Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:01):
A rare and balanced view on politics in today's world,
based on facts born of rationality, common sense, and logic,
providing context on today's events. This is American Perspective with
Rick Thomas.
Speaker 2 (00:21):
Hello everyone, and welcome to American Perspective. Goodness, I don't
know what the heck happened there, but my apologies. You know,
they say when you're on the radio or when you're
on television, you're not supposed to clear your throat on microphone,
you know, when the microphone's hot. I hear freaking Mark
(00:45):
Levin do it all the time, and he's got a
popular radio show, and I think I even heard, you know,
Rush Limbaugh do it every once in a while, you know,
on some of his shows. So I don't know, I
don't know, maybe it's just, you know, I know it
was a a etiquette thing, but hey man, you're getting
(01:08):
me raw, unfiltered, uncensored, and uh hey, I can't even
think of any other uns not undressed though, because I
do look dapper in these wonderful shirts. But that's not
tonight's headline sponsor. But that's okay. Yeah, you should go
and check them out at the flagshirt dot com. Anyway,
(01:31):
short little hit there real quick. All right, folks, let's
get things kicked off tonight. We have the absolute fantastic,
the absolute wonderful, the absolute I love. I love the
sound of her voice. Bam Bam is up for tonight's
(01:54):
Pledge of Allegiance. So if you are of mind, please stand,
remove your hat if you're worrying one like me, and
place your hand over your heart and follow along with
Bam with her tiny, tiny girl voice as she recites
(02:18):
the Pledge of allegiance.
Speaker 3 (02:23):
I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States
of America and to the Republic, for which it stands,
one nation under God, indivisible with liberty and justice for all.
Speaker 2 (02:37):
And of course I thank you Bam for that wonderful
rendition of the pledge. If you would like to hear
your rendition of the pledge played here on the program,
all you need to do is record yourself reciting the
pledge in your style. Then take that audio file, video file,
whatever kind of file, and attach it to an email
(02:57):
address It off to fans fa ns at American Perspective
dot online. That's fans fa ns at American Perspective dot online,
and I will get you into the rotation. I'm looking
for number twenty one. I have twenty of these. I
(03:20):
need twenty one, and then of course twenty two, twenty three,
twenty four, twenty five, twenty six, whatever. Anyway, Yeah, so
get yours in. And by the way, if you do
it on your phone, I've been told by a heavenly
source that if you do it on your phone, you
(03:43):
use the share option. So you can record yourself on
your phone using like voice memo or something along those lines,
and then take that a hit the share option and
you should be able to share it to fans fa
NS at American Perspective dot online, and I will get
you into the rotation as quickly as possible. All right. Tonight,
(04:09):
of course is Wednesday. That means it is down the business.
That's the next of the guards. Baby, that's right, it's
whiskey Wednesday. It's like Taco Tuesday, but for badasses. And
(04:29):
tonight I'm getting down to the dregs in the bottoms
of the Buffalo trace that I had that I went
out and bought. Oh, I don't know about a month
ago or so. So there it is buffalo trace. Yeah,
it's in the glass and it's in the what do
you expect It's Wednesday. What do you think the glass is?
(04:51):
Dun't do dn't don't, don't do do do do do.
That's right, true grit Roots Network glass in the fantastic red, white,
and blue. It is fantastic. And then of course, of
course there are the requisite stones in the bottom. That's right.
It takes stones to drink with whiskey. So here we go.
(05:15):
Mm requisite first sip right there? Mm hmmm mm hmm.
All right, Oh it's smooth anyway, Okay, what have we
got on tap for you tonight really quick before we
get to our headline sponsor. Oh, I've got some judicial
(05:35):
and constitutional lessons for you, as well as a couple
of other things. There's been a study that has found
that apparently climate change does affect your brain, but not
in the way that you would think. And also some
more smalie Somalian malfeasans here in the United States, although
(06:01):
this is not in Minnesota, it's actually in Maine. I
we'll get to that, and then hopefully maybe we'll talk
about the FED and the FED rate cut. They cut
the rate this afternoon last time for the year. Also too,
I have a new book on my desk here for
(06:23):
consumption in the near future. I've actually got a couple
of them. I've been I've been grabbing a few of these,
so in particular, though, there are a couple that I
that I'm really interested in. I've been talking about it
here so so yeah, and also, don't forget tonight's pat
(06:45):
of the Week. I did get a quick submission toward
the end of the day here, so quick submission so
I didn't have to use my emergency backup now. Ms
te kind of got a little miffed yesterday when I
mentioned that I wanted a Pet of the week. And
I want to make something clear. See Miss t sent
(07:08):
me a PET of the Week, but she specifically pointed
out that it needs to be used for emergency use only.
And so here's the thing. I am holding that back
until if I make a call out to say, hey,
I need a Pet of the week and I don't
(07:28):
get one. Okay, That's why I'm holding it back. It's
not that I'm trying to, you know, mess you up,
Miss Tea. It's just you basically told me it's for
emergency use only. Emergency use in that case, in my
mind is I didn't get one when I asked, So,
if somebody sends me one and I don't have to
(07:51):
use the emergency one, I'm going to put it back
in the emergency box. It's sort of like in emergency
break glass, you know, one of those things. You don't
break the glass if you're not in an emergency. And
so because of the fact that I received a pet
of the week after I requested it there that had
emergency is still back in my back pocket or in
(08:12):
the behind the glass, in the break glass. So that's why.
All right, Yeah, she just sounded like she was a
little miffed. She was like, wow, like right now, it's
an emergency. No, it's not an emergency if I get
one anyway, Love you, miss t.
Speaker 1 (08:30):
H.
Speaker 2 (08:31):
All right, so all right, let's get it on with
our headline sponsor tonight because we are drinking out of
the True grit Roots Network class. It is, of course
true grit Roots Network. And boy, that didn't work out
too well because I didn't freaking have this up anyway.
It is True grit Roots Network TGRN dot net is
(08:53):
our place on the web for you to go and
listen listen to some fantastic tunes. Man, I'm telling you
we are an all digital internet radio station that have
two channels. Right now, we have Walter Trout Blues Rock
Radio as well as Dallas More Outlaw Radio, and you
(09:16):
can listen to both of them right through your browser
at tgrn dot net. All you have to do is
go and go to tgrn dot net. Right here, I'm
telling you, this is the This is the this is
the head page. Right here, this is the home page.
This is the page that you come to. You just
scroll down a little bit and you find the players
(09:37):
there they are. See those two play buttons. One of
them is right up next to my head here in
the video. But all you have to do is click
the button and you can start streaming the sound right
through tgrn dot net. You can also pop those out too.
There's a little PopOut option that you can pop them
out and put them in their own page so that
(09:58):
it's not affecting your page when you you know, navigate
away or whatever. Or what you can also do is
you can go to our go to our page and
click on one of these two buttons, whether it's the
App store or the Google play Store, and you can
download the apps to your phone or your mobile device,
(10:20):
whether it's a tablet or you know, your phone or whatever,
and you can download either one. I say, download both
and switch back and forth between them when you're trying
to like listen to things. Hi, Barb from Ohio on
a farm too. That's even better. But as I was saying,
Walter Trout Blues Rock Radio, Dallas More Outlaw Radio, download
(10:43):
the app from the app store or Google Play, both
of them, download both of them. And yeah, we definitely
want to try and avoid popping out in public for sure,
But yeah, go and do that and listen to both.
