May 27, 2025 • 28 mins
Laurel Libby, a state legislator from Maine won her case and her role in Maine politics with the help of the Supreme Court ruling in her favor. But she is still struggling to do her job for her constituents, because some in Maine’s legislature do not want to hear from her. She also has plenty to say about why the dems can not connect with today’s generation.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Stay right here for our final news roundup and information overload.
Speaker 2 (00:04):
All right, news round up and information overload. Our toll
free our number is eight hundred and nine point one Sean.
If you want to be a part of the program. Well,
the left wing Democrats they can't help themselves. I guess
they really can, but they choose not to. But they
are who they are, and I don't think they're going
to change too much. And anyway, the issue of trans
(00:27):
athletes or men playing women's sports, they are now the
champions of And if you remember, President Trump got into
a little bit of a confrontation with the with the
governor of Maine, Governor Mills, over this issue. And here's
how that went down.
Speaker 3 (00:42):
Is the main here the governor of Man.
Speaker 4 (00:45):
Are you not going to comply with it? Well, we
are the federal law. Well you better do it. You
better do it because you're not going to get any
federal funding at all if you don't. And by the way,
your population, even though it's a liberal orthough I did
very well there. Your population doesn't want men playing in
women's sports. So you better comply because otherwise you're not
(01:07):
getting any federal funding.
Speaker 3 (01:10):
Every state. Good, I'll see you, and could I look
forward to that that should be a really easy one
and enjoy your life after governor, because I don't think
you'll be an elected politics ouch.
Speaker 2 (01:22):
And then of course Galvin Newsom talks to Charlie Kirk.
I'm not for men playing women's sports. But we've got
the tape, and here's what he had said at the time.
Speaker 5 (01:32):
Turns out in twenty fourteen, here's before I was governor.
There was a law established that established the legal principles
that allow the allowed trans athletes and women's sports. But
the issue of fairness is completely It is an issue
of fairness, and I think Democrats have last thank you
for what you did on civil rights for students in
(01:53):
our schools, transgender rights in this state.
Speaker 2 (01:57):
Oh, of course, you know, Gaveners flips and flops and
flails because he wants to live at sixteen hundred Pennsylvania Avenue.
Now you might remember the case. A Laurel Libby, state
legislator from Maine won her case, by the way, and
her role of main politics for the help of the
Supreme Court ruling in her favor. But she's still struggling
to do her job for her constituents because some people
(02:20):
in Maine's legislature do not want to hear from her,
and she's also had plenty to say about why the
Democrats cannot connect with today's generation. But anyway, we appreciate
you being with us, Laurel Libby. Thank you, And you
know you decided to stand up and protect girls sports
(02:40):
and you are ostracized, and I guess remain ostracized. And
you reminded your state what title mine was all about
in the first place, and they were responded by rejecting
your right to voice your opinion. I mean, this is
this is the modern day left today.
Speaker 6 (02:56):
That is the modern day left. Thankfully, the Supreme Court
has ruled that the justaure has to count my vote
now while the case is pending, and so I am
still not able to speak in the main House, but
I am allowed to vote on behalf of my constituents
at this point, I mean.
Speaker 2 (03:10):
I just can't believe what is the rationale for not
letting you speak?
Speaker 6 (03:14):
Well, I was centered three months ago and their rationale
was that I shared a picture of a minor. Now,
of course, this was a picture that had been shared
publicly already, and if I had shared the post in
celebration of a biological male winning a state championship in
the female category, then that post would have been celebrated
(03:36):
as well. But the fact is that it highlighted a
policy that's not popular with manors, and so in political retaliation,
I was censured and my ability to vote and speak
on the floor on behalf of my constituents was taken.
Speaker 2 (03:50):
So we have two issues that have come out today.
Abe Hernandez, a male high school athlete identifying as a female,
continues to make waves in the track field world. Hernande
is the name you may be familiar with. Took first
place in both the long jump and triple jump at
the California Interscholastic Federation Southern Section Master's Meet over the weekend,
(04:14):
and by doing so, Hernandez qualified for both events for
next weekend state championships. And anyways, this individuals I guess
a junior, and those latest accomplishments could be enough to
start Nettingham College scholarship offers in women's track and field,
made possible by the fact that the biological male recently
(04:35):
amended his birth certificate to reflect his change to the
poultry sum of twenty three dollars and anyway, an organization
also that works to protect fairness, safety, and equal opportunity
for women in girls' sports, issuing various officials in the
state of Minnesota for allowing poise to compete against girls
in sporting events there, and the Alliance Defending Freedom Female
(04:57):
Athletes United you know names the Attorney General Keith Ellison
and others. And the official policy of Minnesota High State
High School League, which governs high school athletics in the state,
is to allow students to compete based on their stated
gender identity without regards to sex. So this obviously is
(05:19):
still continuing and Democrats continue to champion it. What's your
reaction to that.
Speaker 6 (05:23):
Yes, absolutely, completely unfair and discriminates against our young women
who have worked so hard for years trying to excel
in their different fields and to have a biological male
boy swoop in and take their place, because that's exactly
what is happening. They're being pushed aside so that a
(05:44):
boy can can swoop in and take their podiums, take
their medals, take their scholarships. It is completely unfair and
we've heard that from Gavin Newsom. Unfortunately he's not backed
that up with any action in support of women and girls.
But that's we need to see state by state, And
thankfully we are seeing individual school districts step up, whether
(06:07):
we're talking about Maine or Washington or other states and
declare that they're going to go by Title nine rather
than allowing this woke policy to persist. But folks need
to stand up and say no more.
Speaker 2 (06:19):
Well, I appreciate your winning the Supreme Court. The idea
that you cannot speak on behalf of your constituents and
they're silencing you is beyond troubling to me? Is it
not anybody in that chamber that you work in and
main willing to stand up for you and stand with
you and support your right to speak?
Speaker 6 (06:40):
You know, I wish that there were. I just got
my right to speak back last Thursday, and just today
him having the right to vote on specific bills challenged
by even my own party when Republicans wouldn't support a
roll call on a bill that I requested today. So
now ongoing challenges from both the left and the right
(07:03):
in the main House.
Speaker 2 (07:04):
Chamber, And what is the reaction among your constituents in
this case?
