Who Was Sam Houston?

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
All right, we're loaded up today and man want to
show we have eight hundred and ninety four one sean
if you want to be a part of the program.
Another huge drop by James O'Keefe and Project Veritas. And
they actually got a video of reporter Amy Robach and

(00:21):
she was on Mike on camera talking to a producer
and obviously really annoyed that she had the story of
Jeffrey Ebstein for three years, lockdown, tight, and that it
was spiked by ABC. I mean the whole thing. We had,
the whole allegation about Prince Andrew, we had Clinton, we

(00:41):
had everything. I got a little concerned about why I
couldn't get on. She describes the interview with the woman
who had the courage to come forward. She says she
had pictures, had everything, she had been hiding for twelve years,
and then they convinced her to do the interview. And
you know who's Jeffrey Epstein. No one knows who that

(01:04):
was there. This is a stupid story. Well, now she's
having a backtrack a little bit. I'm sure pressure from
within ABC. You know, ABC puts out a stupid statement
where do not do not meet our standards. Oh, Okay, yeah,
as if they have standards, they have any standards with
Donald Trump? Now, any standards You've got mister war Room,
George H. Stephanopolis himself, Clinton sycophant, you know, running your

(01:31):
news division. It's just pathetic. But that's that. That is
the medium mob as we now know it today. Um,
we've got Greg Jarrett, Peter Schweitzer, and John Solomon with
the new huge breaking development as it relates to Ukraine.
They're slowly releasing some of the transcripts that have gone
on behind closed doors. Well let me just warn you,

(01:53):
because I've been warned repeatedly by my sources. Yet they
are selectively cherry picking the transcripts only the few that
they think work on That behalf. By the way, we
don't even need transcripts, or I'm sorry, we don't. We don't.
We need to just read the transcript. I love the
people wearing those shirts behind Trump last night. It was hilarious.

(02:15):
But anyway, you got Jim Jordan now out there saying, no,
Adam Schiff, the compromised, corrupt, coward, congenital liar that he is,
He's been lying to this country for three years. He's
now cherry picking the secret Soviet Union impeachment, coup attempt interviews.

(02:35):
He's only he's only cherry picking those that he thinks
make a case to the public. But the reality is
the transcripts of the people they're interviewing a fairly meaningless
because we have the transcript. Read the transcript. When you
read the transcript, there was no quid pro quo, none whatsoever.
When you read the transcript, I hear a president of

(02:57):
the United States, after we've been told for three years,
is that foreign election interference is bad. He's trying to
get to the bottom of foreign election interference. In twenty sixteen,
Ukrainian court said that, yeah, they were guilty of trying
to influence the outcome of America's presidential election on behalf

(03:18):
of Hillary Clinton. We've also established that a DNC operative
went colluded with Ukrainians and the Ukrainian embassy in DC.
And in fact, if you look at Politico January eleven,
twenty seventeen, yep, they were successful. That's when they were
digging up dirt Paul Manafort and others. Anyway, you know,

(03:39):
the way the media would tell it is Shift's decision
to release some of the transcripts of the Soviet style
secret impeachment testimony, which is really an impeachment coup attempt
has taken so far. Look, why all of a sudden
don't we hear from the whistle blower. Why we're whatever
happened the whistle blower? Whistle blower? Well, number one, it's

(04:00):
not really a whistleblower. You know. The whistleblower statute, you
just can't have. It protects people from retribution or reprisal.
It doesn't protect it doesn't guarantee anonymity. If you look
at the Whistleblower Protection Act, two conditions have to be met.
The complaint must involve intelligence activity. The alleged abuse must

(04:24):
involve someone in the intelligence community. Neither condition was met,
and that means the so called whistleblowers, not a whistleblower
at all, wouldn't qualify in my opinion, Greg Jared's opinion too.
You know, he is not entitled to identity protection. This
is outrageous. Ram Paul has asked that the whistleblower come testify. Yeah,

(04:46):
come testify, And while you're testifying, we need to know
the contacts you had with the compromised, corrupt, coward, and
congenital liar Adam Schiff's office. That makes him a fact
witness in the case. And if we're going to take
it to its proper point, well that means that not

(05:07):
only should the whistleblower be subpoenaed and have to go
before Congress in an open door session, well, that would
also mean that Adam Schiff has to raise his right hand,
and that would also mean that Hunter Biden has to
raise his right hand. And Joe Biden, we can get
a lot of people, I don't know why, Republicans, and

(05:28):
I'm going to start pushing this. Okay, let's release the
transcripts Joe Biden talking to anybody from Ukraine in the
time period that this is all relevant. I'd like those
transcripts released. We have transcripts released. The transcripts they wanted
to transcript from Trump, they got it. I think it's
a bad precedent. But now that they opened the door, fine,

(05:51):
And when putin was promised by Barack Obama, tell Vladimir
a lot more flexibility after the election. Okay, let's look
after the election. Did more flexibility mean? Maybe we'll learn
a lot if we release those transcripts, And maybe we'll
learn a lot if we release the transcripts of any contact,
any conversation that Joe three O three three zero or

(06:14):
Obama had with the Iranium Mullah's before they dumped one
hundred and fifty billion in cash and other currency on
their tarmac. What a dumb idea that was. But you know,
the whistleblower needs to be put under oath. You know
this hiding the whistleblower's identity is a crock that's not

(06:35):
guaranteed under the whistleblower statute. I don't care what the
law lawyer can threaten all he wants. I don't see
this as a real whistleblower as I hearsay whistle blower,
second hand whistle blower. If anything, it sounds closer like
a leaker to me than anything else. You know, what
was supposed to believe? Well, somebody told me something really
bad happened, Okay, And then everybody's interpretation and they call

(06:59):
the thirty people on the call. Most of the people
on the call are saying they didn't hear anything that
was inappropriate. You read the transcript, Donald Trump, he has
a sworn duty, a note to faithfully execute the laws
he's investigating. Yes, Ukrainian election and inference, which we know happened,
and yes it would be and we've identified specific crimes

(07:22):
that Joe Biden may have been committed. Where's that investigation?
The Attorney General can open that up tomorrow, you know
for House Democrats cherry picking the transcripts now they're trying
to build a public case. And remember, there are no
rules of fairness, none of it. And this whole thing

(07:42):
has been rigged with these phony rules to appear like
they did what new Ingrids did, and they did none
of it. And it's designed and it's been rigged to
shut Republicans out. Betsy McCoy, writing in The New York
Post today, how Speaker Loosie insists impeachment procedures adopted last

(08:03):
Thursday are the fairest possible. She writes, don't believe it.
In truth. The provisions slightly added at the last minute,
is all but certain to deprive President Trump of the
ability to defend himself, which, by the way, frankly gives
the US Senate the right and frankly the obligation and

(08:25):
duty to send a strong message to their House colleagues
about how due process ought to work and that they're
not They're going to rebuke the whole process. It's corrupt,
being run by a compromised leader, the cowardly chief himself,
the congenital liar. You know, one side propaganda circus is

(08:48):
what this is. That's what Betsy McCoy writes. And you
got the ringmaster being you had the compromise, corrupt, coward,
congenital liar Chiff. Democrats are posting out the impeachment inquiry
protections offered to Trump, claiming that the same rules devised
for Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton. That is a ball

(09:08):
faced lie they are lying. Look at Section F, quietly
devised by Jerry Nadler. It stipulates that unless the president
surrenders executive privilege, a power even the US Supreme Court
has ruled is vital to the office of the presidency,

(09:29):
he and his lawyers will be denied any ability to
call or question witnesses. Okay, let's take away the president's
rights under the Constitution in the process and their Section
F was triggered on Monday when four White House officials
refused to show up for this witch hunt, and they
rightly claimed executive privilege and the president should have a

(09:51):
right to have it like every other president had it
and Chief immediately called these four officials firsthand witnesses of
serious misconduct. He's rushing to judgment, has been rushing to
judgment the whole time. It's all rigged, it's all phony. Now,
we do have a lot of stuff as it relates
to Ukraine that should be investigated. Once again. Well, first

(10:14):
of all, this is now, and I'll go through the
data at some point this hour. It's blowing up in
the Democrat's face as we predicted, and it's only gonna
get worse because the rush impeachment inquiry is you want
to call if you want to call it that the
Soviet styles secret impeachment coup attempt. Yeah, it's getting slowed

(10:38):
down by judges. And I'll hear arguments December tenth. Oh
what are they gonna do now? Now the American people
get to scrutinize this. I mean we saw to meet
the press. I played it yesterday. Yeah, we're sick of
your crap. Lawrence Jones did an mos for us last
night on Hannity. Same thing. Now. John Solomon came out

(11:00):
with a huge blockbuster report last night. Now we know
the whole story about Hunter Biden. We know that we
got Joe daddy on tape bragging that we want to
quid pro quote. We got one quid pro quote Joe,
because Joe Biden's on tape bragging that you got six

(11:20):
hours you fire that prosecutor, you'll get the billion dollars.
You don't fire the prosecutor, you're not getting the billion
dollars quid and a pro and a quote from Joe.
Then you got his son. Oh, why why would have
you vice president of the United States? Why would he
ever want a Ukrainian prosecutor fired? Oh? We figured out

(11:41):
that reason too. And the worst interview of forty nine
year old man ever gave that I've seen in my life.
Have any experienced sin Ukraine? No oil, no gas, no wow,
any experience at all? I was I sat on a
board at amtrack once. That doesn't count. How'd you get
that position? You got paid millions of dollars? Yeah, yeah,

