July 15, 2025 • 30 mins
Chairman James Comer of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform is asking the questions to find out what exactly happened with the autopen. Will we get answers and accountability? Or is this just another sweep it under the rug moment for the government.
Follow Sean and Our Guests on Social Media:
-
Facebook: facebook.com/SeanHannity
-
X (Twitter): x.com/seanhannity
-
Truth Social: truthsocial.com/@SeanHannity
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Stay right here for our final news roundup and Information Overload.
Speaker 2 (00:04):
News round Up and Information Overload hour. Here is our
toll free telephone number. It's eight hundred and nine to
four one sean if you want to be a part
of the program.
Speaker 3 (00:14):
We've got some.
Speaker 2 (00:15):
Real issues and problems as it relates to what the
hell is going on with Joe Biden at the end
of his administration. What was going on with all these
auto pens. I'd like to know, And you know, we
went into this in some specificity in detail last night,
but the scandal around Biden's use of the autopen has
(00:36):
grown worse by the day. So the New York Times
does an interview that they published but yesterday or the
day before, I forget, and Biden actually admitted he did
not approve each individual pardon. The former president claimed he
quote made every decision about Clemency's but later admitted that
he had his staff replicate his signature because he said, quote,
(00:59):
We're talking about a lot of people. And what's even
more alarming in this, According to The New York Times,
has Biden discussed pardons with his advisors on January the nineteenth,
that's his last night in office, and after messages circulated
among his advisors summarizing the meeting, it was Biden's then
chief of staff, Jeff Zinz who sent an email reading quote,
(01:19):
I approved the use of the autopen for the execution
of all of the following pardons. Now, The New York
Times also said that Biden just put parameters around the
issuance of clemency for people, but he didn't sign off
on specific cases. That is not the same as him
deciding who to pardon or to offer clemency to. So
(01:43):
they admitting here that he didn't make the ultimate decision,
that he just put parameters around what his staff can
choose or not choose. Because that constitutional power authority, which
is absolute, there's no doubt about that. It appears less
then clear that Biden made the decisions. Matter of fact,
it sounds and reads to me like he didn't make
(02:06):
the specific decisions. So we have that issue, and then
we have this other issue of the report from John Solomon,
who we had on the program yesterday. The FBI now
is looking at all the years of weaponization of the
federal government, opening the door now for a special prosecutor
to look into everything, starting with the Russia hoax. And
Baiza abuse straight on through Jack Smith and the Special Counsel. Anyway,
(02:31):
here to weigh in on all of this is the
chairman of the House Committee of Oversight and Government Reform,
Chairman James Comer is with US Congressman, welcome back.
Speaker 3 (02:41):
How are you.
Speaker 1 (02:42):
I'm great, thanks t having me on Seohn.
Speaker 2 (02:44):
So I read this article and I read it that
Biden is admitting he didn't approve each individual pardon and
clemency here and that it was as chief of staff
that signed off on these last day clemencies. Biden acknowlogy
he didn't agree to the aim of every person that
received a pardon. I made every decision, he says about
(03:04):
the clemencies, before admitting that he had his staff replicate
the signature because we're talking about a lot of people.
And then his team used an autopen on twenty five
warrants for pardons and commutations in December and January, but
two of the Warrens granted clemency to thousands of people.
And then Biden commuted roughly fifteen hundred sentences and outright
(03:25):
pardon thirty nine more, and three days before he left office,
he commuted the sentence of nearly twenty five hundred federal
inmates convicted of crack cocaine offenses, and even the New
York Times is saying that Biden approved the standards that
would be used in which convicts would qualify for a
partner commutation while his staff sorted out the details. Well,
(03:45):
that doesn't sound like Tell me if I'm wrong, But
I didn't know that the power of the pardon, which
is absolute for a president, that he could just put
parameters around what the criteria would be and not actually
specifically off on each individual.
Speaker 1 (04:01):
You're exactly all right, Sean. He is not allowed to
do that. That's not how it works. He has to
do them individually, and he has to sign with his
own signature. Think about all the time and effort that
prosecutors went in to convicting these people of crimes, of
various crimes over the years. You had a jury in
most cases, and you had you know, a huge expense
(04:24):
to the tax first, and then all at once, Joe
Biden supposedly gives his unnamed unelected bureaucratic staff or the
authority to pardon them just just diminish everything that was
determined in the court of law. That's not how it works,
and by Joe Biden's own admission of The New York Times,
(04:45):
then those pardons should be ruled void in a court
of law. And I think you know, it's about more
than the pardon, Sean. It's about the executive orders, and
it's about the fact that you know, there's no evidence
that shows that there was any formal process where Joe
Biden told the individuals who were who were putting using
(05:07):
that autopend for pardons and executive orders that he knew
exactly which pardon or which executive order he was talking about.
He had read it inside out. And I want you
to sign my autopen because I'm out of town. The
other problem, Sean, is that seventy five percent of the
time they used the autopen, Joe Biden, according to the
(05:27):
White House logs, was in the White House. I mean,
none of this makes sense. It ill begged to the question,
did Joe Biden have any idea what his signature was
being signed on? And thus far I can say, I
haven't any evidence that was Jesse did.
Speaker 2 (05:44):
All right, So you're the chairman of the very powerful
House Oversight and Government or Reform Committee. You have been
doing interviews with people in the Biden White House. I
know you have other interviews scheduled, and you put out
subpoenas for people, and some people look operating and others
are not. So what is the status? What are you
learning as you interview these people?
Speaker 1 (06:06):
We're learning pretty much with The New York Times reported
that there's no evidence that Joe Biden had any idea
the overwhelming majority of what was being signed using the autobit.
There's no formal process. The people that have stuck the
documents in, the staffers that stuck the documents in and
(06:27):
hit the power button to sign Joe Biden's signature, never
heard from Joe Biden directly. In fact, in some cases
they went, you know, long periods of time without even
seeing Joe Biden. So you know, there was a very
select few that were calling the shots in the White House.
You mentioned, We've had several depositions and transcribed interviews. We
(06:47):
have several more scheduled. In fact, one tomorrow with Joe
Biden's former chief of staff, who already declined a scheduled
interview we had, so I had this pain of him
and bring bring him in. But we're going to get
to the answers of who was in fact calling the shots.
(07:09):
We brought the doctor in, doctor O'Connor, to see if
if you know, the first question we asked, doctor O'Connor,
did anyone ever try to get you to lie about
Joe Biden's health? And he pled the fifth? Sean, I mean, so,
I mean there's nothing good is coming out of this
At the end of.
Speaker 2 (07:27):
The did he plead the fifth throughout the entire interview.
