July 18, 2025 • 66 mins
In this explosive episode of Beyond the Paradigm, we dig deep into one of the most controversial cultural shifts of the last century: the feminist revolution. Was it truly about liberation — or was it social engineering from the top down? We investigate the disproportionate Jewish influence in the early feminist movement, from media moguls to radical academics, and connect the dots to the rise of what some insiders call the Awful Cabal — affluent, urban, liberal white women pushing globalist values through academia, politics, and pop culture. Who funds them? Who protects them? And what’s the endgame? Follow the money, trace the ideology, and prepare to see feminism in a whole new light — one the mainstream doesn't want you to see.
Linksemail:beyondtheparadigm@yahoo.comBeyond the Paradigm - YouTubeinstagram.com/paradigm1979twitter.com/paradigm_79(1) FacebookSupport The Show patreon.com/BeyondTheParadigm buymeacoffee.com/beyondthep5Guest Link
Linksemail:beyondtheparadigm@yahoo.comBeyond the Paradigm - YouTubeinstagram.com/paradigm1979twitter.com/paradigm_79(1) FacebookSupport The Show patreon.com/BeyondTheParadigm buymeacoffee.com/beyondthep5Guest Link
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
M You're here because you know something. What you know
you can't explain, but you feel it. You felt it
your entirely. Do you know what I'm talking about, Matrix.
(00:28):
I had dreams that weren't just dreams.
Speaker 2 (00:35):
We accept the reality of the world with which were presented.
Speaker 1 (00:38):
It's as simple as that. Billions of people just living
out their lives oblivious, they talks. You're good, Hey, do
you believe their world? You can deny all the things
I've seen, all the things I've discovered, not for once
long because too many others know what's.
Speaker 2 (01:00):
Happening, and and no one.
Speaker 1 (01:03):
No government agency, has jurisdiction over the truth. Hello, and
welcome to Beyond the Paradigm. I'm your host, Paul bracal.
It is great to be back with a new episode.
Like I said on the previous episode that A released,
which was a reloaded episode, I have been away on holiday,
so the podcast obviously and work, all these types of
(01:24):
things take a back burner when you're having a family
holiday and relaxing and just coming away from sort of
reality for a week and a half or so, and
it's good to do that. I encourage people to take
time out, never neglect your families, spend time with your families,
but take time out to have rest, go on holidays.
(01:45):
Because it's a crazy world. It's a wicked world, and
it drains you mentally, physically, and spiritually. So if you
are new to this podcast, welcome. What can you expect
Well this podcast we challenged the Mainstrea narratives. We dig
deep into many things like history, ancient history of looks
into UFOs, looks at all kinds of conspiracies, We've looked
(02:08):
at false flag operations. We're basically uncovering what lies beneath
the ideologies shaping our world today. And this is all
done through a Christian perspective, as I am a Christian,
so we examine all this in the light of a
biblical worldview. But just before we go into the episode,
little bit of housekeeping, just want to remind people that
(02:31):
I do have an Instagram. You can go on there
and follow me on there. Do post short videos on there,
which are also linked to my Facebook account. So if
you don't have Instagram but you have Facebook, follow my
page on Facebook and you'll see the videos that I
post on there. Quite active on Instagram. I do have
a Twitter, but I mentioned this before I am shadow
band on there. It's a bit of a waste of time,
(02:52):
to be honest with you, but I still have one
and sometimes I post on there and every now and again,
and like always, guys, I'm going to ask for your support.
And the number one way to support the show is
to first of all, follow the show and then give
the show a rating, and if you think I've earned it,
give me a five star rating, as it will help
make this podcast more visible or there are so many
(03:13):
podcasts out there and want it to just be visible
so it's easier for people to find when they're looking
through for episodes or just looking for podcasts to listen
to which are relevant to the things that they enjoy
listening to and are interested in. You can also support
the show financially. You can do this through my Patreon,
(03:34):
so for less than one pound a month, or it's
in dollars so it's one dollar, but that's less than
one pound a month. You can't even buy a cup
of tea from a cafe for that or a cup
of coffee. And you do help me keep this show
on air because there are costs and curred monthly running courts,
and then sometimes I need to buy new equipment such
(03:56):
as a new microphone, for example, which I do need.
This microphone now has probably had its day, but hopefully
the quality is good enough that it's not distracting, but
it's just really helpful and it's really really appreciated to
the people that have signed up to that. And I
would like to welcome JP who signed up to be
a patron of the show. So thank you JP for
(04:19):
signing up, and also Tim prevost or Prevost, I'm sorry
if I've mispronounced your surname, but welcome Tim, and thank
you for signing up to be a patron of this show.
And there is another way you can support the show financially,
and some people have done this by making one off
donations on Buy Me a Coffee. And I will leave
(04:40):
as usual all links in the show description. So without
further ado, let's get into this episode today, which is
definitely going to be controversial. Today I'm going to be
diving into feminism now, not this simplistic slogan of equal
(05:02):
rights for women, but the deeper routes the philosophical framework
and the consequences of the feminist movement, especially how it's
been used, funded and guided by interests that go far
beyond women's empowerment. So we're going to look in to
(05:23):
feminism and then what I believe is probably the greatest
enemy of the West, and I'll identify who that is
towards the end of this episode. And we're also going
to take a sober look at something rarely discussed in
(05:43):
polite conversation, the disproportionate Jewish influence in shaping of radical
feminist theory and its institutional spread, not out of bigotry,
but to understand historical patterns of influence and the ideologies
that sprang from them. So let's look at, first of all,
(06:07):
the route the real origins of feminism and feminism came
in different waves. So the first wave of feminism in
the nineteenth century, it began with real grievances like a
lack of voting rights, property laws by US towards men,
limited access to education, and so on, and thinkers like
(06:31):
Mary Wollstonecraft laid the groundwork with Enlightenment principles arguing that
reason and education should apply to women as well as men.
But even this early feminism contained seeds of something more
radical and subversive, a reordering of the traditional family and
(06:53):
gender roles, and as we move into the twentieth century,
particularly the second wave feminism of the nineteen sixties and seventies,
we find an overwhelming ideological shift away from legal rights
and towards cultural revolution. Feminism began to push not just
for opportunity, but for dismantling roles and norms and ultimately
(07:17):
the family itself. Now, before I'll go any further, I
do want to say that in no way I am
attacking women at all, And as a Christian, I believe
that male and female men and women are created in
the image of God, and ontologically we are all of
(07:39):
equal value. Men aren't less in the eyes of God
than women are, and vice versa. Women aren't less in
the eyes of God than men are. We've just been
created for different roles. So I just wanted to say
that before I went any further, before people start saying
that I'm being sexist or whatever, and taking a calculated
(08:02):
look at feminism and now it's an enemy of the West,
and then looking at the enemy of the West, which
is a great enemy of the West. So that was
sort of the first wave, and we moved now at
looking at feminism and sort of elite social engineering. So
(08:23):
feminism didn't just grow organically. It was promoted, guided, and
funded by elite interest. And there's an example often cited
a conversation between filmmaker Aaron Russou and Nicholas Rockefeller, in
which Rockefeller admitted that women's liberation movement was about getting
(08:45):
women into the workforce so they could be taxed, and
then getting children into state schools early for indoctrination. And
that's what's happened, isn't it. Basically children now have the
said to a state school, they are being indoctrinated. And
(09:06):
because of the cost of everything, now what once would
have been affordable by one income now takes two incomes.
And this has all been done by design, obviously. So
let's look at some of these cultural architects of feminism.
Small number of individuals, often coming from radical political backgrounds,
(09:30):
shape what feminism would become. And among these a significant
number were Jewish intellectuals, a historical fact that must be
examined with contexts, not malice. So notable figures include Betty
Freedom born Betty Neomic Goldstein, who wrote The Feminine Mystique
(09:54):
in nineteen sixty three. Freedom's book was the catalyst for
the second wave feminism, portraying housewives as prisoners in a
suburban hell. What is less known is that Freedom had
deep Marxist ties, including work with Communist front groups in
the nineteen forties, which she later downplayed in her later life.
(10:17):
Glorias Steinhem, another central figure of second wave feminism, worked
with the CIA in the nineteen fifties through the Independent
Research Service. Though not Jewish herself, Steinhum's rise was aided
by heavily Jewish publishing and media networks. Her brand of
feminism promoted sexual liberation, corporate careers, and anti male rhetoric.
(10:42):
Shulimuth Feirestone, author of Dialectic of Sex, was an explicit
Marxist feminist who called for the abolition of the family
and the use of technology to eliminate pregnancy. She envisioned
a future where women would be liberated from biology itself.
Her background, again was Jewish and leftist. And what is
(11:08):
interesting about Shulimth Firestone is that she died at the
age of sixty seven in her own home, all alone.
She died of starvation and her body wasn't discovered for days.
So there she has reaped to the wind and sawn
(11:29):
the whirlwind she advocated for the destruction of the family,
and she died all alone, miserable, starved to death. Andrea's Working,
an extreme radical feminist known for her anti male writings
and support of censorship laws, had Jewish heritage and used
(11:49):
her trauma to justify broad ideological prescriptions for society. Emma Goldman,
an anarchist and early advocate of feminism, was also Jewish
and advocated for sexual liberation and destruction of religious and
bourgeoisie institutions. Now I'm not saying that Jews all alone
(12:16):
created feminism. That's obviously too simplistic. But when we look
at it, there was a disproportionate role of Jewish thinkers
in the second wave of feminism, especially those with Marxist
or atheistic world views. So we've got to ask this question,
(12:36):
what cultural values were they promoting, And often the answer
is anti traditionalism, rejection of Christian family structures, and utopian
revolution through social engineering. So what about feminism and the
collapse of the family. Well, the feminist narrative rebranded the
(12:57):
family as an institution of female oppression, and that's the
propaganda that's been promoted over and over again. And you
probably come across women like this who say things like, oh,
don't say women should, you know, be looking after the
children and you know, men should be house husband's a
(13:18):
house husband. That has got to be one of the
most horrific name tags I've ever heard. And I've heard
someone in a place used to work and they said, oh,
I used to be a house husband. If you're a
house husband, you've been completely emasculated. It's just that simple.
It's horrific. Now they rebranded the family, like I said,
(13:41):
as an institution of female oppression, and in Freedom's words,
the home became a comfortable concentration camp. And what are
the outcomes of this type of propaganda, Well, the outcomes
are absolutely devastating. So devoce rates doubled after more fault
divorced laws really pushed by feminists during the nineteen seventies,
(14:06):
fathulessness soared, especially in minority communities, and today over seventy
percent of African American children are born out of wedlock.
