September 28, 2025 • 25 mins
Explores the complexities of Venetian imperial governance in its maritime territories, particularly during the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries. It examines how Venice balanced public and private interests through its administrative and judicial systems, focusing on the roles of Venetian officials and the intricacies of negotiating power with subject communities. The source analyzes the acquisition and administration of Venice's overseas domains, highlighting the intertwined nature of family connections, office-holding, and economic gain within the patriciate. Furthermore, it details the judicial processes and appeals systems that mediated disputes and addresses instances of official misconduct and popular unrest, demonstrating the fluid and often contested nature of Venetian authority in its empire.
You can listen and download our episodes for free on more than 10 different platforms:
https://linktr.ee/book_shelter
Get the Book now from Amazon:
https://www.amazon.com/Men-Empire-Negotiation-University-Historical/dp/0801891450?&linkCode=ll1&tag=cvthunderx-20&linkId=5882dfe98edbaf1f30e3711c63adaa18&language=en_US&ref_=as_li_ss_tl
You can listen and download our episodes for free on more than 10 different platforms:
https://linktr.ee/book_shelter
Get the Book now from Amazon:
https://www.amazon.com/Men-Empire-Negotiation-University-Historical/dp/0801891450?&linkCode=ll1&tag=cvthunderx-20&linkId=5882dfe98edbaf1f30e3711c63adaa18&language=en_US&ref_=as_li_ss_tl
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Have you ever thought about empires? Maybe not as these giant, rigid,
top down structures, but is something, well, something a bit
more fluid.
Speaker 2 (00:08):
Yeah, maybe even something written.
Speaker 1 (00:10):
On water exactly because today that's exactly where we're taking
a deep dive. We're going to unravel the fascinating story
of Venice's maritime state. We're drawing on the incredible insights
from men of empire, power and negotiation in Venice's maritime state.
Our mission for you really is to tell the detailed,
immersive story of how Venice managed its vast, sprawling commercial empire.
(00:32):
We're talking late fourteenth to the mid sixteenth century here,
and it's a tale that goes far beyond just grand strategy,
gets into the surprising realities of everyday negotiation, personal ambition,
even challenges to authority.
Speaker 2 (00:43):
That's spot on the core insight here, I think, is
that Venice's power just defied the typical rigid empire model.
You should imagine it less as a solid block of
centralized control and more like well like water itself, constantly
flowing along particular pathways, as the book says, and collecting
in urban centers of exchange. And that leaves these blurred boundaries,
(01:05):
uneven gaps. This fluidity built on negotiation, contestation, collaboration, accommodation.
That was key to how it functioned, not rigid command.
Speaker 1 (01:14):
Okay, let's unpack this maybe with an example, something that
really brings this fluidity to life. Our central character for
a part of this deep dis is Girolamo de Moosee Vignier.
He's a Venetian administrator and his story perfectly illustrates this
inherent tension between public duty and private interest. So picture this.
It's fourteen eighty five Gilamo serving as Bilato and he
gets caught up in this controversy over electing a town
(01:36):
doctor and his own business associates were deeply involved. And
get this, he even left sixty gold ducats in his
will to the very doctor whose re election sparked the
whole mess.
Speaker 2 (01:46):
Wow. Yeah, that definitely blurs the lines, doesn't it.
Speaker 1 (01:49):
It really does. Girolamo wasn't just an office holder. He
was a merchant, deeply embedded in the whole maritime economy.
His family, the Veneers the even specialized in maritime officehold
in trade. It just shows how intertwined commerce and governance
became in this empire, and that.
Speaker 2 (02:05):
Blurring of public and private. It wasn't unusual at all.
It wasn't an anomaly. Venice's maritime domains were, in essence,
an empire of naval bases right maintained largely to support
the merchant patrician oligarchy back home in Venice. So administrators,
while theoretically responsible to the collective public, while they very
often leveraged their posts for personal gain or to strengthen
(02:28):
their family networks. It created an empire not just of merchants,
but also of administrators who are constantly navigating this really
delicate balance, almost.
Speaker 1 (02:37):
Like a CEO today who also has personal investments within
the company, that kind of thing.
Speaker 2 (02:41):
Sort of. Yeah, a lot of potential for conflict there, absolutely, So.
Speaker 1 (02:45):
To really understand how this unique empire on water worked,
we need to rewind a bit. We need to see
how it actually took shape. It wasn't just luck, was it.
Speaker 2 (02:52):
Oh, definitely not luck. Contrary to some myths, Venice's expansion
wasn't accidental or philanthropic for that matter. It was a
law term, patient and incredibly deliberate strategy. They wanted to
acquire territories that directly benefited Venetian interests. Especially controlling vital
material and human resources across the Adriatic and the Agent.
Speaker 1 (03:13):
And they used all sorts of methods, not just fighting exactly.
Speaker 2 (03:16):
They had an incredibly diverse toolkit for expansion far beyond
just military conquest. Think shrewd diplomacy. Like in Corfu back
in thirteen eighty six, Venice capitalized on political instability there
offered privileges, but only after they gained submission.
Speaker 1 (03:30):
Very clever Tommy.
Speaker 2 (03:32):
Then they outright purchased key territories Zara and fourteen oh
nine for instance, for a hefty sum. That was after
the local nobility became unhappy with the previous ruler. Venice
cemented loyalty then by extending citizenship or d intus as
they called it, and confirming local laws, though crucially always
with Venetian interests first.
Speaker 1 (03:51):
So always a slight edge for Venice always.
Speaker 2 (03:53):
And we also see inheritances like Derazo in thirteen ninety
two and these clever marital alliances which really come into
play later with Cyprus Ah Cypress.
Speaker 1 (04:01):
Yes, it's acquisition in fourteen eighty nine. That wasn't a
sudden takeover, right, it was more gradual, very gradual.
Speaker 2 (04:06):
A formalization of influence. Really it started with the marriage
of Katerina Corner to King James the second way back
in fourteen sixty eight. After James died, Venice just progressively
assumed control step by step, eventually raising the standard of
San Marco.
Speaker 1 (04:20):
It's a fantastic example of their long game strategy, isn't it.
Speaker 2 (04:23):
Absolutely patience and strategy.
Speaker 1 (04:26):
But then things started to change. By the fourteen nineties,
the tide started to turn.
Speaker 2 (04:30):
You could say, yeah, exactly, with the Portuguese circumnavigation disrupting
the old trade routes and the rise of the really
formidable Ottoman Empire. Venice's era of expansion was largely over.
Speaker 1 (04:41):
So Cypress was the last big one pretty much.
Speaker 2 (04:44):
Yeah, Its last major acquisition the sixteenth century for Venice
became what the book calls an extended defensive.
Speaker 1 (04:50):
Action, which led to losses.
Speaker 2 (04:52):
It did, significant losses like Malvasia, and eventually Cypress itself
fell to the Ottomans, though famously they managed to hold
on too.
Speaker 1 (04:59):
Cour Corfu held strong, it did, and.
Speaker 2 (05:02):
This whole transition from expansion to defense it meant a
profound change in how administrators had to operate. Instructions from
Venice increasingly stressed the necessity of not provoking their powerful
Ottoman neighbors. Protecting the hard won piece became paramount.
Speaker 1 (05:19):
That must have made the job much harder, especially for
the rector.