Speaker 1 (07:30):
Through the whole interview, Through the whole interview, the only
question he answered was his name at the very beginning
of the position. You have to stay your name, and
he did that. Everything else he pled the fifth. Uh,
We're going to interview everyone, give everyone their due process,
give everyone an opportunity to tell the truth. Then we're
going to publish a report based on facts, handed over
(07:52):
to Pam Bondy at the Attorney General's office and let
them go from there. Because you know, when you talk
about accountability, the things that I want to see many
of these executive orders and pardons, these pardons like for
the Biden family, Are you kidding me? We're a direct
result of our investigational Mobsight committee for finding all the
(08:14):
money they cooked from people in foreign countries. Now you've
got executive orders that were signed in the last two
weeks of the Biden administration. They were signed using the
auto pen. There's no evidence Joe Biden knew anything about it.
He never had a bill signing ceremony, never had anything
like that, and they were done for the sole purpose
of Trump proofing the Trump administration. They're making it harder
(08:37):
for Donald Trump to shut down the government agency. They're
making it harder for Donald Trump to deport the criminal
need in legals. These were based on executive orders that
were signed using the auto pen on days when Joe
Biden was supposedly in the White House, but he never
answered questions about it. They never issued any statements. We
think all of these could very easily be declared void
(08:59):
in a course of allow and that would go a
long way to helping President Trump accomplish his agenda.
Speaker 2 (09:05):
All right, So let me ask you this, Would it
not invalidate all of these clemencies and pardons, especially in
the in the waning days of the administration, if there's evidence,
or if if he just laid out standards that should
be applied by his team and was not knowledgeable about
(09:25):
every single pardon, clemency, whatever he was offering people. And
he just laid out a criteria for his his I
guess staff to follow, and then an auto pen was used.
It seems to me that that would invalidate it. Is
there anything illegal that you can see here?
Speaker 1 (09:44):
Well, again, you know what Joe Biden admitted to was
he gave the authority, he verbally gave his the authority
to his staff to use his signature to pardon anyone
that's not legal. That's not like so Joe Biden's already
admitted to The New York Times, which is funny. That
should have been a slam dunk interview for Joe Biden. Instead,
(10:05):
it incriminated him even more. That's illegal. We question Joe
Biden's mental fitness. We're going to try to do some
things to create a situation where possibly the doctor can
have immunity to try to answer our questions. That still
doesn't mean he'll answer them or not, but we're going
(10:27):
to try to go to great links to get a
medical analysis from Joe Biden's doctors as to what his
true mental and physical health condition was to determine whether
or not these staffers or even communicating with Joe Biden.
They may have just been acting unilaterally, which which the
evidence would suggest. I think everything that was signed with
(10:50):
the auto pen, especially on days when Joe Biden was
in the White House, shun. I think everything can be
ruled invalid in a court of law.
Speaker 2 (10:58):
All right, let me go to this other And we
had you on TV last night with John Solomon. He
was also on this radio program yesterday. And you know
we have covered at length. I can't tell you how
many years we spent on Russia, Russia, Russia. And we
had a small ensemble cast of us that were able
to unfeel every layer of the onion and get to
(11:19):
the bottom and get to the truth of that entire story.
The most frightening part of it is that they knew
from the beginning that this was a Hillary Clinton campaign
bought and paid for dirty Russian disinformation dossier. And then
even though James come in particular was warned that it
was a political document of old people in August of
(11:42):
twenty sixteen, although he was worn in July as well
not to trust it, he still used it. It was
the basis of not one, but four FIZ applications. He
signed three of the four of them. He years later
went before Senator Graham before a committee hearing and admitted,
knowing what he knows now, as did every other person
that signed those FISA applications, admitted that knowing what they
(12:06):
know now, they never would have used it. But they
didn't know then. And that's the problem. Now what's happening
is we now have the door has been opened for
a special prosecutor to look into everything ranging from Russia
and the Russia hoax, to PISA abuse, to fifty one
(12:27):
former Intel agents that knew absolutely nothing about the very
real Hunter Biden laptop, all these incidences, the impact weaponization
against Donald Trump, false valuation of maur Lago, a novel
legal theory used by Alvin Bragg when the statute of
limitations had run out on a legal non disclosure agreement
(12:48):
which is only a mystimeter, and he turned it into
thirty four felony counts and to the ex all the
way through Jack Smith and the double standard with the
rate at mar Lago versus Hillary Clinton and Joe and
their top secret classified materials that they had and they
didn't get the same treatment. Now where do you see
this going? Because that to me seems like a ten
(13:09):
year you know, deep dive investigation.
Speaker 1 (13:13):
Yeah. Well, I think a lot of these committees have
already investigated. I think you go back to the work
that Devin Nunaz did when he was there. Uh, he
was the first person when when he was a ranking
member of the Intelligence Committee going up against Adam Schiff
to say that this was all a joke, a hoax.
Speaker 3 (13:31):
Uh.
Speaker 1 (13:32):
Then you've got you know, there's there's been stuff that
House Judiciary Committee's done, House Oversight Committee. I think a
lot of the investigative work's done. If it's what you're
seeing now from John Radcliffe and hopefully Cash Patel, they're
going to continue to expose the truth about how this
was all a hoax generated by the Clinton campaigns, the
(13:54):
Obama campaigns to try to take Trump down. I think
that the committees where comy and and then never testified
and lied. That's perjury. I think they should uh have
criminal referrals to the Department Justice. I think I think
that the CIA and the FBI should issue reports and
(14:14):
hand over to the Department Justice. And I think the
Attorney General should just start starting now and try to
get some accountability here for for perjury. For abuse of power.
I mean, the list goes on and on and on
and set an example out of these deep state actors.
The truth is known now, the evidence is out there.
(14:34):
There have been investigations from from various committees, there have
been Senate committees, center gradually, Ron Johnson, I mean, there
are a lot of different investigations that I think can
be pieced together without having a special counsel and just
go ahead and start to start the prosecution of these
criminals now, because that's what they are, criminals, and I
(14:55):
think the evidence is overwhelming.
Speaker 2 (14:57):
Well, we appreciate all your hard work and always being
generous your time to share with us an update us
on what's going on. These are very critical issues we
need to get to the bottom of. James Comer, Chairman,
House Government Reform and Oversight Committee, We appreciate your time, sir.
Speaker 1 (15:13):
Thank you, Sean, appreciate it.
Speaker 2 (15:15):
Five now till the top of the arrow. Will get
to your calls in just a minute. Here listen. Thanks
to your generosity, your thoughtfulness, your kindness. The Tunnel to
Towers Foundation, they're making lasting differences in real lives, lives
like the Ernst family and when US Navy Chief Petty
Officer Michael Thomas Ernst was killed in a training accident.
(15:39):
Well the Tunnel to Towers. They had the money you
provided and generously donated, and they were able to provide
this family a mortgage free home, and his loving family
had that burden lifted off of them. And since Tunnel
to Towers was founded in the aftermath of nine to eleven,
the Ernst family is one of many that you have
(16:00):
been able to help. And your help is desperately still
needed today. And you have now helped empower our most
catastrophically injured vets and first responders to reclaim their independence
and help provide specially adapted smart homes. But there is
a lot more to do. Many heroes, many of their families,
they are still in need. We can't forget America's heroes
(16:21):
have given so much, and together you know we can
all say thank you in a very lasting and a
very meaningful way. Anyway, please join us a team. Hannity
support the Tunnel to Towers Foundation. Go to their website.