Single motherhood became normalized, despite data showing worse outcomes for
children in single parent homes. Marriage rates plummeted, birth rates fell,
(14:30):
and emotional instability among young people roles dramatically traditional motherhood,
once revered, was now seen as a failure. Daycare replaced
parental care. Feminism told women they could have it all,
but never told them the cost. And I just want
to go back to these traditional motherhood was once revered
(14:53):
and this daycare replacing parental care. So motherhood it was revered,
and it was actually shameful for a woman not to
have children, and it's the exact opposite now it's not
seemed really as shameful. In fact, a lot of them,
these feminists, they see it as shameful actually having children,
(15:15):
and that's the inversion that they've done now. Incidentally, in
Nazi Germany, there was a thing called the marriage loan
which was introduced in nineteen thirty three, and this was
a low interest loan of one thousand rights marks given
to newlywed couples. However, the lawn was forgiven incrementally for
(15:35):
each child born, so for the first child twenty five percent,
second child and other twenty five percent, and so on,
so after four children, the entire lawn was essentially wiped out.
So this was obviously meant to encourage early marriage and
child bearing. And they also gave out what's called the
(15:56):
Mother's Cross or the Mutter crowds. Now, obviously it's not
a financial benefit, but it was actually a state honor
awarded to mothers for bearing multiple children. So you've got
a Bronze Cross for bearing between four and five children,
you got her Silver Cross for bearing between six and
(16:17):
seven children, and you've got the Gold Cross for having
more than eight children, so eight or more. And this
public honor carried with it social prestige. That's something they
don't tell you in history class. Is it daycare then,
so it's replaced parental care. I've heard people talking at
(16:41):
work and the same things like, oh, it's costing me
a fortune this daycare. And basically what's happening is with
people in this country and all over the world, and
Western nations particularly. I mean, you've got the mother, they're
having the children, right, they're having a child within a
few months, they might take a few months off, they're
(17:02):
going back to work, handing the kids over to strangers,
they're going into day care, and then they're paying out
loads of money a month. Well what's the point in that.
And I raised this point because people are talking about, well,
we had to get back into work to pay for
the child care. Well, no you didn't, because there was
(17:23):
free child care available called the mother, and the mother
should have been raising the children. This is what we
did as a family. My wife, when the children were
growing up, she was at home with the children. We
didn't hand them over to strangers. We lived with one
income because we were able to, not because we were loaded,
(17:48):
but because we cut our cloth accordingly. And people now
they're going to work, they've got two incomes, but the
second income he's all getting paid out in daycare. And
I actually find that absolutely a barrant that you're going
to hand your children over to strangers. And that's essentially
what you're doing. You're giving your children over to strangers. Yeah,
(18:09):
they mr have all these certificates and government approved and
all this stuff, but the reality is children go up
fast anyway. So you're handing your kids over, you're going
to work. You're going to regret it years later. There's
going to be regretted there that you didn't spend the
time with your children that you should have done. So
let's further look at sort of the economic fallout and
(18:31):
actually the psychological toll of this feminism. So you know,
feminism promise of economic empowerment came with massive trade off,
so the two income household became the standard, but prices
roles to match. So in real terms, families today are
poorer and more indebted than they were fifty years ago,
(18:53):
and corporate exploitation has increased. The same system feminists claim
to fight now profits from women who have abandoned motherhood
for cubicles and career ladders. So these women are sold
by these feminists or don't let your husband tell you
what to do, don't let him, you know, boss you
(19:14):
around and exercise authority over But the fine with them
going to work and being told to do what a
stranger tells them to do. So some man at works
now telling your wife what to do if she goes
to work, and these feminists are fine with that. Now,
I'm not advocating men bossing women around at home, but
(19:35):
there is a biblical structure which we are going to
go into, and there's a way that men and women
ought to treat each other. But the my simple point
is is that they're telling these women that they shouldn't
be listening to their husbands, but then going to work
and being told what to do off another man. Women
are more medicated, anxious, and depressed more than ever before.
(20:00):
A CDC report shows that women take antidepressants at twice
the rate of men. So, despite more freedoms, studies show
women are less happy today than they were in the
nineteen fifties, and that is an absolute fact. Women are miserable.
(20:20):
Women in work are miserable. Go to your workplace and
observe them. The miserable Men didn't fare much better. They
became disposable, unnecessary, and even soxic. The workforce became feminized.
Education catered to female learning styles. Boys are falling behind,
(20:42):
committing suicide at alarming rates, and losing a sense of purpose.
(21:25):
Third wave feminism ushered in gender fluidity, queer theory, and intersectionality.
No longer about women's rights, feminism became the vehicle for
social deconstruction. Gender was now a social construct. Masculinity became toxic.
(21:46):
Women were encouraged to behave like men, and men were
punished for behaving like men. If you watch television, which
I wouldn't recommend it, but a lot of the male
characters now are very effeminate or the stupid, wherein the
woman he's seen as being the powerful one, the clever, one,
(22:07):
the dominant one, and one of the things that's on
the TV over here at the moment, which is something
I will not watch and do not watch and not
watch football anyway, women's football. There's a big push on
this women's football now and encouraging, you know, young girls
to take up the sport of football and obviously abandoning
(22:31):
you know, marriage, don't get married, don't have children, be
a footballer. And a lot of these women's footballers are lesbians,
and these are now the role models being pushed for females,
young females growing up, these lesbian footballers. And the reality
(22:53):
is this football anyway, it's not of the same standard
as the male game. I mentioned it on a previous episode.
Like I said, I don't watch football, but I have
heard about this particular thing. It was a game between
a women's football team, a professional women's football team, and
(23:14):
I think it's happened a number of times with different
female teams playing like sixteen year old boys teams, and
the boys teams are beating them easily, like easily, So
they're pushing this women's sport particularly is football at the minute,
and it's not even the same standard anyway as what
men play absolutely nowhere near it, and it's so borran.
(23:37):
And I tell you what's even more ambarran women's boxing
and Women's Ultimate Fighting Championship absolutely a borring. If you
can sit there watching women beat each other up, you
need to give your head a wobble because that's disgusting.
I mean, the fact that you can watch men beating
each other up is bad enough, but watching women beat
(24:00):
up disgusting. And if you're a Christian, I'd ask you this.
Do you think how a lord would sit there watching
two women beat each other up or two men beat
each other up? I can tell you it absolutely would not.
So this assault on biological sex and family roles created
mass confusion, and many critics argue that this is by design,
(24:20):
which it absolutely is. Because of a society without identity,
without tradition, and without gender coherence. Guess what it's easier
to control. And that is what it's all about, isn't it.
It's always about the control, And again we see Jewish
intellectuals at the center of this postmodern shift. Judith Butler,
(24:44):
a philosopher and gender theorist, is a key proponent of
queer theory. Under critic of traditional gender roles and her
theories dominate university gender departments today. Now, what I wanted
to do is talk a little bit, just for a
few minutes about this nomadic tribe of the Coochy people
(25:07):
or the chuck Key people. Can't pronounce it anyway, It's
spelled chuk Cchi. And these are people that live in
the Arctic tundra in below freezing temperatures and needless to
say for them, their daily lives involve harsh conditions, rigorous
work and labor intensive responsibilities and just to be able
(25:30):
to survive in the six screen climate. Okay, So these people,
these Chucky people of indigenous Siberian descent and normads. So
they migrate seasonally across the icy tundra with their families
and belongings. They live in tents made of leather draped
over long poles, the hunter gatherers, and they subsistence survive
(25:52):
purely on what they can procure within their environment. Now,
the men heard reindeer. They then tether to the sleds
and they use these reindeer to pull the sleds along
the frozen ground during migrations. The men also continuously have
to assemble and disassemble the large tents that everyone lives
(26:14):
in whenever it's once again time to move on, And
of course the men also hunt for food. The tribe
eats and lives off whatever the men are able to
face or catch or hunt. Now, the women are mostly
tucked away safely inside the tents, tending to the babies
and the children, sowing furs and leathers to make sturdy
(26:34):
garments to safeguard the people from the harsh cold weather,
and cooking over large fires the food that the men
folk are able to hold back. The faces of the
men are red and leathery because of the freezing cold temperatures.
And on this program, one of the men from this
tribe had suffered frostbite on both of his feet and
(26:59):
his to have his feet amputated, yet he still worked
just as hard as the other men. The only telltale
sign of his physical disability was his uneven gait in
his large boots as he ran along with the other
men in order to catch reindeer. Now, the point is,
(27:20):
if you watch this video, one of the things it's
going to strike you is this that these people are
hardy because of the way of life, and there's absolutely
no traces of feminism to be found there whatsoever. Now,
under the harsh light of their severe and strenuous conditions,
the reality became manifests. Women need men just to survive.
(27:45):
They needed them just so that they can stay alive
in them harsh environments. So within the icy climate of
the arts A tundra, it was immediately obvious that the
men and women are vastly different. Women do not have
the upper body strength that is necessary to who erep
the tents they require for shelter and sleep. Women do
not possess the physical strength or speed needed to catch
(28:07):
and secure fleeing reindeer. Women do not have the same metal,
endurance or speed that are essential for hunting arctic animals,
and without these things they'd be absolutely no chance of
survival for this tribe. So the men do the grueling
laborer's tasks, and they simply accept it as their natural
(28:28):
responsibility to do so. There's no false bravado to be
seen anywhere, no fake flexing nor empty boss about being
empowered or independent. There are no women going around casually
talking big game about being you know, the boss babe
or whatever. Now that being said, the women, they did
(28:48):
work hard, and they contribute but they are happy and
completely satisfied with remaining within the warmth and safety of
the tent, where they are sheltered from the storms and
protected from the elements, and an easier and more suited
responsibility for them to keep the fire going, to cut
the food that the men spent the days hunting, and
(29:09):
to tent to the children. So what sane woman would
rebel against this natural order of things and protest? No,
you know, I refuse to be subjugated like this inside
the tent where it's nice and warm and toasted. I
feel so oppressed. Have every right to be outside in
the feezing tundra air getting ice burns due to freezing
(29:30):
cold winds. I have the choice to go out hunting
and possibly get frostbite leading to my limbs being amputated.
Why do women stay home like this? This is misogyny
down with the chucky patriarchy. They're not saying that order,
but these lunatics in the West would be saying things
(29:51):
like that. Now in the arts, it's undra. Like I said,
there's absolutely none of that sort of talk whatsoever. It's
only in the here and now, in our specific time
and place in human history, that such things of feminism
can emerge born from privilege and delusion, and after men
have arduously strived to build the world around us, tamed
(30:14):
the jungles that would otherwise devoured us, unsuccessfully constructed civilization.
