American Eagle Refuses to Kneel and the Woke Meltdown Begins

Bob and Eric discuss the American Eagle ad and the death of woke

Long-time show hosts Bob Dunlap, a businessman from North Carolina, and Eric Matheny, a criminal defense attorney in Florida, deliver weekly patriotic brilliance. Here on Maverick Broadcasting Netowrk, the outspoken duo are ready to take it to the next level. America is at a crossroads. Bob and Eric are here to keep people informed about the right directions to go. Catch them every Saturday at noon Eastern as they discuss the important issues of the week.

Follow Maverick Broadcasting Network on Pickax to catch the full lineup of shows and breaking news: https://pickax.com/maverickbroadcasting

Protect your financial future with precious metals! Get your FREE Gold and Silver Guide from My Gold Guy today and take control of your financial destiny! https://mygoldguy.com

Indulge in the finest quality with Freedom First Beef – sous vide, freeze-dried, and ready to savor today or in a decade. Order now using code BOBANDERIC for a 25% discount. https://freedomfirstbeef.com

Be ready for anything life throws your way with The Wellness Company's Medical Emergency Kit. Order today using code BOBANDERIC for a 10% discount at https://twc.health/mbn.

Unleash the spirit of liberty in every cup with Supermassive Black Coffee. Order now using code MAVERICK and savor the unparalleled taste of freedom in every patriotic sip. https://supermassiveblackcoffee.com.com

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
You keep America.

Speaker 2 (00:02):
We'll keep Ameron congrae.

Speaker 1 (00:07):
A keep Americ, jeep America, Well keep a man could
gray ah jeep a meer jeep America. Well jaepermer cocrete.

Speaker 3 (00:25):
Welcome to the Bob and Eric sam America Podcast. What
is Bob Deadline? Pull my mic over here? My name
is Eric PATHETI thank you all for tuning in a wonderful,
wonderful Saturday we're having here. Please head up the Patreon
Patreon dot com slash Bob and Eric. Everything you give
helps the show continue time and time again. And Bob,
there is something remarkable going on in the world right now.

(00:46):
If we didn't already know it, and I think we did,
it is the death of woke. It is done, it
is over. It has gone the way of the Dodo bird.
It is behind us.

Speaker 2 (00:57):
Amazing, amazing. Okay, So, for those of you that are
living on Mars in a cave with your eyes closed,
we had an ad come out this week American Eagle
Company and makes genes, among other things. Sidney Sweeney, young actress.
I'm not terribly familiar with her body of work. Arguably
an objectively attractive white blonde woman in denim talking about

(01:19):
her genes, using kind of a double entendre of genes
as the closed genes is what we hear from our parents.
Working on nineteen sixty five for GT Classic Americana. Hey,
and here's the quasy thing, Bob, here's the crazy thing.
There was nothing outlandish about the ad. There was nothing edgy,

(01:40):
There was nothing controversial. If you and I were flipping
through a magazine or watching television twenty years ago, we
would gloss over that ad and go no big deal.
The fact that it was so remarkably simple, dare I say,
normal and traditional, has created a backlash. I have not
seen sometime. What is your take on the Sydney Sweeney

(02:03):
American Eagle ad.

Speaker 4 (02:05):
I thought it was fine. I just think that the
left is demonic with the blue hair. It's not see.
They're mentally insane.

Speaker 2 (02:13):
All of them, you know. That's Here's the thing, though,
What we got to realize is that with the wokeness
and that crowd that comes after the people go on
TikTok and go oh, we got to dismantle this ad.
It's Nazism, it's eugenics. They're talking about whiteness and genes.
I feel like it's the fringe elements, namely those that

(02:34):
are online and namely those that attract a lot of attention.
I see people online, you know, talking about, oh my god, Trump,
when is he going to go away? He's in my
face twenty four hours a day. I'm like, buddy, put
your phone down, you turn off the TV. He's not
out in the world. I just spent my whole morning
working on my yard, working on my car, going to
the gym. Donald Trump was not there. Nobody was there,
no politician was there. It was just existing in the world.

