Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Now back to the best of Sean Hannity.
Speaker 2 (00:10):
Well, we have come out to your city.
Speaker 3 (00:15):
Want to pay?
Speaker 2 (00:16):
I gets all saying you a comfort zone will be
desire how a tela and if you want a little
banging again.
Speaker 3 (00:27):
Here I come along.
Speaker 4 (00:29):
I don't think that we should have billionaires because frankly,
it is so much money in a moment of such inequality.
Speaker 5 (00:35):
This isn't just about mister mom Donny as an individual.
This is about the message that the people of New
York City are trying to send to our party.
Speaker 2 (00:44):
What do you think the message is?
Speaker 6 (00:46):
Uh, people want to be able to afford to dream
and they want a government that bets on them.
Speaker 7 (00:53):
Freedom is back in style.
Speaker 8 (00:57):
Welcome to the revolution.
Speaker 1 (01:00):
Coming to your site, going the way out against Aalzentane.
Speaker 2 (01:06):
You a concosult.
Speaker 1 (01:09):
New Sean Hennity show more me, I'm the scenes, information
on freaking news and more bold inspired solutions for America.
Stay right here for our final news roundup and information overload.
Speaker 2 (01:24):
All right, News Roundup and information Overload. Our toll free
are numbers eight hundred and ninety four one.
Speaker 3 (01:30):
Sean.
Speaker 2 (01:30):
If you want to be a part of the program,
as I have said many many times, the radicals that
run New York City and and places like Los Angeles
and Chicago and San Francisco and other places around the country,
these deep blue states and cities the most radical people there.
(01:51):
Now you have, according to Polymarket as of yesterday, I
haven't checked today, seventy six percent chance that Zoran Marxist
Mondami is going to be the next mayor of New
York City. Here's mom Donnie explaining why Palestine is part
of his politics.
Speaker 7 (02:09):
Listen, this is how we defeat the occupation.
Speaker 2 (02:14):
Style.
Speaker 7 (02:17):
So the third holy grail of taboos in American politics.
Speaker 2 (02:20):
You have socialism of Islam.
Speaker 4 (02:22):
And then you have Palestine, and you are really going
for the trifecta.
Speaker 7 (02:26):
Let's go. Let's go tell me why is Palestine a
part of your politics? When you grow up as someone,
especially in the Third World, you have a very different
understanding of the Palacine struggle. It is one that is
framed in terms of empathy and solidarity.
Speaker 2 (02:42):
What part of what happened October seventh, What part of
tens and hundreds of thousands of rockets fired into Israel
by enemies in Gaza and Lebanon and the Huti rebels
and the Iranians. Does he not understand October seventh, that
would be the equivalent of you rapilate out the population
of Israel compared to the US of forty thousand dead
(03:04):
Americans in a day. We lost two nine hundred and
seventy seven on nine to eleven and oh one. I'm
not sure what part of murder and rape and kidnapping
and torture and beheading people like Marxist Mondani don't seem
to understand, is Mondani? You know? Defending taxing wider neighborhoods.
Speaker 5 (03:27):
We went on your website and realized there's a policy
proposal that says your plan, and I'm going to quote
it for folks, is to shift the tax burden from
overtaxed homeowners and the outer boroughs to more expensive homes
in richer and wider neighborhoods. Explain why you are bringing
race into your tax proposal.
Speaker 6 (03:46):
That is just a description of what we see right now.
It's not driven by race. It's more of an assessment
of what neighborhoods are being under taxed versus overtaxed. We've
seen time and again that this is a property tax
system that is inequitable.
Speaker 2 (04:00):
And why bring up race If it's not about race,
you're making it about race, you know. Then him saying
clearly not a capitalist, but a Marxist, that I don't
think we should have billionaires. This is going to be
great for New York City's economy, not really. Florida is
going to see growth like they've never seen before if
this guy gets elected.
Speaker 4 (04:20):
Listen, I don't think that we should have billionaires because, frankly,
it is so much money in a moment of such inequality.
And ultimately, what we need more of is equality across
our city and across our state and across our country.
Speaker 2 (04:34):
Two each according to their need, from each according to
their ability, and as determined by the big hand of government.
That is, by definition, Marxism, communism, statism, call it whatever
you want. And he even went as far as to
give the textbook definition, the dictionary definition for socialism, and
(04:57):
that is seizing the means of production.