Only then is it possible for some women to claim
that they are the same as men. Only then are
they able to boldly declare that whatever men can do,
women can do too, that they are strong and independent
(30:34):
women who have no need for men. When the work
you're referring to is just sitting comfortably behind the desk
pushing papers, or you have the luxury of a causy,
snug little off ace which is well equipped and it's
got air conditioning and heating soul, you're nice and warm
during the winter, you kept cool during the summer, then
(30:57):
you sure women are able to do the work just
like men. However, when the work involves laboring in below
freezing temperatures or extreme heat, exhausting yourselves, doing ditches, persevering
while working in sewers, risking your life fighting on the
front lines of war, than not so much. Inevitably, reality
(31:24):
exposes the delusions and hypocrisy that are embedded within feminism.
So here is some of the reality. The construction industry
overall ninety to ninety three percent of the employees and men.
Now that's the industry overall, which also includes some support roles.
(31:48):
If you're talking about on site labor jobs, ninety six
percent plus of people on building sites and men. Oil
rig workers or offshore oil and gas workers between ninety
five and ninety seven percent are men. Whale fishers and
(32:12):
commercial fishing ninety eight percent plus are men. This type
of fishing is one of the most dangerous professions in
the world with extremely high fatality rates, which is reflected
and it's overwhelmingly male workforce. Firefighters ninety five to ninety
(32:34):
six percent of men, and this is despite increased recruitment efforts,
and firefighting remains heavily male dominated due to its physical
and emergency response demands. Let's be honest. If your house
is burning down to the ground and your stock on
the top floor, right, do you want a couple of
(32:55):
women firefighters turning up? If you weigh like I do,
sixteen and a half stones, you're incapacitated and you want
to burly guys turning up six foot plus beasts who
can just pick you up, no problem. Well, I know
what I want, and I want the men to turn
up because they'll be able to pick me up and
carry me downstairs if I'm incapacitated. The women will not
(33:18):
be able to do it. I'm six foot three away
over sixteen and a half storm, They're not going to
be able to pick me up. And they are just
cold hard facts, cold hard data. So let's have a
look at some more cold hard data. In response to
feminists who talk about equality. Okay, let's talk about the
(33:41):
gender death gap. Ninety two percent of all deaths that
take place in the workplace are men. Okay, that's ninety
two percent of all workplaces deaths are men. So things
(34:02):
like construction, logging, commercial fishing, oil and gas extraction, transportation. Okay,
that's the reason, because of the jobs that men are doing,
so ninety two percent of all deaths. And these statistics
have used the US Department of Labor for that, So
that's in the United States. Okay. In twenty twenty two,
(34:22):
there was four hundred and eighty six fatal occupational injuries
so deaths. Five thousand and eighty four of the deaths
were men. What about war and military deaths? In virtually
every war in history, over ninety five percent of combat
fatalities have been male, and even today in most global
(34:47):
armedforces combat roles and ninety nine percent mail conscription which
we have in the UK, we had in the UK,
or you call it a draft in the United States,
it historically applied only to men. In World War I
World War II, tens of millions of men were conscripted.
(35:09):
They died in trenches, jungles, and deserts. The Vietnam War,
fifty eight thousand United States soldiers died, ninety nine percent
of them were men. So the state has long assumed
male disposability when it comes to dying for one's own country.
(35:30):
What about suicide and mental health? Men die by suicide
three to four times more often than women globally. In
the US, the UK, and Australia, men account for between
seventy five and eighty percent of all suicides. Men are
far less likely to seek help for depression, anxiety trauma,
(35:55):
and this is partly due to cultural pressure to be stoic.
Toxic masculinity is often blamed, but favullessness, isolation, and social
rejection play huge roles, problems that feminism rarely addresses seriously.
Death from homelessness or addiction or neglect. Men make up
(36:17):
between seventy to eighty percent of the homeless population in
Western nations. They also lead in deaths from drug overdoses, alcoholism,
and exposure to harsh weather. These are often invisible deaths
and are not counted in headlines or protests. Though this
(36:38):
gender death gap it's not accidental, and it actually reflects
a civilizational pattern where men are expected to die for
the country, sacrifice their bodies for infrastructure, suppress their emotions,
and bear the burdens of society silently. In exchange, they
receive very little recognition and often face social criticism if
(37:02):
they question the system that uses them. Modern feminism focuses
on women's inclusion in elite spheres, but remains largely silent
on male suicide, dangerous labor, inequality, frvolousness, and male mental health.
If gender equality is truly the goal, then the deaf
(37:23):
gap must be part of the conversation. Now, I won't
ask a question for any feminists who are listening. You
might not think you're actually a feminist, but you probably
are if you've grown up in this modern society. Because
even so called Christian women these days. If you put
(37:43):
them to the test about what the scriptures say versus
their feminism, their feminism will win every single time. But
my question is this, who enforces women's rights? Who enforces
women's rights? Well, the simple answer is this, men do.
(38:07):
Because unless men enforce the rights of women, women can't
enforce them themselves. And I'll give you an actual, real
world example. When the US the UK pulled out of Afghanistan,
what happened to the women over there? Within weeks, they
couldn't go to school, universities, work, all these types of things.
(38:29):
They basically went back to how they were twenty years
before the invasion because the men decided that that's how
it was going to be. Women are unable to enforce
their own rights. They need men to do it for them.
(38:50):
And if you doubt that, like I said, look at
the example of Afghanistan. But I'll also pose another question
to you. A country where there's been a civil war,
for example, and the government of that nation has been
overthrown by armed force, by physical armed force, namely one
(39:15):
country that that's happened to, where the army or the militia,
whatever you want to call them, we're women. I'll wait
because no one's going to be able to send me
a message, an email or anything naming any country at all.
Because every time there's a coupe or a military uprising
(39:36):
or whatever, a government overthrown, it's always by men, violently
overthrown by men. And that's the reality. These these are facts.
These are called hard facts. So one of the greatest
(40:38):
enemies of the West, of Western civilization is this the
awful cabal affluent white female urban liberals. They are a
seriously dangerous enemy of the West. White liberal women playing
(40:59):
in orderate role. They almost always are at the forefront
of any protests, lecturing others about systemic racism, white privileged,
toxic masculinity, and the need for equity in every sphere
of life. These same women are given every conceivable platform
(41:19):
to spew their revolutionary rhetoric. They demand to be heard,
and they do not hesitate to confront and shout down
their opponents. The prevailing attitude among them best fits the
popular quote attributed to the late Harvard professor Laurel Thatcher Ulrich,
who wrote in nineteen seventy six that well behaved women
(41:41):
seldom make history. This was apparently taken out of context
and is given a new meaning that if women are
to make an impact on society for good, they must
rebel against the norm and be disruptive. The notion of
a woman who is gracious and well mannered as she
protests is athema to the thinking of most contemporary white
(42:04):
liberal female activists. The modern warped feminist is consumed with
her own self righteousness. She is obsessed with virtue signaling
before others. She hasn't the faintest doubt about the rightness
of her cause, and anyone who opposes her or even
tries to temper her opinions, is no different than the
(42:25):
most deplorable humans we could imagine. Restraint and moderation aren't
permitted among today's feminists. Like the most rabid religious fundamentalist,
there is no reasoning with them. It's all nothing proposition.
So this powerful force, this awful capal, is reshaping the West.
(42:46):
So it's not through a war or invasion, but through
the ideological capture. The institutions of education, media, public health,
and law have been influenced. In fact, they've even been
dominated by this ideology called class that promotes emotionalism over truth.
That's a key point in all this it's a key
(43:07):
aspect of women's nature anyway, So they promote emotionalism over truth.
Truth isn't even they're not even bothered about truth. Inclusivity
over order, and identity over responsibility. It's not about just individuals.
It's in actual ideology, and it's one that's taken route
in the minds of this particular social class, these affluent
(43:32):
white female urban liberals. And many of these women are
working in media, academia, NGOs, and state bureaucracy, so ideas,
they don't stay in think tanks due that they travel
through institutions. So universities teach activist dogma under the guise
(43:53):
of education. Journalists fram narratives emotionally rather than factually. Hr
departments in force ideological compliance. Courts reinterpret language, gender and
law through equity lenses. The culture rewards emotional moralism, often
championed by what we call the professional empathy class. And again,
(44:17):
many of the influencers of white liberal women in their
thirties to fifties, not because of the race, really, but
it's because of their ideological worldview. It just seems to
be particular to this group of women, and they believe
that safety is more important than truth. Offense is a
(44:39):
form of violence. Victimhood is virtue, and institutions must protect
feelings and not uphold facts. There's this like tyranny of
soft power. It's not a tyranny of boots and guns,
but of emotional coercion. Policies are passed based on lived
(44:59):
des experience, not upon data. School curriculums are rewritten to
prioritize identity over competence. Language is police to ensure emotional
comfort over once debate. The long term effect is that
truth becomes dangerous and honesty becomes hate. And this is
how your culture dies. This is how any culture dies,
(45:23):
not from blunt force, but from emotional fragility being institutionalized
as law. And these white liberal women are at the
spherehead of the destruction of the West, or the deconstruction
of the West, but it can be destruction. They're destroying
it anyway, deconstructing it, whatever you want to call it.
(45:44):
Gender confusion, displacing biological reality, family breakdown under the banner
of liberation, open borders seen as compassion regardless of consequences,
Eurasure of national identity in favor of a global equity.
Religious conviction is now recast as hate speech. And at
(46:06):
the core of all these trends is the rejection of
objective truth and the rise of emotional relativism, a cultural
framework that claims to be tolerant but in practice silences
dissent and erodes civilizational coherence. The media obviously plays its
(46:27):
role as then enforcer of numerality. Legacy media and entertainment
platforms act as the priesthood of this new religion, with
obviously white liberal women at the forefront. It's the lead
in editorial and production roles that dominate morning talk shows,
daytime news commentary, lifestyle journalism, public school policies, and children's programming.
(46:52):
Topics like motherhood, masculinity, national pride, or biblical faith are
portrayed as regressive or toxic, while the highest virtues become inclusion, affirmation,
and therapy. So they've moved away from empowerment to actual control.
Now originally sort of feminism aimed to address some real injustices,
(47:16):
but in its modern elite form it is morphed into
a system of soft totalitarianism and moral absolutism dressed as empathy,
a justification for the erosion of masculine leadership. Family hierarchy
and religious authority. And what's been the result a society
where men are demoralized, children are confused, and institutions are
(47:41):
hollowed out. And I just want to quickly examine the
nature of women, because I've talked about emotions and emotional
moralism and all these types of things. When I'm talking
about these white liberal women now women and nurturers, they
are disposed to care, to treat and help others, the
(48:03):
natural do gooders. They have this innate pole to help
and ease the suffering of the less fortunate, and their
inclination is to make things better their helpers at heart. Now,
obviously these are not necessarily bad qualities, the good qualities,
but they must be kept in check lest it more
into the kind of militant women who have taken hold
(48:25):
in our society. And there's the second reason, and it
lies in the emotional nature of women. And they tend
to think from the heart, not so much as from
the head. Women generally tend to be less critical and
cautious in their thinking the men. They are often more reactionary,
and the heartstrings can be pulled more easily than their
(48:48):
male counterparts. So when you think back upon the time
when women weren't allowed to vote. It wasn't just because
or we just don't want women to vote. It's like
any kind of law, like the laws of God or
whatever that are seen as sort of stopping us doing something,
you know, or imprisoning us. They're actually there to protect us.
