Reloaded Ep 27: Global Elite Control Agenda with Charlie Robinson

Climate change, 15 Minute Cities and a Cashless society are all part of the Global Elites plans to control the whole of the Human race. In this Episode their plans will be exposed. These Agendas will affect all of us and the mainstream media are lying to you about everything regarding them. Today I am joined by the host of Macroagressions Podcast Charlie Robinson.
Linksinstagram.com/paradigm1979twitter.com/paradigm_79email:[e-mail]/BeyondTheParadigmbuymeacoffee.com/beyondthep5
Guest Links⁠The Octopus of Global Control – The Most Dangerous Book in the World⁠https://open.spotify.com/show/5NjueKLTNtwLCRCzljYWtQ?si=04bd2cc1cfe942c6twitter.com/macroaggressio3

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
And welcome to Beyond the Paradigm. I'm your host, Paul Brachell.
This is a reloaded episode featuring Charlie Robinson the Global
Elite Control Agenda, and this episode is from way back
in twenty twenty three, actually November tenth, twenty twenty three.
And for those of you that do listen week in

(00:20):
week out, obviously you will have noticed there was no
episode last week and that basically was due to fatigue
mento fatigue. I didn't have a guest book. I've been
trying to get certain guests on and it's been proving
extremely difficult to get guests on just because of the
time difference between me and a lot of the guests

(00:41):
who are abroad in the United States Canada, and seeking
to find some UK based guests who can come on
during the day an interview with me is proving difficult
as well. So that's the reason, guys, there was no
episode last week. And furthermore, I did actually have an
interview booked for today which would have been released tomorrow,

(01:03):
which is seventeenth of October. So today, at the time
of this recording of this particular introduction, it is the
sixteenth of October, and Unfortunately, due to a mix up
over time, my guest is not able to record with me,
and it's actually my fault from an email that I

(01:25):
followed up with. And this is the problem. I'm on
British Standard Time, my guest is on Eastern Standard Time
in the United States. We agreed a particular time, and
then when I sent the time over instead of putting BST,
I've looked and I've put est, So the guest thought
that I was recording at three pm Eastern Standard Time,

(01:47):
which is too late for me to record today.

Speaker 2 (01:51):
So totally my own fault.

Speaker 1 (01:53):
So in terms of an episode this week, guys, I
haven't made my mind up. I haven't got anything prepared,
so unfortunately, they possibly may not be an episode this
week due to my own mistake that I made, and
it's cost me big time because now I'm not going
to have an interview for you. And this guest is
a guest who many of you have requested to come

(02:16):
back on, and he is always willing to come back on,
and it's simply down to times and dates getting things
nailed down. I also have a couple of episodes which
are audio classics that I need to listen to myself
before I publish them on here. As you know, I've
released a few audio classics, but I don't just publish
them without listening to them. So I need to listen

(02:36):
to them in order to sort of review them and
give a criticism at the beginning in order to avoid copyrights.
So these are things that are in the pipeline. Like
I said, guys, I was just suffering with mental fatigue.
I just couldn't bring myself to do an episode last week.
Obviously you must imagine that being a working man and
a family man and then having to research for topics

(02:59):
is very very difficult and very time consuming when you're
recording for a monologue. Obviously doing an interview is easier,
although it is also time consuming, but not as time
consuming as a monologue. So that's an explanation, guys to
why there was no interview, because sometimes I have had
messages asking me why I've not done one, like as

(03:20):
if I'm completely tied to doing one every week. I
just want to remind people that I do this purely
on a voluntary basis. I get no money from it.
Some members of my Patreon do oviously pay a bit
of money in terms of keeping this podcast on air
and it's just purely donations, voluntary. But I'm not funded

(03:44):
by anyone. There's no political parties funding me. You know,
I'm not funded by anybody at all. I'm totally independent
and I'm doing this all on my own. As I'm
recording this, I'm sat at a desk with my computer
and everything in my dining room. I built this little
studio area self. Everything has been done by me on
my own. I've learned how to record, and this episode

(04:06):
is from you know, back in twenty twenty three when
I was still learning, and the audio is probably not
as good as what it has been over the last
twelve months, but that's because I was in a learning
phase at that stage. But that's enough ranting on from me.
This particular episode today is very relevant, still remains relevant,

(04:26):
particularly with the announcement over each of this digital idea
and then obviously there is countries around the world that
have digital IDs. So this, you know, global elite control
agenda is that it is international, it is across all borders.
It is global governance, and each government of each nation

(04:48):
is just middle management. So you need to take this
into account when listening to this episode. You know we're
talking about global issues, and each individual nation does have
their own government, although they're just middle management, and there's
people obviously above them that are unseen. We know some
of the names, but the real power brokers are the

(05:08):
ones who we don't know. So without further ado, this
is the reloaded episode from November tenth, twenty twenty three
with Charlie Robinson.

Speaker 3 (05:27):
Here's the littlest song I old you might want to
hear him in your You'll own Nassy.

Speaker 4 (05:36):
And be happy.

Speaker 3 (05:40):
Ain't got no cash, ain't got no car, but to
empty four booster shots in your arm.

Speaker 4 (05:46):
Own Nassy, be happy.

Speaker 3 (05:53):
You can't even buy it in their store because of
your low social credits. You own Nassy, Be happy.

Speaker 4 (06:11):
You will own Nassy and be happy. Be happy, and.

Speaker 1 (06:20):
Welcome to beyond the paradigm. I am your host, Paul,
and that was Klaus Schwarb. You will own nothing and
be happy. That's what these global elite psychopaths want. And
Klaus Schwarb is obviously the leader, if you will, of
the World Economic Forum. You can look up the World

(06:43):
Economic Forum. It's not a conspiracy theory, it's an actual organization.
But I want to thank everybody who's been listening to
this podcast, because at the last count I have had
listeners now from thirty one different countries. So thank you
for all those who have been coming back time and again.
I started the podcast only back in May, and I

(07:06):
wouldn't have even imagined that I'd had listeners across this
many countries. I didn't have a clue how to do
a podcast or and I didn't think it was going
to grow like this. I'll be honest with you. I
knew at the time the things I wanted to talk about,
but I've had to learn how to actually produce a podcast,
how to use the different software packages, and it has

(07:28):
already come a long way from my first episode, which,
to be honest with you, was pretty rubbish because I
absolutely didn't know what I was doing. I doing kerk
Coss in order to keep this podcast on her. So
I wondered if my regular listeners would like to make
a monthly donation by becoming a patron at patreon dot

(07:50):
com slash Beyond the Paradigm for three pounds a month.
You'll keep this show on her, you'll get a shout
out on the show, and you'll acquire voting rights to
on topics that you want to hear about on the show.
But if you can't make a regular donation amount, you
can make a one off donation at buy me a
Coffee dot com slash beyond the p five. And in

(08:13):
the new year, I intend to add another tier of
membership and this will give the added bonus of being
able to listen to member only episodes. So I'm looking
to do that in the new year. Well today with me, guys,
I've got another guest, and this guest has done so
much research and he's brimming with knowledge. I'm going to

(08:36):
be joined today by Charlie Robinson. And Charlie Robinson is
the host of the extremely popular Macroaggressions podcast. He is
also on TNT Radio. I think he's on there on
Saturdays and he hosts his own show on there, and
he's wrote some books including The Octopus of Global Control

(08:57):
and Hypocrazy. And what we will be talking about today
is affecting and will affect everyone more and more, and
it is an extremely important topic to discuss. So it's
time to get Charlie on the show.

Speaker 4 (09:17):
The Truth. You can't handle the truth.