Speaker 8 (04:59):
Listen, we have to continue to elect more socialists, and
we have to ensure that we are unapologetic about our socialism.
It is very critical for all of us to remember
what it is that we are fighting for and to
remember that our agenda is an agenda that must not
be dictated by calculus, but by conviction. And what I
(05:20):
mean by that is that the many.
Speaker 4 (05:22):
Things that we believe, some of them are already popular
in this moment right now, right If we're talking about
the cancelation of student debt, if we're talking about Medicare
for all, you know, these are issues which have the
groundswell of popular support across this country. But then there
are also other issues that we firmly believe in, whether
it's BDS right or whether it's the end goal of
(05:43):
seizing the means of production, where we do not have
the same level of support at this.
Speaker 2 (05:49):
Very moment end goal to seize the means of production. Anyway,
This is a return appearance. It's been a while. Chris
Han is the host of the ever so popular and
growing Chris Han Show and an acolyte disciple of Chucky Schumer. Uh,
(06:10):
you missed me? How are you? How many affiliates are
you up to? Now?
Speaker 3 (06:13):
I do miss you. I'm on a lot of affiliates
right now. I don't know how many. And it's the Chris.
Speaker 2 (06:19):
About how many is it ten, twenty thirty?
Speaker 3 (06:21):
It's probably in between twenty and thirty somewhere like that.
Speaker 2 (06:24):
I'm we're up to we're we're up to about seven
sixty or seven seventy something like that.
Speaker 3 (06:29):
Razy be hooking You should be hooking your brother up
and tagging me onto your shows man, so that I
could you know, crossing door.
Speaker 2 (06:35):
Look, let me ask you a question. If I ask you,
Chris Han, are you against racism? What would you say?
Speaker 3 (06:41):
I am one hundred percent against racism and.
Speaker 2 (06:43):
You're against anti semitism one hundred percent?
Speaker 3 (06:45):
Right, I'm half do it?
Speaker 2 (06:47):
You and I? You and I. This may be a
rare moment of solidarity. We get along, Okay? Is it
hard to condemn the global Antifada?
Speaker 3 (06:57):
It is not hard to condemn the global antifi At first,
you had to understand what that means, which I don't
know that this thirty three year old does.
Speaker 2 (07:04):
Oh. I think he does know what it means. If
you listen to all the other comments that he has made,
he knows damn well what it means. And you know,
holy war part of it. And it is scary. Do
you think that anyone should promote a policy that taxes
one race more than another race? What do you call
(07:25):
what would Chris Han call that? Because I have a
word in my mind? What I if I would isolate
out one race over another, what would you call that?
Speaker 3 (07:35):
Chris Han, I suggest that a lot of politicians that
don't think they're going to win, And Okay, he won
and he's at the polymarket as him at seventy six
percent chance as of yesterday to win the general.
Speaker 2 (07:50):
What do you call it when you isolate out and
want to tax one race higher than another race? I
think there's an easy word to describe that.
Speaker 3 (07:58):
I would say that that's a race spate taxation, which
I don't race based caut text.
Speaker 2 (08:02):
No, no, no, no, I think you're I think you're no, no,
you're you're trying to uh, you're trying to water it down.
What do you What do you really call it? I?
Speaker 3 (08:12):
I don't like it? Is what I call it.
Speaker 2 (08:14):
What if a politician said that they want to tax
African Americans more than others? What would you call that?
Speaker 3 (08:21):
I think we would have the same problem with that.
Speaker 2 (08:23):
What would you call it? Come on, help me out here?
Speaker 3 (08:26):
Is we'd call it a race?
Speaker 2 (08:27):
Thank you? Ding ding ding ding ding. Jeopardy Now our
double jeopardy question. Are you ready?
Speaker 1 (08:33):
Wait?
Speaker 3 (08:33):
Hold on a second, everybody is counting out my former
radio partner, Curtis Leewa in this election, and I think
if he tightens it up a little bit, it's gonna
be a little closer than you think, especially if it's
the four person race.
Speaker 2 (08:45):
Oh we'll see. I mean, I would think that Eric
Adams and Cuomo, who stayed in this would shocked. I
think a lot of people and Marxist Mona Donnie, I think,
uh that that might create a lane for Curtis, no
doubt about it. And I think Curtis Curtis would institute
the policies of Rudy when Rudy was married. Do you
agree with that?