Speaker 2 (05:21):
Yeah, particularly in border regions, where as the book puts it,
religious and political dividing lines crossed a society that was
wound together economically and culturally.
Speaker 1 (05:31):
Wow, walking a tightrope basically.
Speaker 2 (05:33):
Truly a political and economic tyrope.
Speaker 1 (05:36):
So who were these men of empire, the ones tasked
with this delicate balancing act.
Speaker 2 (05:40):
Well, they were, of course the Venetian patricians, the noble
elite back in Venice.
Speaker 1 (05:45):
And why did they even want these jobs? Was it duty? Money?
Speaker 2 (05:48):
It varied. Their motivations were mixed. For some it was
a sense of civic duty, sure, for others definitely a
financial opportunity or a way to enhance personal status, maybe
family status, or simply stepping stone to higher office back
in Venice.
Speaker 1 (06:02):
Itself some mix of reasons. And how were they chosen?
Was it fair?
Speaker 2 (06:05):
Well? Election was theoretically egalitarian, open to the patrician class,
but in practice it was often responsive to family desires, connections, influence,
You know, how it goes.
Speaker 1 (06:16):
Yeah, connections still relevant today, I suppose.
Speaker 2 (06:19):
Absolutely, and you can see distinct career patterns emerge. At
the top. You had the really big jobs governors and
captains of major regional capitals like Zara, Corfu, Crete Cyprus.
These were powerful positions, significant salaries, usually filled by experienced,
prominent patricians men with.
Speaker 1 (06:39):
Clout, and below them.
Speaker 2 (06:40):
Below them were the lesser offices, subordinate roles like counselors, castilans,
treasurers or maybe heads of smaller regimes. These were less prestigious,
less lucrative, often filled by less experienced patricians or maybe
those considered needy patricians.
Speaker 1 (06:55):
Easy patricians said, not all nobles were rolling in.
Speaker 2 (06:57):
It, not necessarily no, and Venice actually tried to broaden
office distribution in the early fifteenth century through something called contumasia.
It required time out of office between postings. Did it
work partially, but the most important posts they still tended
to go to a pretty restricted circle of experienced individuals, and.
Speaker 1 (07:14):
Things got more military later on.
Speaker 2 (07:16):
They did as the Empire's borders militarized, especially facing the Ottomans,
temporary military officials became more common. They were called pro
vetatory in some regions like Crete, these roles even became
permanent fixtures.
Speaker 1 (07:31):
You know. One of the things that really jumped out
at me from the sources was this idea of family specialization.
Could you talk about that?
Speaker 2 (07:38):
Oh, yes, that's fascinating. We see so many examples of
families repeatedly sending members to the same regions or specializing
in certain types of posts like you. Well, the Cegrido clan,
for instance, frequently served in Zara, and the Dido family
had really extensive maritime connections and often held related offices.
Speaker 1 (07:57):
So why was this so crucial about getting good at
the job?
Speaker 2 (08:01):
It was partly about skill, sure, but maybe more importantly
it was about building more permanent connections with residents of
the territory. That's the key phrase from the.
Speaker 1 (08:10):
Book, building local networks exactly.
Speaker 2 (08:13):
And that's the double edged sword right there, Ausa. Well,
on one hand, this local expertise and these networks certainly
increased Venice's imperial reach and effectiveness. But on the other hand,
it constantly conflicted with the official ideal of a non
partisan and impartial territorial governor.
Speaker 1 (08:29):
So the ideal versus the reality.
Speaker 2 (08:30):
Precisely, this tension was a persistent defining feature a Venetian
imperial administration, the ideal versus the messi practical reality.
Speaker 1 (08:40):
Which brings us I guess to the reality of these
administrators' lives, which often stood in pretty stark contrast to
Venice's official ideal. Right, this ideal of the disinterested and
temporary Podesta the chief magistrate.
Speaker 2 (08:54):
Very much so. Officials were legally forbidden from engaging in
commerce while in office, or marrying locals, or even a
accepting gifts.
Speaker 1 (09:01):
Strict rules on paper, but in practice, in.
Speaker 2 (09:04):
Practice, well, these rules were let's just say, often bent,
if not outright broken.
Speaker 1 (09:08):
I suspected as much.
Speaker 2 (09:09):
Yeah, I mean, look at the symbolic rituals. They were
all designed to glorify Venice, the collective republic. When a
new governor arrived, for example, the ceremony was all about
raising the Lion of San Marco, the symbol of Venice,
not a portrait of the individual.
Speaker 1 (09:24):
Governor, emphasizing this state over the person exactly.
Speaker 2 (09:28):
Yet, these same officials frequently decorated public spaces with their
own family heraldry. You see families like the Calbo putting
their coat of arms above city gates or on buildings.
Speaker 1 (09:40):
Like personal branding. Even back then you could.
Speaker 2 (09:42):
Call it that, effectively resisting the state's efforts to separate
the man from the office. It's subtle, but a powerful act.
Speaker 1 (09:49):
And it wasn't just symbolism, was it. There were more
concrete strategies.
Speaker 2 (09:53):
Oh, absolutely powerful informal strategies like marriage, kinship, property ownership,
These were absolutely key. Patrician family often use their terms
of service abroad to establish lasting links with the local
elites in those territories. Strategic marriages basically strategic marriages, yes,
and these weren't just about property or immediate influence, though
that was part of it. They created, as the book says,
(10:15):
lasting bonds between center and periphery that helped to stabilize
Venetian rule abroad.
Speaker 1 (10:21):
Can you give an example, sure.
Speaker 2 (10:23):
The Arimando Grisogono marriage in Zara is a good one.
Niccolo Armando, who was the Venetian count of nearby Pola,
had direct family ties through marriage to the Zarantine nobility.
Or look at Crete. The Venedo Cretan patriciate families of
Venetian origin living on Crete skillfully leverage these marriages to
document and strengthen their claims to Venetian patrician status back
(10:46):
in Venice.
Speaker 1 (10:47):
Ah, using marriage to climb the social ladder back home.
Speaker 2 (10:49):
Precisely, it shows how marriage ties and office holding on
crete worked together to build lineage and patronage bonds. It's
fascinating how these personal connections became so integral to imperial stability.
Speaker 1 (11:00):
So these connections formed through holding office again and again
through marriage, property, business deals. They didn't just stop when
the official went home.
Speaker 2 (11:09):
Not at all. They often continued long after. In fact,
former governors frequently acted as advocates or maybe lobbyists for
subjects from their former territories back in the Venetian councils,
guiding requests for favors, things like that.
Speaker 1 (11:22):
So the guy on the ground, the rector, he really
had to balance things.
Speaker 2 (11:26):
Absolutely, he had to walk a very fine line, as
the book puts it, between upholding the state's ideals and
navigating these crucial personal networks that frankly made the whole
system function.
Speaker 1 (11:38):
Okay, let's shift gears a bit and talk about the
judicial system. You said it wasn't just about solving disputes,
more like an.
Speaker 2 (11:43):
Arena, exactly, an arena for ongoing negotiation. It offered really
significant opportunities for subjects, both the elites and okay to
a lesser extent, commoners to pursue their claims and articulate
their grievances, all within a space controlled by Venice.
Speaker 1 (11:59):
Of course, were there different levels of courts.