We appreciate it, believe me. And hey, if you want
to show off your support for either one the other, both,
(11:06):
or just for true grit Roots Network, all you need
to do is go up here to the headline or
to the head menu right up here at the top
of the page TGRN. I'm flashing it right now. That's
the shop button. You click that and you'll be taken
to the store shop dot TGRN dot net and you
(11:29):
can go ahead and grab a T shirt, hoodie or
cap if you're looking for something fantastic. We've got them
in various colors, and of course the various logos. I
personally am partial to the black TGRN True Grit Roots
Network t shirt right here. I also like my hoodies,
(11:53):
so I might go and grab like this black TGRN
hoodie right there. You can also get it in or
you can get it in gray, and you could do
that anywhere with all of the logos that we have.
You can also grab a cap with a nice leather
here's one in black. Look at this at TGRN True
(12:15):
Grit Roots Network in leather in black. That's just fantastic.
You can go and grab that in a cap. You
can also grab it in gray. Gray gray looks pretty good.
I personally I don't kind of like the black or
the brown kind of brownish tan. I don't know if
I call that tan. But anyway, go and check them out.
(12:36):
Go to shop dot TGRN dot net, get yourself some
slag and show off your support for your favorite internet
to digital radio station known as True Grit Roots Network.
That's tg r N dot net. We are based out
of Austin, Texas, and we thank you for your support.
(12:57):
All right, Well, I mentioned these books. I've been buying
some books. Miss Whiskey is not happy with me. I've
got a bunch of books right now. Our bookshelves are overflowing.
She's like, you need to get rid of some of
the books. Yep.
Speaker 1 (13:13):
No.
Speaker 2 (13:14):
Anyway, here's one which I'm starting to read right now.
This is called Hijack our Republic unless we can save it.
It's by Peter what is it, Peter Calfee, C. A. L. Fee,
and J. Kevin Dolan. You can look at this. It's
(13:38):
actually a fairly short read. I've kind of started it,
but I haven't been able to go too far into it.
But it's it's a fairly short read. It's a nice book,
very well annotated in terms of where they got all
of their information. And then of course in the books
that I am interested in reading only because I already
(13:59):
know the answers to these questions, but I want to
see what other people have found, because that's kind of
the way I work research. But this one did America
have a Christian founding? So this one here is uh yeah,
so there you go. And that's another book that I've
(14:21):
got up. And this one just came in the faiths
of our founding fathers. Yeah, so this one I got
in particular because I am seriously, I mean Obviously, I've
been telling you that we are a Judeo Christian nation.
So that's why this question comes into play. Did America
(14:43):
have a Christian founding? And the answer, of course is yes.
But I want to see what they say. And then,
of course the other thing is the the common uh
misconception is that the deists of our country, we're all dists,
and that they that meant that they're not they're not
(15:07):
God fearing, that they meant for our country to have
a separation of church and state, and actually that is incorrect.
And so that's where this book comes in. I want
to see where they've done their research and everything else
to tell us where the face of our founding fathers
came from. So those are my reads, as you can see.
(15:28):
I mean, I've got a pretty big stack here, and
that's just what I've got on hand. I've got others
that are scattered throughout the studio here that are other
reads that I need to do, and I need to obviously,
you know, wintertime, bad weather kind of have to sit
down and do all that. What's this poo tang? What
(15:52):
are you talking about? Poo tang? Anyway? All right, so yeah,
there you go, and that's that's something that I'm looking
at in terms of going all right, let's uh, let's
take a look at one of the mistakes once again.
(16:15):
And I say mistakes, although some of this is actually
on purpose. But apparently there's another offender that has assaulted
or attacked. So yeah, anyway, as I was saying, this
(16:40):
individual has had to repeat arrests and no consequences because
that's the way the Democrats roll. Well, this person assaulted
a Chicago cardiologist. This cardiologist was attacked inside of an
elevator at the Northwestern Memorial Hospital by a man who
(17:01):
has been arrested more than just a dozen times this year,
oh just this year, a dozen times alone, according to
court documents and police reports. This reported.
Speaker 4 (17:18):
Uh okay, anyway, uh okay, I'm sorry, bar I'm a
little lost, but that's okay.
Speaker 2 (17:31):
I don't want to get too far off the track,
all right, So reported by the Gateway Pundent, Apparently, the
forty two year old doctor entered an elevator when she
was allegedly followed by the assailant. And that assailant, I
can just tell you he is a black man, but
(17:51):
he allegedly has or went in and repeatedly punched her
in the head until she stumbreed backwards, covering her face
with her hands as the beating continued. Now Chicago Police
reported that this individual had been arrested twelve times in
twenty twenty four alone in the same area surrounding the campus.
(18:19):
SO records show that he was arrested seven times this
year and six additional times between twenty twenty and twenty
twenty three. So let me do some quick math here.
Twelve times in twenty twenty four, seven times this year.
That means nineteen and six additional times between twenty twenty
(18:39):
and twenty twenty three. So that puts his arrest record
at twenty five times of being arrested, twenty five times
being arrested between twenty twenty and now, and uh yeah hm.
(19:02):
SO Chicago reported that the victims suffered multiple bruises, abrasions,
and hematomas to her head, head, face, arm, and hand.
Authority said that the doctor apparently had no prior contact
and that the attack was unprovoked. Do we really want
these people, these people to be running around on our streets?
(19:27):
Is this what we want? People? Is this what we want?
I mean, you would think that putting this guy. Putting
this guy into jail, would you know take care of it?
That incarcerating this individual would be the one to take
(19:51):
care of it. Well. Apparently one of the security officers
at the campus identified them immediately after reviewing footage, noting
that there was approximately thirty plus prior incidences at that
hospital where the man had to be removed. According to
(20:13):
a detention petition. Another officer stated that he had had
incidents with the man approximately two times a day over
the last nineteen months, and at the time of the assault,
Pops was out. But sorry, I didn't mean to say
his name anyway. The man was out on pre trial
(20:36):
release stemming from an October trespassing case at the Streeterville
Residential building. In that particular incident, he allegedly attempted to
escape from a police station lock up. Yeah, repeated encounters
(20:58):
with this man and the circle scumstances of the attack
have renewed attention on Illinois Cook Counties handling of violent
repeat offenders and pre trial release policies. It's really pretty simple, folks.
I mean, I'm just gonna flat out say it. There
is this thing known as the power of deterrence, Okay,
(21:21):
and the power of deterrence is basically goes like this.