Speaker 3 (09:05):
I think some of them, and maybe some of them
in a better way. Curtis is not as dumb as
people think he is. He's very smart. I've spent a
lot of time.
Speaker 2 (09:13):
Nobody thinks Curtis is dumb. And he's been a long
time friend. And don't say that about my friend.
Speaker 3 (09:17):
He's my friend too. I've known him forever and I
worked with him for years. And I think his policies
are a little bit more in line with what traditional
New Yorkers think than people think. And I think that
counting him out at this point in time, especially if
Cuomos days in. I think if Cuomost days in, he
has a real lane. He got twenty eight point five
percent four years ago, Curtis did. And I know that
(09:38):
because I was the first person to talk to him
after he lost on the radio and uh, and he
kept saying at thirty and I reminded him he was
twenty eight point five. Well, if he could turn that
twenty eight point point five into thirty two percent, he
could win in a four man race. If he could
turn into thirty four percent, he has a chance in
the three man race.
Speaker 2 (09:54):
So I totally agree with you, and I think that's very,
very possible, even though Democrats out number of Republicans nine
to one. Well, there's let me ask you the hard question,
because now I'm going to go straight to the heart
of it. What is Chucky Schumer and Jerry Nadler and
people like that, other prominent New Yorkers did Chuck Schumer
(10:15):
and Jerry Nadler? Did they endorse mom Donnie?
Speaker 3 (10:20):
I didn't see an endorsement. I think they saw an
acknowledgement that he won the primary and won.
Speaker 2 (10:25):
Them an acknowledgement, an acknowledgement that he.
Speaker 3 (10:27):
Won the primary, and he won it in a similar
way to Trump won his primary. It was a populist
campaign that was very popular that got a lot of
people excited. It didn't look you went down a road
about statements he made that most people don't know. And
when he campaigned, he campaigned on things like lowering prices.
Sounded a lot like Trump in twenty twenty four. I
think that the squishy mission middle voted for Trump because
(10:49):
he said he was going to get down prices. And
by the way, he didn't have to give a plan,
neither did Trump. He just wanted people want to know
that the person who they're going to vote for cares
about the issues they care about and they're going to
try to fix it. And I think he took on
all comers. He went on a lot of different types
of broadcasts. I think he ran a very successful campaign.
I reached out to people on the Clomo campaign the
beginning of June's saying, what are you guys doing. You're
(11:11):
running Elliot Spitzer's failed comeback for controller campaign, and this
guy is coming up on you and he's going to
pass you because he's exciting and young and hip, and
you're staying in your bunker like Harris did against against
Trump in twenty twenty four, and it just doesn't work.
You've got when you're running for public office, you need
to appear in public.
Speaker 2 (11:30):
All right, quick break, Well, come back Chuck Schumer's former disciple,
our friend Chris Hahn of the Chris Han Show. More
with him on the other side than we'll get to
your calls coming up straight ahead. Eight hundred nine four one, Shawn,
as we continue, You're.
Speaker 1 (11:50):
On the Sean Hannity Show, a place where free speech
and the First Amendment are still alive.
Speaker 2 (11:57):
And well, liberalism is a sailed id.
Speaker 1 (12:00):
Get your dose of independence and liberty every weekday right
here with Sean Sean Hannity.
Speaker 2 (12:27):
Chris Mount is with us post of his own podcast,
and he's on a couple of radio stations around the country,
and we appreciate him being back with us. Friend of
Chuck Schumer, do you not think that this is a
now a big problem, Like I know a lot of
people in your party have just scratching their heads and
they're wondering why they lost in the against Donald Trump,
(12:52):
for example. Right, Okay, anyway, by the way, Chuck Schumer
did call and he did congratulate Mom Donnie on social media.
I've known Mom Donnie since we've worked together, et cetera,
et cetera. He ran an impressive campaign connected with New
Yorkers about affordability, fairness, and opportunity. Where is his criticism
(13:12):
about the issues we just discussed. Why isn't Chuck Schumer.
I'm going to tell you what the answer is. I'm
not even going to ask you because you're too close
to him and you're not gonna want to hear it.
