there were always
two big pillars that were erected in service of the
Russia collusion hopes. The second one was this idea that
Trump colluded with putin steal the election from Hillary. That's
what the Steele dossier was all about. But none of
that would have been possible rhetorically without the first pillar,
(07:18):
which was the allegation that Russia interfered in the election
in twenty sixteen for the purpose of electing Donald Trump
in defeating Hillary Clinton. That really was the foundation of everything.
And what we've learned in the last week from Gabbard
and Ratcliffe, and God blessed them for finding this information
and getting it out there. We found that that first pillar,
(07:39):
this idea that Russia was interfering to help Trump win,
that was a lie, that they knew it was a lie,
that they never had any intel to support it, and
that they even used the Steele dossier. Contradictory to John
Brynn sworn congressional testimony, they even used the Steele dossier
to support this lie that Putin wanted Trump to win.
Speaker 1 (07:59):
You can part on a basic level because lying to
Congress under oath is a crime, and that would then
therefore implicate a number of top people. I would assume
Brennan and Clapper and call me and we could just
start there. Is that correct?
Speaker 3 (08:13):
That is correct, But there's also a five year statute
of limitations if you're looking at perjury or false statements.
Brennan's came within the last couple of years. I think
he told Congress this particular falsehoods recently is twenty twenty three.
So if you're just looking at perpon well.
Speaker 1 (08:29):
Some of them love it were in twenty twenty, and
I believe that they can get this going and extend
the Statute of Limitations. Is my understanding for those three
in particular, Well.
Speaker 3 (08:40):
I think they may be able to. I think the
better case for tolling the Statute of Limitations is to
not look at singular false statements to Congress as the
basis for all criminal charges. It's to look at everything
that was done since twenty seventeen is as part of
a massive fraudulent conspiracy against the American people and against
(09:03):
the government of the United States. In each new false
state that they make today or tomorrow or a week
from now is an overt act in furtherance of that conspiracy,
which starts that Statute of Limitations clocks. Overall.
Speaker 1 (09:16):
Again, that's all true, which is part of the reason
why I'm looking at the broader investigation of Cash Fattel.
Now from my advantage point, everything that we know about
twenty sixteen and seventeen, and how the original intelligence assessment
that came from rank and file career rank and files,
(09:39):
senior and Intel officials, they concluded something that was very
clear that there was no Trump Russia collusion well, it
turns out that Barack Obama, according to the declassification and others,
did not like that assessment, and then they went about
the business of redoing it and creating a false now
(10:00):
narrative based in part on a debunct dossier that Hillary
Clinton had bought and paid for that they were warned about,
you know, early in the campaign, Brennan himself warning Obama
and that it was also used for not one but
four fi's application. So I would argue that that's part
of the grand conspiracy, and that is to undermine a
duly elected president. Then I would argue that it continues
(10:22):
through twenty twenty because we know that they verified the
authenticity of Hunter Biden's laptop. The FBI did in March
of twenty twenty, and then they systematically went about meeting
on a weekly basis with all these big tech companies
and warning them that they may be victims of a
Russia hoax and disinformation campaign. And they also knew at
(10:46):
the time that Rudy Giuliani's attorney, Bob Costello, had a
copy of Hunter's very real laptop. They knew it would
become public. They were warning these companies specifically that this
Russian disinformation may be about Hunter or Joe Biden, and
it might even include barisma, is my understanding. And then
when the story broke in the New York Post in
(11:08):
October of twenty twenty, many of those social media company
leaders like Mark Zuckerberg and Jack Dorsey a Twitter. They
were asking the FBI, is this what you were warning about?
Or is it true? They wouldn't give them the answer,
even though they knew the truth. They knew what the
answer was, they had prebunked the entire story. The story
gets suppressed, that impacts the election. To me, that's putting
(11:30):
cinderblocks on the scales of an election. And lastly, I
would argue, from twenty twenty to twenty twenty four, in
the weaponization of the DOJ, etc. And lawfair that went
on against Donald Trump, that was to bloody him up
and destroy him so he would never be a viable
candidate at all for twenty twenty four, that to me,
(11:50):
all combined would be the grand conspiracy you of many
of the same actors' names and players thoughts.
Speaker 3 (11:56):
Oh, I completely agree, And let's transport ourselves back to
when the FBI rated Trump's personal home in mar Lago
which was just a shocking, unprecedented act of suggery. One
of their stated reasons for going in there was they
thought he had a bunch of these documents implicating them
in their Russiagate conspiracy, and they were going back there
(12:19):
to take all those documents back from him. So even
the raid of him, the federal charges against him, were
part of this larger conspiracy that started with the entire
Russiagate collusion hoax. And this isn't just the biggest scandal
of the last couple of years or the biggest scandal
of the twenty first century. I think it is the
(12:40):
biggest political scandal in American history and to date yet
not one person has gone to prison for it.
Speaker 1 (12:46):
Quick break right back more with Sean Davis, CEO, co
founder of the Federalist on the other side than your
calls coming up eight hundred and ninety four one, Sean,
as we continue, I would continue now Sean Davis is
with us CEO, co founder of the FED. This is
where I guess we have to manage people's expectations, right,
I mean, I never like to overpromise and under deliver.
(13:08):
I think the evidence is overwhelming. I think it's incontrovertible.
I think the timeline is very clear. The fifty one
former Intel officials, not one of them knew a thing
about Hunter's laptop. They knew that the Steele nossier was garbage,
They knew the real value of Mara a Lago, they
knew that the statute of limitations had run out on
a legal non disclosure agreement. And I can keep going
(13:30):
and going and going. It just never ending. Made up,
trumped up charges pun intended to destroy this man and
to impact presidential elections and impact the office of the presidency.
Now I would agree with you. I think it's the
biggest scandal in history. Will anything happen in your view?