You make the resulting response resulting response of an event
worse than the gain made by the event. And so
(21:49):
I mean, essentially, what you do is you take these
people and you put them into prison, lock up. You
get them away away from the general public. You put
them in the general you get them away from the
general public. These people, I mean, this guy was arrested
twenty five times in the last five years. Five years,
(22:12):
twenty five times for those of you, that's in average
of five times a year. What and he's still walking
around and he was able to do this? Now, where's
the judges? Where's these kinds of things that you know,
where are the people who basically say, hey, look, you know,
(22:35):
we're on a progressive system. What happened to like the
three strikes your out rule? Whatever happened to that? Apparently
Democrats don't believe in that crap. Apparently democrats believe that, hey,
you know, anybody can be redeemed. I'm sorry, but statistics
say otherwise. Statistics demonstrate that the majority of is specially
(23:00):
violent crimes are done by repeat offenders, people who have
already done these heinous crimes and they go ahead and
do it again and again and again. This is this
isn't this isn't a debatable issue. People. The recidivism rate
(23:24):
for violent offenders is astronomical. You can't just go and
put them away. Generally speaking, these violent offenders, they've already
crossed the threshold. They've already crossed the line. They don't
care anymore. And especially when you have somebody like this
(23:50):
where you know, the Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson publicly argued
against increased incarceration as a response to crime. However, that
increased incarceration and hey, even going so far as to
doing things like the death penalty when it's needed that
actually brings crime down. Johnson was hurt saying it was
(24:15):
making remarks alongside Illinois Governor JB. Pritzker, who's another fricking moron.
Johnson said, we cannot incarcerate our way out of violence.
Oh I bet we can. I bet we can incarcerate,
and I'll bet we can do the death penalty and
get our way out of violence. Absolutely, because we have
(24:38):
already tried that and we have ended up with the
largest prison population in the world without solving the problems
of crime and violence. Well, that's because you slapped him
on the wrist and you let him back out. He continued,
the addiction on jails and incarceration in this country, we
have moved past that. And then of course he says
(24:59):
things stupid. He goes, it's racist, it's immoral, and it's unholy,
and it's not the way to drive violence down. Oh,
I know of another way to drive violence down. And
I'm serious, I mean, how many times can I just
ask this question? And it's kind of rhetorical, because let's
be honest, I'm not really on like a phone call
(25:22):
or you know, someplace that somebody can respond, but I do.
I'm watching the chat day, I'm watching the chats. How
many times have anybody seen a bully in school who
finally had somebody stand up to them and smack them,
(25:47):
physically smack them defending themselves. How often did you see
that bully all of a sudden rethink and stop. Believe me,
I've seen I've seen things like this. I mean, this
(26:09):
is literally the way to get these people to quit.
And you're sitting here talking. You know the old adage,
the only thing that'll stop a bad guy with a
gun is a good guy with a gun is right. See,
there is this thing in our brains that's known as
the power of deterrence. It is known as when you
(26:31):
are the biggest dog in the room and all of
a sudden you're taken down by well, I don't care
whether it's a smaller dog or a bigger dog, it
doesn't matter. But you're taken down all of a sudden,
you start to realize that, oh crap, I'm no longer
the most powerful person in this place. And this goes.
(26:52):
This is basic, Seriously, this is basic animal nature, human nature,
animal nature, all of them. I promise you if these
guys are taken a notch or two, and by the
way too, keep in mind, okay, keep in mind this
idea where you go off to prison and you get
(27:14):
three squares a day, you get internet privileges, you get libraries,
you get to go back to school, you can earn
your degree, all of these different things that we have
attempted to try and make available for these people. No, no,
you got to make it harder, harder than what they did.
(27:40):
That's how it works. That's how it works. Anyway, these
democrats and these idiot leftists, they're not going to learn
about this. They're not going to understand any of this,
(28:02):
and by the way, that attack is apparently still under investigation.
So yeah, we're gonna keep seeing this, especially in Democrat
run cities, because they have those thought processes where they're like, uh,
you gotta be you gotta be uh you know, you
gotta gotta try and be good to them, but they
(28:26):
just had conflict in their heart. Really no, I'm sorry. Well,
here's another thing that the stupid Democrats in Congress are doing.
Apparently two Democrats have decided to file articles of impeachment today.
(28:49):
The first one is from Representative Haley Stevens. She is
a Democrat out of Michigan. She has filed articles of
impeachment against Robert F. Kennedy Junior. Stevens accused Kennedy of
failing in his role and criticized him for allegedly neglecting
(29:11):
science and public safety. I'd like to understand what law
he may have broken, Like, seriously, what law did he break?
What high crime or misdemeanor did he perform? Just sitting
(29:32):
here and saying that that allegedly he neglected science, he
hasn't been in office long enough to affect public safety
here folks. I mean, seriously, I just I I don't
get it. I don't understand why these people, you know,
apparently because of the fact that they impeach Trump over
(29:53):
a simple ass phone call, they feel the Democrats feel
like they can impea person for just about anybody. For
those of you that aren't students of US history, impeachment
was a tool that was to be used sparingly, sparingly. Oh, palms,
(30:24):
you gotta go back and watch last night's episode. Last
night's episode had that, by the way, that last night's
episode covered a little bit of Jasmine Crockett running for
Senate now in Texas, So I gotta go back and
look at that one. Anyway, moving on here the other one.
(30:47):
And by the way, responding to the impeachment move, the
Health and Human Services spokesperson Andrew Nixon stated, yeah, Secretary
Kennedy remains, folks, on the work of improving Americans' health
and lowering costs, not on partisan political stunts. There you go,
(31:12):
there you go. That's that's the way that works. So yeah, yeah,
all right. Also, oh, this guy, Oh, let's see if
I can find him here. Oh, yes, here he is.
(31:39):
Oh do you remember this guy? Here. I'm gonna I'm
just gonna put him up here, yes, because you know,
you remember this guy. He got like a bad, a
bad freaking uh. I don't know if that's his real
hair or not, but you remember this guy. He's almost
as bad as like Al Green, you know Al Green
(31:59):
of the Congress. He's just as bad. Well, anyway, this
guy filed articles of impeachment again against Donald Trump. Yeah, yeah, Shri.
What's his name, Shri Bendatar Thannis Star. I don't know. Anyway,
(32:21):
He's also from Michigan. What the hell do they put
in the water in Michigan? I don't know. But anyway,
this guy has filed impeachment articles of impeachment against Secretary
of War Pete Hegseth. That's right, Pete hag Seth, now
(32:41):
the India born congressman, cited false reports alleging that hag
Seth ordered a secondary strike on cartel operatives aboard a
drug boat who had survived an initial attack. He alleged
in his bringing of articles of impeach Pete Hegseth has
(33:01):
been using the United States military to extra judicially assassinate
people without evidence of any crime. Former military attorneys have
come out and asserted that his conduct constitutes war crimes.
We cannot allow his reprehensible conduct to continue, which is
why I have filed these articles to impeach him. Okay, folks,
(33:27):
let me just point something out here. See, they're this guy.
He's an admiral. Yeah, he's the head of US Special
Operations Command, and uh, you know he approved both the
initial strike and the follow up actions. And this guy,
(33:47):
this Admiral Frank Bradley, has repeatedly stated that Secretary Hegseth
never gave the alleged kill everybody order cited by the idiot.