Chuck Schumer is afraid of Mom Donnie. He's afraid of AOC.
He has a seventeen percent approval rating your friend, and
AOC would wipe the floor with him, according to recent
(13:34):
polls in a primary in New York, and he would lose.
So Chuck Schumer I don't think likes Mandamie in his heart,
but doesn't have the courage of his convictions to go
out there and say it. And you're going to tell
me I'm wrong, but you know, deep down in your heart,
I am dead on accurate.
Speaker 3 (13:52):
I think that in a campaign Trump, Chuck Humor would
be any comer.
Speaker 2 (13:56):
For his wrong wrong, Then put your money where your
mouth is. If AOC primaries him. I'll take that.
Speaker 3 (14:04):
Bet, all right, steak dinner. Baby, you're on.
Speaker 2 (14:07):
You're now bigger.
Speaker 3 (14:08):
I wanted to hurt on Long Islandan, I.
Speaker 2 (14:13):
Don't go back to New York. I'm not welcome in
New York anymore.
Speaker 8 (14:15):
Hurt.
Speaker 3 (14:16):
That might hurt me, it won't hurt you.
Speaker 2 (14:19):
Well, the thing is okay. He wants to not only freeze,
rent and seize buildings if he deems it necessary, raised
property taxes, corporate taxes. He wants to quote tax the
rich at record levels. You do you believe in replacing
police with social workers, because that's what he wants to do.
Do you believe in free buses and government operated grocery stores?
(14:42):
Do you think that we should have free childcare so
we can indoctrinate kids but from the moment they're born.
Do you think that you know, each new parent should get,
you know, a goodie bag with us with resources, diapers,
baby wipes. Do you think that you do what's.
Speaker 3 (15:00):
Wrong with giving what is wrong with giving childcare to people?
What is wrong with nothing?
Speaker 2 (15:04):
Why don't why don't why don't you? Why don't you?
Why don't you democrats get together and generously donated? If
you see a need.
Speaker 3 (15:09):
Tax deductions for all sorts of things. In this country.
Speaker 2 (15:12):
We give break, I give I'd give donations all the time.
I don't talk about it, but if I see somebody
in need, I absolutely give them money.
Speaker 3 (15:18):
Winners and losers in our tax policy all over the place.
Why can't parents and renters and people that take the bus?
Why can't they be winners? And here's the point you're
missing about mom Domi and about Trump. They appealed to
what people were caring about at the moment, and it
still seems to be the affordability issue which Trump appealed
to in twenty twenty four. It's the same campaign. These
(15:40):
are very similar campaigns. I've compared Mondami favorably to Trump
and to Trump's campaigns. This is the future of campaigning.
With Chuck Schumer and with other traditional Democrats need to
understand that going forward, you can't just talk about the
policies that you passed and the accomplishments you've had, because
if that was the case, Clomo would be be running
from marrying. Are you a lot of accomplishments in.
Speaker 2 (16:00):
This last question?
Speaker 3 (16:02):
You got to you got to you got to focus
on what people care about at the time, and you've
got to say, look, this is what I care about.
Speaker 2 (16:07):
Right, So here's where we are. You're supporting mom DOMI.
You got the squad, you got AOC, you got Grandpa Bernie,
you know. And and now you have Democrats on record
voting to champion the rights of men to play women's
sports in Chuck Schumer's Senate. Then you had the Senate
last night or the early this morning vote for the
(16:28):
largest tax increase in history. They didn't stand up for
working men and women and cut tax on tips in overtime. Uh,
they did. They allowed the border to be invaded over
the last four years, and Democrats lied about it. That
allowed in terrorists and murderers and rapists and cartel and
gang members.
Speaker 1 (16:47):
Uh.
Speaker 2 (16:47):
You have a party that's against energy dominance, your party
that literally allowed our military to be depleted and our
strategic oil reserves to be depleted. I mean, you don't
understand why you lost when you had a candidate that wants,
you know, taxpayer funded sex change operations for illegals.
Speaker 3 (17:08):
I don't think you understand, Sean. I don't think any
of that matters. Right now. You have a party that
just voted to take away health insurance for fourteen million people.
Speaker 2 (17:15):
Not true, has no no. They put in a work requirement,
so you have to tell the truth. I'll tell you what.