(12:03):
I did. Huh. Why do you think that they did this?
I don't know. Do you think maybe it's because your
dad is the second highest ranking public official in the
United States, the Vice President. Yeah, probably that's it. I
think that one's it. Anyway, Solomon is pointing out Hunter
was peddling his influence because we now have access, thanks

(12:26):
to a Freedom of Information Act request by John Solomon
to Damny new documents that show how Hunter's company, Baris Maholdings,
used the Vice President's son to try and win special
favor from the Obama administration. Oh, so they did get
something for their money. They bought access all right, Freedom

(12:50):
of Information Act discovery, John Solomon, Yeah, Baris Maholdings, Yeah,
they did use Hunter Biden to try and win special
favor for the Obama administration. In February twenty sixteen, just
one month before the Vice President leveraged our billion dollars
in a shakedown quid pro quote Joe to force the

(13:12):
prosecutor to force Ukraine to fire the prosecutor investigating his
son and Barisma Holdings with zero experience. A representative for
the company was communicating with the Obama State Department. We
find out he's newly unearthed emails courtesy of this Freedom
of Information Act request to Solomon, who will join us

(13:33):
at the top of the hour. The rep was lobbying
the Obama administration to end corruption allegations against the company,
even noting quote too high profile US citizens are affiliated
with their company, including Hunter Biden as a board member.
One month later, then Vice President Biden, remember who's tipped

(13:57):
off they were investigating his son by the New York Times.
He tells the country of Ukraine, fire the prosecutor in
six hours or you won't get your billion. You're fire him,
you get it. You don't fire him in six hour
leaving in six hours. You don't believe me, call Obama wow, braggy, Well,
that would be called in my world a shakedown where
I grew up, you know, And then calling the compromised, corrupt, coward,

(14:20):
congenital liar, Adam schiff, Hey, Adam, where's the investigation into
the real quid pro quo? And Joe on tape, just
like he can't interview himself. Why because he's compromised because
his office was in contact with the whistle blower. Apparently
the whistle blower non whistleblower, heresay whistleblower also was supporting

(14:43):
Joe Biden. And you know, you go through all this,
it stinks to high Heaven. Everything they feign moral outrage
about Trump, they themselves are guilty of. You just replaced
the name Joe Biden with Donald's vice President Donald Trump,
Hunter Biden with the name Don Junior. You think the

(15:04):
mob and the media might be reacting a little bit differently. Yeah,
I think that question answers itself. All Right, we'll have
a lot more on the other side than Peter Schweitzer,
Greg Jarrett, John Solomon and James O'Keefe brand new tape today,
straight ahead, all right, glad you Wether's twenty five till
the top of the hour and a second. I'm gonna

(15:25):
respond to the mob and the media in their breathless,
hysterian obsession with me. So me. It's it's actually funny.
You know, Linda's like, turn on fake news CNN. I'm
all over the screen. You know what I think it is.
And they've done this how many times? Sean Hannity was
the third client of Michael khne. No. I wasn't never

(15:48):
no case ever, no third party, no billing, no retainer,
no payment, never mind lay it never worked on a case.
And Michael called me that I alogizes that you've got
enough problems. I except your apology. I have no idea
where it came from. It's ridiculous, but they have Sean

(16:09):
hen Hey, But I think maybe it's because they get
no ratings over there at Fake News C and then
and maybe they think, okay, if people are flipping around
the dial and they see Hannity, maybe they'll stay and
think it's Fox. I mean, he didn't think that they
need to start paying me, don't you think, Linda, I
think they should pay me. I think that there's jealous

(16:30):
you know, because you're all ninja up now, you know,
Oh yeah, that's what it is. They're they're people aren't
gonna stays tuned for Humpty Dumpy, you know. But you
know if they put a little Hannity up there, little
nda itis, you know what I mean. You know, it's
so funny because what's that name? Fake news Acosta? You
know how you remember that? Because I didn't remember it.
It was so funny because you have fake news Acosta.

(16:52):
You know, Sean Hannity didn't say it to my face.
I'm like, we were on a bus together, and Helsinki
that where it was helping to see the point of
the point of the story is up to me. Then
the point of the story is that you and other
people on the bus don't remember it. Not only did
he remember it, but he allchides it for life in
a book and talked about it in a book, but

(17:15):
nobody bought the book, you know, on Fox, But what
do you know. I'm like, why don't you guys like
focus on maybe getting your crappy ratings up. I wouldn't
survive if my ratings ever sunk that low. I wouldn't
have a job. And thanks to everybody on this program

(17:35):
that keeps us on radio NTV because your listenership, yourship
means the world and allows me to do this job
every day. Thank you, no seriously, by the way, the stories,
I'm just heartbroken. You have six kids, Three women living
in a community of US citizens in Mexico shot to
death Monday, Several others kidnapped after their convoy comes under

(17:58):
fire and a brazen daylight ambush believed to have been
carried out by gunmen affiliated with organized crime in Mexico,
and those attack were members of the LeBaron family, well
known American clan who lived in the fundamentalist community I
think LDS in the northern part of the country for decades.

(18:19):
According to The New York Times, and Kenny LeBaron, as
a cousin to several of the victims, told the Times
he feared the death toll would increase. When you know
there are babies tied in a car seat that are
burning because of some twisted evil that's in this world.
It's hard to cope. Yeah, it's hard to cope with that.
But I'm not what I'm trying to understand. I guess

(18:41):
they had dual citizenship. Why were they living in Mexico?
You know, maybe it was just a choice, But anyway,
it's a decades old settlement in Sonara and founded in
part as an offshoot of the Church of Jesus Christ
of Latter day Saints, and they were missing after the
attack on the convoy of three SUVs. President tweeted out

(19:05):
their monsters who perpetrated this act. Wonderful family friends. Utah
are caught between two vicious drug cartels shooting at each other,
with the result being many great Americans were killed, young
kids killed, still many missing. If Mexico needs or requests

(19:26):
help in cleaning out these monsters, we stand ready, the
President said, willing and able to get involved and do
the job quickly and effectively. President of Mexico has made
this a big issue. But the cartels have become so
large and powerful, you know, I've actually met people from
countries like El Salvador, and there are certain parts of
the country that it is run. It is lawless, run

(19:49):
by gangs, run by cartels, I mean, and they'll kill
you for fifty cents. It's unbelievable anywhere. Our prayers go
out to this family, and I hope we get to
the bottom of this. So sad broke my heart today.
All right, let's play the mob yesterday going off about yours.

(20:13):
Truly it basically, it's actually funny. They're actually accused me
of being part of a shadow foreign policy with Mike
pum Bail. Listen to this now. Then tonight we can
also report on new testimony about the intersection of this
shadow foreign policy plot and the president's shadow communications arm

(20:34):
because a Fox News anchor who shared a lawyer with
the President whose name arose in the Muller probe is back.
In the new transcript out tonight, this ambassador details how
Sean Hannity's attacks on her and his alleged support of
aspects of the Ukraine plot made it to the highest
levels of the State Department, where some officials called Hannity
seeking any evidence to support Basically, these red hot allegations

(20:56):
against her. The testimony stating that these officials asked basically
to Fox News, Hey, what's going on? Do you have
any proof of these kinds of allegations are not and
if you have proof, you know, tell me and if not,
stop impeachment investigators are probing the theory that this was
part of the shadow foreign policy to hijack diplomacy for
Trump's reelection. Every single thing that came out of this

(21:17):
transcript that we did not know before was alarming and
disturbing and not normal. And it goes beyond, well beyond
just that July twenty fifth phone call. This shadow government,
this shadow foreign policy between Rudy Giuliani and what Sean
Hannity knew and what Mike Vompeo knew and maybe look
the other way and did not acknowledge, is something that
does not happen in the United States. And you've had

(21:38):
countless number of diplomats who have served for decades say
that this is not normal. And that's and this is
not normal, is the thing we heard from McKinley. He
resigned because he saw the State Department being misused as
a part of a political mission to benefit the president.
We saw Sean Hannity, you know, Fox, theer's opinion host,
being effectively treated as White House communications director giving talking
points to the administration, and also somebody who principles would

(22:00):
hall to find out what was really going on behind
the scenes. That's the side of bizarre world, folks. That's
the tail wagon, the dog that at one point the
Secretary of State says that he will call Sean Hannity
to try to find out what the deal is with
this whisper campaign of slander that is being directed at
her to get her removed. In addition, he was trying

(22:20):
to run this shadow foreign policy, using people like Rudy
Giuliani and people outside the government to try to pressure
Ukraine to launch these fogus investigations. One of those folks
that got caught up made then Sean Hannity, and it
is quite disturbing that his name would even be involved
in any of this. I don't even know where to begin.

(22:42):
All right, let me let me just put this to rest.
I did on TV law, I'll do it again here.
I don't know anything about this woman. We went back
in our transcripts. I'm like, yeah, Joe de Jennifer once
brought it up that she has some questions she should
answer Mark Levin the same thing. But Baba Holdover, this
wasn't the president's choice to be. I guess what was

(23:03):
she was Ukrainian ambassador. There was one story that and
I asked one question about this woman ever that we
could find, and it was, is there any truth that
they were monitoring I guess our social media or something.
And I think maybe I think I asked that a
Solomon and uh, I don't know anything about this woman.