Speaker 6 (07:09):
Now, my constituents are thankful as the am I that
I am able to vote on their behalf. It's been
a long three months they have not had representation. They've
been completely disenfranchised by the Democrat majority issuing this censure
and declaring that I couldn't speak or vote on their behalf.
But they're also eager for me to have my voice
back and to be able to speak on their behalf.
(07:31):
In our case is pending on June fifth, we'll have
a hearing before the First Circuit Court of Appeals, and
I'm hopeful that they'll uphold the Constitution in my constituents'
right to representation and my right to the First Amendment
right to free speech, and that this will be struck
down well.
Speaker 2 (07:50):
This is also unprecedented in as much as you have
all four active federal judges in Maine, all four of
them recuse themselves from hearing your lawsuit against the main
House speaker. Why did they accuse themselves.
Speaker 6 (08:09):
The mother of the biological mail the boy that won
the state championship here in Maine that I posted about.
That young man's mother apparently works for the court, and
so the judges recused themselves because of that close relationship
with that employee. And my case was moved to Rhode
(08:31):
Island where it was heard, and then when we lost there,
we've moved again to the First Circuit Court of Appeals
and are looking forward to having our day in court
on June fifth.
Speaker 2 (08:42):
It really is unbelievable. What did you make of this
news that came out over the weekend, some what, twenty
million dollars a plan to study the syntax of young
men to win their votes over. I mean, what was
your reaction to that? I mean it made me laugh.
I mean I chuckled to myself with the idea that
somehow Tim Walls was chosen as the as the white
(09:04):
guy to you know, be able to talk pro talk
with people is laughable to me. But I mean, that's
that's what happened. But Democrats wrote, you know, twenty million
dollars plot to win over young male voters doesn't sound
very authentic to me.
Speaker 6 (09:20):
No, it certainly does not sound very authentic. And if
you're in a position where you have to buy the
next generations vote, you may want to consider that perhaps
the policies that you're advocating for economic to social policies
and everything in between, perhaps you should reconsider what you
stand for. If the next generation is saying we don't
(09:42):
want that rather than trying to buy their vote.
Speaker 2 (09:45):
Yeah, the plan was called SAM, which is short for
Speaking with American Men, a strategic plan and promised investment
to study the syntax, language, and content that gains attention
and and virality in these spaces. And the plan recommends
buying advertisements and video games and noted above all, we
(10:09):
must shift from a moralizing tone. I mean, old, let
me hi, bro, how are you? What's going on? Dude?
What's up?
Speaker 7 (10:20):
Man?
Speaker 2 (10:20):
How are you? What's happening with you? I mean, we
have to have a lesson in how to be a person.
Speaker 6 (10:26):
You know, a I can go a long way, but
I don't think it can help shift the failed Democrat
policies to win over the next generation, and certainly not
the folks who are playing video games by bringing in
any kind of fake you know, they're looking for authenticity.
The next generation is looking for authenticity and they can
(10:48):
tell authenticity from not and that's what's shifting folks away
from the Democrat party. Buying advertisements in video games is
not going to get them anywhere.
Speaker 2 (11:00):
I don't think so.
Speaker 8 (11:01):
Well.
Speaker 2 (11:01):
We appreciate your fight. Sorry, you have to live through this,
and I am very grateful to hear that your constituents
support you, because we need more people like you that
are willing to get in the fight and engage in
the fight even though you're treated so unfairly. And I
hope the courts rightly reverse this travesty, this constitutional travesty
(11:22):
in this case. And we appreciate you coming on and
we wish you the best.
Speaker 1 (11:26):
Of look, thank you so much.
Speaker 7 (11:27):
All right, Laurel.
Speaker 2 (11:28):
Libby eight hundred and nine to four one, Shawn is
a number if you want to be a part of
the program. We have somebody call themselves coach from the
great state of Texas. God bless Texas. What's up, coach?
How are you you a coach? Yes, sir, what do
you coach? What do you coach?
Speaker 1 (11:43):
Well? I coached It's a little bit of football, basketball.
I coached both my daughters in sports. I played sports forever.
I'm luckily I'm retired now because if I was in
the school district right now, I would be risking my
career because I'm first of all, I'm pissed off number one.
And you have to question last segment, how much is enough?
I don't know if that was rhetorical, but I haven't
(12:04):
answer how much is enough. I might do three things
that are gonna have to happen to kill This has
nothing to do with legislation or funding one they needed.
Somebody has to step up and out absurd, be absurd,
bringing Mike Tyson in women's box and bring me Labron
James and basketball, give me a mail tennis player and girl,
and that will end it. That's one way. Number two. Sadly,
(12:27):
somebody's probably gonna have to die, and I hope it
doesn't go that way, but we're getting closer.
Speaker 2 (12:31):
And close, God, I hope not. I mean, you have
the one volleyball player that was pretty severely injured, and
it's just about physicality. And I think Caitlyn Jeni said
it best when she said, I don't care what your
hormone levels are when you're eighteen, nineteen twenty, what were
your hormone levels at puberty? And then you have this
(12:52):
whole concept of puberty blockers. Then you have another concept
where where where kids can literally get this type of
treatment without parental consent, which is a major problem for
me because as a parent, you're not a potted plant,
and I believe in parental rights. Well, I mean, it's
a multifaceted.
Speaker 1 (13:11):
Issue, but it's not to me. It's not about the biology.
If you look at any game or any sport that's
ever been played or ever will be played, it's got
to be fun. It's got to be fair. There's got
to be free of danger. Of three, yes, is what
I call it. So the the man playing in the
women's sport, let's just call it what it is. It
removes all three. It's no fun, it's no fair, and
(13:32):
now we're in danger. It's gonna take a serious injury
or death sadly to make this stop.
Speaker 2 (13:38):
I hope it doesn't come to that, coach, I really do.
I'd hate to see that happen. And it's preventable and
it's just. But what is amazing to me is, in
spite of public opinion so strongly against this, the Democrats
are clinging to this as their issue, just like they
cling to, you know, defending the rights of illegals over
(13:59):
the safety of an Americans, like they cling to the
notion that it is a constitutional crisis to cut out waste,
fraud and abuse in government spending. It's like they could
They wouldn't even stand for mothers that lost their children.