Stay right there. I'm gonna I'm gonna hold over Chris Hahn.
This is the biggest opportunity for a real radio audience
in his life. I'm going to give him a chance.
And I have one remaining question for you. Okay. On
the other side, you are listening to the best of
the Sean Hannity Show, and stay tuned. More memorable moments,
(17:38):
interesting guests, and a lot of fun coming up next.
(17:59):
More of the best that the Sean Hannity Show coming up.
Speaker 1 (18:03):
Draining the swamp one a corrupt politician at a time.
This is The Sean Hannity Show.
Speaker 2 (18:12):
Twenty five now til the top of the hour, eight
hundred and nine to four one. Shawn, if you want
to be a part of the program, all right. I
didn't want to rush you off the air. Chris Han.
I kid him because, uh, Chris is actually a pretty
good guy for a liberal, but he's crazy and he's
Are you still best for bff with Chucky?
Speaker 3 (18:27):
I wouldn't say I'm bff, but I am still part
of this humor family without a doubt.
Speaker 2 (18:32):
Okay, I bet he wasn't said when I left town?
Did he make any comments to you, like I'm so
glad he left a couple of years ago.
Speaker 3 (18:37):
Oh, he called me up. He said, you know, Chuck
Sean Hannity left down, Christopher, what's going for this place?
Speaker 2 (18:45):
That's pretty good? Did he really call you or no?
Speaker 3 (18:48):
No, but he called me every day for six years
when I worked for him. So you never forget the
freaking voice.
Speaker 2 (18:52):
That is funny. Chuck doesn't seem to like me. He's
never come on my show. He doesn't like to he
doesn't like me. Think about I don't like the guy,
but he's the here's the fundamental problem for Chuck, and
you're just denying the reality of it. So you have
Marxist Mondani win this mayoral race. You have AOC who
(19:12):
might primary Chuck. We'll see what happens. You have this
radicalism and this is this is what happened in the
last election. Your party, the Democratic Party, you had a
candidate that supports that. Well, first of all, that was
part of an administration that led and said the borders
were closed and the borders were secure. We have known terrorists, murderers, rapist,
(19:33):
cartel members, gang all came in under Biden and Harris.
And she wants as part of the open border mentality,
she wanted taxpayer funded sex change operations for illegals and
for convicts. Her running mate wanted taxpayer funded college tuition
for illegals. Then, of course he wanted gender affirming care
(19:54):
without parental consent, this guy. And then he wanted to
put tampons in grade school boys bathrooms. If that makes it,
you know, if that's your policy. And now you've got
a guy that wants to replace police with social workers,
wants to tax white people more than people of other races.
This is a guy that wants to freeze rent, raise
(20:14):
taxes on everybody, offer everything is free, free free across
the board, and promote the trans agenda, raise the minimum
wage to thirty bucks. Then he wants to eliminate all
guns in New York and swears that he's going to
fight ice and deportation. And I'm just trying to understand it.
(20:40):
If you and Chuck realize that you can't win on
these platforms, that your party has become way more extreme
than it's ever been, do you see that reality I'll
let you have the last word.
Speaker 3 (20:53):
Well, there was a lot to what you just said there.
But here's the reality. The reality is nobody can win
when you're drilling down into small components of people. You
need broad based appeals. That's why Trump won, That's why
Mondami won. If he wins in November, that is going
to be why he wins, because he appealed to a
(21:14):
broad base of people, across demographics, across party lines, across
you know, wealth.
Speaker 2 (21:19):
Respectfully, you're not addressing where your party is championing the
rights of men to play women's sports, putting the rights
of the illegals like Abrego Garcia over the safety of others.
Address the real issues.
Speaker 3 (21:33):
The party, the Democratic Party needs to needs to focus
on core issues. They need to come up with them
four core values that they stand for that appeal broadly.
You're talking about issues that appeal very narrowly, that have
been blown up out of a portion I think successfully
by challenges to Democrats. But Democrats can can push back
(21:56):
on that with broad popular.
Speaker 2 (22:00):
Mom Donnie is the embodiment of all these radical policies.
He's doubling down and taking it further global antifata Oh great.
Speaker 3 (22:09):
Yeah, well, look, I mean, you know, a lot of
the policies of the right were unpopular, and then Trump
doubled down on them, and that here's why they're popular.