(23:25):
If some shadow government burned policy, I never got a
call from Mike Pompeio or anybody else at the State Department.
So let's have a little walk down my Let me
just say, I don't think I've ever spoken in my
whole life to anybody from Ukraine, not one, not one person.
I know. My staff called over for an interview with

(23:45):
the prosecutor that was fired because by Joe and I
don't you know, we you know, it seemed promising for
a minute. I know, just dropped. But I'm accused of
like making an allegations. No allegations were made, none. It's unbelievable.
I don't I don't even know this woman. I don't
know anything about this woman except she was a holdover.

(24:07):
Never talked to Pompeo, never talked to anybody else that
works at State about Ukraine. The only my only thing
I cared about Ukraine was Hunter and Joe Joe and
possible laws he violated. Um me running a secret you
know what did they say, a secret farm policy something?

(24:28):
And what what the hell of the it's these are lies,
a conspiracy theory, slander for crying out loud, This is
slander anyway, go ahead. So no, what I was gonna
say on Hannity back in March, we put up We
actually did two articles like this. We reminded the audience,
you know, in any liberals who are who are willing

(24:49):
to read Hannity dot Com and learn something. ABC senior
correspond to Claire Shipman, married to a White House Press secretary,
CNN president Virginia Mosley, married to Hillary Clinton's deputy secretary,
CBS president David Rhodes married to Ben Rhodes from the
Obama administration. ABC president Ben sherwood sister is Elizabeth Sherwood,

(25:11):
Obama Special Advisors. So if we're going to talk about
shadow governments and the mainstream media, it's it's a flawk climb.
Do you know what I'm saying. I got a kick
out of it. To be honest and honestly, I think
they liked to run these stories like Khne was never
my attorney. He never was, and he called and apologized.
I accepted the guy's apology. Had enough. Look the guys,

(25:33):
you know, look what he was dealing with. I said,
all right, I understand you didn't mean your lawyer didn't
mean it. Well, I don't know where the hella came from,
but you know whatever, And they still just reported as
as if that was true. We corrected the record. Listen,
I'm gonna tell you what matters in this. You know,
these mob, these crazy mob people in the media and

(25:55):
there they are a mob with a mob mentality. You know,
they don't want to get into Joe Biden his real
quid pro quo, or that his inexperienced son is making
millions and millions of millions with no experience. I don't
want to deal with that, you know. The Corrupt Practices
Act fifteen USC. Seventy eight says it's illegal for any

(26:15):
US person to commerce or influence, through bribery or extortion,
a foreign national into taking an action that might financially
benefit that person, his family, or business. Oh yeah, that
would be bad. Eighteen USC. Two oh one bribery. Whoever
corruptly gives, offers, promises anything of value to a public

(26:36):
official to influence an official act is guilty of bribery. Oopsie, Daisy,
you know or you know the Gratuity's Act, giving offering
promising anything of value to a public official in exchange
for any official act. Oh, Joe should be in trouble.
I'm reading this as clear as day. The Hobbs Act.

(26:59):
A threat to are an official in order to obtain
an official benefit affecting interstate of foreign commerce would constitute extortion.
They don't want to deal with any of this, But
I'm gonna tell you what's happening. I see polls out
now every day. You know, John Zogby's picked up. John
Zogby has picked up The minorities are now moving to

(27:21):
Donald J. Trump, and he's making solid inroads with new voters.
These are his words. Who feel good about the economy,
including those in urban areas and the poor, traditionally part
of the Democratic base. An interesting area where Trump has
caught steam is among economically vulnerable groups. We categorize these groups.

(27:44):
Categorize these groups as a lost job at a job
that pays less, afraid of losing a job, gone without
food for twenty four hours. Another factor helping the president
is there's very weak enthusiasm for any of the Democrats.
Zogby has been nailing this. You know that. I'm just
telling NBC couldn't show any anti Trump voters in Florida.

(28:05):
They couldn't find them. I mean, that's bed. Look, there's
a Red State article today. The number of Democrats showing
up a Trump rallies his stunning. It was a poll
out yesterday. Ten percent of Democrats now are considering voting
for Trump. If Trump's numbers doubled in support with African Americans,

(28:28):
Hispanic Americans, Asian Americans, women in the workplace because of
the good job he's doing, they're done, it would be
a landslide. The Trump economy remained strong. Oh that's bad
news for Democrats. Oh, terrible news for Democrats. Now, the President,
I love what he did yesterday before our military guys.
You know what are the Democrats Chuck Schumer saying We're

(28:49):
going to have only electric cars by twenty forty there
was an interview of the Guy of Perez, the DNC
chairman Univision. Anyway, the question is where the presidents achieve
something important, especially for Latinos, which is to reduce the
unemployment rate to historic glows. How can the Democrats compete

(29:10):
with the president that has been beneficial to Latinos on
economic matters? His answer, the economic situation in the US
is excellent for wealthy people like Trump, but the economic
situation is bad for our community. Well, Biden, Obama put
thirteen million more Americans on food stamps, eight million more
in poverty. And I'm telling you this impeachment agenda is

(29:31):
backfiring and it's going to blow up in their face.
And I'm telling you right now you watch, this is
not gonna work out the way they wanted. And we're
still awaiting the IG report. Yeah, that's coming too. That's
not gonna be good for them either. And you go
to this whole Ukraine issue, what do you see The

(29:51):
only corruption that should be investigated is sleepy, creepy, crazy
Uncle Joe for the very crimes I just mentioned. So
poule out fifty nine percent say UPS interactions with Ukraine
neither illegal nor wrong By the way, the only people
quit pro quo. Joe is the only one that needs
to be investigated. All the T shirts last night at
the president's rally in Kentucky. Read the transcript. Schiff Trump

(30:14):
portrayed America. He's compromised, He's corrupt, he is a coward
and a congenital liar. By the way, there's a piece
in the New York Times how Pelosi shouldn't be president
and involved in this case at all, because if they
impeached Trump and Pence, she'd be next in line. How
God help us. But they don't want to talk about anything.

(30:35):
And then oh, there's another Paul. Majority of Americans think
Hunter Biden showed at least bad judgment and they want
it investigated. And the idea brand Paul is being torched
by the media. It's disgusting that he wants the whistleblower interviewed. Yeah,
I also want Joe Biden under oath, Adam Schiff under oath,
Hunter Biden under oath, and the non whistleblower under oath. Yeah,

(30:57):
you bet. That's what they would do if it was
Donald Trump. That's what they do if it was Donald
Trump junior. President Trump has great courage. He faces down
the fake media every day, but Congress needs to step
up and have equal courage to defend the president. Hunter

(31:20):
Biden made fifty thousand dollars a month. That's the definition
of corruption. We know he got it only because of
his family connections. We also now know the name of
the whistleblower. The whistleblower needs to come before Congress as
a material witness because he worked for Joe Biden at

(31:43):
the same time Hunter Biden was getting money from corrupt oligarchs.
I say tonight to the media, do your job and
print his name. And I say this to my fellow
colleagues in Congress, to every Republican in Washington, step up
and Sophina Hunter Biden and Sephina the whistleblower. And I

(32:09):
say to my colleagues, if Shifty Shift will not let
Hunter Biden come, and if you will not bring the whistleblower,
for every Republican in Congress should take a walk and
say this is a farce, all right. That was last
night in the rally gladia with us our two. Sean
Hannity showed things heating up by the second. I think

(32:32):
one of the funniest things was last night, all the
people behind the president with the read the transcript t shirts.
You read the transcript, and the president is wanting to
get to the bottom of twenty sixteen Ukrainian election interference
as described by a Ukrainian court decision. Shocking. You know,

(32:54):
the non whistleblower, hearsay whistleblower, non whistleblower, whistleblower. Yeah, the
whistleblower is not a whistleblower under the actual law, just
like we were pointing out last night, very specific problems.
If you'd care about law, justice, the constitution, equal access,

(33:14):
equal application of our laws, equal justice under the law, all,
then Joe Biden has a whole host of problems that
he's facing, as identified by Greg Jarrett. Joining us now
is Greg Jarrett, Fox News legal analyst, author of The
witch Hunt is as his latest book bestseller, the Story
of the Greatest mass Delusion in American political history. And

(33:37):
by the way, the book is more relevant every day
based on the new information we get and how ahead
of the time of his time he was on all
of this. Peter Schweitzer, similarly, he's the head of the
Government Accountability Institute. It was his book Secret Empires that
was released a while ago that described in detail all

(33:58):
of the corruption of Oh, let's say call it what
it is. What it looks to me to be the
Joe Biden crime syndicate. It's unbelievable. Um, let's start with
the whistleblower aspect, Greg Jared, this is not a whistle blower.
He had no firsthand information. It sounds like a deep
state Obama holdover, friends with Brennan, friends with Joe three

(34:23):
three three zero, the bidens and hates Trump. So now
and now we know that the the contact that took
took place with the corrupt, compromised cowward congenital liar Adam Schiff.
So I think, not only do we need Hunter to testify,

(34:44):
we need the whistleblower non whistle blower to testify, and
we need Adam Schiff and his office people to start
answering questions about what advice they were given the non
whistleblower that got this thing started. Sean. And the notion
that the Ukraine whistleblower is somehow entitled it anonymity sounds

(35:04):
like it was peddled by the Flat Earth Society. It's
a myth and demonstrably, so all you have to do
is look at the Whistleblower Protection Act, anonymity is never mentioned,
and it's not found in the Presidential Policy direct of
nineteen that also covers whistleblower protections. You know, all a

(35:24):
whistleblower get is writes against retaliation and reprisal in the workplace,
not identity protection. But let's assume, for the sake of
argument that the whistleblower might be entitled to anonymity. He
first has to qualify for whistleblower's status under the governing law.