Speaker 1 (09:23):
We accept the reality of the world with which represented
it's as simple as that. Billions of people just living
out their lives.

Speaker 2 (09:42):
Is Welcome to the show, Charlie.

Speaker 5 (09:54):
Thanks for having me.

Speaker 4 (09:55):
Paul.

Speaker 1 (09:56):
It's good to have you. I've been listening to your part.
I've read a little bit of your book. And for
those of my audience who don't know, obviously you're the
host of Macroaggressions podcast and you've wrot a couple of books.
I believe have you contributed to a third book as well?

Speaker 5 (10:13):
I believe I've got a third book that's out now. Yeah,
it's called hippoc Crazy, Surviving in a World of cultural
double standards. The first book was The Octopus of Global
Control that came out in twenty seventeen, and that was
like a encyclopedia of terror, you know. It was like
a list of all of the way these psychopaths are

(10:36):
controlling us through and used the metaphor of the octopus
with the eight tentacles and broke it up into eight
parts in terms of how that works. So that came
out in twenty seventeen. Then I wrote a book with
Jeff Berwick, who is the founder of the Dollar Vigilante
and the founder of Anarcapulco, which is the largest anarchist
conference in the world, and he and I wrote a

(10:57):
book took us about a year and a half to
write it called The Controlled Demolition of the American Empire.
We put that out the Friday before the US elections
in twenty twenty, and that became a number one best
seller in America and in Australia on election day in America,
which is great because if you read the book, you'll
never vote an election again, you know, I mean it
just it would be pointless. So those are the two

(11:21):
books that came before it. So in the process of
doing the promotion for book number one, I met Jeff
Berwick and then we started writing book number two, and
then the promotion for book number two, or really in
the lead up to the you know, while I was
working on book number two, Tony Merkle from The Confessionals

(11:42):
was like, you should do a podcast and I was like, well, maybe,
but I don't know how to do all the behind
the scenes stuff. He says, I'll do that for you,
but you need to do it. So he's my partner
on macro Aggressions and that started. That started March of
twenty twenty, just coincidentally, you know, just we had we
had funny timing that it happened. It started like the

(12:05):
week of COVID, so it was it was wild timing
on that. And so yeah, the podcast is you know,
the podcast keeps me able to talk about relevant things
that are happening sort of, you know, week by week,
as opposed to the books, which you know, I mean,

(12:25):
it may be a two year process to write the
book and then it goes out and then you know,
a lot has happened in that two year period. That's
what with Berwick. And we were just about finished with
Controlled Demolition when COVID hit, and I was like, hey,
I think we should like sit and wait about six

(12:45):
months and see how things play out. And he said, yeah,
I think so too. So we were thinking we were
going to launch it in February of twenty twenty for
an Arcapulco, but really Jeff still had stuff he had
to do on it, and so I was like, well,
we're just it'll come out when it comes out. And
then COVID hit and I was like, okay, We've got
to wait and see how this plays out. And then
we got to about August of twenty twenty and I said,

(13:08):
I've seen enough, man, what about you? He said, yeah, yeah,
I've seen enough. I know where this is, where this
is headed. So then we finished it up and included
the COVID component in it, and then and that book
just went crazy. I mean, because you know, I think
it helps because Jeff's got this massive international audience and
people were interested to hear the take of a Canadian

(13:31):
anarchist who lives in Mexico Jeff and a sort of
semi normy American who lives in America me and so
what he could, the way he could see things from
being outside of the States was invaluable to me because
I could see things inside from one perspective and he
could see things on the outside from another. And we

(13:53):
put that together and it worked. So so yeah, that's
sort of the background books and podcasts and the books.
The podcast came as a result of promoting the books,
but now they're sort of intertwined, so it's hard to
separate them.

Speaker 4 (14:09):
Yeah.

Speaker 1 (14:09):
For those who've not listened to Charlie's podcast, I can
highly recommend it. It's information packed for definite. I've been
listening to it over the last few weeks and it's
excellent and obviously you've got the book Octopus of Global Control.
I've read some of the book and there's a part
of the book that just keeps making me laugh and
I probably shouldn't laugh at it. And when I was

(14:34):
reading it, I was reading it sat on my bed
and my wife was like looking at me, like why
are you're laughing? And it was just a little part
about I think you say if you add a'm I
writing thinking to two people. I need to get these right. Well,
let's put it this way. I know you don't like
George Bush from this comment. So is it Hitler and

(14:56):
Stalin in a room and you have a gun and
George Bush and you've got two bullets, and you shoot
George Bush twice?

Speaker 5 (15:06):
Yeah, I said, if you're in a room with Hitler,
Stalin and George H. W. Bush and you had a
gun with two bullets, it was it was and only
two bullets, I said, it would be reasonable to shoot
George Bush twice just to make sure.

Speaker 4 (15:19):
Yeah.

Speaker 5 (15:20):
Yeah, And I consider him to be a a a
diabolical figure in especially if you start to dig into
like the the the Bush family, because the the irony
is that you know, since I mentioned Stalin and Hitler,
it's like, you know, the Bush family financed Hitler, quite
literally financed him. They were running Brown Brothers Harriman Bank,

(15:43):
and that was the bank that was that was financing Hitler.
And they almost hanged Prescott Bush for treason, but but
they couldn't be cut optically. It was going to be
it would be a bad look because he was running
this this thing called the us O, which is like
bring our troops home, and it was like support the
troops would be like the support the troops guy, like

(16:05):
the leader of the support the Troops guy is financing
Adolf Hitler. We can't let anybody know that. Like, so
they they didn't. They didn't put him in prison, and
they didn't take him out back and shoot him, which
they should have done either of those two things. Not
only did they not do that, they they buried it
so that nobody would know he had done that, because
he was it was so embarrassing to them that he

(16:27):
had been caught. So so again this is the Bush
family is like financing Hitler. I can't remember where they
are when JFK was shot, even though he was in Texas.
And then the Sun goes on to be involved in
nine to eleven. Like, I think they might be the
worst family in American history besides maybe like the Rockefellers.

Speaker 1 (16:48):
Yeah, yeah, I was a I said to my wife,
if I was going to replace George Bush, I'd replace
him with someone Blair.

Speaker 5 (16:57):
Yeah, Tony they have. There's a lot of similarities. There's
a lot of similarities. There's a guy. You know, you
look at them and you go like, you can almost
see the evil in Tony Blair when you look at him.
You you it's the smile, is the eyes. There's something
non human about him. And I'm not I might be

(17:20):
friends with David Ike. I'm not gonna go to I
won't go down that path. But I mean there's something
non human about no any player.

Speaker 1 (17:26):
Oh yeah, I agree with you the definitely what we're
saying about the eyes.

Speaker 2 (17:30):
And just when I see.

Speaker 1 (17:31):
Him on the TV, I'm just like my wife's like
all your favorite person's on the time that don't so so.

Speaker 5 (17:38):
On a side note, David Ike tells this story of
how he was sitting in a make like a dressing
room at the BBC before he was I don't know,
he was just starting to get known for being David Ike,
and and he was in one makeup chair and next

(17:59):
to him was Ted he in the other one, and
he wasn't he He didn't say anything. They didn't say
anything to each other, but David knew it was him
right there, and he said that Ted he turned and
looked at him and started didn't even look at his eyes,
didn't even look him in the eyes or anything, just
immediately looked him, looked at his feet and like scanned him,

(18:19):
looked up and then looked down at him. And David
was staring at him, trying to like make eye contact
with him and see, like, what is this freak doing
right here? And he said as soon as he got
his head up where it was eye level, he looked
and he said, Ted Heath's eyes were completely black. There
was no whites in his eyes. He was just pure black.

