June 20, 2024 • 31 mins
Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach is here to discuss his effort focused on getting the truth out of Pfizer and the lies they told that hurt millions of people all over the country, and his state of Kansas.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Well, we have come in.
Speaker 2 (00:02):
Your city. I get saying you a conscience zone.
Speaker 3 (00:09):
Will be tell and if you want.
Speaker 2 (00:15):
A little bang and a yi, I come along.
Speaker 4 (00:18):
Biden wrote the devastating nineteen ninety four crime Bill talking
about super predators.
Speaker 5 (00:25):
That was Biden like, if we don't acknowledge, uh that
there are some things, some real pocketbook issues that are
still front of mine for people we miss the mark.
Speaker 2 (00:37):
It's people are Hispanic. We're gonna lose Hispanic bails. Yeah,
what a loose.
Speaker 1 (00:45):
Clock.
Speaker 4 (00:48):
Only one hundred and thirty seven days until America vote.
Speaker 2 (00:55):
That we have come in to your city. Don't no
way get change you a conscious song.
Speaker 4 (01:04):
From coast to coast, from border to border, from c
to Shining Sea. Sean Kennedy is on Stay right here
for our final news round up and Information Overload.
Speaker 2 (01:23):
All right, news round up in Information Overload, our toll free.
Our number is eight hundred and ninety four one, Sean.
If you want to be a part of the program.
If you've noticed we've been doing a lot of segments
on the follow up as it relates to COVID nineteen
and all of the lies that we have been told.
You know, if you get the vaccine. You're you're never
gonna get COVID. Lie. If you get the vaccine, you're
(01:44):
never gonna infect others. Lie. I mean all of these
things that even though it was emergency authorization use. You
know what do we learn from the doctor that created
the technology that actually allowed for the creation of these
all new mRNA vaccinations, and that's doctor Robert Malone who
(02:05):
said that the technology was never perfected. We have a
case out of Kansas, thankfully thanks to Chris Kobok, the
Kansas Attorney General will join us in a second about
Pfeiser and how they made multiple misleading statements to deceive
the public about their vaccine at a time when Americans
(02:25):
needed to know the truth. And he is now suing Peiser.
We're misleading the people of Kansas on the COVID vaccine.
I look what they did in Great Britain Astrozenica their
version I guess of Pfiser and the Maderna shot, which
was different than the Johnson and Johnson shot, which was
one shot, not two, and it was a vaccination made
(02:48):
the more natural way. People began mocking it because it
didn't have the new technology for those that took vaccinations.
I guess in retrospect, maybe it wasn't so overdumb after all. Anyway,
he said. On Monday, Chris Colback did announcing that he's
suing Pfizer for what he said were misleading claims that
it made related to the COVID nineteen vaccine, and he
(03:12):
joins us, now, mister Attorney General, great to have you back.
Speaker 3 (03:15):
How are you great to be with you doing fine?
Speaker 1 (03:18):
Sean?
Speaker 3 (03:18):
Yeah, we filed a suit on Monday under our Kansas
Consumer Protection Act and are seeking civil monetary penalties, damages,
and injunctive relief for the misleading statements that Sizer made
in marketing its vaccine. You know, the federal government gave
the vaccine manufacturer's immunity from torque lawsuits where somebody sues
and says, you know, I was injured in some way
(03:41):
and I want damages to compensate me. But they did
not give them immunity for making deceptive claims to the public.
And I think everybody remembers at the time the vaccines
first came out, everybody had to make a decision or
two decisions. First am I going to take the vaccine?
And second which one am I going to take? And
in that kind of an environment, especially with all of
(04:02):
the anxiety and the duress with some employers forcing their
employees to take vaccines. People needed the information and it
was imperative that the information be truthful, and that was
not the case, as we lay out in our lawsuits.
Speaker 2 (04:15):
You know, I'll just bring you back in my own
personal experience, the amount of pressure that was brought to
bear on me to push my audience into taking a
vaccination was it was inordinate. It was not something I
had experienced before. I've experienced a lot of political pressure
in my life. The other thing was, you know, for
me to give everybody my status, what is my status?
(04:37):
Are you vaccinated or have you gotten COVID? Everybody wanted
to know my personal business. And by the way, mister
Attorney General, I probably would have gladly shared it at
the time. However, once they were demanding I share it,
I was like, screw you, it's none of your business.
I have my own personal you know, I believe in
I believe in medical privacy with all due respect to
(04:58):
all of you. So I didn't tell anybody but what
I said to people on the air, and I'm so
glad that I didn't give into their pressure, not that
there was any threat that I would, But I said
to people, I don't know anything about your health. I
don't know anything. If you have pre existing conditions, I
don't know. I have no idea. If you have cole morbidities,
(05:19):
I have no idea. I'm not a doctor. I don't
know anything about this shot. I was not qualified to
tell people what to do. I didn't know. But what
you're telling me is they didn't know either, or they
just flat out light about it. What do you think
it is and what did they lie about?
Speaker 3 (05:34):
Well, it's pretty clear that they did flat out lie
about it at least Advisor in several respects. They made misleading,
deceptive statements. And you know, let me give you two examples.
One is pregnant women. They marketed the vaccine as safe
for pregnant women. You know, that's an example of as
you're describing. You know, each person needs to make a
decision for themselves, but pregnant women needed to know that
(05:57):
there was a risk for them, and Peiser had two studies.
They also possessed information from their October twenty twenty pregnancy
study on rats indicating that the COVID nineteen vaccine was
linked to likely infertility, loss of litters and still born offspring.
That should have been a major signal forcing them to
(06:18):
put the brakes on things, but they proceeded, and in
February twenty twenty one, Peiser had reports for four hundred
and fifty eight pregnant women who received Peiser's vaccine during pregnancy,
and more than half of those women reported an adverse event,
and more than ten percent reported a miscarriage, many within
days of the vaccination. Sean, let's just pause. A miscarriage
(06:39):
means that a human being dies, a baby dies in
the womb. That's extraordinary and over ten percent For Pfiser
to continue to market its vaccine as safe to pregnant
women in light of that and with the knowledge of that,
that's I just think that's, you know, not only its deceptive,
(07:00):
it's just wrong on multiple levels. And then the other
case example we lay out in detail in our complaint
is myocarditis. They Pfizer denied any evidence of a safety
signal between its COVID nineteen vaccine and myocarditis. The safety
signal is just a risk signal, and the CEO in
January of twenty twenty three was asked whether the vaccine,
(07:22):
it's that Peiser vaccine caused strokes from arcarditis, and he said, quote,
we've not seen a single a single signal, although we
have distributed billions of doses end quote. But Piser new
and the United States government new, and the US military
new and others had found that the Pfiser vaccine caused
what was linked to myocarditis and pericarditis.
Speaker 2 (07:44):
So these statements, well, it's myocarditis. And I can't tell
you how many doctors I've spoken to that say post
COVID that the incidents, especially among young athletes, believe it
or not, young people, is so much higher than they
ever have seen before. And the other issue I keep
hearing a lot about is blood clotting. Is that is
that what you're learning as well?