(35:47):
This whistleblower, the faux whistleblower, does not because he complained
about intelligence activity. Now this was a diplomatic conversation, not
intelligence activity. You have to be complaining about somebody in
the intelligence community. President Trump is not, So he doesn't
even qualify under the law as a whistle blower. For

(36:10):
this reason, his identity needs to be revealed, and he
needs to testify about his contacts with Adam Shift's staff.
It appears to me the evidence is increasingly clear that
Shifts and his staff and this faux whistleblower simply conjured
up a pretext for an impeachable offense against Trump. All right,

(36:35):
so he's a non whistle Blower, you make some great points.
There's no anonymity protection. You just have protection against retaliation
and reprisal, Okay, which, by the way, seems like a
good thing this person though obviously I want to know
if they had contact with Brennan. I want to know
what the contact with Shift's office is. I think, yeah,
we do need to get to the bottom of Hunter

(36:57):
Biden and Joe Biden will get to the legal aspect
in a second. But Peter Schweitzer, in your book Secret Empire,
as you were the first to expose all of these
issues and all of these millions of dollars that Hunter
Biden was making, I think probably the dumbest interview I've
ever seen a forty nine year old man give. He

(37:17):
goes on Good Morning America. What does he say? Do
you have any experience in Ukraine? No? And experience an
oil gas energy? No? What qualified you? I sat on
a board at Amtrack once. I got all a board
with my dad, so they put me on the board.
All right, So he sits on a board of Amtrack
that qualifies him for nothing, and yet he's getting millions

(37:38):
of dollars. And then we got the magic tape of
Joe Biden. We'll get to the criminality of it in
a second, or possible criminality of it with Greg Jarrett
and John Solomon's joining us in a second. And they
made a fortune. Peter Schweitzer, he knew nothing. And you're
saying the same thing happened in China and now we're
discovering may have happened in Romania anywhere else across the globes.

(38:02):
Cashin in. You know when he finally said, do you
think you got the job? Because he had dad, probably
no experience. No other Americans get that. It gets that deal.
That seems like they want to buy favor, doesn't it.
Absolutely there's no other way to interpret those deals. And
I think what's really important, Sean, is to look at

(38:23):
both sides of this. Greg masterfully laid out the legal
problems with this whole whistle bow or complaint. But remember,
just like with the Steel dossier, they desperately don't want
you to know what is the source of the information.
They desperately want to obscure what the information is. When
you contrast that with the Biden case, we know the facts,

(38:46):
We know that he received all this money for jobs
that he was not qualified for. We know that there
are only two countries on the face of the planet
that his father was the point person for Obama administration policy,
that Ukraine in China and Low and behold, those are
the only two countries, major countries where Hunter Biden gets

(39:09):
these massive deals. And there's just simply no other way
to interpret it. And if you look at some of
the recent polling, I know Poland can be suspects, but
you know, sixty nine percent of the American people and
a recent poll said they consider what Hunter Biden did
fishy and it needs further investigation. But the problem is
in Washington, DC today, particularly with this House of Representatives,

(39:31):
only certain people with certain party affiliations are going to
be investigated. Others are not. And let's remember, you know,
the Republican Senate, like how they handle it or not,
the Intelligence Committee under the Republicans actually did look into
the allegations of collaboration. They actually did look at the
charges made against Trump. So the Republican Senate certainly has

(39:53):
shown its willingness to investigate or look at both sides.
The Democrats have thrown off all pre chance and have said, look,
the laws and investigations are not going to apply to
Joe Biden, as it did not apply to Hillary Clinton
as well. Well, we're gonna go over every potential statue.
Greg wrote a great column about it. Let me bring

(40:16):
in John Solomon, his latest investigative work. We broke it
last night on Hannity, and he was able through a
Freedom of Information Act request he got documents showing how
Hunter Biden's company, Bariemholdings, used the Vice president's son to

(40:37):
try and win special favor from the Obama administration. Now
the mob in the media is not going to cover this,
which makes it even more insane. Journalism is dead. We
have an information crisis. They are the biggest campaign contributors
to the Democratic Party and the new Socialist Democratic Party. Look,
one month before Vice President leverage that billion dollars, he's

(41:01):
breaking about quid pro quo Joe. You're not getting them.
You're not gonna get the billion dollars. You got one hour,
you got six hours. Fire the Ukrainian prosecutor. Why would
a vice president ever want to Ukrainian prosecutor fired? Now
we know why, or you're not getting the billion. If
you fire him, I'll give you the billion. Quid pro

(41:23):
quo Joe. Anyway, in February of twenty sixteen, just a
month before that, trying to force the Ukraine to fire
the prosecutor investigating Bearismer Holdings and his son. We now
know a representative for the company, Maism Holdings, was communicating
with the Obama State Department. Now John Solomon has newly

(41:45):
unearthed emails and the Baris m rep was lobbying the
Obama administration to end corruption allegations against their company, even
noting that quote. Two high profile US citizens are affiliated
with the company, including Hunter Biden, the board member. One
month later, well, Vice president Joe Biden, who says he
never talks to his son about his business. Never. Yeah,

(42:07):
then why did he leverage a billion taxpayer dollars give
him six hours to fire the guy that's investigating his son,
Because that's exactly what he did, and for good measure,
he's just bragging about it. I don't care what you
call it. A shakedown, That's what I call it. But
certainly we need to get to the bottom of it. John,
what else did you find out? Well, listen, I think

(42:27):
you come to understand why the federal law created the
conflict of interest in the appearance of conflict interest standard
so that we would avoid the very circumstances that we
see in these documents. In these documents, when Barisma wants
to put the squeeze on the State Department, saying we
need you, the United States government in Ukraine, to stop
talking about these corruption allegations about us, what do they do?

(42:48):
They invoke the Vice President's son's name because he's on
their board. That's exactly the appearance standard that the statute
was designed to avoid. If you take a look at
the few times that Hunter Biden made contact with the
State Department that we can see so far, who is
he reaching out to Tony Blincoln, the Deputy Secretary, Joe
Biden's longtime national security advisor. Exactly the sort of thing

(43:10):
that creates the appearance of a conflict of interest. But
most importantly, one of the events that triggers this line
that ends with Joe Biden firing the Ukraine prosecutor is
a very important fact in February second, February second, twenty sixteen,
right as the primaries are starting, right as Hillary Clinton

(43:30):
is trying to take on Donald Trump, the Ukrainian prosecutors
launched a raid on Hunter Biden's boss's home. The Oligarch Zolachsky.
They went and they seized his home and his goods
and documents. That triggered a sense of panic in Brisma
that they no longer had the protection they thought they
had with Hunter Biden on the board. And that's why
they go to the State Department. That's really really important

(43:51):
to understand that that ends or is the trigger for
which all these other events we just talked about occurred. Right,
stay right there, John Solomon, Greg Jarrett, Peter Schweitzer, there
with us for the full hour. All right, as we continue,
Greg Jarrett, Peter Schweitzer, John Solomon, all with us. Let
me go to the question that we went into in
some depth last night on the show, Greg Jarrett, and

(44:14):
that is, what are the laws that are in play
in terms of Joe Biden and him leveraging a billion
taxpayer dollars which clearly seemed to me to be for
the benefit of his son continuing to get those monthly
checks from Barisma Holdings. Well, the Department of Justice has
plenty of evidence to open a criminal investigation into Joe Biden.

(44:39):
They would do so under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.
It was pasted in nineteen seventy seven. It's illegal for
a US person, especially a public official, to coerce or
influence through bribery or extortion, a foreign nation into taking
action that might financially benefit that person or his family

(45:01):
or his business. So if it can be shown that
Biden is a vice president used his public office to
coerce a foreign official into taking official action that benefited
his son, that's a violation of the law. So a
lot depends on Biden's at intent, But specific laws that

(45:23):
you've identity Foreign Corrupt Practices Act right bribery, which is,
you know, offering anything of value to a public official
to influence their official act. I would look at the
Gratuity Statute, which is very similar offering something of value
to a public official and it doesn't require proof of

(45:48):
a quid pro quo. And then finally the quick break
but yeah, the last one the Hobbs Act Extortion Act,
that is also relevant. Stay right there. Legal analyst Fox News,
Greg Jarrett. We have Peter Schweitzer, Government Accountability Institute investigated
reporter John Solomon. They will remain the next half hour

(46:09):
as we continue, glad you with us, and at the
top of the hour, James O'Keefe. Wow, what a blockbuster
released today. That's ABC protected Jeffrey Epstein and it's obvious.
We'll tell you why straight ahead. I carried out the
policy of the United States of America. Are allies in

(46:30):
the International Monetary Fund the EU in dealing with the
corrupt prosecutor period number one. I did not know he
was on the board of that company. And in fact,
no one's asserted on the board that was illegal for
bear of the board or he did anything wrong. And
if you had known, would you have said, no't or
would you have believed he said it? This is wrong. No,

(46:50):
it's not wrong. His words speak for themselves. He wished
he had realized how thugs like Rudy Giuliani and his
cronies and the cronies of the prey it would try
to paint it. The fact is there's been nothing established
that he did anything wrong. They can say it as
many times as they want to say it. I don't
believe Joe Biden and his actions. I think backed me up.

