Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:30):
All right, Leonard Skinna simple man. That can only mean
one thing on this radio program, and that is all
things self proclaimed simple man. That means all things Bill O'Reilly,
all things Bill O'Reilly, Billoreilly dot com. Mister O'Reilly, Sir,
it's always a pleasure to have you. I know, it's
the highlight of you week. How are you, sir?
Speaker 2 (00:49):
Search up Hannity, We're uh.
Speaker 1 (00:53):
I don't know why. The sound of your voice cracks
me up, just just you being on the pro Patrick
bet David was asking about you when we were together.
We had a good time talking.
Speaker 2 (01:02):
What does he want to know? I'm an open book,
you know that. No.
Speaker 1 (01:06):
I mean he was mentioning people that had worked at
Fox and don't and I said, well, everybody that I
know that left tells me and you more than anybody,
to be very blunt, that they that you're happy with
your career decisions. And we discussed this a little bit
last week, and I said, uh, my success or failures
not predicated on somebody else's failure success. And I the
(01:31):
intramural fighting days of my life and career arelong gone.
I don't care. I wish people all the best, and
I want to do the best shows I can do
for my audience, and that's where my focus is.
Speaker 2 (01:43):
Well, it's true, you're an older statesman. Now you're rapidly aging.
Speaker 1 (01:47):
And what about you? What are you? You're much older
than me?
Speaker 3 (01:51):
What is this? Lee?
Speaker 2 (01:52):
I'm I'm I'm like, uh, I.
Speaker 1 (01:55):
Did see you lately. I bought you breakfast as always
I always pay.
Speaker 2 (01:59):
Yeah, I'm the I mean it's six inch waist. But
you have taken on wisdom now.
Speaker 4 (02:07):
You know.
Speaker 2 (02:07):
It's interesting because the world and particularly the United States,
is changing so dramatically that in my fiftieth year of journalism,
and I couldn't have predicted when I left FNC eight
years ago that independent journalism because of the technology, would
(02:30):
rise so quickly. It was the same thing in nineteen
ninety six when we Hannity and I were first on
the bench at Fox News when it started. We were
there because of technology, because they had the ability to
do twenty four hour television news, and then we stepped
into that breach and became successful. Well, the same thing
(02:54):
has happened now, but in a different realm. So now
it's YouTube and Spotify and TikTok and all this other
stuff that reaches an enormous amount of people that linear
television doesn't. So those of us who left linear television
and have gotten into this world, and I didn't predict it.
(03:14):
I mean, I just wanted to do interesting work, have
now found ourselves, some of us who put on an
honest product, not garbage, in a very lucrative position.
Speaker 1 (03:26):
And that's what that's no Listen, We've both have been
blessed beyond our wildest dreams. And I would add in
my case, when I started in talk radio in nineteen
eighty seven or eight, I don't even remember what year,
they were only like two two hundred and fifty talk
stations in the country, and it's grown and exploded. I
(03:47):
never thought i'd be on over what, seven hundred and
sixty stations now, and I'm very blessed and honored to
do it. And I even do my own podcast, as
you know. And on top of that for Fox, and
I love doing everything that I do it all day
and I like to work hard. All right, I'm going
to give you a choice today. Now, I have two
topics for you. I have one water cooler topic and
(04:10):
then I have one more serious topic. Which one would
you like to deal.
Speaker 2 (04:13):
With first, let's go to the cooler first.
Speaker 1 (04:17):
All right, water cooler first. Sydney Sweeney. I know you've
been following the story. There's a great piece on foxnews
dot com, Why the War on Hot Women? Now? Listen,
she's to me, she's a pretty young lady, young woman.
I don't you know she's That's not how I would
describe her. Why the woke mob hates Sydney Sweeney. I
(04:39):
knew nothing next to nothing about her, except she's all
over the New York Post and it has been for
months and months and months, which is the about all
I really know about her. Anyway, it's an MSDNC for example,
Sydney Sweeney's ad shows an unbridled cultural shift towards whiteness.