Speaker 3 (13:48):
Well, I think one good development on that front was
when Attorney General Pam Bondi announced the formation of what
she called a strikeforce from DJ is a very particular
type of entity. It's not just one special prosecutor with
the informoder DOJ going to investigate stuff by himself. It
(14:10):
is a directive that all agencies have to work together
towards a common goal of investigating and prosecuting crime. And
if you look at the history of these DOJ strike forces,
these multi agency strike forces, they were really designed and
used to great effect against organized crime, against mob crime,
to root out and prosecute racketeering. That to me is
(14:34):
a sign that DJ is very seriously looking at what happened,
not as a series of discrete events whereby one or
two intell officials set something false before Congress, but a
massive conspiracy designed to defraud the entire United States for
a year. So I think that's a great development from
our DOJ so far.
Speaker 1 (14:54):
I think it is as well. I have a pretty
high degree of confidence that this is not being done
for no reason, and I hope we get to the
bottom of it because if we don't, I think what
Dan Bongino was warning about this weekend and his widely
publicized X post, We're not going to have a republic
(15:15):
at the end of this process if this type of
thing can go on and continue and people are not
held accountable. Jean Davis, CEO, co founder Federalists, We appreciate you,
Thank you, sir.
Speaker 3 (15:25):
Always a pleasure. Thank you.
Speaker 1 (15:26):
All right, let's get to our busy, busy telephones here.
Let's say hi to Steve in Colorado. What's up, Steve?
How are you glad you called?
Speaker 4 (15:36):
Hey?
Speaker 5 (15:37):
Sean? I just called to address the rumors that we've
been hearing. Okay, we're thinking, we're even thinking about starting
a Facebook group. It's called Truckers for Sean Hannity for President.
Speaker 1 (15:50):
Oh my gosh, why Linda, why did you start this?
I can't get away from this. First of all, I
love my I love our truckers. You know, I really
lies and recognize that there's nothing in any store we
go to except that you guys got it there. I
appreciate the hard work that you do every day. I'm
(16:11):
a little worried about your industry because now they have
self driving rigs. Did you see this? Yeah, A little
worried about that, are you?
Speaker 5 (16:20):
Oh yeah, yeah? Oh no, not really yeah. But you know.
The the other thing is, we would like you to
pick Linday, oh boy, secretary Secretary of Defense. Wow, now, Holden,
we've got a good quiz for you too, Sean, for
your VP.
Speaker 1 (16:40):
This individual you know not what you speak. Do you
know how dangerous that would be if she was in
charge of melons?
Speaker 6 (16:51):
I think it'd be wonderful.
Speaker 5 (16:53):
Wait until you huh, who would like you to pick
for your VP?
Speaker 1 (16:57):
Oh? Who's up?
Speaker 5 (16:58):
Openly said on your show that he thought omelets were
better than sex.
Speaker 1 (17:06):
Senator John Kennedy, he did.
Speaker 5 (17:08):
Yes, Kennedy, But now for your check.
Speaker 1 (17:10):
He is one of my favorite senators. Why don't you
like my choice? I said, if I ever did run,
and I have no intention of it, And I don't
know why Linda's stirring up garbage because I'm getting asked
now wherever I go about this, it's beginning to I'm
gonna put I'm not Stephen A. Smith. I'm not playing
this out for a long period of time.
Speaker 5 (17:30):
Well, how about for your chief of staff though, because
we know that she actually runs the show and keeps
you and Linda in uh in check. Katie is your
chief of staff?
Speaker 1 (17:43):
Okay, this is like the biggest suck up call we've
ever had in the history of the show. Is I mean,
you are sucking up to Linda and Katie? Why don't
you mention Jase Owen? Why don't you mention Ethan? Why
don't you mention sweet baby James? On top of it,
I'm sure you have jobs for the too.
Speaker 6 (18:01):
Listen, it could just be the handity show goes to Washington.
You know they make movies about these things.
Speaker 1 (18:05):
It's fine, that's mister Smith goes to Washington, not mister
Hannity goes to Washington.
Speaker 6 (18:10):
I mean, you know, in different times, different people. I
think you know. Listen, Truckers are very smart people. You know,
he speaks, he knows where he comes. I love his ideas.
Speaker 1 (18:20):
I do like the idea, whoever the nominee would be.
I don't think it would be a bad idea to
make Trump the VP. What do you think of that idea?
Speaker 6 (18:31):
It can't happen because if you were to ever die,
he wouldn't be able to take on the role as president. Wrong,
you'd be ineligible.
Speaker 1 (18:37):
Absolutely, he would not be ineligible. You are incorrect.
Speaker 6 (18:41):
Okay, tell me why I'm wrong.
Speaker 1 (18:42):
Because he's the vice president, he would assume the role
of president for the rest of the term. That is
not unconstitutional.
Speaker 7 (18:49):
So I'm going to chime in here. Trump cannot be VP, unfortunately,
because in order to be VP, you have to qualify
to run for president. So he would actually not be
able to run for VP.
Speaker 4 (19:01):
Under you.
Speaker 1 (19:02):
It's not been determined that that is in fact the case.
It's never had a constitutional challenge, And I believe if
he's running for VP, you don't assume that the president's
going to die.
Speaker 7 (19:12):
But in order to be VP, you have to qualify
to be president. Since he's already had two terms, he
doesn't qualify to be president again. Therefore he can't be
named as VP.
Speaker 1 (19:22):
Why are you ruining my great fund that I'm faving
with the idea that Linda brought up, which I never
wanted to bring up, that he claims she saw on
social media, which I doubt in the first place. You
did bring it up. You tell me you said I.
Speaker 6 (19:37):
Was merely the communicator.
Speaker 1 (19:39):
That's all.
Speaker 6 (19:39):
Is very simple. I did not write it.
Speaker 1 (19:41):
Okay, what do you mean America brought it up? But
what you read two posts on X that might have
said this, I'm on X all day.
Speaker 6 (19:48):
I live on X. That's where my world is. It's
all I read all day long.
Speaker 1 (19:52):
Okay? And how many and how many posts did you
see before you brought this to my attention.
Speaker 6 (19:58):
Enough for me to bring it to your ten Let
me ask you something true orfuls? How often do I
bring something to your attention.