(47:13):
Now here. You have your kid with no experience in Ukraine,
no experience in gas, no experience in oil, no experience
and energy, and that dopey interview, he gives, well, why
do you think they chose you to give millions of
dollars to it? You know, do you think it has
to do with the fact that your father's the second
highest elected official in the United States, the one that

(47:36):
is in charge of Ukraine. Probably? Yeah, I mean probably
that's why I got millions. Anyway, we continue Peter Schweitzer
Government Accountability Institute, and he broke all of this wide
open a while ago. They're finally catching up with him
and us in his book Secret Empires. Greg Jared's new
book is out, witch Hunt, the Story of the greatest

(47:58):
mass delusion in American political history. And we have investigative
reporter John Solomon. John, I want to go back to
you and this Freedom of Information Act piece that you
put out late last night and you said there's more coming.
What's coming? Well tonight. I hope to be able to
talk about this a little bit more in your show.
But let's give your listeners a little taste right now.

(48:20):
Joe Biden says he didn't know his son was on
the company's boarding up. Peter Schwitz has already done some
great work showing that White House entry log show just
before Hunter Biden was added to the board. His business partner,
what met with Joe Biden. Devin Archer met with Joe
Biden just before Hunter Biden got on the board. Now
that's either a really crazy coincidence or there's something Joe
Biden hasn't told us about that meeting. But let's fast forward.

(48:42):
The documents show that when Ambassador Maria Vanovitch, the new
ambassador coming into Ukraine in the summer sixteen, was going
for her Senate confirmation hearing, she anticipated getting a question
about Hunter Biden, and the prepared answer she wrote for
herself or her staff wrote for her to give to
the senators. Anything having to do with Hunter Biden, you
should talk to Joe Biden's office. The State Department thought

(49:05):
as a Joe Biden issue. Why doesn't Joe Biden see
it as a Joe Biden issue? Well, and what are
these documents that you've been able to obtain? Specifically, if
you have Barisma representatives going to the Obama State Department,
he's leveraging a billion taxpayer dollars. The guy's investigating his son.
You interviewed the prosecutor that was fired. ABC interviewed him,

(49:27):
and the Washington Post interviewed him and he said to
all three of you, that's the same thing that he
was fired because of Joe Biden. Now, if it's not
a quid pro quo, you get the billion if you
fire him in six hours, you don't get the billion.
If you don't fire him in six hours, that seems
to be a shakedown. That's a quid pro quo for Joe.
And it defies all reason, common sense and intelligence to

(49:50):
think that Joe didn't know about his son's money that
he's making in Ukraine. It doesn't meet the smell test.
Greg jarrett I totally agree. You know, these the Bidens
have a lot to answer for. And Hunter Biden, you know,
it's very hard to prove that simply leveraging his father's

(50:11):
famous name is a crime. Its influence pedaling, and it's
a self dealing self frinchman and so forth. But as
Peter Schweitzer has pointed out, there really are no laws against,
you know, leveraging your famous name. However, John Solomon's reporting
changes the equation here. If it can be proven that

(50:33):
Hunter Biden was actually part of a scheme or an
agreement to pressure a foreign government into doing something that
would help Hunter Biden and using his father to do it.
Then Hunter Biden could be a co conspirator in all
the crimes I identified. Let me go back to Peter Schweitzer.

(50:54):
I mean, when I watched the interview of Hunter, any experience, No, no, no,
why do you think they chose you? I don't know.
Maybe because her father's last name, Yeah, probably. I couldn't
believe he was that stupid. I really thought, this kid
wants to go to jail because he's cashing in on
his father's name, and his father's taking official actions, using

(51:17):
taxpayer dollars to protect his kid. So I couldn't believe
he didn't help his father's case at all, which is
more legal than even his case, unfortunately. But what else
do you know about the relationship with Joe and Hunter
that would prove that, in fact, they did know everything
about what he was doing in Ukraine. Well, if we
were to take Joe Biden's word for it that he
and Hunter never discussed business, which is demonstrably false because

(51:42):
Hunter said in a New Yorker interview they did discuss business.
But if you took Joe's word for that, that would mean,
for example, when Hunter Biden flew with his father on
Air Force too from Washington, DC all the way to Asia.
You know, the eighteen twenty hour trip never once discussed

(52:03):
before Ukraine. That's correct, that's correct, But that they never
discussed any of those activities. The fact that Hunter Biden
and Joe Biden have talked for years about how close
they are to each other, and they are, I mean
that they talk all the time, that they share all
these common interests. Again, it defies credibility. I think the
other point that we need to really focus on here,

(52:25):
Sean is the issuing of the firing of this Ukrainian prosecutor.
What's interesting about it is not only the fact, of
course that the prosecutor is investigating Hunter's son, but if
you look at Joe Biden's record in steering us AID
during this time period that his son is on the board,
you don't really find any other really specific, narrow issues

(52:48):
like this where he says I want this particular government
official fire. Well, I want this particular action to be taken.
So it's unusual in that it stands out from normally
what he's doing in Ukraine, which I think leads us
to wonder why did he make that decision in the
first place. You know, the idea that Hunter Biden doesn't
know why he was hired by Breism or why he

(53:10):
didn't get the deal with the Chinese is an absolute joke.
Hunter Biden has been in Washington, DC for years. He
was a lobbyist for the online gambling industry. Before that,
he was a lobbyist for earmark legislation that his father
would would put in place for the benefit of his clients.
It just defies credulity and the fact that the mainstream media,

(53:30):
with a few exceptions, appears to have no curiosity about
this at all, no desire to dig further. I mean, John, No,
they actually said, oh, there's no evidence that anything wrong happened.
Then no evidence whatsoever? No, none, none, none. Uh, you know,
the President said it last night. It's a line I've
been using. Let's replace the name Vice President Joe Biden

(53:52):
and say it's Vice President Donald Trump Donald J. Trump,
and let's say Hunter's name is Don Junior. I doubt
the media would be stepping all over themselves to protect
the Trump's just the opposite. Where do you see at
some point, John Solomon, if you keep pulling up freedom

(54:13):
of information stuff, like this. I'm imagining this is going
to blow up in Biden's face and the Democratic Party's face,
and the media's face, just like the whole Russia Holts
conspiracy theory, collusion narrative blew up in their face. Yeah.
I think that's the real danger here, and I think
that's what some Democrats, particularly those in Trump districts, are
a little worried about here. Let me bring out a

(54:34):
couple of First, I want to give thanks to Southeastern
Legal Foundation because they helped me file this lawsuit. And
if it wasn't for a public interest law firm like that,
I might never have gotten these documents. So a big
shout out to them for their great work and their
legal work in convincing the State Department to release these
documents here, as I think a very important thing to watch.
Senator Graham last night, Lindsay Graham, chairman of the Senate

(54:54):
Judiciary Committee, said he was going to have a conversation
today with the chairman of Senate Foreign Relations, Senator and
try to get a hearing start and get these people
before the Senate to ask the questions that haven't been
asked of them under oath when they have to really
give the truth. Here's an important thing. If Joe Biden's
whole thing to withhold the foreign aid was part of

(55:14):
a strategy, was the State Department? Was anyone else? The
White House consultant? Was there an interagency review to authorize
him to do what he did when he leveraged that
billion dollars? We saw the Trump stuff when this aid that.
Lots of agencies are involved in deciding whether the aid
can be released or not, a lot of ambassadors. Here's
a question that Joe Biden should ask. Did he put
the idea of withholding the money from Ukraine through the

(55:38):
normal interagency process. If he did not, it's another example
that he was skipping the normal process he's going it
tends to give more credence to the idea he was
doing this for his son, not for the United States.
Greg who would be who are the people if we're
gonna have equal justice, an equal application of our laws.
I was actually very encouraged to see that Senator Grassley,

(56:00):
Senator Ron Johnson. I think I was the only one
that had been calling for this. They go him back
at the rigged investigation in the Hillary Clinton server, and
I think if they do their job, we will see
that not only were there numerous violations of the Espionage
Act and numerous subsections, but then, of course the obstruction

(56:20):
of justice aspect with the deleted emails and bleach bit
and hammers. Yes, and in my new book, I spent
an entire chapter detailing the corrupting criminal acts of Hillary Clinton.
Of course, Peter Schweitzerner's great book, Clinton Cash laid out
yet another scheme involving uranium, one in Hillary Clinton essentially

(56:41):
putting a for sale sign on her State Department office door.
So I am also glad to hear that these senators
want to look back. One of the pivotal points I
make in the book is that top FBI officials, finally
under oath, admitted that not only did they have no
credible evidence to begin the Trump Russia investigation, but before that,

(57:06):
when they cleared Hillary Clinton, they said they did so
at the direction of Loretta Lynch, the Attorney at General's
Department of I'll add one thing to that. And by
the way, your book chronicles all of it, and I
urge everybody, it's a definitive chapter in verse on this
mass corruption that is known as the Trump Russia collusion

(57:30):
nonsense but we were sold lives every day. But you're right,
all of that is true. And they also said Struck
and Page, we're joking about it. Yeah, it's it's it's all.
It's ragged, you know. And then she said, remember Loretta
Lynch infamously to James Come, it's a matter, it's not
an investigation, right, you know it was Again, these people

(57:51):
of the FBI say they got their mock marching orders
to clear Hillary Clinton from Loretta Lynch, who likely also
got it from Barack Obama, and so it was rigged
from the very beginning. Hillary Clinton should have been charged
with a hundred and ten felonies representing one hundred and
ten classified documents. I think I lay out in my

(58:12):
book one of the reasons why the dj wanted to
clear her even though she committed crimes, is because Barack Obama,
using a pseudonym, was communicating classified information to Hillary Clinton
that was likely landing in the hands of foreign adversaries,
a serious national security risk. All right, gotta take a break,

(58:34):
we'll come back final moments. These guys, by the way,
all three of them, have done amazing work. Peter Schweitzer
exposing all of this in his book Secret Empires the
definitive chapter verse. I've forgotten more than I remember, and
I thought I remembered a lot. It's all chronicled in
Greg's book, which Hunt the story of the greatest mass

(58:56):
delusion in American political history, and you know it was.
You know, we're going to be going on three years
pretty soon. John Solomon has been unpeeling the layers of
the onion on all of this corruption from the very
get go. I don't know where we'd be without all
three of you doing all the great work you do.
I wrapping up this hour with Peter Schwitzer, Greg Jarrett,

(59:16):
and John Solomon. All Right, John, Fisa, when are we
going to get it? How devastating will it be? I
think you're looking at later this month. It's going to
be a devastating look at miss misconduct inside the FBI
and perhaps stretching into the CIA. I think there's there's
some evidence now that the investigation has moved in that

(59:37):
direction that informants were activated against Americans before there was
a legal justification. So I think later this month, probably
just before Thanksgiving, is what I'm hearing right now, Greg Jarrett.
All four fights, so warrants were illegally obtained by the
FBI and the Department of Justice signed off by people
like James Comey, Andrew McCabe and Sally h and Rod Rosenstein.