This is a party that has really really gone astray
and they've lost, you know, any moral compass or moral
clarity or common sense in their lives. Maybe it's a
(14:22):
good thing if you don't want them to win, but
you know what, they're not going to give up fighting.
They're not They're going to try and take your stove,
take your air conditioner, take your refrigerator, you know, put
a car in your driveway that you don't want, and
not give you freedom, and then and promise a cradle
to grave, womb to tomb society that will never materialize. Anyway,
my friend, eight hundred nine four one Shawn is our number.
(14:44):
If you want to be a part of the program.
All right, quick break right back. We'll get to your calls.
Eight hundred ninety four one Shawn as we continue today. Anyway,
eight hundred and nine four one Shawn, if you want
to be a part of the program. I mean, it
is clear the left is not going to change. I
mentioned earlier. They want to want you to climate proof
your Memorial Day and electric grills are a climate friendly
(15:04):
option of fossil is nothing cleaner burning than natural gas,
nothing cleaner. It makes zero sense. They don't care. But
that's them, that's the left today. You know, Mike Rose
said something that was very, very interesting and I like
him a lot. He did the Dirty Job series. He
also is on my favorite show, Deadliest Catch. I love
(15:26):
that show, just loved that show. You know, I donated
the money. He never he still has never sent me
my poster autographed by the captains of that show. Can
you believe that? What's up with Mike? Anyway? He's highlighting
how there is a lack of consequences that could be
leading to a declining work ethic and with all the
new high paying career jobs that will be coming online
(15:49):
in the next four years, there's going to be a
great need for people that have a good work ethic. Anyway,
so he went on to point out that a lot
of these younger kids, and you know, they grew up
in a world without deadlines and consequences, and that it's
fueling a potential crisis. And over the last few years,
(16:11):
many people are questioning the work ethic of former members
of gen Z. Those are people born between ninety seven
and twenty twelve and have expressed concern over how this
impacts young people entering the workforce. And anyway, he went
on to explain he was on with Martha McCallum on
Fox that one of the overriding factors contributing to the
(16:33):
decline in work ethic in younger generations is they face
more lenient deadlines and less consequences, and he said that
expectations and standards of workers can become fungible quickly. He's
not wrong. I've noticed this in my own life. You know,
if you live your life on a high wire with
(16:54):
the safety net fifteen feet below you all the time,
there's no consequence for falling, and on to explain that
the work ethic is gone. I can tell you one
of the best things that ever happened in my life
is I worked, and I work from you know, the
at age eight with a with a you know, doing
paper routes, age twelve, working Friday, Saturday, Sunday night, washing
(17:17):
dishes and a busy restaurant. And it's like we've got
to now go. But we got to get our kids back,
and we got to teach them a work ethic. And
it's like schools today, they just pass you, whether you're
qualified to pass or not. Pretty unbelievable. Anyway, eight hundred
and nine one, Shawn is our number. You want to
be a part of the program. Let's say, how to
(17:38):
Randy and Washington State. Randy, how are you glad you called?
Speaker 6 (17:41):
Hey?
Speaker 7 (17:41):
I wonder to talk about that great, big, beautiful bill.
Speaker 1 (17:45):
I don't understand.
Speaker 7 (17:46):
If we have the House and a swim majority in
the Senate, why are we even listening to these Democrats?
They obviously just want to spend their money needlessly and waitefully.
And if we have the majority, why don't we just
write it down bill the way it's supposed to be written,
cutting out all the pork, and fight it out in
(18:09):
the Senate. And honestly, we don't even really have the
Senate because we don't have enough votes to pass the bill.
Speaker 2 (18:15):
We do through the reconciliation process. And frankly, you can
thank the chairman of the Budget Committee in this case
that happens to be Lindsey Graham. Now Ron Johnson, Ram
Paul and some others are saying they don't think the
cuts go far enough. I'm fine with them adding more
cuts to it, I really am. I have no problem
with that at all. The Trump tarrifs, by the way,
(18:36):
have foreign car company scrambling to open factories. In New York,
consumer confidence jumped by double digits in May. That number
just came out. The stock marker went through the roof today.
And you know, but I'll give you an example. And
you know, doctor Oz was on this program last week
that we're all footing the bill fourteen billion dollars, you know,
(18:59):
from Medicaid fraud while eligible patients struggle for care. There's
one point four million people that are illegal that are
getting Medicaid benefits. Now, there was a New York Post
article today and you're right, Yes, Republicans need to cut
federal spending and soaring Medicaid outlays because it's headed towards insolvency,
(19:24):
you know. And you could see that the outlays have
skyrocketed these last twenty years, and the Fed spend one
hundred and sixty billion in fiscal year twenty three and
over three and a half times as much state level spending. Meanwhile,
that rose from one hundred and eight to two hundred
and eighty billion dollars. But what's basically gone on is
(19:45):
Democrats steadily pushing towards universal health care coverage at taxpayer,
taxpayer expense. By doing it this way. In the process,
Medicaid's grown from covering the poor and covering the near
poor and even the not really poor at all. In
the process, sas displacing private insurance more than it's actually
expanding the share of the population that is covered. Any
(20:08):
illegal immigrants as well as legal ones who aren't supposed
to become, you know, beyond the public dole or on
the public dole, and they're all benefiting from this. That's
not how this was designed. That's why it's headed towards insolvency,
just like Social Security is headed towards insolvency, and it's
a big problem. If the Senate can improve it and
(20:30):
make it more conservative and cut back more money, I'm
all in favor of it, and I think probably Republican
House members will support that too. The way this is
going to work is the House passed it by you know,
a slim margin, and the Senate will pass their version
of it, working with the Senate parliamentarian to make sure
(20:50):
it meets the criteria for reconciliation, and then they'll go
into conference between the two houses. They'll come up with
a compromise bill. Hopefully it cut more because I think
the more the better. I think it's better for the economy.
We can't keep robbing from our kids. And then they'll
vote again in the House, so again in the Senate,
and then hopefully the President signs the bill. As of now,
(21:13):
I don't see problems. I think that eventually will get there.
But I think it's a heavy lift, and I think
the more that they cut the better.
Speaker 7 (21:23):
Well, and I don't agree with them, you know, like
putting Social Security on the chopping block.
Speaker 1 (21:32):
You know, I'm sixty eight.