(49:10):
And maybe, just maybe the reason why women weren't allowed
to vote back then was because there was a greater
understanding of women's nature and they were maybe seen as
being dangerous because they are nurturers and they are given
over to emotionalism more than men. Now, obviously there are
exceptions to what I'm saying, and there's plenty of women
(49:33):
who are careful thinkers who are not as easily manipulated
emotionally as other women. Now, women like this are probably
the exception and not the known. Unfortunately, they are the outliers.
I don't even think it comes natural to them, and
they must fight against their more trusting and emotional natures
(49:55):
in some way. Now, bear in mind, I'm not saying
that men are completely free of emotionalism and less critically
minded in the way women generally are, and there's plenty
of men out there who can be just as irrational
at times and emotionally driven, but overall I'm talking overall now,
on balance, males tend to be different in this realm
(50:16):
than females. Men are not as easily emotionally manipulated as women,
and in this sense, the two sexes really are different
from each other, and it should surprise nobody. While religious
Charlatans and radical Marxist groups have so easily preyed on females,
they understood the nature of females and they exploit it
(50:40):
for all its worth. Cosmetic manufacturers target women in their
advertisements in ways that comport with the nature and unique
proclivities of the females. They know good and well that
most women are gullible and can be easily manipulated, and
they would never admit it. Of course, they would not
(51:01):
have had the same level of marketing success if these
fundamental distinctions were not kept in mind. You see, the
Bible talks about remembering the old paths and the ancient landmarks,
and like I previously just mentioned, there's laws in the Bible.
The laws there, they're like a fence, really like a
(51:22):
boundary to keep us protected. And when we step outside
of those boundaries, it has devastating effects on us personally,
on our families, and then on why the society doesn't it.
So before I move on to what the Bible says,
where do we actually go from here? Sort of restoration Wise, Now,
(51:45):
we can't deny, and I don't deny, women deserve rights.
Women are equal to men. They are as precious in
the sight of God as men are. In that instance,
there is no difference. But we have have different roles,
and we've been created for different roles. Women have agency,
and women have made an extraordinary contributions to the world.
(52:09):
But we must reject the radical, anti family, anti biological,
and anti spiritual world view that feminism has become. We
need a restoration of the family as the founder of civilization,
complementarity between men and women, not competition, a return to
(52:31):
values rooted in faith, community, and tradition, not ideology. It's
not about turning the clock back, but it's about recognizing
that the path we've been on is leading to civilizational suicide.
So as we begin to close out this episode, it's
crucial to distinguish the modern ideology of feminism from the
(52:55):
eternal truths of scripture. The feminist movement says, a woman
UN's worth comes from Korea independence and rejecting male authority.
But the Bible gives a far richer, more dignified, and
ordered vision, one that does not diminish women, but places
them in a divine framework of purpose, honor, and beauty.
(53:19):
So women as a help meet, equal in value but
distinct in role. The first woman, Eve was not created
as a rival to Adam, but as a help meet,
not as inferior, but complementary. Okay. So the Lord said
Genesis two, verse eighteen, it's not good that man should
(53:43):
be alone. I will make him a help meet for him. Now,
the Hebrew concept of help here is the word easier.
It doesn't imply weakness. It's often used in the same
terms as when God is helping Israel, the ancient people
of Israel. So it says that she was also made
(54:03):
for the man, okay, not the other way around. So
the woman was made for the man, not the man
made for the woman. One Corinthians, chapter eleven, verse eight
to nine. For the man is not of the woman,
but the woman of the man. Neither was the man
created for the woman, but the woman for the man.
This establishes order, not hierarchic of worth, so you need
(54:29):
to take that on board order, not hierarchic of worth,
the glory of the home and motherhood. In today's world,
the home is belittled, but Scripture exalts the home as
a realm of influence, holiness, and service. A godly woman
is at the heart of that home. Proverbs thirty one,
(54:52):
twenty seven to twenty eight. She looketh well to the
ways of her household, and eateth not the bread of idleness, child,
and a rise up call her blessed her husband also,
and he praiseth her the Proverbs thirty one woman is industrious, intelligent, resourceful,
(55:12):
and focus primarily on flourishing of her family and community.
This is not oppression, its divine dignity submission. In church
and marriage, the Bible teaches male headship in the home
and the church not as tyranny, but as a loving responsibility.
Women are called to submit not to all men, but
(55:36):
to their own husbands, and in the church contexts to
male eldership Ephesians five twenty two to twenty four. Wives
submit yourselves unto your own husbands as unto the Lord.
For the husband is the head of the wife, even
as Christ is the head of the church. Therefore, as
(55:57):
the church is subject unto Christ, so let the wives
be to their own husbands in everything. This is not cultural.
Paul roots it in creation order, not just social norms.
One Timothy two verses twelve to fourteen. But I suffer
not a woman to teach, nor to assert authority over
(56:18):
a man, but to be in silence. For Adam was
first formed then Eve, and Adam was not deceived, but
the woman being deceived was in the transgression. So if
you read chapter three of Genesis, the devil doesn't go
to Adam, because as he does, he inverts everything. He
(56:39):
reversed the roles. He went to Eve, and he deceived Eve,
not Adam. Obviously Adam did eat of the fruit via
the hand of his wife. Now it doesn't mean that
women are less intelligent or less spiritual. It simply means
God has ordained specific roles for men and specific rolls
(57:00):
for women in the church and for his glory and
the leadership rolls for men. If you go to a
church and a woman comes and stands in the pulpit,
get up and walk out, because that's not a real church.
So they shouldn't be in the pulpit spiritual equality in Christ.
(57:23):
While roles differ, the worth and salvation of men and
women is equal in the eyes of God. The ground
is level at the foot of the cross Galatians three
twenty eight. There is neither Jew nor Greek. There is
neither bond nor free. There is neither male nor female,
(57:43):
For you are all one in Christ Jesus. Now this
verse isn't about raising gender roles, but it's about salvation,
access and spiritual value. God does not love men more
than women. He gave his son for both. So we
need to have a call. We need to call our
(58:05):
fellow believers to counter cultural faithfulness. Now, the reform view
doesn't idolize tradition for tradition's sake. It holds scripture as supreme,
and Scripture calls both men and women to live sacrificially
in obedience and humility. Titus two, verses three to five.
(58:26):
The aged women likewise, that they may be in behavior
has become of holiness, that they may teach the young
women to be sober, to love their husbands and to
love their children, to be discreet, chaste, keep us at home, good,
obedient to their own husbands. That the word of God.
(58:47):
Be not blasphemed. This is countercultural, but that's not the point.
The world offers chaos. God offers you order, peace and joy.
The biblical woman is not a doormat, she's not a
corporate clone, and she's not a slave to trends. She
(59:08):
is the daughter of the King, called to reflect Christ
in her femininity through service, strength, wisdom, and grace. Christian
women are not empowered by rejecting their design, but by
embracing it with confidence and joy in the Lord. There's
nothing wrong with being feminine, but there's everything wrong with
(59:30):
being a feminist. I would encourage women to be feminine
but reject feminism. Embrace femininity but reject feminism, and men
embrace masculinity. Stop playing the computer games and behaving like
boys and be men. Look after your families, provide for
(59:54):
your families, and be men. Feminism robs women. It's as
simple as that. It'll you of joy, It'll rob you
of what's truly valuable. Like I mentioned about that feminist
Sulamith Firestone, sixty seven years old, died all alone at home.
No one loved her, no children visited her because she
(01:00:17):
didn't have anything, and she died of starvation. That'll happen
many more times, over and over again from these feminists
who when they get into the fifties, when probably it's
too late for them to have children, they then regret it.
The famous actress Helen Mirran is quoted as saying that
one of her biggest regrets, if not her biggest regret,
(01:00:41):
was not having her own children, and when she was
asked whether she regretted it or not, this was her reply.
I have never had a moment of regret about not
having children. Well, I lie. When I watched the movie
Parent I sobbed for about twenty minutes, she continued. I
(01:01:05):
sobbed for the loss of the chance of parenthood and
the fact that I never experienced it. The Bible says
that the devil has come to steal, to kill, to destroy,
to lie, and he has come to lie to you
women and tell you that feminism or it's a good thing.
(01:01:27):
Reject you know, male headship, its toxic masculinity. Pursue your careers,
be a career person, become a woman footballer, become a
woman's sports star or actress. This will for fol you.
It won't fulfil you in the end, it'll leave you
an empty shell and miserable. Feminism is of the same
(01:01:51):
spirit of Jezebel. It's from the Jezebel spirit. Jezebel, that
wicked wife of King Ahab. What happened to her? Or
she died a violent death, didn't she? Elijah, that man
of God opposed Ahab. He opposed Jezebel, And that's what
(01:02:13):
needs to happen in this day and age. Men need
to stop being beta males and they need to be
like Elijah opposing this spirit of Jezebel, this godless spirit
of Jezebel. Read about her, Read what happened to her?
A violent death that she met. God hates feminism. God
(01:02:36):
created women for a specific purpose. They're a beautiful creation
of God, equal ontologically with men in the eyes of God.
In fact, God created them male and female in his
own image. Did he create them? But this spirit of
(01:03:00):
Jezebel needs ap posing, needs casting out, It needs opposing
by men who were have the spirit of Elijah. So
that's it for me for another episode. Guys, hopefully this
has been informative for you, and I hope that you
women out there don't stop listening to this podcast because
(01:03:20):
you're offended by anything I've said. Nothing that I've said
is meant for offense. Like I said previously, many many
times before, this podcast is about getting to the truth
of the matter and exposing feminism, the lies of feminism,
and teaching people what actual, true biblical femininity is. Is important.
(01:03:43):
It's very very important. Our culture is dying. The Western
world is dying. It's been destroyed from the inside out.
So we need to turn away from the things that
are being promoted in the mainstream, and we need to
embrace what the Bible says about men and what it
says about women. So as yet, guys, I haven't decided
(01:04:04):
what my new episode will be. In a week's time
or so. I've got a few guests in mind that
I'm going to contact, and I've had people contacting me,
so I'm just in the process of getting everything up
to date. After being on holiday, I just left the podcast,
didn't really answer any of the emails regarding it, put
it on the back burner. But I'm back and I'm
(01:04:26):
going to be looking into things and hopefully delivering some
more interesting episodes and bringing on some more informative and
interesting guests. So that's enough for me. I'm Paul, and
this is beyond the paradigm my crazy. We don't use
(01:04:48):
that word in.