He's just the ol my gosh, Yes, we're gonna we're
gonna impeach him on a lie. Well that's what they do,
(34:11):
is they impeach on lies, they impeach on bullshit. Admiral
Bradley provided video to a Congressional panel showing that the
two cartel operatives who survived the initial strike, they climbed
back onto the wreckage of the boat and started to
(34:33):
gather the vessel's cargo. They gathered the vessel's cargo. Well,
that indicates that they're trying to save the drugs that
we were looking to, you know, get rid of which,
by the way, how anybody could think that a boat
(34:53):
going like one hundred miles an hour on the water, Oh,
that's just a fishing trawler when it has you know,
like fifty five gallon drums of what I'm assuming is
going to be drugs. I mean, seriously, come on, it's
just seriously. Oh, they were fishing. No, they weren't. I
(35:16):
don't know of anybody that goes fishing in the ocean
that travels at one hundred miles an hour on the
water anyway, And you know, to be honest with you,
Palms brings up a good point. Why is nobody talking
about either the pilot being a bad shot or the
(35:38):
munition that was sent that was sent didn't do it
right the first time? Why is nobody asking that anyway?
I don't know, I don't know, but yeah, So, the
admiral stated that because it appeared that the two survivors
(36:00):
were attempting to contact other nearby cartel boats in an
effort to salvage that shipment, the survivors were deemed to
still be in the fight and were considered valid targets. Yeah. So, yeah,
(36:24):
I don't know if anybody's seen images of these damn
drug boats. But I gotta tell you, they're freaking like
they're like a cigarette boat. And you have the two
guys at the back who have like four outboard motors
lined up to make the boat run that fast. Okay,
just think like Miami Vice cigarette boats. I mean, I
know I'm dating myself going back to the eighties for
(36:46):
this show, but go take a look at Miami Vice.
I mean the old Miami Vice, the cigarette boats with
the massive, big engines. There's four or five of them
or whatever. How can anybody sit there and say, oh, yeah,
those are fishing boats. No, there's there's not even a
single fishing like. There's no cabin, there's no cover, there's
(37:10):
no I mean, oh my gosh, I don't know. I
just I just can't imagine these idiots. Oh anyway, why
they are doing this. I have no idea. And not
only that, but you also have to remember somebody actually
even argued they were like, well, a boat can't travel
(37:33):
a thousand miles over the water. They can if you
modify their fuel system to have multiple cans, multiple gas cans,
or multiple gas tanks or fuel tanks. Some of these engines,
now those ones were outboards, but even some of the
(37:55):
inboards are actually running on diesel engines. I mean, yeah,
you're not fishing well like like like Sleazy says is,
you're not fishing with four fifteen thousand dollars outboard motors.
(38:16):
Not to mention there wasn't any fishing gear that was
evident in the images prior to the being blown up.
They also also don't think about the fact that, you know,
maybe they're doing this pony express style. For an example,
they run the boats as far as they can go,
(38:37):
having enough fuel to get back and then transfer stuff
out in the middle of the Caribbean Sea, transfer it
and then set that boat goes and continues the rest
of the way. So maybe both Maybe these boats can
do one thousand miles, but they're doing one thousand miles
where in five hundred mile lengths or something like that. Anyway,
(38:59):
I just I these people, Oh I'm just telling you,
these people are so idiots, are so stupid. And yes,
they breed and they vote and they do all kinds
of other stuff. Oh yeah, palms, palms. There have been
I think something like seventeen or something along those lines
(39:21):
that have been uh disabled shot at blown up who knows. Yeah,
it's just the one on September second that they're focused
in on because the rest of them the first hit
took care of it. So it's just the one on
the second on September second that they're they're doing it.
Speaker 5 (39:40):
So yeah, anyway.
Speaker 2 (39:47):
Oh okay, let's go over. You know what I want
to talk about this wonderful, beautiful elixir that I drink
every single morning before I move on to my next story.
I drink coffee every single morning. I have a sixteen
ounce mug that my kids gave to me. It says
(40:08):
father like no other. It's one of my favorite Father's
gifts Father's Day gifts, you know, instead of a tie,
which I've got a bunch of ties. I'm looking at
them right now. I've got a bunch of ties. But
this gift gets used every single day and it's filled
with this wonderful morning pick me up known as coffee.
(40:31):
And if you still haven't tried seventeen seventy five coffee yet,
now is your shot. The seventeen seventy five Coffee Starter
Kit is available in a limited number of units, and
in each unit, you'll be getting the bull Dark roast
that hits hard, the smooth medium roast, and the Vitality
(40:54):
Mushroom coffee. So uh and by the way, that Vitality
Mushroom coffee gives you clean energy and laser focus no crash.
All of these coffees are single origin, small batch, toalksin
free and mold free. Plus. As a part of this kit,
you'll also be receiving my personal favorite, the gold spoon clip.
(41:21):
The gold spoon clip because Freedom isn't scooped with plastic.
It has a frother strong enough to stir up not
only your coffee but also your mother in law's opinions.
And let's be honest, it really isn't that hard to
do for your mother in law's opinions. Ah. And you'll
also be receiving in black seventeen seventy five tumbler. All
of these things come up to one hundred and seventy
(41:44):
dollars worth of coffee and gear, but you're getting it
for the low, low price of ninety nine dollars. This
is for the ones who've been watching seventeen seventy five
coffee blow up on Rumble and wondering if it's not
worth it. And uh spoiler alert, let me just tell
(42:05):
you this coffee it is. Go to the numbers one
seven seven five Coffee dot Com Forward Slash Studio. That's
seventeen seventy five Coffee dot Com Forward Slash Studio s
t U d Io, and grab your starter kit before
they are gone. By the way, that slash is the
(42:27):
question mark key on your keyboard. Okay, go to seventeen
seventy five Coffee dot Com Forward Slash Studio and get
bold beans, clean fuel, and a morning routine that stands
for something just like rumble does. Go to seventeen seventy
five Coffee dot Com Forward Slash Studio and grab your
starter kit today. All right, Well, you know, for as
(42:58):
much judicial law fair that we have running around in
this country, and for as many judicial judges more like
activists who don't follow and understand, perhaps haven't even read
the Constitution. They certainly don't understand it from a historical perspective,
for certain, But these activist judges, thankfully are being overruled
(43:24):
at times, more often than not by smart, smart judges
on these appellate courts. So apparently there was a lawsuit
with regards to Trump's ordering of Hegsath to put a
(43:48):
ban on military dudes in dresses. And this has now
worked up to the through the US District Court to
the Appeals Court, and the appeals panel shot it down.
They actually overruled the judicial or the district judge. So
(44:11):
the district judge Anna Reyes, who is a foreign born
Biden appointed, I don't really care lesbian judge. I don't
really care about that either. She previously worked as a
lawyer to fight and this is part of the problem
to fight the first prompt administration's immigration policy. See these
What happens here, folks, is that these these people drawing
(44:35):
these lawsuits, okay, are going around and shopping for judges.
And because they go and shop for a you know,
sympathetic judge, that's why we're getting a lot of these
activist rulings. They're not constitutional rulings. Okay. First of all,
(44:59):
they need to understand that constitutionally speaking, there is no
way that a federal judge, federal district court judge created
by Congress after the Constitution was ratified, or even suggested
to be ratified, that the district court judges cannot do
(45:23):
things that Congress does not have itself have the power
to do. And see that's That's the problem that I
have with this is that these federal court judges do
not have the jurisdiction to be able to overrule a
constitutionally created branch of government, meaning the presidency in this
(45:47):
particular case. See, these federal court judges are what they're
called lower courts. The only court that constitutionally has the
power to be able to block either the President or
Congress from passing laws is simply the Supreme Court. That's
(46:09):
the whole purpose of their being enacted. And if you
read Article three in the Constitution, it literally states lower
courts such that Congress shall may create and abolish. Okay,
(46:30):
so all of these lower courts that Congress is making,
they can't. Congress can't just because Congress can't overrule the
president necessarily they can impeach him. But our idea of
separation of powers, Congress can't tell the president what to do,
just like the president can't tell Congress how they do
(46:53):
their job. And so these people, these federal district court judges,
do not have the constitutional power. Regardless of whether they
say it's under Article three, it's not, it's not there.