(18:42):
And he was like, oh my god, this guy is
scanning me. And he and he was like, this guy's
not human. There's no way that guy's I think, you
know what I mean, Maybe there's a possibility. I didn't
see it with my own eyes, but I do. I'm
interested in what David saw.

Speaker 2 (19:00):
Yeah, Wow, mind blowing.

Speaker 1 (19:03):
I can't I say a lot on my podcast that
there's there's things we just can't rule out. We can't
just call people liars or disbelieve them. All we can
do is sort of just maybe put it on the
shelf and go, Okay, that's a possibility. There's definitely a
lot of weird stuff going on, for sure.

Speaker 5 (19:21):
Yeah, just look around the world these days, you see
you see a lot of it. And and and I
know that we're going to get into some of it today,
some of the direction of where we're headed, because it's
it's not good, but it's it's also not over yet,
you know what I mean. There's there's still more to
this game to be played, and and and and so
I don't ever want to like tell people, you know,

(19:44):
make people think that like, oh, it's over. They've got us,
they're gonna you know, they're gonna enslave humanity, you know.
But because I don't think that. I think that these
people make a lot of mistakes, and I think that
their ideas are stupid, and I think the general public
can can be, you know, woken up to this at
some point, but it's going to take it's going to

(20:06):
take people getting honest with the information, and they're going
to have to start to expand there there there are
information sources too, and get away from the mainstream media
and start to find some shows, or find some books,
or find some magazines, or find something that is outside
of the mainstream because you're going to get a much
much more unfiltered version of reality. And I think that

(20:28):
these days, I think we need that. So so I'm
excited for talking to you to definitely.

Speaker 1 (20:33):
Definitely so one of the topics I wanted to talk
to you about today because the only problem I had
after listening to your podcast was like, what am I
going to talk about? Because I could talk to you
about all kinds of things, but I decided on we're
going to sort of go down this road. So climate change, obviously,
we keep hearing about it in the news, and we've
heard terms by one of the guys from the UN.

(20:54):
You know, we've entered the era of global boiling, and
obviously that's been you to increase the fear. Yeah, but
what do you think is behind this actual climate agenda
that we're being constantly bombarded with?

Speaker 5 (21:10):
So it's not my opinion what it's about. They tell
you what it's about in their writings. And so there's
a group called the Club of Rome. And the Club
of Rome was started in nineteen seventy one seventy and
it is a group that is globalist backed group that

(21:35):
is very focused on sort of behind the scenes world government.
It's not really a new concept. There's a lot of
groups out there that are into this. But the Club
of Rome did something interesting. They had one of the
members wrote a book called The Limits to Growth. And
in this book, which came out in nineteen seventy two,

(21:55):
they talk about the idea of global warming. It's a
term that they came up with and what they say
in this book. And I and since we mentioned the
Octopus Book, you can find the quote in the Octopus Book.
The format of my Octopus Book is that there are
seven hundred quotes from five hundred different people. So you

(22:18):
get an understanding of some of the things that are
going on in the world. Not me saying that this
is what's happening, but you get to read their words,
whether it's an interview somebody gave, or it's a book
that they wrote and it's from the book and or
you know, excerpt from it's it. I put it in
the Octopus Book, and I put the quote from the
Limits to Growth book that the Club of Rome wrote,

(22:40):
and it talks about how the idea of global warming,
even if it is invented for the purposes, should be
pushed as a pretext to create a global carbon tax,
and that this and they say it doesn't matter if
if global warming is or imagined, I mean they say

(23:02):
it's it doesn't matter that the purpose is to create
a carbon tax, and then this carbon tax will be
the funding mechanism for their world government that they want
to start. So this was fifty years ago and so
it's not a new concept. They use global warming, but
then a funny thing happened inconvenient for them, is that
temperature started going down, so they oh, I can't use

(23:24):
global warming if the temperature is going on. So then
they use climate change, which covers you either way. It's
either up or down. And climate you know, the weather's changing.
People think weather equals climate. It's not, but they think
that and they go, oh, it's changing. And every time
we have a storm here, every time we have a
hurricane here, they go, Now they go, oh, it's climate change.
It's like, no, we had hurricanes before. Of this stuff

(23:46):
is new, but so it's fake. It's all fake. The
entire component of is fake. But there is a side
of it that is very real, and that is pollution. Now, pollution,
we pollute our rivers and our oceans, and our air
and our bodies and our drinking water and all these things.

(24:06):
I mean, so we do have a problem with pollution.
But what these guys have done, and it's pretty brilliant,
is that they've hijacked that. They've taken all the anxiety
and all the compassion that you have for wanting to
clean up this beautiful planet that we most definitely need
to do, and they've said that is climate change. It's not.

(24:27):
That's pollution. Pollution is different. Climate change is fake. Climate
change is another invisible enemy that's coming to get you
in the form of carbon dioxide, which is ironic because
if we didn't have carbon dioxide, everything on this planet
would be dead. So don't let the facts get in
the way, right of course. So again, it's whether it's

(24:49):
invisible terrorists that are around the corner that are going
to get you unless you get scared and give your
giveaway your rights and pay more taxes to your government,
or it's an invisible virus that goes one direction down
the grocery store aisles, and it's definitely going to kill
you unless you give up your rights and pay more
in taxes. Or it's carbon dioxide, which is an invisible, odorless,

(25:12):
colorless gas that's way way way up in the toll
in the stratosphere where you're never going to go there
and measure it, and it's definitely going to kill you
unless you give up your rights and pay more in taxes.
So it's the same plan, it's the same scam. It's
it's just a different boogeyman, and it is you know,
and look, it'd be one thing if it was just that,

(25:34):
it'd be frustrating and annoying. But the problem is that
they're going to use this a fake thing as the
justification to start to remake society in a way that's
you know, carbon free, carbon neutral, carbon zero. If we
get to carbon zero, we're at human beings zero too.
So the thing doesn't make any sense, you But at

(25:57):
its core, what people need to understand is that there
are the people that are pushing this, not all the
not the minions, not the dummies like Greta that don't
know what the game is, but I mean the people
at the top that are pushing this down. They have
two things that they really want and they go hand
in hand, and this carbon you know scam is going

(26:19):
to help facilitate this. The first is they want a
world government. The second part, and they're kind of connected,
is that they want depopulation because if you're going to
have a world government, it's a lot easier to control
the world if there are fewer people in the world.
So they want to get it down. That's why there's
this push to like, you know, Georgia guides don't say

(26:41):
half a million people or half a billion people in
you know, in harmony with nature. And then you've got
these lunatics, Bill Gates talking about if we do a
really good job, we can lower that number by ten
to fifteen percent, talking about global population. So they're depopulationists,
they're eugenesis, they're they're transhumed and is they want to
depopulate the planet and create a world government and the

(27:05):
funding mechanism for that, and also the control apparatus is
going to be in the future climate climate change, so
and you can see it now, you can see it
where you are with you lose lose systems, the that
the monitors and everything that the people are cutting down rightly, so,

(27:26):
and you can see where this is going. You know,
you'll eat the bugs. You know, we've got to call
all the cows. We've got to do you know, all
these things. And you go, this is about carbon really,
so so the scientists are saying this, and you go,
they go, yeah, oh yeah, the scientists are all in agreement.
You mean, the same scientists that we're all in agreement
about COVID. I mean those scientists, the ones that you

(27:47):
guys paid to be in agreement with. I mean, it's
it's nonsense. But the problem is, it doesn't matter if
we know it's nonsense. The vast majority of the populations
of this planet are going to fall for it because
they're they don't want to hurt the planet. They live here.
They don't you know, they don't want to destroy the planet.
They have kids, you know, they don't want to leave

(28:10):
a dysfunctional planet for their children. Right, So they say, oh, fine, yeah,
I'll go to an electric car and instead of a
gas powered car. You go, well, where does the electricity
come from? Comes from my wall socket?