Speaker 1 (20:06):
From You can answer to very rare, next thing, never
next to that.
Speaker 5 (20:11):
That's right.
Speaker 6 (20:11):
So you think I saw two posts and I was like, oh,
this is interesting.
Speaker 1 (20:17):
I just don't believe this widespread support, I don't think
I can get elected, dog Catcher. If you want to
know the truth, hey, you.
Speaker 6 (20:22):
Know through your hat in the ring. That's the only
way to find out.
Speaker 1 (20:25):
Listen. I go back to one of my favorite movies
of all time, and that's Gladiator, and Marcus Aureally is
in this this incredible scene, says upon my death, I
will bestow my powers onto you, and he says it
to the Rome's greatest General, Maximus. And Maximus says, well,
(20:50):
what about commedist? Comedist is not a moral man. You
have known this your entire life. Do you're not, Maximus?
Accept this great honor? And he answers perfectly with all
my heart. No, that is why it must be you.
(21:11):
Now I'm saying no, But I'm not General, Maximus. I'm
not that great general. There's got to be better qualified people.
I can think of a few off the top of
my head. Why don't you run? If you're so fascinated
by all this, go you run for office. You'd have
to work hard to get my vote, though.
Speaker 6 (21:30):
Listen, you know I don't know what I would have
your vote. I mean, if you know who's running against me,
Let's be honest.
Speaker 1 (21:38):
Come on, but I'd have to vote for you, but
otherwise you'd put me in prison.
Speaker 6 (21:42):
There you go, lock them up, throw away the key.
I don't know if I would ever run.
Speaker 1 (21:46):
Made you be BP, I'd be poisoned within three months.
Speaker 6 (21:51):
No, I would never. I would give you at least
six months. I would never poison you in three months.
Speaker 1 (21:54):
Way to poison you in six months?
Speaker 6 (21:56):
Six months?
Speaker 1 (21:58):
People are going to start this keeps coming up with
callers now because you started this, I, people are going
to start thinking it's serious and it's not. I'm being
very clear to everybody. I have no desired or intention
to ever run.
Speaker 6 (22:11):
Listen, Katie wants to be chief of staff. That's really
why I did it. I mean, I didn't want to
spill the beans earlier, but that's what it really is.
Speaker 1 (22:18):
All right, let's go back to our busy phones. John
in San Diego, Co Goo Radio? What's up, John? How
are you? Sir?
Speaker 8 (22:25):
Hey Sean. Now that Lee Zelden is removing regulations, you're
going to learn in real time that regulations cause all
of the inflation in America. There is no other source.
And when you remove them, you cut the price of
everything because you've cut the cost regulations get enforcing and
complying with regulations costs money, but they don't increase the
(22:50):
value of anything. That's how we get inflation. The cost
goes up, but the value of it never went up.
And when when Powell says, oh, we're worried about inflation
because you know we can't lower into well, low interest
rates have never caused inflation. High interest rates do. And
anyone who's read the Federal Reserve CPI chart and the
(23:13):
Fed Funds chart together can see that high interest rates
drag inflation up and low interest rates drag inflation down,
and they move together. And it's been what they've been
lying about this for a century. And it's as big
a lie as claiming that smooth Holly made the depression
(23:34):
worse when it actually did nothing, and claiming that.
Speaker 1 (23:38):
By the way, the smooth Hally actually happened after the
crash in nineteen twenty nine, just for factual purposes, although
there are those that would argue that it contributed to
the ongoing economic situation at the time, but.
Speaker 8 (23:53):
It didn't contribute at all. What happened is nineteen thirty one,
Congress raised everyone's income taxes one hundred and fifty percent.
That's correcked the depression worse. And I was also.
Speaker 1 (24:07):
That's that's why I'm a supply sider. That's why I
think people have completely they do not understand the impact
and the magnitude of Donald Trump giving the largest tax
cut in American history. And people think that the math is, oh,
if you cut taxes, you're going to reduce revenues, when
just the opposite is true, and it's been proven again
(24:27):
and again and again. And you add energy dominance, then
you add twelve trillion and committed manufacturing investments from countries
and companies, and then you add you know, all of
this together. I'm telling you right now it is going
to be an economic golden error based on the fundamentals. Now,
(24:48):
Bill O'Reilly's right to caution that there can be an
unforeseen event, God forbid another nine to eleven happens, God
forbid of COVID happens. But I'm saying, if all things
remain nor relatively that I think that we're headed for
a really good period of time and economic prosperity and
growth that every American will benefit from.
Speaker 8 (25:10):
And the problem is the cap Also, everybody still claims
that the Clinton budget surplus reduced the debt.
Speaker 5 (25:18):
It did not.
Speaker 8 (25:18):
The debt went up every year, and the only spending
cuts were on interest on treasury bonds because it happened
at a special time where remember in nineteen seventy nine,
eighty and eighty one, we had the highest interest rates
in history. M hm, I do okay, Well fifteen years later,
is all right?
Speaker 1 (25:39):
You remember they were twenty one and a half percent.
Speaker 8 (25:42):
That's ninety four, ninety five, ninety six. That's when we
paid all those off and they got reduced and they
got replaced with low interest five percent treasury bonds instead
of the fifteen percent. And that's where the entire cut
in government spending was. That gave us the surplus, but
the debt stool went out there every year.
Speaker 1 (26:03):
Listen, if we would only if we could have economic
growth rein in spending, and that means if you cut
a penny or two pennies out of every dollar, eliminate
baseline budgeting revenues go up dramatically because of energy and
(26:24):
because of the tax cuts, and because of all the
economic measures that President Trump is put in place, the
twelve trillion dollars in new manufacturing investment, all of this
is going to create more revenues to the government. They
have got to rein in spending on top of it.
And that doesn't mean that you can't give tax relief
(26:45):
or further tax relief to the American people. I think
they deserve it. Anyway, my friend, I appreciate the call.
Thank you. Eight hundred and ninety four one Seawan, New York,
Pete standing by. How you doing, Pete? What's going on?