They do not have the constitutional power to issue these injunctions.
That are basically broad in nature. That is a twentieth
(47:16):
century development. Okay, So anyway, this Judge Anna Reys decided
in March to indefinitely block the enforcement of the second
Trump administration's ban on Well, basically, this is what they are,
transvestites in the military, and she was suggesting that it
(47:41):
likely violated their constitutional rights. I don't think that there's
a constitutional right. Maybe somebody who I don't know might
have a copy of the Constitution can sit there and
say I don't think there's any constitutional right to serve
(48:05):
in the military. Yeah, I don't think there is. I
know this. So she suggested in her March eighteenth ruling
that the military band is soaked in animus and that
it was her responsibility as a judge to keep the
executive branch at heel. Now here's the problem. She acknowledged
(48:30):
as a part of this that she was having a
pernicious nature of judicial overreach. So she not only knew,
she not only knew that she was overreaching her authority.
She did it anyway. She did it anyway. Now, there
(48:52):
is no constitutional right to serve in the military. There
is no constitutional right to in women's clothing, there is
no constitutional right to being transgender. There is no constitutional
right to not have the military adhere to certain standards.
(49:15):
Because what a lot of people don't seem to understand
is there's a reason why there's military standards. See, the
military has to be, above all else, an extremely effective
fighting force. You cannot do that if a you don't
have the people in the actual physical shape that needs
(49:36):
to they need to be in in order to be
able to fight hours and hours and hours a day.
And not to mention the fact that just having somebody
in the unit who does not conform to the standard
military protocols is detrimental to the cohesiveness of the unit
(49:59):
itself and it can endanger operational effectiveness. This is why
you don't have somebody who may be well, I don't know,
injured in the military, somebody who may have to have
special considerations, like somebody who is a clear diabetic, or
(50:23):
somebody who cannot wear glasses. In fact, for the longest time,
the military actually had and I know this for a fact,
but the military actually had a ban on wearing contacts
in the military. You had to wear glasses. See, any
(50:47):
time you need any kind of a what is known
as thanks jar head for this terminology maintenance medications. Okay,
you are considered non deployed. When you are injured, you
are considered non deployable. I went through a couple surgeries
(51:07):
while I was in the service. I was non deployable
while I was recovering for that. Then if there were
a couple of field exercises that I couldn't go on
because of the fact that I was non deployable. See
all of these things, whether it's a medical condition, a
mental condition, a you know, whatever kind of condition that
you want, it all messes with military unit cohesiveness and
(51:34):
effectiveness in the field. If you have somebody and trust me,
I know this too, if you had somebody who does
not conform to the height weight standards in the military,
you get put on well back then it was called
the fat boy program. But you get put on to
(51:58):
you get put onto a program and you become undeployable.
And when you're undeployable, you are no longer of any
use to the military. That's why when you when women
become pregnant, there are times where you know the military
has frowned upon women getting pregnant because of the fact
(52:18):
that they become undeployable at that point. So this this idea,
for whatever reason, this idea that this judge is going
to be like, oh no, no, no, a man who
dresses in women's clothing, they are perfectly fine to be
in the military. No they're not. There are so many
(52:40):
other reasons as to why this is totally ridiculous. It's
totally ridiculous. Okay. Now, on Tuesday, a three judge panel
at the US Court of Appeals for the District of
Columbia handed the administration a pro upper and correct win.
(53:04):
It was a two to one decision. It stays Rayes's
order and green lights the enforcement of the ban. Now,
they cited as a part of this, by the way,
they cited the Supreme Court's six' three ruling in The
United States Versus, skurmeti which Upheld tennessee's ban on sex
(53:28):
rejecting genital mutilations and sterilizing pubity blockers for. MINORS Us
Circuit court Judges Gregory katsis And naomi raw that's r. Ao,
yeah see it. Didn't i'm laughing because my close captioning
(53:51):
didn't didn't catch it. Up, anyway both appointed By President Donald,
trump which AGAIN i don't care ruled that The War
Secretary Pete hegxas's ban on trans identifying military members likely
did not violate The constitution and the equal protection clause
(54:15):
in the Fourteenth, amendment nor does it actually trigger any
form of heightened scrutiny about.
Speaker 5 (54:20):
It so, yeah, Anyway.
Speaker 2 (54:29):
Katsassas actually emphasized that even if the policy contained a
classification triggering some form of heightened, scrutiny decades of precedence
establish that the judiciary must tread carefully when asked to
second guess considered military judgments of the political. Branches so
(54:52):
even he is basically, saying, hey even if there were,
something even if there were something that might classify as heightened,
scrutiny the jury or the, judge the judicial branch has
to tread extremely carefully because constitutionally, speaking.
Speaker 6 (55:16):
And this is, correct, okay totally, Correct.
Speaker 2 (55:19):
But constitutionally, speaking judges can't dictate what the military. Does
they can't because the military falls exclusively under the executive
branch in terms of its, management and that the only
thing that falls Under congress has to deal with gaining
(55:41):
the money in order to raise the. Army that's. It that's.
It so sitting here and trying to judge this whole.
THING i mean, Anything i'm. Serious even if you have
troubles with a particular, individual, like for an, example you
(56:03):
have an individual who is consistently causing trouble in the,
unit that can be a you, know under The Uniform
code Of Military, justice that can be an offense that
you could get discharged. For you could get tried and
discharged for it if you're a constant, clown and that
(56:26):
affects military effectiveness and readiness and so on and so,
forth the military cohesion or unit. Cohesion, man you're, gone
that's just. It you're. Out and anybody who hasn't been
in the military at, all, which by the, WAY i
was accused by a, total complete utter moron On facebook
(56:48):
that THAT i didn't know WHAT i was talking about
when it came to the. Military they in fact, STATED i. Digress,
here we're going to go. Down we're going to go
down the, trail the off the track. Trail but they
even accused me of only serving milkshakes and.
Speaker 5 (57:05):
Fries, YEAH i.
Speaker 2 (57:12):
Got A dd two fourteen to prove. It but, ANYWAY i.
Digress so this here In Trump's january twenty Seventh Executive.