Speaker 4 (28:23):
Yeah?

Speaker 5 (28:23):
Yeah, yeah, but where does the electricity come from? Oh,
it comes from burning coal. Okay, so you're are you
saving the planet? So you traded your gas powered car
for a coal burning car. Good job, you know what
I mean. So there there's a vast majority of people
that think they're helping and they think that they're a
part of the solution. The problem is there is no problem.

(28:47):
That you don't need to be part of the solution
because there's no problem. Aren't We aren't having a climate emergency.
It's it's fake, it's not real. And the same people
that brought you this are the same ones that are
going to try and stick you into a fifteen minute
city as well. So it's it's a I think it's
imperative for us to know it, to understand it, to
recognize it, to see what the game is and then

(29:09):
that way. First of all, you don't have to have
climate anxiety. You know, you don't have to do that,
but you But what you do have to do is
you have to pay attention and hopefully, you know, talk
to people close to you and say, oh, you know,
this whole thing is not what you think it is.

Speaker 4 (29:25):
So.

Speaker 2 (29:55):
Totally agree with you.

Speaker 1 (29:56):
I've been trying to say to people the same thing. Listen,
climate change inge is not happening, and they've gone, but
we spill oiling the scene with it, and I've gone, no, No,
that's pollution. And and like I was saying off air,
I live near the coast. If I go down to
the beach and I see litter on the beach, I
pick it up. I'm not saying to people, don't look
after the environment. If I see nets that people has discarded,

(30:18):
I'll pick them up.

Speaker 2 (30:19):
Do you know what I mean?

Speaker 1 (30:20):
I want us to keep the place clean. But what
I'm saying is the same as what you're saying, is
that climate change it is a scam. Like you said,
they use global boiling, and then inconveniently they add some
data release that showed that the temperature had gone down.
So we can't use that now, but we can use
this all encompassing phrase climate change. And there's a there's
a there's a sort of local incident that I use

(30:44):
to highlight it to people who who I know around here,
to highlight to them how they use this climate change.
So just down the road from where I live, there's
a coach company that hires out minibuses and the large
coaches does the score runs and everything. Now where that's situated.
There's a hill at the side of it, and they've
just built a new housing estate on this hill and

(31:05):
I think it was finished about eighteen months ago. Now,
when it rains, the coach company keeps getting flooded. So
people obviously, oh, it's climate change. No, it's not climate change.
They've tarmacd over a hill that was soaking up the water.
It's that simple. But obviously people say, look, and one
of the things that's happening over here, I mean over

(31:26):
in the States. You used in you've named your storms
for quite a lot of years. They've only just started
doing it in the last sort of a couple of
years in the UK. And I've said to people, they're
doing this over here now because we've literally just had
one yesterday called Storm Keran. We had one two weeks
ago called Storm be Bet where there was flooding, and yeah,
places do get flooded because they're building houses on floodplains

(31:49):
and in all the wrong places. But they're using this now,
these names to highlight, oh, this storm's coming, this storm
b Bet, this storm Kran, you know, to to stalk
up the fear because it adds sort of emphasis. Whereas
once of it was just like, yeah, there's going to
be some bad wind and rain, and that was it.
But now it's a storm, such a such a name.

(32:12):
But your talks about obviously we want to look really
at the players because you we've talked about like the
strategy they use in but who are the people that
are pushing this? Who would you say the main players
are in this?

Speaker 5 (32:26):
Well, anybody connected to the United Nations, which would be
quite a few of the all of the major leaders
of the countries are involved. The World Economic Forum is
part of this. They're not the not the major part,
but there's definitely a climate side to it. The the

(32:47):
you know, look, the banks love it because if you've
got to remake society and you've got to go away
from the existing paradigm, and you've got to build a
whole new infrastructure and a whole new you know, the
concept electric cars, electric this electric that that requires massive
capital investments. So you're gonna go out those companies are
gonna go out and borrow money from the banks and

(33:09):
things like that. So the banks love it. Banks are
in on it. They know that this is this is
a scam. And of course one of the funny things
about how you know that the banks know that it's
a scam. Is brought to you by if you know
London Reel, if you've seen London Real. London Reel has
a guy that he has brought on many times, a

(33:30):
guy who's like a mentor to him, Gonna Dan Paynia.
Dan Pagnia is a lunatic, but like a billionaire lunatic, right,
And he's and he's known for being very kind of
boisterous and you know, and using a lot of colorful language.
But he's on a stage in he's on a stage
somewhere and and like a panel discussion, they're taking questions

(33:52):
from the audience. And this this lady in the audience
is just out of her mind and she's so pissed
off at him because how dare you say the climate
change is fake? And I have to live in And
he just immediately got just jumps down her. They shut up,
you stupid or yeah, I mean, he just he goes
off on her right, and he says, listen, I invest

(34:13):
in all sorts of real estate. He says, I have
seen all kinds of investment prospectuses from high rise buildings
in South Florida. My entire life. I have never seen
terminology in any of those contracts that said, if climate
change happens and sea levels rise, this billion dollar condo

(34:37):
that's right on the beach in Miami is going to
be worthless. You know, do you agree to He's I've
never seen that in there. And the reason why I've
never seen that in there is because it's not real.
And if it were real, the banks would never lend
on it if they thought that their investment could turn
to zero from rising sea levels. So they know it's fake.
If they thought otherwise, you wouldn't be able to get

(34:59):
insurance on the and you can get insurance on the building.
So he's like, it just disproved. He's like, just forget
what if people are saying, watch what they're doing. Banks
are lending, insurance, companies are ensuring, they wouldn't be doing
that if they thought there was a risk on the
coast from climate change sea level rise. They show you

(35:20):
a map in twelve years, Florida is going to be underwater.

Speaker 4 (35:24):
No, it's not.

Speaker 5 (35:25):
You know why it's not because climate change is fake.
It's a scam. It's a gigantic scam. It's a it's
a it's just getting started. We are going to hear
about it for the rest of our lives. That's how
big of a scam it is. It's good. And I'll
tell you what, if they pull it off, it will
be a bigger scam than central banking. They'll have the

(35:45):
power to control. I mean, they'll have you convinced that
your behavior impacts the weather. It's mental, of course, of course,
what we do. The weather doesn't care what we think
or what we do. It's going to do its own thing. Now,
where we do get into differences is when you start
doing things like you mentioned, which is developing in areas

(36:09):
where you shouldn't be developing, and then as a result,
nature says there's nowhere for the water to go. It
normally seeks, you know, sinks into the through the grass
and into the ground, and now you've built over that,
and so now it has to pool down here. That
so we do have to pay attention to these things.
It's not like the weather will never affect us, like

(36:30):
we have to be smart about it. But but there
isn't some you know, we haven't put too much carbon
dioxide into the atmosphere because one of the things that
you'll notice is that the people that are pushing climate change.
John Kerry, you know that that guy, he's crazy, he
loves climate change. But these people, they're only focused on

(36:54):
one type of climate change, anthropogenic, man made man cause
climate change. They only concerned about that, which represents a
fraction of the amount of carbon dioxide that's being released
into the atmosphere. You have one Icelandic volcano go off,
and it puts more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere than