Speaker 2 (12:01):
Yes, multiple layers if you take Creed again, the local
ducal court hurt land disputes, things like that. They even
mediated between villagers and landowners. We actually have records of
peasants complaining about everything from you know, pigs foraging in
their fields to being forced to do unpaid.
Speaker 1 (12:19):
Labor, so everyday issues very much so.
Speaker 2 (12:23):
Now, Venetian officials were supposed to apply local laws in
these courts, but often they lacked the specific knowledge, so
they ended up becoming quote hostage to the advice of local.
Speaker 1 (12:32):
Lawyers, relying on local experts who might have their own agendas.
Speaker 2 (12:35):
Potentially, yes, and for peasants there were real obstacles the
cost of going to court for one, and sometimes rectors
would try to avoid appeals by simply labeling cases as
criminal matters, which had different procedures.
Speaker 1 (12:47):
But appeals were possible to Venice itself.
Speaker 2 (12:51):
Crucially, Yes, subjects could appeal to central Venetian courts back
in Venice, courts like the Avlgaria, the commun that was
their main criminal court, or the Auditory Noientence for civil disputes,
and even the powerful Qurantia, one of their supreme courts.
Speaker 1 (13:05):
So there was a way to go over the local
governor's head.
Speaker 2 (13:08):
There was, and this system provided a really flexible and
subtle way for Venice to regulate its system. It allowed
them to correct potentially bad judgments from Afar, and crucially
it also bolstered Venetian authority. It showed Venice was the
ultimate arbiter.
Speaker 1 (13:24):
Now what's fascinating here you mentioned earlier is the overlap
in personnel.
Speaker 2 (13:28):
Yes, this is really interesting. Many of the judges in Venice,
the Avigadori or Auditory, had actually previously served as rectors
out in the.
Speaker 1 (13:36):
Maritime State, So the judges knew the places they were judging.
Speaker 2 (13:40):
Exactly, which meant the very judges hearing these appeals were,
as the book says, tied into the same network of
personal and family connections that the rectors of the Maritime
State were.
Speaker 1 (13:50):
So they were informed but maybe biased.
Speaker 2 (13:53):
It allowed for incredibly informed decisions certainly, but yes, also
potentially for biased ones it's complex. A perfect example is
that Jirolama Dieto we mentioned earlier. He served as Duke
of Crete, a top post. Later he became an ovigator
back in Venice and guess what he handled cases originating
from Crete.
Speaker 1 (14:11):
Wow, that's a direct connection. Almost like the appeals court
judges were former governors themselves.
Speaker 2 (14:16):
Pretty much. Yeah, it shows that personal connection at work
right at the heart of the justice system.
Speaker 1 (14:21):
Okay, so beyond the formal courts, Venice also relied heavily
on something called the Grazi system.
Speaker 2 (14:27):
What were gradzy think of them as special favors or
maybe grants, permissions, pardons, sometimes even debt remissions granted directly
by the Venetian state, favors from the top essentially, yes,
and this system was a core tool for political patronage.
It was constantly linking the center of the empire, Venice,
(14:47):
with its periphery, the overseas territories.
Speaker 1 (14:50):
How did you get one? Was it complicated?
Speaker 2 (14:52):
The process was actually quite elaborate on paper. Requests had
to pass through multiple public forums in Venice, from the
Doge himself to the Great Council. It's very formal. But
despite this seemingly public process, personal influence often shown through
connections mattered. For example, former officials frequently supported these requests
for people from places they used to govern, which perfectly
(15:14):
demonstrates their continued connections.
Speaker 1 (15:16):
Right right, those lasting bonds exactly.
Speaker 2 (15:18):
Remember Jiro Lamauvignier are example from the intro.
Speaker 1 (15:21):
The guy with the doctor controversy.
Speaker 2 (15:23):
That's him. His contacts back in Spilato were managing his
property and finances long after he'd left office. It truly
shows how these informal bonds lasted and could be leveraged.
Speaker 1 (15:32):
And these gradzys weren't just random acts of kindness. I
assume Venice used them strategically.
Speaker 2 (15:38):
Oh absolutely strategically. They used them to reward loyalty, especially
when they were acquiring new territories, key local figures who
helped might get agrazia. They also use them to neutralize descent,
offering stipens tax concessions to local elites to keep them happy, keep.
Speaker 1 (15:55):
Them on side smart politics.
Speaker 2 (15:57):
Very much so. And Crete interestingly, was the most frequent
recipient of gratzi. White well, it was a large, important
and sometimes rebellious colony. We see the grazzy system used
heavily after the Sifi Vlastos conspiracy in the mid fifteenth century.
That was a religiously motivated plot to rebel against Venice. Afterwards, loyalists,
(16:18):
including Greek nobles, even Jewish merchants who helped expose it
were richly rewarded with privileges, often extending to their whole communities.
Even peasants, Yeah, peasants who revealed conspirators were offered freedom
from serfdom, a huge reward.
Speaker 1 (16:32):
But surely this system caused problems too, favors overriding.
Speaker 2 (16:36):
Rules, definitely, it wasn't without its conflicts. Grozi for debt relief,
for example, often caused significant problems for the local colonial treasuries.
They needed that income, and Grotzi granting local offices could
directly undercut the authority of the Venetian rectors on the
ground and the local councils too.
Speaker 1 (16:54):
So Venice knew this was happening.
Speaker 2 (16:56):
Oh, yes, there were a frequent official But Venice often
granted these favors anyway. Why because they prioritized flexibility and
negotiation over strict adherence to the rules.
Speaker 1 (17:08):
Pragmatism over principle, maybe you.
Speaker 2 (17:10):
Could say that. And interestingly, communal delegations groups representing local
communities regularly traveled all the way to Venice to protest
these issues.
Speaker 1 (17:17):
So there was pushback, a dialogue.
Speaker 2 (17:20):
A constant, active dialogue between the center and the periphery.
It's really a testament to their adaptive governance, even if
it seemed messy.
Speaker 1 (17:28):
This dynamic tension. It brings us back to how Venice
tried to control its own administrators all this potential for
private gain.
Speaker 2 (17:36):
Right the state legislated furiously against corruption. They were genuinely
worried that governors would build up local power bases that
could challenge the central institutions back in Venice.
Speaker 1 (17:46):
How do they try to police it?
Speaker 2 (17:47):
Primarily through the institution of syndics. These were special inspectors
sent out periodically from Venice to hear greevances against officials,
like an internal affairs division almost.
Speaker 1 (17:57):
And what kind of things got officials into trouble.
Speaker 2 (18:00):
Prosecutions often centered on actions deemed against God, justice and
the honor of our dominion, or, as the documents frequently
put it, causing scandal and murmuring among the local subjects.
Public perception mattered.
Speaker 1 (18:15):
Scandal and murmuring love that phrasing.
Speaker 2 (18:17):
It's very evocative, isn't it. Remember jeromam Venier again, he
was actually recalled from Spilado to face accusations related to
his conduct.
Speaker 1 (18:25):
Did he get convicted?
Speaker 2 (18:26):
Interestingly, no, he was ultimately acquitted and even got reimbursed
for his trouble, which just shows the system's inherent complexities
and maybe the power of connections.
Speaker 1 (18:36):
So not always straightforward, not at all.