Speaker 7 (21:34):
I don't make enough on my Social Security to even
qualify to rent an apartment. And that's a you know,
cheap apartment. You have to have three times amount of
monthly income to qualify to rent an apartment. And I
paid my dues and I'm still paying. I'm back to
work and I'm paying every paycheck into Social Security and
(21:56):
I already paid. I don't think that's just anyway. I
know there's a lot of injustice, and I know Trump's
doing a fantastic job. I'm really impressed, and I hope
that they addressed the Social Security issue because every year
these politicians vote themselves are raised. Well, we in social
Security ought to get the same percentage of a race.
(22:19):
We don't we get two point five percent. Woo. That
doesn't even keep up with the times. So anyway, that's
all I had to say, Sean, thanks for taking my call.
Speaker 2 (22:29):
You bet, Randy, appreciate it. Man, Glad you called Jimmy
New York Next Sean Hannity Show.
Speaker 9 (22:34):
Hi, I was just calling about the blatant hypocrisy and
the lack of ethics that has become the Democratic Party.
The fact that they went out of the way to
throw everything and the kitchens think at Trump to try
to get them tossed, and they created the twenty fifth
Amendment just to go after his mental and cognitive abilities.
(22:57):
Yet the mainstream media and the party had such a
concerted effort that I'm playing key parts and covering up
Biden's diminishing ability. Now they're trying to spin around that
they're pointing out Jake Tapper putting out his book. They
have no shame. They're trying to take the part of
pointing out this, and now they're pointing out the importance
(23:19):
of going after Trump's declining ability again, like people aren't
picking up on their games. They're playing with their classic
deflection tactics.
Speaker 2 (23:28):
Listen. It was, as we pointed out on this radio
show and on TV, we were pointing out as cognitive
decline in Frank over the summer and fall of twenty nineteen,
and it was obvious to us then he was not
the same guy that he was as vice president, not
(23:50):
the same guy he was as president. So the idea
that they didn't know just holds no water with me.
We were showing the American people in real time. Somebody
on one of these networks said they weren't showing it,
they weren't highlighting it, they weren't focusing on it. They
were covering it up, and they didn't make it a
big issue. Had they done so, Joe Biden probably would
(24:12):
have been removed with the twenty fifth Amendment. And the
people around him that were responsible for this, what did
they know? When did they know it? That needs to
be a full fledged investigation because that is a real
constitutional crisis if you don't know, if the president doesn't
have control of his faculties. Anyway, appreciate the call, Jimmy,
Glad you're with us. Dave Illinois. Next Sean Hannity Show.
Speaker 8 (24:34):
Hi, Hello, an honor to speak to you, mister Hannity
an honor.
Speaker 2 (24:39):
The honor is all mine, Sorr, glad you checked it.
What's going on.
Speaker 8 (24:43):
Well living here in the fine communist state of Illinois.
But anyway, I was diagnosed. I got my diagnosis the
exact same day that our former president did on prostate cancer.
I'm sixty two years old, had been monitoring it for
for five years, saw a spike, we did an MRI.
(25:04):
MRI led to a biopsy. Biopsy led to the diagnosis.
It is not that hard to, you know, be diagnosed
with prostate cancer again, if they're doing just a simple
blood test, literally a ten minute test two times a year,
(25:24):
pointed them to where I've been diagnosed with.
Speaker 7 (25:29):
Prostate cancer.
Speaker 2 (25:30):
Now do I like to now a what what stage
just cancer do you have? Do you know?
Speaker 8 (25:35):
Well, the on the Gleason scale, I've gotten real smart
on this. I'm a seven.
Speaker 2 (25:42):
It's a pretty high score. That's not that's not that,
that's not something you can ignore.
Speaker 8 (25:47):
No, No, they said, you know, I could probably go
this summer without dealing with it. I could probably push
it up to a year without really going after it.
But no more than that. And it's like, no, I'm
I'm gonnae on top of this. So I have a
twenty three treatment radiation followed by they will insert radioactive
(26:07):
seeds into me, and the week after fourth of July,
I'm done.
Speaker 2 (26:15):
Let me tell you something. I know Rudy Giuliani who
was public about it. Ali North, he was public about it.
They used the radiological seeds like you were using, and
they had great results. I know people that used other
treatments that have had great results. I applaud you for
jumping on it early, not waiting that year, because you
(26:36):
run the risk. The longer you wait, the greater of
the odds it can spread beyond the prostate. But most
people don't know. Most men will die with prostate cancer,
but not from prostate cancer. And it's very very common.
Yours got, you know, aggressive fast, but you stayed on
top of it. And I'm going to tell you how
(26:57):
this is likely going to end for you. I'd say
the very very high You're going to be fine and
you're not going to die of prostate cancer. And the
fact that he didn't have a simple PSA test that
you rightly point out a blood test is unconscionable to me.
It's unfathomable to me. And having been around President Trump
and been with him in the Middle East. I saw
(27:18):
upfront and close and personal, the close proximity. At all times.
Doctors are with the president. Anytime you see a presidential
motor cave, there is an emergency vehicle with medical doctors
prepared to do surgery on the president at the ready.
It's with him at all times. He has access to
(27:40):
a doctor twenty four to seven and as it should
be for any president, Democrat or Republican. Anyway, I'm glad
you're going to be through this by the fourth of July.
I think that's awesome. You're being proactive. I could not
encourage any more to do so, and I think you
made the right call. I really do well.
Speaker 8 (27:56):
I think that every guy needs to have a check
because again, it is not a huge ordeal.
Speaker 2 (28:02):
God bless you in your treatment. Keep us up to speed.
Let us know you're okay, right well do thanks sir?
Eight hundred nine four one, Shawn, you want to be
a part of the program. All right, that's gonna wrap
things up for today. Hannity Tonight, nine Eastern on the
Fox News Channel, Caroline Levitt Wrihine's previous Joe Conshaw on
a corrupt media, Senator Mark Wayne Mullen, Alan Dershwoodz, Greg Jarrett,
(28:23):
and also we will check in with Clay Travis. Say
you DVR tonight Hannity nine Eastern on Fox. We'll see
you tonight back here tomorrow. Thank you for making this
show possible.
Stay right here for our final news roundup and information overload.
Speaker 2 (00:04):
All right, news round up and information overload. Our toll
free our number is eight hundred and nine point one Sean.