Speaker 2 (01:04:49):
Here, s S S S s s s
Speaker 1 (01:05:45):
S
M You're here because you know something. What you know
you can't explain, but you feel it. You felt it
your entirely. Do you know what I'm talking about, Matrix.
(00:28):
I had dreams that weren't just dreams.
Speaker 2 (00:35):
We accept the reality of the world with which were presented.
Speaker 1 (00:38):
It's as simple as that. Billions of people just living
out their lives oblivious, they talks. You're good, Hey, do
you believe their world? You can deny all the things
I've seen, all the things I've discovered, not for once
long because too many others know what's.
Speaker 2 (01:00):
Happening, and and no one.
Speaker 1 (01:03):
No government agency, has jurisdiction over the truth. Hello, and
welcome to Beyond the Paradigm. I'm your host, Paul bracal.
It is great to be back with a new episode.
Like I said on the previous episode that A released,
which was a reloaded episode, I have been away on holiday,
so the podcast obviously and work, all these types of
(01:24):
things take a back burner when you're having a family
holiday and relaxing and just coming away from sort of
reality for a week and a half or so, and
it's good to do that. I encourage people to take
time out, never neglect your families, spend time with your families,
but take time out to have rest, go on holidays.
(01:45):
Because it's a crazy world. It's a wicked world, and
it drains you mentally, physically, and spiritually. So if you
are new to this podcast, welcome. What can you expect
Well this podcast we challenged the Mainstrea narratives. We dig
deep into many things like history, ancient history of looks
into UFOs, looks at all kinds of conspiracies, We've looked
(02:08):
at false flag operations. We're basically uncovering what lies beneath
the ideologies shaping our world today. And this is all
done through a Christian perspective, as I am a Christian,
so we examine all this in the light of a
biblical worldview. But just before we go into the episode,
little bit of housekeeping, just want to remind people that
(02:31):
I do have an Instagram. You can go on there
and follow me on there. Do post short videos on there,
which are also linked to my Facebook account. So if
you don't have Instagram but you have Facebook, follow my
page on Facebook and you'll see the videos that I
post on there. Quite active on Instagram. I do have
a Twitter, but I mentioned this before I am shadow
band on there. It's a bit of a waste of time,
(02:52):
to be honest with you, but I still have one
and sometimes I post on there and every now and again,
and like always, guys, I'm going to ask for your support.
And the number one way to support the show is
to first of all, follow the show and then give
the show a rating, and if you think I've earned it,
give me a five star rating, as it will help
make this podcast more visible or there are so many
(03:13):
podcasts out there and want it to just be visible
so it's easier for people to find when they're looking
through for episodes or just looking for podcasts to listen
to which are relevant to the things that they enjoy
listening to and are interested in. You can also support
the show financially. You can do this through my Patreon,
(03:34):
so for less than one pound a month, or it's
in dollars so it's one dollar, but that's less than
one pound a month. You can't even buy a cup
of tea from a cafe for that or a cup
of coffee. And you do help me keep this show
on air because there are costs and curred monthly running courts,
and then sometimes I need to buy new equipment such
(03:56):
as a new microphone, for example, which I do need.
This microphone now has probably had its day, but hopefully
the quality is good enough that it's not distracting, but
it's just really helpful and it's really really appreciated to
the people that have signed up to that. And I
would like to welcome JP who signed up to be
a patron of the show. So thank you JP for
(04:19):
signing up, and also Tim prevost or Prevost, I'm sorry
if I've mispronounced your surname, but welcome Tim, and thank
you for signing up to be a patron of this show.
And there is another way you can support the show financially,
and some people have done this by making one off
donations on Buy Me a Coffee. And I will leave
(04:40):
as usual all links in the show description. So without
further ado, let's get into this episode today, which is
definitely going to be controversial. Today I'm going to be
diving into feminism now, not this simplistic slogan of equal
(05:02):
rights for women, but the deeper routes the philosophical framework
and the consequences of the feminist movement, especially how it's
been used, funded and guided by interests that go far
beyond women's empowerment. So we're going to look in to
(05:23):
feminism and then what I believe is probably the greatest
enemy of the West, and I'll identify who that is
towards the end of this episode. And we're also going
to take a sober look at something rarely discussed in
(05:43):
polite conversation, the disproportionate Jewish influence in shaping of radical
feminist theory and its institutional spread, not out of bigotry,
but to understand historical patterns of influence and the ideologies
that sprang from them. So let's look at, first of all,
(06:07):
the route the real origins of feminism and feminism came
in different waves. So the first wave of feminism in
the nineteenth century, it began with real grievances like a
lack of voting rights, property laws by US towards men,
limited access to education, and so on, and thinkers like
(06:31):
Mary Wollstonecraft laid the groundwork with Enlightenment principles arguing that
reason and education should apply to women as well as men.
But even this early feminism contained seeds of something more
radical and subversive, a reordering of the traditional family and
(06:53):
gender roles, and as we move into the twentieth century,
particularly the second wave feminism of the nineteen sixties and seventies,
we find an overwhelming ideological shift away from legal rights
and towards cultural revolution. Feminism began to push not just
for opportunity, but for dismantling roles and norms and ultimately
(07:17):
the family itself. Now, before I'll go any further, I
do want to say that in no way I am
attacking women at all, And as a Christian, I believe
that male and female men and women are created in
the image of God, and ontologically we are all of
(07:39):
equal value. Men aren't less in the eyes of God
than women are, and vice versa. Women aren't less in
the eyes of God than men are. We've just been
created for different roles. So I just wanted to say
that before I went any further, before people start saying
that I'm being sexist or whatever, and taking a calculated
(08:02):
look at feminism and now it's an enemy of the West,
and then looking at the enemy of the West, which
is a great enemy of the West. So that was
sort of the first wave, and we moved now at
looking at feminism and sort of elite social engineering. So
(08:23):
feminism didn't just grow organically. It was promoted, guided, and
funded by elite interest. And there's an example often cited
a conversation between filmmaker Aaron Russou and Nicholas Rockefeller, in
which Rockefeller admitted that women's liberation movement was about getting
(08:45):
women into the workforce so they could be taxed, and
then getting children into state schools early for indoctrination. And
that's what's happened, isn't it. Basically children now have the
said to a state school, they are being indoctrinated. And
(09:06):
because of the cost of everything, now what once would
have been affordable by one income now takes two incomes.
And this has all been done by design, obviously. So
let's look at some of these cultural architects of feminism.
Small number of individuals, often coming from radical political backgrounds,
(09:30):
shape what feminism would become. And among these a significant
number were Jewish intellectuals, a historical fact that must be
examined with contexts, not malice. So notable figures include Betty
Freedom born Betty Neomic Goldstein, who wrote The Feminine Mystique
(09:54):
in nineteen sixty three. Freedom's book was the catalyst for
the second wave feminism, portraying housewives as prisoners in a
suburban hell. What is less known is that Freedom had
deep Marxist ties, including work with Communist front groups in
the nineteen forties, which she later downplayed in her later life.
(10:17):
Glorias Steinhem, another central figure of second wave feminism, worked
with the CIA in the nineteen fifties through the Independent
Research Service. Though not Jewish herself, Steinhum's rise was aided
by heavily Jewish publishing and media networks. Her brand of
feminism promoted sexual liberation, corporate careers, and anti male rhetoric.
(10:42):
Shulimuth Feirestone, author of Dialectic of Sex, was an explicit
Marxist feminist who called for the abolition of the family
and the use of technology to eliminate pregnancy. She envisioned
a future where women would be liberated from biology itself.
Her background, again was Jewish and leftist. And what is
(11:08):
interesting about Shulimth Firestone is that she died at the
age of sixty seven in her own home, all alone.
She died of starvation and her body wasn't discovered for days.
So there she has reaped to the wind and sawn
(11:29):
the whirlwind she advocated for the destruction of the family,
and she died all alone, miserable, starved to death. Andrea's Working,
an extreme radical feminist known for her anti male writings
and support of censorship laws, had Jewish heritage and used
(11:49):
her trauma to justify broad ideological prescriptions for society. Emma Goldman,
an anarchist and early advocate of feminism, was also Jewish
and advocated for sexual liberation and destruction of religious and
bourgeoisie institutions. Now I'm not saying that Jews all alone
(12:16):
created feminism. That's obviously too simplistic. But when we look
at it, there was a disproportionate role of Jewish thinkers
in the second wave of feminism, especially those with Marxist
or atheistic world views. So we've got to ask this question,
(12:36):
what cultural values were they promoting, And often the answer
is anti traditionalism, rejection of Christian family structures, and utopian
revolution through social engineering. So what about feminism and the
collapse of the family. Well, the feminist narrative rebranded the
(12:57):
family as an institution of female oppression, and that's the
propaganda that's been promoted over and over again. And you
probably come across women like this who say things like, oh,
don't say women should, you know, be looking after the
children and you know, men should be house husband's a
(13:18):
house husband. That has got to be one of the
most horrific name tags I've ever heard. And I've heard
someone in a place used to work and they said, oh,
I used to be a house husband. If you're a
house husband, you've been completely emasculated. It's just that simple.
It's horrific. Now they rebranded the family, like I said,
(13:41):
as an institution of female oppression, and in Freedom's words,
the home became a comfortable concentration camp. And what are
the outcomes of this type of propaganda, Well, the outcomes
are absolutely devastating. So devoce rates doubled after more fault
divorced laws really pushed by feminists during the nineteen seventies,
(14:06):
fathulessness soared, especially in minority communities, and today over seventy
percent of African American children are born out of wedlock.
Single motherhood became normalized, despite data showing worse outcomes for
children in single parent homes. Marriage rates plummeted, birth rates fell,
(14:30):
and emotional instability among young people roles dramatically traditional motherhood,
once revered, was now seen as a failure. Daycare replaced
parental care. Feminism told women they could have it all,
but never told them the cost. And I just want
to go back to these traditional motherhood was once revered
(14:53):
and this daycare replacing parental care. So motherhood it was revered,
and it was actually shameful for a woman not to
have children, and it's the exact opposite now it's not
seemed really as shameful. In fact, a lot of them,
these feminists, they see it as shameful actually having children,
(15:15):
and that's the inversion that they've done now. Incidentally, in
Nazi Germany, there was a thing called the marriage loan
which was introduced in nineteen thirty three, and this was
a low interest loan of one thousand rights marks given
to newlywed couples. However, the lawn was forgiven incrementally for
(15:35):
each child born, so for the first child twenty five percent,
second child and other twenty five percent, and so on,
so after four children, the entire lawn was essentially wiped out.