It's the letter T, the number two, the letter T
dot org. The letter T the number two the letter
T dot org for the Tunnel to Towers Foundation. All right.
(16:43):
So there was a short gaggle earlier today before the
President added to Pennsylvania to talk about oil and gas
and AI and a variety of issues. Let me play
a little bit of that and then we'll get to
your calls.
Speaker 4 (16:57):
The president, your reaction to the latest numbers from the
Department saying that inflation rose slightly last month.
Speaker 3 (17:03):
Very slight.
Speaker 5 (17:04):
Essentially, they were exactly as anticipated, very low inflation. So
what you should do is lower the rate. Offen should
lower the rate immediately.
Speaker 3 (17:16):
There was a terror.
Speaker 5 (17:19):
Terror wear a big win with the Supreme Court on
the Department of Education, and we want, as.
Speaker 3 (17:25):
You know, we want to bring education back to the States,
take the federal government out of it.
Speaker 5 (17:31):
A little tiny bit of supervision, but very little, almost nothing,
like to make sure they speak English.
Speaker 3 (17:37):
That's about all we need. Yes, that's a question. I
give a Russia fifty days. What happens now? Do you
talk to Lamir prudent?
Speaker 5 (17:44):
But at the end of fifty days, if we don't
have a deal, it's gonna be uh too bad.
Speaker 3 (17:49):
Should Lenski get more aggressive? Yeah? The terroriffs are going
to go on and other sanctions go on.
Speaker 4 (17:56):
Lensky target Moscow, should the Lensky target MOSCOWT Sir should
do Lensky target Moscow or deeper in corruscial.
Speaker 3 (18:04):
He shouldn't target Moscow.
Speaker 5 (18:06):
Oh, I don't think fifty days is very long, and
it could be sooner than that.
Speaker 3 (18:10):
I don't think fifty days is very long. You should
have asked that same question to Biden. Why did he
get us into this war? You should ask that question, Yeah,
and what did he tell you? Why did he get
us into this war?
Speaker 5 (18:23):
You know why he got us in because he's a dummy,
that's why. And you don't and you don't cover it right.
But you should be asking that question to bite Why
did he get us.
Speaker 3 (18:31):
Into this war? Because he's incompetent.
Speaker 5 (18:34):
It would have never happened if I were president from Texas.
Speaker 3 (18:38):
You believe your.
Speaker 6 (18:39):
Harems minus n offer teflation to increase clap clus You
didn't had any.
Speaker 3 (18:44):
We had very little inflation. I don't know who do
you work for today? What you want to say today?
Speaker 1 (18:50):
Oh?
Speaker 5 (18:50):
Well, they wrote me a beautiful article the other day,
So I can't get angry at you us say today
just wrote a very good article about me. What's that
all about? So I can't get angry there was very
little inflation. As you know, the numbers were very good,
very much inside the margin. So we've had no inflation.
All we have is we're making a fortune. We are
(19:11):
taking in hundreds of billions of dollars. You say, we
had a surplus of twenty five billion dollars last month,
which we haven't had in many, many years. We are
doing because I got it, because I'm able to do it.
Speaker 3 (19:30):
Nobody else would be able to do it.
Speaker 5 (19:32):
We have tariffs going on because we want tariffs and
we want the money coming into the United States. But
more important than the money, there's two aspects of the tariffs.
Speaker 3 (19:43):
There's the money which comes in.
Speaker 5 (19:45):
The other aspect is that rather than paying the tariffs,
the country or the company will build in the United States,
make their product in the United States, and that creates jobs.
And I would say of the two, probably the more important.
Speaker 3 (20:00):
To me is that, yeah, are you are you? Are
you on your play's side?
Speaker 5 (20:04):
Now?
Speaker 3 (20:05):
No, I'm on nobody's side.
Speaker 5 (20:07):
I'm gonna know what I want to you know who
the side I'm on humanity side. I want to stop
the killing of thousands of people away and I want
to stop the killing. I want the killing to stop
in the Ukraine Russia war.
Speaker 3 (20:20):
That's the side I'm.
Speaker 4 (20:21):
On, mister President and your daughter, Mister President, your daughter.
Speaker 3 (20:25):
In law stand that there's that there should.
Speaker 4 (20:27):
Be transparency in the Epstein case.
Speaker 3 (20:29):
You will agree with her, sir uh.
Speaker 5 (20:31):
The Attorney General's handled that very well. She is She's
really done a very good job. And I think that
when you look at it, you'll understand that I would
like to see that also.
Speaker 3 (20:43):
But I think the Attorney general the credibility is.
Speaker 5 (20:46):
Very important and you want credible evidence with something like that,
and I think the Attorney General has handled it very well.
Speaker 4 (20:55):
The Attorneys general point view on the buk and FBI review.
Speaker 3 (21:00):
You tell that.
Speaker 5 (21:02):
What on the on what subject?
Speaker 3 (21:07):
There are a few other files. Turn her very very
quick briefing and.
Speaker 7 (21:11):
Did she tell you what did she tell you about
what you had specifically?
Speaker 3 (21:14):
Think she tell you and all that your name appeared?
Speaker 5 (21:18):
No, No, she's she's given us just a very quick briefing.
Speaker 3 (21:23):
And in terms of the credibility of the different things
that they've.
Speaker 5 (21:26):
Seen, and I would say that you know, these.
Speaker 3 (21:29):
Files were made.
Speaker 5 (21:30):
Up by Komi, they were made up by Obama, they
were made up by but the biting it from you know, uh,
we and we went through years of that with the
Russia Russia Russia hoax.
Speaker 3 (21:41):
With all of the different things that we had to
go through. We've gone through years of it. But she's
handled it very well and it's going to be up
to her.
Speaker 5 (21:48):
Whatever she thinks is credible. She should release yes on Texas.
Speaker 7 (21:53):
On Texas, how many more seats do you want the
Republicans to draw?
Speaker 3 (21:57):
Five?
Speaker 7 (21:58):
And then what if California, New York, Illinois and other
blue sp Well that's okay too.
Speaker 3 (22:03):
But five.
Speaker 5 (22:04):
I think we get five and there could be some
other states we're gonna get another three or four or five.
In addition, Texas would be the biggest one.
Speaker 7 (22:12):
And are you are you calling him for a complete
redrawing of the congressional Mapou are just a very simple redrawing.
Speaker 5 (22:18):
We pick up five seats and where we have a
couple of other states where we'll pick up seats also. Well,
when he was in my office, I told him, he's
doing your very bad job.
Speaker 3 (22:36):
He's way late. That's why I call him too late.
Jerome Powell is too late. He's way late. Interest rate
should be coming down.
Speaker 5 (22:45):
Where we have a very very successful country we should
have the lowest interest rate anywhere in the world, and
we don't. Jerome Powell has done a terrible job, and frankly,
I don't think he could do a worse job. He's
called everything wrong. They had a report come out the
other day seventy one different economis and me.