The amount of hatred that is being shown to this
(05:01):
young woman who who's doing an ad about genes. He's
obviously an attractive young woman. Fine, I wouldn't use the
words they're using in headlines, et cetera, et cetera. And
I don't know where all the feminist outrage was with
Dylan Blvany, et cetera, et cetera. But you know, a
celebrating womenhood. But they really are after her because okay,
(05:26):
they she's doing a gene ad meaning genes that you
wear and quote, you know, a play on words, genes,
and somehow they're taking this to Nazi eugenics. I mean,
it's insane.
Speaker 2 (05:39):
I haven't I have to confess that I don't know
much about the young woman. She's an actress. I know
she's in the America, the Eagle Spot, but I don't
know how they're making the linkage from trying to sell
genes into the third right, what is the thread there?
What are they trying to say?
Speaker 1 (06:00):
Because they're implying and this is my take on it,
and Linda, you can weigh in a field differently, because
she's a pretty young woman. She's an attractive young woman.
They use the word, they spell the word genes ge
n e s and she's selling genes and that's the brand.
(06:20):
And anyway, and then good Morning America. You know she's
being compared to the Nazi propaganda. Now, all they're acknowledging
is is that she's an attractive young woman. Okay, great,
they're using a play on words and they're trying to
somehow connect this. Now, why is this? Why are they
going after this young woman? I find it repulsive and
(06:42):
they've lost their collective mind. And now she's under fire,
you know, because of this American Eagle ad. It makes
me want to buy the ad and maybe even you know,
I don't even know what she does, to be honest,
I have no I can't name one show she's been
on or anything that she's done that she does. I
know she's in the paper all the time. That's about it.
Speaker 2 (07:03):
Yeah, because she's an attractive woman, and the tabloids use
the women, and so does the Internet to get clicks,
and that's been going on since nineteen five. But I
still don't understand g E n ees genes. I guess
these kooks, these loons believe that because this woman has
(07:27):
good genes in that she's attractive, that this is some
kind of eugenics tied into white superiority. So when you
hear something like that, there are two reactions. Number one,
who's ever saying it should be institutionalized and we should
send people over in.
Speaker 1 (07:49):
That's a good way to put it. But I think
most of the left institutionalized at this point.
Speaker 2 (07:54):
They've got to be they've got to be analyzed. There
may be a danger to themselves, sanity and we want
to be passionate here. Okay, that's number one, and number two,
it's so desperate to get people to pay attention to them.
The people that push this MSNBC is a great example desperate.
They don't know what to do. The Epstein thing is
running out of steam and their ratings are cratering. So
(08:19):
let's throw this poor woman up as some kind of
you know, SS woman or something.
Speaker 1 (08:26):
I mean, it's so insane. It's insane, but it's more
than insane.
Speaker 2 (08:32):
It shows you how our culture has declined because you
don't take a human being, this woman and put her
into a situation of mass murder, which is what the
third reiche was. If you have any conscience, you don't
(08:53):
do that. That's appalling. But they don't care. And I
don't know about the outrage. I guess it's getting a lot.
I don't live in that internet world, you know that.
But that's my water cooler analysis.
Speaker 1 (09:08):
All right, quick break, we'll come back with Bill O'Reilly
All Things simple Man, eight hundred and ninety four one.
Shawn is on number. We'll get to your calls coming
up as well as we continue. We continue now with
all Things simple Man. That means all things Bill O'Reilly,
All things Bill O'Reilly at billoreilly dot com.
Speaker 2 (09:25):
So what's your serious story?
Speaker 1 (09:27):
All right, the serious story is I'm angry about Jerome Powell,
the FED chair. I'm sure you're aware that the GDP
number that came out today, the US economy grew at
a very healthy three percent, which is more than Biden
ever had in four years, more than he ever had.
(09:48):
This is my take on the economy. We have never
been set. What Donald Trump has accomplished in six months
is unprecedented, and I think it's going to yield incredible results.
Let me give you the long list. Bear with me.