If you want to be a part of the program. Well,
the left wing Democrats they can't help themselves. I guess
they really can, but they choose not to. But they
are who they are, and I don't think they're going
to change too much. And anyway, the issue of trans
(00:27):
athletes or men playing women's sports, they are now the
champions of And if you remember, President Trump got into
a little bit of a confrontation with the with the
governor of Maine, Governor Mills, over this issue. And here's
how that went down.
Speaker 3 (00:42):
Is the main here the governor of Man.
Speaker 4 (00:45):
Are you not going to comply with it? Well, we
are the federal law. Well you better do it. You
better do it because you're not going to get any
federal funding at all if you don't. And by the way,
your population, even though it's a liberal orthough I did
very well there. Your population doesn't want men playing in
women's sports. So you better comply because otherwise you're not
(01:07):
getting any federal funding.
Speaker 3 (01:10):
Every state. Good, I'll see you, and could I look
forward to that that should be a really easy one
and enjoy your life after governor, because I don't think
you'll be an elected politics ouch.
Speaker 2 (01:22):
And then of course Galvin Newsom talks to Charlie Kirk.
I'm not for men playing women's sports. But we've got
the tape, and here's what he had said at the time.
Speaker 5 (01:32):
Turns out in twenty fourteen, here's before I was governor.
There was a law established that established the legal principles
that allow the allowed trans athletes and women's sports. But
the issue of fairness is completely It is an issue
of fairness, and I think Democrats have last thank you
for what you did on civil rights for students in
(01:53):
our schools, transgender rights in this state.
Speaker 2 (01:57):
Oh, of course, you know, Gaveners flips and flops and
flails because he wants to live at sixteen hundred Pennsylvania Avenue.
Now you might remember the case. A Laurel Libby, state
legislator from Maine won her case, by the way, and
her role of main politics for the help of the
Supreme Court ruling in her favor. But she's still struggling
to do her job for her constituents because some people
(02:20):
in Maine's legislature do not want to hear from her,
and she's also had plenty to say about why the
Democrats cannot connect with today's generation. But anyway, we appreciate
you being with us, Laurel Libby. Thank you, And you
know you decided to stand up and protect girls sports
(02:40):
and you are ostracized, and I guess remain ostracized. And
you reminded your state what title mine was all about
in the first place, and they were responded by rejecting
your right to voice your opinion. I mean, this is
this is the modern day left today.
Speaker 6 (02:56):
That is the modern day left. Thankfully, the Supreme Court
has ruled that the justaure has to count my vote
now while the case is pending, and so I am
still not able to speak in the main House, but
I am allowed to vote on behalf of my constituents
at this point, I mean.
Speaker 2 (03:10):
I just can't believe what is the rationale for not
letting you speak?
Speaker 6 (03:14):
Well, I was centered three months ago and their rationale
was that I shared a picture of a minor. Now,
of course, this was a picture that had been shared
publicly already, and if I had shared the post in
celebration of a biological male winning a state championship in
the female category, then that post would have been celebrated
(03:36):
as well. But the fact is that it highlighted a
policy that's not popular with manors, and so in political retaliation,
I was censured and my ability to vote and speak
on the floor on behalf of my constituents was taken.
Speaker 2 (03:50):
So we have two issues that have come out today.
Abe Hernandez, a male high school athlete identifying as a female,
continues to make waves in the track field world. Hernande
is the name you may be familiar with. Took first
place in both the long jump and triple jump at
the California Interscholastic Federation Southern Section Master's Meet over the weekend,
(04:14):
and by doing so, Hernandez qualified for both events for
next weekend state championships. And anyways, this individuals I guess
a junior, and those latest accomplishments could be enough to
start Nettingham College scholarship offers in women's track and field,
made possible by the fact that the biological male recently
(04:35):
amended his birth certificate to reflect his change to the
poultry sum of twenty three dollars and anyway, an organization
also that works to protect fairness, safety, and equal opportunity
for women in girls' sports, issuing various officials in the
state of Minnesota for allowing poise to compete against girls
in sporting events there, and the Alliance Defending Freedom Female
(04:57):
Athletes United you know names the Attorney General Keith Ellison
and others. And the official policy of Minnesota High State
High School League, which governs high school athletics in the state,
is to allow students to compete based on their stated
gender identity without regards to sex. So this obviously is
(05:19):
still continuing and Democrats continue to champion it. What's your
reaction to that.
Speaker 6 (05:23):
Yes, absolutely, completely unfair and discriminates against our young women
who have worked so hard for years trying to excel
in their different fields and to have a biological male
boy swoop in and take their place, because that's exactly
what is happening. They're being pushed aside so that a
(05:44):
boy can can swoop in and take their podiums, take
their medals, take their scholarships. It is completely unfair and
we've heard that from Gavin Newsom. Unfortunately he's not backed
that up with any action in support of women and girls.
But that's we need to see state by state, And
thankfully we are seeing individual school districts step up, whether
(06:07):
we're talking about Maine or Washington or other states and
declare that they're going to go by Title nine rather
than allowing this woke policy to persist. But folks need
to stand up and say no more.
Speaker 2 (06:19):
Well, I appreciate your winning the Supreme Court. The idea
that you cannot speak on behalf of your constituents and
they're silencing you is beyond troubling to me? Is it
not anybody in that chamber that you work in and
main willing to stand up for you and stand with
you and support your right to speak?
Speaker 6 (06:40):
You know, I wish that there were. I just got
my right to speak back last Thursday, and just today
him having the right to vote on specific bills challenged
by even my own party when Republicans wouldn't support a
roll call on a bill that I requested today. So
now ongoing challenges from both the left and the right
(07:03):
in the main House.
Speaker 2 (07:04):
Chamber, And what is the reaction among your constituents in
this case?
Speaker 6 (07:09):
Now, my constituents are thankful as the am I that
I am able to vote on their behalf. It's been
a long three months they have not had representation. They've
been completely disenfranchised by the Democrat majority issuing this censure
and declaring that I couldn't speak or vote on their behalf.
But they're also eager for me to have my voice
back and to be able to speak on their behalf.
(07:31):
In our case is pending on June fifth, we'll have
a hearing before the First Circuit Court of Appeals, and
I'm hopeful that they'll uphold the Constitution in my constituents'
right to representation and my right to the First Amendment
right to free speech, and that this will be struck
down well.