Speaker 2 (18:39):
But others did face consequences. We see cases where rectors
brazenly use state resources to build personal palaces or extorted goods,
or abuse their judicial power. They could be fined, banned
from serving in that territory again sometimes worse.
Speaker 1 (18:55):
So what's the big picture here? What does this tell
us about justice and accountability?
Speaker 2 (19:00):
This system, which was largely based on denunciations and complaints
coming up from the local subjects, ensured that the crimes
most likely to be prosecuted were those that angered subjects.
Speaker 1 (19:09):
So the people's voice, or at least the local elites
voices had some real impact if they chose to complain.
Speaker 2 (19:16):
It seems so. Their complaints could trigger investigations.
Speaker 1 (19:19):
And it wasn't just individuals, whole families could be involved.
Speaker 2 (19:22):
Oh yes, there were major corruption scandals, like those implicating
multiple members of the Segredo family down in Crete in
the fourteen thirties. It wasn't just rogue individuals. And what's more,
the syndics themselves the inspectors. They weren't immune to accusations,
either accusations of corruption or using their powerful position for
(19:44):
their own private agendas.
Speaker 1 (19:45):
The investigators investigated.
Speaker 2 (19:47):
Sometimes, yes, and the overlap we talked about syndics often
having previously been administrators or hoping to be administrators. Again,
that further complicated the ideal of impartial oversight. It constantly
blurred those lines between the state's interest and personal or
family interest.
Speaker 1 (20:03):
It seems like these tensions were just baked into the system.
Speaker 2 (20:05):
They really were everywhere you look.
Speaker 1 (20:07):
Okay, finally, let's talk about the fault lines, the things
that really challenged Venice's rule. What were the biggest threats?
Speaker 2 (20:15):
Broadly two kinds, external threats primarily from the rising Ottoman Empire,
which was a constant pressure. And then internal.
Speaker 1 (20:22):
Strikes strife within the territories.
Speaker 2 (20:24):
Yes, often conflicts between the local nobles and commoners or
sometimes outright peasant revolts against landowners, often Venetian landowners.
Speaker 1 (20:34):
Can we look at a couple of examples.
Speaker 2 (20:36):
Absolutely, two key rebellions stand out in the book. First,
there was one on the island of Lesina or Hvar,
from fifteen ten to fifteen fourteen.
Speaker 1 (20:45):
What caused that?
Speaker 2 (20:46):
It seems largely triggered by economic distress and class conflict.
Commoners were demanding entry into the communal councils, wanting more, say,
the Venetian counts on the island struggled to contain the violence.
Venice eventually sent commanders like Sebastiana a Justinian to quell it.
Speaker 1 (21:01):
How did they handle it? Just cracked down hard.
Speaker 2 (21:03):
Initially, yes, harsh repression, hangings, arrests, but ultimately it led
to a general amnesty and interestingly, the popular faction actually
gained some concessions, like getting to elect a treasurer from
among the people.
Speaker 1 (21:15):
So repression followed by negotiation kind of.
Speaker 2 (21:19):
And importantly, the ongoing appeals process back in Venice meant
that this conflict, even after the violence could be routed
through the Venetian judicial system, it moved the fight from
the streets into a more controlled legal arena.
Speaker 1 (21:31):
Okay, what was this second rebellion that was on Crete?
Speaker 2 (21:34):
Crete experienced constant upheaval, especially in its rural areas. Roughly
from fifteen seventeen to fifteen twenty eight.
Speaker 1 (21:40):
That was happening there.
Speaker 2 (21:42):
Mainly peasants protesting heavy taxes and burdenso labor services demanded
by landowners.
Speaker 1 (21:47):
So similar causes to Lsina economic hardship, similar.
Speaker 2 (21:51):
But with a crucial difference. Unlike in Lcina, Venetian officials
very quickly labeled these actions on Crete as rebellion. Why
because crucially many of the landowners being targeted were Venetian
settlers or families.
Speaker 1 (22:05):
Ah, so it felt like an attack on Venice itself exactly.
Speaker 2 (22:08):
It gave the conflict an explicitly anti Venetian flavor in
the eyes of the state. So the repression there was
far more violent.
Speaker 1 (22:15):
But did negotiations still play a role even there?
Speaker 2 (22:18):
Yes, The book argues that even the military solutions were
nuanced by the same reliance on negotiation, appeal and continuous litigation.
Eventually even rebels ended up pursuing their grievances in Venetian courts.
Remarkable flexibility, really, it.
Speaker 1 (22:32):
Really is so moving towards the end of this period,
say the fifteen thirties, how did Venice adapt, especially with
the Ottomans becoming so powerful.
Speaker 2 (22:40):
Well, by the fifteen thirties, Venice had to accept it was,
relatively speaking, a secondary power facing this massive Ottoman state,
So it significantly shifted its maritime policy towards conciliation.
Speaker 1 (22:53):
And prudence, playing it safe, basically.
Speaker 2 (22:55):
Playing it safe, knowing they couldn't afford constant conflict on
their borders anymore.
Speaker 1 (22:59):
What did that mean in practice?
Speaker 2 (23:00):
It meant that the poorous Ottoman border and the delicate
role of Venetian rectors and mediating interactions across that border
became absolutely paramount. Their official instructions increasingly stressed the need
to live quietly and in peace with their Ottoman neighbors,
recognizing the deeply intertwined nature of the region's economy and culture.
(23:21):
It was about managing coexistence.
Speaker 1 (23:23):
A very different approach from their earlier expansionist.
Speaker 2 (23:25):
Phase A start contrast, Yeah, a recognition of changed realities.
Speaker 1 (23:30):
So let's wrap this up after this really deep dive
into Venice's story. What does it all mean for us?
What's the big takeaway?
Speaker 2 (23:36):
I think it reveals the incredibly dynamic nature of Venice's empire.
It wasn't static at all. It was a state constantly negotiating,
constantly adapting, engaging in as the book puts it a
kind of ongoing negotiation with subject communities, an empire built
less on pure conquest, maybe less on just conquest, and
more on this fascinating blend of formal institutions, courts, laws, officials,
(24:01):
and these vital informal personal connections, family, patronage, local knowledge.
Speaker 1 (24:07):
Right, And maybe the most provocative thought for me at
least comes from thinking about those tensions we kept discussing,
which ones, the tension between public duty and private interest,
between central control and local autonomy, between formal justice and
informal negotiation.
Speaker 2 (24:22):
Ah, Yes, those constant push.
Speaker 1 (24:24):
And pulls exactly. And the book seems to argue quite
profoundly that these tensions weren't actually weaknesses the doomed Venus.
Speaker 2 (24:31):
No, quite the opposite.
Speaker 1 (24:32):
There were the very mechanisms that allowed its empire written
on water, to persist for centuries.
Speaker 2 (24:37):
That's the core argument. I believe that these seeming contradictions,
this constant balancing act, was actually the source of its resilience.
It allowed Venus to constantly reinvent itself through this very adaptive,
sometimes messy governance.
Speaker 1 (24:52):
Indeed, and that's a really complex idea to sit with,
that the very things we might instinctively see as weaknesses
or problems to today, we're actually integral to their longevity,
their flexibility.
Speaker 2 (25:04):
It really makes you think, doesn't it.