I'll hand you the ball. You run with it as
long as you want. But Donald Trump now has over
(10:09):
twelve trillion dollars in committed monies for manufacturing. That's automobile manufacturing,
that's semiconductor manufacturing, pharmaceutical manufacturing, rare earth mineral manufacturing, magnet manufacturing.
I mean, we're going to be it's going to be
high paying career jobs for so many Americans. It's going
(10:30):
to have such a big effect on the economy. I'm
a supply sider. The largest tax cut in American history.
Every time we've cut taxes that results in more revenues
to the government. It is a fallacy that will cut
cut money to the federal government. The President gave us
the first trade, I'm sorry, the first surplus economically for
(10:52):
the government in over twenty years. The President now has
opened the door for energy dominance. He just did this
deal where Europe is. The European Union is going to
spend seven hundred and fifty billion on our energy and
that will defund Plutin's war machine. When you put that
coupled with no tax on tips and overtime and social
(11:13):
security into the mix, the largest tax cut in history.
Bill I. One of the banks yesterday came out and said,
this is not a period of prosperity. This is going
to be an economic boom like we've not seen in decades.
I believe in that outcome.
Speaker 2 (11:29):
What say you more cautious than you are? In fact,
I sold off some of my speculative stocks because there's
a difference between what is on paper and what's in
the bank. Now, it all could work out, and we'll
know by December, and if it works out, and the
(11:50):
Republicans will win the midterms easily.
Speaker 1 (11:53):
Acor now we'll know by November of twenty six. I
mean that's when that's that will be the determining factor
I think for the economy. Peace and prosperity drive elections.
Speaker 2 (12:05):
Right. Well, we'll know if these tariff deals work by
this December of this year, because already the money is
pouring in, and that money should be used to pay
down a debt. Hannity, that at least a portion of it,
because it goes into the general Fund and the treasury,
(12:26):
and they should be using that to pay down a
debt because that would strengthen a dollar across the board.
There's a lot of caution here because the world is
so dangerous and bad things can happen quickly. The key
to America and to Donald Trump's economic success is getting
a deal with China. I think that's going to happen,
(12:47):
and you know that I was there in May. I
believe that that's going to happen. And if that does,
there'll be a surge and America will be so much stronger.
And I like to act that Trump hammered India today
because India continues to buy Putin's oil when they don't
have to, and that helps Putin murder people, And I
(13:13):
was happy to see Trump say you want to do that,
we're slapping sanctions on you. The way to start putin
is economically, you got to starve them now. So I
think things are are heading in a positive direction. And
I hated Schumer saying that this whole thing is faked.
Did you hear that sound by it? I think you
(13:34):
might have used that on your TV show, didn't you?
Speaker 1 (13:37):
I did you know? But the only thing I would
say is Bill, We've never had committed investments to this degree.
We've never had somebody give as large a tax cut.
We've never had We've never pushed for energy dominance. We've
never had these deals in place, the European Union, Japan, Vietnam, Indonesia, Canada, Mexico,
(13:58):
and yeah, depending China, they've agreed in principle, but yeah,
they've got to sign the dotted line. But all of which,
you know what, and it's resulted in, you know, five
times the amount of tariff money that we've ever had.
Speaker 2 (14:11):
That.
Speaker 1 (14:11):
But they're thinking about cutting a check to every American
right now.
Speaker 2 (14:14):
I hope they don't do that. We got to pay
down that debt. That is the key to it. Use
the money to get the debt down, and I agree
with you, but.
Speaker 1 (14:24):
I would not mind if lower and middle income americans
got some I wouldn't mind that at all. But I've
got to run, simple man. You know why I could
talk to you all day. Mister O'Reilly when your book
comes out, you are not getting a cupcake interview. I'm
warning you ahead of time. This is going to be
the most brutal interview you've had in your career in
fifty years. So you better buckle up.
Speaker 2 (14:45):
Anny, You're gonna love it all right.
Speaker 1 (14:48):
Eight ninety four one Shawn is on. Now, that's what
he told me before lived for your debt Nity, I'm
gonna be a cupcake interview. I'm like, okay, whatever that means.