Speaker 2 (07:50):
This is also unprecedented in as much as you have
all four active federal judges in Maine, all four of
them recuse themselves from hearing your lawsuit against the main
House speaker. Why did they accuse themselves.
Speaker 6 (08:09):
The mother of the biological mail the boy that won
the state championship here in Maine that I posted about.
That young man's mother apparently works for the court, and
so the judges recused themselves because of that close relationship
with that employee. And my case was moved to Rhode
(08:31):
Island where it was heard, and then when we lost there,
we've moved again to the First Circuit Court of Appeals
and are looking forward to having our day in court
on June fifth.
Speaker 2 (08:42):
It really is unbelievable. What did you make of this
news that came out over the weekend, some what, twenty
million dollars a plan to study the syntax of young
men to win their votes over. I mean, what was
your reaction to that? I mean it made me laugh.
I mean I chuckled to myself with the idea that
somehow Tim Walls was chosen as the as the white
(09:04):
guy to you know, be able to talk pro talk
with people is laughable to me. But I mean, that's
that's what happened. But Democrats wrote, you know, twenty million
dollars plot to win over young male voters doesn't sound
very authentic to me.
Speaker 6 (09:20):
No, it certainly does not sound very authentic. And if
you're in a position where you have to buy the
next generations vote, you may want to consider that perhaps
the policies that you're advocating for economic to social policies
and everything in between, perhaps you should reconsider what you
stand for. If the next generation is saying we don't
(09:42):
want that rather than trying to buy their vote.
Speaker 2 (09:45):
Yeah, the plan was called SAM, which is short for
Speaking with American Men, a strategic plan and promised investment
to study the syntax, language, and content that gains attention
and and virality in these spaces. And the plan recommends
buying advertisements and video games and noted above all, we
(10:09):
must shift from a moralizing tone. I mean, old, let
me hi, bro, how are you? What's going on? Dude?
What's up?
Speaker 7 (10:20):
Man?
Speaker 2 (10:20):
How are you? What's happening with you? I mean, we
have to have a lesson in how to be a person.
Speaker 6 (10:26):
You know, a I can go a long way, but
I don't think it can help shift the failed Democrat
policies to win over the next generation, and certainly not
the folks who are playing video games by bringing in
any kind of fake you know, they're looking for authenticity.
The next generation is looking for authenticity and they can
(10:48):
tell authenticity from not and that's what's shifting folks away
from the Democrat party. Buying advertisements in video games is
not going to get them anywhere.
Speaker 2 (11:00):
I don't think so.
Speaker 8 (11:01):
Well.
Speaker 2 (11:01):
We appreciate your fight. Sorry, you have to live through this,
and I am very grateful to hear that your constituents
support you, because we need more people like you that
are willing to get in the fight and engage in
the fight even though you're treated so unfairly. And I
hope the courts rightly reverse this travesty, this constitutional travesty
(11:22):
in this case. And we appreciate you coming on and
we wish you the best.
Speaker 1 (11:26):
Of look, thank you so much.
Speaker 7 (11:27):
All right, Laurel.
Speaker 2 (11:28):
Libby eight hundred and nine to four one, Shawn is
a number if you want to be a part of
the program. We have somebody call themselves coach from the
great state of Texas. God bless Texas. What's up, coach?
How are you you a coach? Yes, sir, what do
you coach? What do you coach?
Speaker 1 (11:43):
Well? I coached It's a little bit of football, basketball.
I coached both my daughters in sports. I played sports forever.
I'm luckily I'm retired now because if I was in
the school district right now, I would be risking my
career because I'm first of all, I'm pissed off number one.
And you have to question last segment, how much is enough?
I don't know if that was rhetorical, but I haven't
(12:04):
answer how much is enough. I might do three things
that are gonna have to happen to kill This has
nothing to do with legislation or funding one they needed.
Somebody has to step up and out absurd, be absurd,
bringing Mike Tyson in women's box and bring me Labron
James and basketball, give me a mail tennis player and girl,
and that will end it. That's one way. Number two. Sadly,
(12:27):
somebody's probably gonna have to die, and I hope it
doesn't go that way, but we're getting closer.
Speaker 2 (12:31):
And close, God, I hope not. I mean, you have
the one volleyball player that was pretty severely injured, and
it's just about physicality. And I think Caitlyn Jeni said
it best when she said, I don't care what your
hormone levels are when you're eighteen, nineteen twenty, what were
your hormone levels at puberty? And then you have this
(12:52):
whole concept of puberty blockers. Then you have another concept
where where where kids can literally get this type of
treatment without parental consent, which is a major problem for
me because as a parent, you're not a potted plant,
and I believe in parental rights. Well, I mean, it's
a multifaceted.
Speaker 1 (13:11):
Issue, but it's not to me. It's not about the biology.
If you look at any game or any sport that's
ever been played or ever will be played, it's got
to be fun. It's got to be fair. There's got
to be free of danger. Of three, yes, is what
I call it. So the the man playing in the
women's sport, let's just call it what it is. It
removes all three. It's no fun, it's no fair, and
(13:32):
now we're in danger. It's gonna take a serious injury
or death sadly to make this stop.
Speaker 2 (13:38):
I hope it doesn't come to that, coach, I really do.
I'd hate to see that happen. And it's preventable and
it's just. But what is amazing to me is, in
spite of public opinion so strongly against this, the Democrats
are clinging to this as their issue, just like they
cling to, you know, defending the rights of illegals over
(13:59):
the safety of an Americans, like they cling to the
notion that it is a constitutional crisis to cut out waste,
fraud and abuse in government spending. It's like they could
They wouldn't even stand for mothers that lost their children.
This is a party that has really really gone astray
and they've lost, you know, any moral compass or moral
clarity or common sense in their lives. Maybe it's a
(14:22):
good thing if you don't want them to win, but
you know what, they're not going to give up fighting.
They're not They're going to try and take your stove,
take your air conditioner, take your refrigerator, you know, put
a car in your driveway that you don't want, and
not give you freedom, and then and promise a cradle
to grave, womb to tomb society that will never materialize. Anyway,
my friend, eight hundred nine four one Shawn is our number.
(14:44):
If you want to be a part of the program.