(37:16):
all of mankind's uh industrial capacity from the from the
time we were rubbing sticks together until yesterday. One Icelandic
volcano takes care of all that. Just as so the
fact that we're we're going to modify behavior while volcanoes
are going off, well, I mean, it's it's it's crazy,

(37:37):
it's it's lunacy, it's totally backwards logic. And anyone that
digs into it for more than just ten minutes and
doesn't get their information off of the nightly news will
discover that it's it's phony. But but it's very But
again back to the point, it almost doesn't matter if
it's fake, because it's coming and so it's going to

(37:57):
be very real to us that the rammifications of the
decision making based on that will be the only real
part of it, you know, like how we have to
you know, buy different cars. Or here in the United States,
in California, they've banned gas powered leaf blowers like you

(38:20):
know the gardeners use there will blow you know, you
cut your grass and blow all the leaves and anything.
You can't have gas powered ones. Now it has to
be electric again, electricity coming from coal burning power plants.
So there's no there's no benefit here. It's just trading
one for another. It's nonsense. It's busy work. But this

(38:41):
is being normalized. And what's even worse is that I mean,
in envision this scenario where three years ago you saw
what the COVID police, the the you know, the the
lady down the street from your house who would call
the police and say, my neighbor has too many cars

(39:03):
in front of their driveway. I think they're having a
party a super spreader event. Now that's COVID, right, A
virus with a ninety nine point nine to eight percent
survivability rate in a medium death age of eighty years old.
That's COVID. And that lady thinks she's saving the neighborhood
by making that phone call. What do you think she's
going to do when she thinks she's saving the world,

(39:25):
you know what I mean. So we're going to have
an entire planet of carbon. Karens out there picking up
the phone and calling the police to report a carbon
dioxide crime that's happening next door. They're out there, they're
in their car and they're they're revving their engines. We
have to get the police here immediately, throw these people
in jail. So, like, it's going to get crazy out there.

Speaker 1 (39:49):
One of the things that blows my mind on all this.
I mean I'm not a scientist or anything, but I
know basic signs what I learned at school, and carbon
dioxide is plumt food. Like if we have no carbon dioxide,
we have no plants and we die. Yes, I mean,
it's just that simple. So they are lunatics. And like
you said, if we do go to true net zero,

(40:12):
as they call it, there is no people, and.

Speaker 5 (40:15):
They just they and they want they but but again
that's at their core. They're depopulationists. They're fine with that.
I mean, they want to be alive and they want that.
You know, they're they're small group of people to be alive,
but the rest of us, we can go die. As
far as they're concerned, we're taking up too much space
on their planet. That's the way they see it.

Speaker 1 (40:36):
So one of the things that you briefly mentioned the
phrase fifteen minute cities, and we could call them smart cities.
It's obviously a term that we've started to hear more
and more. Possibly not everyone who listens to the show
may be completely familiar with what we mean by that.
So could you explain what the mainstream is saying and

(40:59):
then explain what they actually are a fifteen minute or
smart city.

Speaker 5 (41:03):
Yeah, so, look, the idea of a fifteen minute city
in and of itself, there's nothing nefarious about it. If
you live in New York City, you're in a fifteen
minute city. Essentially, you know your your school, your kids
school is within fifteen minutes of a dry What it
means is it's your world is basically within fifteen minutes
of you. You get on a train, or you get

(41:25):
in a you have a car, or you can walk
or wherever. But your your school, for your kids, your
medical for yourself, your job, your entertainment, it's all in
the neighborhood. If you live in New York City. I
know people that have lived there for a long long
time and they don't really ever leave. If they live
in Manhattan, they're just like, oh, well this is where
I live and everything's here, and and so there's nothing

(41:47):
wrong with that. The problem and so the media is
talking about how, hey, it's going to be a fifteen
minute city. You'll know, you'll you'll you'll be able to
do everything within this area is and it's convenient for
the answer is, of course, yeah, it's your dry cleaners
is there, and your job is there, and grocery store
not too far away, and you can get everything done.
The problem is when you want to leave your fifteen

(42:09):
minute city. You want to you need to get on
a plane and go visit your aunt who's having a surgery,
and you want to be there for her, you know
what I mean. So you go, oh, I'm going to
fly to from New York City, my fifteen minute city.
I'm gonna fly to to h Dallas and go see her.
And they go, no, you're not. You can't leave your
fifteen minute city. So so the sales pitch is that

(42:32):
everything's going to be close everything's going to be walkable,
everything's going to be public transport. You're not gonna need
a car. You won't, of course be allowed to have
a car, but you won't need a car because everything
will be walkable or public transport or whatever. And so
that's the sales pitch that where it takes a turn
is that at some point along the line, once they

(42:55):
get everybody in, then you then then you can't leave
the fifteen minute city. And maybe it's not as diabolical
as like gates and walls set up around your fifteen
minute city. Maybe it's not quite so overt like that.

(43:16):
Maybe instead, what it is is that if you have
a car, an electric car, then you're geotagged, where you're
geo fenced, where you can't. You can't your car won't
go past a certain area. It just the component, you know,
just it won't allow you to It locks up. You know,

(43:38):
all the electric cars can be you know, remotely controlled.
So so you you get to a point where maybe
my car doesn't allow me to go there, or maybe
maybe maybe I don't even have a car and I
can physically go to the next city over that's an
hour away, but my Central Bank digital currencies that we've
switched over to, they just don't work there, or maybe

(43:59):
you know, you know, maybe some of them work enough
that I can go over and get like a hamburger
or something, but certainly not enough that I can stay
there for an extended period of time.

Speaker 4 (44:10):
You know.

Speaker 5 (44:10):
So then they start to geo fence your money so
that your money only works in a certain area within
fifteen minutes, you know, fifteen minute radius, right, So there's
ways that they can make you comply with this. So again,
early on, when you're trying to get everyone convinced that
this is a good thing, it's going to be. It's
gonna be what I imagine the sales pitch for communism was,

(44:32):
which is, you know, unicorns and rainbows, nobody's working and
everybody's eating. And then what do you get. You get
gray Soviet style drab boring buildings, breadlines and lining up
lining up against the wall to be shot. And so
so again, early on, Oh, it's gonna be great. I mean,
think about it like this, as an example, during during

(44:54):
during COVID summer of well, it must have been winter
where where you and I were, it was summer in Australia,
and they were putting people in COVID concentration camps, these
these little camps, and they were taking pictures of them,
seeing the pictures of it, and it was these like
young twenty something really attractive Australian girls that were like

(45:18):
sitting out on the front porch of their jail cell. Essentially,
it was like a like a like a tiny home
that had a little front porch and they're sitting there
and it looks and they've got their you know, their coffee,
and they're just like living their best life. And I
was looking at that, going, this is a sales pitch
for a prison cell for a virus with a ninety

(45:39):
nine point nine to eight percent survivability rate. This is insanity,
and they're trying to sell it like it's an Abercromie
and Fitch, you know. Comeercia is like black and white,
like look at me living my best life, you know,
and doing all this, and it's like, no, this is gross.
This whole thing is gross. So so again, like it'll
start off glamorous, it'll start off convenient, and then they'll

(46:00):
start to take things away from you. You know, like
as you know you're in a fifteen minute city, maybe
maybe the you know, maybe you can leave the fifteen
minute city, provided that your social credit score is high enough,
you know, and if and if it's not, then your
money doesn't work, or if it's not, then you can't
get on train or a bus. I mean, this isn't
this isn't conspiracy theory. This is conspiracy analysis because this

(46:24):
is happening in Shenzen, China already and has been for years.
If your social credit score there is too low, you
cannot get on an airplane or a train. You can't.
You'll scan your thing and it'll say you're ineligible. So,
you know, like we would look at that and go no,
thank you. But the people that are running Western countries

(46:44):
are looking at the Chinese system and saying, tell us,
how you do that? We want to do that here,
We want to do that for our people. We don't
we want that top down authoritarian control like you guys
have tell us more about this and so, and how
do they do it. They do it facial recognition cameras
in a robust social credit database system that's all tied
into the same thing. So, as an example, you're a

(47:08):
you're a Chinese guy who's smoking a cigarette on a
bus when you're not supposed to be smoking a cigarette
on a bus, and the camera in the bus picks
up your face, matches it to your the geotag of
all the cell phones in that area figures out that
it's you. You get done, you put your cigarette out
on that bus, You get off, your your bus stops there,
bus stuff, You get off, You walk around the corner.