Speaker 5 (15:05):
Breaking news all afternoon. When you get off work, be
sure to check in first for everything you miss during
the day. This is the Sean Hannity Show.
Speaker 1 (15:17):
H twenty five Now to the top of the hour.
Eight hundred and nine four one Shawn is a number.
You want to be a part of the program. I
love my friends at lone star transfer dot com. Look,
if you're in a timeshare nightmare, it's a disaster. You're
stuck paying endless maintenance fees. All these special assessments, the
maintenance fees go up every year and probably stop going
(15:38):
to your time share using it years ago. Now, our
friends at lone star Transfer dot com they have been
shaping the timeshare exit industry now for over a decade.
They're leading the way with their exclusive solutions. Lone Star
Transfer makes getting out of your timeshare faster and easier
than ever before. They have a guarantee in writing lone
(15:58):
Star Transfer their family own company. They are wonderful people.
They'll never put any pressure on you, but they have
helped tens and tens and tens of thousands of owners
break free from their time shares over the past fifteen years.
They have earned an A plus rating with the Better
Business Bureau. Check out their thousands and thousands of five
star reviews online now. They've been with us on the
(16:20):
show for almost ten years now because they're the only
company I trust, a family owned company to deliver results
for you, my listeners. They have helped so many people
out and they're saving him a ton of money. You'll
get a free consultation, zero pressure. Give them a call
eight three three five nine four zero zero seven five
(16:40):
eight three, three, five, nine, four zero zero seven to five.
On the web, it's one word lone star transfer dot com. Well,
it happened with Luigi Mangioni, the guy that you know
assassinated the United Healthcare CEO. I mean, it became as celebrity.
(17:01):
He became, you know, worshiped. He Oh, please keep your
letters short to me. All these people writing him, praising him,
women throwing themselves at him. I mean, it's just nauseating
that the left would celebrate the shooting of innocent people. Well,
now we have the shooting that took place in New
York City, and now people on the left are celebrating
(17:24):
the shooting of this Blackstone executive by this NYC shooter.
Take a listen. They're the reason why there's a housing crisis.
So hey, you know what, let's get more against those
Blackstone people.
Speaker 3 (17:35):
Let's take them out. If you're having a bad day.
Speaker 1 (17:37):
I just wanted to hop on and let you know
that the CEO of.
Speaker 4 (17:40):
Blackstone and Private equity real estate firm was one of
the victims in the recent shooting. That I'm not saying
she deserved it, but I'm saying God's timing is always right.
Speaker 1 (17:51):
Let's go CEOs. He's been good. Let's hope it lasts
till December like it did last year.
Speaker 6 (17:57):
Oh my god, that's another CEO is shot.
Speaker 3 (18:00):
Ye Christmas.
Speaker 1 (18:03):
I mean, I don't really have words for this type
of evil, because it is evil. It turns out I'm
not going to say which victim, that a very close
friend of mine, his business partner's niece was one of
the victims here, and it is so personal for them,
(18:24):
I mean the entire family. When I inquired, I mean,
it's a stupid question, but you ask, how are they
holding up? And it's like, how do you think they're
holding up? They're not. They lost their loved one. And
what we're learning is, you know, you got mayor oal candidate,
and I wonder if this might have an impact on
(18:46):
this race for New York City mayor. You know, Marxist
Mumdani is facing a heavy backlash for saying, oh, I'm
grateful to first responders after the deadly mass shooting, given
that Mumdanni had previously called to dismantled the New York
Police Department. Remember it was Andrew Cuomo. He wanted the
no bail laws in New York, which is like a
(19:07):
slap of the face to all the cops that do
the heavy lifting and arresting people. But anyway, so but
Mamdani in his particular case, you know, he had a
shared desire to defund the police and now he say,
oh I'm heartbroken to learn here now. In a post
from November seventh, twenty twenty, comrade or Marxist Mamdani you know,
(19:31):
purportedly wrote nature is healing in response to another user
who exclaimed I just saw a cop crying in his car,
laughing my ass off. Ha ha ha uh. We don't
need an investigation to know the NYPD is racist again.