All right, quick break right back. We'll get to your calls.
Eight hundred ninety four one Shawn as we continue today. Anyway,
eight hundred and nine four one Shawn, if you want
to be a part of the program. I mean, it
is clear the left is not going to change. I
mentioned earlier. They want to want you to climate proof
your Memorial Day and electric grills are a climate friendly
(15:04):
option of fossil is nothing cleaner burning than natural gas,
nothing cleaner. It makes zero sense. They don't care. But
that's them, that's the left today. You know, Mike Rose
said something that was very, very interesting and I like
him a lot. He did the Dirty Job series. He
also is on my favorite show, Deadliest Catch. I love
(15:26):
that show, just loved that show. You know, I donated
the money. He never he still has never sent me
my poster autographed by the captains of that show. Can
you believe that? What's up with Mike? Anyway? He's highlighting
how there is a lack of consequences that could be
leading to a declining work ethic and with all the
new high paying career jobs that will be coming online
(15:49):
in the next four years, there's going to be a
great need for people that have a good work ethic. Anyway,
so he went on to point out that a lot
of these younger kids, and you know, they grew up
in a world without deadlines and consequences, and that it's
fueling a potential crisis. And over the last few years,
(16:11):
many people are questioning the work ethic of former members
of gen Z. Those are people born between ninety seven
and twenty twelve and have expressed concern over how this
impacts young people entering the workforce. And anyway, he went
on to explain he was on with Martha McCallum on
Fox that one of the overriding factors contributing to the
(16:33):
decline in work ethic in younger generations is they face
more lenient deadlines and less consequences, and he said that
expectations and standards of workers can become fungible quickly. He's
not wrong. I've noticed this in my own life. You know,
if you live your life on a high wire with
(16:54):
the safety net fifteen feet below you all the time,
there's no consequence for falling, and on to explain that
the work ethic is gone. I can tell you one
of the best things that ever happened in my life
is I worked, and I work from you know, the
at age eight with a with a you know, doing
paper routes, age twelve, working Friday, Saturday, Sunday night, washing
(17:17):
dishes and a busy restaurant. And it's like we've got
to now go. But we got to get our kids back,
and we got to teach them a work ethic. And
it's like schools today, they just pass you, whether you're
qualified to pass or not. Pretty unbelievable. Anyway, eight hundred
and nine one, Shawn is our number. You want to
be a part of the program. Let's say, how to
(17:38):
Randy and Washington State. Randy, how are you glad you called?
Speaker 6 (17:41):
Hey?
Speaker 7 (17:41):
I wonder to talk about that great, big, beautiful bill.
Speaker 1 (17:45):
I don't understand.
Speaker 7 (17:46):
If we have the House and a swim majority in
the Senate, why are we even listening to these Democrats?
They obviously just want to spend their money needlessly and waitefully.
And if we have the majority, why don't we just
write it down bill the way it's supposed to be written,
cutting out all the pork, and fight it out in
(18:09):
the Senate. And honestly, we don't even really have the
Senate because we don't have enough votes to pass the bill.
Speaker 2 (18:15):
We do through the reconciliation process. And frankly, you can
thank the chairman of the Budget Committee in this case
that happens to be Lindsey Graham. Now Ron Johnson, Ram
Paul and some others are saying they don't think the
cuts go far enough. I'm fine with them adding more
cuts to it, I really am. I have no problem
with that at all. The Trump tarrifs, by the way,
(18:36):
have foreign car company scrambling to open factories. In New York,
consumer confidence jumped by double digits in May. That number
just came out. The stock marker went through the roof today.
And you know, but I'll give you an example. And
you know, doctor Oz was on this program last week
that we're all footing the bill fourteen billion dollars, you know,
(18:59):
from Medicaid fraud while eligible patients struggle for care. There's
one point four million people that are illegal that are
getting Medicaid benefits. Now, there was a New York Post
article today and you're right, Yes, Republicans need to cut
federal spending and soaring Medicaid outlays because it's headed towards insolvency,
(19:24):
you know. And you could see that the outlays have
skyrocketed these last twenty years, and the Fed spend one
hundred and sixty billion in fiscal year twenty three and
over three and a half times as much state level spending. Meanwhile,
that rose from one hundred and eight to two hundred
and eighty billion dollars. But what's basically gone on is
(19:45):
Democrats steadily pushing towards universal health care coverage at taxpayer,
taxpayer expense. By doing it this way. In the process,
Medicaid's grown from covering the poor and covering the near
poor and even the not really poor at all. In
the process, sas displacing private insurance more than it's actually
expanding the share of the population that is covered. Any
(20:08):
illegal immigrants as well as legal ones who aren't supposed
to become, you know, beyond the public dole or on
the public dole, and they're all benefiting from this. That's
not how this was designed. That's why it's headed towards insolvency,
just like Social Security is headed towards insolvency, and it's
a big problem. If the Senate can improve it and
(20:30):
make it more conservative and cut back more money, I'm
all in favor of it, and I think probably Republican
House members will support that too. The way this is
going to work is the House passed it by you know,
a slim margin, and the Senate will pass their version
of it, working with the Senate parliamentarian to make sure
(20:50):
it meets the criteria for reconciliation, and then they'll go
into conference between the two houses. They'll come up with
a compromise bill. Hopefully it cut more because I think
the more the better. I think it's better for the economy.
We can't keep robbing from our kids. And then they'll
vote again in the House, so again in the Senate,
and then hopefully the President signs the bill. As of now,
(21:13):
I don't see problems. I think that eventually will get there.
But I think it's a heavy lift, and I think
the more that they cut the better.
Speaker 7 (21:23):
Well, and I don't agree with them, you know, like
putting Social Security on the chopping block.
Speaker 1 (21:32):
You know, I'm sixty eight.
Speaker 7 (21:34):
I don't make enough on my Social Security to even
qualify to rent an apartment. And that's a you know,
cheap apartment. You have to have three times amount of
monthly income to qualify to rent an apartment. And I
paid my dues and I'm still paying. I'm back to
work and I'm paying every paycheck into Social Security and
(21:56):
I already paid. I don't think that's just anyway. I
know there's a lot of injustice, and I know Trump's
doing a fantastic job. I'm really impressed, and I hope
that they addressed the Social Security issue because every year
these politicians vote themselves are raised. Well, we in social
Security ought to get the same percentage of a race.