(47:28):
Your cell phone pings and it says you've been found
guilty of smoking on the bus and we've deducted, you know,
a twenty one fine from your we we bo account,
which is like you know, like PayPal, So like you've
been caught, you've been fined, and it's been taken out
of your account within eight minutes. This isn't theory, it's

(47:49):
they were They tried it, They tested it. I saw
a video where they tested it with a guy getting
on a bus smoking and it did it to him.
And so this is this is a component of a
fifteen minute city. So when people start to hear that,
if they're unfamiliar with that term, they start to think, well,
that sounds kind of like, I don't know, it sounds crazy. Well, yeah,

(48:09):
of course, but that doesn't mean it isn't coming, and
so start to pay attention to things like that. What
they've ideally like to do is just shrink your world
into a smaller and smaller and smaller place and get
you to stop even thinking about going somewhere. They're they're
demonizing air travel. Oh, how much carbon dioxide it emits. Meanwhile,

(48:32):
the United States military aircraft carriers or never stop. You know,
they're going all over the place emitting god knows what.
So so you know, we we we're sliding into this authoritarianism,
but it's it's coming to us through guilt, because they
want you to feel that you're the problem, like that

(48:55):
you are putting out too much carbon dioxide and you're
killing the planet. And if only you would be in
control of yourself, then then then we wouldn't have the
problems that we're having. All this crazy weather, which isn't
it's either not necessarily anything new, or if you do
get these massive storms, they're manipulated. I mean that that

(49:15):
technology has existed since the Korean War, so so, which
is the nineteen fifties. So this is a this is
this is something that I think everybody needs to pay
attention to because you're not going to hear it on
your nightly news. You're only going to hear things about
how you know. You're just going to hear hear all

(49:37):
the beautiful sales pitch for it, and you're never going
to hear the downside. But it's most definitely common.

Speaker 1 (50:13):
I read an article earlier and I just cut a
portion of it out because I just I read it
and I was like, talk about contradictory and it's about Oxford.
So this article says. In its local Plan twenty forty,
Oxford City Council proposed installing fifteen minute neighborhoods throughout the

(50:34):
city over the next twenty years. These plans don't include
restricting people to their local areas, but instead focus on
improving infrastructure and increasing mobility within the neighborhoods. However, Oxfordshire
County Council also recently announced traffic reducing measures throughout the city.
From twenty twenty four, drivers in Oxford will be encouraged

(50:58):
to travel around the city by using the Ring Road
or public transport rather than just driving through it. In
a very similar system to law traffic neighborhoods, the council
will hand out fines to those using city center roads
at certain times. The new policy doesn't stop you from

(51:18):
traveling anywhere. But this is the bit why I had
to read this out. So they're saying, the new policy
doesn't stop you from traveling anywhere, but it does limit
wording when you can use your car. Well, hang on,
you've just said it doesn't stop you from traveling anywhere,
and then then in the next breath, well, it does

(51:39):
limit you from where and when you can use your car.

Speaker 2 (51:43):
It's just insane.

Speaker 5 (51:45):
This is something I had a funny conversation with Richie
Allen and he's in Manchester, and Richie said, it says
to me, he said, I had this conversation with a
guy many years ago. He was like, it was like
ten years ago, and this guy worked. This guy was
in I don't I don't know if he was in
Manchesters and in a in a city that was sort
of outside of Manchester, and he was in like the

(52:06):
city council of it. He was he was involved in
the local government. And he said, Richie, I am seeing
plans for them to have these these barriers that are
they when recessed, they just they're they're flat with the road,
but then when activated they come up out of the
road and create barriers and what they what they want

(52:27):
to do. There might be three or four of them
across the road, basically to block off this road so
that you can no longer go, you can no longer
access it. So he said, they're going to shut off
certain roads so you just can't even be on them.
And and this guy told Richie about this like eight
years ago, and Richie remembered it and told me about

(52:51):
it because he said they actually they did.

Speaker 1 (52:55):
It, Yes, he said, because I'm I'm from that way
and I can I can even tell you now right
in the city center.

Speaker 2 (53:04):
They've built new tram links now.

Speaker 4 (53:06):
But one of the.

Speaker 1 (53:07):
Roads basically going you had the marks expenses here what's
called print works behind it, like one of the main
shopping streets. It had time barriers on the bollards what
you're talking about. And they used to come up because
I used to be a delivery driver many years ago
and I had to go around the ring Rogue at
certain times in the morning. You could not drive down

(53:28):
that street. But now it's been replaced with a tram stop,
so you still can't drive down it because only the
trams go on it. So they actually did implement it,
but then they've put something else there, so you still
can't go down there.

Speaker 4 (53:42):
Yeah.

Speaker 5 (53:43):
Yeah, they want to restrict you. They want to they
want to shrink your world and get you thinking very locally.
And and and this is part of a of a
of a broader plan. There's Agenda twenty thirty, which is
the United Nations plan to commit everybody, you know, all

(54:06):
these countries to basically reducing their carbon output. But then
there's a smart Cities program that's underneath that, a Sea
forty program, and and that picks partner cities that aren't
quite it's not not at a country level, but just
at it like a large city level. And what they
what they're doing there is they're just trying to make

(54:28):
it specific to this this particular city so that you
you it's it's essentially a fifteen minute city, but but
but on a local level. So there's the there's the
global side of agenda of the United Nations Agenda twenty thirty,
and then it takes it down to the nationwide level,
and then there's a level even below that and it's

(54:49):
city specific. Now, it didn't do very well. They wound
up having to fold the you know, the the United
the Sea forty program. It wound up going away. But
one of the things that didn't go away from it
was the networking between all the cities where they talk
about how they can share best practices for how to

(55:12):
implement these things, maybe in a different way. So the
network is still there, but there's you know, but the
idea of having it city specific for this agenda twenty thirty,
it wound up just falling apart because they mismanaged it.
So again I point out all these crazy things that
these globalist world government lunatics want to do, but also

(55:36):
we need to remember that they make a lot of
mistakes and they're not perfect, and they're not gods. Though
they think they are, they don't. They are on some
levels very ignorant of how humanity works. They so again
we have to push back on them. We have to
remember to not comply with their crazy ideas, cause if

(56:01):
we don't do what they tell us to do, it
turns out they don't really have a good backup plan
for that. If there's mass non compliance, then they go, well,
I don't I don't know. You know, in the States,
they said, give them free donuts for your to give
them take the shots, because because a lot of people
are like, we're not doing that. We're not we're not
doing shots. We're not we're not doing that. And they went, oh, well,