Order it was Titled Prioritizing Military excellence And. Readiness, says
consistent with the military mission and LONGSTANDING DoD, policy expressing
(57:35):
a false gender identity divergent from an individual's sex cannot
satisfy the rigorous standards necessary for military service beyond the
hormonal and surgical medical interventions. Involved adoption of a gender
identity inconsistent with an individual sex conflicts with a soldier's
(57:58):
commitment to an honor, durable, truthful and disciplined, lifestyle even
in one's personal. Life so there you. Go. Now The
pentagon subsequently released guidance stating that military service by service
(58:18):
members and applicants for military service who have a current
diagnosis or history, of or exhibit symptoms consistent with gender
dysphoria is incompatible with military. Service and that is. TRUE
i almost didn't make it in to this service itself
(58:42):
for a various number of medical, reasons but one in
particular was THAT i have very low. Arches and history
is shown that when you don't have a really good
arch in your, foot you are prone to have having
foot problems like plantar fasciitis and other foot. Issues now
(59:08):
that's a physical milady, malady if you want to pronounce
it that. Way but that possibly could have made me non,
deployable which means THAT i would have been. REJECTED i
would have been in The World WAR ii terms code
forour F i wouldn't have been able to go. In
(59:31):
and that was a reference To Marvel's Captain america, Anyway so,
yeah so there you.
Speaker 1 (59:41):
Go.
Speaker 2 (59:42):
Now katsis continued and suggested That reyes's claim that The
pentagon's policy did not advance legitimate interest was more or less.
Baseless he said that she gave no sound reason for
overriding the secretaries considered. Judgment that she premised her claim
saying that medical studies now overwhelmingly conclude that gender dysphoria
(01:00:03):
is highly treatable on a declaration from one single doctor
who simply, stated in one sentence and without any kind of,
citations that gender dysphoria is highly. Treatable whoa oh that?
Was that was a hell of a hell of a call.
Out YEAH i GOT i finally got a. DOCTOR i
(01:00:24):
basically went and shopped, around just like everybody shops around for.
JUDGES i shopped around for a doctor and the doctor, goes, yeah,
yeah gender dysphoria is highly. Treatable we'll prove. IT i.
CAN'T i don't have any any things to any. CITATIONS
i don't have any, STUDIES i don't have. ANYTHING i
just say gender or dysphoria is highly, treatable and you're
(01:00:45):
supposed to accept. It it's, true just, like by the,
way it is when you look At trump and you, say, oh,
Yeah trump raped. Kids oh where's where's the? Proof, well
we don't have. It it's just somebody said ON cnn
That trump rapes. Kids oh So i'm supposed to believe
(01:01:06):
That trump rapes kids just because some rando on The
internet decided to say it ON. Cnn, NO i don't think.
SO i don't think.
Speaker 5 (01:01:14):
So so, yeah.
Speaker 2 (01:01:20):
Anyway katsis also added that she Meaning, rayes the judge
had downplayed evidence of greater mental health issues faced by transgender,
individuals and that is a.
Speaker 5 (01:01:32):
Fact so there you.
Speaker 2 (01:01:35):
Go the, court by the, way also Rejected raya's suggestion
that the policy is rooted in animus against, transvestites noting
that she looked beyond the Hag seth policy itself to
derive the animus from various statements made by the president
or other officials and approach The Supreme court had previously.
(01:01:58):
Rejected so, yeah there you. Go. Anyway, yeah so thankfully
that was a that was a win for the. Administration,
well NOW i love this. Person, NO i. Don't i'm being.
(01:02:22):
Facetious she's an. Activist. GOD i hope that there's some
legal way to basically say that because she was appointed
by the auto pen Of, biden that there might be
a way to get her, off to get her off
The Supreme. Court, oh let's hope that happens sometime in
(01:02:43):
the next three. Years BUT i. Digress, Yes Kotenji Brown
jackson is. Back, Uh Kotenji Brown, jackson who has literally no,
experience no knowledge of couldn't even identify what a woman
was she. Has there's no knowledge of or understanding of
The constitution of The United. States, now when they were
(01:03:07):
doing oral arguments On monday Of trump Versus, slaughter that's
THAT ftc, case you, know the firing of THE ftc. Commissioner,
Anyway oh, boy well's happening?
Speaker 6 (01:03:28):
Now oh things are still going. There what's happening?
Speaker 2 (01:03:39):
Now? Oh come, on, Okay, well, folks that told me
(01:04:18):
WHAT i needed to, know all, right come, on there we. Go, well,
folks that told me WHAT i needed to know about my.
(01:04:38):
Connections so this particular CONNECTION i can't necessarily utilize because
it doesn't it doesn't handle internet bumps as well as
the other. One uh, yeah all, right hmm well that's
(01:04:59):
going to be interesting to check. Out hmm, Yea and of,
course now and there we. Go oh, boy, anyway all,
(01:05:23):
Right i'm. Sorry i'm sorry about. That. Guys it looks
like my internet connection bounced in this particular way doesn't.
Connect you, Know i'm gonna be honest with. You jarhead
kind of mentions time to get. Starlink, starlink, unfortunately does not.
Transmit latency is an issue with starlink and streaming like. This,
(01:05:48):
okay so, yeah that's that's that's a. PROBLEM i WISH
i could But chevy fire the it. Guy, Yeah i'd
be firing, myself is what's. Happening but, HEY i had a.
FEELING i had a feeling that this was going to,
be you, know the night that something was going to,
happen and so this was an attempt to try a different,
(01:06:11):
way a different methodology of, streaming and it didn't. Work
so so there you. Go, anyway all, right so, yeah,
okay back to THE. Fdc so here's the thing is
that even THE Ftc Chairman Andrew ferguson issued a statement
(01:06:35):
at the time that That trump Fired, Slaughter Rebecca Rebecca.
Slaughter that he, Says President trump is the head of
the executive branch and is vested with all the executive
power in our. GOVERNMENT i have no doubts that his
constitutional authority to remove, commissioners which is necessary to ensure
(01:06:57):
democratic accountability for our. Government The Federal Trade commission will
continue its tireless work to protect consumers' lower prices and
police anti competitive. Behavior and that's true because let's be honest. Here, okay,
(01:07:17):
again looking at the, constitution the executive branch literally is the.
President all executive power is vested in The president of
The United. States there is no, aye we're going to,
have you, know a panel of people though all executive
(01:07:38):
power is vested in The president of The United. States
So Koateenji Brown jackson question whether or not presidents should
have the authority to remove the leadership of certain independent. Agencies,
okay who in their right, mind, yeah can tell. Me
(01:08:02):
and by right, MIND i mean who out there has the?
Intelligence is there any AND i know all My whiskey
warriors do because they're the smartest listening audience in all
of the. Ethosphere but is there any any place in
The constitution anywhere that states that there are independent agencies
(01:08:24):
outside of the three branches of? Government Meaning article, One article,
Two article. Three is there anyone anywhere that can point
to me where within The constitution it, Says, oh, yeah
we're going to have you, know unelected bureaucrats and they're
going to be independent and, uh you, know they're they're
(01:08:47):
untouchable by. GOVERNMENT i want to know where in The
constitution it states That congress has the ability to protect
protect certain. Agencies, yeah, well Jar head's already hit. It he's, like,
(01:09:11):
nope there is. None there is. None and Three chevy
points out that all agencies serve at the pleasure of the.
President that is, correct. Folks so, realistically there is No
there is no other answer other than scotis basically, Saying,
hey the president can fire whoever he, wants whenever he,
(01:09:32):
wants as long as the law is being implemented As
congress has written, it and the president is taking care
to ensure that laws are fully and faithfully. Executed that's.
It there is no other. Answer there's no other answer on.