Speaker 4 (26:59):
God help us? If Dobby gets in the process that
we had, the peaceful process that turned into riots will
seem like nothing compared to what will happen if this
guy gets in. And you know what's happened in the
last forty eight hours with a cop losing their life,
and these people are making light of it, and the
(27:21):
city is so unsafe. Showan. This is a city that
even the chief keeps saying that there's thirty four thousand
cops in New York. There was a mass exodus of
cops retiring over the last four or five years. How
many do you really think there are? From what I've heard,
there's less than twenty.
Speaker 1 (27:40):
Well, according to Curtis Lee, we said we're down a
thirty one thousand and it's either at their height during
the Giuliana years. I think we're over well over forty thousand.
That means a bar viewer, street patrols. That's a twenty
five percent reduction. Then you add to it no bare laws.
Then you add to that defund Mantle and the desire
(28:01):
to replace police with social workers. I mean, it is
a prescription for a disaster.
Speaker 4 (28:07):
Thanks for your time. Shows just wanted to make it.
Speaker 1 (28:09):
All right, my friend, God bless you. Eight hundred nine number.
You want to be a part of the program. Bill
is in New York as well. Hey Bill, how are you.
Speaker 4 (28:19):
Sure?
Speaker 1 (28:19):
How are you doing good? What's going on? Sir?
Speaker 4 (28:24):
I am a.
Speaker 8 (28:25):
Long time listener and television watcher, and I have on
sweat the Republicans.
Speaker 4 (28:33):
Lindsay Grahams years ago said he was going to have.
Speaker 8 (28:37):
Biden and Hunter on to find out what was going
on with.
Speaker 4 (28:44):
The laptop and everything, and they never followed through.
Speaker 8 (28:48):
What they should think that with this investigation, even now
they have all.
Speaker 4 (28:53):
The information about the bis A warrant being.
Speaker 5 (28:56):
Illegal and Komy and Brandon and Age, what makes you
think that they're actually going to follow through and prosecute.
Speaker 1 (29:05):
I'm not making a promise I can't make. I'm not,
but I do believe that this is smoking gun evidence,
and I do believe the case is so overwhelming, and
the evidence is so incontrovertible, and the corruption's so deep.
I agree with Sean Davis, the biggest political scandal in
our history. This makes Watergate look like jaywalking to me,
(29:29):
and I've said that before. It's the Golden years are back.
Maybe a grating again. Hang on, It's gonna be fun.
Speaker 3 (29:40):
Sean Hannity twenty twenty five is.
Speaker 6 (29:44):
On right now.
Speaker 1 (29:50):
All right, that's gonna wrap things up at today, record
setting second quarter, exceeding expectations. Anyway, We'll check in with
Steve Moore, Brian Brendberg, Laura Trump tonight, Greg Jarrett, Nicole Parker,
Sean Duffy, the Transportation Secretary, Clay Travis nine Eastern Sate DVR, Hannity,
Fox News. We'll see you tonight. Back here tomorrow. Thank
(30:12):
you for making the show possible
Stay right here for our final news roundup and information overload.
All right, News Roundup and Information Overload, Hour eight hundred
and nine four one, Shawn our number if you want
to be a part of the program. So we have
new developments today. If you go back to the declassification
by Tulca Gabbard, let's remind you of what she said
(00:21):
when she announced she was making this declassification, some of
the things that she found, like, for example, then CIA
Director John Brennan overruling CIA officers who dared to challenge
the Russia Gate narrative. Remember, the original intelligence assessment report
(00:41):
that was put out was one that said that Donald
Trump never colluded with Russia and there was no evidence
of such. And this is weeks and weeks after the
twenty sixteen election. Here's what she said.
Speaker 2 (00:52):
The Intelligence Committee's oversight report reveals that CIA Director Brennan
overruled senior CIA officers who challenged the Obama ordered intelligence assessment,
stating quote, we don't have direct information that Putin wanted
to get Trump elected. Yet the Obama directed assessment was
published on January sixth, twenty seventeen, which explicitly stated, quote,
(01:15):
we assess Putin and the Russian government aspired to help
President elect Trump's selection chances when possible by discrediting Secretary
Clinton and publicly contrasting her unfavorably to him end of quote.
Speaker 1 (01:28):
With regards to the.
Speaker 2 (01:29):
Steele dossier, we now know that one of the source
documents that the Obama administration used in the creation of
this intelligence assessment in January of twenty seventeen was none
other than the discredited, unverified Steele dossier. The House Intel
report states quote, contradicting public claims by then CIA Director
Brennan that the dossier was not in any way incorporated
(01:52):
into this intelligence assessment. The dossier was referenced in the
intelligence assessment's main body text and further detailed in a
two page assessment annex. John Brennan lied, and he denied
using this dossier in this intelligence assessment that President Obama
ordered because he knew it was discredited. It was a
politically motivated, manufactured document. He directed senior CIA officials to
(02:17):
use it anyway.
Speaker 1 (02:19):
They knew by December twenty sixteen. That's why they got
rid of Christopher Steele. At the time. They knew it
was discredited. They were even warned about it As early
as August of twenty sixteen, Bruce Or warned James call
Me not to trust the document, that it was political
in nature, and this was the Hillary Clinton bought and
paid for Russian disinformation dossier. And anyway, it was not
(02:44):
only discredited and unverified, it has since been totally completely debunked.
It was debunked by December of twenty sixteen. And then
it raises questions about call Me, because it was the
bulk of information also used for not one, not two,
not three, but four PHIZ applications, three of which called
Me personally signed on to himself even well after the
(03:07):
point designing at least two of them, knowing completely that
it was discredited by law. Once he knows that information
presented to a PHIZA court ends up being false, at
that point he has an obligation to go back to
the Phiz of court and said, no, we made a mistake.