Speaker 3 (08:06):
You know, we don't make specific allegations about blood clotting
outside of the myocarditis and pericarditis context, and they may
involve clotting. I'm not not a medical doctor, so I'm
not sure. But you know, I have a friend, Seawn,
who took the Pizer vaccine and shortly after you took
the vaccine, he had heart conditions that he never had before.
(08:29):
Had to have two surgeries, and he also suffered a stroke,
and his doctor said, it's the vaccine. There's no other explanation.
I mean, you know, people had anecdotal information like that.
But this lawsuit is just about what Phiser knew and
what they said, and Pizer knew certain things, and those
things contradicted what they were saying to the public.
Speaker 2 (08:49):
Did Maderna treat this differently? Because I find it interesting
that you're suing Pisa but not Maderna.
Speaker 3 (08:56):
You know, we we have the information with respect to Phizer.
There's one other difference regarding Pfizer. So Pfiser did not
accept the Operation Warps Warp Speed money from the federal government,
and as a result, they were not subject to all
of the same reporting requirements that recipients of the Operation
(09:16):
Warp Speed money were. They made a decision not to
take that money in order to free themselves of certain obligations.
And I have a quote here from the CEO Offiser.
He said, they want reports. I don't want to have
any of that end quote, And that's referring to the
federal government wanting reports. So I think that may be
(09:39):
one of the important distinctions between the vaccine manufacturers. That's
relevant here.
Speaker 2 (09:44):
What do you make of astra Zeneca take in their
shot off the market and that was used more widely
in Great Britain and elsewhere.
Speaker 3 (09:54):
You know, I don't have enough evidence to say, you know,
people are listening to my comments very carefully because we're
in litigation. So I don't have enough information about Astrozenica
that speculate about why they took it off the market.
But you know, focusing on Fisre, we have clear evidence
here that they were making statements for the public in
advertisement you just can't do. I mean, you know, think
about on your show. You know, in the advertisements there
(10:16):
may be some pharmaceuticals that are advertised, and we all
know that in that ad they point out all of
the potential side effects or issues that can result if
you take that pharmaceutical. That's part of what we're accustomed
to in America. But here Fiser not only didn't tell
us about it, they said the opposite. They said there
(10:36):
is no connection. And so it's you know, behavior like
that that triggers a Consumer Protection Act violation. And I
should note that although Kansas is the lead state here there,
we're part of a coalition of a growing coalition of
half a dozen states. Now, who are you standing together?
And they're either going to be bringing their suits in
their respective states or they will be taking steps forward
(10:57):
doing so, depending on what Pfizer does.
Speaker 2 (11:00):
I'm just trying to anticipate what they made argument will be.
Are they going to say, well, all of this was
done under the guise of emergency authorization that allowed them
to bypass the usual the usual process to getting a vaccination,
to get legal vaccination or FDA approval.
Speaker 3 (11:23):
You know, I'm waiting with bated breath, tousha to see
what they're going to say, because I just, you know,
the public staments that they've made since we filed the
suit have sinply've been rather general. You know, the vaccine
saved lives, and we made accurate statements. We'll see when
push comes to shove, when they are forced to explain
exactly what they said and why they said it and
(11:43):
what they were working.
Speaker 2 (11:44):
How soon will these people be the post.
Speaker 3 (11:47):
Yeah, that's what I was going to Next, we'll be
depositions and there will be discovery where they have to
provide documents in addition to what we already have from
various Foyer requests. The schedule will be set by the judge,
and he has not yet laid out of schedule for
what the stages of discovery will be, including depositions.
Speaker 2 (12:06):
All right, quick break, We'll come back more with Kansas
Attorney General Chris Colbok on the other side than your
calls coming up. Eight hundred and ninety four one, Sean,
as we continue, right, we continue now with Chris Kobok
is the Attorney General of the Great State of Kansas,
and he's now suing Pfizer over the COVID vaccination that
they gave out. I think this is very key and
(12:27):
one of the things that's been really alarming, and we've
had a lot of people. I don't know if you
know doctor Quay, he testified before Congress this week about
the origins of COVID. I don't know if you've had
a chance to read Ram Paul's Book of Deception. I mean,
you've got emails going back and forth, and it was
very obvious that people at the NIH in the earliest
days of COVID knew and understood that the NIH money
(12:53):
going through and funneled through the Eco Health Alliance was
going to the Wuhan Virology Lab where they knew coronavirus
research took place, and they knew gain of function research
took place, and they were panicked almost from day one
that the American taxpayers actually funded the creation of those virus,
(13:13):
which turns out to look pretty true to me at
this point. And you have people have not been held
accountable for that either.
Speaker 3 (13:21):
Yeah, it's interesting how long you know. Here we are
in the middle of twenty twenty four and we're looking
back and finally this information is coming out. I think
we're going to continue looking back in these lawsuits and
as more people testify in front of Congress or in
other ways, you know, disclose information. It's not looking good.
And certainly in the case of you know, the decisions
(13:42):
Americans were presented in the manner in which you know,
certainly Advisor presented them, but you know, looking what the
government did, you know forcing you know, one of the
things that I think was the worst in terms of
government actions, Sean was the military vaccine mandate. They I
represented some pilots at the time who wanted to avoid
the vaccine on religious grounds, and the Department of Defense
(14:05):
was proceeding to fire them at a time when the
Air Force had a shortage of over fifteen hundred pilots.
They're firing pilots over this. It's just unreal the kind
of decision making that was occurring during this period.
Speaker 2 (14:18):
You really can't make up how bad it was, you know,
back to the pressure that I felt. I mean, could you.
I'm a radio and television talk show host. Now. I
try to be as informed as possible. You've known me
for a long time, and we've known each other for
a long time, and I do a lot of reading
and a lot of research. But I'm not equipped to
give my audience advice, medical advice on something as serious
(14:41):
as to taking a vaccine or not taking a vaccine.
It's just not my role now. I think I gave
good advice telling people to take it seriously. I think
I gave good advice telling people to talk to their
doctor and to do their own research. I think I
gave people good advice that they have to look at
their own specific medical history and pre existing conditions and
(15:04):
cod morbidities, and they've got to look at their age.
And then it's a decision that only they and the
doctor can make. It's not a decision that a radio
talk show and a TV talk show host can make Well.
Speaker 3 (15:16):
I think that's exactly right. And the keyword in my
mind that you just said was do your own research.
And that's where this loss it comes into play. Well,
how are you going to do research if the company
is making statements that our contrary to the research the
company has but you don't have. And it should be
noted that the many of the studies and facts presented
(15:39):
and this losses only came out because of a Foyer
Fear of Information Act request and that request was resistant
and finally the information came out. So that's why you
know this lawsuit didn't happen last year or the year before.
This only happens after we get the information that has
been very hard to get.
Speaker 2 (15:56):
All right, Kansas Attorney General Chris Kobak will follow the
suit very very closely. We appreciate your time, my pleasure.
Eight nine one, Shawn. If you want to be a
part of the program, all right, twenty five to the
top of the hour. Eight hundred nine f one Seawan
is our number. If you want to be a part
of the program. Well, the the Cuckoo Brigade, the conspiracy
(16:16):
theory Brigade is out in full force. This all started
when you had conspiracy theorist extraordinaire Rachel Maddow thinking that
if Donald Trump is elected, he will be putting her
in a camp. I didn't get any clarification on is
it a day camp, is it a sleep away camp?