(56:25):
then bribe them. What do stupid people like, they're like
donuts and lottery tickets and lap dances and things like that, Well,
then give them that. And so that's what they started doing.
So I watched that and I thought, really, this is
your plan, Like, this is plan B. If people don't
voluntarily line up for the shots. Plan B is we're
going to give them free donuts. And you go, honestly,

(56:46):
that's the plan. That's the dumbest plan I've ever heard.
So so again, like part of it is if you
can get them off of their timeline and and twenty
thirty year twenty thirty is a huge deal for them.
That is like the finish line in their minds. But
they can't get there if all of us, if we
cut down the cameras, you know what I mean, Like

(57:07):
they go, we put all the the sensors up, we
put all the cameras up. We're gonna get everybody. But
then and then they go out one day and half
of them have been cut down and they go, well,
we weren't expecting that. And they go, well, what's the
backup plan? They go, I don't really have one. Good
do keep doing that? Keep screwing up their timeline if
they can't get you know, if they have a ten

(57:29):
step plan but they can't finish step two, who cares
that they had all these other ideas lined up, they
can't get to them. So we do play a role
in this, and and collectively, if we decide that we
don't want to participate in this, and we just say
we are not doing this. We're not going to use

(57:49):
your central bank digital currency, they try that Nigeria. They
have the Nigerian population. They said, listen, you know we've
had we've had problems with currents over the years, but
we're gonna roll out a central bank digital currency. You
guys are going to all have to use it. We're
getting rid of cash immediately. And now we've got the

(58:12):
central bank digital currency. Half of one percent of the
population signed up for it. You know what, the you
know what the rest did? They all started using bitcoin instead.
So thirty five percent of the Nigerian community of the country,
the population transacts in bitcoin. Because they said we're not
doing that. But the arrogance of the government to think, oh,

(58:33):
we'll just roll it out and everyone will do it
immediately because we say too, no, they won't. So we
do have a say in this collectively. We need to
get honest about what it is. So when they start
to roll out these climate policies, we just go, no,
we're not doing it. And they say, oh, what are
you trying to destroy the planet? You know, like, oh,
you're trying to kill grandma. That was the thing for

(58:54):
three years of COVID stuff, like, Oh, you're gonna try
and guilt me into this by saying I'm killing the planet. Now, well, no,
it doesn't work on me. I understand what the scam is.
That doesn't work. So as soon as you understand the scam,
it takes away all the power. So it's like a
magician trying to do a trick, and you know how
the trick is done. You go, he's gonna pull a
dove out of his back pocket. That's how he does.
And you know and when you know that, then the trick.

(59:17):
You see the trick and you go, oh, it's not
that impressive. So I think that with us, the general public,
the more we know about what we're walking into, and
we know the more we know about how they plan
to do it, the harder it will be for them
to pull it off. So again, like I don't want
people to be like, oh, you know, there's no hope

(59:37):
you know these guys. No, there's plenty of hope actually
because because if we decide it doesn't happen, it doesn't happen.

Speaker 1 (59:44):
Yeah, they've had a real problem in London with well
it's not a problem for us, it's a problem for
London City Council with a group called the Blade Runners,
and they're the guys who are pulling the cameras down,
and they have been pulling hundreds of them down to.

Speaker 2 (59:59):
The point we're London City Council.

Speaker 1 (01:00:01):
And I we don't even know whether we can even
go ahead with.

Speaker 2 (01:00:04):
This because they're just going to keep doing it.

Speaker 1 (01:00:06):
They're just going to keep pulling them down, which you know,
I mean, I'm not going to go around vandalizing things.
But we need to resist. We do need to resist.
I mean one of the things that we're reading about
Oxford as well is that the planning on bringing in
a bus pass, like not a bus passes and gets
you on the bus for free, but like you want
to get so many a year and that's it, like

(01:00:29):
say one hundred passes, and then when you've used them
all up, you can't go on the bus again until
you get your next quarter of the year after. These
are some of the things that they're mooting right now
and it's just bonkers. And there's other other cities Birmingham,
canter A, bit Ipswich, Sheffield, Bristol, they're all they're all
looking to implement these fifteen minute city plans. That's just
over obviously in England.

Speaker 5 (01:00:50):
And then when you're looking off all the bus all
the bus drivers just go on strike, just say we're
not showing up for work. We're never going We're not
We're never going to show up for work. Into you
get rid of this and then they go, uh, what
do we do? Hire more bus drivers? Fine, you hire
a new batch of bus drivers and they say, we're
not doing this either, So so now what you know

(01:01:10):
what I mean? Like at some point these people aren't
criminal masterminds some of them. Most of them are really dumb.
They don't understand that they haven't thought this out there.
They are you know, we're going to implement this and
then that's just going to be the way it is.
And then you go, oh no, no, no it's not.
We'll cut down all the cameras, will will will we'll,

(01:01:32):
you know, we'll we'll be completely non compliant with you. Guys.
You want to roll out a new you know, digital
euro or a digital pound or something like that, good
luck with that. We'll use bitcoin, we'll use Monaro, we'll
use cash, we'll use we'll do something else, We'll use
another currency, and we will we will go around you.

(01:01:52):
So because that's what we do, and that's what we
have to do, and so we if we make them
work for it on every single level, then there's not
enough effort. There's not enough people loyal to the cause
inside the government that they will tolerate that. Most of
them are low level people that are like, I don't
want to do this either. I don't want to have
to give you a ticket for this. I'm just told

(01:02:14):
that I have to. And but once those people stop participating,
you know, the police, for all their you know, oh,
what will make you do it? Well, you know what,
the police are one bounced paycheck away from switching sides too.
You know what, I mean, if all of a sudden
the checks stop flowing to the police every two weeks,

(01:02:35):
then do you really have police? You know, because then
they'll leave. So so again like it's our duty and
obligation to be as difficult as possible for these people
because they are trying to destroy our lives. They are
trying to remake society in a way that is incompatible
with humanity, and we just won't allow it.

Speaker 2 (01:02:53):
Well, absolutely, they're trying to destroy us.

Speaker 1 (01:02:56):
Well, I mean I will just I've renamed the police
offering now today Guestapo because some of the things that
I've seen them doing, it's just unbelievable. I mean, there's
been a guy arrested for protesting against the Palestinian protests.
So they had a protest for the Palestinians and there
was one guy protesting against them, and they arrested him

(01:03:19):
like three coppers, And it's like, what is going on here?
But it's like I've been reading and I were listening
to klausch Forbe earlier and he was saying about Los
Angeles and he's saying, you know, it's going to become
private car free by twenty thirty.

Speaker 2 (01:03:38):
So if you want to go somewhere.

Speaker 1 (01:03:40):
No I thought that, and like you said, arrogance, like
twenty thirty, that's like seven years away.

Speaker 2 (01:03:46):
That's not going to happen.