(02:56):
And I think these people that are terminally enmeshed with
our politics just have no sense of how the real world,
the world that is not glued to social media fifteen
hours a day, the world that is not glued to
the news, how the world just reacts. And quite frankly,
when we look at where we are now, in August
of twenty twenty five, as opposed to August of twenty

(03:16):
twenty four, BOP, we had zero border cross edge. We
have zero illegals getting into the country. The border is
shut down.

Speaker 4 (03:24):
The last too most right, zero the.

Speaker 2 (03:27):
Last two months. I mean the numbers this time last
year it was something like sixty thousand a month, we're
being released into this country, and now that number is zero.
So for everybody sitting around going, oh, Donald Trump isn't
doing this, or Trump isn't doing that, or he's not
fulfilling the promise that I want, guys, first and foremost,
if you're looking for perfection from any human being, let
alone politicians, you are setting yourself up for failure and

(03:50):
you gotta find a new hobby. You gotta find something
else to do, because it's just not going to work
that way. But that being said, we have to look
at it in terms of everything we've accomplished. Can you
imagine the alternative? Can you imagine if Kamala Harris and
Tim Wallas won that election?

Speaker 4 (04:06):
Oh, I can't imagine. We'd have no country. We'd lose it,
for sure, we.

Speaker 2 (04:11):
Have no country left. But I think that goes back
to what we're talking about with the death of Woke.
Woke really did the idea of corporation's entertainment, universities and
basically any entity that puts social issues, specifically leftist social issues,
first and forefront and on the forefront. Nothing more important

(04:32):
than you know, diversity, nothing more important than inclusion, gay
and lesbian transgender propaganda. You know, company's Nike trying to
sell a shoe, Nike being a company that prides itself
on fitness and athleticism, using a three hundred pounds model
to push body positivity. That's woke, you know, going back
the other way. When I buy shoes, when I buy clothing,
when I'm looking for something that to me represents athleticism,

(04:55):
I want to see someone who's athletic. When I want
to buy clothes, I want to see attractive people modeling
the clothes. I don't care if you're a man or
a woman. The fact that using attractive people to sell products.
I don't care if you're selling motor oil. I don't
care if you're selling jeans. I don't care if you're
selling Coca cola. Beer, Bob, we were alive in the
eighties and nineties. What were beer adds from the eighties

(05:16):
and nineties. Horses and cowboys and good looking women.

Speaker 4 (05:21):
Yeah, yeah, remember the good Yeah, remember the bud light.

Speaker 2 (05:25):
And I remember being in college in my freshman year
of college and all the you know, the Budweiser and
Miller and all the all the boasters on people's doors,
and you know, women in bikinis with the bikini teams
and things like that. That was just a part of
our culture and we got away from that. The body
shaming and this and that, and that's a bunch of horseship,
because nobody wants to see a three hundred pound model

(05:46):
wearing jeans and thinking themselves, I want to buy that.
You want to see yourself. You want to see something
you admire in a product you want to purchase. And yes,
sex sells. That's the oldest trope of mankind. They've been
using sex to sell for since advertising began. You're a
to the human primal brain, both men and women, running
on that part of your brain that goes, oh, equate
that product with sexuality, with something that's arousing to you,

(06:09):
and you're going to purchase the product. So the idea
that wokeness is dead is exemplified by the fact that
an ad can come out that could be so normal
and so traditional and honestly tame. I mean she was
wearing jeans and a denim top. It wasn't like she
was parading around naked. The fact that you can have
this relatively tame, traditional ad caused such a stir. It's

(06:33):
a beautiful thing, and I really relished in every moment
of it, because for us, I think for most conservatives,
it's not just a return to the politics and policies
that we want to see. It's a return to the
culture that we love, the culture that makes this country
what it is. Tradition. We like tradition. We like men