(01:00:02):
And so the question is will the IG make criminal referrals?
If I were a betting man, I'd say yes. Last word,
Peter Schweitz, are your predictions? Well, everybody was saying in
the mainstream media that the Deep State was a myth,
that it didn't exist, that it was a made up fiction.
And every week that passes, with the reporting done by

(01:00:24):
Greg and John and others, and the reports that are
coming out, indicates that the deep State is real. And
this is a fundamental challenge to our Republican form of governments.
And I think it's a painful process to go through.
It's got to be very frustrating for the White House
and people who want to support his agenda, but it's

(01:00:44):
a necessary process and I think it's importance for the
future of our country that it proceeds. So I'm actually
very optimistic this is a good cleansing of Washington, DC
that's taking place, God'll hope. So, all right, you've done
amazing work, all three of you. Solomon, Greg, Jared Peter Schweitzer.
When we come back, this will blow you away. Project

(01:01:06):
Veritas James O'Keeffe his next undercover project, this time exposing
Jeffrey Epstein scandal. ABC covered it up and they had
it three years ago, and the anchor involved, Damie Rohrbach,
is on tape admitting it all straight ahead. Coming up
next our final News round Up and Information Overload Hour.

(01:01:28):
All right, News round Up, Information Overload Hour. Another big,
huge story by Project Veritas and James O'Keefe is more connections,
more people. Now he seems to have deputized half the world.
Last he exposed Jeff Zucker the president of Fake News
c and then as being an agenda driven anti Trump Zellot. Well,

(01:01:51):
now this is devastating what he's got here. You have
on tape and she knew she had a hot mic on,
but she didn't know it was being recorded. ABC News
anchor Amy Roebuck, who was recent an interview with Hunter
Biden made national headlines. I thought she actually did pretty
decent in the interview. A few more questions I would
have certainly asked, but you know, she got him to admit,

(01:02:12):
did you get the job because of your experience? No?
Why do you think you got it? I don't know.
Maybe because of your dad, Yeah, that's it. Probably anyways,
So she made recent news about that interview. But she's
talking to a producer. You can tell she is frustrated
because she's revealing that she had a huge expose ready

(01:02:34):
to go with people on the record, lockdown tight about
Jeffrey Epstein three full years ago. The network cave to
pressure and they deep sixed the story. And he got
all this happening in a lot of these networks. He
got the whole issue involving NBC. I know Fox over
the years had their issues, but you know what, he

(01:02:56):
got CBS and less Moonvez. He got this. This is
out of control. You might remember Lisa Myers had the
interview with Jani to Broderick and they were they were
trying to spike it and Lisa Myers called one to
Broderick said, yeah, we got a problem. She goes, what
the network thinks, You're very credible. That's the problem. Very credible. Anyway.

(01:03:21):
In comments that they were able to obtain at Project
Veritas dot Com, Robock went as far to suggest that
the information she had implicated Bill Clinton. We had Clinton,
we had everything rather than give you my take on it,
why don't I play it for you? Then we'll bring
in Project Veritas founder James O'Keefe. I've had the story

(01:03:44):
for three years. I've had this interview with Virginia Roberts.
We would not put it on the air. First of all,
I was told of who's Jeffrey Epstein? No one knows
who that is. This is a stupid story. Then the
Palace found out that we had her whole allegations about
Prince Andrew and threatened us million different ways. We were
so afraid we wouldn't be able to interview Kate will

(01:04:06):
that we That also quashed the story. And then and
then Alan Derschowitz was also implicated because of the planes.
She told me everything, she had, pictures, she had everything,
She wasn't hiding for twelve years. We convinced her to
come out. We convinced her to talk to us. It
was unbelievable what we had Clinton, We had everything. I

(01:04:29):
tried for three years to get it on to no avail,
and now it's all coming out, and it's like these
new relevant revelations that I breaking had all of it.
I'm so pissed right now, like every day I get
more and more pissed because I'm just like, oh my god,
it was what we had was unreal. Other women backing
it up, Hey yep right Edwards the attorney three years

(01:04:52):
ago saying like like we there will come a day,
but we will realize Jeffrey Epstein was the most prolific
pedophile this country has ever known. And I had it
all free years ago. And then and then Alan Derschwitz
was also implicated because of the plane. So she told
me everything, she had, pictures, she had, everything. She wasn't
hiding for twelve years. We convinced her to come out.

(01:05:13):
We convinced her to talk to us. It was unbelievable
what we had Clinton, we had everything. I tried for
three years to get it on to no avail, and
now it's all coming out and it's like these new
relevant revelations that I freaking had all of it. I'm
so pissed right now, Like every day, I get more
and more pissed because I'm just like, oh my god,

(01:05:35):
it was what we had was unreal. So do I
think he was killed? One hundred percent? Yes, I do,
because you wanted he made his whole living blackmailing people. Yeah,
there were a lot of men in those planes, a
lot of men who visited that island, a lot of
powerful men who came into that apartment. We were like

(01:05:55):
herrings founded. I knew immediately. And they made it seem
as though he made that suicide as him two weeks earlier,
but his lawyers claimed that he was roughed up by
his salmon around the neck. That was all like to
plant the seed. And then that's why I really believe it.

(01:06:15):
I really believe it. Unbelievable. Amy Robach had this story
locked down tight. Clinton. We had everything, you know, we
had her whole allegations about Prince Andrew got a little
concerned about why I couldn't get it on, describing how
she interviewed a woman who had the courage to come

(01:06:35):
forward years ago about Epstein pictures, everything. You know, she
was in hiding for twelve years. She finally convinced her
to talk to us. You know, this is the worst
pedophile probably in history of the United States. Anyway, James
O'Keefe found her Project Veritas, another huge story for him
and Project Veritas. I mean, you guys are always on

(01:06:58):
a roll, and I don't even know what to say,
except it shocks the conscience H James, Yeah, the Sean.
I think that's that's this is pretty self evident. The
tape speaks for itself. But of course Amy Roebok is upset. Sean.
I mean I'd be upset too. I mean it's it's
She's very credible here, um and this is one of

(01:07:20):
those hot mic moments that was given to us by
an ABC News insider. In other words, it's not just
ab Robot that's upset, it's insiders within ABC News leaking
us this tape. And those insiders did not go to
the Washington Post or the New York Times or CNN,
because all of these media entities are apparently complicit. They

(01:07:41):
came to Project Veritas and Sean. ABC News has responded
to this tape. They put out a very sort of milktoast, bureaucratic,
you know, remarks that seem to have been written by attorneys,
where Amy Robock says, and I'm going to read this
to you in the year since no one has ever
told me or my team to stop reporting on Epstein

(01:08:01):
literally contradicts what Amy says in this moment of unguarded truthfulness.
So I think that Amy comes across quite well in
this tape, and I believe her and she has a
right to be upset. Uh. Now, they did release a
statement ABC News is what they released at the time.
Not all of our reporting met our standards to air.