This their words, not mine, anti queer, and a major
(19:52):
threat to public safety. What we need to do is
hashtag defund the NYPD. The thirty three year old mayor
candidate wrote in another posts that he had and if
you flash back to Mamdani, he pledged to disband Hey
police units, including the one to dispand the New York
(20:16):
Police Department's Strategic Response Group, and that is one of
the NYPD's special operations units, which, according to their official website,
they specialize in disorder response, crime suppression, crowd control, responds
to citywide mobilization civil disorders and major events with highly
(20:36):
trained personnel and specialized equipment. And they're the ones that
are deployed to areas that require an increased police presence
due to increased crime or other conditions. And they are
the group that mobilizes for shootings and bank robberies and
missing persons demonstrations and significant incidents. In December, Marxist Mamdani
(20:59):
claimed that the n y I had deployed this particular
SRG group to harass and arrest striking teamsters, and he said,
as mayor, I will disband this group in the NYPD.
And they have cost taxpayers millions in lawsuits and settlements
and brutalized countless New Yorkers exercising their First Amendment rights rights.
(21:22):
Mamdani has been ripped for this. He said he we
want to defund the police. In a twenty twenty social
media post, he's the guy that wants social workers social work.
What is a social worker going to do if in
a situation like this where you have an active shooter,
(21:42):
you need somebody with a gun that's going to have
the ability to save lives and take out the shooter.
It's just basic, simple, common sense but you know, obviously
he's been busy from his over the top fairly Jeff
Bezos like wedding in Uganda. Apparently they had they had
(22:04):
a lot of security of this wedding. Unbelievable. All right,
let's get to our busy phones here eight hundred and
ninety four one, Sean, if you want to be a
part of the program, let's say hi to marry in
New Jersey. What's going on, Mary?
Speaker 6 (22:18):
How are you all right? I am so sorry for
your friend's loss.
Speaker 1 (22:23):
Well, thank you. It's terrible. It's absolutely heartbreaking.
Speaker 6 (22:27):
It is. I can't believe I'm back in New Jersey.
I lived in Atlanta and Bortsland for thirty six years,
and now I'm back in New Jersey.
Speaker 2 (22:36):
No.
Speaker 1 (22:36):
I tried to talk borts maybe a year or two
ago into getting back on the air. He laughed at me, Oh,
I would love it.
Speaker 6 (22:43):
If he got back on the air. He was one
of my very favorites.
Speaker 1 (22:48):
Oh he's in real life, he's worse. He's like a
little child's like he thinks like a twelve year old.
On some levels, he really does, But on the other
other levels he's brilliant.
Speaker 6 (23:00):
I met him at one of your Freedom concerts in Atlanta.
Speaker 1 (23:05):
Yeah. Nah, he's a great guy. You know, even though
at one point we were competitors, we got along great,
We really did.
Speaker 3 (23:10):
Yeah.
Speaker 6 (23:11):
Yeah, Well, anyway, I'm calling about Jimmy Kimmel. I don't
know if you remember well Ben Stein. He was in
I believe, the Reagan administration, and after he got out
of politics, he had his own game show when Ben
Stein's Money, and Jimmy Kimmel was his sidekick on that show,
(23:33):
and he was actually conservative.
Speaker 1 (23:36):
I don't know what happened to all of these guys,
and Jay Leno nailed it, and all was whining and
moaning and complaining, you know, from the left. You know,
Seth Myers is worried for his mental health of his
late night show is canceled. I've seen the ratings for
this guy show. It's like seven hundred thousand viewers a night.
(23:56):
You cannot sustain any program with that low love of viewership.
And CNN gets less than that every hour of a
twenty four hour day.
Speaker 6 (24:06):
You remember when CNN first came on the air, when
you know, when we had Desert Storm, Desert Freedom, and
they had a reporter in Baghdad. They were awesome back then,
and they like Jimmy Kimmel, have all had brain transplants.
Speaker 1 (24:21):
I think I don't know what happened. Let me give
you another example. Let me play, and I appreciate the call.