(06:56):
being men, women being women, men and women getting married,
having families, living in peaceful communities. I don't want to
live in a world. And here's the thing, here's the
big kicker. You know when you know and they use
I guess Beyonce had done an American Eagle add or
I don't know if it was for American Eagle or
another company doing the Genes ad a while ago, when

(07:16):
she was wearing jeens and posing. And that type of
advertisement is totally fine. There's nothing wrong with that. I
don't care. I don't look at it and go, oh
my god, my stars, let me get my pivygo smelling salts. No,
it's it's absolutely fine. But the fact that, and this
begs a bigger question, is that when anything white, if

(07:37):
you have a white person in advertising, which which has
has really declined over our lifetime, when you see a
white person, specifically an attractive white person in advertising. Why
is there an immediate association of a whiteness, racism, Nazism, eugenics.
I mean diversity. Diversity is supposed to include everybody, but

(07:57):
diversity has become codeword for anti white.

Speaker 4 (08:00):
Yeah, imagine they put a straight white guy in the
ad too with it.

Speaker 2 (08:05):
Well, that was okay, so so dunkin Donuts. They did
an immediate follow up and they did, I guess, you know,
an attractive white person, a white young white man in
their ad and again causing the same stir. But here's
the thing. Here's the thing. And I know people, when
you think your corporations go woke, you think they've taken
a stance on a position, they don't give a shit

(08:25):
about that stance. They're trying to make money. And five
years ago they gauged where the culture was and they said,
we can make money from this. You know, when the
country was on fire and everybody was cow telling the
BLM and Nancy Pelosi was wearing an African cloth and
Nike was giving forty million dollars to BLM, which they
squandered on mansions. That's beside the point. Five years ago

(08:46):
Corporate America said, this is a trend. We can take
advantage of it. Corporate America marketing reflects culture, and the
fact that they could say patriotism, normalcy tradition is now
profitable is a huge cultural win for.

Speaker 4 (08:59):
All of us. Yeah, yeah, hey, I got something for you.
Trey Gowdy wants to bring back shame. I thought of you.
Did you hear about that?

Speaker 2 (09:10):
But he wants to bring back he wants to Okay,
So this Russia Russia collusion was a hoax. We've been
saying that for six years. We've been saying that for
ten years, Russia collusions a hoax. We now have evidence
of it. And Trey Goudi, former prosecutor Trey Goudy form
a tough prosecutor that comes out and says that we
don't need to send the perpetrators of the Russia collusion

(09:32):
hoax to prison. They can be shamed, but they can beamed. Bob.
That got that got me thinking, man if Okay, So,
for those that don't know, the Russia collusion hoax really
has been exposed, it was a hoax exactly that that
fact remains is that the entire thing was made up
by Hillary Clinton's campaign entirely made up. So that being said,

(09:57):
there has to be accountability for those involved. I mean,
they indicted Donald Trump for saying, peacefully and patriotically, have
your voices heard. They impeached him for a phone call,
mind you, And I said this. I was on Steve
Gruber show the other day and I said, if twenty
sixteen they tried to steal twenty sixteen, and we have
evidence of that, significant provable evidence of that, there can

(10:19):
be no doubt that they did steal twenty twenty, which
would justify everybody going over to the Capitol to have
their voices heard. So for Donald Trump to say, hey, peacefully, patriotically,
have your voices heard, he obviously knew what was going on.
He's known this information for a long time. It just
took a while for it to come out. So the
fact that the left will indict him for that, will

(10:42):
impeach him for a phone call, and we have the
evidence in front of us. I don't want to see
any special counsels. I don't want to see any Lindsey
Graham letters. I don't want to see investigations congressional subcommittees
because to me, all that says is we're going to
kick the can down the road. Take that to a
grand jury day morning. Do you know. I've had people

(11:02):
come to me and they say, Oh, I think it's
gonna happen this time. I think you're gonna see Hillary
and James Comy and you know, Clapper and Brennan and
all these guys and cuffs. Are you as optimistic about that?
I feel like there's something missing. I feel like there
are certain people in our political system, regardless of party,
that somehow seem to be above suspicion and above consequence.