Speaker 1 (25:05):
It does. It makes you consider what this tells us
about power and negotiation more broadly. Even in systems today
that might seem perfectly stable on the surface, you know
what inherent tensions exist in our own world that might
actually be mechanisms of flexibility rather than just flaws. Something
to ponder, definitely something to ponder.
Have you ever thought about empires? Maybe not as these giant, rigid,
top down structures, but is something, well, something a bit
more fluid.
Speaker 2 (00:08):
Yeah, maybe even something written.
Speaker 1 (00:10):
On water exactly because today that's exactly where we're taking
a deep dive. We're going to unravel the fascinating story
of Venice's maritime state. We're drawing on the incredible insights
from men of empire, power and negotiation in Venice's maritime state.
Our mission for you really is to tell the detailed,
immersive story of how Venice managed its vast, sprawling commercial empire.
(00:32):
We're talking late fourteenth to the mid sixteenth century here,
and it's a tale that goes far beyond just grand strategy,
gets into the surprising realities of everyday negotiation, personal ambition,
even challenges to authority.
Speaker 2 (00:43):
That's spot on the core insight here, I think, is
that Venice's power just defied the typical rigid empire model.
You should imagine it less as a solid block of
centralized control and more like well like water itself, constantly
flowing along particular pathways, as the book says, and collecting
in urban centers of exchange. And that leaves these blurred boundaries,
(01:05):
uneven gaps. This fluidity built on negotiation, contestation, collaboration, accommodation.
That was key to how it functioned, not rigid command.
Speaker 1 (01:14):
Okay, let's unpack this maybe with an example, something that
really brings this fluidity to life. Our central character for
a part of this deep dis is Girolamo de Moosee Vignier.
He's a Venetian administrator and his story perfectly illustrates this
inherent tension between public duty and private interest. So picture this.
It's fourteen eighty five Gilamo serving as Bilato and he
gets caught up in this controversy over electing a town
(01:36):
doctor and his own business associates were deeply involved. And
get this, he even left sixty gold ducats in his
will to the very doctor whose re election sparked the
whole mess.
Speaker 2 (01:46):
Wow. Yeah, that definitely blurs the lines, doesn't it.
Speaker 1 (01:49):
It really does. Girolamo wasn't just an office holder. He
was a merchant, deeply embedded in the whole maritime economy.
His family, the Veneers the even specialized in maritime officehold
in trade. It just shows how intertwined commerce and governance
became in this empire, and that.
Speaker 2 (02:05):
Blurring of public and private. It wasn't unusual at all.
It wasn't an anomaly. Venice's maritime domains were, in essence,
an empire of naval bases right maintained largely to support
the merchant patrician oligarchy back home in Venice. So administrators,
while theoretically responsible to the collective public, while they very
often leveraged their posts for personal gain or to strengthen
(02:28):
their family networks. It created an empire not just of merchants,
but also of administrators who are constantly navigating this really
delicate balance, almost.
Speaker 1 (02:37):
Like a CEO today who also has personal investments within
the company, that kind of thing.
Speaker 2 (02:41):
Sort of. Yeah, a lot of potential for conflict there, absolutely, So.
Speaker 1 (02:45):
To really understand how this unique empire on water worked,
we need to rewind a bit. We need to see
how it actually took shape. It wasn't just luck, was it.
Speaker 2 (02:52):
Oh, definitely not luck. Contrary to some myths, Venice's expansion
wasn't accidental or philanthropic for that matter. It was a
law term, patient and incredibly deliberate strategy. They wanted to
acquire territories that directly benefited Venetian interests. Especially controlling vital
material and human resources across the Adriatic and the Agent.
Speaker 1 (03:13):
And they used all sorts of methods, not just fighting exactly.
Speaker 2 (03:16):
They had an incredibly diverse toolkit for expansion far beyond
just military conquest. Think shrewd diplomacy. Like in Corfu back
in thirteen eighty six, Venice capitalized on political instability there
offered privileges, but only after they gained submission.
Speaker 1 (03:30):
Very clever Tommy.
Speaker 2 (03:32):
Then they outright purchased key territories Zara and fourteen oh
nine for instance, for a hefty sum. That was after
the local nobility became unhappy with the previous ruler. Venice
cemented loyalty then by extending citizenship or d intus as
they called it, and confirming local laws, though crucially always
with Venetian interests first.
Speaker 1 (03:51):
So always a slight edge for Venice always.
Speaker 2 (03:53):
And we also see inheritances like Derazo in thirteen ninety
two and these clever marital alliances which really come into
play later with Cyprus Ah Cypress.
Speaker 1 (04:01):
Yes, it's acquisition in fourteen eighty nine. That wasn't a
sudden takeover, right, it was more gradual, very gradual.
Speaker 2 (04:06):
A formalization of influence. Really it started with the marriage
of Katerina Corner to King James the second way back
in fourteen sixty eight. After James died, Venice just progressively
assumed control step by step, eventually raising the standard of
San Marco.
Speaker 1 (04:20):
It's a fantastic example of their long game strategy, isn't it.
Speaker 2 (04:23):
Absolutely patience and strategy.
Speaker 1 (04:26):
But then things started to change. By the fourteen nineties,
the tide started to turn.
Speaker 2 (04:30):
You could say, yeah, exactly, with the Portuguese circumnavigation disrupting
the old trade routes and the rise of the really
formidable Ottoman Empire. Venice's era of expansion was largely over.
Speaker 1 (04:41):
So Cypress was the last big one pretty much.
Speaker 2 (04:44):
Yeah, Its last major acquisition the sixteenth century for Venice
became what the book calls an extended defensive.
Speaker 1 (04:50):
Action, which led to losses.
Speaker 2 (04:52):
It did, significant losses like Malvasia, and eventually Cypress itself
fell to the Ottomans, though famously they managed to hold
on too.
Speaker 1 (04:59):
Cour Corfu held strong, it did, and.
Speaker 2 (05:02):
This whole transition from expansion to defense it meant a
profound change in how administrators had to operate. Instructions from
Venice increasingly stressed the necessity of not provoking their powerful
Ottoman neighbors. Protecting the hard won piece became paramount.
Speaker 1 (05:19):
That must have made the job much harder, especially for
the rector.
Speaker 2 (05:21):
Yeah, particularly in border regions, where as the book puts it,
religious and political dividing lines crossed a society that was
wound together economically and culturally.
Speaker 1 (05:31):
Wow, walking a tightrope basically.
Speaker 2 (05:33):
Truly a political and economic tyrope.
Speaker 1 (05:36):
So who were these men of empire, the ones tasked
with this delicate balancing act.
Speaker 2 (05:40):
Well, they were, of course the Venetian patricians, the noble
elite back in Venice.
Speaker 1 (05:45):
And why did they even want these jobs? Was it duty? Money?
Speaker 2 (05:48):
It varied. Their motivations were mixed. For some it was
a sense of civic duty, sure, for others definitely a
financial opportunity or a way to enhance personal status, maybe
family status, or simply stepping stone to higher office back
in Venice.
Speaker 1 (06:02):
Itself some mix of reasons. And how were they chosen?
Was it fair?
Speaker 2 (06:05):
Well? Election was theoretically egalitarian, open to the patrician class,
but in practice it was often responsive to family desires, connections, influence,
You know, how it goes.
Speaker 1 (06:16):
Yeah, connections still relevant today, I suppose.