(16:37):
Obviously that's not what she's referring to, but you get
my point, you know, followed up Chrissy Teagan, Trump will
come after her, followed by AOC thinking that she's going
to be thrown in jail, followed up by Joylis behar
And and Rachel Maddow, you know, talking in depth about this,
thinking that you know, shows like the hard hitting news
(16:59):
show The View will be taken off the air.
Speaker 6 (17:01):
Now.
Speaker 2 (17:02):
Nicole Wallace says joined the brigade, suggesting that if Trump
wins reelection, she'll be taken off the air. Listen to her.
Speaker 7 (17:09):
I've seen that toast a bunch of times, but it
landed very differently this year, because depending what happens in November,
seven months from right now, just time next year, I
might not be sitting here. I might not be a
White House correspondence dinner or free press.
Speaker 2 (17:25):
Okay, so Nicole, you're still going to be on the
air if you want to be on the air, and
your employer wants to keep you on the air. I
can promise you that number one. But here's all the
mob media democrats worried that Donald Trump is either going
to throw them in jail or put them in a camp.
Speaker 8 (17:41):
Listen, you said recently that you thought that you, as
an outspoken critic, could be a target yourself. Some people
think that sounds all dramatic, but I'm right there with you.
I think that he is so vindictive that he will
go after however he has to through the irs maybe
or even are for sponsors to get us off the air?
Speaker 7 (18:02):
Maybe?
Speaker 1 (18:02):
Or are you?
Speaker 9 (18:03):
I think it's bad to have somebody saying, give me
as much power as you can in this country so
I can use it to go after other Americans. And
I don't think anybody's safe if that's the sort of
basis on which he wants to get more.
Speaker 10 (18:19):
If Donald Trump wins, we are looking at the potential
dissolution of democracy in the United States of America. It
sounds nuts, But like I wouldn't be surprised as this
guy through me in jail.
Speaker 2 (18:32):
It sounds nuts. That's the only thing she said in
that statement that was true. You have the co founder
of LinkedIn, guy by the name of Reid Hoffman, I
don't even know who he is, saying he's worried that
Trump will retaliate against him. I don't even think Trump
knows half these people. I'll ask him, but I don't
think he knows half these people.
Speaker 3 (18:50):
Listen and I literally talk to business leaders who are
who are fearful about speaking out against this because they're
fearful of retaliation.
Speaker 6 (18:58):
Are you concerned that Trump can retelliate against you?
Speaker 3 (19:01):
Of course I'm concerned.
Speaker 2 (19:03):
Of course I'm concerned because what do you think he's
going to do to the co founder of LinkedIn. I
don't think he's going to do anything. I don't think
he even knows who he is. But I guess this
is now, you know, the fear tactic. You know what
this is a cheap, fake paranoia, feigned phony outrage, and
it's just a way to scare people that Donald Trump
is this scary, scary figure, et cetera, et cetera. Maybe
(19:26):
what they really do fear is because they they all
have one thing in common. They have support the supported
the weaponization of our justice system, and their silence has
been deafening. They're part of the group that had no
problem with that sham trial in New York, no problem
with evaluation of mar A Lago at eighteen million, had
(19:46):
no problem that Steve Bannon and Peter Navarro, unlike so
many others held in contempt of Congress or are going
to jail, Peter Navarro in jail. Maybe it's maybe it's
maybe it all related to that. I don't know. All right,
We're going to get your calls in a minute. Here. Look,
if you own a gun, you believe in the Second Amendment,
(20:06):
that's not enough in today's America. It is essential you
be ensured, trained, educated. As a USCCA member, you can
defend yourself and your family against people that want to
bring you in your family harm, and also protect yourself
against the legal system that maybe doesn't protect the rights
of gun owners. You might you may now want to
(20:29):
end up like a guy like Craig. Who's Craig. He's
an American veteran, no criminal history. Returned home, he finds
an intruder wearing a mask in gloves in his own house. Anyway,
the criminal ignores Craig's yells to leave and reaches into
his pocket Craig shoots calls nine to one one. Law
enforcement label it a justified homicide. But they charge him
(20:52):
anyway because the gun wasn't registered with the government, and
because he's not a USCCA member, he's going to spend
a fortune to get a lawyer, and you know that's
even willing to take the case and then hope and
pray that he doesn't go to prison for defending himself
on his own property. Now, I share this story with
you because the truth is that simply owning a gun
(21:15):
for family protection can get you in trouble in our
New America. Now, I've been a proud member of the
USCCA for nine years because they have the best training,
best safety training, best education, best access to insurance made
specifically for self defense incidents. And you get all of
that for less than a dollar a day. Now, go
(21:36):
to their website, Defendfamily dot com right now you can
learn more about USCCA and their membership. You'll get enter
to win a gun of your choice and one hundred
up to one hundred and fifty five dollars worth of
free bonuses. But if you believe in the Second Amendment,
please you've got to go to Defendfamily dot com two day.
All right, let's get to our busy phones. Eight hundred
(21:56):
and nine to four to one, Sean, if you want
to be a part of the program, Ben is say
in New York, bed and how are you glad you called? Sir?
Speaker 1 (22:03):
Hey Sean, thank you for taking my call? Shut afrom
Long Island?
Speaker 2 (22:06):
Where Long Island? You're from my old stomping ground where
I was born and raised? What's going on?
Speaker 1 (22:11):
That's right? Valley Stream, Vali Stream.
Speaker 2 (22:13):
Well, first of all, anyway, you will you were raised
in Valley Stream?
Speaker 1 (22:16):
Yep?
Speaker 2 (22:17):
Do you remember the old Karl Hopples?
Speaker 1 (22:19):
No?
Speaker 2 (22:20):
Okay, how old are you?
Speaker 3 (22:22):
Fifty?
Speaker 2 (22:23):
Yeah? It might be might have been a little before
your time because my dad was a waiter at Carl
Hopples and Baldwin. But I grew up in Franklin Square
right next door to you, very close. Anyway, what's on
your mind today?
Speaker 1 (22:35):
Well, you know, like most Americans in watching the you know,
watch the trial in New York, the Sam Trial as
you call it, and we know that the gag order
hasn't been lifted, and it's very strange, and I have
a theory on it, and I'm wondering what you think
about it. You know, the debate is next week, and
I think they're trying to box Trump in. And what's
going to happen if they bring up the trial and
the President cannot respond to anything because he's under a
(22:58):
gag order. What do you think is going to happen.
Speaker 2 (22:59):
I think he's not going to respond to it, because
I think he's been pretty smart in not responding to it,
knowing that this judge is crazy enough to want to
put him in jail, I think, but I think there
are other ways around it. I don't think it's insurmountable.
I mean, Joe Biden is going to want to call
him a convicted felon as many times as he can,
and I have a good answer for it, and it's frankly, Joe,
(23:23):
be careful now that we know the laptop is real.
Remember your son implicates you as benefiting financially from all
of his foreign business deals at times when you are
the vice president taking actions to help his business companies,
and you might want to be careful about this convicted
felon mantra of yours because if there is equal justice
(23:43):
under the law, there seems to be a primate facia
case against you. That's what I would say.