Speaker 4 (11:22):
I think it's gonna happen after the midterms, when we
get really full control of the Senate and Congress and
we start see the judicial system is a choke. So
what are we going to try him? As civilians at
Bosberg and DC. I mean, so the only way to
get them prior to the midterms is calling them a
military combatants or it's got military tribunals. That's the only one.

Speaker 2 (11:45):
Well, day, Well, I've said that. I've said that for
a long time, specifically as it relates to immigration. But
but we we have the evidence there they Hillary Clinton
and her campaign created the Russian collusion hopes, and not
only was it just a campaign smear, because we understand
American politics, it's going to happen. But people's lives were

(12:05):
ruined over this General Flynn, George Poppadopolis. And granted they've
been pardoned, that doesn't undo what happened to you.

Speaker 4 (12:12):
At the time.

Speaker 2 (12:12):
If you're going through that, if your liberty is deprived.
The amount of money they had to spend on legal fees,
you know, practically bankrupted them, and all predicated on a lie.
The entire underlying basis of it was completely made up.
To sit there and to look at January sixth and say,
three hours at the Capitol of our Republic was never

(12:33):
in danger. No lives were ever in danger. That's a
bunch of horseshit. People went over there to protest. You
had agitators in the crowd. We know as many as
seventy FBI and foremants of cooperators in the crowd, riling
people up, and it got out of hand. The fact
remains is that that was considered to be an insurrection
that warranted years and years of investigation, congressional subcommittees, people
crying on TV, and no consequences have befallen those who

(13:00):
really tried to I mean committed treason. I mean, you
want to talk about insurrection, a silent coup, a bloodless coup.
That's what they did. And if they are not held accountable, Bob,
I don't know how we have faith in our justice
system anymore.

Speaker 4 (13:14):
I know Trump wants to hold it accountable.

Speaker 2 (13:16):
He's the president. Call the ball, do it. Direct, Direct
your attorney general, who serves at the pleasure of the president.
Get this to a grand jury. Get that done, and
then we'll court take it to It'll be it'll be
tried in a federal court, probably probably a districtive of Columbia, DC.

Speaker 4 (13:35):
And don't you think that that's there are all a
bunch of left wing scumbags in that court.

Speaker 2 (13:43):
I mean, I'm not. I'm not. You know if if well,
here's the thing, you know, it depends. It depends on
where the crimes originated from. So if they're planning this,
you know, Hillary Clinton's headquarters in New York or Chicago
or wherever. I mean, they could they could jurisdictionally go
to the forum where the crime committed or there's substantial
ties to the criminal activity, if they think that would

(14:04):
be a better jurisdiction. But I mean they're gonna be
They're gonna be tried as any American would. I O'donald
Trump when he was prosecuted under the same statutes, you know,
violations of this Act and that Act in crimes against
Rights and all these kind of catch all provisions that
they were saying he did with January sixth and everything
with the twenty twenty election. They can flip that on

(14:26):
those who perpetrated the Russia collusion hopes and try them
in the same courts that I mean, if you want
to consider it. I mean, they're civilians, though you're not
going to try them in a military court. They're going
to be tried to civilian court. They're going to have
all the rights and privileges afforded to any American defendant.
But they have to see their day in court. They
have to see their day in court. There has to
be accountability otherwise when the pendulum swings back the other way,

(14:46):
and historically it always does sooner or later, they're going
to do it again.

Speaker 4 (14:51):
Do you remember when Lindsay Graham was interviewing or talking
to a cavan on. I think they can put these
people as enemy combatants and then try them in the military.