(22:19):
We don't we get two point five percent. Woo. That
doesn't even keep up with the times. So anyway, that's
all I had to say, Sean, thanks for taking my call.
Speaker 2 (22:29):
You bet, Randy, appreciate it. Man, Glad you called Jimmy
New York Next Sean Hannity Show.
Speaker 9 (22:34):
Hi, I was just calling about the blatant hypocrisy and
the lack of ethics that has become the Democratic Party.
The fact that they went out of the way to
throw everything and the kitchens think at Trump to try
to get them tossed, and they created the twenty fifth
Amendment just to go after his mental and cognitive abilities.
(22:57):
Yet the mainstream media and the party had such a
concerted effort that I'm playing key parts and covering up
Biden's diminishing ability. Now they're trying to spin around that
they're pointing out Jake Tapper putting out his book. They
have no shame. They're trying to take the part of
pointing out this, and now they're pointing out the importance
(23:19):
of going after Trump's declining ability again, like people aren't
picking up on their games. They're playing with their classic
deflection tactics.
Speaker 2 (23:28):
Listen. It was, as we pointed out on this radio
show and on TV, we were pointing out as cognitive
decline in Frank over the summer and fall of twenty nineteen,
and it was obvious to us then he was not
the same guy that he was as vice president, not
(23:50):
the same guy he was as president. So the idea
that they didn't know just holds no water with me.
We were showing the American people in real time. Somebody
on one of these networks said they weren't showing it,
they weren't highlighting it, they weren't focusing on it. They
were covering it up, and they didn't make it a
big issue. Had they done so, Joe Biden probably would
(24:12):
have been removed with the twenty fifth Amendment. And the
people around him that were responsible for this, what did
they know? When did they know it? That needs to
be a full fledged investigation because that is a real
constitutional crisis if you don't know, if the president doesn't
have control of his faculties. Anyway, appreciate the call, Jimmy,
Glad you're with us. Dave Illinois. Next Sean Hannity Show.
Speaker 8 (24:34):
Hi, Hello, an honor to speak to you, mister Hannity
an honor.
Speaker 2 (24:39):
The honor is all mine, Sorr, glad you checked it.
What's going on.
Speaker 8 (24:43):
Well living here in the fine communist state of Illinois.
But anyway, I was diagnosed. I got my diagnosis the
exact same day that our former president did on prostate cancer.
I'm sixty two years old, had been monitoring it for
for five years, saw a spike, we did an MRI.
(25:04):
MRI led to a biopsy. Biopsy led to the diagnosis.
It is not that hard to, you know, be diagnosed
with prostate cancer again, if they're doing just a simple
blood test, literally a ten minute test two times a year,
(25:24):
pointed them to where I've been diagnosed with.
Speaker 7 (25:29):
Prostate cancer.
Speaker 2 (25:30):
Now do I like to now a what what stage
just cancer do you have? Do you know?
Speaker 8 (25:35):
Well, the on the Gleason scale, I've gotten real smart
on this. I'm a seven.
Speaker 2 (25:42):
It's a pretty high score. That's not that's not that,
that's not something you can ignore.
Speaker 8 (25:47):
No, No, they said, you know, I could probably go
this summer without dealing with it. I could probably push
it up to a year without really going after it.
But no more than that. And it's like, no, I'm
I'm gonnae on top of this. So I have a
twenty three treatment radiation followed by they will insert radioactive
(26:07):
seeds into me, and the week after fourth of July,
I'm done.
Speaker 2 (26:15):
Let me tell you something. I know Rudy Giuliani who
was public about it. Ali North, he was public about it.
They used the radiological seeds like you were using, and
they had great results. I know people that used other
treatments that have had great results. I applaud you for
jumping on it early, not waiting that year, because you
(26:36):
run the risk. The longer you wait, the greater of
the odds it can spread beyond the prostate. But most
people don't know. Most men will die with prostate cancer,
but not from prostate cancer. And it's very very common.
Yours got, you know, aggressive fast, but you stayed on
top of it. And I'm going to tell you how
(26:57):
this is likely going to end for you. I'd say
the very very high You're going to be fine and
you're not going to die of prostate cancer. And the
fact that he didn't have a simple PSA test that
you rightly point out a blood test is unconscionable to me.
It's unfathomable to me. And having been around President Trump
and been with him in the Middle East. I saw
(27:18):
upfront and close and personal, the close proximity. At all times.
Doctors are with the president. Anytime you see a presidential
motor cave, there is an emergency vehicle with medical doctors
prepared to do surgery on the president at the ready.
It's with him at all times. He has access to
(27:40):
a doctor twenty four to seven and as it should
be for any president, Democrat or Republican. Anyway, I'm glad
you're going to be through this by the fourth of July.
I think that's awesome. You're being proactive. I could not
encourage any more to do so, and I think you
made the right call. I really do well.
Speaker 8 (27:56):
I think that every guy needs to have a check
because again, it is not a huge ordeal.
Speaker 2 (28:02):
God bless you in your treatment. Keep us up to speed.
Let us know you're okay, right well do thanks sir?
Eight hundred nine four one, Shawn, you want to be
a part of the program. All right, that's gonna wrap
things up for today. Hannity Tonight, nine Eastern on the
Fox News Channel, Caroline Levitt Wrihine's previous Joe Conshaw on
a corrupt media, Senator Mark Wayne Mullen, Alan Dershwoodz, Greg Jarrett,
(28:23):
and also we will check in with Clay Travis. Say
you DVR tonight Hannity nine Eastern on Fox. We'll see
you tonight back here tomorrow. Thank you for making this
show possible.
The Sean Hannity Show News
Host
Sean Hannity
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Boysober
Have you ever wondered what life might be like if you stopped worrying about being wanted, and focused on understanding what you actually want? That was the question Hope Woodard asked herself after a string of situationships inspired her to take a break from sex and dating. She went "boysober," a personal concept that sparked a global movement among women looking to prioritize themselves over men. Now, Hope is looking to expand the ways we explore our relationship to relationships. Taking a bold, unfiltered look into modern love, romance, and self-discovery, Boysober will dive into messy stories about dating, sex, love, friendship, and breaking generational patterns—all with humor, vulnerability, and a fresh perspective.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com