Speaker 1 (23:50):
You know what, I think. I think he should just
speak up and say whatever he wants to say and
let you know, let the judge do what he wants
to do. But he needs to you know, I know.
Speaker 2 (23:59):
It's the judge may end up, you know, sentencing them
to jail. Anyway. The judge I think is just chomping
at the bit to put him into jail cell. And
if they do, I think the country will see it
for what it is. I'm not worried about it. I
don't want that for our country. I don't want that
for the president. However, I think at the end of
the day, they're going to have a very hard time
(24:21):
for a first defender with multiple appeals. Now, I think
my guess is he's going to be sentenced to jail
with pending appeal. That's my guess. First time offender. He's
not a flight risk with the Secret Service around him
at all times. He is a person, you know, for again,
we're talking about a classy felony. It's not even a
(24:43):
major felony. And I just but again, you have an
abusively biased judge in this case, and a judge that
I think is chomping at the bit to be loved
in New York social circles. And by the way, he
will be, and so will allow Vin Bragg. They're going
to be loved in New York social circles. Listen, New
(25:04):
York for me became almost inhabitable, especially New York City,
not Long Island, where I lived, where people knew me
and people are always really nice to me. They were great. However,
it just it just got to the point it just
wasn't worth it for me anymore. And that's one of
the reasons. I mean, when when you're in New York
(25:24):
City and I have to think twice, three, four or
five times about what restaurant I can go to with
my staff or with friends, it's not the place for me.
And I don't have that experience down in Florida. It's
very different. And look, it's not like I was so
married to New York anyway, because I lived in Rhode
Island five years, California five years, Alabama two years, Georgia
(25:48):
four years, and I've always I've had a home in
Florida for close to thirty years. I've had a place,
so for me, it was a natural transition. Anyway, I think, yeah,
I think I think Trump will abide by the gag order.
I think it's unconstitutional, but I think he'll abide by it,
and I think there's a number of ways around it
for him. Anyway, I appreciate the call. Eight hundred ninety
(26:09):
four one, Shawn is a number if you want to
be a part of the program. Gary is in New Joysy.
What's up? Gary? A New Joysey? What's going on to
the Joysey Shore?
Speaker 6 (26:18):
Much? Hot? Hey? I was listening to you. How you doing, Sean?
Speaker 2 (26:22):
But I'm good man, how are you?
Speaker 6 (26:25):
I listened to you yesterday with Bill talking about terrorism
that's been going on here for three years now, you know,
with the fentanyl and everything coming across the border. Killed
my son?
Speaker 2 (26:39):
You lost your son to fetanoyl yep? How old is
your son?
Speaker 1 (26:45):
Stuff to talk.
Speaker 2 (26:46):
Man, Gary, Gary, you don't have to apologize for being
upset over losing your son. I know I speak for
everybody hear in your voice right now. Our prayers, our
deepest condolence to you and your family. I can't imagine
the pain you live through. Was it an overdose? Was
(27:06):
it just.
Speaker 6 (27:08):
Get something mixed mixed into something nice? Exactly? But it
was the fentanyl.
Speaker 2 (27:14):
Yeah, it's in everything now, by the way, they're putting
fentanyl and weed. Now, did you know that? Yeah, And
these kids are dying. We're losing a generation of kids
opioids and fentanyl. You know, this is all being manufactured
in China, and our wide open borders are allowing all
of it in. And we're losing people like your son,
(27:35):
you know, hundreds and hundreds every week, and they don't
do a thing to stop it. And as far as
I'm concerned, the government has blood on their hands. Yeah,
Joe Biden, how long ago did this happen?
Speaker 6 (27:48):
For a year and almost a year and a half it
was Saint Patti's day. Yea.
Speaker 2 (27:53):
Let me guess you've never been the same and you
probably will never be the same again.
Speaker 1 (28:01):
Yeah.
Speaker 2 (28:01):
I got it. I got it. I understand, of course
you do. It takes your breath away. I get it,
I really do. I've had friends that have experienced the
exact same thing. You know, one thing of a dear
friend of mine. I'll do the talking through you. A
dear friend of mine that lost their son like you did,
(28:24):
a little younger than your son. The fatanyl, he said,
and he goes around the country and he gives talks.
He doesn't care if the crowd's ten people or one
hundred people or a thousand people. And he says the
same thing. If you are foolish enough to think this
cannot happen to you, you are dead wrong. I will
tell you every article I read every day, every day
(28:44):
I've run across these articles. I copy, I paste it,
I text it to my kids. I'm like, guys, pay
attention to this. And you know, I'm sure they're probably
at some point rolling their eyes, but by now they've
got the message from their dad. This is real, and
it's dangerous, and it's everywhere, and they're targeting our children.
They're targeting them. You know, a couple of what is
(29:08):
the equivalent of a grain of salt or two grains
of salt can take out a two hundred and fifty
pounds man, and not I mean kill them. I mean
that's how insidious this is. And they put it in,
they mix it into pretty much everything. Anyway. I'm really sorry, Gary,
I really please know our love and our prayers with
you and your family and the only hope I have.
(29:29):
And it's not cliche to me, because I believe it
with all my heart. I do believe that there is
a heaven and a God. And you know when I
say let not your heart be trouble, the rest of
that verse goes on. You know that Jesus talks about
letting not your heart be trouble in my Father's house
from many mansions, and I go to prepare a place
(29:50):
for you so that where I am, you shall also be.
And I just believe you'll be reunited with your son
one day. I believe that with all my heart. And
in the meantime, it doesn't take your pain away, But
just know that there are a lot of people that
understand the pain you and your family have been through.
It's terrible and it needs to stop, and we have
(30:11):
the ability to stop it, and we're not doing it.
It's can all be prevented, all of it. Secure the
damn border and prevent this poison from coming into our country.
Speaker 6 (30:21):
Yeah, I mean, we have to worry about any terrorism
happening here because any bullets being shot, because it's all
being done by the defending all.
Speaker 2 (30:31):
You know, I never thought about that before. Isn't that
a form of an attack on our country? Flooding our
country with poison like that.
Speaker 6 (30:38):
New York and Biden should be brought upon treason. Ask me,
they're not the way safe, They're not.
Speaker 2 (30:45):
Nope, and Joe, this week the borders secure. I secured
it myself. I'm like, okay, God bless you, my friend,
and I mean that.
Speaker 4 (30:53):
All right.
Speaker 2 (30:53):
That's going to wrap things up for today. We are
loaded up tonight on Hannity on the Fox News channels.
Please at your DVR so you never ever, ever ever
miss an episode anyway nine to ten Eastern, nine to
ten pm Eastern Monday through Friday on Fox News. Anyway.
We'll load it up tonight, Mary Katherine Ham, Tommy Laryn,
vivek Ramaswami, Alena Haba. We have new information about Judging Goron.
(31:18):
He's the guy that you know still swears by the
valuation of mar A Lago at eighteen million dollars, which
is insane. Jason Chafitz, Jimmy Fala, Nu Kingrich. Anyway, it's
all happening tonight. I promise news you won't get from
the media.
Speaker 6 (31:34):
Mob.
Speaker 2 (31:35):
Say you dvr Hannony nine Eastern. We'll see you tonight.