Speaker 3 (23:04):
You know who is right? Me? Did you know that
I was right? It was the president?
Speaker 5 (23:12):
Are you going to a mist now to another.
Speaker 3 (23:15):
As the next year? You must be kidding. That's the president.
There's a president. What are your thoughts on Andrews?
Speaker 5 (23:28):
We had to waste the question. We are talking to
the EU and we're making progress. But look, you know
we already have a deal with EU. It's called the
letter that was sent out. I think it was thirty percent.
Speaker 3 (23:46):
That's the EU.
Speaker 5 (23:47):
But we at the same time we are talking.
Speaker 3 (23:54):
Go ahead, mister president.
Speaker 4 (23:55):
Your reaction to Andrew Cuomo's saying in the New York
City mayor's race, Andrew Plomo staying in the New York
City mayor's race, I.
Speaker 3 (24:02):
Think we should stay. I think he's a shot. Would
you prefer him over I don't want to say, you know,
I'm a Republican, he's a Democrat. Or an independent. No,
I think Andrew would have a good shot of winning. Well,
he's got to run a tough campaign. Well, you know
he's running.
Speaker 5 (24:17):
Against the communists. I would think that he would have
a good shot of winning.
Speaker 3 (24:23):
Tell us about your trip to Scotland, sir, what are
you going to do on your trip to Scotland.
Speaker 5 (24:29):
We're going to be meeting with the British Prime Minister,
very respected.
Speaker 3 (24:33):
And we are going to have a meeting with him,
probably an Aberdeen.
Speaker 5 (24:38):
And we're going to do a lot of different things,
and we're going to also refine the trade deal that
we've made.
Speaker 3 (24:44):
So we'll be meeting.
Speaker 5 (24:45):
Mostly with the probably one of my properties, or maybe not,
depending on what happens, but we'll be an Aberdeen in Scotland,
meeting with the Prime Minister. With the retaliate, well, I
don't know how they can retaliate.
Speaker 3 (25:05):
You know, they've made a lot of money.
Speaker 5 (25:06):
They've treated us very badly, but now they're treating us
very nicely, and I think we'll end up. I think
everybody is going to be happy with the.
Speaker 3 (25:13):
EU meet with Pope over your future.
Speaker 5 (25:21):
Third, I'm not a plan I would do it. I
have a lot of respect I really like his brother.
His brother is a major serious trumper.
Speaker 3 (25:29):
You know that. He's mega all the way.
Speaker 5 (25:31):
I like the Pope's brother, and I think i'd like
the Pope. But the Pope's brother lives in Florida.
Speaker 3 (25:37):
I met him and he is maga. He's got maga
signs all over the house. He likes Trump and I
like him. The latest on a wrong how about you wrong?
He's found death. Well, we're going to see what happens
with President.
Speaker 5 (25:56):
So far, I've been very disappointed with President Putin. I've
so a lot of wars in the last three months,
but I haven't gotten this one yet.
Speaker 3 (26:05):
This is a Biden war, it's not a Trump war.
Speaker 5 (26:08):
I'm here to try and get us out of that message.
Speaker 3 (26:16):
An he messages for what? Yeah, go ahead, go have
a what.
Speaker 6 (26:26):
For the people of Brazil. Are you from Brazil?
Speaker 3 (26:30):
Okay? He's going to trial now? Right? When is that
trial starting? When is the trial for both scenarios starting?
(26:51):
When is it? How is it going now? But they
haven't found him guilty? But have they found him guilty?
Speaker 1 (27:04):
Now?
Speaker 7 (27:07):
On the hall?
Speaker 3 (27:09):
President Bolsonaro is a good man. I've gotten to.
Speaker 5 (27:13):
Know a lot of Prime ministers and presidents and kings
and queens, and I know him and I'm pretty good
at this. President Bolsonaro is not a dishonest man. He
loves the people of Brazil. He fought hard for the
people of Brazil. He negotiated trade deals against me for
the people of Brazil, and he was very.
Speaker 3 (27:31):
Tough, and he was.
Speaker 5 (27:32):
Tough because he wanted to do a good deal for
his country.
Speaker 3 (27:35):
He was not a dishonest man.
Speaker 5 (27:37):
And I believe it's a witch hunt and it shouldn't
be happening.
Speaker 3 (27:41):
It's not that I know.
Speaker 5 (27:43):
Him that Look, he's not like a friend of mine.
He's somebody that I know, and I know him as
a representative of millions of people, Brazilians. They're great people,
and he loves the country and he fought hard for
those people.
Speaker 3 (27:58):
And they want to put him in jail.
Speaker 5 (27:59):
And I think that's a witch hunt, and I think
it's very unfortunate, and nobody's happy with what Brazil is
doing because Bolsnario was a respected president, very respectful. You
say you want Adam sim Hunts.
Speaker 3 (28:17):
To justice, I'd love to see him brought to justice.
I think I'll tell you what I think.
Speaker 5 (28:23):
Adam Schiff is one of the lowest of the low
I would love to see him brought to justice.
Speaker 3 (28:29):
He is a dishonest cricket guy.
Speaker 5 (28:31):
I don't know about the individual charge, if that even happens.
Speaker 3 (28:35):
But Adam Shift is a serious lowlife.
Speaker 5 (28:37):
And Tomorrow Morning here wants to give the Nail team
the host go wrong Mom, Donny for Brekfice reunited.
Speaker 3 (28:46):
I'd love to be I'd really love to go. I mean,
I look forward to meeting him both. I know him
both very well through what I read and through what
I see.
Speaker 5 (28:55):
Look, he's a communist. I don't think our country is
ready for a guy immunists, but we're gonna see.
Speaker 3 (29:01):
And I don't think that race is over yet either.
You do have a couple of people running against and
I it'll be an interesting thing.
Speaker 5 (29:08):
Things are coming out about him which aren't good.
Speaker 3 (29:12):
And uh, you know AOC.
Speaker 5 (29:14):
Look, I think she's very nice, but she's very low
IQ and we really don't need low IQ. Between her
and Crockett. We're gonna give them both an IQ test
to see who comes out beast.
Speaker 3 (29:27):
Now. I took my test.
Speaker 5 (29:29):
I took a real test at Walter Reed Medical Center,
and I haste it. I got every one of all
those questions right now, it's time for them.
Speaker 3 (29:38):
To take a test. Anyway, have a good time.
Speaker 5 (29:43):
I like Dan Boys, all right.
Speaker 2 (29:51):
That was the president from earlier today, gaggle he held
prior to going to Pennsylvania to talk about uh, the
issues of energy, AI and all the things that are
going to hopefully make the economy grow at a level
we've never seen before. That's my hope. We wrap things
up for today. We got a great Hannity Set your
DVR nine eastern on the Fox News Channel. New Gingrich
(30:13):
will be with us. We'll get his historic view of
Trump's first six months. And Turntine is going to join
us on the absolute meltdown of his Democratic Party. Mark
Wayne Mullins tonight, Larry Cudlow on Trump calling on Jerome
Powell to lower interest rates once and for all. Also
a friend, Klay Travis. Set your DVR nine eastern. Hannity
(30:34):
on Fox. We'll see you tonight. Back here tomorrow. Thank
you for making this show possible.