Then we have this big story breaking earlier today that
cash Patel has turned over documents to the Senate Judiciary
(03:30):
Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, which apparently he found a trove
of sensitive documents related to the origins of the Trump
Rushier probe that were buried in multiple quote burn bags
in a secret room inside the FBI, and sources now
telling Fox News Digital that the burn bag system is
used to destroy documents designated as classified or higher and anyway,
(03:55):
the multiple burn bags were found filled with thousands of
documents and courses now saying that one of the documents
the FBI officials found in the burn bag was the
classified annex to the former Special Council John Durham's final report,
which includes the underlying intelligence that he reviewed, and the
declassification of the classified annex is being done in close
(04:19):
coordination with John Ratcliffe, the CIA director, Cash Bettel, the
FBI director and the Director of National Intelligence Tulcy Gabbart,
and the Attorney General Pam Bondi according to people. But anyway,
this will be transmitted now to the Senate Judiciary Committee chairman.
And then this goes to the broader investigation opened by
Cash Bettel's FBI into what is a grand conspiracy to
(04:42):
put cinderblocks on the scales of elections, which it appears,
based on everything we've been reporting now for years, absolutely
positively have happened. Sean Davis with the Federalist is going
to join us in just a second, here is the
CEO and founder of The Federalist and he put up
(05:02):
a post that pointed out that there are five to
ten people that have been deeply involved in reporting on
the Russia collusion hoax from the very beginning back in
early twenty seventeen, he points out rightly, so he's one
of them, also others, and that they've been doing this
for eight years. Well, we've been doing it on this
show and been doing it on Hannity, and we've had
(05:24):
Sean Davis on various times about all of this, discussing
it with our ensemble cast. But the blockbuster revelations he
points out from last week about the fraudulent Intelligence community
assessment is not old news, and it's not and anyone
saying that there's nothing new in the recent declassification is
(05:46):
flat out lying and it's not a nothing burger. These
are called smoking guns in the industry anyway. Sean Davis
joins us. Now, sir, how are you.
Speaker 3 (05:56):
I'm doing well? Thank you for having me.
Speaker 1 (05:58):
Well, we were on similar parallel pass at the time,
and I know that people like you and others were
doing your work. We had you on numerous times to
talk about this and other issues. But what you're pointing
out in your post top Obama officials in their corrupt
media stenographers repeatedly lied when they claimed that the bogus
(06:20):
Stele dossier was which was paid for by Hillary Clinton,
and the DNC was never referenced in the body of
this intelligence assessment. Now, Pulsey Gabbard made that very bold
statement based on the declassification announcement that she made, and
she made it clearly. And fake news CNN, which went
wall to wall with this phony Russia collusion hoax all
(06:42):
those years, even cut away from the press conference because
it totally discredited what they had been reporting for the
longest period of times time, but more specifically that three
year period.
Speaker 3 (06:56):
Right, this is a major blockbuster because there were always
two big pillars that were erected in service of the
Russia collusion hopes. The second one was this idea that
Trump colluded with putin steal the election from Hillary. That's
what the Steele dossier was all about. But none of
that would have been possible rhetorically without the first pillar,
(07:18):
which was the allegation that Russia interfered in the election
in twenty sixteen for the purpose of electing Donald Trump
in defeating Hillary Clinton. That really was the foundation of everything.
And what we've learned in the last week from Gabbard
and Ratcliffe, and God blessed them for finding this information
and getting it out there. We found that that first pillar,
(07:39):
this idea that Russia was interfering to help Trump win,
that was a lie, that they knew it was a lie,
that they never had any intel to support it, and
that they even used the Steele dossier. Contradictory to John
Brynn sworn congressional testimony, they even used the Steele dossier
to support this lie that Putin wanted Trump to win.
Speaker 1 (07:59):
You can part on a basic level because lying to
Congress under oath is a crime, and that would then
therefore implicate a number of top people. I would assume
Brennan and Clapper and call me and we could just
start there. Is that correct?
Speaker 3 (08:13):
That is correct, But there's also a five year statute
of limitations if you're looking at perjury or false statements.
Brennan's came within the last couple of years. I think
he told Congress this particular falsehoods recently is twenty twenty three.
So if you're just looking at perpon well.
Speaker 1 (08:29):
Some of them love it were in twenty twenty, and
I believe that they can get this going and extend
the Statute of Limitations. Is my understanding for those three
in particular, Well.
Speaker 3 (08:40):
I think they may be able to. I think the
better case for tolling the Statute of Limitations is to
not look at singular false statements to Congress as the
basis for all criminal charges. It's to look at everything
that was done since twenty seventeen is as part of
a massive fraudulent conspiracy against the American people and against
(09:03):
the government of the United States. In each new false
state that they make today or tomorrow or a week
from now is an overt act in furtherance of that conspiracy,
which starts that Statute of Limitations clocks. Overall.
Speaker 1 (09:16):
Again, that's all true, which is part of the reason
why I'm looking at the broader investigation of Cash Fattel.
Now from my advantage point, everything that we know about
twenty sixteen and seventeen, and how the original intelligence assessment
that came from rank and file career rank and files,
(09:39):
senior and Intel officials, they concluded something that was very
clear that there was no Trump Russia collusion well, it
turns out that Barack Obama, according to the declassification and others,
did not like that assessment, and then they went about
the business of redoing it and creating a false now
(10:00):
narrative based in part on a debunct dossier that Hillary
Clinton had bought and paid for that they were warned about,
you know, early in the campaign, Brennan himself warning Obama
and that it was also used for not one but
four fi's application. So I would argue that that's part
of the grand conspiracy, and that is to undermine a
duly elected president. Then I would argue that it continues
(10:22):
through twenty twenty because we know that they verified the
authenticity of Hunter Biden's laptop. The FBI did in March
of twenty twenty, and then they systematically went about meeting
on a weekly basis with all these big tech companies
and warning them that they may be victims of a
Russia hoax and disinformation campaign. And they also knew at
(10:46):
the time that Rudy Giuliani's attorney, Bob Costello, had a
copy of Hunter's very real laptop. They knew it would
become public. They were warning these companies specifically that this
Russian disinformation may be about Hunter or Joe Biden, and
it might even include barisma, is my understanding. And then
when the story broke in the New York Post in
(11:08):
October of twenty twenty, many of those social media company
leaders like Mark Zuckerberg and Jack Dorsey a Twitter. They
were asking the FBI, is this what you were warning about?