Back here tomorrow, and thank you for making this show possible.
Well, we have come in.
Speaker 2 (00:02):
Your city. I get saying you a conscience zone.
Speaker 3 (00:09):
Will be tell and if you want.
Speaker 2 (00:15):
A little bang and a yi, I come along.
Speaker 4 (00:18):
Biden wrote the devastating nineteen ninety four crime Bill talking
about super predators.
Speaker 5 (00:25):
That was Biden like, if we don't acknowledge, uh that
there are some things, some real pocketbook issues that are
still front of mine for people we miss the mark.
Speaker 2 (00:37):
It's people are Hispanic. We're gonna lose Hispanic bails. Yeah,
what a loose.
Speaker 1 (00:45):
Clock.
Speaker 4 (00:48):
Only one hundred and thirty seven days until America vote.
Speaker 2 (00:55):
That we have come in to your city. Don't no
way get change you a conscious song.
Speaker 4 (01:04):
From coast to coast, from border to border, from c
to Shining Sea. Sean Kennedy is on Stay right here
for our final news round up and Information Overload.
Speaker 2 (01:23):
All right, news round up in Information Overload, our toll free.
Our number is eight hundred and ninety four one, Sean.
If you want to be a part of the program.
If you've noticed we've been doing a lot of segments
on the follow up as it relates to COVID nineteen
and all of the lies that we have been told.
You know, if you get the vaccine. You're you're never
gonna get COVID. Lie. If you get the vaccine, you're
(01:44):
never gonna infect others. Lie. I mean all of these
things that even though it was emergency authorization use. You
know what do we learn from the doctor that created
the technology that actually allowed for the creation of these
all new mRNA vaccinations, and that's doctor Robert Malone who
(02:05):
said that the technology was never perfected. We have a
case out of Kansas, thankfully thanks to Chris Kobok, the
Kansas Attorney General will join us in a second about
Pfeiser and how they made multiple misleading statements to deceive
the public about their vaccine at a time when Americans
(02:25):
needed to know the truth. And he is now suing Peiser.
We're misleading the people of Kansas on the COVID vaccine.
I look what they did in Great Britain Astrozenica their
version I guess of Pfiser and the Maderna shot, which
was different than the Johnson and Johnson shot, which was
one shot, not two, and it was a vaccination made
(02:48):
the more natural way. People began mocking it because it
didn't have the new technology for those that took vaccinations.
I guess in retrospect, maybe it wasn't so overdumb after all. Anyway,
he said. On Monday, Chris Colback did announcing that he's
suing Pfizer for what he said were misleading claims that
it made related to the COVID nineteen vaccine, and he
(03:12):
joins us, now, mister Attorney General, great to have you back.
Speaker 3 (03:15):
How are you great to be with you doing fine?
Speaker 1 (03:18):
Sean?
Speaker 3 (03:18):
Yeah, we filed a suit on Monday under our Kansas
Consumer Protection Act and are seeking civil monetary penalties, damages,
and injunctive relief for the misleading statements that Sizer made
in marketing its vaccine. You know, the federal government gave
the vaccine manufacturer's immunity from torque lawsuits where somebody sues
and says, you know, I was injured in some way
(03:41):
and I want damages to compensate me. But they did
not give them immunity for making deceptive claims to the public.
And I think everybody remembers at the time the vaccines
first came out, everybody had to make a decision or
two decisions. First am I going to take the vaccine?
And second which one am I going to take? And
in that kind of an environment, especially with all of
(04:02):
the anxiety and the duress with some employers forcing their
employees to take vaccines. People needed the information and it
was imperative that the information be truthful, and that was
not the case, as we lay out in our lawsuits.
Speaker 2 (04:15):
You know, I'll just bring you back in my own
personal experience, the amount of pressure that was brought to
bear on me to push my audience into taking a
vaccination was it was inordinate. It was not something I
had experienced before. I've experienced a lot of political pressure
in my life. The other thing was, you know, for
me to give everybody my status, what is my status?
(04:37):
Are you vaccinated or have you gotten COVID? Everybody wanted
to know my personal business. And by the way, mister
Attorney General, I probably would have gladly shared it at
the time. However, once they were demanding I share it,
I was like, screw you, it's none of your business.
I have my own personal you know, I believe in
I believe in medical privacy with all due respect to
(04:58):
all of you. So I didn't tell anybody but what
I said to people on the air, and I'm so
glad that I didn't give into their pressure, not that
there was any threat that I would, But I said
to people, I don't know anything about your health. I
don't know anything. If you have pre existing conditions, I
don't know. I have no idea. If you have cole morbidities,
(05:19):
I have no idea. I'm not a doctor. I don't
know anything about this shot. I was not qualified to
tell people what to do. I didn't know. But what
you're telling me is they didn't know either, or they
just flat out light about it. What do you think
it is and what did they lie about?
Speaker 3 (05:34):
Well, it's pretty clear that they did flat out lie
about it at least Advisor in several respects. They made misleading,
deceptive statements. And you know, let me give you two examples.
One is pregnant women. They marketed the vaccine as safe
for pregnant women. You know, that's an example of as
you're describing. You know, each person needs to make a
decision for themselves, but pregnant women needed to know that
(05:57):
there was a risk for them, and Peiser had two studies.
They also possessed information from their October twenty twenty pregnancy
study on rats indicating that the COVID nineteen vaccine was
linked to likely infertility, loss of litters and still born offspring.
That should have been a major signal forcing them to
(06:18):
put the brakes on things, but they proceeded, and in
February twenty twenty one, Peiser had reports for four hundred
and fifty eight pregnant women who received Peiser's vaccine during pregnancy,
and more than half of those women reported an adverse event,
and more than ten percent reported a miscarriage, many within
days of the vaccination. Sean, let's just pause. A miscarriage
(06:39):
means that a human being dies, a baby dies in
the womb. That's extraordinary and over ten percent For Pfiser
to continue to market its vaccine as safe to pregnant
women in light of that and with the knowledge of that,
that's I just think that's, you know, not only its deceptive,
(07:00):
it's just wrong on multiple levels. And then the other
case example we lay out in detail in our complaint
is myocarditis. They Pfizer denied any evidence of a safety
signal between its COVID nineteen vaccine and myocarditis. The safety
signal is just a risk signal, and the CEO in
January of twenty twenty three was asked whether the vaccine,
(07:22):
it's that Peiser vaccine caused strokes from arcarditis, and he said, quote,
we've not seen a single a single signal, although we
have distributed billions of doses end quote. But Piser new
and the United States government new, and the US military
new and others had found that the Pfiser vaccine caused
what was linked to myocarditis and pericarditis.
Speaker 2 (07:44):
So these statements, well, it's myocarditis. And I can't tell
you how many doctors I've spoken to that say post
COVID that the incidents, especially among young athletes, believe it
or not, young people, is so much higher than they
ever have seen before. And the other issue I keep
hearing a lot about is blood clotting. Is that is
that what you're learning as well?
Speaker 3 (08:06):
You know, we don't make specific allegations about blood clotting
outside of the myocarditis and pericarditis context, and they may
involve clotting. I'm not not a medical doctor, so I'm
not sure. But you know, I have a friend, Seawn,
who took the Pizer vaccine and shortly after you took
the vaccine, he had heart conditions that he never had before.