(01:09:54):
This And Kateenji Brown jackson continued and says That congress
had established structures where nonpartisan, experts including, scientists, economists and
regulators hold responsibilities that she, argued should not fall under
direct presidential. CONTROL i suggest That Kateenji Brown jackson needs
(01:10:21):
to get a copy of The constitution of The United
states fifteen, minutes fifteen minutes to read this. Thing that's.
It that's. It. Now she went even, further and she
reflected on concerns that she actually linked to the founding.
(01:10:45):
Era oh my, god this is just. Wow she, goes
that has some, issues some, matters some areas that should
be handled in this way by nonpartisan. Experts That congress
is saying that expert bertise matters with respect to aspects
of the economy and transportation and the various independent agencies
(01:11:08):
that we. Have so having a president come in and
fire all the scientists and the doctors and the economists
and the PhDs and replace them with loyalists and people
who don't know anything is actually not the best interest
of the citizens of The United. States except there's only one, problem.
(01:11:28):
Folks there is nothing in The constitution that basically, states,
oh when you create this, law you're going to consult
with people who are considered who are considered to be the. Experts,
no this is an activist thought. Process this is what
(01:11:49):
an activist. Says oh you. Can't you can't question the.
Experts the experts are, experts and you can't question. Them bull,
HONKEY i. Can't in, fact if those experts were smart,
enough they would be, like, hell, yeah question me all the,
time BECAUSE i may be an expert, today but something
can change AND i won't be an expert. Tomorrow but, no,
(01:12:10):
no there's nothing in The. Constitution just bringing this constitutionally,
speaking there is nothing in there that says That congress,
itself oh we need to defer to the. Experts no we.
Don't there are certain times, when, yes you might consult with,
experts but the onus and the buck stops with The
(01:12:33):
president of The United states when implementing laws for this. Country,
see that's the. Thing the, legislator the, legislature which is
made up Of congress two, houses four hundred and thirty five, members,
sorry five hundred and thirty five, members they make the,
(01:12:54):
law they create the, law but they do not implement the.
Law the person who implements the law as the. President,
now if the lawyers want to demonstrate within the, law,
hey this is how we want to implement, it and
by all means write it in. There but if all
you do is just, say, hey create a commission called
(01:13:15):
The Federal Trade, commission and this is what it, does
and this is, this and then hands it over to
the hands it over to the, presidency who is supposed
to implement it the best that they. Can like, Three
chevy points, out, experts experts built The, titanic and what
(01:13:36):
happened with The Titanic it hit an iceberg and it freaking.
Sunk so, yeah, Yeah now she added to, this she,
said these issues should not be in presidential. Control so
whose control are they supposed to? Be? In unelected? Bureaucrats
(01:13:56):
you mean to tell me that you would have, agreed
and she, probably but you would have agreed with Doctor,
fauci who basically said, that, oh you know that whole
six foot thing that we made everybody, Do, YEAH i
came from out of. Nowhere we just sort of made it.
Up oh and by the, way those surgical masks that
we made everybody, wear that you, know caused potential problems with,
(01:14:17):
oxygen caused our young young children to have developmental sounds
bad but retardation because they couldn't see expressions on people's.
Faces oh and, yeah by the, way you, KNOW i
paid for AND i approved paying for that gain of
(01:14:39):
function research that happened over In. Wuhan but you, know, yeah,
YEAH i mean, SERIOUSLY i, Mean i'm, sorry but, uh
this is it's just. Ridiculous oh my, god this. Woman,
yeah these issues should not be in press resinential. Control
(01:15:00):
they don't need to be in anybody else's. Control and
to be completely, honest things like, transportation by the, way
outside of maintaining post, roads which is In article, One section,
eight there really isn't anything. ELSE i, mean granted that
seems to be a broad based, thing but what else
are we talking about? Here regulators are just responding to
(01:15:25):
the laws that were, created the laws that were created By.
CONGRESS i, mean this is this is. Ridiculous she, Goes
can you speak to me about the danger of allowing
in these various, areas the president to actually control The
Transportation board and potentially The Federal reserve and all of
(01:15:48):
these other independent. Agencies there is nothing in The constitution
that states that we need to have independent agencies by
non elected. Bureaucrats that is not what the intended Woman and,
YES i am calling you a, woman BECAUSE i actually
know what a woman. Is there is absolutely no way
(01:16:10):
that we should even have any independent agencies and unelected
bureaucrats running. Things. See that Was Woodrow wilson's. Idea, see
he thought That congress should be, like you, know so
far off the beaten, track That congress, itself you, know
shouldn't should be very, minimal and that there should be
(01:16:33):
a overpowering executive and bureaucrats should run the. Country you
know who runs. Countries you, know bureaucrats who run. Countries
that's called, socialism that's called, communism that's Called, Marxism, Leninism.
Stalinism that's where you get the bureaucrats in. There she also,
(01:16:59):
continue and this is even. Worse she also continued by
asking Why congress's judgment should take, precedence noting that one
would think under our constitutional, design given the history of
the monarchy and the concerns that The framers had about
a president controlling everything that in the clash between those
Two congress's view that we should be able to have
(01:17:21):
independence with respect to certain, issues should take. Precedence, no
that's the whole point in separation of, Powers. Lady we
don't want overarching run over arching unelected bureaucrats running. Things
that's the whole point these, People i'm telling, you she
(01:17:55):
lacks the education and the knowledge to understand what the
constitution actually. States they don't get. It and by the,
way there is an opinion piece in The New York.
Post i'm going to show it to you BECAUSE i
don't have time to walk through, it but you should
probably grab the link and check it. Out there's an
(01:18:17):
opinion piece in The New York post that basically states
What i've been, stating which is that A Supreme court
win For trump in THE ftc case would restore the
founder's original, design which is exactly what it needs to. Be,
(01:18:39):
see this is where they need to understand that if
The president, says, HEY i am the executive, branch you're,
fired they're able to do. That they have to be
able to do. That, Anyway let's hope that The Supreme
(01:19:04):
court can actually do what it needs to. Do all,
Right i've got one more article THAT i want to
hit and we're not going to get to some of
the other stuff Because i've been going off and we
had that little blip in the. Middle But i've got
another article That i'm gonna hit before the pet of the.
(01:19:25):
Week so here let's talk about. This So zorron Man,
danny he is doing basically the same thing THAT aoc
did and some other elected officials have, done Where zorron
is giving out advice on how to EVADE ice. Agents
(01:19:51):
and our secretary know. Him she has called it out and,
said you know, What Zorron mandanny could be violating The
constitution because he posted this video giving residents advice on
how to EVADE ice. Agents and technically she's correct because
(01:20:15):
the individual when you swear in as, mayor a mayor
is an. Executive the executive is supposed to ensure the
implementation and enforcement of. Law and, so Ma'am, danny it's
basically outlining the encounters WITH, ice pledging that his administration
(01:20:44):
with safeguard immigrant communities while protecting the city's constitutional right to.
Protest he, says as, Mayor i'll protect the rights of
every Single New yorker and that includes more than three
million immigrants who call this, city their. Home but we
can all stand up TO ice if you know your. Rights,
well here's part of the. Problem there is zo ron
(01:21:05):
that not only, that by the, way he also he
also incorrectly said some things because here he offered guidance
for immigrants who may ENCOUNTER. Ice, first he, SAYS ice
cannot enter into private spaces like your, homeschool or private
area of your workplace without a judge's warrant signed by a.