Speaker 5 (01:03:48):
No. I lived in Los Angeles for twenty five years.
I can tell you with absolute certainty, there is no
infrastructure capable of getting people around except cars in Los Angeles.
New York maybe New York City, different story. It's very
very condensed, and there's a subway system, and there's cabs
and there's buses, and everything's geographically kind of condensed. And

(01:04:12):
Los Angeles goes on you. I mean, it's an hour
in every direction by car. You're not going to take
a cab for that. It's a seventy five dollars cab
ride one way. You're not going to take an uber.
You're not gonna There is no subway system. There's a
there's a Los Angeles there. There's a very small, primitive
subway system that nobody uses that goes from like three

(01:04:32):
places to downtown and back, and nobody cares, Nobody ever
uses it. It is it. He's delusional if he thinks
that the private car ownership in in Los Angeles southern
California is going to go away in seven years. He's
out of his mind. It's it's so, so what is
everybody going to do to go to work? Does he
have a solution for that? I mean that the California

(01:04:54):
is already, you know, putting in electric car standards for
twenty forty and they say, oh, well, we're gonna we're
gonna transition. They're actually twenty thirty five no longer allowed
to sell gas powered cars in California. Uh, and they're

(01:05:14):
they're phasing them out completely. And they say, because they
want everybody to go to electric, Well, guess what in
August when it's one hundred degrees in Los Angeles and
everybody has their air conditioning on, the power grid sometimes
goes down in what they call brown outs, so they
can't even keep the power fully on in southern California

(01:05:36):
in August. Now they want to put twenty five times
more vehicles on the power system. And they think, and
by the way, no investment, no additional investment in the grid,
in the power grid. It's not like they have It's
not like they said, well we have eight trillion dollars
going into the power grid.

Speaker 6 (01:05:55):
No.

Speaker 5 (01:05:55):
No, no, they're completely pretending like everything is fine. So
there it's magic thinking by really, I mean, I don't
know if like Gavin Newsome and these guys are dumb,
they can't be dumb. But it's I mean, it's an arrogance.
That's just it's bordering on delusion. It's just it's it's

(01:06:16):
not doesn't even require you to be an engineer or
or or or anything. You just have to you just
have to have a functioning brand. And you go, how
or how's the power grid going to handle it when
we when we quadruple the amount of people that are
on it, when it doesn't even work very well right now? Like,

(01:06:38):
how do you plan to do that? And they say
we're going green and you go, yeah, yeah, but nothing
is going to work. No car, no car, you're gonna
get rid of gas stations. You're just gonna have electric
cars on a power grid that can't support it. And
then what and then and then what happened? What happens
when your electric battery, the battery in your electric car
goes out and you have to buy a brand new one.

(01:06:59):
Have you seen how much those costs? Twenty six thousand
dollars for a brand new battery, not a brand new car,
a brand new bad for the battery for your car.
So the whole thing is like, if this were your
science project, you would have gett you'd get a failing
grade on it, and you would deserve it. The teacher

(01:07:20):
would say, you haven't really thought this thing out. It
doesn't seem like a very feasible idea that you're proposing.

Speaker 4 (01:07:27):
Here.

Speaker 5 (01:07:27):
Where's the investment in the elect and the infrastructure to
support all this? And you go, you know, we're not
gonna we're not gonna worry about that. That won't get me
elected to governor if I if I talk about infrastructure,
that's so boring. I'm gonna talk about climate change and
scare everybody into voting for me. It's just maddening.

Speaker 2 (01:07:46):
Yeah, it's absolutely mad man.

Speaker 1 (01:07:48):
So just just before we sort of wrap it up,
obviously it's all to do with control, and another aspects
of it seems to be this push towards a cashless society.
How far off can you see that that becomes a
reality where we just have a cashless society?

Speaker 5 (01:08:05):
Well, I mean hopefully it doesn't happen, but the idea,
I mean, we've been sort of drifting towards digital payments
for a while.

Speaker 4 (01:08:14):
We have.

Speaker 5 (01:08:16):
Credit cards, and we have wire transfers, and we have PayPal,
and none of this is new and we've had we've
had bitcoin for ten years and uh, you know, so
we've been sort of going this direction, and I think
that we will get to a place where we are

(01:08:38):
maybe cashless, but I don't think there's much of an
appetite for uh, central bank digital currencies, programmable money. That
that to me, if if if you ask, like, what
is the number one most important component thing that you

(01:08:58):
would you know aspect that you would say, this is
the hill to die on. You know, we under no
circumstances can we allow this to take hold. More so
than climate change all this, I would say central bank
digital currencies because if you allow these people to be
able to program your money so that it doesn't work
outside of your fifteen minute city, or they set it

(01:09:21):
to expire. Let's just say that they set part of
your money to expire in order to force you to
spend it. And but but you can only spend it
at certain stores that that will take it. Maybe it's
only the Maybe it's only the companies that are partnered
with the World Economic Forum. There's plenty of them, But
you know, maybe it's like the company It's like shopping
on the company store. When the Rockefellers used to do that,

(01:09:43):
they would they would have these big mining camps, and
then they'd build a store, and then they'd run the store,
and then the only place where these guys could buy
anything was at the company store, and they marked up
all the prices. So it's like we could get ourselves
in a situation where the central bank digital currencies only
work at the company store, and the company store is
all the partners of the World Economic Forum. So you

(01:10:06):
know you have money, and when Klaus Schwab says, you
know you'll own nothing. The reason why you'll own nothing
you'll never be able to save any money to buy
anything large enough, like a car or anything like that,
because they'll have your money expiring. So this is that,
to me, is the fear of going cashless. You know
that is that is the thing that you have to

(01:10:30):
push back on because if you don't, you're going to
wind up in a situation where they they they've got
you if they can, if they can control your money.
I mean, they already have messed with our money through
central banks and inflated it and made it worthless. But
if they could actually control it, they could control where
you spend it. They could see who you send it to,

(01:10:51):
they could see exactly how much you have. They could
take it out of your account at any time. They
could take your taxes out whenever they want to. They
could confiscate it and make you have to fight them
in court to get it back. They could set it
to expire. They could set it so that you can't
buy guns, whether they could set it so you can't
buy bitcoin, whether they could set it so you can't
buy red meat with it. I mean, they could set
it up so that it's almost limitless. The sort of

(01:11:15):
controls that they could put on that, and if we
allow that to happen, it's over for us. So that
is my number one fear is the central bank digital currencies.
But again back to the Nigeria story. They rolled that out.
Half of one percent of the people participated in that,
and they turned off cash. They straight up said this

(01:11:36):
money that you guys have been using, it doesn't work anymore,
has no value, it's worthless. We're not going to take it.
We're not going to accept it. The only thing you
can do is use the central bank digital currency, and
still only one out of two hundred people got on
board with that. So there's hope. There's a lot of hope.
But we've got to get honest about the situation and
we have to recognize these traps because they're going to

(01:12:00):
present them to us as being benefits, but in actuality
it's going to be the enslavement of humanity.

Speaker 1 (01:12:11):
Yeah, I just encourage all my listeners to really look
into these things that me and Charlie has been talking
about today, because these things are real, they're happening now,
they are threat to us. So just before we go, Charlie,
could you tell tell everyone where they can get older,
where they can get your books and listen to your
podcast and everything. Sure.

Speaker 5 (01:12:32):
Macroaggressions podcast goes out twice a week, once as a monologue,
once as a video interview. You can catch it in
audio format wherever podcasts are served. You can catch it
in video format over on Rumble. Now I have a
new Rumble channel. You can It's on rockfin It's on
band dot Video. The website is the Octopus of Globalcontrol

(01:12:53):
dot com. That's the name of the first book. You
can find information about the books there and you can
follow me on Twitter at Macroggremtions where I argue with robots.

Speaker 1 (01:13:08):
I'd definitely encourage you guys to go and listen to
Charlie's podcast. I listen to it, and go on his
website and have a look at his books that I
purchased one because he does, like I said, there's a
lot of information. It's information packed. So thank you again
Charlie for joining me. I'll be back next week.

Speaker 4 (01:13:23):
Guys.

Speaker 1 (01:13:25):
I'm Paul and this is beyond the paradigm.

Speaker 6 (01:13:34):
My crazy. We don't use that word in here.

Speaker 4 (01:14:20):
S