(08:29):
Had to have two surgeries, and he also suffered a stroke,
and his doctor said, it's the vaccine. There's no other explanation.
I mean, you know, people had anecdotal information like that.
But this lawsuit is just about what Phiser knew and
what they said, and Pizer knew certain things, and those
things contradicted what they were saying to the public.
Speaker 2 (08:49):
Did Maderna treat this differently? Because I find it interesting
that you're suing Pisa but not Maderna.
Speaker 3 (08:56):
You know, we we have the information with respect to Phizer.
There's one other difference regarding Pfizer. So Pfiser did not
accept the Operation Warps Warp Speed money from the federal government,
and as a result, they were not subject to all
of the same reporting requirements that recipients of the Operation
(09:16):
Warp Speed money were. They made a decision not to
take that money in order to free themselves of certain obligations.
And I have a quote here from the CEO Offiser.
He said, they want reports. I don't want to have
any of that end quote, And that's referring to the
federal government wanting reports. So I think that may be
(09:39):
one of the important distinctions between the vaccine manufacturers. That's
relevant here.
Speaker 2 (09:44):
What do you make of astra Zeneca take in their
shot off the market and that was used more widely
in Great Britain and elsewhere.
Speaker 3 (09:54):
You know, I don't have enough evidence to say, you know,
people are listening to my comments very carefully because we're
in litigation. So I don't have enough information about Astrozenica
that speculate about why they took it off the market.
But you know, focusing on Fisre, we have clear evidence
here that they were making statements for the public in
advertisement you just can't do. I mean, you know, think
about on your show. You know, in the advertisements there
(10:16):
may be some pharmaceuticals that are advertised, and we all
know that in that ad they point out all of
the potential side effects or issues that can result if
you take that pharmaceutical. That's part of what we're accustomed
to in America. But here Fiser not only didn't tell
us about it, they said the opposite. They said there
(10:36):
is no connection. And so it's you know, behavior like
that that triggers a Consumer Protection Act violation. And I
should note that although Kansas is the lead state here there,
we're part of a coalition of a growing coalition of
half a dozen states. Now, who are you standing together?
And they're either going to be bringing their suits in
their respective states or they will be taking steps forward
(10:57):
doing so, depending on what Pfizer does.
Speaker 2 (11:00):
I'm just trying to anticipate what they made argument will be.
Are they going to say, well, all of this was
done under the guise of emergency authorization that allowed them
to bypass the usual the usual process to getting a vaccination,
to get legal vaccination or FDA approval.
Speaker 3 (11:23):
You know, I'm waiting with bated breath, tousha to see
what they're going to say, because I just, you know,
the public staments that they've made since we filed the
suit have sinply've been rather general. You know, the vaccine
saved lives, and we made accurate statements. We'll see when
push comes to shove, when they are forced to explain
exactly what they said and why they said it and
(11:43):
what they were working.
Speaker 2 (11:44):
How soon will these people be the post.
Speaker 3 (11:47):
Yeah, that's what I was going to Next, we'll be
depositions and there will be discovery where they have to
provide documents in addition to what we already have from
various Foyer requests. The schedule will be set by the judge,
and he has not yet laid out of schedule for
what the stages of discovery will be, including depositions.
Speaker 2 (12:06):
All right, quick break, We'll come back more with Kansas
Attorney General Chris Colbok on the other side than your
calls coming up. Eight hundred and ninety four one, Sean,
as we continue, right, we continue now with Chris Kobok
is the Attorney General of the Great State of Kansas,
and he's now suing Pfizer over the COVID vaccination that
they gave out. I think this is very key and
(12:27):
one of the things that's been really alarming, and we've
had a lot of people. I don't know if you
know doctor Quay, he testified before Congress this week about
the origins of COVID. I don't know if you've had
a chance to read Ram Paul's Book of Deception. I mean,
you've got emails going back and forth, and it was
very obvious that people at the NIH in the earliest
days of COVID knew and understood that the NIH money
(12:53):
going through and funneled through the Eco Health Alliance was
going to the Wuhan Virology Lab where they knew coronavirus
research took place, and they knew gain of function research
took place, and they were panicked almost from day one
that the American taxpayers actually funded the creation of those virus,
(13:13):
which turns out to look pretty true to me at
this point. And you have people have not been held
accountable for that either.
Speaker 3 (13:21):
Yeah, it's interesting how long you know. Here we are
in the middle of twenty twenty four and we're looking
back and finally this information is coming out. I think
we're going to continue looking back in these lawsuits and
as more people testify in front of Congress or in
other ways, you know, disclose information. It's not looking good.
And certainly in the case of you know, the decisions
(13:42):
Americans were presented in the manner in which you know,
certainly Advisor presented them, but you know, looking what the
government did, you know forcing you know, one of the
things that I think was the worst in terms of
government actions, Sean was the military vaccine mandate. They I
represented some pilots at the time who wanted to avoid
the vaccine on religious grounds, and the Department of Defense
(14:05):
was proceeding to fire them at a time when the
Air Force had a shortage of over fifteen hundred pilots.
They're firing pilots over this. It's just unreal the kind
of decision making that was occurring during this period.
Speaker 2 (14:18):
You really can't make up how bad it was, you know,
back to the pressure that I felt. I mean, could you.
I'm a radio and television talk show host. Now. I
try to be as informed as possible. You've known me
for a long time, and we've known each other for
a long time, and I do a lot of reading
and a lot of research. But I'm not equipped to
give my audience advice, medical advice on something as serious
(14:41):
as to taking a vaccine or not taking a vaccine.
It's just not my role now. I think I gave
good advice telling people to take it seriously. I think
I gave good advice telling people to talk to their
doctor and to do their own research. I think I
gave people good advice that they have to look at
their own specific medical history and pre existing conditions and
(15:04):
cod morbidities, and they've got to look at their age.
And then it's a decision that only they and the
doctor can make. It's not a decision that a radio
talk show and a TV talk show host can make Well.
Speaker 3 (15:16):
I think that's exactly right. And the keyword in my
mind that you just said was do your own research.
And that's where this loss it comes into play. Well,
how are you going to do research if the company
is making statements that our contrary to the research the
company has but you don't have. And it should be
noted that the many of the studies and facts presented
(15:39):
and this losses only came out because of a Foyer
Fear of Information Act request and that request was resistant
and finally the information came out. So that's why you
know this lawsuit didn't happen last year or the year before.
This only happens after we get the information that has
been very hard to get.
Speaker 2 (15:56):
All right, Kansas Attorney General Chris Kobak will follow the
suit very very closely. We appreciate your time, my pleasure.
Eight nine one, Shawn. If you want to be a
part of the program, all right, twenty five to the
top of the hour. Eight hundred nine f one Seawan
is our number. If you want to be a part
of the program. Well, the the Cuckoo Brigade, the conspiracy
(16:16):
theory Brigade is out in full force. This all started
when you had conspiracy theorist extraordinaire Rachel Maddow thinking that
if Donald Trump is elected, he will be putting her
in a camp. I didn't get any clarification on is
it a day camp, is it a sleep away camp?