Speaker 2 (15:02):
Kavanaugh agreed that would be that would be a stretch.
I don't know if the legal battles to get that
done would necessarily be worth it, as opposed to streamlining
the process and indicting them and filing the cases in
the district courts as we would for any criminal defendant
in the federal court. I don't know if it would. See,

(15:23):
you gotta be at the same time, while you're trying to,
I guess, make a statement that these are enemy combatants,
you're also creating a lot of legal loopholes and grounds
for appeal or courts can step and say they can't
be tried as enemy combatants. We don't hang people in
this country. Well, they could be if they're the the

(15:45):
the penalty for treason is if they are, you know,
if they're yeah, I mean, we don't hang them. It
would be lethal injection. But no, I don't. I don't
think it's worth it to try to make some point
go military tribunals. Look, I think you know it can
conspiracy against rights, conspiracy against the United States of America.
You try them in civilian courts like you would anyone else,

(16:06):
and let the cards fall where they may. But I mean, look,
the bottom line is that there has to be accountability
that we have. We have to see that at least
of the American people one know that nobody is truly
above the law. And two it acts as a deterrent
to those that would seek to do it again, and
of course punishes those that that nearly tore this country apart.
I mean you remember, I mean what we had to endure.

(16:27):
This affected every one of us. We're all victims of
that crime. And it was it was made up. It
was completely made up. And we're sitting here shouting from
the hilltops that this is a hoax, and they're all,
you're a Russian agent, you're this or that. And I
saw somebody, I think it was in Rolling Stone there said, oh,
the information coming out about the Russia collusion hoax? Can
they be coming from Russia itself? So if you hate
the media, and I really sincerely hope you do, it's

(16:48):
just not enough.

Speaker 4 (16:49):
As much as much as you should. The media is
very culpable in all this. If it wasn't for the media,
it wouldn't have taken off the FBI. It seems like
it's a reco caase where they everybody's involved but bobber
Brandon clad Susan right. It just seems like there.

Speaker 2 (17:07):
Were a significant number of players involved, for sure. But
as far as the media, the media is culpable in
the sense of the media is always cupable. Are they
criminally culpable? I think that's too much of a slippery slope.
I wouldn't go after media figures because they're going to
report what they see happening in the political sphere. I
think people like Adam Schiff who repeatedly went out there

(17:29):
and told the lie. And remember one of the things
they said about Trump and his indictment for January six
was continually going out and they indicted people for going
out and talking about the election being rigged, and people
faced criminal and civil consequences, were going out and saying
that when it was the powers that be the deep
state said no, the election was not rigged. As the
safest election in American history, we know that to be false. True.
Is Adam Shift basically built his entire brand. The reason

(17:53):
that he, you know, came to the forefront was because
he made the Russia collusion thing. He's got this kind
of history anti Trump is going on that I think
something may be mentally wrong with him. There's something he's
really hung up on Trump for whatever reason, and that's
kind of the only time we ever hear from him.
But he was one of the key players in that.
And yeah, there has to be accountability there as well,

(18:15):
because of the distrust and discord that that creates in
our culture, and the fact that that Donald Trump's first
term really from the beginning almost till his I think
it was up until twenty nineteen, was marred by this
and this really handicapped him. And for a lot of
people saying he deserves a third term, I get it.
They constitutionally it's not going to happen. But for everything

(18:37):
they've tried to do for him, But that begs another question.
For everything they've tried to do for him, I think
many many lesser men would have laid down and surrendered.
Look at what he's accomplished and look at where we
are today. I mean, he really came out on top.
He won. He's really undefeated. I don't know how he
does it at his age, with his energy level, with
his success rate. I mean, I think people a hundred

(19:00):
two hundred years from now, they're going to study this
guy and go what the hell was he made of?

Speaker 4 (19:04):
Yeah? How about that new ballroom that Chuck Schumer on
video saying lying?

Speaker 2 (19:08):
All they do is lying? Anyways, the new ballroom, I
got a problem with it. I think it's awesome. I
think we should have a nice place to entertain dignitaries
and have parties.