Speaker 2 (06:19):
Absolutely, and you can see distinct career patterns emerge. At
the top. You had the really big jobs governors and
captains of major regional capitals like Zara, Corfu, Crete Cyprus.
These were powerful positions, significant salaries, usually filled by experienced,
prominent patricians men with.
Speaker 1 (06:39):
Clout, and below them.
Speaker 2 (06:40):
Below them were the lesser offices, subordinate roles like counselors, castilans,
treasurers or maybe heads of smaller regimes. These were less prestigious,
less lucrative, often filled by less experienced patricians or maybe
those considered needy patricians.
Speaker 1 (06:55):
Easy patricians said, not all nobles were rolling in.
Speaker 2 (06:57):
It, not necessarily no, and Venice actually tried to broaden
office distribution in the early fifteenth century through something called contumasia.
It required time out of office between postings. Did it
work partially, but the most important posts they still tended
to go to a pretty restricted circle of experienced individuals, and.
Speaker 1 (07:14):
Things got more military later on.
Speaker 2 (07:16):
They did as the Empire's borders militarized, especially facing the Ottomans,
temporary military officials became more common. They were called pro
vetatory in some regions like Crete, these roles even became
permanent fixtures.
Speaker 1 (07:31):
You know. One of the things that really jumped out
at me from the sources was this idea of family specialization.
Could you talk about that?
Speaker 2 (07:38):
Oh, yes, that's fascinating. We see so many examples of
families repeatedly sending members to the same regions or specializing
in certain types of posts like you. Well, the Cegrido clan,
for instance, frequently served in Zara, and the Dido family
had really extensive maritime connections and often held related offices.
Speaker 1 (07:57):
So why was this so crucial about getting good at
the job?
Speaker 2 (08:01):
It was partly about skill, sure, but maybe more importantly
it was about building more permanent connections with residents of
the territory. That's the key phrase from the.
Speaker 1 (08:10):
Book, building local networks exactly.
Speaker 2 (08:13):
And that's the double edged sword right there, Ausa. Well,
on one hand, this local expertise and these networks certainly
increased Venice's imperial reach and effectiveness. But on the other hand,
it constantly conflicted with the official ideal of a non
partisan and impartial territorial governor.
Speaker 1 (08:29):
So the ideal versus the reality.
Speaker 2 (08:30):
Precisely, this tension was a persistent defining feature a Venetian
imperial administration, the ideal versus the messi practical reality.
Speaker 1 (08:40):
Which brings us I guess to the reality of these
administrators' lives, which often stood in pretty stark contrast to
Venice's official ideal. Right, this ideal of the disinterested and
temporary Podesta the chief magistrate.
Speaker 2 (08:54):
Very much so. Officials were legally forbidden from engaging in
commerce while in office, or marrying locals, or even a
accepting gifts.
Speaker 1 (09:01):
Strict rules on paper, but in practice, in.
Speaker 2 (09:04):
Practice, well, these rules were let's just say, often bent,
if not outright broken.
Speaker 1 (09:08):
I suspected as much.
Speaker 2 (09:09):
Yeah, I mean, look at the symbolic rituals. They were
all designed to glorify Venice, the collective republic. When a
new governor arrived, for example, the ceremony was all about
raising the Lion of San Marco, the symbol of Venice,
not a portrait of the individual.
Speaker 1 (09:24):
Governor, emphasizing this state over the person exactly.
Speaker 2 (09:28):
Yet, these same officials frequently decorated public spaces with their
own family heraldry. You see families like the Calbo putting
their coat of arms above city gates or on buildings.
Speaker 1 (09:40):
Like personal branding. Even back then you could.
Speaker 2 (09:42):
Call it that, effectively resisting the state's efforts to separate
the man from the office. It's subtle, but a powerful act.
Speaker 1 (09:49):
And it wasn't just symbolism, was it. There were more
concrete strategies.
Speaker 2 (09:53):
Oh, absolutely powerful informal strategies like marriage, kinship, property ownership,
These were absolutely key. Patrician family often use their terms
of service abroad to establish lasting links with the local
elites in those territories. Strategic marriages basically strategic marriages, yes,
and these weren't just about property or immediate influence, though
that was part of it. They created, as the book says,
(10:15):
lasting bonds between center and periphery that helped to stabilize
Venetian rule abroad.
Speaker 1 (10:21):
Can you give an example, sure.
Speaker 2 (10:23):
The Arimando Grisogono marriage in Zara is a good one.
Niccolo Armando, who was the Venetian count of nearby Pola,
had direct family ties through marriage to the Zarantine nobility.
Or look at Crete. The Venedo Cretan patriciate families of
Venetian origin living on Crete skillfully leverage these marriages to
document and strengthen their claims to Venetian patrician status back
(10:46):
in Venice.
Speaker 1 (10:47):
Ah, using marriage to climb the social ladder back home.
Speaker 2 (10:49):
Precisely, it shows how marriage ties and office holding on
crete worked together to build lineage and patronage bonds. It's
fascinating how these personal connections became so integral to imperial stability.
Speaker 1 (11:00):
So these connections formed through holding office again and again
through marriage, property, business deals. They didn't just stop when
the official went home.
Speaker 2 (11:09):
Not at all. They often continued long after. In fact,
former governors frequently acted as advocates or maybe lobbyists for
subjects from their former territories back in the Venetian councils,
guiding requests for favors, things like that.
Speaker 1 (11:22):
So the guy on the ground, the rector, he really
had to balance things.
Speaker 2 (11:26):
Absolutely, he had to walk a very fine line, as
the book puts it, between upholding the state's ideals and
navigating these crucial personal networks that frankly made the whole
system function.
Speaker 1 (11:38):
Okay, let's shift gears a bit and talk about the
judicial system. You said it wasn't just about solving disputes,
more like an.
Speaker 2 (11:43):
Arena, exactly, an arena for ongoing negotiation. It offered really
significant opportunities for subjects, both the elites and okay to
a lesser extent, commoners to pursue their claims and articulate
their grievances, all within a space controlled by Venice.
Speaker 1 (11:59):
Of course, were there different levels of courts.
Speaker 2 (12:01):
Yes, multiple layers if you take Creed again, the local
ducal court hurt land disputes, things like that. They even
mediated between villagers and landowners. We actually have records of
peasants complaining about everything from you know, pigs foraging in
their fields to being forced to do unpaid.
Speaker 1 (12:19):
Labor, so everyday issues very much so.
Speaker 2 (12:23):
Now, Venetian officials were supposed to apply local laws in
these courts, but often they lacked the specific knowledge, so
they ended up becoming quote hostage to the advice of local.
Speaker 1 (12:32):
Lawyers, relying on local experts who might have their own agendas.
Speaker 2 (12:35):
Potentially, yes, and for peasants there were real obstacles the
cost of going to court for one, and sometimes rectors
would try to avoid appeals by simply labeling cases as
criminal matters, which had different procedures.
Speaker 1 (12:47):
But appeals were possible to Venice itself.
Speaker 2 (12:51):
Crucially, Yes, subjects could appeal to central Venetian courts back
in Venice, courts like the Avlgaria, the commun that was
their main criminal court, or the Auditory Noientence for civil disputes,
and even the powerful Qurantia, one of their supreme courts.