Or is it true? They wouldn't give them the answer,
even though they knew the truth. They knew what the
answer was, they had prebunked the entire story. The story
gets suppressed, that impacts the election. To me, that's putting
(11:30):
cinderblocks on the scales of an election. And lastly, I
would argue, from twenty twenty to twenty twenty four, in
the weaponization of the DOJ, etc. And lawfair that went
on against Donald Trump, that was to bloody him up
and destroy him so he would never be a viable
candidate at all for twenty twenty four, that to me,
(11:50):
all combined would be the grand conspiracy you of many
of the same actors' names and players thoughts.
Speaker 3 (11:56):
Oh, I completely agree, And let's transport ourselves back to
when the FBI rated Trump's personal home in mar Lago
which was just a shocking, unprecedented act of suggery. One
of their stated reasons for going in there was they
thought he had a bunch of these documents implicating them
in their Russiagate conspiracy, and they were going back there
(12:19):
to take all those documents back from him. So even
the raid of him, the federal charges against him, were
part of this larger conspiracy that started with the entire
Russiagate collusion hoax. And this isn't just the biggest scandal
of the last couple of years or the biggest scandal
of the twenty first century. I think it is the
(12:40):
biggest political scandal in American history and to date yet
not one person has gone to prison for it.
Speaker 1 (12:46):
Quick break right back more with Sean Davis, CEO, co
founder of the Federalist on the other side than your
calls coming up eight hundred and ninety four one, Sean,
as we continue, I would continue now Sean Davis is
with us CEO, co founder of the FED. This is
where I guess we have to manage people's expectations, right,
I mean, I never like to overpromise and under deliver.
(13:08):
I think the evidence is overwhelming. I think it's incontrovertible.
I think the timeline is very clear. The fifty one
former Intel officials, not one of them knew a thing
about Hunter's laptop. They knew that the Steele nossier was garbage,
They knew the real value of Mara a Lago, they
knew that the statute of limitations had run out on
a legal non disclosure agreement. And I can keep going
(13:30):
and going and going. It just never ending. Made up,
trumped up charges pun intended to destroy this man and
to impact presidential elections and impact the office of the presidency.
Now I would agree with you. I think it's the
biggest scandal in history. Will anything happen in your view?
Speaker 3 (13:48):
Well, I think one good development on that front was
when Attorney General Pam Bondi announced the formation of what
she called a strikeforce from DJ is a very particular
type of entity. It's not just one special prosecutor with
the informoder DOJ going to investigate stuff by himself. It
(14:10):
is a directive that all agencies have to work together
towards a common goal of investigating and prosecuting crime. And
if you look at the history of these DOJ strike forces,
these multi agency strike forces, they were really designed and
used to great effect against organized crime, against mob crime,
to root out and prosecute racketeering. That to me is
(14:34):
a sign that DJ is very seriously looking at what happened,
not as a series of discrete events whereby one or
two intell officials set something false before Congress, but a
massive conspiracy designed to defraud the entire United States for
a year. So I think that's a great development from
our DOJ so far.
Speaker 1 (14:54):
I think it is as well. I have a pretty
high degree of confidence that this is not being done
for no reason, and I hope we get to the
bottom of it because if we don't, I think what
Dan Bongino was warning about this weekend and his widely
publicized X post, We're not going to have a republic
(15:15):
at the end of this process if this type of
thing can go on and continue and people are not
held accountable. Jean Davis, CEO, co founder Federalists, We appreciate you,
Thank you, sir.
Speaker 3 (15:25):
Always a pleasure. Thank you.
Speaker 1 (15:26):
All right, let's get to our busy, busy telephones here.
Let's say hi to Steve in Colorado. What's up, Steve?
How are you glad you called?
Speaker 4 (15:36):
Hey?
Speaker 5 (15:37):
Sean? I just called to address the rumors that we've
been hearing. Okay, we're thinking, we're even thinking about starting
a Facebook group. It's called Truckers for Sean Hannity for President.
Speaker 1 (15:50):
Oh my gosh, why Linda, why did you start this?
I can't get away from this. First of all, I
love my I love our truckers. You know, I really
lies and recognize that there's nothing in any store we
go to except that you guys got it there. I
appreciate the hard work that you do every day. I'm
(16:11):
a little worried about your industry because now they have
self driving rigs. Did you see this? Yeah, A little
worried about that, are you?
Speaker 5 (16:20):
Oh yeah, yeah? Oh no, not really yeah. But you know.
The the other thing is, we would like you to
pick Linday, oh boy, secretary Secretary of Defense. Wow, now, Holden,
we've got a good quiz for you too, Sean, for
your VP.
Speaker 1 (16:40):
This individual you know not what you speak. Do you
know how dangerous that would be if she was in
charge of melons?
Speaker 6 (16:51):
I think it'd be wonderful.
Speaker 5 (16:53):
Wait until you huh, who would like you to pick
for your VP?
Speaker 1 (16:57):
Oh? Who's up?
Speaker 5 (16:58):
Openly said on your show that he thought omelets were
better than sex.
Speaker 1 (17:06):
Senator John Kennedy, he did.
Speaker 5 (17:08):
Yes, Kennedy, But now for your check.
Speaker 1 (17:10):
He is one of my favorite senators. Why don't you
like my choice? I said, if I ever did run,
and I have no intention of it, And I don't
know why Linda's stirring up garbage because I'm getting asked
now wherever I go about this, it's beginning to I'm
gonna put I'm not Stephen A. Smith. I'm not playing
this out for a long period of time.
Speaker 5 (17:30):
Well, how about for your chief of staff though, because
we know that she actually runs the show and keeps
you and Linda in uh in check. Katie is your
chief of staff?
Speaker 1 (17:43):
Okay, this is like the biggest suck up call we've
ever had in the history of the show. Is I mean,
you are sucking up to Linda and Katie? Why don't
you mention Jase Owen? Why don't you mention Ethan? Why
don't you mention sweet baby James? On top of it,
I'm sure you have jobs for the too.