So this was obviously meant to encourage early marriage and
child bearing. And they also gave out what's called the
(15:56):
Mother's Cross or the Mutter crowds. Now, obviously it's not
a financial benefit, but it was actually a state honor
awarded to mothers for bearing multiple children. So you've got
a Bronze Cross for bearing between four and five children,
you got her Silver Cross for bearing between six and
(16:17):
seven children, and you've got the Gold Cross for having
more than eight children, so eight or more. And this
public honor carried with it social prestige. That's something they
don't tell you in history class. Is it daycare then,
so it's replaced parental care. I've heard people talking at
(16:41):
work and the same things like, oh, it's costing me
a fortune this daycare. And basically what's happening is with
people in this country and all over the world, and
Western nations particularly. I mean, you've got the mother, they're
having the children, right, they're having a child within a
few months, they might take a few months off, they're
(17:02):
going back to work, handing the kids over to strangers,
they're going into day care, and then they're paying out
loads of money a month. Well what's the point in that.
And I raised this point because people are talking about, well,
we had to get back into work to pay for
the child care. Well, no you didn't, because there was
(17:23):
free child care available called the mother, and the mother
should have been raising the children. This is what we
did as a family. My wife, when the children were
growing up, she was at home with the children. We
didn't hand them over to strangers. We lived with one
income because we were able to, not because we were loaded,
(17:48):
but because we cut our cloth accordingly. And people now
they're going to work, they've got two incomes, but the
second income he's all getting paid out in daycare. And
I actually find that absolutely a barrant that you're going
to hand your children over to strangers. And that's essentially
what you're doing. You're giving your children over to strangers. Yeah,
(18:09):
they mr have all these certificates and government approved and
all this stuff, but the reality is children go up
fast anyway. So you're handing your kids over, you're going
to work. You're going to regret it years later. There's
going to be regretted there that you didn't spend the
time with your children that you should have done. So
let's further look at sort of the economic fallout and
(18:31):
actually the psychological toll of this feminism. So you know,
feminism promise of economic empowerment came with massive trade off,
so the two income household became the standard, but prices
roles to match. So in real terms, families today are
poorer and more indebted than they were fifty years ago,
(18:53):
and corporate exploitation has increased. The same system feminists claim
to fight now profits from women who have abandoned motherhood
for cubicles and career ladders. So these women are sold
by these feminists or don't let your husband tell you
what to do, don't let him, you know, boss you
(19:14):
around and exercise authority over But the fine with them
going to work and being told to do what a
stranger tells them to do. So some man at works
now telling your wife what to do if she goes
to work, and these feminists are fine with that. Now,
I'm not advocating men bossing women around at home, but
(19:35):
there is a biblical structure which we are going to
go into, and there's a way that men and women
ought to treat each other. But the my simple point
is is that they're telling these women that they shouldn't
be listening to their husbands, but then going to work
and being told what to do off another man. Women
are more medicated, anxious, and depressed more than ever before.
(20:00):
A CDC report shows that women take antidepressants at twice
the rate of men. So, despite more freedoms, studies show
women are less happy today than they were in the
nineteen fifties, and that is an absolute fact. Women are miserable.
(20:20):
Women in work are miserable. Go to your workplace and
observe them. The miserable Men didn't fare much better. They
became disposable, unnecessary, and even soxic. The workforce became feminized.
Education catered to female learning styles. Boys are falling behind,
(20:42):
committing suicide at alarming rates, and losing a sense of purpose.
(21:25):
Third wave feminism ushered in gender fluidity, queer theory, and intersectionality.
No longer about women's rights, feminism became the vehicle for
social deconstruction. Gender was now a social construct. Masculinity became toxic.
(21:46):
Women were encouraged to behave like men, and men were
punished for behaving like men. If you watch television, which
I wouldn't recommend it, but a lot of the male
characters now are very effeminate or the stupid, wherein the
woman he's seen as being the powerful one, the clever, one,
(22:07):
the dominant one, and one of the things that's on
the TV over here at the moment, which is something
I will not watch and do not watch and not
watch football anyway, women's football. There's a big push on
this women's football now and encouraging, you know, young girls
to take up the sport of football and obviously abandoning
(22:31):
you know, marriage, don't get married, don't have children, be
a footballer. And a lot of these women's footballers are lesbians,
and these are now the role models being pushed for females,
young females growing up, these lesbian footballers. And the reality
(22:53):
is this football anyway, it's not of the same standard
as the male game. I mentioned it on a previous episode.
Like I said, I don't watch football, but I have
heard about this particular thing. It was a game between
a women's football team, a professional women's football team, and
(23:14):
I think it's happened a number of times with different
female teams playing like sixteen year old boys teams, and
the boys teams are beating them easily, like easily, So
they're pushing this women's sport particularly is football at the minute,
and it's not even the same standard anyway as what
men play absolutely nowhere near it, and it's so borran.
(23:37):
And I tell you what's even more ambarran women's boxing
and Women's Ultimate Fighting Championship absolutely a borring. If you
can sit there watching women beat each other up, you
need to give your head a wobble because that's disgusting.
I mean, the fact that you can watch men beating
each other up is bad enough, but watching women beat
(24:00):
up disgusting. And if you're a Christian, I'd ask you this.
Do you think how a lord would sit there watching
two women beat each other up or two men beat
each other up? I can tell you it absolutely would not.
So this assault on biological sex and family roles created
mass confusion, and many critics argue that this is by design,
(24:20):
which it absolutely is. Because of a society without identity,
without tradition, and without gender coherence. Guess what it's easier
to control. And that is what it's all about, isn't it.
It's always about the control, And again we see Jewish
intellectuals at the center of this postmodern shift. Judith Butler,
(24:44):
a philosopher and gender theorist, is a key proponent of
queer theory. Under critic of traditional gender roles and her
theories dominate university gender departments today. Now, what I wanted
to do is talk a little bit, just for a
few minutes about this nomadic tribe of the Coochy people
(25:07):
or the chuck Key people. Can't pronounce it anyway, It's
spelled chuk Cchi. And these are people that live in
the Arctic tundra in below freezing temperatures and needless to
say for them, their daily lives involve harsh conditions, rigorous
work and labor intensive responsibilities and just to be able
(25:30):
to survive in the six screen climate. Okay, So these people,
these Chucky people of indigenous Siberian descent and normads. So
they migrate seasonally across the icy tundra with their families
and belongings. They live in tents made of leather draped
over long poles, the hunter gatherers, and they subsistence survive
(25:52):
purely on what they can procure within their environment. Now,
the men heard reindeer. They then tether to the sleds
and they use these reindeer to pull the sleds along
the frozen ground during migrations. The men also continuously have
to assemble and disassemble the large tents that everyone lives
(26:14):
in whenever it's once again time to move on, And
of course the men also hunt for food. The tribe
eats and lives off whatever the men are able to
face or catch or hunt. Now, the women are mostly
tucked away safely inside the tents, tending to the babies
and the children, sowing furs and leathers to make sturdy
(26:34):
garments to safeguard the people from the harsh cold weather,
and cooking over large fires the food that the men
folk are able to hold back. The faces of the
men are red and leathery because of the freezing cold temperatures.
And on this program, one of the men from this
tribe had suffered frostbite on both of his feet and
(26:59):
his to have his feet amputated, yet he still worked
just as hard as the other men. The only telltale
sign of his physical disability was his uneven gait in
his large boots as he ran along with the other
men in order to catch reindeer. Now, the point is,
(27:20):
if you watch this video, one of the things it's
going to strike you is this that these people are
hardy because of the way of life, and there's absolutely
no traces of feminism to be found there whatsoever. Now,
under the harsh light of their severe and strenuous conditions,
the reality became manifests. Women need men just to survive.
(27:45):
They needed them just so that they can stay alive
in them harsh environments. So within the icy climate of
the arts A tundra, it was immediately obvious that the
men and women are vastly different. Women do not have
the upper body strength that is necessary to who erep
the tents they require for shelter and sleep. Women do
not possess the physical strength or speed needed to catch
(28:07):
and secure fleeing reindeer. Women do not have the same metal,
endurance or speed that are essential for hunting arctic animals,
and without these things they'd be absolutely no chance of
survival for this tribe. So the men do the grueling
laborer's tasks, and they simply accept it as their natural
(28:28):
responsibility to do so. There's no false bravado to be
seen anywhere, no fake flexing nor empty boss about being
empowered or independent. There are no women going around casually
talking big game about being you know, the boss babe
or whatever. Now that being said, the women, they did
(28:48):
work hard, and they contribute but they are happy and
completely satisfied with remaining within the warmth and safety of
the tent, where they are sheltered from the storms and
protected from the elements, and an easier and more suited
responsibility for them to keep the fire going, to cut
the food that the men spent the days hunting, and
(29:09):
to tent to the children. So what sane woman would
rebel against this natural order of things and protest? No,
you know, I refuse to be subjugated like this inside
the tent where it's nice and warm and toasted. I
feel so oppressed. Have every right to be outside in
the feezing tundra air getting ice burns due to freezing
(29:30):
cold winds. I have the choice to go out hunting
and possibly get frostbite leading to my limbs being amputated.
Why do women stay home like this? This is misogyny
down with the chucky patriarchy. They're not saying that order,
but these lunatics in the West would be saying things
(29:51):
like that. Now in the arts, it's undra. Like I said,
there's absolutely none of that sort of talk whatsoever. It's
only in the here and now, in our specific time
and place in human history, that such things of feminism
can emerge born from privilege and delusion, and after men
have arduously strived to build the world around us, tamed
(30:14):
the jungles that would otherwise devoured us, unsuccessfully constructed civilization.
Only then is it possible for some women to claim
that they are the same as men. Only then are
they able to boldly declare that whatever men can do,
women can do too, that they are strong and independent
(30:34):
women who have no need for men. When the work
you're referring to is just sitting comfortably behind the desk
pushing papers, or you have the luxury of a causy,
snug little off ace which is well equipped and it's
got air conditioning and heating soul, you're nice and warm
during the winter, you kept cool during the summer, then
(30:57):
you sure women are able to do the work just
like men. However, when the work involves laboring in below
freezing temperatures or extreme heat, exhausting yourselves, doing ditches, persevering
while working in sewers, risking your life fighting on the
front lines of war, than not so much. Inevitably, reality
(31:24):
exposes the delusions and hypocrisy that are embedded within feminism.
So here is some of the reality. The construction industry
overall ninety to ninety three percent of the employees and men.
Now that's the industry overall, which also includes some support roles.