Speaker 4 (19:19):
He's paying for it, and donors are paying for it.
The US taxpayers not paying a dime to Chuck Schumer
is lying on video saying that we are We're not.

Speaker 2 (19:28):
We're not. Donald Trump's got a lot of money. If
he wants to purchase it, that's great. Where on the
property are they going to put it?

Speaker 4 (19:36):
Probably attached to the White House, I would say.

Speaker 2 (19:38):
So it's going to historically change the shape of the
White House.

Speaker 4 (19:41):
Yeah. Yeah, it's gonna hold six hundred and fifty people.
I've watched the video on it today.

Speaker 2 (19:45):
So what what's it? What don't we have? I mean,
I guess like we have reception areas at the White
House now, don't they just don't.

Speaker 4 (19:52):
Hold as many people two hundred currently?

Speaker 2 (19:56):
You know, it would be incredible you you open up
that ballroom and then he holds a Trump rally there,
invites the public. I mean, obviously you got to get vetted.
But you get vetted if you've ever been to a
Trump rally, I'm sure lots of our listeners and viewers have.
You do get vetted, and you know, you have to
apply in advance and they screen you and everything like that.
So you can't just walk in. I just walked into

(20:16):
a metal detector. Well, you have to sign up online.

Speaker 4 (20:20):
I did, and then and then you.

Speaker 2 (20:22):
Go to the announcier. But no to go to mar Alogue. Okay,
if you go to mar Alago, they have to vet you,
like Secret Service has to vet you. So I think
if they were to have an event at the White House,
it would probably have to be invitation only, or if
they open it to the public, you'll first come, first
serve and they have to, you know, make sure they
screen you that you don't want people coming in there
who are going to be a danger to the present. Becauys
already had two assassination attempts on him, But how great

(20:44):
would that be to have a big Trump rally in
the brand new White House ballroom.

Speaker 4 (20:48):
I can just envision the left right now seeing him
in a tuxedo and his hot wife staying there.

Speaker 2 (20:57):
Oh my goodness, man, but crazy crazy week. I do
hope something comes of it, I really do. I hope
something comes of what's going on with Russia collusion. But
back to what we were talking about initially, I think
that companies have to take a look at what's going
on right now with American Eagle and Duncan and understand
that this is the wave of the future, or at

(21:18):
least this is the wave right now. And it's funny
because when you have the woke advertising, there's always a
financial backlash, and for the negative. I mean, think bud Light,
think Jaguar, Think these companies that go woke go broke.
There really is some truth to that. But the companies
that rejected and not just reject it in terms of
their ads, but actually stand by it and go, we're

(21:40):
not apologizing we did nothing wrong. Their stock price goes up,
they sell out. People want to see that that's a
reflection of the country as a whole. It's not necessarily
a conservative and liberal thing. And you know, if you
want to boycott American Egal, it'd be my guess. You
boycott any company you want. But the truth is this

(22:00):
is what people want to see, and it crosses political
lines because the ads that are considered to be anti
woke ads are actually a political ads. There was nothing
political about the Sydney Sweeney ad. I don't know what.
I don't know if she's liberal conservative, I have no idea,
And I couldn't tell from that ad what her politics are.
I could say she's an objectively attractive woman and that's
a great American car, and she's selling jeans. That's all.

(22:22):
That's all there is to it.

Speaker 4 (22:23):
Yeah, she I think she leans conservative because two years
ago she had a birthday for her mom and she
had on the hat made sixty great again. It was
her mom's sixty.