Speaker 1 (13:05):
So there was a way to go over the local
governor's head.
Speaker 2 (13:08):
There was, and this system provided a really flexible and
subtle way for Venice to regulate its system. It allowed
them to correct potentially bad judgments from Afar, and crucially
it also bolstered Venetian authority. It showed Venice was the
ultimate arbiter.
Speaker 1 (13:24):
Now what's fascinating here you mentioned earlier is the overlap
in personnel.
Speaker 2 (13:28):
Yes, this is really interesting. Many of the judges in Venice,
the Avigadori or Auditory, had actually previously served as rectors
out in the.
Speaker 1 (13:36):
Maritime State, So the judges knew the places they were judging.
Speaker 2 (13:40):
Exactly, which meant the very judges hearing these appeals were,
as the book says, tied into the same network of
personal and family connections that the rectors of the Maritime
State were.
Speaker 1 (13:50):
So they were informed but maybe biased.
Speaker 2 (13:53):
It allowed for incredibly informed decisions certainly, but yes, also
potentially for biased ones it's complex. A perfect example is
that Jirolama Dieto we mentioned earlier. He served as Duke
of Crete, a top post. Later he became an ovigator
back in Venice and guess what he handled cases originating
from Crete.
Speaker 1 (14:11):
Wow, that's a direct connection. Almost like the appeals court
judges were former governors themselves.
Speaker 2 (14:16):
Pretty much. Yeah, it shows that personal connection at work
right at the heart of the justice system.
Speaker 1 (14:21):
Okay, so beyond the formal courts, Venice also relied heavily
on something called the Grazi system.
Speaker 2 (14:27):
What were gradzy think of them as special favors or
maybe grants, permissions, pardons, sometimes even debt remissions granted directly
by the Venetian state, favors from the top essentially, yes,
and this system was a core tool for political patronage.
It was constantly linking the center of the empire, Venice,
(14:47):
with its periphery, the overseas territories.
Speaker 1 (14:50):
How did you get one? Was it complicated?
Speaker 2 (14:52):
The process was actually quite elaborate on paper. Requests had
to pass through multiple public forums in Venice, from the
Doge himself to the Great Council. It's very formal. But
despite this seemingly public process, personal influence often shown through
connections mattered. For example, former officials frequently supported these requests
for people from places they used to govern, which perfectly
(15:14):
demonstrates their continued connections.
Speaker 1 (15:16):
Right right, those lasting bonds exactly.
Speaker 2 (15:18):
Remember Jiro Lamauvignier are example from the intro.
Speaker 1 (15:21):
The guy with the doctor controversy.
Speaker 2 (15:23):
That's him. His contacts back in Spilato were managing his
property and finances long after he'd left office. It truly
shows how these informal bonds lasted and could be leveraged.
Speaker 1 (15:32):
And these gradzys weren't just random acts of kindness. I
assume Venice used them strategically.
Speaker 2 (15:38):
Oh absolutely strategically. They used them to reward loyalty, especially
when they were acquiring new territories, key local figures who
helped might get agrazia. They also use them to neutralize descent,
offering stipens tax concessions to local elites to keep them happy, keep.
Speaker 1 (15:55):
Them on side smart politics.
Speaker 2 (15:57):
Very much so. And Crete interestingly, was the most frequent
recipient of gratzi. White well, it was a large, important
and sometimes rebellious colony. We see the grazzy system used
heavily after the Sifi Vlastos conspiracy in the mid fifteenth century.
That was a religiously motivated plot to rebel against Venice. Afterwards, loyalists,
(16:18):
including Greek nobles, even Jewish merchants who helped expose it
were richly rewarded with privileges, often extending to their whole communities.
Even peasants, Yeah, peasants who revealed conspirators were offered freedom
from serfdom, a huge reward.
Speaker 1 (16:32):
But surely this system caused problems too, favors overriding.
Speaker 2 (16:36):
Rules, definitely, it wasn't without its conflicts. Grozi for debt relief,
for example, often caused significant problems for the local colonial treasuries.
They needed that income, and Grotzi granting local offices could
directly undercut the authority of the Venetian rectors on the
ground and the local councils too.
Speaker 1 (16:54):
So Venice knew this was happening.
Speaker 2 (16:56):
Oh, yes, there were a frequent official But Venice often
granted these favors anyway. Why because they prioritized flexibility and
negotiation over strict adherence to the rules.
Speaker 1 (17:08):
Pragmatism over principle, maybe you.
Speaker 2 (17:10):
Could say that. And interestingly, communal delegations groups representing local
communities regularly traveled all the way to Venice to protest
these issues.
Speaker 1 (17:17):
So there was pushback, a dialogue.
Speaker 2 (17:20):
A constant, active dialogue between the center and the periphery.
It's really a testament to their adaptive governance, even if
it seemed messy.
Speaker 1 (17:28):
This dynamic tension. It brings us back to how Venice
tried to control its own administrators all this potential for
private gain.
Speaker 2 (17:36):
Right the state legislated furiously against corruption. They were genuinely
worried that governors would build up local power bases that
could challenge the central institutions back in Venice.
Speaker 1 (17:46):
How do they try to police it?
Speaker 2 (17:47):
Primarily through the institution of syndics. These were special inspectors
sent out periodically from Venice to hear greevances against officials,
like an internal affairs division almost.
Speaker 1 (17:57):
And what kind of things got officials into trouble.
Speaker 2 (18:00):
Prosecutions often centered on actions deemed against God, justice and
the honor of our dominion, or, as the documents frequently
put it, causing scandal and murmuring among the local subjects.
Public perception mattered.
Speaker 1 (18:15):
Scandal and murmuring love that phrasing.
Speaker 2 (18:17):
It's very evocative, isn't it. Remember jeromam Venier again, he
was actually recalled from Spilado to face accusations related to
his conduct.
Speaker 1 (18:25):
Did he get convicted?
Speaker 2 (18:26):
Interestingly, no, he was ultimately acquitted and even got reimbursed
for his trouble, which just shows the system's inherent complexities
and maybe the power of connections.
Speaker 1 (18:36):
So not always straightforward, not at all.
Speaker 2 (18:39):
But others did face consequences. We see cases where rectors
brazenly use state resources to build personal palaces or extorted goods,
or abuse their judicial power. They could be fined, banned
from serving in that territory again sometimes worse.
Speaker 1 (18:55):
So what's the big picture here? What does this tell
us about justice and accountability?
Speaker 2 (19:00):
This system, which was largely based on denunciations and complaints
coming up from the local subjects, ensured that the crimes
most likely to be prosecuted were those that angered subjects.
Speaker 1 (19:09):
So the people's voice, or at least the local elites
voices had some real impact if they chose to complain.
Speaker 2 (19:16):
It seems so. Their complaints could trigger investigations.
Speaker 1 (19:19):
And it wasn't just individuals, whole families could be involved.
Speaker 2 (19:22):
Oh yes, there were major corruption scandals, like those implicating
multiple members of the Segredo family down in Crete in
the fourteen thirties. It wasn't just rogue individuals. And what's more,
the syndics themselves the inspectors. They weren't immune to accusations,
either accusations of corruption or using their powerful position for
(19:44):
their own private agendas.
Speaker 1 (19:45):
The investigators investigated.