Speaker 2 (22:17):
Which which policy was unpopular with Trump?
Speaker 3 (22:20):
I don't know, rounding up people that are making your bagels.
Speaker 2 (22:23):
In the morning and nobody nobody's no, they're trying to
They're they're deporting people like in Los Angeles they were
arresting child molesters, murderers, gang members, and and other violent criminals.
Don't do you do you think that Harris and Biden
did the right thing, but with open borders and chucks
that by that idly Bien did nothing. Do you think
(22:44):
that was the right call?
Speaker 3 (22:45):
I think that there was a very sick There was
a piece of legislation that would have solved this problem
that Trump stopped because he walked.
Speaker 2 (22:52):
Oh Trump, Trump wasn't in office. This is Biden's policy.
Speaker 3 (22:56):
Stop the bill.
Speaker 2 (22:59):
Okay, But Trump he's proven you don't need legislation. His
policies have not been codified into law. He just put
out presidential directives, which Biden could have done.
Speaker 3 (23:09):
Yeah, And I remember being on your show when Obama
was president and you rallying against that kind of action
by a president. I remember it.
Speaker 2 (23:18):
Actually, actually no, that's not true. But we'll go back
and we'll listen to the tape look at it. But
you're trying to avoid my question. These are this is
now your party. Your party lied to the American people
for four years and said the borders closed, the borders secure.
They lied and said inflation as transitory. They lied and
(23:40):
said that Joe was not cognitively impaired. When did you
notice a cognitive impairment?
Speaker 3 (23:47):
Well, look, I wasn't in a campaign, budd and.
Speaker 2 (23:50):
Ask you if you're in the campaign. I'm not in
the campaign. And I started reporting on it in twenty nineteen.
When did you first notice?
Speaker 3 (23:56):
Let me tell you, I've been on your show a
few times during the Biden administration, and I reach out
to people inside and I was given the run around too.
Speaker 2 (24:02):
And when did you first notice it?
Speaker 3 (24:04):
I first started thinking about it in like twenty nineteen,
and I started saying not twenty nineteen, twenty twenty two.
I started thinking it in that regardless of what is
going on here, didn't think you would run again. And
then when we saw the disastrous debate, I was one
of the first people to say, get this guy out
of here.
Speaker 2 (24:20):
But again, and do you think that running a candidate
that supports taxpayer funded sex change operations for illegals was
a good idea?
Speaker 3 (24:29):
That was a Trump administration policy and that clip.
Speaker 2 (24:32):
Was that was not a Trump administration policy. Nobody had
a sex change operation she's on She's on tape saying
she supported it. Find that with Trump never not happening.
Speaker 3 (24:43):
That tape was made in twenty nineteen when Trump was You.
Speaker 2 (24:48):
Think Tim Walls was was a good choice supporting tampons
in Greade school boys bathrooms.
Speaker 3 (24:56):
I don't think the policy was to put it in
boys bathrooms. I think it's a block.
Speaker 2 (24:59):
It was.
Speaker 3 (25:00):
No.
Speaker 2 (25:00):
And taxpayer funded tuition for illegals, was that a good policy?
Speaker 3 (25:05):
I think tax I think having tuition for college for
people who get ahead or here who are dreamers, I
think that's something American support.
Speaker 2 (25:11):
No for illegal immigrants, people that didn't respect our laws,
border and sovereignty.
Speaker 3 (25:15):
He were doing it for dreamers who people actually if
you pull them, want to see them stay here. And
they were okay.
Speaker 2 (25:22):
So you're avoiding the question why couldn't Why couldn't members
of your party stand for the family of Lake and Riley.
When President Trump gave a speech, a joint session speech,
Why couldn't they stand for the for the mother Alexis Nungary,
who we've interviewed on this show, the lost her twelve
year old little daughter, who Biden Harris illegals that brutally
(25:46):
raped and murdered her. Why didn't your party stand for them?
Speaker 3 (25:50):
Yeah? Look, I think they should have stand for them.
Speaker 2 (25:53):
You think they should have. You don't think that? Doesn't
that show a lack of heart, soul and a conscience.
Speaker 3 (25:58):
I think when somebody loses a loved one, you want
to respect them and have empathicizes.