Speaker 2 (22:33):
I think I think it's her her mother or her father.
I think someone in her family is a is a
big Trump supporter. But hey, I don't care. Eoo, she's
she's an actress, she's in Hollywood. Does she have liberal leanings?
Who cares? Man, I don't care. But what when I
buy a product? I mean, there have to be spaces
in our lives that are free of politics. And you
don't necessarily need to see an ad that's ramming right

(22:55):
wing politics down your throat anymore than you need to
see one that's running left wing politics. It's got to
be an a political space to sell a product. And
the fact that that's the trend now gives me a
lot of hope for where our culture is going. And
if you remember, one of the major reasons why Trump
won was not just policies, it was culture. It was

(23:16):
backlash against the transgenderism, against everything being shoved down our throats.
And as we get to the end of the show here,
I just want to pontificate for a moment as a
political science major, objectively, irrespective of my leanings, I think
the Democrats, who have his historical branding problems, historical disapproval ratings,

(23:41):
I think they could have been a powerful political force
had they done a few things over the last ten years.
One reject socialism. There's no place for socialism in the
Democrat Party. Reject it, kick it out right, don't let
it in the door. Two, don't embrace wokenus because you're
appealing to fringe communities when you need to be a
big tent. And three the outright rejection and wholesale vilification

(24:08):
of white males. I think those are three things from
which they may never recover.

Speaker 4 (24:16):
I don't think they are and they're doubling down on
their telemas policies. I think I thought of this yesterday.
It's because they think they're going to cheat their way
into power again, and that's not going to happen.

Speaker 2 (24:27):
How would they do that? Though? Don't you think that
we are so wise to what they're doing now? Don't
you think that we've I mean, we've become so aware
of their tricks. How would they do it again? How well, if.

Speaker 4 (24:39):
We use computers, it's easy to do, but hopefully we're
going to be using paper ballots, we get to say
it act Yeah, computers, how about that?

Speaker 2 (24:47):
We let them?

Speaker 4 (24:47):
We let them do it in twenty twenty.

Speaker 2 (24:50):
Maybe I don't. I don't know. I don't. I don't
think it's going to happen. I think I think I
think jd Vance is in a great position right now
to be our nominee. I think the Democrats are. You know, look,
if they were a viable force, they'd have their nominee
in place, and.

Speaker 4 (25:05):
They'd already be building him or her up.

Speaker 2 (25:07):
I know they're trying to send like Pete Bootage edge
out on all like the podcasts to go like, hey,
you know, he's not a crazy leftist he's just like you.
It's not going to work because again, and nobody cares
about his sexuality. I don't care who he goes to
bed with. He was an ineffective transportation secretory. In fact,
he was a really bad one. The fact that we
had to talk about him on a routine basis with
trains derailing and ships out at port and shortages on

(25:30):
the shelves, items that couldn't get to port and places
they need to get to. That's on him and the
fact that he was such an ineffective. The thing about
him is he's a smart kid. He's a Harvard guy,
he's an Oxford guy, he's an academic. But as we
know in business, Bob, sometimes those are the most ineffective
people around. They're too smart for their own good. And
he's one of those guys that just is so smart

(25:50):
to the point that he can't function. He's not viable.
If they want to double down on Kamala Harris, I said,
be my guest, AOC Gavin Newsom, who is there. That's
that's a viable threat that can cross party lines because remember, no,
no political party can win only on a party vote.
They have to have independence, they have to have people
crossing party lines, Republicans included.

Speaker 4 (26:10):
I think the Pennsylvania governor is not crazy.

Speaker 2 (26:12):
What's his name, oh, Shapira.

Speaker 4 (26:15):
Yeah, there was talk.

Speaker 2 (26:17):
There was talk about him being Kamala Harris's VP pick,
but the Democrats shot away because he's Jewish and they
don't want to piss off their Hamas contingent. You're not kidding, now, Kenny. Well, guys,
thank you all for tuning in. I've got some great
shows coming up for us this summer. Whatever you do today,
enjoy your Saturday and we will see you soon. Oh

(26:38):
bless take care of guys.

Speaker 1 (26:40):
Yeah, yeah, keep America, Keep America.

Speaker 2 (26:45):
We'll keep American Gray.

Speaker 1 (26:50):
Keep America, Keep America. Well, keep amer