Stay right here for our final news roundup and Information Overload.
Speaker 2 (00:04):
News round Up and Information Overload hour. Here is our
toll free telephone number. It's eight hundred and nine to
four one sean if you want to be a part
of the program.
Speaker 3 (00:14):
We've got some.
Speaker 2 (00:15):
Real issues and problems as it relates to what the
hell is going on with Joe Biden at the end
of his administration. What was going on with all these
auto pens. I'd like to know, And you know, we
went into this in some specificity in detail last night,
but the scandal around Biden's use of the autopen has
(00:36):
grown worse by the day. So the New York Times
does an interview that they published but yesterday or the
day before, I forget, and Biden actually admitted he did
not approve each individual pardon. The former president claimed he
quote made every decision about Clemency's but later admitted that
he had his staff replicate his signature because he said, quote,
(00:59):
We're talking about a lot of people. And what's even
more alarming in this, According to The New York Times,
has Biden discussed pardons with his advisors on January the nineteenth,
that's his last night in office, and after messages circulated
among his advisors summarizing the meeting, it was Biden's then
chief of staff, Jeff Zinz who sent an email reading quote,
(01:19):
I approved the use of the autopen for the execution
of all of the following pardons. Now, The New York
Times also said that Biden just put parameters around the
issuance of clemency for people, but he didn't sign off
on specific cases. That is not the same as him
deciding who to pardon or to offer clemency to. So
(01:43):
they admitting here that he didn't make the ultimate decision,
that he just put parameters around what his staff can
choose or not choose. Because that constitutional power authority, which
is absolute, there's no doubt about that. It appears less
then clear that Biden made the decisions. Matter of fact,
it sounds and reads to me like he didn't make
(02:06):
the specific decisions. So we have that issue, and then
we have this other issue of the report from John Solomon,
who we had on the program yesterday. The FBI now
is looking at all the years of weaponization of the
federal government, opening the door now for a special prosecutor
to look into everything, starting with the Russia hoax. And
Baiza abuse straight on through Jack Smith and the Special Counsel. Anyway,
(02:31):
here to weigh in on all of this is the
chairman of the House Committee of Oversight and Government Reform,
Chairman James Comer is with US Congressman, welcome back.
Speaker 3 (02:41):
How are you.
Speaker 1 (02:42):
I'm great, thanks t having me on Seohn.
Speaker 2 (02:44):
So I read this article and I read it that
Biden is admitting he didn't approve each individual pardon and
clemency here and that it was as chief of staff
that signed off on these last day clemencies. Biden acknowlogy
he didn't agree to the aim of every person that
received a pardon. I made every decision, he says about
(03:04):
the clemencies, before admitting that he had his staff replicate
the signature because we're talking about a lot of people.
And then his team used an autopen on twenty five
warrants for pardons and commutations in December and January, but
two of the Warrens granted clemency to thousands of people.
And then Biden commuted roughly fifteen hundred sentences and outright
(03:25):
pardon thirty nine more, and three days before he left office,
he commuted the sentence of nearly twenty five hundred federal
inmates convicted of crack cocaine offenses, and even the New
York Times is saying that Biden approved the standards that
would be used in which convicts would qualify for a
partner commutation while his staff sorted out the details. Well,
(03:45):
that doesn't sound like Tell me if I'm wrong, But
I didn't know that the power of the pardon, which
is absolute for a president, that he could just put
parameters around what the criteria would be and not actually
specifically off on each individual.
Speaker 1 (04:01):
You're exactly all right, Sean. He is not allowed to
do that. That's not how it works. He has to
do them individually, and he has to sign with his
own signature. Think about all the time and effort that
prosecutors went in to convicting these people of crimes, of
various crimes over the years. You had a jury in
most cases, and you had you know, a huge expense
(04:24):
to the tax first, and then all at once, Joe
Biden supposedly gives his unnamed unelected bureaucratic staff or the
authority to pardon them just just diminish everything that was
determined in the court of law. That's not how it works,
and by Joe Biden's own admission of The New York Times,
(04:45):
then those pardons should be ruled void in a court
of law. And I think you know, it's about more
than the pardon, Sean. It's about the executive orders, and
it's about the fact that you know, there's no evidence
that shows that there was any formal process where Joe
Biden told the individuals who were who were putting using
(05:07):
that autopend for pardons and executive orders that he knew
exactly which pardon or which executive order he was talking about.
He had read it inside out. And I want you
to sign my autopen because I'm out of town. The
other problem, Sean, is that seventy five percent of the
time they used the autopen, Joe Biden, according to the
(05:27):
White House logs, was in the White House. I mean,
none of this makes sense. It ill begged to the question,
did Joe Biden have any idea what his signature was
being signed on? And thus far I can say, I
haven't any evidence that was Jesse did.
Speaker 2 (05:44):
All right, So you're the chairman of the very powerful
House Oversight and Government or Reform Committee. You have been
doing interviews with people in the Biden White House. I
know you have other interviews scheduled, and you put out
subpoenas for people, and some people look operating and others
are not. So what is the status? What are you
learning as you interview these people?
Speaker 1 (06:06):
We're learning pretty much with The New York Times reported
that there's no evidence that Joe Biden had any idea
the overwhelming majority of what was being signed using the autobit.
There's no formal process. The people that have stuck the
documents in, the staffers that stuck the documents in and
(06:27):
hit the power button to sign Joe Biden's signature, never
heard from Joe Biden directly. In fact, in some cases
they went, you know, long periods of time without even
seeing Joe Biden. So you know, there was a very
select few that were calling the shots in the White House.
You mentioned, We've had several depositions and transcribed interviews. We
(06:47):
have several more scheduled. In fact, one tomorrow with Joe
Biden's former chief of staff, who already declined a scheduled
interview we had, so I had this pain of him
and bring bring him in. But we're going to get
to the answers of who was in fact calling the shots.
(07:09):
We brought the doctor in, doctor O'Connor, to see if
if you know, the first question we asked, doctor O'Connor,
did anyone ever try to get you to lie about
Joe Biden's health? And he pled the fifth? Sean, I mean, so,
I mean there's nothing good is coming out of this
At the end of.
Speaker 2 (07:27):
The did he plead the fifth throughout the entire interview.
Speaker 1 (07:30):
Through the whole interview, Through the whole interview, the only
question he answered was his name at the very beginning
of the position. You have to stay your name, and
he did that. Everything else he pled the fifth. Uh,
We're going to interview everyone, give everyone their due process,
give everyone an opportunity to tell the truth. Then we're
going to publish a report based on facts, handed over
(07:52):
to Pam Bondy at the Attorney General's office and let
them go from there. Because you know, when you talk
about accountability, the things that I want to see many
of these executive orders and pardons, these pardons like for
the Biden family, Are you kidding me? We're a direct
result of our investigational Mobsight committee for finding all the
(08:14):
money they cooked from people in foreign countries. Now you've
got executive orders that were signed in the last two
weeks of the Biden administration. They were signed using the
auto pen. There's no evidence Joe Biden knew anything about it.