(01:08:24):
But we gotta go over this for a second here,
because you know what, they really don't have standards. Let's
be honest here. When it comes to anything Donald Trump,
they'll say anything. Let me see, did they run with
the story am Arosa's N word tape or the Covington kids,
Bob and Robert's interviewed Jesse Smollette, what Kavanoff allegations? I mean,

(01:08:48):
the statements not actually being responsive. This ABC is response
to initial hot mic claims by this ABC News anchor,
mostly shows that ABC News has different standards for often
Covington boys than it does for what Amy characterizes as
all the stuff on Bill Clinton. These are her words,
these are not my words. And what's remarkable, Sean, is

(01:09:10):
that not just the right wing or the conservatives, but
Alexander AOC retweeted our story. We've had the Associated Press
cover of story everyone's angry about. By the way, don't
forget your old friends, you know, Sean Hannity, who has
tried to support you as much as I can because
I've always supported the good work you've You've done. We
appreciate that. And by the way, I honestly feel bad

(01:09:32):
for you. You've taken more crap. You know, people have
assassinated your character more often. You've had more lawsuits, which
I think I warned you on the first story you
ever did that that was probably going to happen, and
you beat back six separate lawsuits. They've never won in
a case against you, but they try and even haven't

(01:09:53):
you been arrested. I have, and I stood falsely accused
and I was vindicated. I've won every lawsuit since. But
one person, Sean tweeted today this is a blue check
mark mainstream journalist. Oh, I wish Project Veritas didn't break
the story, And I said back to him, I said,
you know what, there's a reason why only Project Veritas
breaks a story like this because look at the tape

(01:10:15):
of Amy Roebuck on what she's saying. Nobody trusts the media.
The media will not report the news. Listen to her
anger and her indignation in the tape. So people are
upset that we are the ones breaking these stories and
not the media. I mean, come on, if the media
were to stop googling and tweeting and actually go out
and actually do reporting and have the courage to expose

(01:10:37):
the president of ABC News, which is what this does.
But it was Sean, something amazing is happening, and you've
been really helpful getting these messages out. A lot of
other insiders and the networks are reaching out to us
now as a result of this CNN whistle blower and
this ABC News insider. There's this movement of heroes, anonymous
people who don't care about being famous. They just want

(01:10:57):
to expose the truth. And it's a really amazing thing
to behold. We can finally see what are the powers
that be are really thinking and believing and doing. And
when this proves the media is corrupt, this tape proves
that they still have that interview Sean, and they haven't
aired it yet, and I hope that they do air
it as a result of this. All right, quick, Frank,

(01:11:19):
We'll come back more with James O'Keefe, founder of Project Veritas.
Where do you see this? We'll show it tonight on Hannity.
And as we continue with James, O'Keefe, founder Project Veritas,
and this tape that he put out today. ABC News
anchor Amy Roebok very frustrated. Listen, I'm going to tell
you something. Every news organization that had this credible information,

(01:11:41):
they did a disservice to every other victim or alleged
victim of Epstein. And it's funny, che mean, with a certainty. Now.
I had on this program on Friday, doctor Michael Boden,
he's you know, he's fifty years This guy's been doing autopsies.
He's in some of the highest profile cases. He was

(01:12:02):
present during Epstein's autopsy, and he's convinced at a very
high level that this was not a suicide, but it
was a strangulation, which would have meant somebody else was involved.
How convenient that the quote guards fell asleep at the time,
and that the cameras weren't working at the time, and

(01:12:23):
how convenient that nobody knows what happened, because in New York,
if you rule something a suicide, while the investigation stops there.
And he said he never would have ever classified this
as a suicide, and he would have had him full investigation.
So I don't know the answer to any of that.
That's not my field of endeavor. But hearing Amy Robock

(01:12:47):
say that with that certainty, because how many you know,
who are all these famous people on the Lolita Express,
including Bill Clinton? How many trips did he take? Read
one story, maybe as many as twenty six? Or Orgy
Island were all these young girls were brought into service,
these high profile friends of his, and the whole Prince
Andrew angle of this is just obnoxious. And you know,

(01:13:10):
but was the network at ABC more interested in getting
an interview with, you know, Prince Harry and his new bride.
It seems like it. Well, Sean, I mean, she says
one hundred percent. I'm going to quote her here. This
is Amy Roebok. I'm the hot mic on the set
of ABC Good Morning America. She she's not on TV,
she's about to go on TV. She says, quote, do
I think Epstein was killed? Quote a hundred percent, Yes,

(01:13:32):
I do. He made his whole living blackmailing people, and
there were a lot of men on those planes, a
lot of powerful men on the island. And quote then
that's what I really believe it. I really believe it.
So I don't know whether it's it's there's a lot
of people she names here that the executives at CBS,
Alan Dershowitz. There's this powerful nexus of people that she's

(01:13:53):
up and you could see it, you could hear it
in her voice. She's really upset and she's a good
I'm not exposing Amy Robok here, We're I think, actually,
I think, I actually think Amy comes out looking great.
The problem for Amy Roebok now that ABC put out
their statement, she put out her statement, she said as
a journalist. As the Epstein story continued on fold last summer,

(01:14:16):
I was caught in a private moment of frustration. I
was upset that an important interview I had conducted with
Virginia Roberts didn't air because we couldn't obtain sufficient corroborating
evidence to meet ABC's editorial standards about her allegations, my
comments about Prince Andrew and her allegation that she had
seen Bill Clinton on Epstein's private island, or in reference

(01:14:40):
to what Virginia Roberts said in that interview in twenty fifteen,
and I was referencing her allegations, not what ABC had
verified through our reporting the interview itself. While I was disappointed,
it didn't air, didn't meet our standards, And the years since,
no one ever told me or the team to stop
reporting on Epstein, and we have continue to aggressively pursue

(01:15:01):
the important story. Let me tell you how I read
that as somebody that has been in TV news for
twenty four years. You know that is Amy. You better
get your story straight with us. Yeah, you better say
didn't meet our standards too, Right, Amy's screwed. I mean,
maybe I'm wrong, but that's how I would read it.
That's my interpretation. I think that, you know, my speculation here, Sean,

(01:15:25):
would be that my attorney said, you know, that's a
fifty thousand per word statement. If this is a seems
to be written by attorneys or corporate spokespeople. I think
the line in that Amy Robot response quote in the
year since no one has ever told me or the
team to stop reporting it directly contradicts what she said
on the hot mic. And I think you said it right, Sean.

(01:15:46):
She comes across very well, very honest, very sincere. I
think it makes her look great. She did a great job.
Journalists would say this publicly. I wish people would say
all these things publicly. I don't know why they don't
say the truth publicly? What do they have fraid of?
She did say it. We're giving that to the masses.
And Sean, this statement was given exclusively to Project Gas,

(01:16:07):
the president of ABC News talk to me. I think
it's a seminal moment for our organization because we're now
actually getting responses to these very powerful people. And I
think this is going to be a great thing for
more whistle blowers and insiders to go to. Go forward
at projects dot com, slash brave. All right, Project Veritas
dot com, slash brave if you wanna well do some

(01:16:29):
undercover work with James O'Keefe. James, unbelievable. I couldn't believe
it when I watched it. Unbelievable. Thank you. I hope
you put it on TV. Thanks By the way, I
am going to put it on TV. Thank you. Eight hundred,
Thank you, eight hundred ninety four one. Sean, if you
want to be a part of the program. In their praise,
there's for power. The Democrats are trying to tear our

(01:16:51):
country apart. First, Democrats engineered the Russia Hopes, the most
egregious fraud ever voisted upon the American people. The Russian homes.
Then they did the Mueller scam. You remember that, the
Muller scam. Two years and they said nothing, and then

(01:17:15):
mister Muller testified. That was a wonderful day for me.
And you remember last week. I don't know Tulsey Gabbert,
but Hillary Clinton said that Tulsi Gabbert is a Russian agent.
I don't know Jill Stein. She's a greeny and that's fine,

(01:17:35):
she's a greeny Jill Stein. But Jill Stein was an
agent over Russia. Also, these people are crazy now corrupt politicians,
Nancy Pelosi and Adam Shift. They are corrupt at Nancy,
Unlike Kentucky, which is doing great. Nancy orders stopped wasting time,

(01:17:58):
go back to her district in San Francisco, helped the
homeless get rid of the drugs, get rid of the
needles that are lying all over the street, and all
of the things you sad are washing into the ocean
through this storm sewer system. What's happened to San Francisco

(01:18:19):
and what's happened to so many other places run by
the radical left Democrats. It's unbelievable. Los Angeles, you take
a look at Los Angeles, looks like a third world city.
But go back to Nancy's area. Look at what's happened.
There's been no place in the country that's gone down
like the area that Nancy Pelosi represents. And she's wasting

(01:18:43):
all of her time. And you know what, it's backfiring.
You see it. But the media and the Democrats have
launched an even more brazen assault on our nation with
a deranged, hyperpartisan impeachment with judge impeachment the president last
night it in Kentucky. And you know, I experienced this

(01:19:08):
myself this weekend giving speeches in Detroit and Chicago, and
that is it's the anger is palpable, it is real.
And I'm getting the impression that Democrats that have done
nothing except this for three long years and nothing else,
and they are triggered, to quote Don Junior's new book,

(01:19:30):
by anybody, even the sound of Donald Trump's voice. But
you can see the American people like the results. The
American people also see that they do nothing. They see
how corrupt the processes led by a corrupt chairman. He's
compromised in the case of fact witness in the case himself,
and that would be the compromised, corrupt coward and congenital

(01:19:53):
liar by the name of Adam Schiff lied to us
for three years about all of this. But this is
where they want to take the country. It's not gonna happen.
I think Willie Brown was right. What they're gonna there's
no this will be all anti climatic. We know the outcome.
There's no mystery here the Senate. They're not getting twenty
Republicans to convict, and that means then Donald Trump gets

(01:20:14):
to run on being vindicated, and run on his great economy,
and run on killing Bagdaddy, and run on beating back
the Caliphate in Syria by removing the ridiculous rules of
engagement imposed on the military by Biden Obama joining us Now.
He is one of the co hosts of the number
one cable morning show in the country, Fox and Friends.

(01:20:37):
Ryan Kilmead is with us. By the way, he has
a book out. It's called Sam Houston and the Alamo Avengers,
which he just put out today. Now, I'm having a
hard time with you and Ducy in the books. You
kind of tell you why. Yep. Okay, We're in the
middle of the last election and Steve Doocey comes out
with a cookbook, and by the way, he dumps me
in the back of the book, my recipe about cornbefn cabbage.