Thank you for joining us. Let me play Stephen Colbert
and this is him with Donald Trump as his guest,
thanking Donald Trump for running for president and talking about
how great Donald Trump is. How did he evolve from
(24:42):
this into what he's now become, you know, a virulent
anti Trump hater. I mean, thank you so much for
being here. Thank you speaking of doing a fantastic job.
You are setting the world on fire right now. We'll
have a lot of fun and I think we're hitting
some pretty good issues.
Speaker 3 (24:57):
Steven, and I want.
Speaker 1 (24:58):
To thank you not only for being here, I want
to thank you for running for president, because I'm not
gonna say. I'm not gonna say this stuff rights itself
Lampshire and Iowa.
Speaker 4 (25:13):
No matter where we go, it seems that the response
it just gets better and better.
Speaker 1 (25:17):
And the polls have been phenomenal. Was great, thirty three
percent that came out today, right, thirty three percent incredible.
I'm not surprised at all. I'll tell you why.
Speaker 3 (25:27):
It is because I'm liking him a lot.
Speaker 2 (25:29):
No, I'm not.
Speaker 1 (25:31):
I'm liking you too.
Speaker 5 (25:32):
I'm liking you too.
Speaker 1 (25:34):
I'm not surprised at all because, especially in the Republican field,
because of a country.
Speaker 4 (25:38):
We have to create.
Speaker 3 (25:39):
Number one, we're gonna build a wall. Number two, we're learna.
Speaker 1 (25:42):
Okay, listen to this.
Speaker 3 (25:43):
Even with your.
Speaker 1 (25:44):
Crowd, I hear they love the wall.
Speaker 3 (25:46):
They love the wall.
Speaker 1 (25:47):
People love the wall.
Speaker 3 (25:49):
Well, Donald Trump, thank you for being here.
Speaker 1 (25:52):
Donald Trump is the leader, well, the Republican nomination. We'll
be right back. Well, he went hardcore left in hardcore
Trump rangement syndrome, and he lost his audience, they lost money,
and now he's canceled. It's that simple quick break. Right
(26:14):
back to our busy phones are toll free telephone numbers
eight hundred and nine four one Sean. If you want
to join us, Hey, what's on your mind today?
Speaker 2 (26:29):
Information?
Speaker 5 (26:30):
Download Hannity and the breaking news you might have missed
today with Shawn's insider information.
Speaker 1 (26:38):
Sean Hannity, Right back to our busy phones, eight hundred
and nine to four one Sean, if you want to
join us. Julius is in New Jersey. Hey, Julius, how
are you glad you called.
Speaker 3 (26:55):
Yeah.
Speaker 4 (26:57):
I just want to make this clear. Ivery think he
said about Mom Donnie is yeah, just utter crap song.
Let's be honest here.
Speaker 1 (27:06):
Utter crap. Tell me one thing that I said about
Mom Donnie that's not true in terms of what he
himself has said.
Speaker 3 (27:13):
No, no, no, no, no no, let's go into this whole.
Speaker 1 (27:15):
No no, no, no, no, no, no no. Tell me one
thing that I said that is utter crap.
Speaker 3 (27:19):
You know?
Speaker 1 (27:20):
Yeah, did I did I say one thing about Mom
Donnie that is false? No? The answer is no. But
I can save you time. But if you can think
of something, go ahead.
Speaker 3 (27:29):
The cops that you've called and the riots police, they
do start the they do start the problems. There's videos
out on YouTube that have been caught where they are
the ones who start the riot. And so Mom Donnie
is correct about them. And as for the defund the police,
I don't personally like the name of it, but the.
Speaker 1 (27:46):
Idea that I'm not saying every cop is perfect, but
I would say, generally speaking, ninety nine percent of them
and not out there to start start fights with people,
and they put their lives in harm's way to protect people.
And this guy has been I mean, do you support
dismantling the police department? Do you support no ball laws?
Speaker 3 (28:08):
You know what, when it comes to low level crimes
like smoke, like having a joint.