(31:48):
If you're talking about on site labor jobs, ninety six
percent plus of people on building sites and men. Oil
rig workers or offshore oil and gas workers between ninety
five and ninety seven percent are men. Whale fishers and
(32:12):
commercial fishing ninety eight percent plus are men. This type
of fishing is one of the most dangerous professions in
the world with extremely high fatality rates, which is reflected
and it's overwhelmingly male workforce. Firefighters ninety five to ninety
(32:34):
six percent of men, and this is despite increased recruitment efforts,
and firefighting remains heavily male dominated due to its physical
and emergency response demands. Let's be honest. If your house
is burning down to the ground and your stock on
the top floor, right, do you want a couple of
(32:55):
women firefighters turning up? If you weigh like I do,
sixteen and a half stones, you're incapacitated and you want
to burly guys turning up six foot plus beasts who
can just pick you up, no problem. Well, I know
what I want, and I want the men to turn
up because they'll be able to pick me up and
carry me downstairs if I'm incapacitated. The women will not
(33:18):
be able to do it. I'm six foot three away
over sixteen and a half storm, They're not going to
be able to pick me up. And they are just
cold hard facts, cold hard data. So let's have a
look at some more cold hard data. In response to
feminists who talk about equality. Okay, let's talk about the
(33:41):
gender death gap. Ninety two percent of all deaths that
take place in the workplace are men. Okay, that's ninety
two percent of all workplaces deaths are men. So things
(34:02):
like construction, logging, commercial fishing, oil and gas extraction, transportation. Okay,
that's the reason, because of the jobs that men are doing,
so ninety two percent of all deaths. And these statistics
have used the US Department of Labor for that, So
that's in the United States. Okay. In twenty twenty two,
(34:22):
there was four hundred and eighty six fatal occupational injuries
so deaths. Five thousand and eighty four of the deaths
were men. What about war and military deaths? In virtually
every war in history, over ninety five percent of combat
fatalities have been male, and even today in most global
(34:47):
armedforces combat roles and ninety nine percent mail conscription which
we have in the UK, we had in the UK,
or you call it a draft in the United States,
it historically applied only to men. In World War I
World War II, tens of millions of men were conscripted.
(35:09):
They died in trenches, jungles, and deserts. The Vietnam War,
fifty eight thousand United States soldiers died, ninety nine percent
of them were men. So the state has long assumed
male disposability when it comes to dying for one's own country.
(35:30):
What about suicide and mental health? Men die by suicide
three to four times more often than women globally. In
the US, the UK, and Australia, men account for between
seventy five and eighty percent of all suicides. Men are
far less likely to seek help for depression, anxiety trauma,
(35:55):
and this is partly due to cultural pressure to be stoic.
Toxic masculinity is often blamed, but favullessness, isolation, and social
rejection play huge roles, problems that feminism rarely addresses seriously.
Death from homelessness or addiction or neglect. Men make up
(36:17):
between seventy to eighty percent of the homeless population in
Western nations. They also lead in deaths from drug overdoses, alcoholism,
and exposure to harsh weather. These are often invisible deaths
and are not counted in headlines or protests. Though this
(36:38):
gender death gap it's not accidental, and it actually reflects
a civilizational pattern where men are expected to die for
the country, sacrifice their bodies for infrastructure, suppress their emotions,
and bear the burdens of society silently. In exchange, they
receive very little recognition and often face social criticism if
(37:02):
they question the system that uses them. Modern feminism focuses
on women's inclusion in elite spheres, but remains largely silent
on male suicide, dangerous labor, inequality, frvolousness, and male mental health.
If gender equality is truly the goal, then the deaf
(37:23):
gap must be part of the conversation. Now, I won't
ask a question for any feminists who are listening. You
might not think you're actually a feminist, but you probably
are if you've grown up in this modern society. Because
even so called Christian women these days. If you put
(37:43):
them to the test about what the scriptures say versus
their feminism, their feminism will win every single time. But
my question is this, who enforces women's rights? Who enforces
women's rights? Well, the simple answer is this, men do.
(38:07):
Because unless men enforce the rights of women, women can't
enforce them themselves. And I'll give you an actual, real
world example. When the US the UK pulled out of Afghanistan,
what happened to the women over there? Within weeks, they
couldn't go to school, universities, work, all these types of things.
(38:29):
They basically went back to how they were twenty years
before the invasion because the men decided that that's how
it was going to be. Women are unable to enforce
their own rights. They need men to do it for them.
(38:50):
And if you doubt that, like I said, look at
the example of Afghanistan. But I'll also pose another question
to you. A country where there's been a civil war,
for example, and the government of that nation has been
overthrown by armed force, by physical armed force, namely one
(39:15):
country that that's happened to, where the army or the militia,
whatever you want to call them, we're women. I'll wait
because no one's going to be able to send me
a message, an email or anything naming any country at all.
Because every time there's a coupe or a military uprising
(39:36):
or whatever, a government overthrown, it's always by men, violently
overthrown by men. And that's the reality. These these are facts.
These are called hard facts. So one of the greatest
(40:38):
enemies of the West, of Western civilization is this the
awful cabal affluent white female urban liberals. They are a
seriously dangerous enemy of the West. White liberal women playing
(40:59):
in orderate role. They almost always are at the forefront
of any protests, lecturing others about systemic racism, white privileged,
toxic masculinity, and the need for equity in every sphere
of life. These same women are given every conceivable platform
(41:19):
to spew their revolutionary rhetoric. They demand to be heard,
and they do not hesitate to confront and shout down
their opponents. The prevailing attitude among them best fits the
popular quote attributed to the late Harvard professor Laurel Thatcher Ulrich,
who wrote in nineteen seventy six that well behaved women
(41:41):
seldom make history. This was apparently taken out of context
and is given a new meaning that if women are
to make an impact on society for good, they must
rebel against the norm and be disruptive. The notion of
a woman who is gracious and well mannered as she
protests is athema to the thinking of most contemporary white
(42:04):
liberal female activists. The modern warped feminist is consumed with
her own self righteousness. She is obsessed with virtue signaling
before others. She hasn't the faintest doubt about the rightness
of her cause, and anyone who opposes her or even
tries to temper her opinions, is no different than the
(42:25):
most deplorable humans we could imagine. Restraint and moderation aren't
permitted among today's feminists. Like the most rabid religious fundamentalist,
there is no reasoning with them. It's all nothing proposition.
So this powerful force, this awful capal, is reshaping the West.
(42:46):
So it's not through a war or invasion, but through
the ideological capture. The institutions of education, media, public health,
and law have been influenced. In fact, they've even been
dominated by this ideology called class that promotes emotionalism over truth.
That's a key point in all this it's a key
(43:07):
aspect of women's nature anyway, So they promote emotionalism over truth.
Truth isn't even they're not even bothered about truth. Inclusivity
over order, and identity over responsibility. It's not about just individuals.
It's in actual ideology, and it's one that's taken route
in the minds of this particular social class, these affluent
(43:32):
white female urban liberals. And many of these women are
working in media, academia, NGOs, and state bureaucracy, so ideas,
they don't stay in think tanks due that they travel
through institutions. So universities teach activist dogma under the guise
(43:53):
of education. Journalists fram narratives emotionally rather than factually. Hr
departments in force ideological compliance. Courts reinterpret language, gender and
law through equity lenses. The culture rewards emotional moralism, often
championed by what we call the professional empathy class. And again,
(44:17):
many of the influencers of white liberal women in their
thirties to fifties, not because of the race, really, but
it's because of their ideological worldview. It just seems to
be particular to this group of women, and they believe
that safety is more important than truth. Offense is a
(44:39):
form of violence. Victimhood is virtue, and institutions must protect
feelings and not uphold facts. There's this like tyranny of
soft power. It's not a tyranny of boots and guns,
but of emotional coercion. Policies are passed based on lived
(44:59):
des experience, not upon data. School curriculums are rewritten to
prioritize identity over competence. Language is police to ensure emotional
comfort over once debate. The long term effect is that
truth becomes dangerous and honesty becomes hate. And this is
how your culture dies. This is how any culture dies,
(45:23):
not from blunt force, but from emotional fragility being institutionalized
as law. And these white liberal women are at the
spherehead of the destruction of the West, or the deconstruction
of the West, but it can be destruction. They're destroying
it anyway, deconstructing it, whatever you want to call it.
(45:44):
Gender confusion, displacing biological reality, family breakdown under the banner
of liberation, open borders seen as compassion regardless of consequences,
Eurasure of national identity in favor of a global equity.
Religious conviction is now recast as hate speech. And at
(46:06):
the core of all these trends is the rejection of
objective truth and the rise of emotional relativism, a cultural
framework that claims to be tolerant but in practice silences
dissent and erodes civilizational coherence. The media obviously plays its
(46:27):
role as then enforcer of numerality. Legacy media and entertainment
platforms act as the priesthood of this new religion, with
obviously white liberal women at the forefront. It's the lead
in editorial and production roles that dominate morning talk shows,
daytime news commentary, lifestyle journalism, public school policies, and children's programming.
(46:52):
Topics like motherhood, masculinity, national pride, or biblical faith are
portrayed as regressive or toxic, while the highest virtues become inclusion, affirmation,
and therapy. So they've moved away from empowerment to actual control.
Now originally sort of feminism aimed to address some real injustices,
(47:16):
but in its modern elite form it is morphed into
a system of soft totalitarianism and moral absolutism dressed as empathy,
a justification for the erosion of masculine leadership. Family hierarchy
and religious authority. And what's been the result a society
where men are demoralized, children are confused, and institutions are
(47:41):
hollowed out. And I just want to quickly examine the
nature of women, because I've talked about emotions and emotional
moralism and all these types of things. When I'm talking
about these white liberal women now women and nurturers, they
are disposed to care, to treat and help others, the
(48:03):
natural do gooders. They have this innate pole to help
and ease the suffering of the less fortunate, and their
inclination is to make things better their helpers at heart. Now,
obviously these are not necessarily bad qualities, the good qualities,
but they must be kept in check lest it more
into the kind of militant women who have taken hold
(48:25):
in our society. And there's the second reason, and it
lies in the emotional nature of women. And they tend
to think from the heart, not so much as from
the head. Women generally tend to be less critical and
cautious in their thinking the men. They are often more reactionary,
and the heartstrings can be pulled more easily than their
(48:48):
male counterparts. So when you think back upon the time
when women weren't allowed to vote. It wasn't just because
or we just don't want women to vote. It's like
any kind of law, like the laws of God or
whatever that are seen as sort of stopping us doing something,
you know, or imprisoning us. They're actually there to protect us.
(49:10):
And maybe, just maybe the reason why women weren't allowed
to vote back then was because there was a greater
understanding of women's nature and they were maybe seen as
being dangerous because they are nurturers and they are given
over to emotionalism more than men. Now, obviously there are
exceptions to what I'm saying, and there's plenty of women
(49:33):
who are careful thinkers who are not as easily manipulated
emotionally as other women. Now, women like this are probably
the exception and not the known. Unfortunately, they are the outliers.