He never had a bill signing ceremony, never had anything
like that, and they were done for the sole purpose
of Trump proofing the Trump administration. They're making it harder
(08:37):
for Donald Trump to shut down the government agency. They're
making it harder for Donald Trump to deport the criminal
need in legals. These were based on executive orders that
were signed using the auto pen on days when Joe
Biden was supposedly in the White House, but he never
answered questions about it. They never issued any statements. We
think all of these could very easily be declared void
(08:59):
in a course of allow and that would go a
long way to helping President Trump accomplish his agenda.
Speaker 2 (09:05):
All right, So let me ask you this, Would it
not invalidate all of these clemencies and pardons, especially in
the in the waning days of the administration, if there's evidence,
or if if he just laid out standards that should
be applied by his team and was not knowledgeable about
(09:25):
every single pardon, clemency, whatever he was offering people. And
he just laid out a criteria for his his I
guess staff to follow, and then an auto pen was used.
It seems to me that that would invalidate it. Is
there anything illegal that you can see here?
Speaker 1 (09:44):
Well, again, you know what Joe Biden admitted to was
he gave the authority, he verbally gave his the authority
to his staff to use his signature to pardon anyone
that's not legal. That's not like so Joe Biden's already
admitted to The New York Times, which is funny. That
should have been a slam dunk interview for Joe Biden. Instead,
(10:05):
it incriminated him even more. That's illegal. We question Joe
Biden's mental fitness. We're going to try to do some
things to create a situation where possibly the doctor can
have immunity to try to answer our questions. That still
doesn't mean he'll answer them or not, but we're going
(10:27):
to try to go to great links to get a
medical analysis from Joe Biden's doctors as to what his
true mental and physical health condition was to determine whether
or not these staffers or even communicating with Joe Biden.
They may have just been acting unilaterally, which which the
evidence would suggest. I think everything that was signed with
(10:50):
the auto pen, especially on days when Joe Biden was
in the White House, shun. I think everything can be
ruled invalid in a court of law.
Speaker 2 (10:58):
All right, let me go to this other And we
had you on TV last night with John Solomon. He
was also on this radio program yesterday. And you know
we have covered at length. I can't tell you how
many years we spent on Russia, Russia, Russia. And we
had a small ensemble cast of us that were able
to unfeel every layer of the onion and get to
(11:19):
the bottom and get to the truth of that entire story.
The most frightening part of it is that they knew
from the beginning that this was a Hillary Clinton campaign
bought and paid for dirty Russian disinformation dossier. And then
even though James come in particular was warned that it
was a political document of old people in August of
(11:42):
twenty sixteen, although he was worn in July as well
not to trust it, he still used it. It was
the basis of not one, but four FIZ applications. He
signed three of the four of them. He years later
went before Senator Graham before a committee hearing and admitted,
knowing what he knows now, as did every other person
that signed those FISA applications, admitted that knowing what they
(12:06):
know now, they never would have used it. But they
didn't know then. And that's the problem. Now what's happening
is we now have the door has been opened for
a special prosecutor to look into everything ranging from Russia
and the Russia hoax, to PISA abuse, to fifty one
(12:27):
former Intel agents that knew absolutely nothing about the very
real Hunter Biden laptop, all these incidences, the impact weaponization
against Donald Trump, false valuation of maur Lago, a novel
legal theory used by Alvin Bragg when the statute of
limitations had run out on a legal non disclosure agreement
(12:48):
which is only a mystimeter, and he turned it into
thirty four felony counts and to the ex all the
way through Jack Smith and the double standard with the
rate at mar Lago versus Hillary Clinton and Joe and
their top secret classified materials that they had and they
didn't get the same treatment. Now where do you see
this going? Because that to me seems like a ten
(13:09):
year you know, deep dive investigation.
Speaker 1 (13:13):
Yeah. Well, I think a lot of these committees have
already investigated. I think you go back to the work
that Devin Nunaz did when he was there. Uh, he
was the first person when when he was a ranking
member of the Intelligence Committee going up against Adam Schiff
to say that this was all a joke, a hoax.
Speaker 3 (13:31):
Uh.
Speaker 1 (13:32):
Then you've got you know, there's there's been stuff that
House Judiciary Committee's done, House Oversight Committee. I think a
lot of the investigative work's done. If it's what you're
seeing now from John Radcliffe and hopefully Cash Patel, they're
going to continue to expose the truth about how this
was all a hoax generated by the Clinton campaigns, the
(13:54):
Obama campaigns to try to take Trump down. I think
that the committees where comy and and then never testified
and lied. That's perjury. I think they should uh have
criminal referrals to the Department Justice. I think I think
that the CIA and the FBI should issue reports and
(14:14):
hand over to the Department Justice. And I think the
Attorney General should just start starting now and try to
get some accountability here for for perjury. For abuse of power.
I mean, the list goes on and on and on
and set an example out of these deep state actors.
The truth is known now, the evidence is out there.
(14:34):
There have been investigations from from various committees, there have
been Senate committees, center gradually, Ron Johnson, I mean, there
are a lot of different investigations that I think can
be pieced together without having a special counsel and just
go ahead and start to start the prosecution of these
criminals now, because that's what they are, criminals, and I
(14:55):
think the evidence is overwhelming.
Speaker 2 (14:57):
Well, we appreciate all your hard work and always being
generous your time to share with us an update us
on what's going on. These are very critical issues we
need to get to the bottom of. James Comer, Chairman,
House Government Reform and Oversight Committee, We appreciate your time, sir.
Speaker 1 (15:13):
Thank you, Sean, appreciate it.
Speaker 2 (15:15):
Five now till the top of the arrow. Will get
to your calls in just a minute. Here listen. Thanks
to your generosity, your thoughtfulness, your kindness. The Tunnel to
Towers Foundation, they're making lasting differences in real lives, lives
like the Ernst family and when US Navy Chief Petty
Officer Michael Thomas Ernst was killed in a training accident.
(15:39):
Well the Tunnel to Towers. They had the money you
provided and generously donated, and they were able to provide
this family a mortgage free home, and his loving family
had that burden lifted off of them. And since Tunnel
to Towers was founded in the aftermath of nine to eleven,
the Ernst family is one of many that you have
(16:00):
been able to help. And your help is desperately still
needed today. And you have now helped empower our most
catastrophically injured vets and first responders to reclaim their independence
and help provide specially adapted smart homes. But there is
a lot more to do. Many heroes, many of their families,
they are still in need. We can't forget America's heroes
(16:21):
have given so much, and together you know we can
all say thank you in a very lasting and a
very meaningful way. Anyway, please join us a team. Hannity
support the Tunnel to Towers Foundation. Go to their website.
It's the letter T, the number two, the letter T
dot org. The letter T the number two the letter
T dot org for the Tunnel to Towers Foundation. All right.