(01:21:29):
Judge that is a. Lie all AN ice agent is
needs to have is reasonable suspicion and an inclination that
if they do not take you into custody at that,
moment that you're gonna, rabbit that you're gonna. Run that's
(01:21:53):
all they. Need they just need to think that you're
gonna take off because of that in That india altercation
or that interaction is the word THAT i was looking.
For and see that alone under immigration law means that
they can take you into. Custody they can also search
(01:22:17):
any place without a warrant if they have reasonable. Suspicion
see this is not probable. Cause because, unfortunately what a
lot of these idiots don't seem to understand is the
protections under THE us constitution only apply To american. Citizens
(01:22:37):
they do not apply to illegal. Aliens and so therefore
there is a little bit more latitude when dealing with
illegal aliens by our border enforcement because, technically AND i
need you to understand, this, technically regardless of where that
(01:22:58):
individual physically, resides meaning however far they're inside the border
of The United states technically and from a legal, standpoint
and ensured the same way By Scotus scotus, rulings they
(01:23:19):
haven't technically crossed the border because they have not entered. Legally,
therefore they are considered to be able to be. Searched
they are considered to be able to be arrested without a.
Warrant this is why the law was written the way
it was in the immigration. Law they are allowed to
(01:23:41):
do these. Things all they need to have is a
reasonable suspicion that one you are not in compliance with federal,
law federal immigration, law and two that you're going to
run if they don't take you into custody right now.
(01:24:03):
Now because he is spewing this, crap and he's basically,
saying If ice does not have a judicial warrant signed
by a, judge you have a right to SAY i
do not consent entry and the right to keep your door.
Closed that's, incorrect that is, incorrect that is. False and
(01:24:28):
by doing, so he is actually Violating title Eighteen United States,
Code section one one, one which is, assaulting, resisting or
impeding certain officers or. Employees you don't have to do
(01:24:49):
anything violent against these. People you don't have to do
anything other than stand in front of their. Vehicle you
have an assault their. Vehicle yet you're standing in front
of the. Vehicle they are. Automatically you are automatically in
violation of EIGHTEEN Us code one by impeding ice. Agents
(01:25:15):
end of. Story, okay end of. Story all you have
to do is. Intimidate you don't even have, TO i, mean, forcibly, assaults, resist, supposes, impedes,
intimidates or. Interferes that's. It he is interfering with their.
(01:25:38):
Agency this is WHY i don't understand why these governors
of these states and these mayors of these cities telling
the police officers saying things, like hey just stop them
from doing why they're not being arrested under this. LAW
i have no idea that is totally and unequivocally the
law that they should be using. Here it basically states
(01:26:05):
that anyone who is, impeding, intimidating interfering any person designated
under a different section of The title WHICH ice agents
are a part, of while engaging in or on account
of the performance of their official. Duties end of. Story
(01:26:27):
end of. Story he. Can't they. Cannot they, literally an
illegal alien cannot claim protections under The constitution because technically they're.
Not even even if they are physically, here they are
not legally crossed have crossed the border because they had
they didn't enter, Properly and so the court system all
(01:26:51):
the way up To scotis has agreed, That, hey doesn't
matter where you, are you're still technically not in The United.
States end of. Story coh these, People i'm Just i'm
getting sick and tired of these democrats who are twisting
and warping the law in such a way to make
it to Where, yeah this is a problem. Anyway all, right,
(01:27:17):
folks let me go ahead and get Tonight's pet of
The week. Up so let's see the.
Speaker 6 (01:27:23):
WEEK i think is this number right?
Speaker 2 (01:27:27):
Here all? Right Tonight's pet of The week comes to
us courtesy Of. Coco So coco has this new little
visitor and this new little visitor that has come. Around
(01:27:48):
let me go ahead and get uh get, it get
it up, here get this little visit up. Here she's
got a new little visitor that's running around on her.
Property this little visitor has now been Named. Earl this
Is Earl earle the. Ermine, yeah ermine is supposed to.
(01:28:16):
Rhyme is supposed to pronounce. It you're supposed to rhyme with.
Vermin It's earl the. ERMINE i would have called it the,
ermine but that's just me. Anyway. Anyway, yeah see even
that the close captioning wrote it the same, way regardless
of which WAY i pronounced. It but, anyway So earle
(01:28:38):
showed up, Apparently and just to give you some, Background
earl is also known as a, stoat is a member
of the weasel family and usually lives in the northern
areas Of North. America they're great hunters of. Rodents they
(01:28:58):
go after things Like mike for an. Example in the
summer they have a brown. Coat in the winter it turns.
White and apparently they have a distinctive black tipped. Tail,
Now coca wasn't able to get the distinctive black tipped
tail in any kind of a. Picture but that's, okay
(01:29:18):
we're not gonna we're not gonna penalty penalize you for.
That so She coco apparently let her dogs out a
few weeks, ago And earl started hissing at the dogs
from under some car mats That coco had laid out
on the, ground as you see in the photo behind.
Me and that's how they met. Him, now her son
(01:29:41):
took these, pictures so it's almost as Though earle was
posing for the. Pictures now her, Husband coco's husband said
that he saw he, knew he saw something white running
through the fields and was happy to find out what it.
(01:30:02):
Was so here Is earl The. Ermine there he is
under the, deck and as you can, see he's obviously
not afraid of the of the, humans the humans who are.
There so There's earl eating something on the ground or
(01:30:26):
sniffing something on the. Ground and there he is again
under the. Deck so that Is earl The. Ermine And,
earl by the, way apparently is a cute according To,
coco and looks like everybody, else cute little. Feller, Yeah
(01:30:47):
earl The.
Speaker 5 (01:30:48):
Ermine so there.
Speaker 2 (01:30:51):
You, go and, That, oh this one's kind of, blurry,
unfortunately but came. Close he almost got the. Tail look
over here in the corn in the. Corner you almost
almost got the tail in the. Shot it's just outside
of the. SHOT i was almost. There but, Anyway so
(01:31:15):
That's earl The, ermine cute little wild At Wild. Creature
that's the best shot of him right. THERE i had
to tell you there There's, Earl, Hi. Earl how you
doing all? Right? Folks that is it for tonight's. Show
and if you have A pet of the week that
you would like to see featured on the, program go
(01:31:37):
ahead and send it. In send it to fans F
a n s At American perspective dot. Online that's fans
F a n s At American perspective dot, online AND
i will go ahead and get you queued up for
next week next Week's pet of the. Week we will
(01:31:59):
see you tomorrow. Night oh BEFORE i, go make sure
that you head on over to rumble dot com get
yourself an account is, free and once you are signed
up and signed, in make sure that you search up
The American perspective channel and hit that Green fallow button
to get notified every TIME i go. Live and before
you take off, too don't forget hit those thumbs up
(01:32:21):
thumbs down are in the case of Three chevy a thumb.
Sideways we will see you tomorrow, night five Pm PACIFIC
Apm eastern, time right here On american. Perspective have a
great rest of your, evening and good night.
Speaker 1 (01:32:35):
Everybody the previous broadcast was produced in his own By
Active EYEMEDIA. Llc all rights reserved
Speaker 5 (01:33:07):
For