I don't even think it comes natural to them, and
they must fight against their more trusting and emotional natures
(49:55):
in some way. Now, bear in mind, I'm not saying
that men are completely free of emotionalism and less critically
minded in the way women generally are, and there's plenty
of men out there who can be just as irrational
at times and emotionally driven, but overall I'm talking overall now,
on balance, males tend to be different in this realm
(50:16):
than females. Men are not as easily emotionally manipulated as women,
and in this sense, the two sexes really are different
from each other, and it should surprise nobody. While religious
Charlatans and radical Marxist groups have so easily preyed on females,
they understood the nature of females and they exploit it
(50:40):
for all its worth. Cosmetic manufacturers target women in their
advertisements in ways that comport with the nature and unique
proclivities of the females. They know good and well that
most women are gullible and can be easily manipulated, and
they would never admit it. Of course, they would not
(51:01):
have had the same level of marketing success if these
fundamental distinctions were not kept in mind. You see, the
Bible talks about remembering the old paths and the ancient landmarks,
and like I previously just mentioned, there's laws in the Bible.
The laws there, they're like a fence, really like a
(51:22):
boundary to keep us protected. And when we step outside
of those boundaries, it has devastating effects on us personally,
on our families, and then on why the society doesn't it.
So before I move on to what the Bible says,
where do we actually go from here? Sort of restoration Wise, Now,
(51:45):
we can't deny, and I don't deny, women deserve rights.
Women are equal to men. They are as precious in
the sight of God as men are. In that instance,
there is no difference. But we have have different roles,
and we've been created for different roles. Women have agency,
and women have made an extraordinary contributions to the world.
(52:09):
But we must reject the radical, anti family, anti biological,
and anti spiritual world view that feminism has become. We
need a restoration of the family as the founder of civilization,
complementarity between men and women, not competition, a return to
(52:31):
values rooted in faith, community, and tradition, not ideology. It's
not about turning the clock back, but it's about recognizing
that the path we've been on is leading to civilizational suicide.
So as we begin to close out this episode, it's
crucial to distinguish the modern ideology of feminism from the
(52:55):
eternal truths of scripture. The feminist movement says, a woman
UN's worth comes from Korea independence and rejecting male authority.
But the Bible gives a far richer, more dignified, and
ordered vision, one that does not diminish women, but places
them in a divine framework of purpose, honor, and beauty.
(53:19):
So women as a help meet, equal in value but
distinct in role. The first woman, Eve was not created
as a rival to Adam, but as a help meet,
not as inferior, but complementary. Okay. So the Lord said
Genesis two, verse eighteen, it's not good that man should
(53:43):
be alone. I will make him a help meet for him. Now,
the Hebrew concept of help here is the word easier.
It doesn't imply weakness. It's often used in the same
terms as when God is helping Israel, the ancient people
of Israel. So it says that she was also made
(54:03):
for the man, okay, not the other way around. So
the woman was made for the man, not the man
made for the woman. One Corinthians, chapter eleven, verse eight
to nine. For the man is not of the woman,
but the woman of the man. Neither was the man
created for the woman, but the woman for the man.
This establishes order, not hierarchic of worth, so you need
(54:29):
to take that on board order, not hierarchic of worth,
the glory of the home and motherhood. In today's world,
the home is belittled, but Scripture exalts the home as
a realm of influence, holiness, and service. A godly woman
is at the heart of that home. Proverbs thirty one,
(54:52):
twenty seven to twenty eight. She looketh well to the
ways of her household, and eateth not the bread of idleness, child,
and a rise up call her blessed her husband also,
and he praiseth her the Proverbs thirty one woman is industrious, intelligent, resourceful,
(55:12):
and focus primarily on flourishing of her family and community.
This is not oppression, its divine dignity submission. In church
and marriage, the Bible teaches male headship in the home
and the church not as tyranny, but as a loving responsibility.
Women are called to submit not to all men, but
(55:36):
to their own husbands, and in the church contexts to
male eldership Ephesians five twenty two to twenty four. Wives
submit yourselves unto your own husbands as unto the Lord.
For the husband is the head of the wife, even
as Christ is the head of the church. Therefore, as
(55:57):
the church is subject unto Christ, so let the wives
be to their own husbands in everything. This is not cultural.
Paul roots it in creation order, not just social norms.
One Timothy two verses twelve to fourteen. But I suffer
not a woman to teach, nor to assert authority over
(56:18):
a man, but to be in silence. For Adam was
first formed then Eve, and Adam was not deceived, but
the woman being deceived was in the transgression. So if
you read chapter three of Genesis, the devil doesn't go
to Adam, because as he does, he inverts everything. He
(56:39):
reversed the roles. He went to Eve, and he deceived Eve,
not Adam. Obviously Adam did eat of the fruit via
the hand of his wife. Now it doesn't mean that
women are less intelligent or less spiritual. It simply means
God has ordained specific roles for men and specific rolls
(57:00):
for women in the church and for his glory and
the leadership rolls for men. If you go to a
church and a woman comes and stands in the pulpit,
get up and walk out, because that's not a real church.
So they shouldn't be in the pulpit spiritual equality in Christ.
(57:23):
While roles differ, the worth and salvation of men and
women is equal in the eyes of God. The ground
is level at the foot of the cross Galatians three
twenty eight. There is neither Jew nor Greek. There is
neither bond nor free. There is neither male nor female,
(57:43):
For you are all one in Christ Jesus. Now this
verse isn't about raising gender roles, but it's about salvation,
access and spiritual value. God does not love men more
than women. He gave his son for both. So we
need to have a call. We need to call our
(58:05):
fellow believers to counter cultural faithfulness. Now, the reform view
doesn't idolize tradition for tradition's sake. It holds scripture as supreme,
and Scripture calls both men and women to live sacrificially
in obedience and humility. Titus two, verses three to five.
(58:26):
The aged women likewise, that they may be in behavior
has become of holiness, that they may teach the young
women to be sober, to love their husbands and to
love their children, to be discreet, chaste, keep us at home, good,
obedient to their own husbands. That the word of God.
(58:47):
Be not blasphemed. This is countercultural, but that's not the point.
The world offers chaos. God offers you order, peace and joy.
The biblical woman is not a doormat, she's not a
corporate clone, and she's not a slave to trends. She
(59:08):
is the daughter of the King, called to reflect Christ
in her femininity through service, strength, wisdom, and grace. Christian
women are not empowered by rejecting their design, but by
embracing it with confidence and joy in the Lord. There's
nothing wrong with being feminine, but there's everything wrong with
(59:30):
being a feminist. I would encourage women to be feminine
but reject feminism. Embrace femininity but reject feminism, and men
embrace masculinity. Stop playing the computer games and behaving like
boys and be men. Look after your families, provide for
(59:54):
your families, and be men. Feminism robs women. It's as
simple as that. It'll you of joy, It'll rob you
of what's truly valuable. Like I mentioned about that feminist
Sulamith Firestone, sixty seven years old, died all alone at home.
No one loved her, no children visited her because she
(01:00:17):
didn't have anything, and she died of starvation. That'll happen
many more times, over and over again from these feminists
who when they get into the fifties, when probably it's
too late for them to have children, they then regret it.
The famous actress Helen Mirran is quoted as saying that
one of her biggest regrets, if not her biggest regret,
(01:00:41):
was not having her own children, and when she was
asked whether she regretted it or not, this was her reply.
I have never had a moment of regret about not
having children. Well, I lie. When I watched the movie
Parent I sobbed for about twenty minutes, she continued. I
(01:01:05):
sobbed for the loss of the chance of parenthood and
the fact that I never experienced it. The Bible says
that the devil has come to steal, to kill, to destroy,
to lie, and he has come to lie to you
women and tell you that feminism or it's a good thing.
(01:01:27):
Reject you know, male headship, its toxic masculinity. Pursue your careers,
be a career person, become a woman footballer, become a
woman's sports star or actress. This will for fol you.
It won't fulfil you in the end, it'll leave you
an empty shell and miserable. Feminism is of the same
(01:01:51):
spirit of Jezebel. It's from the Jezebel spirit. Jezebel, that
wicked wife of King Ahab. What happened to her? Or
she died a violent death, didn't she? Elijah, that man
of God opposed Ahab. He opposed Jezebel, And that's what
(01:02:13):
needs to happen in this day and age. Men need
to stop being beta males and they need to be
like Elijah opposing this spirit of Jezebel, this godless spirit
of Jezebel. Read about her, Read what happened to her?
A violent death that she met. God hates feminism. God
(01:02:36):
created women for a specific purpose. They're a beautiful creation
of God, equal ontologically with men in the eyes of God.
In fact, God created them male and female in his
own image. Did he create them? But this spirit of
(01:03:00):
Jezebel needs ap posing, needs casting out, It needs opposing
by men who were have the spirit of Elijah. So
that's it for me for another episode. Guys, hopefully this
has been informative for you, and I hope that you
women out there don't stop listening to this podcast because
(01:03:20):
you're offended by anything I've said. Nothing that I've said
is meant for offense. Like I said previously, many many
times before, this podcast is about getting to the truth
of the matter and exposing feminism, the lies of feminism,
and teaching people what actual, true biblical femininity is. Is important.
(01:03:43):
It's very very important. Our culture is dying. The Western
world is dying. It's been destroyed from the inside out.
So we need to turn away from the things that
are being promoted in the mainstream, and we need to
embrace what the Bible says about men and what it
says about women. So as yet, guys, I haven't decided
(01:04:04):
what my new episode will be. In a week's time
or so. I've got a few guests in mind that
I'm going to contact, and I've had people contacting me,
so I'm just in the process of getting everything up
to date. After being on holiday, I just left the podcast,
didn't really answer any of the emails regarding it, put
it on the back burner. But I'm back and I'm
(01:04:26):
going to be looking into things and hopefully delivering some
more interesting episodes and bringing on some more informative and
interesting guests. So that's enough for me. I'm Paul, and
this is beyond the paradigm my crazy. We don't use
(01:04:48):
that word in.
Speaker 2 (01:04:49):
Here, s S S S s s s
Speaker 1 (01:05:45):
S
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
New Heights with Jason & Travis Kelce
Football’s funniest family duo — Jason Kelce of the Philadelphia Eagles and Travis Kelce of the Kansas City Chiefs — team up to provide next-level access to life in the league as it unfolds. The two brothers and Super Bowl champions drop weekly insights about the weekly slate of games and share their INSIDE perspectives on trending NFL news and sports headlines. They also endlessly rag on each other as brothers do, chat the latest in pop culture and welcome some very popular and well-known friends to chat with them. Check out new episodes every Wednesday. Follow New Heights on the Wondery App, YouTube or wherever you get your podcasts. You can listen to new episodes early and ad-free, and get exclusive content on Wondery+. Join Wondery+ in the Wondery App, Apple Podcasts or Spotify. And join our new membership for a unique fan experience by going to the New Heights YouTube channel now!