Speaker 6 (18:01):
Listen, it could just be the handity show goes to Washington.
You know they make movies about these things.
Speaker 1 (18:05):
It's fine, that's mister Smith goes to Washington, not mister
Hannity goes to Washington.
Speaker 6 (18:10):
I mean, you know, in different times, different people. I
think you know. Listen, Truckers are very smart people. You know,
he speaks, he knows where he comes. I love his ideas.
Speaker 1 (18:20):
I do like the idea, whoever the nominee would be.
I don't think it would be a bad idea to
make Trump the VP. What do you think of that idea?
Speaker 6 (18:31):
It can't happen because if you were to ever die,
he wouldn't be able to take on the role as president. Wrong,
you'd be ineligible.
Speaker 1 (18:37):
Absolutely, he would not be ineligible. You are incorrect.
Speaker 6 (18:41):
Okay, tell me why I'm wrong.
Speaker 1 (18:42):
Because he's the vice president, he would assume the role
of president for the rest of the term. That is
not unconstitutional.
Speaker 7 (18:49):
So I'm going to chime in here. Trump cannot be VP, unfortunately,
because in order to be VP, you have to qualify
to run for president. So he would actually not be
able to run for VP.
Speaker 4 (19:01):
Under you.
Speaker 1 (19:02):
It's not been determined that that is in fact the case.
It's never had a constitutional challenge, And I believe if
he's running for VP, you don't assume that the president's
going to die.
Speaker 7 (19:12):
But in order to be VP, you have to qualify
to be president. Since he's already had two terms, he
doesn't qualify to be president again. Therefore he can't be
named as VP.
Speaker 1 (19:22):
Why are you ruining my great fund that I'm faving
with the idea that Linda brought up, which I never
wanted to bring up, that he claims she saw on
social media, which I doubt in the first place. You
did bring it up. You tell me you said I.
Speaker 6 (19:37):
Was merely the communicator.
Speaker 1 (19:39):
That's all.
Speaker 6 (19:39):
Is very simple. I did not write it.
Speaker 1 (19:41):
Okay, what do you mean America brought it up? But
what you read two posts on X that might have
said this, I'm on X all day.
Speaker 6 (19:48):
I live on X. That's where my world is. It's
all I read all day long.
Speaker 1 (19:52):
Okay? And how many and how many posts did you
see before you brought this to my attention.
Speaker 6 (19:58):
Enough for me to bring it to your ten Let
me ask you something true orfuls? How often do I
bring something to your attention.
Speaker 1 (20:06):
From You can answer to very rare, next thing, never
next to that.
Speaker 5 (20:11):
That's right.
Speaker 6 (20:11):
So you think I saw two posts and I was like, oh,
this is interesting.
Speaker 1 (20:17):
I just don't believe this widespread support, I don't think
I can get elected, dog Catcher. If you want to
know the truth, hey, you.
Speaker 6 (20:22):
Know through your hat in the ring. That's the only
way to find out.
Speaker 1 (20:25):
Listen. I go back to one of my favorite movies
of all time, and that's Gladiator, and Marcus Aureally is
in this this incredible scene, says upon my death, I
will bestow my powers onto you, and he says it
to the Rome's greatest General, Maximus. And Maximus says, well,
(20:50):
what about commedist? Comedist is not a moral man. You
have known this your entire life. Do you're not, Maximus?
Accept this great honor? And he answers perfectly with all
my heart. No, that is why it must be you.
(21:11):
Now I'm saying no, But I'm not General, Maximus. I'm
not that great general. There's got to be better qualified people.
I can think of a few off the top of
my head. Why don't you run? If you're so fascinated
by all this, go you run for office. You'd have
to work hard to get my vote, though.
Speaker 6 (21:30):
Listen, you know I don't know what I would have
your vote. I mean, if you know who's running against me,
Let's be honest.
Speaker 1 (21:38):
Come on, but I'd have to vote for you, but
otherwise you'd put me in prison.
Speaker 6 (21:42):
There you go, lock them up, throw away the key.
I don't know if I would ever run.
Speaker 1 (21:46):
Made you be BP, I'd be poisoned within three months.
Speaker 6 (21:51):
No, I would never. I would give you at least
six months. I would never poison you in three months.
Speaker 1 (21:54):
Way to poison you in six months?
Speaker 6 (21:56):
Six months?
Speaker 1 (21:58):
People are going to start this keeps coming up with
callers now because you started this, I, people are going
to start thinking it's serious and it's not. I'm being
very clear to everybody. I have no desired or intention
to ever run.
Speaker 6 (22:11):
Listen, Katie wants to be chief of staff. That's really
why I did it. I mean, I didn't want to
spill the beans earlier, but that's what it really is.
Speaker 1 (22:18):
All right, let's go back to our busy phones. John
in San Diego, Co Goo Radio? What's up, John? How
are you? Sir?
Speaker 8 (22:25):
Hey Sean. Now that Lee Zelden is removing regulations, you're
going to learn in real time that regulations cause all
of the inflation in America. There is no other source.
And when you remove them, you cut the price of
everything because you've cut the cost regulations get enforcing and
complying with regulations costs money, but they don't increase the
(22:50):
value of anything. That's how we get inflation. The cost
goes up, but the value of it never went up.
And when when Powell says, oh, we're worried about inflation
because you know we can't lower into well, low interest
rates have never caused inflation. High interest rates do. And
anyone who's read the Federal Reserve CPI chart and the
(23:13):
Fed Funds chart together can see that high interest rates
drag inflation up and low interest rates drag inflation down,
and they move together. And it's been what they've been
lying about this for a century. And it's as big
a lie as claiming that smooth Holly made the depression
(23:34):
worse when it actually did nothing, and claiming that.
Speaker 1 (23:38):
By the way, the smooth Hally actually happened after the
crash in nineteen twenty nine, just for factual purposes, although
there are those that would argue that it contributed to
the ongoing economic situation at the time, but.