(01:21:00):
The Alamo is important, but we're in the middle of
the biggest election of our life and this impeachment battle,
and we're taking us back to the Alamo. I'm having
a hard time with you and Duzy. One thing, I
think you have to separate the two cooking in history.
I believe they're separate by Barnes and Noble and books
a million they would put them in different sections. And
I know in the long run, you're gonna have to

(01:21:21):
make a decision who you like better, and you can
reveal that at some point. But I will tell you
that although you're not included in this book, and that's
an advantage for Steve, I will tell you that in
going back in our history, you find that people who
are passionate about the news are passionate about our history.
And I never thought when I started to a good answer,
that is a very good answer, right, Well, everybody wants

(01:21:43):
the point we got here. Well, I mean everybody knows
the main story of the Alamo. I mean, you know
the fight for Texas independence, and I think the events
are familiar, but they're the people you know. Few remember
that following a crushing off the work of Sam Houston
leading a ragtag army of volunteers to an incredible victory.

(01:22:06):
So you know your stuff. And what I wanted to
do is, you know, Fox Nation asked me to do
this series what made America Great? I did not know
what part of history I wanted to focus on. When
they send me to the Alamo, and I saw the
passion and George P. Bush is re establishing the footprint
of the actual Alamo. What you go down to is
just the church. George P. The Land Commissioner's going to
be on the special on Fox News on the seventeen

(01:22:28):
in November. And the way the places pack gives you
a sent sewn of how people still care about this
country and the way it's relevant today. And it's not
a stretch to say this when you see a group
of people who come to America and all they need
is a gun and a rake and are told you
have an opportunity to be successful, and you compare it
to Andrew Yang wanting to give everybody a thousand dollars

(01:22:51):
because automation makes job employment tough. And then Baby bucks
from Query Booker because your parents didn't have a lot
of money, and then you have to to reunite with
our roots. Sam Houston, Yeah, he had problems, drank too
much as a kid. Not a great farmer, not a
great clerk. But he was mentored by this guy named
Andrew Jackson. He had to be a great military officer,

(01:23:12):
but he was too brave and he got shot three times,
almost died. By the time he's ready to lead Texas
to freedom, he knows that courage has to be calculated
and the American dream is fragile. You got to keep
it together. They tried to take freedom and liberty away
from these Texians who are all Americans, and they would
when Mexico said we're going to take that away. These

(01:23:34):
people are my people are not ready for liberty. They
picked up guns and they defended themselves and they found
a way to win. If you look back in our past,
you want to know why. And you say this every
day on television radio. We're an exceptional nation. And if
you don't understand our history, you think Sean is just
saying that as a slogan. The listeners right now, you
go back in our past and things break our way

(01:23:56):
in a way that no other country does. And the
thing is, it's not just better for America, it's better
for the entire world, because we're the only ones practicing
freedom and fighting for it and willing to die for it.
And the Alamo was famous because they died and they
knew they were going to die. And William Barrett Travis wrote,

(01:24:17):
you know, take care of my son. America is a
great country. Victory or death. How many people, how many
countries have people like that willing to die for an ideal?
And I figure, if I could bring these stories out,
you'll understand why this election is about freedom and opportunity,
not about guaranteed making of a living. It's not about

(01:24:38):
vilifying which people. That's what we're doing now. And I'm
reading this book and I'm learning about these characters and
their antithesis of what we're seeing in America right now,
a whining, crying coat or a culture who says, why
isn't life fair? You think these people thought life was
fair back then. Every time I want a whine in life,

(01:24:59):
I think of my my grandparents, all four of them
came from Ireland, poor. You know, every time I want
a why, and I work too hard, and I do.
I think of my mother who was a prison guard
at the Nassau County Jail for twenty five years, most
of those years working sixteen hours shifts every day, and
my dad a family cor probation guy, and as working

(01:25:22):
as a waiter on the weekends. I will say this
and the relevance to modern day and why history matters,
and why not repeating the mistakes of history. You know
why the Alamo was so important is because it paved
the way for America's westward expansion, or else we wouldn't
be the United States of America as we know it today.

(01:25:43):
But I think you're right. Reagan said that, you know,
we're only one generation away from possible extinction. You know,
the idea of that we were endowed by a creator, life, liberty,
pursuit of happiness, but not equal results or the whole
concept of live free or I. And then you compare
that to say the New Green Deal, everything's free. You're

(01:26:04):
gonna have Medicare for all fifty two trillion. We only
take in four that's forty trillion and ten years we
can't even pay for that one plan. And then confiscation
of wealth you pay you sixty five cents out of
every dollar if you live in New York in taxes,
then they're going to take another bite at the apple
if you're dumb enough to save it, and if you
have more when you die, they're going to take another

(01:26:25):
fifty three percent between the federal government, state city, and
New York. Um, we have gotten this mindset. These are
false promises, Brian. This could never happen. You can't have
everything for free, whether you're willing or for your career.
So Sam Houston was, you know, was a governor of Tennessee,
left a little bit of a scandal, came worked his

(01:26:46):
way back, goes comes to Texas and finds a way
three months after the Alamo to win at San Jancinto
in eighteen minutes. And we caught said and his army
actually sleeping. And when Sam Houston loses it all and
gets it all back, we're reading other story is about
people lose it all and get it all back. They
went to Texas for a second chance. They after America
gave him a second chance. And I'll give you an example,

(01:27:07):
and I would say this, I'll jump to a conclusion.
You were doing everything you can to make it in
radio and in our business and television, it's kill or
be killed. And there's no guarantee that the news director
is going to like you or hire you in one station,
let alone the four to five to six hundred that
you're at. But you would have been working just as
hard in Santa Barbara today as you offer the six

(01:27:29):
hundred plus stations you're on. Because no one guarantees you success,
You're gonna put in the effort. You can't guarantee results.
What I learn in reading history is no one guarantees results.
They relish the opportunity to be successful. Listen, we got
the crapet out of the effort. But think about it,
we got the crap beat out of us by a
corrupt mob in the media. And they're a mob. They

(01:27:51):
live in their own little bubble. They talk to each other,
they echo each other's points, they retweet each other's columns
or reports. They try to outdo themselves. You know, Trump
is a horrible person. No, he's a horrible, horrible, horrible,
horrible person. And they have total contempt that look at
the heart and soul of where we're at. There is

(01:28:11):
a deep hatred for smelly Walmart, Costco. Target shoppers like
me by shop at all those places. There is a
contempt that It's very revealing, irredeemable deplorables. It's very revealing.
You know, bitter Americans that cling to their God. Oh sorry,
I believe in God. Oh and their Second Amendment, Oh

(01:28:34):
and their Bibles and their religion. Those that voted for
Trump show up at the rallies for Trump, even the
thirty thousand of times that stand outside because they couldn't
get in. They they don't. They have contempt for the
American people. But I'll tell you this, if we don't,
this is why this election matters. If we don't continue

(01:28:54):
to live free, if we may, if we buy into
these false promises that everything's going to be taken care of, free, free, free, well,
American exceptionalism will die. Poverty will replace it, the welfare
state will replace it. You know. Barry Farber once famously said,
you know, there's never been a country in the history
of man that has literally accumulated this power and abused

(01:29:17):
it less And I used the line, never been a
country in the history of mankind that it has accumulated
this power and used it for the advancement of the
human condition. And human benefit than the United States of America.
So yeah, you're right, these people that fall for that
freedom and everything, especially Texas. Texas is hot now and
bable O'Rourke to show you the folly of his candidacy

(01:29:40):
to take away and we call Robert Francis Bozo overrock.
Go ahead. Yeah, I mean to take away the guns
and the people of Texas when literally, if without guns
they would have been oppressed by Santa Anna is brutal
military force. They were there to defend themselves. And the
reason why we keep winning these wars because we had
to kill things to eat and if they missed, they're

(01:30:02):
in at an ammo. They were bilified. So the reason
why we win the War of eighteen twelve is because
we don't miss And the reason why we end up
prevailing in Texas and holding out the thirteen days at
the Alamo is because our guys know how to shoot,
and it's not to kill people, it's to survive and
preserve liberty. And if you don't understand what makes Texas well,

(01:30:22):
by the way, we put more people in Texas in
ten years than the Spanish put in three hundred years.
For those people listening would think that we stole Texas
through your research, it's not the case. So we were
thriving colony and when you take away Americans liberty, they
react sadly. I'm looking at these stats while I'm studying
for this book for two years, and this next generation

(01:30:44):
thinks we should have socialism and capitalism is bad, and
I'm told not to use that word because now as
a negative connotation, democracy needs capitalism. They didn't share each
other's wealth on farms. They got land and were told
to make it work by Stephen F. Austin. And they
were there to help each other, but not share each
other's money because no, no know. What they want to

(01:31:05):
do is confidence. It's called the wealth tax. Brian, keep up,
but now, honestly, good book. Congratulations, Sam Houston and the
Alamo Avengers will put it up on Hannity dot com,
Amazon dot com, bookstores everywhere. The number one morning show
in all the cable news Fox and Friends. Thanks, Brian,
appreciate it. Tonight nineties to we have more breaking news.
John Solomon will join us. Lindsey Graham, what's the Senate

(01:31:26):
gonna do? The corrupt, abusively biased, lying media will have
the latest on that. Judge Janine Tonight, Eric Trump Tonight,
and so much more nine Eastern News you won't get
from the fake news industry. Hannity tonight at nine Fox News.
We'll see it, then we'll see you back here tomorrow.
Thanks for being with us.

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

The Sean Hannity Show News

Host

Sean Hannity

Popular Podcasts

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

Crime Junkie

Ridiculous History

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Who Was Sam Houston?