(16:37):
Obviously that's not what she's referring to, but you get
my point, you know, followed up Chrissy Teagan, Trump will
come after her, followed by AOC thinking that she's going
to be thrown in jail, followed up by Joylis behar
And and Rachel Maddow, you know, talking in depth about this,
thinking that you know, shows like the hard hitting news
(16:59):
show The View will be taken off the air.
Speaker 6 (17:01):
Now.
Speaker 2 (17:02):
Nicole Wallace says joined the brigade, suggesting that if Trump
wins reelection, she'll be taken off the air. Listen to her.
Speaker 7 (17:09):
I've seen that toast a bunch of times, but it
landed very differently this year, because depending what happens in November,
seven months from right now, just time next year, I
might not be sitting here. I might not be a
White House correspondence dinner or free press.
Speaker 2 (17:25):
Okay, so Nicole, you're still going to be on the
air if you want to be on the air, and
your employer wants to keep you on the air. I
can promise you that number one. But here's all the
mob media democrats worried that Donald Trump is either going
to throw them in jail or put them in a camp.
Speaker 8 (17:41):
Listen, you said recently that you thought that you, as
an outspoken critic, could be a target yourself. Some people
think that sounds all dramatic, but I'm right there with you.
I think that he is so vindictive that he will
go after however he has to through the irs maybe
or even are for sponsors to get us off the air?
Speaker 7 (18:02):
Maybe?
Speaker 1 (18:02):
Or are you?
Speaker 9 (18:03):
I think it's bad to have somebody saying, give me
as much power as you can in this country so
I can use it to go after other Americans. And
I don't think anybody's safe if that's the sort of
basis on which he wants to get more.
Speaker 10 (18:19):
If Donald Trump wins, we are looking at the potential
dissolution of democracy in the United States of America. It
sounds nuts, But like I wouldn't be surprised as this
guy through me in jail.
Speaker 2 (18:32):
It sounds nuts. That's the only thing she said in
that statement that was true. You have the co founder
of LinkedIn, guy by the name of Reid Hoffman, I
don't even know who he is, saying he's worried that
Trump will retaliate against him. I don't even think Trump
knows half these people. I'll ask him, but I don't
think he knows half these people.
Speaker 3 (18:50):
Listen and I literally talk to business leaders who are
who are fearful about speaking out against this because they're
fearful of retaliation.
Speaker 6 (18:58):
Are you concerned that Trump can retelliate against you?
Speaker 3 (19:01):
Of course I'm concerned.
Speaker 2 (19:03):
Of course I'm concerned because what do you think he's
going to do to the co founder of LinkedIn. I
don't think he's going to do anything. I don't think
he even knows who he is. But I guess this
is now, you know, the fear tactic. You know what
this is a cheap, fake paranoia, feigned phony outrage, and
it's just a way to scare people that Donald Trump
is this scary, scary figure, et cetera, et cetera. Maybe
(19:26):
what they really do fear is because they they all
have one thing in common. They have support the supported
the weaponization of our justice system, and their silence has
been deafening. They're part of the group that had no
problem with that sham trial in New York, no problem
with evaluation of mar A Lago at eighteen million, had
(19:46):
no problem that Steve Bannon and Peter Navarro, unlike so
many others held in contempt of Congress or are going
to jail, Peter Navarro in jail. Maybe it's maybe it's
maybe it all related to that. I don't know. All right,
We're going to get your calls in a minute. Here. Look,
if you own a gun, you believe in the Second Amendment,
(20:06):
that's not enough in today's America. It is essential you
be ensured, trained, educated. As a USCCA member, you can
defend yourself and your family against people that want to
bring you in your family harm, and also protect yourself
against the legal system that maybe doesn't protect the rights
of gun owners. You might you may now want to
(20:29):
end up like a guy like Craig. Who's Craig. He's
an American veteran, no criminal history. Returned home, he finds
an intruder wearing a mask in gloves in his own house. Anyway,
the criminal ignores Craig's yells to leave and reaches into
his pocket Craig shoots calls nine to one one. Law
enforcement label it a justified homicide. But they charge him
(20:52):
anyway because the gun wasn't registered with the government, and
because he's not a USCCA member, he's going to spend
a fortune to get a lawyer, and you know that's
even willing to take the case and then hope and
pray that he doesn't go to prison for defending himself
on his own property. Now, I share this story with
you because the truth is that simply owning a gun
(21:15):
for family protection can get you in trouble in our
New America. Now, I've been a proud member of the
USCCA for nine years because they have the best training,
best safety training, best education, best access to insurance made
specifically for self defense incidents. And you get all of
that for less than a dollar a day. Now, go
(21:36):
to their website, Defendfamily dot com right now you can
learn more about USCCA and their membership. You'll get enter
to win a gun of your choice and one hundred
up to one hundred and fifty five dollars worth of
free bonuses. But if you believe in the Second Amendment,
please you've got to go to Defendfamily dot com two day.
All right, let's get to our busy phones. Eight hundred
(21:56):
and nine to four to one, Sean, if you want
to be a part of the program, Ben is say
in New York, bed and how are you glad you called? Sir?
Speaker 1 (22:03):
Hey Sean, thank you for taking my call? Shut afrom
Long Island?
Speaker 2 (22:06):
Where Long Island? You're from my old stomping ground where
I was born and raised? What's going on?
Speaker 1 (22:11):
That's right? Valley Stream, Vali Stream.
Speaker 2 (22:13):
Well, first of all, anyway, you will you were raised
in Valley Stream?
Speaker 1 (22:16):
Yep?
Speaker 2 (22:17):
Do you remember the old Karl Hopples?
Speaker 1 (22:19):
No?
Speaker 2 (22:20):
Okay, how old are you?
Speaker 3 (22:22):
Fifty?
Speaker 2 (22:23):
Yeah? It might be might have been a little before
your time because my dad was a waiter at Carl
Hopples and Baldwin. But I grew up in Franklin Square
right next door to you, very close. Anyway, what's on
your mind today?
Speaker 1 (22:35):
Well, you know, like most Americans in watching the you know,
watch the trial in New York, the Sam Trial as
you call it, and we know that the gag order
hasn't been lifted, and it's very strange, and I have
a theory on it, and I'm wondering what you think
about it. You know, the debate is next week, and
I think they're trying to box Trump in. And what's
going to happen if they bring up the trial and
the President cannot respond to anything because he's under a
(22:58):
gag order. What do you think is going to happen.
Speaker 2 (22:59):
I think he's not going to respond to it, because
I think he's been pretty smart in not responding to it,
knowing that this judge is crazy enough to want to
put him in jail, I think, but I think there
are other ways around it. I don't think it's insurmountable.
I mean, Joe Biden is going to want to call
him a convicted felon as many times as he can,
and I have a good answer for it, and it's frankly, Joe,
(23:23):
be careful now that we know the laptop is real.
Remember your son implicates you as benefiting financially from all
of his foreign business deals at times when you are
the vice president taking actions to help his business companies,
and you might want to be careful about this convicted
felon mantra of yours because if there is equal justice
(23:43):
under the law, there seems to be a primate facia
case against you. That's what I would say.
Speaker 1 (23:50):
You know what, I think. I think he should just
speak up and say whatever he wants to say and
let you know, let the judge do what he wants
to do. But he needs to you know, I know.