(16:43):
So there was a short gaggle earlier today before the
President added to Pennsylvania to talk about oil and gas
and AI and a variety of issues. Let me play
a little bit of that and then we'll get to
your calls.
Speaker 4 (16:57):
The president, your reaction to the latest numbers from the
Department saying that inflation rose slightly last month.
Speaker 3 (17:03):
Very slight.
Speaker 5 (17:04):
Essentially, they were exactly as anticipated, very low inflation. So
what you should do is lower the rate. Offen should
lower the rate immediately.
Speaker 3 (17:16):
There was a terror.
Speaker 5 (17:19):
Terror wear a big win with the Supreme Court on
the Department of Education, and we want, as.
Speaker 3 (17:25):
You know, we want to bring education back to the States,
take the federal government out of it.
Speaker 5 (17:31):
A little tiny bit of supervision, but very little, almost nothing,
like to make sure they speak English.
Speaker 3 (17:37):
That's about all we need. Yes, that's a question. I
give a Russia fifty days. What happens now? Do you
talk to Lamir prudent?
Speaker 5 (17:44):
But at the end of fifty days, if we don't
have a deal, it's gonna be uh too bad.
Speaker 3 (17:49):
Should Lenski get more aggressive? Yeah? The terroriffs are going
to go on and other sanctions go on.
Speaker 4 (17:56):
Lensky target Moscow, should the Lensky target MOSCOWT Sir should
do Lensky target Moscow or deeper in corruscial.
Speaker 3 (18:04):
He shouldn't target Moscow.
Speaker 5 (18:06):
Oh, I don't think fifty days is very long, and
it could be sooner than that.
Speaker 3 (18:10):
I don't think fifty days is very long. You should
have asked that same question to Biden. Why did he
get us into this war? You should ask that question, Yeah,
and what did he tell you? Why did he get
us into this war?
Speaker 5 (18:23):
You know why he got us in because he's a dummy,
that's why. And you don't and you don't cover it right.
But you should be asking that question to bite Why
did he get us.
Speaker 3 (18:31):
Into this war? Because he's incompetent.
Speaker 5 (18:34):
It would have never happened if I were president from Texas.
Speaker 3 (18:38):
You believe your.
Speaker 6 (18:39):
Harems minus n offer teflation to increase clap clus You
didn't had any.
Speaker 3 (18:44):
We had very little inflation. I don't know who do
you work for today? What you want to say today?
Speaker 1 (18:50):
Oh?
Speaker 5 (18:50):
Well, they wrote me a beautiful article the other day,
So I can't get angry at you us say today
just wrote a very good article about me. What's that
all about? So I can't get angry there was very
little inflation. As you know, the numbers were very good,
very much inside the margin. So we've had no inflation.
All we have is we're making a fortune. We are
(19:11):
taking in hundreds of billions of dollars. You say, we
had a surplus of twenty five billion dollars last month,
which we haven't had in many, many years. We are
doing because I got it, because I'm able to do it.
Speaker 3 (19:30):
Nobody else would be able to do it.
Speaker 5 (19:32):
We have tariffs going on because we want tariffs and
we want the money coming into the United States. But
more important than the money, there's two aspects of the tariffs.
Speaker 3 (19:43):
There's the money which comes in.
Speaker 5 (19:45):
The other aspect is that rather than paying the tariffs,
the country or the company will build in the United States,
make their product in the United States, and that creates jobs.
And I would say of the two, probably the more important.
Speaker 3 (20:00):
To me is that, yeah, are you are you? Are
you on your play's side?
Speaker 5 (20:04):
Now?
Speaker 3 (20:05):
No, I'm on nobody's side.
Speaker 5 (20:07):
I'm gonna know what I want to you know who
the side I'm on humanity side. I want to stop
the killing of thousands of people away and I want
to stop the killing. I want the killing to stop
in the Ukraine Russia war.
Speaker 3 (20:20):
That's the side I'm.
Speaker 4 (20:21):
On, mister President and your daughter, Mister President, your daughter.
Speaker 3 (20:25):
In law stand that there's that there should.
Speaker 4 (20:27):
Be transparency in the Epstein case.
Speaker 3 (20:29):
You will agree with her, sir uh.
Speaker 5 (20:31):
The Attorney General's handled that very well. She is She's
really done a very good job. And I think that
when you look at it, you'll understand that I would
like to see that also.
Speaker 3 (20:43):
But I think the Attorney general the credibility is.
Speaker 5 (20:46):
Very important and you want credible evidence with something like that,
and I think the Attorney General has handled it very well.
Speaker 4 (20:55):
The Attorneys general point view on the buk and FBI review.
Speaker 3 (21:00):
You tell that.
Speaker 5 (21:02):
What on the on what subject?
Speaker 3 (21:07):
There are a few other files. Turn her very very
quick briefing and.
Speaker 7 (21:11):
Did she tell you what did she tell you about
what you had specifically?
Speaker 3 (21:14):
Think she tell you and all that your name appeared?
Speaker 5 (21:18):
No, No, she's she's given us just a very quick briefing.
Speaker 3 (21:23):
And in terms of the credibility of the different things
that they've.
Speaker 5 (21:26):
Seen, and I would say that you know, these.
Speaker 3 (21:29):
Files were made.
Speaker 5 (21:30):
Up by Komi, they were made up by Obama, they
were made up by but the biting it from you know, uh,
we and we went through years of that with the
Russia Russia Russia hoax.
Speaker 3 (21:41):
With all of the different things that we had to
go through. We've gone through years of it. But she's
handled it very well and it's going to be up
to her.
Speaker 5 (21:48):
Whatever she thinks is credible. She should release yes on Texas.
Speaker 7 (21:53):
On Texas, how many more seats do you want the
Republicans to draw?
Speaker 3 (21:57):
Five?
Speaker 7 (21:58):
And then what if California, New York, Illinois and other
blue sp Well that's okay too.
Speaker 3 (22:03):
But five.
Speaker 5 (22:04):
I think we get five and there could be some
other states we're gonna get another three or four or five.
In addition, Texas would be the biggest one.
Speaker 7 (22:12):
And are you are you calling him for a complete
redrawing of the congressional Mapou are just a very simple redrawing.
Speaker 5 (22:18):
We pick up five seats and where we have a
couple of other states where we'll pick up seats also. Well,
when he was in my office, I told him, he's
doing your very bad job.
Speaker 3 (22:36):
He's way late. That's why I call him too late.
Jerome Powell is too late. He's way late. Interest rate
should be coming down.
Speaker 5 (22:45):
Where we have a very very successful country we should
have the lowest interest rate anywhere in the world, and
we don't. Jerome Powell has done a terrible job, and frankly,
I don't think he could do a worse job. He's
called everything wrong. They had a report come out the
other day seventy one different economis and me.
Speaker 3 (23:04):
You know who is right? Me? Did you know that
I was right? It was the president?
Speaker 5 (23:12):
Are you going to a mist now to another.
Speaker 3 (23:15):
As the next year? You must be kidding. That's the president.
There's a president. What are your thoughts on Andrews?