Speaker 8 (23:53):
It didn't contribute at all. What happened is nineteen thirty one,
Congress raised everyone's income taxes one hundred and fifty percent.
That's correcked the depression worse. And I was also.
Speaker 1 (24:07):
That's that's why I'm a supply sider. That's why I
think people have completely they do not understand the impact
and the magnitude of Donald Trump giving the largest tax
cut in American history. And people think that the math is, oh,
if you cut taxes, you're going to reduce revenues, when
just the opposite is true, and it's been proven again
(24:27):
and again and again. And you add energy dominance, then
you add twelve trillion and committed manufacturing investments from countries
and companies, and then you add you know, all of
this together. I'm telling you right now it is going
to be an economic golden error based on the fundamentals. Now,
(24:48):
Bill O'Reilly's right to caution that there can be an
unforeseen event, God forbid another nine to eleven happens, God
forbid of COVID happens. But I'm saying, if all things
remain nor relatively that I think that we're headed for
a really good period of time and economic prosperity and
growth that every American will benefit from.
Speaker 8 (25:10):
And the problem is the cap Also, everybody still claims
that the Clinton budget surplus reduced the debt.
Speaker 5 (25:18):
It did not.
Speaker 8 (25:18):
The debt went up every year, and the only spending
cuts were on interest on treasury bonds because it happened
at a special time where remember in nineteen seventy nine,
eighty and eighty one, we had the highest interest rates
in history. M hm, I do okay, Well fifteen years later,
is all right?
Speaker 1 (25:39):
You remember they were twenty one and a half percent.
Speaker 8 (25:42):
That's ninety four, ninety five, ninety six. That's when we
paid all those off and they got reduced and they
got replaced with low interest five percent treasury bonds instead
of the fifteen percent. And that's where the entire cut
in government spending was. That gave us the surplus, but
the debt stool went out there every year.
Speaker 1 (26:03):
Listen, if we would only if we could have economic
growth rein in spending, and that means if you cut
a penny or two pennies out of every dollar, eliminate
baseline budgeting revenues go up dramatically because of energy and
(26:24):
because of the tax cuts, and because of all the
economic measures that President Trump is put in place, the
twelve trillion dollars in new manufacturing investment, all of this
is going to create more revenues to the government. They
have got to rein in spending on top of it.
And that doesn't mean that you can't give tax relief
(26:45):
or further tax relief to the American people. I think
they deserve it. Anyway, my friend, I appreciate the call.
Thank you. Eight hundred and ninety four one Seawan, New York,
Pete standing by. How you doing, Pete? What's going on?
Speaker 4 (26:59):
God help us? If Dobby gets in the process that
we had, the peaceful process that turned into riots will
seem like nothing compared to what will happen if this
guy gets in. And you know what's happened in the
last forty eight hours with a cop losing their life,
and these people are making light of it, and the
(27:21):
city is so unsafe. Showan. This is a city that
even the chief keeps saying that there's thirty four thousand
cops in New York. There was a mass exodus of
cops retiring over the last four or five years. How
many do you really think there are? From what I've heard,
there's less than twenty.
Speaker 1 (27:40):
Well, according to Curtis Lee, we said we're down a
thirty one thousand and it's either at their height during
the Giuliana years. I think we're over well over forty thousand.
That means a bar viewer, street patrols. That's a twenty
five percent reduction. Then you add to it no bare laws.
Then you add to that defund Mantle and the desire
(28:01):
to replace police with social workers. I mean, it is
a prescription for a disaster.
Speaker 4 (28:07):
Thanks for your time. Shows just wanted to make it.
Speaker 1 (28:09):
All right, my friend, God bless you. Eight hundred nine number.
You want to be a part of the program. Bill
is in New York as well. Hey Bill, how are you.
Speaker 4 (28:19):
Sure?
Speaker 1 (28:19):
How are you doing good? What's going on? Sir?
Speaker 4 (28:24):
I am a.
Speaker 8 (28:25):
Long time listener and television watcher, and I have on
sweat the Republicans.
Speaker 4 (28:33):
Lindsay Grahams years ago said he was going to have.
Speaker 8 (28:37):
Biden and Hunter on to find out what was going
on with.
Speaker 4 (28:44):
The laptop and everything, and they never followed through.
Speaker 8 (28:48):
What they should think that with this investigation, even now
they have all.
Speaker 4 (28:53):
The information about the bis A warrant being.
Speaker 5 (28:56):
Illegal and Komy and Brandon and Age, what makes you
think that they're actually going to follow through and prosecute.
Speaker 1 (29:05):
I'm not making a promise I can't make. I'm not,
but I do believe that this is smoking gun evidence,
and I do believe the case is so overwhelming, and
the evidence is so incontrovertible, and the corruption's so deep.
I agree with Sean Davis, the biggest political scandal in
our history. This makes Watergate look like jaywalking to me,
(29:29):
and I've said that before. It's the Golden years are back.
Maybe a grating again. Hang on, It's gonna be fun.
Speaker 3 (29:40):
Sean Hannity twenty twenty five is.
Speaker 6 (29:44):
On right now.
Speaker 1 (29:50):
All right, that's gonna wrap things up at today, record
setting second quarter, exceeding expectations. Anyway, We'll check in with
Steve Moore, Brian Brendberg, Laura Trump tonight, Greg Jarrett, Nicole Parker,
Sean Duffy, the Transportation Secretary, Clay Travis nine Eastern Sate DVR, Hannity,
Fox News. We'll see you tonight. Back here tomorrow. Thank
(30:12):
you for making the show possible
The Sean Hannity Show News
Host
Sean Hannity
Popular Podcasts
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Special Summer Offer: Exclusively on Apple Podcasts, try our Dateline Premium subscription completely free for one month! With Dateline Premium, you get every episode ad-free plus exclusive bonus content.
The Breakfast Club
The World's Most Dangerous Morning Show, The Breakfast Club, With DJ Envy, Jess Hilarious, And Charlamagne Tha God!
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.