Speaker 2 (23:59):
It's the judge may end up, you know, sentencing them
to jail. Anyway. The judge I think is just chomping
at the bit to put him into jail cell. And
if they do, I think the country will see it
for what it is. I'm not worried about it. I
don't want that for our country. I don't want that
for the president. However, I think at the end of
the day, they're going to have a very hard time
(24:21):
for a first defender with multiple appeals. Now, I think
my guess is he's going to be sentenced to jail
with pending appeal. That's my guess. First time offender. He's
not a flight risk with the Secret Service around him
at all times. He is a person, you know, for again,
we're talking about a classy felony. It's not even a
(24:43):
major felony. And I just but again, you have an
abusively biased judge in this case, and a judge that
I think is chomping at the bit to be loved
in New York social circles. And by the way, he
will be, and so will allow Vin Bragg. They're going
to be loved in New York social circles. Listen, New
(25:04):
York for me became almost inhabitable, especially New York City,
not Long Island, where I lived, where people knew me
and people are always really nice to me. They were great. However,
it just it just got to the point it just
wasn't worth it for me anymore. And that's one of
the reasons. I mean, when when you're in New York
(25:24):
City and I have to think twice, three, four or
five times about what restaurant I can go to with
my staff or with friends, it's not the place for me.
And I don't have that experience down in Florida. It's
very different. And look, it's not like I was so
married to New York anyway, because I lived in Rhode
Island five years, California five years, Alabama two years, Georgia
(25:48):
four years, and I've always I've had a home in
Florida for close to thirty years. I've had a place,
so for me, it was a natural transition. Anyway, I think, yeah,
I think I think Trump will abide by the gag order.
I think it's unconstitutional, but I think he'll abide by it,
and I think there's a number of ways around it
for him. Anyway, I appreciate the call. Eight hundred ninety
(26:09):
four one, Shawn is a number if you want to
be a part of the program. Gary is in New Joysy.
What's up? Gary? A New Joysey? What's going on to
the Joysey Shore?
Speaker 6 (26:18):
Much? Hot? Hey? I was listening to you. How you doing, Sean?
Speaker 2 (26:22):
But I'm good man, how are you?
Speaker 6 (26:25):
I listened to you yesterday with Bill talking about terrorism
that's been going on here for three years now, you know,
with the fentanyl and everything coming across the border. Killed
my son?
Speaker 2 (26:39):
You lost your son to fetanoyl yep? How old is
your son?
Speaker 1 (26:45):
Stuff to talk.
Speaker 2 (26:46):
Man, Gary, Gary, you don't have to apologize for being
upset over losing your son. I know I speak for
everybody hear in your voice right now. Our prayers, our
deepest condolence to you and your family. I can't imagine
the pain you live through. Was it an overdose? Was
(27:06):
it just.
Speaker 6 (27:08):
Get something mixed mixed into something nice? Exactly? But it
was the fentanyl.
Speaker 2 (27:14):
Yeah, it's in everything now, by the way, they're putting
fentanyl and weed. Now, did you know that? Yeah, And
these kids are dying. We're losing a generation of kids
opioids and fentanyl. You know, this is all being manufactured
in China, and our wide open borders are allowing all
of it in. And we're losing people like your son,
(27:35):
you know, hundreds and hundreds every week, and they don't
do a thing to stop it. And as far as
I'm concerned, the government has blood on their hands. Yeah,
Joe Biden, how long ago did this happen?
Speaker 6 (27:48):
For a year and almost a year and a half it
was Saint Patti's day. Yea.
Speaker 2 (27:53):
Let me guess you've never been the same and you
probably will never be the same again.
Speaker 1 (28:01):
Yeah.
Speaker 2 (28:01):
I got it. I got it. I understand, of course
you do. It takes your breath away. I get it,
I really do. I've had friends that have experienced the
exact same thing. You know, one thing of a dear
friend of mine. I'll do the talking through you. A
dear friend of mine that lost their son like you did,
(28:24):
a little younger than your son. The fatanyl, he said,
and he goes around the country and he gives talks.
He doesn't care if the crowd's ten people or one
hundred people or a thousand people. And he says the
same thing. If you are foolish enough to think this
cannot happen to you, you are dead wrong. I will
tell you every article I read every day, every day
(28:44):
I've run across these articles. I copy, I paste it,
I text it to my kids. I'm like, guys, pay
attention to this. And you know, I'm sure they're probably
at some point rolling their eyes, but by now they've
got the message from their dad. This is real, and
it's dangerous, and it's everywhere, and they're targeting our children.
They're targeting them. You know, a couple of what is
(29:08):
the equivalent of a grain of salt or two grains
of salt can take out a two hundred and fifty
pounds man, and not I mean kill them. I mean
that's how insidious this is. And they put it in,
they mix it into pretty much everything. Anyway. I'm really sorry, Gary,
I really please know our love and our prayers with
you and your family and the only hope I have.
(29:29):
And it's not cliche to me, because I believe it
with all my heart. I do believe that there is
a heaven and a God. And you know when I
say let not your heart be trouble, the rest of
that verse goes on. You know that Jesus talks about
letting not your heart be trouble in my Father's house
from many mansions, and I go to prepare a place
(29:50):
for you so that where I am, you shall also be.
And I just believe you'll be reunited with your son
one day. I believe that with all my heart. And
in the meantime, it doesn't take your pain away, But
just know that there are a lot of people that
understand the pain you and your family have been through.
It's terrible and it needs to stop, and we have
(30:11):
the ability to stop it, and we're not doing it.
It's can all be prevented, all of it. Secure the
damn border and prevent this poison from coming into our country.
Speaker 6 (30:21):
Yeah, I mean, we have to worry about any terrorism
happening here because any bullets being shot, because it's all
being done by the defending all.
Speaker 2 (30:31):
You know, I never thought about that before. Isn't that
a form of an attack on our country? Flooding our
country with poison like that.
Speaker 6 (30:38):
New York and Biden should be brought upon treason. Ask me,
they're not the way safe, They're not.
Speaker 2 (30:45):
Nope, and Joe, this week the borders secure. I secured
it myself. I'm like, okay, God bless you, my friend,
and I mean that.
Speaker 4 (30:53):
All right.
Speaker 2 (30:53):
That's going to wrap things up for today. We are
loaded up tonight on Hannity on the Fox News channels.
Please at your DVR so you never ever, ever ever
miss an episode anyway nine to ten Eastern, nine to
ten pm Eastern Monday through Friday on Fox News. Anyway.
We'll load it up tonight, Mary Katherine Ham, Tommy Laryn,
vivek Ramaswami, Alena Haba. We have new information about Judging Goron.
(31:18):
He's the guy that you know still swears by the
valuation of mar A Lago at eighteen million dollars, which
is insane. Jason Chafitz, Jimmy Fala, Nu Kingrich. Anyway, it's
all happening tonight. I promise news you won't get from
the media.
Speaker 6 (31:34):
Mob.
Speaker 2 (31:35):
Say you dvr Hannony nine Eastern. We'll see you tonight.
Back here tomorrow, and thank you for making this show possible.
The Sean Hannity Show News
Host
Sean Hannity
Popular Podcasts
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.