Speaker 2 (26:03):
But your party didn't. What does that tell you about
your party? You're friends with these people?
Speaker 3 (26:08):
Again, Elections are about appealing to broad bases of people,
broad groups of people, not bases.
Speaker 2 (26:14):
I should say, you're giving me cliches and platitudes. Why
didn't your party stand and why don't you just say
it was a disgraceful moment for my party?
Speaker 3 (26:23):
I said they should have stand. Sean, did you not
hear me? I said it?
Speaker 2 (26:27):
Yeah?
Speaker 3 (26:27):
I mean reception bad in Texas or wherever you are today.
I mean it's in New York. We hear, but it is.
It is something they should have done. Why they didn't,
I don't know. I don't answer for them, But what
I would suggest is they don't give their opponents these
openings and they just stick to a to a mantra
(26:49):
of issues that are broad issues.
Speaker 2 (26:52):
I'm going to make two predictionsden Is Chuck Schumer will
not have the courage to condemn Mom Donnie. And two,
if he is primaried by AOC, he will lose, and
he will lose spectacularly.
Speaker 3 (27:06):
I don't know.
Speaker 2 (27:07):
I'm a former New York. I don't even go back
to New York. I have not been to Rothmans in
two years. Do you know that?
Speaker 3 (27:14):
Oh, you know you'll be coming next year or two
years from now after the primary, when you're buying a stake.
Speaker 2 (27:18):
No, no, I'm never going back.
Speaker 3 (27:20):
And you know you love Rothmans. Just come back. I'll
give you a pass.
Speaker 2 (27:24):
I love Rothmans. The guys that are from Rothmans are
building a place not far from me. Well, then, you know,
like every other New York company, they're getting out, and
if you were smart, you get out too.
Speaker 3 (27:35):
You could send your jet for me and I'll have
dinner with you at Rothmans in Texas wherever.
Speaker 2 (27:39):
You are the typical liberal, you want something for free.
I'm not paying for your plane. Fair.
Speaker 3 (27:43):
I'm gonna lose the bat, so of course I want it.
You can even up here. I'll come there. But you know,
if I'm coming there, you're flying me.
Speaker 2 (27:51):
Listen, you and I both know the deep in Chuck
Schumer's heart. He knows that this is crackpot stuff. I
know he knows it because he's never advocated this crap
in his life. I've never really liked him, but I
don't think he's a total nut job like the squad.
I don't, and I think that, you know, Unfortunately, he's
getting more extreme. But the thing is he fears his
(28:14):
party now more than ever. Chuck Schumer is afraid, and
rather than just do the honorable thing and just realize
this party doesn't represent my values anymore and just you know,
let his term run out and let somebody else take over,
he's going to try and fight it out, and it's
not going to be pretty for him.
Speaker 3 (28:33):
We'll see, Sean, We'll see maybe that kitchen New York.
Speaker 2 (28:38):
No never, I'm not not in happening, not coming back.
I am gone told my house, I don't have a
I don't have a house there.
Speaker 3 (28:47):
I got I got a spare room. You can crash here.
Speaker 2 (28:50):
No, I'd rather forget it. I get a free hotel
room on at Roosevelt Hotel. That's the city. They'll give
it to you. You'll stay closed, Lindicals, they closed.
Speaker 3 (29:02):
You'll fit in perfectly.
Speaker 2 (29:05):
Uh. You got to admit the case against your party
is weak. Just admit it. And you just admit we're
in a bad spot right now. You're right handed. We've
been taken over by radicals. We got to refocus our attention.
We got to get back to bread and butter issues.
But here's your The problem is you can't with Jasmine
Crockett and AOC and mom Donnie the Marxist. You can't.
(29:27):
You can't. You cannot recover. Kamala Harris, Tim, Timmy Tampon, Tim,
you can't recover from that.
Speaker 3 (29:35):
I just said we got to get back to bread
and butter issues. You know I didn't say it bread
and butter. But yeah, why don't you.
Speaker 2 (29:41):
Just support Trump and suck it up? Go ahead and
say I support Trump's policy.
Speaker 3 (29:45):
Support Trump. I don't hate Trump, but I'm not going
to support Trump.
Speaker 2 (29:49):
I don't like everyone on your party hates Trump.
Speaker 3 (29:52):
Nobody, they all hate him. I think hate is not
worth it. I don't like hating anyone.