Speaker 2 (19:47):
Sometimes, yes, and the overlap we talked about syndics often
having previously been administrators or hoping to be administrators. Again,
that further complicated the ideal of impartial oversight. It constantly
blurred those lines between the state's interest and personal or
family interest.
Speaker 1 (20:03):
It seems like these tensions were just baked into the system.
Speaker 2 (20:05):
They really were everywhere you look.
Speaker 1 (20:07):
Okay, finally, let's talk about the fault lines, the things
that really challenged Venice's rule. What were the biggest threats?
Speaker 2 (20:15):
Broadly two kinds, external threats primarily from the rising Ottoman Empire,
which was a constant pressure. And then internal.
Speaker 1 (20:22):
Strikes strife within the territories.
Speaker 2 (20:24):
Yes, often conflicts between the local nobles and commoners or
sometimes outright peasant revolts against landowners, often Venetian landowners.
Speaker 1 (20:34):
Can we look at a couple of examples.
Speaker 2 (20:36):
Absolutely, two key rebellions stand out in the book. First,
there was one on the island of Lesina or Hvar,
from fifteen ten to fifteen fourteen.
Speaker 1 (20:45):
What caused that?
Speaker 2 (20:46):
It seems largely triggered by economic distress and class conflict.
Commoners were demanding entry into the communal councils, wanting more, say,
the Venetian counts on the island struggled to contain the violence.
Venice eventually sent commanders like Sebastiana a Justinian to quell it.
Speaker 1 (21:01):
How did they handle it? Just cracked down hard.
Speaker 2 (21:03):
Initially, yes, harsh repression, hangings, arrests, but ultimately it led
to a general amnesty and interestingly, the popular faction actually
gained some concessions, like getting to elect a treasurer from
among the people.
Speaker 1 (21:15):
So repression followed by negotiation kind of.
Speaker 2 (21:19):
And importantly, the ongoing appeals process back in Venice meant
that this conflict, even after the violence could be routed
through the Venetian judicial system, it moved the fight from
the streets into a more controlled legal arena.
Speaker 1 (21:31):
Okay, what was this second rebellion that was on Crete?
Speaker 2 (21:34):
Crete experienced constant upheaval, especially in its rural areas. Roughly
from fifteen seventeen to fifteen twenty eight.
Speaker 1 (21:40):
That was happening there.
Speaker 2 (21:42):
Mainly peasants protesting heavy taxes and burdenso labor services demanded
by landowners.
Speaker 1 (21:47):
So similar causes to Lsina economic hardship, similar.
Speaker 2 (21:51):
But with a crucial difference. Unlike in Lcina, Venetian officials
very quickly labeled these actions on Crete as rebellion. Why
because crucially many of the landowners being targeted were Venetian
settlers or families.
Speaker 1 (22:05):
Ah, so it felt like an attack on Venice itself exactly.
Speaker 2 (22:08):
It gave the conflict an explicitly anti Venetian flavor in
the eyes of the state. So the repression there was
far more violent.
Speaker 1 (22:15):
But did negotiations still play a role even there?
Speaker 2 (22:18):
Yes, The book argues that even the military solutions were
nuanced by the same reliance on negotiation, appeal and continuous litigation.
Eventually even rebels ended up pursuing their grievances in Venetian courts.
Remarkable flexibility, really, it.
Speaker 1 (22:32):
Really is so moving towards the end of this period,
say the fifteen thirties, how did Venice adapt, especially with
the Ottomans becoming so powerful.
Speaker 2 (22:40):
Well, by the fifteen thirties, Venice had to accept it was,
relatively speaking, a secondary power facing this massive Ottoman state,
So it significantly shifted its maritime policy towards conciliation.
Speaker 1 (22:53):
And prudence, playing it safe, basically.
Speaker 2 (22:55):
Playing it safe, knowing they couldn't afford constant conflict on
their borders anymore.
Speaker 1 (22:59):
What did that mean in practice?
Speaker 2 (23:00):
It meant that the poorous Ottoman border and the delicate
role of Venetian rectors and mediating interactions across that border
became absolutely paramount. Their official instructions increasingly stressed the need
to live quietly and in peace with their Ottoman neighbors,
recognizing the deeply intertwined nature of the region's economy and culture.
(23:21):
It was about managing coexistence.
Speaker 1 (23:23):
A very different approach from their earlier expansionist.
Speaker 2 (23:25):
Phase A start contrast, Yeah, a recognition of changed realities.
Speaker 1 (23:30):
So let's wrap this up after this really deep dive
into Venice's story. What does it all mean for us?
What's the big takeaway?
Speaker 2 (23:36):
I think it reveals the incredibly dynamic nature of Venice's empire.
It wasn't static at all. It was a state constantly negotiating,
constantly adapting, engaging in as the book puts it a
kind of ongoing negotiation with subject communities, an empire built
less on pure conquest, maybe less on just conquest, and
more on this fascinating blend of formal institutions, courts, laws, officials,
(24:01):
and these vital informal personal connections, family, patronage, local knowledge.
Speaker 1 (24:07):
Right, And maybe the most provocative thought for me at
least comes from thinking about those tensions we kept discussing,
which ones, the tension between public duty and private interest,
between central control and local autonomy, between formal justice and
informal negotiation.
Speaker 2 (24:22):
Ah, Yes, those constant push.
Speaker 1 (24:24):
And pulls exactly. And the book seems to argue quite
profoundly that these tensions weren't actually weaknesses the doomed Venus.
Speaker 2 (24:31):
No, quite the opposite.
Speaker 1 (24:32):
There were the very mechanisms that allowed its empire written
on water, to persist for centuries.
Speaker 2 (24:37):
That's the core argument. I believe that these seeming contradictions,
this constant balancing act, was actually the source of its resilience.
It allowed Venus to constantly reinvent itself through this very adaptive,
sometimes messy governance.
Speaker 1 (24:52):
Indeed, and that's a really complex idea to sit with,
that the very things we might instinctively see as weaknesses
or problems to today, we're actually integral to their longevity,
their flexibility.
Speaker 2 (25:04):
It really makes you think, doesn't it.
Speaker 1 (25:05):
It does. It makes you consider what this tells us
about power and negotiation more broadly. Even in systems today
that might seem perfectly stable on the surface, you know
what inherent tensions exist in our own world that might
actually be mechanisms of flexibility rather than just flaws. Something
to ponder, definitely something to ponder.
Popular Podcasts
My Favorite Murder with Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark
My Favorite Murder is a true crime comedy podcast hosted by Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark. Each week, Karen and Georgia share compelling true crimes and hometown stories from friends and listeners. Since MFM launched in January of 2016, Karen and Georgia have shared their lifelong interest in true crime and have covered stories of infamous serial killers like the Night Stalker, mysterious cold cases, captivating cults, incredible survivor stories and important events from history like the Tulsa race massacre of 1921. My Favorite Murder is part of the Exactly Right podcast network that provides a platform for bold, creative voices to bring to life provocative, entertaining and relatable stories for audiences everywhere. The Exactly Right roster of podcasts covers a variety of topics including historic true crime, comedic interviews and news, science, pop culture and more. Podcasts on the network include Buried Bones with Kate Winkler Dawson and Paul Holes, That's Messed Up: An SVU Podcast, This Podcast Will Kill You, Bananas and more.
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com