Speaker 5 (23:28):
We had to waste the question. We are talking to
the EU and we're making progress. But look, you know
we already have a deal with EU. It's called the
letter that was sent out. I think it was thirty percent.
Speaker 3 (23:46):
That's the EU.
Speaker 5 (23:47):
But we at the same time we are talking.
Speaker 3 (23:54):
Go ahead, mister president.
Speaker 4 (23:55):
Your reaction to Andrew Cuomo's saying in the New York
City mayor's race, Andrew Plomo staying in the New York
City mayor's race, I.
Speaker 3 (24:02):
Think we should stay. I think he's a shot. Would
you prefer him over I don't want to say, you know,
I'm a Republican, he's a Democrat. Or an independent. No,
I think Andrew would have a good shot of winning. Well,
he's got to run a tough campaign. Well, you know
he's running.
Speaker 5 (24:17):
Against the communists. I would think that he would have
a good shot of winning.
Speaker 3 (24:23):
Tell us about your trip to Scotland, sir, what are
you going to do on your trip to Scotland.
Speaker 5 (24:29):
We're going to be meeting with the British Prime Minister,
very respected.
Speaker 3 (24:33):
And we are going to have a meeting with him,
probably an Aberdeen.
Speaker 5 (24:38):
And we're going to do a lot of different things,
and we're going to also refine the trade deal that
we've made.
Speaker 3 (24:44):
So we'll be meeting.
Speaker 5 (24:45):
Mostly with the probably one of my properties, or maybe not,
depending on what happens, but we'll be an Aberdeen in Scotland,
meeting with the Prime Minister. With the retaliate, well, I
don't know how they can retaliate.
Speaker 3 (25:05):
You know, they've made a lot of money.
Speaker 5 (25:06):
They've treated us very badly, but now they're treating us
very nicely, and I think we'll end up. I think
everybody is going to be happy with the.
Speaker 3 (25:13):
EU meet with Pope over your future.
Speaker 5 (25:21):
Third, I'm not a plan I would do it. I
have a lot of respect I really like his brother.
His brother is a major serious trumper.
Speaker 3 (25:29):
You know that. He's mega all the way.
Speaker 5 (25:31):
I like the Pope's brother, and I think i'd like
the Pope. But the Pope's brother lives in Florida.
Speaker 3 (25:37):
I met him and he is maga. He's got maga
signs all over the house. He likes Trump and I
like him. The latest on a wrong how about you wrong?
He's found death. Well, we're going to see what happens
with President.
Speaker 5 (25:56):
So far, I've been very disappointed with President Putin. I've
so a lot of wars in the last three months,
but I haven't gotten this one yet.
Speaker 3 (26:05):
This is a Biden war, it's not a Trump war.
Speaker 5 (26:08):
I'm here to try and get us out of that message.
Speaker 3 (26:16):
An he messages for what? Yeah, go ahead, go have
a what.
Speaker 6 (26:26):
For the people of Brazil. Are you from Brazil?
Speaker 3 (26:30):
Okay? He's going to trial now? Right? When is that
trial starting? When is the trial for both scenarios starting?
(26:51):
When is it? How is it going now? But they
haven't found him guilty? But have they found him guilty?
Speaker 1 (27:04):
Now?
Speaker 7 (27:07):
On the hall?
Speaker 3 (27:09):
President Bolsonaro is a good man. I've gotten to.
Speaker 5 (27:13):
Know a lot of Prime ministers and presidents and kings
and queens, and I know him and I'm pretty good
at this. President Bolsonaro is not a dishonest man. He
loves the people of Brazil. He fought hard for the
people of Brazil. He negotiated trade deals against me for
the people of Brazil, and he was very.
Speaker 3 (27:31):
Tough, and he was.
Speaker 5 (27:32):
Tough because he wanted to do a good deal for
his country.
Speaker 3 (27:35):
He was not a dishonest man.
Speaker 5 (27:37):
And I believe it's a witch hunt and it shouldn't
be happening.
Speaker 3 (27:41):
It's not that I know.
Speaker 5 (27:43):
Him that Look, he's not like a friend of mine.
He's somebody that I know, and I know him as
a representative of millions of people, Brazilians. They're great people,
and he loves the country and he fought hard for
those people.
Speaker 3 (27:58):
And they want to put him in jail.
Speaker 5 (27:59):
And I think that's a witch hunt, and I think
it's very unfortunate, and nobody's happy with what Brazil is
doing because Bolsnario was a respected president, very respectful. You
say you want Adam sim Hunts.
Speaker 3 (28:17):
To justice, I'd love to see him brought to justice.
I think I'll tell you what I think.
Speaker 5 (28:23):
Adam Schiff is one of the lowest of the low
I would love to see him brought to justice.
Speaker 3 (28:29):
He is a dishonest cricket guy.
Speaker 5 (28:31):
I don't know about the individual charge, if that even happens.
Speaker 3 (28:35):
But Adam Shift is a serious lowlife.
Speaker 5 (28:37):
And Tomorrow Morning here wants to give the Nail team
the host go wrong Mom, Donny for Brekfice reunited.
Speaker 3 (28:46):
I'd love to be I'd really love to go. I mean,
I look forward to meeting him both. I know him
both very well through what I read and through what
I see.
Speaker 5 (28:55):
Look, he's a communist. I don't think our country is
ready for a guy immunists, but we're gonna see.
Speaker 3 (29:01):
And I don't think that race is over yet either.
You do have a couple of people running against and
I it'll be an interesting thing.
Speaker 5 (29:08):
Things are coming out about him which aren't good.
Speaker 3 (29:12):
And uh, you know AOC.
Speaker 5 (29:14):
Look, I think she's very nice, but she's very low
IQ and we really don't need low IQ. Between her
and Crockett. We're gonna give them both an IQ test
to see who comes out beast.
Speaker 3 (29:27):
Now. I took my test.
Speaker 5 (29:29):
I took a real test at Walter Reed Medical Center,
and I haste it. I got every one of all
those questions right now, it's time for them.
Speaker 3 (29:38):
To take a test. Anyway, have a good time.
Speaker 5 (29:43):
I like Dan Boys, all right.
Speaker 2 (29:51):
That was the president from earlier today, gaggle he held
prior to going to Pennsylvania to talk about uh, the
issues of energy, AI and all the things that are
going to hopefully make the economy grow at a level
we've never seen before. That's my hope. We wrap things
up for today. We got a great Hannity Set your
DVR nine eastern on the Fox News Channel. New Gingrich
(30:13):
will be with us. We'll get his historic view of
Trump's first six months. And Turntine is going to join
us on the absolute meltdown of his Democratic Party. Mark
Wayne Mullins tonight, Larry Cudlow on Trump calling on Jerome
Powell to lower interest rates once and for all. Also
a friend, Klay Travis. Set your DVR nine eastern. Hannity
(30:34):
on Fox. We'll see you tonight. Back here tomorrow. Thank
you for making this show possible.
The Sean Hannity Show News
Host
Sean Hannity
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.