Speaker 2 (30:00):
And why did they lie about the value? You know,
I can go through the chapter and verse. They they
had no problem with all of the law fair and
the weaponization against him.
Speaker 3 (30:11):
Seems like he's doing a little law fare of his
own right now, don't you think no, Oh no, you don't. No,
you don't think he's the rest of the congresswoman in
New Jersey was warranted?
Speaker 2 (30:22):
You don't think that, well that first of all, Donald
Trump did not make that decision. Are you saying that
it's perfectly acceptable for a congresswoman, as the allegation goes,
is interfering with the police, law enforcement and doing their job.
You think that's acceptable? Is that part of your defund
dismantle no bail law mentality?
Speaker 3 (30:42):
I think she was doing her job, and I think.
Speaker 2 (30:45):
That disrupting, disrupting law enforcement, I mean they were interfering
in their in their work. What's called obstruction Where I grew.
Speaker 3 (30:53):
Up, Congress last time I checked, the Constitution says Congress
is going to be a check of balance on the presidency,
and that means you get to visit federal You.
Speaker 2 (31:01):
Can check and balance all you want, but you can't.
You can't interfere in law enforcement in the middle of
an operation.
Speaker 3 (31:07):
There was no operation going on. They were going.
Speaker 2 (31:10):
Actually was you're wrong.
Speaker 3 (31:11):
Okay, Well, let's see what the court says. But it
seems like a little law fair. There seems like a
little law fair against the attorney general in New York.
Seems like that's going on right now. So if they
really think that it was law fair, maybe they wouldn't
engage in law.
Speaker 2 (31:26):
Do you think an attorney general should run in any
state on a platform to go after one man, one organization,
and and one family the way that the attorney general
in New York did with quote the phrase I'm gonna
get Trump. Is that acceptable to you?
Speaker 3 (31:44):
I think if there is evidence of a crime.
Speaker 2 (31:47):
I'm gonna get Trump. I'm gonna so I'll become attorney
general on a platform I'm going to get Chris Hahn.
Speaker 3 (31:54):
Now, look, I think it's I think no one is
above the law. And I don't think from what.
Speaker 2 (31:58):
And what law did Trump break?
Speaker 3 (32:00):
He was convicted, He.
Speaker 2 (32:02):
Was convicted of what what was the conviction about? It was?
It was Trump? First of all, the charges were a
novel legal theory. You know the statute of limitations that
run out. You know that it was a legal nda.
It was paid for as a legal expense, and it
was done by a lawyer. Listen, Chris Han, the Chris
(32:22):
Han Show. Appreciate your time, Chris. Good to catch up
with you, and God bless you. If you're down on Florida,
let me know when you're freezing up there in the wintertime,
give me a call.
Speaker 3 (32:30):
I will I'll talk you, sir.
Speaker 2 (32:32):
Eight hundred and nine four one show on the Tunnel
to Towers Foundation. They support America's greatest heroes. You'rs service members,
first responders, people that die or are catastrophically injured in
the line of duty. And you can help these heroes
and help these Tunnel to Towers programs and they never
forget programs. Just go to their website. It's the letter T,
the number two, the letter T dot org. We hope
(32:54):
you'll donate generously so this great work continues. That's the
letter T, the number two, the letter T.
Speaker 1 (33:05):
The information you need, the troth you demand.
Speaker 3 (33:09):
This is the Sean Hannity Show.
Speaker 2 (33:31):
I'm gonna turn wrap things up for today. We're going
to cover probably tomorrow considering the jury and the Diddy trial.
They did come to verdicts on every count but won
the rico charge, so the judge sent him home for
the day and wants them to keep deliberating. But we'll
have that probably tomorrow. Also, the latest on the Big
Beautiful Bill in the House. Tonight on Hannity, we have
(33:51):
Governor Ron DeSantis, Christy Nomley with the Presidents Today, Alligator Alcatraz,
Mike Johnson on the Big Beautiful Bill, break Jared and
the Diddy Trial. All coming up nine Eastern Hannaday, I'm Foxy.
Then back here tomorrow. Thank you for making the show possible. Hey,
there's still a lot more ahead on the best of
the Sean Hannity Show. Stay tuned for more right afternoons
on this station.