Speaker 1 (28:11):
I didn't ask about low level crimes. We have videos
of people beating the hell out of officers and innocent
civilians in Times Square and they're let out on the
street because of New York's idiotic no bail laws. Do
you support it or not? And stop being a jackass?
Speaker 3 (28:27):
Cops speak is that after the cops beat the crap
out of someone.
Speaker 1 (28:30):
No, the people that were getting the crap beat out
of them were the cops and innocent civilians. If you
go and watch the video, you can see it. But
because of the aseni no bail laws that clearly you support,
they were let out within hours and then they flipped
the bird to the media before they left for another
sanctuary state.
Speaker 3 (28:51):
I've seen the videos, so those and you're.
Speaker 1 (28:53):
Okay, And you're okay with that. Beating up cops is
okay with you.
Speaker 3 (28:56):
If a cops starts, yeah, cup starts problems, then guess
what you're not. You're not above the law, all right?
Speaker 1 (29:03):
Should we defund the police completely?
Speaker 4 (29:07):
Let's see no, how about this, Why don't we redirect
the money to things that could actually be more helpful?
Speaker 1 (29:12):
First of all, okay, so read direct means defund because
they won't have money to pay cops, So no cops
to use support, no bail laws.
Speaker 3 (29:19):
Can I finish? Or are you gonna just talk over me?
And and and put words in mind?
Speaker 1 (29:23):
Now I'm trying to get to the bottom of what
you're saying here. So you want to defund the police,
you want no ball laws, anything else that any other genius, liberal,
idiotic idea you're you have rolling around in that sick
twisted mind ears.
Speaker 3 (29:37):
Now the sick twisted mind is yours. Okay, Now, don't
talk over me.
Speaker 1 (29:41):
Okay, my show. If I want to ask you questions,
I'll ask them and you can't stop me.
Speaker 3 (29:46):
Don't don't lie about don't lie about what I'm saying.
Speaker 1 (29:50):
Do you support yes or no? Defunding the police? Simple question?
Speaker 3 (29:55):
Defunding in how much?
Speaker 5 (29:57):
Totally?
Speaker 4 (29:58):
No?
Speaker 1 (30:00):
What percentage should be cut? What percentage fifty percent? Right now,
New York and it's height had forty one thousand cops,
so they have thirty one thousand. How many cops should
New York City have? For example, I.
Speaker 4 (30:11):
Don't know Sean because guess what, I'm not the one
in charge of the paperwork, so I don't know what
I'm gonna go on.
Speaker 1 (30:17):
I'm not in charge of the Well, maybe then you
shouldn't make you know all these statements if you don't
know anything about it. You didn't know there were thirty
one thousand cops when we used to have forty one
thousand cops. And let me ask you, do you support
replacing police with social workers? Do you support that? That's
what Mam Donnie wants your buddy.
Speaker 4 (30:37):
Yeah, when it comes to dealing with people with mental issues, yeah,
because you know how many times cops have.
Speaker 1 (30:42):
Murdered people, murdered people.
Speaker 3 (30:46):
Yeah, you want to go a go of course, and
pay stupid. Yeah, let's pay stupid on this.
Speaker 1 (30:51):
Not saying every cop is perfect. You do have bad apples,
but that's not the majority of them. You just seem
to hate the police. Let me ask you a question.
Do you violate laws? Do you deal with drugs? Do
you break the law?
Speaker 3 (31:02):
Holy crap, you just love to go there with that.
You know, here's the thing.
Speaker 1 (31:07):
You're a very angry young man. How old are you?
You're an angry man.
Speaker 3 (31:11):
First, I'm fifty years old.
Speaker 4 (31:13):
I was in the military, so I don't take crap
from anyone.
Speaker 1 (31:17):
Well, I appreciate your service, but I will say this,
you're a very angry person that has lost every bit
of common sense you might have been born with when
you had it. Because social workers can't deal with the
mentally ill in a situation where they're threatening people with violence,
can happen, won't work, defund won't work, dismantle won't work,
(31:37):
and no bail laws are asinine. If you want to
support Asenine, you go right ahead, have a good day.
Appreciate you being with us.